20040311 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040301

WEG Project # 1753
WETLANDS / 401 GROUP
MAR P 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
Fentress-Shawboro 230kV Transmission line
City of Chesapeake, Virginia
and Currituck County, North Carolina
Prepared for
Dominion Virginia Power
Ms. Gail Lamm
120 Tredegar Street
Richmond, Virginia 26532
Prepared by
Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
December 2003
46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160 7325 Beaufont Springs Drive, Suite 100
Sterling, Virginia 20166 Richmond, Virginia 23225
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
' Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
1.0 NORTH CAROLINA PRE-CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION
' 1.1 Pre-Construction Notification
1.2 DCM-MP 1
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
' [] 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Corps Nationwide Permit #12
' 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: L
' 4. -If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
' section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
' 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: I x
' H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
' Name' Dominion Virginia Power. Attn: Gail Lamm
Mailing: Address: 120 Tredegar Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219
Telephone Number: 804-819-2970 Fax Number: 804-819-2342
E-mail Address:
2. 'Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
' Name: Mr. David M. Ramsey
Company Affiliation: Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Mailing Address:
3000 Easter Circle, Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
' Telephone Number: 757-220-6869 Fax Number: 757-2294507
E-mail Address: dramseyAweAnet com
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
' Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
' boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
' include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey.with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
' USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
' reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Fentress - Shawboro 230 W Transmission Line
1
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
' 3. -Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
' County: Currituck Nearest Town: Moyock, Snowden, Gum Comer
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
t 'The existing easement can be accessed from State Route 34 and State Route 4 north of their intersection with
Snowden Road in Gum Corner.
' 5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Please we attached.
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
' coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 127.14 acres
' 7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Moyock Run, Lolly's Creek, Guinea Mill Run
8. River Basin: PasWotank
' (Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at hq://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
' 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and eeneral land use in the vicinity of the uroiect
at the time of this application:
Forested undeveloped land and cleared agricultural land lies within the limits of the proposed project, including wetlands
' and stream channels. General land use in the vicinity of the proposed alignment includes agricultural and residential.
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The proposed
project involves the construction of 14.13 miles of 230kV power transmission line in NC. This construction involves the
installation of single circuit poles and the associated line. For details on construction please see Section 3.0 in the attached
Pre-Construction Notification.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project is necessary to relieve the projected thermal
overloading in Dominion's existing transmission system serving northeastern North Carolina and southeastern Virginia.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
' A request for a confirmation of wetland boundaries was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on August 22, 2003.
A site review was conducted with WEG on October 22,2003. A confirmation was subsequently issued January 5, 2004.
' V. Future Project Plans
' Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated.
i
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
' plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
' Page 7 of 12
5.0 Site coordinates for each crossing of a distinct water body.
Moyock Run Lat: 36° 31' 2.96" N
76° 11' 19.75" W
Roland Creek: 3629'39.43"N
76° 09' 26.62" W
Guinea Mill Run Canal: 3628'45.13"N
76° 08' 23.48" W
' I. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Permanent impacts of 912 SF are expected as a
result of concrete fill necessary to provide a stable footing for the installation of single transmission poles.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
Sheet 5 Fill 0.0018 No >100 LF PFO
Sheet 6 Fill 0.0025 No - 75 LF .0022PFO/.0003PEr
Sheet 7 Fill 0.0033 No - 75 LF PFO
Sheet 8 Fill 0.0077 No >100 LF PFO
Sheet 9 Fill 0.0055 No > 100 LF PFO
TenWrary
? List tech itrn.s.N . PFO to PSS
.mot-t.. s. t : tom. a.. 22.78 No Variable PFO
exeavatio fl --:-'or-' ---r-- - -?'t-- ,,.. -. , „u. e:c not umaoa w: mecnanu= mearmg, 8?aa?ng, nu,
ss n' o?n& ditching/drainage, etc. F dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Foderal Emergency Management Agency's structure and Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps ace available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hgpV-www fema eov.
sss List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,-
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only). .
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 24.65 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 912 Square feet
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name* * Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease specify)
N/A

.• T3st "A t--M a ....e1. .J :.S .e_
- -- -------? ^---t^ .W) Wyo?w. auw La mt:?uuc, uut are not mrrea to: cuivens ana assoctatea np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www• gLm. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.wgzone.com_
www.mapq test o etc).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
Page 8 of 12

4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
mp -k,---.y dentify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on nW)
Type of Impact* Area -of
Impact
acres
Name of Waterbody .
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,

bay, ocean, etc.
N/A

' List each i act t
d ' an
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is. proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): :1 uplands stream wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): There is no pond construction proposed.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact. Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide.
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A discussion of the avoidance and minimization efforts taken for both permanent and temporary impacts is attached
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

' USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
' including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing. losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
r
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
' for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in 'DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
' bZ://h2o.erw.state.nc.us/ncwetland.s/shmgide.hftnl.
' I. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
' of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant is proposing to mitigate for permanent impacts to 912 square feet at the following ratios, 2:1 for impacts tc
PFO wetlands, 1.5:1 for impacts to PSS wetlands, and 1:1 for impacts to PEM wetlands.
Since there is no proposed conversion of PFO to PEM since the PFO wetlands that have to be cleared will me allowed to
revegetate into a PSS community and will be permanently maintained as such. Please see the attached supplement title
"Impact Justification and Mitigation Supplement"
' 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
t [phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr state nc us/wrp/index htm. If use of
' the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12

' IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes [ I No L
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note. If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
' coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes I I No x J
' If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes .J No x
' X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
' It is the. applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
' applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
' (Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes J No Ix If you answered "yes", provide the following information:

Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone` Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Miti tion
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Zone i extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
L'der mitigation is >reVIMd, picric discuss what type
of Property. COmMation Ruement, ?atian Bu of mitigatfiom is proposed (i.e., Donation
l'ayAlent into the Riparl? Buff,, ltastoratiou I Bnbancemenk Pt"Orvation or
?' Please attach all npproprtate iixfarnoatian as
Identified within 1$A NCAC 2B .02420 p 260,
Xl. StOtmwater (required bybWQ)
Desan'be impervious acreage (both existing and ro osed versus t
I)IM a stormwator controis p ' ) otal acreage on the aita.
40W31S?M from the V1flDeitY?P iv atdex to protect aurfaee waters and wetlands
.
?!race ?vqt bt lfo hnpeCAQ" M"614 WSW 1?" t w maim ll„dee_
XI1. Szwage Disposal (cegaired by DWQ
y daWl the ultimate tra meat methods and
sp
wzstoarotar aenetated ftm the disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
Na wauc-t a WM be e?,od b, ? womed Icel. or available aaDachy of the sutsjxt fac?itty. Frapaw
XIII. Vlolationt (required by DWO)
D ft she in violation of DWQ Wind Rules (15A NCAC 2H,0500) or any Ru for Rules?
Yes No L
h this YsR? c-tho-factlpetmit applioation?
Mv. Other Circwmmstuncea (optional):
It is tbua apphoarLt'e rMponsibility to submit the
wnstzuatioa, dates to allow aPPli?tion attffdcntllr advance of desirod
Choose to !tat cons lnbcessing time fox these pmnits. Hmcvor. an applicant =y
associated with ooAstluation or sequencing that may impose limits on
wo* Scbedules (e•$.. draw-down schOdulm for !slew, dates associated with Endangmd and
Threatened Svocies, accessibiIitY vmblems, or, otim Lums outside of the avolicanes control!.
wrn./ a ?o 0
A ilcant/Ageut?a Siguat?e
' (Agent's signature i$ valid only if an authorization letter from the a bate
. pplicant is provided)
PA$e 42 of 12
LLIAMSB .
URG
' ENVIRONMENTAL
?! ROUP, INC.

Environmental Consultants
Impact Justification and Mitigation Supplement
Pre-Construction Application Form
' Fentress-Shawboro 230kV Transmission line
City of Chesapeake, Virginia
and Currituck County, North Carolina
' The proposed project alternative alignment was chosen for multiple reasons, see attached
Alternative Analysis, including, but not limited to, fewer expected environmental impacts. The
1 chosen alternative required crossing fewer water bodies and associated wetlands. This factor
alone. avoided unnecessary impacts to jurisdictional areas that would have resulted from the
' utility pole placement. Further avoidance was pursued in designing the pole placement for the
proposed alignment. By altering the pole placement, permanent impacts to waters of the United
' State were avoided In an effort to minimize the unavoidable impacts resulting from pole
installation, the applicant chose to use a single pole design buried in concrete that would not
' require greater than a 16 square foot impact area. In contrast, the standard 'I-r' pole requires
approximately 60 square feet of impact for installation. Dominion has worked extensively to fast
' . avoid unnecessary permanent impacts to. wetlands and water of the United States, and where
avoidance was not practicable, they minimized the necessary impacts.
' Avoidance and minimization measures were also taken into account in determining
the
temporary impacts that would result from construction of the proposed. alignment. Temporary
impacts have been avoided through the alignment alternatives. By choosing an alignment that
crosses fewer jurisdictional features, the likelihood for temporary impacts decreases. Once the
' . best alternative alignment was chosen, the applicant worked with in-house foresters and
biologists to determine how to maintain the right of way (ROW) in a manner that would be less
' detrimental on the wetlands that are located within the proposed ROW. The result of this
coordination.was an alteration in the approach in which standard ROW maintenance is conducted.
' Instead of clearing the forested wetlands and maintaining them as an emergent wetland with
regular mowing, Dominion is proposing to allow the 22.78 acres of forested wetlands within the
' ROW to re-vegetate and establish themselves as scrub-shrub wetlands that will be permanently
maintained as such. This will be made possible through successive low volume, selective
applications of herbicides of the existing root mass left after the clearing of hardwood trees for
1 . 3000 Easter Circle - Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 - [phone] - FAX [phone]
Impact Justification and Mitigation Supplement
Fentress- Shawboro DOW Transmission Line
February 10, 2004
the installation of the transmission line. Once the trees within the ROW have been cut and
removed to upland windrows, mats will be laid over the existing scrub shrub vegetation and once
construction in that section of the ROW is complete, the mats will be removed and the existing
scrub shrub vegetation will, be allowed to come back. Over time the number of required
applications will be reduced and.eventually eliminated. This eliminates the ever-thickening cover
of fast growing root sprouts that require frequent mowing with heavy equipment. Once the
competition from these sprouts is removed, the more desirable grasses, fortes, and low growing
shrubs willre-vegetate the existing and cleared the ROW. The initial application, and any
.subsequent applications, will be made on foot with backpack sprayers in order to selectively
apply the herbicide to stumps and/or invasive species. This newly proposed method of ROW
maintenance avoids the permanent conversion of forested wetlands to emergent wetlands. It
should be noted that the existing easement had routinely been bush -hogged for maintenance
reasons.. The existing easement will be cleared one last time, prior to the construction of the
proposed alignment and then allowed to re-vegetate and establish as a scrub shrub habitat to be
maintained in the same process as the. proposed alignment. This additional acreage will increase
the ecological benefit of this new maintenance program. It is because of this self mitigating
conversion maintained scrub-shrub wetland in addition to the existing ROW being able to
establish itself and be maintained as a scrub shrub wetland that Dominion is not offering
additional mitigation for the 22.78 acres of forested wetland conversion.
. Dominion is very willing to work with the agencies in an effort to make this new
conversion plan one that willbecome a standard maintenance guide where practicable. They also
recognize that monitoring will be required to ensure that the ROW is allowed to return to and be
maintained as a scrub shrub wetland. In the NWP 12 issued by the Norfolk District Corps on
January 30, 2004, for the Virginia portion of this project, special conditions were included that
require the "...corridor be maintained in a scrub shrub community dominated by native
vegetation. The affected wetlands areas must be monitoring in the fall of years 1, 3, and5
following construction. If the corridors have not adequately vegetated in 5 years, planting and/or
additional monitoring will be required" In keeping with these conditions, Dominion is proposing
:. Impact Justification and Mitigation Supplement
Fentress- Shawboro DOW Transmission Line
February 10, 2004
' to monitor the ROW within wetlands that is located under the W' '
thmngton District 'Corps office in
the same manner and under the same conditions.
r
r
i
s
i
i
Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by. all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
from the NC state line to the Shawboro substation
1. APPLICANT
c. Street address or secondary road number
N/A
a. Landowner: --
Name Dominion Virginia Power d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X Yes No
Address 120 Tredegar Street
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Moyock Run, Roland Creek, Guinea
City Richmond State Virginia
Zip 23219 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Williamsburg Environmental Group Inc.
Address 3000 Easter Circle
City Williamsburg State Virginia
Zip 23188 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any Fentress-Shawboro 230kV
Trasnsmission Line
N07E._ Permit will be issued in nano, of kw0 wmer(s), and/or
projed manic.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
.PROJECT
a. County Currituck County, North Carolina
Revised 03/95
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED. PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
To construct a 230kV transmission line within an existing 50,
easement with the exception of 6.61 miles to be constructed
in newly acquired easement adjacent to the existing easement.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
.. project, new work, or both? New work
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pageS. Dominion Power is proposing to upgrade
an existing 230kV transmission line between the Fentress sub-
station in Chesapeake, Virginia and the Shawboro substation in
Currituck County, North Carolina in order to relieve projected
overloading on the existing transmission line that would result
in power outages in the Outer Banks area of North Carolina.
' Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 127.17 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
N)WL Varied along the easement.
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Again, varied along the easement.
e. Vegetation on tract Please see attached Pre-Construction
Notification
f. Man-made features now on tract None
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? moma& the iooal Land we plan.)
Conservation Transitional
x Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Varied along the easement.
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? x Yes No
(Attach Loatng con pffance certificate, tf appftaabk)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is -the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve. a.. National
Reeister listed or eligible property?
' Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes No
Coastal (marsh) Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? x
(Attach docume?"don, if awUable)
m: Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
No wastewater treatment facilities are necessary.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater,. industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) Please see
attached Pre-Construction Notification.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission. Rule. 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or oche larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
I Revised 03195
Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies. that such notice has been provided.
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
No previous permits have been -issued.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the day of , 19
Print Name
Dominion Virginia Power
Signature
Ltatdmmer or Authorized Agent
Please-indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
_ DCM MP-4 Structures Information
DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please -sign and date each attachment In the
. space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
2.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
The proposed project is necessary to relieve projected thermal overloading on
Dominion's existing power transmission line serving southeastern Virginia and northeastern
North Carolina. As the customers in this service area require additional power in the future,
Dominion is required to ensure that the company maintains overall, long-term system reliability.
This includes planning for the effect future demands will have on the current transmission
system. (Application, Appendix, Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Virginia Electric and Power
Company, Fentress- Shawboro 239 kV Transmission Line Application no. 223 Case No. PUE-
2003, Filed February 14, 2003.)
Dominion's planning criteria is founded on the North American Electric Reliability
Council (NERC) guidelines. The maximum loading for a 230 kV transmission line cannot be
greater than 94% of the line's total capacity. This leaves 6% of the line capacity in reserve for
use in abnormal use loads and/or inclement weather. Projected load growth along the existing
line will result in the line being used at or above 100% capacity violating the reliability criteria.
(Application, Appendix, Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Virginia Electric and Power Company,
Fentress- Shawboro 239 kV Transmission Line Application no. 223 Case No. PUE-2003, Filed
February 14, 2003.)
Specifically, the expected growth rate for the next ten years in the Outer Banks area of
North Carolina is anticipated to be considerably greater than historic growth. Studies completed
on the existing transmission line reveal that this growth will leave the Outer Banks with an
increased vulnerability to voltage collapse that would leave customers without power. The
proposed upgrade will alleviate these reliability concerns. The upgrade will also provide Virginia
customers with the added benefit of increased reliability of the current power source.
(Application, Appendix, Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Virginia Electric and Power Company,
Fentress- Shawboro 239 kV Transmission Line Application no. 223 Case No. PUE-2003, Filed
February 14, 2003.)
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Dominion Virginia Power (Dominion) is proposing to upgrade the existing power supply
system between the existing Fentress substation (Fentress) located in the City of Chesapeake,
Virginia south through the Hickory substation in the City of Chesapeake, Virginia to the existing
Shawboro substation (Shawboro) located in Currituck County, North Carolina, see Figure 3-1.
Currently, a single 230 kV transmission line is located within a 100-foot wide portion of an
existing 150-foot right-of-way (ROW) easement from Fentress to Shawboro. The remaining 50-
foot section of easement has remained idle with the exception of a 115 kV transmission line that
is located between Fentress and Hickory.
The portion of the proposed upgrade located in North Carolina involves the construction
of a new 230 kV transmission line within the idle portion of the existing easement between the
North Carolina border and the existing Shawboro substation. From the North Carolina border
south to the Shawboro substation 14.13 miles of clearing and new transmission line construction
are necessary. The proposed project limits are within the 50 feet of idle ROW that is located
along the western side of the existing easement. The exception to this is in the southern portion
of the proposed line where 6.61 miles of a new 50-foot easement will be acquired by Dominion
adjacent to the existing 100-foot easement. This is shown on Figure 3-2.
The proposed transmission line requires the clearing of forested areas within the existing
easement, the installation of single circuit guyed steel poles buried in concrete or steel pipe pile
footers, and the installation of the power line. These single circuit steel poles will average 75 feet
in height and the average span along the corridor between structures will be approximately 400
feet (Figure 3-3). The proposed foundations are the minimum size necessary and separate
footings will be constructed for each pole.
The existing 50 feet of easement to be utilized for the proposed 230 kV transmission line
includes agricultural fields, forested land, Lolly's Creek, Moyock Run, Roland Creek Canal,
Guinea Mill Run Canal, and associated wetlands features. WEG conducted a delineation of the
waters of the United States, including wetlands within the proposed alignment in April 2003 and
determined that potentially jurisdictional features exist within the project limits and are located in
bottomland areas within the floodplains of the Moyock Run, associated wetlands, and on nearly
level mineral flats. Wetland systems encountered within the project limits are generally forested
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
with a lesser amount of scrub shrub and emergent systems. Portions of the forested wetland
systems encountered are classified as containing greater than 10% Taxodium distichum.
The proposed transmission line requires the installation of single circuit poles within
wetland features. The concrete or steel pipe piles will require an impact area of 16 square feet per
pole, resulting in 912.00 square feet of direct permanent wetland impacts. Please see the attached
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map, Sheets 1-9 for impact locations. The following chart itemizes
the expected direct impacts by wetland type. While the single circuit pole locations are located
on average every 400 feet along the corridor, pole placement was reconfigured in some areas in
order to avoid pole placement within rivers and stream channels. Therefore, there are no
proposed direct impacts within waters of the United States.
PFO
Palustrine wetlands Palustrine Palustrine
Forested containing
greater than Scrub/Shrub Emergent TOTAL
Wetlands
10% Wetlands Wetlands (Square
(PFO)
Taxodium (PSS) (PEM) Feet)
(Square Feet) Distichum (Square Feet) (Square Feet)
(Square Feet
Proposed
Direct 832 SF 64 SF 0 SF 16 SF 912 SF
Impact
While the proposed transmission line predominately traverses open, cleared, agricultural
land, small areas of forested wetlands, including areas that contain greater than 10% Taxodium
distichum, will also be traversed These forested areas will need to be cleared and therefore
converted from a forested community to a mature scrub shrub community.
Dominion submitted an application for the proposed project for review by the State of
North Carolina, Utilities Commission February 17, 2003. The Sate of North Carolina, Utilities
Commission issued a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity on June 8, 2003 (Appendix
A).

t. ? P
j
+ae
.: EC?? ??WOib
4J I
i

????7 8
3 MILES 1.5 0 MILES 3 MILES
JOB NUMBER: 1753
SCALE: 1 INCH = 3 MILES
SOURCE: VIRGINIA ATLAS AND GAZETTEER,
DeLORME MAPPING CO., 1995.

7IRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
FIGURE 3-1
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
FENTRESS TO SHAWBORO
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VA &
CURRITUCK COUNTY, N.C. OCTOBER 2003
Felltlt:SS Slb.
H4Dry Sub_
Pitoposed 2ric
Exututg F.lw
6.9 rcze.
Ex titto 115 kv &1 230 kv
No RewC'onstrwtion
4.L22mm iles
t* 2391.V
r ropmd 2rLd 2301.?J
E} s-'Emg R MT
L
r
E
i
i
i I
50 feet iq--w Ftm
s.F1 rrii es

VA
r C
R?sting 230k
34
?Vi1•'G?fOI'0 ?U?l, .
! F[DATIOCTO11111 003
FIGURE 3-2 PROPOSED AND EXISTING ILLIAMSBURC
NVIRONMENTAL
EASEMENT DETAILS ARBiNV POWER FENTRESS TO SHAWBORO ROUP, INC.
f, CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA 6 _
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
4: 6n.Ironmen t.i Coaeultents
E

HICKORY - SH AWBORO
23Oku LINE
EXISTING PROPOSED
32.5 FEE T
32 FEET
R/w
R./w
,? yy 'may ??rt } r, r?
i'r??('Itf ??TjT4? ' ??i7V ?I4?P"i+?R??: 'frF? W14'?il1?h?JQe • '?'dro'1 '
`
50 FEET
SO FEET Q FEET
150 FEET
TYPICAL RIGHT OF WAY LOOKING SOUTH
1
TYPE OF STRUCTUREt SINOLE CIRCUIT POLE
APPROX. AVERAGE HEIGHT; 75 FEET
WIDTH AT CROSSARMS; 15 FEET
APPROX. AVG SPAN LENZTtt 400 FEET
CONDUCTOR TYPE: ALUMINUM
R10HT-OF-way WIOTHt 150 FEET (EXISTING)
APPROX. LENGTH OF LINca 5,9 mLles to VA & 7.52 mtles in NC
(14,42 MILES TOTAL LENGTH
FOUNDATLON: DIRECT OURIED
FD-ATE: R 23, 2003 FIGURE 3-3 1753 TYPICAL RIGHT OF WAY ILLIAMSBURC OSCALE LOOKING SOUTH NVIRONMENTAL FENTRESS TO SHAVVBORO ROUP, INC. INION%AR0INIA POWER
m
si
a
'?
ao
o
?
°
CRY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA 6
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA antironmeae.t conew.nt.
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Constriction Notification
4.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The intent of the transmission line route selection process was to identify a route for a
230kV transmission line that would minimize impact on the natural and human environment
while keeping within the bounds of accepted economic and engineering practices. The process
involved the general route selection procedures suggested by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission in its publication Electric Power Transmission and the Environment (Federal Power
Commission, 1970) as well as procedures stated in the State Code of Virginia. Dominion
evaluated the economic, engineering, and environmental aspects of three routes prior to choosing
the selected option.
4.1 Alternative #1
The first alternative was to increase the capacity of an existing transmission system west
of the Outer Banks in North Carolina by increasing the capacity of the existing 115 kV lines
located in Washington and Tyrell Counties and by building a new 35 mile alignment that would
connect these circuits to the Outer Banks. This alternative requires clearing the ROW and the
construction of the necessary 35 miles of new line. This additional alignment would result in
crossings of the Alligator River, Croatan Sound, the Roanoke River, and the associated wetlands
of all three water bodies. This alternative was withdrawn due to the anticipated impacts to waters
of the United States, including wetlands, and the significant cost in acquiring, clearing, and
constructing 35 miles of new ROW and transmission line.
4.2 Alternative #2
The second alternative was to construct a new transmission line east of the proposed line
and utilizing portions of the existing easement. However, this alternative requires the
construction of 61 miles of transmission line. The immense cost required obtaining the additional
easements and to clear and construct 61 miles of ROW and transmission line makes this
alternative impracticable.
4.3 Selected Alternative
There were multiple reasons that the proposed alignment was selected. First, the State
Code of Virginia requires that any public service company must show cause as to why an existing
' Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
easement and ROW cannot be used for a proposed project. Secondly, guideline #1 under FERC
' requires that existing easements and ROWs be given priority to proposed work. The selected
alternative complies with both of these guidelines. This state and federal compliance helps
' reduce the cost associated with getting the proposed line approved by the Commonwealth of
Virginia State Corporation Commission, Division of Energy Regulation and the State of North
Carolina Utilities Commission.
While Dominion originally focused on this alternative for its compliance with FERC, the
' decreased cost to construct and the minimized environmental impacts in comparison with the
other alternatives were the deciding factors in choosing this alignment to meet the purpose and
need of the project. This alternative does not require the acquisition new easement in Virginia
versus a minimum of 35 miles of new easement for alternative #1. This is a time and cost
consuming process. Secondly, the cost of clearing the ROW are minimized due to the current
access points and the fact that the existing and adjoining ROW can be used for access up and
down the ROW. Finally, the expected impacts to the environment are minimized. Fewer water
bodies and associated wetlands are crossed in this alternative than in the alternative alignments.
This implies that expected impacts from pole placement and clearing will also be less than would
have been necessary in the alternative alignments.
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
1 5.1 Threatened and Endangered Species:
' Information concerning threatened and endangered species, rare species, and unique
natural communities is available from the databases maintained by the North Carolina Office of
Conservation and Community Affairs Natural Heritage Program (NCNH) and the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Neither the NCNH nor the FWS listed any known rare,
threatened, or endangered species within the proposed project corridor.
5.2 Cultural Resources
According to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, any project requiring
Federal action (i.e. Federal permit) is subject to the requirements of this law. Since the proposed
transmission line will require a Corps permit, Section 106 will apply.
Under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act, state agencies are
encouraged to comment on proposed projects. The North Carolina Department of Cultural
Resources (DCR) did not provide comments to the North Carolina Department of Administration
(the state clearinghouse for reviewed actions) under the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act.
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
6.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
The primary objective of mitigation for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional wetlands
and other waters of the United States is to offset the environmental losses, and in particular
functional values lost. The applicant utilized avoidance and minimization efforts, through an
alternatives analysis on the possible alignments, to the maximum extent practicable as the first
two steps in the development of an acceptable mitigation plan. To complete the process, the
applicant proposes to mitigate for direct permanent impacts to forested wetlands at a 2:1 ratio,
scrub shrub wetlands at a 1.5:1 ratio, and emergent wetlands at a 1:1 ratio through the purchase of
credits from an approved wetland mitigation bank. Currently, the applicant is proposing to
purchase 0.02 credits from a Corps approved wetland mitigation bank for direct permanent
impacts in North Carolina. Due to the small amount of direct permanent impacts, 912.00 square
feet, onsite creation is not a practical alternative.
In an effort to provide mitigation for the minimal adverse effects the clearing of the
additional ROW will have on surrounding wildlife, Dominion has worked with the Virginia
Department of Conservation and Recreation to develop a maintenance schedule that will benefit
the surrounding wildlife. The goal of the maintenance program is to minimize long-term
maintenance cost and site disturbance through the establishment and maintenance of mature scrub
shrub communities that will provide beneficial wildlife habitat in aesthetically pleasing corridors
that require minimal maintenance activities.
Through successive low volume, selective applications of herbicides, the existing tree
root mat left after the clearing for the installation of the transmission line is reduced and
eventually eliminated. This eliminates the ever-thickening cover of fast growing root sprouts that
require frequent mowing/maintenance with heavy equipment and/or chemicals. Once the
competition from these sprouts is removed, the more desirable grasses, forbes, and low growing
shrubs will re-vegetate the cleared ROW.
After the initial applications in wetland areas have eliminated coppice brush, subsequent
applications will be made on foot with backpack sprayers in order to selectively apply the
herbicide to invasive species. This re-vegetation process will reduce the need and frequency of
maintenance operations along the ROW. The standard three-year maintenance cycle could be
increased to as many as four, five, or six years, depending on the local vegetation type.
' Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
' The applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional areas where
practicable to offer the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative. Appropriate and
' necessary steps have been taken to minimize potential adverse impacts resulting from the
discharge of fill into the aquatic ecosystem. This project is not expected to impact public water
supply, any shellfish harvesting area, spawning grounds, waterfowl habitat; nor jeopardizes
' threatened or endangered species, of which we are aware; nor disrupt the movement of aquatic
life. Therefore, this activity should not cause or contribute to the significant degradation of
' waters of the United States, nor should the activity adversely or substantially affect human health
or welfare; life stages of organisms dependent upon the aquatic ecosystem; ecosystem diversity,
' productivity, or stability; or significantly degrade recreational, aesthetic, or economic values.

1

APPENDIX A
' State of North Carolina
Utilities Commission
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
UTILITIES COMMISSION
RALEIGH
DOCKET NO. E-22, SUB 407
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
In the Matter of
Dominion North Carolina Power for a )
Certificate of Environmental Compatibility )
and Public Convenience and Necessity to )
Construct ApproAmateiy 14.13 Miles of )
230 kV Transmission Une in Currituc k )
County, North Carolina )
ORDER GRANTING CERTIFICATE OF
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY
AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY AND WAIVING HEARING
REQUIREMENTS
BY THE COMMISSION: On February 17, 2003, Virginia Electric and Power
' Company, d/b/a Dominion North Carolina Power (North Carolina Power) filed an
application pursuant to G,S. 62-101 and 62-102 and Rule R8-62 of the Commission
Rules and Regulations for a ceMcate of environmental compatibility and public
convenience and necessity to construct a new approximately 14.13 mile 230 kV
transmission line In Cunituck County, North Carolina.
I The new 230 kV transmission line will be constructed adjacent to an existing 230
W transmission line from the existing Hickory Substation In Chesapeake, Virginia, to
the existing Shawboro Substation In Cunituclk County, North Carolina. The
' approximately 7.52 rMles of new 230 kV transmission line will be constructed in the
vacant portion of the existing 1504oot right-of-way (ROW) between the Hickory
Substation and a point near Snowden, North Carolina, 1.1 miles north of SR 1210
' (Snowden Road) west of Highway 168. From that point to the Shawboro Substation,
the approximately 6.61 miles of new line will be constructed on a new 504oot ROW to
be obtained adjacent to the existing 100-foot ROW.
' The new Hickory-Shawboro line Is necessary to assure that the Company's
transmission facilities oontinue to meet the projected load growth in a reliable manner
' consistent with the Company's reliability contingency guidelines for transmission
facilities. The proposed project Is necessary to relieve projected thermal overloading
and avoid potential voltage collapse of the transmission system in northeastern North
Carolina. Particularly, the rate of load growth in the Outer Banks area of North Carolina
' Is projected to be substantially greater than that of the Company's system as a whole
over the next decade. Past studies have confirmed the susceptibility of the Outer Banks
area to voltage collapse,
' The Commission issued an order on February 19, 2003, scheduling the
application for public hearing on June 17, 2003, in Currituck subject to cancellation, and
' requiring publication of notice, On April 3, 2003, North Carolina Power filed the required
affidavits of publication.
' On June 4, 2003, North Carolina Power filed a motion requesting that the hearing
be cancelled and that the case be decided on the basis of the filed record, North
Carolina Power further stated that as of the May 28, 2003, deadline for intervention, no
' one had petitioned to intervene, protested, or otherwise shown any Interest In appearing
and/or submitting testimony or evidence in this docket.
' On June 5, 2003, the Commission issued an order canoeling the hearing
scheduled for June 17, 2003, in response to North Carolina Power's motion of June 4,
2003.
' The Public Staff presented this matter at the Commission's Staff conference on
June 16, 2003, recommending that the Commission issue a certificate of environmental
compatibility and public convenience and necessity for the construction of the subject
' 230 W transmission line located in Curdtuck County, North Carolina,
After careful consideration, the Commission finds good cause to grant the
' certificate.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that a certificate of environmental compatibility
' and public convenience and necessity, attached as Appendix A, is granted.
ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION,
This the 8"' day of June, 2003.
NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
M ? x »eaw.
n?a ? 1fflu f1t £i?"'Y?
a: wtt •' ?? ? '?Mq. •
•s.••CN. ofMOY??j. ?.....w ZG]«?.?dF.d7??M2??
Gail L Mount, Deputy Clerk

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
' UTILITIES COMMISSION
RALEIGH
DOCKET NO, E-229 SUB 407
' Know All Men by These Presents that
DOMINION NORTH CAROLINA POWER
IS HEREBY ISSUED THIS
r CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY PURSUANT TOGS 62.101 and 62-102
to construct a 14.13 mile 230 W transmission line
to be located in
Currltuc k County, North Carolina
subject to receipt of all federal and state permits as
required by eAsting and future regulations prior to
beginning construction subject to all other orders, rules,
regulations and oonditions as are now or may hereafter be
lawfully made by the North Carolina Utilities Commission.
ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
' ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
This, the 1Ot' day of June, 2003,
NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
?'rt'Y R " ?h'KSt"w
Sww1, s.12'aaMw.<i.«w,+!?y„'I?,pim;;.¢i.w ', tl.... ?
Gail !_ Mount, Deputy Clerk
APPENDIX B
Correspondence from the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
North CarolinaWildlife Resources Commission 0
.rr: s •.? ?. .. ... ..,..r•.... w r-• - ices: ? . .
Charks R. Fullwand, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO= Mclba McGee
Environmental Coordinator
Office of Legislative and 1 e,?ve ,rental Affairs
North Carolina peparttpe?nt of Envi nment and Natural Resources
1~ ROMt David McHenry
41/11
Northeast Coastal Regiod bordinator
Habitat Conservation Section
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE; March 19, 2003
' SUB.IEC-r! Cammentc on Siting and Environmental Report l'or Fentress-Shamboru 230k-V
Transmission Line, Dominion Now: Carolimq Power. Currituck County,
OL1A # 03-0253
r Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (Commission) reviewed the
rcporl Nr ith regard to impacts of the project on fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in
' accordance with provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 et scq.. as
amended; I NCAC-25) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (49 Stat, 401, as amended: 16 U.S.C.
661 et seq.),
t Dominion North Carolina Power applied for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and
Public Convenience and Necessity from the.Nonh Carolina Utilities Commission to upgrade the
Fentress-Shawboro transmission line in Currituek Count,-. The project is needed to maintain service
reliability and projected power demand for northeastern North Carolina, A 230kV line will be
' constructed parallel to an existing line in the 14.13 mile long right-of-way extending from the North
Carolinn/Virginia border to the Shawboro Substation. A 150•foot, clear corridor is needed for the
project, which requires cutting of obstructing vegetation, as necessary, along the existing right-of-way
' and a 50-foot wide by 6.61 mile long addition to the right-ofway.
The report did not assess the potential impact,, of the project on listed or rare plant and animal
species or suitable habitat for these species. Because of the habitat disturbance and alteration associated
' with this project, potential impacts on these species should be evaluated through consultation with the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program and United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The North
Carolina Nattaal Heritage Program can be contacted at
1615 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699.1615
[phone]
Nlailinn Addrew T7ieieinn nl Tnt.in,4 Me t....i.... • 1771 \d-`
.ale.«......r........r. t7111

OLIA No. 03-0353 Page 2
March l9, 2003
Some wildlife will be directly impacted or displaced by conversion of forested arena of the right-
ofway to low growing vege4tion. Forests and riparian wetlands, which are sparse along several sections
of the right-of-way, provide important habitat for a variety of neotopical birds, mammals, and other
species. Rebuilding populations of wild turkey (Meleagr/,t gaIZIOrva)rely on older forests and edge
habitats in the project area for feeding, roosting, and nesting. Therefore, to minimize direct impacts on
wildlife, the Commission recommends that, to the extent practical, right-of-way clearing activities only
be
ocon ucted from Octobcr 1 to Match 30 of any ye-- to avoid the warm season nesting and brooding
pe.
In contrast to detrimental effects on wildlife, several species may benefit from habitat
conversion, particularly if mitigation measures are conducted to offset the loss of forested habitat. For
example, wild turkey may lose roosting habitat from forest clearing, but they may also benefit from the
additional open foraging habitat in portions of the right-0f--way that an relatively distant from
agricultural fields. Cottontail rabbit (Sy rvllO9WJlearldanw) and bobwhite quail (Collnus vlrgNi n w)
would also benefit if the cleared areas provide adequate cover and forage. To promote these benefits, the
Commission recommends the following Measures be incorpamated into the proje=
1. Brush piles should be constructed along the right-of-ways ruing the non-harvestible, woody
vegetation that Is cut . IMO report indicates that this material will be chipped or burned, but
productive cover for a variety of wildlife can be created if much of this material is left in
piles adjacent to forested areas,
2. Seeds of plants that are beneficial to wildlife should be used following discing to stabilize
the disturbed areas, The Commission recommends year-round planting of kobe or Korean
lcspedeza, winter-time planting of rye or wheat, and summer-time planting of millet or
sorghum. These plants provide erosion rontrol as well as forage and cover for a variety of
wildlife until native grasses become esp.. ,fished. Seed types including bahia, fescut, and
sericea lespedeza provide limited benefits to wildlife or, in the case of sericea lespedeza, are
highly invasive and inhibit eventual establishment of native grasses, Shrub lespedeza is also
a recommended perennial for the margins of the right-of-way to provide excellent forage and
cover for wildlife.
Similarly. the Commission recommends allowing landowners or their lease holders to
manage wildlife food plots In the right-of--way along forested areas. These allowances could
be communicated to landowners during contacts regarding the right-of--way addition,
3. In addition to avoiding warm season nesting and brooding periods during initial clearing,
ongoing corridor maintenance should be conducted in staggered sections to minimize
impacts to wildlife. For example, one-third of a corridor section could be mowed or treated
every year instead of the entire length in a single year. Herbicides and posticldes should not
be uccd n wetland or riparian areas.
The Commission appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project And requests that these
comments be addressed or considered before final processing of the project by the Clearinghouse. If you
need to discuss these comments please call David McHenry at [phone] extension 345.
c:
Rowe, D. - NC Wildlife Res. Comm., District I
Pearsall, L. - North Carolina Natural Heritage program
Rabon, D. , US Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
Dzw: d i__->? - Us ros
?D AvY, 3 3 7Z(,,
/,e.,`?, nfC Z 76 36.3726
9?9 f ss-z' -s Zo
u ?
gg?

--mo n ur n uarouna w amite Kesomu ,ommiss on 9
Charles R. Fuliwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gail Lamm
project Support, TraUMmisslon Right of Way
Dominion North Carollm Power
FROM: David McHemy, Northeast Coastal Region CoordiAat
' Habitat Conservation Sections
DATE: June 9, 2003.
SUBJECT: Response on Fentress-Shawboro 239 kV Transmission Line
SCH File No. 03-E-4600-0253
' This memerandum responds to your June 5, 2003 memorandum regarding discussions of comments
on the project made by North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (Commission) on March 19, 2003.
Based on discussions with yourself and Mr. Mice Brueato on May 28, 2003, and as outlined in your
memorandum,, the Commission concurs with the suggested revision of the mitigation measures. Specifically,
the vegetation management techniques you propose to address item #3 of our comments should have minimal
impacts to fish and wildlife resources and promote wildlife habitat diversity.
' The Commission also appreciates the opportunity to pursue a cooperative wildlife plot management
with property owners and will contact Mr. Mike Bruoato in the future should we be able to develop that
I program in North Carolina. We also support the field effort to identify any rare plants and other habitats
along the proposed route and would appreciate being apprised of those results.
The Commission appreciates -the efforts of Dominion North Carolina Power to oonserve and promote
' wildlife habitat and the opportunity to discuss the impacts of the project on fish and wildlife resources. If you
need to discuss these comments further please call David McHenry at [phone] extension 345.
Mailing Address: Aivislon of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center '
Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]
WEG Project # 1753

PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
Fentress-Shawboro 230kV Transmission line
City of Chesapeake, Virginia
and Currituck County, North Carolina
Prepared for
Dominion Virginia Power
Ms. Gail Lamm
120 Tredegar Street
Richmond, Virginia 26532
WETLANDS 1401 r9ROUP
Prepared by
Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
December 2003
LIAR I2004
WATER QUAu Ty SECT lure
46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160 7325 Beaujont Springs Drive, Suite 100
Sterling, Virginia 20166 Richmond, Virginia 23215
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
' Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
1 1.0 NORTH CAROLINA PRE-CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION
1.1 Pre-Construction Notification
1.2 DCM-MP 1
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
El Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Corps Nationwide Permit #12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: L
4. -If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: I X
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Dominion Virginia Power, Attn: Gail Lamm
Mailing Address: 120 Tredegar Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219
Telephone Number: 804-819-2970 Fax Number: 804-819-2342
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. David M. Ramsey
Company Affiliation: Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Mailing Address:
3000 Easter Circle, Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
Telephone Number: 757-220-6869 Fax Number: 757-229-4507
E-mail Address: dramceyAwegnet.com
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
' Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
' boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey.with the property
' boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's. discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
' reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Fentress - Shawboro 230 W Transmission Line
' 2
T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only). . N/A
3...Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Cu rituck Nearest Town: Moyock, Snowden, Gum Corner
Subdivision name (include phase/lot numbe r): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
'The existing easement can be accessed from State Route 34 and State Route 4 north of their intersection with
Snowden Road in Gum Corner.
f 5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): please ace attached.
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 127.14 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Moyock Run, Lolly's Creek, Guinea Mill Run
8. River Basin: Pasquotank
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at hq://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mvs/.)
' 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and eeneral land use in the vicinity of the nroiect
at the time of this application:
Forested undeveloped land and cleared agricultural land lies within the limits of the proposed project, including wetlands
and stream channels. General land use in the vicinity of the proposed alignment includes agricultural and residential.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The proposed
proiect involves the construction of 14.13 miles of 230kV power transmission line in NC. This construction involves the
installation of single circuit poles and the associated line. For details on construction please see Section 3.0 in the attached
Pre-Construction Notification.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project is necessary to relieve the projected thermal
overloading in Dominion's existing transmission system serving northeastern North Carolina and southeastern Virginia
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
A request for a confirmation of wetland boundaries was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on August 22, 2003.
A site review was conducted with WEG on October 22,2003. A confirmation was subsequently issued January 5, 2004.
I V.
I VI.
Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated.
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
Page 7 of 12
5.0 Site coordinates for each crossing of a distinct water body.
Moyock Run Lat: 36° 31' 2.96" N
76° 11' 19.75" W
Roland Creek: 36'29'39.43"N
76° 09' 26.62" W
Guinea Mill Run Canal: 36'28'45.13"N
76° 08' 23.48" W
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Permanent impacts of 912 SF are expected as a
result of concrete fill necessary to provide a stable footing for the installation of single transmission poles.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
ear feet
Type of Wetland***
Sheet 5 Fill 0.0018 No >100 LF PFO
Sheet 6 Fill 0.0025 No - 75 LF .0022PFO/.0003PED
Shat 7 Fill 0.0033 No - 75 LF
PFO
Sheet 8 Fill 0.0077 No >100 LF PFO
Sheet 9 Fill 0.0055 No > 100 LF PFO
Temporary
R TA'd ~h PFO to PSS 22.78 No Variable PFO
-- --, - _ .__....., .• ...! .,.e., ....t.4. W. ""tw b uxaaue, our are not umtrea to: mecnantzea cieanng, graang, nu,
excavation, flooding, ditchitWdrainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both stricture and flooding.
** 100-year floodplains are identified the Federal
through Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIItM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps ate available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hhW://www fema zov.
*•* List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,-
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only). .
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 24.65 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 912 Square feet
I Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet
Stream Name* * Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
N/A

* TAt ~.16 i..m a .efe1.. --A
--v -----? •??•?••..., ,uy,uvw. ua y+ww -,;?uuC, oul are r10C umliea r0: cravens ana SSSOCiatCa np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tooozone.con
www.maRque-? .,,o.... etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
Page 8 of 12
I4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact

Site Number

indicate on map)

Type of Impact*
Area of
Impact

acres
Name of Watecbod
y

(if applicable)
Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A

f100d1n J-•t•'+••• -k--.i w u ?ucuuly wuipuntry urpaeis. MVacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
g, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ] uplands stream wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): here is no Pond construction Proposed.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area:
' VII. Impact. Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide.
' information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
' techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A discussion of the avoidance and minimization efforts taken for both pernianent and temporary impacts is attached.
' VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
' Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
' including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing. losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
' for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in 'DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
hU://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plain view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
' The applicant is proposing to mitigate for permanent impacts to 912 square feet at the following ratios, 2:1 for impacts t<
PFO wetlands, 1.5:1 for impacts to PSS wetlands, and 1:1 for impacts to PEM wetlands.
Since them is no proposed conversion of PFO to PEM since the PFO wetlands that have to be cleared will me allowed to
' revegetate into a PSS community and will be permanently maintained as such Please see the attached supplement title
"Impact Justification and Mitigation Supplement"
' 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
' [phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
' Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
' Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(fedeml/state) land?
Yes C1 No Ix
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note. If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at S919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
' Yes I I No x I
' If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ,J No X1
' X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the. applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
i map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
' applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify_ )?
Yes J No Ix If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
? buffer ?ltx$ation ?,q d plc discuss what
of Property, Coasarvatitype on Bauaenient. Rip2lian wm Buff of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
kayment into the Ripar;s?a Buffer Aostoration / Bnbancemeak Proaorvation or
identified within 1$A NCA,C 2B .R02o4storuflou
0? ?. ?ew attach all appropriate i?dfotaoation as
XL Starmawater (required by b W Q)
' ')"m U impetvious acreage Ootb
Ong
blsouss stoImwator controls and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
downsP seder to protect surface waters and wetlands
yam from the trronetty
Thaw WW b* so hrmwvi-. ec?sge lots" Wida the pe4m U Its.
ZI. Sewage Dlrpasal (Mgttfred by DWQ)
Cry detail the ultimate unatmettt methods , disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
' waaftwaw WM tmopoaed t?oroioct. or available caoaalty of the subiaCt tic V.
t=WRW br the
P tNICCt.
XIII. VIal.ations (required by DWO)
i
1,8 this she to violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (1SA NCAC 2H.0500) or any Betffor Rules?
Yea No (x
Is Us Y?C?he-factlPermit appliowon?
• .
MV. Other Circum,stanm (optioAal):
' It is the apPlioaut'e reOPonsibilitY to submit the
application sutlidcntly in advance, of desired
constxuatioa dates to avow processing time for these permits. However an applicant may
vboose to llat comtraiats associated with aowauation or sequencing '
' wo* achodules (e.$,, draw-down schodtilos for ldms, dates assooc with Ehdangered and
Threatened Svecies. acceWbility vmbloms. or other issues outside of the avolicant's control).
i 'Q Q C?
Rte./ /? ?rr?/ a ?0 0
A 11"mfiAgetat's S%maturc
pr
(AScat's signature is valid only if an authorization latter from the a heart is DiAe
1? ? provided.)
Page 42 of 12
.WILLIAMSBURG
ENVIRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
Impact Justification and Mitigation Supplement
Pre-Construction Application Form
Fentress-Shawboro 230kV Transmission line
City of Chesapeake, Virginia .
and Currituck County, North Carolina
Environmental Consultants
The proposed project alternative alignment was chosen for multiple reasons, see attached
Alternative Analysis, including, but not limited to, fewer expected environmental impacts. The
chosen alternative required crossing fewer water bodies and associated wetlands. This factor
alone. avoided unnecessary impacts to jurisdictional areas that would have resulted from the
utility pole placement. Further avoidance was pursued in designing the pole placement for the
proposed alignment. By altering the pole placement, permanent impacts to waters of the United
' State were avoided. In an effort to minimize the unavoidable impacts resulting from pole
installation, the applicant chose to use a single pole design buried in concrete that would not
require greater than a 16 square foot impact area. In contrast, the standard 'I . r' pole requires
approximately 60 square feet of impact for installation. Dominion has worked extensively to fast
' . avoid unnecessary permanent impacts to wetlands and water of the United States, and where
avoidance was not practicable, they minimized the necessary impacts.
' Avoidance and minimization measures were also taken into account in determining
the
temporary impacts that would result from construction of the proposed alignment. Temporary
impacts have been avoided through the alignment alternatives. By choosing an alignment that
crosses fewer jurisdictional features, the likelihood for temporary impacts decreases. Once the
' best alternative alignment was chosen,. the applicant worked with in-house foresters and
biologists to determine how to maintain the right of way (ROW) in a manner that would be less
detrimental on the wetlands that are located within the proposed ROW. The result of this
coordination.was an alteration in the approach in which standard ROW maintenance is conducted
Instead of clearing the forested wetlands and maintaining them as an emergent wetland with
regular mowing, Dominion is proposing to allow the 22.78 acres of forested wetlands within the
ROW to re-vegetate and establish themselves as scrub-shrub wetlands that will be permanently
maintained as such. This will be made possible through successive low volume, selective
applications of herbicides of the existing root mass left after the clearing of hardwood trees for
1 3000 Easter Circle • Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 • [phone] • FAX [phone]
Impact Justification and Mitigation Supplement
Fentress- Shawboro DOW Transmission Line
February 10, 2004
the installation of the transmission line. Once the trees within the ROW have been cut and
removed to upland windrows,.mats will be laid over the existing scrub shrub vegetation and once
construction in that section of the ROW is complete, the mats will be removed and the existing
scrub shrub vegetation willbe allowed to come back. Over time the number of required
applications will be reduced and.eventually eliminated. This eliminates the ever-thickening cover
of fast growing root sprouts that require frequent mowing with heavy equipment. Once the
competition from these sprouts is removed, the more desirable grasses, forbes, and low growing
shrubs willre-vegetate the existing and cleared the ROW. The initial application, and any
.subsequent applications, will be made on foot with backpack sprayers in order to selectively
apply the herbicide to stumps and/or invasive species. This newly proposed method of ROW
maintenance avoids the permanent conversion. of forested wetlands to emergent wetlands. It
should be noted that the existing easement had routinely been bush -hogged for maintenance
reasons.. The existing easement will be cleared one last time, prior to the construction of the
proposed alignment and then allowed to re-vegetate and establish as a scrub shrub habitat to be
maintained in the.same process as the proposed alignment. This additional acreage will increase
the ecological benefit of this new maintenance program. It is because of this self mitigating
conversion maintained, scrub-shrub wetland in addition to the existing ROW being able to
establish itself and be maintained as a scrub shrub wetland that Dominion is not offering
additional mitigation for the 22.78 acres of forested wetland conversion.
Dominion is very willing to work with the agencies in an effort to make this new
conversion plan one that will become a standard maintenance guide where practicable. They also
recognize that monitoring will be required to ensure that the ROW is allowed to return to and be
maintained as a scrub shrub wetland. In the NWP 12 issued by the Norfolk District Corps on
January 30, 2004, for the Virginia portion of this project, special conditions were included that
require the "...corridor be maintained in a scrub shrub community dominated by native
vegetation. The affected wetlands areas must be monitoring in the fall of years 1, 3, and 5
Mowing construction. If the corridors have not adequately vegetated in 5 years, planting and/or
additional monitoring will be required" In keeping with these conditions, Dominion is proposing
' Impact Justification and Mitigation Supplement
Fentress- Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
February 10, 2004
' . to monitor the ROW within wetlands that is located under the Wilmington District Corps office in
the same manner and under the same conditions.

1

r

Form DCM-MP-1

' APPLICATION,
(To be completed by.all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
from the NC state line to the Shawboro substation
1. APPLICANT

c. Street address or secondary road number
N/A
a. Landowner: -
' Name Dominion Virginia Power d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X Yes No
Address 120 Tredegar Street
' e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
City Richmond State Virginia
creek, sound, bay) Moyock Run, Roland Creek, Guinea
' Zip 23219 Da
Phone [phone]
y
Fax [phone]. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE .
OF PROPOSED. PROJECT
b h
A
i
d A
. or
ut
ze
gent:
Name Williamsburg Environmental Group Inc. a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
' building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Address 3000 Easter Circle To construct a 230kV transmission line within an existing 50,
' easement with the exception of 6.61 miles to be constructed
City Williamsburg State Virginia in newly acquired easement adjacent to the existing easement.
Zip 23188 Day Phone [phone]
P Y
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New work
' Fax [phone]
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Public
c. Project name (if any) ' Fentress-Shawboro 230kV
Trasnsmission Line d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
NOTE.. Pernds wM be Issued in naw ojlandowner(a), and/or project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Dominion Power is proposing to upgrade
project Hanle: an existing 230kV transmission line between the Fentress sub-
station in Chesapeake, Virginia and the Shawboro substation in
' Currituck County, North Carolina in order to relieve proiected
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED overloading on the existing transmission line that would result
.PROJECT in power outages in the Outer Banks area of North Carolina.

a. County Currit_uck County, North Carolina
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 127.17 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL Varied along the easement.
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Again, varied along the easement.
e. Vegetation on tract Please see attached Pre-Construction
Notification
f. Man-made features now on tract None
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local kod am plan.)
Conservation Transitional
X . Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Varied along the easement.
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? x Yes No
(Attach Zoning conlpUance cenVcate, (f appllcabk)
J. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is -the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a, National
Reeister listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? x Yes No
Coastal (marsh) Other x
If yes, has a delineation boo conducted? X
(Anach documentation, if avaUabk)
m: Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
No wastewater treatment facilities are necessary.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater,. industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and reridential discharges.) Please see
attached Pre-Construction Notification.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by i V white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission. Rule. 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
1 Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies. that such notice has been provided.
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
No previous permits have been.issued.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION' AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
'project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the day of , 19
Print Name
Signature
Dominion Virginia Power
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
2.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
The proposed project is necessary to relieve projected thermal overloading on
Dominion's existing power transmission line serving southeastern Virginia and northeastern
' North Carolina. As the customers in this service area require additional power in the future,
Dominion is required to ensure that the company maintains overall, long-term system reliability.
' This includes planning for the effect future demands will have on the current transmission
system. (Application, Appendix, Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Virginia Electric and Power
I Company, Fentress- Shawboro 239 kV Transmission Line Application no. 223 Case No. PUE-
2003, Filed February 14, 2003.)
' Dominion's planning criteria is founded on the North American Electric Reliability
Council (NERC) guidelines. The maximum loading for a 230 kV transmission line cannot be
greater than 94% of the line's total capacity. This leaves 6% of the line capacity in reserve for
use in abnormal use loads and/or inclement weather. Projected load growth along the existing
' line will result in the line being used at or above 100% capacity violating the reliability criteria.
(Application, Appendix, Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Virginia Electric and Power Company,
' Fentress- Shawboro 239 kV Transmission Line Application no. 223 Case No. PUE-2003, Filed
February 14, 2003.)
' Specifically, the expected growth rate for the next ten years in the Outer Banks area of
North Carolina is anticipated to be considerably greater than historic growth. Studies completed
' on the existing transmission line reveal that this growth will leave the Outer Banks with an
increased vulnerability to voltage collapse that would leave customers without power. The
proposed upgrade will alleviate these reliability concerns. The upgrade will also provide Virginia
customers with the added benefit of increased reliability of the current power source.
' (Application, Appendix, Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Virginia Electric and Power Company,
Fentress- Shawboro 239 kV Transmission Line Application no. 223 Case No. PUE-2003, Filed
I February 14, 2003.)
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Dominion Virginia Power (Dominion) is proposing to upgrade the existing power supply
system between the existing Fentress substation (Fentress) located in the City of Chesapeake,
Virginia south through the Hickory substation in the City of Chesapeake, Virginia to the existing
Shawboro substation (Shawboro) located in Currituck County, North Carolina, see Figure 3-1.
Currently, a single 230 kV transmission line is located within a 100-foot wide portion of an
existing 150-foot right-of-way (ROW) easement from Fentress to Shawboro. The remaining 50-
foot section of easement has remained idle with the exception of a 115 kV transmission line that
is located between Fentress and Hickory.
The portion of the proposed upgrade located in North Carolina involves the construction
of a new 230 kV transmission line within the idle portion of the existing easement between the
North Carolina border and the existing Shawboro substation. From the North Carolina border
south to the Shawboro substation 14.13 miles of clearing and new transmission line construction
are necessary. The proposed project limits are within the 50 feet of idle ROW that is located
along the western side of the existing easement. The exception to this is in the southern portion
of the proposed line where 6.61 miles of a new 50-foot easement will be acquired by Dominion
adjacent to the existing 100-foot easement. This is shown on Figure 3-2.
The proposed transmission line requires the clearing of forested areas within the existing
easement, the installation of single circuit guyed steel poles buried in concrete or steel pipe pile
footers, and the installation of the power line. These single circuit steel poles will average 75 feet
in height and the average span along the corridor between structures will be approximately 400
feet (Figure 3-3). The proposed foundations are the minimum size necessary and separate
footings will be constructed for each pole.
The existing 50 feet of easement to be utilized for the proposed 230 kV transmission line
includes agricultural fields, forested land, Lolly's Creek, Moyock Run, Roland Creek Canal,
Guinea Mill Run Canal, and associated wetlands features. WEG conducted a delineation of the
waters of the United States, including wetlands within the proposed alignment in April 2003 and
determined that potentially jurisdictional features exist within the project limits and are located in
bottomland areas within the floodplains of the Moyock Run, associated wetlands, and on nearly
level mineral flats. Wetland systems encountered within the project limits are generally forested
I Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
' with a lesser amount of scrub shrub and emergent systems. Portions of the forested wetland
systems encountered are classified as containing greater than 10% Taxodium distichum
The proposed transmission line requires the installation of single circuit poles within
' wetland features. The concrete or steel pipe piles will require an impact area of 16 square feet per
pole, resulting in 912.00 square feet of direct permanent wetland impacts. Please see the attached
' Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map, Sheets 1-9 for impact locations. The following chart itemizes
the expected direct impacts by wetland type. While the single circuit pole locations are located
on average every 400 feet along the corridor, pole placement was reconfigured in some areas in
order to avoid pole placement within rivers and stream channels. Therefore, there are no
proposed direct impacts within waters of the United States.
PFO
Palustrine wetlands Palustrine Palustrine
Forested containing
greater than Scrub/Shrub Emergent TOTAL
Wetlands
10% Wetlands Wetlands (Square
(PFO)
Taxodium (PSS) (PEM) Feet)
(Square Feet)
Distichum (Square Feet) (Square Feet)
(Square Feet
Proposed
Direct 832 SF 64 SF 0 SF 16 SF 912 SF
Im act
While the proposed transmission line predominately traverses open, cleared, agricultural
land, small areas of forested wetlands, including areas that contain greater than 10% Taxodium
distichum, will also be traversed These forested areas will need to be cleared and therefore
I converted from a forested community to a mature scrub shrub community.
Dominion submitted an application for the proposed project for review by the State of
North Carolina, Utilities Commission February 17, 2003. The Sate of North Carolina, Utilities
Commission issued a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity on June 8, 2003 (Appendix
A)
I ?-
^bt
9r? ?
?,CWIRKkn
1 `? I

7%==
3 MILES 1.5 0 MILES 3 MILES
JOB NUMBER: 1753
SCALE: 1 INCH = 3 MILES
SOURCE: VIRGINIA ATLAS AND GAZETTEER,
DeLORME MAPPING CO., 1995.
'ILLIAMSBURG
TIRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.

FIGURE 3-1
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
FENTRESS TO SHAWBORO
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VA & OCTOBER 2003
CURRITUCK COUNTY, N.C.
:i
Hicl?vrf Sub_
Proposed 2rA
bx stit>;g R-W
6.9 rcze
N
Proposed 2rd 230:'
E:dstlrlg? RIV7
.J
50 feet New
.1 .61 mi3es

r. '
W22
.
. 23?]i
S?tFi?VIS0I?O ?1]?l ,
FIGURE 3-2 ?m
EEDATE.OCTOBER23 003 T ILLIAMSBURGPROPOSED AND EX ISTING H NVIRONMENTAL E EASEMENT DETAILS iJ
iRCNiA POWER FENTRESS TO SHAWBORO r ROUP, INC. ,m
CRY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA & 1-77 °°"'°b190 .ti
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ~
an vlronIDm[el Cone Wtenb
Frdi?, ?t?a_
mow,; 115uf &23Ok,Q , .. .
NO New Gonsttictian
4,?2 miles
3i iug 2 3 Q1t , VA,
f SAC

HICKORY - SHrAWBORO
23Ok V LIME
EXISTING PROPOSED

32 FEET -12.5 FEET
R/w R!w
tlm- l l1w-Nw d6-W ?7?1 vi +f h`1a? -*%-4*'
50 FEET 6O FEET Q FEET
154 FEET
TYPICAL. RIGHT OF WAY LOOKING SOUTH
TYPE OF STRUCTURES SINGLE CIRCUIT POLE
APPROX. AVERAGE HEIGHT; 75 FEET
WIDTH AT CROSSARMS: 15 FEET
APPROX.AVG SPAN LENZTtt 4e0 FEET
CONDUCTOR TYPE: ALUMINUM
RIGHT-CF-way W10TH, 150 FEET (EXISTING)
APPROX. LENGTH OF LINES 6,q mLlea in VA & 7.52 MLIeS in NC
(14.42 MILES 70TPIL LENGTHS
FOUNOATION: DIRECT BURIED
DATE OCTOBER23,2003 FIGURE 3-3 w^`p?-?^^
TYPICAL RIGHT OF WAY ILLIAMSHURC ,w.. , a.,..m
JOB NUMBER. 1753 n
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE LOOKING SOUTH NVIRONMENTAL
FENTRESS TO SHAWBORO ROUP, INC.
SOURCE: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER CRY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA 6
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA antiro.ro.n e.1 con.uaoe.

Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
4.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The intent of the transmission line route selection process was to identify a route for a
230kV transmission line that would minimize impact on the natural and human environment
while keeping within the bounds of accepted economic and engineering practices. The process
involved the general route selection procedures suggested by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission in its publication Electric Power Transmission and the Environment (Federal Power
Commission, 1970) as well as procedures stated in the State Code of Virginia. Dominion
evaluated the economic, engineering, and environmental aspects of three routes prior to choosing
the selected option.
4.1 Alternative #I
The first alternative was to increase the capacity of an existing transmission system west
of the Outer Banks in North Carolina by increasing the capacity of the existing 115 kV lines
located in Washington and Tyrell Counties and by building a new 35 mile alignment that would
connect these circuits to the Outer Banks. This alternative requires clearing the ROW and the
construction of the necessary 35 miles of new line. This additional alignment would result in
crossings of the Alligator River, Croatan Sound, the Roanoke River, and the associated wetlands
of all three water bodies. This alternative was withdrawn due to the anticipated impacts to waters
of the United States, including wetlands, and the significant cost in acquiring, clearing, and
constructing 35 miles of new ROW and transmission line.
4.2 Alternative #2
The second alternative was to construct a new transmission line east of the proposed line
and utilizing portions of the existing easement. However, this alternative requires the
construction of 61 miles of transmission line. The immense cost required obtaining the additional
easements and to clear and construct 61 miles of ROW and transmission line makes this
alternative impracticable.
4.3 Selected Alternative
There were multiple reasons that the proposed alignment was selected. First, the State
Code of Virginia requires that any public service company must show cause as to why an existing
' Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
' easement and ROW cannot be used for a proposed project. Secondly, guideline #1 under FERC
' requires that existing easements and ROWs be given priority to proposed work. The selected
alternative complies with both of these guidelines. This state and federal compliance helps
' reduce the cost associated with getting the proposed line approved by the Commonwealth of
Virginia State Corporation Commission, Division of Energy Regulation and the State of North
Carolina Utilities Commission.
While Dominion originally focused on this alternative for its compliance with FERC, the
' decreased cost to construct and the minimized environmental impacts in comparison with the
other alternatives were the deciding factors in choosing this alignment to meet the purpose and
' need of the project. This alternative does not require the acquisition new easement in Virginia
versus a minimum of 35 miles of new easement for alternative #1. This is a time and cost
consuming process. Secondly, the cost of clearing the ROW are minimized due to the current
access points and the fact that the existing and adjoining ROW can be used for access up and
' down the ROW. Finally, the expected impacts to the environment are minimized. Fewer water
bodies and associated wetlands are crossed in this alternative than in the alternative alignments.
This implies that expected impacts from pole placement and clearing will also be less than would
have been necessary in the alternative alignments.
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
' 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
5.1 Threatened and Endangered Species:
' Information concerning threatened and endangered species, rare species, and unique
natural communities is available from the databases maintained by the North Carolina Office of
' Conservation and Community Affairs Natural Heritage Program (NCNH) and the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Neither the NCNH nor the FWS listed any known rare,
' threatened, or endangered species within the proposed project corridor.
5.2 Cultural Resources
According to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, any project requiring
Federal action (i.e. Federal permit) is subject to the requirements of this law. Since the proposed
transmission line will require a Corps permit, Section 106 will apply.
Under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act, state agencies are
encouraged to comment on proposed projects. The North Carolina Department of Cultural
Resources (DCR) did not provide comments to the North Carolina Department of Administration
(the state clearinghouse for reviewed actions) under the North Carolina Environmental Policy
Act.
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
6.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
The primary objective of mitigation for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional wetlands
and other waters of the United States is to offset the environmental losses, and in particular
functional values lost. The applicant utilized avoidance and minimization efforts, through an
alternatives analysis on the possible alignments, to the maximum extent practicable as the first
two steps in the development of an acceptable mitigation plan. To complete the process, the
applicant proposes to mitigate for direct permanent impacts to forested wetlands at a 2:1 ratio,
scrub shrub wetlands at a 1.5:1 ratio, and emergent wetlands at a 1:1 ratio through the purchase of
credits from an approved wetland mitigation bank. Currently, the applicant is proposing to
purchase 0.02 credits from a Corps approved wetland mitigation bank for direct permanent
impacts in North Carolina. Due to the small amount of direct permanent impacts, 912.00 square
feet, onsite creation is not a practical alternative.
In an effort to provide mitigation for the minimal adverse effects the clearing of the
additional ROW will have on surrounding wildlife, Dominion has worked with the Virginia
Department of Conservation and Recreation to develop a maintenance schedule that will benefit
the surrounding wildlife. The goal of the maintenance program is to minimize long-term
maintenance cost and site disturbance through the establishment and maintenance of mature scrub
shrub communities that will provide beneficial wildlife habitat in aesthetically pleasing corridors
that require minimal maintenance activities.
Through successive low volume, selective applications of herbicides, the existing tree
root mat left after the clearing for the installation of the transmission line is reduced and
eventually eliminated. This eliminates the ever-thickening cover of fast growing root sprouts that
require frequent mowing/maintenance with heavy equipment and/or chemicals. Once the
competition from these sprouts is removed, the more desirable grasses, forbes, and low growing
shrubs will re-vegetate the cleared ROW.
After the initial applications in wetland areas have eliminated coppice brush, subsequent
applications will be made on foot with backpack sprayers in order to selectively apply the
herbicide to invasive species. This re-vegetation process will reduce the need and frequency of
maintenance operations along the ROW. The standard three-year maintenance cycle could be
increased to as many as four, five, or six years, depending on the local vegetation type.
Fentress -Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
Pre-Construction Notification
' The applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional areas where
practicable to offer the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative. Appropriate and
necessary steps have been taken to minimize potential adverse impacts resulting from the
' discharge of fill into the aquatic ecosystem. This project is not expected to impact public water
supply, any shellfish harvesting area, spawning grounds, waterfowl habitat; nor jeopardizes
' threatened or endangered species, of which we are aware; nor disrupt the movement of aquatic
life. Therefore, this activity should not cause or contribute to the significant degradation of
' waters of the United States, nor should the activity adversely or substantially affect human health
or welfare; life stages of organisms dependent upon the aquatic ecosystem; ecosystem diversity,
' productivity, or stability; or significantly degrade recreational, aesthetic, or economic values.
APPENDIX A
State of North Carolina
Utilities Commission
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
UTILITIES COMMISSION
RALEIGH
DOCKET NO. E-22, SUB 407
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION
In the Matter of
Dominion North Carolina Power for a )
Certificate of Environmental Compatibility )
and Public Convenience and Necessity to )
Construct Approximately 14.13 Miles of )
230 kV Transndssion Une in Currituck )
County, North Carolina )
ORDER GRANTING CERTIFICATE OF
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY
AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY AND WAIVING HEARING
REQUIREMENTS
BY THE COMMISSION: On February 17, 2003, Virginia Electric and Power
' Company, d/b/a Dominion North Carolina Power (North Carolina Power) filed an
application pursuant to G.S. 62-101 and 62-102 and Rule R8-62 of the Commission
Rules and Regulations for a cettiflcate of environmental compatibility and public
convenience and necessity to construct a new approximately 14.13 mile 230 kV
transmission line in Currituck County, North Carolina.
' The new 230 kV transmission line will be constructed adjacent to an existing 230
kV transmission line from the existing Hickory Substation In Chesapeake, Virginia, to
the existing Shawboro Substation In Cunituc k County, North Carolina. The
aPProxjm,a?tely 7.52 miles of new 230 kV transmlWon line will be constructed in the
vacant portion of the existing 1504oot right-of-way (ROW) between the Hickory
Substation and a point near Snowden, North Carolina, 1.1 miles north of SR 1210
' (Snowden Road) west of Highway 168. From that point to the Shawboro Substation,
the approximately 6.61 miles of new line will be constructed on a new 6040ot ROW to
be obtained adjacent to the existing 1004oot ROW.
' The new Hickory-Shawboro line Is necessary to assure that the Company's
transmission facilities continue to meet the projected load growth In a reliable manner
consistent with the Company's reliability contingency guidelines for transmission
facilities. The proposed project Is necessary to relieve projected thermal overloading
and avoid potential voltage collapse of the transmission system In northeastern North
Carolina. Particularly, the rate of load growth in the Outer Banks area of North Carolina
' Is projected to be substantially greater than that of the Company's system as a whole
over the next decade, Past studies have confirmed the susceptibility of the Outer Banks
area to voltage collapse.
The Commission Issued an order on February 19, 2003, scheduling the
application for public hearing on June 17, 2003, In Currituck subject to cancellation, and
requiring publication of notice, On April 3, 2003, North Carolina Power filed the required
affidavits of publication.
' On June 4, 2003, North Carolina Power filed a motion requesting that the hearing
be cancelled and that the case be decided on the basis of the filed record. North
Carolina Power further stated that as of the May 28, 2003, deadline for intervention, no
' one had petitioned to intervene, protested, or otherwise shown any interest In appearing
end/or submitting testimony or evidence In this docket.
On June 5, 2003, the Commission Issued an order oanoeling the hearing
scheduled for June 17, 2003, In response to North Carolina Power's motion of June 4,
2003.
' The Public Staff presented this matter at the Commission's Staff Conference on
June 16, 2003, recommending that the Commission Issue a certificate of environmental
compatibility and public convenience and necessity for the construction of the subject
' 230 W transmission line located In Currituck County, North CWDIIW__
After careful consideration, the Commission finds good cause to grant the
certificate.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that a certificate of environmental compatibility
' and public convenience and necessity, attached as Appendix A, is granted.
ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION,
This the _81 day of June, 2003.
NORTH CAROtJNA UTILITIES COMMISSION
t U Mf ???
Gall L Mount, Deputy Clerk
RM17G3. i s
I
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
UTILITIES COMMISSION
RALEIGH
DOCKET NO. E-221 SUB 407
Know All Men by These Presents that
DOMINION NORTH CAROLINA POWER
I
IS HEREBY ISSUED THIS
CERTIFICATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBI
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY PURSUANT TOGS 62 1 of and 62-102
I
to construct a 14.13 mile 230 kV transmission line
I to be located in
I Currituck County, North Carolina
subject to receipt of all federal and state permits as
I required by existing and future regulations prior to
beginning construction subject to all other orders, rules,
regulations and conditions as are now or may hereafter be
I lawfully made by the North Carolina Utilities Commisslon.
ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
I ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION
This, the 11" day of June, 2003,
I NORTH CAROLNA UTILITIES COMMISSION
.01
3 'K '. ,? x:aaiss
Gall L Mount, Deputy Clerk
APPENDIX B
Correspondence from the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
s North CaarolinaWildlife Resources Commission R2
Charles R. Fullwood, F-i"-utire Director
MEMORANDUM 89
? ??????
?
T0: Mciba McGee 1?k
Environmental Coordinator
' OtT-ce of Legislative and tntteij,* or iental Affairs APR
M 003
RSM-ED
North Carolina Dtparttp t of Envi nnwnt and Natural Resources
' FROM: David McHenry OOA
Northeast Coastal RegiocfE'oordinatflr ?,?
Habitat Conservation Section l?yl y
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission S2aiE"
DATE; March 19.2003
' SUBJEC t': Comments on Siting and Environmental Repon I'or Fentress-Shamboru 230kV
Transmission Line, Dominion Nor';: Carolinn Power. Currituck County,
OL1A # 03-0253
' Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (Commission) reviewed the
report %%ith regard to impacts of the project on fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in
• accordance with provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-I et seq.. as
amended; 1 NCAC-25) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (49 Stat• 401, as amended, 16 U.S.C.
661 et seg.).
' Dominion North Carolina Power applied for a Certlticate of Environmental Compatibility and
Public Convenience and NecesslY from thtNorth Carolina Utilities Commission to upgrade the
Fentress-Shawboro transmission line in Currituek Counw, The project Is needed to maintain service
reliability and projected power demand for northeastern North Carolina. A 230kV line will be
' constructed parallel to an existing line in the 14.11 mile long right-of-way extending from the North
Carolinn/Virginia border to the Shawboro Substation. A 150-foot clear corridor is needed for the
project, which requires cutting of obstructing vegetation, as necessary, along the existing right-of-way
' and a 50-foot wide by 6.61 mile long addition to the right-ofway.
The report did not assess the potential impact, of the proJCLt on listed or rare plant and animal
species or suitable habitat for these species, Because of the habitat disturbance and alteration associated
with this project, potential impacts on these species should be evaluated through consultation with the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program and United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program can be contacteA at :
' 1615 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1615
[phone]
Nlail;nv Addrew T);vin;nn of Tt hn.11':et,,.,;,,. • 1711 NA..
OLIA No. 03-0253 • Page 2 March 19, 2003
Some wildlife will be directly impacted or displaced by conversion of forested areas of the right-
of-way to low growing vegetation. Forests and riparian wetlands, which are sparse along several sections
of the right-of-way, provide important habitat for a variety of aeotrop""" birds, mammals, and other
species. Rebuilding populations of wild turkey Melea It al!
habitats in the project area for feeding, roosting, and nesting Three fore, to mon older fore inimize direecct?impa?areon
wildlife, the Commission recommends that, to the extent practical, right-of-way clearing activities only
conducted from Octobcr l to March 30 of any ye^- to avoid the warm season nesting and brooding
periods.
be
In contrast to detrimental effects on wildlife, several species may benefit from habitat
conversion, particularly if tnitigadon measures are conducted to offset the loss of forested habitat. For
example, wild turkey may lose roosting habitat from forest clearing, but they may also benefit from the
additional open foraging habitat in portions of the right-of-way that are relatively distant from
agricultural fields. Cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagur,noridanus) and bobwhite quail (Colinas vlrgintanw)
would also benefit if the cleared areas provide adequate covet and forage. To promote these benefits, the
Commission recommends the following measures be incorporated into *io project.
1. gush plies should be constructed along the right-of--ways using the non-harvestible, woody
vegetation that is cut. The report Indicates that this material will be chipped or burned, but
productive cover for a variety of wildlife can be created if much of this material is left in
plies adjacent to forested areas.
3. Seeds of plants that are beneficial to wildlife should be used following discing to stabilize
the disturbed areas. The Commission rocommends year-round planting of kobe or Korean
Icspedeza, winter-time planting of rye or wheat. and summer-time planting of millet or
sorghum. These plants provide erosion rtontrol as well as forage and cover for a variety of
wildlife until native grasses become es... ,Ilshed. Seed types including bahia, fescue, and
sericea lespedeza provide limited benefits to wildlife or, in the case of sericea lespedeza, are
highly Invasive and Inhibit eventual establishment of native grasses, Shrub lespedeza is also
a recommended perennial for the margins of the right-of-way to provide excellent forage and
cover for wildlife.
Similarly. the Commission recommends allowing landowners or their lease holden to
manage wildlife food plots in the right-of--way, along forested areas. These allowances could
be communicated to landowners during contacts regarding the right-of--way addition.
3. In addition to avoiding wrum season nesting and brooding periods during initial clearing,
ongoing corridor maintenance should be conducted In staggered sections to minimize
impacts to wildlife. For example, one-third or a corridor section could be mowed or treated
every year Instead of the entire length in a single year. Herbicides and pesticides should not
be u.--.d in wetland or riparian areas.
The Commission appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project and requests that these
comments be addressed or considered before final proceuing of the project by the Clearinghouse. If you
need to discuss these comments please call Davl4 McHenry at [phone] extension 345.
Rowe, D. -NC Wildlife Iles. Comm., District I
Pearsall, L. - North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
Rabon, D. , US Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
'0aw: d I' rr,1 , US rL06
P0AvY, 337Z4(,, Al

I i I f s s,- 4s Zo
g g?
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Qail Lamm
Project Support, Traosmisslon Right of Way
Dominion North Carolina Power
FROM: David McHenry, Northeast Coastal Region Coordinat
Habitat Conservation Sections
DATE: June 9, 2003.
SUBJECT: Response on Fentress-Shawbom 239 kV Transmission Line
SCH File No. 03-E-4600-0253
This memorandum responds to your June 5, 2003 memorandum regarding discussions of comments
on the project made by North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (Commission) on March 19, 2003.
Based on discussions with yourself and Mr. Mice Brucato on May 28, 2003, and as outlined in your
memorandum, the Commission concurs with the suggested revision of the mitigation measures. Specifically,
tho vegetation management techniques you propose to address item #3 of our comments should have minimal
impacts to fish and wildlife resources and promote wildlife habitat diversity.
The Commission also appreciates the opportunity to pursue a cooperative wildlife plot management
with property owners and will contact Mr. Mike Bruoato in the fl:ture should we be able to develop that
program its North Carolina. We also support the field effort to identify any rare plants and other habitats
along the proposed route and would appreciate being apprised of those results.
The Commission appreciates •the efforts of Dominion North Carolina power to conserve and promote
wildlife habitat and the opportunity to discuss the impacts of the project on fish and wildlife resources. If you
need to discuss those comments further please call David McHenry at [phone] extension 345.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center ` Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephooe: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]
V V ILLIAMSBURG
ENVIRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.

Eni,ironniental Consultants
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Attn: Mr. Steven Lane Date: J '
2/26/04

To: NC Division of Water Quality Project #: 1753
401-Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center Reference: Fentress to Shawboro 230kV
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Transmission Line, Chesapeake
Virginia and Currituck County,
From: Shelley Carlisle North Carolina
Regulatory Specialist II
cc: File
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
? Plans
? Prints
? Copies
? Contracts
® Literature
? Report
? Samples
? Letters
? Other:
REASON:
® As per your request
? For your signature
? For your review/comments
? For your use/files
? Other:
SENT BY:
? Mail
® Overnight Carrier. UPS
? Courier:
? Other:
WETLANDS / 401 GROUP
MAR 12004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION
2 12/03 Pre-Construction Notification Fentress - Shawboro 230kV Transmission Line
City of Chesa cake, Vir inia and Currituck County, North Carolina

Notes:
Signature
L:\1 700's\1 753 - Shawboro to Fentress\regulatory\NC application and information\transtoDWQ.doc
3000 Easter Circle • Mlliamsbuq, Virginia 23188 • [phone] • FAX [phone]
s'
~ ~
o N ~y
N F1
~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~?1
r ry OD ~ ~
e~ o N ~
z a N~ _m 0 ro ma No V
~ Lro roo ~~p~ aC dN ~1
r
F ~>O ~O~ CNO ~ ~~ro o~v N~c°17 q
~ i i
NNO ro~r ro>m W N fD~N ~p~ N E O C
0.~~ rL~ [`7'~~ Q
^j ~=tA ~ UO ~ NO r~~C ro[~0 ~~nC ~
W
~~yy ~ W
~ z
z~
~o'° w w
~ a
~z
~o o
EXISTING 700' EASEMENT - ~x =ASEMENT ~
PROPOSED 50' EASE d/ Z 50 EASEMENT
8 X
X
h°
tip, ,o
ti~
¦
z~
¦
W w
~g
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: /
APPROXIMATE FORESTED
~"~~'y~' WETLAND LIMITS PROPOSED CONVERSIONS:
W
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 6.73 ACRES±
x 0 ^o~
WETLAND LIMITS
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE± \
~~yyy APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLgND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
~ W y WETLAND LIMITS THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
a CONVERSION
J '~'~~a~? APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER X
~ THAN 70%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 6.73 ACRES± i o
F
z
Q ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT
a FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 240.00 S.F.±
EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS
x Z ~o ~
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± a +~~v~ C~ z . p~~
a Y ~ - O
~r O N
~ ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.±
0 ~ ~ W i
WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± '4 V~ T W
~ Irr-nn ~ ~ UJ
3 ~ y~' APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM ~ ~ W
a WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS ~ \ OQ r~ O L, % v O
~ ~ N -
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 240.00 S.F.± ~ ~ + Q W W ~ ~
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB ~ O W d ~ ~ ~
g WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: ~ O O d d O N W O O
3 m ~ O m In Q ~ Q
m ~ N O ~ f~ ~ - _ O r II Z
° APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 6.73 ACRES± ~ ~ W W -
* ~ (1 ~ J oC U OC
s y ~ WETLAND IMPACTS o TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 240.00 S.F.± ,r r o° J W Q oX - ~ W z m
0_ ~ ~ m (1 C
~ yi i n J T iii
CY) L0 WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER Li W
W W U W .j co Z J Cc
o THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS
0 n Q W U 0
SHAWBORO 0 c (n CO
/ 300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 900' 900' SUBSTATION

~ ~ o
N M N G~
~ O ~ ti
c0 > ~
07 ~ N N cv NN 0
ro ~ N m co U
EXISTING Y 00' EASEMENT ~ L ro ro o N ~ a d a Rf
°j~ coo
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT oI U~a~o o~~ m~r~i
N 7~ rJ C i s ° ° ° N C O ro~ r ro> O
SI $ ~I ° o ~ °o roNN m00 ~ Od ey °rn ° + W~N N OC ~ Ol N O 0 ro^ r~~ ~ L(~ 0
° rn O O UO ONO
r~~C ro[°D ~cn~ D
~ W
ml
w w_ z ' k
go,I, ~ y y p
a x 1 Q ~
$I / ~ ~ h
~ z z~
w
,1 ~ a
~z
ao a o
~x
{
z
gl SLIGO
gl °ml SUBSTATION
a

w
w
1`
8
x ,~o A
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
y' PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT
~ W
~ APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED CONVERSIONS: ~
y'y~'y~' WETLAND LIMITS
o~
0
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 9.36 ACRES± ._~w ~
WETLAND LIMITS
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE±
- -
~v ~ y APPROXIMATE EMERGENT W~~,gND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE± m
~ ~'~~'yti' WETLAND LIMITS THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
f . ~ ~ ~t o
z CONVERSION ~ ,w t o
W APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER ~ ~ r~ ~rn ov
~ , ~t y~~~ i~ °
W '~'-y_~_ THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 9.36 ACRES± * ~
a
y ii ~ ~ i ~ 'i
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: ~ ~ ~
i ~ i ~v~~ Z
a ~`Y," ~.i-. . ~ oo O
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 336.00 S.F.± ~ ' x
ti ~ M v V'.Y'. o l~~ ~ . ~ _ ,Y
EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS i'Y 'Y f •i. i'• Q
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± ~r• O
s ~
k r
o EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± o ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS m
p
W ~ WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± ~ ~ W ~ti~ ~ O
~ o° ~ a N ~ ~ ~
o THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM Q W W ~ ~
APPROXIMATE FORESTED IMPACTS r ~ ~ W ~ r ~
~ y y WETLAND IMPACTS ff ~ p W d ~
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 336.00 S.F.± ~ ~ ~ 0.. W ~ ~ N W ~ O
O ~ m ~ ~ Q ~ Q
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB r (V ~ f~ ~ - ~ r II Z
L WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: P ~ W W -
N } I- I ~ ~ a o= U Q oC
0 J ~ W W Z _ m ~
~ ~ ~ m
y W APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 9.36 ACRES± - a ~ r
Q p W
L L~ vvc i v-\iNv nvirr~v i o II TOTAL STRUCTURE IMF'AG 15 336.00 S.F.± II w W v
N U) z J cc W
I- > m Q D Q W 0 U 0
g ~v ; ? WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER 0 Ir U) U)
THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS soo' o' 150' soo' soo' 600' 900'

~ ~
o N
m
~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~+1
r a0 N ~ OD > m
ch ~ N ~
N N~ O ~ ro Ql N N O U
z~ c ~ro _roo
~r m ~ a a N ~
~P
41 70 3 -O C Q~
N NO ro~f~ ro~(D ~N N m 0 O O ~y
N ~ N O C d' w~
°o m~ ova o~L~ ~ O=~ QUO O~O
mfr r[C00 ~cnC D
w
~~yy W
~i ~ U
E~ ~ z
8 z~
w
~ ~
~z
~o o
EXISTING 100' EASEMEN PROPOSED 50' EASE ~x EASEMENT R
z 50 EASEMENT
X

Oh
n
ti,
~.l\
x ~ \ ~ 0~0 _
~
•
~P ~
W w
~,8
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: /
y ~~~y APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED CONVERSIONS:
WETLAND LIMITS ~
W
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 6.73 ACRES± 8 x
WETLAND LIMITS
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE± \
`~~W y'~' APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
y WETLAND LIMITS THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
3
CONVERSION
z ~ ~y APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER o~ x
w THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 6.73 ACRES±
f~
z
Q ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 240.00 S.F.± PROPOSED50'EASEMENT
EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS _ _ ~y
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± l
a ~ ~ J L~ p -
~ O
~ ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± y N
0 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ T
WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± ~ ~~S M W Irr-nn
3 y~' APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM ~ ~ VJ
~ ~ ~ W + oo ~ O
a WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS ~ x ~J p ~ ~ ~ ^p0 ~ -
m TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 240.00 S.F.± y lV
~ Q - W W ~ ~ Q W m
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB 'Y M p ~ LL
g` WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: i ~'J ~ O ~ O O d d
3 m ~ p N W ~ p ~ O m In ~ Q
L ~ Q ~ N p ~ f~ ~ -
_ ~ r II Z ~ ~ W W -
° APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 6.73 ACRES± r~~ N ~ ~ _ ~ ~r a ~
o WETLAND IMPACTS J 0= U Q= ~ o° J W Q -
o TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 240.00 S.F.± z o - ~ W Z o0 _ ~

i " Q Z r W
WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER W U ~ W
o 0 THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS W Z J
n Q W 0 0
SHAWBORO Q U) U)
/ 300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 900' 900' SUBSTATION

O
N q
r ~ ~ ~1.i
N
m z m q
~ r A N ~N N~ O
m ~rnN am U
$I mo mW p~ CN y
ml 0 OI ~ O J ~ Ul OI M Ql
U ~ ~ r
wEN m`om ~a°e q
oI om~ °v°o Imo ti
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT m~C r¢~ a~nC p
0 p gl W
d PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT ° y
r
0 0 ~ a
p r 0 ~ ~Ez
0 N
o r 0 ~w~
0 o ~ --r°'_---- z
0 0 ~ z a:
0 0 o r
0 rn 0
i •t•j ,p ~ i i i i i z
Y t W y } x' W
Y Y s
gl
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT ml U
S
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT " oI
0
0 O`
r
o - F
p 1't 67 I k
O _
p Z
r i o i i + i `l
0 m

p ~ ~ V
r r ;
.y T ,t , O Z
a 4#:Y
i i 3Y~
i i
E END: a = " ~ L G SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: ~ LL Q W U
~ ~ ~ APPRO; 1 APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED CONVERSIONS: y Q ~ _
~ ~ ~ WETLA J WETLAND LIMITS
APPRO; FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 3.49 ACRES± F n ~ V 1 APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB ~ ~ F
WETLA
J WETLAND LIMITS ~ W Y Q SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE±
~ ~ ~ APPR0 APPROXIMATE EMERGENT W~~,gND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE± 5 = = ~ ~

3 ~ ~ ~ WETLA WETLAND LIMITS THAN 70%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM N Z V V
W CONVERSION
Z J „ ,C
W ~ APPRO LL Y APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER
~ ~ THAN 1 THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 3.49 ACRES~-
z W_
Q.
Q
~ APPRO 1 APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS:
U J FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 144.00 S.F.± Z
Q a
~ EXISTI~ 1 EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS ~ O
U Q J SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± o
d N Q
~ ~

~ PROPC J 1 PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± } J ~ m
U
W WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± ~ o ~
N
0 ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ APPRO 1 APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM Q ~ ~ ~ ~
ro ~ ~ ~ WETLA J WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS ~ T LL O ~

TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 144.00 S.F.± co °o ~ o a a
0
o APPRC l APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB ~ N m~ o~ Q
~ WETLA J WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: ~ m w r ii w z
N J a a~ U ~ ate[
0
~ ~ ~ ~ o APPRC ~JI APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 3.49 ACRES± a ~ ~ m Z m >
Y ~ r iii
T ~ ~ ~ WFTL~ WFTI AND IMPACTS Tr,Tni o-roi inri ioc inn~nrTC inn nn c G + Q ~
1 4 .L Ji I I J II Ivl!'L Vinvvi vi~iiviIr-viv
In W T Z J
WETL/ 0 a WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER 7
0 THAN THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS ~ ~ O ~ O
r 27m
300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 900'

~ ~ o
N N
3 O y.~
~ O ~ r
ODD > ~ ~
(h 0 N ~ N NN 0
~ ~N N~ C L~ ~O ~
N ~ Q d N _ C
UFO ~~p)~ C ~O
~ai~ o~~ m~~ `m ~co ~-~e~ ~ 0
(tl NN m ~(0 ~
N N W ~N ~N O ~
Y t~ error rL~ ~ LCD ~ ~ =W ~ UO ~ m0
J'.: dY ' ~ g r~~C rOC°0 ~cnC ~
W
N
kn a
K ~ .
f ~ ~ o N a ~ z
z
.Y w
~ ~ S. a ~
EXISTING 100 EASEME f: o ~ ~
~ , ~ t` ~ ~ fi a Q
W PROPOSED 50 EASEMENT ~ Q',
~j
_ 7pgo T,gX~D~UL'ONTq~N/NG ~"•sw.4x oiSTipNVM
q: n" r -
O + n
N
~ , t.,, t ,
`~e_ W
2
J

2~
U
z ~
f
i. ' ¦
~I~/~ g/ EXISTING 1 * + y 100' EASEMENT :XISTING W w
7p~ T~Q~UM ~F~~N~N~ ~ PROPOS DiSTi~H~M ,°I PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT
0 0
0 r
LEGEND: p
\ ~
N
W
~ APPROXIMATE FORESTED
y~~'y~' WETLAND LIMITS SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: ~ APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB PROPOSED CONVERSIONS: ~ ~ ,rte ~ o 'ti +
WETLAND LIMITS „'a.,. 'f
FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 3.99 ACRES± ~
~°Oa~ ~ ~
y ~ y APPROXIMATE EMERGENT ~
a wy~'~~' WETLAND LIMITS SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.05 ACRE± V ~ ~ /y~
w >
Z t~ 'y-^
~ ,~~y APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 5.20 ACRES±
"'`°lM1
THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
a CONVERSION Q
~ ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS ~ TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION g.24 ACRES±
a Z O
~ Z O C
Q ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: Q L
N Q
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 128.00 S.F.± D
0 T }M'
o ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± W
v UJ Q
t ~ ~ W ~ O
a~ O ~ ~ N ~
o y ,y EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± ~ ~ Q W W
~ ~ APPROXIMATE FORESTED n ~ W C' J T
m ~ y WETLAND IMPACTS WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 176.00 S.F.± O W ~ ~ ~
O O a a O N W C~ p
o THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM O _ m ~ Q Q
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB IMPACTS N O f~ ~ - ~ r II z
WETLAND IMPACTS ~ W W -
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 304.00 S.F.± N ~ ~ I ~ ~ a oC U Q cC
0 J ~ W W Z _ m
0= ~ m
w w APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: 1l ~ T Q Q W
r
L..' vvc i L-r\rvU uvirr.~, i o w Z W v
ci N W ~Q J
m Q D Q w 0 0 0
o LLLLWETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 9.24 ACRES± Q 0= U) C/)
y'-~''• THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 304.00 S.F.± soo' o' 1 eo' soo1 soo' 600' 900'

o
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: N ~ w
m > d O~j
~ ~ APPRO) APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED CONVERSIONS: ~ °i' m ° v
~ ~ ~ WETLAI WETLAND LIMITS
m a n!? a c~v ^-W ~ ~ m
APPRO) APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 0.48 ACRE± m ~ ~ ° m y
WETLAI WETLAND LIMITS W mN m ~N o q
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.001 ACRE± o= N o n o o m o
e°~3C amC
~ ~ ~ APPRO) APPROXIMATE EMERGENT ~/~~,qND CONTAINING GREATER 1.77 ACRES± w

~ WETLAI WETLAND LIMITS THAN 70%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
CONVERSION P~'~ ~
n~' „1, APPRO~ ~ APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER ~ H z
THAN 1 THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.25 ACRES± ~ W
~za
APPRO) APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: ?a o ~
~ ~
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 16.00 S.F.± z
EXISTIN EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS
SCRUB SHRUB IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.±
PROPO PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.±
WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 64.00 S.F.±
° ~ APPRO; ° APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
~ ~ ~ WETLAI WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 80.00 S.F.±
° APPRO;
o APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB
° WETLAI ~`~l M WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY:
r
O
APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.25 ACRES± ~
o EX A EMENT ~ APPRO~ m (STING 100E S
~~=1... ° ~ ~ ~ WETLAI WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 80.00 S.F.± a
~ ~ PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT C? ~ Z
` ° „ r V + ~ ,
J 0 ° ~ TAI 0 ° WE L WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER
P ~ THAN 1 THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS
U
w~
° 0 ~ Z
al
3Y~
g a
p/ ~ LL ~ W ~
O ~ _ ~c
~ LL
Q WY~o~
W ~N2VV
Z J
W

Z w_
d
Q
° cn ° g~
~ o U a
Q d
o~ Z
~ o ~ o
U G ~ ~ c~i Z
Q 7 a
°o ~
°
p o s ~d ~ T° 0
v U } g ~ o
w t
m EXISTING 100 EASEMENT o 3 o
o d a -~J~__ 90 ~ ° o
~ PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT -
~ g ~ o ~O Q ° ~ W
' a ~
L ~ lp"V -s:. j,..,
~ ~ ~ ~ a a
, o m ~ ~ Q Q
t "t•' ~ 't a { t ~ ~ r u ~ z
ui W w
~ J J a bC U Q o~C
Y U_
2 G o~ ~ cWn m ? m >
r.C)NTP`~N~ri ~M a ~ r
WLA tic) OIS-j JUV Q LJ LU ET M w w U DIU
0%) T AXO W U) Z J m 1 > m Q D
WETLANDS CONTAINING
D m CO C/)
70%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM [it I Q w 0 0 0 27~~~ - I ~ I
300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 900'

~ ~ o N •Id
+ ~ ry o ~I
~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~
o ~ N ~
O ~ ~ o N ~ q
N NN O O
o N O N N V
o _~°w° " ~ ~ ~ O
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
3 i i
~ N NO N~r ~~O W N m ~ O ~ ~O
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT s---'''~"~ ~ N E N O C R ~1 ~ N r ~ L~ ~ L N
of ~r O=~ ~ UO ONO •M
~3r ~~r ~ p
W
8~ __-d---~-._---°
a
x ~ ~
N ~ z
$I z~
w w
1~"'1 ~ a
8I ~z ao
a o
~x ~x
z
0 0
0 o
0 0
o m o
EXISTING 700' EASEMENT 0 o 0
0
~ 8 \ PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT ~I
gl Q
~
~I . c . d
. y y~ y i yt~Yy Yy VyW~O V i i ~~w~r~~rr~~r

gl \
¦
¦
W w
EAGLE CREEK
I GOLF COURSE
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS:
APPROXIMATE FORESTED
~'~~'y~' WETLAND LIMITS PROPOSED CONVERSIONS: W
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 2.72 ACRES±
W
WETLAND LIMITS
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.10 ACRE±
o, APPROXIMATE EMERGENT
w ~v WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
a WETLAND LIMITS W THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
Z CONVERSION
~ APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER
W THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.82 ACRES±
a
F ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS:
a a
z
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 96.00 S.F.± 0
Q ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS
r~ z o -
~ SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± o ~
s N ~
o ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 16.00 S.F.± r ~
t ~ m ~ ~
3 WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± ~ ~ W
~ O O
a THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM ~o APPROXIMATE FORESTED ~ N ~ ~ ~
m WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS Q W W
~ ~ T- W ~
o TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 112.00 S.F.± O W W O ~ ~
O O W W O N W ~ O
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB O _ m ~ ~ Q Q
N WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: N O ~ f~ ~ - ~ r II Z
0 ~ W W -
Z N ~ F- Z ~ (3 ~ a ~ U ~
y y y A~/P~i ONIDMAMPE EMSRGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.82 ACRE± - J W Q - - ~ W Z o0 ~ _
~ ~ 00
m ~ , II I U I AL S I HUG I UHt IMF'AG IS 112. 00 S.F.± II Q u 5 w
w w U cn z I m
W > m Q
WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER Q w 0 0 0
THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS o m CO U)
300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 600' 900'

Y k
i ~ ~ o
N m
i I ~ O ~ N O ~
i C NVER I N BY TAT S E. TR T IMPA 7 S UC URE ti MPA T BY STATE: ~ ~ r ~
T ANALYSIS. OVERALL IMPA
s ~ o N q N NN ~~q tC~
lU m N N O U
VIR INIA WETLAND G S ~ VIRGINIA WET VER ION: PR P ED N 0 OS C A W ETLAN D ~ N Ol Q._ d N ~ C U>W ~ m~ C ~O ~
s FORESTED WETLANDS 5.05 ACRES ± FORESTED WETLANDS 160.OOS.F. ± v cLr Yarn q
L ~o o» m mc~ ~
SIGN 27.83 ACRES± SCRUB SHRUB WETLANDS 1.88 ACRES ± SCRUB SHRUB WETLANDS FORESTED WETLAND CONVER 4.00 S.F. ± ~n~o ro~r ~>co S 6 N ~
W N ffl~N ~OO EN E.. O ~
EMERGENT WETLANDS 0.00 ACRE ± EMERGENT WETLANDS 16.00 S.F. ± $ ro~ o~v o~~~ o O=N QUO 010
VER I N 1. ARE ± SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CON S 0 98 C S WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER 5.20 ACRES ± WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATEI c~~C r[[°? ~cn~ ~ GREATER 176.00 S.F. + q _ w
0 0 THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM iTICHUM
WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 6.97 ACRES±
TOTAL WETLANDS 12.13 ACRES ± TOTAL WETLANDS THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM 416.00 S.F. ± ~ ~a
CONVERSION ~ ~ H ~ z
NORTH CAROLINA WETLA INA 1 NDS. NORTH CAROL LINA WETLANDS: ~ z
TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 36.78 ACRE+ + w + ~
- FORESTED WETLANDS 22.78 ACRES _ FORESTED WETLANDS 896.00 S.F. _ . ~ f~,
w ~ ~ SCRUB SHRUB WETLANDS 0.10 ACRE ± SCRUB SHRUB WETLANDS ~z )S 0.00 S.F. ± ~
ao
PR P ED TR TURE IMPACTS: 0 OS S UC + EMERGENT WETLANDS 0.00 ACRE _ EMERGENT WETLANDS 16.00 S.F. ± ~ ~
WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER 1.77 ACRES ± WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATEI _ Z GREATER 0.00 S.F. +
F T D WETLAND IMPA TS 992.00 S.F.± 0 0 ORES E C THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM iTICHUM
TOTAL WETLANDS 24. ACRES ± TOTAL WETLANDS 65 912.00 S.F. ±
r SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 64.00 S.F.+
TOTAL CONVER I N M ~ T TAL IMPA T l S 0 SU MARY. C S 0 ACT SUMMARY. -
WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 176.00 S.F.+ I ' L m.
° M THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHU VIRGINIA TOTAL VIRGINIA TOTAL v E d ~ f~ I'
IMPACTS WET + .
LAND CONVERSION 12.13 ACRES _ WETLAND IMPACTS 416.00 S.F. ± ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = al
a a ~ ~ r ~ r c~ ~
NORTH CAROLINA TOTAL + NORTH CAROLINA EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 16.00 S.F._ ~r ~ ~ ° ~ .
WETLAND CONVERSION 24.65 ACRES ± TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS . F. ± fS 912 00 S ~ ~ ~ . >lllllleeeeee,,, ~ ~ : , 9 N'
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS 1248.00 S.F.±
ry 1 .A'~ + e
TOTAL WETLAND CONVER I N ± T S 0 36.78 ACRES TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPAC S .CTS 1328.00 S.F. _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ ;,t~"",, B k ; t r: x4
- ~ - T , ~ I ~ ~ c~' .y~; ~
0 C , ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ , x , T TAL IMPA T SUMMARY: ' ~ ~ i ~ _ - ' ~ ~ ~a` r + w ,b,.,: ~ F. s.
, . ,a a " , rows i ' r°*r , ; ' ~ sue, -'3 A , dx ~r i ? ~ ~ f1 tj r': a _ a
~ - ~ A (ON s~ j H
36.78 ACRE± ~ ~ = t~ ~ ~ ~ { 1 ~~,~t TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION ~ ` ~ ~ . ~ ~ i.. ~ I . - ~ ~ 1 . , , ~ . a , t, ~ I..` ; - y Y kfs'i. i(~s~.t t ~r'.'. t t y # ` ?e`,! ~'~t + SF° ' ~ , . _ ~ ~ ~ M € ~ ~ ~ ~
a R T TAL WETLAND IMPA T + ~~~t.a:~_ ~ , ' - ~ ' 0 C S 1328.00 S.F._ ~ ~ _ ,t ~F r. ~ /IA a 1
, t _ S - I~ t ~ ~ I i ~ ~ :'t' ~ ° ~ 1 e~ ` t `t Ids: ~ ~ ':n',e~ ~ ~ ,I _ ~ , , f t, , , _ t ~ a` ~ _ {j f ~ i x r o i - r . !
, i ;t. „ { t~ ti,.4a - ~ r ~'1 - r. ! .bJ. , i' ;tl 1ai,' a: ~ ~ I ~ " x - e } ~ - ~ ~
t _ a ~ , ~ ~ . _ t .:_:I . 1 ~ „ . , ,{t,r ,-,a F 1 ~ . . ~ - 1 .a
~'1 I ~ r , ,I,k~~. _ ~ _ r It ~ • i'~~ t",{ t,i,' a ra'{r.{,fl mG'- , , r i _ ~ i t , ~ „ ~ , " z ! I ~ ix , `
~ . tt #tt t { 3 =~`:J i I I ~ ,r r r _ .t ~ i a. t ~'I' +~a ( a r t'~t , , ,i t _ ~ ; . _ 1 ; ~ , I~ i -.I~<., ~ .L ~ iii .~i. 4- ` ~ i~`-~ _ _ ''il r4"kt~" 1 'ii7~, I k , _ 1 GJ o _ ti r Wis. ~
1 ,gyn. : . .r ifi ' e ~ a i ~ w
' 1 . , ~ .w, ~ . i _ - a _ _ r . _ . ~ + ; _ i Iu . _ r , r - - .
, ~w ; , l it t~t(~1 .1., ill£xa!(yxi1541k ~ 1~ _ SY.t ,S', ~~-l _ ~ ',tC."', - {tt t l 1 , t ; ~ , , tilt , , a : ~ f ",r ! w
f~ W ~x
- ..~j, # ~ ~ P ! ;1~~ I ~i a :t It'~I" ~q (~~1 t ~ ,v lam'' ( I:''.,. . ! _ , s-.k .rl' t. , {r. n.-` , i4ltl r, ~ r i`.. t' ~ , 1 t~ . i + ~S , ; icy -.J'„~~.p u:. t Y:`- - {,1. F,tt""{X I~( '~;.1 £ I' I I{°.1.N i £l 1{r t f
s ,~4 ~ k , t .,s ~ _ i, E~ 'I { I'f,'r~ I t4ly ,I t.s. ai, s I,. . ~a
' ~ ~ - , ~ - s - ' ; _ _ ~ r . _ ,i I RA 'i . ~ a o. , 1:3 ~ ` fin. £1~, r,'" I,t{3- 1 "~I t t ~ I " ~ , + ~ r.
. ' ' i _ ii i y r ,e..:. , .Y% ~ 'y ~ ~ 1 ~ _ t~, ,M ky «I.II (r,, 'tip ar f t e. f ' a ` +'*5+..~- , f. ~ ':~..t - c x`a^~ t 'i~ ~ttalrl. ,I '<r I. 'i #t ~ f
- - t. -,u.:.:.:. , r= r. - ~ ~ _>.y c~5:. ...11',Ot aat °w 1(.I°;y`l r'II , x a , 'ir_ t ] [ ~ ~ .It ~~J'1k t11r,. t.,;4 1,l.,i;. , i ~ ..A-, ,a .t. i` r ~ It I I~)r tt r, (-stl ti'I ~ ~~''t , , , ' ='4' E x,, . V
. . .,j I« ~ ; v , , _ , . ~ ' , . ~ ~ _°r , , t ~f _ 4~ k , ~ ~i' F.. { y, { { d .n3
, _ maK._~._ ' , ~ ..:e .s,.:^ , > t ,',i" v.,a, j :a1 is it r(. 4{t Itl. (II,+~"'tt lljl a« ,i({,.,.i:.tc, jf~., v;~~ . m e . t . t ! ~ s - - y s, S~ .,~=rr-;,°... ~ .e~ , it., t fri e. I ,.,i rl.,, .l I.11'" r " • a :~s ~ ~ Ir: ~ , t
'd r s r . . . ' ~d ;r ~g , , ~ o, (i 1" t r { 1 (,'tl lrllt Flt' i ~ta sl' , b _ 1... ,`xc~„ ~ > ; 1 ',f { I '-`i It t! 1°II i t~ ~Jr~ • : ~ W ~~ti~;~ z~:
t°:. ~ ' 1 t :°I .ji I£na(t1~,#+I rl 3('. - l ~'k, 4:z ~,r r f, , t a . 4 1 r s >.-,,.~`7t ":..h. ~ _ . t s r, , a k~~ a~ti£~~t4°. , lt. t 'r r'; i {`1,5111, i=rt k14~ ql' t. ~;i.~s w
x _ 4 i a ~ I ~ " , `'~a,l r 'ri,; a" , 1 1 .,,~VI&~ 'tt, to tat, ' tl -n'i ~ ' +f . w~ , f , , „ r s a,. ,„ti... . , , . ~ . a- t~ a , C. ~ c'.~.,y k 5 y! 1 +~i-,"t, r f jx 4 ~ ~ `
t . .~.,,.J` r., a.:'.: _ ~ J_ per.. • `t c` A I t. " ! '4... . ~ 6. a 14. . ~ £ .ter a{d. 1 :i, 3i.i, ! + a. ,.r. I s .i f. , , , r :I a• t ~''t. 't .ii,l5.r4 i' }'t
~ r 1 , :c -d ,a r ~ . , . ~ i ,y`4. i . 1, 1 (,.,r' li l f ,f xr a .';n"~. . - i 1 I' : - s. q 1 f~ i I:. ,I. t 3tt t . ,...`n • , ` t kitt. , rr '"i' ~'I '~:t ,d«,t :r I t, ~i v,.+.. . ;`t 1 r r
t 't ~ r,, y, ..I . i . ( ,,K r~-.. F 1:, tt t I ~~t' r,~i~Pn"li, r."_ - , ~ t . ,a - p ,y t _ ~ r ~ ~ ~ s _ > ~ ~a
f ,l ; :;fib ~ f ~ It ~ .i I dl ty11, a a~5 , ' ~y j , , ° k ni ~r 1 ~ -5:- ~ w - .i' l - ~ ~ 1 ~'af
i D ° ll ~ { 1 = a t ~ a $.1 ~,t ~ r !xt . (sll 5i.:.+. t li>.-li ..5 _ it i g rt,.i'} .e.Ir #lt rb. .Y .a~,,,...~ ~ t, l4,n tt;t '4 i+ I„~, ~,_1a. t 1, ~ i ~ z . w z 4 , " t ' t .rat ,t ` F ; f at.: s 4- : tre 3 tf ~ c ~ ~ 4 „{Z , . t' a Y x » 1 ! 4, ~ .:1 ( 4. x. k - Tir ~ y; i ~
s;, .._f v, . „ . f;, ' z~ °°i itr;#i%'.~. k, a,s - 1 I: , t '~'1 r 1" ' { y , ~ i - o ' : ' - - i 5.1 i -r , I i +ct'S. 1 i , f.! t , ..~.1 .t ' _ - , _ , ~ t' a ~ u
' . ` t < w r . p , - ~ .:°_.l`~,t, , , _,1 f'iir~ tr~Y t, 4r,,, t, . ~5, - ~
_ ' 1. I_.. Ir:',t i` 6 ~ .-t"' I ~ itt 'ti~a~ _ Y ~ £ ~ . ~ 1 . ~ _y., y s (t r.~ u ~ it : " y I t , r- t` P " , 7 ( ~iw `~i r' I .,~4 ~ d*-u).- i . s, ~e ..o ~
, , r~. 3 { I . r ~ , `"a~ . ft. I ~ Jr7,{ i `I , , rn. i ~4 " ~L• t tl t t ~ t p 1 rc `t'e.w , . ~ f. _ ' y , < , '~"~,r ..I, { r s ~ .':~~.a - I.' ~ `t r" " I (,i " ,-I Ii _ t ~ J i.'. °l i # ~ ~ ~ , y. s k t r J;:._ 7 . - ' _ - ~ , ' r
4 _ , r} : E r ~ ; , Fy ,
O i , n x.. a ' „ . , , - - { ~ , ~ - ~ h,e f ' i , ,
- , " r " ~ ~Af t.. '..y1 t• t' .:.t ikl'{"•i?~ ,r'. ~',,L- t{?; , 'i y~ .9 nom,. y~ ~ ° e 3 ~ d ~ _ - 'm ~ - fi.s e.. 4 ;n YI
, e 1 r ` W at, - ~ it I' ~LII VA ~1, t ~ c , 4 ~ a <4 ~ f ~s~,,~. ~ ~ ~ IR i. ~ . ' ~ ~ ~.y _ t€ ~w
.r. ' i ( A ' tip 1 i ~ ~ - a . , a s p _ , 7 ~ ~ , . it ~ ~ ~ - 1 t t i £ - t t . ~ 1"t t x.e+'" ~ i- _ .r- 5''. ^I
s s' ' ' ' .k r . . _ ~ ~ , , , _ r . J +'41:~k E. jt `-i., ~ ~;~x t,i el 1 k fi I`4 +k~ ~ 4 T °5.v ate: ( , „~~y. ~ yS
, , r Sid, ~ ~ - r / ~ { ?a.~lllll ,i.i:' I, . , ~ i i r R n' ~ ~ & y::~i~'*
, + * ;1 . : _ . ~ ...u;tl 1 ~ , f`_, r, r_ ~ . i 4 4 U.
' s r T
l., 1 ~ ~ gyp„ - r , . 9 ' _ , _ ~ U
I ' 1 i 4 _ . ~ : ~ it ' a ,w o- t a ~ r~e , l'J
Q , . Y ~ o, ,r l I t' I ~ .ti7 j' f' O
G 4 "w ,h: 'r., 4 ~ 1 'It rr1 r it (y r,', .I °r - > , _ . . i . . r , W N Q
r ` 'r# '°'-a ` t' ~ , ' { T ~ A,. i- rl 1j1 tl I"• 1 r # ~ 'M I t !'r `il ~:L 1~ + ' "fi ~ Yy ~(#,1 °1 III r _ ~ ,;>K,.~:. ~ ~ - ~ 5 ~ / ~ 3"t4,~_•;1 ~,ut {~I.~ i t. ~,I tl.u~ , , ~j~ m _ 'Y` ~
, .r e ' , , e: / , O f5 ,.'I ti'ke i~ il'l{ 1~ ii I .t~ ' ~ ` `U { ~ jj _ , . .J >3 o ai' { 1 y'Ii~#rtlt+t, i,,l.. `I, i~ j ~l. fi ;a`s,~ 1r , . . R~,.
k` { ~ ~ - ..d~ _ 1 Y'~t111 t' ~.s `i',. _ ~'w:, k sw ew ~ , " ~,.,.a ; £ ep 11 , Z m ~ r
HICK Y S~ TION , .I - ~ e # i ` 3s a.1 }i.~ f 1 a u ~ O s ~ s ~ i y i.. < ~ M
~ ~s~P4 'rY ~ . + p , z ~ . A ~ t It.w 1 ial la 11," ! ` i I ~ 15 j e f , ; , i i ' . - - , ' t, t I, ~ _ ~r i ~y~ 1, p .t_,Ii,. ~i t1b ,+`I I,t 1:" t • r±. I1r , _ , ~ , :tt~ # ~ ~ c ~ 1, z1~1 »i.., ~i,.71 k.I ~{{tl ,i' I "~,,,1,: ~ 5 a x.. ~ ~ j ~ `•J M d, . ~ ~ W
'.I , w" I i:, =1~ 3+;a '~~Y, 4 :w = s ~ " ~.-•,I,,:= _y i 11 e ! t I. ' . ( ''I 13 ti + '3• , r u ~ ~ O
f , 4 ! . , , , ; , t ` { y. , 5 N~ ` N W ~ . W
~ ' ' , } 1 ,s' ~ ,t! ` a, ~ , ~i e 'k `k `t.. ° . 1 _ ` e ,I i..:.i ,i 1'i I~ , ~a' ~ _ ~t~{~ ~,~.r ' i:~~ ~y , 0 tee, . _ LA W
L ~ .y ~ . b r. a s,. C7 r
" , ~ r + .ff*+ t~, 9:.., ~ c- ,t~ , .4.tr' ~ t~ ' S' tll 1 #k{! _ I,I; , 0 . L i ~ : 1. ~ a ,n a'^ ~ I I l , •'I , ' i iSe - i i l"~=t't 1 " ~ ' yap Q O a ,r ~ y ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~
" ' z .1 a. 't a, _._f i . ~ t t .~r ~ i'#I 1 i.- f .t~ I ~ _ w£y, 3'. t ~ 5 ,i+il . , „tt P ~Iltl'~rt ~,I+' I . #a., t4, ~ ~~~,:r .i ';a~#( , t , Q i j , ~ I I~,.'~:" ii I{. 11 1 r ,rrl jf ,I el. ai - Itl'~.i I+`t.l a. + , „ , r a ,I i'. . ; I t °Ur t i "4 a t l t', t I. 3~ ~ is ~ O N W ~ ~ ~ Fri s; i - ~ 'S £4 , n ~ i'~ r L. < s;t yr
# , _ a a... t. t.: ~ 3. Y. ,:'1,.t. 1. r1lt: .".I,tl.ti_I1 s., t,. tl II'.t~ i , ~ _r tl , t,, I t , : I ,y~r - I t l t . , , ~ , / ~ i" t # ~ ~ ti, !I, 4.;11 t F ~H-) li its"#liiltr,"Lt~e ~ ,4_p' s ; 1 R , N ~ ~
f f t, L - ~ , tir t' ~ ~ [y i F ~ ~ 1 I! I ,~I~ : ttl I ~ I i ~ 1~,~ ~ 'C" ~t ~a i.l~ l t ,'li'#6,~ (.t`tl , , 't a F l.a t ~ Y ~ A ~ W W
~ " „ ` l F i t I { ~ ' S I([IH.:~Af 7.twi ~ e ~ . ( I { - It I' ~ i "i ~ s , " . , - - , , _ I . , I t t a-, a ~ 1 ~ ~ I N (A
gyn. oCUQ
0 Y U J ~ W W CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10 FOOT ? m ~ ~ ~ m
2 (j r w
ei LO Q w w U
r d r
S O mQ::)
O r 7 w _ (n z J 0= Q w 0 0 0
r 4000 0' 2000' 4000' 8000' 12000' a U) U)
4 }
f
tr S ~I

~ ~ o N N
~ M
3 O ~ ~ (4 ~
~ ~ ~
~0 ~1 P7 0 N ~ j
8 of N NN ~ O
N ~ N N (fl U C 'c ~ N O
i ~ ~ Q~ dN ~
EXISTING 100 EASEMENT _ > ~ ~ b1 cr C ~ O y.1
UOlO~D 0» NCB N 7 (0 ~ . C'7 C ~ r Q~
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT N N o ~ ~ r m > co
w a mom ~~o Ea ~N o c~ p
~ ~f~ ~LV ~ Lch o=~n ~ o0 0 ~o ~ ~e c~~C rOC00 vcnC
HICKORY w
SUBSTATION
ok°~
~ z
z~
w
~ a
Y' Z FF-~-~~ ~ 1~
Q a o
~x ~
z
Q
Q' x~ 5~
11
a` V 1
~k~
1
P ~
.~G~
¦
¦
W w
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: N~
P
APPROXIMATE FORESTED ~t
~'y~'~~' WETLAND LIMITS PROPOSED CONVERSIONS:
1, W
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE±
WETLAND LIMITS ~4l
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE±
~ \1
~Wyw~ APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
WETLAND LIMITS THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM ~~4
m 1F X~
a CONVERSION EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
Z APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER
PROPOSED 50 EASEMENT
~y * THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE±
Q ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS:
Q FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.±
a ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS Z
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± 0
v ok ('7 Z
a O
PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± O
N Q
0 ~ 00
o WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± ~ T
t ~ THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM rI-n VJ Q
m APPROXIMATE FORESTED ~ ~ W
a ~ WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS ~ o O
~ ~ N ~ ~ ~
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± ~ Q W W A ~
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB
9 WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: O W d ~ ~ ~
O O ~ d O N W ~ O
O _ m ~ ~ Q Q N O ~ f~ ~ -
_ ~ r II Z
o y' y' APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE± ~ W W -
o WETLAND IMPACTS a J OC U OC
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± J W Q - - ~ W Z m ~ _ ~
~n ~ m LL T
c~-~--s~f-i n i r1 ~ II I
CY) WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER \ Q u LJJ
W W U `
THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS W (n Z J fr ~ m Q
0 0 Q W p U 0
o C (A (n
/ 300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 600 900,
~P

o ~ N `N
~ O ~ ~ O ~ ti

~ ~ ~ ~ c i p N ~ ~i
a NN u~o 0 ro ON N O
a ~ Lro roo
N ~ Q._ d N ~
>rn cn.~~ ~ roo ~ U ~ ~.E~
~ 3~ o>m m ~r 0
u~~o ro~~ ro>co roNa ro ~ - W ~N m~cv 00~ ry
~tlr rL~ o L"' 0 (h
c~~C ~~00 ~cnC ~
EXISTING 700' EASEMENT
W
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT
^y/
U
~ z
z~
w
~ ~
~z ao
o
~x _ - r~
z
^h/
yyi
o~
X a°
w~~
o° X
,~o
¦
¦
W w
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS:
~'yw~~' APPROXIMATE FORESTED
y WETLAND LIMITS PROPOSED CONVERSIONS:
O 0
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 1.06 ACRES± \ QOP W
WETLAND LIMITS ~
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 7.83 ACRES± Q~ ~ o~
x ~0
yywyy APPROXIMATE EMERGENT ~/~~,qND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
WETLAND LIMITS '
3 THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
~O CONVERSION
Z APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER J ~ ~ W ~
THAN 70% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.8g ACRES± PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT ~
Q ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: o° o"
,1
a FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 32.00 S.F.±
~ ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 64.00 S.F.± a z
PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WEf"LAND IMPACTS 16.00 S.F.± ~ z
O -
0 X O N Q
WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± ~ ~
1"'
APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 7 0% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM W VJ
a y y y WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS r~rn
m ~ ~ W
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 172.00 S.F.± ~ ~ O ~ O ~
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB ~ ~ N - ~ ~ ~
~ ~ Q r ~r ~ W ~ W
°`o WETLAND IMPACTS o ('7 r W ~ o O LL ~
ro TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: ~ ~ o ~ 0 O O W W
O N W C~ O
o APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.89 ACRE± O _ m ~ ~ Q N Q O ~ ~ ~ -
a w WETLAND IMPACTS r II z ~ W W -
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 712.00 S.F.±
z J oC U OC
W Q -
.~t~'^~ w~i a~in~ nnnirninunin r_RGOT~o h ~ m
I` - - ~ r v v V Y 1 / 111 Y11 Ytll \AI IL/ \ ( LI I r L`' O LL T
THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACT S Q W W U
0 0 ~ W W Z J
r i J ~ \ m ]
Q W p U 0
300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 9 00, 900, D Cc U) CO

~ ~ o
N m p
~ O Q
~ O ~ ~I r iy
00 > ~ Q
c~ 0 N ~ a Na ~ 0
EXISTING 700' EASEMENT m m N N co U
C L ~ N O NOl Q~ dN ~
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT UFO ~ O~ C ~O y. U O~ 0 L~ N C~
° ° N 7(0 ~~(h C Q
o ° $ NCO ro~f~ ~>(p ~y o
~I 0I ~I rn ° o ° W N m pN ~ pj0 rn N a ~N O C~ m p l0~ r~~ ~ LC9 0
m _ Q1 ~ ~ UO ~ NO
r~~C roC°D ~inC ~ _
ml u~ W
8
ml ~ _ • G ml d ~ ~ _ J
A
Q
~ ~ U E~
as z z~
,_-`1 w
~ a
~z
~o a o
~x
z
W I m I SLIGO
SUBSTATION 8
c ,
W
X
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS:
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
'~~,~'y+ APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT
WETLAND LIMITS PROPOSED CONVERSIONS: W
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 9.36 ACRES± x
WETLAND LIMITS IL
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE± tf
~ y w APPROXIMATE EMERGENT
a Wyy~~" WETLAND LIMITS WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
W THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM w ~ . ~
Z CONVERSION W ~ ~ i ~ _ i~i~ i
i~ ~ ~
~~',j~'~~ APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER ~v ~.a y W ~ Y p
W THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 9.36 ACRES± i i ~ `Y Y 0
a 'Y i ~ '1' 'Y i i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
F ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
i i 'Y i ~ t t ~
a a i ~ 4 ~
~ ~ ~ i i r $ V
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 336.00 S.F.± ~ ~ ~
o ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS ~ ~ ~ 0 0
~ SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± ~ o
s =~x r•.w. ~v. ~ - ~ ~ O
~ .
0 o ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± ~".k . ~ w N O Y ~h ~ . x Q
v
t ~ T
o WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± W rI- VJ
(/II~~ O
W ~'y APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 70%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM ~ ~ W oo V Q
o, WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS 0 o ~ N -
o I- > ~ + Q W W 0
a TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 336.00 S.F.±
3 ~ APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB O W W ~ ~ 0
~ ~ O O W d. ~ O N W C') O
WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: ~ O _ m ~ ~ Q Q
0 N O ~ f~ ~ -
Z ~ W W -
N } F- I ~ C'3 ~ a ~ U oC
_ WETLOANID MPACTSRGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 9.36 ACRES± J W Q - - ~ W Z m
~ ~ m - >
n II I U I AL 61 FiUCTURE IMPACTS 336.00 S.F.± II LL T
Q C) W
o WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER w U _ Z w
J W L I- > in Q
THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS Q w 0 0 0
21m 71 0 Ir ~ (n
300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 300' 900'

o N q~dy
0
N N W
~ 0 0 ~
N oN N q
N O
m `rn N m ~ U - c
8I m~m ~n~ an
>rn Nwo cmo w
gl ~ w~ j>m m mm Y~1
~ ~ NI \ W E N m~ N O c t Q
O l6 t~ L O l7 M C
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT ~-N aU0 ~U,10
m~C r¢°D emC
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT ~T ~I W
0
0 0
o r _ ~ .a ~
0 O N
o ~ o _s - ~ ~ ~ - a~ z z
o ~ ~ 0 ~W~
o o a
o ~ 0
rn m ~z~
0
~x~°
f.}.+. ; i • i i i 5
w w z
~i~d;,
W
o,
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
0
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT N m~ {
0
0
_ o
8 0
o , ~ Q
O t
(P r
o i Z
i• r '
+ t, <<
~ t t
v ] ~ Y
y' lY-r,'w rye rYt YY [~1ri 'F 5' { 1' V ' Y Y Y Y N 5' 'v Y' Y` 5 4 f o>Z
-
3Y~
LEGEND: HEFT 2 IMPA TAN a _
S C ALYSIS: Q 0~
~ ~ APPF ~ LLO W V APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED CONVERSIONS:

WETI WETLAND LIMITS ,A O ~ = U
APPF APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 3.49 ACRES± F~ ^ ~ LL ~
WETI WETLAND LIMITS V W O O
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE±
W', ~
~ ~ ~ APPF 3 Vr Vr yy' APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE± 5 Z = ~ ~
~ WETI WETLAND LIMITS THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM ~ N ,Z U U
W Z
J CONVERSION
~ ~ n~ ~ _ , ,APPF APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER
~
z ~ THAI W THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 3.49 ACRES±
d Q
~ APPF APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS:
U Q
a
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 144.00 S.F.± Z
U
Q EXI " d EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS ~ rS Z
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± °o ~
c~ N Q
0
o PROF EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS ~ m
U W
N
3 WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± ~ ~ ~ ~ o w
a° ~ ~ ro ~ ~ APPF
APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM ~ N ~
~ ~ ~ WETI WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS ~ ~ w p
o '
0 TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 144.00 S.F.± co °o ~ o a a
~ APPF APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB o N m~ o Q Q
WETI WETLAND IMPACTS N ° ~ r u ~ Z
0 TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: ~
~ ~ a oC U Q o~C
0 Y
~ ~ APPF z APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 3.49 ACRES± pC ~ u m z m >
J~ ,L J~ l A !r'Tt
C; u vvr- VVC 1 LFIIVLI nvirr,~ i o II TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 144.00 S.F.± II W ~ Z w J C)
LO r
o 0 V. WET[ ~ > m Q WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER
r < THAN 70%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS ~ O ~ O
THAN J
300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 900'

~ ~ o N Y~.y~
a m M
m ~ O ~ ~ O ~
~ ~ m ~
o ~ ? Oj ~ ~ ~N ~
- a Na o 0
o (6 ~ N N O V + C 'C ~ N O
m ~ a a a R1
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
o ~ OaOD O~~t N~~~ I1~,1
N N O ~ r co
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT
8I ~ _ O - ~ ~ U Oro ~p ~ O •~1
W
.
Q r-~ ~i
~
~ z z~
w
~ a
~z
of ao a o
~x ~ x
~
0 0
0
o
0 o m o
~ \ \ EXISTING 100' EASEMENT 0 o ~
0 0
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT gI Z
Q
\ \ ~I ~I ~
~~y
gl ~V,~V Yy Y 1 • y. YYyV Y YW'Yy W,~Y~ ~~w~w~~~~~~~~~

'I i EAGLE CREEK W
GOLF COURSE
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS:
~'~yyy APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED CONVERSIONS:
W
~ y WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 2.72 ACRES±
WETLAND LIMITS
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.7 0 ACRE±
3 ~'~~'Wy' APPROXIMATE EMERGENT y~/~~,gND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
W WETLAND LIMITS THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
Z CONVERSION
~y~~'"`~ APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER
W 'm~~'~ THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.82 ACRES±
a
F ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS:
a
a
~n FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 96.00 S.F.± z
0
Q ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS z
~ SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± o -
s o ~ N Q
~ EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS + o ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS 16.00 S.F._ T }
W
t VJ Q
3 WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± ~ O W ~ O
am y APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM O ~
~ N - ~ ~ ~
a ~ WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS Q W W ~ ~
r W ~
o TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 172.00 S.F.± O W d O O O W d
9 ~ APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB O N W ~ O
WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: O _ m ~ O Q Q N O ~ f~ ~ -
0 (Y~ r ~ ~ z
~ W W - N } ~ I ~ C~
a ~ ~ oC U oC
~ APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.82 ACRE± J W Q - - ~ W z o0 ~ _ ~ ~ 00
VVCI LFIIVL.I iivirr.~.i0 TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS u- > T
n 172.00 S.F.± Q w w U
Z w J Cc Li
WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER 0 > m Q D
Q w/y~ 0 0~/~ 0~/~
THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS :I== 7 0 LL U) VJ
300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 600' 900'

o
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: N
m m m
~ APPROX APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED CONVERSIONS: ~ w`~' U
~ ~ ~ WETLAI~ C N WETLAND LIMITS
N W d W d(~ ~ i- N C C N
APPROX APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 0.48 ACRE± ~ o ; = Wm ~
no 'aa~ 10>~0
WETLAI~ WETLAND LIMITS ~ m = ~ ~
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.001 ACRE± °o=-"~ o=~ o ° o S a v o I m o ~n3C n¢°D am^
~ ~ APPRO~ APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 1.77 ACRES± w
~ ~ ~ WETLAf~ WETLAND LIMITS THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
CONVERSION f~ ~
c
APPROX ~ APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER ~ H ~
~ THAN 1( THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.25 ACRES± ~ W Z
~za
APPRO~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: ~ O~ ~
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 16.00 S.F.± z
EXISTING EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS
SCRUB SHRUB IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.±
o PROPO~ 0 PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.±
WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 64.00 S.F.±
o ~ ~ APPRO~ 0 APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
m ~ ~ ~ WETLA~
r WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 80.00 S.F.±
o
APPR ~ 0 APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB
~ WETLA~ WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY:

o 0
o EXISTING 100' EASEMENT APPRO~ APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.25 ACRES± ~
~ ~ WETLA~ WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 80.00 S.F.± a
~ ~_r P PROPOSED 50 EASEMENT
~ ~ o Q' o Z
0 ~ WETLA~ ~ WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER
P ~ ~ THAN 1( THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS ~ ~
U

o~ 0 > Z
3~~
a
~ ~°~'oW~
F~~~~
o~ LL
~ pg/ Q WY~~
~ =V~j
a
W
Z
J W
W
Z
W_ a
Q
0 ~ o
~ o
U a Q
a
~ o oI z
U o G ~
a ~ _ c~ Z
~ o N Q
0 J f / ~ D
0 a sl J }
U W g ~ ~ ~ m
~ EXI TIN 1 'EASEMENT S G 00 0
3 o
d `o~ a * ~ . ~o Q `V ru p w
~ a PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT o 0 ~
~ j t`~`- o ~ a ~ w
e ~ a a
3 ~ V f A'°' ~ V}' F 1 i' i t y
/ ° o m Q Q ~ ~ r u ~ z
^ ~y 1~. w
J J d oC U Q OC
Y
U_ 2
..r,n~TA1N~NG w a~~ S Z m>
DS Tlc"ulv' Q 0 G W
AN Is ~f l- D w w U W UM ODD w
00/0 TAX U) Z .J m 1 H m Q D
° ~ WETLANDS CONTAINING m U) U)
' 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM r7a 0 Q w 0 U 0 27,m 1 I
300' 0' 150' 300' 600' 900'

~ ~
o N
a~ p
p ~ cn co
ro m ~ ~ ro > ~
c~ o N ~ ~
N ~ N ~p rO~ N O) N N O V
N~ C .C ~ N O
N 01 Q.~ d N ~
~ 01~ C ~O y,~ UOOpD 0`~ N~~
~ ~>I~ C ~r Q~
y ~ in~o ro~r m>c~ N ^M~ W N ~]~N ~O~
yr: EN ~r, O C M O Nr rL~ C~LN ~
~ UO ~ ~O •h m~C roCCO ~cnC ~
` r~ w
j" '
~a
'J~ .._.Y ~ ' ~L ~
N MM C~' W F-I
S y~iii z~
w )a . ~ w wk
HR ,•.-~•,g,~ EXISTING 100 EASEMENT ~ G~ . r, Q' I--~
` ~ N I~
w~ - ~ '`4. ~ ~ . Q~ PROPOSED 50 EASEMENT t1'i
~•f
,,R,
~~ST/CH M
^ 7
O :t' "4`„
~ w ~ M1 ~ N
~x
;;W
W 2
J
hU

U
a
~~~dZf~ . I Yc N/
/a ¦
i
WETS ~ g ¦
i
70~ ~S CQ ' o/ EXISTING 1 Tq~Cpp~UM NT,q~N~N • ~ " :XISTING 100' EASEMENT w
W
DISTICN M ~ y ~ ROPOS PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT 0
0
0 T
LEGEND:
\ N
APPROXIMATE FORESTED W
y~~y~ WETLAND LIMITS SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS: `_1` APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB PROPOSED CONVERSIONS: ~
` o
0
~.~4 0
11 _g ~ ~ O
WETLAND LIMITS Q~ o
~ _y
~ y W APPROXIMATE EMERGENT FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 3.99 ACRES±
a ~'~y~~' WETLAND LIMITS SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.05 ACRE± - -
w u o ~
z ~
~ ~~Sy.~"~ APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 5.20 ACRES± _
W THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
a CONVERSION
a
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION +
Q 9.24 ACRES_
a
Z
0
Q ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: ri Z
o -
o ~ N p
FORESTED WET~.4ND IMPACTS 128.00 S.F.± 0
T }
~ ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.±
t n Q
~ O W ~ O
a w m EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± O ~
APPROXIMATE FORESTED ~ N - ~ ~ ~
m ~ WETLAND IMPACTS Q W W ~ ~
y`- WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 176.00 S.F.± C~ r W ~
O W fZ ~ ~ O O ~ d
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB M ACTS o TAXODIUM DISTICHUM O N W C~ O
O _ m ~ ~ Q Q N O ~ f~ ~ -
WETLAND IMPACTS _ ~ II Z
o TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 304.00 S.F.± ~ W W -
~ a ~ ~ ~ J W Q -
APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND ~ W Z m ~ ~ ~ (A m -
_ WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: LL ~ T
_ W W co z J 0=
> m Q D
g y t WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 9.24 ACRES--t r- I Q W 0 0 0
THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 304.00 S.F.± 0= U) C/) J
aoo' o' 150' soo' soo' 600' 900'

'MII,
~ ~ o
i N a
O RS ~ O ~
I CONVERSION BY TATE: , S TR T RE IMPA T VIPACTS BY STATE: ~ ~ ~ ~
S C U U VERALL IMPA T ANALYSIS. 0 C I
oN ~ a N N~ O o
ro ~N No V
VIRGINIA WETLANDS: W VIRGINIA ETL PR P ED NVERSION: 0 OS CO ~ WETLANDS. 'C N ~ O N Ql Q._ d N ~I C
FORESTED WETLANDS 5.05 ACRES ± FORESTED WETLANDS > W ~ 01 ~ Crop `til 160.00 S.F. v -co c L r Y~ rn a
o0 0>~ m mc~ ~ ~ ~co ~ cn C
FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 27.83 ACRES± SCRUB SHRUB WETLANDS 1.88 ACRES ± SCRUB SHRUB WETLANDS S 64.00 S.F. ± N~o mgr. ~>co N C
W N m 00 ~ ~O ~N ~N O Cd' a
EMERGENT WETLANDS + EMER ENT W TLAND 0.00 ACRE _ G E S 16.00 S.F. ± g o~~ o~L~ o O =N ~ UO ONO
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 1.98 ACRES± WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER 5.20 ACRES ± WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATEF r~~C ra[°D ~cn~ ~ GREATER 176.00 S.F. ± a
w
0 0 THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TICHUM
WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 6.97 ACRES±
TOTAL WETLANDS 12.13 ACRES ± TOTAL WETLAND o S THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM 416.00 S.F. ± L'3
I~
CONVERSION ~ ~ 'I E-+
NORTH CAROLINA WETLAND S N RTH CAROLINA U al Z )LINA WETLANDS: z
TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 36.78 ACRE+ w
- FORESTED WETLANDS 22.78 ACRES ± FORESTED WETLANDS 896.00 S. F. _ d ~ a
SCRUB SHRUB WETLANDS 0.10 ACRE ± SCRUB SHRUB WETLANDS ~z S 0.00 S.F. ± ~
ao a o
PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS: EMERGENT WETLANDS 0-00 ACRE ± EMERGE~IT• WETLANDS 16.00 S.F. ± ~ ~ ~ ~
WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER 1.77 ACRES ± WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATEF GREATER 0.00 S. F. ± Z
FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 992.00 S.F.± THAN 1 ° TAX DI M DI TI H M ° 0% O U S C U THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TICHUM
T TAL WETLAN + 0 DS 24.65 ACRES _ TOTAL WETLANDS 912.00 S.F. ±
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 64.00 S.F.±
TOTAL CONVERSI N M 0 SU MARY. TOTAL I M PACT S l WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 176.00 S.F.+ ACT SUMMARY:
:I y} A.~, e A
THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM VIRGINIA TOTAL VIRGINIA TOTAL 1 ` (L. 4 f y f n
IMPACTS + WETLAND CONVERSION 12.13 ACRES _ WETLAND IMPACTS 9~I I .t
416.00 S.F. ± - ~ ~ " " ,
+ NORTH CAROLINA TOTAL NORTH CAROLINA EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 16.00 S.F._
WETLAND CONVERSION 24.65 ACRES ± TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS 12.00 S. F. ± ~ ~ ~ ~ S 9 z f - ~ x a
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS + 1248.00 S.F._ ~ ~ 3 ¢y ~ t ~ E
r m. . + ,
TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 36.78 ACRES ± TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS STS 1328.00 S.F. _ " : . r ,4 { f
p . ~ , ~ ~
)fl a.r z.. 3 ~ '~~fy = ;i}~ . ~ w~ ~`r.v 9;' +I ~~it1 - TOTAL IMPACT UMMARY: ~ r, 7 K 5,.~ II ~ "ti € Y j I i ^ ;e 'f A r. ` xis . k R sI{5, 4 i' ~ . r. ,r,
" ~ ~w ~ _ ~ v.
TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION + ~„•-_~s t~_..,. ~ ~ , ~~~~.I~ ~ i ~ A~`ION ~ i ~ ~ ~
36.78 ACRE_ ; . ~ . - r h ,.r f t"4 ..y ~ u } ~ k
. r TOTAL WETLAND IMPACTS ~B . ~ ~ ,r a ,}~I~{ i § ; 1,1 1328.00 S.F.- ~ 1 1#ip, ' " t ~ i; . ~ . LI .y k f.:.; ~ t'
w A 1 ~ ~ 1 } 1 >i , E ~ i r. <'f i, ybff ~ e1 eA j., fb~ 1 ~d.'
m w 4 ,i ~ ~ , s i , , ~ 1 ~ _ a - 5 ,..L`~ x11L ~ SE " {lril3~a .a 'Ci tali ~ t t r 1.+-. F Y ~
,i ' ~ ' s i t°~. 1.. ~ Ps _ - M t ir,~_i 5 r c r ~ r° , i r 'Fa-. t. -t .i aI'w.~s , 1 yw' y., k- ~ •t~ - { i .:7: it w ii*. -l, 1 . , . " _ t . r _ C t, I _ ii. ~r. 4 s '~~4 j ~ ~n "
i t~._ 1 ~ e ~ Il a' - _ t. ~ .tt` `i ~ ~°a i ,~t E + i 'i tint; ~ - . ~ _ r - ' , 1 r I,+,~! r k{ i r• 4 t, t it `3t=f t 4f ~ ' t r 6 k ~ , • I '1 y ~ ~ 1 : , - i i ~ ~ Ski . . ¢ t a 2~
-.4 i~i 1,:-t:. - r .,j. ..e ...3, j 1 1.~ it ;`1 'rrr . .lr 1 q, i , f' , I r. _ „'d 1 _ 1 t} . 1 _ ~ ,r 1 .°i _ . f b .a r.:. ~ *`.r^ ^ ' r. 9 a . = 1 tt z _ 6 ~ yr _
r° A . - R 4 I ' 1 J 1 t . ~ ~ r . ~ Lti . _ u,, - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , pµy i i s _ .
~ J p ~ _ r a 4 . R - P
f , I ' ,~'t r, ~ ~5 111 l i1L1 ~ yl' _ i _s._..,-'?4' M1iJ~"..~).~.4.1..~ ,-r•=":_.__ :~=J ~..:.~rJ. T,....:..• v S. ;~t i`t, rl 1 .'ii~ • ~ _ q + f " i~
' h _ + i ~ i r r i~ i W w . ,r. z
, . ~ I _ t ~ i d~ i ~:,`1~ iii , i r r 1 + 4;e ' 1 ia' ri6~ ~ ~ 1 . l + Vii. r" I r Y i'L: - - ~r r,, ,.rr 1~, i r a i, dl~i`, ~iA _ s: Y _ ~ ~ ~ ~ " _ ~ i. FM ~ -.t~~ ; fi
~ - ).i J rYc^~ - ~ i - 'i' r`I,1 w i t t 1 p pi iii l i1,t 116 ti , , i ~ + b , ti. a a~ 4 x , V i viz P I t . s . ~ , c y i ~ _ t a ib 1 'F i ~ ~ t ~ s i i, r, l` k iy .t{r a ¢ta i , 1. ~ ~ '
, - s i i is~a i I, pi x f i .='+4-- "rn'~ ~ i ~ xix i "a II ~',,,'i i :,mot'. ~ . fie: ~ ~ ~ , I ~ ' i . a• _ ' 1~# i .1 I i # iid x 1 1, , r ~ { r ~ ~ {.i r" . # st
~wwi~ ~ < ~ 5~ , ~ . 1. } ~ ~ r ll i l.r ri ~ 1 ~+r ,.r'';`lr~"t''p r , x_ ~ T l t ~ ,1 , s ''tN ii alia , i ~i'st i . h 2 _ ~ 1 , r ~ls _ r f i 45 ~ ~ . ae '.~s" i ~ - Z! 1 i.. t .1, rMsa. _ _ 4,.: i ~ ~ ~ { F' I `"'11 -;1e`a. }'1 i 5 _e a 5 ;
_ _ ~ ~ . ~ - ~ ~ ~ _ - - , r t i ;~~„i it . ~ ri ~ r k 'a'. 7 ' i i. 1 1 r ` l . i.: + r rr i / t ' f " # s p u 'J~ x5 R,
f , I s , R 'a {y. ~ , , , a' i r t i i rt i r'1 1 ,_j- '1 - } r~. q , . sv. { ~ ~ ~ ' . ..1 i' a t 1 1 iM e.l. I , ° a ~ e., I' ~
_ 1 . , d . ~ ~ . €'.e. ~ ~ ,,.~a,,.e~ ~ 5i'. a. r: 1; A I i t I ICI plri r.ar i ~ ti}=a < -t d ' : mar~S^: k . t ~ 4 - , {i I i', t r } I ! i t I ~ its n , , y ~ . Mc;. f SJ - i •i. dc''ai} r,r `k,I yl t. t i~~b,y ! ?i -J•, r w, ~ ~ -
r ' fa , ~ $ - t ~ t .l ~l ' ~ fk ! i E ~ r lit. t!y .i 1 •7't~ ,..r .,wr ~ , r #`';,k fyt 5" 1 ,fit itl ~ ,,r° . ~ ? ~ ~c _ r , W ~.fi
is ,i • i r ~ _ 't, ' ¢ ~ , s s, r,:. ' i R y 3 I . . . .i ~ > # ~ ~ ~,k t} i{.i ° ~ I i + 9• ' 4 t p ~ it, c ~ , i i r< , ri : e i x 3 w 1 ~ . n
t~ A lr , . , .,,__r.. ; n:, r .x'' ~~£y, ; ~.::i "li.i',. ; $,I 1 •r t` Yk'al. 11.-1i ~ r I,E .n'fsi ~ > , r , , ~ : ~ F 4 i I , ~ r ° i 7 n \ ~n t` . . i ~ t ~ Y 9.),ii i' Ali ,t a!'r1 3 JW 't-- Y'{ , , ~ r F. m r . q rh i
s `~s :k~ s , , _r. r - a `i tf h"-1 ~ °'1'k =1~`: ~ i t _ , r , , > . ~ k. 1 t" ,i,t ,i' 1 } i ,rt i ,lid y}1 11 .,}e. , `i? _ .
. :t , :p= . _~.r 'a,,.r~Y ~i" fiS+dt"nfi3tr .~I i>1 'll ;i',t4~"i t ~i , t , ~ s r i` ~ ,ar 3 ~ ta, f ~ ~'a~ r r~`.I~~. l~l l.i`Ii~.;1;, X11 ci' ~ • 'r p, s - . t S.s }r ! , + f'`~ _ -4 fie. rE 1. ~ I 1 it !firx ! i;ii ! ~''l, 3 +.t ~D ~ r d < " ~ ~ $ t,- . ~ ~
{ , { `l.z." # ,T~ . ,d o <*l~,; r{: if;i' '1 },"{,+I" li it lt:. 't. s^. f . _ ,t . f . ~ _ i i ~ , . + p#x 1.11' iir p3pi ~'r r'i t c$ `°.i: i - . . - . r - ~ _ ~ a._ ~ ; ~ - ~ ,g, r ~ F - ~ ~ ~ a.~ 4- ~ ~
, .•.a. mss' ~ _,x",: :r / d"' ~ 1 i 1i r t v k . , r;,;. } i i}} t . C ,,a' . s. . ..7 - a ~ . I 1 ' , f zs., " ,.n> _.y_ fi~ f- ( • ''-'.'.a r q ~-a . 'p~, ~ i~sr ~,i r F S s { rt ~i' w` ' 1 za r i ? y i,~+. , F , , ~ ~ r ~ ~ a,~ e t e., c - ,
~ i.. t~ yy ~ ~ ' ~ a ~ aaf- r. a ~ _iq a' r I ;'a e } , p i + fir t _ _ . • - yy ~ , art/, r :U . ' + . - . r~l p li I, - > > ,i !e } ~ ",t r F~ - tr i tin i't +~k, i+>It~a i -t i t~f 8,! - - , , , p # - . ' !ir '-d: m f F r i t +Y t~. ~ ~p _ . r1.s i%i't at + pj I`rt ~ ~ alit r I n,r; ' _ `~`YF * ~ i~ ~r y ~ ~ ~ w, ~ ~ f ~g~ s
A . y _ • ' i l y r ~ - iJ~ -s. - >1 . ~ .4 ( Y 'Jixt Fc + a I 41 i ~p p . t ? ~ L~ , - ,4 ~ " ~ I .
+ ,ta ~ r ? ~ ~ ra_„, ~j4't'~ 6Y rar-. 'a' I~,el 1 I t' ¢ r~ , , { + . " - ' ~ ~
w 1~.!f. `I iii[, i.i ,ts +iyl i' Y§ s ~ ~ 1} iz',, i1, ~i'.1 1 1 r rlh i t ~y . ] ~ ,r~ . ` ` i t 1, i kar , ~ ' ~ ~ i y 1 i 1 Iw r ri +..i } ~,,1v+ .1 i 7 x ,-.-..a . I , > . y 1 ~
r i v `5 - . g a - yTi i r ~,.iy+ a t ,~~lua Ip h~ i i Ie +i'Yi c ~a ' , ~ „ .1 r' ~ ,6:- J 1 r< x i - r i~ r l 1 i" 11 t i r r° I '4' ti. yr~ , _ , " „ ~ n ~ . ~ . , ~ 4 ~ r ~ ,y, . ,
„ ~ ' . T ` i~ i.l.l ~ s f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y
, , ~ , , c , _ , " 8 ' , - _ _ ' ~x t~ ~ R.
a ~ i ` ' i < M1. " ' Y a: o-4 - e r x. ~ ~ S
, } s, ~ i' r ~ a, sr A . . W ~ ~ ~ , ~ , • : ~ ' ' ,~-~.r' VIRGINIA• N R~ ~L~ - i ' I' ~ ~ ~ s. _ ~
, ' k ~ ~ . _ a-
_ , - _ ^ s 1 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ r~; aaiar# ,l :r- li a'!fi tia 1i I ,1~.. ,t,~'I. e . , b , c _ a ,
, ~f a . _ r 1 i, ~ } i _ r 1 , ,.Rti.' a i ~
? , ; i" . s4 1~ .t. r ~ 2-,.. - .r I , . , ~ - ~ i. ~
'rr. - ,i i O - H " ~ ' .~l , ,i. 111.'{,. 11 ~ ~ e11' 4 I Iris#I' i
' z t t `ili+ VJ 'd iii § ~ - r.. ~ . , ' _ _ 1 - ~ ~i .i ~Y1,~1 ..al'~lil.. .L~ r 1, ar s• ~ "~1 I
1, tii , • U . W
f.~ tt r ` i i' 1 r ;'tr ~ ..r i;t [ , 7 ~ .y Ipir .'y rl I rill 1. r'i.ii i , .r. r~ I , 1 _ - ~ 0
l r~,~, L. r i.. F ;u. y}. _,f, d~'1 t~atl ~lr ill ;rill , +i 1. rl i •,r_ ~ , ~ . , „ IY. I 1..-' .°t.. ,t _ .r '.e _ , ""t., ti a i I ui'i I.1 1 ~ , I ~ a~ .i , i ,0 it 4 -Y.Iry rl it ~t'1 <,'r~'i - _ i g , q . O m W x
~I~ ~ , ~ ~ ysi}-~ 11.1 1 h{ I , i i . ~ ~ i. t V 7 : .x , • ° r gQ f d i,{r} ..~i~ ~ irl } .,1 ~',I r~) ! .i z r N Q a, 4 4: ~ I ~Iwil 3 e x i ~
J 'a Y, i• I s p° r 4i Itll, r i ( ~ s..a.'a r . ~ ~ ff ii A • ' . -x . M ~ T ~
a.rtr ~ ..2 :l - l.l~~il ili i'~,.I 1 C' ~ ''=,i '~?u - .~l' rr, . ~riliilf - i .k y a ' " , ~ ~ r f + ~ ~ s 3 ~ w ~ - ~ ~
fl' =li' ' _ ~ t ' >1 HICK ~ SU TION ~ ril ~ r - ' ...r ~ ~ . V I i ' . ' 1 r It r , ,y,. ':r , , , 1~ ~ ~ . ~ ~t~:~ rn V J ~ v
i'~, [ ~ li,.. 1~ I i. 1 r~r+n Ir I ~ t r..~~ ,i 4 ~ ~ ;.w. t ~ i yc"e. { r r ir.. ~ . .~1 ~ ,r, : - i t~ ~,.P~ l 1 .w Ia~~_ i t r it r,."~. t.+t , . s ~ - ' ` fr i. . ~ r .n. 4. -ark i i.. -11.,,,1 f f ,.itdlii I.i - Y ei ' f ~ ~i , ~ _ ^ ~ ~ W ? w~ . . O
k M A ' t d ir• ~ 4 ~ ~ ~r~ I ti. ' . 11r^,i,«ir , 1 - I#.,} ` 'Ara , , . - V - V , , ~ _ i O
1. r / r. 7 r . , , r'I a 4f._ i ~ j,; { A e -E. I . , r s . , ! 1 ~,r ~ ~ - N ~ W . _ .
p } dal , , ti t,' F tI 1~• y ~ o ,It a v i. ii>'li i ~p tfili `i'4~ i h ~ T i " , £ ~ . ~ 1, ! ~-.~j y. 'I~t . S ,•1 ~ a i f,.,.i =t( I'I 11 +i ~ ~ k e r ~'s a. }°'°e ; _ W 4 ~ ~<< ~ . - LL
~ m ` Ir , _ ~ ~ $ r
IkI , ' 4 i w , . 1~ -,i , i k . , i a I~- ,i ~ 'il al, I1F t+ rz ~ i}~'4it 1'1 a } i fi 1.. , . O O ~ . a ~ . 4 - t O W C~
o ~.°s l + Ialrir~ ~j ~ ~ I ~ ii}r~}}`1t(; ~''"t^'. -i zay4 . , ~ .R ~ rliF 3 i 9 ` r,,~,'..'"`"'_ ,~Ii i'~l"1 1'.ii,rriy'.~i~ir ~ I a,.':ti` > tea' i9~~ k t,r,e„~+i~11t , ' , _ p , , ~ ' O O O 4 N O
t . . 1 lit 1., : i li . i " 1~. ti r• a~^, , i. <Y °,:!.'.,4.r 3 ~ ~ ,.i f 71n a Idl ,Idi I . F„ !t ' 1 t :ti.. e .1A , . , " 1.-. .lli. alq -•1 i Eric) 0 ro 1 ~ k . _ 1 av 'V V rt i illir-.iski. yy ~4 ~a lr'~{ ,.I I"'11 '1 ili r- s ea !G ~ , ~ _ . " ~ - ~ -
~ S " :v.:ar~ t ~'i ~ ~ ryl rilr .1 s?,r # ~ ~ - ~ -`4 . , - ~ 1a -ir I r L i.. r s, iY 7~ is + 1.~1 I .II ,.iir, d it a} .~s.. +~'!r, + +tk.. 'a,~,,' , Cn - , .i s I i , , . ~ ,i. l .S. a. ! Eeirs~ ;:1~ t,jr .i,~ e, ~ ~ rl,' lip I.+r i 'i ~!i k. ,r° 1 yk+il#,' ili Ri i:iir V .,r - _r. a ~ ~ II
.3 as 4 ~ ~ ~ a I•,t~{,,`,~ .'a i; o:u~.~ar.}c~+xtxrr. Jf I,~+, k'; ,r, r ,r,. 4 - - . M a_ _ , - ar .i it l! ,eS.- - r,i il, ~ W W
0 N } _ (A ~a oCU
Y U J Q CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10 FOOT - ~ W W Z m
1 I i
C7 LO Q Q W
r w U (A Z J
N 0 W W
> m Q D
r 4000' 0' 2000' 4000' 8000' 12000' mm7 i cl=:j
T
I I
qq h
J~ . i~
v l' f 5 i r f I ~ II i

~ ~ o N
~ ~i
~ O ~ ~ O ~
O N ~
oD > ~ ch 0 N ~
N N~ O ~
ro mN No U ~ .L ro ro o
N ~1 a C d N ~
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT ° > ~ ~ ~ m o U~~ m~~
N ~O ~>P7 c ~r ~
NQO ro~~ ro>~p PROPOSED 50 EASEMENT
W N mQN ~~O ~y 0.~~ rL~ C9'~C7 ~
00=tp ~ UO ~ NO ,M
r~3C rOCCO ~u~C ~
HICKORY W
\i
SUBSTATION ~
Ok V ~ a
~ z
z~ ~ ~
w
~ a
~z
ao a o
~x - ~
z
v:, 0
P ~
~
x~
EP •
~P~
¦
¦
W w
x~
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS:
P
APPROXIMATE FORESTED
~ ~ WETLAND LIMITS PROPOSED CONVERSIONS:
W ,E,
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE±
WETLAND LIMITS
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE± LL
~yywy APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
WETLAND LIMITS THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
~ Ok~
~ CONVERSION ~ . . EXISTING 100 EASEMENT
~s~
Z APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER l ~
THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION ° 0.00 ACRE_ PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT
Q ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS:
Q FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.±
~ ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± Z
0
a a ox ~ Z 8 0 -
o ~
PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± N 0
0 ~ ~
o WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± r m
~ ~
t THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM w APPROXIMATE FORESTED S D
a ~ WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS ~ ~ W ~ ~ o
~ o ~
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± ~ ~ ~ ~ o" Q W W
r W ~
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB O W d
WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: ~ ~ ~ O O W O N W C~ O W
3 ° O _ m ~ ~ Q Q
N O ~ f~ ~ - ~ r I I Z
o APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 0.00 ACRE± \ ~ W uJ -
~ a ~ U ~
z WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 0.00 S.F.± ~ J Q - ~ W W Z m -
z - ~ ~ ~ (A m
~ ~ 5 r
Q ? w
WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER ~ w W U
THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS D Z W J > m Q
0 0 Q w U 0
r 0 f (A U)
/ 300' 0' 150' 300' 600'
600' 900' ~~P

~ ~ o N N
~ N
~ O ~ ~ O ~
[0 N N
P7 Q N ~ M
N NN O Q
N 01 N N (0 U C N l~ O
m.m QC dN ~
V~/m{~ ~ rnrn C ~O y.1 V! Y V/ ~ co cLr ~~rn ~
ai co o > ~ a~ ~ c~ ~ yN7(0 3 [Lr
NCO ~~f~ ~~(0 ~NNN mp(0 ~ ~O
~N ~N O O_~r rL~ C~'L(~ 0
00=~(l ~ UO ~ NO ,M
m3C ~cnC ~
EXISTING 100' EASEMENT W
PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT a Q'i
~ ~
M1/ E~ ~ Z
z~
w
~ a
~z ao
a o
~x ~x
z

~Y
~ o 0
0 r
F
Y Y . rWw.
o° x 0
~ti ~
¦
¦
w
W
LEGEND: SHEET 2 IMPACT ANALYSIS:
~yy y~' APPROXIMATE FORESTED PROPOSED CONVERSIONS:
~ WETLAND LIMITS W
P~ 0
0
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB FORESTED WETLAND CONVERSION 1.06 ACRES± ~ O Q~
WETLAND LIMITS ~
SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND CONVERSION 1.83 ACRES± O a o0 X 0
~ y w APPROXIMATE EMERGENT ~/~~p,ND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 ACRE±
'~W'~'yy WETLAND LIMITS o THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM EXISTING 100' EASEMENT
CONVERSION ti
Z ~y<~~"~' APPROXIMATE WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER PROPOSED 50' EASEMENT ~
~ * THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.89 ACRES_
o° o"
Q ~ APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE IMPACTS:
Q FORESTED WETLAND IMPACTS 32.00 S.F.±
a ~ EXISTING TOWER LOCATIONS Z
v~~i SCRUB SHRUB WETLAND IMPACTS 64.00 S.F.± . Z
U O -
a o O
~ ~ PROPOSED TOWER LOCATIONS EMERGENT WETLAND IMPACTS 16.00 S.F.± X N 0
\ ~ ~ ~
o WETLAND CONTAINING GREATER 0.00 S.F.± \ r ~
~ m
APPROXIMATE FORESTED THAN 10%TAXODIUM DISTICHUM o ~ ,r ~ p W ~ O
~ ~
a ~ WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS ~ ~ O - ~ ~ ~ N ~ y ~ ~
TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 712.00 S.F.± Q W W ~ ~
yr r W ~ o O u- W
APPROXIMATE SCRUB SHRUB o ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~
o WETLAND IMPACTS TOTAL IMPACT SUMMARY: ~ ~ oo W O N ~ O
9 3 O _ m ~ O Q Q N O I~ ~ -
_ ~ r II Z
~ W W - N } ~ I C~
o w y APPROXIMATE EMERGENT WETLAND TOTAL WETLAND CONVERSION 2.89 ACRE± J a ~ U ~ J Q -
z ~ WETLAND IMPACTS Y TOTAL STRUCTURE IMPACTS 112.00 S.F.± a W W Z m _ ~
~ ~ m LL T
WETLANDS CONTAINING GREATER p w :D W
THAN 10% TAXODIUM DISTICHUM IMPACTS LLj ~Q Z J 2 I- CD Q J
0 Q W 0 0
0 r Q Ir U) Cf)
)0' 600' 900'
300' 0' 150' 300' 60