20040291 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040226

Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Marine Fisheries Preston P. Pate Jr., Director
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Y
loft. -- r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Mike St
DATE: May 11, 2004
SUBJECT: Onslow County WTP Upgrades
WFTLANI ,('
" 4,V t ?, It )U4
WATER QUAti [Y SEA:TIU1V
Attached is the Divisions' reply for the above referenced project
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
MS/sw
If you have any
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX [phone] \ Internet www.ncdmf.net No hCaxolina
An Equal Opportunity; Affm a ivc Actin Fi:wioy 50 u?clatl'. 1?T post Gonsuir;u Ea bier ;R'tlfL ally
P
Ar4m
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
'Actlael F Easley. Governor Division of Marine Fisheries PresIon P. 13ate Jr., Director
`Vd am G. Ross,h... "Iecretwy
Memo
To: John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
From: Patricia L. Murphey -W-?
Marine Biologist Supervisor
Thru: Mike Marshall M't?3-
Central District Manager
Date: 5/11/2004
Re: Comments for Onslow County WTP Upgrades
The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) is concerned and questions the
justification behind the crossing of strearns 3, 4, and 5 by placing pipes on piles over these streams
instead of crossing by directional bore under the stream as proposed for streams 1 and 2.
Directional bore would have less impact on these streams compared to building the piers. The
application does not list any justification for traversing these streams using piles verses the use of
directional bore. The NCDMF also recommends that any dredging or pumping of piles occur
outside the dredging moratorium for anadromous fish (Feb 15'"- Sept 30")
NorthCaro Tina
?$+1 Ar-'nd- li `?Irerl ;10 Rye )9. M !F iiu( O Cityr t??;rlli ( tinlinl '8557 ??itu'' Lfi?lff
E ?14nrL .' i, h X911 AA .'.?? Ili (ltya? nleuwt ??Jt d1C(??ll? nEl
An Equal0JFpoiluniLl!Aftitin iiiE ActionImplover `,(! Hef /ded 10"; poAConsumer Paper
.f
Office Use Onl
Y
USACE Action ID No.
DWQ No. 04.0
n
APR 6 2004
1IDMF`=eH1F6?'NT??RaTEC .ION
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
WFTLANDS / 411 GROUP
Name: Mr. Kerr O. Randel
Mailing Address: Onslow County Public Utilities F ._ - 2 h 2004
228 Georgetown Road
Jacksonville, North Carolina 28540 t !1?'?!.. L,"E lON
Telephone Number: 910/45570722 Fax Number:_ 910/455-0115
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Di
Company Affiliation: ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Mailing Address: 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-5073
Telephone Number: 919/854-1282 Fax Number: 919/854-5448
E-mail Address: ldieboltgarcadis-us.com
Page 5 of 15
} of NN A rF9
O? QG
co r
O ?
June 2, 2004 WERANDS 401 GROUP
Onslow County Public Utilities
Attn: Kerry Randall
228 Georgetown Road
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Dear Mr. Randall:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions (WQC #3374), to do the following
activity at your property located along Hwy 24, SR 1428 south of SR 1425, and SR 1432 in Onslow
County. This approval allows you to:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.,Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
,lljN n 4 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTO
SUBJECT: Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification
and Additional Conditions
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Hubert WTP
DWQ Project # 040291
Onslow County
1. Grade and fill Section 404 Wetlands for the purpose of installing new wells sites and raw water
transmission lines to the Hubert WTP from the Castle Hayne aquifer system, as follows:
Jurisdictional Wetlands
HSW10/Riggs Site -
HSW8/Bougie Site -
HTW7/Rogers Site -
permanent impacts
0.145 acres
0.047 acres
0.051 acres
temporary impacts
0.188 acres
0.025 acres
0.027 acres
Isolated Wetlands
HTW 10/Howard 3 Site -
permanent impacts
0.092 acres
temporary impacts
0.094 acres
2. Temporarily impact Queens Creek and Pasture Branch during installation of piles that will
support raw water transmission lines over the stream (the piles shall not be placed in the stream
channel).
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in you Pre-Construction
Notification (PCN) application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on February 26, 2004,
and additional information received by the Wilmington Regional Office on April 6, 2004. After
reviewing your application, we have determined that General Water Quality Certification Number 3374
covers this activity. This Certification (#3374) allows you to use your 404 Permit when the Corps of
Engineers issues it. Please keep in mind that there may be additional Federal, State or Local regulations
applicable to your project, such as (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and
Water Supply Watershed regulations, NPDES Stormwater and Coastal Stormwater. In addition, this
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 Permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone] Customer Service #
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Fax [phone] NC M
Mr. Randall
Page Two
DWQ Project #040291
June 2, 2004
Please be aware that if you change or modify your project, you must notify the Division
(DWQ) in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If
the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the
future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 211.0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification.
Please notify the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone]) if any problem arises during the
construction of the project that may affect water quality.
Please read the attached conditions. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification,
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this
letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C.
27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the DWQ Permit # 040291. If you have any questions, please
telephone Noelle Lutheran at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
,-7. Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director, Division of Water Quality
Attachments: GC # 3374
Certificate of Completion
cc: Jennifer Frye - Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Cyndi Karoly - 401/Wetland Unit, Central Office
Noelle Lutheran - WiRO
Linda Diebolt - ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina Inc.
WQC #3374
UTILITY LINE BACKFILL AND BEDDING CERTIFICATION
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE
FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBER 12 OR
REGIONAL PERMIT 198100049 (UTILITY LINE BACKF(LL AND BEDDING)
AND RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULES (BUFFER RULES)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401,
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15A NCAC 2B.0200 for
the discharge of fill material to waters and wetland areas as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A
(B) (12) and General Permit No. 198100049 of the Corps of Engineers regulations (i.e., including
any fill activity for utility line backfill and bedding) and for the Riparian Area Protection Rules
(Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 2B .0200. This certification replaces Water Quality Certification
(WQC) Number 2664 issued on January 21, 1992, Water Quality Certification Number 3022
issued on September 6, 1995, Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3101 issued on
February 11, 1997 and Water Quality Certification Number 3288 issued on June 1, 2000. This
WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers reauthorize Nationwide 12 or Regional Permit
198100049 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of the Division of Water Quality.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth. .
Conditions of Certification:
1. Activities covered by this General Certification do not require written concurrence from the
Division of Water Quality as long as they comply with all conditions of this General
Certification and the conditions of Nationwide 12 or Regional Permit 198100049 as
appropriate. If any condition in this Certification cannot be met, application to and written
concurrence from DWQ are required. Also, Condition No. 6 is applicable to all streams in
basins with riparian area protection rules;
2. In accordance with North Carolina General Statute Section 143-215.3D(e), any request
for written concurrence for a 401 Water Quality Certification must include the appropriate
fee. If a project also requires a CAMA Permit, one. payment to both agencies shall be
submitted and will be the higher of the two fees;
3. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) compensatory mitigation may be required for
stream and/or wetland impacts. Streamside buffer mitigation may be required for any
project with Buffer Rules in effect at the time of application for buffer impacts resulting
from activities classified as "allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of
the Buffer Rules or require a variance under the Buffer Rules. A determination of buffer,
wetland and stream mitigation requirements shall be made by DWQ for any Certification
involving written concurrences including those for relevant Buffer Rules;
4. The edge of the construction corridor shall not be installed parallel to and closer than 10
feet (3 meters) to a stream and 25 feet in waters classified as HQW. Utility lines shall not
cross a stream channel at other than a near-perpendicular direction (i.e., stream channel
crossings shall not be at an angle of less than 75 degrees or more than 105 degrees to
the stream bank);
WQC #3374
5. Any wastewater line that crosses any stream shown on the most recent version of the
1:24,000 USGS topographic map or NRCS (SCS) County Soil Survey as permanent or
intermittent shall be installed with no joints connected within the footprint of a stream
channel or within 2 feet of the stream banks. Otherwise, written concurrence from DWQ
is required;
6. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Randleman and Catawba River
Basins (or any other river basins with Buffer Rules in effect at the time of application)
requires written concurrence from DWQ in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0233,.0259,
.0250 and .0243. Activities listed as "exempt" from these rules do not need to apply for
written concurrence under this Certification. New development activities located in the
protected 50-foot wide riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not) within the
Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Randleman River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified
within and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233, .0259, .0250 and .0243.
All new development shall be located, designed, constructed, and maintained to have
minimal disturbance to protect water quality to the maximum extent practicable through
the use of best management practices;
7. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
8. Herbicides can be applied in wetlands or other waters only when applied by a certified
applicator, and in strict accordance with product labeling;
9. Placement of rip rap is restricted to the stream bottom and banks directly impacted by the
placement of the utility line. Rip rap may only be used below the normal high water level.
The stream cross section must be restored to its original grade and elevation. Placement
of rip rap or other materials shall not result in de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks
upstream of downstream of the crossing;
10. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" whichever is
more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR
Regional or Central Offices) shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management
Practices in order to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard;
11. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land
Resources has released the project;
12. Annual native species suitable for wet locations shall be planted and established within
jurisdictional wetlands for soil and erosion control. Perennials such as fescue are
prohibited;
13. No fertilizer shall be applied within 10 feet (3 meters) of streams. Any fertilizer application
must comply with all other Federal, State and Local regulations;
14. The construction corridor (including access roads and stockpiling of materials) is limited to
40 feet (12.2 meters) in width in wetlands and across stream channels and must be
minimized to the maximum extent practicable;
WQC #3374
15. Permanent, maintained access corridors shall be restricted to the minimum width
practicable and shall not exceed 10 feet (3 meters) in width except at manhole locations.
A 10 feet (3 meters) by 10 feet (3 meters) perpendicular vehicle turnaround must be
spaced at least 500 feet (152.4 meters) apart. Written concurrence is required if the
maintenance corridor is greater than 10 feet (3 meters) wide-except that a maintenance
corridor larger than ten feet is acceptable for gas pipelines as long as mitigation is
provided for additional wetland fills to the maintenance corridor beyond those widths
specified in this General Certification;
16. An anti-seep collar shall be placed at the downstream (utility line gradient) wetland
boundary and every 150 feet (45.7 meters) up the gradient until the utility exits the
wetland for buried utility lines. Anti-seep collars may be constructed with class B
concrete, compacted clay, PVC pipe, or metal collars. Wetland crossings that are
directionally drilled, and perpendicular wetland crossings that are open cut and less than
150 feet (45.7 meters) long do not require anti-seep collars. The compacted clay shall
have a specific discharge of 1 X 10- 5 cm/sec or less. A section and plan view diagram is
attached for the anti-seep collars;
The following specifications shall apply to class B concrete:
a) Minimum cement content, sacks per cubic yard with rounded course aggregate 5.0
b) Minimum cement content, sacks per cubic yard with angular course aggregate 5.5
c) Maximum water-cement ratio gallons per sack 6.8
d) Slump range 2" to 4"
e) Minimum strength - 28 day psi 2,500
17. This General Certification does not authorize any permanent changes in pre-construction
elevation contours in waters or wetlands or stream dimension, pattern or profile. The
permittee will have a specific plan for restoring wetland contours. Any excess material
will be removed to a high ground disposal area;
18. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
19. Stormwater management will not be required for this Certification as long as all other
Conditions are met. However, in the twenty coastal counties, the appropriate DWQ
Regional Office must be contacted to determine if Coastal Stormwater Regulations still
apply;
20. Compensatory mitigation (i.e., restoration, creation or preservation) for wetland losses will
not be required for this Certification if written concurrence is not needed;
21. Payment of a dollar per acre figure into the Wetland Restoration Program for these
impacts is acceptable when compensatory mitigation is required as long as the Wetlands
Restoration Program agrees in writing to accept this payment. Other mitigation plans
must receive written DWQ concurrence;
22. This Certification does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility to obtain all other
required Federal, State or local approvals;
23. Additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects for which written concurrence
is required or requested under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with all
applicable water quality and effluent standards;
WQC #3374
24. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall expire
three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the same day as the
expiration date of the corresponding Nationwide Permit 12 or Regional Permit 198100049
whichever is sooner;
25. When written concurrence is required, the applicant is required to use the most recent
version of the Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the
401 Certification has been completed.
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project
may result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or
civil penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a
formal application for individual certification for any project in this category of activity that requires
written concurrence under this certification, if it is determined that the project is likely to have a
significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses of the
wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: 18 March 2002
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
WQC # 3374

WQC #3374
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR
Winches 4 UtiiftirUne
(Diameter Varies)
1
1 foot I Class $ Concrete
l or Compacted Clay
6 inches "jrenehW1ddt'0 6 inches
Not to exceed 40 feet
SECTION
Cass B Concrete
or'Compacted Clay
t
t_1 2
Inches
6 Inches . 6 inches
PLAN
s
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Noelle Lutheran
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Bick Shiver
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Onslow County Water Treatment Plant Upgrades County Onslow
Project Number 04 0291 County2
Recvd From APP Region Wilmington
Received Date 2/26/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type expansion and upgrades of WTP Facility
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
Wet Pine F770 -NF-Fig-4-1-16-1 SA HQW 30,501. 0.63F F_ O Y O N -F-19-
41-16 SA NSW 30,501. F- 47.60 ? F_
F_ ?
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
This office has no objection to the project as proposed,
Additional information way received by this office on April 6, 2004. The Raleigh Office was hand
delivered this inform_ abon on March 31, 2004. Regardless of the 60 day time lapse in Raleigh. the
applicant wishes to secure a 401 Water Quality Gertification due to the fact the county began work
without a 401/404 and is still in violation.
T1101 Water Quality Gertification was issued on 6/2/2004. NML
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Onslow County Water Treatment Plant Upgrades County Onslow
Project Number 04 0291 Regional Contact: Noelle Lutheran
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
V
c? I.
CL p N
o -U3
M
O M
U

?

?
N

U)
N
V o
Y

a
U
(
N o
v
cZ O O
a
c

O
a?
U) ac
co
U)
U
N ,
O ?
U
0
IL
30
? N
cz O
f-
rn
C? N
O

O
N
d

Q
d
O

C C
U O
•
L
cc

d
c
0
c
Triage Check List
Date: 3/ 31 /d Y
Project Name: Dorloti, Co k 4 rad,l - Nuie,'r k/Y
DWO#:
County: Oh s
To: ? ARO Mike Parker
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
RRO Steve Mitchell
z? 1-2 1-2
From:
? W Steffens
iRO Noelle Lutheran ,
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919) 3 -Vz??
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
® Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
® Check drawings for accuracy
? Is.the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: Are well safer loc,,kq Lk,4 +key ray P t" fkt 4 r? Cootly p rolcr??
r

-e 5-,-z

ARCADIS G&M of North

Carolina, Inc.
l;ir`;"?IStitl?. Clr', Lli.!C(ir!gs, emT 'rolNllEnt, C:?rrllrltl!IICc'rlIC11 801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
Mr. John R. Dorney North Carolina 27607-5073

1' N 1•,, i,+'
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Tel [phone]
401 Wetlands Certification Unit Fax [phone]
1650 Mail Service Center www.arcadis-us.com
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject:
DWQ # 04-0292
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Dixon WTP
Date:
Dear Mr. Dorney: 30 March 2004
The attached information is provided in response to the Division of Water Quality

(DWQ) letter dated March 16, 2004, regarding the above referenced project. Contact:

Linda Diebolt
Enclosed are seven copies of the response to your letter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 919/854-1282. Extension:
220
Sincerely,
E-mail:
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. [e-mail]
^ Our ref:
l NC703021.0000
Linda Diebolt
Wetland Scientist
Enclosure
Copies:
Kerry Randel/Onslow County Public Utilities
Noelle Lutheran/USACE, Wilmington Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Erika Bailey/ARCADIS
John Maynard/ARCADIS
Mary Sadler/ARCADIS
File

:'art of a bigger PiCll!I'e
ARCADIS
Please show all wetland impacts including the potential for draining of
the wetlands via groundwater withdrawal.
The proposed upgrade and expansion of the WTP will allow Onslow
County to replace water from the Cretaceous aquifer (existing wells)
with water supplied from the Castle Hayne aquifer. Before pursuing
additional raw water from the Castle Hayne aquifer, Onslow County
commissioned a study with Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
(GMA) to perform a detailed analysis of the Castle Hayne groundwater
yield and proposed aquifer protection measures. Results from this
evaluation were used to ensure that adequate capacity would be available
to obtain the needed additional water without adverse effects (i.e. salt
water encroachment, declining aquifer levels). The County also
identified proposed well sites based on GMA's recommendations for
well spacing and plans to conduct a well field evaluation after
construction to determine actual pump cycling operation to avoid
excessive drawdown.
GMA also prepared and certified the "Onslow County Wellfield
Evaluation to Support Capacity Use Area Permitting" report for Onslow
County Public Utilities Department in October 2002. GMA has
conservatively estimated the safe yield for the Castle Hayne aquifer in
Onslow County to be 23 million gallons per day and the recharge rate
thereof to be greater than 40,000 gallons per day per square mile. The
plant expansion and groundwater capacity requests were not found to be
significant with respect to the available yield in the Castle Hayne aquifer.
Significant changes in groundwater quality and quantity are not
anticipated.
Based on GMA's findings relative to the safe yield and recharge rates of
the Castle Hayne aquifer, no direct or indirect wetland impacts are
anticipated from the proposed project.
The information was provided in the Final Environmental Assessment
for Onslow County Dixon and Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Projects (ARCADIS 2004) for which a draft Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) has been issued. The final FONSI will be issued on
April 5, 2004.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
2/3
ARCADIS
2. Please indicate the proposed lot layout cis overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate ownership of proposed impact sites and provide a
statement from the owner acknowledging permission to conduct impacts.
All of the well sites provided in the PCN application package are owned
by Onslow County.
3. This office believes that the well labeled on the plans as DTW2-2A can
be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the pine savanna.
Please address this issue and revise your plans to avoid or minimize
impacts.
DTW2-2A is positioned on the site as required by 15A NCAC 18C
.0203(1) that states, "The well shall be located on a lot so that the area
within 100 feet of the well shall be owned or controlled by the person
supplying the water. The supplier of water shall be able to protect the
well lot from potential sources of pollution and to construct landscape
features for drainage and diversion of pollution." As shown on Figure 2
of the PCN application, placement of well DTW2-2A is 100 feet from all
property boundaries, and all of the area within the property boundaries is
considered jurisdictional pine savanna. Due to the requirements of the
Administrative Code-cited above, relocating the well to reduce impacts
to the pine savanna is not feasible. The access road connects to an
existing culvert crossing and extends to a turnaround area adjacent to
gates that provide access to the production well. The gates are
positioned such that during maintenance to the well, such as replacement
of the pump, a drill rig can access the well.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
3/3
t ;I d JiirT
:t
ARCADIS G&M of North
1 I Carolina, Inc.
-r-toict K', lirlllClrlgS, !'ll!6"GI71i7Pi7, Col'i71r7ilnlCcrllOlrS ?e.. i 'lql 801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
Mr. John R. Dorney North Carolina 27607-5073
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Tel [phone]
401 Wetlands Certification Unit Fax [phone]
1650 Mail Service Center www.arcadis-us.com
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject:
DWQ # 04-0292
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Dixon WTP
Date:
Dear Mr. Dorney: 30 March 2004
The attached information is provided in response to the Division of Water Quality
Contact:
(DWQ) letter dated March 16, 2004, regarding the above referenced project.
Linda Diebolt
Enclosed are seven copies of the response to your letter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 919/854-1282. Extension:
220
Sincerely,
E-mail:
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. [e-mail]
2r "T Our ref:
NC703021.0000
Linda Diebolt
Wetland Scientist
Enclosure
Copies:
Kerry Randel/Onslow County Public Utilities
Noelle Lutheran/USACE, Wilmington Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Erika Bailey/ARCADIS
John Maynard/ARCADIS
Mary Sadler/ARCADIS
File
Uof a yi?er aiUM-e
ARCADIS
Please show all wetland impacts including the potential for draining of
the wetlands via groundwater withdrawal.
The proposed upgrade and expansion of the WTP will allow Onslow
County to replace water from the Cretaceous aquifer (existing wells)
with water supplied from the Castle Hayne aquifer. Before pursuing
additional raw water from the Castle Hayne aquifer, Onslow County
commissioned a study with Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
(GMA) to perfonn a detailed analysis of the Castle Hayne groundwater
yield and proposed aquifer protection measures. Results from this
evaluation were used to ensure that adequate capacity would be available
to obtain the needed additional water without adverse effects (i.e. salt
water encroachment, declining aquifer levels). The County also
identified proposed well sites based on GMA's recommendations for
well spacing and plans to conduct a well field evaluation after
construction to determine actual pump cycling operation to avoid
excessive drawdown.
GMA also prepared and certified the "Onslow County Wellfield
Evaluation to Support Capacity Use Area Permitting" report for Onslow
County Public Utilities Department in October 2002. GMA has
conservatively estimated the safe yield for the Castle Hayne aquifer in
Onslow County to be 23 million gallons per day and the recharge rate
thereof to be greater than 40,000 gallons per day per square mile. The
plant expansion and groundwater capacity requests were not found to be
significant with respect to the available yield in the Castle Hayne aquifer.
Significant changes in groundwater quality and quantity are not
anticipated.
Based on GMA's findings relative to the safe yield and recharge rates of
the Castle Hayne aquifer, no direct or indirect wetland impacts are
anticipated from the proposed project.
The information was provided in the Final Environmental Assessment
.for Onslow County Dixon and Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Projects (ARCADIS 2004) for which a draft Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) has been issued. The final FONSI will be issued on
April 5, 2004.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
2/3
ARCADIS
2. Please indicate the proposed lot layout cis overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate ownership of proposed impact sites and provide a
statement fi-om the owner acknowledging permission to conduct impacts.
All of the well sites provided in the PCN application package are owned
by Onslow County.
3. This office believes that the well labeled on the plans as DTW2-2A can
be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the pine savanna.
Please address this issue and revise your plans to avoid or minimize
impacts.
DTW2-2A is positioned on the site as required by 15A NCAC 18C
.0203(1) that states, "The well shall be located on a lot so that the area
within 100 feet of the well shall be owned or controlled by the person
supplying the water. The supplier of water shall be able to protect the
well lot from potential sources of pollution and to construct landscape
features for drainage and diversion of pollution." As shown on Figure 2
of the PCN application, placement of well DTW2-2A is 100 feet from all
property boundaries, and all of the area within the property boundaries is
considered jurisdictional pine savanna. Due to the requirements of the
Administrative Code.cited above, relocating the well to reduce impacts
to the pine savanna is not feasible. The access road connects to an
existing culvert crossing and extends to a turnaround area adjacent to
gates that provide access to the production well. The gates are
positioned such that during maintenance to the well, such as replacement
of the pump, a drill rig can access the well.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
3/3
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
lr')i`lr;;fillf:il.l?:?, l/IIC(i1!?,', 'll!'JI"0171;1E'i1 ; Cvirl/i7(J!11C itIQ1iS 801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
Mr. John R. Dorney North Carolina 27607-5073
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Tel [phone]
401 Wetlands Certification Unit Fax [phone]
1650 Mail Service Center www.arcadis-us.com
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject:
DWQ # 04-0292
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Dixon WTP
Date:
Dear Mr. Dorney: 30 March 2004
The attached information is provided in response to the Division of Water Quality Contact:
(DWQ) letter dated March 16, 2004, regarding the above referenced project.
Enclosed are seven copies of the response to your letter. If you have any questions, Linda Diebolt
please do not hesitate to call me at 919/854-1282. Extension:
220
Sincerely,
E-mail:
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. [e-mail]
Our ref:
NC703021.0000
Linda Diebolt
Wetland Scientist
Enclosure
Copies:
Kerry Randel/Onslow County Public Utilities
Noelle Lutheran/USACE, Wilmington Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Erika Bailey/ARCADIS
John Maynard/ARCADIS
Mary Sadler/ARCADIS
File
'.iii of d i:;lUgef')IC`! ffe
ARCADIS
Please show all wetland impacts including the potential for draining of
the wetlands via groundwater withdrawal.
The proposed upgrade and expansion of the WTP will allow Onslow
County to replace water from the Cretaceous aquifer (existing wells)
with water supplied from the Castle Hayne aquifer. Before pursuing
additional raw water from the Castle Hayne aquifer, Onslow County
commissioned a study with Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
(GMA) to perform a detailed analysis of the Castle Hayne groundwater
yield and proposed aquifer protection measures. Results from this
evaluation were used to ensure that adequate capacity would be available
to obtain the needed additional water without adverse effects (i.e. salt
water encroachment, declining aquifer levels). The County also
identified proposed well sites based on GMA's recommendations for
well spacing and plans to conduct a well field evaluation after
construction to determine actual pump cycling operation to avoid
excessive drawdown.
GMA also prepared and certified the "Onslow County Wellfield
Evaluation to Support Capacity Use Area Permitting" report for Onslow
County Public Utilities Department in October 2002. GMA has
conservatively estimated the safe yield for the Castle Hayne aquifer in
Onslow County to be 23 million gallons per day and the recharge rate
thereof to be greater than 40,000 gallons per day per square mile. The
plant expansion and groundwater capacity requests were not found to be
significant with respect to the available yield in the Castle Hayne aquifer.
Significant changes in groundwater quality and quantity are not
anticipated.
Based on GMA's findings relative to the safe yield and recharge rates of
the Castle Hayne aquifer, no direct or indirect wetland impacts are
anticipated from the proposed project.
The information was provided in the Final Environmental Assessment
for Onslow County Dixon and Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Projects (ARCADIS 2004) for which a draft Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) has been issued. The final FONSI will be issued on
April 5, 2004.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
2/3
ARCADIS
2. Please indicate the proposed lot layout cis overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate ownership ofproposed impact sites and provide a
statement from the owner acknowledging permission to conduct impacts.
All of the well sites provided in the PCN application package are owned
by Onslow County.
3. This office believes that the well labeled on the plans as DTW2-2A can
be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the pine savanna.
Please address this issue and revise your plans to avoid or minimize
impacts.
DTW2-2A is positioned on the site as required by 15A NCAC 18C
.0203(1) that states, "The well shall be located on a lot so that the area
within 100 feet of the well shall be owned or controlled by the person
supplying the water. The supplier of water shall be able to protect the
well lot from potential sources of pollution and to construct landscape
features for drainage and diversion of pollution." As shown on Figure 2
of the PCN application, placement of well DTW2-2A is 100 feet from all
property boundaries, and all of the area within the property boundaries is
considered jurisdictional pine savanna. Due to the requirements of the
Administrative Code.cited above, relocating the well to reduce impacts
to the pine savanna is not feasible. The access road connects to an
existing culvert crossing and extends to a turnaround area adjacent to
gates that provide access to the production well. The gates are
positioned such that during maintenance to the well, such as replacement
of the pump, a drill rig can access the well.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
3/3
I
a ?.
I,it al tluctl.l(°, il_IIiCl1"!CJ?, r?ll!41G1'l',5ent, cooiniunlcaT701i":
Mr. John R. Dorney
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Subject:
DWQ # 04-0292
off a a If
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Dixon WTP
Dear Mr. Dorney:

ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
The attached information is provided in response to the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) letter dated March 16, 2004, regarding the above referenced project.
Enclosed are seven copies of the response to your letter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 919/854-1282.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Linda Diebolt
Wetland Scientist
Enclosure
Copies:
Kerry Randel/Onslow County Public Utilities
Noelle Lutheran/USACE, Wilmington Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Erika Bailey/ARCADIS
John Maynard/ARCADIS
Mary Sadler/ARCADIS
File
NATURAL RESOURCES
Date:
30 March 2004
Contact:
Linda Diebolt
Extension:
220
E-mail:
[e-mail]
our ref:
NC703021.0000
u! l VI a higOel PiCtU e
ARCADIS
Please show all wetland impacts including the potential for draining of
the wetlands via groundwater withdrawal.
The proposed upgrade and expansion of the WTP will allow Onslow
County to replace water from the Cretaceous aquifer (existing wells)
with water supplied from the Castle Hayne aquifer. Before pursuing
additional raw water from the Castle Hayne aquifer, Onslow County
commissioned a study with Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
(GMA) to perform a detailed analysis of the Castle Hayne groundwater
yield and proposed aquifer protection measures. Results from this
evaluation were used to ensure that adequate capacity would be available
to obtain the needed additional water without adverse effects (i.e. salt
water encroachment, declining aquifer levels). The County also
identified proposed well sites based on GMA's recommendations for
well spacing and plans to conduct a well field evaluation after
construction to determine actual pump cycling operation to avoid
excessive drawdown.
GMA also prepared and certified the "Onslow County Wellfield
Evaluation to Support Capacity Use Area Permitting" report for Onslow
County Public Utilities Department in October 2002. GMA has
conservatively estimated the safe yield for the Castle Hayne aquifer in
Onslow County to be 23 million gallons per day and the recharge rate
thereof to be greater than 40,000 gallons per day per square mile. The
plant expansion and groundwater capacity requests were not found to be
significant with respect to the available yield in the Castle Hayne aquifer.
Significant changes in groundwater quality and quantity are not
anticipated.
Based on GMA's findings relative to the safe yield and recharge rates of
the Castle Hayne aquifer, no direct or indirect wetland impacts are
anticipated from the proposed project.
The information was provided in the Final Environmental Assessment
.for Onslow County Dixon and Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Projects (ARCADIS 2004) for which a draft Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) has been issued. The final FONSI will be issued on
April 5, 2004.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
2/3
ARCADIS
2. Please indicate the proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate ownership ofproposed impact sites and provide a
statement front the owner acknowledging permission to conduct impacts.
All of the well sites provided in the PCN application package are owned
by Onslow County.
3. This office believes that the well labeled on the plans as DTW2-2A can
be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the pine savanna.
Please address this issue and revise your plans to avoid or minimize
impacts.
DTW2-2A is positioned on the site as required by 15A NCAC 18C
.0203(1) that states, "The well shall be located on a lot so that the area
within 100 feet of the well shall be owned or controlled by the person
supplying the water. The supplier of water shall be able to protect the
well lot from potential sources of pollution and to construct landscape
features for drainage and diversion of pollution." As shown on Figure 2
of the PCN application, placement of well DTW2-2A is 100 feet from all
property boundaries, and all of the area within the property boundaries is
considered jurisdictional pine savanna. Due to the requirements of the
Administrative Code cited above, relocating the well to reduce impacts
to the pine savanna is not feasible. The access road connects to an
existing culvert crossing and extends to a turnaround area adjacent to
gates that provide access to the production well. The gates are
positioned such that during maintenance to the well, such as replacement
of the pump, a drill rig can access the well.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
3/3
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
!_ll'd l!g5, en! llf l]ItlFi? , cc oniuntcavclt'.: 801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
Mr. John R. Dorney North Carolina 27607-5073
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Tel [phone]
401 Wetlands Certification Unit Fax [phone]
1650 Mail Service Center www.arcadis-us.com
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject:
DWQ # 04-0292
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Dixon WTP
Date:
Dear Mr. Dorney: 30 March 2004
The attached information is provided in response to the Division of Water Quality
Contact:
(DWQ) letter dated March 16, 2004, regarding the above referenced project. Linda Diebolt
Enclosed are seven copies of the response to your letter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 919/854-1282. Extension:
220
Sincerely,
E-mail:
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. [e-mail]
2r 17 Our ref:
Y l? NC703021.0000
Linda Diebolt
Wetland Scientist
Enclosure
Copies:
Kerry Randel/Onslow County Public Utilities
Noelle Lutheran/USACE, Wilmington Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Erika Bailey/ARCADIS
John Maynard/ARCADIS
Mary Sadler/ARCADIS
File
`Ul[ of d f 1gCJ1eI' f)ICIL!Ie
ARCADIS
Please show all wetland impacts including the potential for draining of
the wetlands via groundwater withdrawal.
The proposed upgrade and expansion of the WTP will allow Onslow
County to replace water from the Cretaceous aquifer (existing wells)
with water supplied from the Castle Hayne aquifer. Before pursuing
additional raw water from the Castle Hayne aquifer, Onslow County
commissioned a study with Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
(GMA) to perfonn a detailed analysis of the Castle Hayne groundwater
yield and proposed aquifer protection measures. Results from this
evaluation were used to ensure that adequate capacity would be available
to obtain the needed additional water without adverse effects (i.e. salt
water encroachment, declining aquifer levels). The County also
identified proposed well sites based on GMA's recommendations for
well spacing and plans to conduct a well field evaluation after
construction to determine actual pump cycling operation to avoid
excessive drawdown.
GMA also prepared and certified the "Onslow County Wellfield
Evaluation to Support Capacity Use Area Permitting" report for Onslow
County Public Utilities Department in October 2002. GMA has
conservatively estimated the safe yield for the Castle Hayne aquifer in
Onslow County to be 23 million gallons per day and the recharge rate
thereof to be greater than 40,000 gallons per day per square mile. The
plant expansion and groundwater capacity requests were not found to be
significant with respect to the available yield in the Castle Hayne aquifer.
Significant changes in groundwater quality and quantity are not
anticipated.
Based on GMA's findings relative to the safe yield and recharge rates of
the Castle Hayne aquifer, no direct or indirect wetland impacts are
anticipated from the proposed project.
The information was provided in the Final Environmental Assessment
for Onslow County Dixon and Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Projects (ARCADIS 2004) for which a draft Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) has been issued. The final FONSI will be issued on
April 5, 2004.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
2/3
ARCADIS
2. Please indicate the proposed lot layout cis overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate ownership of proposed impact sites and provide a
stateinent from the owner acknowledging permission to conduct impacts.
All of the well sites provided in the PCN application package are owned
by Onslow County.
This office believes that the well labeled on the plans as DTW2-2A can
be moved oi- reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the pine savanna.
Please address this issue and revise your plans to avoid or minimize
impacts.
DTW2-2A is positioned on the site as required by 15A NCAC 18C
.0203(1) that states, `"The well shall be located on a lot so that the area
within 100 feet of the well shall be owned or controlled by the person
supplying the water. The supplier of water shall be able to protect the
well lot from potential sources of pollution and to construct landscape
features for drainage and diversion of pollution." As shown on Figure 2
of the PCN application, placement of well DTW2-2A is 100 feet from all
property boundaries, and all of the area within the property boundaries is
considered jurisdictional pine savanna. Due to the requirements of the
Administrative Code.cited above, relocating the well to reduce impacts
to the pine savanna is not feasible. The access road connects to an
existing culvert crossing and extends to a turnaround area adjacent to
gates that provide access to the production well. Tile gates are
positioned such that during maintenance to the well, such as replacement
of the pump, a drill rig can access the well.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
3/3

( 1 i ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
h')?i r--;Sii Ul--i`1.1?2, i%lll(Uil'!CJS; C?ll!';IGI?I i1F.il ?; GlrnmilnlC8 U01?:i 801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
Mr. John R. Dorney North Carolina 27607-5073
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Tel [phone]
401 Wetlands Certification Unit Fax [phone]
1650 Mail Service Center www.arcadis•us.com
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject:
DWQ # 04-0292
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Dixon WTP
Date:
Dear Mr. Dorney: 30 March 2004
The attached information is provided in response to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) letter dated March 16, 2004, regarding the above referenced project. contact:
Linda Diebolt
Enclosed are seven copies of the response to your letter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 919/854-1282. Extension:
220
Sincerely,
E-mail:
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. [e-mail]
Y v-) y Our ref:
l? NC703021.0000
Linda Diebolt
Wetland Scientist
Enclosure
Copies:
Kerry Randel/Onslow County Public Utilities
Noelle Lutheran/USACE, Wilmington Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Erika Bailey/ARCADIS
John Maynard/ARCADIS
Mary Sadler/ARCADIS
File
`urt of a 1"UL1e1_ piCiurl,
ARCADIS
Please show all wetland impacts including the potential for draining of
the wetlands via groundwater withdrawal.
The proposed upgrade and expansion of the WTP will allow Onslow
County to replace water from the Cretaceous aquifer (existing wells)
with water supplied from the Castle Hayne aquifer. Before pursuing
additional raw water from the Castle Hayne aquifer, Onslow County
commissioned a study with Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
(GMA) to perfonn a detailed analysis of the Castle Hayne groundwater
yield and proposed aquifer protection measures. Results from this
evaluation were used to ensure that adequate capacity would be available
to obtain the needed additional water without adverse effects (i.e. salt
water encroachment, declining aquifer levels). The County also
identified proposed well sites based on GMA's recommendations for
well spacing and plans to conduct a well field evaluation after
construction to determine actual pump cycling operation to avoid
excessive drawdown.
GMA also prepared and certified the "Onslow County Wellfield
Evaluation to Support Capacity Use Area Permitting" report for Onslow
County Public Utilities Department in October 2002. GMA has
conservatively estimated the safe yield for the Castle Hayne aquifer in
Onslow County to be 23 million gallons per day and the recharge rate
thereof to be greater than 40,000 gallons per day per square mile. The
plant expansion and groundwater capacity requests were not found to be
significant with respect to the available yield in the Castle Hayne aquifer.
Significant changes in groundwater quality and quantity are not
anticipated.
Based on GMA's findings relative to the safe yield and recharge rates of
the Castle Hayne aquifer, no direct or indirect wetland impacts are
anticipated from the proposed project.
The information was provided in the Final Enviranunental Assessment
for Onslow County Dixon and Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Projects (ARCADIS 2004) for which a draft Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) has been issued. The final FONSI will be issued on
April 5, 2004.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
2/3
ARCADIS
Please indicate the proposed lot layout cis overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate ownership ofproposed impact sites and provide a
statement fi-on: the owner acknowledging permission to conduct impacts.
All of the well sites provided in the PCN application package are owned
by Onslow County.
This office believes that the well labeled on the plans as DTW2-2A can
be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the pine savanna.
Please address this issue and revise your plans to avoid oi- minimize
impacts.
DTW2-2A is positioned on the site as required by 15A NCAC 18C
.0203(1) that states, "The well shall be located on a lot so that the area
within 100 feet of the well shall be owned or controlled by the person
supplying the water. The supplier of water shall be able to protect the
well lot from potential sources of pollution and to construct landscape
features for drainage and diversion of pollution." As shown on Figure 2
of the PCN application, placement of well DTW2-2A is 100 feet from all
property boundaries, and all of the area within the property boundaries is
considered jurisdictional pine savanna. Due to the requirements of the
Administrative Code-cited above, relocating the well to reduce impacts
to the pine savanna is not feasible. The access road connects to an
existing culvert crossing and extends to a turnaround area adjacent to
gates that provide access to the production well. The gates are
positioned such that during maintenance to the well, such as replacement
of the pump, a drill rig can access the well.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
3/3
0ARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
Mr. John R. Dorney
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
4t,

Subject:
DWQ # 04-0291
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Hubert WTP
Dear Mr. Dorney:
s ?
?nf
4tL CADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
The attached information is provided in response to the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) letter dated March 16, 2004, regarding the above referenced project.
Enclosed are seven copies of the response to your letter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 919/854-1282.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Linda Di bolt
Wetland Scientist
VV
I?nclosure
Copies:
Kerry Randel/Onslow County Public Utilities
Noelle Lutheran/USACE, Wilmington Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Erika Bailey/ARCADIS
John Maynard/ARCADIS
Mary Sadler/ARCADIS
File
r
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
NATURAL RESOURCES
Date:
30 March 2004
Contact:
Linda Diebolt
Extension:
220
E-mail:
Idiebolt(u)arcadis-us.com
our ref:
NC703021.0000
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS
Please show all wetland iinpacts including the potential for draining of
the wetlands via groundwater ivithdralval.
The proposed upgrade and expansion of the WTP will allow Onslow
County to replace water from the Cretaceous aquifer (existing wells)
with water supplied from the Castle Hayne aquifer. Before pursuing
additional raw water from the Castle Hayne aquifer, Onslow County
commissioned a study with Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
(GMA) to perform a detailed analysis of the Castle Hayne groundwater
yield and proposed aquifer protection measures. Results from this
evaluation were used to ensure that adequate capacity would be available
to obtain the needed additional water without adverse effects (i.e. salt
water encroachment, declining aquifer levels). The County also
identified proposed well sites based on GMA's recommendations for
well spacing and plans to conduct a well field evaluation after
construction to determine actual pump cycling operation to avoid
excessive drawdown.
GMA also prepared and certified the "Onslow County Wellfield
Evaluation to Support Capacity Use Area Permitting" report for Onslow
County Public Utilities Department in October 2002. GMA has
conservatively estimated the safe yield for the Castle Hayne aquifer in
Onslow County to be 23 million gallons per day and the recharge rate
thereof to be greater than 40,000 gallons per day per square mile. The
plant expansion and groundwater capacity requests were not found to be
significant with respect to the available yield in the Castle I layne aquifer.
Significant changes in groundwater quality and quantity are not
anticipated.
Based on GMA's findings relative to the safe yield and recharge rates of
the Castle Hayne aquifer, no direct or indirect wetland impacts are
anticipated from the proposed project.
The information was provided in the Final Environmental Assessment
fbr Onslow CounhY Dixon and Huhert Water 'T'reatment Plant Expansion
Projects (ARCADIS 2004) for which a draft 1, inding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) has been issued. The final FONSI will be issued on
April 5, 2004.
NCDWQ # 04-0291
30 March 2004
Page:
2/3
ARCADIS
2. Please indicate the proposed lot la},out as overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate ownership gfproposed impact sites and provicle a
statement from the owner acknowledging permission to conduct impacts.
All of the well sites provided in the PCN application package are owned
by Onslow County.
NCDWQ # 04-0291
30 March 2004
Page:
3/3
Va ARCAD IS ARCADIS G&M of North
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications Carolina, inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
Mr. John R. Dorney North Carolina 27607-5073
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Tel [phone]
401 Wetlands Certification Unit Fax [phone]
1650 Mail Service Center www.arcadis-us.com
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject:
DWQ # 04-0292
Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Dixon WTP
Date:
Dear Mr. Dorney: 30 March 2004
The attached information is provided in response to the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) letter dated March 16, 2004, regarding the above referenced project. contact:
Linda Diebolt
Enclosed are seven copies of the response to your letter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 919/854-1282. Extension:
220
Sincerely,
E-mail:
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. Idiebolt a arcadis-us.com
Our ref:
NC703021.0000
Linda Diebolt
Wetland Scientist
Enclosure
Copies:
Kerry Randel/Onslow County Public Utilities
Noelle Lutheran/USAGE, Wilmington Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Erika Bailey/ARCADIS
John Maynard/ARCADIS
Mary Sadler/ARCADIS
File
Part of a bigger picture
ARCADIS
Please shorn all wetland impacts including the potential.Jor draining qf'
the wetlands via groundwater withdrawal.
The proposed upgrade and expansion of the WTP will allow Onslow
County to replace water from the Cretaceous aquifer (existing wells)
with water supplied from the Castle I-Iaync aquifer. 13ef6re pursuing
additional raw water from the Castle Haync aquifer, Onslow County
commissioned a study with Groundwater Management Associates, Inc.
(GMA) to perform a detailed analysis of the Castle Hayne groundwater
yield and proposed aquifer protection measures. Results from this
evaluation were used to ensure that adequate capacity would be available
to obtain the needed additional water without adverse effects (i.e. salt
water encroachment, declining aquifer levels). The County also
identified proposed well sites based on GMA's recommendations for
well spacing and plans to conduct a well field evaluation after
construction to determine actual purnp cycling operation to avoid
excessive drawdown.
GMA also prepared and certified the "Onslow County Wellfield
Evaluation to Support Capacity Use Area Permitting" report for Onslow
County Public Utilities Department in October 2002. GMA has
conservatively estimated the safe yield for the Castle I Iayne aquifer in
Onslow County to be 23 million gallons per day and the recharge rate
thereof to be greater than 40,000 gallons per day per square mile. The
plant expansion and groundwater capacity requests were not found to be
significant with respect to the available yield in the Castle Mayne aquifer.
Significant changes in groundwater quality and quantity are not
anticipated.
Based on GMA's findings relative to the safe yield and recharge rates of
the Castle I Iayne aquifer, no direct or indirect wetland impacts are
anticipated from the proposed project.
The information was provided in the Final Environmental Assessment
for Onslow County Dixon and Hubert Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Projects (ARCADIS 2004) for which a draft Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) has been issued. The final FONSI will be issued on
April 5, 2004.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
2/3
ARCADIS
2. Please indicate the proposed lot laVout as overlavs on the site plan.
Please indicate ownership gfproposed impact sites and provide a
statement_ ront the owner acknowledging permission to conduct inipacts.
All of the well sites provided in the PCN application package are owned
by Onslow County.
This office believes that the well labeled on the plans cis DDY2-2A can
be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the pine savanna.
Please address this issue and revise your plans to avoid or mniintize
impacts.
DTW2-2A is positioned on the site as required by 15A NCAC 18C
.0203(1) that states, "The well shall be located on a lot so that the area
within 100 feet of the well shall be owned or controlled by the person
supplying the water. The supplier of water shall be able to protect the
well lot from potential sources of pollution and to construct landscape
features for drainage and diversion of pollution." As shown on Figure 2
of the PCN application, placement of well DTW2-2A is 100 feet from all
property boundaries, and all of the area within the property boundaries is
considered jurisdictional pine savanna. Due to the requirements of the
Administrative Code cited above, relocating the well to reduce impacts
to the pine savanna is not feasible. The access road connects to an
existing culvert crossing and extends to a turnaround area adjacent to
gates that provide access to the production well. The gates are
positioned such that during maintenance to the well, such as replacement
of the pump, a drill rig can access the well.
NCDWQ # 04-0292
30 March 2004
Page:
3/3
W ATFC
400F
} 1
p Y
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 16, 2004
DWQ # 04-0291
Onslow County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Onslow County Public Utilities
Attn: Kerry Randel
228 Georgetown Road
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Subject Property: Water Treatment Plant Upgrades, Hubert WTP
Dear Mr. Randel:
On March 8, 2004 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your application regarding
your plan to fill wetlands or waters for the purpose of upgrades and expansion in Onslow County. Approval from
DWQ is required to disturb these areas. Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the
DWQ # listed above in your reply. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance V = 100 feet) so we
can begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
1. Please show all wetland impacts including the potential for draining of wetlands via groundwater
withdrawal.
2. Please indicate the proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. Please indicate ownership of
proposed impact sites and provide a statement from the owner acknowledging permission to conduct
impacts.
Please telephone Ed Schwartzman at 919-715-3477 if you have any questions or would require copies of our rules
or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is received. If we do not hear
from you by writing or by fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer want to
pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely,
, /CO
John R. Dorney
401 Water Quality Certification Program
JRD/bs
cc: Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Wilmington Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Linda Diebolt, Arcadis, 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300, Raleigh, NC 27607-5076
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
A IQ
Q ARCADIS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications
Transmittal Letter
To: Copies:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality File
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
From: Date:
Linda Diebdlt j 8 March 2004
Subject: ARCADIS Project No.: VmTER Q U Onslow County Water Treatment Plant NC703021.0000% ?? i r vlr( x ft1S
(WTP) - Dixon WTP and Hubert WTP
We are sending you:
® Attached ? Under Separate Cover Via the Following Items:
? Shop Drawings ? Plans ? Specifications ? Change Order
? Prints ? Samples ? Copy of Letter ? Reports
® Other: copies of previous permits
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
WCT?L ANDS 1491 (107a TATION
MAR H 2004
Copies Date Drawing No. Rev. Description Action*
7 7/3/03 NPDES permit renewal request and responses for Dixon WTP F
7 11/27/02 Nationwide Permit 12 for Dixon WTP F
7 7/3/03 NPDES permit renewal request and responses for Hubert WTP F
7 1/6/04 CAMA permit for Hubert WTP F

Action*
? A Approved
? AN Approved As Noted
? AS As Requested
? Other:
? CR Correct and Resubmit
® F File
? FA For Approval
? Resubmit Copies
? Return Copies
? Review and Comment
Mailing Method
? U.S. Postal Service 1" Class
? Certified/Registered Mail
? Other:
® Courier/Hand Delivery ? FedEx Priority Overnight ? FedEx 2-Day Delivery
? United Postal Service (UPS) ? FedEx Standard Overnight ? FedEx Economy
Comments: Please find attached supplemental information for inclusion with the Pre-Construction Notification application
forms submitted on 26 February 2004 for work associated with the Onslow County Water Treatment Plant Upgrades and
Associated Improvements Project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (919) 854-
1282, extension 220. Thank vou, Linda Diebolt
V2 ARCAD IS
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications ,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Subject:
Pre-Construction Notification Application Forms for Section 401
General Water Quality Certification for Onslow County Water Treatment Plant
Upgrades and Associated Improvements Project
Dixon Water Treatment Plant and Hubert Water Treatment Plant
Dear Sir or Madam:
ARCADIS was contracted by the Ollslow County Public Utilities Department (the
Comity) to prepare the Pre-Construction Notification Application forms for the
County's upgrades and expansions ofthe Dixon and I lubert Water "Treatment Plants
(WIT) near Jacksonville, North Carolina. Seven (7) copies of the Pre-Construction
Notification Application forms are attached. The County requests the issuance of a
Section 401 General Water Quality Certification for the proposed work outlined in
the forms. Payment of the $200 application fee for each of the two WTP projects is
included.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of'North Carolina, Inc.
r I
r r_-
Linda Di4olt
Wetland Scientist
Copies:
File
I' EF ?! t 1.4141
ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
TRANSPORTATION
Date:
26 February 2004
Contact:
Linda Diebolt
Extension:
220
E-mail:
Idiebolt @ arcadis-us.com
our ref:
NC703021.0000
Part of a bigger picture
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. J c. ;
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information WETLANDS /401 GROUP
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. Kerry O. Randel FEB 2, 7004
Mailing Address: Onslow Count Public Utilities
228 Georgetown Road ATER OuAt, o
Jacksonville. North Carolina 28540
Telephone Number: 910/455-0722 Fax Number: 910/455-0115
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Linda Diebolt
Company Affiliation: ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
Mailing Address: 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-5073
Telephone Number: 919/854-1282 Fax Number: 919/854-5448
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 15
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Onslow County Water Treatment Plant Upgrades -Hubert WTP
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See Attached Sheet
4. Location
County: Onslow Nearest Town: Jacksonville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Take I-40 east to exit 364 near
Warsaw. Take Highway 24 east through Warsaw and Jacksonville. The westernmost well is
proposed to be located adjacent to Bell Swamp at Highway 24 in Hubert. Additional
proposed well sites and raw water transmission lines are proposed to be located along
Highway 24, SR 1428 south of SR 1425, and SR 1432.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): See Attached Sheet
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Four parcels that cover approximately one acre each
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Bell Swamp and Queen Creek
8. River Basin: White Oak
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: 1. HSW10 - Riggs Site: The northwestern portion of the
Ries Site has been disturbed. and a production well is located in the disturbed area. The
Page 6 of 15
remainder of the parcel consists of mature hardwood forest. An access easement extends
from the Riggs Site to SR 1428 (Riggs Road). The Riggs Site and the access easement
contain jurisdictional wetlands. The site is bound on the north, east, south, and west by
wooded, undeveloped land. 2. HSW8 - Bougie Site: A portion of the Bougie Site has been
disturbed and a production well is located in the disturbed area. The remainder of the parcel
consists of an immature pine community. A 15-foot wide utility easement is located in the
western portion of the site. The entire Bougie Site contains jurisdictional wetlands. The
Bougie site is bound on the north, south, and west by undeveloped, wooded land. The site is
bound by SR 1432 (Parkertown Road) to the east. 3. HTW7 - Rogers Site: The Rogers
Site contains a mature pine community, a disturbed area, and an existing grass field road.
The Rogers Site, with the exception of the existing grass field road, contains jurisdictional
wetlands. The site is bound on the north and east by undeveloped, wooded land and on the
south and west by agricultural land. 4. HTW10 - Howard 3 Site: The Howard 3 Site
consists of a mature hardwood forest that is bound on the north, east, south, and west by
undeveloped, wooded land. No jurisdictional wetlands are located onsite. Access to the
Howard 3 Site is provided by a 20-foot wide easement that originates along NC Highway 24.
The northern portion of the easement contains a cypress bowl wetland that is isolated. 5.
Stream 1 (Bell Swamp Creek): Stream 1 is a perennial stream that discharges into White
Oak River. The width of stream from top of bank to top of bank at the pipe crossing is
Nproximately 10 feet. Stream 1 will be traversed by the raw water transmission main in the
NC Highway 24 right-of-way. The surrounding area consists of rural residential,
agricultural, and undeveloped lands. 6. Stream 2 (UT to Queen Creek): Stream 2 is a
perennial stream that discharges into Queen Creek. The width of stream from top of bank to
top of bank at the pipe crossing is approximately 70 feet. Stream 2 will be traversed by the
raw water transmission main in the SR 1428 (Riggs Road right-of-way. The surrounding
area consists of rural residential, agricultural, and undeveloped lands. 7. Stream 3 (Queen
Creek): Stream 3 is a perennial stream that discharges into Bell Swamp Creek. The width
of the stream from top of bank to top of bank at the pipe crossing is approximately 15 feet.
Stream 3 will be traversed by the raw water transmission main in the SR 1428 (Riggs Road)
right-of-way. The surrounding area consists of rural residential, agricultural, and
undeveloped lands. 8. Stream 4 (Pasture Branch): Stream 4 is a perennial stream that
discharges into Bell Swamp Creek. The width of the stream from top of bank to top of bank
at the pipe crossing is approximately 50 feet. Stream 4 will be traversed by the raw water
transmission main in the NC Highway 24 right-of-way. The surrounding area consists of
rural residential, agricultural, and undeveloped lands. 9. Stream 5 (Queen Creek): Stream
5 is a perennial stream that discharges into Bell Swamp Creek. The width of the stream from
top of bank to top of bank at the pipe crossing is approximately 40 feet. Stream 5 will be
traversed by the raw water transmission main in the NC Highway 24 right-of-way. The
surrounding area consists of rural residential, agricultural, and undeveloped lands.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project consists of expansions and upgrades at the Hubert Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
from 2 million gallons per day (MGD) to 6 MGD. The proposed project includes expansion
of the WTP and the installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains for the WTP.
The Hubert WTP is located on a 15-acre tract in the Hubert community at the intersection of
NC 172 and NC 24. Ten new well sites have been identified to supply additional raw water
Page 7 of 15
to the Hubert WTP. The raw water transmission main system includes 4,440 feet (0.8 mile)
of 16-inch line and 28,485 feet (5.4 miles) of 12-inch line. The raw water transmission
mains will be constructed within existing highway rights-of way. The list of equipment
anticipated to be used during project implementation includes a directional boring machine,
trencher, bulldozer, front-end loader, motor grader, dump truck, track hoe, pile driver, and
roller/compactor.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project includes expansion of the Hubert
WTP and installation of new wells and raw water transmission mains to provide additional
raw water to the WTP from the Castle Hayne aquifer system.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Renewal of NPDES permit number NC0083321 was requested by Onslow County Public
Utilities Department on May 12, 2003. DWQ determined that all data and requirements needed
by the agency would be provided in the environmental assessment document. CAMA General
Permit Number 36723-C was issued on January 6, 2004 for the installation of a raw water main
with ten 10) new wells and involving five 5) stream crossings. The CAMA permit indicates
that the project involves primary nursery area(s) and a Public Trust Area.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 8 of 15
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Wetland impacts: For the sites listed
below, the installation of a production well will include a concrete pad, fencing, miscellaneous
equipment within the fenced area, and a gravel access road from the point specified below for
each site to the fenced area. 1. HSW10 - Riggs Site: Installation of a production well with the
gravel access road from NC SR 1428 (Riggs _ Road) to the fenced area will result in 0.145 acre of
v,) permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. Installation of a raw water connecting main from
1 the production well to the raw water transmission main that is proposed to parallel the west side
of NC SR 1428 will result in 0.188 acre of temporary impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. 2.
HSW8 - Bougie Site: Installation of a production well with the gravel access road from NC SR
1432 (Parkertown Road) to the fenced area will result in approximately 0.047 acre of permanent
impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. Installation of a raw water connecting main from the
production well to the transmission main that is proposed to parallel the west side of NC SR
1432 will result in 0.025 acre of temporary impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. 3. HTW7 -
Rogers Site: Installation of a production well with the gravel access road from an existing grass
field road to the fenced area will result in 0.051 acre of permanent impacts to jurisdictional
wetlands. Installation of a raw water connecting main from the production well to the raw water
transmission main that is proposed to parallel the east side of NC SR 1431 (Lee Rogers Road)
will result in 0.027 acre of temporary impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. 4. HTW10 - Howard
3 Site: Installation of a gravel access road from NC Highway 24 to the production well area will
result in 0.092 acre of permanent impacts to isolated wetlands. Installation of a raw water
connecting main from the production well to the raw water transmission main that is proposed to
parallel the south side of NC Highway 24 will result in 0.094 acre of temporary impacts to
isolated wetlands.
Stream impacts: Stream 1 (Bell Swamp Creek) - Installation of the raw water transmission
main will require a directional bore under the stream, resulting in 16 inches of temporary impact.
The width of stream from top of bank to top of bank at the pipe crossing is approximately 10
feet. Stream 2 (UT to Queen Creek) - Installation of the raw water transmission main will
require a directional bore under the stream, resulting in 16 inches of temporary impact. The
width of stream from top of bank to top of bank at the pipe crossing is approximately 70 feet.
Stream 3 (Queen Creek) - Installation of the raw water transmission main will require the pipe
to be placed on piles over the stream. The piles will not be placed in the stream channel. The
width of the stream from top of bank to top of bank at the pipe crossing is approximately 15 feet.
Stream 4 (Pasture Branch) - Installation of the raw water transmission main will require the
pipe to be placed on piles over the stream. The piles will not be placed in the stream channel.
The width of the stream from top of bank to top of bank at the pipe crossing is approximately 50
feet. Stream 5 (Queen Creek) - Installation of the raw water transmission main will require the
pipe to be placed on piles over the stream. The piles will not be placed in the stream channel.
The width of the stream from top of bank to top of bank at the pipe crossing is approximately 40
A
JA4 s
oN7
oar
a 9z
31t'-
VIM
.
Page 9 of 15
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
HSW 10 Permanent Fill 0.145 Yes 1550' Disturbed lands
HSW8 Permanent Fill 0.047 No 1575' Wet pine flatwoods
HTW7 Permanent Fill 0.051 No 1575' Wet pine flatwoods
HTW 10 Permanent Fill 0.055 No 600' Cypress bowl (isolated)
HSW 10 Temporary Fill 0.188 No 1550' Disturbed lands
HSW8 Temporary Fill 0.025 No 1575' Wet pine flatwoods
HTW7 Temporary Fill 0.027 No 1575' Wet pine flatwoods
HTW 10 Temporary Fill 0.094 No 600' Cypress bowl (isolated)
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.femaZgy.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: HSW10 = 0.918
acre, HSW8 = 0.932 acre, HTW7 = 0.799 acre, HTW10 = 0.149 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: HSW 10 =0.333 acre, HSW8 =0.072 acre, HTW7
= 0.078 acre. HTW 10 = 0.149 acre
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Q??k
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif
Stream 1 Directional bore 1.3' Bell Swamp 10' Perennial
Stream 2 Directional bore 1.3'__..
LID
TS?uee1-Creek . - ---- 79--- __? Perennial
3 Piles Queen Creek Perennial
Stream 4 Piles 15' Pasture Branch 50' Perennial
Stream 5 Piles 15' Queen Creek 40' Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wwww%s..gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., AAy pgcone,axn,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Stream 1 = 1.3', Stream 2
= 1.3'. Stream 3 = 15'. Stream 4 = 15'. Stream 5 = 15'
Page 10 of 15
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The location of the well sites is dictated by several factors that include, but are not limited to, a
minimum distance requirement between wells, location of available undeveloped land, and
location of the well sites in relation to the WTP. Within the well sites, the wells must be placed a
minimum of 100 feet from the property lines. The HSW10 - Riggs Site, HSW8 - Bougie Site,
and HTW7 - Rogers Site contain disturbed areas. The production well, associated equipment,
fence, and access road on the aforementioned sites have been placed within the disturbed areas,
to the extent feasible to reduce the amount of impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. Access to
HSW10 - Howard 3 Site is via an easement that contains an isolated wetland. The raw water
connecting mains will be placed to minimize the distance through jurisdictional wetlands. The
raw water transmission mains will be constructed within existing highway rights-of-way.
Several streams will be crossed by the raw water transmission mains. Directional boring
techniques will be used to avoid impacts to two stream channels. The three remaining stream
Page 11 of 15
channels will be traversed by installing piers. The piers will not be placed within the stream
channel. Impacts to the streams and wetlands cannot be avoided, except by choosing a no-build
alternative.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.cnr.state.nc.ushlcwetlands/stnngide.htm.l.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mechanized land clearing and placement of fill material into Section 404 jurisdictional
wetlands occurred during the initial phase of the Onslow County WTP Upgrades and
Associated Improvements. The mitigation plan for the impacts has been submitted to the
United States Army Corps of Engineers. The measures included in the aforementioned
mitigation plan involve mitigating the onsite wetlands outside of the areas to be impacted on
each site.
Page 12 of 15
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at bttp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ® Draft EA has been reviewed by NCDENR, and a draft FONSI
will be issued March 1, 2004. Final EA will be submitted with draft FONSI for Clearinghouse
Review.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 13 of 15
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The total acreage for the four well sites is approximately 4 acres. Existing impervious area
covers approximately 0.080 acre, and proposed impervious area covers approximately
acre. The project shall comply with all measures required for full compliance with the
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973, as implemented by 15 NCAC 4A, 413, and 4C, as
amended. Stormwater control measures will include the minimization of exposed soil at one
time, avoidance of erosive surface silts or clays for construction of fill and waste areas, provision
of temporary measures such as berms, dikes, and drains to prevent water flow, provision of water
barriers as required to protect the site from soil erosion, spanning of low areas to allow
unimpeded drainage, and periodic inspection of earthwork for evidence of erosion and
sedimentation and implementation of corrective measures, as needed.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal wastewater is generated from sinks and bathrooms at the WTP site. No wastewater
will be generated at the well sites or along the raw water connecting mains or raw water
Page 14 of 15
transmission mains. Municipal wastewater generated at the WTP site is treated in an onsite
septic treatment system. Process waste streams generated at the WTP will be collected and
transmitted to four (4) onsite backwash water ponds for storage and settling of solids. Process
waste streams include backwash waste streams generated from backwash of pressure filters,
softeners, and carbon filters. It is estimated that a total waste flow of 0.5 MGD is expected to be
discharged via the existing outfall. Overflow from the ponds will be discharged to Queen Creek
via the County's existing outfall, permitted under NPDES Permit No. N00083321. The existing
NPDES permit does not have a flow limitation. Discharge concentrations from the expanded
WTP are expected to be similar to existing effluent concentrations, which area significantly
lower than the existing permit limits. Although the mass loads to the receiving stream will
increase with the increased discharge flows, the mass loads to the receiving stream will be
substantially lower than the permitted loads associated with maximum allowable discharge
concentrations at existing discharge flows.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Age's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 15 of 15
FFb 25 04 02:56p
Agent Authorization
Onslow County hereby grants ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc, signatory
authority to sign the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Forms for the
Onslow County Water Treatment Plant Upgrades (Hubert Water Treatment Plant and
Dixon Water Treatment Plant).
ZL??
Signature
D,?cs v l,.oL?,?•
Title
ZS' le,6
Date

p.2
III. 3. Property Identification Numbers
Well Site Number Property Identification Number
HSW 10 532700988151
HSW8 533501486092
HTW7 533603339856
HTW 10 533502952456
III. 5. Site Coordinates
Well Site Number Latitude Longitude
HSW 10 34°46'36.60"N 77014'8.75"W
HSW8 34043'1 8.18"N 77013'1 5.04"W
HTW7 34°44'4.68"N 77°13'21.36"W
HTW10 34°42'53.55"N 77°12'5.33"W
Stream Crossing Number
Stream 1 34°42'48.45"N 77°14'51.33"W
Stream 2 34°44'46.76"N 77°14'14.85"W
Stream 3 34°45'5.96"N 77°14'2.92"W
Stream 4 34°42'59.93"N 77°12'58.41"W
Stream 5 34°42'55.35"N 77°13'26.46"W
1% ARCADIS
ARCADIS 06M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-5073
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
.W.0rcadis-us.com
JL CRIS ER c4L TROUTMAN
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3809 PEACHTREE AVENUE, SUITE 102
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROUNA 28403
[phone] FAX [phone]
BELL SWAMP DIRECTIONAL BORE FIGURE
STREAM 1
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION 5
Proposed Raw Water Line
Onslow County, North Carolina
----
GROU
-
-- ---
12" SDR2 I PV
C
N Lf m r- o o - o C o FI,
a mC oa a m �j o — r-
Lf o o �0 0
N N N N
32+00 33100 3di00 35+00 --
ARCADIS
ARCADIS C6M of North Carolina. Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive Suite 300
Raleigyh, North Carolina 27607-5073
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
WWW.arcadis us.com
a,
r
N
- 36+00
dKCRISER & TROUTMAN
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3809 PEACHTREE AVENUE, SUITE 102
�r WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
[phone] Fm [phone]
UT to QUEEN CREEK DIRECTIONAL BORE
STREAM 2
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION
Proposed Raw Water Line
Onslow County, North Carolina
FIGURE

- OvN
EX\5?

12" S R2 1 PVC 12 DI 12" DI 12" DR2 I PVC
PILE
N 1.n In I- I.n Ln Ln U) o In I-n
In o II o 0 0 -0 rl- 0 Lf- 0 Lf- 0
r r- o r-
N N N I--
N r- r- (r r-
N N N r r`-
N rr- N
55+00 )6400 5 7+00 58+00
ARCADIS
ARCADIS 06M of North Carolino.Inc.
801 Corporate center Drive, Suite 300
Rolelpph. North Carolina 27607-5073
TEL
919/854-
28
F
s
AX:919/854-5448
1
2
www.arcadi3-us.com
CRIS ER & TROUTMAN QUEEN CREEK FIGURE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
d STREAM 3
A HUBERT WTP EXPANSION 7
awa PEACHTREE AVENUE, SUITE 102
?? ..' WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
1 Proposed Raw Water Line
(9
0) 397-2929 Fix [phone] Onslow County, North Carolina
-_BO_-TOM_OF PIPE TO BL_FLUS
WITH INSDE TOP OF BOX CULVERT
FXI _ _
-- 12" DI
- --- - - - -------- - - - - - - - --- -- - -- 12
- PILL BEN-I S- _
SEF DETAII S
EXIS 1 8 _I3OX CU-L_VER --
CD F-0 r' C-) c\j v c "' m a m
a - r
(o - a
39+00 40+00 41100 42+00
ARCADIS
ARCADIS CQM of North Carolina. Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive. Suite 300
Raleigh. North Carolina 27607-5073
TEL-919/854-1282 FAX; 919/854-5448
www.orcad13-US.COM
JLRISER&TROUTMAN PASTURE BRANCH
CONSULTING ENGINEERS STREAM 4
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION
N NORTTH CAROUN rt2844M
WWil-MINOTO Proposed Raw Water Line
[phone] FM [phone] Onslow County, North Carolina

rn
43+0
FIGURE
8
CRISER & TROUTMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3809 Peachtree Avenue, Sulte 102 0 PO Box 3727 0 Wilmington, North Carolina 28406-0717 0 [phone] 0 FA.C [phone]
Date: July 3, 2003
Project # 4967.01
To: David
From: Don
Subject: NPDES permits-Onslow Co
WETF M',`US 1401 GROUP
MEMORANDUM
MAR
David,
WATER QUALIV SECTION
At the suggestion of Ed Beck, we submitted the updated NPDES permit forms. On
June 26, I got a call from Cookie Jackson, Div. Of Water Quality (733-5083) and she
basically did not know wh we were submitting the permits. After much discussion, she
referred the forms to?Ale_x Marks. On June 30, Mr. Marks called and we had similar
discussions on why the forms were being submitted. The final discussion concentrated
on the need for the forms. Since the project was over one million gallons per day, an
environmental assessment had to be done. He asked if one was completed and I gave
him the status. He said that the EA would provide all the data and requirements that he
needed.
CRISER & TROUTMAN CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
3809 Peachtree Avenue, Suite 102 0 PO Box 3727 0 WUffdngton, North Carolina 28406-0727 O [phone] 0 FAX ( 910) 397-2971
Date: May 14, 2003
Project # 4967.01
To: NC Dept of Natural Resources
Div of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
From: Don Butler, PE
Subject: NPDES Standard Form A
Onslow Co. Water Department
MEMORANDUM
Gentlemen;
The Onslow County Water Department plans to expand both Public Water Supply
Treatment Plants. Additional softeners will be added and the backwash water to the
lagoons will be increased. Enclosed are the flow revisions added to the NPDES
fonns for both plants.
CRISER & TROUTMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS
3fNM Peachtree Avenue. Suite 102 0 PO Box 3727 0 Wihnington, North Carolina 2"06-0727 0 [phone] 0 FAX ( 910) 397-2971
Date: 05/08/03
To: Pte Deaver
From: u er, PE
Project # 4967.01
RECEIVED
Subject: NPDES permit renewal [??
MEMORANDUM Qt--rnnTTrr'kr4
Pete,
We contacted Ed Beck and got the attached forms for the NPDES permit renewal.
It basically changes the expected volinne discharged from the lagoons to the creeks.
NC.DENR / DWQ / NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - STANDARD FORM A
Nlunicipal Facilities with permitted flows >1 MGD or with pretreatment programs
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SECTION 1. APPLICATION AND FACILITY DESCRIPTION
Unless otherwise specified on Ibis form all items are to be completed. It an item is nct applicable indicate'NA'.
North Carolina NPDES Permit Number N000 83321 (if known)
Applicant and facility producing discharge
This applies to the person, agency, firm, municipality, or any other entity that owns or is responsible for the permitted facility. This may or may not
be the same name as the facility or activity producing the discharge. Enter the name of the applicant as it is officially or legally referred to; do not
use colloquial names as a substitute for the official name.
Name of applicant / permittee: Onslow County Water Department
Mailing address:
Street address 232 Georgetown Rd
City Jacksonville County Onslow
State NC Zip Code 28540
Telephone Number ( 910) 455-0722
Fax Number ( 910) 455-2587
e-mail address
2.
Drlailing address of applicant's Authorized Agent/ Representative:
Complete this section if an outside consulting firml engineering firm will act on behalf of the applicant / permittee
Engineer / Company name
Street address
City
County
State Zip Code
Telephone Number ( )
Fax Number ( )
e-mail address
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such
information is true, complete, and accurate.
??. Q. /GoZ ?v4rC ,Zti; , o l w o6v 46 /ii u6 Y.
t
Printen?&004 Title '!
(Z d
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent Date Ap ication Signed
North Carciina General Statue 140-215.6 (b)(2) provides that Any person who knowing,/ makes any false statement representation, or certification in any appficaticn,
record, report, plan, or other document riles or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that
Article or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21
or regr:la: cns of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be gully of a misdemeanor punishable by a line not to exceed 510,000, or by
imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fire or not more than $10,000 or imprisonment not more than 5
years, or loth, for a similar offense.)
tof4
NC DENR / DWQ / NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - STANDARD FORM A
Municipal Facilities with permitted flows >1 NIGD or with pretreatment programs r
3. Permitted Facility Location:
Give the physical location of the facility where discharge(s) presently occur(s) or will occur.
Hubert Water Treatment Plant
Street address 374 Hubert Blvd
City County Onslow
State NC Zip Code 28540
Telephone Number
Fax Number
e-mail address
4. blunicipalities or Areas Served (see instructions
Enter the names of the municipalities or areas served by this facility. For each municipality enter the best estimate of actual population served at
the time of this applicalion.
V / A
5. Average Daily Industrial Flow
Total estimated average daily flow from all industrial sources: 0 kIGD
Total permit!ed monthly now from all industrial sources: 0 MGD
Note: All Significant Industrial Users (as defined in Section III) discharging to the municipal system must be listed in Section III.
6. Facility Description
• Present Ooeratino Status: Provide a narrative description of installed wastewater trealment components at the facility.
Include sizes & capacities for each component.
• Potential Facility Changes: Provide a narrative description of any planned upgrades / expansions / repairs planned for the
facility during the next five years. Do not Include tasks associated with routine operation & maintenance. ,
. Schemalic of wastewalerflow: ;A line .drawing of water flow through the facility must be attached to this'application: The'
schematic should show flow volumes at all points in the treatment process. Specific treatment components Should be
identified.
• Location mao: A map showing the location of each ouffall must be attached to tflis applicalion. The usual meridian arrow
showing north as well as the map scale must be shown. On all maps of rivers, the direction of the current is to be indicted by
an arrow. In tidal waters, the directions of the ebb and flow tides are to be shown. All outfalls should be identified with the
oulfall number(s) used in Section II of this application. A copy of the relevant portion of a USGS topographic map is preferred.
All sheets should be approximately letter size with margins suitable for filing and binding. All pages should include facility location
and permit number (if available).
LtLTLTLtTtTttLLLLTTTTTTLT
2 of4
NC DENR / DWQ / NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - STANDARD FORM A
Municipal Facilities with permitted flows >I MGD or with pretreatment programs
SECTION 11. BASIC DISCHARGE DESCRIPTION
Complete this section for each present (or proposed) discharge indicated in Section 1.
All values for an existing discharge should be representative of the twelve previcus months of opera?cn.
(If this is a proposed discharge, values should reflect best engineering estimates.)
1. Facility Discharges, Number and Discharge Volume
Specify the number of discharges described in this application and the volume of water discharged or lost to each of the categories below.
Estimate average volume per day in MGD. Do not include intermittent discharges, overflows, bypasses or seascnal discharges from lagoons, etc.
Discharge To: Number of Discharge Points Total Volume Discharged (MG01
Sur,ace Water
Other (describe below)
1
0.360
TOTAL
If'othe!isspecifiied.describe: _ Lagoon Discharge
2. Outfall Number: 1
Assign a !hree-digit number beginning with 001 for the point of discharge covered by the first description. Discharge serial numbers should be
cor,secul ve fcr each additional discharge described; hence, the second serial number should be C02 , the third 003, e!c.
3. Discharge to End Date
If the discharge is scheduled to cease within the next 5 years, give the date (within best estimate) the discharge w'.II end: NA
Give the reascr,(s) for discontinuing this discharge in your cover letter.
4. Receiving Stream Name
Give the name of the waterway (at the point of discharge) by which it is usually designated on published maps of the area. If the discharge is to an
unnamec tributary, so state and give the name of the first body of water fed by that tributary which is named on the map, e.g., UT to McIntire Creek,
where McIntire Creek is the first water way that is named on the map and is reached by the discharge.
ueens Creek
5. Outfall Structure
Describe the outfall structure and any significant changes since the last permit was issued (repairs, shoreline maintenance, etc.).
3of4
Al %- 1.IC'IYtC / DWQ / NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - STANDARD FORM A
Municipal Facilities with permitted flows >1 MGD or with pretreatment programs
SECTION 111. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
Submit a separate Section 111 for each Significant Industrial User.
1. Significant Industrial User (SIU)
An SIU has (or could have) significant impact on the POTW receiving the wastewater or upon the quality of effluent from the receiving POTW.
Specifically, an SIU:
• has a flow of 50,000 gallons or more per average workday;
• has a flow greater than 5 percent of the total flow carried by the municipal system m receiving the waste, or
• has a toxic material in its discharge.
It may be necessary to alter these administrative criteria in certain cases, such as an instance where two or more contributing industries in
combination can produce an undesirable effect on either the municipal facility or the quality of its effluent.
Name of SIU_ N/A
Street ad
City
County,
State Zip Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
e-mail address
2. Primary Product or Raw Material
Specify either the principal product or the principal raw material and the maximum quantity per day produced or consumed.
Quantities are to be reported in the units of measurement for each SIC category at the facility. SIC categories should use the units of
measurement normally used by that industry.
3.
0.36 fvIGD QX Intermittent Conlinuous
4of4
Flow
Indicate the volume of water discharged into the POTW and whether this discharge is intermittent or continuous
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE - SHORT FORA A
For municipal discharges <1 IvICD (or similar privately owned discharges <IMCD)
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit N000 83321
Please print or type
Name of applicant/permittee Onslow County Water Department
Address, location, and telephone number of facility producing discharge:
A. Facility Name Hubert Water Treatment Plant
13. Mailing address of applicant/ permittee:
Address 232 Georgetown Rd
City Jacksonville County Onslow
State NC ZIP 28450
Telephoned 910 455 0722 FaxR 910 455 2587
e-Mail address:
C. Physical Location of facility to be permitted:
Street address 374 Hubert Blvd
city
County Onslow
State NC Zip Code
Telephone FaxT
NA
Type of wastewater treatment:
? None ? Primary ? Intermediate F] Secondary ? Advanced
Design floc, of facility AICD. Average monthly flow
ivIGD
Percent BOD removal (actual):
? 0-29.9 ? 30-64.9 65-84.9 •
? ? 85-94.9 ? 95 or more
Population served:
? 1-199 ? 200-499 ? 500-999 [] 1,000-4,999 ? 5,000-9,999 ? 10,000 or more
Number of separate discharge. points:
? 1 ? 2 Y ? 3 ? 4 or more dive number)
Description of wastewater volume discharged to receiving stream.
Discharge per Flow, MUD (million gallons per operating day) Volume treated before
o eratin day
Average dischar ino ( ercent)
Maximum 0.360
1012
11/10/99
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE - SHORT FORMA
For municipal discharges <1 MGD (or similar privately owned discharges <INIGD)
If any wastewater, treated or untreated, Is discharged to places other than surface waters, check below
as applicable.
NA
Flow, MGD mi llion gallons pe operating ay)
Wastewater is
discharged to 0-0.0099. 0.01-0.049 0.05-0.099 0.1-0.49 0.5-0.99
Dee well
Evaporation lagoon
Subsurface percolation
system
Other, specify:
Is any sludge ultimately returned to a waterway?
? Yes [j No
Do you receive industrial waste? ? Yes ? No
If yes, enter approximate number of industrial dischargers into system
Type of collection sewer system:
A. ? Separate sanitary
B. ? Combined sanitary and storm
C. ? Both separate and combined server systems
Name of receiving stream(s) Queens Creek
Does your discharge contain (or is it possible for your discharge to contain) any of the following
substances (circle all that apply):
Ammonia cyanide aluminum beryllium cadmium chromium
Lead mercury nickel copper selenium zinc phenols

I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
?.
U41
Printed name of Person Signing

Signature of Applicant
Title

Date Application Signed
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) states: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation,
or certification in any application, record; report, plan, or other document riles or required to be maintained under Article 21 or
regulations of the Environmental Management Commission Implementing that Article, or who falslries, tampers with, or knowly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or
regulations of the Environmental Management Commission Implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor..
punishable by a fine not to exceed S10,000. or by Imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001
provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10.000 or Imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both. for a similar
offense.)
2 cf 2 12110199
F et) 05 04 10:34a
4 _ r'
J?..?.,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Acting Director William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
Onslow County
C/o Kerry Randel
228 Georgetown Road
Jacksonville, N.C. 28540
Dear Mr. Randel :
P.3
RECEIVED
Attached is General Permit #36723 C for the expansion of two water treatment plants in areas noted on
enclosed permit.
In order to validate this permit, please sign all three (3) copies as indicated. Retain the white copy for your
files and return the signed yellow and pink copies to us in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope. If the
signed permit copies are not returned to this office before the initiation of development, you will be working
without authorization and will be subject to a Notice of Violation and subsequent civil penalties.
We appreciate your early attention to this matter.
Sincerely,

Tere Barrett
Coastal Management Representative
TB/rcb
Enclosures

151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza ll, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet; www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
Fed 05 04 10:34a p.2
AMA / LYDREDGE & FILL !`i? 367 23-(?,
L?J!GENERAL PERMIT Previous permit #
LW?New LModification ?Complete Reissue 1--Partial Reissue Date previous permit issued
As authorized by the State of North Carolina, Department of Environment and Natural Resources G1/ I
and the Coastal Resources Commission in an area of environmental concern pursuant to 15A NC AC ll`.•I Rules attached.
Applicant Name ect Location: County. It Address Street Address/ State Road/ Lot #(s)
s-?;%)-?--
StathZIP-??
City l
# ) o # { --) Subdivision-
Phone ?-? ? City ZIP
Authorized /{gent
CW ?EW *TA ]ES ?PTS Phone# RiverBasin l
Affected C OEA C HHF D IH C' UBA C N/A a nat man unkn}
AEC{s): Adj. Wtr. Body
C PWS: C FC:
Closest Maj. Wtr. Body- - -
ORW: yes (?ioPNA yes no Grit. Flab. yes / no
Type of Project/ Activity r? .k Ts (Scale:
•
Pier (dock) length l!k`t?J -?? CC7J
Platform(s)- - -
.?--' d ? ?• ,?c? ?•?`?-d ?,, ? 'i- ? CIA ?-tZ. Tf'?P4??im??r
Finger pier(s)
Groin length`' !t 1 j '?4 n --T -
KCB
number ? , -'SS{;0? ? I Iti?- ? SC? ??..t.-C?,.. /? n I
Bulkhead/ Ripralenghore
avg distance
max distance offshore
Basin, channel
cubic yards-
((?? ?, 2 2
Boat rramp
J - V f [QLCSL7 Ci_ L.
Boathouse/ Boatlift__ _? ? ?•Rx.l ?2.i?'??n'?;S ?'?• ?tl? •l?' ? ?`Si
+c 4TZ'L'O1
f.?5w°I
Beach Bulldozing- - Q 0g? Q l -^ t
Ilk- C, Other *?(U7?"" -`?' .- I? -- -
--
i
Shoreline Length 14
L M
SAV: not sure yes no
i
Sandbags: not sure yes ?. - --- -... --
Moratorium: nla yes o)
Photos: yes - -
Waiver Attached: yes no) ----- - - - - -
A building permit may be required b See note on back regarding River Basin rules.
- i cv
V
Notes/ Special Conditions I
-y4 w
?•
Kerr _ ndel,- u.. _y
Agent orYAppl' rimed Na
Signature ** Please read compliance statement on back of permit
Application Fee(s) Check #
of--
Local Pfauning J urisdiction Rover File Name
co w W <
I w??
J
N QmZ
0
wb
?o
0-
D
PIPE BENT NOTES: 8" (1) 16" D.I. PIPE
1. MAX. PIPE BENT SPACING: 18'-0"
2. PIPE BENTS SHALL NOT BE PLACED o00 2 1/2" X 1/4" H.D. GALV."
ALONG CENTER LINE OF CHANNELS = 'v -J ?= BENT STRAPS W/ (2) 1/20

3. ALL TIMBER SHALL HAVE ALL FIELD co
1 w W :5
a w J H.D. GALV. BOLTS
CUTS & BORINGS TREATED WITH a N r (2) 4x12 SPLIT CAP, BOLTED
KOPPERS #50 Q m (n
TO PILES. (No. 1 OR No.2
' 4. LAST 2FT. TO 2.5FT. SHALL BE TAMPED S.Y. PINE S2E OR ROUGH CUT)
I
WITH AN EXCAVATOR OR TO REFUSAL, °
t SEE DETAIL 7/43
WHICHEVER IS ACHIEVED FIRST.
8" 8" (1) 16" D.I. PIPE
' ,
J
o Q o CUT CAP BEAMS TO FIT RADIUS
"
2 1/2" X 1/4" H.D. GALV. 1+ OF PIPE (2
MAX. SEAT CUT)
BENT STRAPS W/ (2) 1/2-0 1+
PROVIDE FULL BEARING ACROSS
H.D. GALV. BOLTS
12 SPLIT CAPS.
(2) 4x12 SPLIT CAP, BOLTED 0 12 SEE DETAIL 7/43
_ TO PILES. (No. 1 OR No.2
S.Y. PINE S2E OR ROUGH CUT) o

o o (2) 3/40 H.D. GALV THRU BOLTS W/ I
b o
t-
OGEE WASHERS INSIDE 0 PILES H.D. GALV. a
i
k -o & R WASHERS OUTSIDE H.D. GALV. o o
o
CUT CAP BEAMS TO FIT RADIUS OF ' X-BRACING REQUIRED
?2)2x8
1+
1+ PIPE (2 MAX. SEAT CUT) PROVIDE No. 2 S.Y. PINE, ROUGH)
FULL BEARING ACROSS SPLIT CAPS. ,
12 ? 12
3/4"0 H.D. GALV THRU BOLTS W/ '
OGEE WASHERS INSIDE @ PILES H.D. GALV. ,
o & R WASHERS OUTSIDE H.D. GALV.
' VAPPROX. EXIST. GRADE APPROX. EXIST. GRADE
I I-1 I I-1 I ICI I I?ti I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 11-
N
W
J
a
a
Go
3
? a
w
m
W
z
1n
N
(2) 2x8 X-BRACING REQUIRED
WHERE TOP OF SPLIT CAP
EXCEEDS 3'-0" ABOVE
EXISTING FINISH GRADE
(No. 2 S.Y. PINE, ROUGH)
CLASS B TIMBER PILES
(SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIZE
TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS.
PILE CAPACITY = 5 TONS)
PIPE BENT UP TO 10'-0"
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
I I-11
cn
W
J
a
a
m
3
? o
w
m
w
z
in
N
CLASS B TIMBER PILES
(SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIZE
& TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS.
PILE CAPACITY = 5 TONS)
PIPE BENT 10'-0" UP TO 15-0"
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
I ICI I ICI I I-1 I I-1 I I-{ q ICI I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 11-1 11..
RESTRAINED JOINT PIPE FLANGE
LOCATED 2'-0" MAX FROM
BENT. PIPE TO CLEAR SPAN
40'-0" MIN.
=4 8" ?(1) 16" RESTRAINED JOINT D.I. PIPE
Or i?= BENT STRAPS W/ (2) 1/2"0
p o o W11/43 2 1 /2" X 1 /4" H.D. GALV.
jr ? H.D. GALV. BOLTS
a Q m Z (2) 4x12 SPLIT CAP, BOLTED
TO PILES. (No. 1 OR No.2
S.Y. PINE S2E OR ROUGH CUT)
SEE DETAIL 7/43
(JET SEE DCUT CAP BEAMS TO FIT RADIUS
FOR ALL INFORMATION NOT SHOWN OF PIPE (2" MAX. SEAT CUT)
PROVIDE FULL BEARING ACROSS
SPLIT CAPS.
PIPE BENT @ CROSSING
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
10' MINIMUM
IF NO DITCH
OaSTING GRADE
COMPACTED BACKFILL
10' MINIMUM
IF NO DITCH .,51
PAVEMENT WIDTH VARIES AND THE
LOCATION IN THE R/W VARIES, SEE
PLAN - PROFILE FOR INDIVIDUAL
LOCATION.
ASPHALT SURFACE
w
?z
aQ
J
a.
? w
aW
W N
0
#57 STONE
ISTURBED
RJND ??« a : -
Z \
uNE m z? I---- CENTERLINE OF PAVEMENT Z
M J L I STEEL ENCASEMENT i ?
i?
40
I
TRENCH WIDTH
VARIES
TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL.
SCALE: N.T.S.
SEAL EACH END CARRIER PIPE
WITH 1:3 PORTLAND
CEMENT. CASING WILL BE INSTALLED AT LINE AND GRADE SHOWN ON
THE INDIVIDUAL PROFILE FOR EACH CROSSING.
TYPICAL BORING / JACKING DETAIL
SCALE: N.T.S.
J% ARCADIS
ARCADIS G&A1 of North Carolina. Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive. Suite 300
Raleigh. North Carolina 27607-5073
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
www.arcadls-us.com
',dKCCRISER & TROUTMAN
ONSULTING ENGINEERS
3809 PTACHTREEAVENUE. SUITE 102
r; WMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
?i [phone] Fm [phone]
TYPICAL PIPE DETAILS
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION
Proposed Raw Water Line
Onslow County, North Ca d
TOE OF
SLOPE
z_
(V
FIGURE
11
L
O
0
U
m
o-6
Q. 6
CP
C?
L
L
7
UJ
0
L
0
g
W
F-
M
J
Q
U
a
/
N
0)
c
.3
v
L
:t-_
L
E
va
oQ
".? w
?/
?E
13
3
ON
NO
to
?o
r
LPL/
?E
N ;
N
EE
i= Z
//
L
00
? d
co
O C
6 0
? C
NE
W 0
Z
U L
U rn
Q ?
GATE VALVE
rat
lo'I
lot
1001
II
II
EXTENTS OF PARKING AREA
APPROX. 6' THICK ABC
(MIN. 20' WIDE)
16'W DOUBLE OPENING GATE
6'H CHAIN LINK FENCE W/3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE
NOT TO SCALE
ELECTRICAL
EQUIPMENT
© 2004 ARCADIS GBM,
4' OF CRUSHER RUN
COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
APPROX. 12'
TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD DETAIL
Project Director
J.MAYNARD Area Manager
J.MAYNARD
Task Manager Technical Review
L. DIEBOLT E. BAILEY
Drawing Date Drawn By
19 FEB 2004 T. BENTON
i AtAv
2ARCADIS
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
TYPICAL SITE LAYOUT
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION
GMA -6
ommmme&
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC
THE GROUNDWATER EXPERTS
ENGINEERING HYDROGEOLOGY
101-E WOODWINDS INDUSTRIAL 2025-E EASTGATE DR
CG CARY. NC 27511 GREENVILLE, NC
[phone] 27858 (252)
758-8810
ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
Project Number Fgure
703021 10
0
O
U
?o
o?
a?
?o
C 5a
0
a
0
w
C.D
CT
.E -
3M
O
0
E
N
9na
r 4-
N EE
3
i
O N
N O
M
°o
41
L E
?E
N3
? C7
EE
ii
dt
00
oa
co
c
u•i
r- c
E
>Z
U f?A
Q ?
NORTH
WOODED/
UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED PRODUCTION WELL,
CONCRETE PAD, FENCING, AND
EQUIPMENT
AREA OF TEMPORARY ISOLATED
WETLANDS IMPACT
-0.094 ACRES
, 10119'
10
J
y,45, /
4"T
AREA OF PERMANENT ISOLATED
WETLANDS IMPACT
-0.055 ACRES
PROPOSED RAW WATER
CONNECTING MAIN
O/
WOODED/
UNDEVELOPED
\ -\ © M ARCADIS caM, V
\
\
\
\
\
PROPOSED RAW WATER
TRAN.SMIr" MAIN

Project Director Area Manager
J.MAYNARD J.MAYNARD
Task Manager Technical Review
L. DIEBOLT E. BAILEY
Drawing Dale Drawn By
24 FEB 2004 T. BENTON
C2 ARCADIS
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
HTW10 "HOWARD 3" SITE
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION
PROPOSED RAW WATER GMA
ll
CONNECTING MAIN
mmsMe
GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC
THE GROUNDWATER EXPERTS
ENGINEERING HYDROGEOLOGY
101-E WOODWINDS INDUSTRIAL 2025-E EASTGATE DR
Ct, CARY, NC 27511 GREENVILLE, NC
[phone] 27858 (252)
758-8810
PROPERTY LINE
0 50' 100' 150'
SCALE IN FEET
ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
Project Number Figure
703021 4
0
0
U
T
m
•-M
S21
O?
aro
C9
NORTH
WOODED/
UNDEVELOPED
PROPERTY LINE
N
W
W
0
M
W
C-D
/
3
c7i
E
Ea
N/
E
13
o?
C> C%s
N O
M
L
N3
?z
N L
o°a°
CAD
O C
L
O
Z
a?
PROPOSED PRODUCTION WELL,
CONCRETE PAD, FENCING, AND
EQUIPMENT
WOODED/
ib,
UNDEVELOPED
WOODED/ JURISDICTIONAL
UNDEVELOPED
=
WETLANDS-_ aLL
Project Director Area Manager
-='-'`- J. MAYNARD J. MAYNARD
Task Manager Technical Review
= L. DIEBOLT E. BAILEY
AREA OF PERMANENT JURISDICTIONAL
AGRICULTURAL
PROPOSED RAW WATER LAND WETLANDS IMPACT Drawing Dale Drawn By

TRANSMISSION MAIN N0.051 ACRES 116
23 FEB 2004
T. BENTON
PROPOSED RAW WATER
CONNECTING MAIN
EXISTING GRASS FIELD ROAD
r
1 I
I ? I
I ? zl • I.
I
IA
Io -n cnl
I
1Cn ?i
lo- I. I
1 I
1 I .
AREA OF TEMPORARY JURISDICTIONAL /
WETLANDS IMPACT
0.027 ACRES / W . CADIS
AR

AGRICULTURAL
LAND
PROPOSED GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD
© 2003 ARCADIS GBM, Inc.
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.areadis-us.com
HTW7 "ROGERS" SITE
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION
GMA -4
MORE*&
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, NC
THE GROUNDWATER EXPERTS
ENGINEERMG HYDROGEOLOGY
101-E WOODWINDS INDUSTRIAL Ct 2025-E EASTGATE DR
CART, NC 27511 GREENVAlE. NC 27858
[phone] [phone]
ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
0 50' 100' 150' Project Number Figure
703021 3
SCALE IN FEET
0
NORTH
aF
c;
U
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED PRODUCTION WELL,
CONCRETE PAD, FENCING, AND
EQUIPMENT

o PROPOSED RAW WATER -
00 E CONNECTING MAIN
LLJ
UNDEVELOPED
AREA OF PERMANENT JURISDICTIONAL -
H WETLANDS IMPACT
-0.041 ACRES
CC,
0
€ PROPOSED GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD -
Ea?
AREA OF TEMPORARY JURISDICTIONAL -
"' E WETLANDS IMPACT
13 -0.025 ACRES
Ii
0 15' UTILITY -
W ----- EASEMENT
-------
--
E --
-- -
--
N3

r
a
a
cc
o c
Sri
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
F2 E
>z°
o d
?W
=
1
r
r
r
WOODED/ 1
UNDEVELOPED r

i
1
.LL .L
?iL 1

1L ;L JIL iu_ 'AL 1L
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS 1

1

1

'
L
-141! !
1

1L 'i?L
±s

1
-- ------ - -- - -- - -- - ---?-
i?
N.C.S.R. 1432 - PARKERTOWN ROAD
I © 2003 ARCADIS G&M,
r
r
r
i
If
i
1
l
r
1
WOODED/
If UNDEVELOPED
If
1
1
/ Project Director Area Manager
I J.MAYNARD J.MAYNARD
Task Manager Technical Review
I L. DIEBOLT E. BAILEY
I EASEMENT Drawing Date Drawn By
I 23 FEB 2004 T. BENTON
I
--------- i raARCADIS
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
PROPOSED RAW WATER Raleigh, NC 27607
TRANSMISSION MAIN Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
- - - - - - - - - www.aradis-us.conn
HSW8 "BOUGIE" SITE
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION
GMA -6
ORISMO&
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC
THE GROUNDWATER EXPERTS
ENGINEERING HYDROGEOLOGY
101-E WOODWINDS INDUSTRIAL 2025-E EASTGATE DR
Ct CARY. NC 27511 GREENVILLE. NC
UNDEVELOPED (s1s) 481-2s31 758-8810
)
CUTOVER ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
0 40' 80' 120' Project Number Figure
SCALE IN FEET 703021 2
© 2004 ARCADIS G&M, Inc.
0
0
U
a
m
d(,
N
o?
a?
c?
?o
j T
UJ
Cr
U
CD
W
c?
i
0
E
gi
M 9
?/
E
13
o?
N O
M
^
L
i
N ;
3
c?
EE
?s
C3 o
oa
CD c
Uri
N
E
? o
z
Q ?
NORTH
iiL . I.
'id
WOODED/
UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED PRODUCTION WELL,
CONCRETE PAD, FENCING, AND
EQUIPMENT
AREA OF TEMPORARY tdz I
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS ACRES a ? IMPACT PROPERTY LINE
0.188 ACRES
I
AREA OF PERMANENT
JURISDICTIONAL / I
WETLANDS IMPACT
-0.145 ACRES JI
( =- _J
.>L I
1L 1.119. -1iL -141?
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
?L A'. L
I '''' Wit. .
' I `PROPOSED GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD
WOODED
UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED RAW WATER I
CONNECTING MAIN
WOODED
I UNDEVELOPED
4, I 20- EGRESS, REGRESS
p AND LrnuTy EASEMENT
Project Director
J.MAYNARD Area Manager
J.MAYNARD
Task Manager Technical Review
L. DIEBOLT E. BAILEY
Drawing Dale Drawn By
23 FEB 2004 T. BENTON
C2 ARCADIS
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
HSW10 "RIGGS" SITE
HUBERT WTP EXPANSION
PROPOSED RAW WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN
N.C.S.R. 1428 - RIGGS ROAD
WOODED/
UNDEVELOPED
0 60' 120' 180'
SCALE IN FEET
GMA -6
omsssmo&
GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC
THE GROUNDWATER EXPERTS
ENGINEERING HYDROGEOLOGY
101-E WOODWINDS INDUSTRIAL 2025-E EASTGATE DR
Ct. CARY. NC 27511 GREENVILLE, NC
[phone] 27858 (252)
758-8810
ONSLOW COUNTY, NC
Project Number Figure
703021 1
i •?rr??; 4' Tl+.a° t ?1;,:.cr a,',?'?_ _ :•?. 1 .-. _i-_ i `yv
1 4rJ •?A?? * ` -at,•_
11'}. i•'Ir ,. ? "C?.,,/ / ? a \ ?? • f'`!. `\t ...,?- ?,.+1l?r?w'??a„r-"?1.+•.? Su%h ) -
1 1- 1 I •,, - I `s
.,,, `: ,,:'? ,' 1: , / Q?;?`'' ARCADIS
1 ?. 1 'rwwe.` ~• ?' HSW10 I Y1 y. ..- r. , ^I? • ,_
44 ?TN .,.^.`" y i "RIGGS" ... __ __ ---tw -' - - - 1= :,.5:-•-^-?' ?.:,:.
%
. 1,1 • r' .i •,.
}A •?.:y?., ??l••V?"L I pwp„r?•°• -',ypyj? ._.. .-- ?.. ._. _._I -.. .?. _. .- _-•r. .
'? - = ?. 1 ' :` .;..:.. • Legend.
Existing Wells (HSW)
f -.ay _?Vyy 1 .t, a,x rte, Vim{ . f , a• ,• •
/(^' "': .•? ?; t ,? Phase 1 Wells (HSW)
Phase, ? Wells (HTVV)
VY-
??' Existin Transmission Mains
P"? New Transmission Mains
t I t ?+ , A •
-1. ?..,._ ., ,.,1f?,, r•__ ?. I O Stream Crossings
?/ ,rr , 7•. ij,_,?'`",t1 .r T-•S?. r'S? V V TM _xK r? ~`? .,+t•.-rr ^"' ` i
^.,s aaa,? fry a;••"t yi: 'S:, `\'''s? 1.?1 ''ti ;! 'ir\?sd. ,...+'a3' ?... '`-t IS.% "`'?•j y~ C
-•Jr Y, `• t + •.,I! 5 ,) 'F. +ti.?+I ?,•'•? ' l''r sS l+" It `? i
HSW4 xIL
?y l'+ ri 1•,?ir?^ •?l I ? y 1 .f_.i 11V '? ? j ` l •'^.
?, ?`+, -? .= • ? c r, a. ??j' 4?, .. I• I' . i .? . `?, tl I _ l? ' ? t `?„'J_''' ? `emu
pw t . ' I
HSW3
sx? 1
j. ' : *?y ,yu'_. ,.:? r w•a t ?.? a •a. f .?i ' (
_ . ? `4p l t' [ , a?? •' 1, ._ -... ' •gi ? iii l ?' •;-+
'L a I ? r; ti ??') ? ;1 ?'+ \ , • .'l'i \_. 8 1 i t a ? 1,.•,r t ? \ •''
'•?d? L . p ? ,. as / , y? _.: ti ? -? Sys` ? k .__•r l?.l.l •! ??r_ .
<..ti ' '* ; - i•'ji ?'?? y HSW2 1 OR
IN.
-a(; jig
A., Z;jL
tt , +'.: t ,. 5 } a?,r• + t -'';.. } r ,+
' r , •=-, r .. 1_t 1 J t )_/ t' \\r.,
HSW8
"BOUGIE"
1A,`-,.+.
.? ( \ •r?? y}. ??? '` ;a I - ?` ?, n + 7.
= 1 ' I 1 } , r f J? •j `' 1 %j
`?? fr' ? ? ? ' ? `.?. r? a;? _ 1' I ?j'? ? 4.? t r••+? 'at t ',,'``'•??:;;f - ? • f r;l 111???'? ;?.,ti.,; •' _ `•
'' Tt?41
? -g •? t F,1 7t? • ••
`? '1'1111blYC !• '
r '` :%, ?' ?t ?j,? ,l • •a } :.?+,, , Z •_ __ 1 /! I St`-
' y. $tr a ^ >y?y oil
NOW 4•.;: •i `.?'` _ ' "•?'? i1.• v`' '''l .,HOWARD 3..
. +a'' ' ,'• ?{ `c??r emir _
` + dlnv'M+ ti r - y HSW1 HUBERT WATER + ` .w ?^ - t§+ t - rb
?'r?ftt f; +5 Jam- a. ,u I TREATMENT PLANT } - .t?rr ?: ?:' 4 a _
? 'r t \ ? + ???., 1 :?`+.f??v •/J ;? ; \ ,?..'.i •'? ) 5 '- ? f.rf?i},'\! r, ` `:' S a r• ?? .a. _ ,
1 ?r t1' ?t;?y s1l .1 L i a 16r,,!'
j .l? i } .l"t.:}re t\ \ ? ?};` I ..... ; • F<' . ? ? ??,d-• :y '':; ?,•'_'-?,^' ?,?--'•`'?`•2_J,e„'••.;.?:l:.l,-. ''?1 "? ?,-"•V/ ?--• ?•'? J?? _ _
J i 1' , ?, a•t \ , ! V•". 1 y.a}!ti '?'la ?? • `, ?.ev'f•V \: •. t.-?t r•'I! ?Z?"}'," y '
11 C? ++ I f?,: ' ' !`}? ?? / ?! i J. `?r_^i'? +Y S.n•.+.? _?. tea' 1? ~ L 'b
r' ,i' ; :. I + 4t '' i 1? ,/)IM1?` e• „'?.` '? rl -•S b._r'"? ?{ \t °`4''.. )-.J {?.
5 `t 'rt?:l J ! ? ? :•1' I r' ' ' • 1 4 ' ,...`,.. {r ?• - A •j. '.1 ?. ?17 •/'}(`..? _ ^.?? ??, 4 i ?6r' ?_. i'r.. `t??••?' ? \ •?'?
?• 1 t .? ?1 f• lr+ ?? i' .?y { ?'•"+ r S i••ti? I'' ?E'?,+• `, a??.C" . ,? +, ' .1 L. ...,.._ ?` 1
`a , ? i ?'tiy 3i r?i^.. _ t'. *i ???!'` r? if+4_. i7' "`-'% 1 1..??'1 ••.•?#. _I- ? n.•? +? \ J ?
- 5 ?+:? / a ' -? •? } r ???'' 6 Z..(?rV"'-/ .. ? /S? j ?'.'i? S ? t'r \ t f ?. '? r
` C '? 4+' ,`may-n' --•.•- ". .•^?'.rr?,•?ue:; n.t}Y'?• .a -.? ??. /^••,??7& <f "? 1 } S" 1.+1••''
``^-. ?'#'?a '.1. t?,, , `r_ \.?~ -?" ? T •rv ~`\l? ` ?`?!' +? •r t+\?•' ,V •S VVY•1 S.8 V5R
?i • (I `rf «?" -,. '+...+? " 1 S.'?C,'} `r ,!.• r.l?-•?? 1:P:1' 'f ??`?'?''' r.t pl?'? ?. ar ?;
N --
0.3 0.15 0 0.3 0.6 0.9
Miles W E Proposed Raw Water Supply Well
USGS Maps: Field for Hubert WTP Expansion
Kellum, Stella
Camp Lejeune, Hubert
S
DWQ# Date ^7/1 Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
R Please show all wetland impacts including an' p f ?t7 I o. I `Gi 1Y11 h? ?? Yvt
L q To "n G1 w'Gl-}-io C- W G{ `'CL "'J
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. ? fof2?"'J
Ed Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. `P y??? S? 1 I n O 1 i? 'nC -
lEa S? I nJ i??-e at,? l
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan. s
'5 J'-_ -??o?u Gwnz?cxcl ?c,-)1e,l? ry
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan. ??M i 55 O?l ??
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage. CaY14cuC I YV( e ?-5
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
. Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide
Mitigation
copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
¦ Cbmplete Items 1, 2, and . Also complete
Item 4 if Restrloted Delive is desired.
¦ Print your name and add on the reverse
so that we can return the rd to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mallpleo6,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Onslow County Public Utilities
228 Georgetown Road
Jacksonville, NC 28540
DWQ# 04-0291 - Onslow
2. Article Number
(flg?rb/er Irom aervlce
PS Form 3811, AU9L
A. Signature
X ?
B. Received by (Prfnted Name)
1 _ A 0 Agent
Date of Deliver)
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ? Yes 1
If YES, enter delivery addre ss bel : O No
;tar-
3. Service lype
ACertffied Mall ? Express Mail
O Registered 1li? Return Receipt for Merchandise
O Insured Mail 13 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Estee Fee) O Yee
7002 2410 0003 0275 4605
Domestic Return Receipt 10259"2--lank
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE /-01'11
PM 2 M 4 R "- .._..
• Sender: Please print Mr11amg,`address? and ZIP+4 In this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crahtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604