Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG020202_Compliance Inspection_20190513'c. Energy, Mineral and Land Resources ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY May 13, 2019 Martin Marietta Materials, Incorporated Attention: Mr. Richard Broughton 8701 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite 540 Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection NPDES Stormwater Certificate of Coverage- NCG020202 Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Broughton: ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary S. DANIEL SMITH Interim Director Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Reports for the inspections we conducted at Matthews Quarry on May 7, 2019. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704) 663-1699 or by email at angela.lee@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, 3111%k—ks' VC Zahid S. Khan, CPM, CPESC, CPSWQ Regional Engineer Land Quality Section Enclosed: Inspection report c: Stormwater Permitting Branch Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCG020202 Effective: 10/01/15 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta -Matthews Q County: Mecklenburg 1215 Sam Newell Rd Region: Mooresville Matthews NC 28106 Contact Person: Richard Broughton Title: Phone: 803-978-6275 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 05/07/2019 Primary Inspector: Angela Y Lee Secondary Inspector(s): Certification: Phone: EntryTime: 10:OOAM Exit Time: 12:OOPM Phone: 704-235-2139 Lily C Kay Matthew J Gigante Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas: ® Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page 1 of 3 Permit: NCG020202 Owner- Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc Inspection Date: 05/07/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: This inspection was conducted as a routine annual inspection in conjunction with a mine inspection. Richard Broughton and Thomas Neely from Martin Marietta were present for the inspection. At the time of the inspection, the site was in compliance. Page 2 of 3 permit NCG020202 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc Inspection Date: 05107/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? � ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan Include a detailed site reap Including outfall locations and drainage areas? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan inClude a list of Responsible Party(s)? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ! ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ®❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Please update the Responsible Party list. Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ®❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Analytical Monitorinq Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ®❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Page 3 of 3