20040267 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040223

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 S. NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27610
919-212-1760 • FAX [phone]
www.esinc.cc
February 23, 2004
Mr. John Dorsey
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Re: Woodridge Nest II
Wilson County, NC
Mr. Dorsey:
0 p?..b?
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
FEB 2 3 2004
MATER QU,q! 17 y SECTIOPj
Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) is submitting this PCN application on behalf of Bartlett
Engineering and Surveying, PC and Preston Gregory of Gregory-Thomas Properties. The
applicant is requesting a Section 401 State Water Quality Certification for the proposed project.
Mr. Kevin Yates of the USACE is reviewing the application for the Section 404 permit.
Please call me if you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal. Thank you for
your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Jetf Harbour, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Attachments
JACKSONVILLE 0 ST. AUGUSTINE • COCOA • JUPITER •, DESTIN 0 SAVANNAH • ATLANTA • RALEIGH 0 CHARLOTTE
W AT
F9P

O G
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
t
l R
t
d N
f E
i
ura
esources
ronmen
an
a
nv
North Carolina Department o
? Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
-1 Division of Water Quality
D ?
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 18, 2004
DWQ Project No. 04-0267
Wilson County
Page 1 of 2
Gregory-Thomas Properties
2408 Winding Creek Drive
Wilson, NC 27893
Subject Property: Woodridge West II, Airport Blvd., Wilson, NC
UT to Bloomery Swamp [03-04-07, 27-86-6-(0.5), C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
To Whom It May Concern:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact 0.34 acres of wetlands, 1,220 square feet (ft2) of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of
constructing the proposed residential subdivision at the subject property, as described within your application dated
February 12, 2004 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on February 23, 2004. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the General Water Quality Certification Number(s)
3402 (GC3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment
Control and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires
unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If
total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
Erosion & Sediment Control Practices - Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with
all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must
be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North
Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites,
borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated
with the project.
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind -No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands,
waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notice Application.
All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands
Gregory-Thomas Properties
Page 2 of 2
March 18, 2004
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
3. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters - Sediment and erosion control measures
shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and
erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade
restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
4. Certificate of Completion - Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
5. Diffuse Flow - An additional condition is that all constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed as
diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that it will not re-concentrate
before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (5). If this is not possible it may be
necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered to remove nitrogen. This may require additional
approval from this Office.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 1508.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
tAlan W. Klimek, P.E.,
NC DWQ, Director
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC 3402
Cc: Mr. Robert Bartlett, P.E., Bartlett Engineering & Surveying, PC, 1906 Nash Street North, Wilson, NC 27893
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 040267
Date: March 18, 2004
bz

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. i
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory-Thomas Properties WETLANDS / 401 GROUP
Mailing Address: 2408 Winding Creek Drive
Wilson, NC 27893 FEB 2 3 2004
WATER Q1 JAI 11-Y SECTION
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Robert Bartlett. P.E.
Company Affiliation: Bartlett Engineering & Surveying, PC
Mailing Address: 1906 Nash Street North Wilson NC 27893-1726
Telephone Number: 252-399-0704
E-mail Address:
Fax Number: 252-399-0804
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Woodridge West II
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
The site is located north of US 264, west of Airport Blvd. Currently, access to the site is
through the existing Woodridge subdivision located off of Airport Blvd.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - if project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT of Bloomery Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Portions of the site were disturbed when it was timbered and
root-raked several years ago, however much of the site remains forested. Surrounding land
use consists of urban disturbed and agriculture.
Page 6 of U
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will provide 119 lots for residential home construction. Typical construction
equipment will be used during construction including bulldozers, back-hoes, graders, etc...
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work in the Waters
of the US is to reconfigure the existing pond for necessary stormwater management purposes.
Also a minor amount of wetland impact is necessary for the utilization of several lots.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
ESI and Kevin Yates of the USACE performed a formal jurisdictional determination on
October 30, 2003. ESI also met with Mr. Yates on January 15, 2004 for a pre-application
meeting.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
Page 7 of 13
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: 0.34 acres of proposed wetland
impacts (0.21 ac forested and 0.13 ac successional); 0.25 acres of temporary open water
impacts for the stormwater pond reconfiguration.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
A Fill 0.179 180 Forested
B Fill 0.036 115 Forested
C Fill 0.022 150 Successional
D Fill 0.007 210 Successional
E Fill 0.096 35 Successional
I
*c List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include. but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage. etc. For dams. separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htip://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland. beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog. etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 7.26
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.34
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please seci )

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include. but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap.
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after. and net loss/gain).
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall. gabions. etc.), excavation. ditching/straightening. etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name. list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
w\vw.usP_s.?Pov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g.. www.topozone.com.
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Page 8 of 13
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: NA
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
le)
Name Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
Open Water Impact Fill (temporary impact) 0.25 N/A Man-made pond

? List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include. but are not limited to: fill. excavation. dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
NOTE: A greater area of surface water will result from the reconfigured stormwater pond. Therefore, the impact associated with
filling 0.25 acre of the existing pond should be viewed as temporary.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): excavation
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): The existing pond will be reconfigured to accommodate
current stormwater reauirements associated with the oronosed development.
Size of watershed draining to pond: 54.9 Expected pond surface area:47,480 sq.ft.
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Stavint? out of the main wetland svstem minimized wetland impacts. Impacts are limited to drier
jurisdictional sloughs extending off the main stem of the wetland system. Reconfiguration of the
pond is being performed in uplands. One lot between existing lots 32 and 33 was dropped from
the site plan due to an excessive wetland impact associated with the lot.
Page 9 of 13
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stn-ngide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant proposes to place a restrictive covenant over the remaining on-site
jurisdictional wetlands to compensate for the unavoidable wetland impacts. A copy of the
restrictive covenant document to be used is included for your review. The project engineer
has also designed a littoral shelf that will be constructed along approximately 300 feet of the
northeast edge of the stormwater pond. This littoral shelf will be planted with native wetland
trees such as bald cypress, green ash and swamp tupelo. The littoral shelf will help mitigate
the loss of the littoral edge of the original on-site pond. No monitoring is being proposed for
the littoral shelf planting and the future homeowners association will maintain it. This
littoral shelf is being proposed pursuant to a request made by the USACE during the pre-
application meeting.
Page 10 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Page 1 1 of 13
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1220 1.5 Not required
Total 1220 Not required
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel: Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
The impact to the buffer is in zone II which allows aradine and re-vel?etating provided the health
of zone I is not compromised. Based on the Rule, this activity is Allowable in a subdivision as
long as impacts are less than or equal to 150 linear feet or 0.3 acres. This impact is in the
vicinity of Lots 44 & 45.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Bartlett Envineerine and Survevine. PC has suDDlied a descriotion of the DroDosed Stormwater
treatment methodology.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Bartlett Engineering and Surveying, PC has supplied a description of the sewage disposal
methodology.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
PRes-ToN GF-e& J2!(, PJZE9 Dl-nr
/Applicant/Agent* Signidtire Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
Environmental Services, Inc.
Additional Information in Support of the Woodridge West II
Nationwide Permit 39 Application
1.0 Location
The project study area is located in Wilson, North Carolina, north of U.S. Highway 264, east of
Airport Boulevard. A general location map is attached depicting the project site on the Winstead,
N.C., United States Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (USGS 1977). Total
size of the project site is approximately 55 acres.
2.0 Existing Site Conditions
Plant Communities
The site contains four primary plant communities: pine forest, mixed hardwood forest,
clearcut/successional, and Coastal Plain small stream swamp (Brownwater subtype).
The pine forest is an upland community dominated by loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Mixed
hardwood forest consists of both uplands and wetlands. The uplands are dominated by white oak
(Quercus alba), flowering dogwood (Cornus,lorida), hickory (Carya sp.), and American holly
(Ilex opaca). The wetland portion of the mixed hardwood forest is dominated by red maple (Ater
rubrum), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracij'lua), black gum
(Nyssa sylvatica), and water oak (Quercus nigra). The clearcut/successional area is a result of
past logging activity and is vegetated with numerous disturbance-oriented species. The dominant
species are red maple, sweetgum, black cherry (Prunus serotina), loblolly pine, blueberry
(Vaccinium sp.), winged sumac (Rhus copalina), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum). The
Coastal Plain small stream swamp is located adjacent to the main stream along the southwest
boundary. This community is dominated by red maple, black gum, lizard's tail (Saururus
cernuus), and giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea).
Soils
The Soil Survey of Wilson County, North Carolina (USDA 1983) describes the on-site soils as Bibb
loam, Norfolk loamy sand, Goldsboro sandy loam (0-2% slope), and Rains sandy loam. Bibb loam
and Rains sandy loam are known hydric soils. Goldsboro sandy loam (0-2% slope) is a non-hydric
soil known to have hydric inclusions. Norfolk loamy sand is a non-hydric soil.
Environmental Services, Inc.
Water Resources and Hydrology
The southwestern boundary of the project study area occurs in the forested floodplain of an
unnamed tributary (UT) to Bloomery Swamp. Bloomery Swamp has a Best Usage Classification
of C NSW (DENR 2003). Waters with a Best Usage Classification of C are fresh waters that are
suitable for aquatic life and secondary recreation. Waters with a supplemental designation of
NSW are nutrient sensitive waters.
The hydrology of the site is driven primarily by surface runoff and groundwater. The UT to
Bloomery Swamp is topographically the lowest point on the project site. Overbank flooding may
contribute slightly to the overall site hydrology; however, the topography does not allow this
flooding to expand across the site.
Wetlands
The USACE and the EPA jointly define wetlands as:
"Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and
duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence
of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally
include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas."
According to the USACE Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987), areas must exhibit three
distinct characteristics to be considered jurisdictional wetlands: 1) display a prevalence of
hydrophytic (water tolerant) plants, 2) area dominated by hydric soils, and 3) possess sufficient
wetland hydrology. Vegetation, soils, and hydrology data were collected during the field surveys
in order to determine whether the three criteria were satisfied within each potential wetland area.
The on-site wetlands and surface waters were delineated on April 14 and 15, 2003 based on
current criteria established by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) 1987 Wetlands
Delineation Manual (DOA) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Mr. Kevin Yates of
the COE verified the delineated wetlands during an on-site inspection conducted on October 30,
2003. Approximately 7.26 acres of wetlands occur on the site.
The majority of the on-site wetlands are located adjacent to the unnamed tributary to Bloomery
Swamp located along the southwest boundary. The Coastal Plain small stream swamp contains
both herbaceous and forested areas. The herbaceous areas are near the main stream and are
within or adjacent to the existing sewer easement. Over-bank flooding from the adjacent stream
influences these areas. Vegetation consists of lizard's tail, soft rush (Juncus effusus), and
woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus). The forested portion of the Coastal Plain small stream swamp is
2
Environmental Services, Inc.
dominated by red maple, black gum, water oak, pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), possum haw
(Viburnum nudum), and netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata).
There are several areas where the jurisdictional wetland line leaves the main stream and follows
small hardwood sloughs toward the center of the site. These small sloughs are groundwater-
influenced, mixed-hardwood wetlands that drain toward the main creek. The hydrology is not as
pronounced as that associated with the small stream swamp community. The sloughs are
vegetated with hardwood species such as red maple, tulip poplar, sweetgum, black gum, and
water oak. Groundcover is sparse.
One pond occurs on the site and it was delineated as a surface water. This pond is mapped on the
USGS map. Steve Mitchell of DWQ has reviewed the pond and determined that it is an isolated
surface water and not subject to any buffer rules pursuant to DWQ File # NBR 03-166.
3.0 Proposed Site Conditions
The applicant is proposing to construct a residential subdivision comprised of single-family
homes. Bartlett Engineering and Surveying, PC, has designed a site plan that avoids and
minimizes wetland impacts. This site plan is included with this submittal. All jurisdictional
impacts cannot be completely avoided due to the wetland location and the applicant's purpose
and need. The applicant and project engineer have minimized wetland impacts to the greatest
extent practicable from both project feasibility and engineering perspectives. ESI worked closely
with the engineer during the preliminary design stage for this project and we have attempted to
keep Section 404 wetland impacts under the current NWP threshold of 0.5 acre.
3.1 Wetland Impacts
The proposed site plan proposes impacts to 0.34 acre of jurisdictional wetlands. Of this
total, 0.21 acre is forested and 0.13 acre is successional wetlands resulting from past
logging. The wetland impacts are a result of proposed fill needed to accommodate
several single-family lots. One lot was dropped from the site plan due to a large wetland
encroaching into the area. The site plan has been designed so as to minimize the amount
of wetland fill needed in order to make the project financially feasible with regard to the
necessary number of lots. Approximately 6.92 acres of wetlands will remain
undisturbed.
3.2 Temporary Surface Water Impacts
The proposed site plan also proposes to temporarily impact 0.25 acre of a man-made
pond. This impact is necessary in order to reconfigure the pond for use as an on-site
stormwater management pond. The pond will be reshaped and the new portion will be
3
Environmental Services, Inc.
excavated entirely from uplands. The resulting pond will be larger than the current pond;
therefore, the surface water impacts should be viewed as temporary and offsetting. A
narrow littoral fringe consisting primarily of red maple is present along the edge of the
existing pond. To offset impacts to this littoral fringe, COE has requested that the
applicant provide a littoral shelf along one edge of the reconfigured stormwater pond.
This shelf will be planted with at least two native wetland species. Species that may be
appropriate include bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), green ash (Fraxinus
caroliniana), buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), pickerelweed (Pontederia
cordata), and arrowhead (Sagittaria lanciolata).
4.0 Environmental Considerations
Dredge and fill activities in "waters of the United States" must be authorized by the COE
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Waters considered navigable by the
COE are also subject to permitting of obstructions to navigation under Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act. Activities authorized by the COE are subject to further requirements of Section
401 of the CWA. In North Carolina, the NCDWQ administers the Section 401 Water Quality
Certification process.
ESI held a pre-application meeting with Kevin Yates of COE on January 15, 2004. During this
meeting, permitting scenarios were discussed and they have been incorporated into this document
as applicable.
The applicant is applying for a Section 404 permit from COE and a Section 401 General Water
Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The project
meets the criteria established by Nationwide Permit 39 (NWP 39) as regulated by COE pursuant
to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Section 401 of the CWA (33 U.S.C. 1341) requires each
state to certify that state water quality standards will not be violated for activities which: 1)
involve issuance of a federal permit or license; or 2) require discharges to "waters of the United
States." The use of a Section 404 permit requires the prior issuance of the 401 certification. The
project also appears to meet the criteria established by DWQ pursuant to General Water Quality
Certification Number 3402.
Section 404(b) Guidelines requires the applicant to demonstrate avoidance, minimization, and
mitigation of jurisdictional wetland impacts. The applicant cannot completely avoid wetlands on
the project site and the present design has attempted to minimize wetland impacts as much as
possible. One entire lot has been dropped from the site plan in order to reduce the amount of
wetland impact. The existing pond is to be reconfigured entirely in uplands and no jurisdictional
wetland impacts will result from its construction. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and
minimization of wetland impacts on the site.
4
Environmental Services, Inc.
The applicant is proposing compensatory mitigation in the form of a restrictive covenant over the
remaining on-site jurisdictional wetlands. Approximately 6.92 acres of wetlands will remain
undisturbed and may be placed under the restrictive covenant.
The applicant is also proposing a 300' x 10' littoral shelf along the northeast side of the
stormwater pond. This will help mitigate for the lost littoral shelf along the original pond.
Riparian Buffer Rules
The site lies within the Neuse River basin. DWQ regulates riparian buffers on certain surface
waters within the basin. Surface waters that are mapped on the most recent version of either the
USGS topographic quadrangles or county soil survey maps are subject to the riparian buffer rules.
The UT to Bloomery Swamp and the pond are depicted on the latest USGS maps. DWQ granted
the applicant a variance to the buffer rule for the pond located on the site since there is no stream
entering or exiting the pond.
The riparian buffer consists of two distinct zones. Zone 1 comprises a 30-foot wide area adjacent
to the surface water that cannot be disturbed except for those specific activities that are allowed
by the Buffer Rules. Zone 2 comprises a 20-foot wide area adjacent to Zone 1 that is to be left
undisturbed except for those activities specifically allowed by the Buffer Rules. Activities in the
buffer area beyond the footprint of the existing use are classified as either "exempt",
"allowable"," allowable with mitigation", or" prohibited."
Riparian buffer impacts resulting from Woodridge West 11 total approximately 1,220 square feet
of impact to Zone 2. This impact is proposed in the vicinity of Lots 44 and 45. The Buffer Rules
allow grading and re-vegetating in Zone 2 provided that the health and condition of Zone 1 is not
compromised. Based on the Buffer Rules, this activity is allowable in a subdivision as long as
impacts are less than or equal to 150 linear feet or 0.3 acre. The proposed impact to Zone 2 is
less than 150 linear feet and only 0.03 acre.
Cultural Resources
Use of a Section 404 pennit also requires coordination through the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) to determine if cultural or archaeological resources are known from the project
site or are expected to occur. Mr. Scott Seibel, a Registered Professional Archaeologist with ESI,
submitted a letter to SHPO on January 31, 2003. SHPO replied to Mr. Seibel via a letter dated
February 21, 2003 and indicated that they are aware of no historic resources that would be
affected by the project. A copy of this letter is enclosed with this submittal.
5
Environmental Services, Inc.
Federal Threatened and Endangered Specie
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially Proposed
(P) for such listing, are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC
1531 et seg.), as amended. The most recent list published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) is dated January 29, 2003 and contains a list of the Threatened and Endangered species
that have ranges considered to extend into Wilson County. These species include red-cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), and Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii). A review of records kept by the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
on January 20, 2004 revealed no known occurrences of federally protected species within 3.0
miles of the project study area.
Red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) - This small woodpecker is 7 to 8.5 inches long, has a black
head, prominent white cheek patch, and black-and-white barred back. Males often have red
markings (cockades) behind the eye, but the cockades may be absent or difficult to see. Primary
habitat consists of mature to over-mature southern pine forests dominated by loblolly pine, long-
leaf (Pinus palustris), slash (P. elliotii), and pond (P. serotina) pines (Henry 1989). Primary nest
sites for RCWs include open pine stands greater than 60 years of age with little or no mid-story
development. Nest cavity trees tend to occur in clusters, which are referred to as colonies.
Foraging habitat is comprised of open pine or pine/mixed hardwood stands 30 years of age or
older (USFWS 2003). Pine flatwoods or pine-dominated savannas, which have been maintained
by frequent natural fires, serve as ideal nesting and foraging sites for this woodpecker.
Development of a thick understory may result in abandonment of cavity trees. The woodpecker
drills holes into the bark around the cavity entrance, resulting in a shiny, resinous buildup around
the entrance that allows for easy detection of active nest trees (Henry 1989).
There is no suitable nesting or foraging habitat for red-cockaded woodpecker on the project site.
The planted pine forest is unsuitable foraging habitat because it appears to be younger than 30
years old and has relatively dense midstory coverage. Additionally, it is more than 200 feet from
any other potential RCW nesting or foraging habitat. NHP records do not document any
occurrences of red-cockaded woodpeckers within 3 miles of the project site. The proposed
project will not affect the red-cockaded woodpecker.
Red-cockaded woodpecker Biological Conclusion - No Effect
Dwarf wedgemussel - The dwarf wedgemussel rarely exceeds 1.5 inches in length. The outer
shell is brown or yellowish brown with faint green rays, and the nacre is bluish or silvery white.
The shells of the females are somewhat wider that those of males. This mussel species typically
inhabits streams with moderate flow velocities and substrates varying in texture from gravel and
coarse sand to mud with little silt deposition (USFWS 1993). It is generally found in association
6
Environmental Services, Inc.
with other mussels but is never very numerous. As with other mussel species, the dwarf
wedgemussel has suffered from excess siltation in streams and rivers and from the toxic effects of
various pollutants entering waterways. No suitable habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel occurs on
the project site due to the absence of suitable stream channels. The UT to Bloomery Swamp
shows signs of siltation and occasional impounded conditions due to debris blockage. NHP
records do not document any occurrences of the dwarf wedgemussel within 3.0 miles of the
project site. The proposed project will not affect the dwarf wedgemussel.
Dwarf wedgemussel Biological Conclusion - No Effect
Michaux's sumac - Michaux's sumac is a dioecious, densely pubescent rhizomatous shrub,
generally 2 to 3 feet in height, which produces fruits and seeds in late summer. In the Piedmont,
Michaux's sumac appears to prefer clay soil derived from mafic rocks or sandy soil derived from
granite. Michaux's sumac typically grows in disturbed areas where competition is reduced by
periodic fire or other disturbances, and may grow along roadside margins or utility rights-of-way
(Weakley 1993). The project site does not support the vegetative communities typically
associated with Michaux's sumac. The successional areas resulting from past logging contain
thick groundcover and are unsuitable habitat. The NHP records do not document any occurrences
of Michaux's sumac within 3 miles of the project site. The proposed project will not affect
Michaux's sumac.
Michaux's sumac Biological Conclusion - No Effect
Federal Species of Concern
The January 29, 2003 USFWS list also includes a category of species designated as "Federal
species of concern" (FSC). The FSC designation provides no federal protection under the ESA
for the species listed. NHP documents no occurrences of FSC within 3 miles of the project site.
State Protected Species
Plant and animal species which are on the North Carolina state list as Endangered (E), Threatened
(T), or Special Concern (SC), receive limited protection under the North Carolina Endangered
Species Act (G.S. 113-331 et seq.) and the North Carolina Plant Protection Act of 1979 (G.S.
106-202 et seq.). NHP documents no occurrences of state protected species within 3 miles of
the project site.
7
Environmental Services, Inc.
5.0 References
Department of the Army (DOA). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Tech. Rpt. Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
100 pp.
Henry, G.V. 1989. Guidelines for the Preparation of Biological Assessments and Evaluations for
the Red-cockaded woodpecker. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA.
[NCDENR] North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 2003. NC
Waterbodies Listed by Subbasin. Web Address: http://h20.enr.state.nc.us/bims/reports
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1983. Soil Survey of Wilson County, North Carolina.
Soil Conservation Service. 117 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Dwarf Wedgemussel Recovery Plan. U.S.
Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Hadley, MA. 39 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery plan for the red-cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis): Second Revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Atlanta, GA. 296 pp.
[USGS] United States Geological Survey. 1977 Winstead, NC 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle.
Weakley, A.S. 1993. Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas and Virginia. Working Draft of
November 1993. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. 575 pp.
8
IF-
0110
BART'LETT
& N Pc
1906 Nash Street North Wilson, NC 27893-1726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Woodridge West II
Wilson, NC
Stormwater:
The proposed residential subdivision is located on 55 acres. The existing
conditions are woods and cut-over with no impervious area. There is 7.5 acres within the
proposed public right-of-ways of which 4.5 acres will be impervious. There are 119
single-family residential lots proposed that contain 34.1 acres of which approximately 6
acres or 18% will be impervious. The remaining 13 acres will be open space containing
the pond, wetlands and buffer areas. In summary, there will be a total of 10.5 acres of
impervious area on the 55 acre development.
This project is located within the City of Wilson and is required to comply with
the Neuse Stormwater Rule and the Neuse Buffer Regulations. In addition, the City of
Wilson's Stormwater Policy requires that the post development peak flows be reduced to
80%, of the predevelopment peak flows for the 1-year and 2-year storms and 90% for the
10-year and 25-year storms. The proposed water quality pond is designed to meet or
exceed all of the requirements for nitrogen removal and peak flow reduction. There will
be an undisturbed open space between the majority of the residential lots and the
wetlands/surface waters. Only 2 lots and portion of 6 other lots directly adjoin any
wetland area. There is an average of 100 feet of buffer from the wetlands and an average
of 150 feet of buffer from surface waters.
Sewage Disposal:
All sanitary sewer generated from the residential development will be collected in
a piped system that will be maintained by the City of Wilson. The collection system will
be design, permitted and installed in accordance with the City of Wilson and NCDENR
specifications and regulations. The collection system for this development will discharge
into an existing outfall line and ultimately be treated at the Hominy Creek Wastewater
Facility (WWTF Permit No. NC 0023906), which is operated by the City of Wilson. The
City Engineer has approved this subdivision plan, indicating that the treatment facility
has available capacity.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
Office of Archives and History
December 19, 2003
Scott Seibel, RPA
Archaeologist/ Senior Scientist
Environmental Services, Inc.
524 New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Division of Historical Resources
Re: Woodridge West II, a Residential Subdivision, Wilson County, ER03-3483
Dear Mr. Seibel:
Thank you for your letter of November 25, 2003, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above-
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
David Brook
www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 2769911617 (919) 7334763 •733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 [phone] •715-4801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 2769911617 [phone] •71511801
?? ?A?MC. ?'? ??+' 3° ??. ? ,, • • it
a t?r 4 U
+! - l +
Mathew
ii????, ?BTtt ?? MIS
PIS
it r
l?Cr •
;> • . S
)„
1
?d
13i0
13M I
ILIkW t i
`?" 'may ;'i 1 r.•3,
141
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
Map center is UTM 18 231951E 3960418N (WGS84/NAD83)
Winstead Crossroads quadrangle N M=-9
Projection is UTM Zone 18 NAD83 Datum G=-1
Printed for Jeff Harbour <jharbour(aesiral.com> 2/23/2004
WATER QUALITY POND
WOODRIDGE WEST II
TOP OF BERM ELEV. 110.0
8'
25'
BUFFER
WETLANDS I _ - - - - ?V
ELEV 100.0
i3 3
-1-- 1
EXISTING GROUND
TOP OF BERM ELEV. 110.0
10'
NORMAL POOL ELEV. 105.0
POND BOTTOM ELEV. 102.0
TYPICAL X-SECTION q/pa
NO SCALE
/13
L LITTORAL SHELF
ELEV. 104.5

NOTE:
THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO DESIGNATE
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS FOR PERMITTING
PURPOSES.
WETLAND AREAS
WETLANDS #1: 316,346 S.F. (7.26 ACRES)
WETLANDS #2: 21,221 S.F. (0.49 ACRES) (OPEN WATER)
WETLAND IMPACT: 14,837 SO. FT. (0.34 ACRES)
OPEN WATER IMPACT: 10,775 SO. FT. (0.25 ACRES)
WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED BY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SITE DATA
LOT AREA:
ZONE:
MINIMUM BUILDING LINES:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE
NUMBER OF LOTS
PROPOSED LAND USAGE:
OWNER:
DEVELOPER:
54.9 ACRES
RA-8S
FRONT = 35'
SIDE = 8'
ST. SIDE - 17.5'
REAR = 20% MLD
8,000 SO. FT.
121
SINGLE FAMILY
GREGORY-THOMAS PROPERTIES
2408 WINDING CREEK DRIVE
WILSON, N.C. 27893
GREGORY-THOMAS PROPERTIES
2408 WINDING CREEK DRIVE
WILSON, N.C. 27893
LINE DATA TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
Li N25'45'30'W 53.16'
L2 N17*11'36"E 33.23'
L3 N33'06'18'W 24.99'
L4 N83'43'55W 14.68'
L5 N34 42'58W 35.23'
L6 N79 34'50'W 95.48'
L7 S85'39'25W 22.67'
L8 S59'21'03'W 15.23'
L9 N6757'23'W 40.59'
L10 N1749'55"E 20.56'
L11 N48'16'23W 97.77'
L12 N45'46'54W 98.84'
L13 N60'24'04"W 79.15'
L14 N49'18'15W 60.61'
L15 N33'36'1 6"W 64.36'
L16 N7700'1 4W 40.87'
L17 S5959'14'W 63.98'
L18 N7T17'29"W 47.89'
L19 S64'17'18W 21.73'
L20 S55'44'48'E 27.70'
L21 N5544'48"W 58.49'
L22 N73'28'54W 111.45'
L23 N14'03'54"W 160.57'
L24 N20'00'06'E 104.63'
L25 N26'32'54W 100.76
L26 N06'05'41'W 273.39'
L27 N06'05'41"W 55.56'
L28 N4,T09'34W 40.30'
L29 N3709'07'E 42.90'
L30 NOT34'31'E 44.67'
L31 N33'51'13'W 63.28'
L32 N43'40'58'W 61.75'
L33 NOT53'01'E 86.68'
L34 N74'54'34W 43.15'
L35 N26'54'36W 138.44'
L36 N8W53'17"W 39.14'
L37 N38'48'21'W 57.90'
L38 N1738'54 W 68.41'
L39 N30'S8'52'E 56.66'
L40 N5738'50"E 106.95'
L41 N07'00'52"E 60.79'
L42 N2734'19'W 38.66'
L43 N544 38'29'W 47.68'
1_44 N0426'59W 88.42'
L45 N69'39'05"E 46.70'
L46 N29'12'55W 44.52'
WETLAND IMPACT LINE TABLE
A'
(7,782 S.F.)
DIRECTION LENGTH
N84'25'5 2"E 26.41
S15'09'26"E 42.30
N69'59'44"E 16.03
N35'41'48'E 48.35
N8743'29'E 20.69
S43'57'45"W 4.77
N33'07'31'E 184.96
N78`23'1 8W 2.10
N27*28'18"W 14.71
N35'49'59'E 3.45
N06'34'36"W 53.18
N01'21'28'W 50.88
N30 39'50'E 34.02
WETLAND IMPACT LINE TABLE
'B'
(1,583 S.F.)
DIRECTION LENGTH
N74'19'04'E 12.91
S1940'40'E 20.29
S33'1 0'09"W 21.81
S58'03'33'W 39.63
S24'25'48'W 19.64
S64'G4'11"W 12.28
N04'13'09'W 29.42
S88'13'24E 3.25
N64'33'32'E 19.76
N48'54'30'E 28.29
N20'09'39'E 24.07
WETLAND IMPACT LINE TABLE
'C"
(978 S.F.)
DIRECTION LENGTH
N76'14'15E 14.41
N66'44'13"E 53.88
S40`01'54'W 43.77
S71'03'41'W 32.96
N12'03'11'W 19.94
WETLAND IMPACT LINE TABLE
D'
(307 S.F.)
DIRECTION LENGTH
N69'38'47'E 26.62
S4W04'48'W 17.44
S51'37'17"W 24.35
N29'58'39'W 13.34
N48'35'1 6'E 6.49
N81'03'28'E 9.22
WE
WETLAND IMPACT LINE TABLE
'E'
(4.187 S.F.)
DIRECTION LENGTH
N2T08'04'E 190.54
S28'54'48'E 7.11
S2(730'59'E 16.05
S16'45'24W 42.89
S26'16'14'W 15.35
S48'56'27'W 30.69
S41'18'17"W 25.11
S071 1'41'E 25.35
S06'06'47'W 14.51
S14'53'51'W 25.00
S13'22'56"W 31.08
N29'58'39W 45.83
OPEN WATER WETLANDS
LINE TABLE
(10,775 S.F.)
DIRECTION LENGTH
S33'29'32"E 15.61
S20'45'1 6'E 17.54
S1 2'55'59"W 23.39
S1726'49'W 58.21
S25'20'58"W 63.72
S1 3'20'28"W 16.37
N52'40'1 5°W 96.04
N40'00'09'E 58.52
N37*22'46'E 61.28
N46'20'38"E 29.43
N53'38'53'E 17.70
?j
LOCATION MAP
NO SCALE
PROPOSED
WETLAND IMPACT
FOR
WOODRIDGE WEST II
TUFT BARTLETT
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, PC
1906 NASH STREET NORTH
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 2789
TEL [phone]
PAGE 2 OF 2
NOTE. I N/F
THIS PLAT IS A WETLAND DELINEATION PLAT AND IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, DAVID W. WOODARD &
SALES, OR CONVEYANCES. ROMAINE WOODARD
N/F DB 703 P 112 N/F
ESTELLE (All" WINSTEAO
CRY OF WILSON ?E dip EF 76E P 112
PB 3 P 134 a ?1 PIN 3703-82-1722 DB 603 75 SECTION IV
PM 3703-67-8757 q, PIN 3703-82-4280 WOODRIDGE WEST fir y. # ZONE A-1 I ZONE: A-1 I PS 28 P 218
ZONE 1-2 r 89
r fr T br1Ad / 90 !? s 8 WIV42E r
/ 88 } 18'421 405A2' T L b`9 3d a 91 92 / 95 s i3L74, 10 93 94 m /
6p -
71 87 fo / B6 FRED C/NICK iE 108
g16? / ,. ?r ^/ MARTHA C. VICK
72 86 ,? ( ?j? PIN63703-7P` 9756 867 107
WETLANDS 67 1 73 85 ( R ?? ZONE All 40
MPACT 31 eel 97 \
66 74 '_,84
83 81 105
_38 -62
45\ \WETLANDS \ 5\ • 64 `
76 -* :r 104 `
n 76 \ ?' /
MPACT ND 11 11
44\ 79 80 99 100 101 102
\ 43\ k3 0633 0
I O ?\ 41\ \\ ?? \ ?? - \ m rr
i
WETLANDS 62 A91fOFip DIM //(so' R 37' a-La) 4+
40 4 T 1-4
31 _ _ 25 115
2 - ?' 59 - 57 ' 56 i / F-"5- 19 4.18 117 116 +a
I -- ?. --
4-1 -23- _ v WK\ \\ I tl' 1 n
SECTION 6 r
RAVEN RI w , i 26 ` 22` ?? 20 19, 18 2
PB 29 P 88 pp? \ OPEN WATER 5 a 3
ZONE RA-6 O, \\\ \ 27 \ ` .
1 i
' \`\ \ \ \\?\ 2B\ --- R%W\37'-`B -?///? _ WEfLdNDS ? 9 29
Am Mr. WETLANDS
30
32
SECTION 6 10 \ \ \ \ \\` " \ 31 \ 33J 3 WETLANDS
RAVEN RIDGE \ \ \ °0 ° MPACT 'B
PB 29 P 66 .? v .{
ZONE RA-8\ \? \ \ - - - - 10 s ?} / y
O roy\1? \ \ - \ \ STORM n_ lyl \ \ ?f 14 y
WATER aa(i' 'I
j \ \? ?` ?? ?\ \ \ 120 imp
o
12
7 \ \ 121 - _ - _WETLANDS , -• \
\ WETLANDS /1 PI' \ \ Q'
\ L14 L13 L12 L11 \
11*
SECTION FIVE \" /
RAVEN RIDGE
PS 27 P 210 O \ \ W / N/F
ZONE: RA-8 \ - IRENE MITCHELL MOORE
/ `----7 DB 1747 P 125
30 1 29 / 28 ' PIN 3710E 60-6455
GRAPHIC SCALE \ PR 1 7 ??
SECTION 91 0
200 0 100 200 400 B00 RAVEN RIDGE I
I 1 I I I I PB 20 P 118
? m ? ZONE RA-8
( IN FEET )
PAGE 1 OF 2 1 inch = 200 ft
P:\-CADD\-LANDPROJECTS\GTP\03110\dwg\0311OWf2.dwg 11/06/2003 10:50:45 AM EST
I ZONE RA-BS
?'E I
s1rt00-'--
FU.TON PLACE
! 109
? T SECtKMI"N
i
6v F5 23 F 38
I
21
110 Q
111
36 I
112 h? 5
13 • O
SECTION 6
i \WOODRIDGE WEST
PB 26 P 212
t O ZONE RA-8S
32
O
31
M LSEA DRIVE
a 28 (360'
oEVa,ovERs R/W
37032-n-a ? 27 Nape: L;?{vro( s"I- i 3DO?xlp'
Or, NE Side of Pond
l
1
N/F
AVID WOODARD k
OMAINE WOODARD
DB 283 P 50
DB 263 P 192
)NB 1656-3703P70-6846832 PROPOSED
ZONE. RA-8 WETLAND IMPACT

FOR
WOODRIDGE WEST 11
BARTLETT
A ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, PC
1906 NASH STREET NORTH
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27893
TEL [phone] FAX [phone]

E'? DATE: D
R
NOV. 5, 2003 CADFlLE: