20040240 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040218

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Alan Johnson
WO Supervisor: Rex Gleason
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name 66 Acre Hwy 29 Site
Project Number 04 0240
Recvd From APP
Received Date 2/18/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type develop into event parking lot
County Mecklenburg
County2
Region Mooresville
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet r_? ? -3
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
39 Stream ©T 4 N ? F 17-5 I ` F 3(1,711. F 639.00 F 639.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
F
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y (0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? Q YQ N Recommendation:Q Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 352021 Longitude (ddmmss) 804204
Comments:
Staff visited the site on March 2, 2004. Applicant requests approval to impact (pope) approximately
639 linear feet of stream. The site is located approximately 1 mile north of 1-485 at the intersection of
Hwy 29 (northeast Charlotte) and the access road to the Mallard Creek WWTP. The imposed use
for the site is a rah ssed parking area for the Lowes Motor Speedway,
Three intermittent channels are to be impacted: Channel E: 60 ft.: Channel C: 194 ft.; and Cahnnel F:
385 ft. Channel E is basically a drainage way along an old road bed. Channel C receives
stormwater runoff from a paved lot and channel F recieves upland stormwater runoff through a
culvert that passes under the access road to the treatment plant. Although channel F did have the
geomorphilogical characteristics of a stream channel, it was well incised from stormwater flow.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1

Triage Check List Date: . c q'co Project Name:
DWQ#e
eckte,,
County:
U", U
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ?' WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ke to ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
RO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From: . Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need asdstance.
? Stream length impacted
Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
ElAre the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
cumulative impact concern
Comments:
RA
Cod - GA-<- cN er-
?^ rapt 2Q Q?t- Aec ?-
ft'4'?eA lad
ere

Carolina Wetland Services
Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to a
Nationwide Permit No. 39

\1I1II''YIII I
i4
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0435
tm
February 17, 2004
Prepared For:
Mr. Brian Hoffinan
The Trammel Crow Company
214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 400
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-5399
[phone]
Prepared By:
Mr. Gregory C. Antemann, P.W.S.
Mr. Ron G. Johnson, W.P.I.T
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
[phone]
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
FEB 18 2004
WATER QUALITy SECTION
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 • Charlotte, NC 28217 • [phone] Office • [phone] Fax
www.carolinawetlandservices.com
' 66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 2
Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 3
Current Land Use ................................................................................................................................
Jurisdictional Delineation ................................................................................................................... 3
3
Agency Correspondence ......................................................................................................................... 6
' Cultural Resources ..............................................................................................................................
Protected Species ................................................................................................................................ 6
6
Purpose and Need for the Project ........................................................................................................... 6
Avoidance and Minimization .................................................................................................................
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters ............................................................................................. 8
8
Compensatory Mitigation ....................................................................................................................... 8
' List of Attachments
Attachment A - Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Attachment A - Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
Attachment A - Figure 3. Wetland Boundary Survey
Attachment B - Agent Certification of Authorization Form
Attachment C - Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39
Attachment D - Routine On-Site Data Forms
' Attachment E - NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
Attachment F - USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets
Attachment G - Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
Attachment H - Representative Photographs
' Attachment I - Figure 4. Proposed Impacts
Attachment I - Figure 5. Proposed Impact Detail

n

' 66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Executive Summary
The 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site is located in northeast Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately
1 mile north of the US Highway 29 - Salome Church Road intersection .
(Attachment A- Figures 1 and 2). The Trammel Crow Company has contracted Carolina
Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide permitting services for this project. An Agent
Authorization Form has been included as Attachment B.
' The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are six
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A - F) and three jurisdictional wetland areas
(Wetlands AA - CC) located within the project limits (Attachment A - Figure 3). On behalf of
The Trammel Crow Company, CWS is requesting written verification of the location and size of
these on-site jurisdictional features (Attachment G). Unavoidable impacts associated with this
project total approximately 639 linear feet (0.031 acre) of Unimportant Intermittent stream
' channel. On behalf of The Trammel Crow Company, CWS is submitting a Pre-Construction
Notification with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 13,
and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 (Attachment Q.
2

I

I

0
I

I

I
I

I

I
I

66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Existing Conditions
The 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site is located in northeast Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately
1 mile north of the US Highway 29 - Salome Church Road intersection
(Attachment A- Figures 1 and 2) This project proposes to develop the property into a residential
subdivision. The Trammel Crow Company is developing the project and has contracted Carolina
Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404 permitting services.
Current Land Use
The current land use of the project area consists mainly of undeveloped forested areas. Dominant
vegetation within forested areas includes red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciua), river birch (Betula nigra), loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda), water oak (Quercus nigra), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), and willow oak
(Quercus phellos). A portion of the site has been cleared and is dominated by tall fescue
(Festuca arundinacea).
Jurisdictional Delineation
On December 31, 2003, and January 2, 2004, CWS's Isaac Hinson and Ron Johnson delineated on-
site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.' within the project area. Jurisdictional areas were determined
on site using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - Routine On-Site Determination
Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual 2
Routine On-Site Data Forms representing Wetlands AA-CC, as well as adjacent upland areas, have
been included as Attachment D. Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were classified according to
recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)3 and USACE guidance. A NCDWQ
Stream Classification Form and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet for Stream A have
been included as Attachments E and F.
1 "Jurisdictional waters of the U.S." includes essentially all surface waters such as: all navigable waters and their tributaries, all
interstate waters and their tributaries, all wetlands adjacent to these waters, and all impoundments of these waters.
2 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 1
3 North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Classification Method. Version 2.0. 1999.
3
' 66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
' The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are six
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A - F) and three jurisdictional wetland areas
' (Wetlands AA - CC) located within the project limits (Attachment A - Figure 3). On-Site
waters are unnamed tributaries to Mallard Creek. Mallard Creek is part of the Yadkin River
' basin (HU# 0304105)4 and is rated "Class C Waters" by the NCDWQ. On-Site jurisdictional
areas are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

I

Table 1. Summarv of On-Site Jurisdictional Stream Channels
Jurisdictional
Area ! - Classification Approximate
Length (if) Approximate
Acrea a (ac.) NCDWQ
Score USACE
Score
Stream A Perennial 1,8801f -- 46.75 58
Stream B Perennial 2,768 if -- 33.75 45-
Stream C Unimportant Intermittent 375 if 0.019 ac. 21.5 39
Stream D Unimportant Intermittent 50 If 0.002 ac. -- --
Stream E Unimportant Intermittent 1121f 0.004 ac. 16 35
Stream F Unimportant Intermittent 4401f 0.026 ac. -- --
Total 5,6251f 0.051 ac. - --
Table 2. Summarv of On-Site Jurisdictional Wetland Areas
Jurisdictional
Area
Classification
Approximate Acreage
Wetland AA Forested 0.037 ac.
Wetland BB Forested 0.038 ac.
Wetland CC Forested 0.067 ac.
Total -- 0.142 ac.
Stream A flows south across the western portion of the project area for approximately 1,880
' linear feet (Attachment A - Figure 3). This stream channel was evaluated to be Perennial based
on strong flow with a six to eight-foot average ordinary high water width and substrate
' consisting of coarse sand to cobble. Stream A exhibits moderate sinuosity, a moderate presence
of amphibians (frogs), and complete canopy coverage for the reach investigated. Stream A
' scored 58 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
and 46.75 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
' (Attachments E and F - SCPl). A photograph of Stream A has been included as
Attachment H - Photograph A.
' 4 "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.
4
1 .
i
i
i
i
66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Stream B flows south across the eastern boundary of the project area for approximately 2,768
linear feet (Attachment A - Figure 3). This stream channel was evaluated to be Perennial based
on strong flow with a two to four-foot average ordinary high water width and substrate
consisting of coarse sand to gravel. Stream B exhibits moderate sinuosity with frequent
meanders, a strong presence of amphibians (frogs), and a moderate presence of crustaceans
(crayfish). Stream B scored and 33.75 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ.Stream
Classification Form and 45 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheet (Attachments E and F - SCP2). A photograph of Stream B has been
included as Attachment H - Photograph B.
Stream C was evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent. Stream C flows east from Wetland BB
for approximately 375 linear feet until its confluence with Stream A (Attachment A - Figure 3).
This stream was evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent based on intermittent flow, persistent
pools, and a two to three foot average ordinary high water width. Stream C scored 39 out of a
possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and 21.5 out of a
possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form (Attachments E and F - SCP3).
A photograph of Stream C has been included as Attachment H - Photograph C.
Streams D, E, and F were evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent. Stream D flows west for
approximately 50 linear feet until its confluence with Stream A. Stream E flows west for
approximately 112 linear feet until its confluence with Stream A. Stream F flows west for
approximately 440 linear feet from the existing access road bisecting the property to,its
confluence with Stream A. These streams were evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent based
on a lack of flow at the time of investigation, lack of substrate (silt to coarse sand), and a one to
two-foot average ordinary high water width. Stream E scored 16 out of a possible 71 points on
the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form and 35 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and (Attachments E and F - SCP4).

I

I
I

66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Wetland AA is located along the eastern border of the site and is approximately 0.037 acre in
size (Attachment A - Figure 3). Wetland AA is contiguous with Perennial Stream B. Dominant
vegetation includes silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis), black willow (Salix nigra), and various species of sedges (Carex spp.).
Wetland AA exhibited low chroma soils (2.5Y 4/1, 5Y 2.5/1) with mottles (IOYR 3/6), as well
as inundation and soil saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface. A Routine
Wetland Determination form for Wetland AA has been included as Attachment D - DP 1. A
photograph of Wetland AA has been included as Attachment H - Photograph D.
Wetlands BB and CC are located in the southeast portion of the site and are approximately 0.38
and 0.067 acre in size, respectively (Attachment A - Figure 3). Both areas exhibited similar
vegetation and soils and are represented with one data point. Dominant vegetation within these
areas includes tag alder, black willow, cat briar (Smilax rotundifolia), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), red maple (Acer rubrum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua).
These areas exhibited low chroma soils (7.5YR 5/1) with mottles (5YR 4/6), as well as soil
saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface, drift lines and sediment deposits. A
Routine Wetland Determination form for Wetlands BB and CC has been included as
Attachment D - DP2.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 4, 2004 to
determine if areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance are located within the
project area and if these sites would be affected by the project. To date, no response has been
received from the SHPO.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on
February 4, 2004 to determine any federally-listed, candidate species or critical habitat located
within the project area. To date, no response has been received from the NCNHP.
6
r
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of this project is to develop the existing property into an event parking lot. The site
is located near Lowe's Motor Speedway and will provide a needed increase in parking
availability. The site will add 3,700 spaces to accommodate large crowds during six major race
events throughout the year. This lot will serve as overflow parking for these single events with
no overnight camping.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. No impacts to on-site Perennial streams and wetlands will occur under the proposed
plan. The surface of the parking lot will be grass-lined and will not increase the impervious
surface area of the site. The main aisle will be gravel but will not increase the impervious area of
the site by more than ten percent. Therefore, a Storm Water Management Plan is not being
developed for this project. The current site plan utilizes multiple entranceways to avoid crossing
important streams. Riparian buffers will be maintained to the maximum extent possible. Proper
sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters.
Proposed Impacts to jurisdictional Waters
Proposed impacts will total approximately 639 linear feet (0.031 acre) of Unimportant Intermittent
stream channel. Impacts will result from the grading of the site for use as an event parking facility
(Attachment I - Figures 4 and 5). On behalf of The Trammel Crow Company, CWS is submitting
a Pre-Construction Notification with attachments in accordance with the written notification
requirements of Nationwide Permit No. 39.
7
i
i
i

66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Compensatory Mitigation
The proposed design of this project will limit unavoidable impacts to less than 1/10 acre of
jurisdictional stream channels. Impacts will be limited to only Unimportant Intermittent
channels. The Trammel Crow Company is proposing the establishment of approximately 4,648
linear feet of riparian buffers along on-site Perennial stream channels. The buffer along
Perennial Stream A will be established on both sides of the channel and will be approximately 50
foot wide on each side (Figure 4). Perennial Stream B will have a 20-70 foot wide buffer along
one side of the channel.
8
( 656,
? 1 r? ?' G r,? ? ? { / y
4N,N.%?11f
-yt
l 11, 4r/9 _ - ter/?? JG' :?: SI ) ti
i` rll ?,?"._7}\1` 1t -},`?'" ???s/ ?? ill r• \,?{Q? i •Jr+ ` `?
iC?
\ i ?t ?? 1{?? a A) -Y
?, i,f 1 '? ( u x , . C
-:--? tz
E? yy i`= Hvo
- ±???,?? • --? '?`? w'-SITE 1 ? _ n. -n
S81011'IC Ch?rrh Road ?Ij
I N,
? 1J.`. ? ? r it,.? .y? r t J .. f? ?. 1 x / .\\? 1 a "'r F,
rtr I ? 4
f[C-'"r 3r I ,\ 7 ?? ???,. ^"!\'? ''11'11 f'?'? ? ? ? 'Y ??... -``-? •-. ? / Q t \/l/ ? ? ?l i ? 5?/ -
? _ ? a} ! { j X11 r ? 9r A ? P r?,
Approximate Scale 1" = 2000'
Reference: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Harrisburg, NC Quadrangle, dated 1996.
Carolina Wetland Services Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Charlotte, North Carolina
`p CWS Project No. 2003-0435
.1
PREPARED BY ?? DATE CHECKED BY DATE
i

a.?

Carolina Wetland Services Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
I , 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0435
PREPARED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE
x.Tf?- ??I1310.y 6 CR ? • if. 03

I Approximate Scale 1" = 2,000'
Reference: NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, Sheet No. 5, dated 1980.

0
•
NORTH TRYON
ST EET U
S
4IG
THIS DRAWING WAS DELIVERED .
.
VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS FOR
r
ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE v
L L
=
t
r CALL HARRISBURG SURVEYING r?
. t y 4 y ,

- --------- -----
•
µ

x
LLC
11
TW OR Gat 04
1°'
PC ?

%sit

°sa M

/
Aa
t
4
o
AM c?LCDIAtm BY o00o Me79Da W 7 Perenlal Stream A
1
880 if a
a
TM
4s ?
-o

A ?>
TM BOU
POMW

Rh

3
e
,
f
I8 /?
I .c0 -a-
i'
SH t1e0O8AB!COlB7A000DNDP 8IO118L H "70 3 T (70eA)
eao1N AIAlN6 Sn R/N l0A w N ai
I N m
BAS 26 AN i ,
/ v An s wTB' w Be
S
UNIe, 90CN TB0 AS M PBDPREf 011418 1L1'!A
im an =0 = cor oe Fill MOM AIM NO WMM
t p
PRFwENTt? i?
V
`?
see m 99ea PG 3e2 3e4 an a xa S. WAY 1IfiTJii`i1xi.
II?IC. •

AIL 1H DM UMMIS Abe SHDVN AT ffi
APPIDIMUN UXMR

g? g ,
;?
Unimportant Intermittent
i
PBOPZWff LM IN TM XUJAW CE=[ DAMMEM
ME Stream D - 50 if
A PO8lm OF 7W PROPMY I= IN !Be eDn A8
e son : nGOD PLO AIOA PER IaDStA3mwG Co as
Unimportant Intermittent
( 9361.0 ft , 9 .36)
1
7718 PBOPnPE RM A W 3MACE 1AM DAPACT rABAGD
MU ( &XIBL ) eC MU SOP OF RAn OF CIMM Stream C - 375 if \
l - Unimportant Intermittent
Stream E - 112 if
?
w BBB Pa wi ?
Y 29 * 120' PUBLIC R /W

°
Q
v
¦
i s How 90u S
amass ? RZAAM IS 9w w
a VA= r 22&'
a
? s IBeii"iL nNa®L fl
„
?aora °1BN '_
!S
8ocA
Perennial Stream B
2,768 if
e1*
?,Pb
9
x-
WM MEW= ®AW IN P01n POX ON US 29 AT aM OR 17 - ,y D II(I r
EIN ROM BRAD 3U MAUAi21 CUM =AM= PLNL w - qp '? # ? v ' I L3ti'
7AeeN BBMI xa0.QT. RAM "R PRDAM 9.atow" A c?
- o-aue BBroaom Of NNE 2:3 PG AMN D2a19 n SCP4
wAS?A Ir !'' 1 { { ?•'
ayetlaq to t 19 4w - - 1 F Ill
V Carolina Wetland Services cwa,
c' n 5000 Nations Crossing Rd, Suite 230
Y•J `?? Phloneo ??) 527-1177a 25217
do to
%
1 I,?
Unimportant Intermittent 4
Stream F - 440 if l,G

..o w
a i
`? TBw? V ?1. a P*?SEN7R i ,?+?, ?
a« aN w ! .?. N r..
MV N
.?
N ° I
opt:
e
INS R .?^,
e 4. 4 p I ,w
DB 15641 PG 653
•w
TAX# 051 091 fig A.
"N t73MI52 Sqft A,
42.47 Ares. TOTAL ;? I • '?
1850080:5 Sa.ft; t rt
1 ?b +
P / ?;?? J C? ? I m I_ r
i s DP4 + i o
L r r Wetland AA - 0,037 acre I f + SCP2
"Ow
P3
DP1 ??1y
62 I
Il? i

NDT6 JURISDICTIDrIAI. WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED BY
CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES (CWS) ON DECEMBER 31, 2003, AND
JANUARY 2, 2004. JURISDICTIONAL AREAS WERE SURVEYED USING
A GPS UNIT WITH SUB-METER ACCURACY.
STt

54eR9'S3'IY
4 JAIES T,VEST, REOS70ED LAID SUIVEYOt NUON L-3x92 [??

HEREBY COMFY M OE OR HOE OF THE Fa10VD14 AS DOICATEa Ail
A THAT THIS PUT IS OF A SURVEY THAT CREATES A SVetiVISIIIi
LAND WITHIN THE AM OF A MARTY OR N NMV*XTY TNAST
AN GENNANCE THAT RORATES PARCELS aF LAM G
A THAT THIS PUT 13 OF A SURVEY THAT O LOCATED O MM A
OF A CLURY OR MM IPAI ITY THAT IS UNREGULATED AS TD o
00?4NCE THAT REDUATES PARCELS d• L6
a THAT
I?PLAT IS O' A SURVEY OF AN CaSTDI6 PARCEL O
O Pipe
E7P -
PLn
'MM I
- 1
0. THAT THIS PUT IS OF A SURVEY OF ARTIER CATEGORY, SUCH 41 N.
/2 lran
RM/Re
Nn tl'
.
N'p-
?
? Aa
bAYpl
-
I
THE
AECOROMTM OF OGSTING PARCELS, A dART DRDUIED _ P
p PVAC -
SURVEY, OR GRER EACEPTUN TO THE EEFDeTDl4 IF Man - ODM-oF-Way NorArent
E. THAT THE DPORNTMN AVALGxE TO THIS SUIVEYM IS SUCH

I AM UNABLE TO NA E A NTEMMOTM14 TO THE BEST OF NY
Q; R
_ o; Vay

UtB - l

ABILITY AS TO PRDVIM M CO TAI ED DI A TIRGUGN 0.
ABIM
A PORT131 O THIS PROPERTY SHIM ON
___- .. -_ _-__-?_- R?
- -
- ---
A 24 A LBO YR FLOM PUT IS SUBJECT TO
ICAO AS 9GVN 04 NO RION-V R-3
--- ----- PROPERT'
SETBACM
RELIANCE RATE IDPS PRDA M DATE OF SURVEY FR04T- 3P FENCE
G 3 / 1980 NO USat MOMR V(D®4 SM 4Y - - - - - - APPS. ID

of 1? Wetland BB - 0.038 acre j
Lfl ddd,
.4Y = I Sta44 29a
wr or
plHaDlli
rW°R?NI a10iA i aw
ocN of Curb Wetland CC - 0,067 acre
c
ro PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY FOR THE EXACT
LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER, SEWER, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, TELEVISION AND ANY
Ea OTHER UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITY BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION THE Lkw OMISSION FROM OR THE INCLUSION OF UTILITY LOCATION ON THE CONTRACT
DRAWINGS IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS THE NON-EXISTANCE OF OR A DEFINATE as
LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACT
LM TO VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ALONG THE
ROUTE 13F WORK.
E ,T?TO Er ,AROLINA ONE CALL.............................................. [phone]
JTTTeI R ae
>a A: ANN&
INT GS to
BE a m o
nn 800,00
w a AN SOL74
DA 0949E
Maam6?60744
Iw it m m
r m my a""
M Q man"
eBeae
BE ===
am
B 10 590017
HB A m °1o
e wew
MR m ad.atar 619.00
Iw a m NEOB
MY NPT.7B
BE It m6"
Uff w
>aa m ?VMT1
Hal DELTA ARC RADARS BFiNNC DISTANCE
CI 1 439. 1525. S33'I 437.
C2 1a
-MW I 459, 15M N331 45 456.
to 15 79e 2971. 532 794
1A 157Y31' 752 2x11 4W45'31'1 779.91'
BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF.
DP2 86.87 ACRES ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF
N. TRYON STREET / U.S. HIGHWAY 29
SURVEY FOR.
SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC
PO BOX 187474
CHARLOTTE NC 28218
esiaman
NP O R or
uGUST 8, 200 HARRISBURG .
01 In SUIRVE G -'
ORCNARD 4565 HIGHWAY 49
MECKLENBURG HAERISBIIRG, N.C. 28075 ,
PHOPM704-466-9665
H CAROLINA M* 704-455-9008
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
AGENT CEXZTIFXCATXON OF AUTHORIZATION
I, $ii= Hoftan, representing The T=nmellCrow Coxnpany, hereby cerdfy thaat I have
authorized Gregory C. Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc- to act on my beMf
and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuanaey and acceptance of this
jurisdictional determination and any and all standard and speciai conditions attached,
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge,
Y?.
App cant's sign a get s siriattire
Z 116 Z.i
Date Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future appRcanou correspondence,
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
Nationwide Permit No. 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
' mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Trammel Crow Company: Mr. Brian Hoffinan
Mailing Address: 214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 400
Charlotte North Carolina 28202-5399
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
' Name: Gregory C. Antemann, PWS
Company Affiliation: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Mailing Address: 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte North Carolina 28217
Telephone Number: 704-527-1177 Fax Number: 704-527-1133
E-mail Address: g egg(cDcarolinawetlandservices.com
Page 1 of 7
1 III. Project Information
1. Name of project: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 05108126, 05109109, 05109110, 05109111,
05109112
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Charlotte take North Tryon
(US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately %2 mile west of the
Mecklenburg County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of
the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
' 5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N 35'20'2l"-W80'42'4"
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
The current land use of the project area consists mainly of undeveloped forested areas.
7. Property size (acres): 66 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Mallard Creek
9. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/aclmin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to develop the
existing property into an event parking lot. The site is located near Lowe's Motor Speedway
and will provide a needed increase in parking availability. The site will add 3,700 spaces to
accommodate large crowds during six major race events throughout the year. This lot will
serve as overflow parking for these single events with no overnight camping.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe and typical
excavation equipment will be used for this project.
' 12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The land use surrounding the project
area consists of residential industrial and wooded areas.
I Page 2 of 7
A
IV. Prior Project History
V. Future Project Plans
There are no future plans for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Wetland Impacts

Wetland Impact

Area of Impact Located within

100-year
Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact*
(acres) **
Floodplain Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (yes/no) (linear feet)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management. Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A.
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
t 2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
Stream C piping 1941f Unnamed Tributary to 2' Intermittent
Mallard Creek
Stream E piping 601f Unnamed Tributary to 2' Intermittent
Mallard Creek
Stream F piping 385 if Unnamed Tributary to 2' Intermittent
Mallard Creek
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed,, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Page 3 of 7
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 639 linear feet (0.031 ac.)
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. N/A
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbod
y Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)

N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Impacts to on-site iurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. No impacts to on-site Perennial streams and wetlands will occur under the proposed
plan. The surface of the parking lot will be grass-lined and will not increase the impervious
surface area of the site. The main aisle will be gravel but will not increase the impervious area of
the site by more than ten percent. Therefore, a Storm Water Management Plan is not being
developed for this project. The current site plan utilizes multiple entranceways to avoid crossing
important streams. Riparian buffers will be maintained to the maximum extent possible. Proper
sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters.

1 Page 4 of 7
VIII.. Mitigation
The proposed design of this project will limit unavoidable impacts to less than 1/10 acre of jurisdictional
stream channels. Impacts will be limited to only Unimportant Intermittent channels. The Trammel
Crow Company is proposing the establishment of approximately 4,648 linear feet of riparian buffers
along on-site Perennial stream channels. The buffer along Perennial Stream A will be established on
both sides of the channel and will be approximately 50 foot wide on each side (Figure Perennial
Stream B will have a 20-70 foot wide buffer along one side of the channel.
' 1. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/l*ndex.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
' Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear, feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been fmalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No

Page 5 of 7
? X.
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify: )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. N/A
Zone* Impact
square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
' Sources of nearby impervious cover include roads, driveways, and rooftops. This project will
increase the impervious coverage of the project area no more than ten percent.

Page 6 of 7

J
7

J
7

7

XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Construction is scheduled to continue immediately following rpt of the appropriate permits.
Applicai t'Ageiks Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site Date: 01/02/04
Applicant/Owner: The Trammel Crow Company County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): IJH. RGJ State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes
9 Plot ID: DPI
-
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Alnus serrulata tree FACW 9.
2. Salix nigra tree OBL 10.
3. Sambucus canadensis shrub FACW- 11.
4. Carex spp. herb -- 12.
5. Corpus amomum shrub FACW+ 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
100%
Remarks:
All of the dominant ve
getation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
- Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 00=3 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
- Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hxdrology_indicators are p resent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page I Of 2 1/8/2004
I
I
I
1
I
i
i
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes loam, 8-15% slopes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descri tion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
00-44 B 2.5Y 4/1 1OYR 3/6 common/ silt loam
distinct
4-12 B 5Y 2.5/1 N/A N/A sandy loam
_ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
X Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are p resent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? AYe No Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a jurisdictional wetland area.
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms
Page 2 of 2
1/8/2004

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site Date: 01/02/04
Applicant/Owner: The Trammel Crow Company County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): IJH, RGJ State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: wettan
a
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP2
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Alnussermlata tree FACW 9.
2. Salix nigra tree OBL 10.
3. Acer rubrum tree FAC 11.
4. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 13.
6. Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
100%
Remarks:
All of the dominant ve
getation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
X Drift Lines
Field Observations: X Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are p resent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms
Page 1 of 2
1/8/2004
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes loam, 8-15% slopes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfS Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 S 7.5YR 5/1 5YR 4/6 few/distinct silt loam
_ Histosol Concretions
- Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Mdric soil indicators are present.
V ft I LAND UEI tKMINA FION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No
(Circle)
1Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Ils this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?. Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 1/8/2004
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 66-Acre Hi wa Site Date: 01/02/04
Applicant/Owner: The Trammel Crow Company County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): IJH. RGJ State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP3
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1. Betula nigra Stratum
tree Indicator
FACW Dominant Plant Species
9. Pinus taeda Stratum Indicator
tree FAC
2. Juniperus virginiana tree FACU- 10. Quercus nigra tree FAC
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua tree FAC+ 11. Quercusphellos _ tree FACW-
4. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 12.
5. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 13.
6. Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 14.
7. Elaeagnus umbellata shrub - 15.
8. Fagus grandifolia tree FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
MOON
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant sp
ecies are FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
- Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are absent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms
Page 1 of 2
1/8/2004
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes loam, 2-8% slopes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descri tion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon . (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 B 7.5YR 3/2 N/A N/A silt loam
3-12 B 10YR 4/6 N/A N/A sandy loam
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are absent.
Wt I LANU Ut I tKMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ?N?, (Circ%0)
1Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Samplinq Point Within a Wetland? Yes Approved by HQUSACE 2192

Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 1/8/2004
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site Date: 01/02/04
Applicant/Owner: The Trammel Crow Company County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): IJH,RGJ State: NC-
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
d
Community ID: uplan
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP4
I
If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1. Betula nigra Stratum Indicator
tree FACW Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
2. Juniperus virginiana tree FACU- 10.
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua tree FAC+ 11.
4. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 12.
5. Fagus grandifolia tree FACU 13.
6. Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 14.
7. Pinus taeda tree FAC 15.
8. Polystichum acrostichoides fem FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
63%
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant sp
ecies are FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
- Other
s? No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are absent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 Of 2 1/8/2004

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes loam, 8-15% slopes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descri tion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 B 7.5YR 3/2 N/A N/A silt loam
3-12 B 10YR 4/6 N/A N/A sandy loam oam
_ Histosol _ Concretions
- Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
- Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are absent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circl
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Samolinq Point Within a Wetland? Yes \ No)
Approved by HQUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms
Page 2 of 2
1/8/2004
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCPI - Perennial Stream A
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s):
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita . Longitude: W80'42'4" - Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately '/2 mile west of the Mecklenburg
Countv - Cabarrus Countv border. The site is annroximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 ® 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One'Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
0.5
1
'
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 3.5
II. Hydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1
0.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 0.5 1 IN
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 ® 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip 0
This Step And #5 Below*) 0.5 1 1©
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 0.5 1 1©
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yesfp No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 8.5
III. Biology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Are Fish Present? ® 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4.75
' TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= 46.75 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
OMTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By DitchinzAnd WITHOUTSinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2' Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes No=0
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 20
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 7
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(S):.KJ,Krt/DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s): K+
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W80'42'4" Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately '/2 mile west of the Mecklenburg
County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a ratan-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 ® 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
' 9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 ,
(*NOTE. If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=O*)
10) Is A 2n° Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 Nof
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 13
if. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 ® 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGkINDICATOR POINTS: 2
mmu
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? ausem vean
2 irmueraie
1 ?[ron
0
2 Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
3 Is Perih tan Present? 1 2 3
4 Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLUGYINDIGATUR POINTS: 6
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)

II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
^ Present In Streambed? ln5 1 0.5 0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 0.5 nl 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since 0 103 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skin This Step And #5 Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 O 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes 1. Np=O
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 E 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
-
Natural Drainage Way? 0 0.5 1 T.
A
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS. 3
SECONDARYHYOROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 6

3) Are AouaticTurtles Present? n 0.5 1 1 5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun s Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
7 Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.75
TOTAL POINTS (Primary+ Secondary)= 33.75 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream C
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s):!(
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W 80' 42' 4" Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately '/2 mile west of the Mecklenburg
County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used'
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
(*NOTE: IfBed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2' Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
OnTopo Man And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 No fg
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 10
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 1
III. Biolopv Absent Weak Mnderate qt-..
' PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS, : 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 91 0.5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
0??
1
1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
II. Hydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1?5
1
0.5
0
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? 0 03 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 9 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip 0
This Step And #5 Below* 0.5
) © 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? ® 0.5 1 1.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yeses No=O

1 SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 5
III. Biology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Are Fish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
2 Are Amphibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0.5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? of 0.5 I 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of'All Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Skip This SteD UNLESS SAV Present*). SAV Mostly OBL
2 1 Mostly FACW Mostly FAC
0.75 I Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS. 0.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= 21.5 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 I 0
3 Is Peri h ton Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3

1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 ® 3
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 ] 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)

' NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP4 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream E
Project Name: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s): X,1%
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W80'42'4" Latitude: N 35° 20' 21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately I/2 mile west of the Mee
County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a max-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
111.9 There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
2
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
®
2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? ® 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0
(*NOTE. If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuositv Then Score=O*) 1 3
10) Is A 2' Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo May And/Or In Field) Present?
Yes=3
No f@
' PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
lI. Hydrology 9
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater

PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 0
iii_ 11W. v
Ahaent Weak Mnderate. Strnna
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 ] 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 0
3 Is Peri h ton Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS.--2
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 0.5 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 1.5 0.5 0
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0.5 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
' 5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0.5 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes 1. No=0

SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
1 1. U?VIV
1 Are Fish Present? ?1E
0.5 LIAUUVX 4M
1 f' Vn
1.5
2 Are Am hibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun s Present? 0.5 1 1.5
7 Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 90 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 0.5
I TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)- 16 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)

....---. ..............----..---.._---.-..-:....__..._.........._..---............_...._...._......._......_.._.. - ......._._..._....._.._........_.._........._...._-___......__._.....___....__............_........_........_......__............ _.._..._.._.................... ..................---.... --._........................ ........... ...... _..................... ..... __.... _.----............................... ._.... .......
:
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ # j
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP1: Perennial Stream A
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 10:00 am
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
' 7. Approximate Drainage Area: 500 acres 8. Stream Order: Second
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1,8601f 10. County- Mecklenburg
' 11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
northeast of the Salome Church-Road Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the

Cabarrus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
' 13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
1

15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2.0 acres
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20% Res3tlential 10 % Commercial 10% Industrial 0 % gricultural
60% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other
21. Bankfull Width: 8 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 6 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous Braided Channel
' Total Score (from reverse): 58
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature x? Date
' This channel evaluation form is intedded&ie used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gatheriidg the re ired by the United States Army
Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does
not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

......... _.......... __...... _ ............................ _......._............_........._....---.............. -..._........................ -._...._....... ................... ......... _..................... ..... _..... ......... _............... _.... _......... _......................... _..-....... __..-.......... ._._............ __....... _...... _.... _...__._................. ......... _........ ....

OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ # .............. _.... _.._._.............. _........ -_.--...........
- --

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET `
---F
SCP2: Perennial Stream S

1. Applicant's Name: Trammel-Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 12:30 pm
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 80 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 2,5001f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
'
Cabaxrus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.

12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 90°F
' 16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
' 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (YEE NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20% Res- ential 10 % Commercial 15% Industrial 20 o gricultural
20% Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged .15 % Other (Power Line Right of Way)
21. Bankfull Width: 4 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 2 - 3 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
' 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments:
' Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form s inten ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental profession s in gathering the data required by
the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To
Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

-..._.........._._._.._.._....-...__...... ....._..............._...._....._.................._...........--- _.._..__._._....__..
OFFICE USE ONLY: USAGE AID# DWQ #
r
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP3: Unimportant Intermittent Stream. C.;.
' 1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:30 am
' 5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 10 acres' 8. Stream Order: First
' 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 3001f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabarrus County - Mecklenburg- County boundary.
' 12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
' 14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85°F
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (!DIf yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES(D
20. Estimated Watershed Lan d Use: 0% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
90 % Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged 10 % Other (Road)
21. Bankfull Width: 2 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 3 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
' 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 41 Comments:
' Evaluator's Signature Date ? O
This channel evaluation form is inte ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental profession s in gathering the data required by
' the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To
Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

0

......_........._......._..........._...._.......__.._._........._.._:....._................._..,_.._......_.._..-
.............. ..... ._ ...................................................._.........._._............................................_...._.._....__....._............._._.._....................._...._........................._.._..................................._._..._......-............_.._.........._............... ...
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP4: Unimportant Intermittent Stream E a
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:00 am
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin /Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 5 acres 8. Stream Order: First
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 300 if 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
' northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabaxrus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
t 14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85°F
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ?If yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
' 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES?N
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 0% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
95 % Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged 5% Other (Road)
21. Bankfull Width: 2 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 2 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 21/o) X Gentle (2 to 41/6) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)

24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 35 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date ? y
This channel evaluation form i rote ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental profe sion is in gathering the data required by
' the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form is. subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To
Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCPI - Perennial Stream A
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s): {?TV-
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita . Longitude: W80'42'4" Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately %2 mile west of the Mecklenburg
Countv - Cabarrus Countv border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this farm is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream--this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 ® 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 ® 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 @ 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 5 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
:3) Is Fenphyton Pre ent" 4) Are Bivalves Present?
' P
RIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS: 7
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One'Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
'
1 Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 0.5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 ] 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
0.5
1
'
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
II. Hydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
11 Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
KN
1
0.5
0
'
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 0.5 1 M
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 N 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE.- IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*) 0.5 1 F
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or hi Growing Season)? 0 0.5 1 1©
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yesfn No=0
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 8.5
' III. Biology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Are Fish Present? ® 0.5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 0.5 N 1.5
3) Are AguaticTurtles Present? ® 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
'
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed?
(* NOTE: If Total Absence OfAll Plants In Streambed
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*). SAV Mostly OBL
2 1 Mostly FACW Mostly FAC
0.75 0.5 Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
0 0
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 4.75
' TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= 46.75 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchine And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2°tl Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tovo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes No=0
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 20
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 3
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
' DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s):
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W80'42'4" Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately '/2 mile west of the Mecklenburs
County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modifred natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1._ Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
111, There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 ® 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 ® 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? ® 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 5 3
a 5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Il. Hydros Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 ® 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
my
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? auseua wean iviuuerare
2 1 JRVn
0
2 Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
3 Is Perih ton Present? 1 2 3
4 Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 6
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
31 Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0
0.5
1
'
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
II. Hydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
11 Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? EN
1
0.5
0
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? 0 0.5 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. II'Ditch Indicated hr #9 Above Skip This Step And #S Below*) 0® 1 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? .1. 1 1.5
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yesl .? No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 6
4) Are Crayfish Pn
5) Are Macrobenth
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPI,
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.75
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= 33.75 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 ,
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2' Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 Noffi
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 13
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream C
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
' DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s): YQX.
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W 80'42'4" Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located appmximately '/z mile west of the Mecklenburg
County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
' **E: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchin¢And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2°d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/OT In Field) Present? Yes=3 Not@
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 10
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARYHYOROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 1
III. Bioloev Absent Weak Mnderate Rt-
' PRIMARY BIOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS: 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? E 0.5 1 1.5
-Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0 I 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
0??
1
1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
II. Hydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1?
1
0.5
0
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip 0
This Step And #5 Below*) 0.5 © 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0.5 1 1.5
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yeses No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5
_ w v
1 Are Fish Present? -.1. 11-
0.5 -uuerate
1 3rrong
1.5
2 Are Amphibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0.5 1 1.5
7 Is Filamentous Al ae Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence OJ'All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0© 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS. 0.5
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
3 Is Perih ton Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondarv)= 21.5 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP4 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream E
Project Name: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s):
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W 80'42'4" Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately 'h mile west of the Mecklenburg
County - Cabamis County border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primarv Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 ® 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodplain Present?
0
® 2
3
6) Is The Channel Braided? ® 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8) Is There A Banldull Bench Present? 0 1 5 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 3
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchinz And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2' Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo May And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 No f
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 9
lI. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? ® 1 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 0
iii R-1-
Ahccnt Waal,- Mndarota Q*-_
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 0
3 Is Perih on Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0
0.5
1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
II. Hydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
11 Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 1.5
0.5
0
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present?
1 0.5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip
This Step And #5 Below*) 0.5 1 1.5
1
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0.5 1 1.5
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yeses No=0
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
111. DIVIV
1 Are Fish Present? tIUJGUL Y All
0.5 M.. -.1.
1 atfull
1.5
2 Are Am hibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun s Present? 0.5 1 1.5
7 Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FAC W Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPI,
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 0.5
I TOTAL POINTS (Primary +Secondary)- 16 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
- ..............._.._....... -.... _........... ...._._..._............................................. ......... ............__.._....................... _.......... ._.._.............._..... _.. -......._...... __............ ........... _...... ......... _-...._._......_..:..._......... ............... .... ... - -......_............ _....- --.................. .... ------ -....-- .._.....:..
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP1: Perennial Stream A `
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation:. 10:00 am
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
' 7. Approximate Drainage Area: 500 acres 8. Stream Order: Second
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1,8601f 10. County: Mecklenburg
' 11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
northeast of the Salome Church-Road -. Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabanus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
' 13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85°F
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2.0 acres
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20% Res?deential 10 % Commercial 10% Industrial 0 % Agricultural
60% Forested % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 8 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 6 feet
' 23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>101/o)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous Braided Channel
' Total Score (from reverse): 58 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
' This channel evaluation form is intetfiled Afle used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gatheridg the re fired by the United States Army
Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does
not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

SCPl: Perennial Stream A
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
isttl6v i 11v DtIt:TiU k ! U
CHAR-A( TERISTIC S
taf
C
oa
SCORE
.
s
?
Piednlont 'N"lonlit: lltl
'
Presence of flow persistent pools in sfr ealu ? -
`lcm bl , Innarlnn ?1('W Points)
F:? idence of past hum m alteration _

cstC!'I i" e Ii 1-at I tI IIiI a t(:!1 1o11 flm-v poir. ) 3
Riparian zone ?

- ---- inc? hult?=r-I?: Ct?nti,?ur?u?. ?.?i((c hu?Fcl rn:u pcirnt?) t? 6 -1 f -?
4
ILvidence of nutrient or chelute 11 dlseh 1r''cs
t)_ no dil "J-Ill m?lz jlo?nI's -
?
_ Grouod«ate dlschlr,e -

Ino discnlr?_ Ij .?nnn_; ?c?p.,_ , ctl:utd?, c?c. -=m?.? pulnt,) p = « 4 2
Presence of adjacent lloodpl:aill

L_ 1111) `loocjpln:ll - (?: cStc'11J1\ ? tli]i)(I7I11I1 IllnV i-'Olllts
_ I -
Entrenchment i lloodphnin access

-
d cpl. c'nOWPOed - W QUML C!"AMp - MAN r„>i11 tsl t? 0-4 I u-_ 2
Presence of adjacent FNetland.s -- --

r11U ;, rll"llld" In lar dja?,?nt ?.? erlon?t? nl:??: point>)
-? - - 4
- 2
? ? C'h 111 Il Cl Slll tl lrsll? -??-? _-?

lc?ten?i? c ch;??nclr?:alion 0. n?turil ncnnd?I coati prinT?i ?I fl-j
sedinjullt input ?.
lr) I
I ,It+n S" dcpl"ltion- I1
_tt?!C oI
i1(19?d7111?k1t =ill :l '?l?c?l11 CS} O _? fJ--l

' 0--1
.
Size & dnersit? of ch lnnet bed suhstl 1tc --
I liar- ll m?"rcnou.; _ +I 11rrc, di , ?r?. ?1,?; nl?l?•; point?i ?
U vidence of channel incision or Niidcninr'
_
Presence of 111a or hnnl. Inures

?a? l???a)n ?i ?u??in ?rlhl? r1nk; Iglu:, p"111[s) 0 5 -5
-
-?
Root depth and density on hall's

14

''

Ins :MA youn in donor Inw tn W?
_ -- ouh??ut - max l,,
I_tLsI
4

,
_
3
?
Impact b? 1 ricldtttrc or llNcstock production

bun tanti.d imps -?1: n?? , n?- ITLIN 0111t ) 4
Presence of 6ftlc-pmA r fipple- pool completes
lt, 1 Tippic, )I t _: cl l-c (- "? o' I r rots i -?
- - o 3
Flabrt at complc -'ir? - -
? - - ? - - - ?
??ltil? iiI n ? llhll It I?: ?1? ? tLCil t. ) hdhlant? tll a_'. h? Illti1
1
-- -?
-?-?
f .:11U)p}' Cod U'a `d, e' oN cr str ea111bed
5
(n(: :ha?tlu rna.\ point")
Substrate ernheddedness
?
I`
? ;iI ?I?ture nla?
- 1
?
?rhl
l iA?'` (I- i II- }
- --
Presc
uee of st1 eanr u
ever tehr ates
2
iu2ncc- -`I )I] 1 ,o 11 _t]LI111?ICin? I pcs II I;. I T-iP,
_
Presence of m
phihi ins
„ } n -t -t 2
u cr ](:.?- ?I C"11n!Ilk In numrruu> P.!,C> - ltrtr p.+inCSl
Presence of Irsh --

fI- 1 Ii-?
.1-? 0
-
l??idence of «ddhfe use

thundnnt j.nc .:r.?? >>c?iur?i 2
Total Poiats Possible i (ir1 ?p iii!
-- - - ---TnT"CORE ('11 >') ent_?rm-, li nt page) - 58
2
.._.... .............. .......... -...... _........... _.._............ - ................. _......... -........ ........_.... ......... ...... _..._......... _.......... .............._............................... _...._.............. _..... _....... _._.._......... -..-................................... _............. ...... .--..................... ---- - --._._...__...- - ---- - --- .._.. --- -;
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
' SCP2: Perennial Stream B
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel-Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
' 3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 12:30 pm
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 80 acres - 8. Stream Order: First
' 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 2,5001f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
' northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabarrus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
' 12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 90°F
' 16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (T)If yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
' 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? "E NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20% Res' ential 10 % Commercial 15% Industrial - 20 .igricultural
20% Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged 15 % Other (Power Line Right of Way)
21. Bankfull Width: 4 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 2 - 3 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
' 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments:
' y ?.r+?y ? t!t
Evaluator's Signature,/ Date
This channel evaluation form s inten ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental pr f Sion s in gathering the data required by
the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05103. To
Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

SCP2: Perennial Stream B
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECORFGAO
N POIN'T' RANGE
C HAR??CTI?RTSTICS - -
- SCORN
Coastal Piednlout Mountain
Presence of tloNN perv"tent pools in stream
-- (t11) Il?'R OF . ItUIC!1 , n 1 1 11 ,.,1 nU111IS)
?
.
Ex idence of past hunrul nlteratlon _
?st?nsi?.e ,11t.r;Iri?u1 - 1i: 1,, 0 -(' ) ti 2
Riparian zone

no bufl?r?- 1L c,?nt1 uuu?. Mile huffcr = 111a't pol'it')
6
- i
- , 2

EN idenc e of Rutz lent or chenrle d disch 11 -acs - -
I

0 no ?li?chul acs nt.) Point;)
-- -- --- -
-- - 2
<:roundwatel- dischar,e -- ----- -

Ilk dl?ch.u _,c - 0_ ?prnl seeps- sed,uul?. ??[c. - ln,t? p!?ints I - - 4 - -l 2
" PtCSQnCe (it Adjacent floodpl.lin

?, 1nu tl?????lplanl_11_ ??t?nsl?c° Il???>rlp_un _nla.? u??rntsi 0-
0

Eno-enchment 'tloodplaill access --
- _ -

?iccrl cr.n?Cnchc,i = r): tiryuclIr t111u,ii7I - ?r)z points) ? ?) 4 l -
- 0
Pl eSence of Adj Ieent Nsedands ---?- - -
-
-? no V, r['LlIds I I ?.11ij,W (? nr lF"tlaIICk - m l-. P(ARts) - t) -t? ?
- l t)-_ 2
Ch mnel snnlosit?

1?-?tensi?c ?hano° vatlcn--t1_ ?1?lturaln?cand?r -MLX ??oinc?l 3
, 3
Sccfintent input
I t)
isAc-:11Sf .le,h?;;ItiC,R- 11_ httlc? e-,r no ?e?hnlc'lll - tl x III+IRT )
- -

-- 1 -4
j 2
Sue & divcrsitu of ch nliel he d substrate ?

I 2
(fine. h ?rn1???cn??li, ?? 1 u ?e. li??r<< ;1,??e - In?r,: h?nni> 1 ,
l vidl'.Ilce of challllel Illc)sloll oi- IN idellltl; _ j
i
I?ICtitil. 11l?ri Cc t- I1: ,Lil1lC hcJ ??, h;Ll)IC? ?l?tA 11011115) -4
I
' 2
presence of major hank failin-es
r -
-
? - -
f,
i
M _.
,e??.
d

?- 110 c?r? cr7?lon - U n1, erl,;i?1n. ,7,Ihl? hnl! s l1ac points)
Root depth and densirY on banks --- - -
u
,1,7h1? r)ot III ,!V
lluinrsi----- -
h,lpact hs a?,rlcnllw c or ti.estock production

1j111,1t.LItl121? In 1D1lC ?!: 711: .1. Ids' 112, ?1£1C j?( MI.?
-4

-----?-

--

2

3
Presence of riffle-pool )) fipple-pool completes

???1= ??:1 ,ir??:i??ped ?r7:?: o1-?intsi _
or
Habitat conlplesiIN --
l
trlc
r n,tlab it,n = (1: tl -yucnt ..n iccl h,?hltar, nl?.?. prult?i U 3
Canops-covera<e over sireambed

I II ?? 1 n
11 ;1C{Ill t;]Utln -- 11: C, )fl 11 Mlotl? '?LI1.( 11)1` Cll:1X I?I)IilL- ) ri - > 3
Subs[l.rte ell] heddedllcss -
- - -??
J ??
111 ?r;?. ?n)hcddcd 11, 1?,? ,?, suu?nlr?? ala::I - p 2
Presence of strcmil invertebrates
^u ti -1 ? rl ? it-,
2
?Tl(1 cnclcnce- f1. ?111111k,ll. 11',M ' ,Ill> 1 "pc'; - !n,lX
pn)n1>i
Presence of amphibians
t U -? l-? 3
1n . , itl(TIC,' -i1 C MI[11011 M11TICI,?11: . ,c, n1 r• winr?l

Presence of tish -- -
l11, 1) CC. -= 1): ill Ill )n. 1lUT11 'tI 11.17 P" 11t11; I
V%idencc of lv HIM fe 1111c
nc; uien1: ,,hund,Lnt i?icn - nu?? pnint?i
Foral Points Possible ?N? ou I1P)
T'O'J_-Aj. SCORE ial?e! ?nt?t ?)n III?t pa ?) 45
2
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
STREAM QUALTTY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEE'T'
M
' SCP3: Unimportant Intermittent Stream. C _.
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name. Kip Kerecman
' 3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:30 am
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 10 acres' 8. Stream Order: First
' 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 3001f 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabarrus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.

12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85°F
' 16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (!DIf yes, estimate the water surface area:-N/A-
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 0% Residential-' 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
90 % Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged 10 % Other (Road)
21. Bankfull Width: 2 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 3 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander = Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 41 Comments:

F1

Evaluator's Signature Date .O
This channel evaluation form is inte ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental profession s in gathering the data required by
the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To
Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

SCP3: Unimportant Intermittent Stream C
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECORLGIO?
CIi_k IZ_`1CT ER[ST IC'S POINT RANGE ---- - -- -- sCORL_
'('oastal P' , 1 'il
f

I
1
M
M
- - - lU 111011.1 0UItL.1111
Presence of flow - per slstcnt pools in stream

Ilo f](I" v 01 saturatl? n = ?). ,irlm? ilo?.t? ulrc? ix)i1] 1
EFidelice of past 11111liall alteration _ ?
I cKl 11 1 ; e Ilt - [-tl I T] 11 aau X11 - Inns 1-1 1 T
tsl
Ripari311 Lo lie --

(110 111?C2Q. ?OTllI ?i1t?11? _>,-I??? J?_1F!C! -111.8S I)Olrlt-) - t, ) 4 3
-
1 ? ldence of nutrient nr chcmlc 11 disch a "'cs - --- --? - --

-- Ot?n?l?.??°dt,?h?_r??? ?_? setlat_?ti -1111, M)inls)
---
?
(?rounditiatcr dlschu-'?c I '
I rl.? dlu h 1? _ . = I I, '.I?1IR_? c'h? .? c'lilln Iti- -'R'. -= nla'i PCirlC
Pl esenct of adjacent flood plaill

(flo I ?)C I)h111 - O_ -Stulhi' fli)odp I.;tlI) - I1111S [1, ) 1111 O -_ 4 ) 0
_ Filtrunchmcnt! lloodpillin access - -

(icCpi. CnI1VT]chCd 11 'LJULlU 17O?dtn2 - I1i?tX I',?llli ) !)--1 (i-? 1
?P1 eselice of ad
j lccit t wetlands
-
(Ilk) lit ILmds 111a>: punts)
-

? (-hannel sinuosilv - -----

- n
atatai
tnanucl n1a,..nintsl
2
?
ticdilllcllt input
I - ---. --

r ten?i.cdcptlsiti??n O' Ilttlc,>rno C(IMIC111-ur s T)01111s) l -? - 3
"'Ve & dkersito] Cll lllrlel bed lllhett ate
2
(il[1C.-. Il Ilh )'?.C IlU III - I1 L! `?C :`: CI->? l.'.CS - 11111, Il( :1IL-
1 ?idenec ofch innel incision or Nicknine

?dcr ?I. i?lcl,? 1 - r1_ ,tsl??lc hcti ? orlnh? - 111.11 hoini?l I
j ci 3
1.1 eurlce of lwl; or halll+ f llltll'e1 - --- - -

12 ? l I
II
O
]
?1
f 11 'i nll ?1 1I 11 JII !tl
1A t??111ll ) )
I ri I
?
? it
- -
-
-
! _ - ?
o
R
Root depth lth
l
nd denvh on bulks
?
r

U ]s(. [t>? t? t-l1 O1.1;flU al- Ol'1.A hr l f7 L? - - ,
4
-
3
-
fmpact by t riculturc of 11N eslock production
i.ul?,t?ln[ial 11n?ac u: n? ? , uLrn?. m;? n?unl:y I
Pi-uscu
e of riffle-pool.
t ipptc-pool l c
tple-xes
1
1l,
- l
`
li
a 111
l \inl,ti l
l - ri 1
Ilabltiu Colnplc-xi N --
I or n?, !
11111 ahwlf O_ f c uclu I an -?; -o 0
?,a llllp? C(l?el 1`,?e. o?el st1( llllbcd
5
I ntl ih1U.i 111 C?? LLlil[7 - (l ?; i[Ill Ill TOLL-.
m,1„, `Irlash?llnLti)
'substrate etobcddedtlcss \ 1- -

n
r` - nl,ctl 2
P1 cscnce Of str c 1111 illN u tcbrate" r) r'c tl - - -- -
- - 0
c',i,tc?l??:-?I, _ ?:nu?. nu?I?I?,u? t.1 ? ?__ n??t? p1 int?l
Presence of :lilt phibi:lns
?) n - - 0
n??.lr'cn?? 11_ ??t1n?11cn.111?11?roLri_ I?c - max
' Pt csence of fish -?-?-
-
?n .a11 ,'11,?=?1; _;1nu11??t1_ ?u 1?I,?u> ???> -rna?< h? InCSi ?? - + q 0
ENidernce of «ildlife nee
j - i 0
Cotal Points Possible :()(I Oli I (ill
TO FAL. C'ORF ials?l ?n?cr nt1 lire. ??d<?cj 41

........ ........._ ............................................__._..__... - ......................... ....... _......._....._..-- ...._..........._.._.__.... _......_._._..._..
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP4: Unimportant Intermittent Stream E
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:00 am
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 5 acres 8. Stream Order: First
' 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 300 if 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabanus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85°F
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (5If yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
' 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES(
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 0% Residential 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
95 % Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged 5 % Other (Road) 21. Bankfull Width: 2 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 2 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 41/o) Moderate (4 to 100/0) -Steep (>10%)
' 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous -Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 35 Comments:
r
' Evaluator's Signature Date ?
This channel evaluation form i rote ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental profe si o s n gathering the data required by
' the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form is-subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To
Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

SCP4: Unimportant Intermittent Stream E '
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
' POINT RANGE

CHAR.1CTFRIS i
iCS

- SCORE
i
-- Coastal Piedmont \lountaiii i
Presence of flow ' persistent pools in stream
nc r?rl?s arurar_ou O: ;none= !?„"r = may points i

--
Evidence of past huul In dteratlon -- - -

rzr II,I1, V altcrzl[I( n 2 ? ) IltCrau0 I1 - I l I". pk)Ill 2
Riparian zone

Ilk, huFfe.I - O; c?inti uou.?. aide hulI'CT - nrl_r point>I
O -ri fl -- I
4
C)-,
4
Fs idence of nutrient or chenlrc 11 disc h ir-,es

_
r
-?tcTl?r c'1T Chu ?? !inch II ?'_ m,T ;)dint>1 ) - 1
? -? 3

( 'rounder atc r dlscllm ?c -- ?
-
Ilv dI c113i ??t' I ). >hl It1 'J. ?CC'1?? ?A c.tland>. ?[?. - MZI-x 1?Olllt> I
Presence of adjacent floodplain

rn?I tl?'udt?lain ?): ? ?1_? n?i?. ? 9??c1?11lhlin = ?uI . ilolnht
? 0
i
Entrenchnlurt , floodpla611 lcccss

??{??'? I?'Clltf?'I1CIlC?I- l) I]-?XI Lent ,?i'i ?llttl ,l- I113? [7??llItJ) ? ) d
- U -
Presence of adf Icent 1Nctlands
(n0 CSctI:LnCi.1 O; 1ar-l "L<I)e?;:nC ?.Fc111n d,--- 17l'c7S h(1IllLti)
! h:11111e1 sinllositY _
?at?nsi?? citann?ll ???rin? -= fi; naulml n1c311dcl ms:< poin(s)
Scdinrentinput -_ - -- I -- -- - -- ,
dopn"iullil-- O- 11111.e ?)I- ?O ?? 11IT7 Cnl -- DI:L\ 1)0111.Ic1
diNtrslt'N of Channel bed substrate
III;1C_ Ili Illc)?CIL)Cis=11, 1,LI"C ?'LI `. C]S: ?I.'_?- 11111E 11 If
-
Evidence ofchmuulcl lnckionor ??idenlnv,

j- _
(iiCc:[ 1 IT7C..??d ,11)1C d & I` I I I I s - III,L: 111 1
- n 3
'Presence of major bank< tflilWrCV

I ?r. ere ?I ?,i?n1 O_ u? "o.?ion, ;1ahl? l3nk? nl,Ix i)?,ints)
'i 3
,
Root depth and densits on banks
d 2
- _-?n I,Th1 r oN dcn? 1( t ?h1011 lwut n tti p?ir.r;l --- -
hnp 1ct bN 1 r Iculturc or liN c stock. production
4
>ui ,t Innai
111p ICt I I fit) 111A%
pr?inis r
- -
?- - - - -?
Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
_ ufo 1lfilt npplL'; UT,2ul l? ,-Il'L d ms3 pklnr,1
11ablC11 com )leXllN

? I
I
tinkle ,,r Ili, hahiru - O. I1, ?IUCUt ?I Icd hah;t?c, n?a?: ,?umt) ?,
U (> O h I 2
f l - i I
-:1ll0p', lo\CI 1',t o?cr 1trC 1111b(d _
•
L) ?I]1dll _S?l TUl'il- a coT]11I111('U? In ?1?'d MI IL ,,??InrSl
- ->-; s
tinhstr uc elnbeddtdnl is ---

- iu?_pi??.,nTh?-.ld?
Presence of surcanl
,I,2?
- 11 ?,un n ?n_InuL?r:IU> 1 P1-
i,l?.
nl Into ?
I 4 0
_
-
-- - -
Presetlce of amphibians
I
..
n U n? = iT cam ?I? n nun 1 1us C_p?s
- 11 1:; I'( IrCSI
- - . 1
f) r1 -
0

P1 e"Cnce of I1sh - - -
-- ?- ?)
1
i.?11111"W[1- ]].1I11 ' lJM` I ?)0III
1de11CC of V171dk11C L1SC
?
-?
(',h`
?- ll?l fl Lill ? IiIC[ 113 . cilTl L? i
--- --- ----- ;. _?.-_? ---?
i l) -.? 1
.
Tola1 Points Pos,iblt 0
TOT ki SCORE ('Iko ent'?r t)n hr t ???I?c) 35
2

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
' DATE: February 17, 2004
COUNTY Mecklenburg County, North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE'OF TRACT 66 acres
' PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 66-Acre Highway 29 Site
' PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
The Trammel Crow Crow Company
' POC: Mr. Brian Hoffman at [phone].
214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 400
' Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-5399
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
' Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
POC: Gregory C. Antemann, PWS at [phone]
' 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
' STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
( X) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: site grading )
' ( ) No specific development planned at present
( ) Project already completed
(Type of project: 1
' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be
forwarded.
(X) USGS Site Location Map (Attachment A - Figure 1)
(X) NRCS Soil Survey (Attachment A - Figure 2)
' (X) Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map (Attachment A - Figure 3)
(X) Agent Certification of Authorization Form (Attachment B)
(X ) Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 (Attachment C)
(X) Routine On-Site Data Forms (Attachment D)
' ( X) NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (Attachment E)
(X) USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (Attachment F)
(X) Representative Photographs (Attachment H)
' (X) Proposed Impacts (Attachment I - Figure 4)
(X) Proposed Impact Detail (Attachment I - Figure 5)
Si tore of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Gregg C. Antemann, PWS

66 - Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Protect No. 2003-0435
td
Photograph A. View of Perennial Stream A.
:1TM K
3e- ?"T 8
.
?' ??,•"^r L'

y ?A

3'^ ? 3 •'
wS r

J i TV-

4 : ??_,?., fly d ; v' •'

Photograph B. View of Perennial Stream B.
I
66 -Acre HiOncay 29 Site February 17, 2004
NationNcide Permit No. 39 kpplication Project No. 2003-0435
., t yy ,? sY;?.a rR.•+?.. .. .,a,,,t ad "f ra
..f
?? t ?' ? ' ? ; ? . - ..?' . ' ?:x ;? Y, y ? p? .'sew`'-1':
w. t ? eta h J,
*ij
Photograph C. View of Unimportant Intermittent Stream C.
D. View of Wetland AA.
11

"
V,
I I

' FIGURE 5 n I ;

Unimportant Intermittent
Str C - 194 LF
(0.01 a
) impacted
' a

r n

U
n

•
set`
'

01
• J?
t I

NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATER:
DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY C,
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS HAVE B
SUB-METER ACCURACY.

nl rv MM76
e s m emao
INV emo6
IBC )ial W774 444.48
IB Ik sn MW
WT 07.24
s ffiINIVMae
lea P. ImI awn
IA 664.46
1B Q >mt 640.79
III ULM
lea RK 6611.36
coma WT or=
re Y MU GMav Met
: >i>y III Mot
M It = ULM
DIV 670.61
M '*-= NNO
WV W17.72
le It )i01
>iA r
le o: HII GOM Y 67L71
LEGEND
AVOIDED STREAM CHANNEL
IMPACTED STREAM CHANNEL
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
RIPARIAN STREAM BUFFER
APPROXIMATE SCALE: I"=200'
j Carolina Wetland Services
J 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
REFERENCE: BASE MAP PROVIDED BY HARRISBURG SURVEYING,
DATED AUGUST 8, 2003.
Figure 4. Proposed Impacts
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0435
PREPPED BY- DA7/-? CHECKD DATE L
941 1 .2 /6 62' •1
7 O
i
i
i
i

4 1 4 -

m

9
v
N r
:t LL

J D .r
r 4 0 0 U-)
O Q ` `q
0
gas, CO

U i U

a
o

-?

C)
o
E
?

.
E Q N
a0
Np
' p
c+??O
E p Z) (n?.

/

W ? \
?
w \ \ ?
w .,
w.

aw?
H
W 7 rn n
Q
Z
O
A
,

_3 W --
? ¢ W

w
Ov
w
o?
0
3wx
W

U o°
-0 RE
QZ ?`
?
Q
¢
C W?
s
o ca
4
D F-

Q
O
W C4 C/)
o
¢?
n
?,arles
0

c
N

-- u- -0

E J Q '
w eown um
MMINT FOU"
N d" U „
4-j 0 7

- Z%-

U
4j
L U W aF
O D o
C) -
O
•E 0
Z) U)

¢
c
v
a W Q
z

U

H z

U

?

a

o
0

a

Q O
Q a
X
(I I
O Vs
Q
? N
•
^ Lo
? N
V] ? N z
?
A ?
oN
?
tot
CCl . ? 7-. ? CL N ? o

t:
?z z z
a
z?
?
? x
u
.o ?
z ?-

?oU ?o
0 ??UV Ac
w r CA
w
m?
a
u El
x?
w¢

RAIZIl1 R
`? NORTH TRYON STREET * U. S. HIGH 'WAY 29 * 120' _PUBLIC R W
7 If -s
Vhf a ?1? Ys.l L ? / C. , I I I
FIGURE .5 r
Unbmportant Intermittent
Stream C - 194 lF - I l ''J
' (0.01 ac.) impacted '
i )
Unimportant Intermittent
Stream E - 60 LF
t (0.001 aa) Impacted I'
^ ?? •
17
i
Unkpwtarkt Intemlatent l
Stream F - 385 LF '
at (R02 ae) Impacted - '
A ,.. ? I I a
f n M
a
/ M
?11 ? Jt Il I ? I >
r
I I T
was'
fit
f?
a
4 1„ / I
I
1 if
(I ,
c 14i l
Two. ? ??w
/ NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING WETLANDS HAVE BEEN
' DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES (CWS).
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS HAVE BEEN SURVEYED USING A GPS UNIT WITH
,M SUB-METER ACCURACY.
!
!
WI6 , A7r_
tu4? ? ?
,_1

401*1

Os
M? 010.70
M & RM ?. ?eod
M G is L774 M
M® 0: WN MW ee7t1
a ao1 mw
MIG
my oft"
M Q R M BM79
7Bees
MB RM ULM
a066a 11M OPM
x o
nn W&M
Mm x m 590.0
MIF erea
ME 96M 69LIM 67661
Ma aww 99969
bn m.r.
to !t ?
all
Q SW 66.7!
M1M OEI.TA ARC BE/JtN7C DISTANC E
C i Q 18'4 7.80 '
5.02
S3r4532'E 796.00 '
1 v41 10Ta"al- I /az26 11911_ae I ma147a1 W I /19.7
LEGEND
AVOIDED STREAM CHANNEL
IMPACTED STREAM CHANNEL
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
® RIPARIAN STREAM BUFFER
APPROXIMATE SCALE: I"=200'
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
iV Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
REFERENCE: BASE MAP PROVIDED BY HARRISBURG SURVEYING,
DATED AUGUST 8 2003.
Figure 4. Proposed Impacts
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0435
BY? DATg CHEC DATE
PREP D
a
Carolina Wetland Services
Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to a
Nationwide Permit No. 39
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0435
FEB t S 2004
February 17, 2004
Prepared For:
Mr. Brian Hoffinan
The Trammel Crow Company
214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 400
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-5399
[phone]
I
lit,
Prepared By:
Mr. Gregory C. Antemann, P.W.S.
Mr. Ron G. Johnson, W.P.I.T
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
[phone]
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
WATER QUALITY SECTION
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 • Charlotte, NC 28217 • [phone] Office • (704) 527-1 133 Fax
www.carolinawetlandservices.com
66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ...............................................................
Existing Conditions ...............................................................
Current Land Use, .............................................................
Jurisdictional Delineation ..................................................
Agency Correspondence ........................................................
Cultural Resources .............................................................
Protected Species ...............................................................
Purpose and Need for the Project ..........................................
Avoidance and Minimization ................................................
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters ............................
Compensatory Mitigation ......................................................
List of Attachments
Attachment A
Attachment A
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Attachment D
Attachment E
Attachment F
Attachment G
Attachment H
Attachment I
Attachment I
...............................................................2
............................................................... 3
................. ..........................................3
...............................................................3
......................................................:........6
...............................................................6
............................................................... 6
...............................................................6
............................................................... 8
............................................................... 8
............................................................... 8
- Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
- Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
- Figure 3. Wetland Boundary Survey
- Agent Certification of Authorization Form
- Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39
- Routine On-Site Data Forms
- NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
- USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets
- Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
- Representative Photographs
- Figure 4. Proposed Impacts
- Figure 5. Proposed Impact Detail

66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Executive Summary
The 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site is located in northeast Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately
1 mile north of the US Highway 29 - Salome Church Road intersection
' (Attachment A- Figures 1 and 2). The Trammel Crow Company has contracted Carolina
Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide permitting services for this project. An Agent
Authorization Form has been included as Attachment B.
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are six
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A - F) and three jurisdictional wetland areas
(Wetlands AA - CC) located within the project limits (Attachment A - Figure 3). On behalf of
The Trammel Crow Company, CWS is requesting written verification of the location and size of
these on-site jurisdictional features (Attachment G). Unavoidable impacts associated with this
' project total approximately 639 linear feet (0.031 acre) of Unimportant Intermittent stream
channel. On behalf of The Trammel Crow Company, CWS is submitting a Pre-Construction
Notification with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 13,
and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 39 (Attachment Q.
66-Acre Highway 29 Site ' February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435

I

0

Existing Conditions
The 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site is located in northeast Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately
1 mile north of the US Highway 29 - Salome Church Road intersection
(Attachment A- Figures 1 and 2) This project proposes to develop the property into a residential
subdivision. The Trammel Crow Company is developing the project and has contracted Carolina
Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404 permitting services.
Current Land Use
The current land use of the project area consists mainly of undeveloped forested areas. Dominant
vegetation within forested areas includes red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), river birch (Betula nigra), loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda), water oak (Quercus nigra), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), and willow oak
(Quercus phellos). A portion of the site has been cleared and is dominated by tall fescue
(Festuca arundinacea).
Jurisdictional Delineation
On December 31, 2003, and January 2, 2004, CWS's Isaac Hinson and Ron Johnson delineated on-
site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.1 within the project area. Jurisdictional areas were determined
on site using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - Routine On-Site Determination
Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual?
Routine On-Site Data Forms representing Wetlands AA-CC, as well as adjacent upland areas, have
been included as Attachment D. Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were classified according to
recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)3 and USACE guidance. A NCDWQ
Stream Classification Form and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet for Stream A have
been included as Attachments E and F.
1 "Jurisdictional waters of the U.S." includes essentially all surface waters such as: all navigable waters and their tributaries, all
interstate waters and their tributaries, all wetlands adjacent to these waters, and all impoundments of these waters.
2 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
3 North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Classification Method. Version 2.0. 1999.
' 66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
' The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are six
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A - F) and three jurisdictional wetland areas
(Wetlands AA - CC) located within the project limits (Attachment A - Figure 3). On-Site
waters are unnamed tributaries to Mallard Creek. Mallard Creek is part of the Yadkin River
' basin (HU# 0304105)4 and is rated "Class C Waters" by the NCDWQ. On-Site jurisdictional
areas are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1. Summarv of On-Site Jurisdictional Stream Channels
Jurisdictional
Area Classification Approximate
Length(ti) Approximate
Acrea e,(ac.) NCDWQ
Score USACE
Score
Stream A Perennial 1,880 if -- 46.75 58
Stream B Perennial 2,768 if -- 33.75 45
Stream C Unimportant Intermittent 375 if 0.019 ac. 21.5 39
Stream D Unimportant Intermittent 50 if 0.002 ac. -- --
Stream E Unimportant Intermittent 1121f 0.004 ac. 16 35
Stream F Unimportant Intermittent 4401f 0.026 ac. -- --
Total 5,625 If 0.051 ac. -- --
Table 2. Summarv of On-Site Jurisdictional Wetland Areas
Jurisdictional

Area
Classification
Approximate Acreage
Wetland AA Forested 0.037 ac.
Wetland BB Forested 0.038 ac.
Wetland CC Forested 0.067 ac.
Total -- 0.142 ac.
Stream A flows south across the western portion of the project area for approximately 1,880
' linear feet (Attachment A - Figure 3). This stream channel was evaluated to be Perennial based
on strong flow with a six to eight-foot average ordinary high water width and substrate
' consisting of coarse sand to cobble. Stream A exhibits moderate sinuosity, a moderate presence
of amphibians (frogs), and complete canopy coverage for the reach investigated. Stream A
' scored 58 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
and 46.75 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
(Attachments E and F - SCP1). A photograph of Stream A has been included as
Attachment H - Photograph A.
' 4 "HU#" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.
4
66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Stream B flows. south across the eastern boundary of the project area for approximately 2,768
linear feet (Attachment A - Figure 3). This stream channel was evaluated to be Perennial based
on strong flow with a two to four-foot average ordinary high water width and substrate
consisting of coarse sand to gravel. Stream B exhibits moderate sinuosity with frequent
meanders, a strong presence of amphibians (frogs), and a moderate presence of crustaceans
(crayfish). Stream B scored and 33.75 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream
Classification Form and 45 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheet (Attachments E and F - SCP2). A photograph of Stream B has been
included as Attachment H - Photograph B.
Stream C was evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent. Stream C flows east from Wetland BB
for approximately 375 linear feet until its confluence with Stream A (Attachment A - Figure 3).
This stream was evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent based on intermittent flow, persistent
pools, and a two to three foot average ordinary high water width. Stream C scored 39 out of a
possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and 21.5 out of a
possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form (Attachments E and F - SCP3).
A photograph of Stream C has been included as Attachment H - Photograph C.
Streams D, E, and F were evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent. Stream D flows west for
approximately 50 linear feet until its confluence with Stream A. Stream E flows west for
approximately 112 linear feet until its confluence with Stream A. Stream F flows west for
approximately 440 linear feet from the existing access road bisecting the property to its
confluence with Stream A. These streams were evaluated to be Unimportant Intermittent based
on a lack of flow at the time of investigation, lack of substrate (silt to coarse sand), and a one to
two-foot average ordinary high water width. Stream E scored 16 out of a possible 71 points on
the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form and 35 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and (Attachments E and F - SCP4).
5
66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Wetland AA is located along the eastern border of the site and is approximately 0.037 acre in
size (Attachment A - Figure 3). Wetland AA is contiguous with Perennial Stream B. Dominant
vegetation includes silky dogwood (Corpus amomum), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis), black willow (Salix nigra), and various species of sedges (Carex spp.).
Wetland AA exhibited low chroma soils (2.5Y 4/1, 5Y 2.5/1) with mottles (IOYR 3/6), as well
as inundation and soil saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface. A Routine
Wetland Determination form for Wetland AA has been included as Attachment D - DPL A
photograph of Wetland AA has been included as Attachment H - Photograph D.
Wetlands BB and CC are located in the southeast portion of the site and are approximately 0.38
and 0.067 acre in size, respectively (Attachment A - Figure 3). Both areas exhibited similar
vegetation and soils and are represented with one data point. Dominant vegetation within these
areas includes tag alder, black willow, cat briar (Smilax rotundifolia), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), red maple (Acer rubrum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua).
These areas exhibited low chroma soils (7.5YR 511) with mottles (5YR 4/6), as well as soil
saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface, drift lines and sediment deposits. A
Routine Wetland Determination form for Wetlands BB and CC has been included as
Attachment D - DP2.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on February 4, 2004 to
determine if areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance are located within the
project area and if these sites would be affected by the project. To date, no response has been
received from the SHPO.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on
February 4, 2004 to determine any federally-listed, candidate species or critical habitat located
within the project area. To date, no response has been received from the NCNHP.
6
66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of this project is to develop the existing property into an event parking lot. The site
is located near Lowe's Motor Speedway and will provide a needed increase in parking
availability. The site will add 3,700 spaces to accommodate large crowds during six major race
events throughout the year. This lot will serve as overflow parking for these single events with
no overnight camping.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. No impacts to on-site Perennial streams and wetlands will occur under the proposed
plan. The surface of the parking lot will be grass-lined and will not increase the impervious
surface area of the site. The main aisle will be gravel but will not increase the impervious area of
the site by more than ten percent. Therefore, a Storm Water Management Plan is not being
developed for this project. The current site plan utilizes multiple entranceways to avoid crossing
important streams. Riparian buffers will be maintained to the maximum extent possible. Proper
sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters.
Proposed Impacts to jurisdictional Waters
Proposed impacts will total approximately 639 linear feet (0.031 acre) of Unimportant intermittent
stream channel. Impacts will result from the grading of the site for use as an event parking facility
(Attachment I - Figures 4 and 5). On behalf of The Trammel Crow Company, CWS is submitting
a Pre-Construction Notification with attachments in accordance with the written notification
requirements of Nationwide Permit No. 39.
7
' 66-Acre Highway 29 Site February 17 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435
Compensatory Mitigation
The proposed design of this project will limit unavoidable impacts to less than 1/10 acre of
jurisdictional stream channels. Impacts will be limited to only Unimportant Intermittent
channels. The Trammel Crow Company is proposing the establishment of approximately 4,648
linear feet of riparian buffers along on-site Perennial stream channels. The buffer along
Perennial Stream A will be established on both sides of the channel and will be approximately 50
foot wide on each side (Figure 4). Perennial Stream B will have a 20-70 foot wide buffer along
' one side of the channel.
8
t
r
t
it 111 {+A
4'",t4
}b `r 1r`?aPpT ` ?_)? / ?` I \ 1 f f `v? l
PI Ott
?,-
??
-40
7
•`_l-
??.? .?i"r,t
f } r 11 ?'? t ?:
l ig HV,Y
??? ? ? `•1??? t? \'? ? ??? ?I? /?(??-? ? ? ?. ?? I?? ?, 1. ?,, ?f') '.Q j ??j ?t\a 1?. ? `t ly ? ,rV ? ?Y ?j•
F It 1 1 i
`SITE 1 C n
'?.?-??? '?? ,.???•' .Ittl-',.f ??j", ???.y, (ra lI, I????\ n?'???? "' l?? `?.ii ? N?
a?omr (?Y irrh Road ( I,
T?c
C ! of car li 1 I ; _i }t ? ` \?, \-??
1?k \?L \ l L I -_ r ( M
?? 1 1 } 1
(,
?.? 4 ",ey?{ ? ? ' {. ? _ ?\1? ? ? k ? •?? t ,. ??fl . N- o
;t
I i
mss'' 11,
00
Approximate Scale P = 2000'
Reference: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Series, Harrisburg, NC Quadrangle, dated 1996.

Carolina Wetland Services Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
I 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0435
PREPARED BY • ' IT K DATE V13119-3 CHECKED BY DATE ? / ? G 3
K 6CLI
t
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217

?k
l

x ? ? TC
Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0435
YKEYAKEU BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE
?11316,,Y G C R ?j .19.0 3
I Approximate Scale 1" = 2,000'
Reference: NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, Sheet No. 5, dated 1980.

• NORTH TRYON ST EET * U. S. IG Y 29 * 120 PUBLIC R W
11 a THIS DRAWING WAS DELIVERED
.• VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS FOR
? ?' ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE 4 t s p
CALL HARRISBURG SURVEYING
N4812M-E A.
•
TCE
?
/D T TD ..,. rm,.N
vcan Mr HTS s D90A1? Tu r B L!! weID
y ass a Zara SIR
NOffi w 1Mw B• Ya M ! ,t
to I - ii A `s 00 Aons /( ` w asl0ouwi z
AM& CAMMIAM 67 = COCO IM7HM W Y PC 4W Perenlal Stream A ? 4r?/1M1
1,880 if 8 ark
rae tommAST ID PUDICAUD BY = IDaNmmlm L
POmm Alm Tiff WMIM09 OF =CDtD AS Sffllff. Nj
' ?!ff 'm P0NCI1DN tAMIkOW w sa?r rs no I r sera PC a 71? I ?' ?
BaD I AWNW= PrNI R 7=0111 9R ID DI rLICt ' V M ? a ! ,/ v ? I PL ? ??
1 o w
Tat sDt 7DA7 T= cot OR mA. moon AM NO IANOU 1a' 10? A PT.2F?EN'171' ? ? I M?? '?c R ?• r- •'
MaDED. as w 99ee w sat, see an s
AM UMDWm D S;D'1AY 1107JR551XJRes, DKC.
AU. THJ1Qe A46 SHOW At ' DW
AMOIDYTt IATCA=DR $ Unimportant Intermittent ( •?° X41
' PROPIM IM IN T= NNIARO C? VA72FAM
R Stream D - 50 if 7= Z= AZ I
A ° 01 m erennial Stream B -71 s tOW t nDOD rum Att? ett NtC?IDDO O CO. OR Unimportant Intermittent (t t?3ST ft P
lam PDAPBR EMS A e0• MWMZ VAM DIPABT NANAOnmrr Stream C - 375 if 1' l I 2,768 tf
AMU ( R1EER ) eC My toe or am or C1 B l Unimportant Intermittent i
Stream E - 112 if I
eBDT mIClDIA1Q 0 A V= ER POM Pmi ON D9 e9 AT
w e ?_ w > rti ?-, I ?+
ZNTRAM ROAD
NAUARD TAM FMK Gat. PPLAM fist OJIMS 9 C1?7d r $ I A osl o .. ` • I
D-Mm ZMEM OF
aR P[ 9 PO 9s ATDRI est19 K tt
KP4
wasBaA
aJetlAp lE r it MI ' R ?1 QI I d
d Carolina Wetland Services `en Yn
S e 5000 Nations Crossing Rd, Suite 230 p p
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 r I I
Phone [phone]
Unimportant Intermittent ( ")
S • Irv Stream F - 440 if
s
p 'j f

a-a w t
rwfa y 1? o u ? I 'y I.
'awoa w a - I 5- w At ,I? '? PRE 34ENTI,Y y h „T x
N rJ' E. DB 15841 PG 858 r •
ww
N A ? ?112 4TAX# 05i 091 Pg
T54. E7
I ,
42.47 Acres. TOTAL ? (•? ? ? • °?
a
1$50080.5 SQ, ft. i is r
1 ID 1 t p.A. ' ?' r v II .. r
Wetland AA - 0,037 acre sCP2
i r
4 e ? w i 1,4'1/1
NOTE, JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED BY DP1 40%
CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES (CWS) ON DECEMBER 31, 2003, AND = +I?ktD °? I
JANUARY 2, 2004. JURISDICTIONAL AREAS WERE SURVEYED USING I IN
A GPS UNIT WITH SUB-METER ACCURACY.t •
41

o?
P?
.mmya0."
m 1k iNl my 10401
Na a = •Q74
=D: m wor 0.7.0
mEd W&W
my a"
MP in M
me =at"
ORa
?n 11" Om
rm c Bw W slaw
ame
Im A BEl sea"
Una ®l BeLft
mr raa
Na a 1011 ew.w
am Mr.
OlV W4.9
=O: m GKIVY
MIA

all Wetland HB - 0,038 acre i
Y CS 15-"3r 1
'
RMUSIERED LO uaveml
MMSER
L-33%
L RW TWEST r aD4/
T,
O
OW
M
OR
IEIErr cERTWntTFY TO DE m NOK OF THE FnLmrnR4 As DamaaED
A. THAT TWS PLAT a 0' A SURVEY THAT CREATES A SUND1VISM

F
r BOUNDARY ? TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OR

LAIC WITM THE AREA IF A COW" OR MDHCIDAIITY TH
AST
AN O MIA
AMS
G4 DP2 85.87 ACRES ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF

C
NCE THAT REOAATES PARCELS W LAl,
M
& THAT THO PLAT IS 0/? 4r N. TRYON STREET / U.3. HIGHBOY 29
OF A SURVEY THAT IS LOCATED IN SUCH A
O' A COMITY OR MDOCOAIIIY THAT 13 UIE(M ATED AS TO MON Ctr or falaplR
aw >b at SURVEY FDR
ODONIEE THAT REQAATES PARCELS 1F LAW 0 ar MIA • •a
-or SPEEDWAY 1, INC
7PORTS
Or- ""r
>? r IS s A SMVEY OF AN °wrim PARCEL OR PAP Wetland CC - 0
067 acre PO BOX X 18
187474
m EID - EN15" Iron Pin r PI * D/C - DacR of curb . CHARLOTTE NC 28218
IL THAT Txts PLAT IS OF A sLavEr DP ANOTHER CAlEtfftl, SuCN

S N P N. iron PM' arr GoA Rod/R. l.W J,
.WoK
CP - W PoNt PWR - A•r•
PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
°•
THE RECDODMID)1 OF EMISTDR PARCELS, A COAtT O
OR ODER =
StMEY, D=" TO THE DUMM OF RV414V SK Poan Pale
M0/ _ 0P"V6Y Mp1N'""t HVAC - IM••rMla

01O THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY FOR THE EXACT w M u

E THAT THE DFmMATIDI AwuuAE TO Ties SURVEYOR is S"
'?
si Way Utz - LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER, SEWER, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, TELEVISION AND ANY
OTHER UNDERGR
UGUS
T 8
200 RwvA
I AN UAKE TO eWE A DETEMmNTUN TO THE BEST OF MY ,
R Eos,n.rt
C«a.r LAr OUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITY BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION. THE
OMISSI ,
G W
AMMY As TO PRDVISMIS CO TADr9 Of A. TIa0NA1 a ABOVE ON FROM OR THE INCLUSION OF UTILITY LOCATION ON THE CONTRACT
DRAWINGS IS NQT 100
1'= ' SURVEYI
F1

Pw101 OF THIS PR
OPERTY SHOWN m
_
R/W

TO BE CONSIDERED AS THE NON-EXISTANCE 13F OR A DEFINATE
LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES
IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIB -
N G
R IN A 101 YR FL® PLAT is SUBJECT .TO
PLM ASSOW? m me ? w_ R-3 PROPERTY
I.RE ,
ILITY OF THE CONTRACT
TO VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ALON
T ?
C
D

ISURA ICE RATE MAPS PRIOR TO DATE OF AaVEY
a
70
a

ROMTP 3W
'

_

G
HE
ROUTE OF WORK.
?? 75
?
MECKLE
N
BURG
RA
iE
a
2 i a r 19" m ? NOWPOIT ?
' 6

- - - - -
-

the uHE avR TELE
ETC-
APPx LDCATDDR a Pa%

AROLINA ONE CALL ..,»»»»„»,,,,,....,.».,,.»».,[phone]

CARDLIN ?Ax7D4-455-9008 ?

NW DELTA ARC RADIUS BEARNIG DISTANCE
C 1 179 1S2S. S37'I 45 137.
C2 1 1 NS3'I 4SS.
790. 40` 1 2971 S77 790.
PA Ts 3t 787.2F tnT N7716'31'M 7M91
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AU'x HORIZATION
I, BxL= Koffman, representing, The TrammellCrow Compa=y, hereby certify chat I have
authorized Gregory C. A,ntemann of Carolina Wetlaad Services, Inc_ to act on my behalf
and take all actions necessary-to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this
jurisdictionl determination and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge,
Y? -
App cant's sign e
geu. s signature
116 ?. 0
?-
Date Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future applIeatiou correspondence

r

J

1

7

Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
Nationwide Permit No. 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: The Trammel Crow Company: Mr. Brian Hoffman
Mailing Address: 214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 400
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-5399
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Greeorv C. Antemann, PWS
Company Affiliation: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Mailing Address: 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte North Carolina 28217
Telephone Number: 704-527-1177 Fax Number: 704-527-1133
E-mail Address: _g egg(cDcarolinawetlandservices.com
Page 1 of 7
I III.
Project Information
1. Name of project: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 05108126, 05109109, 05109110, 05109111,
05109112
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Charlotte take North Tr.
(US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately '/2 mile west of the
Mecklenburg County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of
the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N 35° 20' 21"- W 80'42'4"
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
The current land use of the project area consists mainly of undeveloped forested areas.
7. Property size (acres): 66 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Mallard Creek
9. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to develop the
existing property into an event parking lot. The site is located near Lowe's Motor Speedway
and will provide a needed increase in parking availability. The site will add 3,700 spaces to
accommodate large crowds during six major race events throughout the year. This lot will
serve as overflow parking for these single events with no ovemi hg_ t camping.
' 11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe and typical
excavation equipment will be used for this project.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The land use surrounding the project
area consists of residential industrial and wooded areas.
I Page 2 of 7
IV. Prior Project History
V. Future Project Plans
There are no future plans for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Wetland Impacts

Wetland Impact
of Impact
Area pact Located within
ear
yea
Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact*
(acres) **
dplai Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (yes/no
(linear feet)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A.
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
Stream C piping 1941f Unnamed Tributary to 2' Intermittent
Mallard Creek
Stream E piping 60 if Unnamed Tributary to 2' Intermittent
Mallard Creek
Stream F piping 385 if Unnamed Tributary to 2' Intermittent
Mallard Creek
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tbpozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
r Page 3 of 7
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 639 linear feet (0.031 ac.)
Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, _Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. N/A
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding; drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
' local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
I VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Impacts to on-site iurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. No impacts to on-site Perennial streams and wetlands will occur under the proposed
plan. The surface of the parking lot will be grass-lined and will not increase the impervious
surface area of the site. The main aisle will be gravel but will not increase the impervious area of
the site by more than ten percent. Therefore, a Storm Water Management Plan is not being
developed for this project. The current site plan utilizes multiple entranceways to avoid crossing
important streams. Riparian buffers will be maintained to the maximum extent possible. Proper
sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
' waters.
' Page 4 of 7
VIII.. Mitigation
The proposed design of this broiect will limit unavoidable impacts to less than 1/10 acre of iurisdictional
stream channels. Impacts will be limited to only Unimportant Intermittent channels. The Trammel
Crow Company is proposing the establishment of approximately 4,648 linear feet of riparian buffers
along on-site Perennial stream channels. The buffer along Perennial Stream A will be established on
both sides of the channel and will be approximately 50 foot wide on each side (Figure 4). Perennial
Stream B will have a 20-70 foot wide buffer along one side of the channel.
1. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
t Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
' Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
' If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
' Yes ? No
Page 5 of 7
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
! It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
! justification for these impacts in .Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
! Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
! Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify: )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
! Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. N/A
0
J
u
0
H
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within .15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
! XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
! Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Sources of nearby pervious cover include roads, driveways, and rooftops. This project will
increase the impervious coverage of the project area no more than ten percent.

I Page 6 of 7
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Construction is scheduled to continue immediately following receipt of the appropriate permits.
Applica tTAgeA's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site Date: 10 /02/04
Applicant/Owner: The Trammel Crow Company County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): IJH. RGJ State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DPI
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S cies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Alnusserrulata tree FACW 9.
2. Salix nigra tree OBL 10.
3. Sambucus canadensis shrub FACW- 11.
4. Carex spp. herb 12.
5. Cornus amomum shrub FACW+ 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
100%
Remarks:
All of the dominant veg
etation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 00=3 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are p resent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 1/8/2004
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes loam, 8-15% slopes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descrition:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
00-44 B 2.5Y 4/1 10YR 3/6 common/ silt loam
distinct
4-12 B 5Y 2.511 N/A N/A sandy loam
Histosol X Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
X Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are p resent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
oYes ircle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No s this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? No
Remarks:
Approved by HOUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 1/8/2004
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: - cre a 2 Site Date: 01/02/04
Applicant/Owner: The Trammel Crow Company County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): IJH.,RGJ State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP2
If needed, explain on reverse.
VFGFTATInN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Alnus serrulata tree FACW 9.
2. Salix nigra tree OBL 10.
3. Acer rubrum tree. FAC 11.
4. Liquidambarstyracii lua tree FAC 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 13.
6. Platanus occidentalis tree FACW- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
100%
Remarks:
All of the dominant ve
getation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
- Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
X Drift Lines
Field Observations: X Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) - Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland h, d? rology indicators are 1 resent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 1/8/2004
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes loam, 8-15% slopes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon Nunsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 B 7.5YR 5/1 5YR 4/6 few/distinct silt loam
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are p resent.
VVt 1 LANU Ut I V-KMINA 1 IVN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye No
(Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Ils this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?. Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 1/8/2004
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 66-Acre Highway 2 Site Date: 01/02/04
Applicant/Owner: The Trammel-Crow Company County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): IJ& RGJ Stater NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: nnian
d
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP3
If needed, ex lain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecies
1. Betula nigra Stratum
tree Indicator
FACW Dominant Plant Species
9. Pinus taeda Stratum Indicator
tree FAC
2. Juniperus virginiana tree FACU- 10. _Ouercus nigra tree FAC
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua tree FAC+ 11. Quercusphellos _ tree FACW-
4. Ligustmm sinense shrub FAC 12.
5. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 13.
6. Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 14.
7. Elaeagnus umbellata shrub -- 15.
8. Fagus grandifolia tree FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
70%
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant sp
ecies are FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
- Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
- Inundated
- Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: - Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
- Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) - Water-Stained Leaves
- Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil N/A (in.) - FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are absent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 1 of 2 1/8/2004
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes loam, 2-8% slopes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descri tion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0_3 B 7.5YR 3/2 N/A N/A silt loam
3-12 B 10YR 4/6 N/A N/A sandyloam
_ Histosol _ Concretions
- Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
- Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are absent.
Wt I LAND Ut 1 tKMINA I IUN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes N?o (Circle)
1Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by HOUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 of 2 1/8/2004
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
A
Project/Site: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site Date: 1/0 02/04
Applicant/Owner: The Trammel Crow Company County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): IJH RGJ State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: uplan
d
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DP4
I
If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1. Betula nigra Stratum Indicator
tree FACW Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
2. Juniperus virginiana tree FACU- 10.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua tree FAC+ 11.
4. Smilax rotundifolia vine FAC 12.
5. Fagus grandifolia tree FACU 13.
6. Lonicera japonica vine FAC- 14.
7. Pinus taeda tree FAC 15.
8. Polystichum acrostichoides fem FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
63%
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant s
pecies are FAC or wetter.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
- Other
No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
- Inundated
- Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: - Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are absent.
Routine On-Site Data Forms
Page 1 of 2
1/8/2004
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wilkes loam, 8-15% slWeS Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T ie Ha ludalfs Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 B 7.5YR 3/2 N/A N/A silt loam
3=12 B 10YR 4/6 N/A N/A sandy loam
_ Histosol _ Concretions
- Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
- Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are absent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circl
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of a non-jurisdictional upland area.
Approved by HQUSACE 2192
Routine On-Site Data Forms Page 2 Of 2 1/8/2004
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP1- Perennial Stream A
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): K7K
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s): TU:.
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W 80° 42' 4" Latitude: N 35o 20' 21"
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 ® 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 ® 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 5 3
0 5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One'Number Per Line)
1 Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 0.5 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 ] 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
0.5
1
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.5
II. Hydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
(1?
I
0.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 0.5 1 EN
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 H 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE. If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip 0
This Step And #S Below*) 0.5 1
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0 0.5 1 1©
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? YS=-MR No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 8.5
III. Biology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Are Fish Present? ® 0.5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 0.5 1.5
31 Are Am,ati,T.. lee Present? 5 O S 1 1 5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 9 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun s Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
' 8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FAC W Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPI,
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS. • 4.75
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= 46.75 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchia¢And WITHOUTSinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2' Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Toap And/Or In Field) Present? YesA No=O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 20
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 7
NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP2 - Perennial Stream B
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s):C*
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W 80°42' 4" Latitude: N 35° 20' 21"
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner.agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the hest professional judgement of the evaluator, the
' feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 ® 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 2 ,
(*NOTE: 11'Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=O*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On TORO Map AmUOr In Field) Present? Yes=3 No=5
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 13
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 ® 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2

1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? V CCi{lC
2 I JLCUn
0
2 Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
3 Is Perih ton Present? 1 2 3
4 Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINOICATOR POINTS. 6
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 EN 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
' Natural Drainage Way? 0 0.5 1 FN

SECONDARY GEOMORPHOL OGY INDICA TOR POINTS: 3
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 11.5 1 0.5 0
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 O 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 0®. 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headeut)? Yes 41-A No=0
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 6
111. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? ® 0.5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 0.5 N 1.5
3) Are AcuaticTurtles Present9 rI0 0.5 1 1 5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun us Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
7 Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 0. 1 1.5
' 8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPI,
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 3.75
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= 33.75 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
5) is There An Active (Ur Relic)
Floodplain Present? 0 ® 2 3
6) Is The Channel Braided? ® 1 2 3
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream C
Project Name: 66 - Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s): Y.Jf.
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W80'42'4" Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located aporoximateiy '/2 mile west of the Mecklenburg
County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used-
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 U 2 3
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditchint?And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2" Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Man And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 No=f
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 10
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 1
TTL Rinlnw Absent Weak Mnderate - St--
' PRIMARY BIOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS. 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 91 0.5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
1
1.5
'
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 1
11. Hydrology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1
0.5
0
'
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 fob 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 O.A 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip 0
This Step And #5 Below*) 0.5 © 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0.5 1 1.5
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes 1. No=0
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 5

1) AreFis hPresent?
® 0.5 Lrauueraie
1 otrun
1.5
2 Are Amphibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun s Present? 0.5 1 1.5
Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5
' 8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPI,
(* NOTE. IfTotal Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0© 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SA VPresent*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 0.5
I TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary= 21.5 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 I 0
3 Is Peri h ton Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3

' NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP4 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream E
Project Name: 66-Acre Highway 29 Site River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): KJK
' DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Mallard Creek Signature(s): Y-M
Date: 8/12/03 USGS QUAD: Derita Longitude: W 80° 42' 4" Latitude: N35'20'21"
Location/Directions: From Charlotte take North Tryon (US 29) towards Concord. The site is located approximately '/z mile west of the Mecklenburg
County - Cabarrus County border. The site is approximately one mile north of the Salome Church Road - US 29 intersection.
-PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 ® 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain?
0
1
2
3
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodylain Present?
0
®
2
3
'
6) Is The Channel Braided? ® 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0
(*NOTE. If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuositv Then Score=O*) 1 3
10) Is A 2°a Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AndlOr In Field) Present? Yes=3 No f@
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 9
II. Hvdrologv Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? ® 1 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 0
iii Rinlnw Aheant Wnalr Modnr.tn Rt.......
' PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 2
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0
0.5
1.5
'
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOL OGY INDICA TOR POINTS. 2
II. Hydroloev Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambef 1.5
0.5
0
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (-NOTE: IfDitch Indicated In #9 Above Skip
This Step And #5 Below*) 0.5 1 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 0.5 1 1.5
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes 1. No=O
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 2.5
1 Are Fish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
2 Are Am hibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fun s Present? 0.5 1 1.5
7 Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0.5 1 1.5
' 8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(*NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 OS 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS. 0.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary +Secondary)= 16 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3 Is Peri h ton Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3

USACE AID#
DWQ#
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP1: Perennial Stream A
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation:. 10:00 am
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 500 acres 8. Stream Order: Second
9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 1,860 if 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
northeast of the Salome Church-Road -Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabarrus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
n

14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85°F
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2.0 acres
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map. YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey. NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20% Re- dential 10 % Commercial 10% Industrial 0 %?ricultural
60% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
21. Bankfull Width: 8 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 6 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 58 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature
???? Date off,//??
This channel evaluation form is inte4ed&-be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gatherii? dafa re fired by the United States Army
Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does
not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To Continent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1
......................... _._........... _..... ......................... __.... -............. __........ _..._._._........... _._..._-..... _..._.... _.............................. _.._-..._..... ._._........ ------ -....... _.._...... _..._..-.... _........... _.._---......_...-----........ ........ --........... _.._.....- -...__._......... _.... ......... ......... _................ ----........ -..........
_._
' OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DW # i
Q
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSIFLEET ? r
SCP2: Perennial Stream B
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 12:30 pm
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 80 acres 8. Stream Order: First
' 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 2,5001f 10, County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
' northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabarrus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
' 12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
' 14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 90°F
' 16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NIf yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
' 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? E NO
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 20% Re's ential 10 % Commercial 15% Industrial - 20 ?O Agricultural
1 20% Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged .15 % Other (Power Line Right of Way)
21. Bankfull Width: 4 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 2 - 3 feet
t 23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 41/o) _Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight -Occasional Bends X Frequent Meander Very Sinuous Braided Channel
' Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments

Evaluator's Signature,/ Date --az ?ay
This channel evaluation form s int? en ebe used only as ,a guide to assist landowners and environmental profession s in gathering the data required by
the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To
Continent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
x
- , ; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1
SCP3: Unimportant Intermittent Stream C --~
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:30 am
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 10 acres' 8. Stream Order: First
' 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 300 if 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
' northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabarrus County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
12. Site Coordinates (if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85°F
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
' -Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (!Dif yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES n 0 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 0% Residentia 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
90 % Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged 10 % Other (Road)
21. Bankfull Width: 2 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 3 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander Very Sinuous _Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 41 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date This channel evaluation form is inte ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental profession s in gathering the data required by
the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To
Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
--......._._..__.........._..................._.......__........._...._._............................._.._..._..__._...-- .....- ............_..:._......_.. - ._...._._........ -- ..__..... _-.......... __.:...._...__.._._..-_...... __.........
.._... -- -- -
OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ #
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP4: Unimportant Intermittent Stream E ` .
1. Applicant's Name: Trammel Crow 2. Evaluator's Name: Kip Kerecman
' 3. Date of Evaluation: 08/12/03 4. Time of Evaluation: 11:00 am
5. Name of Stream: N/A 6. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
7. Approximate Drainage Area: 5 acres 8. Stream Order: First
' 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 300 if 10. County: Mecklenburg
11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): The site is located off of U.S. Highway 29, one mile
' northeast of the Salome Church Road - Highway 29 intersection. The entrance to the site is approximately one half mile west of the
Cabarius County - Mecklenburg County boundary.
12. Site Coordinates -(if known): N 35°20'21" W 80°42'4"
13. Proposed Channel Work (if any):
' 14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within 24 hours
15. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny, 85°F
16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (51f yes, estimate the water surface area: N/A
18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES(F)
20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 0% Residentia 0 % Commercial 0 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
' 95 % Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged 5 % Other (Road)
21. Bankfull Width: 2 feet 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 2 feet
23. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) X Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
' 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends -Frequent Meander -Very Sinuous Braided Channel
Total Score (from reverse): 35 Comments:
' Evaluator's Signature Date ? y
This channel evaluation form i rote ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental profe Sion is in gathering the data required by
' the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of
this form issubject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 05/03. To
Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

i
i
i
i
i
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: February 17, 2004
COUNTY Mecklenburg County, North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE'OF TRACT 66 acres
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 66-Acre Highway 29 Site
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
The Trammel Crow Crow Company
POC: Mr. Brian Hoffman at [phone]
214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 400
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-5399
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
POC: Gregory C. Antemann, PWS at [phone]
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
( X) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: site grading )
( ) No specific development planned at present
( ) Project already completed
(Type of project: )
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be
forwarded.
(X) USGS Site Location Map (Attachment A - Figure 1)
(X) NRCS Soil Survey (Attachment A - Figure 2)
(X) Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map (Attachment A - Figure 3)
(X) Agent Certification of Authorization Form (Attachment B)
(X) Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to a Nationwide Permit No. 39 (Attachment C)
(X) Routine On-Site Data Forms (Attachment D)
(X) NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (Attachment E)
(X) USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (Attachment F)
(X) Representative Photographs (Attachment H)
(X) Proposed Impacts (Attachment I - Figure 4)
(X) Proposed Impact Detail (Attachment I - Figure 5)
Si ture-o Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Gregg C. Antemann, PWS
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Proiect No. 2003-0435
3
5.
:
?..? i, ?
fAt? ? ,
f
Photograph A. View of Perennial Stream A.
x? rr"
41

Photograph B. View of Perennial Stream B.
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site February 17, 2004
Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application Project No. 2003-0435

NN%
7
Photograph C. View of Unimportant Intermittent Stream C.
D. View of Wetland AA.
i

' FIGURE 5
>s?aaa

Int
Str- 19
(OL01-) knknpa

tqL 2

U

M

.4
,
n? o®

AUK ?I

NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY CA
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS HAVE BE
SUB-METER ACCURACY.
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
f? Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
REFERENCE: BASE MAP PROVIDED BY HARRISBURG SURVEYING,
DATED AUGUST 8, 2003.
Figure 4. Proposed Impacts
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
ARE $? CWS Project No. 2003-0435 -1 DA PREPO/ DT IT), ?ic? ?//1 .7
- d?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

N \
0 - •? ?? u
£qc N
U-
C ? 4-00
L- v 1
41 O CL
? w? r7 ?-
E -4a
,. c
p W
0 D co E 1
QE v N
N
O E
O
E N O C p
4- C3 Z) V)
:D V)
/rte -
IN.
-- ----=r

ova ?'
z?H
U ?
a
F
-
W , 0.
ow n
`j
V
]
Q
Qz?

F ---
--
r
a >
O.D
H $14
U
W
w
m

Q W Q
3wx
z
¢ °
FW q
'
Q a V
QwQ
U xxogN
osx
1
4

Q

z¢?cf)

C
N

- - J
W POWM UM
S- ++ tllcrrr ?OLT"

40) 0
? R 'onr
z
?c
z M
171
U a?
41 1
4F
co E 0 ?
E
o
Q
)
0
L.-
-+'0
'
C
D
W

w Q

U

H
A z

z
U
?
Q O

z
W
o
U
0

Q

Q O
Q a a
ti Q

X
--? II I Q
-
? o
? N V

-600

(n ai N
a
'? ?i ? > v r/? C o
a ,
N
??t u o yoz ?`

" O
cd
z a
a
?.
4.4 C> cd °
V ooCuj0 ?UV
y?
W N ?I
V4
.,
a;
m? w
m
° ?
? F

r
'? IMQ S.

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM {
TO: John R. Dorney, Division of Water Quality MAR 1. 8 2004
Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE:
SUBJECT: Review of 404/401 Application, DWQ No. 040240, Trammel Crow Company, Lowe's
Motor Speedway Overflow Parking Improvements, Unnamed Tributaries Mallard Creek,
Mecklenburg County
The applicant is requesting 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality. The NCWRC has reviewed information provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff
are familiar with habitat values of the project area. These comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The proposed project is to develop the site into an event parking area to add 3,700 spaces to accommodate
large crowds anticipated for six major racing events held annually at the Lowe's Motor Speedway.
Impacts are proposed to 639 linear feet of intermittent channel. No impacts to perennial streams are
proposed and no stormwater management plan is offered with the application.
We are concerned about continued development and stormwater influences in and around urbanizing areas.
Specifically for this parking lot, we are concerned about Cumulative and Secondary Impacts (CSI) from
increased vehicular activities and associated development near the car racing facility. Information on CSI
measures can be found at bi!p://i,,iiNv.ncNiildlife.org/vgO7 WildlifeSneciesCon/pg7c3 impactspdf We
recommend that project proponents visit this site and consider Low Impact Development (LID) techniques
for these proposed and future improvements. Information on LID measures can be found at
www.lowiMpactdevelOI)ment.org.
If no stormwater measures are provided or required for the parking lot improvements, we recommend
preservation of 200' perennial stream buffers and maximum available undisturbed natural floodplain
provisions for stormwater filtration and stream protection. If practicable and appropriate, onsite
bioengineering perennial stream restoration should be considered for mitigation to improve buffer filtration
as well as provide improved stream functionality and stability.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding
these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Alan Johnson, DWQ-MRO
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]
Ja
?P:19:7t
FIGURE 5
I:raaa
NORTH TRYON STREET * U. S. HIGHWAY 29 * 120' PUBLIC R W
,we
PSPHA
M W
ter.. AIL
LT r&r
,
......_. __ _ -. r _--..._-..
•. '?. 1
z
p ,Ik I i'
Ic
rrrs I.. ? 1 ?' `? a, nema `. w ' ? \ Idl u.m. ?uv ?` ` , Ir l?
i e f
un t INtermlttent I I I i
stwm C - 494 LF /
(0.01 «.) impacted
S
e [ ` unimportant intermittent I
'•. ( ' 1 1? Stream _E- 80 iF
aZa I i i (0.001 ac) impacted
/ ' inimpatamt ntermittant " •?
Stream F - 385 lF I`
$ a iIL (0.02 aa) impacted
I
ZT,
?? ' I I l
f I j
6iSZ1?? ? -fir 1 ? 1
? a
i
i ? II ! I r
-66 LiL
y ?
IIOm l0 W
411
an wYuamv
/ NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING WETLANDS HAVE BEEN
DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES (CWS).
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS HAVE BEEN SURVEYED USING A GPS UNIT WITH
SUB-METER ACCURACY.

LEGEND
AVOIDED STREAM CHANNEL
IMPACTED STREAM CHANNEL
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
® RIPARIAN STREAM BUFFER
APPROXIMATE SCALE: I"=200'
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
REFERENCE; BASE MAP PROVIDED BY HARRISBURG SURVEYING,
DATED AUGUST8,2003.
Figure 4. Proposed Impacts
66 - Acre Highway 29 Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0435
PREP D LY-
3T CHECKED DATE
'I. 2 l7.0

ti
rM m
m 01o96
R I" enoe
Im a >m eL74 W&W
k New
IMP m7.&
M tmlamm
Hn amm
mr.=mn
In eeem
Im a EM a& mex
MR =am"
cc= An am
: 1M a0.=
M60
MH a Y01 Goo"
W MMM
1® it 1m1 en.ee
Hn omen
5%w
HIr ants
::: MH k Hal 6°I otH19 67L7E
* Yi

NUM 00.TA ARC RAM BEARe1C DISTANC E
CI 18'29' 439.37 152A5 533'1 4b 137.80 '
C2 18'29'59' 458.80' 1888.82 N33'I 45 W 455.07
C3 15'23' 798. 2971. 537453 T98.00 '