20040150 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040204

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 1, 2004
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Tony Wilder, Assistant County Manager
Harnett County
102 East Front Street
Lillington, North Carolina 27546
Dear Mr. Wilder:
Harnett County Airport
DWQ Project No. 04-0150
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
material in 0.225 acres of wetlands and 0.27 acres of waters (a man made pond) for the purpose of
constructing a 700' runway extension at the Harnett County Airport near Erwin, and realignment of Old
Stage Road (SR 1769). This project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated
January 30, 2004 (received February 4, 2004). After reviewing your application, we have decided that this
fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404. This certification corresponds to the
Nationwide Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other
federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project, including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval
will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality
Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified
below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is
thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre, or if total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this
approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the attached certification.
1) Upon completion of the project, the Harnett County Airport authority shall complete and return the
enclosed "Certification of Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401
225 Green Street - Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: ww.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/ NorthCarohna
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper Naturiallff
Mr. Tony Wilder
April 1, 2004
Page 2
Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to
the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project.
2) Harnett County must follow the appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which
equal or exceed those outlined in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual or the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual
whichever is more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the
DENR Regional or Central Offices) and shall be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation, and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to assure compliance with the appropriate water quality standard
for turbidity (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25
NTUs in all lakes and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters);
3) Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources
has released the project;
4) There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated
with this permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or borrow sites be located
in wetlands or stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact of this project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please contact Ken Averitte at 910-486-1541.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
hamettairprt.401
225 Green Street - Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: ww.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally
ai
C)
(D
(
(D
.a
c
(D
N
K -v
O 2 0 G
cc 0 C
o ° w
CL N N
,Z3 =3
w ° CD ° vv
-? O O O
O
_
V
O
O
2
W
W
CD

N

0
z

o C o

co Q ? O
0 ,i <D
< D % n r*

Q o w
c
(D
m
x

c?
. - o
n
m n
m
0
a?i
m
O
O X
O O O

tD

a a Q Q O
w w w w

0 0 0 0

O
W N N
N v
O O m m
p p W
m
Q
v
N N v O
o ? r*
CD ° M

Q
O
n
r+
cn
w
cn
O
C7
CY)
N
O
a?
Triage Check List
G 04 Project Name:
Date: J
From:
CO i r)ol--? rx-)-,
countya
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ?' WaRO Tom Steffens
/
C! ] FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
? RRO Steve Mitchell
J EG 5 Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to -, our for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
ffWetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
UAfinimization/avoidance, issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse; Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
?"Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
Check drawings for accuracy
the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
C4/1 ??ti J?:ag? ?p 6P OY4?gne?I
G?vO r C? W?2?"l ct n cad

cfs
r
`t
BERT" & BRIGHT
January 27, 2004
Mr. Richard K. Spencer, MS
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
Project Manager FEB 0
USACE 4 2004
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue WATER QUALITY SECTION
Wilmington, NC 28402
RE: Transmittal of Pre-Construction Notification Application Form for a project at the
Harnett County Airport, Erwin, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Spencer:
On behalf of Harnett County and the Harnett County Airport, Talbert & Bright, Inc. requests
authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C. Division of Water Quality to fill
wetlands to relocate Old Stage Road (SR 1769) and extend the runway at the Harnett County
Airport. These projects are needed to conform to current Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) safety criteria and siting regulations/standards. We are seeking authorization to fill 0.225
acres of wetland and 0.270 acres of a small manmade pond (0.495 acres total) via a Nationwide
No. 14 permit and its associated N.C. Water Quality Certification (WQC #3404). Attached for
your review is one copy of the completed Pre-Construction Notification Application Form.
Supporting attachments to the application are identified below. By copy of this letter, we are
submitting seven copies of the PCN along with an application fee of $200.00 to Mr. Ken Averitte
at the N.C. Division of Water Quality.
As you may recall, the original wetlands survey for the project area was provided to the Army
Corps of Engineers on December 17, 2001. You and Mr. Ken Averitte of the N.C. Division of
Water Quality reviewed the delineation in the field on February 11, 2002 and you included
additional wetland areas. These additional wetland areas were surveyed, and a map showing the
wetlands per your field review is enclosed. We have also included the data sheets prepared by
Southeastern Environmental. At the time of the field meeting, you indicated that mitigation for
the wetland impacts (if less than 0.5 acres) would not be required. See attached letter dated
February 15, 2002 and excerpts from the draft Environmental Assessment.
At the time of your field visit in 2002, the intent of the County was to expedite the project by
permitting it as two separate projects: the runway extension and the relocation of Old Stage
Road. The runway extension permit application was to be submitted by Talbert & Bright on
behalf of the County immediately to meet the Army's schedule so that they could construct the
fill for the project. The permit application for Old Stage Road was to be prepared by the
NCDOT at a later date, with the road relocation to be performed by a private contractor.
However, due to world events, the Army was not able to participate in the project.
ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS
W W W.TALB E RTAN D B RI G HTCOM
4810 SHELLEY DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28405 910.763.5350 FAX [phone]
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA • CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA • RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

w
The intent at this time is that both the runway extension and Old Stage Road relocation be
constructed as a single project. Therefore, the enclosed application addresses impacts to
wetlands from both the runway extension and the relocation of Old Stage Road.
Please contact us with any questions, comments, or if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
G. Martin Wynn, Jr.,
c: Mr. Tony Wilder, Harnett County w/enc.
Mr. Ken Averitte, N.C. DWQ w/enc. (7) and application fee
Attachments include:
1. Agent authorization letter
2. Letter date February 15, 2002 with excerpts from Draft EA
3. Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
4. Project/vicinity map
5. USGS Map
6. Airport Layout Plan
7. Project Site Plan
8. Wetland Plat and Data Sheets
9. Preliminary drawings for Runway Extension
10. Preliminary drawings for Old Stage Road Relocation
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No.
Form Version May 2002
No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 14
3.' If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Harnett County Airport, Attn• Tony Wilder Assist County Manager
Mailing Address: Harnett County 102 East Front Street Lillington NC 27546
Telephone Number: 910-893-7555 Fax Number: 910-814-2662
E-mail Address: twilderna harnett org
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: G. Martin Wvnn Jr. P E
Company Affiliation: Talbert & Bright Inc
Mailing Address: 4810 Shelley Drive Wilmington NC 28405
Telephone Number: 910-763-5350 Fax Number: 910-762-6281
E-mail Address:_ [e-mail]
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
FEB 0 4 2004
Page 5 of 12 WATER QUALITY SECTION
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Harnett County Airport - Runway Extension and Old Stage Road
Relocation
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0589-15-6531-000
4. Location
County: Harnett Nearest Town: Erwin
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):The airport is located
approximately 5.4 miles north of Erwin NC off NC 421 and 0.3 miles west of NC 421
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35022'43.66"/78044'01.05"
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): approximately 200 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Cape Fear River
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at ft.//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/ma- s/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Airport runway protection zone absent of trees and building
structures. Ground cover primarily consists of Harasses/shrubs
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
In order to extend_ the runway Old Stage Road (SR 17691 will be relocated parallel with the
extended runway centerline and intersect with NC 421 This project mainly consists of
placing fill material using earth moving construction equipment including rubber tire and
track mounted vehicles. These would include but not limited to small pans. dum trucks
motor graders, backhoe dozers and rollers
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide a 700' runway extension The
existing runway length of 4,300' does not meet NC DOA standards which recommend a
minimum runway length of 5,000' for publicly owned airports in North Carolina This
standard was established as a result of current industry business aircraft trends aircraft
insurance requirements and guidance from the FAA
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No other permits have been requested for this project
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No other permit requests are anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
Page 7 of 12
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: This project consists of filling
0.225 acres of wetlands and a 0.270 acres man made pond
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
indicate on ma acres es/no linear feet
Portion of Area 7
C1C-C5C Fill 0.157 No 600' of
disturbed wetland
intermmittant
Portion of Area 7
C14C-C17C Fill 0.008 No 10' of
disturbed wetland
intermmittant
Portion of Area 4
BB1-BB4
Fill
0.060
No 10' of
wooded wetland
intermmittant

I-St vacit impact separately and identity temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at b-o://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.91 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.225 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
N/A

* T 1 _L
L10L oa%;u nupaCt separately ana taennry temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.mgpquest.com, etc.).
Page 8 of 12
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number

indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

acres
(if Name Waterbody
applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
Portion of Area 3
C4-C6
filling
0.270
N/A
Small manmade pond

* List h
eac impact separately and identi fy temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A NEPA EA has been prenared for this project and includes detailed description and
evaluation of alternatives. A Finding of No Significant Impact for the proposed projects was
made by the NCDOT-Division of Aviation on 6/28/02 and is attached
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
hiip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htrnl.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Per 2/11/02 meeting with Army Corps of Engineers (Richard Spencer) and NC Division
of Water Quality (Ken Averitte no mitigation is required
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state nc us/wrp/index htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify N/A )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
s uare feet
Multiplier
Required
Miti ation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Lone i extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The Harnett Countv Aimort owns approximately 255 acres Of that approximately 16.5 acres are
impervious (6.47%). This project will be relocating Old Stage Road removing proximately
0.89 acres of road and constructing 1.01 acres net increase of 0.12 acres). as well as constructing
a 700' Runway Extension (1.2 acres) Therefore the total impervious area will be increased 1 32
acres for a total of 17.82 acres-C6.7%). All stormwater will drain via grass lined swales except
where crossing under Old Stage Road
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
AT/A
X HL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes El No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
and Brit Inc. G. Martin W Jr.
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

NOTICE OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter is to give notification that as Assistant County Manager of Harnett County, I
Tony Wilder do hereby declare Talbert and Bright, Inc. located at 4810 Shelley Drive,
Wilmington, NC 28405, has been authorized to represent Harnett County in the Wetlands
Permitting process for the Runway Extension and Old Stage Road Relocation Projects at
the Harnett County Airport.
Tony *ilder
Assistant County Manager
Harnett County
qa•- ? Z ? LQG ?{
Nth cdy h.,
??1?10' 74 2-4 z81
1 kLBERT & BRIGS If

February 15, 2002
Mr. Richard K. Spencer, M.S.
Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: CESAW-RG-L
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28402
Re: Harnett County Airport
Draft Environmental Assessment
TBI No. 2701-0103
Dear Mr. Spencer,
Enclosed is a copy of the draft NEPA Environmental Assessment for the runway
extension and associated improvements to the Harnett County Airport near Lillington,
North Carolina. The document has been prepared on behalf of Harnett County with
assistance from the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Aviation.
Please review the document and provide any comments you may have within 30 days.
Comments should be provided directly to Talbert & Bright.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
.. 11 '
Al
ne
Project Manager
A
Enclosure
c: Mr. John Caldwell, Project Manager, NC Division of Aviation
Mr. Rick Barkes, Manager, Aviation System Development, NC Division of Aviation
Mr. Tony Wilder, Assistant County Manager, Harnett County
ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS
THE COTTON EXCHANGE 321 N. FRONT STREET WILMINGTON. NC 28401 910.763.5350 FAX [phone]
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA • WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA • RICHMOND. VIRGINIA
q..
impounded in a man-made pond located partly within airport property. An intermittent
unnamed tributary of the Cape Fear River begins near SR 2015 approximately 1200'
northwest of the airport, and runs roughly parallel to the airport toward the Cape Fear River.
Approximately 600' of the stream runs through the southwestern comer of airport property.
Stormwater runoff from the southern half of the airport flows through grass-lined ditches , .
into a concrete flume, then overland to the Cape Fear River. Stormwater runoff from the
northern half of the airport flows through grass lined ditches into a detention basin, then into
the unnamed intermittant tributary of Thornton's Creek. In the vicinity of the airport, the .
Cape Fear River and Thornton's Creek are classified by the N.C. Division of Water Quality
as WS-IV freshwaters. Neither water body has supplemental classifications. The DWQ
recognizes five classes of water supply (WS) waters, with WS-I waters (those located in
natural and undeveloped areas) having maximum protection, with no permitted point-source y
discharges. The WS-1V classification applies to waters used as sources of water supply for
drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes where a WS-I, II or III classification is not a
feasible. WS-IV waters are generally in moderate to highly developed watersheds. In WS-
IV watersheds, development under the low density option is allowed with a 24% built upon
area, and requires 30' stream buffers. These rules are codified in the Harnett County Water a
Supply Watershed Management and Protection Ordinance, amended through April 17,
2000. Standard erosion and sediment control rules apply to WS-IV waters. NC DOT
highway projects affecting WS-IV waters must follow guidelines in the NC DOT
publication Best Management Practices for Surface Waters. t
4.18 Wetlands
Wetlands are defined by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) as "those areas that are 1
inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to
r
support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation
typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (33 CFR 328.3). In accordance with
this definition, wetlands must possess the following three diagnostic characters: a = 6
predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. The ACOE is - f
charged with regulating the discharge of dredge or fill material into jurisdictional wetlands
and open waters under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended.
28
1
11
The wetlands in the EA study area were delineated by Southeastern Soil and Environmental
Associates Inc. in December 2001. The wetlands delineation was reviewed in the field by
the Army Corps of Engineers on February 11, 2002, and a preliminary map of the wetlands
is shown in Figure 10. The final delineation will be included in the Final EA. Several
wetland areas were identified in the study area. The northernmost wetland consists of
approximately 0.85 acres of wetlands around the one-acre man-made pond adjacent to US
421. These wetlands are associated with the Mixed Forest and Disturbed Herbaceous biotic
communities described in the section 4.19. A 0.5 acre wetland area is located immediately
south and downstream of the man-made pond. This wetland is associated with the Alluvial
Forest biotic community. An intermittent stream with a channel width of 2' to 3' drains
- from the eastern wetland. This stream, which is an unnamed tributary to Thornton's Creek,
{ is described in the previous section. A third wetland area, approximately 1.5 acres in size, is
located just north of SR 1769. This wetland is associated with the Shrub Scrub and
Disturbed Herbaceous communities. A fourth wetland area is located just east of the airport
property line (approximately 0.5 acres in size).
4.19 Biotic Communities
In December 2001 CZR Inc. performed an evaluation of the biotic communities in a 130
acre study area for the north and south runway extension alternatives. Where property
owners had not granted access permission, CZR evaluated the areas based on observations
from the perimeter of the property and information available from soils maps and aerial
photography.
Biotic communities refer to major vegetative associations and land-use areas that are
relatively distinct assemblages of floral and wildlife components. These communities are
the result of local geologic, hydrologic, and soil conditions. Most of the communities in the
study area have been influenced at some time by such disturbances as logging, clearing/
J farming, livestock grazing, suppression of natural fires, and modification of hydrologic
regimes. As a consequence of disturbance and plant succession, some of the habitats
represent intermediate stages or ecotones of some the communities described in this report.
29

within a base floodplain (i.e.,100 year flood area). Therefore, it may be assumed that
there are no floodplain impacts from any of the alternatives.
5.11 Wild and Scenic Rivers
The nearest designated wild and scenic river is located over 60 miles from the project area.
Therefore, there are no anticipated impacts from any of the alternatives to any federally
designated wild and scenic rivers.
5.12 Water Quality
The development of the both the north and south extension alternative would result in a total
built-upon area of 13% of the ultimate airport property. Stormwater drainage for any of the -
alternatives will be predominantly channeled through vegetated ditches (with some runoff
channeled through pipes under impervious surfaces).
A water quality permit from the N.C. Division of Water Quality and a Watershed
Protection Permit from Harnett County will be required for construction of any of the
alternatives. All of the alternatives would be constructed following N.C. stormwater
regulations ISA NCAC 2H.1000, Stormwater Management and the Harnett County Water
Supply Watershed Management and Protection Ordinance. For all of the alternatives,
stormwater runoff will be managed following the low-density rules for WS-IV water
supply watersheds, which require stormwater runoff to be transported primarily by
vegetated conveyances, and require a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer adjacent to
perennial surface waters. A sedimentation and erosion control permit shall be obtained
prior to commencing any construction for any of the alternatives (see Section 5.20 for
discussion of construction impacts).
5.13 Wetlands and Streams
Y 1
The no action alternative has no impacts on wetlands and streams.
Y North Extension Alternative

As shown in Figure 14, a total of 0.43 acres of wetlands and waters would be impacted ,
under the north extension alternative; 0.30 acres for the relocation of SR 1769, and
I
46
T 1
3
T-?
i 0.13 acres for the runway extension fill. The north extension alternative has no stream
impacts. The north extension alternative would require a Section 404 Nationwide
Permit from the Army Corps of Engineers for the wetlands impacts. Based on
information provided by the Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE) and Division of Water
Quality, no wetlands mitigation will be required for the wetlands impacts. 11
South Extension Alternative
As shown in Figure 15, a total of 0.30 acres of wetlands would be impacted by the south
extension alternative for the relocation of SR 1769. The south extension alternative
would also impact approximately 900 linear feet of an unnamed stream tributary to the
Cape Fear River. The stream would be impacted by placement of fill to construct the south
runway extension and parallel taxiway extension. Wetlands impacts exceeding 0.5 acre and
stream impacts exceeding 200 linear feet require an Individual Permit from the ACOE. The
south extension alternative would require a Section 404 Individual Permit for stream
and wetland impacts, and permit requirements would include compensatory wetland
and stream mitigation. Under the south extension alternative, the Airport would prefer to
mitigate using the N.C. Wetlands Restoration Program (described below).
Wetland mitigation may include restoration, creation, enhancement, and preservation of
wetlands. Restoration is the mitigation method generally preferred by regulatory agencies.
On-site (at or near the project area) is generally preferable to off-site mitigation, and in-kind
t
(wetlands of the same type as those being impacted) mitigation is generally required.
Restoration involves the reestablishment of previously existing wetland functions at a site
r
where they have ceased to exist or at a site where they exist in a substantially degraded state.
A mitigation ratio of 2:1 is generally required for in-kind restoration, and higher ratios may
j be required for out-of-kind restoration. Enhancement involves activities that increase wetland
T functions within existing wetlands. A mitigation ratio of 4:1 is generally required for
enhancement. Permit requirements typically include monitoring hydrology and vegetation at
the restoration/enhancement site for a period of five years to ensure success of the mitigation
" Personal communication, Talbert & Bright and Richard Shelton, Army Corps of Engineers and Ken Averitte,
N.C. Division of Water. Quality; February 11, 2002.
47
17

project. In addition, the restoration area must be protected in perpetuity by restrictive
covenants or a conservation easement.
Because of the.danger to aircraft posed by wildlife (particularly birds) that can be attracted to
wetlands on airport property, the FAA promotes the use of wetland mitigation banks as
offering an ecologically sound approach to mitigation 12. The North Carolina Wetlands
Restoration Program (NCWRP) is a non-regulatory government program that restores 4
wetlands throughout the State. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the NC t
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the ACOE allows payments of in- s
lieu fees to the NCWRP to satisfy compensatory mitigation requirements in some cases.
Project eligibility for this program is considered by the ACOE on a case-by-case basis. The
NCWRP evaluates each request for payment of in-lieu fees and determines if they have a
current or planned restoration project that would be suitable for use as mitigation for the
proposed wetland impacts. Upon acceptance of the request and receipt of the appropriate
fees, the NCWRP accepts all responsibility for mitigation planning, implementation, and
long-term maintenance and management. In-lieu fees are $12,000 per acre for non-riparian . J
mitigation and $24,000 per acre for riparian mitigation. All of the wetlands that would be J
impacted under the South Extension alternative are riparian. j
.1
5.14 Biotic Communities
If construction will cause only a minor permanent alteration of existing habitat, it may be
assumed that there will be no significant impacts to biotic communities, particularly if the '
habitats affected represent a small percentage of the area's inventory and support a limited
variety or number of common wildlife species. Most of the communities in the study area
have been influenced at some time by such disturbances as logging, clearing/farming,
livestock grazing, suppression of natural fires, and modification of hydrologic regimes. As
described in Section 4.19, only the alluvial forest, hardwood forest, and to a lesser extent, the `
mixed forest communities exist in a relatively natural state in the EA study area.
iz FAA, A Wetlands Mitigation Banking Strategy for FAA, July, 1996.
48
JIL-15-2002 12:29 fiFOl: NCDOT AU;"jON 9196400645
TO: I^'-W626261 P:3/17
a
Hamett County Airport
Erwin, North Carolina
Runway Extension and Associated Projects
The North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Aviation
State Block Grant Program
Administrative Action
Finding of No Significant Impact
Submitted Pursuant to the Provisions of
The National Environmental Policy Act
And
Requirements of the State Aid to Airports Program
Approved:
0%
Richard . Barkes ?ate
Manager Airport System Development
JUL-15-2002 12:29 FROM:NCDOT AVI 7 9198490645 TO: Y" P:4.,17
TA13LE OF CONTENTS
Section
A. Preliminary Notes:
0. Purpose And Need:
C. Alternatives
0.
E.
F.
Environmental Impact Categories Summary
Noise
Compatible Land Use
Social Impacts
Relocations
Surface Transportation
Induced Socioeconomic Impacts
Air Quality
Water Quality
Section 303 ( c ) Lands
Historical, Architectural, Archeological, and Cultural Resources
Biotic Communities
Endangered and. Threatened Species
Wetlands and Streams
Flood plains
Coastati Zom Management Programs
Coastal Barriers
Wild and Scenic Rivers
Prime or Unique Farmland
Energy Supply and Natural Resources
Light Emissions
Solid Waste Impacts
Construction Impacts
Environmental Justice Impacts
Environmental Consequences - Other Considerations:
Recommendations _
Page Number
1
1-2
3
4-10
4
4
4-8
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9-10
10
11
G. Appendix
Letter from Hamett County - Public Hearing Opportunity
JUL-15-2802 12:29 FROM:NCDOT AVID ON 9198400645 TO: 1,07626281 P:5/17
A. - Prefttnaay dotes'
This environmental document is to be reviewed under the guidelines set forth
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The proposed
development of this airport will require that the federal and local governmental
units participate in the funding of this project and the development has been
proPosed for federal funding under the State Block Grant Program.
Under the provision of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NCEPA) no funds may be dispersed
until the funding agency has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of the
proposed projects and has concluded that the impacts, if any, are acceptable. in
the scoping of these projects, Harnett Count} was required to develop an
Environmental Assessment (EA) meeting the provisions of both the federal and
state environmental regulations. After the EA was circulated and reviewed by
both state and federal agencies, the comments and concems were addressed
and it has been determined that the environmental Impacts are minimal. As a
meuit of this documentation, a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is
apprgpriate and accWaNe in this matter.
S. - Purpose and Need:
Although Harnett County's population has grown over 34% in the last decade
(the eighth fastest growth rate in the state), the county is struggling economically.
Over 3,000 jobs have been lost in the last four years, with less than 200 new jobs
created. Because of the loss of jobs, the County is having difficulty providing the
infrastructure and school funding to support the growth in population, which is
attributed Wvgety to in-migration from surrounding counties. The County
recognizes that providing up-to-date airport facilities that can accommodate
corlmxete jet Wimm f is vital to attracting new and expanded industry to the
county. Updating the airport wits include extending the runway to meet NC
Division of Aviation and FAA standards, and performing numerous additional
safety and capacity improvements. These improvements will provide Harnett
County with airport facilities comparable to and competitivve with those available
in surrounding counties.
The Harnett County Airport is a public general utility airport in rural east central
Hamett County, North Carolina, between the towns of Lillington and Dunn.
Harnett County Is located in south central North Carolina. Harnett County is
bordered by Johnston County on the east, by Chatham and Wake Counties on
the north. by Lee and Moore County on the west, and by Cumberland and
Sampson Counties on the south. Lillington, the county seat, is approximately 30
miles south of Raleigh, and 30 miles north of Fayetteville.
JUL-15-2002 12:30 FROMMCODT AV1( ON 9198400645 TO::!''`?7626281 P:6-,17
The Harnett County Airport is the only publicly owned airport in the county. The
Harnett County Airport desires to lengthen its current runway from 4300' to 5000'
and perform additional capital improvements. The Harnett County Airport was
opened October 7, 1981, as a general aviation general utility facility classified as
a 8-11 category airport. The total airport acreage includes 182 acres held in fee
tAk and 19 acres in aviation easements. Initially, the airport consisted of a 3700'
x 75' runway, a 2400 s.f. terminal building, and 200'x 300' paved apron. The
airport currently has 49 based aircraft, which is 40% more based aircraft than
forecast for year 2000 in the 1992 Airport Layout Plan Report. The current level
of based aircraft also exceeds the forecast year 2010 based aircraft by 17%.
The existing runway length of 4300' does not meet NC DOA standards, which
recommend a minimum runway length of 5000' for publicly owned airports in
North Carolina. This standard was established as a result of current industry
business aircraft trends, aircraft insurance requirements, and guidance from the
FAA. Runways shorter than 6000' have difficulty accommodating even smaller
corpora* set aircraft, particularly during less than optimum weather conditions
(dry, moderate temperatures). During optimum conditions, FAA Runway Length
Requirements forAirport Design, AC-15015325-4A requires a minimum 4670'
runway length for small corporate jet aircraft at 60% fuel load, compared to the
4300' now available. in the absence of an expansion of the runway to meet
minimum standards, the County is concerned not only about its ability to attract
new businesses, but that existing businesses may leave the county. For
example, the corporate aircraft used by the largest employer in the county
(Morganite, Inc.) cannot fly into the Harnett County Airport and must use the
Fayetteville Airport.
In addition to the inadequate runway length, the Harnett County Airport's runway
and taxiway pavement strength of 12,500 lbs. cannot accommodate the majority
of corporate jet aircraft. The airport also lacks a precision Instrument Landing
System (ILS) or locatlizer to provide aircraft guidance during inclement weather.
With its current configuration, Harnett County's airport cannot compete with the
publicly owned airports in adjacent counties, all of which have superior facilities.
The County desires to improve the safety of aircraft operations and the airport's
ability to accommodate and attract corporate aircraft. The County proposes to
extend the runway and existing parallel taxiway to 5000', widen the runway 25',
overlay the airport pavements to improve their strength, install an ILS, and install
additional runway and taxiway lighting. Capacity improvements planned by the
County Include expansion of the existing aircraft parking area (apron) and auto
parking area.
JUL-15-2002 12:30 FROM:NCDOT AVID'- 9198400645 TO: 1^-17626281 P:7/17
C. -AIternativeS:
The County considered 6 alternatives including a "No Action" alternative in the
development of the EA. The EA contained an extensive discussion of these
alternatives and the preferred alternative is the north extension alternative option.
The airport desires to expand the existing facilities to meet safety and operational
demands. The preferred alternative proposed actions are outlined as follows:
a) Extend runway 700' to a total length of 5000', including installation of
additional runway edge lights
b) Extend parallel taxiway to a total length of 5000', including installation
of now taxiway edge tights
c) Widen runway 25' to a fatal width of 900'
d} Overlay existing runway, taxiway, and apron pavement
e) Install runway end identifier lights (REILs) and runway threshold lights
f) Install localizer, glide slope, and outer marker and establish precision
instrument approach
g) Relocate portion of SR 4769 for localizer installation/runway extension
h} Expand aircraft apron
+) Construct additional auto parking
j) Acquire land (Fee-Simple and Easement) in runway protection zones
and approaches for the extended runway
Each of the elements is described in detail the previously circulated
environmental assessment and that discussion will not be repeated here.
The "No-Action" alternative would leave the runway in its current configuration of
4300' long by 75' wide. The "No Action" alternative was rejected. Although this
proposal has the least amount of environmental impacts it does not meet the
current or projected needs of the airport from a potential development or current
safety perspective.
In the previously-circulated EA a matrix comparison of the impacts of each build
alternative to the "No Action" alternative was created. Both the north and south
extension alternatives impact no more than 0.5 acres of wetlands. The south
extension alternative would require the relocation of approximately 900' of an
existing stream, while the north extension alternative does not impact any
streams. The south extension alternative also impacts more biotic communities
in a relatively natural state than the north extension alternative. The south -
extension alternative requires over 10 times more fill than the north extension
alternative, and is therefore significantly more costly. The single advantage of
the south extension altemative is that no relocations of msidenoes are required.
Due to the reduced environmental impacts and significantly lower costs, the north
extension alternative is the alternative preferred by Harnett County and
recommended for construction.
JUL-15-2002 12:31 RROM:NCDOT AUIf-r ON 9196400645 TO: 26281
P:8/ 17
D. - Environmental Impact Gatesories Summanr-
MCI=
No noise analysis is needed for proposals involving Design Group 11 airplanes on
utility type airports whose forecast operations in the period covered by the EA do
not exceed 90,000 annual adjusted propeller operations or 700 annual adjusted
jetoperations. Harnett County is a Group It utility airport, and the projected 2010
operations are less than the thresholds requiring a noise analysis. However, a
cw w analysis was performed and the FAA Integrated Noise Model (INM) was
used to evaluate noise levels for the Harnett County Airport both with and without
the proposed runway extension. A detailed discussion of noise, and the potential
related impacts took place in the EA and will not be repeated here.
Based on the INM analysis, several residences are expected to be affected by
noise for the preferred north extension alternative. The noise analysis indicated
that four of the residential properties (three mobile homes and one single family
home) just north of US 421 were located in the 65 DNL noise contour. In
addition, one single family home located at the intersection of SR 2015 and
Airport Road is located in the 65 DNL noise contour. No other incompatible land
uses from noise were identified. It is anticipated that the incompatible residential
uses north of US 421 will be mitigated through fee-simple purchase of the
residence and relocation of the occupants and at the intersection of SR 2015 and
Airport Road is anticipated to be mitigated through purchase of a noise
easement. Therefore with the mitigation it may be assumed that there will be no
significant noise impacts.
Gam_patIhIe Land Use:
The compatibility of existing and planned land uses in the vicinity of an airport is
usually associated with two factors: a) the extent of noise impacts related to the
airport and related development and, b) consistency with local land use plans
and development policies. The mitigation of noise impacts was previously
discussed in this document. None of the planned land uses for any of the
alternatives are incompatible with planned land uses as described in the Harnett
County land use guidance and zoning regulations. It can be concluded that there
are no significant compatible land use impacts.
Social Impacts:
Relocations
Of the alternatives, only the north extension alternative will require relocations.
The north extension altemative will require the relocation of up to four single-
family residences and four mobile homes. No business relocations will be
required. Relocations are required for incompatible land uses from noise and to
protect critical safety areas, Including the Runway Protection Zone for the north
end of the extended runway. For all relocations, the provisions of the -Uniform
JLL-15-2002 12:31 FROM:NCDOT AV1,7PN 9196400645 TO: r- 7626281 P:9/17
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as
coded in the FAA Advisory Circular No. 150/5100-17, Land Acquisition and
Relocation Assistance for Airport Improvement Program Assisted Projects, will
be met. Due to the small number of relocations, impacts on individual
neghbo:rhoods from the relocations are anticipated to be minor. There are an
ample rwrnber of comparable single-family dwellings, mobile homes, and mobile
home sites for sale on the open market in Harnett County to accommodate the
relocation of single family homes and mobile homes,
surface transportation
Surface transportation impacts for the north extension alternative consists of
relocating a portion of SR 1769. Correspondence with the N.C. DOT Division
Engineer indicates that the realignment of SR 1769 "should have little impact on
users of jthisj roadway. The intersection of SR 1769 with US 421 is in a 6-lane
section with adequate sight distance and will allow full access". Per the request
of the N.C. DOT Division Engineer, the project will include a right turn lane from
US 421 to the relocated SR 1769. None of the alternatives are expected to
increase congestion or acoess time to community facilities, recreation areas, or
places of residence or business.
Therefore as a result of the proposed mitigation factors no significant impacts are
anticipated for the social impacts topic.
Induced Socioeconomic Impacts:
This category is primarily concemed with induced or secondary impacts on the
surrounding communities. Induced impacts are usually not considered significant
unless there are significant impacts in other categories especially noise, land use
or direct social impacts. Inducted socioeconomic impacts of airport development
normally involve shifts in .population, increased public service use, or changes in
the local business and economic climate. The positive economic impacts of the
airport have been substantial, and the proposed actions are expected to extend
these positive impacts to the local community and region.
The preferred north extension alternative would be expected to have positive
induced socioeconomic impacts due to the opportunity for the airport to serve
existing corporate users during a wider range of weather conditions. The
expansion of the airport to meet business-class airport requirements will
contribute additional opportunities for employment based on new businesses,
increased airport facilities and short-term construction employment. Based on
the previous discussions there are not any anticipated negative impacts that will
require further analysis in this area
JUL-15-2002 12:31 FROh1:NCDOT AV7?' ON 9196400645 T0:?-97626291
Air Quallttr
Harnett County is currently in attainment of all of the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards, therefore, the requirements of general and transportation conformity
under the Clean Air Act do not apply to the project and no further analysis is
required for any of the alternatives. North' Carolina requires an air quality permit
for the construction and modification of airport facilities designed to have at feast
100,000 annual aircraft operations. The Harnett County Airport is below this
threshold for existing and projected operations. Since no further analysis is
needed it can be determined that there is not any significant impact. Any open
burning that occurs during construction will adhere to all federal, state, and local
regulations
water Quality:
A water quality permit from the N.C. Division of Water Quality and a Watershed
Protection Permit from Harnett County will be required for construction of any of
the alternatives. All of the alternatives would be constructed following N.C.
stormwater regulations 15A NCAC 2N. 1000, Stormwater Management and the
Harnett County Water Supply Watershed Management and Protection
Ordinance. For all of the alternatives, stormwater runoff will be managed
following the low-density rules for WS-IV water supply watersheds, which require
Stormwater runoff to be transported primarily by vegetated conveyances, and
require a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer adjacent to perennial surface waters. A
sedimentation and erosion control permit shall be obtained prior to commencing
any construction for any of the alternatives. An extensive discussion of this topic
was presented in the previously circulated EA and it can be concluded that the
potential impacts on water quality will be minimized. By utilizing best
management practices for stormwater management the proposed construction is
not anticipated to have significant negative impacts on water quality issues.
Section 03(c) Lands-
Section 303(c), Title 49 USC, formerly known as Section 4(0 of the Department
of Transportation Act, states that a project requiring the use of any publicly
owned land from a public park, recreation area, or from a historic site of national,
state. or local significance shall not be approved unless there is no feasible
alternative to the use of such land. No public parks, recreation areas, or historic
sites are located in the project areas for any of alternatives. Therefore, no
significant impacts are anticipated for this topic.
Hi topic Archliectural. rc eolo is 1 and Cultural R sources:
Based on consultation with the N.C. Department of Natural Resources, no
historic, architectural, archeological, or cultural resources are known to exist in
the project areas for any of the alternatives. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated for this topic.
P: 1W17
6
Ju--15-2002 12:32 FROM:NCDOT AVID. ?UON 9196400645 TO: 77626281
Bilp-& Communities:
If construction will cause only a minor permanent alteration of existing habitat, it
may be assumed that there will be no significant impacts to biotic communities,
particularly if the habitats affected represent a small percentage of the area's
inventory and support a limited variety or number of common wildlife species.
The majority of the biotic communities affected by construction of the north
extension alternative are man-dominated or agricultural land. Construction of the
north extension alternative will cause only a minor permanent alteration of
existing habitat in a relatively natural condition, and therefore, it may be assumed
that there wilt be no significant Impacts to biotic communities.
Endangered and Threatened Species:
There are no records of state. or federally listed endangered or threatened
species within a mile of the airport. Based on the results of the evaluation and
correspondence with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, none of the alternatives
appear to have any impacts on endangered or threatened species. The NCNHP
indicated in their correspondence that a state special-concern mussel species -
the pod lance (Eltiptio folliculats) - is located several mites down the Cape Fear
River near the NC 217 bridge at Erwin. This species is not legally protected;
however, the NCNHP encourages that proper sedimentation structures be in
place along the river to ensure that sediment does not reach the river. Best
management, procedures and an approved sediment and erosion control plan will
be followed for construction of the project. Based on review of the Environmental
Assessment. the U.S. Fish and Wildit Service indicated that the "project site
does not contain suitable habitat for any Federally-iist+ed species known to occur
in the area. We believe the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have
been satisfied." Therefore. no significant impacts are anticipated for this topic.
Wetlands and Streams:
In the previously circulated EA it was determined that a total of 0.49 acres of
wetlands and waters would be impacted under the north extension altemative,
0.20 acres for the relocation of SR 1769, and 0.29 acres for the runway
extension till. The north extension alternative has no stream impacts. The north
extension alternative would require a Section 404 Nationwide Permit from the
Army Corps of Engineers for the wetlands impacts. Based on information '
provided by the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and Division of Water Quality,
no wetlands mitigation will be required for the wetlands impacts. Therefore, no
significant impacts are anticipated for this topic.
P:11/17
JUL-15-2092 12:32 FROM:NCDOT AVON 9198400645 TO:I 7626281
Mood plains:
Based on consultation with the ACOE and examination of the applicable Flood
Insurance Rate Map, none of the construction for the proposed alternatives will
occur within the 100 year flood boundary, and none of the alternatives are
expected to directly or indirectly support secondary development within a base
fkoodpfain (i.e.. 100 year flood area). Therefore, it may be assumed that there
are no floodplain impacts from any of the alternatives.
Coastal Zone Management Programs
Harnett County is not one of the twenty counties regulated by the Coastal
Resources Commission (CRC). Therefore the State's Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) does not apply to this project.
coastal flarriem-
Hanvtt County is not located in the Coastal Barriers Resource System (CBRS)
or an Otherwise Protected Area (OPA). Therefore the Coastal Barrier Resource
Act (CBRA) does not apply to this project.
Y S ivers-
The nearest designated wild and scenic river is located over 60 miles from the
project area. Therefore, there are no anticipated impacts from any of the
alternatives to any federally designated wild and scenic rivers.
Prime or Unique Farmlands:
A Form AD-1006, "Farmland Conversion Impact Rating", was submitted to the
local Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The NRCS found that
the north extension alternative affects 27.5 acres of prime and unique farmland.
The total combined score of 142 was less than the threshold value of 160
established by the USDA indicating a potential adverse impact. Therefore, it
may be assumed there is no significant impact to farmland caused by the north
extension alternative.
net? Suapiy and Natural Resources:
Based on definitions given in FAA Order 5050.4A Airport Environmental
Handbook, the proposed action will not have significant demands on energy
supply or natural resources. It can thus be concluded that there will not be any
significant impact and no further action is necessary.
P: 12/17
JUL-15-2002 12:32 FROM:NCDOT AUTO ON 9199400645 T0sa 76?1
Linission-
The FAA requires the airport sponsor to consider the extent to which any lighting
associated with an airport action will create an annoyance among people in
surroundings areas. With the exception of low-density residential development
north of US 421, there are no other residences near the airport. The types of
lighting being installed, location, and method of use for the lighting should not
have any sign scant impact on residences in the vicinity of the airport. If an
annoyance lighting problem should develop from the new lighting installed then
measures can be taken to reduce or eliminate the problem. There should not be
a significant impact on this subject.
Solid Waste Impacts-
There are not any solid waste impacts known or anticipated due to the
construction or operation of this project. In addition there are not any known
impacts to existing or proposed solid waste facilities in the area.
Construction Impacts
The types of impacts to be considered primarily are related to noise, air, water
and flora and fauna impacts. There was a detailed discussion of the potential
construction impacts and possible solutions in the EA. Basically, there are not
any anticipated noise impacts that are not expected to unduly impact local
residences or businesses and the other impacts have been discussed in other
areas of this document, In general all applicable permits. (such as sediment and
emskx% controt plans, and burning permits) and good construction techniques
and best management practices (like those outlined in FAA Order 15015370 - 10
Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports) should alleviate any potential
impacts in this subject.
Environmental Justice Impacts-
On February 11, 1994, President Clinton signed the Executive Order 12898,
"Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations." A Presidential Memorandum directed to the heads of
all Departments and Agencies accompanied the Executive Order 12898. The
Memorandum states "each Federal agency shall analyze the environmental
effects, including human health, economic and social effects, of Federal actions,
including effects on minority communities and low-income communities, when
such analysis is required by NEPA." Both the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are divisions of the U.S.
Department of Transportation and are included in the DOT Order 5610.2 "Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-income
Populations" (62 Federal Register 18377 at sea. (April 15, 1997). On December
2, 1998 the FHWA issued Order 6640.23 that establishes policies and
procedures for the agency to use in complying with Executive Order 12898.
P: 13,17
9
JUL-15-2002 12:33 FR'OMMPOT AVT^'TION 9198400645 T0: 7626281 P:14/17
While the DOT and FHWA policies and procedures require analysis of
disproportionate impacts, they do not define thresholds for the analysis of
Environmental Justice (EJ) impacts.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established thresholds for the
determination of EJ impacts. In April 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) Region 4, which has jurisdiction for North Carolina, released its report
erititled tntedm Policy to Identify and Address Potential Environmental Justice
Areas This document defines environmental justice as "the fair treatment of
people of all races, cultures, incomes, and educational levels with respect to the
development and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.
Fair treatment implies that no population should be forced to shoulder a
disproportionate share of exposure to the negative effects of pollution due to the
lack of political or economic strength." The EPA Region 4 Interim Policy Report
cemnuT ends, relative thresholds be used as benchmarks to determine whether a
substantial tow-Income and minority population would be adversely impacted.
This relative threshold is determined as 1.2 times the state average of minority
and low4noome population.
The minority percentages for the EA study area were compared to the' minority
thresholds for Harnett County and the State of North Carolina in order to
determine whether there was the potential for disproportionate impacts. All of the
FA study area minority populations are below the state thresholds, and therefore
there is no disproportionate impact on these populations from any of the
aft rmMyes. Based on information contained in the EA no disproportionate
impa.ts to low income populations are expected from any of the alternatives.
Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated for this topic.
E. - Environmental Consequences - Qther Considerations:
The EA has addressed all the anticipated specific environmental impacts for this
project in both the construction phase and ultimate utilization of the project.
There were not any controversial issues raised during the EA development. The
project planning and subsequent design will take into account all anticipated
environmental impacts and make great efforts to avoid and minimize them. The
proposed actions appear to be consistent with all federal, state, and local
requirements for the surrounding area.
As outlined in FAA Order 5O50.4A Airport Environmental Handbook, Harnett
County provided opportunity for the general public to comment on the proposed
projects contained in the EA (see letter in appendix). They received no request
to conduct a public hearing, thus no such hearing was held.
In conclusion, the EA has shown that the proposed project can be completed
with no significant Impact on the environment. All necessary permits are
expected to be obtained without incident and any additional measures that may
be necessary will be completed prior to, or when applicable In the construction
process.
10
Jl&-15-2002 12e33 FROM:NCDOT AV7P ?ON 9198400645 TOO 107626281
F. - Recatn Wdatjans:
After careful review of the Environmental Assessment and comments and
response from the coordination process, and the facts contained herein, the
undersigned has found that The proposed project is consistent with the objectives
Of the national and state envNonmentai policies. The objectives and potirces are
set forth in the National Environmental Policy Act and the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act, and the project will not significantly affect the quality of
human environment or otherwise include any significant condition requiring
further consultation with any federal, state, or local review agencies with the
following exception which shat! be made a condition of the environmental
approval of this protect:
1. l famett County, or its appointed representative shall obtain any and all
iederai, state, or local permits (such as burning, sediment and erosion
control, NPDES general construction permit, 401 WQC, 404, etc., prior
to construction of this project.
2. Any mitigation that might prove necessary shall be developed and
implemented prior to, or during the construction phase of this project.
Such mitigation may include but will not be limited to noise mitigation,
last resort housing, and wettands mitigation.
I To the extent practicable every effort will be made to avoid and minimize
environmental impacts in the development of this project. The
development of this project will utilize best management practices and
good construction techniques.
Therefore it is the undersigned's recommendation that the project be given a
Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) under the provisions set forth by the
State of North Carolina Block Grant Program, and the National Environmental
Policy Act.
P: 15/17
I I
Richard W. Barites Date
Manager, Airport System Development Section
Division of Aviation, North Carolina Department of Transportation
JUL-15-2002 12:33 FROM:NCDOT WJ-nTION 9196400645
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Tewv J. Bvno, Chairman
REATitwE B. Htu., trice Chairman
DAN 8. AMAIMS
Tim MCNFtu
WALTTnrHWOX
TO=.'-Q407626261 P: 17/17
COUNTY MANAGER
Nnu.BmuRr
Wt4. A. CrONY) wtwu:e. Assisiatu
CLERK TO THE BOARD
KAY S. 0LAN Hmw
COUNTY OF HARNE"
NO. BOX 759 - LILL114CsTON. N.C. 27W
[phone] • FAX (910) S14-2662
may 116120M
Mr. Rick Barkes
Manager, Aviation System Development
N.C. Dept of. Tramportation
Division of Aviation.
1560 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1560
Re. Harnett County Airport
Environmental Assessment
Dear Rich

As you requested, we have provided an opportunity for a public meeting for the
above referenced project A copy of the advertisement is attached. The advertisement
was tun in the local newspaper, the "Daily Record" on April 19, April 25, and May 2,
2002, as shown in the attached legal affidavit. We did not receive any requests for a
public workshop. We believe we have met our obligation to provide an opportunity for a
public meeting.
Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
WW- A (Too?Wilder
Assistant Manager
c: Mr. John Caldweai

Ho mett County dogs wt ftai oinam on the basis of rata, color. nadonal origin, sex, irdig m age or
disaB ky to evploymm or the pWvishm of servim.
55 N?
Project Vicinity Map
Ik?
?? ?7o G \ „q.. c € ti
36°30'00' 40
7Q
Y•({•?L ?'?a?? - II f4 ?? j ??cv ?,I __ ? \\ "1 ?l ?X,tit $, TL _.,?Pl -
i . ,
?
'L ( R
401 ? I \ ? . 'i. fi j
B
.. ?u
x
Location of Airport 27
?' ?' ikAo - .y ,77? ? :`,?P ? r ? " +' ? ?.`- ?^''rni? rox ,?' `-? • ? ' 1
_CO? ;t \ I-i ?Y #?', 5 I ? i? pia ?e , u? ? ?r?? ? ?
7 / 421 55? d. Nrjr?- - -?
1 401
5°2000" - !. 9 a K . e 1r mw?
210 z ? ° . { ? j 1 ? I <_? tt 301 _ \ j e i.p
C o ?a 217
x ?
S ^. ^1 v?? 7Y l?Fn1 ? ? r f 1 r -h
r "? C ?t ? 6 ?, l > C?
m (r _ J d x ?? .66 ?. 62 p Tr Y,_ -- t
? ,?,? `?'`j•?` - .?.: ? ?i ? ? ? ? ? ?? . ° 1 ?` 421
6.2500° y
y
a., J\
<r
r
W?
V?
x x i _ ?`{
D
1\ \ ? i ??? \l -, ??_' ?• ' ; Wes' •? ` , ` Y
???? 1 ?`? ti• '' ...-?11ara. \ ?`•?- BOOS
?? ,fry \ 'Jt _ ;: TOTS ?"r.. 1 ?a •1? ?,
A,REA,' a
? zaa, 1 ', «J • ?
ve? '?J 9< i 111 }
.
r'
'
e
MtF
j
Gravel
Pits
(? jt,?
?TOI ' ` aie9
IM,
i .
-low
/'<) l 1. Cl J
Y 1,
F
j
?? i ?' (7016). .?-.. \ ?=,?`` 1 •?
- .a ? ? $GALE 1 "= 2 0.00'

RUNWAY END COORDINATES
RUNWAY EIOSTING ULTIMATE
LATITUDE NORTH 35'22!983 SAW
4
LONGITUDE WEST 78'4415.39' SANE
22 LATRTUDE NORTH 35'=57.89 35230755
LONGITUDE WEST 78'43'48.71' 7V4T38
COORDINATES ARE BASE D ON NAD83 DATUM
i
WA DEC.
r-arw
=3 ?j
400' 0 400' 800' 1200'
SCALE IN FEET
1'400'
BUILDINGS STAGING
TERMINAL STAGE 11993-1998 r--S-1_
02 CORPORATE HANGAR STAGE N 1999-2003 r 5-11_
Q3 OPEN SHED HANGAR STAGE IN 2004-2013 r- S-W
L. ?
___ _J
Q T - HANGAR BEYOND 2013 r I
-__--
MAINTENANCE HANGAR
CONSTRUCTION NOTICE REOUREMENT
Qe CONVENTIONAL HANGAR W PROTECT OPERATIONAL SAFETY AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, ALL
PROPOSED CONSIRUCIION (IN THE AIRPORT MUST BE COORDINATED
BY THE AIRPORT OWNER WITH THE FAA AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE
PRIOR 70 CONSTRUCTION. REVIEW TAROS APPROXIMATELY W DAYS
h ,8 8
7
}
ULTIMATE APPROACH SURFACE /
fff(((ry 5o0'x TODOO'x 3500'
4s i } 3k1 APPROACH SLOPE REQ.
RUNWAY PF TCON ZONE
Sari 4
X ,&
J
+., i
r!v it T
t
...........s `_........yy......f?...........d........t.. L .................?
j ERSDNG APPROACH SURFACE
i N SW x SWOz 2WO
II PPP RUN APPROACH SLOPE REO.I
4 I RUNWAY PROlEC1XXW ZpE
+o I I i 5arz 1TOOx 800'
+ r
I r `?
LEGEND
ITEM E)OSTING FUTURE
GROUND CONTOURS i?,AS J
WOODED AREA
ROADS PAVED
ROADS UNPAVED ---' --
BUILDINGS STRUCTURES
AIRPORT PAVED AREAS
AIRPORT PROPERTY LITRE PL -++-
AIRPORT BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE BRL
ANGATION EASEMENT
7 m

F ?S
MM
F+-1
?S
o•
\((.? pp 6 um,
??D Na q$ 'Y ' 1 W
?` f utWUIE APPItOAON SOPlACE ,
'SOO'N x SSW
(((( [ V" a SLOPE NEO. p
RUNWAY
? i j,?-?I-\•\+` ? Al A *? ` 1 ` ?t Sarv,70D'%101CWN ZONE $ Q
D II ?gP APPROACH SURFACE *v + '?9 L rC
2?0:1xAPPROAACH SLOPE REQ. 1 +'ho
'WIRPORT AC-CEsS +?•' , RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE + +
/r
PiC I _ z 4i 50O`x IWOx 80O J`?''^^^•W
- - R R ............... ........ ......w.. ................0.................. ............ _? ...... ...._...... ...... ... _
OO LR IeY NE - g, NIURE CORP. HGRS "-+. + 't
APRON
-'• or. 20WXSW
3W VIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY_ Z
35 WOE PARALLEL TAMIWAY .. +g ?f 7
... ... ...... i ... ..........._. ..q.: ?........? + ?+ F
rs tCJ
. 5
- + a
do
• ---? _ _ - - _ - -
40. EXIST. ARP 0 N 39L8'39' E (1R1? 0 ULT. AAP WO'X EXT.
4-22 3700x? 75' EASTING 5000'xlW ULTIMATE ?•.,,"?,W_? n ? J g _M•,,1D0 +
u LOS-- Q
f 1?4..._..... ... o
Lr_
+ ...... .............................. .........._.... ,........................................... ?.... ........ ............................................. ............... .................. rc O
4.04-Or an
1!? I 1 Approwd By
1I8e
i I l ! 1 ? ?4/!/?""°•..•+..""\ ,+."?v?? ) I ? ...Y \ Y I t1?._` ?o r I 4J/ I/1 1 /
NOTE: R/W 4-22 MAGNETIC BEARING 4732'39'. R/W NUMERALS Date
INTENTIONALLY DESIGNATED 4-22 TO AVOID CONFUSION WITH
R/W 5-23 AT MOORE COUNTY AIRPORT.
REGULATORY REQUIREMEN TS
AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE ARC ITEM DOST1NG ULTIMATE
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA RSA WIDTH 15V 15W
RSA BEYOND R END 307 300'
RUNWAY OBSTACLE FEE ZONE 1WD7H 250' 257
OFZ BEYOND R END 200' 200
RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA OFA WIDTH 507 507
OFA BEYOND R END B00 800•
RUNWAY CENIERUNE TO AIRCRAFT PARKING 250 257
TAAWAY CENTERLINE TO TA)OWAY C:NTERUNE 105' 105'
TAAWAY CEN7EPoJNE TO AIRCRAFT PARKING 65.5' 1 G&S'
* ADDITIONAL ARC REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON PLAN

AIRPORT DATA
ITEM E)OSTING ULTIMATE
AIRPORT REFERENCE PORT LATTITUDE NORTH 35'22'43.88 35'22.4&59
NAD83 ARP COORDINATES LONGITUDE WEST 78'44'01.05' 78'4158.01'
ESTABI.ISHED AIRPORT ELEVATION MEAN SEA LEVEL 197.82' 199.07
NORMAL MA)OLIUM TEMPERATURE - HOTTEST MONTH 907 SAME
AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE ARC B N SAME
AIRPORT AND TERMINAL NAVAIDS SC WC SAME
ROT.BEACON SAME
NDB SAME

TA)OWAY LIGHTING M17L SAME

RUNWAY DATA
ITEM E)OSTING ULTIMATE
LENGTH X WIDTH 3700'x75' 5007x100'
EFFECTIVE GRADIENT 0.25X 0.21%
PAVEMENT SURFACE ASPHALT SAME
PAVEMENT STRENGTH 12 3(XOOOjSG
MARRING NPI SAME
U GH71NG MIRL SAME
NAVAIDS 4/22 SAME
RE1L 4
NPI APPROACH R 22 D13 4.0 NM F SAME
NPI APPROACH R 4 LOG
e DICE WAIL 8E COLOCATED WITH LO CALIZER
HARNETT COUNTY
Dote
NOV. 1983
Ode 1'- IOU'
Dm
ISM
CN.dtd
WSB
Project m& 2701 - 92DI
Sheet No.
1
Of 5

K
-
'
Exiatin9
unway

668 1 r
8

ji t 4Y11ylµyy "^
c re
Relocated Old Stage Roo

a
0
tw//

CD
- a g"
Iy ? _
M N
nB!
?z=
(L
n.
x
?z
W W WI
mz A
J W ?s
a
Q_
ZI
0
Ix
a
4 Z
J
mix
C3<
d
;o
~ (?
Z Z
UZ
I Z:)
W? g
Z?
a D!--
w
xz
3
a
x
SEAL
21182
M.
JM. 2004
Scale
1' = 100'
Drawn
TED
Checked
GMW
Project No.
2101-0202
Sheet No.
1
Q ONE
03Y
300 0 300 800 900
GRAPHIC SCALE - FEET
Rohn Aaf
61118 AY CNNW
31NHNE
NAY WIR YN OF
Na Ian NY r om
Rw AIYY LE
NE MINI
WIRY: 61fY NONCE
MI! f 48mv 21.W
t? MW
?
op-m NtEI `I well" 2LIr
WWFH
I &W
IEio f 3NC 1
NIi101 3 ULYdN?YC
?5 9`EN
No-0Y Ncasn" nr
JWN Lum AL
DEM BOOK 774
PACE 550
owes
wPr
ERRS CL
AYE
OF
oNN
Of ONA
NWW AON32 IPoNLTT COUNTY
U fidW L9N.lNAP15 df -Wy Md NJ. CId - dI- ,Idw
TIN NgnlYn(dwl d-w- -.4d In D.A SEE
P.JrVIA 9. fOt/ff.. It wwI - 31-19
YiNiCHfd W dI- Avn AT.EIBM NYIII Y 9.d JAW. NP
q Ana Ta E bmd Yp oo??
-aW a 10 dWmbff.J.a bafsl mw4w OM Yd this 6 TH
d.y d MANN xa 20M
CAR04 t 1514 -
?
e 49 I
L
R
w
O W H
MEBJ
CERnFY T
2 SEAT TM N AN E%NWC PARCEL
.
No
1514 W PARCELS OF LAND.
.

PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION
CONVEYANCES OR SALES
aft &
91 E
CYYIES BEINY LEE
WLUAM OM11Y LEE
WMINGEIL
DEED BON INS
PACE 701
103 LEE FAMISIHC,
IOR 4 Kl.P9 103
1'p 403 a
1 40 In
Cftft orJumaT COUNTY OF HARNETT
774 AIPPORT PROPERTY
AMP RIC ',.ft 8, 174.82 ACRES TO
&I8
7?`ACRES
E?ONt?
3Y 1?-\?W{
ESTER RYALS TERRY
91 E 211
Lx
/ -?r • mEN.W Y
• WpNAf Y
a3a B?99Ira ?attr N-
Aw ? ? ns A ?q/q Nara,.
i , 3 I
A7N0 N.Op YY w ,
ofN REM ?
NwA
s-, d•
0740
19IPS 4
**NOTE GRID TIE WAS TAKEN FROM MAP RECORDED IN
MAP NO 98-439. GEOTETIC MONUMENTS WERE DESTROYED
IN CONSTRUCTION OF RUNWAY EKFENTION.
om NOTE: D.O.T. R/W ALONG U.S. 421 IS PROPERTY LINE.
oxl
00
one
LEE '-ILM-
MMOMFA'M L , dP" 0 o3golm o,W
DEED BON 93VAN Tw 0O'qypp;: ,O?r? ,yO
E011`` ??IJ ?Na"?pF" ? j ,MIW
f?`-Y.r/A `1`WYE sRWNR
.. fig W 31S,P0
r ?•
tOF0
M ,PABI7
TAD WM-0034
COUNTY OF NARNETF
KED BOOK 135ZPAGE 959
TAX M / 07581-0034-01
EUM NY13
NOR 60311 ONRIE
1!40 a 27W44r NNr
NFN N a[OIY/W AM
W-1111 N
111-115 N
YIN TAI 0Ai'
? i aialiif s°
W-m lN7Qf0 IWJr
cl-w
cs_o CHI 3 J?NrU\ 20L7r
NA-if
a- Ns INNNf
YF.II f Yf1Et W
sa ff.N,Yt vur
M fflM4l, AY
NY ¦17r1/t IYAr
W MNf
N- E- N YS
`?
M TAO
M f OAriIY
M M! ?
a Nolb
M
i N
f. RA LEE HEMS t ?4?
4 1N
a
Y' ? ..
K
A
M ' W.R. MANTL NNMm,r/N
E aYN o? ova N ft
, ,F7
-
a on
M
M
` Y
A

Y
P

R 3NWR? us
fA21,M64
M A7
MbNY f 1,14t/t
MYNY f AYtft tV
Alr
MI ¦711,N 7Y
0
NNMIN .I,.%
t
YYO . ftAwjr
r
w
NANW AE7
w rmm
NYaw f Yret IIII Nr NN- s 6 n
NNFIIY tYaln E,r _
wwwr MFN iMl iaw j IR
M flllrlft i.r
am NDINn MIR4 RNON r•I
WIR lump
ur M fWOIN flJ< CAR ll6 WINn N-cl V/MM+N 2m7r
Ws : M aw NJ-A1l amNWN %4V e?y? nY
W CI M
-
M i won"
INNM f Nwww Y M3•Ml !
IDYX31t
,w MYM/ 3 orYWT1 atr
aJr
0 p.N1 a r
mrr

4NNAY 3N1YA7
44I ¦Nlrlft
Y3r AANJ6 2 Ir11Y1^f
w ML- 23913Y
12r OD /DB
aNlaY f flfflft
aNwY ItY'Yt " NY•AO 31lNr,N
NAr Ao#J 33n7 m7P
rolAr
gIPNNf iwan ? 10111-111111 0
Wf.11N fl..Vww
NRW tow4m AM !-M 831
" NFl3 MI Nlll'
EI,' q,-Rf
f?IN1N®?6
NN.NN. NA-17 am 111-mot
6fYN :-ftft
Alas m4YH >W EI-MI N7rIrNr3
am NYAY.IY,NW
-ICE
®- f
ant."
tlf.tlY N-r
W
311r
NNN[ r N-Q
R6 fIN4
"
11!!49
NOd6 f NlY'Y9
IW
N'7 r*
66 3swor" nw
M f AENt no
lr

MORMON AM5
f NNT
NAY INNI, 136 OF
Nf91NW
mum Alarm"
R or C111101 LINE
NA AAn
CAR 6AN Hall
;•S"7
on JOIN Lwm JR.
DEEM BOON 774
PAN 550
JOIN LBNIT AL - A1M111N
NM BOOK 774
PAN 350
GLE END
LLINEES sNDTAHVEY?M
MF--EXISTING NW PIPE
ECY------ ERWIINO CONCRETE MONUMENT
TN---KEW RMN PIPE
PI01------PX TCUE SET
DS------ EXISM LONIN00D STAKE
a
INGHT WAY
C W T
-CDUERUNE
k "'i NNESTAIE
EP/EM - (EgIDML coaais)
C P -- CALCULATED PONT
MAP REFERENCE
MAP BOOK 98-439
NOTE3URVEY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM
A MAP ENTITLED PROPOSED HARNEFT
COUNTY LAND ACQUISITION RECORDED
IN MAP BOOK 98-439
HARNETT COUNTY AIRPORT
WETLAND LOCATION
HARNETT COUNTY NEILL'S CREEK TOWNSHIP NORTH CAROLI
BENNETT SURVEYS, INC. MARCH 6,2002
1662 CLARK ROAD,UWNGTON N.C. 27546 910-893-5252
NYNIW
lno
-- - ??• -..•... ...?....vci cvr?ci .71Ui7CC'gDgU
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fax:[phone]:49
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1887 COE•Wetlan(ft Determination Manual)
Project 131110•_ 1--(a G AWI o.4- --
Applicant i owner.
Inveatlpator, 1c,10.-
Do normal circumstances oxlat on the aft? Yw ono
Is the site significantly diaWrbeid (Atypical aituatlon)? Ye. lac
Is the area a potential problem am? Yen no ?
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
P. 02
P.1
Dafie:
City: _j-r•.
Stars: AJG
Community ID: Uj?a.cQ
TransectID: zo L
Plot 1D;
Darnland ancan.etes !lrr_ lleminent ymnt sue. Ism h
10
s. 1.1.
4. 1?.
S.
? 13.
6. 14.

e. 16.
Percent of Dominant 8pecisa that we 08L, F, ICW, or FAC excluding FAC-1.
O ?•
Romauics: Wetland Veg4stion Present Based Upon Csreatc- than 50% of the Plant Species arc! a
Classified as FAC-08L in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In -Remind o): Wenand Hydrology Indicators
- Stroup, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial photographs Primary Indira tors:
.,? Other. -Inundated
Saturated In Upper 12,
?No Recorded Data Available Watermrft
Drift ones
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
_ Om"as patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water:) Secondary Indleators:
Depth to Frets Wailer in Pit > 3 6 `? --- OidRoot Channels in Upper 12"
Water Mined Leaves
?} _ Local $olt SWV*y Data

Depth to Saturated Soil: Toot
OUw (Explal t In Rsmaft)
Rerttarks;

t ?,,
Lq

U-o u-r ua:1da micnael eaker
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fax:[phone]
9108224540 P,5
13:50 P. 03
SOILS
Map unit Name
(Serlee and Phase); olinage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): [JA L. Con Rrm
No IWppad Tyne Yes
D
Qwbw epth ? i Malll7[ Coiots MOItM Cpbfi MOM Twa"M Cpngrgpnus
- ti?Q, 111L?! letuesulllratetl Abu 1109 °I
o-? R a? YN? 3 ?
7- L r o?ri- G y _ L,` ?f
(o Ift,
T-T "t
30
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Hi ft" _C NW.Mdons
Soils 1 left Eplpadon - Nlph Organic Cooken in Surteee Layer in Sandy
_SuNkgc Odor Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
_Awdu Mobtura.Reglms Weed On Local Hydric Soils Ulet
- Reducing Cardidans Llsesd on Nallonel Hydric Solis List
,_,,, 6WM or Law•CWwna Colors _ Ollw r j9Weln In Remarks)
Remarks: t j
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrephytic Vegetation Present? Yea No ? is the sampling point
Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes No.? Within a Wetland? Yes No_?
Hyddc Solis Present? Yes No .,L..,
Remarks: Loan" (dw xae) is/i6qala4s ed as a wetland based upon the criteria set fw& in the 1987
Army Corps of En&cus Wetlaa& Deliumdou Manual.
,?,o/--tp

.,an cb u94 uu:iba michael eaker 9108224540
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fax:[phone]:49
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
- (1987 COE-Wetlands Determination Manual)
Praiect / Site..
Applicant I Owner:
e 1f
Do normal cimumatances exist on the site? ves ? No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Ne?_
is the area a potential problem area? Y- ft- (explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
P. 02
p.2
Date: LaV'. ZOO r
Comely- e?r^4*j-
$tate:_ 4! c.
Community ID• wci ?-?+
Transact ID: I •• 4 Z
Plot ID:
Da min"n ARM" AIMM . lndkMw
1. Ace-, res.. -W& Arent Mant $REM Mdcatw
9.
P. a,uta T'rA4
2,- 10.
^

3- 13.
& 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OGL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). ]Sa ?'
Rsrnttrks: Wetland vegetation Preseat Bttserid Upam Greater tb" $0% of the Plant Sped a re cot
Classified as PAC-OHL in the National List ofPiant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Samp a plot was taken...
p+e.•?.- Ir'"a
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In I1lsmarlo ): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Strom % Lake, or Tide Gauge
Photographs
Aerial
O Primary Indicallovs;
ther
.,? kwndaled

_?No Rmvded Data Available ttrex6ed in Upper 12"
r.. Water Merits
Drill Lines
Field Obserwalions: _ Sediment Deposits
brahmme Pepsins to Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: G(Z (irl•) Secondary Indicators:
deirih to Free Water in Pif: t l t.. 4fCxidlawl Boob Channels In tipper 12"
Wabar-969ned Leevee
y?Local $oli Survey Data
Depth to Stituratad sail: t 1 L
(ra.) FAC-Neufral Test
+r__ ether (fixpiain In Rernarits)
Rentarka:
aan co Uft uZJ:1ba miChae1 eaker
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Fax:[phone]
9108224540
13:50
P. 03
p.3
SOlL$
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): l B 6 D"Inage Class ?_
Taxonomy mubgtoup): _ Twml rte, acv
No Lo, Minn IYfapPed Type es
COIoQ mauw cows Not...
washim WE
-lo r4 CariL Z J,A04 u.
yo- r4- - - R M
Hydrte Saul indicators:
-Hb*xm l conerotions
HMS Epipedon ?Hlgh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy
Soils
8tdHdic t?tlor 8tr aaidng In Sandy Salk
A4ule Yai
CadCaml.idons am An twat Hydric Sole List
?Redudng LJaled on Mallonal Hydrk Sails Lut
_ZGleyed or L.ow• %mma Cigars -OUw(E><pleln In Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydraphyde Vegetation Present? You No is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No Within a Wetland? Yea ?No
Hydric Solis Present? Yes ? No __. .
Remarks: tAwatios (&wribe set clan ed as a wetland bawd upan tiie aiteda set forth in the 1987
Army Caps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Mauuat.

I

i
ml a
7

,r
/I"x
s?
P4 ? o
?a
F g
W
L- 1 0
I GO
V) 4j
Ld La
'?``ltt t?M1 Z
O HEADWA 0 NEW
STAR. WMG.77, 34535 LT. I.Yi, 3650' RT.
STA. 44+51 41 175.00' LT.
TOP ELEV. 193!0 INV. 17600 TOP ELEV. 194.70
IT 911E N 187.41 38' NV. IN t6T2o
3C NY. N 186.16 EAST. 36' NV. DOT 167.00 t
31r INV. GBr 18558 BASIN
?
?
W
LT
ST
09
8
.5
ORATE ELEV. 187.00
2 NEW CATCH BASN
p EASING MANHOLE 30' INV. N 18205 STA. 3036745. 20U8 LT.
S0. 37+27.75, 34538' LT. 30' NV, OUT 181.80 GRATE EIEY.0290
08
TOP ELEV. 19
3 3C NV, N 184.10
(S
1?
2e INV, IN iffill)
727
'
38' NV. OUT 1634.0
24
NV. N {,/ 18
' EXISTING CATCH BASIN
®
'
INV. OUT 185.78
38 STA. 43+09.85 49600
LT.
TOP ELEV. 187.75
O NEW CATCH BASN

O 24' RAND ENO SECTION THROAT ELEV. 186.76
30' NY. OUT 18225 STA. 38+40.77. 233.1W LT.
GRATE ELEV. 181.00
STA. 36+01-63, 30749 LT 36" INV. IN 185.09
NV.189 W 35"NY. OUT 184.03

ING RCP
51287 LT.
® STA. 3
7 i+06N

2,r RCP
O
! ,
NY. 1N.56 EXTEND FASTING 36' RCP
O
29, 241" LT.
3
24
STA. 10 OWING LIE AND GRADE
o INV. 16615 FROM FIRST JOINT

t
NY. 185.12
STTAA.37+0123 578.98 LT.
ET951NG IT FLARED END SECTION
O INV. 18208 /-?
'
STA. 3644677. 369.60 LT
NV. 18603 15 F WEND D=NG 30
RCP
TJ TO F70511NG LINE MO BTWE

g ® EIOBTNG 15 RCP
' FROM FNST JOINT
,1057 f
W
O
?
6W
.1 STA. 37+312,.55477
LT.
INV. 191.72 ..
197AW RT.
ST
4
T89
N617629 0 NEW ANOTINI BOX
5
EX57M 15 RCP
67431' LT
S0. 37+19
95 STA. 44+461617!8
LT.
ORATE ELEV. 197.73
N EXSING IT RCP .
,
NY. 191A7 37 NV. IN ISM45
$ S0. 46#E15,16378' RT. 3m. dR 1B629
B W. 178,45
EXISTING RCP
LT.
EKTEND ?
O7
EXISTING IT C3P
O S0. 45+6607, 15639' RT. _
10
FROM FIRST JOINT AND,
N6 17688 NY. Is= t

55 GOP
EXISTING

® ENI TING 3C CEP RISER
, S
TA. 35+59
.77 641&14! LT.
NV. 19285

O6 NEW CATCH BASIN
W
90. 45+10-31.147M
RT. 90A. 44+4616 174A
LT.
TOP NEV. 18303
IT CEP NV. 03T 17696 NEW ANTE ELEV. 194.37
EXIST. Mr NV. N 17660
EAST. 30' INV. N 170.49
Li EX6T 4Y NV. M 17680
TBM
CONTROL NAIL
0 RUNWAY/6TAI9WAY NTX.
RUNWAY CENTERLINE STA. 42+3227
ELEV. 199.04
LEGEND
EASTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR -195-
EASTNG BBUMINOUS PAVEMENT
FUTURE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ;rM :. ,, wv
EASTNG WATER LINE -? 9 -
DIISTNG ELECTRIC -i-1-
EASTNG GAS LINE ---o- -
EXISTING FORCE MAIN -N9-
EXISTING STORM DRAIN
E10S LNG STORM DRAIN
404 WETLAND y y y y
PRELIMINARY
x„
61
LL
177
O
rn Z
, 3 x r av u-x 0 03
- ??
Z
F zO } W
-0 1- Q
l ,"kr?yffs!4•''?p?,?r???• /% i. rv 7'?`- `r;'. jZ X
o? as ?Z
F a
185 Z V Z Q
a
LAI
a? ?} O W
1 ??,• 'f ' y y y y? W,
WETLANDS
SEAL
21152 f l?:
----------- f
DOM
r F r! ,'? ,' •lI? i TINE 2004
I y 11 y *1 y?,'; \ Gram TED
?N iy y 1\ y` ii ,', Coded
i )
off
pmpd ism
2701-0'!02
Lt iy? l1'y y 1 y 8? 50 25 0 50 100 150 Shad Na
`•7 i' J ? ,y ? y>?_ ?`• SCALE IN FEET
5
S I It ?? t 1 `? 1'? ?`
?`W +? I ? i r t 14
NEW 1W FLARED END SECTION
STA. 51+92.00, 54502! LT.
NV. 194,82
NEW III' FLARED RN SECTION
STA. 84+55.20. 523.58' LT.
NV. 195.50
EXISTING 15' RCP
STA 89+•14.75, 256.40' LT.
NV. 190.00
EXISTING 15' RCP
SEA 69+07.61, 263.50' LT.
NV. 190.80
® EXISTING 48' RCP
SEA 57+96.03, 9.77' RT.
NV. 185.84
O NEW 42' FLARED END SECTION
STA. 51+5550, 113.16' RT.
NV. 189.40
NEW 4Y FLARED END SECTION
STA. 51+5580. 18&17 LT.
NV. 190.85
'"•n e:" `? y;H:t` .? :' ? e.ti y"t? ?.%;..'-ATV', ??` ..?
w.5;- n :.iiti.%i?:•-y;":.'ri YFr-:?.'yy "'+M',j'?
Wv.
wY4 •"'?Y''•C;?.?3 ?? :?t?l':. `?},A;.,1?:,'l x,.74+,,: ?-. 'Y .. •?M*
\91 1g9 «\yg \\ --:a 0" -;,Ai-,.lr
%
,t
`•aA.?
?_ ,T4t
TBM
CONTROL IRON to
55' f FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT Q Z Q
r ; lr1 i 'rs"= F; RUNWAY CENTERLINE STA. 58+30,33 Z
???, • , a;R= ELEV. 201.64 :3 U) Z
I'll 0 it Z
_ _ __ m lrff l,rft ': p: E«. (L 1i X y W
57+00 r t _i%''= - ?? Z W Z LIJ
3 Q a?i
Z Z
'?;"t;:'yf Jhj?: `.•"fie: ;,? 0? a;5 oz
j
f r,
LLJ
m: z
yg)
NETLANDS 11?+`X:;llj 'e +; •j4 Q
r a•
PRELIMINARY
of
°
rc
NQ
+- F
007
W
NI
WL
W?
Fn -
510
5
y:
y y

q
5
ti
1
l
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR ?. -te-
PROPOSED CONTOUR -195-
EIOSIING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT a"• s
EMSTING WATER LINE ---?
EXISTING ELECTRIC -? -
EUOSTING GAS LINE -o-
EMSTING FORCE MAIN - ---I9- ^-
E70STING STOW DRAIN
EXISTING STORM DRAIN
404 WETLANDS Y y y y
N
r1 .2
(? z E
°n
Nyy
?LL
3 ?A'pF?•' r4';
J 21182
z o P'VGM F'
Date
JAN. 2004
Scale 1' . 50'
darn
1E0
Chedted off
y d0 2701-6202
Ir/
50 25 0 50 100 150 Sh"t "
w
SCALE IN FEET /l'll`
1"= 50 of 14
9
.n t I

3
s?
50 25 0 50 100 150
SCALE 91 FEET
1'- W.

r
PRELIMINARY

1 ?

°o mo eh

dd °o?
mm ?I
1
? S'? oq

$d ml
?m nm ?i'

d d
ga ??
?J ° 9.,

?' [
gb a'E «u N

bm' b1
d1
- h?. °

-'o ai{
g mR w?

b?
a; °ao °ni

aa e)i
.-,E ?m

e5n1
oo ^a

as d
? mo

dri
?m °nb

rid
e gY n

b? b
6 i

bS
^
$
so
a
d ?b o
d
?°- $
6o d
m o?
?°-, $
Ao a
mm o
(;°
nd ,d
mm ?3t
d 1
?°
dn d?
oo
l,
F;nm
dd
mm RB
°

-- o
8'

"?
$$
r1
m
d 99 d g d g
? a d1
?W a? P gg g 6? %g I j9 % %& 16 b?, ?? t ?? ??
I PRO OSED INISNED GRADE ELEVATI ONS
401Y V.C.

i 1
{
I
°0 ;
i
8

d

i

rc
z
w
I
-
° m
I $
I
_ (` !
ff

Y.L. 200
d w °

I

# 77

_
MSHED

1
,.J
190 { _ # I H 190

I E I

180 (

I S 1 E

I E7 MC 0 AM MMT-F

EXMM MAY(mmM

CENMUFUM OR

E
\

\\,
180
3
I
I DWN6 RGHT-OF- Y (LEFT) f
I
EXIST C ORA 'E ELEV TIOMS
s C I
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 8+00 7+00 8+40 9+00 ,0+00 11+00
0
oa
ZO
a?
a
Z
O
oa aN
U
alx OO
Zz wO
;z ui I
O
zU ]
0Q
1- W U
xz UO
Wo
x 2
WN
Q0-
z°
a?
OW
2W
Q v
?W
z?
op
Q?
?a
Da
aJ
a
SEAL. ' T
1 21192
EP
"6, y?F'YCDiE? a
I JAN. 2001 1
TED
CMded G11W
PYopd Nw 2701-0701
4
a 1G
w, T r ? ti ra o s ? t '\ 1 ? •,? ?? ? E,> / ?.' f ,i ! rl ?? d i ? ;,•
(III ell,
i
t ' 'ti ? ? / ? r f ? /' F j? 11 l?ii'r" ? t` 's it ? .•,?
1 ! 1 Fri
%
eod
I 1 1 vt ?r ?? i `-fi. °'I?IIT t?'? )fir) `' / 11} J Jr J Al d
! I t X11 1 \ J, % rti?i a„? ,? fit,. !. jar J ? ? E : 1 ?
....... S It , ? ?? 1 ??14r rv` t?•t" / r / f, r % 11 'F . ... 1 ? N
+r ^_ ^.. r'rc 14 r a r t fr i 1 x. i i
1 ? ?f ? i `, ` -•.." ...w-°t90' ? ?? ??1.1.16_, 1 r'
1 / NIh57 tYIST1NC
j ;11 ti r , tE S ni rr v NA
PROPOSED SP81WAv
"4EY. 186.00 f ,,l` a ? Ik. t?iatFt aria ' r,', `' 4W c r t A x 0 s ' ' ?,.: // r ? •'.?;
i
i i ` NATCHES'APPROX r R' ?y>k 1r 9 i i rr 1
a d
,.._.......,_?.--._..^-_.. EtOSTING SPILLW/:?„ .. ! a - ' {! ¢! y' ir. "? ! /' J r I •S.K,•'
? ? i ,_..« --E3•p/A11DN•r"" ..•' r -;`? t F{?`EI ??? r?J x h? 0 1, 3 r ? ?' t` ? ' ?• }
? _ 1 1 kt!'?'(vA7?kl'?`??rb :'"tom-. ?,t ?.
01
P.I. - STA. 21+05A
to I
? '? `?.._.w e`' °,.-..1?i1^ ..._........ I'."...'.. ..-•" ?y' '?3' '? ??°?!! ^? l l ?,, ^ ? ? !r• r ? ) ? •e' 'I t 1
`.?, a,t\ .. e3"'"'"\.-'/ ,r+`"r ,5'? ?? n ?.?? ? `•\ ? 1 t \:°S??• A ? ? i 1 $`+ ?.
.?w=`.s.-?«r .:."t=?_ .•• ?''" . ??; .•-a. 4 ? ? ? ? .x`y? 1 \ `..?+?. ??"w:ti: ^•.ti\ A ? i j+ ? ( z
I
IT,
N
50 25 0 50 100 150 O Q
o L-
SCALE IN H:ET l '{ •: r a Q Z O
f>
1' 50' f s t i ,? :. ?, p O z -4
Q
15
Oa QN ?W
U
a W Q
O v
Zz 0
?
? I~
07 O C9
U _ Z ?
U .
kO J Q
Z OQ arcr
uj c? a
z C) i rn7 MQ
200
-too- z
J QJ
a
Ft °:
SEAL
d °:c p
°? 21182
a
JAN. 2DD,
So" 1• . 30' NOR.
1' . e Mr..
Dmm
13rodwd CNW
J Pmod tam 2701-0301
.5110!1 N.
f
5
I 18
g a

210 p?
O N ? Oj
? ?'
pC d? ?(p0?(qq??I(pqpq(?? ?
1
00 0
if3 yy,,? 5a
``
?0 "?0+f1
?? ? 22 Rj
00 ?
Clfi 4 Yf yAylI
Mg Y
1 fyy.((g r j
tl0 18
p6 f dv
$I
6? ? ?S?((0
$9
gi5 ? p'Sp i
90 19
gfi Ym? ? di
93
wf5 d d0 R
0 9
w q ???II? q
tl0 •
6 i ' jO a
d?
%6 ' SS d
99 P
jCI ? I lNf?
OP ?
6CI d OY IdAd
00 SI
gg ?
aDO' F? r t s ni
N n
hg d
vt MA O
NN
[6 ° RR 9 F I ?

?B ? ? I

? 1(1(1((

210

90 W<

S

t
I
tl
I
^

I
n
? I
w

I

1

jJ]

(
t

,oslwe CO

}
WL laatr- a•

wAT
(?

I

j

?

S

90
E),49ND ? PRE?IM INARN
180
160

^ pp
? ND py10C p .,or_yigV (m HT) 1
II E1I13T D GRAD
ELEVA
TIONS
1
t
t

S
d
o?
?? yI
fi f
?I ?j
O
O
S
C q
0 q{
O
C n
O n
O
S
e i
2 ?
O q+
O ? t
1
00 im
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 2i+00
NC Division of Water Quality
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference
17374 2701-0301 Invoice 01/30/04 2701-0301

Talbert & Bright, Inc.
A% I
CK
DATE
Check Number: 7707
Date: 1/30/2004 Check Amt: $200.00
Balance Discount Pay Amount
$200.00 $0.00 $200.00
7707
`k.A i
300 0 300 600 900
GRAPHIC SCALE -FEET
0 ~P
OR
WETLANDS AREA 5 ~0 G~
• eEARNxss A?a otsTANCE ALONG CENTER LN6? Of S11tEAA6lED
WET LA1De ARE 3' EACH
WETLANDS AREA a soE ap CENTER L6E 1fEAR1NW At0 DI6TAtICE ooe ACHES
ALONG CENTER L9E OF eTREAAilED COURSE BEARING DI6TANCE
WET LAND9 ARE 3' EACH 0I -02 565°22 02"E 38,57' SGE OF CENTER LINE s ~ ~ yyE ~r.29' CHARLES BENNY LEE
0.06 ACRES 03-04 S 36'19'37'E 61.01'
couA9E BEAR9Ka oaTA~ x.06 /1e'1o'1rE 41,30; WIWAM DENNY LEE 16-56 ~ al~°O/•1t~'E j4 p~ W.R.SORRELL
014-015 9 T'9'3t' 14'w 3T.T 1' ST~.11 = 14'61 W'w 10.50' 015-016 9'JO'19'3P'w t9A3'
016-017 N e3MJl'ao'w 21.86' 66-81 N 41~06'00~ ~ DEED BOOK 1555 G1T-o1e s 6aaro2'w 16.61' o1o-oi~ a 31•ae'3t'w n.b1'
ale-ale s st•4e32'w 30.16' 3o.9r PAGE 701 019-02o s 4t•as'62'w 2212' of I-alt s oe'61
020-021 N 61•a3'3a'w 34.10' oft-ol3 s et•bt'aow r2.le' to 1-022 s TO.56'23'w 41.43' 012-013 s 3o't4'31'w 37.74'
022-023 s 2ooe'33'w 26.10' 023-024 S e3•E4'3o'W 26.42' ECM JOHN B.BRITT JR.
024-Otb s 32.31' 14'w 3abe' 026-028 s O6.17'~w 12941' 311.7 GI DEED BOOK 774
G26-021 s ' o2T-o2e s ' 13'w 6.61' 025 02 PAGE 550 ~
~ 2 o N 39°47'5?„ ECM 026~y I ~ 3 E 21?2.39' N .
0200 0 N 04 0
DI 13 10 ~ ~ ••NOTE GRID TIE WAS TAKEN FROM MAP RECORDED IN
I ~ O6 / Z N 0 01 I MAP NO 98-439. GEOTETIC MONUMENTS WERE DESTROYED
oT ~ 3 ~ N 4 , 0e ~ 0~ 26 Ec 6 3?•0 ~ Z
ti, 5~ 3 E ? N.c. n IN CONSTRUCTION OF RUNWAY EXTENTION. O N
W , P G 035.04, RF ~~t4 ~ n , O ~ ~ ?3'
o ~ 60 3~ \ r. ~ ~ ~ ~G~ r63 ~ N LEE FARAIS,INC. NOTE: D.O,T. R/W ALONG U.S. 421 IS PROPERTY LINE. rn o
JOHN B.BRITT JR. W ~ Q ib' ~ \ ~ ~ DB 480,PG 205
o ~ 1~ Pti \ ~ 403 93 ECM 492 197
DEED BOOK 774 0; ~ ~ ~~M ECM a ° cu.Pr. ~ 0 ~ 1
PAGE 550 ~ 0 o d` O c~, g,0 s H 32• y' c^a ° R~ 06 0~3
$ ERRS Cl END j ~ , 53' y ~P 9 0, ~ OE PO 66
z 1187 of RuNwAr couN>Y of COUNTY OF HARNETT $ DEE HARNEn' R f 9 o,~ ,o, ,o 36 a ~ 11. ~1
D BooK 68 AIPPORT PROPERTY S,PAGE 774 MAP BK ?3 P 'OD' w ~ m~~ GOJ 0~ NC LEE FARIAS.INC ~ e~ ~0 ~
+a , C 53 `SR N ¦ 1e12e2.o49 Y RICHARD SORRELL ~ ~J+~Oti P~' ' EIS 7s.72e w F~,~ ° q ~ ~d e•3o`aaA
174.82 ACRES TOTAL 2~ E e34o DEED BOOK 934,PAGE 3 ~ ~ .p s ~ ~ti `1 , 6 _ N . ~~F° ,,gyp , a 69
~ ~ couN~y o~ COUNTY pF E rig ~3 ~y9 , w~.4. ,
~ GEED BOOK ° 6 DEED N'~PNLryT o' '~~8 ' c^ ~ ° R BDOK ? N _ ~ ~ 5 d t 685,pA s • N 0 MAMIE STEWARI
~ EXJSTI 'MAP eK ~ NG RUNWAY Al GE 774 ~d ~ q/ ? 1Q Se'gb ~ AP 6K ?3 d RA ~ ss•, rimer' DB 315,PG 379 ,PC ~ ` ~ ~ QR f l 5d~
~ T 12 '~M'10 4,~ N •
ECM HARIyEn• ~ EC OB COllly7p A/RP ~ w SEE NOTE 'IA'0 ~V 9 11 ~ ~C ~ $8 F V ~ + vy, os~ g, s. r t EI5
6d9 PC 707 ORT NAP 8K ?3 ~ ~ N leil51.144 Y Ah r 9~ ~ A1.YK. : I IS.102 Y \ ~l
S 39° ~ c ~ m ,PG 53 47 43'~y oN °p ESTER S 39°46 g' N.c. 1 E ~ ~ 8f ~ N 1" W i81.S2' IIORL ~ q LX,NAN. ~9
97.7g' N °o $ RYAGS R ~ 1134. a1s ISi.80' 111p ~ EM 4' ~Zr
N 9J E ? RY 66 R/Iy 11 6.1 8 7 ~ • r NEW PK SET AT ~ 101ACC0 IIKK 0 OF OLD RUNIYAY ~s r r ' OF 1UNWAY a1RN SLAa4 K
s9 _ 8 ACRf ~ t ~ .1s rAx 1D S ~s. ~ 04D / r N Dp ~ s,~ COUNTY OF HARNETT
ECM S ~ I1-0589- ~e. ~ , w'_ 3 46'48- _ 0044 ~t `~8•. ®g 0 ~ 1 N1 AI,M ~ AVI9ATIOIr EASEYENf D 600K 1352 PAGE 959
96,, f ti ~bt tp AYNtAnoN EASE 1~~39-t _ ar~'o10 S 39' 9 ?c ~ s D E , $ 3 • 1e5 ' s TAX ID 07-0589-0034-Of
JOHN B.BRITT JR. D1 1 910 1 910 ~ ~ D?' ~ ~ wETLANOS AR[A 9
DEED BOOK 774 ESTER RYALS TERRY S ii°10'10" IS ~ 0>!6 ~ R•QLEE 1693.89 A9EA 7 COUN OF HARNETT 1b~. COURSE BEARING aSTANCE HEIRS d A1A-A2A N 56.35'S2"E 15,00'
PAGE 550 29.96' t ~ 91 E 211 D1 ~ ~ RICH ® e ® g _ X11 6, rAX 8.78 ARD SO DEED 8 K 1394,PAGE 847 s~ Se'o " A2A coR 33e'46'o4"E 11o,1e' !D 11, ACRE RRELL ~ 11 coR-e1 s serol u'w s7,35'
Os79- `S ~ cnc / ~s? . v Ii-A1A N lris'iB"W 115,14' $ 39.4 , 0/33 6 ~ .K, _ OB g34 5' ~~3' TAX 07-0589-0034 9 ~ * ~ 0.01 AcREs
NORTH CAROLINA HARNETT COUNTY ?O5 ,PG •1 le ~ 4.48_ D ~ ~g1 CI9C g WETlA10S AREA 2
I,Mickey R. Bennet t,PLS do certify that this plot was drown under ~ ~ CI COURSE BEARING DISTANCE
my supervlsian(deed description recorded In Book SEE , Page MAP •etc) that the boundaries not surveyed are clearly wETLAiD3 AREA1 1~ 51-82 S 83•18'05'W 38,86' 83 ~ -
Indicated ae drawn from Information found In Book 5EE ,page MAP, ~ARBfO DID D20 N 47.67'51"E 61.67' ~7'~' POND 3 j,~ 82 83 N P7'30'44'W 48.64' y $ e , 82 '7 B3-B4 N o2b I'4a'W 79,19'
that the ratio of precision as calculated Is I:I000O:that this plat D2D-D3D N54.41'tt"E 33.17 1 g 48,E"W I y 84-B5 N 06~27'38'W 129.31' D. LEE HEIRS ~ p D58,~, M3 ~ ~ B5-B6 N 1449'S5'E 128.32'
nce with G.S. 47-30 as amended.Wltneas 03D-D4D N7i'S1'05"E t9.N' R.D. LEE HEIRS 8 was prepared In accorda this 6TH D~yD_~p S ~ sr~ W.R. SORRELL • ~A! ~ ~ BL-87 N 00'44'S8'W 171,42' 87-B8 N 10'S8'39'E 53.40' Y.R. SORRELL AVIR4Ti0N EASEMENT ~ ~i. BB ~ C5 EIS
my orlginal slgnature,reglstratlon number and seal D6D-D7D N 89'13'56"E 61.66' IIAw1E STEWART E~. ?W, ~pR~~ S 0~9'~36'42'E 59, 0'
doY of MARCH , A. D. 200 070-D8D S 61.64'24"E 19.96' D8D-D9D S Y3'14'39"W 73.33' 0/ 513,10 379 BIB 8B Cl C t -C2 9 OT'41'46'E 197.60'
L~. D100-D00D S /3'01'01"W 34.10' ~ C2-CS S I I'22'20'E 123.88' WETLANDS AREA 7 C3-C4 9 29'37'21'E 111,38'
` D11D-D12D 511'01'29"W 57.30' COURSE IEAR110 DISTANCE C4-BI S 39'46'48'W 200.79' `O,
MICKEY R. BENNETT D12D-D13D S t1'3T44"w 59.45' D13D-D14D S 85'39'4Y'w 104.63' C1C-C4C N 30'86'38"E 25.21' EI WETLAtD9 AREA 3 1.57 ACRES
A L - 1514 D1SD-Dte~D N 3~6' 6'S3"W 69.66' ~ RO .35' D16D-D17D N 01'67'20"E 35 C2C-c3c 3 77'O2'S1"E 47.60' C3C-C4C N 24'37'21"E 33.83' WEILAIAS AREA 4 COURSE BEARING DISTANCE
ESS/ ~ I MICKEY R. BENNETT PLS D17D-DID N a5'23o1'E 36.29 ~ OF ON ~ DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 0 a~ ~ 2 1.2o AcREs C4C-CSC S 51'03'26"E 15.72' CSC-C6C S 26.47'47"E 03.38' COURSE BEAAN~q DISTANCE 81-C4 N 39'46'4e'E 200.79'
Z ~ ~ THIS IS AN EXISTING PARCEL SEA OR PARCELS OF LAND. C/C-C7C S 06'10'21"E 93.1!' C4-C5 S 33'12'S3'E 81.39' C7C-CIC S 11'23'27"E 82.01 AAI-AA2 S 21'16'OT'E 15.49' C5-C6 S 24'S2'20'E 61,88'
~ No. 1514 ~ CAC-CIC S 23'04/5'"N 32.1/' g 10'03 E 57,72' C6-81 S 76'01'40'W 193.87' c1c-cloc s 3o'Sr34"rr 39.or
~ r n 9ti C10C-C11C S 61'14'S3"E 05,21' AA4-AA5 9 13'1 I'I I'W 19.87' 0.27 ACRES C11C-C12C S 64'4i'14"E 6l.11' AA5-AA6 9 39'S6'12'W lb.et'
o ~ ~ suR ~ C14C-C13C S 41'83'13"E 20,40' Ab-AA7 9 12'S0'31'E 53.TT' C13C-C14C S 32'25'10"E 91.79' M1-BB7 S 37'1 I'32'W 101.44'
Fr ~ R. ~E C14C-C16C S 0!'13'12"W 21.1!' AB7 ~ N Y6~,49~ C15C-C11C S 4YS1'31"W 1I.JS' 816 WET1pg3 AREA 6
C11C-C17C S 13'33'11"W 27.14' 16'8-IM N !1'14TiTW 80.99' C1TC-C11C N 11'22'N"W 28.12' !B4-M3 N I hIt'14'W 40.1 I' I IEMBI03 AMD DIOTANCR AlAl10
C11D-C11C N bt'01'Ot"W 11.00' ~~I M 16?86'01'E 184.06' WETLAIIDSE ARE~EACRUNOFF C1iC-O~20C N 01'84'11"W 13.1T
C40C-C21C N 41'41'26"W 33,06' 681-AAI N T8'le'41'E 0.96' SIDE OF CLNT[RUNE
C21C-C22C N 35.10'32"W 40.04' ACRES C01~1f ~0 paTA~E C22C-C23C N 42.40'16"W 50.34' CHtI 6 10'22'11't 9.03'
C23C-C24C N 10'34'46"W 34.19' S 24'21'47'1 45.11' C2/C-C28C N 42.39'21"W 17,86' 13troQ'67^W
C43C-C26C N 86'42'49"W 50,33' Ch~11 S ~ 22.11' C29C-C27C N 00'60'tt"W 211.11' Ci-161 N 70'S4'83"W 32.IT t'
C27C-CIC N 30'81'31"E 31.16' C6-/N S Bi'0/'29"W 37.56' 1.21 ACIE3 0.008 AC1ES ~ o
r~aTIFICATE fOR U 9 CORPS aF ENGINEER ~ o cv
TH19 CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THI8 PLAT ~
ACCURATELY DEPICTS 1HE BOUNDARY OF THE ~ O
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT PURSANT TO THE 19e1 CORPS OF Nr? ~ W
ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MINUAL AS DETERMINED BY THE UNOER910N ON TH19 DATE. © LL I+J V
UNLESS THERE 19 A CHANGE IN THE LAW OA OUR PUBl19HED REOULATIONB.THIS DETERMINATION OF Q
SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON
fOR A PERIOD OF FIYE YEARS fROM TH19 DATE. MAP REFERENCE IW 27
N 2DD5
SIfiNATURE OF U S CORPS OF ENGINEERS OFFICIAL UNES NOt SURVEYED------------ MAP BOOK 98-439
DATE OF 910NATURE UNES ~ Y7
EIP-------EXISTING IRON PIPE ECM------EXlSI11NC CONCRETE MONUMENT ~ ~t NORTH CAROLINA
NIP------NEW IRON PIPE NOTE;SURVEY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM HARNETT COUNTY NEILL. S CREEK TOWNSHIP 17ee
PKN------RK. NAIL SET 1759 ELS------IXISTINC ucNTwooD STAKE A MAP ENTITLED PROPOSED HARNETT
N/F------ NONE OR FONMERLY
R/w' ------RIGHT OF WAY COUNTY LAND ACQUISITION RECORDED y~~ C/L------ CENTERLINE „ BENNETT SURVEYS, INC. MARCH 6,2002
Nls------NEw IRON STAKE IN MAP BOOK 98-439 sofa
EIS------EXISTING IRON STAKE 1662 CLARK ROAD,LILLINGTON N.C. 27546 910-893-5252 REVISION OF JOB NO. 01347C SITE
E I PIE IS (CONTROL CORNERS) SITE JOB N0.01347D
C P CALCULATED POINT
VICINITY MAP MAP