20001048 Ver 2_401 Application_20000807

1
1
August 7, 2000
1
1
a
f

1
Mr. Allen Davis
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
LAWGIM[BB
GROUP
001048
Vv'ETLANDS G113UP
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification for Nationwide Permits Nos. 39 and 14
1,000-Cell Close Security Prototypical Correctional Facility
Anson County, North Carolina PAYMENT
LAW Project No. 30100-0-0025
RECEIVED
Dear Mr. Davis:
On behalf of the North Carolina Department of Correction (NCDOC), and in cooperation with
Little & Associates Architects (LAA), enclosed please find completed Joint Forms with
accompanying figures for Nationwide Permits (NWP) Nos. 39 and 14 in the above-referenced
matter (Attachments A and B). The NCDOC has retained Law Engineering and Environmental
Services, Inc. (LAW) to provide wetlands and permitting services for this project. The NCDOC
has authorized LAW to act as its agent in this matter. An executed `Agent Certification of
Authorization' form is enclosed (Attachment C). The project area is located approximately 0.75
mile south of Prison Camp Road (SR 1121) and U.S. Hwy. 74 intersection, near the city of
Polkton (Attachment D - Figure 1). Since the proposed project will impact more than 1/10 acre
of an above-the-headwaters stream, this pre-construction notification (PCN) is being provided in
accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) general conditions for NWP
No. 39 (Residential, Commercial, and Institutional Developments).
Background
1
LAA, on behalf of the NCDOC, has designed the proposed 80-acre correctional facility project in
Anson County, North Carolina. The Anson County Correctional Facility (ACCF) will be located
immediately adjacent to the existing Brown Creek Medium Security State Prison Facility as well as
close to the existing Anson County Minimum Security Correctional Center in Anson County. In
' LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 • Charlotte, NC 28208
Serving the Charlotte area for over 50 years.
' 704-357-8600•Fax: [phone]
Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
LA W Project 30100-0-0025
addition to building construction, the project entails grading as well as the construction of a parking
' lot, access road, sewage pump station, and stormwater management ponds.
The North Carolina prison population is projected to exceed prison capacity by the year 2001. This
bed shortage along with a trend toward more serious offense classes of inmates provides the basis
for this project. The purpose of this project is to help satisfy the NCDOC's need for additional
inmate space by providing a 1,000-cell facility that will accommodate 1,000 inmates.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional waters of the U.S., depicted on Figure 3 in Attachment D, were delineated in the
field by LAW'S scientists on February 16, February 21 and February 22, 2000, using the Routine
On-Site Determination as described in the 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual"], but have not yet been field verified by you. This submittal also constitutes a
submittal for a "Jurisdictional Determination" (JD) (Attachment D). The JD package includes a
Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form, a Site Location Map (Figure 1), a USDA Soil
Survey Map (Figure 2), Approximate Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary Maps (Figures
3 and 4), Routine Wetland Determination Forms, Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms, North
Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Classification Forms, and photographs. Waters of
the U.S. delineated on-site include three streams (Stream A, Stream B, and Stream C) totaling
approximately 2,241 linear feet (If) of stream channel, a 1.4-acre wetland (Wetland A), and a
' 0.2-acre braided wetland (Wetland B). These waters of the U.S. are part of the Yadkin-Pee Dee
River Basin, and are classified by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) as Class
C freshwaters. Wetland A is designated on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map as a
palustrine, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded impoundment (PUBHh) and appears as
' an open water pond on the Russellville, NC quadrangle, dated 1971. However, the earthen dam
associated with this impoundment was historically breached resulting in the formation of the
emergent-scrub/shrub wetland area (Attachment D - Photograph A). Wetland B is a braided
wetland with several interconnecting channels that display evidence of over bank flow. This
wetland is heavily wooded. Stream A flows on-site approximately 588 If and flows into and out
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. U..S Army Corps of
Engineers, Washington, D.C. pp. 100 and Appendices

' Anson Coun Correctional Facility -,NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
' LAW Project 30100-0-0025
of Wetlands A and B. The perennial/important section of Stream A has average widths of four to
' six feet (measured from top of bank to top of bank) with a coarse sand to cobble substrate. The
approximate 520 If upstream portion of Stream A was assessed to be intermittent/unimportant
t (Attachment D - Photograph C). Stream B, which begins off-site and is located outside of the
proposed construction limits, is a perennial stream. The stream is located south and parallel to
' Wetland B and has an average width of three to four feet. Stream B is comprised of
approximately 150 If of unimportant stream channel and approximately 780 if of
perennial/important stream channel. Stream C, located along the western side of the proposed
construction limits is predominantly an unimportant stream channel based on the USACE
Intermittent Channel Evaluation Form (Attachment D - Photograph F). The northernmost onsite
portion of Stream C, which flows along the toe of a large graded area, can be characterized as a
largely v-shaped ditch-like drainage feature with average widths of two to three feet.
Approximately 421 If of unimportant stream channel including two small braided wetland areas
encompassing 0.05 acre (Attachment D - Photograph D) and 0.06 acre, respectively, eventually
flow into the perennial/important segment (242 If) of Stream C to the west (Attachment D -
Photographs B and E). An additional 60 if of unimportant stream channel forks from and
parallels the important portion of Stream C. All totaled, approximately 1.71 acres of wetlands
and 2,241 If of stream (1,090 if perennial/important and 1,151 If intermittent/unimportant) occur
on the subject property.
Cultural Resources and Protected Species
Correspondence from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), dated February 24, 2000,
revealed that there are no known recorded archaeological sites which would be affected by the
project (Attachment E.)
Coastal Carolina Research, Inc. of Tarboro, NC (CCR completed a cultural resources
literature/records review and site reconnaissance and walkover on the proposed project area in
April 2000. CCR's management summary revealed five areas that could potentially contain
archaeological resources. CCR recommended that shovel testing and/or surface surveying be
performed on those areas. Upon further review, of the five areas identified, one area was
' concluded to be outside of the proposed construction limits of the recommended alternative.

I
Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
' LAW Project 30100-0-0025
During site surveying efforts a small, unmapped cemetery located within the northern boundary
of the proposed construction limits of the ACCF was discovered. CCR performed deed research
to assist in determining the identity of the persons buried there. Deed documents associate the
early nineteenth century cemetery with the Sturdivant family.
?j Pursuant to General Status Chapter 65 and following a survey and determination of eligibility for
the cemetery, it is the NCDOC's intention to relocate the cemetery. The NCDOC will publish at
least once per week for four consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the
county in at attempt to contact and notify the next of kin. The disinterment, removal, and
reinterment will be performed by a fiineral director duly licensed as a "funeral director" or a
"funeral service licensee" under the provisions of Article 13A Chapter 90 of the North Carolina
General Statutes. All disinterment, removal, and reinterment will be made in a proper and
decent manner under the supervision and direction of the County Board of Commissioners or
other appropriated official, including the local health director. Care will be taken to identify all
tombstones or other markers so as to include these items with the reinterment. All remains
exhumed will be buried in a suitable cemetery or burial ground, and care will be taken to relocate
all grave-sites in a proper and decent manner.
CCR's Archaeological Reconnaissance and Survey, prepared June 2000, indicates that the
cemetery does not appear to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and no
further evaluation is recommended provided that the site is addressed according to North
Carolina General Statutes. CCR's Archaeological Reconnaissance and Survey report was
forwarded to the SHPO on June 13, 2000.
The project sponsor has committed the resources to coordinate the project with the SHPO to
complete the archaeological survey as well as to relocate the cemetery in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes Chapter 65, Article 5.
r
Correspondence was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP), dated
February 7, 2000, to determine the presence of any federally-listed or candidate endangered or
threatened species or critical habitat within the permit area of the proposed project.
Correspondence from the NCNHP dated February 17, 2000 indicates that there no known records

' Anson Couno, Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
1 LAW Project 30100-0-0025
of listed protected species in the vicinity of the project (Attachment F). However, the NCNHP
database indicates that there are six federally and/or state endangered/threatened species which
may occur in Anson County including the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis),
shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii),
bog spicebush (Lindera subcoriacea), single-flowered sandwort (Minuartia uniflora) and puck's
orpine (Sedum pusillum).
LAW's initial on-site field investigation, conducted on February 16, 2000, to determine the
presence of suitable habitat for the aforementioned protected species, revealed that Schweinitz's
sunflower had the greatest probability of occurring on the subject property. Optimal foraging
and nesting habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker is not present on the subject site. Since
there are no granite outcrops located on the proposed site, the presence of puck's orpine and
single-flowered sandwort is remote. The wet, peaty, evergreen shrub bog habitat that the bog
spicebush requires is not located on the subject property. The shortnose sturgeon usually
inhabits large rivers and there are no such waterways located on the site.
The Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb limited to 35 known populations in North and
South Carolina (Weakley and Houk, 1994)2. This plant's habitat includes roadsides, old
pastures, transmission line right of ways (R/Ws), open areas, and edges of upland woods on
' moist and dryish clays, clay loams, or sandy clay-loams that often have a high gravel content and
are moderately podzolized (fort-nation of a layer from the leaching of minerals and organics from
top layers combined with material in lower layers). Schweinitz's sunflower is found primarily
on Iredell soils. This species' survival is largely threatened by destruction/alteration of its open
habitat, fire suppression, residential/commercial development, and R/Ws maintenance practices.
According to the NCNHP, there is not a known occurrence of a Schweinitz's sunflower
population within a one-mile radius of the subject site.
Based on the habitat requirements for this sunflower, the only possible habitat observed on the
subject property was a maintained open field/graded area. These areas of the site were examined
for evidence of Schweinitz's sunflower, but no plants were found.
a Weakley, A.S. and R.D. Houk. 1994. Recovery Plan for Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
' schweinitzii). Prepared for the USFWS, Southeast Region, Atlanta, GA.

Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
LAW Project 30100-0-0025
Alternatives/Minimization
The subject site poses some development challenges, including several drainage features that
dissect the site. Largely due to these constraints, impacts to Stream C and Wetland B on the
subject site are unavoidable due to the construction of the proposed correctional facility and
associated parking lot. The original site plan for the proposed correctional facility, included as
Attachment G, would have impacted all three streams on the site as well as both wetland areas
' resulting in impacts to over 500 If of stream channel and over one acre of wetlands. In an effort
to minimize impacts to waters of the U.S., and as recommended by LAW, the NCDOC
considered three alternative site plans. The site constraints were evaluated by the NCDOC, in
cooperation with LAA and the design team, to determine which alternative would result in the
least amount of environmental impact while best achieving the project's purpose and need and
providing a functionally safe and efficient facility. The original site plan and the first two
alternatives were eliminated due to larger amounts of impacts to wetlands and stream channel.
The third alternative, which shifted the building largely away from existing wetland areas, and
' two of the site's three stream channels, resulted in the least amount of impacts.
A no-action alternative was also considered for the project. As discussed earlier, the proposed
correctional facility is needed to adequately accommodate the projected growth of North
Carolina's prison inmate population. As a result, the no-action alternative does not appear to be
feasible given the projected shortage of prison space.
I Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
The proposed Anson County Correctional Facility will result in unavoidable impacts to waters of
the U.S. These impacts have been determined utilizing an overlay of the surveyed boundaries of
waters of the U.S., including wetlands, and the proposed site plan. Construction of the
' correctional facility building will predominantly impact the unimportant section of Stream C. It
is anticipated that impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands, associated
with the Anson County Correctional Facility building and parking lot construction will be
permitted under NWP No. 39 - Residential, Commercial, and Institutional Developments. The

Anson County Correctional Fociliry - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
LAW Project 30100-0-0025
proposed building will impact approximately 242 If of perennial/important stream channel and
481 if (0.17 acre) of intermittent/unimportant stream channel (Attachment D - Figure 4). Project
impacts to the intermittent/unimportant portions of Stream C (481 If) have not been included
towards the 300 linear foot permitting threshold associated with NWP No. 39, but have been
included towards the 0.5-acre waters of the U.S. threshold. Additionally, approximately 0.10
acre of Wetland B will be impacted by the grading limits of the parking lot (Attachment D -
Figure 4). These unavoidable impacts, resulting from the grading limits and construction of the
' correctional facility and associated parking lot, have been minimized to the maximum extent
practicable and are necessary for the construction of the facility and associated parking lot. The
multi-story design of the proposed correctional facility has maximized project function while
minimizing the footprint and resultant impacts. Additionally, the entire building and parking lot
layout has been shifted from its original layout, largely away from existing wetland areas and
stream channels.
The proposed ACCF access road crossing at Stream A will impact approximately 70 if of
perennial/important stream channel, approximately 60 if (0.01 acre) of unimportant stream
channel, and approximately 0.02 acre of Wetland A (Attachment D - Figure 4). It is anticipated
that impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands, associated with the
construction of the access road will be permitted under NWP No. 14 - Linear Transportation
Crossings. These impacts will result from the proposed installation of one 18-inch reinforced
concrete pipe culvert (RCP) and one 36-inch RCP culvert. The proposed installation of these
culverts will include flared end sections and will be sized to convey the 25-year storm. The
culverts will be placed at or below the elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage and
' unimpeded movement of aquatic life. The culvert installation will not require any additional
channel modifications outside the impacts of the structure.
The proposed fill in wetlands necessary to complete the road will result in impacts to 0.02 acre of
' Wetland A. The access road has been designed to maintain a low vertical profile to minimize
associated fill slopes and subsequent wetland impacts. In addition, the road was aligned to avoid as
' much of the wetland as possible, particularly the central portion of the wetland area. Several
different alternatives were discussed for the entrance road alignment. These options included
shifting the road crossing upstream to cross Stream A at an intermittent/unimportant section,

Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
' LAW Project 30100-0-0025
' shifting the road crossing downstream, and shifting the entire road alignment to the north (closer
di
it
ilit
Shifti
i
ti
B
C
k M
S
F
th
d
i
th
t
d
rown
ree
um
e roa
cross
e ex
s
ng
e
ecur
y
ac
y).
ng
ng ups
ream an
to
' the alignment to the north would have resulted in large cuts into an earthen berm that separates
Br
wn Cr
k fa
ilit
from the
ro
d entr
n
e road
F
rth
th
i
ti
th
l
y
p
.
e ex
s
ng
o
ee
c
pose
a
c
u
ermore,
e c
ose
proximity of the entrance road to the existing perimeter road of the Brown Creek facility would
' erational conflicts and a
ublic safet
Shiftin
have caused o
issue
the
d
i
p
p
y
.
g
roa
cross
ng
downstream would result in more wetland impacts (Wetland A) and/or additional stream channel
impacts to more significant downstream stream channel segments. The proposed fill in
jurisdictional areas is unavoidable and is required for construction of the proposed access road.

All totaled, the facility and associated parking lot will result in unavoidable impacts to
approximately 242 If perennial/important stream channel and 0.27 acre of wetlands, including
481 If of intermittent/unimportant stream channel (0.17 acre) pursuant to NWP No. 39. The road
' crossing at Stream A will impact approximately 70 If of perennial/important stream channel,
approximately 60 If of unimportant stream channel (0.01 acre), and app
mately 0.02 acre of

Wetland A pursuant to NWP No. 14. '
X

_, -4 I/
-
W

f 151-
' Activities on the subject site involving impacts to waters of the U.S., including wetlands, will be f a?
required to follow the General Conditions of the Nationwide Permits (Federal Register, Vol. 65,
No. 47; March 9, 2000) and State Consistency Conditions, as applicable.
Stormwater Management Plan
' The proposed project is not expected to result in long-term impacts to the water quality of Brown
Creek and its tributaries in the project area. A key condition of the Section 404 wetlands permit
' and corresponding Section 401 water quality certification will be the implementation of an
on-site Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). The SWMP, approved by DWQ, will be
implemented at the commencement of permitted activities. The SWMP will involve the
collection of stormwater via a series of catch basins and pipes. The storrnwater will ultimately
be conveyed to three proposed wet ponds designed to remove 85% of the total suspended solids.
The proposed wet ponds will be constructed in upland areas. Additional details on the SWMP
are included in Attachment I. In addition, vegetated buffers will be maintained along those

Anson Counh' Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
LAW Project 30100-0-0025
' portions of on site streams situated outside the proposed construction limits. These undisturbed
vegetated buffer areas of approximately 50 feet in width will further minimize the potential
' introduction of toxic substances and the potential eutrophication of receiving waters associated
with runoff.
1 Compensatory Mitigation - Conceptual Plan
Compensatory mitigation will be accomplished through either an off-site stream restoration plan
on property currently owned by the NCDOC in Alexander County, North Carolina
(Attachment H - Photographs A and B) or through a donation to the North Carolina Wetland
Restoration Program (NCWRP). The Alexander County stream restoration site is located in the
' Catawba River Basin within Hydrologic Unit Map #03050101. Off-site restoration would
include the restoration of stream channel (classified as WS-IV) that has been adjacent to active
' pasture in the past. The dollar amount of a donation to the NCWRP, based on 312 If of perennial
stream channel impacted by the project, i.e., 242 If associated with the building construction
1 (NWP No. 39) and 70 If associated with the road crossing (NWP No. 14), is anticipated to be
$39,000. The NCWRP has indicated that there are on-going restoration projects in Anson
County that are within the same river basin (Yadkin-PeeDee) as this project. Minor impacts to
wetlands associated with the project, totaling 0.31 acre, i.e., 0.27 acre associated with the
building construction (NWP No. 39) and 0.03 acre associated with the road crossing (NWP No.
14), will be compensated through the implementation of the above-described SWMP. It is
anticipated that the open water, permanent wet ponds and associated shoreline areas will
adequately compensate for the project's impacts to wetlands.
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act Documentation
' The Anson Count Correctional Facility project exceeds the minimum threshold for preparation
' of an Environmental Assessment (EA) established by the NCDOC of 10,000 sf footprint for new
construction on a new location and is therefore considered a major activity. The project
' subsequently requires the preparation of an EA in accordance with State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) guidelines. An EA has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Act and

' Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
' LAW Project 30100-0-0025
was submitted to the North Carolina State Clearinghouse (SCH) for review. The EA was
' published in the SCH on June 2, 2000 (SCH # OOE45000642).
1 Closing
' Your prompt decision in this matter and corresponding processing of these permits and the
request for jurisdictional determination will be greatly appreciated. Seven copies of this permit
' application have been forwarded to Mr. John Dorney at DWQ for DWQ's written concurrence.
Please do not hesitate to call Mike Iagnocco at [phone] ext. 5543, if you have any
questions.
1 Sincerely,
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1
Michael A. Iagnocco Allen W. Conger, P.W.S.
Senior Environmental Scientist Principal
By -? WITH PERMISSION Environmental Scien ist
By-- WITH PERMISSION
Enclosures: Attachment A - Joint Form - Nationwide Permit No. 39
Attachment B - Joint Form - Nationwide Permit No. 14
' Attachment C - Agent Certification of Authorization Form
Attachment D - Jurisdictional Determination Package
Attachment E - SHPO Correspondence
' Attachment F - NCNHP Correspondence
Attachment G - Original Site Plan
Attachment H - Photographs of Alexander County Site
' Attachment I - Stormwater Management Plan
' cc: Mr. John Dorney, DWQ
Mr. Jim Gates, NCDOC
Mr. David Welling, AIA, LAA
' Mr. Chuck Heiser, HUA

1 10

1 DEM ID:
CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #): 39
' PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
' FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
' 2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE N.C. DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
' SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD
OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN (7) COPIES
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES
SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
' 1. OWNERS NAME: North Carolina Department of Correction
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 4216 MSC - 2020 Yonkers Road
' SUBDIVISION NAME: Central Engineering Division
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27699-4216
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): The project site is located in Anson County, North Carolina,
approximately 0.75 mile south of Prison Camp Road (SR 1121) and U.S. Hwy. 74 intersection.
' POC: Mr. James E. Gates - Proiect Manager
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): N/A (WORK): [phone]
' 4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100, Charlotte, NC 28208
r POC: Mr. Michael A. Iagnocco, Senior Environmental Scientist
4a. TELEPHONE NUMBER (WORK): [phone] Ext. 5543 (FAX): [phone]
1

' S. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE): (See Attachment D - Figure 1 )
COUNTY: Anson NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Polkton
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): The proposed
' site is located approximately two miles southeast of the city of Polkton and six miles west of
Wadesboro, approximately 0.75 mile south of the Prison Camp Road (SR 1121) and U.S. Hwy. 74
' intersection. The proposed facility will be located immediately adjacent to the existing Brown Creek
Medium Security State Prison facility.
' 6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Little Brown Creek
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES ? NO ® IF YES, EXPLAIN:
I 7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES ?NO
' 7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF
COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES ?NO ®IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS PERMIT
' AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401 CERTIFICATION):
' 8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES ? NO ® IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
' 9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: Approximately 80 acres
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
' Approximately 1.71 acres

' 10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 0.10 acre of wetland; 0.17 acre of unimportant stream channel
EXCAVATION.
' FLOODING: OTHER:
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.27 acre
' 1 Ob. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION:
' LENGTH BEFORE: N/A LINEAR FT. AFTER LINEAR FT.
' WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): N/A FT.
WIDTH AFTER: N/A FT.
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: N/A FT. AFTER: FT.
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
' OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: F] PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:?
' CHANNEL EXCAVATION: ? CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Filling of 242 linear feet of perennial/important stream channel for building pad
' H. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED
DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
' WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
' 12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8'/z" X 11" DRAWINGS ONLY):
The proposed 1,000-cell close security correctional facility includes plans for the construction of
a 1,000-cell close security building, encompassing approximately 414,000 square feet (sf);
approximately 1,647 linear feet (If) of asphalt paved access road; parking space encompassing
approximately 159,000 sf ; and a sewage pump station. The construction of the 1,000-cell close
security building and associated parking lot will result in unavoidable impacts to stream channel
' as well as to a wetland area (Attachment D - Figure 4). Backhoes, bulldozers, scraper pans plus
compaction equipment will be used for construction activities.

11
1
1
13
1
1
1
1
1
14
i
PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: The North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory
Commission, in coniunction with the Department of Correction's Research and Planning Office
has predicted the future ten-year prison population for North Carolina. Based on the predictions
of this commission there will be a shortage of prison beds by the year 2001, as the projected
prison population will exceed prison capacity. This bed shortage along with a trend toward more
serious offense classes of inmates provides the basis for this project. To alleviate anticipated
overcrowded conditions and to accommodate the future inmate population increase, the NCDOC
has proposed the construction of the Anson County correctional facility located adiacent to the
existing Brown Creek State Prison medium security facility. The proposed Anson County
Correctional Facility project would help to satisfy the NCDOC's need for additional inmate
space by providing a 1,000-cell facility that will accommodate 1,000 inmates.
STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN
WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS):
The subject site poses some development challenges including several drainage features that
dissect the site. Largely due to these site constraints, impacts to one unnamed stream (Stream C)
and one wetland (Wetland B) on the subject site are unavoidable for the construction of the
proposed building and associated parking lot. The original site plan for the proposed Anson
County Correctional Facility, included as Attachment G, featuring a north-south compound
orientation would have impacted all three existing stream channels on site and both wetland
areas The original plan would have resulted in total impacts to over 500 If of stream channel
and over one acre of wetlands. In an effort to minimize impacts to waters of the U.S., and as
recommended by LAW the NCDOC considered three alternative site plans. LAA and the design
team first revised the original plan by rotating the building 90 degrees with an east-west
compound orientation. This alternative resulted in stream channel impacts of approximately 550
If and wetland impacts of approximately 1.3 acres. Subsequent revisions to the parking lot
layout and driveway location reduced impacts of this second alternative to approximately 400 if
of perennial stream channel impact and 0.4 acre of wetland impact. The third alternative
maintained the design plan in its original north-south orientation but shifted the entire layout
north largely away from the existing wetland areas, and two of the site's three stream channels.

The site constraints were evaluated by the NCDOC, in cooperation with LAA and the design
team to determine which alternative would result in the least amount of environmental impact
while best achieving the project's purpose and need and providing a functionally safe and
efficient facility. The original site plan and first two alternatives were eliminated due to larger
amounts of impacts to wetlands and stream channel. The third alternative site plan eliminated
impacts to Stream B and lessened the original plan impacts to Wetland A, Wetland B, and
Stream A. The estimated impacts for the third alternative site plan are 0.27 acre of wetland,
including 0.17 acre of intermittent unimportant stream channel, and 242 If of perennial stream
for the proposed building and parking lot. This plan provides the least amount of environmental
impact and is, therefore, the recommended site plan for the project.
A no-action alternative was also considered for the project. As discussed earlier, the proposed
correctional facility is needed to adequately accommodate the proiected growth of North
Carolina's prison inmate population. As a result, the no-action alternative does not appear to be
feasible given the projected shortage of prison space.
Potential impacts to jurisdictional waters, including wetlands, associated with sedimentation and
erosion will be minimized through the implementation and maintenance of a State-approved
erosion and sedimentation control plan. The goal of this plan will be to minimize erosion and
retain sediments, to the maximum extent possible, within the construction area. In addition, a
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) is being developed and will follow Best Management
Practices (BMPs) established by the North Carolina Department of the Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR). Additional details on the SWMP are included in Attachment I. No
additional impacts to wetlands or stream channel will result from the SWMP.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)
AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES
SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR
LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE
PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: February 7, 2000 (ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
Letter forwarded by LAW, dated February 7, 2000, certified mail - return receipt confirmed.
No response as of August 7, 2000.

' 16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
' PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: February 7, 2000
Letter forwarded by LAW, dated February 7, 2000, certified mail - return receipt confirmed.
' SHPO response, dated February 24, 2000 (Attachment E). Archaeological Reconnaissance and
Survey Report, dated June 2000, has been submitted to the SHPO.
' 17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
' YES ® NO ? (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
' DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
' YES ® NO ?
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
' DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES ® NO ? (published in the State Clearinghouse on June 2, 2000
' SCH# OOE45000642)
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ACT.
' QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
' CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].

l

6

1
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED
' ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO
WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES AND
' PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26,29
AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY
MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET
OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
(Attachment D - Figure 4)
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED
BY PROJECT. (Attachment D - Photographs A through F)
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
' RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE. (Attachment D)
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED
(Attachment I)
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? The property is bound to the east by
Brown Creek Medium Security State Prison Facility and by undeveloped rural properties to the
north south and west.
' f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
Sewage from the Anson County Correctional Facility will be conveyed via an existing sanitary
sewer to the Anson County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.
' g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
(Attachment C)
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:

1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE
PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
I A. )
OWNER'S/AGENT'S NATURE BY?+?. ?VVITH PERMISSION
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18G.))
7
8
DATE

I DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):

F]

Li

J

14
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE N.C. DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD
OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN (7) COPIES
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES
SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
OWNERS NAME: North Carolina Department of Correction
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 4216 MSC - 2020 Yonkers Road
SUBDIVISION NAME: Central Engineering Division
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27699-4216
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): The project site is located in Anson County, North Carolina,
approximately 0.75 mile south of Prison Camp Road (SR 1121) and U.S. Hwy. 74 intersection.
POC: Mr. James E. Gates - Proiect Manager
TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): N/A (WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100, Charlotte, NC 28208
POC: Mr. Michael A. Iagnocco, Senior Environmental Scientist
4a. TELEPHONE NUMBER (WORK): [phone] Ext. 5543 (FAX): [phone]

i

LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE): (See Attachment D - Figure 1 )
COUNTY: Anson NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Polkton
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): The proposed
site is located approximately two miles southeast of the city of Polkton and six miles west of
Wadesboro approximately 0.75 mile south of the Prison Camp Road (SR 1121) and U.S. Hwy. 74
intersection. The proposed facility will be located immediately adjacent to the existing Brown Creek
Medium Security State Prison facility.
IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Little Brown Creek
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
7a.
IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES ? NO ® IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES ?NO

iJ

P-1
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF
COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES ?NO ®IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS PERMIT
AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401 CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES ? NO ® IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK: Note: This permit is being
submitted concurrently with NWP No. 39 which will cover impacts associated with construction of
the prison facility building and attendant features.
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: Approximately 80 acres
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
Approximately 1.71 acres
2

f

i

I
t

L

I Oa. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 0.02 acre of wetland; 0.01 acre of unimportant stream channel
EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: OTHER:
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.03 acre
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION:
LENGTH BEFORE: N/A LINEAR FT. AFTER LINEAR FT.
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): N/A FT.
WIDTH AFTER: N/A FT.
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: N/A FT. AFTER: FT.
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: El PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNELS
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: F CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING: R
OTHER: The installation of one 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culvert and one 36-inch RCP
culvert will result in impacts to 70 linear feet ofperennial/important stream channel..
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED
DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8'/z" X 11" DRAWINGS ONLY):
The proposed 1,000-cell close security correctional facility includes plans for the construction of
a 1,000-cell close security building, encompassing approximately 414,000 square feet (sfl;
approximately 1,647 linear feet 00 of asphalt paved access road; parking space encompassing
approximately 159,000 sf ; and a sewage pump station. The construction of the proposed
asphalt paved access road will result in unavoidable impacts to stream channel and minor
wetlands involvement. Backhoes, bulldozers, scraper pans plus compaction equipment will be
used for construction activities.
3
u
f
14.
PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: The North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory
Commission in conjunction with the Department of Correction's Research and Planning Office,
has predicted the future ten-year prison population for North Carolina. Based on the predictions
of this commission there will be a shortage of prison beds by the year 2001, as the proiected
prison population will exceed prison capacity. This bed shortage along with a trend toward more
serious offense classes of inmates provides the basis for this project. To alleviate anticipated
overcrowded conditions and to accommodate the future inmate population increase, the NCDOC
has proposed the construction of the Anson County correctional facility located adjacent to the
existing Brown Creek State Prison medium security facility. The proposed Anson County
Correctional Facility project would help to satisfy the NCDOC's need for additional inmate
space by providing a 1,000-cell facility that will accommodate 1,000 inmates. The proposed
road and associated stream channel crossing provides access to the proposed correctional facility.
STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN
WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS):
The proposed fill in wetlands necessary to complete the road will result in impacts to 0.02 acre of
Wetland A. These impacts will result from the proposed installation of one 18-inch reinforced
concrete pipe (RCP) and one 36-inch RCP culvert. The access road has been designed to maintain
a low vertical profile to minimize associated fill slopes and subsequent wetland impacts. In
addition the road was aligned to avoid as much of the wetland as possible, particularly the central
ortion of the wetland area. Several different alternatives were discussed for the entrance road
alignment. These options included shifting the road crossing upstream to cross Stream A at an
intermittent/unimportant section shifting the road crossing downstream, and shifting the entire
road alignment to the north (closer to the existing Brown Creek Medium Security Facility).
Shifting the road crossing upstream and the alignment to the north would have resulted in large
cuts into an earthen berm that separates the existing Brown Creek facility from the proposed
entrance road. Furthermore the close proximity of the entrance road to the existing perimeter
road of the Brown Creek facility would have caused operational conflicts and a public safety
issue. Shifting the road crossing downstream would result in more wetland impacts (Wetland A)
and/or additional stream channel impacts to more significant downstream stream channel
segments. The proposed fill in jurisdictional areas is unavoidable and is required for construction
of the proposed access road.

1

Potential impacts to jurisdictional waters, including wetlands, associated with sedimentation and
erosion will be minimized through the implementation and maintenance of a State-approved
erosion and sedimentation control plan. The goal of this plan will be to minimize erosion and retain
sediments, to the maximum extent possible, within the construction area. In addition, a Stormwater
Management Plan (SWMP) is being developed and will follow Best Management Practices
(BMPs) established by the North Carolina Department of the Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR). Additional details on the SWMP are included in Attachment I. No additional impacts
to wetlands or stream channel will result from the SWMP.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)
AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES
SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR
LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE
PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: February 7, 2000 (ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
Letter forwarded by LAW, dated February 7, 2000, certified mail - return receipt confirmed.
No response as of August 7, 2000
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: February 7, 2000
Letter forwarded by LAW, dated February 7, 2000, certified mail - return receipt confirmed.
SHPO response, dated February 24, 2000 (Attachment E). Archaeological Reconnaissance and
Survey Report, dated June 2000, has been submitted to the SHPO.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES ® NO ? (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES 0 NO ?

i
i
? a
IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES ® NO ? (published in the State Clearinghouse on June 2, 2000
SCH# OOE45000642)
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED
ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO
WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES AND
PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29
AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY
MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET
OR I INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
(Attachment D - Figure 4)
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED
BY PROJECT. (Attachment D - Photographs A through F)
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE. (Attachment D)
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
(Attachment I)
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? The property is bound to the east by
Brown Creek Medium Security State Prison Facility and by undeveloped properties to the north,
south, and west.
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
Included in Attachment C
6

' NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
I ) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE
PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
OWNER' S/AGENT'S NATURE By S -? M PERMISSION AF T E
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18G.))

11

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
Z , /11119yn /? I?
I fJyxe ,x representing the North Carolina Department of
Correction, hereby certify that I have authorized Michael A. Iagnocco of LAW Engineering and
' Environmental Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing,
issuance, and acceptance of this permit and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
' Applicant's signature Agent's signa r
-? 9140-0
Date Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

t

1

I
s
EXPLANATION
soon tooo 0 2000
® APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
APPRO)OHA1E SCALE IN FEET
REF: U.S.G.S. 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF RUSSELLVILLE. N.C. QUADRANGLE, DATED 1971.
LARD
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DA
DATE
SITE LOCATION
1000 CELL CLOSE SECURITY PROTOTYPICAL FACILITY
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JOB NO. 30100-0-0025 FIGURE 1

LJ
1

EXPLANATION
® APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY
M I REF; SOIL SURVEY FIELD SHEET, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, SH
g
LAW
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
B EPARR DATE CHEKEQ_ DATE
2000 1000 0 2000
APPROMMATE SCALE IN PEET
C-4 AND C-5.
SOIL SURVEY
1000 CELL CLOSE SECURITY PROTOTYPICAL FACILITY
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JOB NO. 30100-0-0025 FIGURE 2
= = = = = m = r
G:\
m
m
A
A
z
r7
Fn
T.
10140 EN%ARONMENTAL\
-0

l/1 A 2

1
W .°
CM0

?fjl' N
?n
0
a
0
\ ?? /? // i i q l ! ?(i :;1? , 1.- 1 \` t+ ht? ++ t .fir+,
'z A
o r\
r z
1 ?I? D
? n ? 1 4
a r
} ( I ?' a
O
24
li. t l I m 1 i-4 \ \
}\- '1
' j r
\:'1 M,
Ft " \ \
79
CD M _...?
z
z ,,.s

Av -•

O

C-4
O X
zr-

O
O
> m

o
^? O? r?
Zo CAI
O
o - nm z
oN o*
v1 zn y>

Z?Co
ro w Z0
0-
0
"
C) 30
0.?

1 I? >
C,
D? ?.'C
z
, 30

> v
m
O
C-
m
A
r
N
z
22
09
0
?z
y? A
A
?z
zA
14
A
S
m
w
S\20('0\0025\AN.i?)N\ritiTLAN:'13.:rg 04/11/0(
????? Nr?u?y8 3lllll
s?
0 m
O m °
z
z > • °
t
MHA•' AN

C)
?3QYIb? nxv
Z?
!( \ ?. r0 ......... .

Noi
j
to I
I
_? O C
- C
'> C =i
D m
0 0
o .
_1
o ;o z
?
o 'D
O 1 O x
z -fj O z
l+l r p
o z =j O 0
0:>:!
?
z C > N
N Z
O
;o
m m
to O O
'1
0 (A
S
y? Z Z Q m
25 'i m C
4 in
r

N
O
C-
m
0
N
1
0 X
D Q Z
C f7 Z
3
N CO
m 0
0 o
m D z
0 n
r m
.. m
7
C%

cl
1
1
1 ? ? o • e
1 ;
O
m
0
r_
N '
i
ti\ ? 1
. ov
:t 1!
,? t\ 14l
+
M
V.I tt 1?
r ` ° a
t
mcWO
rLO _-+
vcn?r+,
20zLo
o ?z n
n
-I
m
r?* D 220
• WOm->?
c m
2m0?.
m z0
Cr. C ?
° C
??mcn
OgnZ
;oz M°
oWr?
nOo
mz
zv v
! z?rn
•?? mWoT
f cn Z
mrn
IZ
rnC?
zm
X11. 1• ??°
141.1 C ?a,z
o )r'n
Zpm
M
i v
M
w w? wi w w w w w r r rr r r rr it ur r? fir

v
Nmrn
V 711

?
p
z o
gym;
at.Zm
-4 ;u
?oz-,
; m
mDOs
o 31
ZZA

?gjG i O O ? ? N;N
). ~I+1 ?. 0 O I N
ma ? OCZ
?
? ': O O O I `
'y p
C??

i m
j ?i

-+ -4
,
I
0 17 zz t-.

t?
?: \,? ?
o p
I
Eruoime

o o

yQT+ O
A
I y
D

l
!
z
? ;o
m
'
Z

o z,
m
M 9C
-
'
T Z y?

?
y
?. CD
?
?
I D Z

ill
'll
P"?I

rq w/.a/w Asa.
.............. ....
II
II I
li
i
I
i
Q 1000 CELL CLOSE SECURITY PROTOTYP E

%
f a ' :; ANSON COUNTY BBS, UPCHURCH A ASSOCIATES, P.
i
r 0&%VAMM mw?
SOVIHM MM M - HYRU OMM x
rn APPROXIMATE WATERS OR THE KLL "K MUS. IX - PMECK NC
a U.S. AND WETLANDS BOUNDRY MAP 290 S.w..rood St" . S"b" hnw, path cw"" 26m?
haw: (6i0) 662-3616 - rw,, (610) 662-73 2

I

Ir-?
LJI

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Page 1 of 2
Project/Site: I,cDO Ce-u- c-c-cSF 5??? Y Y Date: -2 16 aO
Applicant/Owner: of t d/L o_-z'77 i J County: A S o?1
Investigator: 64z?b6 t4 r"1 State: Noe-N LAtoL(44-
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes --,No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes 'No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes moo` Plot ID: - q w
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. -S T 9.
2. 1 "ax; A u s o cv<?bv?Jaui [K $ Ff}C(?1 10.
3. 4,Asivv,?, Simy1 SC rj F/-1 L 11.
4. Li m6av -Z-4 uCi?(4Li S -rAC-f 12.
5.I??eF?la {??q?? "-1 S 1~AGin1 13.
6. Cavex ;?P. H - 14.
7. 15.
6. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC SzS _ UU'd
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: N )ro&717 c Ch e F,,- r ova i ?pM?rtaM+ ,
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
-Aerial Photographs X Inundated
-Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
'Y, No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
Y Drift Lines
X Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
-Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: D (in.)
Remarks: We?(ant ?)y?v-61e 15 fes r^4-

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Pane 7 of 7
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): AY00AAJ
GZAIFtLy SA??y 111AM 1 r
Drainage Class: I£ f ? ?'A ?' J
Taxonomy (Subgroup):"_XE tiy C_ T'f --C. BAR- - n V L-IS Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Abundancg/Co trams Structure, etc,
i-r?Any ProM?nCn?
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol 't Concretions
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
dvI'C. so. I
??) 1- ?A4-0'5 avQ
WFTI ONII nI=TFRMINOTInN
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? (jj? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks:
rer"t5e"' ts oi J?V ; s? ?C_+1aVNA,l c.AJ(+IaLA) area.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Paae 1 of 2
oDZ> f.-zL CA-GS1-- f2ra a .3.- ??2L_=-Y
Project/Site: I /00
Date: `V /6
_
Applicant/Owner: N, C, OC-P7, or oFir< >?-? 1
County: 4,4sofV
Investigator: let r cr ?!• z „,,,,,,? State: NoRn? c?,eoLfn/,4
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes A o? Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes `? Plot ID: a - A I -?
VCf=MrATIf%K1
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acey ?u brKr» 7 S SAC 9. Onice?i ?a+ooniec? H r9 C_
2. s0wereus ohe/los T 1C/?'
10. fk
?itinar?i?. ?D o?ay jy11
3.1 'aaidem6av 6VA(r'I luG T SAC 11.
4.L?ri/?¢NIrOn fk?iPi><C?? J' FJC'k 12.
5. ?ti Ks ?aG ?? 'T ??C 13.
6. lT?nipe vNS vivuiMiahti T S i9C? 14.
7. Gitiu.s Jinfh5f- S ayC 15.
8. nti5 umdt?/a?a 5 - 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: ?yd?orkjlit, vfcc}v'_iav' ^1S ?oJv`?vtovt-?
Llvr%of%i f%f^-V
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
-Other
No Recorded Data Available -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_Water Marks
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: t 4i (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: n1 16 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: N f?4 (in.)
Remarks: 0 O inr?ico?D?S a{ v?CI(Utna ?v`?vuloGl? ?iVP 10?tse4
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
enu c I-\ A 7 IA A
Paoe 2 of 2
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ZYA VDDA
.'J,(:?LW s.NR+
LOAM Drainage Class: '.jy L L
Taxonomy (Subgroup): I F{C-RMZL T?I-1-?aC WA(PLUw(_'TS Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Abunda cg/Contrast Structure, etc.

- /2 8
5 4 n+.cn? /'rem;v?cn?
/a yc ?`?-- 44e San lea,,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
-Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Ny??; c So,'/ %gei?A?dV; avP ncf ??PSCw77'
WCTI AMn n9ZTFRMINATION
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y? %s, No Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes to
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (Sto,
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks: "bU+?' v (a00 AV'r
Po'?n? JrP?csc..fi?' a r\av.- J?nr?sJ i c"?i'u??L P

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Paae 1 of 2
Project/Site: J, oco -Coll C In, ' Date: 2 ? 1(0 .1 06
J
Applicant/Owner: N.C. D i P T ori Loa- c G i. 11 a Q
County: A-J-5 4
Investigator: 61rE (P6 A14 1&?'ANnl State: N 027„ c 4-,Q oL JoJX
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ?es._--No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YesJ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ?_.NsLJ Plot ID: DP - T C9!5
t, w L I ue n (1 r+ ?
1k1CrSCTATIr1A1
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.Ty'p4inKS psAAA41ymVeos 'E A C? 9. 3uneus 4Fusks N ?QC_W }
2. G(1KI u?I G y?py?iI1 ?J I1/? S r4C 10.
3.'?cslik y ia?a j OgL 11.
4. pce? ev6z6k ?, 5 FA C' 12.
5. U?UtJCVS V)inVrn T FAr- 13.
6. ?ubvs av???4S 5 F,qC 14.
7. Cave x sc. H - 15.
8.Yhv,:a SLrAnJiVn N FACUJ} 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(00
8 ro
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: H I?V?PI1 is Liege4-,4io6A is C)oj*,
UVr10rl1 r1r1v
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
-Aerial Photographs X Inundated
-Other n Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
Drift Lines
X Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water. - 2 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: IN 1 i4 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks: wQ? I a? a ?A 6,1 0\ o', ?, '1^ 1 c ?Fo?S J F P V Q. S e r?t
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
pane 2 of 2
Map Unit Name / / A?
(Series and Phase): /off ?
(?kA14CLLY A?W LpAM 1 \
Drainage Class:-w
Taxonomy (Subgroup): TY 'PSG I(ARI-L 17U LI S Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) t Structure. etc.
AbundancelContras

13 J
rriµny p?OM ih.h/
17 'YA- 4 4, -?O C 6L AM 64

Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon -Concretions
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-
gGleyed or Low-Chroma C olors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ?I J?; so;l ?n?`ICa??pv5 ?YFSen+
UVCTI AAIn nCYPOU AIATInki
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? e3? No Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? (Y?j) No
Wetland Hydrology Present? (yj4,, No \
Hydric Soils Present? es No
Remarks: I,,+ r o gyn4 YPrveSeA47 o. ,?v13 ? ; 4 i Ov1?{ w&Io r?)

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Page 1 of 2
Project/Site:I, ooQ C5i?,L` GwSE 'Sf ? y f-7A_JL-sry Date: Z11("100
Applicant/Owner: N C_ D 1-Pr . of c o le rc. E, C.TI On/ County: A,,i s u j
Investigator: AN-MWA,4^J State: oo2 rH C A"L,,J A
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (C&s No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ®o Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes (iw? Plot ID: Cq5 u
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Tin us. y` 'T 5 FA 01 9. ?o-cc?avis IIAI?M;{oLw S F&c_
2. L',?i oc t.,r, vin 4 T-A C ( k 10.
LiQUiJaMb?V Sk4YKttilur?
3. T 5 1"ACt 11.
r
4.JNAj$Q/l?5 ?Ifgl/11AN0. S T-AL'i/_ 12.
5.?tgycus cklbo. T 'FA CR 13.
6. Q U r j cVkS \r U1o v-a- T FA C. Iti 14.
7. bog,4vvr^ s nev,5e S. TFA(f 15.
8.gu6as o-v?,u?k5 5 q c 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
l
di
FA 4 ? S?
(exc
u
ng
C-).
Remarks: 14 ?a?aP?yfi? Vec?e?o?ion IS d0??na??};
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
-Other -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
XNo Recorded Data Available _Water Marks
Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
-Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: rJ (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N ( A (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: _(in.)
Remarks: N6 inJicaia?s ?? ?n?avoloc?i? avt ertseAi
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
To.t _ r- ' o_- ?r
Paae 2 of 2

Map Unit Name M? a4
o
?;`
L
5 rU
? w
7

(Series and Phase): Y/1(? ye I
y
c,
Aa
n?
? 1
1
),4
Drainage Class: I
Taxonomy (Subgroup) t(
1 OA
ArC 1Y1 44-PLU7
U L'1 S Field Observ
ations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriution:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
D- Z A 5 11,wi 2 4 inn e 511) 4
Mdv%j prvmineht
z - i2 B z,s Y s/4
L?A4L4? I SAM
?,s vR S Is
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi
Histic Epipedon -Concretions
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 14 ? r) v i G so i t I ?I d I r- &+-a 5 AV a n a fi ? de' S C ?'? ,
JcTI A?IfI ?1cT C O\ll I AI A TI AM
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? (jjgs, No Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes (1?p
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (6 Ld)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes lia
Remarks: bof#o foiA+ re Pitse^4s a ??or1- ?••?i56i'.4ionGJ U?la"3 tire"

?I

I

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Page 1 of 2
Project/Site: 1 -Ooo GE?? c ose SEw v ??Q??'T`I Date: ?I 1,00
Applicant/Owner: 0 _ OF- County: ArQsotJ
Investigator: ?j2c (o Cs k r^? N? State: -o z -r>I r A R &L I N k
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es; No Community ID:
-
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes NQ- Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes (o') Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ivi vns }tic?.. FA C_ 9.
2. ?uiv?S ??cu.?US 5 FA C-_
3.__J?aGC11av i S W;ml di' s SA C 11.

cus
4. AAt?ron,)4n v tcin
H )-qC
12.
5. .Sri) b K Jo) JJ,?? ? rA C 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
p
(excluding FAC-). 5
Remarks: 4?)"f?'lil, JQgc ?a-?'luvl i5 ?ovti')v\?n"?.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
Other -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-
4No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
-local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: r) I e (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: L _(In.)
Remarks: WQ4IAV,( )Ay?v01o1? ??? cw`?wc> avt v`o? eveser+
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
'\ D G A -'I n
Pane 2 of 2
JVILJ YJI v n i
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): AY,5WO (?, ,IIFU,y SAN??? ^'1

_??
Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): I N1?? . L ITC ?A? P? t' ? Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moistl Abundance./Contrast Structure. etc.
Mar d jSF?rtc?
0 - 1 Z ?DYQ 5?
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon -Concretions
-High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfldic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions -Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: _ 0 r ? i n? l c o ill r c? ^v e V?o+ ?'t-e S e A
.r?. ALIM MC!'r u1?lAT1llAl
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? cYjs' No Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Colo
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Remarks: fe e re sev,,+s 0- V?o In - j µY s is+i D?Aa? LAP I uhd aVQO,-

n

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Paqe 1 of 2
o o a ?L? ? s? wiz r? 4c:s<s -rY
Project/Site: I Date: z z i a
,
Applicant/Owner: ?1c 7 OF cv44".--i1one County: A4co,4
Investigator: (slie6P(. 4N7r->'r14,VV State: N02TA C-AcaLWA
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes M Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes fi? Plot ID: D?6 6, 67W
VFrFTATInN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
niw_ 5 JL L 9.
2. 1a)1 ?uli? JAL 10.
3. SCiYeuoev;AuS I? ?C3L 11.
4.-D (A v1 CkA 5 ef LA SLA , I? f`A CVJ+ 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks: ?? ?J?o?h? -}ic JeS cTutlov? ?5 K+
HYf]Rnl ncY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators
-Aerial Photographs >e Inundated
-Other ?C Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
-Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
7FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
AVM Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water In Pit: t4 1A (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: U (In.)
Remarks: We4lauk) h?dvology ?n31 cu?aV5 a, v e rrQSeo+
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
A '7 c? ..i
Pans ? of 2
Map Unit Name n^
Z
G
A
I
A
t
L
A
A
,
YOIDAU
I
(Series and Phase): VEl
V AN
t
'Q
, Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): +?cZ.y
_7
IY??L 13 r5\ -P_C>?I-CS
2t
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc,
_-_ 1 D Yfz 3/1 NOr16 L ?Qy (y
4 qro.Je1 'W bed"ock
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol - Concretions
Histic Epipedon - High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfldic Odor - Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_Aquic Moisture Regime - Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hydric Solis List
>_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
-?y?ri c Sei Ir1d j c? ?u?5 aY? f+QSe
WETLAND DETEHMINATIUN
(Circle) (Circle)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes, No Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? i? No
Hydric Soils Present? No
Remarks: ?????D1lh+ ?QPYfS2r1?? Q, JLkvIs31c'ii -vta. I UJ?? 1?CInJ GtV('G?

INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATIO N FORM
'
ACTION M Wv2T71 I- Aoo?t-'NA

NAME)
APPLICANT NAME) [J? • O U'(( F d' Uhl DATE
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (Le, culvert, relocation, etc.)

WATERBODY/RIVER BA HN `(I
) (,O• A U Ce-!K n
COUNTY/CITY A ?? ?1'? (0 N Nom.,
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS CIe R v Gtr .500164
4

P SP NP
'1A

Observation r ? wv•v.
Comments or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crimaceans Present
Be ethic Macro Invertbrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others) deems aln? Jocc govt }sucks
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
RiffleiPool Structure
Stable Streambanks
e eFr?Q b? ? ks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Riparian Canopy Present(SP =/h 50% closure)
Undercut Banks/Instrearn Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel II 11
Q.IJfV'rG Q ?i ? tl?aTt'V I VI Q 1? Z' W?OC'
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June thru Sept.)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation iniadjacent to channel

X
Lla?? L wNicYS
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y N (ASgLC-
' Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y/(i) Approx. Drainage Area: 20 otc v*PS
!alnanal!llanmanllaiilllallllnlluuluumiulnlalJnnlnnuinnalanallulitnnllnnml?lnlnnnllnrnlalliulnllalnlitnnnllllnal?lunlllnmllnlalmnluiu!!llllllln!!!mn!
' Determination:
Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR Initials
X Intermittent Channel (proceed) R"14 Unimportant Channel: 53o LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (nojd)
1 '
Evaluator
s Signature:
(if other thV C.O.E. project manager)
lllllllllllllllllllJlllllllllll/lllllllll!lllll!l!lllllll!lllll/!lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll/lllllllllllllllllll!llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!lllllllllll/llllllllllllllllllllllll!
Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present

F1
fl

D

J

I ?CTJ?
?r?rt
r
INTERMIT'T'ENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICANT NAME i?)-`P T, ?r=? Lat2 ?z7 ??

DATE F96. 21 Zcw-
I
' PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (Le, culvert, relocation, etc.)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN _EyEow tJ C_ t?"lC COUNTY/CfrY A N Soo c ou ? r' ,
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Cjea y a\n d Su?Nn
S F1 2 ? E7 $
I A N
P SP NP Observation Comments or -Description
X Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present (
is
Benthic Macro Invertbrates
X Amphibians Present/Breeding
)C Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
' la th o? QI a '.s msQ?i?
X Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
rat.(- 00 V1 and a¢v H
x Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) I ^
RiftleiPool Structure
Stable Strearnbanks
e F-e- ? ? ba u k 5
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
h i c o I u+t oA?St 5a ti Svbslra ??
Riparian Canopy Present (SP -/h 50% closure)

?.uara Sul tv w
v e_L(_V5_ LA i a
4 L
X Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure

?
Flow In Channel ??yy

Averp e ?hvre (?D'>' CtiaNv1P? r„idTli
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue)
S
dGwrlS?rcPN-, o FA2
of
/A I Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June thru Sept.)
N A SeepsiGroundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.)
X Adjacent Floodplain Present
X Wrack Material or Drift Lines
X Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel

I
ASS L L oL-' PrS
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y Y A6,vc, as ,fin„ U5ACE
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map?(I)N Approx. Drainage Area: 3 d amt cS
////////////////lllllllllllllllllll?lll/ll1/11111?111111?111??11111?111I1/111111111111111111111rN11111111111111111111//llllllll!llllllllllllllllllllllll111111/l1/IlI111111111lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Determination: +^ee?s Awq 's deb; ?i?i?? o a
pe1'e61 Si0'CGM
X Perennial Channel (stop) 8 Important Channel: 6 (0 LF PROJECT NIGR Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other th .E. project manager)

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll/llllllllllllllllllll!lll/lllllll/lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!llllll!lllllllllllllll!lllllllllll!llllllllll!llllllll!l!lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll/lllllllll/1111/lll
' ?--Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present

F

F

1
J
H

tt?tt
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
N0P-" Cktrot_N4
ACTION 1D APPLICANT NAME ??t - G` CO C Y

DATE Z1, Z-CO C
'PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (Le, culvert, mlocation, etc.)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN 1" ALO1 CeIL COUNTY/CITY
'RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Cl ed 401 u n ?
. sFPr 3 G X73
Up of "aek9e -.SJ4 era.rn. C)
Observation Comments or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present r 1 - E
V l
Benthic Macro invcnbmtes
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
ve e+(,4 c? ba,nki w;N h r0 h ¢ic
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) u t I t +; o v.
JDav, w J h ioe ?voalt A+ 6111
Riparian Canopy Present (SP -/h 50% closure)
Undercut BanksRnstmam Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel
aUOrn L
? fhrQP 007- G/1Nnnt??rNidf'.
Wetlands Adjacent TWContig. With Channel (Discontinue) 5/, GI? b ra i ?e? we 1 IA^a % dpwns?vrofi
Persistent Pools/Satumted Bottom
(June thru Sept.)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation inladjacent to channel
?vncus
r{{?SA;? `_?,? us Per,h?
important Lo uomesttc waterbuppiy:
Y N
C I ass C wa•+e ,5
?ba?e 1?n..lw?-?e?c t s {ev WSA
' Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y / iY Approx. Drainage Area: 4.0 acres
uuanl!lanllllnllullniu/lllnllalllluuluaulunulmaunllnnln!!lllnunlluullnnulWinolnlmm?lnllllullllllllllalitanal!!lullllunllulisllnul/lilunlalllailuuallllunnll
' ',K meets bU40,3 ?Q ;nIfiovt a parlnn; w1
Determination: s(reaM chN??e?.
Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Perennial Channel (gyp)
11
Intermittent Channel (Proceed) X Unimportant Channel: qv LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of importanr/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no id)
Evaluator's Signature: "l Z------
' (if other th .O.E. project manager)
1/llllllllllllll/llllllllllllllll/l/l/l/llllllllllll/l/llll/lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!llllllllllll!llllllllllll llll//lllllllllllll!ll1/llll lllllllllll!/lllllllllll!llllllllll/ll/llllllllll/l/lll/l/
P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present

u

L

1?"III
Ir'?rl

INTERMITTENT CHANNEL ??
' EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICA14TNAME Molt714 C44o111A DEf ,or- COLIZLT -J DATE'yb 2"Z.02-0 7
' PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e, culvert, rclocation, etc.)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN : J y v w rl L J e e k couNTY/cmr A,,\,, o ?? L o ..i+t,
' RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS C?@cD.? ?v? Sv nom.,
sFA 4 6' A 92-
C)
sr1?E4 w? P SP NP

Observation Comments or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present V i Sh 1(E
Benthic Macro Invertbrates
Amphibians Present/Bmeding
aakrf
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
av?c?'?-n v? S
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others) dQQ?
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
RiftleiPool Structure I lN?a
Stable Streambanks I f/P e ??, f t, d bo- y H 5
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock coarse sand)
u vs e a w Avg c-6661-
6s1`J
Riparian Canopy Present (SP -/h 50% closure)
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel
age, a a -?'lnrec ?ao+. Gb?a?n e
? w i w1
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue) ?OWV) $fv eatM av t +?fath !uM SF?
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June thru Sept.)
SeepsiGroundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation iniadjacent to channel
CIAS( C coo-+%rS
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y/N ?hbyo hcadwp+-i As ec.
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y I Approx. Drainage Area: 74oLci
lanlannulalnlnlunllln!llnllnlnllluluuulnulllnltrail!!/!1lllllnnn!llnuullllllnl!!lnlln!lunll!llHall/lnl!!l1llln!!1/l1l11!!lullnlnllllllllll/lllnllllun!llllllullaln!!1/n!l!l!!l
Mteii 'bwd's d tn'?+1ovt of partutn a?
Determination:
)C Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: 7S47 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (nojd) (attach map indicating location of impormnt/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature: P
(if other C.O.E. project manager)
llllllllllll/ll1/lllllllll!lllllll!llllllllllllllllllllllllllll/lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!lll!l!!llllllll!lllllllll/llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!lllllllll!llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll/lllll
P--Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present

C?

rt??r
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICANT NAME NO&T74 CARo-tN A Deer, ar coetcLTiowl DATE '9 b, 221 OOV
' PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (Le., culvert, relocation, etc)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN ?oLo,,r t LoZ-t:k COUNTY/CITY ANsonn C, oHniZLI

RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS L4 t:"`4- A "D SUN N
s?S?g
_ T'V F o.?.t tz 1
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
x Fish/Shellfish/Cntstacmu Present
L ? ?iS
X Benthic Macro Invertbrates
X Amphibians Present/Breeding
X Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality functionj
?i law QN Ti V.-S
X Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Q J Si
X Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
J< RiftletPool Structure
X I Stable Streambanks I U Q n+ P J
Channel Substrate
(i.e. ;ravel, cobble, rock coarse sand) \
a 5 w awl C bb P
Riparian Canopy Present (SP -1> 50% closure)
Undercut Banks/Instmam Habitat Structure
x Flow In Channel 1
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue) J
'ncPn'{ wel?avJ?S

N Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June thru Sept)

NIA SeepsiGroundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
X Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
Llass C ?,.-ie•s
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y/&) 1\6 0,,e \r\ C, i?+s ats p¢? L(5A--(-
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? S)/ N Approx. Drainage Area: /pQ acves
rl?rlJllllllll111lrJJllllllrlJJllll1111N11111111111???111/???I?JJ??IIIIIl1/lNllllll11r1111NlrJJJIIIJIIIrIIJIrIJrJl1/IIJJJIIlIIJrrllJlrlllllrJ?lllllllllJJIIJIIIrJIIr!!1/l1/llllllllllllll111llll?llJllllll?llll??l1/lll?lll
Determination: !? w?K¢ ? s Dt.JQ 's d v,F; ?,; ?ioy aF 7oe renn?'.?/
Perennial Channel (stop) 8 Important Channel: Soo LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature: k.4,&- 4;V??
(if other than . project manager)
111111/lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!lllll!ll!lllllllllllllllllllllllllllNlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll/l1/lllllllllllll/lllllllllllllllllll/lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!l/I
P--Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5FA I 0 E I _?-
SCDWQ Stream Classification Form _rNrEYLMg7FVT
v, ,t r C4AN0 t-L
oject Name: ?jt d l?Yl LI River Basin: [UU6n I?ee r`_ C- County: V)Y1.?01'1 Evaluator: C ),ce of A)-?an'
(by rc-O)Oru c F c +IDWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: (? G Latitude: -\f-)%b Signature: 41. ? 04
? ?q)wr) G'Pe ('-'
ate: Rc 1D . 2A 2_C?0 USGS QUAD: k Lk q'i I It , 0 C Longitude: ' rJ 3`?
ocation/Directions:
PLEASE NOTE: if evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified
tatural stream-this rating system should not be used*
rimpa Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Pre
I ) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
loodplain Present? 0 1 2 3
•) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 (1~? 2 3
('NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
'10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On To o Ma And/Or In Field Present? Yes=3 No=O
'PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: `I
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 60D, I 2 3
I PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: a
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 31 2 1 u
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 ?2y 1 no
' 3) Is Periyhvton Present? 0 L 22 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? ( 11 1 2 3
:?_
PRIMAR Y BIOLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS

Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? COD .5 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 (1 1 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: I
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong

1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
?y '
Present In Streambed? 5
1.5 ( 1J 0

2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? .5
0 .5 n 1 J 1.5 '

3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In 49 Above Skip This Step And N5 Belo,r')
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 C 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1.5 No=0

1

SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: (D
Weak

2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
,
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Presents 5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5

5) Are Macrobenthos Present? l 0) .5 1 1.5

6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? .5 1 1.5

7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 l •5D 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Most AC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE. If Total Absence OJAII Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*)
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= j ( (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)

n

LCDWQ Stream Classification Form 5FA z 6- 'i? I ?
1pE-aEe44iA-L r_0WCL'
roject Name: 6y-L)k Why C.f (let River Basin:yOd6 n - (-'Ce? County: f)Y\SC) I'1 Evaluator: C, ve(o An- cmar) ?n
Carvr c:hor)o I rc?c Ii+X,J
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: C\Ahle- Latitude: -- V-J%C) Signature:
bq)wn C'FeK - 676
late: T:?_-U, 21 , 2_ooo USGS QUAD:R r-IC- Longitude: --
Location/Direct ions:
PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified
tural stream--this rating system should not be used*
rimary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Is The USDA Texture in Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 1 1 2 3
re
) Is There An Active (Or Relic) ?
loodplain Present? ` 1 1 2 3
?9) is A Continuous Bed & Bank Presents 0 CT7 2 3
("NOTE': if Bed Be Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0')
'10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tnno Man And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 N0=0
'PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: _5
111. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 n, 2 3
'PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 ) 2 i
2 Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? no 2 1 0
' 3) Is Periphyton Present? l U) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
' PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 5

Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 C-D 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 (D 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS 3
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1 5
1 J .5
0

2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 5 0 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 5 1 1.5

4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 J 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #S Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 (J5' 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
\\
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1.5) No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 5
Weak
2) Are Amphibians Present? (0 5 1 1.5

3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 5 1 1.5

4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 5 l 1 / 1.5

5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 1 uJ 5 1 1.5

6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 1
5 1.5
5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0. l SJ 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mos C Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*)
SECONDA R Y BIOL 0 G Y INDICA TOR POINTS: 2
TQTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)=J_Qf Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)

LCDWQ Stream Classification Form ? 3 , hr
rojectName: ' )n C''C(? ?. River Basin: ?Vi(14'e ?e. County: A0a)o Evaluator: &RE(,` A??A.M
' CC?(((-(hpYYG l c raC.?t i j
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Ltd Latitude: -ki 80 Signature: 0
Ic
_ 13rU ?n Cy CC
tate:w_b. Z-1, 20M USGS QUAD: (ZuS?ellv?llr, tJG Longitude:-M3'4
Location/Directions:
PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified
?atural stream-this rating system should not be used'
rimary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Wea
Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain
Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Dodylain Present?
Is The Channel Braided?
Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Pre
N There A Bankfull Bench Prese
m9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? (0) 1 z J
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
'10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On To o Ma And/Or In Field Present? Yes=3 No=0
'PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS: 2-
,11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) is There A Groundwater ?,
Flow/Discharge Present? 60 J 1 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 0
Ill.l3iologv Absent Weak Moderate
1 1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? (33 2 l u
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 0
' 3) Is Periphyton Present? (0,) 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Presents no 1 2 3
PRIMA R Y BIOL 0 G Y INDICA TOR POINTS: _4

Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 1 .5 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 (.5 1 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: e r

II Hvdrolou Absent Weak Moderate Strong

1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter ,
Present In Streambed? 1.5? 1 .5 0

2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? t 0 J .5 1 1.5 '

3) Are Wrack Lines Presents co .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 l\ 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 O 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
H
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: LI , 5

Weak
St
2) Are Amphibians Present? l u 1 .5 1 1.5

3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 0) .5 1 1.5

4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 1 1
.5 ( 1.5

5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 ?
.5 (1? 1.5

6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? l
?
(U 1 .5 1.5

7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 ll? 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly 0131, Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*)
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondya)=1EL(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
1 7-

1

RCDWQ Stream Classification Form
I oject Name: bbU)n 0(6-_ River Basin: W V110 -P('C t?Ce, County: (Ay)spl') Evaluator:
COrffrC )ono) 1-rj( l?
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: L -r- Latitude: - WKJ Signature:
?Yu?? G'PeK
'ate: Z L, 2 MO USGS QUAD: R A LS ,?l ,b \y, p,J(-Longitude: ti N 3y
ocation/Directions:
PLEASE NOTE: if evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified
tural stream-this rating system should not be used*
tarimaLry Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Weak M
SCI +6 A 92-
PtR?NtJiA? Cf?ANNZ
Cwco o., A-n?CfYqx o o
J
Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 (C 2 3
i ) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
loodplain Present? 0 l 2 3
('NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score =0*)
'10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On To o Ma And/Or In Field Present? Yes=3 No=O
,PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 10
Absent W
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
I PRIMA R Y H YDR OL OG Y INDICA TOR POINTS: I
Abse
M
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 Q=2 '1 t v
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? c3? 2 ] 0
' 3) Is Periphyton Present? L 1J 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
' PRIMAR Y BIOLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS:

Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)

vilujumy
A. "vV111VE ,
Is There AHead Cut Present In Channel?

?u 01

•. 5u.`

aV 1" W

5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 (.5 ? 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 .5 in 1.5

SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS:' ( • S '
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strone

1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?

1.5

1
//??
G)

0 ,

2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 Ol 1.5 '
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)

5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1.5 '
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6 Are H dric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel Or In Headcut ? (ZzYes=I.S IVO=U '
SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: (0.5
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? 0_ .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1.5

3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 0 .5 1 1.5

4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 Q 5 J 1 1.5

5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5

6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 .5 11 I 1.5

7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*)
SECONDA R Y BIOL 0 G Y INDICA TOR POINTS.
TOTAL PINTS (Primary + Secondary)=(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points Tire Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)

n

ICDWQ Stream Classification Form
'cjectName-?WR ClPC'r- RiverBasin:y(d6v,x-('e t?eQ County: Rnnr1
Cdr rec ? r??c?l a CA(101
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: LMLatitude: N V-1 '?b
6vvwr1 Cree.K
Fte: -r- b- z2- 2co USGS QUAD: gUSgJI V'1IIT,NC- Longitude: -r\l3y
s SAS Ig
'}?t'YL'c?n?tJlRt C??NN?
Evaluator: CW90 hot tfy<x r V
Signature: J?? 00
Location/Direct ions:
LEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modlfted
I ural stream-this rating system should not be used'
rimaa Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
ho
Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? (O 1 1 2 3
i) Is There An Active (Or Relic) ?l
loodplain Present? 0 Cp 2 3
The
2
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 N
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
ii_ Avdrnlnav Absent Wes
) Is There A Groundwater
JPRIMAR Y HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
HU Rinlnav Absent
I ??
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? (j J 2 I 0
Y BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: (.D

Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line) '
1. Geomor holo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 .5 1 1.5 '
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 5 1 1 1.5
te A
h
I
di
3
D
T
ca
y
n
)
oes
opograp
Natural Drainage Way? 0 05 l 1.5

SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS: '
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
(-
0
Present In Streambed? 1.5 1 5

2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 5 l 7) 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 r5 1 1.5 '
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 1.5 ,
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: If Ditch Indicated In 49 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)

5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1.5
'
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6 Are H dric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel car to Heaacut "! res=t.j jvU-v
SECONDAR Y HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: (5 .15
III. Biolo Absent Weak Moderate Strong '
1) Are Fish Present? no .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? O 1 5 1 1.5

3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 0 5 1 1.5

4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 5 (71-1 1.5
'
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 5 1 G.
5")

6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0 5) 1 1.5

7 ) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 6 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*)
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: S. S
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= 21 ? (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)

I
1
LI

u

1

Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14
LAW Project No. 30100-0-0025
August 7, 2000
0
Photograph B. View of perennial/important section of Stream C.
Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14
' LAW Project No. 30100-0-0025

August 7, 2000
1 Photograph C. View of intermittent/unimportant section of Stream A upstream of proposed crossing.

P

Photograph D. View of 0.05-acre braided wetland area along unimportant section of Stream C.

fl

Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14
LAW Project No. 30100-0-0025
August 7, 2000
Photograph E. View of perennial/important section of Stream C, downstream of Photograph B.

Photograph F. View of unimportant segment of Stream C.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: 8/07/00
COUNTY Anson TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT(S) Approximately 80 acres
' PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 1,000-Cell Close Security Prototypical Facility
11 PROPERTY OWNER (name, address and phone) :
N.C. Department of Correction
4216 MSC - 2020Yonkers Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 - 4216
' Attn: James E. Gates, Proiect Manager (919) 716 - 3440
' NAME OF AGENT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
' Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Drive, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
Attn: Michael A. Iagnocco, Senior Environmental Scientist (704) 357 - 8600
I STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
(X) Development in planning stages (Type of development: Institutional )
( ) No specific development planned at present
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be
forwarded.
( X ) Accurate location map (from County map, USGS quad sheet, etc.)
( ) Survey plat of property in question
( ) Aerial photograph (from County Assessors office, or other source;
property boundaries shown on the photo would be most helpful)
' (X) Topographic survey
(X) NC DWQ Stream Classification Forms
' (X) Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms/Routine On-Site Wetland Determination Forms
(X) Preliminary SCS Soil Survey Sheet(s) (Anson County)
(X) Approximate Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary Map
Signature of Property O er or
' Authorized Agent
WMq PERMISSION

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Division of Archives and History
' Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
February 24, 2000
' Michael A. Iagnocco
LAW Engineering
' 2801 Yorkmont Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28208
Re: Initial Scoping Inquiry Proposed 1000 Cell Close Security Correctional Facility, Anson
County, Law Project No. 30100-0-0025, SCH No. 0-E4300-0355
' Dear Mr. Iagnocco:
Thank you for your letter of February 7, 2000, concerning the above project.
There are no known recorded archaeological sites within the project boundaries. However, the
' project area has never been systematically surveyed to determine the location or significance of
archaeological resources.
1 Our records indicate numerous archaeological sites are recorded in the region.
The area plotted on your map includes topographic settings with a potential for an archaeological
site that may be significant.
' We recommend that a comprehensive survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist to
identify the presence and significance of archaeological remains that may be damaged or
' destroyed by the proposed project. Potential effects on unknown resources should be assessed
prior to the initiation of construction activities.
' A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in conducting
contract work in North Carolina is available on our website at
http•//tw.arch.dcr.state.nc.us/consult.htm.
' We look forward to reviewing your Scope of Work for the requested archaeological survey.
Should you need assistance with development of the archaeological Scope of Work please do not
hesitate to contact our office. We suggest you urge the archaeological firm you hire to contact
our office prior to the survey to clarify our concerns about the survey.
Locstion Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
,ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St.. Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 2 7699-46 1 7 (919) 7334763 - 733-3653
ARCHAEOLOGY 421 N. Blount St.. Raleigh NC 4619 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 276994619 [phone] - 715-2671
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount St.. Raleigh NC 4613 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 2 7699-46 1 3 [phone] - 715-4301

page 2
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section
106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
'
comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-
4763.
Sincerely,
C ?
I li/ 4 ??
1 V,
i-N David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
' DB:scb

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CDENR February 17, 2000

JAMES 19. HUNT JR.
IVERNOR
Ms. Jennifer Pownall
LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
L HOLMAN
t 2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
RETARY
C Charlotte, NC 28208

I; PHILIP K.MCKNELLY SUBJECT: Rare Species, High Quality Natural Communities, Critical
DIRECTOR Wilderness Areas or Preserves, and Significant
Habitat
,
Natural Heritage Areas at the Proposed Security Facility
Project Sites in Alexander, Anson, and Scotland Counties,
North Carolina

Dear Ms. Pownall:
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) does not have a record of rare species,
high quality natural communities, critical habitat, wilderness areas or preserves, or
Significant Natural Heritage Areas (SNHAs) at or within a 1.0 mile radius of two of
' the proposed security facility project sites:

1 1. 1000 Cell Close Security Prototypical Facility, Alexander County, NC
2. Existing Prison Expansion, Anson County, NC
There are, however, the following rare species records for the 1000 Cell Close
Security Prototypical Facility in Scotland County, N.C.:
A. Coacbwhip snake (Masticophisflagellum), State Significantly Rare reptile (1979)
B. Southern hognose snake (Heterodon simus), Federal Species of Concern/State
Significantly Rare (PSC) reptile (1973 record)
l
i
S
2
S
. a
pec
tate
)
C. Santee chub-Coastal Plain population Cyprinella zanema pop
Concern fish (pre-1993 record)
S D. River frog (Rana heckscheri) State Special Concern amphibian (1980 record)
I have enclosed a list of rare species and natural communities known to exist in
If habitat for any of these exist at the sites,
d counties
tl
d S
.
an
co
Alexander, Anson, an
the species may be present there. An evaluation of the site would determine if there is
a need for a more definitive survey.
..

?. 1616 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1615
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]OS6
.. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 60% RECYCLED/10% PORT-CONSUMER PAPER

Jennifer Pownall
' February 17, 2000
Page 2
Please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below or call me at (919) 715-
8703 if you have any questions or need further information.
Sincerely,

' Susan Reece Giles, Information Specialist
NC Natural Heritage Program
Enclosure

r?
' NC NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM COUNTY STATUS LIST COVER SHEET
The county status list of the NC Natural Heritage Program is a listing of the elements of natural diversity (rare plant and animal
pecies, exemplary natural communities, and special animal habitats) known to occur in all North Carolina counties. The
Information on which this list is based comes from a variety of sources, including field surveys, museums, herbaria, scientific
literature, and personal communications. This list is dynamic, with new records continually being added and old records being
evised as new information is received. As a result, the enclosed list cannot be considered a definitive record of natural heritage
elements present in a given county and should not be used as a substitute for field surveys.
When this information is used in any document, we request that the date this list was compiled be given and that the NC Natural
'Heritage Program be credited.
STATE STATUS
(
CODE STATUS CODE STATUS
E Endangered SR Significantly Rare
T Threatened EX Extirpated
'
SC Special Concern D De-listed
C Candidate P_ Proposed (E, T, SC, EX or D)
Plant statuses are determined by the Plant Conservation Program (NC Department of Agriculture) and the Natural Heritage
Program (NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources). E, T, and SC species are protected by state law (Plant
Protection and Conservation Act, 1979). C and SR designations indicate rarity and the need for population monitoring and
conservation action. Note that some plants have a double status (e.g., E-SC, indicates that while the plant is endangered, it is
collected or sold under regulation). See the Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina for further
explanation of these statuses.
' Animal statuses that indicate state protection (E, T, and SC) are published in Endangered Wildlife of North Carolina, March 16,
1992, Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program (NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources). SR and EX statuses
are Natural Heritage Program designations. SR indicates rarity and the need for population monitoring and conservation action.
' See the Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina for further explanation of these statuses.
FEDERAL STATUS
' These statuses are designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Federally listed Endangered and Threatened species are
protected under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended through the 100th Congress. Unless otherwise
noted, definitions are taken from the Federal Register, Vol. 56, No. 225, November 21, 1991 (50 CFR Part 17).
' CODE STATUS DEFINITION
LE Endangered A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all of a significant portion of its range."
' LT Threatened A taxon "likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all of a
significant portion of its range."
C Candidate A taxon under consideration for which there is sufficient information to support listing. This category was
formerly designated as a Candidate 1 (Cl) species.
FSC Federal "Species of Concern" (also called "Species at Risk"). Formerly defined as a taxon under
consideration for which there is insufficient information to support listing; formerly designated as a
Candidate 2 (C2) species. Currently, the US Fish and Wildlife Service does not recognize this as an
official designation.
' T(S/A) Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance. The Endangered Species Act authorizes the treatment of a
species (subspecies or population segment) as threatened even though it is not otherwise listed as threatened
if: (a) The species so closely resembles in appearance a threatened species that enforcement personnel
would have substantial difficulty in differentiating between the listed and unlisted species; (b) the effect of
this substantial difficulty is an additional threat to a threatened species; and (c) such treatment of an unlisted
species will substantially facilitate the enforcement and further the policy of the Act. The American
Alligator has this designation due to similarity of appearance to other rare crocodilians. The Bog Turtle
(southern population) has this designation due to similarity of appearance to Bog Turtles in the threatened
northern population.
' PD Species has been proposed for de-listing.

STATE FED. STATE
GLOBAL
' SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS STATUS RANK RANK
Anson-Current
Vertebrate Animal
Acipenser brevirostrum Shortnose Sturgeon E LE S1 G3
Carpiodes velifer Highfin Carpsucker SC - S2 G4G5
Cyprinella zanema pop 1 Santee Chub - Piedmont SR - S3 G3T3Q
Population
Moxostoma robustum Robust Redhorse SC FSC SH G1
Moxostoma sp 2 Carolina Redhorse SR FSC SiS2 G1G2Q
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded Woodpecker E LE S2 G3
Sciurus niger Eastern Fox Squirrel SR - S3 G5
Invertebrate Animal
Villosa delumbis Eastern Creekshell SR - S3 G4
Vascular Plant
Amorpha schwerinii Piedmont Indigo-bush SR - S3 G3
Arabis missouriensis Missouri Rockcress C - S1 G4?Q
Aster mirabilis Piedmont Aster C - S2 G2G3
t Baptisia alba Thick-pod White Wild Indigo SR - S2 G5
Cardamine dissecta Dissected Toothwort C S2 G4?
Helianthus laevigatus Smooth Sunflower SR - S2 G4
Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz's Sunflower E LE S2 G2
Minuartia uniflora Single-flowered Sandwort E - S1 G4
Quercus austrina Bluff Oak SR S1 G5
Sedum pusillum Puck's Orpine E - S1 G3
' Natural Community
Basic Oak--Hickory Forest - - - S3 G4
Floodplain Pool - - - S2 G3?
Granitic Flatrock - - - S2 G3
Piedmont Mafic Cliff
Piedmont/Coastal Plain Heath
-
-
- S1
S3 GiG2
G4?
Bluff
Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland - - - S3? G5
Forest
Piedmont/Mountain Levee Forest - - - S3? G5
Piedmont/Mountain Semipermanent - - - S4 G5
Impoundment
Piedmont/Mountain Swamp Forest - _ - S1 G2
1 Xeric Sandhill Scrub S4 G5
Anson-Historic
Vascular Plant
Anemone berlandieri Southern Anemone C - S1 G4?
Baptisia albescens Thin-pod White Wild Indigo SR - S2 G4
Calamintha georgiana Georgia Calamint SR - S1 G5
' Coelorachis cylindrica Carolina Jointgrass C - SH G4G5
Dodecatheon meadia var meadia Eastern Shooting Star SR S2 G5T5
Gnaphalium helleri var helleri Heller's Rabbit Tobacco SR - S2?

' G4G5T3?
Ilex longipes
Georgia Holly
C
-
SH
G5
Lindera subcoriacea Bog Spicebush E FSC S2 G2
Anson-Obscure
Vertebrate Animal
Etheostoma collis Carolina Darter
1

SC - S3 G3
ur usmtni?L HERITAGE PROGRAM, DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION, DENR July 1999
mm mm mm mm = = m m = mm == m
PROJECTS\30140_ENVIRONMENTAL\J08S\2000\0025\ANSON\WETLANDS.dwg 04/14/00 MHARRISON
A3380 NMO
A
o?
Z -0
0
A
s m
r
t
0 v /i; ?- I!i I (}i )?rlr,?l} II}?11t1, 1'i`?
?_ a'•
g ... • ..??,.. v. (?' n ?/ ? \ ' 1'` \, . Y I? I'?l?l l?i I .\-x'1'1 0 / `?
v
m V1 2Z
m
O
z..
r•
1'II ? ! ? I,? ``tic '' . ? ? \ •!a 111
\ 1?1 ! !I ,? 1 I I N
fm?i :'h KY \ \ \\V\` \t1 `
r \V
i ?
o O I / ? ?t
< y , ; mI?z0
~- GODm
to-0 m
zv
m
rr, -4
w ;01Z
IV, 1', \ 0 X 1a mNp
;o Ln
p
;o
m D
\ m m
< 13
u ZD CO Xr'OZ p
rev, O C
rm. \ c \ l MI
C) Ctnm
In CIS
N.. !\ \ \ i D z
z
F ;o
`\ r m C
m cncn
\? •, }\ Imo
\ \?` oa)Zm(?
-n C) 0
\ \ Z
\'..
ZOV)
zF-m
\ ( i` a Om
N?Z
'Irn
i t ! ?mr-
co;oz
1.. `" a+' MCD
\ z??
1 L, g' u ` tr - mp
rn 3:
N- Oorn
W HJ?J?H? N30Wb? Fmh m
w x
° Dr`mME y?
Z 75 I 1
?s (n n D 1
10 „FI 9Lv;m m 'n A c
o n m z 2 o cn ,n z i
cn p rn N' c a ? 0 0
r?i D c i, z 1 m g R
m ;o : _
O m
rv O an og z z N
030
v
z z O p cn
s > 'n
0 2 A =
D; 2 m
D
D P
in
N? n 310 M 0 c
c
Z N

Anson County Correctional Facility - NWPs Nos. 39 and 14 August 7, 2000
LAW Project No. 30100-0-0025

Photograph A. View of stream located on NCDOC property in Alexander County - potential stream
restoration site. Note: severe bank erosion and lack of woody riparian corrior.
Photograph B. Second view of stream located on NCDOC property in Alexander County - potential stream
restoration site.

' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NARRATIVE
The goals of the stormwater management plan are to detain and treat the first 1-inch of
runoff from impervious surfaces and to provide peak flow attenuation for the 10-year
storm event. The proposed 1000 cell prison facility is filing a stormwater management
plan for the construction of the facility due to impacted wetlands.
' Information on this proposed site and watershed information necessary for hydrologic
and hydraulic analysis was obtained from field topography mapping and site plans. Most
of the property's drainage outfall are directed towards wetland areas. The soils are
' predominantly sandy clay soils with an assumed hydrologic soil class "D". Most of the
cover conditions are recently cleared trees and re-established vegetation. For simplicity,
the pre-development curve number for the pre-development area was assumed to be 80
' with a Rational coefficient of 0.30.
The main devices for stormwater management are storm drain inlets and underground
' piping to wet detention ponds designed to detain 1-inch of runoff from impervious
surfaces over the contributing catchment. The detention ponds are designed to slowly
release the volume of the 1-inch runoff for a period of no less than 2 days and no more
than 5 days. These ponds will also provide peak flow attenuation for the 10-year storm
and will be capable of passing the 25-year storm.
' The rational method and the SCS curve number are used to determine the peak inflow for
both pre-development and post development. All the drainage for the project was
' designed in concurrence with the stormwater management plan. The wet detention ponds
are designed in accordance with NC DENR's guidelines for Stormwater Best
Management Practices, to achieve the pollutant removal rate of 85 percent of total
' suspended solids. Storage routing through the ponds (Chainsaw routing, H.R. Malcom)
are used to determine riser/barrel combinations, dam heights and pond volumes. The
Manning's formula was used to size the stormdrain piping system to the ponds.

iI
i?
r 1
pm;F9
#f y[
i
i
i
i
i
1! 1000 CELL CLOSE SECURITY PROTOTY

r r r s r
'
• :• ANSON COUNTY

lw?
BBS1UPCH RC
A AASo /ATES, P.
4 ! ? ? nM

APPROXIMATE WATER8 OF THE ,
Nr cawm
SOvpm pw% NC - rrRu w4m sC
KnL OM ?«u.s. ec - RKUa+. nc
III U.8. AND WETLANDS dOUNDRY MAP
692-6 . LUffW Fr: HM %T[: wr00 SCK[: 1--140'/ 0:\Pr4XCfS\70140
290 f ro (v1o 0. S"h" ft'm w ? :""'
O
Nm
ZRI

LAW
LAWGIBB Group Member
Approved as submitted
Approved as noted
Returned for conections
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 Date: August 8, 2000 Project No.: 30100-0-0025
Charlotte, North Carolina 28208 Project Name: Anson County Correctional Facility
[phone] FAX [phone] Attention: Mr, John Dornev
Re:
TO: Mr. John Dorney (5
Division of Water Quality `
1621 Mail Service Center
001048
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
WETLANDS GROUP -'o
?...??
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL WATE(t ;LITY SECTION
GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU X -Attached Under separate cover via the following items:
Shop drawings Prints Plans _ Samples specifications
Copy of letter Change order Other
IF FNC LONI IRF.N ARF NOT AN N(-)'I'FD KINDLY NnTIFY I LN A'I' ON('F
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
7 08/07/00 1 NWP Nos. 39 and 14 PCNs
1 07/25/00 2 Check in the amount of $475.00

WSE AM, I RANSM1Tl LU as checked helow:
X For approval
For your use _
As requested
For review and comment
REMARKS: Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. is submitting the necessary documentation for a NWP
No. 39 PCN and a NWP No. 14 PCN on the proposed Anson County Correctional Facility located in Anson County,
North Carolina. If you have any questions, please contact Michael A. Iagnocco at 704-357-8600.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Copy To:
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Michael A. Iagnocco
Senior Environmental Scientist
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
Resubmit
Submit _
Return
copies for approval
_ copies for distrihution
corrected prints
BY WITH PERMISSION