20001048 Ver 1_Complete File_20010924

o f \ NA rFq Michael F. Easley, Governor
of p-7 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> =-I Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
p ^? Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIPT
September 24, 2001
Mr. James Gates
NC Department of Correction
4216 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4216
Dear Mr. Gates:
Subject: DWQ #: 001048
Project: Anson County Correctional Facility
County: Anson
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) has received a check
in the amount of $ 30,250.00 check number 1546633, as payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification, Certificate of
Authorization, and/or Section 404 Permit issued for the subject project. This receipt serves
as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project have been
satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization
associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCWRP is
responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the subject
permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. The
NCWRP will restore 242 linear feet of stream in Cataloging Unit 03040201 of the Yadkin
River basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal
Braswell at [phone].
S' erely,
Ronald E. F ell,
Program Manager
cc: Rob Ridings, Wetlands/401 Unit
file
NCDENR
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NO 27699-1619 [phone] Customer Service
320 West Jones Street Raleigh, NO 27603 Fax: [phone] 623-7748
F WATE
\O?0 9pG Michael F-Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
June 28, 2001
Mr. Jim Gates
NC Department of Corrections
4216 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4216
Subject: Stormwater Ponds
Anson County Correctional Facility
Anson County, NC
DWQ# 001048
Dear Mr. Gates:
This Office is in receipt of the plans dated June 12, 2001 for the stormwater management ponds at the
subject facility prepared on your behalf by Hobbs, Upchurch and Associates and submitted to the Division on
June 15, 2001. Staff from the Wetlands Unit reviewed the plans and found them acceptable. Please note that
this approval shall not be construed as an approval of the dam design for Dam Safety purposes.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Todd St. John at [phone].

R.
Wytlands Unit Supe
cc: Mr. Todd St. John, Wetlands Unit
Fayetteville Regional Office
Charles Heiser, PE, Hobbs Upchurch, PO Box 1737, Southern Pines, NC 28388
File
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
OF W A T FR Michael F. Easley
?O? pG Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
June 2?, 2001
Memorandum To: John Dorney
From: Todd St. John A?
Subject: Anson County Correctional Facility
Anson County
have reviewed the subject stormwater management plans. It appears to meet the
requirement of the WQC.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/

? l
Project No. DWQ
Project Name: Anson County Correctional
pond 1
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations
Bottom of Basin (ft) 295
Permanent Pool (ft) 298 3 ft. depth
Temporary Pool (ft) 300.9 cr 2.9 ft. depth
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft)
18291
13129 sq. ft.
Drainage Area (ac) 16.61
Impervious Area (ac) 7.07 42.6%
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) f I l) ?1 !-,
?5 f 361
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 26548 26112 cu. ft.
Forebay (cu ft) IT 6 j #VALUE! %
other parameters
SA/DA 0 1.81
Orifice Diameter (in) 1.5 0.07 cfs drawdown
Design Rainfall (in) 1 4.3 day drawdown
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA***
CXV Impervious
Next Lowest 40
Project Impervious 42.6
Next Highest 50
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SA/DA from Table
1.73
1.81
2.06
status
ok
ok
ok
ok
#VALUE!
ok
I
l?
Project No. DWQ
Project Name: Anson County Correctional
pond 2
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 292
Permanent Pool (ft) 295 3 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 297.9 ? 2.9 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft)
8976
5263 sq. ft.
ok
Drainage Area (ac) 3.93
Impervious Area (ac) 2.91 74.0%
-

volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft)
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 10888 10220 cu. ft. ok
't
Forebay (cu ft) h #VALUE! % #VALUE!

other parameters
SA/DA 0 3.07 -
Orifice Diameter (in) 1 0.03 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 4.0 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA ***
GX Impervious
Next Lowest 70
Project Impervious 74.0
Next Highest 80
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SA/DA from Table
2.88
3.07
3.36

Project No. DWQ
Project Name: Anson County Correctional
pond
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 292
Permanent Pool (ft) 295 3 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 297.8 2.8 ft. depth ok

areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft)
6771
3356 sq. ft.
ok
Drainage Area (ac) 3.74
Impervious Area (ac) 1.87 50.0%
-

volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft)
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 7230 6788 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) i' #VALUE! % #VALUE! --I>f, !=> -°

other parameters
SAIDA 0 2.06 -
Orifice Diameter (in) I 0.03 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 2.7 day drawdown ok
Linear Interpolation of Correct SVDA * * *
t7o Impervious
Next Lowest 40
Project Impervious 50.0
Next Highest 50
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SAIDA from Table
1.73
2.06
2.06
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Sherri Evans-Stanton, Acting Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
09W;qA1
40
dft
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
January 18, 2001
Charles Heiser, P.E.
Hobbs, Upchurch and Assoc.
PO Box 1737
Southern Pines. NC 28388
Subject: Anson County Correctional Facility
DWQ Project No. 001048
Anson County
Dear Mr. Heiser:
The Wetlands Unit staff reviewed the stormwater management plans for the subject project and determined
that additional information is necessary to complete the technical review process. The required additional
information is as follows:
Vegetated Side Slopes
The basin side slopes above the permanent pool down to the vegetative shelf must be stabilized with
vegetation and side slopes no steeper than 3:1 (horizontal to vertical).
Vegetative Shelf
A vegetative shelf around the perimeter of the pond is required. The shelf shall be gently sloped (6:1
or flatter) and shall consist of native vegetation. Please specify this on the engineering plans.
Draw Down Orifice Diameter
The diameter of the orifice must be sized to draw down the temporary water quality pool volume in
48 to 120 hours. The outlets orifices will draw down the ponds in excess of 10 days, according to my
calculations.
Division wetlands unit staff will strive to complete a final technical review within 10 working days of
receipt of the requested information. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this project, please
contact me at (919) 733-984. Also, please note that the NCDENR Stonnwater Best Management Practices
Manual, April 1999, and other documents and information can be downloaded from the Wetlands Unit web
site at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/.
Sincerely
Todd St. J6hn, E
Environmental Engineer
cc: John Dorney, Wetlands/401 Unit
Fayetteville Regional Office
File
4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Project No. DWQ 0.01048
Project Name: Anson DOC
pond 3
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 292
Permanent Pool (ft) 295 3 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 297.8 2.8 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft)
9300
3356 sq. ft.
ok
Drainage Area (ac) 3.74
Impervious Area (ac) 1.87 50.0 °h,
volunies
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 16575
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 37590 6788 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) 2925 17.6 % check f n-eb(
other parameters
S A/DA 0 2.06
Orifice Diameter (in) 0.75 0.02 cfs drawdown
Design Rainfall (in) 1 24.9 day drawdown check dram
Linear Interpolation of Correct SA/DA ***
r/ Impervious
Next Lowest 50
Project Impervious 50.0
Next Highest 60
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SA/DA from Table
2.06
2.06
2.4
Project No. DWQ 0.01048
Project Name: Anson DOC
pond 2
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 292
Permanent Pool (ft) 295 3 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 297.9 2.9 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 8125 5263 sq. ft. ok
Drainage Area (ac) 3.93
Impervious Area (ac) 2.91 74.0 %
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft) 23000
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 33500 10220 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) 6300 27.4 % check forebi
other parameters
SA/DA 0 3.07
Orifice Diameter (in) t 0.03 cts drawdown
Design Rainfall (in) 1 12.3 day drawdown check drawl
Linear InterPolcition of Correct SA/DA ***
(/10 impervious
Next Lowest 70
Project Impervious 74.0
Next Highest 80
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SA/DA from Table
2.88
3.07
3.36
Project No. DWQ 0.01048
Project Name: Anson DOC
pond 1
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 295
Permanent Pool (ft) 298 3 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 300.9 2.9 ft. depth ok
ureas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 17100 13129 sq. ft. ok
Drainage Area (ac) 16.61
Impervious Area (ac) 7.07 42.6 %,
voluuhes
Permanent Pool (Cu ft) 57860
Temporary Pool (Cu ft) 63220 26112 cu. ft. ok
Forebay (cu ft) 18600 32.1 ch check forebi
other pcuruuetc r.s
SAMA 0 1.81
Orifice Diameter (in) 1.5 0.07 cfs drawdown
Design Rainfall (in) 1 10.3 day drawdown check draw(
Lihhear hhterpolatiou of Correct SA/DA***
C/C impervious
Next Lowest 40
Project Impervious 42.6
Next Highest 50
3 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
SAMA from Table
1.73
1.81
2.06
z?
/--? l
v
For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 242 feet of streams, in 030710 river and
subbasin and 242 linear feet of stream restoration are required. Please be aware that the Wetland Restoration
Program (WRP) rules require rounding of acreage amounts to one-quarter acre increments (15A 2R .0503(b)).
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh,
N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Attachment
cc:
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Fayetteville DWQ Regional Office
Ron Ferrell; Wetland Restoration Program
File copy
Central Files
Todd St. John
Mike Iagnocco; Law Engineering and Environmental
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 4, 2000
Anson County
DWQ Project # 001048
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS, WRP
Mr. James Gates
N.C. Dept of Corrections
4216 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4216
Dear Mr. Gates:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place till material in
0.27 acres of wetlands and 242 linear feet of streams for the purpose of constructing the Anson County Correctional
Facility in Anson County, as you described in your application dated August 10, 2000. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3287. This certification allows
you to use Nationwide Permit Number 29 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion
Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when
the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified
below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application for a new
certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed
one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to notify
the state in order to assure compliance for future wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in
place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
2. An additional condition is that a final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved by this Office before
the impacts specified in this Certification occur. The stormwater management plan must include plans and
specifications for Stormwater management facilities designed to remove 85% TSS according to the most recent
version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Also, before any permanent building is
occupied at the subject site, the stormwater management facilities, as approved by this Office, must be constructed
and operational, and the stormwater plan, as approved by this Office, shall be implemented.
We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program in order to compensate for
these impacts to wetlands and/or streams. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402, this contribution will satisfy our
compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). According to 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h), feet of
restoration will be required. Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check (made payable to:
DENR - Wetland Restoration Program), wetland or stream till shall not occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at
919-733-5083 ext. 358 if you have any questions concerning the Wetland Restoration Program. You have one month from
the date of this Certification to make this payment.
Division of Water Quality • Wetlands/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27669-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
NORTH CAROLINA- DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, N.C. Department of Corrections has permission as outline below for the
purpose(s) of proposed Anson County Correctional Facility. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must
be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached cetification transmitttal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT
VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION Anson County Correctional Facility
COUNTY: Anson
BASIN/SUBBASIN 030710
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for
the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and surface waters as
outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the wetland Restoration Programs must be rounded to one-
quarter acre increments according to 15 2r .0503(b)
acres of Class WL wetlands
acres of riparian wetland
acres of non-riparian wetlands
acres of Class SWL wetlands
242 linear feet of stream buffers
(other)
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment
of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it
to the Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be
sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL
YOU RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS
RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
Date

DWQ Project No.: County:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1621.This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the
project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
I, , as a duly registered Professional (i.e.,
Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, ect.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to
observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that
the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date
LAwGIBB
GROUP
November 22, 2000

Npl
Mr. John R. Dorsey
Non-discharge Branch/Wetlands/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Subject: Payment to the N.C. Wetland Restoration Program
Anson County Correctional Facility
Anson County, North Carolina
LAW Project 30100-0-0025
DWQ #: 001048
Dear Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of the North Carolina Department of Correction (NCDOC), Law Engineering and
Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is submitting this response to your letter dated September 12,
2000 in the above referenced matter. The proposed Anson County Correctional Facility will
impact approximately 312 linear feet of perennial streams and 0.27 acre of wetlands in the Yadkin
- Pee Dee River Basin. In the previously mentioned letter, you provided two options for
satisfying the stream mitigation requirement associated with this project: payment into the North
Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP), it' the WRP would accept the responsibility for
conducting this mitigation work, or preparing and implementing a stream mitigation plan. In our
NWP No. 39 submittal to you dated August 7, 2000, NCDOC proposed stream restoration at a
future Alexander County Correctional Facility site in the Catawba River Basin as compensation
for impacts associated with the Anson County Correctional Facility project. Your office
subsequently suggested that we locate a mitigation site within the same river sub-basin as our
mitigation project.
In a letter dated September 7, 2000, Mr. Mac Haupt, Implementation Coordinator with the WRP,
revealed that payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund was not acceptable because of the lack
of mitigation projects located within the same cataloging unit as the impact. However, Mr. Haupt
stated that if the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) would allow utilizing restoration
projects in the adjoining Yadkin River basin catalog unit (03040201), the WRP could accept
payment for this project.
In a telephone conversation between Mr. Allen Davis with the USACE Wilmington Office and
Lisa Beckstrom of LAW on October 2, 2000, Mr. Davis stated that payment to the WRP for
projects in the adjoining Yadkin River basin catalog unit (03040201) would be acceptable. This
mitigation was subsequently included as a condition of the Section 404 Permits (See attached
permits).
LAW Enrtineerinq and Environmental Services. Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 • Charlotte NC 28208
M4 '157-8600 • Fax: [phone]
Serving/ the 01?11lotte arca hn over 50 venr,
Payment in the N.C. Wetland Restoration Program-Anson Counti, Correctional Facility November 22, 2000
LAW Project 30100-0-0025
LAW would appreciate your written concurrence with payment into the WRF for impacts
associated with the Anson County Correctional Facility. If you have any questions or comments
regarding this request please contact Michael lagnocco at [phone] extension 5543.
Sincerely,
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Michael A. agi cco Richard 13. Darling, C.E.
Senior Env] nmental Scientist Principal
Environmental Scientist
MAI/RBD: jet BY WfTH PERMISSION
Enclosure: General Permit Verifications
cc: James E. Gates, NCDOC
2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200001592
County Anson
Quad RUSSELLVILLE
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property owner: James E. Gates Agent: Michael A. Iagnocco
North Carolina Department of Correction LAW Engineering and Environmental
Services, Incorporated
Address: 4216 MSC - 2020 Yonkers Road 2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27699-4216 Charlotte, NC 28208
Telephone No: [phone] [phone] Ext. 5543
Zone: 17 UTM or LAT/LONG: North: 3871500 East: 574500
Size and Location of project (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): in headwaters of Little Brown Creek
southeast of Polkton, Anson County, North Carolina.
Description of Activity: discharge fill material into 0.27 acre of wetlands and 242 linear feet of perennial stream for
a correctional facility building and associated parking. Special Conditions: see attached page.
Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344)
(check all that apply) Section 10 (River and Harbors Act of 1899)
Authorization: Nationwide Permit Number 39
Your work is authorized by this Regional General (RGP) or Nationwide Permit (NWP) provided it is accomplished in
strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted plans. If your activity is subject to Section 404 (if
Section 404 block above is checked), before beginning work you must also receive a Section 401 water quality
certification from the N.C. Division of Environmental Management, telephone [phone]. For any activity within
the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management,
telephone [phone].
Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the conditions of
the RGP or the NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or
appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any
other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local
agencies before beginning work.
If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the General Permit or Nationwide
Permit, please contact the Corps Regulatory Of al specified below.
Date: October 2, 2000
Corps Regulatory Official: Allen S. Davis Telephone No.: [phone]
Expiration Date of Verification: February 11, 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CESAW Form 591
Revised July 1995

Special Conditions: The permittee shall mitigate for 242 linear feet of unavoidable impacts to perennial stream
channel associated with this project by payment to the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) in
an amount determined by the NCWRP sufficient to perform 242 linear feet of warm water stream stream restoration
mitigation in the Yadkin River basin (Cataloging Unit 03040201). Discharge into streams on the permitted project
shall begin only after the permittee has made full payment to the NCWRP, and the NCWRP has made written
confirmation to the District Engineer, that it has received payment and agrees to accept responsibility for the
mitigation work required, pursuant to Paragraph IV.D. of the Memorandum of Understanding between the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District, dated November 4, 1998. The permittee shall mitigate for 0.27 acre of unavoidable impacts to wetlands
associated with this project by establishment of continuous, permanent, protected vegetated buffers 50 feet wide on
both sides of the centerline of all remaining streams within the property boundaries. Permittee shall maintain the
buffers in their natural condition in perpetuity. Prohibited activities in the buffers include, but are not limited to,
filling; grading; excavating; earth movement of any kind; construction of roads, walkways, buildings, signs, of any
other structure; any activity that may alter the drainage patterns in the buffers; the destruction, mowing, or other
alteration of vegetation in the buffers; disposal or storage of any garbage, trash, or other waste material. In addition,
the permittee shall take no action, whether within or outside the buffers, which will adversely impact the buffers or
adjacent streams.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 47/Thursday, March 9, 2000/Notices 12893
States adversely affected by the project;
(2) A written statement to the District 6. Regional and Case-By-Case
Conditions. The activity must com
l which is likely to jeopardize the
conti
d
i

Engineer detailing cnmpliance with
a p
y
nue
ex
stence of a threatened or
with any regional conditions which may endangered species or a species
paragraph (b),
bove (i.e., why the
discharge must occur in waters of the have been added by the division
engineer (see 33 CFR 330.4(e)) and with proposed for such designation, as
identified under the Federal Endan
ered
United States and why additional
minimization cannot be achieved); (3) A any case specific conditions added by
the Corps or by the State or tribe in its g
Species Act, or which will destroy or
adversely modify the critical habitat of
description of measures taken to ensure
that the proposed work complies with Section 401 water quality certification
and Coastal Zone Management Act such species. Non-federal permittees
shall notify the District Engineer if an

paragraphs (c) through (0, above; and (4)
A reclamation plan (for aggregate
consistency determination.
7. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity y
listed species or designated critical
habitat might be affected or is in the
mining in isolated waters and non-tidal
wetlands adjacent to headwaters and may occur in a component of the
National Wild and Scenic River System; vicinity of the project, or is located in
the designated critical habitat and shall
hard rock/mineral mining only). or in a river officially designated by not begin work on the activity until
This NWP does not authorize hard Congress as a "study river" for possible notified by the District Engineer that the
rock/mineral mining, including placer inclusion in the system, while the river requirements of the Endangered Species
mining, in streams. No hard rock/ is in an official study status; unless the Act have been satisfied and that the
mineral mining can occur in waters of appropriate Federal agency, with direct activity is authorized. For activities that
the United States within 100 feet of the management responsibility for such may affect Federally-listed endangered
ordinary high water mark of headwater river, has determined in writing that the or threatened species or designated
streams. The terms "headwaters" and proposed activity will not adversely critical habitat, the notification must
"isolated waters" are defined at 33 CFR
330.2(d) and (e), respectively. For the affect the Wild and Scenic River
designation, or study status. Information include the name(s) of the endangered
or threatened species that may be
purposes of this NWP, the term "lower
perennial stream" is defined as follows: on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be
obtained from the appropriate Federal affected by the proposed work or that
utilize the designated critical habitat
"A stream in which the gradient is low land management agency in the area that may be affected by the proposed
and water velocity is slow, there is no (e.g., National Park Service, U.S. Forest work. As a result of formal or informal
tidal influence, some water flows Service, Bureau of Land Management, consultation with the FWS or NMFS

throughout the year, and the substrate
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). ,
the District Engineer may add species-
consists mainly of sand and mud." 8. Tribal Rights. No activity or its specific regional endangered species
(Sections 10 and 404) operation may impair reserved tribal
rights, including
but not limited t conditions to the NWPs.

C. Nationwide Permit General
Condition ,
o,
reserved water rights and treaty fishing (b) Authorization of an activity by a
nationwide permit does not authorize
s
The following general conditions and hunting rights.
9. Water Quality. (a) In certain States the "take" of a threatened or endangered
species as defined under the Federal
must be followed in order for any

NWP to or
authorization e
by an be
valid: and tribal lands an individual 401 water

uality certification must be obtained or Endangered Species Act. In the absence

f separate authorization (e.g., an ESA
1. Navigation. No activity may cause
more than a minimal adverse effect cause waived (See 33 CFR 330.4(c)).
(b) For NWPs 12, 14, 17, 18, 32, 39, Section 10 Permit, a Biological Opinion
with "incidental take" provisions
etc
)
navigation. 40, 42, 43, and 44, where the State or
tribal 401 certification (either ,
.
from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
2. Proper Maintenance. Any structure
or fill authorized shall be properly
generically or individually) does not
i or the National Marine Fisheries
Service, both lethal and non-lethal

maintained, including maintenance to requ
re or approve a water quality
management plan
the ermittee must
p "takes" of ro
p tested species are
ensure public safety.

3. Soil Erosion and Sediment ,
include design criteria and techniques violation of the Endangered Species Act.
Information on the location of

Controls. Appropriate soil erosion and that will ensure that the authorized
work does not result in more th
threatened and endangered species and
sediment controls must be used and

maintained in effective operatin an
minimal degradation of water quality. their critical habitat can be obtained
directly from the offices of the U.S. Fish
g
condition during construction, and all An important component of a water

quality management plan includes
and Wildlife Service and National
M

exposed soil and other fills, as well as
any work below the ordinary high water
stormwater manaement that minimizes
degradation of the' downstream aquatic arine Fisheries Service or their world
wide web paps at
htt
://www
rw
/
d

mark or high tide line, must be
permanently stabilized at the earliest
system, including water quality. Refer to
General Condition 21 for stormwate p
.
s.gov
rgen
spp/
ends pp.html and
htt
:!/w
f
/

practicable date. r p
ww.n
ms.gov
prot_res/

4. Aquatic Life Movements. No management requirements. Another esahome.html, respectively.

activity may substantially disrupt the important component of a water quality 12. Historic Properties. No activity

movement of those species of aquatic
life indigenous to the waterbod management plan is the establishment
and maintenance of vegetated buffers which may affect historic properties
listed, or eligible for listing, in the
y,
including those species which normally
i
h next to open waters, including streams.
Refer to General Condition 19 for National Register of Historic Places is
authorized, until the DE has complied
m
grate t
rough the area, unless the
activity's primary purpose is to vegetated buffer requirements for the with the provisions of 33 CFR part 325,

impound water. Culverts placed in
streams must be installed to maintain NWPs.
10. Coastal Zone Management. In Appendix C. The prospective permittee
must notify the District Engineer if the

low flow conditions certain states, an individual state coastal authorized activity may affect any
.
5. Equipment. Heavy equipment
k zone management consistency
concurrence must be obtained or waived historic properties listed, determined to
be eligible, or which the pros
ective
wor
ing in wetlands must be placed on
mats, or other measures must be taken (see Section 330.4(d)).
11. Endangered Species. (a) No p
permittee has reason to believe may be
eli
ible f
li
ti
h

to minimize soil disturbance.
activity is authorized under any NWP g
or
s
ng on t
e National
Register of Historic Places, and shall not
12894 Federal Resister / Vol. 65, No. 47 / Thursday, March 9, 2000/Notices
begin the activity until notified by the
District Engineer that the requirements be used to authorize any part of the
proposed project or any related activit sale agreement or other contract for sale
h

of the National Historic Preservation Ac
Nava been satisfied and that the a
ti
it y
t and
- ; orp urc
ase has been executed;
(10) For NWP 31, Maintenance of
c
v
y
is authorized. Information on the (4) For NW
Ps 7, 12, 14, 18, 21, 34, 38,
39, 40, 41
42
and 43
the PCN m
t Existing Flood Control Projects, the
i

location and existence of historic ,
,
,
us
also include a delineation of affected prospect
ve permittee must either notify
the District Engineer with a PCN
i

resources can be obtained from the State special aquatic sites, including
Historic Preservation Office and the wetlands
ve
etated
h
ll pr
or
to each maintenance activity or submit
fi

National Register of Historic Places (see
33 CFR 330.4(8)). For activities that ma ,
g
s
a
ows (e.g.,
submerged aquatic vegetation, seagrass
b
d a
ve year (or less) maintenance plan.
In addition, the PCN must include all of
y
affect historic properties listed in, or
eligible for listing in
the National e
s), and riffle and pool complexes
(see paragraph 13(f)); the following:
(i) Sufficient baseline information so
,
Register of Historic Places, the
notification must state which historic (5) For NWP 7, Outfall Structures and
Maintenance, the PCN must include as to identify the approved channel
depths and configurations and existing

property may be affected by the
proposed work or include a vicinit information regarding the original
design capacities and configurations of facilities. Minor deviations are
authorized, provided the approved flood
y
map indicating the location of the those areas of the facility where control protection or drainage is not

historic property. maintenance dredging or excavation is increased;

13. Notification. (a) Timing: Where
required by the terms of the NWP
the proposed.
(6) For NWP 14, Linear (ii) A delineation of any affected
special aquatic sites, including
,
prospective permittee must notify the
District Engineer with a preconstruction Transportation Crossings, the PCN must
include a compensatory mitigation wetlands; and,
(iii) Location of the dredged material

notification (PCN) as early as possible.
The District Engineer must determine if proposal to offset permanent losses of
waters of the United States and a disposal site.
(11) For NWP 33, Temporary

the PCN is complete within 30 days of
the date of receipt and can request the statement describing how temporary
losses of waters of the United States will Construction, Access, and Dewatering,
the PCN must also include a restoration

additional information necessary to
k be minimized to the maximum extent
practicable. plan of reasonable measures to avoid
and minimize adverse effects to a
uatic
ma
e the PCN complete only once.
However, if the prospective permittee
does not rovide all e the requested
p
(7) For NWP 21, Surface Coal Mining
Activities, the PCN must include an q
resources.
(12) For NWPs 39, 43, and 44, the
P

information, then the District Engineer
ill Office of Surface Mining (OSM) or state-
approved mitigation
lan CN must also include a written
statement to the District Engineer
w
notify the prospective permittee
that the PCN is still incomplete and the
is still p
.
(8) For NWP 27, Stream and Wetland explaining how avoidance and
i

PCN review
rocess p
will not commence
until all
f th
f
Restoration, the PCN must include

documentation of the prior condition of m
nimization of losses of waters of the
United States were achieved on the
o
e re uested in
ormation
q
has been received by the District the site that will be reverted by the
i project site.
(13) For NWP 39
Residential

Engineer. The prospective permittee
shall not begin the activit
:
perm
ttee.
(9) For NWP 29, Single-Family ,
,
Commercial, and Institutional
D
y
(1) Until notified in writing by the
District Engineer that the activity ma
Housing, the PCN must also include:
Any past use
this NWP by the evelopments, and NWP 42,
Recreational Facilities, the PCN must
i
l
d
y
proceed under the NWP with any ee
individual
vidual permitt and/or the
' nc
u
e a compensatory mitigation
proposal that offsets unavoidable l

special conditions imposed b the
Y
District or Division Engineer; or
permittee
s spouse;
(ii) A statement that the single-family osses

of waters of the United States or

(2) If notified in writing by the District h
housing activity is for a personal justification explaining why

or Division Engineer that an individual
residence of the permittee; compensatory mitigation should not be
required

permit is required; or
(3) Unless 45 days have passed from
(iii) A description of the entire parcel,
including its size, and a delineation of .
(14) For NWP 40, Agricultural

the District Engineer's receipt of the
complete notification and the
wetlands. For the purpose of this NWP,
parcels of land measuring 1/4 acre or less Activities, the PCN must include a
compensatory mitigation proposal to

prospective permittee has not received
will not require a formal on-site offset losses of waters of the United
States

written notice from the District or
Division Engineer. Subsequently, the
'
delineation. However, the applicant
shall provide an indication of where the .
(15) For NWP 43, Stormwater
Management Facilities
the PCN must
permittee
s right to proceed under the wetlands are and the amount of ,
include, for the construction of new
NWP may be modified, suspended, or
revoked only in accordance with the wetlands that exists on the property. For
parcels greater than 1/4 acre in size
a stormwater management facilities, a

procedure set forth in 33 CFR ,
formal wetland delineation must be maintenance plan (in accordance with
State and local requirements
if
330.5(d)(2).
(b) Contents of Notification: The prepared in accordance with the current
method required by the Corps
(See ,
applicable) and a compensatory
iti

notification must be in writing and .
paragraph 13(f)); m
gation proposal to offset losses of
waters of the United States

include the following information:
(1) Name, address, and telephone
b
(iv) A written description of all land
(including, if available, legal .
(16) For NWP 44, Mining Activities,
the PCN must include a description of
num
ers of the prospective permittee;
(2) Location of the proposed project;
(3) Brief descri
tion of the
d descriptions) owned by the prospective
permittee and/or the prospective
' all waters of the United States adversely
affected by the project, a description of
p
propose
project; the project's purpose; direct and
indirect adverse environmental
ff
t permittee
s spouse, within a one mile
radius of the parcel, in any form of measures taken to minimize adverse
effects to waters of the United States, a
e
ec
s
the project would cause; any other ownership (including any land owned
as
t description of measures taken to comply

NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or
individual permit(s) used or int
d
d a par
ner, corporation, joint tenant,
co-tenant, or as a tenant-by-the-entiretv) with the criteria of the NWP, and a
reclamation plan (for aggregate mining
en
e
to and any land on which a purchase and activities in isolated waters and non-

Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 47 /Thursday, March 9, 2000 /Notices 1 ?RQS
tidal wetlands adjacent to headwaters
and any hard rock/mineral mining
activities).
(17) For activities that may adversely
affect Federally-listed endangered or
threatened species, the PCN must
include the name(s) of those endangered
or threatened species that may be
affected by the proposed work or utilize
the designated critical habitat that may
be affected by the proposed work.
(18) For activities that may affect
historic properties listed in, or eligible
for listing in, the National Register of
Historic Places, the PCN must state
which historic property may be affected
by the proposed work or include a
vicinity map indicating the location of
the historic property.
(19) For NWPs 12, 14, 29, 39, 40, 42,
43, and 44, where the proposed work
involves discharges of dredged or fill
material into waters of the United States
resulting in permanent, above-grade fills
within 100-year floodplains (as
identified on FEMA's Flood Insurance
Rate Maps or FEMA-approved local
floodplain maps), the notification must
include documentation demonstrating
that the proposed work complies with
the appropriate FEMA or FEMA-
approved local floodplain construction
requirements.
(c) Form of Notification: The standard
individual permit application form
(Form ENG 4345) may be used as the
notification but must clearly indicate
that it is a PCN and must include all of
the information required in (b) (1)-(19)
of General Condition 13. A letter
containing the requisite information
may also be used.
(d) District Engineer's Decision: In
reviewing the PCN for the proposed
activity, the District Engineer will
determine whether the activity
authorized by the NWP will result in
more than minimal individual or
cumulative adverse environmental
effects or may be contrary to the public
interest. The prospective permittee may,
optionally, submit a proposed
mitigation plan with the PCN to
expedite the process and the District
Engineer will consider any proposed
compensatory mitigation the applicant
has included in the proposal in
determining whether the net adverse
environmental effects to the aquatic
environment of the proposed work are
minimal. If the District Engineer
determines that the activity complies
with the terms and conditions of the
NWP and that the adverse effects on the
aquatic environment are minimal, the
District Engineer will notify the
permittee and include any conditions
the District Engineer deems necessary.
Any compensatory mitigation
proposal must be approved by the
District Engineer prior to commencing
work. If the prospective permittee is
required to submit a compensatory
mitigation proposal with the PCN, the
proposal may be either conceptual or
detailed. If the prospective permittee
elects to submit a compensatory
mitigation plan with the PCN, the
District Engineer will expeditiously
review the proposed compensatory
mitigation plan. The District Engineer
must review the plan within 45 days of
receiving a complete PCN and
determine whether the conceptual or
specific proposed mitigation would
ensure no more than minimal adverse
effects on the aquatic environment. If
the net adverse effects of the project on
the aquatic environment (after
consideration of the compensatory
mitigation proposal) are determined by
the District Engineer to be minimal, the
District Engineer will provide a timely
written response to the applicant stating
that the project can proceed under the
terms and conditions of the nationwide
permit.
If the District Engineer determines
that the adverse effects of the proposed
work are more than minimal, then he
will notify the applicant either: (1) That
the project does not qualify for
authorization under the NWP and
instruct the applicant on the procedures
to seek authorization under an
individual permit; (2) that the project is
authorized under the NWP subject to
the applicant's submission of a
mitigation proposal that would reduce
the adverse effects on the aquatic
environment to the minimal level; or (3)
that the project is authorized under the
NWP with specific modifications or
conditions. Where the District Engineer
determines that mitigation is required in
order to ensure no more than minimal
adverse effects on the aquatic
environment, the activity will be
authorized within the 45-day PCN
period, including the necessary
conceptual or specific mitigation or a
requirement that the applicant submit a
mitigation proposal that would reduce
the adverse effects on the aquatic
environment to the minimal level.
When conceptual mitigation is
included, or a mitigation plan is
required under item (2) above, no work
in waters of the United States will occur
until the District Engineer has approved
a specific mitigation plan.
e) Agency Coordination: The District
Engineer will consider any comments
from Federal and State agencies
concerning the proposed activity's
compliance with the terms and
conditions of the NWPs and the need for
mitigation to reduce the project's
adverse effects on the aquatic
environment to a minimal level.
For activities requiring notification to
the District Engineer that result in the
loss of greater than 1/2 acre of waters of
the United States, the District Engineer
will, upon receipt of a notification,
provide immediately (e.g., via facsimile
transmission, overnight mail, or other
expeditious manner), a copy to the
appropriate offices of the Fish and
Wildlife Service, State natural resource
or water quality agency, EPA, State
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO),
and, if appropriate, the National Marine
Fisheries Service. With the exception of
NWP 37, these agencies will then have
10 calendar days from the date the
material is transmitted to telephone or
fax the District Engineer notice that they
intend to provide substantive, site-
specific comments. If so contacted by an
agency, the District Engineer will wait
an additional 15 calendar days before
making a decision on the notification.
The District Engineer will fully consider
agency comments received within the
specified time frame, but will provide
no response to the resource agency,
except as provided below. The District
Engineer will indicate in the
administrative record associated with
each notification that the resource
agencies' concerns were considered. As
required by Section 305(b)(4)(B) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
District Engineer will provide a
response to National Marine Fisheries
Service within 30 days of receipt of anv
Essential Fish Habitat conservation
recommendations. Applicants are
encouraged to provide the Corps
multiple copies of notifications to
expedite agency notification.
f) Wetlands Delineations: Wetland
delineations must be prepared in
accordance with the current method
required by the Corps. For NWP 29 see
paragraph (b)(9)(iii) for parcels less than
1/4 acre in size. The permittee may ask
the Corps to delineate the special
aquatic site. There may be some delay
if the Corps does the delineation.
Furthermore, the 45-day period will not
start until the wetland delineation has
been completed and submitted to the
Corps, where appropriate.
14. Compliance Certification. Every
permittee who has received a
Nationwide permit verification from the
Corps will submit a signed certification
regarding the completed work and any
required mitigation. The certification
will be forwarded by the Corps with the
authorization letter. The certification
will include: (a) A statement that the
authorized work was done in
.f
r -
12896 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 47/Thursday, March 9, 2000/Notices
accordance with the Corps
authorization, including any general or
specific conditions; (b) A statement that
any required mitigation was completed
in accordance with the permit
conditions; and (c) The signature of the
permittee certifying the completion of
the work and mitigation.
15. Use of Multiple Nationwide
Permits. The use of more than one NWP
for a single and complete project is
prohibited, except when the acreage loss
of waters of the United States
authorized by the NWPs does not
exceed the acreage limit of the NWP
with the highest specified acreage limit.
For example, if a road crossing over
tidal waters is constructed under NWP
14, with associated bank stabilization
authorized by NWP 13, the maximum
acreage loss of waters of the United
States for the total project cannot exceed
1/3 acre.
16. Water Supply Intakes. No activity,
including structures and work in
navigable waters of the United States or
discharges of dredged or fill material,
may occur in the proximity of a public
water supply intake except where the
activity is for repair of the public water
supply intake structures or adjacent
bank stabilization.
17. Shellfish Beds. No activity,
including structures and work in
navigable waters of the United States or
discharges of dredged or fill material,
may occur in areas of concentrated
shellfish populations, unless the activity
is directly related to a shellfish
harvesting activity authorized by NWP
4.
18. Suitable Material. No activity,
including structures and work in
navigable waters of the United States or
discharges of dredged or fill material,
may consist of unsuitable material (e.g.,
trash, debris, car bodies, asphalt, etc.)
and material used for construction or
discharged must be free from toxic
pollutants in toxic amounts (see Section
307 of the Clean Water Act).
19. Mitigation. The project must be
designed and constructed to avoid and
minimize adverse effects to waters of
the United States to the maximum
extent practicable at the project site (i.e.,
on site). Mitigation will be required
when necessary to ensure that the
adverse effects to the aquatic
environment are minimal. The District
Engineer will consider the factors
discussed below when determining the
acceptability of appropriate and
practicable mitigation necessary to
offset adverse effects on the aquatic
environment that are more than
minimal.
(a) Compensatory mitigation at a
minimum 1:1 ratio will be required for
all wetland impacts requiring a PCN.
Consistent with National policy, the
District Engineer will establish a
preference for restoration of wetlands to
meet the minimum compensatory
mitigation ratio, with preservation used
only in exceptional circumstances.
(b) To be practicable, the mitigation
must be available and capable of being
done considering costs, existing
technology, and logistics in light of the
overall project purposes. Examples of
mitigation that may be appropriate and
practicable include, but are not limited
to: reducing the size of the project;
establishing and maintaining wetland or
upland vegetated buffers to protect open
waters such as streams; and replacing
losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing,
or preserving similar functions and
values, preferably in the same
watershed;
(c) The District Engineer will require
restoration, creation, enhancement, or
preservation of other aquatic resources
in order to offset the authorized impacts
to the extent necessary to ensure that
the adverse effects on the aquatic
environment are minimal. An important
element of any compensatory mitigation
plan for projects in or near streams or
other open waters is the establishment
and maintenance, to the maximum
extent practicable, of vegetated buffers
next to open waters on the project site.
The vegetated buffer should consist of
native species. The District Engineer
will determine the appropriate width of
the vegetated buffer and in which cases
it will be required. Normally, the
vegetated buffer will be 25 to 50 feet
wide on each side of the stream, but the
District Engineer may require wider
vegetated buffers to address
documented water quality concerns. If
there are open waters on the project site
and the District Engineer requires
compensatory mitigation for wetland
impacts to ensure that the net adverse
effects on the aquatic environment are
minimal, any vegetated buffer will
comprise no more than 1/3 of the
remaining compensatory mitigation
acreage after the permanently filled
wetlands have been replaced on a one-
to-one acreage basis. In addition,
compensatory mitigation must address
adverse effects on wetland functions
and values and cannot be used to offset
the acreage of wetland losses that would
occur in order to meet the acreage limits
of some of the NWPs (e.g., for NWP 39,
1/4 acre of wetlands cannot be created to
change a 1/ acre loss of wetlands to a
1/4 acre loss; however, V2 acre of created
wetlands can be used to reduce the
impacts of a 1/3 acre loss of wetlands).
If the prospective permittee is required
to submit a compensatory mitigation
proposal with the PCN, the proposal
may be either conceptual or detailed.
"(d) To the extent appropriate,
permittees should consider mitigation
banking and other appropriate forms of
compensatory mitigation. If the District
Engineer determines that compensatory
mitigation is necessary to offset losses of
waters of the United States and ensure
that the net adverse effects of the
authorized work on the aquatic
environment are minimal, consolidated
mitigation approaches, such as
mitigation banks, will be the preferred
method of providing compensatory
mitigation, unless the District Engineer
determines that activity-specific
compensatory mitigation is more
appropriate, based on which is best for
the aquatic environment. These types of
mitigation are preferred because they
involve larger blocks of protected
aquatic environment, are more likelv to
meet the mitigation goals, and are more
easily checked for compliance. If a
mitigation bank or other consolidated
mitigation approach is not available in
the watershed, the District Engineer will
consider other appropriate forms of
compensatory mitigation to offset the
losses of waters of the United States to
ensure that the net adverse effects of the
authorized work on the aquatic
environment are minimal.
20. Spawning Areas. Activities,
including structures and work in
navigable waters of the United States or
discharges of dredged or fill material, in
spawning areas during spawning
seasons must be avoided to the
maximum extent practicable. Activities
that result in the physical destruction
(e.g., excavate, fill, or smother
downstream by substantial turbidity) of
an important spawning area are not
authorized,
21. Management of Water Flows. To
the maximum extent practicable, the
activity must be designed to maintain
preconstruction downstream flow
conditions (e.g., location, capacity, and
flow rates). Furthermore, the activity
must not permanently restrict or impede
the passage of normal or expected high
flows (unless the primary purpose of the
fill is to impound waters) and the
structure or discharge of dredged or fill
material must withstand expected high
flows. The activity must, to the
maximum extent practicable, provide
for retaining excess flows from the site,
provide for maintaining surface flow
rates from the site similar to
preconstruction conditions, and must
not increase water flows from the
project site, relocate water, or redirect
water flow beyond preconstruction
conditions. In addition, the activity
.f ,rr ?-
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 47/Thursday, March 9, 2000/Notices 12247
must, to the maximum extent
practicable, reduce adverse effects such
as flooding or erosion downstream and
upstream of the project site, unless the
activity is part of a larger system
designed to manage water flows.
22. Adverse Effects From
Impoundments. If the activity, including
structures and work in navigable waters
of the United States or discharge of
dredged or fill material, creates an
impoundment of water, adverse effects
on the aquatic system caused by the
accelerated passage of water and/or the
restriction of its flow shall be
minimized to the maximum extent
practicable.
23. Waterfowl Breeding Areas.
Activities, including structures and
work in navigable waters of the United
States or discharges of dredged or fill
material, into breeding areas for
migratory waterfowl must be avoided to
the maximum extent practicable.
24. Removal of Temporary Fills. Any
temporary fills must be removed in their
entirety and the affected areas returned
to their preexisting elevation.
25. Designated Critical Resource
Waters. Critical resource waters include,
NOAA-designated marine sanctuaries,
National Estuarine Research Reserves,
National Wild and Scenic Rivers,
critical habitat for Federally listed
threatened and endangered species,
coral reefs, State natural heritage sites,
and outstanding national resource
waters or other waters officially
designated by a State as having
particular environmental or ecological
significance and identified by the
District Engineer after notice and
opportunity for public comment. The
District Engineer may also designate
additional critical resource waters after
notice and opportunity for comment.
(a) Except as noted below, discharges
of dredged or fill material into waters of
the United States are not authorized by
NWPs 7, 12. 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35,
39, 40, 42, 43, and 44 for any activity
within, or directly affecting, critical
resource waters, including wetlands
adjacent to such waters. Discharges of
dredged ur fill materials into waters of
the United States may be authorized by
the above NWPs in National Wild and
Scenic Rivers if the activity complies
with General Condition 7. Further, such
discharges may be authorized in
designated critical habitat for Federally
listed threatened or endangered species
if the activity complies with General
Condition 11 and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service or the National Marine
Fisheries Service has concurred in a
determination of compliance with this
condition.
(b) For NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19,
22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, and
38, notification is required in
accordance with General Condition 13,
for any activity proposed in the
designated critical resource waters
including wetlands adjacent to those
waters. The District Engineer may
authorize activities under these NWPs
only after he determines that the
impacts to the critical resource waters
will be no more than minimal.
26. Fills Within 100- Year Floodplains.
For purposes of this general condition,
100-year floodplains will be identified
through the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA-approved
local floodplain maps.
(a) Discharges Below Headwaters.
Discharges of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States
resulting in permanent, above-grade fills
within the 100-year floodplain at or
below the point on a stream where the
average annual flow is five cubic feet
per second (i.e., below headwaters) are
not authorized by NWPs 29, 39, 40, 42,
43, and 44. For NWPs 12 and 14, the
prospective permittee must notify the
District Engineer in accordance with
General Condition 13 and the
notification must include
documentation that any permanent,
above-grade fills in waters of the United
States within the 100-year floodplain
below headwaters comply with FEMA
or FEMA-approved local floodplain
construction requirements.
(b) Discharges in Headwaters (i.e.,
above the point on a stream where the
average annual flow is five cubic feet
per second).
(1) Flood Fringe. Discharges of
dredged or fill material into waters of
the United States resulting in
permanent, above-grade fills within the
flood fringe of the 100-year floodplain of
headwaters are not authorized by NWPs
12, 14, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, and 44, unless
the prospective permittee notifies the
District Engineer in accordance with
General Condition 13. The notification
must include documentation that such
discharges comply with FEMA or
FELLA-approved local floodplain
construction requirements.
(2) Fooodwav. Discharges of dredged
or fill material into waters of the United
States resulting in permanent, above-
grade fills within the floodwav of the
100-year floodplain of headwaters are
not authorized by NWPs 29, 39, 40, 42,
43, and 44. For NWPs 12 and 14, the
permittee must notify the District
Engineer in accordance with General
Condition 13 and the notification must
include documentation that any
permanent, above grade fills proposed
in the floodway comply with FEMA or
FEMA-approved local floodplain
constnuction requirements.
a
D. Further information
1. District engineers have authority to
determine if an activity complies with
the terms and conditions of an NWP.
2. NWPs do not obviate the need to
obtain other Federal, State, or local
permits, approvals, or authorizations
required by law.
3. NWPs do not grant any property
rights or exclusive privileges.
4. NWPs do not authorize any injury
to the property or rights of others.
5. NWPs do not authorize interference
with any existing or proposed Federal
project.
E. Definitions
Best management practices: Best
Management Practices (BMPs) are
policies, practices, procedures, or
structures implemented to mitigate the
adverse environmental effects on
surface water quality resulting from
development. BMPs are categorized as
structural or non-structural. A BMP
policy may affect the limits on a
development.
Compensatory mitigation: For
purposes of Section 10/404,
compensatory mitigation is the
restoration, creation, enhancement, or in
exceptional circumstances, preservation
of wetlands and/or other aquatic
resources for the purpose of
compensating for unavoidable adverse
impacts which remain after all
appropriate and practicable avoidance
and minimization has been achieved.
Creation: The establishment of a
wetland or other aquatic resource where
one did not formerly exist.
Enhancement: Activities conducted in
existing wetlands or other aquatic
resources which increase one or more
aquatic functions.
Ephemeral stream: An ephemeral
stream has flowing water only during,
and for a short duration after,
precipitation events in a typical year.
Ephemeral stream beds are located
above the water table year-round.
Groundwater is not a source of water for
the stream. Runoff from rainfall is the
primary source of water for stream flow.
Farm tract: A unit of contiguous land
under one ownership which is operated
as a farm or part of a farm.
Flood Fringe: That portion of the 100-
year floodplain outside of the floodway
(often referred to as "floodway fringe."
Fooodway: The area regulated by
Federal, state, or local requirements to
provide for the discharge of the base
flood so the cumulative increase in
water surface elevation is no more than
Re: 001048, NC Dept of Correction, Anson Co
Subject: Re: 001048, NC Dept of Correction, Anson Co
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 11:26:00 -0400
From: Ron Ferrell <ron.ferrell @ncmail.net>
To: Ken Averitte <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Ken,
Cyndi indicated Friday that the 401 was on hold for stormwater reasons. Do you
agree with the COE mitigation requirements, i.e. do they equal what DWQ will
require? Any problem with sending the applicant an invoice based on the 404
mitigation requirements?
Thanks
Ron
Ken Averitte wrote:
> this was on hold for a while, during the time I was gone. Since I got back,
> I faxed a copy of the WRP agreement to Cyndi, who apparently didn't get a
> copy. Should be resolved by now. If not, let me know and I'll do what I can.
> Ron Ferrell wrote:
>
> > Ken and Cyndi,
> > We have received a 404 permit for the subject project but have been
> > informed that the 401 is on hold. I am not sure the reason the project
> > is on hold, hopefully not because of mitigation. In accordance with our
> > procedures we notified the region and 401 group of our willingness to
> > accept this requirement and after the appropriate period notified the
> > applicant that we would accept the mitigation in a letter dated 1015100,
> > copies to Ken and Rob Ridings. Please note that this acceptance is a
> > little unusual in that the COE has authorized the mitigation in the
> > adjacent CU. This would still be consistent with the DWQ rules, same
> > river basin and physiographic province.
> > The 404 permits (39 and 14) authorize a total of 312 feet of stream
> > impact and 0.3 acres of wetlands, requiring mitigation for streams
> > through payment to WRP for 312 feet of stream impacts. Wetland
> > mitigation satisfied by establishing buffers along streams.
> > Please advise concerning the status of the 401. As far as I am
> > concerned they do not have a valid 404 until the 401 is issued therefore
> > I cannot send the applicant an invoice.
> > Thanks in advance for your assistance.
> > Ron
l of 1 10/23/00 12:34 PM
001048, NC Dept of Correction, Anson Co
Subject: 001048, NC Dept of Correction, Anson Co
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:07:14 -0400
From: Ron Ferrell <[e-mail]>
To: Ken Averitte <[e-mail]>, Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>,
Crystal Braswell <[e-mail]>
Ken and Cyndi,
We have received a 404 permit for the subject project but have been
informed that the 401 is on hold. I am not sure the reason the project
is on hold, hopefully not because of mitigation. In accordance with our
procedures we notified the region and 401 group of our willingness to
accept this requirement and after the appropriate period notified the
applicant that we would accept the mitigation in a letter dated 10/5/00,
copies to Ken and Rob Ridings. Please note that this acceptance is a
little unusual in that the COE has authorized the mitigation in the
adjacent CU. This would still be consistent with the DWQ rules, same
river basin and physiographic province.
The 404 permits (39 and 14) authorize a total of 312 feet of stream
impact and 0.3 acres of wetlands, requiring mitigation for streams
through payment to WRP for 312 feet of stream impacts. Wetland
mitigation satisfied by establishing buffers along streams.
Please advise concerning the status of the 401. As far as I am
concerned they do not have a valid 404 until the 401 is issued therefore
I cannot send the applicant an invoice.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Ron
101,1 10/20/00 9:07 AM
A N?pOCT. 11.2000
co for)
project Name
county a=
Wetland_Loestion
pond or lake
perennial M= .D
intermittent stream
within interstream davit
other
Soil series
predominantly orgaaio - humus, much
predominantly mineral - noa-sandy
predominantly sandy
Hydrsalie fhetous
a? eep topography
?tched or chaaaeliNd
total wedand width x100 foet
Wetland type (select one)*
• oml=d hardwood forest
Headwater forest
_ Swamp forest
wet ft
_ Pocosin
BOB forest
be
silt or
Nearest Road
-- vvv?v-_i rifiAA
- i
Adjacent d use
(W" mile upstream, upsloFe\ or radius)
?f ,- ?.rra2ural vegetation ?? Yo ,
agri' riture, urban/subud=
je,- imprious surthceJ.? Y°
Donzlnan?vegetatia //,t j
(1) }
?j
(2)
(3)
Flooding Ond wstneas
semi ermanently to penmeaently
fto or inundated
y tlood?ad or hWVb ted
$o?ded or UmPO oY
WSW
no dence of:loodiog or nufte water
P savanna j
-Pi er marsh
8
E emeral wb? Hand
C Tina Bay
Water storage
R
A BmWSboreWu stabilization --
T Mutant removal
j Wildlife habitat
N Aguatia lift value .?.-?
G ReweatioNVUcation
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10'/° nonpoint
Wetland
x 4,00m Wng
x 4.00 •
x 5.00
x 2,00
x 4.00 R
x 1.00 sl
;sturbanu1within 112 mile upMU116
1111 I
F
OCT. 11.2000 4: 39PM LNV1KUNMLn 1 HL. MUM I
11V . LU- 1 .-
*1W NORTH CpROL,INA DI[PARTMENT OF
KNVI ONMBNT AND NATURAL, RESOURCES
!
DIVISION OR WA VSR QUALITY
October 5, 2000 P ! J V L R-,
Ms. Lisa J Beckstrom
Law Engineering and Environmental Servi 0 20M
2801 Yorkmont Road
Charlotte, NC 28208 ??'1,':? +? ?y "
Subject: Payment to Wetlands storation Fund
NC Dept. of Correctio
Anson County
Dear Ms. Beekstrom:
The North Carolina Wetlands Restora 'on Program (NCWRP) received your
October 2, 2000 letter requesting that the NC VRP readdress its decision of denying the
acceptance of payment for the compensatory 'tigation requirements for the NC
Department of Corrections in Anson County. Based on information provided by you,
approximately 312 linear feet of stream in ca oging unit 03040104 of the Yadkin River
basin was needed for mitigation, You report A that in a telephone eonve> sation with Allen
Davis of the USACOE, he approved using ca oging unit 03040201 as an alternative
watershed for the mitigation to be done.
In light of this new information regar ng this request, NCWRP will accept 312
linear feet of stream mitigation for tht: Dcp ent of Corrections, Anson County,
provided that mitigation can be performed in ataloging unit 03040201. We will only
accept this payment if the use of the altemati a cataloging unit is written as a condition in
the 404 permit.
We appreciate your interest in the R
any questions concerning this matter please
Restoration Program and if you have
me at [phone].
:ercly,
Haupt
lementation Coordinator
Wetlands Restoration Program
Cc: Rob Ridings, DWQA01/Wetlands i
Allen Davis, USACOE-Wilmington
???itEe'DWQ?'RQ?
FrRSr
I
WLTLANDS RR4TORAr1ON PROGRAM
1019 MAIL stRY1619 C[NTtR, RALKlaN, NC 47499.1 e19
webs! h2o.ennstets.Ite.u4 pHeNC91a.722-9100 FAX91>-"3-0781
AN LOYAL OPPORTUNITY I AFTIRMATIVR A T1oN 4'MPLOYSR • 110% Rxcyc"011016 roo"ONNUM¢R PAPel
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Ken Averitte
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Paul Rawls
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Anson County Correctional Facility County Anson
Project Number 00 1048 County2
Recvd From APP Region Fayetteville
Received Date 8/10/00 Recvd By Region 8/15/2000
Project Type
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. BE
31-39- F OTE1O Y ON 64 1-3-20-1 F C F- 30,710. 0.27 F- 242.00 481.00
F14 Stream O YO N F- F-- r-F- F_ F- 242.00 70.00 • 60.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? pQ Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y 6 N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue * Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 345905 Longitude (ddmmss) 801049
Comments:
I guess It's not my place to que stion the pe rennial vs. intermittent calls. Assuming I was In the nght
locations
t hese st reams appea r to be inter mittent for sure. The streams indicated as intermittent are
,
g .ne y d itches o r drainage s wales at the toe of an extensive fill area. The impacted areas
identified a s "pere nnial" are m arginal (in m u o inio . However, it is my understandina that the DOC
has agreed to miti gate for thes e impacts. T he only question with this project is the need for the road
crossing on the w estern side n ear the sewe r pip station- There is an existing road parallel to this
new entran ce. on the other side of the "stre am". This road appears to be in a suitable location to
serve the p ropose d need. How ever
there is an existing RCP crossing in the immediate vicinity of
the propos ed cros sing. Althou ,
gh the wetla nd score is relatively hjgh, the water quality impacts of this
project are minima lspec:ially given the pr oposed storm water detention/treatment facilities.
Given the s tream distance tM12 .s
onpro t al is conditioned on suitable mitigation proposal and
installation of satis factory storm ,
water man agement system as well as SEPA o.k. Of required.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Anson County Correctional Facility County Anson

Project Number 00 1048 Regional Contact: Ken Averitte
Date: 10/11/2000
Comments (continued from page 1):
installation of satisfactory storm water management system, as well as SEPA OK, If required.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2

Also, please provide details of the stormwater plan referenced in your application. Until this
information is received, I will request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this
project on hold. Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete
information (15A NCAC 2H.0507(h)). I can be reached at [phone].
cerel ,
Do ey
cc: Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Fayetteville DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Mike Iagnocco, 2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28208
001048

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1 • •
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 12, 2000
Anson County
DWQ Project No. 001048
James Gates
North Carolina Department of Correction
4216 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-4216
Dear Mr. Gates:
On August 10, 2000, the NC Division of Water Quality received your application for a 401
Water Quality Certification to impact 312 linear feet of perennial streams and 0.27 acre of
wetlands for the proposed Anson County Correctional Facility. Since you propose to, impact
greater than 150 linear feet of perennial streams, compensatory stream mitigation will be required
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h). You have the following options for satisfying the
stream mitigation requirement associated with this project:
1. Payment into the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program, if the WRP will accept
the responsibility for conducting this mitigation work, or
2. Preparing and implementing a stream mitigation plan.
In your application, you have referenced a potential stream restoration site on Department of
Correction property in Alexander County, but have delayed preparation of a stream mitigation plan
until such time that your proposed mitigation site is accepted. Please note that your application
will be considered incomplete until a mitigation plan is forwarded to this office. Furthermore,
your proposed mitigation site is within the Catawba River Basin, while your impact site is located
within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. We strongly suggest that you locate a mitigation site
within the same river sub-basin as your project. Please see the Draft Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmizide.htmi for
assistance in developing a stream restoration plan. Additional options of stream enhancement,
streambank stabilization, and/or stream preservation may also be feasible for you. See the Interim,
Internal DWQ Policy on Stream Mitigation Options and Macrobenthos Monitoring for the
appropriate mitigation ratios. This document is also available on our web site at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/Ndbranch/wetland/strmmito.htm . As an alternative, you have proposed
payment into the WRP in lieu of developing your own mitigation plan. If you wish to pursue this
alternative, please contact Mr. Ron Ferrell at [phone] to ask whether the WRP will be able
to add this project to their schedule. If so, you should obtain written verification from the WRP
and provide a copy of their concurrence to this office. Wetland mitigation will not be required for
this project.
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
401/Wetlands Unit, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 9 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Anson County Correctional Facility
Project Number 00 1048
Recvd From APP
Received Date 8/10/00
Project Type
Recvd By Region 8/15/2000
County Anson
County2
Region Fayetteville
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
39 5THO Y O N 64 13-20-1 ??- 30,7 10. 0.27
14 Stream P-7@ N F-F-F_F-r-F- 242.00
F_ F_ O Y O N F_ F_ F_F_ F__ F-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y QQ N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y Q N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue * Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 345905 Longitude (ddmmss) 801049
Comments:
I guess it's not my place to the pe rennial vs. intermittent calls. Assuming I was in the right
locations, t hese st reams appea r to be inter mittent for sure. The streams indicated as intermittent are
generally d itches or drainage s wales at the toe of an extensive fill area. The impacted areas
identified a s "pere nnial" are m arginal (in m y o ipnion). However, it is my understanding that the DOC
has agreed to miti gate for thes e impacts. T he only question with this eject is the need for the road
crossing on the w estern sade n ear the sew er imp station- There is an existing road parallel to this
new entran ce, on the other side of the "stre am". This road appears to be in a suitable location to
serve the p ropose d need. How ever
there is an existing RCP crossing in the immediate vicinity of
the impos ed cros sing. Althou ,
gh the wetla nd score is relatively high, the water quality impacts of this
eject are minima lg?jjy given the pr oposed storm water detention/treatment facilities.
Given the s tream distance imp acts
approv al is conditioned on suitable mitigation proposal and
installation of satis factory storm ,
water man agement system, as well as SEPA o.k. Of required.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Anson County Correctional Facility County Anson
Project Number 00 1048
Comments (continued from page 1):
Date:
Ken Averitte
Regional Contact:
cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office
42PT STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION NO. 874760
4
DATE INVOICE/CREDIT MEMO TYPE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT DEDUCTIONS OR
DISCOUNT
NET AMOUNT
07/07/00 070700 072500-0442 $475.00 $475.00
RETURN TO VIVIAN

3 ?
VJE TI ,'
wnrK.
TOTALS 475.00 475.00