20170920 Ver 1_Year 0 AsBuilt Report_20190603

FINAL
AS -BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT (MYO)
HERON STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 100014
Full Delivery Contract No. 7192
USACE Action ID No. SAW -2017-01471
DWR No. 17-0290
RFP No. 16-006990
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Data Collection: February — May 2019
Submission: May 2019
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652

June 3, 2019
Ms. Lindsay Crocker
NC DEQ— Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1652
Subject: Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site: As -built DMS comment response
DMS Contract #: 7192; DMS Project ID: 100014; RFP # 16-006990
General:
1. If RS is petitioning to use as -built for mitigation credits, please provide a memo request to amend the
Mitigation Plan and provide detailed information on the differences between Mitigation Plan assets and
as -built assets. Add a column to Table 1 (Appendix) to show Mitigation Plan assets. There will likely be
questions as to why some of the Ell areas changed from the Mitigation Plan. Provide justification in this
memo to IRT.
A petitioning letter is attached. In addition, a column was added to Table 1 (Appendix A) containing
Mitigation Plan footages.
2. CCPV- Figure 2, label stream reaches on overview map that includes all project polygons and figures
2A -D. Revise stream shown on map to break out by restoration level and label reaches to match Reach
ID on Table 1.
Figure 2, and 2A to 2D have been updated.
Specific Comments/Questions:
1. Page 4, last paragraph, the explanation of deviations from Mitigation Plan are great, but do not
explain all of the increases in stream footage from Mitigation Plan.
More specific information was added to this paragraph to explain all increases and decreases in stream
footage from Mitigation Plan. Specifically, UT 2 was added to the discussion of mitigation footage
changes.
2. Appendix Page 3, table 2, add dates of MYO Monitoring.
MYO Monitoring was added to Table 2 (Appendix A).
3. Table 5, Appendix. How is it that you planted 1,297 stems/acre but all your vegetation plots are
showing about half that amount? Is this accurate?
The average stems/acre across the Site planted is 1297; however, most of the Site was planted at a
density of 680 stems/acre with the exception of the stream -side assemblage and marsh treatment
areas, which were planted at a density of 2720 stems/acre.
4. As Built Drawings: please have your engineer and surveyor sign the final as -built plans.
As built drawings and plans have been signed by the engineer and surveyor.
Thank you,
Worth Creech
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492

FINAL
AS -BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT (MYO)
HERON STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 100014
Full Delivery Contract No. 7192
USACE Action ID No. SAW -2017-01471
DWR No. 17-0290
RFP No. 16-006990
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Data Collection: February — May 2019
Submission: May 2019
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Contact: Worth Creech
919-755-9490 (phone)
919-755-9492 (fax)
Prepared by:
And
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact: Grant Lewis
919-215-1693 (phone)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY.....................................................................................................2
1.1 PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES.........................................................................................2
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................4
1.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURE............................................................................4
1.4 SUCCESS CRITERIA............................................................................................................5
2.0 METHODS.........................................................................................................................6
2.1 MONITORING.....................................................................................................................6
3.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................8
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Project Location
Figures 2 & 2A -2D. Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Tables 9A -9G. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables IOA- IOG. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and
Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Tables I I A-11 G. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters -Cross-sections)
Tables 12A -12G. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E. Groundwater Gauge Soil Profiles
Appendix F. Preconstruction Benthic Data
Preconstruction Benthic Results
Habitat Assessment Dataforms
Appendix G. As -built Plan Sheets
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) Table of Contents page i
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC has established the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Site).
1.1 Project Goals & Objectives
Project goals were based on the Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) report
(NCEEP 2009) and on-site preconstruction data collection of channel morphology and function
observed during field investigations. The Site is located within Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)
03030002050050. The RBRP report documents benthic ratings vary between "Fair" and "Good -
Fair" possibly due to cattle, dairy, and poultry operations. The project is not located in a Regional
or Local Watershed Planning Area; however, RBRP goals addressed by project activities are as
follows with Site specific information following the RBRP goals in parenthesis.
1. Reduce and control sediment inputs (sediment input reduction of 67.3 tons/year);
2. Reduce and manage nutrient inputs (livestock removed from streams, elimination of
fertilizer application, installation of marsh treatment areas; and a direct reduction of 893.2
pounds of nitrogen and 47.0 pounds of phosphorus per year);
Site specific mitigation goals and objectives were developed through the use of North Carolina
Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) and North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NC
WAM) analyses of preconstruction and reference stream systems at the Site (NC SFAT 2015 and
NC WFAT 2010) (see Table 1).
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 2
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Stream/Wetland Targeted Functions, Goals, and Objectives
Targeted Functions
Goals
Objectives
Compatibility of Success Criteria
(1)HYDROLOGY
(2) Flood Flow (Floodplain Access)
• Attenuate flood flow across the Site.
• Minimize downstream flooding to the
•
Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows
and restore jurisdictional wetlands
•
•
BHR not to exceed 1.2
Document four overbank events in separate monitoring years
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
maximum extent possible.
• Connect streams to functioning wetland
*
•
*
Plant wood riparian buffer
Y p
Remove livestock
Deep rip floodplain soils to reduce compaction and increase soil surface roughness
•
•
•
Livestock excluded from the easement
Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
4 Microtopographysystems.
O
•
Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
•
Conservation Easement recorded
(3) Stream Stability
•
Cross-section measurements indicate a stable channel with cobble/gravel
substrate
(4) Channel Stability
• Increase stream stability within the Site
•
Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile
•
Visual documentation of stable channels and structures
�
Remove livestock
•
BHR not to exceed 1.2
so that channels are neither aggrading nor
0
Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
•
ER of 1.4 or greater
degrading.
(4) Sediment Transport
•
Plant woody riparian buffer
•
< 10% change in BHR and ER in any given year
•
Livestock excluded from the easement
•
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
1 WATER QUALITY
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
• Remove direct nutrient and pollutant
inputs from the Site and reduce
•
•
•
•
Remove livestock and reduce agricultural land/inputs
Install marsh treatment areas
Plant woody riparian buffer
Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
•
•
Livestock excluded from the easement
Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
contributions to downstream waters.
•
Provide surface roughness through deep ripping/plowing
•
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
Wetland Particulate Change
•
•
Restore overbank flooding by establishing proper channel dynamics
Cessation of municipal land application
Wetland Physical Change
(1) HABITAT
(2) In -stream Habitat
•
Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
•
Cross-section measurement indicate a stable channel with cobble/gravel substrate
(3) In -Stream Habitat
• Improve instream and stream -side
•
•
Plant woody riparian buffer to provide organic matter and shade
Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows
•
Visual documentation of stable channels and in -stream structures.
2
O Stream -side Habitat
habitat.
and plant woody riparian buffer
*
•
Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
gy
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
(3) Stream -side Habitat
•
•
Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
•
Conservation Easement recorded
3 Thermoregulation
Wetland Landscape Patch Structure
Wetland Vegetation Composition
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 3
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

1.2 Project Background
The Heron Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site") encompasses
a 17.64 -acre easement along warm water, unnamed tributaries to Pine Hill Branch and unnamed
tributaries to South Fork Cane Creek. The Site is located approximately 4 miles southeast of Snow
Camp and 4.5 miles north of Silk Hope in southern Alamance County near the Chatham County
line (Figure 1, Appendix A).
Prior to construction, Site land use consisted of disturbed forest and agricultural land used for
livestock grazing and hay production. Livestock had unrestricted access to Site streams, which
had been cleared, dredged of cobble substrate, straightened, trampled by livestock, eroded
vertically and laterally, and received extensive sediment and nutrient inputs from stream banks
and adjacent pastures. Approximately 62 percent of the stream channel had been degraded
contributing to sediment export from the Site resulting from mechanical processes such as
livestock hoof shear. In addition, streamside wetlands were cleared and drained by channel
downcutting and land uses. Preconstruction Site conditions resulted in degraded water quality, a
loss of aquatic habitat, reduced nutrient and sediment retention, and unstable channel
characteristics (loss of horizontal flow vectors that maintain pools and an increase in erosive forces
to channel bed and banks). Site restoration activities restored riffle -pool morphology, aided in
energy dissipation, increased aquatic habitat, stabilized channel banks, and greatly reduced
sediment loss from channel banks.
1.3 Project Components and Structure
Proposed Site restoration activities generated 5293 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 0.66
Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs) as the result of the following.
• 4068 linear feet of Priority I stream restoration
• 1184 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level I)
• 1090 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level II)
• 0.35 acre of riparian wetland restoration
• 0.61 acre of riparian wetland enhancement
Additional activities that occurred at the Site included the following.
• Installation of six marsh treatment areas throughout the Site.
• Fencing the entire conservation easement by leaving some pre-existing fencing, removing
fencing, and installing additional fencing.
• Planting 12 acres of the Site with 16,000 stems (planted species and densities by zone are
included in Table 5 [Appendix Q.
Deviations from the construction plans included realignment of UT 113 (adding 20 linear feet to
the alignment) due to conflicts with a gas line crossing. The realignment resulted in the reduction
of a log vane and alterations to pipe configurations within the crossing. Gas line realignment also
affected the length of UT 2 in its lower reaches (shortening the Restoration reach). UT 2 also has
minor deviations in the enhancement II reach due to profile elevation alterations to tie to the invert
of UT 1B. These profile alterations were included in construction plans, but not included in table
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 4
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

updates of the detailed plan. Profile alterations resulted in the Enhancement (level II)/Restoration
initiation point migrating upstream, and thus the length of the Enhancement (Level II) reach (UT
2A) decreased by 39 feet, and the length of the restoration reach (UT 213) increased by 17 feet.
Minor easement deviations after construction plan development resulted in some stationing
changes, most notable at the upper reaches of UT IA (adding 5 linear feet to the alignment) and
UT 8A & UTBB (reducing the alignments by a total of 4 linear feet). The easement variations also
affected channel lengths across gas lines, which do not generate mitigation credit. Eight log cross -
vanes were not constructed due to contact with bed rock, or conflicts with the gas line. In addition,
a marsh treatment area was added to the right bank of UT 6 at a draw that was concentrating surface
drainage and scouring the valley walls. No other deviations of significance occurred between
construction plans and the as -built condition. In addition, no issues have arisen since construction
occurred.
Site design was completed in July 2018. Construction started on November 27, 2018 and ended
within a final walkthrough on February 11, 2019. The Site was planted on February 21, 2019.
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background
information are summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).
1.4 Success Criteria
Project success criteria have been established per the October 24, 2016 NC Interagency Review
Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. Monitoring
and success criteria relate to project goals and objectives. From a mitigation perspective, several
of the goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally elevated by restoration activities without
direct measurement. Other goals and objectives will be considered successful upon achieving
success criteria. The following table summarizes Site success criteria.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page S
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Success Criteria
2.0 METHODS
Monitoring requirements and success criteria outlined in this plan follow the October 24, 2016 NC
Interagency Review Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update. Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports
of the data collected will be submitted to the NCDMS by Restoration Systems no later than
December 31 of each monitoring year data is collected. The monitoring schedule is summarized
in the following table.
Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Streams
•
All streams must maintain an Ordinary High -Water Mark (OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
•
Continuous surface flow must be documented each year for at least 30 consecutive days. Surface water
Wetlands
monitoring gauges will be installed in the upper third of all intermittent channels, unless otherwise requested
by the IRT.
•
Bank height ratio (BHR) cannot exceed 1.2 at any measured cross-section.
•
Entrenchment ratio (ER) must be no less than 2.2 for E- and C-type channels at any measured riffle cross-
section. Note: B -type channels may have an ER less than 1.4.
•
BHR and ER at any measure riffle cross-section should not change by more than 10% from baseline condition
Report Submittal
during any given monitoring period.
•
The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance standards shall be met through four separate
bankfull events, occurring in separate years, during the monitoring ears 1-7.
Wetland Hydrology
•
Saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for, at a minimum, 10 percent of the
growing season, during average climatic conditions. Note: Soil temperature for growing season establishment
will be measured daily utilizing a continuous monitoring soil probe. Soil temperature will be measured from
mid-February through the end of April at a minimum).
Vegetation
•
Within planted portions of the site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3; a minimum of
260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at year 7.
•
Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7 in each plot.
•
Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting list for the site;
natural recruits not on the planting list may be considered by the IRT on a case-by-case basis.
2.0 METHODS
Monitoring requirements and success criteria outlined in this plan follow the October 24, 2016 NC
Interagency Review Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update. Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports
of the data collected will be submitted to the NCDMS by Restoration Systems no later than
December 31 of each monitoring year data is collected. The monitoring schedule is summarized
in the following table.
Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Year 4
Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Streams
Wetlands
Vegetation
Macroinvertebrates
Visual Assessment
Report Submittal
2.1 Monitoring
The monitoring parameters are summarized in the following table.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
page 6
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 2019

Monitoring Summary
Stream Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
Stream Profile
Full longitudinal survey
As -built (unless otherwise
All restored stream channels
Graphic and tabular data.
required)
Stream Dimension
Cross-sections
Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
Total of 37 cross-sections on restored
Graphic and tabular data.
channels
Areas of concern to be depicted on a
Visual Assessments
Yearly
All restored stream channels
plan view figure with a written
Channel Stability
assessment and photograph of the area
included in the report.
Additional Cross-sections
Yearly
Only if instability is documented
Graphic and tabular data.
during monitoring
Stream Hydrology
Continuous monitoring surface water
Continuous recording through
Total of 10 surface water gauges
Surface water data for each monitoring
au es and/or trail camera
monitoringperiod
period as depicted in Figures I OA -1 OD.
Total of 10 surface water gauges:
Continuous monitoring surface water
Continuous recording through
One gauge on UTI, 2, 3, 6 and 8.
Surface water data for each monitoring
Bankf ill Events
gauges and/or trail camera
monitoring period
Two gauges on UT 5.
period
Three gauges on UT 7
Visual/Physical Evidence
Continuous through
All restored stream channels
Visual evidence, photo documentation,
monitoringperiod
and/or rain data.
"Qual 4" method described in Standard
Pre -construction, Years 3, 5,
Results* will be presented on a site -by -
Benthic
Operating Procedures for Collection
and 7 during the "index
2 stations (one at the lower end
site basis and to include a list of taxa
Macroinvertebrates
and Analysis of Benthic
period" referenced in Small
UT1 and one at the lower end of UTS)
collected, an enumeration of
Macroinvertebrates, Version 5.0
Streams Biocriteria
Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and
NCDWR 2016
Development NCDW 2009
Trico etera taxa as well as Biotic Index.
Wetland Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
Soil temperature at the beginning of
Wetland
Groundwater gauges
and 7 throughout the year with
6 gauges spread throughout restored
each monitoring period to verify the
Restoration
the growing season defined as
wetlands
start of the growing season, groundwater
March 1 -October 22
and rain data for each monitoring period
Vegetation Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
Permanent vegetation plots 0.0247 acre
Vegetation
(100 square meters) in size; CVS-EEP
As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
14 plots spread across the Site
Species, height, planted vs. volunteer,
establishment and
Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
stems/acre
Version 4.2 Lee et al. 2008
vigor
Annual random vegetation plots, 0.0247
As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
4 plots randomly selected each year
Species and height
acre 100 square meters in size
*Benthic Macroinvertebrate sampling data will not be tied to success criteria; however, the data may be used as a tool to observe positive gains to in -stream habitat
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 7
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

3.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Monitoring Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water
Quality Plan. Available: https:// https:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/planning/basin-planning/water-resource-plans/cape-fear-2005 [December 8,
2016]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North
Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016. Standard Operating Procedures
for Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates (Version 5.0). (online).
Available:
https://files.nc. gov/ncdeq/Water%20Ouality/Environmental%2OSciences/BAU/NCDWR
Macroinvertebrate-SOP-February%202016_final.pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2009. Small Streams Biocriteria
Development. Available:
http://portal. ncdenr. ora/c/document_library/act_ file?uuid=2d54ad23-0345-4d6e-82fd-
04005f48eaa7&groupId=38364
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009 (online). Available
http://portal. ncdenr. org/c/document_library/get_file.9uuid=864e82e8-725 c-415 e-8ed9-
c72dfcb55012&groupId=60329
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment
Method (NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). N.C. Wetland
Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 8
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Simon A, Hupp CR. 1986. Geomorphic and Vegetative Recovery Processes Along Modified
Tennessee Streams: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Disturbed Fluvial Systems. Forest
Hydrology and Watershed Management. IAHS-AISH Publ.167.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2016. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx [August 2016].
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1960. Soil Survey of Alamance County, North
Carolina. Soil Conservation Service.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 9
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Appendix A
Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 1
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Heron Restoration Site
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
page 2
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 2019
MitigationRestoration
Stream
Existing
Restoration or
Reach
Plan
Mitigation
Mitigation
Footage/
Restoration Level
Restoration
Comment
ID
Footage/
Ratio
Credits
Wetland Type
Acreage
Acreage
Equivalent
Acreage
UT IA
(-)0+05 to 04+70
475
470
475
Enhancement (Level I)
475
1.5:1
317
57 if of UT 1 is located outside
856-57=
of the conservation easement
UT 113
04+70 to 13+26
753
836
856
Restoration
799
1:1
799
and therefore is not generating
credit
UT 2A
00+00 to 03+04
304
343
304
Enhancement Level II
304
2.5:1
122
UT 213
03+04 to 03+67
19
46
63
Restoration
63
1:1
63
UT 3
00+00 to 02+79
269
279
279
Restoration
279
1:1
279
UT 4
00+00 to 04+50
485
450
450
Restoration
450
1:1
450
52 if of UT5 is located outside
952-52=
of the conservation easement
UT 5A
00+00 to 09+52
422
952
952
Restoration
900
1:1
900
and therefore is not generating
credit
UT 513
09+52 to 14+90
538
538
538
Enhancement Level II
538
2.5:1
215
UT 6
00+00 to 07+81
683
781
781
Restoration
781
1:1
781
41 if of the UT7 restoration
reach is located outside of the
UT 7A
00+00 to 02+32
0
232
232
Restoration
232-41=
1:1
191
conservation easement and
191
therefore is not generating
credit
55 if of the UT7 enhancement
reach is located outside of the
UT 713
02+32 to 09+96
764
764
764
Enhancement (Level I)
764-55=
1.5:1
473
conservation easement and
709
therefore is not generating
credit
UT8A
00+04 to 06+09
549
607
605
Restoration
605
1:1
605
UT 813
06+09 to 08+57
248
250
248
Enhancement Level II
248
2.5:1
99
Wetland
Riparian
--
0.35
0.35
Restoration
0.35
1:1
0.35
Wetland Restoration
R
Riverine
Wetland
Riparian
E
Riverine
0.61
0.61
0.61
Enhancement
0.61
2:1
0.31
Wetland Enhancement
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
page 2
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 2019

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits (continued)
Heron Restoration Site
Length & Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level
Stream (linear footage) Riparian Wetland (acreage)
Restoration
4068* 0.35
Enhancement (Level 1)
1184** --
Enhancement Level II
1090 --
Enhancement
-- 0.61
*An additional 150 linear feet of stream restoration is located outside of the conservation easement and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation credit
calculations.
**An additional 55 linear feet of stream enhancement (level D is located outside of the conservation easement and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation
credit calculations.
Overall Assets Summar
Asset Category Overall Credits
Stream 5293
Riparian Riverine Wetland 0.66
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Heron Restoration Site
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Deliver
Technical Proposal RFP No. 16-006990
January 11, 2017
January 11, 2017
Institution Date CDMS Contract No. 100014
--
May 22, 2017
404 Permit
--
October 10, 2018
Mitigation Plan
--
July 2018
Construction Plans
--
July 17, 2018
Site Construction
--
November 27, 2018 -February
11, 2019
Planting
--
February 21, 2019
As -built Baseline Monitoring (MYO)
February -March 2019
May 2019
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 3
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Heron Restoration Site
Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems
Project Name
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Project County
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Project Area acres
Worth Creech
Project Coordinates latitude & latitude
919-755-9490
Designer
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Project Watershed Summary Information
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Project River Basin
Grant Lewis
Cape Fear
919-215-1693
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Heron Restoration Site
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 4
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019
Project Information
Project Name
Heron Restoration Site
Project County
Alamance County, North Carolina
Project Area acres
17.64
Project Coordinates latitude & latitude
35.853955°N, -79.363458°W
Planted Area acres
12.05
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
Project River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14 -digit)
03030002050050
NCDWR Sub -basin for Project
03-06-04
Project Drainage Area acres
14 to 96
Percentage of Project Drainage Area
Impervious
that is
<2%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Managed Herbaceous Cover & Mixed Upland Hardwoods
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 4
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Section 4. Project Attribute Table
Heron Restoration Site (continued)
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 5
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
UT1
UT2
UT 3
UT4
UT 5
UT6
UT 7
UT 8
Length of reach linear feet
1155
363
269
485
907
683
202
1221
Valley Classification & Confinement
Alluvial, confined
Drainage Area acres
96.4
7.1 11.7 17.2 38.1 14.1 20.9
30.8
NCDWR Stream ID Score
30.5
22.5 28.5 33.5 27.5 23.5 24.5
27.5
Perennial/ Perennial/ Perennial/
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Perennial
Intermittent perennial Intermittent
Perennial
Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
WS -V, NSW
Existing Morphological Description
Cg5
GO
Cg5
Eg5
Eg5
Cg5
Cg5
Eg5
Ros en 1996
Proposed Stream Classification (Rosgen
C/E 4
Gf 5
C/E 4
C/E 4
C/E 4
C/E 4
E14
C/E 4
1996
Existing Evolutionary Stage (Simon and
III/IV
I/III/IV
III/IV
II/III
II/III
III/IV
III/IV
II/III
Hupp 1986
Alamance silt loam, Georgeville silt loam, Goldston slaty silt loam, Herndon silt loam, Orange silt loam, Worsham sandy
Underlying Mapped Soils
loam, Local Alluvial Land,
Drainage Class
Well -drained, well -drained, well -drained, well -drained, well drained, poorly -drained, oorl -drained
Hydric Soil Status
Nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, hydric, hydric, respectively
Valley Sloe
0.0074
0.0270 0.0222 0.0244 0.0358 0.0300 0.0255
0.0218
FEMA Classification
NA
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont Alluvial Forest/Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover Site
43% forest,55% agricultural land, <2% low density residential/impervious surface
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover
65% forest, 30% agricultural land, <5% low density residential/impervious surface
Cedarock Reference Channel
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive
<5%
Vegetation
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) page 5
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Project Location
Figures 2 & 2A -2D. Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic
Society, i -cubed
f
'- �`-`=�. r _`-•. I _ fir,'/'
AOL'� ,! =I M � � . - .vim � 1 �`•
Axa�i
f _
— — ` EriVirg riarseniaainc.
0
Prepared for:
14
RESTORATION
L/ xst I. - *, Project:
_ �`ir
o J
HERON STREAM
° AND WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
x k
' �I�` •/ - - •��^'••�!' { t I' 'I I'- - V � .�• -__ �«4t ' - 'S ]Y��--aAl2�-i4'����yr
y
87Alamance County, NC
Title:
i ='.Greensboro / Ro' _ -' '-� � ,-• '
"tel r H -ill -
- PROJECT
Snow Camp ,W�;. _
f.
oaf LOCATION
4-7
- Gia
C) - y
NCE CO
J+, •"i -^' ._ -� = CHATHAM CO_ Drawn by:
KRJ
o Date:
- a -,�-- Fork Ch
-
W
swath F DEC 2017
"57 Scale: 1:20000
oe
Project No.:
w ` r rx -_ �� a Directions to the Site from Ralei h:
/ g
dlj1 �`� �,- Take US -64 West out of Raleigh and travel 25 miles, 17-008
,r.�.' _.. _---'I -": Take exit 381 and turn right onto NC -87 N,
After 5 miles, take a left onto Castle Rock Farm Road,
t f r~y:'
- After 5.8 miles, turn left onto Greenhill Road, FIGURE
- After 1.2 miles, turn left onto Lindley Mill Road,
ti ] ,, -. ~-•- 4V/ _y - After 0.5 mile, turn right onto Bethel South Fork Road,
-_
i� Qt_' - Site can be accessed from both sides of Bethel South Fork Road.
T r r f ��,, 1 - Site Latitude, Longitude 35.853955, -79.363458 (NAD83/WGS84)
Copynght:©..2013 National Geographic Lj'
`
O's 14.
U. S Geological Survey i �' `
;National Geospatial Program. Data
rRef'reshe'd-O-cFtober.20��}- '�` — ", USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Silk Hope and Crutchfield Crossroads, NC Quad)

a
lSnom Erl'dwpi' n ,,ci I ric,
Prepared for:
Legend
4k 47;
4 Easement = 17.64 ac
Stream Restoration = 4068 ft
Stream Enhancement (Level 1) = 1184 ft
Stream Enhancement (Level 11) = 1090 ft
4•_ Wetland Restoration = 0.35 ac
'.` Wetland Enhancement = 0.61 ac
250 500 1,000 1,500
:- Feet
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN VIEW
Drawn by:
KRJ
Date:
MAY 2019
Scale:
1:4000
Project No.:
17-008
FIGURE
2
Project:
HERON STREAM
AND WETLAND
_
MITIGATION SITE
Alamance County, NC
Title:
Legend
4k 47;
4 Easement = 17.64 ac
Stream Restoration = 4068 ft
Stream Enhancement (Level 1) = 1184 ft
Stream Enhancement (Level 11) = 1090 ft
4•_ Wetland Restoration = 0.35 ac
'.` Wetland Enhancement = 0.61 ac
250 500 1,000 1,500
:- Feet
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN VIEW
Drawn by:
KRJ
Date:
MAY 2019
Scale:
1:4000
Project No.:
17-008
FIGURE
2

AiclomErNxgo=,• n,,,,. ins:,
a' Prepared for:
r ll
TIN
p ' v
T
''. - �+ - V �:. "k e� a�•; Project:
r % %/•? Z
�' � HERON STREAM
;�rw�,. s xs.s'� - ��.;::�.•- �,�'a � AND WETLAND
F. 1 s / �y . },, P� MITIGATION SITE
1. ._ , .��-. ` •w., y� lY Ia '
,
C / 2 }y 6
1 .
xs;1 o Alamance County,
NC
Title:
110 A
F�. CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN VIEW
Legend
Easement = 17.64 ac
Stream Restoration = 4068 ft
Stream Enhancement (Level 1) = 1184 ft
Stream Enhancement (Level 11) = 1090 ft
— Channel TOB
Wetland Restoration = 0.35 ac
Wetland Enhancement = 0.61 ac
Cross Section
CVS Plots Meeting Success During MYO (2019)
Vegetation Transects Meeting Success During MYO (2019)
O Groundwater Gauge
A Stream Gauge
Benthic Sampling Location
® Marsh Treatment Area
0 100 200 400
Feet
- �it • y � , �.
3 Drawn by:
=a �. KRJ
* • . T' Date:
MAY 2019
Scale:
1.1200
�s. Project No.:
17-008
FIGURE
2A
'NC G�eriter

Heron Asbuilt Vegetation Plots
Photos Taken February 25, 2019
Plot -6
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Heron Asbuilt Vegetation Plots
Photos Taken February 25, 2019
(continued)
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 2019

Appendix C
Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Heron Restoration Site
Species
Total*
Acres
12.05
Alnus serrulata
500
Asimina triloba
100
Betula nigra
400
Carpinus caroliniana
800
Cephalanthus occidentalis
25
Cercis canadensis
500
Cornus amomum
2500
Diospyros virginiana
350
Fraxinus americana
100
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2500
Liriodendron tulipifera
125
Nyssa sylvatia
500
Platanus occidentalis
2400
Quercus lyrate
900
Quercus nigra
2000
Quercus phellos
1900
Sambucus canadensis
25
TOTALS
15,625*
Average Stems/Acre
1297
*Live stakes of Salix nigra were planted, but are not included in this table.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
EEP Project Code 17.008. Project Name: Heron Stream and Wetland
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MYO 2019)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
17.008-01-0001
17.008-01-0002
17.008-01-0003
17.008-01-0004
17.008-01-0005
17.008-01-0006
17.008-01-0007
17.008-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
2
2
2
1
1
1
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
7
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
2
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
41
4
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
41
4
4
1
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
8
8
8
2
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
6
4
4
4
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
11
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
11
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
ICommon Elderberry
IShrub
Unknown
I
I Shrub or Tree
3
31
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
16
16
16
13
13
13
12
12
12
11
11
11
12
12 12
10
10
10
17
17
17
131
13
13
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
61 61 61 41 41 4 5 51 5 51 51 5 7 7 7 6 6 6 8 8 8 7 7
7
647.51 647.51 647.51526.11526.11 526.1 485.6 485.6 485.6 445.21445.21 445.2 485.6 485.6 485.6 404.71 404.7 404.7 688 6881 688 526.11 526.1
526.1
Color for Densitv
Pnol-S = Planted
excludinE livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
EEP Project Code 17.008. Project Name: Heron Stream and Wetland
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MYO 2019)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
17.008-01-0009
17.008-01-0010
17.008-01-0011
17.008-01-0012
17.008-01-0013
17.008-01-0014
MYO (2019)
PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
1
1
4
4
4
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
21
21
21
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
13
13
13
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
10
10
10
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
11
1
1
2
21
2
19
19
19
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
6
6
6
15
15
15
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
11
1
11
1
1
2
2
2
10
10
10
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
11
Quercus
oak
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
31
31
31
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
8
8
8
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
21
2
4
4
4
19
19
19
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
41
4
1
11
1
4
4
4
11
ill
11
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
lCommon Elderberry
IShrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
Unknown
I
I Shrub or Tree
1
5
114
5
5
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
141
141
14
17
17
17
19
191
19
16
16 16
131
131
13
131
131
13
7961
196 196
1 1 1 1 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.35
8 8 8 9 9 9 11 11 11 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 20 20 20
566.6 566.6 566.6 688 688 688 768.9 768.9 768.9 647.5 647.51647.5,
47.5 647.5 526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 566.6 566.6 566.6
Color for Densitv
Pnol-S = Planted
excludinE livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Heron Restoration Site
Specieso
T-1 120
50m x 2m Tem orar
T-2 280
Plot (Bearing)
T-3 2210
T-4 3470
Asimina triloba
--
3
3
1
Betula nigra
--
--
--
1
Carpinus caroliniana
--
--
--
1
Cercis canadensis
1
--
--
3
Cornus amomum
6
--
2
--
Diospyros vir iniana
1
3
--
6
Fraxinus pennsylvaniea
1
3
1
1
Liriodendron tuli i era
1
--
--
--
N ssa s lvatia
--
--
--
1
Platanus occidentalis
2
--
--
--
uercus l rata
--
1
3
1
uercus nigra
2
4
5
1
uercus phellos
1
5
4
2
uercus s .
3
--
2
1
Total Stems
18
19
20
19
Total Stems/Acre
729
769
810
769
Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals
Heron Restoration Site
Plot #
Planted Stems/Acre
Success Criteria Met?
1
648
Yes
2
526
Yes
3
486
Yes
4
445
Yes
5
486
Yes
6
405
Yes
7
688
Yes
8
526
Yes
9
567
Yes
10
688
Yes
11
769
Yes
12
648
Yes
13
526
Yes
14
526
Yes
T-1
729
Yes
T-2
769
Yes
T-3
810
Yes
T-4
769
Yes
Average Planted Stems/Acre
612
Yes
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
Tables 9A -9G. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables lOA- IOG. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Tables 11 A -I IG. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters -Cross-sections)
Tables 12A -12G. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014) Appendices
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina May 2019

9mded cells i. hie that these will typically net be filled iv.
I- The distribmions for thew parameters can include information Rom both the cross -sectio. measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal tJG ,et,, in -bine with the projectreach(added henkflill verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement date produce a. estimate of the ba.kfull floodple tt area i. acres, wbich should be the area Rom the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4- Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based o. the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; S. Of value/needed only if the. e.-3
Table 9a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number Heron/100014 - Segment/Reach: UT 1 856 feet
Parameter Gauge2 Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Cedarock Park Ref
Causey Ref
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -RifFle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD' n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Med
Max
Min
I Mean
Med Max SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.7
8.5 11.1
8
8.1
12.1
10.7
11
11.3
7.8
8.4
9
8.3
11
13
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
13
20 30
15
18
25
122
131
140
10
75
100
25
100
100
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.7 1.1
0.8
0.8
1
1.3
1.4
1.4
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.6
4
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1.1 2
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.9
2
2
0.7
0.8
1
0.6
0.8
1.1
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
5.1
8
14.7
5.1
5.1
5.1
3.7
5.4
7.2
4
Width/Dept hRatio
4.3
14.6 1 22
8
10.1
15.1
8
9
9
12
14
16
17.4
18.7
36.7
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
2.5 4.3 1
1.9
2.1
2.2
11
1 12 1
13
5.1
8.9
11.1
3
8.3
9.3
4
'Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.9 2.5
1.0
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
0.01
1.5
25
0.0316
1.8
37
0.0576
2.1
69
0.002
22
0.01
2.7
44
0.012
81
0.007
0.8
25
0.009
1.1
34
0.01
1.3
68
2.7
0
6
1.5
25
19
0.013
23
1.6
34
16 53 11 1
0.012 0.048 0.01
20 80 12.9
2.1
68
31
31
34
4
34
Riffle Slope (f /ft)
Pool Length ft
()
Pool Max depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ff/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
20
11
1.4
44
2.4
23
16
2
68
2.8
38
27
3.3
116
4.7
17
9
0.8
10
1.5
30
31
2.8
63
2.7
36
113
10.3
91
3.5
25
17
2
51
3
3468
25
3
72
4
85
10
101
6
25
17
2
51
3
34
25
3
72
4
68
85
10
101
6
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
0.61
0.19
0.24
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/M21
Is
I
Is
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Cg 5
Eb 4
E5
E/C 4
C 4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.8
3.8
3.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
19.3
1067
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1433
856
856
Sinuosity (ft)
1.3
12
1.46
1.3
1.3
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0057
0.0258
0.0053
0.0057
0.0087
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
61
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
9mded cells i. hie that these will typically net be filled iv.
I- The distribmions for thew parameters can include information Rom both the cross -sectio. measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal tJG ,et,, in -bine with the projectreach(added henkflill verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement date produce a. estimate of the ba.kfull floodple tt area i. acres, wbich should be the area Rom the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4- Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based o. the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; S. Of value/needed only if the. e.-3

9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1=The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the projectromb(added hank"I verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4= Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Wvalue/needed only if the v exceeds3
Table 9b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number Heron/100014 - Segment/Reach: UT 3 279 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Cedarock Park Ref
Causey Ref
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SDs n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max
SDs
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.2 4.5 5.9
8
8.1
12.1
10.7
11
11.3
4.1
4.4
4.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
9 14 21
15
18
25
122
131
140
20
40
60
18
18
18
1
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.2 0.3 0.4
0.8
0.8
1
1.3
1.4
1.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
1
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.5 0.6 0.7
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.9
2
2
0.4
0.4
0.5
1
1
1
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft
1.4
8
14.7
1.4
1.4
1.4
4.5
4.5
4.5
1
Width/DepthRatio
8 1 17.4 29.5 1
8
10.1
15.1
8
9
9
12
14
16
1 13.2
13.2
13.2
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4 2.2 3.8
1.9
2.1
2.2
11
12
13
4.9
9
12.7
2.3
2.3
2.3
1
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.7 1 2.2 2.4
1.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattem of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
0.01
1.5
25
0.0316
1.8
37
0.0576
2.1
69
0.002
22
0.01
2.7
44
0.012
81
0.023
0.4
13
0.031
0.6
18
0.035
0.7
35
4
0.011
4
1
13
11
0.029
9
1
18
10 19
0.027 0.736
8 21
1 1
35
4.3
0.017
4.9
0
14
14
13
1
14
Riffle Slo a ft/ft
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth ft
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (TUR)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
No distinct repetitive pattem of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
20
11
1.4
44
2.4
23
16
2
68
2.8
38
27
3.3
116
4.7
17
9
0.8
1 10
1 1.5
30
31113
2.8
63
1 2.7
36
10.3
91
3.5
13
9
2
1 26
1 3
18
13
3
1 37
1 4
27
44
10
53
6
13
9
2
26
3
18
13
3
37
4
27
44
10
53
6
Reach Shear Stress competenc Ib/f
1.42
0.34
0.56
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Cq 5
Eb 4
E5
E/C 4
C 4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.6
3.6
1.1
Bankfull Dischar a cfs
5
ow
-
Valley length (ft)
229
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
247
279
279
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
1.2
1.46
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft)
0.0207
0.0258
0.0053
0.0193
0.0176
BE slope (ft/ft)
'Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
100
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1=The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the projectromb(added hank"I verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4= Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Wvalue/needed only if the v exceeds3

9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1 -The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the project romb(added hank"I verification
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4- Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the v exceeds3
Table 9c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number Heron/10O014 - Segment/Reach: UT 4 450 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Cedarock Park Ref
Causey Ref
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SDs n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max SDS
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.1
3.8 4.9
8
8.1
12.1
10.7
11
11.3
4.6
5
5.4
6.5
7.3
8
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
6
15 30
15
18
25
122
131
140
25
50
75
40
40
40
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.5 0.6
0.8
0.8
1
1.3
1.4
1.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.5
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.7
0.8 0.9
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.9
2
2
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
2
8
14.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.2
3
3.7
2
Width/DepthRatio
5.2
7.7 12.3
8
10.1
15.1
8
9
9
12
14
16
17.3
18.3
19.2
2
Entrenchmeaiol
1.3
3.9 6.1
1.9
2.1
2.2
11
12
13
5.4
10
14
5
5.6
6.2
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1.3
2.3 4.0
1.0
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
0.01
1.5
25
0.0316
1.8
37
0.0576
2.1
69
0.002
22
0.01
2.7
44
0.012
81
0.037
0.5
15
0.05
0.7
20
0.056
0.8
40
4
0
4
1.1
15
9
0.021
10
1.3
1 20
9 20 3.5
0.017 0.061 0.014
10 18 3.5
1.4
40
23
23
22
2
22
Riffle Slo e TUR
Pool Length (ft)
Pool depth ft
l Spacing
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
No distinct repetitive pattem of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
20
11
1.4
44
2.4
23
16
2
68
2.8
38
27
3.3
116
4.7
17
1 9
0.8
1 10
1 1.5
30
31
2.8
1 63
1 2.7
36
113
10.3
91
1 3.5
15
10
2
1 30
1 3
20
15
3
43
4
30
50
10
60
6
15
10
2
30
3
20
15
3
1 43
1 4
30
50
10
60
6
Reach Shear Stress competent Ib/f
2.79
0.6
0.59
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eq 5
Eb 4
E5
E/C 4
C 4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.7
4
2.4
Bankfull Discharge cfs
7.3
Valley length (ft)
391
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
428
450
450
Sinuosity(ft)
1.09
1.2
1.46
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft)
0.0283
0.0258
0.0053
0.3111
0.0254
BF slope (ft/ft)
36ankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with ErodingBanks
56
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1 -The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the project romb(added hank"I verification
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4- Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the v exceeds3

ataded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1=The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the projectromb(added hank"I verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4= Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the v exceeds3
Table 9d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number Heron/10O014 - Segment/Reach: UT 5 952 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Cedarock Park Ref
Causey Ref
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SDs n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max SD5
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.5 3.7 6
8
8.1
12.1
10.7
11
11.3
4.6
5
5.4
4.9
6.9
8.1
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4 12 30
15
18
25
122
131
140
25
50
75
40
40
40
4
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.3 0.5 0.6
0.8
0.8
1
1.3
1.4
1.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.5
4
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.5 0.8 0.9
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.9
2
2
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
1.6
8
14.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.4
3.7
4
Width/DepthRatio
3.6 1 8.8 20 1
8
10.1
15.1
8
9
9
12
14
16
12.6
18.3
1 20.9
4
Entrenchment Ratio 1
1.4 1 3.1 1 1 7.3
1.9
2.1 1
2.2
11
1 12
1 13
5.4
1 10 1
14
4.9
5.9
8.2
4
Bank Height Ratiol
1.3 1.5 2.0
1.0
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
0.01
1.5
25
0.0316
1.8
37
0.0576
2.1
69
0.002
22
0.01
2.7
44
0.012
81
0.037
0.5
15
0.05
0.7
20
0.056
0.8
40
3
0.004
4
0.8
15
11
0.028
12
1
20
9 49 8.4
0.027 0.051 0.01
10 59 8.5
1.1
40
41
41
41
4
41
Riffle Slo e TUR
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth ft
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
2023
11
1.4
44
2.4
16
2
68
2.8
38
27
3.3
116
4.7
17
9
0.8
10
1 1.5
30
31
2.8
63
2.7
36
113
10.3
91
3.5
15
10
2
30
3
20
15
3
43
4 1
30
50
10
60
6
15
10
2
30
3
20
15
3
43
4
30
50
10
60
6
Reach Shear Stress competenc Ib/f
2.79
0.6
0.5
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eq 5
Eb 4
E5
E/C 4
E/C 4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
4
2.3
Bankfull Discharge cfs
5.5
In
-
Valley length (ft)
579
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
605
952
952
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
1.2
1.46
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft)
0.0372
0.0258
0.0053
0.3111
0.0256
BE slope (ft/ft)
'Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
50
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
ataded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1=The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the projectromb(added hank"I verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4= Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the v exceeds3

9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1=The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the projectromb(added hank"I verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4= Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Wvalue/needed only if the v exceeds3
Table 9e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number Heron/10O014 - Segment/Reach: UT 6 781 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Cedarock Park Ref
Causey Ref
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SDs n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max SDs
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.6 6.4 9.6
8
8.1
12.1
10.7
11
11.3
4.2
4.6
4.9
6.1
6.5
6.8
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
7 16 46
15
18
25
122
131
140
25
50
75
40
40
40
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.2 0.3 0.3
0.8
0.8
1
1.3
1.4
1.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.4 0.5 0.8
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.9
2
2
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.9
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
1.5
8
14.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.2
2.9
3.5
2
Width/Depth Ratio
15.3 26.7 48
8
10.1
15.1
8
9
9
12
14
16
13.2
15.1
1 16.9
2
Entrenchment Ratio 1
1.1 1 2.4 1 4.8 1
1.9
1 2.1 1
2.2
11
1 12
1 13
5.9
1 10.9
15.3
5.9
1 6.2
6.6
2
Bank Height Ratiol
3.7 5.0 1 7.5
1.0
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.0 1
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
0.01
1.5
25
0.0316
1.8
37
0.0576
2.1
69
0.002
22
0.01
2.7
44
0.012
81
0.031fig
0.4
13.7
2
0.001
4
1
14
10
0.028
12
1.2
18
7 47 8.8
0.024 0.126 0.021
12 18 3.7
1.3
37
33
33
33
2
33
Riffle Slo e TUR
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth ft
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (f /ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
20
11
1.4
44
2.4
23
16
2
68
2.8
38
27
3.3
116
4.7
17
9
0.8
10
1.5
30
31
2.8
1 63
2.7
36
113
10.3
91 1
3.5
13.7
9
2
27
3
18.3
14
3
39
4
36.7
46
10
55
6
14
9
2
27
3
18
14
3
39
4
37
46
10
55
6
Reach Shear Stress competenc Ib/f
14.18
0.47
0.56
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Cq 5
Eb 4
E5
E/C 4
C 4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.5
3.5
1.8
Bankfull Discharge cfs
5.2
In
-
Valley length (ft)
486
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
522
781
781
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
1.2
1.46
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft)
0.028
0.0258
0.0053
0.0261
0.0225
BE slope (ft/ft)
'Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
68
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1=The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the projectromb(added hank"I verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4= Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Wvalue/needed only if the v exceeds3

9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1 -The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the project romb(added hank"I verification
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4- Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding based on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Wvalue/needed only if the v exceeds3
Table 9f. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number Heron/100014 - Segment/Reach: UT 7 232 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Cedarock Park Ref
Causey Ref
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SDs n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max SDs
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.1
5.3 6.7
8
8.1
12.1
10.7
11
11.3
4.9
5.3
5.7
6.2
6.6
7.8
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
7
13 29
15
18
25
122
131
140
25
50
75
10
20
20
4
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.3
0.4 0.5
0.8
0.8
1
1.3
1.4
1.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.5
4
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.4
0.6 0.8
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.9
2
2
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.7
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
2
8
14.7
2
2
2
1.8
2.7
3.3
4
Width/DepthRatio
8.2
1 14.5 22.3 1
8
10.1
15.1
8
9
9
12
14
16
12.8
18.5
24.2
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.7
2.4 5.2
1.9
2.1
2.2
11
12
13
5
9
13
1.6
2.8
3.1
4
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.8
2.5 4.1
1.01.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
ProfileIII
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
0.01
1.5
25
0.0316
1.8
37
0.0576
2.1
69
0.002
22
0.01
2.7
44
0.012
81
0.027
1.3
16
0.036
1.9
21
0.04
2.1
42
3
0.006
3
1
16
13
0.029
9
1.1
21
10 75 13
0.029 0.056 0.011
9 14 2.6
1.5
42
42
42
41
3
42
Riffle Slo a ft/ft
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth ft
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (TUR)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
20
11
1.4
44
2.4
23
16
2
68
2.8
38
27
3.3
116
4.7
17
9
0.8
1 10
1 1.5
30
31
2.8
63
1 2.7
36
113
10.3
1 91
1 3.5
16
10
2
31
3
21
16
3
45
4
32
53
10
64
6
16
10
2
31
3
21
16
3
45
4
32
53
10
64
6
Reach Shear Stress competenc Ib/f
2.36
0.45
0.61
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Cq 5
Eb 4
E5
Eb 4
Cb 4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.5
3.5
2.6
Bankfull Discharge cfs
7
Valley length (ft)
755
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
778
232
232
Sinuosity(ft)
1.03
1.2
1.46
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Sloe Channel(ft/ft)
0.0248
0.0258
0.0053
0.0222
0.0268
BF slope (ft/ft)
'Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
76
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1 -The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the project romb(added hank"I verification
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4- Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding based on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Wvalue/needed only if the v exceeds3

9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1=The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the projectromb(added hank"I verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4= Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the v exceeds3
Table 9g. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number Heron/10O014 - Segment/Reach: UT 8 605 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Cedarock Park Ref
Causey Ref
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SDs n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max SDs
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.2 5.1 6.1
8
8.1
12.1
10.7
11
11.3
5.5
5.9
6.3
6.5
7.9
9.3
2
Floodprone Width (ft) r
5 15 30
15
18
25
122
131
140
25
50
75
20
30
40
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4 0.5 0.6
0.8
0.8
1
1.3
1.4
1.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.6 0.8 1
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.9
2
2
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
2.5
8
14.7
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.6
3.2
3.7
2
Width/DepthRatio
7 11.3 1 1 15.3
8
10.1 1
15.1
8
9
1 9
1 12
14 1
16
1 16.3
19.8
23.4 1
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1 2.7 1 1 4.9
1.9
2.1
2.2
11
12
13
4.6
8.5
11.9
2.2
4.2
6.2
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1 . 1 2.3 1 13.7
1.0
1.8
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
0.01
1.5
25
0.0316
1.8
37
0.0576
2.1
69
0.002
22
0.01
2.70.5
44
0.012
81
0.023
17
0.03
0.8
24
0.034
0.9
47
5
0.007
6
0.9
17
11
0.02
15
1.3
24
11 19 3.4
0.017 0.041 0.009
15 24 4.8
1.6
47
23
23
23
2
23
Riffle Slo e TUR
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth ft
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (TUR)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Width Ratio
Transport parameters
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
20
11
1.4
44
2.4
23
16
2
68
2.8
38
27
3.3
116
4.7
17
9
0.8
10
1.5
30
31
2.8
63
2.7
36
113
10.3
91
3.5
17
11
2
35
3
24
18
3
50
4
36
59
771Meander
1�34
6
17
11
24
18
36
59
10
6
Reach Shear Stress competenc Ib/f
1.85
0.44
0.32
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eq 5
Eb 4
E5
E/C 4
C 4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.6
3.6
2.8
Bankfull Discharge cfs
9.1
Valley length (ft)
520
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
543
605
605
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
1.2
1.46
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft)
0.0218
0.0258
0.0053
0.019
0.0138
BF slope (ft/ft)
3BankfullFloodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
80
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
9iaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled iv.
1=The distribw.iovs for these parameters can include information from both the Cross-section memwemevts and the longitudinal profile. 2= For projects with a proximal US gauge iv -line with the projectromb(added hank"I verification -rare).
3. Utilizing XS messmement data produce an estimate of the bankfWl floodplain area in acres, which shoWd be the mea from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4= Proportion of reach exhibiting banks tbat me eroding bored on the visual survey for compmison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the v exceeds3

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - SegmenUReach: UT 1 (856 feet)
SM1asetl cans mamma 11. d— W II typically not be filled in.
= R—, Run, Paol, GI,I Slep; Sllllgay, Send, G.-, Cobble. Boulder, Bearack; dip = max pave, dl =
n n m nt elas-—di,lblI, c o etas e m .tea entl Prov e o eat cars in table. mvn res rom emeasurM cros n as visual estimates
3 =_s _bin tM reach faofage Info IM1e c esaea hill .tea entl provide the percentage of tM totals acblf.n. iln each class Incth. a -I.. This WII result from tM measured crass sections as vrell as the longlludlnal petiole
Fdd a R,3 -These classes are—Is buil) around the Resgen clessgi-id,end —ranking breaks,but xere aaj—dsl'I to make for easier assignment 1p svnevfim coarser mns bases on visual estimates in IM1efield such IM1at measurement id every segmem for ER ..Id rot be necessaq.
m n rovide the reatlerlepnsumer of design end m—ring infpm,mipn xilM1 a good general sense m the extent p hyd-, containment In the pre¢xisting end tM1e rehedliletetl stets, as -11as comparisons ti, IM1e reference distributi—
e In prlar aubmis.lona as a .... pie j--iicllona as part of - tlesign measurements), M1oxe— IM1 ampma have often focused entirety on facllnatlrg design We- pravming a n..,,,M1 preconsfMlon dlatabullon of these paremiiers, leavl,g tM read—.n,,—retlM1 a sample lM1at la valghled heav fly on the stable sections et
t. reach Hlni m hi, ii aribut ,for v—parameterssI—Id inclutle data from biAh the cross-section measurements and th, lonrelutliel profile and in the case of ER, v lsual estimates. For exa pi,,the typical mrgituainal p -id permits samplii,g m the BHR at mattes beyond[hose subject ti, crosssectipns entl lM1erefore can be readily lmegretea entl provide
a mare complete sampb distribution far th— parameters, thereby provII the dsmbutlo,Jcaverege necessary to prov Me me MoI,l ----
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - SegmentlReach: UT 3 (279 feet)
Fddo R,3 - es a re bps y built roun e c as m n n ren s, but re adjusted sl m ore ier a wnevfim c ars r ns se on visa sM1ma es int ieltl su t ---rt nt m every s g m far ER —d rut be nates, ry
e in a is tlerlcpn um r p n mon prm n re ansa m the ex ant of�M1 p sinm n in xi e r M1aglita e s as n M1e reference dimributions.
— 1111 e In prlar submlaslonasas a..—pi. (crosaaecllon es part of the tlealgn measurements), hox— lM1 ample. have of en f—iidentirety on fact Hatlrg design lxtfhauf provldng a thorough p. -I dlatabullon of the.e paremiie,leavbg tM read.—n,,—rvAlM1a sample that la val1 heavily on the �.bli,.action. or
t reac . i man a iributi- ort me ars s m e a rom a cross secs n --—n. n s n e eutliel profile entl in tM1e case m ER, visual estimates. For e a p , the typical b iditusinal profim permas sa pig m the BHR at raffles a nd those objet td cross-secepns entl lM1erefore can be reatlily Imegmtea entl provide
a mare complete sampb dletrlbubon far these parameeters, thereby pmlvitling Ne UsmbutwNco I,— necessary to prov Me mean I 1 .—p.,..—
Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summery (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project NamelNumber (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 4 (450 feet)
pp �ea asece�ses are m ... n a pagan cascimamn an am renkmg bred s, p uxr Idjusa sII to mea pr ea.rer. en .sen c..— ms ase an papa.sbmaes int a m sop 1- mea.urement m every segmmd lar ER..Id ml ba necessary.
to prone a red r c n.umer o eslgn a arm a good gen .erase a by d—& co ainmen m xi drag an a e s as c sans o area nae
ER end BHR have been atldressed to pror submissbna as a subs mdp a (crossrsections as pea of the d.sbn measuremenlls). ,—w .,, tl.. subaampme bave often focuaea entirelyaon f acioten g dasigun lvnthout providing a tl.—u l preconatMiotn diat6.ion . thea. peremeters, leavirg tM—d.lcamumer.l a sample tl.t m xeig..d h..yily Doth. stable sections oI
t reac i . n oleos or ase parameters sheultl inclutle dma fmm bmM1 the cross-section measurements entl the longltutlinalpMile entl in the case et ER,vwusl estimates. For example, the typical longitutllnalpMim Dermita samDlirg of the BHR at rilllea beyontl those subject to crosaeectlona entl tM1erelore can be reatlily Inlegmtetl entl provide
e mare complete sample distribution for IM1ese parameters, thereby providing Ne distributioNcavemge rreuasery to provide meaningful compenaons.
2 Entrenchment Class <15/1.5-1.99/2.0-4.9/50-9.9/>10
Fddo R,3 - es a re bps y built roun e c as m n n ren s, but re adjusted sl m ore ier a wnevfim c ars r ns se on visa sM1ma es int ieltl su t ---rt nt m every s g m far ER —d rut be nates, ry
e in a is tlerlcpn um r p n mon prm n re ansa m the ex ant of�M1 p sinm n in xi e r M1aglita e s as n M1e reference dimributions.
— 1111 e In prlar submlaslonasas a..—pi. (crosaaecllon es part of the tlealgn measurements), hox— lM1 ample. have of en f—iidentirety on fact Hatlrg design lxtfhauf provldng a thorough p. -I dlatabullon of the.e paremiie,leavbg tM read.—n,,—rvAlM1a sample that la val1 heavily on the �.bli,.action. or
t reac . i man a iributi- ort me ars s m e a rom a cross secs n --—n. n s n e eutliel profile entl in tM1e case m ER, visual estimates. For e a p , the typical b iditusinal profim permas sa pig m the BHR at raffles a nd those objet td cross-secepns entl lM1erefore can be reatlily Imegmtea entl provide
a mare complete sampb dletrlbubon far these parameeters, thereby pmlvitling Ne UsmbutwNco I,— necessary to prov Me mean I 1 .—p.,..—
Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summery (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project NamelNumber (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 4 (450 feet)
pp �ea asece�ses are m ... n a pagan cascimamn an am renkmg bred s, p uxr Idjusa sII to mea pr ea.rer. en .sen c..— ms ase an papa.sbmaes int a m sop 1- mea.urement m every segmmd lar ER..Id ml ba necessary.
to prone a red r c n.umer o eslgn a arm a good gen .erase a by d—& co ainmen m xi drag an a e s as c sans o area nae
ER end BHR have been atldressed to pror submissbna as a subs mdp a (crossrsections as pea of the d.sbn measuremenlls). ,—w .,, tl.. subaampme bave often focuaea entirelyaon f acioten g dasigun lvnthout providing a tl.—u l preconatMiotn diat6.ion . thea. peremeters, leavirg tM—d.lcamumer.l a sample tl.t m xeig..d h..yily Doth. stable sections oI
t reac i . n oleos or ase parameters sheultl inclutle dma fmm bmM1 the cross-section measurements entl the longltutlinalpMile entl in the case et ER,vwusl estimates. For example, the typical longitutllnalpMim Dermita samDlirg of the BHR at rilllea beyontl those subject to crosaeectlona entl tM1erelore can be reatlily Inlegmtetl entl provide
e mare complete sample distribution for IM1ese parameters, thereby providing Ne distributioNcavemge rreuasery to provide meaningful compenaons.

Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 5 (952 feet)
00 oea ase ceases are Daley bullsIth, Roapen cla.adicallon and MVM ranking breaks, but vrere adjusted sN.11 to make for ed�ier.... I,hr lloa.ewhal coarser bins based on visual estimates inlMfield—Inst meaau—Id of every segment tar ER wauId MlMneces�ary.
hitillI.M prpvlitle tM1e reeoerlconaumer of design and monilodnp Inf—ill, vnth a good dith—I sense of the extent If ny lh.& containment In IN preaxlaling and IM reh.1tht.hid states as wall ae compabspna to Ina reference dhdrlbub...
ReaMbil Mve Men eOr,—Ih prior submissions as a subsample(cross-sections as pan of the desren measuremems). boxever, these subeamples h— often f—ilt antire, on facII design Wthld proviI a th—gh presonsinnion disbib,nion of th— peremeters,l— IN tM —d--rwile� sample tMtIe weigmed h.—ly on the stable secrons of
=bill=
or a erose sec lonpitutlinal profile and in tM1e case of ER, visual estimates. For example, [he typical btgitutlinal profib permha eamplitg If tM1e BHR at tittles beyontl tM1ose aublect to croasaections antl Inerefore can be readily Inlepreted antl provide
e more co pate sample diI butlonbolrlM1ese plbitid—,therebyhproviding tEM disMbutimJcovlerege necessary to prov'de meaning).1 comparisons.
Table 10e. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 6 (781 feet)
ems ere ise ie ereatl^pilpr aubmis.I.. as a suM.ple jcrosaaecllon as pan of dhe tle N, euremenls),M1—.,,IMa.....Ill. have often focused entidi l, -11—IN design lwtth.tt providing a lhorougn preconsWllotn ditibiullon of tMaeparemeters,le.v IN I. —1—t— vAth.—pl.lnat la vaigM1led heavily on the a table aectiona of
t reac . men a ilrit. ort me ars s intIl. I.a t— 1.1, t e cross section m rem n s hd thi, itudinal profile and in the case of ER, visual estimates. For --p , the rypcal Imgitudinal profit, pe.ta llipliN d the RHR at riffles bgond tM1ose i.bjt to emss-sections antl Ilhitore can be reatlily Imegmtetl and provide
e mare complete s.mpN dlatrlbutlon far th.. -.id—, thereby i—iding thi,U1-th i. --h i, necessary to p.1d. meaningful compaMona.
Table 10f. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 7 (232 feet)
• -
M. •- - - - •-. .. - •- - ... r. r. a :.
MEN
III it gens indicate 1hal IMse will lypically not be filled iI
Step: Si CIay.SaM, Gravel, Cabbie, Boulder, Bedrock; dip -max pave, tllsp-max subpave
2=Entre men ass - g,lbin the c o o the m testa antl provitle the pe a tl.I reac ach ddii, n the I.bI.. msWllre till from th.measur emss-sec ions as —11 estimates
3 = lNh1bm th. reach —Ni,to the classes mdicatetl aI p ids It. p.—INf IN tidal reach —N. each class in the cable. This - result from IN hilt etl cross-sections as well as the g p ne
Foobl... 2,g - these classes are )Dials, Milt around the Roagen cleithf. shin antl MVM ranking breaks, but were adjusted slightly Io make for easier asaignmenl to somewhat coarser pins based on visual estimates in Ina field such Inst measurement of every segment for ER vrould rot M necessary.
The intent here is to pr—th, Ina reatlerlconsumer of tlesign antl monilodng information vdh i good generel sense of the ahem -of hy—1,g conlammenl in the preaxialing antl the rehabilitated states es wall es-hipensons Io the reference distributions.
e ens ress rsu mss,, Ia ample jcross-sections as pan of Ne desgn thiti merits), however, these subsamples h. -often focused entirely on facilitating designwithout provitlinga tnomugn preconstrution disnthd.n of It... paramet.,leavirg tM reatleNcormumer vMhasamplethat la weighed heavily on the stable ae d...M
tM reach. Tris means )hat iris tlislnbNionsfor these peremeterm should inclutle dale from bolo the cross-section meeauremenls antl the longitudinal profile antl in iris case of EH, visual eslimeles. For axe pa. the typical longitudinalprofne permits sampling of the BHR et Mlles beyond those subject to cross-sections antl therefore ten ba readily lnlegreled end provide
a mare complete sample distribution for tMae parameters, thereby provltling the tlisMbutbrgcaverege necessary to proud. meaningful compaMona.

Table 109. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 8 (605 feet)
00 o easae c.saes are Daley bull) around iM1e Roapen cla..1-lion and —I ranking breaks, but vrere.1..t.d sllgM1tly to make for eas-er...lpnmenl to ammewfial coarmer bin. b ... d on visual eatlmates In .. 1,.M-1- meaauremenl of every segment far ER vroultl Iwl be necessary.
la pravlitle iM1e _d.dconsumer of tleslgn antl monllodng Infom,ation vnth a good generel.ense of - extent of by tlrolagk conlalnment In iM1e preaxlaling antl IM1e rebabiR—d states as wall a. compadsans to IM1e reference d,.trlbub...
Re antbH.Rhave been eOr,—In prior submissions es a subsample(cross-secuone as part or the-, meesur-0). boxev er, these subsampies have —n -.- on f an1-a design Wth-pmv id, a thomugb presonsiMion diem—n m these peremeters, leavi,g lbs reatler/conaumer xilba sampleibal Is weigmad h.—ly on the slabie sections of
rest . or a cross sec lonpitutllnal profile and In iM1e case of ER, visual eatlmates. For example, [he typical blgitutlinal profib pe,mlta eamplllg of the BHR at nfflea beyontl tM1oae aublect to croasaecilons antl IM1erefore can be really Inleprmtetl antl provltle
e more cg pate sample distrlbullgnbolriM1ese pbremaet�ers mherebyhp ding the distdbutbNcovlerege necessary to pmv Ne meaningful co prions.

1 -Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be cons is tent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. ifthis cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Tablella. Monitoring Data
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) Segment/Reach: UT 1 (856 feet)
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Record elevation (datum) used
Floodiphore Width (1t)
Bankfull Mean Depth fft)
BankfullWidth/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ane. (ft')
BankfullWidth/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Cross Sectional Area
1 -Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be cons is tent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. ifthis cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dim ens ional/deposifional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. Ifthe performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Tablellb. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters —Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) SegmenVReach: UT 3 (279 feet)
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dim ens ional/deposifional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. Ifthe performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

I= Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if detemlined to be necessary."
Tablel1c. Monitoring Data
Project Name/Number III 1
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodiprone Width (1t)
Bankfull 10� Depth (III
B.nkfull Bank Height Ratio
C- Se.titmalAreabetweenend pins (ft')
eankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
LowBank Height (ft)
I= Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if detemlined to be necessary."
1 = Widthsand depths forannual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless ofdimensional/depositional development. Inputthe elevation used as the datum, which should be consistentand based on the baseline datum established. Ifthe performer has inherited the projecland cannolacquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. 0 this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to protide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Tablelld. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters —Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Heron/1 00014) Segment/Reach: UT 5 (952 feet)
Bankfull 10� Depth (III
eankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)
1 = Widthsand depths forannual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless ofdimensional/depositional development. Inputthe elevation used as the datum, which should be consistentand based on the baseline datum established. Ifthe performer has inherited the projecland cannolacquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. 0 this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to protide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

I= Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if detemlined to be necessary."
Tablelle. Monitoring Data
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) SegmenVReach: UT6(781 feet)
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (11)
Floodiprone Width (1t)
Bankfull 10� Depth (ft)
B.nkfUll Cross Sectional Area I,)
B.nkfull Bank Height Ratio
C- Sectional Area between end pins (ft')
eankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
LowBank Height (ft)
I= Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if detemlined to be necessary."
1 = Wdthsand depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless ofdimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. Ifthe performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time fora given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to protide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Tablellf. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters —Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Heron/1 00014) Segment/Reach: UT 7 (232 feet)
Bankfull 10� Depth (ft)
B.nkfUll Cross Sectional Area I,)
eankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1 = Wdthsand depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless ofdimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. Ifthe performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time fora given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to protide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

I= Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be cons is tent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. ifthis cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Tablel1g. Monitoring Data
Project Name/Number III(605 feet)
HeightRecord
8ankfull Bank RatioCross
SectionalAreatietweenend pins (ft')
Record elevaton (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
BankfullWidth/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
I= Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be cons is tent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. ifthis cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 =The diaribufions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; SIIt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip=max page, disp=max aubpave
4. = Of wlue/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12a. ... Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 1 (856 feet)
• mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Floodprone Width (it) mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Bankfull Mean Depth mmmmmemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-• mmm®memmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-=.®mm®memmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Width/Depth Ratio mmmmmemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Entrenchment R..mmmmmemmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmm
'-.•mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmm mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm mmmmm
mmmmm
Riffle Length (it) ®mm®mm
e
• ommmmm
• ®mm®mm
Pool Spacing (it) ®mmmm®
t t t t, r•: t,
m
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
Channel Beltwidth (it) ®mmmmm
mm........... ■•m
mmmm ; .
mmmm mm..... ...
from baseline m
mmmmm
m®mmmm
o©mmmm
mmmmm
MeanderWawlength
Meander WidtWR� memmmm
mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmi �mm
ml
mmmmm
Channel Thal,veg length (it)
mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
=-mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
•• mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmm
Channel Stability or Habitat Met
Elm
ilogical .. -
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 =The diaribufions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; SIIt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip=max page, disp=max aubpave
4. = Of wlue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

s aaea cells incear mat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12b. ... Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 3 (279 feet)
mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
- ommmmm
.. , - . m�m��m
- voommm
Pool Max depth
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
Channel Beltwidi
Pattern data will not typidely be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or proftle data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
---..©omomm
mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
mmmmm
Addition arame
.r .
'SC%/Se/./G-/./C-/./B-/./Be%mmmmmm
mm 14M mmmmm
mmmmm
s aaea cells incear mat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12c. ... Data Summary
Project Name/Number 111 I
mmmmmo
..............................
--•®mmmmo
................. mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
Pool Max depth (ft)
®®���©
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
��ignificant
Pattern data will not typidely be will unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
shifts from baseline
I
MMMMM
m
mmmm mm�mmm��������mm�
mmmmm
mmmm��
I
'dl6/d35/dl,50/d84/d95/======Ii==MNMMMMMM
mmmm mmm
I==
s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12d. ... Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 5 (952 feet)
mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
'-: mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
--•mmm�mommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmm
-..mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
- ©mommm
.-,- �mmmmm
- ommmmm
Pool Max depth (ft) mom®mm
mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
Channel Beltwidth (ft) mmmmmm
mmmm mmmmmmmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmmm
mmmm m�
mm
Pattern data will not typidely be will unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
ignificant shifts from.. m
mmmmm
MMMMM
mmmmm
---..mommmm
mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
mmmmm
s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12e. ... Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 6 (781 feet)
--•®®mmmo
................. mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
- ©mommm
.. , - ���� , r
Pool Max depth (ft)
m
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Pattern data will not typidely be will unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
ignificant shifts from baseline
---..©a.®mm
mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
mmmmm
Addition arame
.r
'SC%/Se/./G-/./C-/./B-/./Be%mmmmmm
mm 14M mmmmm
mmmmm
s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12f. ... Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Heron/100014) - Segment/Reach: UT 7 (232 feet)
mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
'-:
mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
--•mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmm
-..mmm®.a
.................
mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
.-,- ����mm
- ©oommm
Pool Max depth (ft)
mmmm
mmmm
mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Pattern data will not typidely be will unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
ignificant shifts from baseline
MMMMM
---..©omomm
mmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
mmmmm
Addition arame
,r.
'SC%/Se/./G-/./C-/./B-/./Be%mmmmmm
mm 14M
mmmmm
mmmmm
s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12g. ... Data Summary
Project Name/Number 111(605 feet)
--•mmmmmo
................. mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
- ©mmmmm
.. , - �mm , r. , rt•
- ommmm®
Pool Max depth (ft) m®mmm©
m
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
mmmmm
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Pattern data will not typidely be will unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
ignificant shifts from baseline
MMMMM
---..©omomm
mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
mmmmm
Addition arame
,r
s aaea cells inaicatamat Ines Own I tymcall not pe mien in.
1 =The distributions for mese parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual surveyfrom visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay,Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip =maxpave, disp=maxsubpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E
Groundwater Gauge Soil Profiles
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 2019

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: a --U („ � j ,( _Pk � I� 4-.t,I'('4.
J
County, State: k'WkMwce-J 0'4('
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: 6W -U\
Investigator: P9,A..(eAm,-
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
�0 I ( J 1%FA,- eJ d{. -�
Ca43-"jam
Matrix
Depth (inches) Color
%
Mottling
Color %
Texture
TU
C L
CL
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: U- 444d
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: V t^uv -euw,, i WeF
County, State: ( k WUA -It I Q . 0
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: U/' 0�
Investigator: PRIM W 1, o,
a
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Color %
Mottling
Color % Texture
4-3 u
T7a-4 au CL -
LlU.y-a.
101f 9- a.-7
I1) Y
fd,y_
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /JUWI JUA
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: `J'G� I�•�cwr,, J uI¢�C�,�/
County, State: k�cwa"(V—
Sampling
Point/ r
Coordinates:
03
Investigator,
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Color
%
Mottling
Color
% Texture
0— rP
(ave -`i
c10
(or- N,�
10 CC -
Co �-- T-
del i.
v
�,� ..
a ' U
u-
av
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w Aaa d u
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: k rd N � tr rtu., k-
County, State: A`uWULW1 f )v L
Sampling Point/q—�
Coordinates:
Investigator: P- f i
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
i dic4 e.
(®cu U IJ �o j
�G. •Sit'\ owv �ur
Quc 11 qwt. 6& r%W,,
I
sd�k i, oO-e- d«�-6ed
Depth (inches)
Matrix Mottling
Color % Color
% Texture
G -O
ci V
Al � �- r CI.4
/v <<C
�A clot" I(l 0' /wCl
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: - /J14 ^" J4,UA
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

Appendix F
Preconstruction Benthic Data
Preconstruction Benthic Results
Habitat Assessment Dataforms
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 2019

AXIOM, HERON PROJECT, ALAMANCE CO., NC, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES COLLECTED 10/2/2018.
PA ID NO
51818
51819
STATION
UT -1 Llower
UT -5
DATE
10/2/2018
10/2/2018
SPECIES
T.V.
F.F.G.
MOLLUSCA
Bivalvia
Veneroida
Sphaeriidae
FC
Pisidium sp.
6.6
FC
5
Gastropoda
Basommatophora
Physidae
Physella sp.
8.7
CG
32
ANNELIDA
Clitellata
Oligochaeta
CG
Tubificida
Tubificinae w.o.h.c.
CG
3
ARTHROPODA
Crustacea
Copepoda
Cyclopoida
1
Isopoda
Asellidae
SH
Caecidotea sp.
8.4
CG
1
Lirceus sp.
7.4
CG
1
Amphipoda
CG
Crangonyctidae
Crangonyx sp.
7.2
CG
12
12
Insecta
Odonata
Coenagrionidae
P
Ischnura sp.
9.5
1
1
Corduliidae
1
Coleoptera
Dytiscidae
P
Neoporus carolinus
5
1
1
Diptera
Chironomidae
Chironomus sp.
9.3
CG
3
Goeldichironomus holoprasinus
15
Polypedilum illinoense gp.
8.7
SH
2
Polypedilum scalaenum gp.
8.5
SH
1
Zavrelimyia sp.
8.6
P
1
Culicidae
I FC
PAI, Inc. Page 1 of 2 axom heron alamance co nc 10 18.xlsx

AXIOM, HERON PROJECT, ALAMANCE CO., NC, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES COLLECTED 10/2/2018.
PA ID NO
51818
51819
STATION
UT -1 Llower
UT -5
DATE
10/2/2018
10/2/2018
SPECIES
T.V. F.F.G.
Aedes sp.
1
1
TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS
75
21
TOTAL NO. OF TAXA
12
8
EPT TAXA
0
0
BIOTIC INDEX ASSIGNED VALUES
7.94
7.40
PAI, Inc. Page 2 of 2 axom heron alamance co nc 10 18.xlsx

3/06 Revision 6
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ rrOTAL SCORE 56
Directions for use: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 200 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of-way. The segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the form, select the
description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions,
select an intermediate score. A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
H 1= R o!V gti-r� .- _5,M ? rl
Stream '�, "� � 3'i KJ L Location/road: a 111) -fM• (Road Name R V County C
Date 10--Z — i Q CC# Basin(P V I, OSubbasin n30 6 7 'Z_ ( ;�
03o3m0o2 NG Y, a.?-oG'01�
Observer(s)/ Type of Study: ❑ Fish Wenthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude'S5 _`, '_Longitude- !'Ecoregion: ❑ MT &I P ❑ Slate Belt ❑ Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature °C DO mg/1 Conductivity (corr.) µS/cm pH
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: $%Forest Z %Residential 4?2 %Active Pasture % Active Crops
%Fallow Fields % Commercial %Industrial %Other - Describe:
Watershed land use : ❑Forest ]Agriculture ❑Urban ❑ Animal operations upstream
Width: (meters) Stream Channel (at top of bank) Stream Depth: (m) Avg Max
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on): (m) 9
_ r
Bank Angle: ° or ❑ NA (Vertical is 90°, horizontal is 00. Angles > 90° indicate slope is towards mid -channel, < 90°
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
❑ Channelized Ditch
'EDeeply incised -steep, straight banks Moth banks undercut at bend ZChannel filled in with sediment
❑ Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development Buried structures ❑Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphyton growth ❑ Heavy filamentous algae growth ❑Green tinge ❑ Sewage smell
Manmade Stabilization:(�2N ❑Y: ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions ❑ Sediment/grade-control structure ❑Berm/levee
Flow conditions: ❑High ❑Normal blow
Turbidity: ❑Clear ❑ Slightly Turbid Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project?? PYES ONO Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of both lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................ ❑
B. Water fills >75% of available channel, or <25% of channel substrate is exposed ........................ WK
C. Water fills 25-75% of available channel, many logs/snags exposed ............................................. ❑
D. Root mats out of water................................................................................................................... ❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools ..................................................... ❑
Weather Conditions: '!O'S Photos: ON ❑Y ❑ Digital 035mm
Remarks:
39

V, I - 1
I. Channel Modification Score
A. channel natural, frequent bends.......................................:................................................................ 5
B. channel natural, infrequent bends (channelization could be old) ...................................................... 4
C. some channelization present.............................................................................................................. 3
D. more extensive channelization, >40% of stream disrupted............................................................... 2
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ..................................................... 0
❑ Evidence of dredging ❑Evidence of desnagging=no large woody debris in stream ❑Banks of uniform shape/height
Remarks Subtotal ' 1
II. Instream Habitat: Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If >70% of the
reach is rocks, 1 type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare, Common. or Abundant.
Rocks -14 Macrophytes �' Sticks and leafpacks Snags and logs I Undercut banks or root mats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVER
Score
>70%
40-70%
20-40%
<20%
3. embeddedness 40-80%..........................................................................................................
Score
Score
Score
Score
4 or 5 types present .................
20
16
12
8
3 types present .........................
19
1'51
11
7
2 types present .........................
18
14
10
6
1 type present ...........................
17
13
9
5
No types present .......................
o woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks
�c
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay...................................................................................................
Subtotal 'i
Remarks
Subtotal
M. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) Look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look at riffle
for embeddedness, and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line" or difficulty extracting rocks.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders
Score
1. embeddedness <20% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders) .........................
15
2. embeddedness 2040%..........................................................................................................
12
3. embeddedness 40-80%..........................................................................................................
8
4. embeddedness>80%.............................................................................................................
3
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddedncss<20%............................................................................................................
14
2. embeddedness 2040%.........................................................................................................
11
3. embeddedness 40-80%........................................................................................................
6
4. embeddedness>80%............................................................................................................
2
C. substrate mostly gravel
1. embeddedness<50%............................................................................................................
8
2. embeddedness>50%............................................................................................................
J
D. substrate homogeneous
1. substrate nearly all bedrock...................................................................................................
3
2. substrate nearly all sand........................................................................................................
3
3. substrate nearly all detritus....................................................................................................
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay...................................................................................................
1
Remarks
Subtotal
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies.
A. Pools present Score
1. Pools Frequent (>30% of 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes...............................................................................................................
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in)............................................................ 8
2. Pools Infrequent (<30% of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes............................................................................................................... 6
b. pools about the same size...................................................................................................... 4
B. Pools absent............................................................................................................................................ 0
Subtotal J
❑ Pool bottom boulder-cobble=hard CTbottom sandy -sink as you walk ❑ Silt bottom ❑ Some pools over wader depth
Remarks
40
l
Page Total

T-"
V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Riffle is area of reaeration -can be debris dam, or narrow channel area. Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream.... 16 1
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width .................................... 14 7)
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ............................. 10
D. riffles absent................................................................................................................... 0
Channel Slope: ❑Typical for area ❑Steep=fast flow OLow=like a coastal stream Subtotal
VI. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
A. Banks stable
1. little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for erosion.. 7 7
B. Erosion areas present
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ..................................... 6 6
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... 5 5
3. sparse mixed vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ................. 3 3
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high flow.. 2
5. little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ........................................... 0 0
Total
Remarks
VII. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
Remarks
Score
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration ............................................. 10
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent ..................................................... 8
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal .................................... 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ....................................................... It
E. No canopy and no shading............................................................................................................. 0
Subtotal
VIII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond floodplain). Definition: A break
in the riparian zone is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as paths
down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides, etc.
FACE UPSTREAM Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
Dominant vegetation: ❑ Trees O Shrubs prorasses tliWeeds/old field ❑Exotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. width > 18 meters..................................................................................... GS 5 .,
2. width 12-18 meters................................................................................... 4 4
3. width 6-12 meters..................................................................................... 3 3
4. width < 6 meters...................................................................................... 2 2
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. width > 18 meters......................................................................... 4 4
b. width 12-18 meters....................................................................... 3 3
c. width 6-12 meters....................................................................... 2 2
d. width < 6 meters......................................................................... 1 1
2. breaks common
a. width > 18 meters......................................................................... 3 3
b. width 12-18 meters...................................................................... 2 2
c. width 6-12 meters....................................................................... 1 1
d. width < 6 meters......................................................................... 0 0
Remarks TotaILLD
Page Total 22
❑ Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion -atypical stream TOTAL SCORE
sc�
41

Diagram to determine bank angle:
90°
Supplement for Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
I
45°
Site Sketch:
Other comments:
42
135°
This side is 45° bank angle.

3/06 Revision 6
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ OTAL SCORE 48
Directions for use: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 200 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of-way. The segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the form, select the
description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions,
select an intermediate score. A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
Stream 1/l'f - 5 tky-(w Location/road: Stvv )( (Road Name 2R- CA )CountyAC R M_-4- N �t
Date p . 2 18 CC# Basin• f t trek Subbasin OS o 3 opO-2 S0 SSG
6. LJ. "i S �3o31002 NCDw2 03-0(o-04)
Observer(s)A*t-i,--ti-t Type of Study: ❑ Fish 00enthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude? c, jr,%Ll'-(' J Longitude rp -31Q � ; LEcoregion: ❑ MT 1XP ❑ Slate Belt ❑ Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature °C DO mg/l Conductivity (corr.) µS/cm pH
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: %Forest 2- %Residential—�a%Active Pasture % Active Crops
%Fallow Fields % Commercial %Industrial %Other - Describe:
Watershed land use: ❑Forest ®Agriculture ❑Urban ❑ Animal operations upstream
Width: (meters) Stream ' - Z Channel (at top of bank) Stream Depth: (m) Avg Max
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on): (m)
Bank Angle: U or ❑ NA (Vertical is 90°, horizontal is 0°. Angles > 90° indicate slope is towards mid -channel, < 90°
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
❑ Channelized Ditch 11��
'�lpet eised-Steep, straight banks ❑Both banks undercut at bend &-hannel filled in with sediment
❑ Recent overbank deposit ❑Bar development ❑Buried structures ❑Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphyton growth ❑ Heavy filamentous algae growth ❑Green tinge ❑ Sewage smell
Manmade Stabilization:'I!iN ❑Y: ❑Ri -rap, cement, gabions ❑ Sediment/grade-control structure ❑Berm/levee
Flow conditions: ❑High ❑Normal Low
Turbidity: ❑Clear ❑ Slightly Turbid urbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project?? V(YES ❑NO Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of both lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................ ❑
B. Water fills >75% of available channel, or <25% of channel substrate is exposed ........................ 10,
C. Water fills 25-75% of available channel, many logs/snags exposed ............................................. ❑
D. Root mats out of water................................................................................................................... ❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools ..................................................... ❑
Weather Conditions: LWA[IAIl Photos: (6N ❑Y ❑ Digital 1335mm
Remarks: S i < vu , •rte,. i G -% , 5 arc 1, a r r 6X-0 r� ✓r �F'
'A ! 44IN — Na N VAr/ /
39

I. Channel Modification Score
A: channel natural, frequent bends ................. ......................:................................................................ 5
B. channel natural, infrequent bends (channelization could be old) ...................................................... 4
C. some channelization present.............................................................................................................. 3-
D. more extensive channelization, >40% of stream disrupted............................................................... 2
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ........... 1 ........................................ 0
❑ Evidence of dredging ❑Evidence of desnagging=no large woody debris in stream Ld�anks of uniform shape/height 3
Remarks Subtotal
Il. Instream Habitat: Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If >70% of the
reach is rocks, 1 type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare. Common, or Abundant.
Rocks . Macrophytes Sticks and leafpacks
Snags and logs -
Undercut banks or root mats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVER
2. embeddedness 2040%..........................................................................................................
>70%
40-70%
20-40%
<20%
3
Score
Score
Score
Score
4 or 5 types present .................
20
16
12
8
3 types present .........................
19
15
11
7
2 types present .........................
18
14
jo
6
1 type present ...........................
17
13
9
5
No types present .......................
❑ No in
0
Remarks
Subtotal
O
woody vegetation riparian zone Remarks
Subtotal
III. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) Look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look at riffle
for embeddedness, and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line" or difficulty extracting rocks.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders
Score
1. embeddedness <20% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders) .........................
15
2. embeddedness 2040%..........................................................................................................
12
3. embeddedness 40-80%..........................................................................................................
8
4. embeddedness>80%.............................................................................................................
3
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddedness<20%............................................................................................................
14
2. embeddedness 2040%.........................................................................................................
11
3. embeddedness 40-80%........................................................................................................
6
4. embeddedness>80%............................................................................................................
2
C. substrate mostly gravel
1. embeddedness<50%............................................................................................................
2. embeddedness>50%............................................................................................................
4
D. substrate homogeneous
1. substrate nearly all bedrock...................................................................................................
3
2. substrate nearly all sand........................................................................................................
3
3. substrate nearly all detritus....................................................................................................
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay...................................................................................................
1
Remarks
Subtotal
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies.
A. Pools present Score
1. Pools Frequent (>30% of 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes............................................................................................................... 10
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in)............................................................ 8
2. Pools Infrequent (<30% of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes............................................................................................................... 6
b. pools about the same size...................................................................................................... .-4-)
B. Pools absent........................................................................................................................................... b
Subtotal
❑ Pool bottom boulder-cobble=hardBottom sandy -sink as you walk ❑ Silt bottom ❑ Some pools over wader depth
Remarks
Page Total
40

H .E(z" UT -
V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Riffle is area of reaeration -can be debris dam, or narrow channel area. Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream.... 16 12
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width .................................... 14 7
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ............................. 10
D. riffles absent................................................................................................................... 0
Channel Slope: ❑Typical for area ❑Steep=fast flow ❑Low=like a coastal stream Subtotal
VI. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
A. Banks stable
1. little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for erosion.. 7 7
B. Erosion areas present
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ..................................... 6 6
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... 5 5
3. sparse mixed vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ................. 3 3
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high flow.. 2 2
5. little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ........................................... 0 0 ILL
Total
Remarks
VII. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
Score
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration ............................................. 10
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent ..................................................... 8
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal .................................... 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ....................................................... 2
E. No canopy and no shading............................................................................................................. 0�
Subtotal
VIII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond floodplain). Definition: A break
in the riparian zone is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as paths
down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides, etc.
FACE UPSTREAM Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
Dominant vegetation: ❑ Trees ❑ Shrubs ❑ Grasses ❑ Weeds/old field ❑Exotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. width > 18 meters.....................................................................................
2. width 12-18 meters...................................................................................
4
J7
4
3. width 6-12 meters.....................................................................................
3
3
4. width < 6 meters......................................................................................
2
2
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. width > 18 meters.........................................................................
4
4
b. width 12-18 meters.......................................................................
3
3
c. width 6-12 meters.......................................................................
2
2
d. width < 6 meters.........................................................................
1
1
2. breaks common
a. width > 18 meters.........................................................................
3
3
b. width 12-18 meters......................................................................
2
2
c. width 6-12 meters.......................................................................
1
1
d. width < 6 meters.........................................................................
0
0 1
Remarks
V
Total
Page TotaleZ r7
❑ Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion -atypical stream. TOTAL SCORE
If�
41

�U/-�
V `+
Supplement for Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Diagram to determine bank angle:
i
I
�- - L
90° 45°
Site Sketch:
Other comments:
42
135°
This side is 45° bank angle.

Appendix G
As -built Plan Sheets
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100014)
Heron Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 2019

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
SITE
AIAMANCE COUNTY
t CHATHAM COUNTY
1 D
EDD
VICINITY MAP
Not to Scale
AS -BUILT PLANS
HERON SITE
LOCATION: ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
+26 UT1
TYPE OF WORK: STREAM RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT (CLEARING,
GRUBBING, GRADING, EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING)
t\ I
START -UT6-
STA 0+00
I' END -UT6-
_ STA 7+8I
END -UT5-
°- STA I4+90
uT7 END -
41 �3 STA b
PSH 17
START -UT5-
STA 0+00
✓D -UT2-
STA 3+67
PSH 00
O END -UT3-
STA 2+79 �
UT3 =
START -UT3- o
STA 0+00
UTI -
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 5
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
A,�rl, UT6
QG�� OOf
UT5
(b r
i r
_Q��/ _� A ��I�
UT2
PSH 06
�UT4
r I
START -UT2-
STA 0+00
+
PSH 16
y C eek
OC
S°u�r �
END -UT4-
STA 4+50
START -UT4-
STA 0+00
V
r Fo
5
out'
6e�re\ 2351
Sj
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UTl = 1331 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT5=
1490 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT2— 367 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT6=
781 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT3= 279 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT7=
996 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT4= 450 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH
OF UT8=
853 LF
TOTAL STREAM
LENGTH= 6547 LF
RESTORATION LEVEL
STREAM (linear footage)
RIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage) NONRIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)
RESTORATION
4218
0.35
-
ENHANCEMENT
2329
-
-
TOTALS
6547
0.61
-
MITIGATION UNITS
5293 SMUs
0.66 RIPARIAN WMUs
- NONRIPARIAN WMUs
UT8
STATE &TATE PROa3CT REPERENC6 NO. BINO.rEET TOTAL
S @8T&
N.C. 1HFPON SIITF, ]�
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NUMBER SHEET
01 Title Sheet
01 A Symbology Sheet
04 THRU 17 As -Built Plan and Profile Sheets
�I
FIS
0 :)
0�0
LUU
VI
LIQ
QIU
I
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION(S)
Surveyor's disclaimer: No attempt was made to locate any cemeteries, wetlands, hazardous material
sites, underground utilities or any other features above, or below ground other than those shown.
However, no visible evidence of cemeteries or utilities, aboveground or otherwise, was observed by
the undersigned (other than those shown).
I certify that the survey is of an existing parcel or parcels of land or one or more existing easements
and does not create a new street or change an existing street.
I JOHN A. RUDOLPH , certify that this plat was prepared under my supervision from an actual field
survey made under my supervision, of as -built conditions.
That the boundaries not surveyed are clearly indicated as such and were plotted from information as
referenced hereon; That the ratio of precision as calculated was 1:7,500+ and that the
global navigational satellite system (GNSS) was used to perform this survey and the following
information was used:
Class of Survey: CLASS B (HORIZONTALI CLASS B (VERTICAL)
Positional Accuracy: 0.12 feet (HORIZONTAL)
Type of GPS field procedure: RTK
Dates of survey: February 2019
Datum/Epoch: NAD 1983(20111
Published/Fixed Control Use: OPUS
Geoid Model: 2012B CONUS
Combined Grid Factor: 0.99990680 GROUND TO GRID
Units: US SURVEY FEET
That this plat meets the requirements of the standards of practice for land surveying in North
Carolina. Witness my hand and seal this 02 day of May , 2019
1IuIIII
CHCA,10 5/31/2019
oQ` FEssio' �2',
SEAL -
v L4194 0�• .z \ DocuSigned by:
i� ,gSNLEY IF v 1C9� L-4194
o ss 1121 Surveyor License Number
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION:
7.8 ACRES
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
I
�111111I1/////�
EJ
Doybu'lpgddbbrc• A RODesigned By: Prepared in the Office of:�"/<Axiom Environmental SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P,A,108gA6$C14994C3..I
218 Snow Ave - = SEAL -
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
Raleigh, NC 27603 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606 — — — —
\I'/ . TEL [phone] _ 2697 I _
Axlan EnNronmeMal. Inc. GRANT LEWIS _� ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
PROJECT DESIGNER Q� \
Restoration Systems/ iOs �IIINI���`O?`\
1 101 Haynes St. ////04 G e
Suite 211 JOSHUA G. DALTON, P.E. 1jj111\\
Raleigh, NC 27604 WORTH CREECH PROJECT ENGINEER
5/31/2019
SITE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE:

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.-
State Line — -
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin O
Computed Property Corner
Property Monument El
Parcel/Sequence Number 1z3
Existing Fence Line —x x x -
Proposed Woven Wire Fence a
Proposed Chain Link Fence El
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -wLe- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary °
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary °
Existing Historic Property Boundary
r /// P AYMM,/
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
O
New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap
0
Sign
m
w
Well
Small Mine
R
Foundation
R
Area Outline
0
Cemetery
New Right of Way Line with
Building
Concrete or Granite RM/ Marker
School
New Control of Access Line with
Church
Concrete C/A Marker
Dam
Existing Control of Access
HYDROLOGY.•
New Control of Access
Stream or Body of Water
Existing Easement Line -
—E
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
E
Jurisdictional Stream
is
Buffer Zone 1
BZ ,
Buffer Zone 2
BZ 2 -
Flow Arrow
PUE
Disappearing Stream
TUE
New Aerial Utility Easement
Spring
el -
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall
Wetland
MINOR:
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL.
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Primary Horiz Control Point
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
Exist Permanent Easment Pin and Cap
\>
New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap
0
Vertical Benchmark
m
Existing Right of Way Marker
0
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Guardrail
New Right of Way Line
R
New Right of Way Line with Pin and Cap
°
Proposed Cable Guiderail
New Right of Way Line with
R
Concrete or Granite RM/ Marker
w
New Control of Access Line with
c
Concrete C/A Marker
Single Tree
Existing Control of Access
n,
New Control of Access
Existing Easement Line -
—E
New Conservation Easement
E
New Temporary Drainage Easement
TDE
New Permanent Drainage Easement
PDE
New Permanent Drainage /Utility Easement
DUE
New Permanent Utility Easement
PUE
New Temporary Utility Easement
TUE
New Aerial Utility Easement
AUE
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
- - C -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
- - F -
Proposed Curb Ramp
cR
Existing Metal Guardrail
Utility Located Object
Proposed Guardrail
T T T
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
Existing Cable Guiderail
°
Proposed Cable Guiderail
° n °
Equality Symbol
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Pavement Removal
Geoenvironmental Boring
VEGETATION.-
- U/G Test Hole LOS A (S.U.E.*)
Single Tree
Abandoned According to Utility Records
Single Shrub
End of Information
AS-BUILT-
SBUILT.•Stream
Hedge
Woods Line
Groundwater Gauge
fl fl fl
Orchard
Vineyard
VlneY.Id
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
oNc
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall
- coNc ww
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
CONC Hw
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
�� UTILITIES.•
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
�Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H -Frame Pole
U/G Power Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole -
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
T U/G Water Line LOS B (S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS C (S.U.E*)
U/G Water Line LOS D (S.U.E*)
Above Ground Water Line
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
WG Gas Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
WG Gas Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
WG Gas Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
>----------<
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
SYMBOLOGY 0/A
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
SS Forced Main Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
O
CD
A/G water
Benthic & Water Quality Station
Origin Point on CVS Plots
CVS Plots
Cross Section
Adjusted Stream Structure
Not Constructed
Riffle Rip Rap
Adjusted Easement
Cosi)
AATUR
E.O.I.
0
Wr
Al
XS -10R
J
�$o� ooh ooh oaf
000�000�000�000�oc
E
MISCELLANEOUS:
1
Utility Pole
b
Utility Pole with Base
4-
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
©
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
®
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
2
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
~�
Geoenvironmental Boring
- - - -`- - -
- U/G Test Hole LOS A (S.U.E.*)
- - -`
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
AS-BUILT-
SBUILT.•Stream
StreamGauge
Groundwater Gauge
O
CD
A/G water
Benthic & Water Quality Station
Origin Point on CVS Plots
CVS Plots
Cross Section
Adjusted Stream Structure
Not Constructed
Riffle Rip Rap
Adjusted Easement
Cosi)
AATUR
E.O.I.
0
Wr
Al
XS -10R
J
�$o� ooh ooh oaf
000�000�000�000�oc
E

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
549—LS7DA
-ENHANNCEUE-NT -I-
_RT RESTORATION
L FiAA�LEY, MICHAEL 1TODD— 5�A -4 / i r
DB 3492 PG 0554 6� ELEV=54/.07
ART ENHA T / 548, - — —
✓w o/! l/ ( �i fl )+a4.6
ELEV=544.89- ~ ---�-- / 0 — }
LD
/ v
00
07
,,,psi � --- --_ --
J
/
—
ti
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS—BUILT STRUCTURES 4
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TEL[phone] ENO FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Aziom Environmental, Inc.
O � A II0 DochJ�S' I�d byr A R
i
o ;
Boas tic .L
e= = 26971
SOS �NG I N
�I I G
5/31/2019
9 DATE:
y DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
— UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
// / 9
A ...� e
v S
UNDARY ��� 3
<BS�
tIc — — 1
^ ' .- � -
7.■■■■■■■■■■■■li ■■■■■■■■■I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
-----------------------------------
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
............. :
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
I,iiiiiiiiiiiii■ � � S
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
T
PROP THALWEG
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50
03 +50 04 +50 05 +50 06 +50
iii
.nn■r.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
lq 01i CI "immon momm■n■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
i■■■■■■osono■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
llo,•Jxlrnn■nn■■u■■■nnnnunnnnunnnnunn
■i buliba■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■n■■■■
■■■■■
R
■■■■■■■■■■■c■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
E!
ii lEEliiii
1111000000MMMMMMMMMMMENEM
■■■■■■■■■■■■■!'7■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
-:o■em.■oo■■■■nounmoonmemos
It■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ric==;■..■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
nnnnnn■n
■iiCCGr■GGG►9iiiii�GGrr■■a■..oa===�
- ---
�
iioon■un■o.:�o mu■un■c
o
i■oini
illlmmi
�
iiiiiiiiiiiiiinuili
lu
onmoommommonmommommoonMENEEMEMENMEMEiiiiiiiiii■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
. � � nnnnnnnnnnnnn■
03 +50 04 +50 05 +50 06 +50

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88
B B 5 -7902 -44A2 -8037-73A242 D6 B444
—UTI—, —UT2— STREAM ALIGNMENT, STRUCTURE
LOCATIONS AND STREAM CROSSING ADJUSTED
DUE TO GAS LINE CONFLICT. EXISTING
STREAM ELEVATIONS USED FOR AREA INSIDE
OF COLONIAL PIPELINE EASEMENT
�FT�T
6
1 ■■■■■ MEN Z= ■■■-nommo■[MOMME■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■.■■■■.===.E°� ■■■■■■-I.EEEEE■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■ ---A■■Y■■Y■ n■■.■.:.o■■-MnEMiO:_i_Y■Gi—i--i 1G:_:moom MINIMIZE■%E
■.■■■■■1■■.NMEEOMa
r.P........... MMmOENoMEmlEE
omMM
■■■■■■■■■■■■YY■YYY.■■■.■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■.■■.iiiiiiiiiiiiNo
3 5 z'
w
L.PM
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ lI
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IUTE:I
■-■ ...............................\I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEMO■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ' - 1 -
mommommoom
iiiiiiiiim A '-7 UT
YYYn uYYYYMY■
09 +50 10 +50 11 +50
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS—BUILT
STRUCTURES 5
MEN
IT11 1a 1161
1LLJI
MIMMM■
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
IN
Lt -1
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
■I
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
...
■■■■WW■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■
....................................
....................................
.
.■■
■.■■■■I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
.■■■■■■■■.■■■■I
■I
:
:::::ME
10a1A
-■....■■
MINIMUM
........................■.■..■.■..■■
.............................■.....
- . 1
........................■■■■■■■■-■■
....■■■■■■■■M■■■■■llMMcf11■ME■M■■■■■■■
00
_ = 2697
-" /'/ ,
::::::::::::::::::::::NONE
GI N��\
OS
0::
1 ■■■■■ MEN Z= ■■■-nommo■[MOMME■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■.■■■■.===.E°� ■■■■■■-I.EEEEE■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■ ---A■■Y■■Y■ n■■.■.:.o■■-MnEMiO:_i_Y■Gi—i--i 1G:_:moom MINIMIZE■%E
■.■■■■■1■■.NMEEOMa
r.P........... MMmOENoMEmlEE
omMM
■■■■■■■■■■■■YY■YYY.■■■.■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■.■■.iiiiiiiiiiiiNo
3 5 z'
w
L.PM
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ lI
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IUTE:I
■-■ ...............................\I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEMO■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ' - 1 -
mommommoom
iiiiiiiiim A '-7 UT
YYYn uYYYYMY■
09 +50 10 +50 11 +50
END RESTORATION
STA 2+78.7 UT 3
ELEV 534.1
�t ' '
UT
END RESTORATION
STA 13+05.9
ELEV 532.76
,0111■■EXST GROUND
EEMMMMi■AT PROP THAL
/
13
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS—BUILT
STRUCTURES 5
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
. ' 9051O1,1ES FRANIWI ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
.
Doctib�i by. A R O
10a1A
C
VANES `.
_ = 2697
-" /'/ ,
CONTACT
GI N��\
OS
Q
5/31/2019
`I
DATE:
\�
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
END RESTORATION
STA 2+78.7 UT 3
ELEV 534.1
�t ' '
UT
END RESTORATION
STA 13+05.9
ELEV 532.76
,0111■■EXST GROUND
EEMMMMi■AT PROP THAL
/
13

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
_ I
\T 2 �' —K DLEY, MIC WE DLO
I
Q��
_ �TARTfNHANCE 11 3 SURVEY BOUND Y � S
a Q��
LEV -.44.89
� � I ;�' / �� � i � ., i � � Rte_ I � � ;� l lr, �� � .— ✓ _
.c
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� iG—'ii___■\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■���■\�G■—GIP■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■■■.��■�_�■-..■■■■■■■■■■■
-■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\i7■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice■..
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■anac■Iannnni�raa■o■■nIIUIIUIIu■uIIUIIOIIUIIuuIIUIIOIIUIIuuIIUIIo■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ww■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MENOMOiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii............................
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEN
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50 03
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 6
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.' 905JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TEL[phone] ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Aziom Environmental, Inc.
�111111111I��
D,occti§i it ed bbyy:C A
9 R
(75
�1089Ap�'M994C3... DiG
CL
SEAL
26971 =
UOSFyci N�-�F�o� \
G
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
/
/
O
suRvVLBNDaR�_,
N
�W
_,
/
// /"D
(VI
_ I
\T 2 �' —K DLEY, MIC WE DLO
I
Q��
_ �TARTfNHANCE 11 3 SURVEY BOUND Y � S
a Q��
LEV -.44.89
� � I ;�' / �� � i � ., i � � Rte_ I � � ;� l lr, �� � .— ✓ _
.c
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� iG—'ii___■\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■���■\�G■—GIP■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■■■.��■�_�■-..■■■■■■■■■■■
-■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\i7■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ice■..
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■anac■Iannnni�raa■o■■nIIUIIUIIu■uIIUIIOIIUIIuuIIUIIOIIUIIuuIIUIIo■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ww■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MENOMOiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii............................
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEN
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50 03
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 6
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.' 905JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TEL[phone] ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Aziom Environmental, Inc.
�111111111I��
D,occti§i it ed bbyy:C A
9 R
(75
�1089Ap�'M994C3... DiG
CL
SEAL
26971 =
UOSFyci N�-�F�o� \
G
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
A SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 1 7
52 1 4-
_ l X553
- \� ��`J-5 � /�----=-551- f_ �-y-'� � / _�J /✓ ) i
—64B-
54/7 8
—
r � ✓
jA
552
�- ~ X572Sg——
/ _
5E2
f5�1 1­1HADLEY, MICHAEL TODD
i
/ X553 549 5,L907
b,�
i
—54-7-
-�--- — — — — — — _--� /
-- — — —— ---546-
___--54 - - - -- -- - - - - -- —544E
_543 -IX
x
_a cni
% j Ci
z /
UT 3
START RESTORATION
v ELEV=3943 v )
0 +50 01 +50 02
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 20/9
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Docu$ignl2�by:C R //
96�wSII ��i
�O
\1089A�49 4C3...
SEAL
S 26971 =
�OS�NGI
hUq 6 P�
''�II11111111�`\\
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
/ l ( AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 8
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: tole
LO
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
1 (I I A D� E�/ y R U SEL L �, ��� Axiom Environmental, Inc.
�I�REVO� TRUST/ / / � � i— ' � /�� � s�v�
DB J95 Cd CROSS VANEIDT i� '�' �Ii �� c)
5� O CONSTRUCTED DUE TO /
CONTACT/ WITH B DROC�
AAARS1=f
--AID — — �� �/
/
/
541
\�'p_�� �c �_
LbG RDSS<,, NE
\RVE 6Y p
5
-0 STAft, RCS
k
110101010101010101111 HE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
n000nn■■ � • n�
............... ....
---------------------------------------
......................................■
0 +50
01
■■•
NO
— ■■
' :::::::::I
_■■■■■■■■■■1
+50 02 +50 03 +50 04 +50
■■------------
■I
MOMoM
■■■I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■I
■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■I
- 1
05 +50
06
\��\IIIIIIII///
1Docu§ti ed by: C A RO
�08994C3...
SEAL
26971
I N
''�II1111111��`\\
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
L _
o
0
L(-)�
w
Qw
u� U-)
Iw w
zw
w
v
a 7
+50

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
530
_525 O
O
CO
Ln
w
Qw
515 z cavil
w
S
U
05
+50 08
1 ; r
HADSLEY, RUSSELL B, '9
REVOC ^RUST
iiiiiiiiUEN
i
STA 0..UT 5
=Ed, Miii
09 +50
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 9
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.' 905JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TEL[phone]
ON ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
w
J O LLI
O + u�
PROPOSED
Q () w THALWEG
Qw
U)
p■■■■■■■■■■■■■
'imoommommonmoiiiiiiiiii
mom
III■■■■■■■1111...1
■�■•..TTTiI
\��11byE AA RO11111111,� /
Do.U$i I i,
F
Q4,
�%
SEAL
26971
�0S ANG I N
�II Gi �II\
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
END RESTORAT
STA 4+49.6
ELEV 513,88--L�]
I:::::m
MOM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMI
IMNNN
............
I■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I
IIIIBM■■■■■i.■■.■■i.■■i.■■i.■■i.■■i.■■i.■■i.■■i.■■i.■B
loomomsommunnummol
■i■■■■■■■■■l■■■■■
■■�moommonommol
■■
Cg9■
■G■mom
■! ■■■■■■i.�
I■■■■■� IIII■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t
.............
11

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
----------------------------
11
\ URVE;'' NDXRY)�
T 5�
ND ENHANWM NT A.
ii(�rS \ STA 5Jt90.vo-
5� 5
i
Vc-
`a VA VA \�\ 51U/g6
\�
\\ \\ 0<
m
6 H � L EVpDRU S'S
TRUST � ?
R9'OC TROT CHEEK
DL VA ii
PES 195 PG 0905 5�1
<
_ C� VY s
+50 12 +50 13 +50 14 +50 15
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 20/9
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\II/ TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
—UT 5- 1 1 1 1
END ENHANCEMENT II
STA 14+90.4
jDo�jgned(dYA
11*' Jw''C14994C3.q-j %�
-CL SEAL
26971 =
VOS�NGI N����o� \\
G
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
5 S-�
AREA ^ — ISE Vt� C� TRt1S ��
I��LY9-REGG� J; �H€EK
RE-VOC TRLISJ
-DB 1195 -PG Q95 \ -
��
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■,....,1....■...■■....■...■■....■■■■■■....■■■■■■....■...■■....■...■■....■
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■...■I,..................PROPOSE
.......■C��■■.........................................................■.
'
UT 41-1 -`
r REsroR
-
rro � —1
.................................
+00
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..
.......................
=52276I�MADR
EV,
F)E
B—�
BUST
9� - G 090-5
, 1
/ � �
O
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ENEE■AMENEE■Ntl■■■■■\�1�����.
IY YY■Y■■■■■■■■■■'.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Y■■
AREA ^ — ISE Vt� C� TRt1S ��
I��LY9-REGG� J; �H€EK
RE-VOC TRLISJ
-DB 1195 -PG Q95 \ -
��
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■,....,1....■...■■....■...■■....■■■■■■....■■■■■■....■...■■....■...■■....■
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■...■I,..................PROPOSE
.......■C��■■.........................................................■.
.................................
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..
.......................
MEN
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ENEE■AMENEE■Ntl■■■■■\�1�����.
IY YY■Y■■■■■■■■■■'.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Y■■
■■■■Gi .7■�..1G�9■■■■■
��o�.v��■���■■Y■■�:9■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■' ■mommommom
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
, ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�
■ ■■■■■E.1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
-00 E......,...
......mmmmmmmm
....................................................................
■�I...... 1.0 ......\_�\
` ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NEEM■
�--� ........................ .
PERMANENT CROSSING a ......n.■■....■...■■....■.■■■■....■..N■■....■..N■■.......■■........■■
...............
.s 1 u .........
2@24" CMPJ...........�I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..■■..■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■.r[�T
...................................................................................I.E.........EE.�■■■\0
S7■^fT=W■In TL'■NEEMn6.EMENEEMEMENEEM..Y■YYN
.NN..
■■ �►l
I■■■■■■■■■ ■.■Y■W.
I■■■■■■■■■ �� ■
Inn■■■■■ ■■
■■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■.L•GS]II.�JIJ�I'•Jll.l�..Y■!.■■...■....■■...■....■■...■
■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■..■■■R.■■■�I..�I..I}.....Y■■■■■■■■■■■■■...■....■■...■.
■■■■■■■..■■.■■■■■■.■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN001:C1.1:1■L7V91.i'a�!■..■...■■...■....■■...■....■■...■...n■...■
C.. _ _
■...
■
I.............................................................................................................................................................
I■■■■■.■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■.■■■■■■■■■...■
I■■■■■.■■■■■■■■..■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■.
• N •...................................................................................................................
.■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■...■....■■...■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■...■....■■...■....■■...■...
....... ■■.......... .........
■■■■■.G...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■■...■■...■.■■■
I■■■■■.■ • • •■■...■■....■...■■....■.■■■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■.■■■■■■■■■■...
I■■■■■.■■■■■■■...■ E...■■....■...■■....■.■■■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■....■...■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....■■...■....�
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50 03 +50
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 11
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
.' 905JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
\\\\IIII I III/// /
Doapg4d b QR�
108�14994C3...
CL SEAL
26971 =
v0 �NG I N �-���o�
�IIGi �I\\
5/31/2019
DATE.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
ISABLEY, RUSS-ELL Be
-411 , REVO& TRUST / -
/ 9B 1195 PG 09.05'
o,
/ O
'�- UT 6/526'
-START RESTORATION / / - — —
E � /
STA 9*00_�
ElEh35/a�6
LOG- OSS= VkNE NOT �3
CONTACT WITH BEDROCK
DUE TO
D_ ROCK ' "
Cb
4�
\OJ\
\ -ZIS �0
LA
�IS
�
—ISS •_ I5� _—
—���T?S�Z���
,SES�
-UT 6-
IIDIIo nIIO��I
T
0 +50 01 +50
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 12
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 20/9
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
W ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
ed4aY�Ro
yp i
26971 =
SOS �NG I N
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
HADLEY, R�USSELLI B.��� n
/ REVOC� TRUST oN ) r /� CD L�
/ DB 1195 -)PG 0905 r\ - - "
JLn
SURVE y �(�UND �"� � �
ARY �f
(\A
X
/ w
e,
5�4 i
�0�
UP 6
ESD RE T-WATIOIV
3 MA TREATMENT S A 7+
\ �i�l` ��� @r 2 {
NbT RT OF DESIGN\ r > o LEV=?00.88 ,
lI �O 5
C��tiG suT�aEv eou Dn
LD
r
LD�
\ \ \ S ` \
f 4N
I
C)
o
�w
w
az
un
w
wW
z�
EE
4--
W
05
+50
..- EXST
...............MEN
......ROP THALWEG.....................
...... ......................
...... ......................
MENNEEN
............................................
+50 08
-IUT '6- 1
III
END RESTORATIC
STA 7+80.9
ELEV; 50Q.88,
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 13
PRO.IECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 20/9
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
$10 905JONE FRANKLIN ROAD
\ REIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TELAL(919)SS9-2243
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUSI "twhay)OARI�/'
I
�OSIc low I ,,�<��';
if189�4 , 3. S / OO
=0 SEAL
26971
VOO // GI N�-���o�
�IIG
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
Sil-
HADLEY VUSSELL/Be \
11 TP VA D DU�TO \ \ \
MARS x0/� GAS LIN FLICT I \ \ \ �C-�
J
TREATMENT o
/ R ' ARES\ _ f J /' R �?� \ +o I\ \ \ o}
Vr—y
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 14
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905JONE FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL[phone]
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
27-
�- '
i
(0 523 chG�'
'
-----
OT-z
�,,,�T�RT RET ION CA)
� STA +00-�
�Iiv= 4
CRY
END\ ORA ION
� 2 �
t A ART\EN ANCF�IVEN
\ v vSTA2+2�
E�E11 V �5�8.0I )
515
510
EXST GROUND
AT PROP THALWEG
PERMANENT CROSSING
2@24" CMP
BURY 20%
OE
MENNEN
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::AR
04 +50 05
\��111111111///�,
Docu ed oi:/A RO1071A11 149194C
CL SEAL
26971
ids RG l N
�IIG
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS—BUILT STRUCTURES 15
PROJECT NAME:: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 20/9
�
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP P.A.
/ > HAVLEY, RUSSELLIB'.
/ / E , , 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RE V OqC- �-TRAAU S T \13O \ / . . RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 21606
TEL D � 119 5- I V ENGIFIRMaLICENSE NO. C59-2243 -890
/�/ �� Axiom Environmental, Inc.
G SRO S VANS/NOT � �
�i ����
/
ONTRUCTED DUE TO ��� / ��
/ �
ON ,L C WIThi GASLIN , �� ' ��
SUR LEY) BO
/
Ljj
jj , / r� w
oz — — /PSN TI / zI1� 1
Cj
-51 jsER �-
L-Lj
Lu
- " _ - - - - _
CID
I
V)9
10
3 \ w
�� \ 3 , � PRS 01 1 1 1 1 1 1
END E NT
&ENA -495.58
9*96.2/
`� 518 ( 1 < •�o� � ' I 505 � 4r
-�"
-w�EM
WA
i1 r.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E
0 0 06 0 0
EXST GROUND
AT PROP THALWEG
+50 09 +50 09 +50
10
■
��\IIIIIIII///
IDSlyn� bY� A R o
6S�
1089 94C3'
-CL SEAL F--
2697 -2697 = _
I N
h�q 6 P�
''�II1111111���`\
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
- - -535_ ��
//F U///�!
- -535-
J � � -537 � � /� R v ��-� F
HADLEY, RUSS clB.
clt\% J�/ \ w�Z ----" SR -H DL REVOC TR EEK " / \�41
/ - �1 -C 1`fYJO 3
T -R5 - `N95 PG 095
531 A, Of�.3.7 i�� '53,3-4' _ p -533\ _ r w
Rt3f E TOR-ATt9N BouVL n
_ JST Qh{ - _ - '53� 4,23- �� �� 530 s '- --- �Z0,— —
5 1 ELEV/— C 6 s TL
��v -527
— 2`O \
F,— J� 5_25-' 'x0.
�__---525-- ----.x `rt__ �ZR�`�
— -52 W -522_
� i \ ( v � �� � —� — — ' � — _ _ — — � ✓521— �-- — — � -�, � ' - - J`
CP
Lp
�Ef-F'
SUR
N / _ r� 3 191?
DB 5 2 676
� � �1 ✓ 1 S
J / - LND �Y� QA R� L W.-\ _\ Lz� 1 fes.
VOf T UST
— s — - DB x 004 -0&0
cn � � � � � � � � I ���/ � / � 1,
...................................UT :
BEGIN RESTORAT-ft
...................................
.....................................
.......................................STA 0+00
.......................................■
-----------------------
0 +50
01 +50 02
+50 03 +50
EXST GROUND
AT PROP THALWEG
04 +50
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 16
PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
..' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
' REIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
\I I/ TELAL(9J9) 85e_.2
ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
aR
m
�IIIIIIIIII/�
DoYSc�prs`i�e�q by�C A R 0
1089A 173,.. LCL /=
C
26971 =
SOS
�II Gi �II\
5/31/2019
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DocuSign Envelope ID: C8A88BB5-7902-44A2-8037-73A242D6B444
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
0 AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 1
7
\ ` PROJECT NAME: HERON STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 20/9
oB ESQvT 4loN vv SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP P.A.
S ST RI ENH N MEI�T'll� ^ m
ST 6- 09. \ \ ` \ 6 I .' 901JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
J \ A-1 \ ` 1 \ g I . \I I/ ' RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
rt} I 1 1 \\\���CCC��`��\��1 j TEL (FIR LICENSE
SEL V -111.43 \ 1 \ \ ` 1 \ �� I ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
JAxiom Environmental, Inc.
I v oN/A
�D�OCUS� by
Ie Q..I. /RI I o0I�
%111
1-
_ii
_ + ��/,o4DLE-',AO-SELL B
RE C TRUST 1089$4994C3HALEY, EGGY JCHEEK GSREV�C T�UST � EAL �C-Y DB IY95 PG 0905
'
;
;
2697 I
00
- _ -52G-- ^``521 5 — — 'Z'/ 5/31/2019
f �6 "<_ = _ _ = i j _ = 5�6 i----5 — / DATE:
_ _ rnDOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
' { <\ \ UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
— PRtIM xF
7:7—
su 71
rl�\
-'Z9" - ( / 1 IiNHA�NCEWENTzVq
7777o—
w
w
TFF T
w-
L - UT 8-
END ENHANCEMENT II
STA 8+56.
PR PO 1 HAM EG
-UT 8-
END RESTORATION
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT II
STA 6+09.0
ELEV=511.43
05 +50 06 +50 07 +50 08 +50 09