20040101 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040128

?0< W ATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 23, 2004
DWQ EXP # 04-0101
Wake County
Reedy Creek Road, LLC
Attn: Mr. Thomas R. Valone
14600 Weston Parkway, Suite 300
Cary, NC 27513
Subject Property: Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
Notification of Compliance-Express Review Program
Dear Mr. Valone:
On March 2, 2004, you received an Approval of a 401 Water Quality Certification and
Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer F?rotection Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0233) with Additional Conditions to impact 65 linear feet of stream and 10,370 square
feet of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of a road crossing at the subject
property. On October 5, 2004, a 401 Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted
on the subject property.
This 401 Compliance Evaluation Inspection is required through the Express Review
Program. This letter is to let you know that there were no violations noted during the
Inspection. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721
or Deborah Edwards at 919-733-9502 in the Central Office in Raleigh.
Sincerely, j
/t
Cyndi Karoly,
401/Express Permitting Unit
CBK/dae
Enclosures: DWQ Inspection Report
cc: Kevin Martin-S&EC
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
401 Wetlands Certification Unit .
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
tura!!y
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Type of
inspection
Inspector
DWQ Evaluation of Site and Waters from NPS Activities
Record Number 00276
Division of Water Quality
[phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
® 401 CEI ? Buffer Complaint
? Storm Water Permit CEI ? DWQ tolk)%?-up Inspection
? DI-R-/ Local Agency Pcfcral ? Other
? DhR Rclcral
? \VCtland Complaint
? Stream Complaint
401 number XP04 101
Region PRO Count (ake
Basin Neuse
Stream class C
Receiving ichland Creek 303d listed streams
ebbie Edwards
Waters DWQ trout listed
stream
? Yes ® No ? N/A
? Yes ® No ? N/A
Date of 11/5/2004 entry time 115PM I exit time 2:55PM I Latitude
inspection
Location
ON THE WEST SIDE OF REEDY CREEK ROAD @ THE
INTERSECTION OF REEDY CREEK ROAD AND TRENTON
Nearest
cross roads
Project Under SUBDIVISION
status Project type
construction
Acreage FOE-1-acre Q 1-5 acres 0 >5 acres
xected --
Estimate of 1 1 26.5 Ep 1Project
Acrea e Completion
Approved S&EC Plan IN Yes ? No /A
BARNHILL CONTRACTING
Contractor
Longitude
Poperty tax id #
Tract Name VALONE TRACT
Violations/Concerns
® None to report
? Verify 401 certification approval see: (p.2)
? 401 certfication see: 401 section (p.2)
? Wetland.std; see- wetland section
? Buffer std. see: buffer section (p,3)
Water supply see watersupply (p.3)
? Stream stds see:_ Stream standard sect. (p.4)
? Permit violations (NCGO1) see: permit sect (p.4)
? Follow-up-with 401. DLR, DFR, local agency
? other
project needs other ? Yes ® No ? N/A
DWQ permits /certs
Does visit prompt NOV? ? Yes ® No ? N/A
NOV Date
Support
Documentation
Name
? Copies, of Land quality inspection reports/files
? Copies of permit or 401 monitoring reports
? Photos
? Stream Samples
? None
? Other
Inspection
Summary
.SED NT.LEA.YINO.SLTF-.
Verify 401 Certification Record Number 00276
Confirmed by ACE ® Yes ? No ? N/A 401 cert. required ® Yes ? No ? N/A
Date of ACE confirm
Stream impacts ? None to report/ <50 feet ? Loading ? Others
® <150 feet of stream impact Type of stream ® Culverting
? >150 feet of stream impact impacts ? Relocation
? 150 feet of perennial stream impacts ? Flooding
Wetlands impacts
® None to report Type of wetland ® None to report ? Dumping
< 1/3 ac.wetland impacts ? Filling ? Ditching
? ? Pumping
E] 1/3-1.0 acre of wetland
? >1.0 acre of wetland ? Flooding
No
certification
comments
please continue
to wetland std.
section (p.3)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................

..................................................................................................................................................................................................

Projects with 401 Certification
Proposed project has not started: date proposed
Project development in process: date est. complete
404 national permit # 14
401 wetland impacts
® None to report
? < 1/3 ac.wetland
? 1/3-1.0 acre of wetland
? >1.0 acre of wetland
11/5/2004
Project work complete
Type of wetland impacts w/401 cert.
® None to report ? Dumping
? Filling ? Ditching
? Pumping
? Flooding
? Yes ® No ? N/A
wetland impacts beyond
authorization estimate
acreage
stream impacts
401 stream impacts Type of stream impacts w/401 cert. beyond authorization
? None to report/ <50 feet ? Loading ? Others
® <150 feet of stream impact ® Culverting
? >150 feet of stream impact ? Relocation
? 150 feet of perennial stream impacts ? Flooding
Wetlands and streams certification conditions
Additional
conditions and other
comments
2
Mitigation required ? Mitgation plan implemented ? Other...
WRP option ® Stormwater plan required
WRP payment received ? Stormwater management plan approved
DWQ mitigation plan required ? Stormwater Management plan implemented
Mitigation plan received ? Deed notification requirements
Mitigation plan approved ? Deed notification implemented
CONDITION #1 OF 401 CERTIFICATION-WRITTEN POCKET WETLAND FACILITIES A,
MANAGEMENTTLA.N.4M. AI. RLAYREQUEED? ......................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................
please continue to wetland
std. section (p.3)
Record Number 00276
Wetland Wetland confirmed by ACE ? Yes ? No ? N/A Date confirmed ACE
Standards 401 cert. required ? Yes ? No ? N/A
Type of impacts ? None to report ? Dumping
? None to report
report
to ? Filling ? Ditching
Wetland impact ?
< 1/3
ac.wetland ? Pumping ? Other...
?
1/3-1.0 acre of wetland Flooding
?
? >1.0 acre of wetland Noticeable substances in amounts which cause adverse impacts to
wetlands 2B.0231 (b)
Have you noticed impact(s) which preclude any of the below
uses of wetlands. Identified uses 2B.0231(a)
Is there evidence of liquids, fill or other
? Yes ? No ? N/A
Hydrologic functions ? Yes ? No ? N/A Is there evidence of Yes
? ? No ? N/A
floating/submerged debris, oil
Stormwater retention and
? Yes ? No ? N/A
r
t Is there evidence of
? Yes [I No ? N/A
s
o
a e
g materials producing color,

Filtration or storage of
? Yes ? No ? N/A ndnr t
Is there evidence
Is there evidence of toxic substances
? Yes E] No ? N/A
pollutants
Shoreline protection
Habitat for aquatic
organisms
Habitat for wetland
dependent wildlife
Wetland
Standards
comments
? Yes ? No ? N/A
? Yes ? No ? N/A
? Yes ? No ? N/A
? Yes ? No ? N/A
? Water currents
? 5 and E control
? Walerteuiperirure ` -
? Chemical, nutri_ent, DO regime
? Aquatic Cuin<i
l,H
? Writer levels- _
?-1`io measurable impacts present --
? Other... -
A .a.
.........................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Riparian Buffer Zone Buffer Rules ®Neuse ? Tar-Pam ? Randleman ? Water supply watershed
Confirmation of stream subject to the rule ® Topo/Soil Survey ® Topographic map
? Site specific conditions ? Local gov. map
Neuse and Tar-Pamlico
Buffer impact zone 1
Estimate of linear
feet of buffer
impact
Estimate of acreage of
mean width of buffer
impact
Buffers use observed
IN Yes ? No ? N/A
Is the biological (flora, fauna)
integrity maintained
Does the impact(s) alter the natural
hydrological conditions of the
wetland(s) to such a degree in which
the wetland(s) now fail(s) to support its
biological and physical characteristics.
Occurred alterations with: (Please
check any)
Buffer impact zone 2
Estimate of linear
feet of impact zone
2
Estimate of acreage
of mean width in
zone 2
IN Yes ? No ? N/A
Other Buffer use designation O Exempt Q Allowable w/ mitigation
Q Allowable Q Prohibited
Randleman Watershed and Water Supply Randleman watershed local gov ? Yes ® o El N/A
jurisdiction
DWQ notification of ? Yes ? No ? N/A Local program response ? Yes ? No ? N/A
local program
Buffer comments
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................

Record Number 00276
Stream Standards
Stream Impacts ? None to report/ <50 feet Type of stream impact ? Loading ? Others
® <150 feet of stream impact . ® Culverting
? >150 feet of stream impact ? Relocation
? 150 feet of perennial stream impacts ? Flooding
Alleged types of
water quality
standards
violations:
02B.0211
Stream
standards
comments
? Best Usage ? Deletrious substances ? Oil/petroleum
? Dissolve Oxygen ? Color ? Debris/refuse
? Floating solids ? Other wastes ? Other...
? Settleable solids ? pH
? Sludge deposits ? Temperature
? Oils ? Turbidity
....................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................

Stream present confirmed by DWQ ® Yes ? No ? N/A Date confirmed 3/31/2004
Is a permit required 10 Yes ? No ? N/A
for this activity ?
Are control devices
IN Yes ? No ? N/A inspected after storms
? DLR (>0.5" per 24 hr. rain event)
® Local program
? DOT Are visible monitoring data
available?
® Yes ? No ? N/A
Permit Conditions
S&E Plan approved
S&E plan approved by
Implementation of
S&E Control plan
S&E control plan on site ® Yes ? No ? N/A
Occurrences when
DLR found site not in
compliance
Noticeable petroleum
discharges
Consistent with
EPA requirements
for herbicide,
pesticide and
fertilizer use
Construction waste
disposed properly
Are controls inspected
weekly? (2/week if 303d
listed for turbidity or
sedimentation)
Permit
comments
Yes ®No ? N/A
? Yes ® No ? N/A
? Yes ? No ®N/A
Is a rain gauge on site
Are basins maintained
Off site sedimentation present
Off site sedimentation events
recorded
Deposition of sediment
in water bodies (waters)
IN Yes ? No ? N/A
IN Yes ? No ? N/A
Linear footage of stream
impacts
Anticipated noncompliance
events reported
IN Yes ? No ? N/A
IN Yes ? No ? N/A
® Yes ? No[] N/A
® Yes ? No ? N/A
? Yes IN No ? N/A
? Yes ? No ®N/A
? None
® Slight <1 inch
? Moderate 1- 4 inches (interspersed)
? Severe >4 inches (covers bottom)
? None to report/ <50 feet
® <150 feet of stream impact
? >150 feet of stream impact
? 150 feet of perennial stream impacts
® Yes ? No ? N/A
4
W ATFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
tom' Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
4 <
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 2, 2004
DWQ Project No. 04-0101
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
Mr. Thomas F. Valone c/o
Reedy Creek Road, LLC
14600 Weston Parkway, Suite 300
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Subject Property: Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
Modification of AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE dated February 19, 2004
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse
River Buffer Protection Rules (1 SA NCAC 2B .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS,
DWQ EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Valone:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions' and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 65 feet of stream and 10,370'square feet (ft) or 0.23 acres of protected
riparian buffers for the purpose of a road crossing at the subject property, as described within your
application dated January 28, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts
are covered by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification
Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when
issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved
Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In
addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-
discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the
accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions
listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Written Pocket Wetland Facilities Management Plan (Final Plan Needed)
An additional condition is that a final, written pocket wetland management plan (including a
signed and notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) shall be approved in writing by
this Office before the impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 6 in GC No.
3404. The pocket wetland management plan must include the following: 1) plans and
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-7RR-17RR 1nhnnal 919-7RR-9R9R (fail hftnJ/h2n_enr_state_nc_us/ncwetlands
ti
Mr. Thomas F. Valone
Page 2of3
3/2/04
specifications for the pocket wetland facilities, 2) annual (by June 1 of each year) visual
monitoring of the structures and plants that are appropriate for the continued functioning of the
control measure, 3) a maintenance plan that states that any repairs must be completed within
60 days such that the measures function and are operational as depicted in approved plans.
Also, before any permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved
by this Office) shall be constructed and operational, and the pocket wetland facilities (as
approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The structural pocket wetland facilities and
maintenance of the facility as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be
maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural pocket wetland facilities (other than
maintenance) shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
2. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to-assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact., These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401 /Wetlands, Unit web site at
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwettands.
3. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization within the buffer; wetland or water prior.taany
land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with `15A NCAC'2B 33 and GC 3404.
-4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures -w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands
and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six
months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate. of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 /Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions
are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification
shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh,
N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.

y Mr. Thomas F. Valone
Page 3 of 3
3/2/04
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Debbie Edwards at 919-733-9584.
Sincerely,
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC 3404
Cc: Kevin Martin-S&EC
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 04-0101

V A T? Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
06 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
"I
t3 'C' Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
February 19, 2004
DWQ Project No. 04-0101
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
Mr. Thomas F. Valone c/o
Reedy Creek Road, LLC
14600 Weston Parkway, Suite 300
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Subject Property: Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS,
DWQ EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Valone:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within
or otherwise impact 65 feet of stream and 10,370 square feet (ft) or 0.23 acres of protected riparian buffers
for the purpose of a road crossing at the subject property, as described within your application -dated January
28, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army. Corps of Engineers
(USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other
required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval
will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General
Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is ,
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible
for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland
or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any
additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
Written Stormwater Management Plan
An additional condition is that the final, written stormwater management plan (including a signed and
notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) shall be approved in writing by this Office before
the impacts specified in this Certification occur per Condition No. 6 in GC No. 3404. The stormwater
management plan must include plans and specifications for stormwater management facilities that
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
Q1Q-733-17RFS rnhnnal Q1Q-733-RRQ3 /fny1 httn•1/h9n am atata nr iic/nrwatlanrlc
Mr. Thomas F. Valone
Page 2 of 3
2/19/04
are appropriate for surface waters classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) and designed to
remove. 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual. These. facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire
project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any
permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be
constructed and operational, and the stormwater management plan (as approved by this Office) shall
be implemented. The structural stormwater practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage
patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be
made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
2. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A sample
deed notification can be downloaded from the 401 /Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
3. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land
disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 2B 33 and GC 3404.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of
completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service,
Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are
made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-
7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.

Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to
review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
Mr. Thomas F. Valone
Page 3 of 3
2/19/04
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 213.0233. If you have any
questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Debbie Edwards at 919-733-9584.
Sincerely,
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC 3404
Kliv ek, P. .,
Q, Directo
Cc: Kevin Martin-S&EC
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 04-0101
Date: 2/19/04 shall be clearly marked by orange fabric fencing for the areas that have been approved to
infringe
Im ppcts Summary
If - RB Cha el
6z
5,630 gft. - one 1
4,7 sgft. Zone 1
t
E
S
1000,
GRAV
\ ?\
SEE
?FIL ER
330
_ 360
? W
3 0 (/ \ \ .
\ 2 \
3
WITHERS RAVENEL 02/17/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
?
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS 1"=50' NRB IMPACT MAP
. 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax 919A67-6" www.witl,-mveoel- JAB RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE MAR-3-2004 WED 09:29
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 4/4
START TIME : MAR-03 09:28
ELAPSED TIME : 01'02"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
vbf

'b$SC.-E£.L 7n :plcH}r7 yriuyatl lR'^ a•roa;d erons^nir .?nJat no.<)1 -ap?;ud:,oa.: o: o:.. ;., ,.uaeai(•votr s... ;,Jm!
svo?)?ru)sv? 11,park.ro s41ov
r aOJI{s aaeua Su{pn{aw s:t?Yc:d,)u aaytur??
t,v),6 ti tpjeL1 caltO notstnipgn pwpj -j"Yl,).{p.. 21 :p,,!goS
8009-00-616 c# xr,-4 OIIIOUVllag VOW f :o;I. x1r:9
L6S9'LzL-6 [( ?N ?'n-i
f OZO CEL-616 :4 auoyd :nopetuanlu{ prgOn:)
0591 669Lf ON '101'11S
,a7ua;) a,y\iac 1t r.)ti O59 i :stiaa)Jp?' -Amp 6V
0922"O9Li J\ '4fi::1r:y
067 .11TS71V. MII)Q a?gq"r1 TUZ: :5F.mppt'7oa.gti
1l VIZ )Otf?S{luk()J;?
SaJAnosa,d p3jujuN put, (u)uamuol!A!!'(.(o )ui)capud.)({
?7!len? aaas,?? ;o uoislA!(i
WVNJO)Id AA'si1,11-1 w, ,T•Ji uid SK-MaXi
FJrrt:?,alr,y?Jo ncnn,rrJ ???5.
-m:n 4mJxi'ym,p,p }I ,min:1 =? ?c9F...p:?n-? `
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE MAR-3-2004 WED 09:32
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 4/4
START TIME : MAR-03 09:31
ELAPSED TIME : 00'51"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
V4
M
rI q!' <': :itli
I. 1 ( W
vn:l'r•n}rl??>:J ::"?ril?t\ 1?1! :!TT?l>'at'n17n ??;?.-•?:1--, :'.
'VP96-i£L-(I67E SP)IMAP7 tl[Mg4Q. -4111tlu11-116-!4 TWA 11 Prw:,yt uI 111:,c Ilm', leln;.:m.?:: 1.
auo?>t?u.ys'ue le>!?ads .w sal/>V
h :1»gs.13 noi Surynfaoo skl tlW j1)JXJCU t1V
voo% :atl:(l U0ts1,uPgTil,' jaa.t.) +p'a?I gaa(gn5
LW-9M-6I6 :# XUA u!ul;P` uin..,)1 :off, >_e j
l.bH9-,tcb1G .IIs+'d
ffr:(YF. L-616 :N auuyd :u?w)em?gpil laru!u; )
US91' 6(,9,'.Z :?hi'4EtaF':1
?wu't;)xl.vati PEW O?yI ssa?Pp\'%lu!1!tati
09Z? trl>ULi ;LV'gct.'("')1
IK? a)mS'P.ronotnog aaageT,? 1Z:.7. as?.IPI!F' )aaUti
)!aft I oty/sPUeI7aM
sa-anosa?I JUJIRIUN Pne telua[nnoal,u ,-j Jo ananejaudaG
fanNnl) s:YiF,11 Jo UOISIAI(j
W VN 90)Id ,413I. aH ,LII1RI:lld SKMdt:I
irllRn!!1%^.M 10 rM!St+NJ
+N R.CI?Aa(1'?ailln?'I! wvlu? ? ? ?:
o-•y,.,,,nme???.?w :..,:a,o,.o?o.-a,n smr„r;-: rnro? '????{ '
2 FT
MIN
CLASS B
17 TEMPORARY STORAGE STONE RIP RAP
3 FT
-Al MAX
\ FILTER
CROSS SECTION FABRIC
10 FT. SEED & MULCH
DESIGN
OP SETTLED 18" _
1 \N ?
3 FT
COMPACTED FILL
FILTER VARIABLE SIDE SLOPE I
FABRIC 0 NATURAL
GROUND
2 FT
ENTRANCE
10 FT EXIT
SEEPAGE FILTER MAINTENANCE
INSPECT SEEPAGE DEVICES AFTER EACH PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANT RAINFALL, NO LESS THAN QUARTERLY.
CHECK THE STRUCTURE FOR DAMAGE FROM EROSION OR PIPING. REMOVE AN REPLACE ANY CONTAMINATED
CHECK STONE. ENSURE ALL FILTER FABRIC IS PROPERLY ANCHORED. REPAIR AND REPLACE AS NECESSARY.
ALL BERMS FOR EROSION. REPAIR, SEED AN MULCH AND UNSTABLE AREAS. MONITOR AREAS DOWNSTREAM
SEEPAGE FILTER FOR EROSION OR RUTTING. CAREFULLY REPAIR, SEED AND MULCH AND ERODED AREAS.
POCKET WETLAND DESIGN CRITERIA
® HIGH MARSH - 1,375 SF (50%) DRAINAGE AREA = +/- 8.0 AC.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE % = <30%
LOW MARSH - 1,100 SF (40%) SA/DA REQUIRED = 0.75%
SURFACE AREA REQUIRED = 2,613 SF
OPEN WATER - 275 SF (10%) SURFACE AREA PROVIDED= 2,750 SF
REQUIRED WETLAND PLANT LIST
QUA SPECIES COMMON NAME ROOT SPACING LOCATION
150 Iris virginico Blue Flag Iris Peat Pot 2' o.c. High Marsh/Egde
30 Juncus biflorus Shore Rush 1 Gal. Cont. 2' o.c. High Marsh
270 Sagittaria latifolia Broadleaf Arrowhead Peat Pot 18" o.c. High Marsh
240 Pontederia cordata Pickerel Weed Peat Pot 18" o.c. Low Marsh
140 Saururus cernuus Lizard's Tail Quart Cont. 2' o.c. Low Marsh
02/»/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
WITHERS & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 1 "=50, POCKET WETLAND DETAILS
11 NlacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withe m enel.com JAB RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA
imap://debbie.edwards%40dwq.denr.ncmail.net @cros.ncmail.net:143/...
Subject: [Fwd: Delivery Status Notification]
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:12:40 -0500
To: [e-mail]
fyi
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:Delivery Status Notification
Date:Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:04:53 -0500
From:Mail Delivery Service <[e-mail]>
To: john.dorney @ncmail.net
- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
[e-mail]; Failed; 5.1.1 (bad destination mailbox address)
Remote MTA 127.0.0.1: SMTP diagnostic: 550 RCPT TO: User unknown
Reporting-MTA: dns; scc076.its.state.nc.us
Received-from-MTA: dns; ncmail.net (207.192.35.200)
Arrival-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:04:52 -0500
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 RCPT TO: <deborah. edwards@ncmail. net> User unknown
Final-Recipient: rfc822; deborah.edwards@ncmail
Action: Failed
Status: 5.1.1 (bad destination mailbox address)
Remote-MTA: dns; 127.0.0.1
Subject: Re: DWQ Review #04-0101
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
Date:.Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:04:52 -0500
To: Jason Bertoncino <[e-mail]>
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
i assume that this is the project that is being reviewed for express permitting.
if so, as stated in the on-hold letter the buffer rules require stormwater measures that remove nitrogen
and your proposed seepage dam does not. please redesign as stated in the letter to provide a BMP that
removes nitrogen. thankx
Jason Bertoncino wrote:
Mr. Dorney:
net
1 of 2 2/17/2004 9:18 AM
imap://[e-mail]:143/...
Good Afternnon. I am providing this email in response to you letter dated February 16, 2004 requesting
additional information.
I would like to offer one point of clarification. It is our opinion the device provided meets the
conventional criteria for level spreader design. The calculations and design for the seepage structure is
to demonstrate we are considering the entire 10-year storm event. It is our opinion, based on the
outflow hydragraph provided within the seepage dam calculations, the 10-year event will be released to
the buffer at a total rate less than 1 cfs and over a width of 20+ feet. The device provided is not intented
to replace diffuse buffer flow, it is intended to provide it.
However, should you determine the data provided does not meet the conventional intent of the riparian
rules, we will provide you with an appropriately sized nutrient removal device for this area. Please note
this would require greater disturbance of existing vegetation. Should you determine this project to
require a nutrient removal device we would like to discuss the merits of the device provided outside of
the context of this project. We feel it could offer a legimate response to diffuse flow requirements while
minimizing disturbance of existing vegetation.
Sincerely,
WITHERS RAVENEL
m MacKenan Chive i tars, NOr! h Carolina 27511
tel: 919-46,)-334,) r fr)x: 91947, 008
direLL' 919-535,5174
2 of 2 2/17/2004 9:18 AM
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE FEB-16-2004 MON 14:03
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
rD,c? (\?
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 3/3
START TIME : FEB-16 14:02
ELAPSED TIME : 00'32"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
.f[
[ r??
?i??1.'.-???^ ?
nm? xn':rtrsm.,x'rn 0-u.em !let -cc-, -o
(e`"+R9C 1sITW1 V;CI (:49!,i JN'??'J:]?? Nw:S nE;\ V:5'1
•rrc:l mn...,mnJ ?V'a.lyM ]0>'G!1['Qim[.H:' c»:s,rQ'J'.,

:suopan»sul iutaads ao saxoN
T :laegs xanoa 9u!pnlam cased av ?aq]rmN
L
- :6(lerhno,
- - - :.
.od, r41.1
£G89-££L-6i6 ?? ?d
93l.T-F.£[: 6?6 :0 QuogfT mopv¢uom looluo,)
0591-669LZ :7N '4"!"t" 2J.
aaTuao aoyan !!eS1i 0991 :-Ippy -,umr i
U9G't-1'OyL'i JN'4il1OIuH
USZ ;n!nS'p.mna!nng?args?? T-£Z :ssa. pp Jaasly
3?afl joi7murnom
saainosag Iuau711N pat! J1jI1 luuoainuj ;o iuawppdaU
.flfiul6 ze;uAk Jo 11015?n!Q

1 O
+maup!]M+O'>a41A5 Hv»IOJ
_
-
+Wadf!O2'd?RX :'l, m14 a
•amoraill[nn%lOn[]vmvon.zira m[wv[Q=a>nmom?+r :t ?'?

4
\07F9
Q9
rvucnaei V. ?aoicy, aav vcn,v,
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
February 16, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Thomas F. Valone c/o
Reedy Creek Road, LLC
14600 Weston Parkway, Suite 300
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Subject Property: Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
DWQ Express Review Program
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Valone:
DWQ Project No. 04-0101
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
On February 3, 2004, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated January 28, 2004 to
impact 65 feet of stream and 10,370 square feet (ft) or 0.24 acres of protected riparian buffers to construct the
proposed road crossing. On February 4, 2004, Ms. Debbie Edwards of the Wetlands Unit discussed
deficiencies of the application with your consultant, Mr. Kevin Martin.
On February 13, 2004, the DWQ received additional information addressing the stormwater outfalls located
southeast of your proposed road crossing that were of concern within the initial Pre-Construction Notification
(PCN) Application review. After review of the new information, the DWQ.still believes that the diffuse flow
requirement will not be met according to 15A NCAC 213 .0233(5).
The additional information provided details an area with a rock berm that will retain stormwater and release the
stormwater from the two-gravel seepage seems at slower velocities. However, the DWQ has determined that
this plan will not provide diffuse flow through the riparian buffer. According to 15A NCAC 213 .0233(6), within
the "Drainage ditches, roadside ditches and stormwater outfalls through the riparian buffet", these activities
"are allowed";
New drainage ditches, roadside ditches and stormwater outfalls provided that a stormwater
management facility is installed to control nitrogen and attenuate flow before the conveyance
discharges through the riparian buffer is an allowable activity.
The proposed rock berm design will not control nitrogen and is not listed as an approved BMP in our
stormwater design manual. Therefore, the DWQ again suggests the construction of a bioretention area or a
pocket wetland at the site so that stormwater will receive the nutrient removal that is required before
concentrating and flowing through the riparian buffer.
Please respond within three days of the date of this letter by sending this information to me via e-mail or fax
and a follow-up copy in writing. The Express Review Program is a process that requires all parties to
participate in a timely manner. If the DWQ feels the Express Review Program is the incorrect review program
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Thomas F. Valone
Page 2 of 2
2/16/04
for your project, then we may have to return your application and have it reviewed through our regular 401
Water Quality Certification Program.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or
protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at
this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Deborah Edwards at [phone] if you have any questions
regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
cc:
Kevin Martin, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
14
DWQ #04-0101
de
02/13/04 11:51 FAX [phone] WITHERS & RAVENEL 4001/007
WITHERS &- RAVENEL
ENGINEER5 1 PLANNERS' I 5URVEY0R8
-FAX TRANSMITTAL
TO: DEgo tz Gti ?t?wr?z? S
FROM: J ?C-TbNG??C7
JOB #c Zp zog4. v
PROJECT NAME: RcZ?V C
ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL:
FAX #: 7;s - 663
DATE: ??-?32 u?t2y t3 , Z004
# of Sheets: ( Including Cotter
S U3 Iv Islo?
0 YES R NO
• 121 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel:[phone] fax:[phone]oo8 www.withersraveneLcom
FEB-13-21304 FRI 18:37 TEL:[phone] NAME:DIJQ-bJETLAHDS P. 1
02/13/04 11:52 FAX [phone] WITHERS & RAVENEL
NEL
WITHERS" RAVE:
LIO002/ 007
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
February 13, 2004
Ms. Deborah Edwards
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Reedy Creek Subdivision
WR Project No. 202094.0
Ms. Edwards:
Please find attached the revised NRB impact/level spreader worksheet for the above referenced
project. Please note the stormwater flowing thru FES 5 is cross drainage only. We have combined
previous FES 3 & FES so outlets to capture the stormwater in one structure. The level spreader
device provided is created to minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. The storage volume
behind the berm is sufficient to store the entire io-year design storm. The intention of the design
provided is to allow the storm event to filter slowly through the two gravel seems and seep into the
buffer. Larger than zo year events would bypass into the conveyance established for the cross
drainage. The design provided would allow the existing vegetation within the footprint of the
storage device to remain. Said vegetation would experience "wet feet" temporarily during storm
events.
Please advise if you have any additional questions or comments regarding this matter. We
appreciate your continued assistance.
Sincerely,
ITHEF2S &- PAVENEL, INC.
`+`+®+iie009P16????
S
25944 ?m
Jason A. Bertoncino, PE % co
%
Attachments ®ss®®B L -%0: +3164.,
???eaececaree+"°
CC: Mr. Kevin Martin, Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mr. David Morris, Reedy Creek Road, LLC.
iii Macl(enan Drive i Cary, North Carolina 2751" 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersraveneLcom
FEB-13-2004 FRI 10:37 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 2
02/13/04 11:52 FAX [phone]TITHERS & RAVENEL LIA003/007
DWQ Project
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : X'k"'K- uD rv l r ??
Contact Person: ASaa (3a-rza-e r•?o _ Phone Number. (9 ioQ 4?y- 3340
Level Spreader ID:. ICES / v
Level Spreader Length
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Maximum Filter St6piBuffer Slope
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method
5c? 0rTA - ft. (perpendicular to flow)
£i O • ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Z • Z. ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
.' 5 % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)}
5Ta ¢,??
/4. 7 cfs -,-r 5m uV /0,/e-,
4 A 0 cfs
Forz . S'+- (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
Vm?a ?-nd> groundcover)
5T-oROG6- of E7-,-n0,5E7 , m,N, E,E?, 77-
(;V_ A,V E 1_ r-r l-T1_V_ 2r: L C A S E
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space. provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
J Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cis for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
j,-//A Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
_1okF8. No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
_ N l4 . Bypass method is specified (it applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
FEB-13-2004 ?FRI 10:37 TEL:[phone] tdANE:DfdG-I4ETLHNDS P. 3
02/13/04 11:52 FAY 919 467 6008 WITHERS & RAVENEL
LO 004/007
7013 NO. 202094
WITHERS RAVENEL SHEB No.-----! z
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEVORS DATE 2/1212004
10B NAME Reedy Creek Subdivision COMPUTED BY JAB
evel preader Out ow Ratin urye CHECKED BY
S11B1ECT 9 k:V02.334oEARodr. Do. Rating Cd-.dn
Calculations for Stacie Discharge for Rock Dam Structures
1. Following calculations were prepared to develop a stage vs. discharge relationship for use in modeling
stormwater flow through rock darn structures of sediment traps.
2. Calculations follow a methodology found in "Design Hydrology & Sedimentology
for Small Catchments," Haan, C.T., Barfield, B.J., Hayes, J.C., Academic Press, INC.,
San Diego, Ca., 1994. Pages 151-156.
Rock Dam Dimensions
Side 3 A
H 3 (ft)
W 2
L 2 at to
Rip Rao Data:
d50= 0.0625 ft
0.02 m
Porosity = 0.46
Coefficient a (From fioure 5.6)
dL
{m). a
1.0 3.2
2.0 2.1
3.0 1.6
Note: Coefficient (a) used in Rating Curve
Calculation obtained from trendline generated using above values
from Figure 5.6
Figure 5.6 assumes a porosity of .46
Ratin Curve dH 0.1 ft Ratin Curve Calculation
dH
ft dL
ft W
ft dH
m dL
m a' b" q
ernsim w
m Q
Cms Q
cis
0.0 20.0 2 0.00 6.10 1.03 0.65 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00
0.1 19.4 2 0.03 5.91 1.05 0:65 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.01
0.2 18.8 2 0.06 5.73 1.07 0.65 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.02
0.3 18.2 2 0.09 5.55 1.09 0.65 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.03
0.4 17.6 2 0.12 5.36 1.12 0.65 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.05
0.5 17.0 2 0.15 5.18 1.14 0.65 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.08
0.6 16.4 2 0.18 5.00 1.17 0.65 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.10
0.7 15.8 2 0.21 4.82 120 0.65 0.01 0.61 0.00 0.14
0.8 15.2 2 0.24 4.63 1.23 0.65 0-01 0.61 0.00 0.17
0.9 14.6 2 0.27 4.45 1.26 0.65 0.01 0.61 0.01 0.21
1.0 14.0 2 0.30 4.27 1.29 0.65 0.01 0.61 0.01 025
1.1 13.4 2 0.34 4.08 1.33 0.65 0.01 0.61 0.01 0.30
1.2 12.8 2 0.37 3.90 1.37 0.65 0.02 0.61 0.01 0.35
1.3 12.2 2 0.40 3.72 1.41 0.65 0.02 0.61 0.01 0.41
1.4 11.6 2 0.43 3.54 1.45 0.65 0.02 0.61 0.01 0.47
1.5 11.0 2 0.46 3.35 1.50 0.65 0.02 0.61 0.02 0.54
1.6 10.4 2 0.49 3.17 1.56 0.65 0.03 0.61 0.02 0.61
1,7 9.8 2 0.52 2.99 1.62 0.65 0.03 0.61 0.02 0.70
1.8 9.2 2 0.55 2.80 1.68 0.65 0.04 0.61 0.02 0.79
1.9 8.6 2 0.58 2.62 1.75 0.65 0.04 0.61 0.03 0.89
2.0 6.0 2 0.61 2.44 1.83 0.65 0.05 0.61 0.03 1.00
2.1 7.4 2 0.64 2.26 1.93 0.65 0.05 0.61 0.03 1.13
2.2 6.8 2 0.67 2.07 2.03 0.65 0.06 0.61 0.04 1.27
2.3 6.2 2 0.70 1.89 2.15 0.65 0.07 0.61 0.04 1.44
2.4 5.6 2 0.73 1.71 2.30 0.65 0.08 0.61 0.05 1.63
2.5 5.0 2 0.76 1.52 2.47 0.65 0.09 0.61 0.05 1.85
2.6 4.4 2 0.79 1.34 2.67 0.65 0.10 0.61 0.06 2.11
2.7 3.8 2 0.82 1.16 2.93 0.65 0.11 0.61 0.07 2.43
2.8 3.2 2 0.85 0.98 3.26 0.65 0.61 0.03 2.84
2.9 2.6 2 0.88 0.79 3.72 0.65 1E 0.61 0.10 3.38
3.0 2.0 2 0.91 0.61 4.38 0.65 I 0.61 0.12 A I'A
-ASSUmmg values above UL UT j1-F1 IULIUWb b"
"Interpolated from Figure 5.6
Wthers & Ravenel
Engineering Surveying, W.
Rock Dam Rating CUrve.AsRock Dam Rating Curve
FEB-13-2004 FRI 10:38 TEL:[phone] NRME:DWG)-WETLAHDS P. 4
02/13/04 11:53 FAX [phone] WITHERS & RAVENEL
JOB NO. 202094
WITHERS RAVENEL SHEET NO- ----2-07-2
ENGINEERS t PLANNERS I SURVEYORS DATE 2112/2004
JOB NAME Reedy Creek Subdivision COMPUTED BY JAB
SUBJECT Leve prea er u low aUng urva CHECKED BY
0,207,334.05\ lack Dam Rating Curve.yls
F --Rack Dam Flow Rating Curve
40.00
38.00
3e.
34.00
32.00
MOD
28.00
26.00
24.00
y^n 22.DD
u 20.00
p 18.00
16.00
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.01
6.00
4.00
2.00
D.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 03.6 0.8 1,0 12 1.4 1.fi 1.8 2.0 2,2 2.4 2.6 2.9 YO
wafer Elevation from Bottom of Pond (ft)
Coefficient a vs dL -06284
y = 3.2124x
R` = 0.9993
3.5-
- -- ------ - -
2.0
aa
1.5 _°.---
1.0 - -- - --- ------
0.5 - - --- -----
0.0 _
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
dL
Withers & Ravenel
Engineering Surveying, Inc.
10005/007
Rock Dam Rating Curve-AsRock Dam Rating Curve
FEB-13-2004 FRI 10:38 TEL:[phone] NAME:D14Q-WETLA1JD- P.
02/13/04 11:53 FAY 919 467 6008 WITHERS & RAVENEI. 19006/007
T5impacts 3-Ci _?/ , If N Ch nn l i f
f A
5, 30 s ft. - Zone 1
,740 qft. Zone 1 / ---=
ES#5
LARGE
EVENT
BYPAS
1-01
92 GRAVEL
SEWAGE
a
13
330 r
- 360 \ \
r? \
0
0
m / \
0 02/13/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
o WITHERS RAVENEL 1"=50' NRB IMPACT MAP
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
JAB RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
711 MxKenan Drive Cary, NOnF Carolina 77511 let: 919-469-3340 fa.: 919-467b009 www.elkrersravenel-com
FEB-13-2004 FRI 10:32 TEL:[phone] HAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. G.
--
02/13/04 11:53 FAX [phone] WITHERS & RAVENEL
ICJ 007/007
MAINTENANCE
INSPECT SEEPAGE DEVICES AFTER EACH PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANT RAINFALL, NO LESS THAN QUARTERLY.
CHECK THE STRUCTURE FOR DAMAGE FROM EROSION OR PIPING. REMOVE AN REPLACE ANY CONTAMINATED
CHECK STONE. ENSURE ALL FILTER FABRIC IS PROPERLY ANCHORED. REPAIR AND REPLACE AS NECESSARY.
ALL BERMS FOR EROSION. REPAIR, SEED AN MULCH AND UNSTABLE AREAS. MONITOR AREAS DOWNSTREAM
SEEPAGE FILTER FOR EROSION OR RUTTING. CAREFULLY REPAIR, SEED AND MULCH AND ERODED AREAS.
0
WITHERS & RAVENEL
a ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
tills MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina ?7511 ld: 919.4693340 Fax: [phone] www.wdhersmvenet.om
FEB-13-2004 FRI 10:34 TEL:[phone]
02/13/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
1"=50' LEVEL SPREADER DETAILS
JAB RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 7
,
i t!/ V v, A A/ 1 1 \X\, / t \ r
;
<. /
'
ago- Q \ \\ f ,/' __...
?. : , /...
f
'' ?r ?F /i`i %? /?:m a??at?_srrss ? ,rya:- "%? ?/ ? ?? ?? ? ?'? ? V `•. ? '' ?1 `? 1 /`s ? '?
7 \A'
h ? ` \ ?'. -."'Ofd. YAS[?NT - = ; ' \ \ \ t \
` 1 31
\ N h 1 / l'"+ ? ? ? \ I \
Tl' OF'cE1E_Y , MHN 0 SAHR1'q?3 \ 1 I t ! X _ \x \\? .?\I? `?• -\ `?\?` _ .. - ,-? ' .
'5,97 AR-
\ .._. 3RdlNG: 14?-Z ' 1 t 1 I r 1 \•/ \? ' \ t ` ?\ \ `? \ \ ? *? •i i ' '1,
1y
vA \ tf?:. RE5ff3FP€3't4E- ? ! ? ? h ' ?..% 9 A \ 1 i w ? ? j ?` '@V v;?.. ? ? ti, ., ? ????% F 1'• `? , 1
17
77 7 7
411
A "A\
ly.
CA\
ttt /
a' -
-
I Al
\ \y
y
lo?
17
: . ; i ??,1.. .. -?,.--?, .. ?- ? A '?' .: ,//. i %` PR?P£ATY, OF?YAK£:?SQt}N1Y --
3 1 .`• t ` ;•1 \\ c/® ca Nfv AYTI3RNE?lSace ??? ?...`.
L?\ \ \ kx gur; 0715,02rss 8103
1721 T ,AC
?Cwo?_V sA.. i •?ZOIMNG:%R-4
v ?;?' \ \\ \\ \
USE '??A
T 01/23/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
WITHERS ? RAVENEL ,'-200'
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS NRB IMPACT VICINITY MAP
. 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel:[phone] tax-919-467-6008 -witlh-m-l- JAB RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

(m H oy,-? i s C ;rL

/C C?
V ? L
4 7?>

C ?

r-kv c (,2 e c V r( t f

C3

Z47 0C)U1

?? c cc/t

CZCC?
C V? O? V?,?/?C2i??l Y"_?n fn r r° i1T? "`? c i4'

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
January 28, 2004
US Army Corps of Engineers' NCDEHNR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade Attn: Mr. John Dorney
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27615 Parkview Building
Raleigh, N.C. ,27604
RE: Request For Nationwide Permit 14 AND express Review of Buffer Approval and
401 Water Quality Certification
Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 7518 W1 wENpS?401 GROUP
FEB 0 3 2004
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney, WA TER'
4UgU1y
On behalf of Reedy Creek Road LLC (property owner), we hereby request authorizationECTION
from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to use Nationwide Permit 14 for
proposed permanent impacts to one intermittent stream resulting from a road crossing. In
addition, we request written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certifications
associated with NWP 14. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached,
as well as an agent authorization form.
The site is located in the western portion of the town of Raleigh, specifically southwest of
the intersection of Trinity Road (SR 1655) and Reedy Creek Park Road (SR 1775). The
site is bordered to the east by Reedy Creek Park Road. The surrounding area is currently
undeveloped and in agricultural farm use. Please refer to the attached USGS map, which
displays the location of the proposed project.
The proposed project consists of impacts resulting from the construction of a 38-lot
subdivision that includes one single road crossing. The proposed road crossing will result
in permanent impacts to 65 linear feet of intermittent stream channel, 5,630 ft2 of zone 1
buffer and 4,740 ft2 of zone 2 buffer. The proposed crossing was placed so that impacts
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
are minimized as much as possible while still allowing access to the western side of the
tract (see attached site plan and letter by Withers and Ravenel).
S&EC performed a detailed delineation on November 27, 2002 at request of the client to
minimize impacts. Andrea Wade with USACE was contacted on January 15, 2003 about
this site and was given appropriate maps showing our results. Ms. Wade determined that
no site meeting was required and that she would accept our determination. Because the
Corp concurred with our determination no 401 or 404 permit should be required, however
DWQ considered an area to be subject to the Buffers that was not considered
jurisdictional so buffer approval is required.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation
to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the'requirements
for notification (0.10 acre). The proposed subdivision will provide housing for the
growing area. The proposed road crossing is necessary to fully access all usable upland
areas on-site. Because the applicant has minimized impacts to the maximum extent
practicable, S&EC believes further compensatory mitigation should not be required by
the USACE, however if mitigation is required, payment to the WRP is proposed.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for perennial stream impacts of
greater or equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project. We request written
concurrence that the project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certification associated
with Nationwide Permit 14. NC-DWQ's current policy does not require wetland or
stream mitigation for perennial stream channel impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear feet
per project. Because impacts to wetlands and channels are below the thresholds for
mitigation, we do not believe that wetland nor stream mitigation should be required by
NC-DWQ. Please also note that following construction the site will contain 22.6%
impervious surface according to the project engineer (Withers and Ravenel). Because
impervious surface will be less than 30% (22.6%), we do not believe that this project
requires a pre-approved DWQ stormwater plan.
Please call if you require any additional information or have any questions.
Sincerely,
Will Buetow Kevin Martin
Soil Scientist In Training Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Level Spreader Calculations
Agent Authorization
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Copy of DWQ Buffer Letter
Wetland Impact Maps
Wetland and Upland Data forms
Payment to DWQ ($3,000)
Justification Letter From Engineer
Express Review Acceptance Letter
1

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Reedv Creek Road. LLC
Mailing Address: 14600 Weston Parkway
Suite 300
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: KMartin(a,SandEC.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so.long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Reedy Creek Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0775.02-85-6616
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Reedy Creek Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Along. Reedy Creek Road
(SR 1775) south of the intersection with Trenton Road (SR 1655)
Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Impact 1: 35° 49' 36.74" N, 78°
44' 7.52" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Richland Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is entirely wooded except for the footprint of an
existing 2 acres pond. The surrounding area is a combination of agricultural uses, low-
density residential development and wooded park land.
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will include construction of subdivision infrastructure to support
single-family residential development with an approximate density of 1.4 units/acre. Typical
heave grading and excavation equipment will be utilized to construct the required roadways
and utilities.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The proposed project will include construction of subdivision infrastructure to support
single-family residential development with an approximate density of 1.4 units/acre. The
property is zoned for 2 units/acre.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
On January 16, 2003, a site meeting was conducted with Ms. Debbie Edwards of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality(NBRRO 03-0656). Ms. Edwards determined that features A,
D and the pond are subject to the Neuse Buffers throughout the property and feature B is subject
below flag 35, however feature C is not subject to the Buffers (see attached DWQ letter and
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permitting is anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
Page 7 of 13
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
There are no proposed jurisdictional wetland impacts. The stream impact is to a DWQ buffered
stream that the Corps (Ms. Andrea Wade) considered not jurisdictional based on a verbal
confirmation with Laura Gadd of S&EC PA. However since a written confirmation has not been
obtained from the USAGE we are including the impact for now.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 1.7 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
I Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
Impact 1 Culvert 65 feet UT of Richland Creek -2 feet Intermittent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
Page 8 of 13
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs•gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tgpozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site
65 feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
At the reauest of the client. a detailed wetland delineation and stream buffer determination
was conducted by Soil and Environmental Consultants on November 18, 2002. This was done
prior to project planning in order to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts to streams and
wetlands. Therefore the only impacts are the crossing of a buffered intermittent channel that is
Page 9 of 13
needed to access the other half of the property isolated by the pond and the stream feature above
it. However, the USACE indicated the section of the feature being impacted would not be
considered jurisdictional by them.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htt-p://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strrngide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
Page 10 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify. )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 11 of 13
Identify the square feet
mitigation is required
multipliers.
and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,630 3 16,890
2 4,740 1.5 7,110
Total 10,370 24,000
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
There is no mitigation proposed since impacts are less than 150' and 1/3 acre of buffer.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The estimated impervious surface percentage for the project is 22.6%. This allows for an
average of 5,000 sf of impervious surface per lot in addition to road, sidewalks, etc. Level
spreader calculations by Withers and Ravenel are attached.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater for the project will be discharged into an extension of the existing City of Raleigh
sanitary sewer system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 12 of 13
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

--? I_? (<)
Date
(Agent's signature-is-v id only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
01/30/04 15:18 FAX [phone] WITHERS & RAVENEL
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
411002
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: (L+c cVtx-e-x s0abIv?s 10 ^J
Contact Person: J a ? EkazbV c. wo Phone Number. (cr/4) 4e-q--'33!J0
Level Spreader ID:.
Level Spreader Length / /0 ft,
Drainage Area 0.84 ac.
Impervious Area b• 60 ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/Suffer Slope t 3.0 %
grass
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm +,:s cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader / • O cis
Finer StrfplBuffer Vegetation G?zs,[?rta rbca!&r (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
LLB L???+ QZ00"J> groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method PHAX Faow b67'e.->"r;0^ r M 10M -M
4-vc- L_ Sp2 4A?L ve4a)ks?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. ff a
requirement has not been met, atfach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement, An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A_ pNicants Initials
JAS Level spreader is at least 13 it per cis for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cls in canopied forest with leaf
fitter,
Preform Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
?IAr?is No structures are located in protected buffers!
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
Al Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass If designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone t of a protected buffer area.
DEC-19-02 11:45 FROM:PROVISION CO
ID:19198392011
PAGE

Environmental Consultants,,
ACID AW-HORIZA'Y"IURM
AR Blanks Tp Be Fled In By The QWnt 7,axuiov elr
j, j"
Name: d" /uGS%
Z?6
Adams: ) C4i
'? 8 ?t 10 6
Phorm
IsrojedNamernescripiiaat. Jr-S

The Ueparumd of tote Army
U.S. Army Corps of ErWmem Walmingt= Uistzrict
P.O Box 7.890
Wi]Vdngbon, NC 2UM
Attn:
Field O
Re: Weflwxb Related Cowaltatg and FemdU ng
To Whom ft may Conaem:
L the current row, owner, hereby designate and authodw So & Fslvsa?mtenta? consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in flee processft of permit applica*w, to furuiffh upon request
suppleaoamul hgormatton in support of appheativns, etc. fiv= this day forward. The day Of
Tim notifncmiioan supersedes any prevww cmvspo Weave conoenting *6 agent for tins project.
N(MCE: Tbfs attic , izatkw, for Hab7W and professional coudesy reason is v" only for
goner meat offidials to enter the prop uty when amontpavh d by 9"C Staff: You Should CaU S"C
to awAnge a site meeftg priorto vil "the site.:
OAL- ig- m l `fxxs
Pmbn Property Ownees Name
or= 14. John homey
NMENR-- DWQ
2323 Crabtree Baruletrard
Raleigh, NC 27604
o?=Ie?s s;re
ftT#y
cc Mr Kem Martin
sod & l nvironm entai ConsuUaxAs PA
Iiamkagmau&fo=aAcc
234L4ndMP Comte Suim C 3917-B LUNUdda Ddm 710 SWIM RDW
Coucard NC 2=5 Gweodow, NC 27455 Tayloavifoc. NC 28681
Pbroat: CM) 720-9405 Phnn: f33615404MM Dhow a= 635-5820
1/1
02-7518 1" =1328 Fi
ure 2 - Soil Surve

Project
Mgr.: km
Date:
11118102 y
g
Valone Tract
Withers & Ravenel
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
March 31, 2003
Laura Gadd
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
NBRRO 03-065
Valone Tract
S&EC # 02-7518
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Dear Ms. Gadd:
This letter will serve as confirmation of the buffer determination made by S&EC at the
subject property referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 03-065.
On January 16, 2003, I conducted a site visit of features A, B, C, D and 1 involved in
the above referenced project as identified on the attached figures 1 and 2. It was determined that
the features shown on the Wake County Soil Survey and on the USGS Raleigh West, NC Quad
map could potentially be subject to protection under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive
Waters Management Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas,
Administrative Code T15A: 02B.0233 (NCAC .0233). Features A and D are both subject
throughout property. Feature B is subject and its origin is flag "35". Feature C is not subject
and the pond, identified as feature 1 is subject.
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules. For information
relevant to 401 Water Quality Certifications, wetlands and other impacts to "waters of the state",
please contact the Central Office at 733-1786. Thank you for your attention to this matter and if
this office can be of any assistance or if you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
U?.lJl1??G`rc?
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist I
cc: John Dorney/DWQ
Wake County -
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper

\1\\?\1 11\\ ?? I U4- 11 (;'.Ill
'/// M0J77------Z-750
W O
O 65 „?
4 •
0
400 J •
n 6.
n
I
\ 11 •4(?
1: a
E
oI v
X00 X0000 O ,5 O ?i?: + 9.11

W u S
_ W
-J
4
1 0
t diu 1
6 ?
Project #: Scale:
02-7518 1" = 2000' Fi
1
USGS QU
d
Project
Mgr.: km Date:
11/19102 gure
-
a
Valone Tract
Withers & Ravenel
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
RALEIGH WEST, N. C.
9 w14 P 6E16H 15' E)UABRM166E
35078-G6-TF-024
PHOTOINSPECTED1988
1968
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA 5255 1 SW-SERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Project #:
02-7518 I Scale:
1" = 1320'
Project pate Figure 2 -Soil Survey
Mgr.: km 11/19102 Valone Tract
Withers & Ravenel
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
• \ / / Senn/Lt _
,
P464W 06Z RUFpMT? N'
„ t
/
-.0m vow
\\ \ ; ,
r'
mkvo
,
:
,y
\ \ ; ! ' I i , i l ? } 1. \',:, ;,1?•`r H/ --_ - -,. \\ ' ? ` 1_?. \ ?` ?~ .. --..-aw-. `` \? ??` \ ' ` 11\ 5`? y _ .
\\ _07x. if
!`
.1 2
lVJ
211
?-41.2 k, 802
Mliji
Ila
V, Al,
'Om
J \ ?\"
\\ \\ `' :t v >? 4 /.' ?'kre C n'or` c/a' cwmil4°drs
/ 1 '•, '7, \ `F.` r:' y ?.. _?" i91d# W75.02
.93-91tl3
? i
l' \ \t+.'\\ t ' t i1?_ ??... 1721 ac E?%MH? .
?n?sr",y ?(15E; yg(p¢,Aj'{' J
l,e
... , \\ r '
i
aM
WITHERS RAVEN EL 01/23/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
ENGINEERS i PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 1 °=200' N R B IMPACT MAP
111 MacKenar Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel:[phone]. fax:[phone] www.withersravenefcom JAB RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
?m acts ?m
?
R,? Chdn n I
5 If/ N?v
5, 30 s ft. - one 1 (-
,740 qft. - Zon a
////
1-01
340
3 \3 ?-
---
`_ 360 \
O
\ W / ? I
IN,
WITHERS RAVENEL 01/23/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 1"=50' NRB IMPACT MAP
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]" www.wilhemmveoel. JAB RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA
i
o
!?A
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
WETLANDS/ 401 CROUP
FEB 0 3 2004
WATER QUALRl' SECT'®N January 28, 2004
US Army Corps of Engineers' NCDEHNR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade Attn: Mr. John Dorney
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27615 Parkview Building
Raleigh, N.C. 27604
RE: Request For Nationwide Permit 14 AND express Review of Buffer Approval and
401 Water Quality Certification
Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 7518 W1
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney,
On behalf of Reedy Creek Road L )rization
from the US Army Corps of Engir br
proposed permanent impacts to on
addition, we request written concu - :)ssing. In
Tater
Quality (NC-DWQ) that the proje, ications
associated with NWP 14. A Pre-c 3 attached,
as well as an agent authorization f -
The site is located in the western 1 + 1 V? uthwest of
the intersection of Trinity Road (? D?1? ? ? C , 4 ( 75). The
site is bordered to the east by Ree currently
undeveloped and in agricultural f, ip, which
displays the location of the propo (< G c G L
The proposed project consists of i _ 8-lot
subdivision that includes one single road crossing. The proposed road crossing will result
in permanent impacts to 65 linear feet of intermittent stream channel, 5,630 ft2 of zone 1
buffer and 4,740 ft2 of zone 2 buffer. The proposed crossing was placed so that impacts
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickory Office:
622 Coon Mountain Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
are minimized as much as possible while still allowing access to the western side of the
tract (see attached site plan and letter by Withers and Ravenel).
S&EC performed a detailed delineation on November 27, 2002 at request of the client to
minimize impacts. Andrea Wade with USACE was contacted on January 15, 2003 about
this site and was given appropriate maps showing our results. Ms. Wade determined that
no site meeting was required and that she would accept our determination. Because the
Corp concurred with our determination no 401 or 404 permit should be required, however
DWQ considered an area to be subject to the Buffers that was not considered
jurisdictional so buffer approval is required.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation
to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the requirements
for notification (0.10 acre). The proposed subdivision will provide housing for the
growing area. The proposed road crossing is necessary to fully access all usable upland
areas on-site. Because the applicant has minimized impacts to the maximum extent
practicable, S&EC believes further compensatory mitigation should not be required by
the USACE, however if mitigation is required, payment to the WRP is proposed.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for perennial stream impacts of
greater or equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project. We request written
concurrence that the project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certification associated
with Nationwide Permit 14. NC-DWQ's current policy does not require wetland or
stream mitigation for perennial stream channel impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear feet
per project. Because impacts to wetlands and channels are below the thresholds for
mitigation, we do not believe that wetland nor stream mitigation should be required by
NC-DWQ. Please also note that following construction the site will contain 22.6%
impervious surface according to the project engineer (Withers and Ravenel). Because
impervious surface will be less than 30% (22.6%), we do not believe that this project
requires a pre-approved DWQ stormwater plan.
Please call if you require any additional information or have any questions.
Sincerely, U
r
Will Buetow Kevin Martin
Soil Scientist In Training Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Level Spreader Calculations
Agent Authorization
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Copy of DWQ Buffer Letter
Wetland Impact Maps
Wetland and Upland Data forms
Payment to DWQ ($3,000)
Justification Letter From Engineer
Express Review Acceptance Letter
Office Use Only' Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If anv narticular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Reedy Creek Road LLC
Mailing Address: 14600 Weston Parkway
Suite 300
Carv North Carolina 27513
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Martin
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: KMartin(a_)SandEC corn
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
8.
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I1 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Reedy Creek Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN)
0775.02-85-6616
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Reedy Creek Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Along Reedy Creek Road
(SR 1775) south of the intersection with Trenton Road (SR 1655)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Impact 1: 35° 49' 36.74" N, 78°
44' 7.52" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 26.
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Richland Creek
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/mgps/.)
River Basin: Neuse
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is entirely wooded except for the footprint of an
existing 2 acres pond The surrounding area is a combination of agricultural uses, low-
density residential development and wooded park land
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will include construction of subdivision infrastructure to support
single-family residential development with an approximate density of 1.4 units/acre. Typical
heavy grading and excavation equipment will be utilized to construct the required roadways
and utilities.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The proposed project will include construction of subdivision infrastructure to support
single-family residential development with an approximate density of 1.4 units/acre. The
property is zoned for 2 units/acre.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
On January 16, 2003, a site meeting was conducted with Ms. Debbie Edwards of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality(NBRRO 03-0656). Ms. Edwards determined that features A,
D and the pond are subject to the Neuse Buffers throughout the property and feature B is subject
below flag- 35, however feature C is not subject to the Buffers (see attached DWQ letter and
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permitting is anticipated for this project
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
Page 7 of 13

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
WETLANDS/ 401 GRQUp
FEB 0 3 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION January 28, 2004
US Army Corps of Engineers NCDEHNR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade Attn: Mr. John Dorney
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27615 Parkview Building
Raleigh, N.C. 27604
RE: Request For Nationwide Permit 14 AND express Review of Buffer Approval and
401 Water Quality Certification
Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 7518 Wl
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney,
On behalf of Reedy Creek Road LLC (property owner), we hereby request authorization
from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to use Nationwide Permit 14 for
proposed permanent impacts to one intermittent stream resulting from a road crossing. In
addition, we request written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certifications
associated with NWP 14. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached,
as well as an agent authorization form.
The site is located in the western portion of the town of Raleigh, specifically southwest of
the intersection of Trinity Road (SR 1655) and Reedy Creek Park Road (SR 1775). The
site is bordered to the east by Reedy Creek Park Road. The surrounding area is currently
undeveloped and in agricultural farm use. Please refer to the attached USGS map, which
displays the location of the proposed project.
The proposed project consists of impacts resulting from the construction of a 38-lot
subdivision that includes one single road crossing. The proposed road crossing will result
in permanent impacts to 65 linear feet of intermittent stream channel, 5,630 ft2 of zone 1
buffer and 4,740 ft2 of zone 2 buffer. The proposed crossing was placed so that impacts
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
There are no proposed jurisdictional wetland impacts. The stream impact is to a DWQ buffered
stream that the Corps (Ms Andrea Wade) considered not jurisdictional based on a verbal
confirmation with Laura Gadd of S&EC PA. However since a written confirmation has not been
obtained from the USACE we are including the impact for now.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httR://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 1.7 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
Impact 1 Culvert 65 feet UT of Richland Creek -2 feet Intermittent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
Page 8 of 13
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mgpguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 65 feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
At the reauest of the client, a detailed wetland delineation and stream buffer determination
was conducted by Soil and Environmental Consultants on November 18, 2002. This was done
prior to project planning in order to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts to streams and
wetlands Therefore the only impacts are the crossing of a buffered intermittent channel that is
Page 9 of 13
needed to access the other half of the property isolated by the pond and the stream feature above
it. However, the USACE indicated the section of the feature being impacted would not be
considered jurisdictional by them.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
Page 10 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 11 of 13
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

-?>_ I -) la
Date
(Agent's signatur aid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
01/30/04 15:18 FAX [phone] WITHERS & RAVENEL
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
[a 002
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : 9A=+ r.Z.r-r: K. ?5 "m D It/ Is o--)
Contact Person: A Smvz c. w0 Phone Number. (9 /4) 469-_ 3 3 #C?
Level Spreader ID:.
Level Spreader Length / /0 ft.
Drainage Area 0.86 ac.
Impervious Area b• 60 ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/suffer Slope t 5.0 %
grass
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-sibs and of ite drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm ?. 5 cis
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader / • O cls
Fitter Strip/Buffer Vegetation CAA'AgPrrm aLeds, r (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
CEA-C tJT-It2. C.0 00".A groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method PEAJC GZOw D?-7L?N?o? NtZiory -ra
46-v c- L- S pP-erATA 1E-TZ- Q.6C,&1?S e;
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. ff a
requirement has not been met, atfach an explanaWn of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
Jas?Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 It per cis in canopied forest with leaf
later.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
Cl+ B No structures are located in protected buffers`
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
ItThe e operation and maintenance agreement induces annual erosion and vegetation repair.
?,IA Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass 9 designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DEC-19-02 11:45 FROM:PROVISION CO ID=19198392011 PAGE 1/1

Environmental Consultants,
MWSOUNUM
AAGENT AUTHORMATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Famed. In The t I,ainda vvner
Name:
Addax .1I `} will ALL- Z76 "&
phone
PralectName/Dams Q - C?ruf c
Date. 1710-L
The Deparuwnt of the Army
US. Army Corps of &WneeM W 'on Disftx±
F_O. BOX IM
'61 amk%inn, NC 28=
At#.a:
Field Of 5w-
Re: Wedancis Related Cmsultft and Fig
To Whom ft may Co1iCP an
L the aunt VMRga owner, hereby dempate and ant wma S4 & Fmrmu nmtat Cooasultanfks, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the Mcewft of pemdt appl cations, to fulmi-,h upon reynest
snppte?anelltal irAOrma>ion m sappod of appjwAbom, eir- fivm this day forward. The day of
This na if cation supmedes any previouscorreRmdeum conventng J* agent hir "Pro)ect-
N(MCts This xathvnzariao. for hab7fty and professional condesy renons, is vAd only for
government ofdals to en the propedy when aoaompamed by S&EC staf You should call S&EC
to awAnp x site meefing prior to vi? the site,
fthd Property Ownees Name prop#ybwan a 9VAlure
ac Mr. Joki Doamey cc Mr. Kev= Martin
NCDEM -- DWQ Sall & Fnvironunentd Consultants, FA
2M Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
b&akaqbuiaw&fb=mA-
ffi
?L ePhi3f'ip Corot St im c 3917-B iva d DAM 71
710 S s$Md NROOd
C 28681
Commod. NC 28025
phooa CM) 720-9405 pt piwz 63M 540.8234 Phoac f= 635 5820
) 1
350 _ IPao- \ 400 D
/---" 0 -
SFriE?Efiiif??
o
h I'
:......::::r
350 \ \\
I zoo / yp0 11 ?.
II
s RI ES
` = i Olv
ITT
.. .. -- s? 11 ' ° G,
/ v o ? i. o? e•I_
I- - - _ ? II
s _ <
O. _ o
I t Jiu ?i a p
00 0
` ?`so it 11 ?'• Cn
\ 6 11. a S I" r?S
14 -
Project #: Scale:
02-7519 V - 2OW Figure 1- USGS Quad
Project
Mgr.: km Date.
11119/02 Valone Tract
Withers & Ravenel
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
RALEIGH WEST, N. G.
SW/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
35078-G6-TF-024
PHOTOINSPECTED 1988
1968
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA 5255 1 SW-SERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Project #: Scale:
02-7518 1" =1320'
ure 2 -Soil Survey
Fi
P
t
P D
t g
rojec
ro
Mgr.: km a
e:
11/19/02

Valone Tract
l
& R
avene
Withers
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
i
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd. - Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
March 31, 2003
Laura Gadd
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Subject: Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
NBRRO 03-065
Valone Tract
S&EC # 02-7518
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Dear Ms. Gadd:
This letter will serve as confirmation of the buffer determination made by S&EC at the
subject property referenced by the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 03-065.
On January 16, 2003, I conducted a site visit of features A, B, C, D and 1 involved in
the above referenced project as identified on the attached figures 1 and 2. It was determined that
the features shown on the Wake County Soil Survey and on the USGS Raleigh West, NC Quad
map could potentially be subject to protection under the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive
Waters Management Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas,
Administrative Code T15A: 02B.0233 (NCAC .0233). Features A and D are both subject
throughout property. Feature B is subject and its origin is flag "35". Feature C is not subject
and the pond, identified as feature 1 is subject.
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules. For information
relevant to 401 Water Quality Certifications, wetlands and other impacts to "waters of the state",
please contact the Central Office at 733-1786. Thank you for your attention to this matter and if
this office can be of any assistance or if you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist I
cc: John Dorney/DWQ
Wake County
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
?i
X) \X
s
0
\ rr; _ i 400
l
? n
n
n
i
?e4 a
v 1V? \ E
\ ?sO RI ES ?N.
OT,
o \ 01 .r 1 f • I- -?
O o •, t
/ o
< I I t diu
4? ?? O it it cc
Project x: Scale:
02-7518 1" = 20w Figure 1 - USGS QUad
Project
Mgr.: km Date:
11119102
Valone Tract
Withers & Ravenel
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
RALEIGH WEST, N. C.
S"'4f?-M_E!6:l 15' 9UABRl.N6tE
35078-G6-TF-024
PHOTOINSPECTED 1988
1968
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA 5255 1 SW-SERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
(919 846-5900 • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Project Scale:
02-7518 1" = 1320'
Proje, Date Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Mgr.: km 11119102 Valone Tract
Withers & Ravenel
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
,
,
,
i
1
f
,
\ j
.
i
,
J
X X"
PI`ta RTY 0F'.Nd1t.r0hC-_Rt7S^?.Ef::
,
• 1
\ i j ! ,? \ \\' ' ! \ \ \ ' ZDItY1G$-2-"' ©?
r M
i
y
,'.
00
\ OF` COt-Y X JOHN a
\ 6+iN# 7702-75-.mw
\\\ ?, 5.07 AC..- ..? fr('' \\i;1: •; \? ??, , i
\yr
\ . • ( .\\. \ .. 1 \ ; \'? I`ll .. 'Y `? \A
r
t ,
FRI)FEW, E,
A wl \\ \ ?` ~ NJ . C/o mumfy
Af BFf7CE' •_ ?\ ?-
\? \
puq ^•'/ } ' \\\ \`f `\`:?M1y4•''` ,7.}9)?0 _. 'l_'.. t-?. „t ''/Y?aG- i? wl5,a2M5 '^?1a3
?. i / v>trawr
NVIi
- --
-
r i
01/23/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
WITHERS ? RAVENEL. _200• NRB IMPACT MAP
'ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS , ••
117 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] ra>-91e-467-6008 w-withers.-I.- JAB RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Impa.cts Strm---mz??
65 If/- NO Chpnn¢I
5.§30 sgft. $one/ 1 ?
y,740 ?agft. ?Z e3/ i
j
11,00,
l
i
10000,
0000,
t
330
360
01/23/04 REEDY CREEK SUBDIVISION
WITHERS ? RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS , -=50' NRB IMPACT MAP
111 MaCKenan Drive Cary, Nonh Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] vnvw.withersravenel- JAB RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Valone Tract/S&EC #02-7518 Date: November 21, 2002
Applicant/Owner: Withers & Ravenel County: Wake
Investigator: Laura Gadd & Will Buetow State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Emergent Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland-flag 08
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
V F CZFTOTIM
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Ilex decidua Shrub FACW- 11.
4. Juncus effusus Herb FACW+ 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:
wvnanl nav
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 3 (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Valone Tract/S&EC #02-7518 Date: November 21, 2002
Applicant/Owner: Withers & Ravenel County: Wake
Investigator: Laura Gadd & Will Buetow State: NC
Mixed pine/hardwood
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: --50' up from flag 08
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acerrubrum Tree FAC 9. Vaccinium stamineum Shrub FACU
2. Quercus alba Tree FACU 10. Quercus albs Sapling FACU
3. Pinus taeda Tree -FA--C 11.
4. Fagus grandifolia Tree FACU 12.
5. Quercus falcate Tree FACU- 13.
6. Acer rubrum Sapling FAC 14.
7. Pinus taeda Sapling FAC 15.
8. Quercus falcata Sapling FACU- 16. _
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 40%
Remarks:

v Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.)
Remarks:
-T
17945
"#'AY
TO
WITHERS & R"ENEL, INC.
17945
Amount Discounts Previous Pay Net Amount
Invoice Number Date Voucher -=
3,000.00
202094/FSD ReedyCrk 2/2/04 0016306 3,000.00 -----
NCDENR Totals 3,000.00 I 3,000.00
CCBChecki 1 -
WITHERSRAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
January 27, 2004
Mr. Will Buetow
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11o1o Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
RE: Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
WR Project Number 202094.0
Mr. Buetow:
We are providingthis letter in support of the NRB impact permit application for the above referenced
project. As shown on the attached figures the project will require crossing of the existing drainage
feature that bisects the property from north to south. The crossing is necessary in order to access
the majority of the property from the existing public right-of-way. Construction of the crossing will be
completed by the private development entity, however construction will be to the minimum City of
Raleigh design standards and ultimately dedicated for public maintenance and use. The subject
crossing is located as close as practicable to the site's northern boundary line in effort to avoid the
feature as much as practicable. Please note we estimate the ultimate impervious surface
percentage for this project to be below 23%. This figure is based on the estimated impervious
surfaces for the roadways and sidewalk and allowing and average of 5,000 square feet of
impervious area per individual lot.
Please advise should you require any additional information regarding this matter. We appreciate
your continued assistance.
Sincerely,
1WITHERS : RAVENEL, INC.
Jason A. Bertoncino, PE
Attachments.
CC: Mr. Jeffery R. Smerko, Reedy Creek Road, LLC
iii MacKenan Drive i Cary, North Carolina 27511 1 let; 919.469.3340 1 fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
JAN-29-2004 10:09 FROM:DWQ-WETLANDS 9197336893 TO:98469467 P:2/2
Michael F ?QF tlVA TFR? E
Williarn . RoaslJr , Secretary
_0 r Nox* Carolina Department of Envitonmcrtt and Natural Resources
j Alan W. Klimck. P.A., Director
Division of WatarQual'ity
'G Col- tl. Sollins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
January 29, 2004
Project Name: Reedy Creek Road Project
Wake County
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Reedy Creek Road, LLC
14600 Weston Parkway, Suite 300
Cary, NC 27513
Dear Sirs:
On January 28, 2004, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email
request from Soil and Environmental Consultants regarding a project known as "Reedy Creek Road" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted
into the Express Review Program once the following items are received: 1) a fee of $3,000 ($1,000 for
a 401 Water Quality Certification and $2,000 for a Riparian Buffer .Approval) made payable to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2) seven complete and collated copies of the application and
3) seven copies of all additional information pertaining to this project. Thank you for your attention to
this matter. Also since this project is in the Neuse Basin, please be certain that a final stormwater plan
providing diffuse flow is included in the application.
Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed application
package and required fee are received.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these (matters further please do not hesitate to call John
Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
z
3RD/bs
Attachments
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
)Kevin Martin, S&EC, 11010 Ravel,. Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614, Fax# [phone]
N. C. Division of W ftr Quality. 401 Wetlands CertiricAtion unit,
1650 Moll Service Center. RNeish, NC 27699.1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Ctabt= Blvd.. Raleigh. NC 27604-2260 aAeation)
[phone] (phone). 919-733-6893 (fax). tbttnl/h2n.anr state.ne uahtcwcdands)
Cu t rncc Scxvice #: 1-877.623-6748
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Valone Tract/S&EC #02-7518 Date: November 21, 2002
Applicant/Owner: Withers & Ravenel County: Wake
Investigator: Laura Gadd & Will Buetow State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Emergent Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland-flag 08
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Ilex decidua Shrub FACW- 11.
4. Juncus effusus Herb FACW+ 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 3 (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Valone Tract/S&EC #02-7518 Date: November 21, 2002
Applicant/Owner: Withers & Ravenel County: Wake
Investigator: Laura Gadd & Will Buetow State: NC
Mixed pine/hardwood
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: -50' up from flag 08
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acerrubrum Tree FAC 9. Vaccinium stamineum Shrub FACU
2. Quercus albs Tree FACU 10. Quercus alba Sapling FACU
3. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 11.
4. Fagus grandifolia Tree FACU 12.
5. Quercus falcate Tree FACU- 13.
6. Acerrubrum Sapling FAC 14.
7. Pinus taeda Sapling FAC 15.
8. Quercus falcata Sapling FACU- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 40%
Remarks:
HYDROLOV
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.)
Remarks:
WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
January 27, 2004
Mr. Will Buetow
Soil and Environmental Consultants
lloio Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
RE: Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
WR Project Number 202094.0
Mr. Buetow:
We are providingthis letter in support of the NRB impact permit application for the above referenced
project. As shown on the attached figures the project will require crossing of the existing drainage
feature that bisects the property from north to south. The crossing is necessary in order to access
the majority of the property from the existing public right-of-way. Construction of the crossing will be
completed by the private development entity, however construction wilt be to the minimum City of
Raleigh design standards and ultimately dedicated for public maintenance and use. The subject
crossing is located as close as practicable to the site's northern boundary line in effort to avoid the
feature as much as practicable. Please note we estimate the ultimate impervious surface
percentage for this project to be below 23%. This figure is based on the estimated impervious
surfaces for the roadways and sidewalk and allowing and average of 5,00o square feet of
impervious area per individual lot.
Please advise should you require any additional information regarding this matter. We appreciate
your continued assistance.
Sincerely,
(THERS & RAVENEL,. INC.
Jason A. Bertoncino, PE
Attachments.
CC: Mr. Jeffery R. Smerko, Reedy Creek Road, LLC
iii MacKenan Drive i Cary, North Carolina 27511 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] i www.withersravenel.com
JAN-29-2004 10:09 FROM:DWQ-WETLANDS 9197336893 T0:98469467 P:2/2
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Reedy Creek Road, 11,C
14600 Weston Parkway, Suite 300
Cary, NC 27513
Dear Sirs-
January 29, 2004
Project Name: Reedy Creek Road Project
Wake County
On January 28, 2004, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email
request from Soil and Environmental Consultants regarding a project known as "Reedy Creek Road" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted
into the Express Review Program once the following items are received: 1) a fee of $3,000 ($1,000 for
a 401 Water Quality Certification and $2,000 for a Riparian Buffer .Approval) made payable to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2) seven complete and collated copies of the application and
3) scvcn copies of all additional inforination pertaining to this project. Thank you for your attention to
this matter. Also since this project is in the Neuse Basin, please be certain that a final stormwater plan
providing diffuse flow is included in the application.
Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start lentil receipt of the completed application
package and required fee are received.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call John
Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
JRD/bs
Attachments
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin, S&EC, 11010 Raven, Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614, Fax# [phone]
N. C. Dtvlsion of W for Quality. 401 wetlands Certification unit,
1650 Mail Service Center. Rale58h4 NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtrac 8tvd., Raleigh. NC 27604.2260 (Ration)
[phone] (phone). 919-733-6893 (fax), (hriny/h2o.cnr, tai ar,or Wrttan at
Customer Service #: 1.877.623.6748
I
-C
Michael F. Easley. Governor
William G. Rona Jr., Secremry
With Carolina Departnmt of Environment artd Natural Resources
Alan w. KlimcJ4 p.13., Director
Division of Watar Quality
Colcen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of WaterQu&Uty
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Valone Tract/S&EC #02-7518 Date: November 21, 2002
Applicant/Owner: Withers & Ravenel County: Wake
Investigator: Laura Gadd & Will Buetow State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Emergent Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland-flag 08
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 10.
3. Ilex decidua Shrub FACW- 11.
4. Juncus effusus Herb FACW+ 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
X Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: 3 (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Valone Tract/S&#C #02-7518 Plot ID: Wetland- flag 08
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well drained
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 O/A 10YR 4/2 NA NA Silt loam
4-8 Al 10YR 4/3 7.5YR 4/4 Common/distinct Sand clay loam
8-12 A2 10YR 5/1 NA NA Sand clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL-
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Valone Tract/S&EC #02-7518 Date: November 21, 2002
Applicant/Owner: Withers & Ravenel County: Wake
Investigator: Laura Gadd & Will Buetow State: NC
Mixed pine/hardwood
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: -50' up from flag 08
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acerrubrum Tree FAC 9. Vaccinium stamineum Shrub FACU
2. Quercus alba Tree FACU 10. Quercus alba Sapling FACU
3. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 11.
4. Fagus grandifolia Tree FACU 12.
5. Quercus falcate Tree FACU- 13.
6. Acer rubrum Sapling FAC 14.
7. Pinus taeda Sapling FAC 15.
8. Quercus falcata Sapling FACU- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-): 40%
Remarks:
HYbROLoV
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Project/Site: Valone Tract/S&#C #02-7518 Plot ID: Upland -50' from flag 08
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Well drained
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 10YR 3/2 NA NA Sand loam
5-16 B 7.5YR 4/6 NA NA Sand clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL- -
11
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
IL- 11
WITHERS` r RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
January 27, 2004
Mr. Will Buetow
Soil and Environmental Consultants
1101o Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
RE: Reedy Creek Road Subdivision
WR Project Number 202094.0
Mr. Buetow:
We are providing this letter in support of the NRB impact permit application for the above referenced
project. As shown on the attached figures the project will require crossing of the existing drainage
feature that bisects the property from north to south. The crossing is necessary in order to access
the majority of the property from the existing public right-of-way. Construction of the crossing will be
completed by the private development entity, however construction wilt be to the minimum City of
Raleigh design standards and ultimately dedicated for public maintenance and use. The subject
crossing is located as close as practicable to the site's northern boundary line in effort to avoid the
feature as much as practicable. Please note we estimate the ultimate impervious surface
percentage for this project to be below 23%. This figure is based on the estimated impervious
surfaces for the roadways and sidewalk and allowing and average of 5,000 square feet of
impervious area per individual lot.
Please advise should you require any additional information regarding this matter. We appreciate
your continued assistance.
Sincerely,
UWITHERS ; RAVENEL, INC.
Jason A. Bertoncino, PE
Attachments.
CC: Mr. Jeffery R. Smerko, Reedy Creek Road, LLC
iii MacKenan Drive i Cary, North Carolina 27511 1 tet. 919.469.3340 1 fax: [phone] i www.withersravenel.com
JAN-29-2004 10:09 FROM:DWQ-WETLANDS 9197336893 TO:98469467 P:2-12
?oF A r?R Michael F. Easley. Governor
William G. Rams Jr., Secretary
Noah Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> Alan W. Ktimcl6 P.S., Director
Division of Ware Quality
colccn Fx. Sallies, Deputy Director
Division of Water Qaa>jty
January 29, 2004
Project Name: Reedy Creek Road Project
Wake County
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEP'T'ANCE LETTER
Reedy Creek Road, LT-C
14600 Weston Parkway, Suite 300
Cary, NC 27513
Dear Sirs:
On January 28, 2004, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Pax/email
request from Soil and Environmental Consultants regarding a project known as "Reedy Creek Road" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted
into the Express Review Program once the following items are received: 1) a fee of $3,000 ($1,000 for
a 401 Water Quality Certification and $2,000 for a Riparian Buffer Approval) made payable to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2) seven complete and collated copies of the application and
3) scvcn copies of all additional information pertainitlg to this project. Thank you for your attention to
this matter. Also since this project is in the Neuse Basin, please be certain that a final stormwater plan
providing diffuse flow is included in the application.
Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed application
package and required fee are received.
U you, have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call John
Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
w ft
Attachments
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614, Fax# [phone]
N. C. DWISion of Wftr Quality. 401 Wetlands CCRifreation Unit,
1650 Moil Service Center. Raleigh. NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Addn=)
2321 Crabtree Blvd.. Raleigh. NC 27604.2260 ajecation)
[phone] (phone). 919 733-6893 (fiat), thUp:/lh2o.enr stet IW-U4/ncwctlan I)
C:ustomec Service*: 1.877.623.6748
Q
w(!i
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
January 29, 2004
Project Name: Reedy Creek Road Project
Wake County
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Reedy Creek Road, LLC
14600 Weston Parkway, Suite 300
Cary, NC 27513
Dear Sirs:
On January 28, 2004, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email
request from Soil and Environmental Consultants regarding a project known as "Reedy Creek Road" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted
into the Express Review Program once the following items are received: 1) a fee of $3,000 ($1,000 for
a 401 Water Quality Certification and $2,000 for a Riparian Buffer Approval) made payable to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2) seven complete and collated copies of the application and
3) seven copies of all additional information pertaining to this project. Thank you for your attention to
this matter. Also since this project is in the Neuse Basin, please be certain that a final stormwater plan
providing diffuse flow is included in the application.
Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed application
package and required fee are received.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call John
Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
JRD/bs
Attachments
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Kevin Martin, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614, Fax# [phone]
X?
?,;?,
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (h!W://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
WA
fl f' r
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Kevin Martin Fax #: [phone]
Company: Soil and Environmental Consultants Date: oQ 9 - o y
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Beverly Strickland at 919-733-3176.

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
01/28/2004 15:16 FAX
t f
4 DWQ DORNEY z 00111005
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Ra)aigb, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SattdEC.com
DATE:_ z f Qq
TO: NAME' (,An
rr?ll
COMPANY, l?
Project Number: (111 - LO D
CC:
FAX NUMBER: - -
kROM: T' n 1? SUBJECT:
The following items are being faxed. Number of pages including transmittal sheet:
For Your Comments /Approval
Per Our Conversation
Please Advise
Would Like To Discuss
14ARD COPY SENT:
US Regular Mail
Overnight.
REMARKS:
For Your Information
Per Your Request
Please. Call
Please Handle
Hand Delivery
No (lard Copy Sent
.
uS C.ft ?Lti _c _EN_,_Jl
.rTh-4 ),1L
IF YOU HAVE ANY RORLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE
CONTACT + AT 919) 846-5900.
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE'S
This transmission .is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is Privileged turd confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are, hereby
notified that any disclosure, distribution or copying of this infornoation is strictly prohibited, If you have received this
transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the. faxed documents to us at the above address
via the United States Postul Service.
C;nen: cko -
•h_arlW (7ffic. 622 Coon Mountain Line
236 LePhiIlip Court, Suite C Gmensbro N oro, NC Leivc
25 rn+'nsC 27455 Ta??lors??illc, NC 28681
Con Phonc: [phone] Phone [phone]
Phone: cord, ,NC NC 280 720-9405
Pax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
r'ax: (7o4) 720-9406
JAN-28-2004 WED 14:57 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 1
FACSIMILE SHEET
,FAX" NO. (9119) 84$6-94667
01/28/2004 15:16 FAX
3 DWO DORNEY L,0002/005
INITIAL INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS PERMITTING PROGRAM FOR
THE 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, ISOLATED WETLAND PERMITTING OR
STREAM ORIGIN DETERMINATION PROGRAMS
September 21, 2003
Version 1.0
Applicant Name; Reedy Creek Road LLC
Applicant Address: 14600 Weston Pkwy. , Suite 300
Oary, NC 27513
Applicant's phone number: 919-834-3106
Applicant's fax number
Applicant's email address
Consultant Name (if applicable)- Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Consultant address (f applicable): 11014 Raven Ridge Road
Rat PiC$i NC 276] 4
Consultant's phone number: 919-846--5900
Consultant's fax number 919-846-9467
Consultant's email address kmarti n,,&sandec . com
Type of action requested under the Express Review Program (check all that apply)-
X 401 Water Quality Certification
Isolated Wetland Permit
X Riparian Buffer Approval
Stream Origin Determination
Name of Project: Reedy _ Creek Road
Property size (acres) 26.5
Nearest named stream (from USGStopomap): UT of Richland Creek
Please provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
the oroi2osed Project consists of impacts resulting
Pr-rim tha onnGt:rurt;inn of a 38--lot subdivision that
i nr1 i?r?a y nn P. ginc7le roast crasslnc . me Pro'posea
road crossing will res'uit in permanent ceannei
impacts to 65 linear feet of intermittent stream
channel.. The road crossing is needed in order to
access the entire property that is separated 77y -a jurisdictional pond
Please attach a map of site location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey, and stream.
Location of project site - please include reference to the county, nearest name town and highway
number:
The site is located in the western portion of the
JAN-28-2004 WED 14:57 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 2
01/28/2004 15:17 FAX y DWQ DORNEY IQJOU3iun5
town of Rate
southwest o
Park Road,
Proposed impacts:
wake County, NC, s
e intersection o Tx
dered to the east by
surrounding area is
cifir_ally
nit yR 775
R ).
ree
urrently undeveloped and in
agricultural farm use.
Q acres of wetlands
n acres of isolated wetlands
6 5 _ linear feet of streams
0 linear feet of isolated streams
10.37Q square feet of protected stream buffers
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two
years? If so, please list which ones.
Which other environmental permits will be needed for this project? Please list them below:
Yes. E.3eo:ress Permit Course. Avolvina for a
Does this project require approval under the State Environmental Policy Act or National
Environmental Policy Act? =N_
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management
Commission" NO
Are you aware of any local controversy concerning this project? if so, please describe the
controversy and any measures that have been taken with respect to public involvement.
No
This form must be submitted via email (c/o bev,[e-mail]) , fax (919733-
6893) or hand-delivered (Parkview Building, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh. NC 27604) within the
first three (3) working days of the month for the first three months of the Express Review Program
(until January 1, 2004). Application procedures after that time will be provided at a later date..
Applicants who are selected to participate in the Express Review Program will be notified via
email or fax with one additional working day. Successful applicants will then be instructed
regarding detailed procedures for full application. Unsuccessful applicants will be queried to
determine if they want to be in the following month's selection process or whether they want to
follow the normal application process.
Please contact John Dorney at 919-733-9646 if you have any questions regarding this form.
JAN-28-2884 WED 14:57 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 3
01/28/2004 15:17 FAX
Praled 4: Scale:
'
027918 1'° soon ure 1- USGS Quad
Fi
¢10?`t g
Vaione Tract
1vlaroz Withers 8 Ravenel
Ratelgh, Wake County, NC
r
A
{
i DWQ DORNEY Lt7j00 4/() U 3
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 RaW Ridge Rd-- R46gh, NC 27614
(919) 84Fr5900 ' (919) 8469467
Web page: ~.SandEC.com
JRN-28-2004 WED 14:57 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 4
9WA RALEIUH IS' QUADRANOLE
35078-G6-TF-024
PHOTOINSPEC76D 1988
7968
PHOTORF-ViSED 1987
OMA 5285 I SW--SFR16S V842
01/28/2004 15:17 FAX -? UWQ DORNEY U005/005
INITIAL INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS PERMITTING PROGRAM FOR
THE 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION, ISOLATED WETLAND PERMITTING OR
STREAM ORIGIN DETERMINATION PROGRAMS
September 21, 2003
Version 1.0
Applicant Name: Reedy Creek Road LLC
Applicant Address: 14600 Weston Pkwy. , Suite 300
Cary, NC 27513
Applicant's phone number: 919-834-3106
Applicant's fax number
Applicant's email address
Consultant Name (if applicable): Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Consultant address (if applicable):
Consultant's phone number.
Consultant's fax number
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Ralaigh, N 7614
919-846-5900
919-846-9467
Consultant's email address kmartinCasandec. com
Type of action requested under the Express Review Program (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification
Isolated Wetland Permit
X Riparian Buffer Approval
Stream Origin Determination
Name of Project:
Property size (acres)
Reedv Creek Road
26.5
Nearest named stream (from USGS topo map): UT of Richland Creek
Please provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
The proposed Project consists of impacts resulting
from the construction of a 38-lot subdivision that
includes one single road crossing. The proposed
road crossing will result in permanent channel
impacts to 65 linear feet of intermittent stream
channel. The road crossing is needed in order to
access the entire property that is separated by -a jurisdictional pond
Please attach a map of site location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey. and stream.
Location of project site - please include reference to the county, nearest name town and highway
number:
The site is located in the western portion of the
75).
Park Road.
Proposed impacts:
undeveloped and in
cultural farm use.
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two
years? If so, please list which ones.
Which other environmental permits will be needed for this project? Please list them below:
Yes, Express Permit Course. Applying for a
Nationwide Permit 39.
Does this project require approval under the State Environmental Policy Act or National
Environmental Policy Act? _ TO
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management
Commission" NO
Are you aware of any local controversy concerning this project? If so, please describe the
controversy and any measures that have been taken with respect to public involvement.
This form must be submitted via email (Go bev. strick land aC7ncmail.net), fax (919-733-
6893) or hand-delivered (Parkview Building, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604) within the
first three (3) working days of the month for the first three months of the Express Review Program
(until January 1, 2004). Application procedures after that time will be provided at a later date..
Applicants who are selected to participate in the Express Review Program will be notified via
email or fax with one additional working day. Successful applicants will then be instructed
regarding detailed procedures for full application. Unsuccessful applicants will be queried to
determine if they want to be in the following month's selection process or whether they want to
follow the normal application process.
Please contact John Dorney at 919-733-9646 if you have any questions regarding this form.
0 acres of wetlands
n acres of isolated wetlands
65 linear feet of streams
O linear feet of isolated streams
10,370 square feet of protected stream buffers
D
:B

Scale:
V = 2000'
Mgr.: fan 1 11119102
Figure 1- USGS Quad
Valone Tract
Withers & Ravenel
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
RALEIGH WEST, N. U.
SW/4 RALEIGH 15' QUADRANGLE
35078-G6-TF-024
PHOTOINSPECTED 1988
1968
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA 5255 1 SW-SERIES V842
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
?z z lf;=
Y, In
??-
i-j
r 3Y ?'?• a 1 Y I c 'i ???t'Q7? ti f" ?' t f jJJ i r.
Wx,
? y?yy?, y I
?1.. 1 tr 1 t [ y ` ? r ? ^ l ?? ? '"+^'.r,??j ? ? ` r • I ? r?'? J ? t l? f 1 ? C
r f ???xSs\?c 3 r ??r
t`'
?i
}} t 1? Z' }.. I 4iS?.,T r I„
RI ???.{?? ,-.? ''?.? $S ?¢ ? ? ? . • ? ?t 7 )?\ ??j? -. -t`'' h m C0 y o5r" ? i ?- ?
I ? f ? ML ?/7 _ F( q
`
rf f l , far k <a?xtnt` 1}'C
• ?? 'l
? '? It ? s •? , ?? , t ?;'? V
4 ?" '?? F. 41Y4.}. ,1? ?-y. 'Gi ,? ?.i T f .;? f ,tr
oeA_ IV?`?.*
I w3 T j }<?ric..t;j ' ?= k I t; 1 r1 ?eU //(4, ?t
.. \ F? 2 2?aS `u `BSI a b^' :..? }d
'?:'??:5
4tc3i ? ? r. - r
Projects: Scale:
02-7518 1" =1320'
Proiect Date: Figure 2 -Soil Survey o Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Myr.: km tvte;oz Valone Tract + 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
Withers & Ravenel [phone] • [phone]
Raleigh, Wake County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
WITHERS & RAVENEL, INC.
Invoice
-- 202094/
NCDENR
CCBChecki 1
17945
Number Date Voucher Amount Discounts Previous Pay Net Amount
FSD ReedyCrk 2/2/04 0016306 3,000.00 3,000.00 I,
Totals 3,000.00 3,000.00

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First-Class Mail
Postag
e 8 Fees Paid
LISPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
"'? ,z.•.
Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this cans to the back of the mailplece,
or on the front if space permits.
1 Article Addressed to: D-O4{+ O 4 _ 0101
Wo-Kc Cou n+?
IpceCiy Cree k RGoa l__.L.C_
ly fc00 I-Ucs+an PbAwc4, 5ut+e
5ui+c 300
Ct_rci KLC- -151-j
2. Article Number
(iitsnsrtsr from service label
PS Form 3811, August 2001
A. PIgnature
X ? Agent
? Addressee
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Dellven
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1 ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ? Express Mail
Registered Return Receipt for merchandisi
C] Insured Mall ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
7002 2410 0003 0275 4162
Domestic Return Receipt
102595.02-M-154