20040167 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040206

Web pages at http://www.fws.gov/r9endspp/endspp.html and http://www.nfms.noaa.gov/prot
i•es/overview/es.html respectively.
12. Historic Properties. No activity that may affect historic properties listed, or eligible for
listing, in the National Register of Historic Places is authorized, until the District Engineer has
complied with the provisions of 33 CFR part 325, Appendix C. The prospective permittee must
notify the District Engineer if the authorized activity may affect any historic properties listed,
determined to be eligible, or which the prospective permittee has reason to believe may be
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and shall not begin the activity
until notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National Historic Preservation
Act have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. Information on the location and
existence of historic resources can be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office and
the National Register of Historic Places (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)). For activities that may affect
historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places, the
notification must state which historic property may be affected by the proposed work or include a
vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property.
13. Notification.
a. Timing; where required by the terms of the NWP, the prospective permittee must
notify the District Engineer with a preconstruction notification (PCN) as early as possible. The
District Engineer must determine if the notification is complete within 30 days of the date of
receipt and can request additional information necessary to make the PCN complete only once.
However, if the prospective permittee does not provide all of the requested information, then the
District Engineer will notify the prospective permittee that the notification is still incomplete and
the PCN review process will not commence until all of the requested information has been
received by the District Engineer. The prospective permittee shall not begin the activity:
1. Until notified in writing by the District Engineer that the activity may proceed
under the NWP with any special conditions imposed by the District or Division Engineer; or
2. If notified in writing by the District or Division Engineer that an Individual
Permit is required; or
3. Unless 45 days have passed from the District Engineer's receipt of the complete
notification and the prospective permittee has not received written notice from the District or
Division Engineer. Subsequently, the permittee's right to proceed under the NWP may be
modified, suspended, or revoked only in accordance with the procedure set forth in 33 CFR
330.5(d)(2).
b. Contents of Notification: The notification must be in writing and include the
following information:
6
1. Name, address and telephone numbers of the prospective permittee;
2. Location of the proposed project;
3. Brief description of the proposed project; the project's purpose; direct and indirect
adverse environmental effects the project would cause; any other NWP(s), Regional General
Permit(s), or Individual Permit(s) used or intended to be used to authorize any part
of the proposed project or any related activity. Sketches should be provided when necessary to
show that the activity complies with the terms of the NWP (Sketches usually clarify the project
and when provided result in a quicker decision.);
4. For NWPs 7, 12, 14, 18, 21, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43, the PCN
must also include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands, vegetated
shallows (e.g., submerged aquatic vegetation, seagrass beds), and riffle and pool complexes (see
paragraph 13(f));
5. For NWP 7 (Cutfall Structures and Maintenance), the PCN must include
information regarding the original design capacities and configurations of those areas of the
facility where maintenance dredging or excavation is proposed;
i 6. For NWP 14 (Linear Transportation Projects), the PCN must include a
compensatory mitigation proposal to offset permanent losses of waters of the US and a statement
describing how temporary losses of waters of the US will be minimized to the maximum extent
practicable;
7. For NWP 21 (Surface Coal Mining Activities), the PCN must include an Office
of Surface Mining (OSM) or state-approved mitigation plan, if applicable. To be authorized by
this NWP, the District Engineer must determine that the activity complies with the terms and
conditions of the NWP and that the adverse environmental effects are minimal both individually
and cumulatively and must notify the project sponsor of this determination in writing;
8. For NWP 27 (Stream and Wetland Restoration Activities), the PCN must include
documentation of the prior condition of the site that will be reverted by the permittee;
9. For NWP 29 (Single-Family Housing), the PCN must also include:
i. Any past use of this NWP by the Individual Permittee and/or the permittee's
spouse;
ii. A statement that the single-family housing activity is for a personal residence
of the permittee;
iii. A description of the entire parcel, including its size, and a delineation of
wetlands. For the purpose of this NWP, parcels of land measuring \1/4\-acre or less will not
7
require a formal on-site delineation. However, the applicant shall provide an indication of where
the wetlands are and the amount of wetlands that exists on the property. For parcels greater than
\1/4\-acre in size, formal wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the current
method required by the Corps. (See paragraph 13(f));
iv. A written description of all land (including, if available, legal descriptions)
owned by the prospective permittee and/or the prospective permittee's spouse, within a one mile
radius of the parcel, in any form of ownership (including any land owned as a partner,
corporation, joint tenant, co-tenant, or as a tenant-by-the-entirety) and any land on which a
purchase and sale agreement or other contract for sale or purchase has been executed;
10. For NWP 31 (Maintenance of Existing Flood Control Facilities), the prospective
permittee must either notify the District Engineer with a PCN prior to each maintenance activity
or submit a five-year (or less) maintenance plan, In addition, the PCN must include all of the
following:
i. Sufficient baseline information identifying the approved channel depths and
configurations and existing facilities. Minor deviations are authorized, provided the approved
flood control protection or drainage is not increased;
ii. A delineation of any affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands; and,
iii. Location of the dredged material disposal site;
11. For NWP 33 (Temporary Construction, Access, and Dewatering), the PCN must
also include a restoration plan of reasonable measures to avoid and minimize adverse effects to
aquatic resources;
12. For NWPs 39, 43 and 44, the PCN must also include a written statement to the
District Engineer explaining how avoidance and minimization for losses of waters of the US
were achieved on the project site;
13. For NWP 39 and NWP 42, the PCN must include a compensatory mitigation
proposal to offset losses of waters of the US or justification explaining why compensatory
mitigation should not be required. For discharges that cause the loss of greater than 300 linear
feet of an intermittent stream bed, to be authorized, the District Engineer must determine that the
activity complies with the other terms and conditions of the NWP, determine adverse
environmental effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively, and waive the limitation
on stream impacts in writing before the permittee may proceed;
14. For NWP 40 (Agricultural Activities), the PCN must include a compensatory
mitigation proposal to offset losses of waters of the US. This NWP does not authorize the
relocation of greater than 300 linear feet of existing serviceable drainage ditches constructed in
non-tidal streams unless, for drainage ditches constructed in intermittent nontidal streams, the
8
District Engineer waives this criterion in writing, and the District Engineer has determined that
the project complies with all terms and conditions of this NWP, and that any adverse impacts of
the project on the aquatic environment are minimal, both individually and cumulatively;
15. For NWP 43 (Stormwater Management Facilities), the PCN must include, for
the construction of new stormwater management facilities, a maintenance plan (in accordance
with state and local requirements, if applicable) and a compensatory mitigation proposal to offset
losses of waters of the US. For discharges that cause the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of an
intermittent stream bed, to be authorized, the District Engineer must determine that the activity
complies with the other terms and conditions of the NWP, determine adverse environmental
effects are minimal both individually and cumulatively, and waive the limitation on stream
impacts in writing before the permittee may proceed;
16. For NWP 44 (Mining Activities), the PCN must include a description of all
waters of the US adversely affected by the project, a description of measures taken to minimize
adverse effects to waters of the US, a description of measures taken to comply with the criteria of
the NWP, and a reclamation plan (for all aggregate mining activities in isolated waters and
non-tidal wetlands adjacent to headwaters and any hard rock/mineral mining activities);
17. For activities that may adversely affect Federally-listed endangered or
threatened species, the PCN must include the name(s) of those endangered or threatened species
that may be affected by the proposed work or utilize the designated critical habitat that may be
affected by the proposed work; and
18. For activities that may affect historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing
in, the National Register of Historic Places, the PCN must state which historic property may be
affected by the proposed work or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic
property.
c. Form of Notification: The standard Individual Permit application form (Form ENG
4345) may be used as the notification but must clearly indicate that it is a PEN and must include
all of the information required in (b) (1)-(18) of General Condition 13. A letter containing the
requisite information may also be used.
d. District Engineer's Decision: In reviewing the PCN for the proposed activity, the
District Engineer will determine whether the activity authorized by the NWP will result in more
than minimal individual or cumulative adverse environmental effects or may be contrary to the
public interest. The prospective permittee may submit a proposed mitigation plan with the PCN
to expedite the process. The District Engineer will consider any proposed compensatory
mitigation the applicant has included in the proposal in determining whether the net adverse
environmental effects to the aquatic environment of the proposed work are minimal. If the
District Engineer determines that the activity complies with the terms and conditions of the NWP
and that the adverse effects on the aquatic environment are minimal, after considering mitigation,
the District Engineer will notify the permittee and include any conditions the District Engineer
9
deems necessary. The District Engineer must approve any compensatory mitigation proposal
before the permittee commences work. If the prospective permittee is required to submit a
compensatory mitigation proposal with the PCN, the proposal may be either conceptual or
detailed. If the prospective permittee elects to submit a compensatory mitigation plan with the
PCN, the District Engineer will expeditiously review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan.
The District Engineer must review the plan within 45 days of receiving a complete PCN and
determine whether the conceptual or specific proposed mitigation would ensure no more than
minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment. If the net adverse effects of the project on
the aquatic environment (after consideration of the compensatory mitigation proposal) are
determined by the District Engineer to be minimal, the District Engineer will provide a timely
written response to the applicant. The response will state that the project can proceed under the
terms and conditions of the NWP.
If the District Engineer determines that the adverse effects of the proposed work are more
than minimal, then the District Engineer will notify the applicant either:
1. That the project does not qualify for authorization under the NWP and instruct
the applicant on the procedures to seek authorization under an Individual Permit;
2. that the project is authorized under the NWP subject to the applicant's submission
of a mitigation proposal that would reduce the adverse effects on the aquatic environment to the
minimal level; or
3. that the project is authorized under the NWP with specific modifications or
conditions. Where the District Engineer determines that mitigation is required to ensure no more
than minimal adverse effects occur to the aquatic environment, the activity will be authorized
within the 45-day PCN period. The authorization will include the necessary conceptual or
specific mitigation or a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation proposal that would
reduce the adverse effects on the aquatic environment to the minimal level. When conceptual
mitigation is included, or a mitigation plan is required under item (2) above, no work in waters of
the US will occur until the District Engineer has approved a specific mitigation plan.
e. Agency Coordination: The District Engineer will consider any comments from
Federal and state agencies concerning the proposed activity's compliance with the terms and
conditions of the NWPs and the need for mitigation to reduce the project's adverse environmental
effects to a minimal level.
For activities requiring notification to the District Engineer that result in the loss of greater
than \1/2\-acre of waters of the US, the District Engineer will provide immediately (e.g., via
facsimile transmission, overnight mail, or other expeditious manner) a copy to the appropriate
Federal or state offices (USFWS, state natural resource or water quality agency, EPA, State
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and, if appropriate, the NMFS). With the exception of
NWP 37, these agencies will then have 10 calendar days from the date the material is transmitted
to telephone or fax the District Engineer notice that they intend to provide substantive,
10
site-specific comments. If so contacted by an agency, the District Engineer will wait an
additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on the notification. The District Engineer
will fully consider agency comments received within the specified time frame, but will provide
no response to the resource agency, except as provided below. The District Engineer will indicate
in the administrative record associated with each notification that the resource agencies' concerns
were considered. As required by section 305(b)(4)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the District Engineer will provide a response to NMFS
within 30 days of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat conservation recommendations.
Applicants are encouraged to provide the Corps multiple copies of notifications to expedite
agency notification.
f. Wetland Delineations: Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the
current method required by the Corps (For NWP 29 see paragraph (b)(9)(iii) for parcels less than
(\1/4\-acre in size). The permittee may ask the Corps to delineate the special aquatic site. There
may be some delay if the Corps does the delineation. Furthermore, the 45-day period will not
start until the wetland delineation has been completed and submitted to the Corps, where
appropriate.
14. Compliance Certification. Every permittee who has received NWP verification from the
Corps will submit a signed certification regarding the completed work and any required
mitigation. The certification will be forwarded by the Corps with the authorization letter and will
include:
a. A statement that the authorized work was done in accordance with the Corps
authorization, including any general or specific conditions;
b. A statement that any required mitigation was completed in accordance with the
permit conditions; and
c. The signature of the permittee certifying the completion of the work and mitigation.
15. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits. The use of more than one NWP for a single and
complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the US authorized by
the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specified acreage limit
(e.g. if a road crossing over tidal waters is constructed under NWP 14, with associated bank
stabilization authorized by NWP 13, the maximum acreage loss of waters of the US for the total
project cannot exceed \ 1/3\-acre) . '
16. Water Supply Intakes. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of
the US or discharges of dredged or fill material, may occur in the proximity of a public water
supply intake except where the activity is for repair of the public water supply intake structures
or adjacent bank stabilization.
17. Shellfish Beds. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the US
11
or discharges of dredged or fill material, may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish
populations, unless the activity is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by
NWP 4.
18. Suitable Material. No activity, including structures and work in navigable waters of the
US or discharges of dredged or fill material, may consist of unsuitable material (e.g., trash,
debris, car bodies, asphalt, etc.) and material used for construction or discharged must be free
from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts (see section 307 of the CWA).
19. Mitigation. The District Engineer will consider the factors discussed below when
determining the acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to offset
adverse effects on the aquatic environment that are more than minimal.
a. The project must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects
to waters of the US to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., on site).
b. Mitigation in all its forms (avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing or
compensating) will be required to the extent necessary to ensure that the adverse effects to the
aquatic environment are minimal.
c. Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio will be required for all
wetland impacts requiring a PCN, unless the District Engineer determines in writing that some
other form of mitigation would be more environmentally appropriate and provides a
project-specific waiver of this requirement. Consistent with National policy, the District Engineer
will establish a preference for restoration of wetlands as compensatory mitigation, with
preservation used only in exceptional circumstances.
d. Compensatory mitigation (i.e., replacement or substitution of aquatic resources for
those impacted) will not be used to increase the acreage losses allowed by the acreage limits of
some of the NWPs. For example, \1/4\-acre of wetlands cannot be created to change a,\3/4\acre
loss of wetlands to a \1/2\-acre loss associated with NWP 39 verification. However, \1/2\-acre of
created wetlands can be used to reduce the impacts of a \1/2\-acre loss of wetlands to the
minimum impact level in order to meet the minimal impact requirement associated with NWPs.
e. To be practicable, the mitigation must be available and capable of being done
considering costs, existing technology, and logistics in light of the overall project purposes.
Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to:
reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland or upland vegetated buffers
to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and
values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferably in
the same watershed.
f Compensatory mitigation plans for projects in or near streams or other open waters
will normally include a requirement for the establishment, maintenance, and legal protection
12
(e.g., easements, deed restrictions) of vegetated buffers to open waters. In many cases, vegetated
buffers will be the only compensatory mitigation required. Vegetated buffers should consist of
native species. The width of the vegetated buffers required will address documented water
quality or aquatic habitat loss concerns. Normally, the vegetated buffer will be 25 to 50 feet wide
on each side of the stream, but the District Engineers may require slightly wider vegetated buffers
to address documented water quality or habitat loss concerns. Where both wetlands and open
waters exist on the project site, the Corps will determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation
(e.g., stream buffers or wetlands compensation) based on what is best for the aquatic
environment or, a watershed basis. In cases where vegetated buffers are determined to be the
most appropriate form of compensatory mitigation, the District Engineer may waive or reduce
the requirement to provide wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts.
g. Compensatory mitigation proposals submitted with the " notification" may be either
conceptual or detailed. If conceptual plans are approved under the verification, then the Corps
will condition the verification to require detailed plans be submitted and approved by the Corps
prior to construction of the authorized activity in waters of the US.
h. Permittees may propose the use of mitigation banks, in-lieu fee arrangements or
separate activity-specific compensatory mitigation. In all cases that require compensatory
mitigation, the mitigation provisions will specify the party responsible for accomplishing and/or
complying with the mitigation plan.
20. Spawning Areas. Activities, including structures and work in navigable waters of the
US or discharges of dredged or fill material, in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be
avoided to the maximum extent practicable. Activities that result in the physical destruction (e.g.,
excavate, fill, or smother downstream by substantial turbidity) of an important spawning area are
not authorized.
21. Management of Water Flows. To the maximum extent practicable, the activity must be
designed to maintain preconstruction downstream flow conditions (e.g., location, capacity, and
flow rates). Furthermore, the activity must not permanently restrict or impede the passage of
normal or expected high flows (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound waters) and
the structure or discharge of dredged or fill material must withstand expected high flows. The
activity must, to the maximum extent practicable, provide for retaining excess flows from the
site, provide for maintaining surface flow rates from the site similar to preconstruction
conditions, and provide for not increasing water flows from the project site, relocating water, or
redirecting water flow beyond preconstruction conditions. Stream channelizing will be reduced to
the minimal amount necessary, and the activity must, to the maximum extent practicable, reduce
adverse effects such as flooding or erosion downstream and upstream of the project site, unless
the activity is part of a larger system designed to manage water flows. In most cases, it will not
be a requirement to conduct detailed studies and monitoring of water flow.
This condition is only applicable to projects that have the potential to affect waterflows.
While appropriate measures must be taken, it is not necessary to conduct detailed studies to
13