NCS000328_EPA Inspection Report_20190603

-ISO SZ42,
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
a� YZ REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
oz 61 FORSYTH STREET
�lpTq< PRpSEG�\ ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
MAY 2 8 9A19
CERTIFIED MAIL 7017 1450 0000 7973 2816
RETURNED RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Rick Petrovich R EC F j\1 rD
General Manager JUN 03 2019
Bestway South, Inc.
165 Halyburton Road DENR-LAND C UALIV
Stony Point, North Carolina 28678 STORMWATER PER[Vih i !NG
Re: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Bestway South, Inc., Stony Point, North Carolina
NPDES Permit No. NCS000328 .
Dear Mr. Hinkle:
On March 18, 2019, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 and North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI)
at the Bestway South, Inc., facility located at 165 Halyburton Road in Stony Point, NC. The purpose of
the CEI was to evaluate Bestway South, Inc., facility's compliance with the requirements of Sections
301 and 402(p) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311 and 1342(p); the regulations
promulgated thereunder at 40 C.F.R. § 122.26; and, the State of North Carolina's NPDES Stormwater
Permit NCS000328.
The EPA and NCDEQ appreciate your cooperation in conducting this CEI. Enclosed is the EPA's CEI
report, which includes EPA's observations. Please review the report and contact Ms. Lauren Garcia at
the NCDEQ office within 14 days of receiving this letter by calling [phone] or by sending an
email to Lauren. ag rciagncdenr. og_v.
There is no need to respond directly to the EPA at this time; however, please note that the EPA will
continue to closely coordinate with NCDEQ to ensure compliance at this facility. If you do happen to
have questions for the EPA, you can contact Mr. Ahmad Dromgoole at the above address, by email at
[e-mail], or at [phone].
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Annette Lucas
NCDEQ
Sincerely,
Daniel J. O' L ne, Chief
Surface Water and Ground Water Section
Water Enforcement Branch
Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30 % Postconsumer)

1"'� U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303
o=
Water Compliance Inspection Report
FACILITY DATA
NPDES ID: NCS000328 Effective Date: 03/01/09 Expiration Date: Administratively Continued
Facility Name: Bestway South, Inc SIC Code: 2491
Address: 165 Halyburton Rd, Stony Point, NC 28678
On -Site Representative(s), Title, Phone Number: Responsible Official, Title, Phone Number, Mailing Address:
Rick Petrovich Rick Petrovich
General Manager General Manager
165 Halyburton Rd 165 Halyburton Rd
Stony Point, NC 28678 Stony Point, NC 28678
704-880-7665 704-880-7665
INSPECTION 1-
Entry Date/Time: 03/18/19, 2:50 pm Exit Date/Time: 03/18/19, 6:45 pm
NAMES OF EPA AND STATE INSPECTORS
EPA Inspectors: Ahmad Dromgoole, Kenneth Kwan
NCDENR Inspectors: Zahid Khan, Isaiah Reed, Stan Aiken
AREAS1 DURING INSPECTIONareas
X Permit Self -Compliance Program Pretreatment
X Records
Compliance Schedule Pollution Prevention
X Facility Site Review
Laboratory X Storm Water
X Effluent / Receiving Waters
X
Operations & Maintenance Combined Sewer Overflow
Flow Measurement
Sludge Handling/ Disposal Sanitary Sewer Overflow
INSPECTION NOTES
The inspection team, consisting of EPA inspectors and state inspectors from various regional offices, arrived at the facility on March
18, 2019 to perform an unannounced Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI). This CEI was performed as both a joint inspection
with the state and a training opportunity for state inspectors. Upon arrival at the facility, EPA inspectors presented credentials and
facilitated an opening conference. The CEI included both a records review portion and a facility walk through. Upon completion, an
exit conference was held with facility personnel in which they were informed of EPA's preliminary findings and told that an actual
inspection report will be sent to the facility by EPA.
., REPRESENTATIVES
Inspector Signature/Name Office/Phone Number Date
USEPA Region 4/WPD-CWEB-SRES
404-562-9212
Ahmad Dromgoole, Environmental Engineer
USEPA Region 4/WPD-CWEB-SRES
404-562-9752
Kenneth Kwan, Environmental Engineer
Management Signature/Name
Office/Phone Number
Date
USEPA Region 4/WPD-CWEB-SRES
404-562-9434
Daniel J. O'Lone, Chief
Stormwater and Residuals Enforcement Section
Page 1 of 6

GPS
Coordinates
Coordinates
1. FACILITY LOCATION I' 1
Latitude 35051'24.11"N Longitude
8101'58.75"W
Receiving
Water(s) or
Unnamed Tributary to
Site
23 total acres
Weather
Partially Cloudy
MS4
Third Creek
Acreage
Condition
N/A, permit
No, Class
Does the site
continue renew
Discharge to 303(d)
C stream in
discharge pollutants
Permit
under NPDES
SIC
2491
listed or TMDL
the Yadkin
contributing to the
No
Application
permit
Code(s)
waters
Pee -Dee
receiving stream
L_
NCS000328
River Basin
impairment.
2. BASIC 1
SPPP TOPICS (Part H)
YES
NO
N/E
SPPP on -site (dated, signed, and annual review) Section A
X
The SPPP was not dated, signed and annually updated.
Site Description Section A(1)(b)
X
(storage practices, loading/unloading activities, outdoor processes, dust generating processes, and waste
processes)
Identify potential Pollutant Sources and Particular Pollutants Section A(1)(b)
X
(include inventory of materials handled at the site, information pertaining to any pollutant sources, information
pertaining to the storage and application of pest control chemicals)
Site Maps (general location map and site specific map) Sections A(1)(a & c)
X
(include identification of receiving waters and/or MS4s, identification of impaired waters, lat/long of discharge
points, drainage areas to each discharge point, site boundaries, site topography, drainage features and flow
directions, impervious areas, industrial activities, and site best management practices (BMPs)
The site map did not outline the site property boundary, the stormwater outfall location, name of receiving water,
and storm drains.
Spill History (3 year history or spills and corrective actions) Section A(1)(d)
X
Significant leaks and spills in the 3 previous years was reported as "none" in the SPPP. However, it is uncleared
as to the timeframe since the SPPP was not dated and has not been updated recently.
SPPP Certification Section A(1)(e)
X
(Annual recertification of no evidence of non-stormwater discharging)
The non-stormwater discharge certification in Section 4.17 of the SPPP was not filled out. The form also needed to
have a certification statement in accordance with Part III, Section B. Paragraph 3.c. of the permit.
Stormwater Management Strategy (Feasibility Study) Section A(2)(a)
X
(Analysis of control options like eliminating exposure or controlling runoff)
The SPPP did not contain a feasibility study on material management practices.
Stormwater Management Strategy (Secondary Containment) Section A(2)(b)
X
The SPPP did not have a table or summary of all process chemical tanks, list of storage materials, and their
associated secondary containment capacity. Also, the SPPP did not address the procedure for how to release the
accumulated stormwater within the containment area.
Stormwater BMP Summary Section A(2)(c)
X
The SPPP listed BMPs such as silt fence and rip rap check dams in drainage ways for the lumber and residue
11 storage areas. These BMPs were not observed on -site. The SPPP has no written record of the specific rational
Page 2 of 6

2. BASIC STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENT INFORMATION
SPPP TOPICS (Part II)
YES
NO
N/E
for not installing these two selected BMPs
Spill Prevention & Response Procedures (SPRP) Section A(3)
X
(Stormwater specific plan identifying the various responsible officials and their signatures)
Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program Section A(4)
X
(address maintenance and cleaning schedules of control systems, outfalls, adjacent waters, handling of industrial
activities, drainage structures, and BMPs)
Employee Training Section A(5)
X
(minimal annual training of spill response and cleanup/prevention and potential areas of industrial stormwater)
No records regarding annual employee training were made available to EPA during the inspection. Also, the
facility personnel responsible for implementing the training was not identified in the SPPP, and their trainings
were not documented by the signature of each employee trained.
Identify the Responsible Party Section (A)(6)
X
SPPP Modified or Update to Current Conditions Section (A)(7)
X
(review and update at least annually, recertify, and include the review of most recent benchmarks samples)
No record of annual review or amendments to the SPPP were made available to EPA for review.
Schedule and Procedures for Routine Inspections (minimum of semiannually) Section A(8)
X
Bestway South operates a lumber treating and dry kiln facility in Stony Point, NC. The facility operates as a treating service only since
it does not own any lumber products. At this facility, raw lumber is received in various dimensions, treated, dried, and packaged for
shipping. The primary raw materials at the since include untreated lumber and treatment chemicals. The facility uses two primary treating
chemicals (copper/chromium/arsenate and copper azole). These lumber treatment chemicals are received by tanker truck in small
quantities such as totes and barrels and are housed inside. The facility operates one batch treatment process unit. Raw lumber is loaded
into the pressure vessel were once sealed, treatment chemicals are introduced, and the vessel is placed under various pressures. Once
treated, the lumber is allowed to drip dry in a bermed area which drains back to a catchment directed back to the process. The treated
lumber is stored outside in uncovered piles throughout the site prior to shipping. Stormwater is collected via storm drains and routed to
a detention pond before discharge to receiving water.
4. RECORD REVIEW
Record Review
YES
NO
N/E
Representative on -site
X
Records of the Implementation of the SPPP Part II Section A(9), Part III Section D(6)
X
Although some of the records pertaining to the implementation of the SPPP were available, a number of records
were not maintained including some of the training and housekeeping records.
Records of Maintenance and Housekeeping Programs Part II, Section A(9)
X
Records pertaining to housekeeping measures including sweeping, visual inspection of tanks, and equipment
were not made available during the inspection.
Records of Routine Inspections Part II, Section A(9)
X
Weekly inspection records of the facility back to 2017 were available and reviewed during the inspection.
However, these inspections focus only on the loading/unloading areas. The BMP controls and seven industrial
Page 3 of 6

4. RECORD
Record Review
YES
NO
N/E
activities identified in Section 4.a. of the SPPP were not evaluated as part of the routine inspections of all
industrial material and activities that are exposed to stormwater.
Records of Employee Training Part II, Section A(9)
X
Records of employee training were requested for review during the inspection. According to facility personnel,
employees receive initial training but did not receive annual refresher training.
Records for the Approval of Representative Outfalls Part III Section D(5)
The facility did not seek approval of a representative outfall.
X
Records of Benchmark Monitoring Part II, Section B & D, Part III Sections D, & E(1)
X
Benchmark monitoring records were reviewed back through 2016. According to the monitoring records, all of
the sample analysis was performed at the contracted lab. This included pH which according to the test method
requires analysis within 15 minutes of pulling the sample. The 15 minute holding time was being exceeded by
having the lab run this analysis off -site.
Records of Qualitative Monitoring Part II Section C, Part III Section D
X
Qualitative monitoring records were reviewed back through 2016. From the records review, qualitative
monitoring records of stormwater discharge at the outfall were not available after 2016.
Records of Tiered Approach to Benchmark Exceedances Part III Sections B
X
Due to exceedances of the copper benchmark, the facility has been considered Tier II since 2009. A requirement
of Tier II is that monthly monitoring begin for all parameters at the exceeding outfall(s) and that records be
maintained of the tiered response in the plan. A review of the plan did not show additional measures being put in
place nor did the facility begin monthly monitoring for all parameters.
Records of Bypasses Part III Sections E(7)
X
Although the SPPP had a page to summarize bypasses, no updates or information was provided on the form. The
permit required a listed of significant spills or leaks during the previous three years. A date with specific year
entry should have been included on the form certifying that in the past three years there were no bypasses to
report.
Records of 24 hr Reporting Part III Sections E(8 &9)
X
EVALUATION5. SITE 1
Pollutant Sources
Note location, quantitative description, design issue, O&M deficiencies (including the nature and
extent), and pollutants off -site
Loading/Unloading
Raw materials and products from the site are transferred to and from the site by truck (as seen in photo
Area
DSCN1818). These trucks access the site through the entrances on the north side.
Untreated and treated lumber at the site is stored outdoors in piles around the site. The lumber piles were
Outdoor Storage
observed as being off the ground on wooden spacers (to allow for forklift access and eliminated the exposure
Facilities (log and
to stormwater runoff along the ground). These piles were observed as not being under any cover to minimize
milled material)
contact with stormwater as seen in photographs DSCN1817-DSCN1819, DSCN1822-DSCN1823, and
DSCN1829.
The facility operates one pressure treating vessel located near the center of the facility. Lumber is loaded and
unloaded from the vessel by the rail system seen in photos DSCNI820 and DSCN1827. The facility also
operates a wood drying kiln near the northwest corner of the site. At the treatment unit, a concrete berm was
Treating, Preserving,
in place around the treatment area used to contain drips and spills from the process (see photos DSCN1820-
and Assembly
DSCN1821). The area within the contained area drains to a catchment which is directed back to the day tank.
Processes
A boiler house was located near the southwest cover of the site. The boiler and associated equipment were all
staged inside of the building. In addition to the operation of the boiler, the facility also performs cleaning and
blowdown operations in the building. A discharge pipe, seen in photos DSCN1830-DSCNI831, was observed
Page 4 of 6

5. SITE EVALUATION & SWP3 IMPLEMENTATION
Pollutant Sources
Note location, quantitative description, design issue, O&M deficiencies (including the nature and
extent), and pollutants off -site
on the south side of the boiler house. According to facility personnel, this pipe drains water from the boiler
house from things like boiler blowdowns and washouts. Photograph DSCNI831 shows evidence of rust/iron
accumulation around the outlet. This water, which would likely continue south to the ditch leading to the
stormwater pond, would be a non-stormwater discharge.
Bestway institutes a number of the housekeeping measures to manage its stormwater runoff in addition to its
retention pond. These housekeeping measures include, but are not limited to, the staging of the treatment
process inside of the bermed area and the staging of treated wood inside of the containment area for a minimum
amount of time to allow for residual chemicals to be captured and recycled (see photo DSCN1827).
Housekeeping
During the walk through of the facility, some areas of the site were observed lacking good housekeeping
practices. This included the drainage structures which were observed with sand/sediment accumulation (see
photos DSCNI819 and DSCN1923). Additionally, the facility has consistently been exceeding its copper
benchmark which is tied to one of its treatment chemicals. During the inspection, the facility was observed to
have treated lumber in close vicinity of storm drain inlets (see photo DSCN1819).
Liquid Storage
The treatment chemicals used at the facility are typically housed inside of the bermed treatment area. The
Tanks
primary treatment chemicals are maintained in above ground tanks. These tanks have loading spigots accessible
from the outside of the building but still inside of the bermed processing area (see photo DSCN1828).
BMPs such as silt fence and rip rap check dams as specified in the SPPP for the lumber storage areas and
residue storage areas were not observed on -site. The area around the facility is a combination of pervious and
impervious surfaces. Along the south side of the site, a series of storm drain inlets were observed and can be
Stormwater and
seen in photos (DSCN1819 and DSCN1829). These storm drains discharged to the drainage ditch on the south
Sediment & Erosion
side of the site leading to the detention pond (seen in photo DSCN1832). At the southeast corner of the site,
Controls (BMPs)
the facility maintains a detention pond (seen photos DSCN1833-DSCN1834) which discharges to its one
monitored outfall. In addition to the discharge structure on the south side of the site, a drainage ditch not
identified in the SPPP as an authorized outfall was observed running north/south through the middle of the site
near the treatment process (see photos DSCN1823-DSCN1824).
Disposal/Waste
Waste material at the site is primarily disposed of in outdoor dumpsters. One of these dumpsters, seen in photo
Handling Areas
DSCN1826, was observed on the north side of the site and was uncovered. Waste chemicals from the process
can be discarded to drums or tote for disposal.
Vehicle Maintenance
Areas
No outdoor maintenance activities were observed.
STORMWATER
Outfall, Stormwater
Discharge & YES NO
Receiving Water
DISCHARGE & RECEIVING WATER OBSERVATIONS
Describe: According to the facility's current SPPP, the one outfall identified was the outfall
Number & location
from the detention pond near the southeast corner of the property. This is the outfall, seen in
of stormwater
photograph DSCN1835. It is sampled by facility personnel and monitored for benchmarks. A
discharge(s)/outfall(s)
X
second outfall was identified during the inspection discharging from the ditch running through
consistent with the
the center of the property (seen in photo DSCN1823) and discharging on the north side of the
SPPP
property (seen in photos DSCN1824-1825). This second outfall was not identified in the SPPP
as an authorized stormwater outfall.
Evidence of off -site
accumulation of
Describe: Although some sediment accumulation was observed in the drainage features and
pollutants observed
X
around storm drain inlets around the site, offsite sediment accumulation was not observed during
in receiving water
the inspection.
Page 5 of 6

6. OUTFALL,
STORMWATEROBSERVATIONS
Outfall, Stormwater
Discharge &
YES NO
Receiving Water
Non-stormwater
Describe: The boiler room on the south side of the property was observed as having a drainage
discharge observed
X
valve used to purge accumulated water from washouts and blowdowns. These discharges would
be considered non-stormwater discharges.
Additional inspection summary, narrative, findings, comments, photos, and schematic diagram of the facility area as
necessary:
An exit conference was held with Rick Petrovich where the following observations were relayed:
• SPPP Observations
o There were no signature updates of the SPPP
o The spill records in the plan were not annually updated
o The non-stormwater discharge certification in Section 4.f of the SPPP was not filled out
o The site plan did not account for or identify stormwater drains
o The site plan did not include the necessary feasibility study
o The SPPP did not include or document the increased measures implemented by the site in response to the benchmark
exceedances.
• Records Observations
o No annual employee training records on stormwater pollution prevention
o Sampling for pH was not performed in the field and therefore not being analyzed within the alloted 15 minutes in the
test method
o The facility has been operating at the Tier II level for several years due to benchmark exceedances for copper.
Although copper monitoring was performed at the increased monitoring frequency, the remaining parameters were
not being monitored at the increased frequency
o No qualitative visual monitoring of stormwater discharge at outfall has been performed at the site since 2016
• Site Observations
o An additional outfall was identified on the north side of the site that was not in the SPPP
o Some sediment accumulation was observed near storm drain inlets throughout the site
o Some storage of treated lumber was observed within feet of storm drain inlets
o The BMPs identified in the plan such as silt fence and rip rap check dams were not observed at the site
o Process water from the boiler room was observed being directed to the stormwater drains
Page 6 of 6

SW-NCSO00328-031819 Photolog
Bestway South, Inc
165 Halyburton Rd
Stony Point, NC 28678
Overview Map
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 1 of 20

DSCN1817.JPG
NIG
w 0&x
1
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1817.JPG
Description
Photograph of outdoor storage piles. Piles of both untreated lumber and treated wood products
were located throughout the facility. Wood piles were slightly off the ground (to allow for forklift
access) in uncovered areas.
Latitude
N 35° 51' 23.50"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 57.03"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 2 of 20

DSCN1818.JPG
,r
a
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1818.JPG
Description
Photograph of outdoor storage piles. Piles of both untreated lumber and treated wood products
were located throughout the facility. Wood piles were slightly off the ground (to allow for forklift
access) in uncovered areas.
Latitude
N 35° 51' 23.44"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 57.08"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 3 of 20

DSCN1819.JPG
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1819.JPG
Description
Photograph of one of the storm drain inlets along the south end of the site. These storm drains
discharge to the diversion ditch leading to the retention pond. Some sediment accumulation was
observed around the inlets. No control measures were observed during the inspection for the
prevention of sediment discharge to the storm drain.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 22.55"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 57.34"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 4 of 20

DSCN 1820.J PG
r 1 —NC-N 5
e
a
t ■
• •
s
t'� f' • • i *i •f
l
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1820.JPG
Description
Photograph of the treatment area in the middle of the site. The treatment unit and chemical
storage tanks were all located inside of the building. The loading and unloading sides of the
process were observed on the north and south sides of the building. The area around the
treatment building was covered and had a berm structure used for the containing of process
water and chemicals so that they can be recycled to the process. The area inside of the berm is
used for the drying of material immediately after treatment.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 22.96"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 58.66"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 5 of 20

DSCN1821.JPG
• i r '-
a
fT — �•
d
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1821.JPG
Description
Photograph of the bermed area around the treatment area. Inside of this area, staining was
observed from excess treatment chemicals accumulated from the products. This excess material
was collected in the bermed area and directed to the ditch around the perimeter which leads to
the catchment inside of the building. Material from this catchment is recycled to the process.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 22.78"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 58.24"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 6 of 20

DSCN 1822.J PG
� V
t
.0
� may+ °
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1822.JPG
Description
Photograph of outdoor storage piles. Piles of both untreated lumber and treated wood products
were located throughout the facility. Wood piles were slightly off the ground (to allow for forklift
access) in uncovered areas.
Latitude
N 35° 51' 23.08"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 58.58"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 7 of 20

DSCN 1823.J PG
■
R T !
V + ! 2 y # i
•
J
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1823.JPG
Description
Drainage feature, running south to north, through the middle of the site. This drainage feature
appeared to discharge to the northern property boarder and had sediment accumulation which
appeared to discharge off site. This discharge point was not identified in facility's SPPP as an
authorized outfall.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 25.76"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 59.06"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 8 of 20

DSCN 1824.J PG
F
rt
r
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1824.JPG
Description
Drainage feature, running south to north, through the middle of the site. This drainage feature
appeared to discharge to the northern property boarder and had sediment accumulation which
appeared to discharge off site. This discharge point was not identified in facility's SPPP as an
authorized outfall.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 25.57"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 59.17"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 9 of 20

a
PO-9k,.ta!'G!rbe. USDA Farm Service Agency

DSCN 1826.J PG
ti
J
Vrt
"Mir. It
■ # *RENEW
r
i • •
SIR I� o
11 '
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1826.JPG
Description
Photograph of an uncovered waste dumpster at the site.
Latitude
N 35° 51' 25.21"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 59.21"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 11 of 20

DSCN1827.JPG
.F
rI * r • ;
* i
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1827.JPG
Description
Photograph of the treatment area in the middle of the site. The treatment unit and chemical
storage tanks were all located inside of the building. The loading and unloading sides of the
process were observed on the north and south sides of the building. The area around the
treatment building was covered and had a berm structure used for the containing of process
water and chemicals so that they can be recycled to the process. The area inside of the berm is
used for the drying of material immediately after treatment.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 25.00"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 58.38"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 12 of 20

DSCN 1828.J PG
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1828.JPG
Description
Photograph of the area along the outside of the treatment building were treatment chemicals are
pumped to the holding tanks. The loading points for the tanks were behind the doors along the
side of the building and located within the bermed area leading to the catchment system.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 23.89"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 57.29"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 13 of 20

DSCN 1829.J PG
Cem
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1829.JPG
Description
Photograph of another storm drain inlet along the south side of the site. This inlet was observed
in close proximity of outdoor storage of treated lumber. This storm drain connects to the drainage
ditch leading to the detention pond.
Latitude
N 35° 51' 22.48"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 54.71"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 14 of 20

DSCN 1830.J PG
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1830.JPG
Description
Photograph of the outlet pipe from the boiler house. The boiler house has a catchment which
discharges to this pipe. Periodically, the company performs blow downs and washouts of the
boilers. This water is accumulated in the catchment and directed to this outlet. Some evidence of
rust was observed around the outlet of the pipe.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 22.66"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 53.69"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog
Page 15 of 20

DSCN1831.JPG
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1831.JPG
Description
Photograph of the outlet pipe from the boiler house. The boiler house has a catchment which
discharges to this pipe. Periodically, the company performs blow downs and washouts of the
boilers. This water is accumulated in the catchment and directed to this outlet. Some evidence of
rust was observed around the outlet of the pipe.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 22.75"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 53.89"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 16 of 20

DSCN 1832.J PG
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1832.JPG
Description
Photograph of the drainage ditch in which the storm drains along the south end of the site
discharge. This ditch directs the stormwater runoff to the detention pond.
Latitude
N 35° 51' 22.49"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 51.19"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 17 of 20

Y! Y'
1 ..a .; i.'- L t �• LIB ... i f ._
� � •'-•• .aTY_���-'y^ _ `.�. �ti �L�Y•� 1 -� •-may, .- -\--�� '�I•��� .
liz,
�, .•� - �: iL' ���� �'-i � ])ii{{{•��--may, - -:��_ _���- . ,
•� 'eta i ..� �• .�, i �. i � tF � '.
'low 1 aC ,r �� ��Y �'SEY� f e�_ ►►►111 ��-�. �•' t 1 -fj r � �. � .. "{� ��. 1• y # �
*a * a t CCC
A 1.
km
-. •�„' r��� "+��'s °�•_ ,+�i� :'_c'1 - y °ram �' ��:� ■ .c� _ � .. -
� 1
.r .
AAuto Repair
ti
LocIS-'.La rtie — O nstructio n
PLO, i�,t IGbbe, USE! A- Farm Service Agency i

• \ L
PIPs Auto Repalf
Lane Construction
. .
}Gknbe, USDA Farm SerwweAgsrGy

DSCN1835.JPG
l y+
�.v
t�
f
03 18 0 0
`2AvF-a:
Attributes
File Name
DSCN1835.JPG
Description
Photograph of the stormwater outfall from the site.
Latitude
N 35' 51' 22.03"
Longitude
W 81' 01' 45.49"
SW-NCS000328-031819 Photolog Page 20 of 20