HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170537 Ver 1_As-built_DWR Site Visit Notes_20190619Mitigation Site Meeting Notes
Date: May 28, 2019
Project Name: Hannah Bridge
Prepared By: Erin Davis, NCDWR
Type of Site: Bank Stream and Wetland Site
Meeting Type: Year 0 As -Built Review
Sponsor/Provider: RES
USACE AID: 2015-01799
County: Johnston *Denotes County w/ 30 -foot Buffer
NCDWR ID: 20170537
HUC and Basin: Neuse - 03020201
Weather:
Coordinates: ON °W
Attendees:
DWR - Katie Merritt, Mac Haupt, Erin Davis
USACE - Todd Tugwell, Kim Browning, Dam Dailey, Josh Deal
WRC - Travis Wilson
RES - Ryan Medric, Brian Hockett, Brad Breslow
Project Review Checklist - (provide additional detail in notes section on next page)
General Site Issues/Concerns:
❑
Vegetation Composition or Density
❑
Inappropriate Credit Ratio Proposed
0
Planted Stem Vigor (due to soil, browsing)
❑
JD Needed to Confirm Approach
❑
Invasive/Exotic Species
❑
Continuity/Fragmentation
❑
Beaver/Feral Hogs (management plan)
❑
Easement Issues (existing farm, CE, NRCS funding)
❑
Soil (manipulation, compaction, fertility)
2
Easement Encroachments (livestock, clearing)
❑
Livestock Present/Evidence of Livestock Access
❑
Easement Marking/Signage
❑
Crossings or Utility Lines
❑
Insufficient Project Size
❑
BMPs or Alternate Approaches
❑
Adjacent Property Owner
❑
Fencing Issues or Fencing Needed
❑
T&E Species
❑
Ponds Within Project Area
❑
Section 106 (historic listing/tribal issues)
Stream Issues/Concerns:
❑
Incised/Entrenched
❑
Insufficient Stream Drainage Area
❑
Headcuts Present/Forming
❑
Insufficient Hydrology (if raising channel bed)
❑
Stream Structures Failing/Piping
❑
Vegetation in Channel (stream vs wetland)
❑
Excess Sediment/Aggradation
❑
Flow Obstructions (undersized pipes, fords)
❑
Cross -Sections Missing/Indicate Problems
❑
Substrate Concerns (embeddedness, particle size)
❑
Bank Instability/Failure
❑
Live Stakes Absent/Failing
❑
Bench Rills/Erosion (constructed bench or P2 valley)
❑
Evidence of Water Quality Issues
❑
Excess Sinuosity (lack of flow)
❑
In -stream Habitat Weak/Missing
❑
Braided/Anabranch Channel
❑
Stream Buffer Width Inadequate
Wetland Issues/Concerns:
❑
Evidence of Excessive Hydrology
❑
Missing Gauge Data (preconstruction or monitoring)
❑
Evidence of Insufficient Hydrology
❑
Gauge Location/Placement
❑
Hydric Soil Indicators/Soil Series
0
Gauge Maintenance
❑
Surface Roughness or Bedding
❑
Drainage Ditches/Swales Present
❑
Channel Relocation/Riparian Connectivity
❑
Field Tiles/Subsurface Drainage
❑
Hydroperiod Length or Start/Stop Date
❑
Continued Ag Use Adjacent to Wetland
Page 1 of 2
Date: May 28, 2019 Project Name: Hannah Bridge
Notes, Sketch, Action Items, etc.:
Soil comment no proposed 9% MY1-2
Gauge request in wetland
Wrack lines abundant in floodplain/ wetland
Toe wood exposed - concern about rot in long term flux (dry)
Hobo diagonal in pool at base
Cut privet along preservation reach
GwG - quick creek, clay clog bentonite & long term seep, clay seal, pvc screen, cracking after 2 mo, different from technical
standard,
EI no brush toe or live stakes
Bank work - bare areas, low vigor
Get flow height for bankfull on intermittent reach
Buffer area - easement encroachment replanting & signage
Mostly wood structures, very little rock/stone
W3 xs watch structure and below aggradation
Keep eye out for cattle - 1 strand of barbed wire
Draft as -built received; final report & red line plan pending; include cover letter request credits w/ ledger
Credit Release/Site Closeout Information (for monitoring or closeout reviews only)
Stream Credits
Wetland Credits
Warm Cool Cold
Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal
Requested
Approved*
Result of Monitoring Report or Closeout Review I Close Out Approved
Project Manager Signature
Date
*The updated credit ledger for the project, which includes this release, must be approved by the Project Manager.
Page 2 of 2 Form Updated 03/20/2019