The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140335 Ver 1_Credit Release_DWR Site Visit Notes_20190619Mitigation Site Meeting Notes Date: May 29, 2019 Project Name: Aycock Springs Prepared By: Erin Davis, NCDWR Type of Site: Bank Stream Site Meeting Type: Year 3 Monitoring Review Sponsor/Provider: Restoration Systems USACE AID: County: Alamance *Denotes County w/ 30 -foot Buffer NCDWR ID: 20140335 HUC and Basin: Weather: Coordinates: ON °W Attendees: DWR - Mac Haupt, Erin Davis USACE - Todd Tugwell, Kim Browning DMS - Melonie Allen, Joe Famularo Axiom - Philip Perkins RS - Matt Harrell Project Review Checklist - (provide additional detail in notes section on next page) General Site Issues/Concerns: ❑ Vegetation Composition or Density ❑ Inappropriate Credit Ratio Proposed EI Planted Stem Vigor (due to soil, browsing) ❑ JD Needed to Confirm Approach ❑ Invasive/Exotic Species ❑ Continuity/Fragmentation ❑ Beaver/Feral Hogs (management plan) ❑ Easement Issues (existing farm, CE, NRCS funding) ❑ Soil (manipulation, compaction, fertility) ❑ Easement Encroachments (livestock, clearing) ❑ Livestock Present/Evidence of Livestock Access ❑ Easement Marking/Signage ❑ Crossings or Utility Lines ❑ Insufficient Project Size ❑ BMPs or Alternate Approaches ❑ Adjacent Property Owner ❑ Fencing Issues or Fencing Needed ❑ T&E Species ❑ Ponds Within Project Area ❑ Section 106 (historic listing/tribal issues) Stream Issues/Concerns: ❑ Incised/Entrenched ❑ Insufficient Stream Drainage Area ❑ Headcuts Present/Forming ❑ Insufficient Hydrology (if raising channel bed) ❑ Stream Structures Failing/Piping IM Vegetation in Channel (stream vs wetland) ❑ Excess Sediment/Aggradation ❑ Flow Obstructions (undersized pipes, fords) ❑ Cross -Sections Missing/Indicate Problems ❑ Substrate Concerns (embeddedness, particle size) ❑ Bank Instability/Failure ❑ Live Stakes Absent/Failing ❑ Bench Rills/Erosion (constructed bench or P2 valley) ❑ Evidence of Water Quality Issues ❑ Excess Sinuosity (lack of flow) ❑ In -stream Habitat Weak/Missing ❑ Braided/Anabranch Channel ❑ Stream Buffer Width Inadequate Wetland Issues/Concerns: ❑ Evidence of Excessive Hydrology ❑ Missing Gauge Data (preconstruction or monitoring) ❑ Evidence of Insufficient Hydrology ❑ Gauge Location/Placement ❑ Hydric Soil Indicators/Soil Series ❑ Gauge Maintenance ❑ Surface Roughness or Bedding ❑ Drainage Ditches/Swales Present ❑ Channel Relocation/Riparian Connectivity ❑ Field Tiles/Subsurface Drainage ❑ Hydroperiod Length or Start/Stop Date ❑ Continued Ag Use Adjacent to Wetland Page 1 of 2 Date: May 29, 2019 Project Name: Aycock Springs Notes, Sketch, Action Items, etc.: Grass management winter fescue treatment Flow observed in upper UT1 Gauges - bentonite seal (good) Low vigor/survival in bank cut areas Checked repairs UT1 from immediately post -construction storm No flow mid and lower UT1 and UT2 Veg in channel UT2 Rose, pear and cattail sparse and being treated Good species diversity in wetland Lower Travis creek juncus dominated in old pond area, supplemental container plantings wetter species, overbank inundation from creek Wrack and deposits in floodplain, wrack in trees Few logs and toe wood areas Discussion on wood riffles, adding more wood to the system Property access/easement constraints at high bank areas and erosion monitoring spots Credit Release/Site Closeout Information (for monitoring or closeout reviews only) Stream Credits Wetland Credits Warm Cool Cold Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal Requested Approved* Result of Monitoring Report or Closeout Review I Full Credit Release Approved Project Manager Signature Date *The updated credit ledger for the project, which includes this release, must be approved by the Project Manager. Page 2 of 2 Form Updated 03/20/2019