310066_Inspection_20190509

4 = Division of Water Resources
Facility Number Division of Soil and Water Conservation
- _
01Other,Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other Oj Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1 29U Departure Time: County: 1 1 Region: ti
Farm Name: �Ax( 1. *a— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: CA"Ii� 9j Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: (�Y 1 s t--
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine'= `.Capacity Pop. ' '
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design
Current
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
'Design
Current
Dry Poultry
Canaeity
Pon_
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dischar1jes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design _Current
Cattle -Capacity _ Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili �umber: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier.
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 9
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? 0
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
16
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �Q
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes I xI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
IN
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
Vj
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
El Yes
���No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
KA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
Ti
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Tr nsfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0
No
Page 2 of 3
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21412015 Continued

.-jeility dumber: 0 1 - LXAX Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 9No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
0
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
�d NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes PqNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
0 Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
0 NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
0 Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ YeslNo
No ❑ NA
ONE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refefrttoguestian #)=E�flain.adypYES ansvyers and/ate-any additionaloecommendatibn's`or_any othe7comments *`;==.-°-. ;
Use drawin s-of fac�ty to=better explain situations vse,additionahvaaes as.necessarv).
c�011 l�al�Si S
,uL 20 l
kv [ks � 12
61123 [I$
441 t WOM 4 1� �`IkS' 4y UrWj MAY 716Lt
ctll q
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
� .--�e�q Cty
Phone: -7Jb
Date: 1
21412015