20190810 Ver 1_APP B&C_20190614

APPENDIX B

U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):DATE(S):WATERSHED(S):HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:PROJECT STUD Y LIMIT S:LATITUDE:LON GIT UDE:
HOOV ER ROAD ATHLETIC PARKDURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP
42811
36.001250-78.856979
50.1 ACRES NORTHEAST DURHAM2016
03020201UPPER NEUSE (NEUSE RIVER BASIN)
These plans and associated docum ents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GRO UP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
Path: R:\805\42811-Hoover Road\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42811-VIC.mxd
5
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000Feet
Site limits are approximate.Topographic imagery from USGS.
Site Limits
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):DATE(S):WATERSHED(S):HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:PROJECT STUD Y LIMIT S:LATITUDE:LON GIT UDE:
HOOV ER ROAD ATHLETIC PARKDURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFIGURE 5: NR CS SOIL SURVEY MAP
42811
36.001250-78.856979
50.1 ACRES NORTHEAST DURHAM2016
03020201UPPER NEUSE (NEUSE RIVER BASIN)
These plans and associated docum ents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GRO UP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
Path: R:\805\42811-Hoover Road\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42811-NRCS.mxd
5
0 900 1,800 2,700 3,600Feet Site limits are approximate.Soils data from NRCS w eb soil survey.
Legend
Project Study Limits - 50.1 Acres
Site Limits
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
SHEET NUMBERSCALE1
DATE 12/13/2018
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
PROJECT NAME
A. MEHFOUD
HOOVER ROAD ATHLETIC PARK
21A-6
21B-2
21B-5
21C-2
21D-2
21E-4
21E-9
FDS-32A1-2
FDS-32A1-1
21F1-6
32F1-8
32G1-521F1-1
32A1-6
32D1-2
32E1-5
32G1-1
")O
")M
")P
")L
")N
")K
Culvert
Culvert
")S
")T
!(J
!(I
!(E
!(D
!(B
!(A
!(H
!(F
!(C
!(G
!(Q
!(R
23A1-2
23A1-8
23A1-14
23B1-10
Kern St
Duval St Mayo StSoutherland StC heek R d
Ellington StCenter StRoane StJunctionRdCatalpa DrHeidelberg StNHoover
Rd
1 " = 125 'H:
FIGURE 6:WETLANDS ANDWATERS OF THEU.S. DELINEATIONMAP
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION
These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
PROJECT NUMBER42811HOOVER ROAD ATHLETIC PARKDURHAM COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0125250
SCALE (FEET)
R:\805\42811-Hoover Road\GIS\WTDM\42811-WTDM.mxd
1. Waters of the U.S. within theproject study limits have beenlocated using submeter, BluetoothGPS antennas by TimmonsGroup.2.Waters of the U.S. have notbeen confirmed by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers.3. Project limits are approximate.4. Topography based on USGSLiDAR.5. Cowardin StreamClassifications are based solelyon field observations. No formalStream assessment methodologywas completed to determine theseCowardin Classifications.
Legend
Project Study Lim its - 50.1 Acr es
")X Stream Identi fier
!(X Wetland Identi fi er
g
M/Wetland Flag
A Field Data Station
Neuse Buffer - 50 Feet
F\J-B Buffer - 50 Feet
F\J-B Buffer - 100 Feet
Culvert
Overland Flow
Perennial Stream (R 3)
Intermittent Str eam (R 4)
Ephemeral Str eam (R 6)
Palustrine Em er gent (PEM) Wetl ands
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetlands
PFO(sq ft)PSS(s q ft)PEM(sq ft)POW(s q ft)R3(lf)R4(lf)R6(lf)Dit c h(lf)A 32,173 NT / VB4841,124 NT / V
C 2,220 NT / V
D 1,077 2,031 NT / V
E 2,005 NT / V
F 4,223 NT / VG243NT / V
H 5,107 NT / V
I 836 NT / VJ422NT / V
K 1,275 NT/ NV
L 1,418 948 NT/ NVM65NT/ NV
N 298 NT/ NV
O 24 NT/ NVP184NT/ NV
Q 1,112 NT/ VR12,951 NT/ V
S 31 NT/ NV
T 158 NT/ NVTotal60,848 0 5,160 0 2,693 1,495 213 0
* T=Tidal; NT=Non-tidal; V=Vegetated; NV=Non-Vegetated; PFO=Palustrine Fores ted W etland; PSS=Palustrine Scrub-Shrub W etland; PEM=Palustrine Emergent W etland; POW = Palustrine Open W ater; EIW = Estuarine Intertidal W etlands; R3= Upper Perennial Streams; R4=Intermittent Streams ; R6 = Ephemeral Streams
Resource Identific ation
Confirma tion Res ourc eDescriptionNotes*
Tota l W e tla nd Are a =
Tota l Stre a m Le ngth =
66,008 sq ft
4,401 lf
1.52 a c
XXBLOCK WALL
SAN
S
A
N
SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN
SAN SAN
SAN
SA
N
S
A
N
SANSANSAN
50' NEUSE BUFFER
100' F/J-B BUFFE
R
50'
N
E
U
S
E

B
U
F
F
E
R
100'
F
/
J
-
B

B
U
F
F
E
R
50'

N
E
U
S
E

B
U
F
F
E
R
100'

F
/
J
-
B

B
U
F
F
E
RHOOVER ROADS 88°37'37" E 408.60'S 15°48'01" W 592.79'S 85°39'32" W 1579.72'
S 73°32
'
0
4
"

W

6
1
1
.
5
2

T
O

E
I
P
N 02°06'57" E 493.11'N 01°55'14" E 374.53'N 02°48'39" E 252.81'S 85°20'52" E 744.82'
S 87°35'42" E 320.78'NOW/FORMERLYLENA C. HARPERDEED BOOK 212 PAGE 555PLAT BOOK 12 PAGE 14NOW/FORMERLYLENA C. HARPERDEED BOOK 212 PAGE 555PLAT BOOK 19 PAGE 160NOW/FORMERLYJACKIE LOCKLEARDEED BOOK 2992 PAGE 612NOW/FORMERLYMILTON E. GOMEZDEED BOOK 5411 PAGE 307NOW/FORMERLYCHRISTIANA TRUSTDEED BOOK 7447 PAGE 638NOW/FORMERLYBESSIE MAE PRATTDEED BOOK 1863 PAGE 166NOW/FORMERLYJDW PROPERTIESDEED BOOK 7332 PAGE 93PLAT BOOK 173 PAGE 1NOW/FORMERLYFILANDES B. VILLATORODEED BOOK 6715 PAGE 402PLAT BOOK 173 PAGE 11NOW/FORMERLYANGELA C. CARVERDEED BOOK 4200 PAGE 441NOW/FORMERLYCREDLE YANCEYDEED BOOK 4309 PAGE 411NOW/FORMERLYHAYILYAH HA-SHE'BDEED BOOK 2264 PAGE 849NOW/FORMERLYGLORIA H. MORGANDEED BOOK 6198 PAGE 335NOW/FORMERLY PROPERTY OF THE
ATLANTIC LAND AND IMPROVEMENT CO.
A PORTION OF PLAT BOOK 81 PAGE 48
DEED BOOK 424 PAGE 758
NOW/FORMERLY PROPERTY OF
TIMOTHY G. SCHULTEN
A PORTION OF PLAT BOOK 114 PAGE 88
DEED BOOK 2978 PAGE 619
NOW/F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y

T
R
I
A
N
G
L
E

I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S
PLAT B
O
O
K

7
8

P
A
G
E

3
6
DEED B
O
O
K

1
7
3
0

P
A
G
E

9
1
2
NOW/FO
R
M
E
R
L
Y

J
U
A
N
I
T
A

N
.

M
A
T
A
DEED B
O
O
K

6
7
9
7

P
A
G
E

2
0
5
NOW/F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y

R
U
T
H

A
M
A
N
D
A

B
R
O
W
N
PLAT B
O
O
K

2
7

P
A
G
E

1
7
4
DEED B
O
O
K

4
7
3
9

P
A
G
E

9
8
6
NOW/F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y

L
I
N
Z
Y

B
.
CHASE
PLAT B
O
O
K

2
3

P
A
G
E

1
9
6
DEED B
O
O
K

1
6
4
3

P
A
G
E

2
3NOW/FORMERLYLENA C. HARPERDEED BOOK 212 PAGE 555PLAT BOOK 12 PAGE 14NOW/FORMERLYLENA C. HARPERDEED BOOK 212 PAGE 555PLAT BOOK 19 PAGE 160NOW/FORMERLYGLORIA H. MORGANDEED BOOK 6198 PAGE 335 124.0
5'
N 55°
4
0'
1
5
"
E
S
6
1
°
3
7
'
4
5
"

E

2
5
0
.
3
5
'
S 87°42'14" E
118.33'
135
.49
'N 27
°33
'11
"
W250.43'S 02°12'47" WS 55°38
'21
"
E
428
.27
'50'
NEUSE
BUFFER100'
F
/J
-B
BUFFER
10'
B
U
I
L
D

S
E
T
B
A
C
K
10' BUILD SETBA
C
K
5
0
'
N
EU
S
E

BU
F
F
ER
1
0
0
'

F
/
J
-
B

B
U
F
F
E
RHOOVER ROADJOB NO.
SHEET NO.
SCALE
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BY
DATEREVISION DESCRIPTIONYOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102 | Raleigh, NC 27607TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.comTHIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THERALEIGH OFFICEJ. LEWIS
B. HALL
B. HALL
05/30/2019
HOOVER ROADDURHAM COUNTY - NC42811
----EXISTING CONDITIONS OVERALLIM-1.0NAD 830
SCALE 1"=80'
160'80'
IM-1.1
IM-1.1
EXISTING
TREE LINE
EXISTING
TREE LINE
EXISTING
TREE LINE
SITE DATA:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 50.03 ACRES
TOTAL WETLANDS: 1.67 ACRES (72,921 SF)
TOTAL STREAMS: 2,660 LF
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 4.92 ACRES
LEGEND
EXISTING WETLANDS
IM-2.2
SANSANSANSAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
10
0
'

F
/
J
-
B

B
U
F
F
E
R
10'
B
U
I
L
D

S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
A
N
S
A
N
SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN
SAN
JOB NO.
SHEET NO.
SCALE
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BY
DATEREVISION DESCRIPTIONYOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102 | Raleigh, NC 27607TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.comTHIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THERALEIGH OFFICEJ. LEWIS
B. HALL
B. HALL
05/30/2019
HOOVER ROADDURHAM COUNTY - NC42811
----EXISTING CONDITIONS OVERALLIM-1.1NAD 830
SCALE 1"=20'
40'20'
STORM CROSSING (PERMANENT)SANITARY EXTENSION (TEMPORARY)
ZONE 2
ZONE 1 ZONE 1
ZONE 2
10' BUILD
SETBACK
ZONE 2
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
ZONE 1
10' BUILD
SETBACK
EXISTING
TREE
LINE
EXISTING
TREE LINE
SITE DATA:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 50.03 ACRES
TOTAL WETLANDS: 1.67 ACRES (72,921 SF)
TOTAL STREAMS: 2,660 LF
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 4.92 ACRES
LEGEND
EXISTING WETLANDS
XXBLOCK WALL
SAN
S
A
N
SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN
SAN SAN
SAN
SA
N
S
A
N
SANSANSAN
50' NEUSE BUFFER
100' F/J-B BUFFE
R
50'
N
E
U
S
E

B
U
F
F
E
R
100'
F
/
J
-
B

B
U
F
F
E
R
50'

N
E
U
S
E

B
U
F
F
E
R
100'

F
/
J
-
B

B
U
F
F
E
RHOOVER ROADS 88°37'37" E 408.60'S 15°48'01" W 592.79'S 85°39'32" W 1579.72'
S 73°32
'
0
4
"

W

6
1
1
.
5
2

T
O

E
I
P
N 02°06'57" E 493.11'N 01°55'14" E 374.53'N 02°48'39" E 252.81'S 85°20'52" E 744.82'
S 87°35'42" E 320.78'NOW/FORMERLYLENA C. HARPERDEED BOOK 212 PAGE 555PLAT BOOK 12 PAGE 14NOW/FORMERLYLENA C. HARPERDEED BOOK 212 PAGE 555PLAT BOOK 19 PAGE 160NOW/FORMERLYJACKIE LOCKLEARDEED BOOK 2992 PAGE 612NOW/FORMERLYMILTON E. GOMEZDEED BOOK 5411 PAGE 307NOW/FORMERLYCHRISTIANA TRUSTDEED BOOK 7447 PAGE 638NOW/FORMERLYBESSIE MAE PRATTDEED BOOK 1863 PAGE 166NOW/FORMERLYJDW PROPERTIESDEED BOOK 7332 PAGE 93PLAT BOOK 173 PAGE 1NOW/FORMERLYFILANDES B. VILLATORODEED BOOK 6715 PAGE 402PLAT BOOK 173 PAGE 11NOW/FORMERLYANGELA C. CARVERDEED BOOK 4200 PAGE 441NOW/FORMERLYCREDLE YANCEYDEED BOOK 4309 PAGE 411NOW/FORMERLYHAYILYAH HA-SHE'BDEED BOOK 2264 PAGE 849NOW/FORMERLYGLORIA H. MORGANDEED BOOK 6198 PAGE 335NOW/FORMERLY PROPERTY OF THE
ATLANTIC LAND AND IMPROVEMENT CO.
A PORTION OF PLAT BOOK 81 PAGE 48
DEED BOOK 424 PAGE 758
NOW/FORMERLY PROPERTY OF
TIMOTHY G. SCHULTEN
A PORTION OF PLAT BOOK 114 PAGE 88
DEED BOOK 2978 PAGE 619
NOW/F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y

T
R
I
A
N
G
L
E

I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S
PLAT B
O
O
K

7
8

P
A
G
E

3
6
DEED B
O
O
K

1
7
3
0

P
A
G
E

9
1
2
NOW/FO
R
M
E
R
L
Y

J
U
A
N
I
T
A

N
.

M
A
T
A
DEED B
O
O
K

6
7
9
7

P
A
G
E

2
0
5
NOW/F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y

R
U
T
H

A
M
A
N
D
A

B
R
O
W
N
PLAT B
O
O
K

2
7

P
A
G
E

1
7
4
DEED B
O
O
K

4
7
3
9

P
A
G
E

9
8
6
NOW/F
O
R
M
E
R
L
Y

L
I
N
Z
Y

B
.
CHASE
PLAT B
O
O
K

2
3

P
A
G
E

1
9
6
DEED B
O
O
K

1
6
4
3

P
A
G
E

2
3NOW/FORMERLYLENA C. HARPERDEED BOOK 212 PAGE 555PLAT BOOK 12 PAGE 14NOW/FORMERLYLENA C. HARPERDEED BOOK 212 PAGE 555PLAT BOOK 19 PAGE 160NOW/FORMERLYGLORIA H. MORGANDEED BOOK 6198 PAGE 335 124.0
5'
N 55°
4
0'
1
5
"
E
S
6
1
°
3
7
'
4
5
"

E

2
5
0
.
3
5
'
S 87°42'14" E
118.33'
135
.49
'N 27
°33
'11
"
W250.43'S 02°12'47" WS 55°38
'21
"
E
428
.27
'50'
NEUSE
BUFFER100'
F
/J
-B
BUFFER
10'
B
U
I
L
D

S
E
T
B
A
C
K
10' BUILD SETBA
C
K
X X X X X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXX
X
X
370369371372373374370
37
0
369
D
D
53.25' OF
15" RCP
DD D D
39.24' OF 15" PVC
220.23' OF 15" PVC230.14' OF 15" PVC231.03' OF 15" PVC 370370370367368368368369371371372372372340340345345345350
355
360
365337337338338339339341341342342343343343344344344346346346347348349351352353354
356
357
358
359
361
362
363
364
366
360358
359
361
362
363
368
365
3
8
3381360
355
36436336322.52' OF
15" RCP
369330
335
340
345
350
355
360 326327
328
329
331
332
333
334
336
337
338
339
341
342
343
344
346
347
348
349
35
1
352
353
354
356
357
358
359
361
362
363
3
5
0355360
364 346345 343341
330
335
335
3303253
2
5
33
0
33
5
330
335
350355360365
370
350
355
360
365
370
375
380
365365
370
375
380 365360
365365355360365365363364366367368370370
369
368
380
375
380
370
3703
6
9 371372369369386386372
3
4
5
3
5
0
3
5
5
330
335
3
4
0345350
350355360365WWWW
W
WWW
S
SANS
5
0
'
N
EU
S
E

BU
F
F
ER
1
0
0
'

F
/
J
-
B

B
U
F
F
E
RHOOVER ROADJOB NO.
SHEET NO.
SCALE
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BY
DATEREVISION DESCRIPTIONYOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102 | Raleigh, NC 27607TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.comTHIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THERALEIGH OFFICEJ. LEWIS
B. HALL
B. HALL
05/30/2019
HOOVER ROADDURHAM COUNTY - NC42811
----OVERALL SITE PLANIM-2.0NAD 830
SCALE 1"=80'
160'80'
IM-2.1
IM-2.2
EXISTING
TREE LINE
EXISTING
TREE LINE
EXISTING
TREE LINE
SITE DATA:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 50.03 ACRES
TOTAL WETLANDS: 1.67 ACRES (72,921 SF)
TOTAL STREAMS: 2,660 LF
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 4.92 ACRES
LEGEND
EXISTING WETLANDS
LEGEND
ZONE 1 BUFFER
ZONE 2 BUFFER
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
IM-2.2
320
325
330
335
340
320
325
330
335
340
324.5324.0324.0324.2324.47324.00324.00324.249+80 10+00 11+00 11+50HEADWALL #1TOP 333.50INV OUT 323.17 (STREAM CROSSING)HEADWALL #2TOP 331.80INV IN 323.00 (STREAM CROSSING)STREAM CROSSING
82.28' OF
72" RCP
@ 0.21%
FINISHED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
S
A
N
S
A
N
SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN
SAN
340340345350337337338338339339341342343344346347348349
351352330
335
335
3303253
2
5
33
0
33
5
330
335
3
4
5
3
5
0
3
5
5
330
335
3
4
0 345350WWWWWWWW
W
JOB NO.
SHEET NO.
SCALE
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BY
DATEREVISION DESCRIPTIONYOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102 | Raleigh, NC 27607TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.comTHIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THERALEIGH OFFICEJ. LEWIS
B. HALL
B. HALL
05/30/2019
HOOVER ROADDURHAM COUNTY - NC42811
----IMPACTS SITE PLANIM-2.1NAD 830
SCALE 1"=20'
40'20'
STORM CROSSING (PERMANENT)
STREAM CROSSING PROFILE
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
10' BUILD
SETBACK
EXISTING
TREE LINE
SITE DATA:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 50.03 ACRES
TOTAL WETLANDS: 1.67 ACRES (72,921 SF)
TOTAL STREAMS: 2,660 LF
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 4.92 ACRES
LEGEND
ZONE 1 BUFFER
ZONE 2 BUFFER
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
IMPACTS:
PERMANENT ZONE 1 BUFFER: 12,408 SF
PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER: 10,413 SF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 104 LF
PROFILE SCALE
0
0
20
2
SANSANSANSAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
10
0
'

F
/
J
-
B

B
U
F
F
E
R
10'
B
U
I
L
D

S
E
T
B
A
C
K
37
0
D
D
WWWW S
SANSANSANSANSANS SANSANSANSANSANSAN50'
NEUSE
BUFFER100'
F
/J
-B
BUFFER350355JOB NO.
SHEET NO.
SCALE
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BY
DATEREVISION DESCRIPTIONYOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102 | Raleigh, NC 27607TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.comTHIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THERALEIGH OFFICEJ. LEWIS
B. HALL
B. HALL
05/30/2019
HOOVER ROADDURHAM COUNTY - NC42811
----IMPACTS SITE PLANIM-2.2NAD 830
SCALE 1"=20'
40'20'
SANITARY EXTENSION (TEMPORARY)
ZONE 2
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
ZONE 1
10' BUILD
SETBACK
EXISTING
TREE LINE
SITE DATA:
TOTAL SITE AREA: 50.03 ACRES
TOTAL WETLANDS: 1.67 ACRES (72,921 SF)
TOTAL STREAMS: 2,660 LF
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 4.92 ACRES
LEGEND
ZONE 1 BUFFER
ZONE 2 BUFFER
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY ZONE 1 BUFFER: 4,067 SF
TEMPORARY ZONE 2 BUFFER: 2,784 SF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 34 LF
EXISTING STREAM CROSSING RESTORATION
IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY ZONE 1 BUFFER: 3,054 SF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 35 LF
ZONE 1
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 2

APPENDIX C

5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 1/11
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly aected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of eects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site-specic (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specic (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
oce(s) with jurisdiction in the dened project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Durham County, North Carolina
Local oce
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Oce
 [phone]
 [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Oce Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 2/11
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 3/11
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of inuence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly aected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a sh population, even if that sh does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential eects to species, additional site-specic and
project-specic information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local oce and a species list which fullls this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an ocial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local eld oce directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an ocial species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an oce of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially aected by activities in this location:
Flowering Plants
1
2
NAME STATUS
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 4/11
Critical habitats
Potential eects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may nd in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur o the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Smooth Coneower Echinacea laevigata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Endangered
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
1
2
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 5/11
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in oshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds elsewhere
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 6/11
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
“Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey eort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of condence in the presence score. One can have higher condence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey eort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Eort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey eort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 7/11
 no data survey eort breeding season probability of presence
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas o the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC Vulnerable
(This is not a Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) in this
area, but warrants
attention because of
the Eagle Act or for
potential
susceptibilities in
oshore areas from
certain types of
development or
activities.)
Eastern Whip-
poor-will
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 8/11
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specied location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identied as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to oshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specied location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specied. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 9/11
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacic Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in oshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. oshore energy development or longline shing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, eorts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially aected by oshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also oers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specied location”. Please be aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey eort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data” indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey eort is the key component. If the survey eort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey eort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
conrm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be conrmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 10/11
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identied based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classication established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verication work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1A
RIVERINE
R4SBC
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
5/9/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JNUBA2XPMRBMZAPK6YDIJNIYKQ/resources 11/11
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be
occasional dierences in polygon boundaries or classications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tubercid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may dene and describe wetlands in a
dierent manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to dene the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specied agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
aect such activities.
■ ■■■
•� NC DEPARTMENT OF
■■L■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCE=S
IN won
May 9, 2019
Ben Crumrine
Timmons Group
1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300
Richmond, VA 23225
RE. Hoover Road, 42811
Dear Ben Crumrine.
Roy Cooper. Governor
Susi Hamilton, Secretary
Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-8951
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerWncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Hoover Road
Project No. 42811
May 9, 2019
NCNHDE-8951
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type -
Durham County Open Space Durham County. multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/hely). Data query generated on May 9, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q2 Apr 2019. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3
Hoover Road Athletic Park
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA
NR Points
NR Individual Listing
NR Listing, Gone
NRHD Center Point
NR Boundaries
National Register Boundary
Boundary of Destroyed/Removed NR Listing
SL Points
SL Individual Entry
SL and DOE entry
Study List Entry, Gone
SL and DOE, Gone
May 9, 2019 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi
0 0.4 0.80.2 km
1:18,056
CULTURAL RESOURCES BACKGROUND STUDY – HOOVER ROAD
ATHLETIC PARK, DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Timmons Group, Inc. is preparing a background study for the proposed Hoover Road Athletic Park
development. The proposed project will consist of four soccer fields, a restroom, shelter structure, an
access road connected to Hoover Road, stormwater control measures, and underground utilities (i.e.
water and gravity sanitary sewer). Project construction will include site clearing and grading, utility
installation, and site development.
The approximately 50.2-acres project area is located within the city of Durham, North Carolina, within
Durham County. The project area of potential effects (APE) is bound by residential homes, commercial
development, and Cheek Road to the north. To the east, the APE is bound by commercial development
and Junction Road. To the south, the APE is bound by a forested upland area, commercial development,
and Junction Road. To the west, the APE is bound by US 70 Bypass and commercial development. The
project area is mainly comprised of forested areas with the central portion of the property having been
clear-cut within the last 5 years. There are multiple stream and wetland features throughout the APE
along the sewer easement and drainages (Figure 1).
A Timmons Group Secretary of Interior qualified archaeologist conducted a review of the cultural
resources database at the North Carolina Office of State Archeology (OSA) on June 3, 2019. Research at
the OSA indicated that no previous archaeological surveys have been conducted in the APE or within a
one-mile radius. Research further indicated that a single archaeological site has previously been identified
within one mile of the APE. That site (DH586) is described as a prehistoric lithic scatter outside of the
current project APE that is not recommend eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP). Seven historic structures (Table 1) have been recorded within one mile of the project area. None
of these previously recorded structures are within the current direct APE and none have been evaluated
for listing on the NRHP.
Table 1 Historical resources located within a one-mile radius of the APE.
State Site No. Description Status
DH507 Houses Not Evaluate
DH772 Houses Not Evaluated
DH1764 Mrs Holloway House Demolished
DH1780 Houses Not Evaluated
State Site No. Description Status
DH2136 Lee Allen Farm Not Evaluated
DH2409 Log House Not Evaluated
DH2550 Ross Primitive Baptist Church Not Evaluated

Known historic properties are located within the indirect APE and may need to be evaluated for inclusion
in the NRHP. The USGS Web Soil Survey (accessed 06/13/2019) defines most soils in the APE as hydric, or
frequently saturated. Although the current project area has never been surveyed for the presence of
cultural resources, these types of soils are not considered sensitive for the preservation of archaeological
remains. However, given the proximity of known historic sites, as well as the presence of a nearby
archaeological site, the possibility remains that intact archaeological deposits could be present. As a
result, the SHPO may choose to recommend further archaeological studies within the APE as it is currently
defined.