20190809 Ver 1_2019-1-31 PJD Package_20190613

CIVIL ENGINEERING | ENVIRONMENTAL | SURVEYING | GIS | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607

P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com

February 1, 2019

Mr. James Lastinger
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Wilmington Field Office
Raleigh Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587

Re: Wetland Delineation Confirmation – PJD Request Package
Adams Vineyards
Fuquay-Varina, Wake County, North Carolina
Project No.: 41143

Dear Mr. Lastinger,

On behalf of Adams Vineyard, Timmons Group conducted a wetland delineation on January 22,
2019 to identify potential jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including stream and wetland boundaries.
The project site encompasses approximately 42.9 acres and is located at 3315 Johan Adams Road
in Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina within Wake County. The project site is located within one parcel
of land that is further described as Wake County Parcel Identification Numbers (PIN) 0696571218.
The project site is located within the Neuse River Basin (HUC 030202011201); and more
specifically, within the Little Black Creek-Black Creek sub-watershed. The project site includes an
unnamed tributary that flows south to Black Creek, which has a NC Division of Water Resources
Stream Index Number of 27-45-(3) and a Stream Classification of Class C and NSW. The project
site does contain a floodplain area according to NC FIRM Maps 3720069600J (effective date May 2,
2006). The Site contains mostly agricultural areas within the central portion of the property and also
contains two drained ponds. There are stream and wetland features throughout the Site and
primarily associated with the pond features.
The project site was delineated based upon the methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0). In
addition, streams were delineated based upon the methodology outlined in the North Carolina
Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Stream and Their Origins (Version 4.11). Based on our field investigations, two (2) intermittent
streams, one (1) perennial stream, one (1) palustrine open water (POW) pond, two (2) palustrine
emergent (PEM) wetlands, and three (3) palustrine forested wetlands were delineated within the
project site. A total of approximately 768 linear feet of intermittent stream, 287 linear feet of perennial
stream, 3.03 acres of POW, and 3.73 acres of wetlands were flagged within the project site. The
delineation is depicted on Figure 5. Wetland and Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map.

Timmons Group would appreciate your review of the enclosed maps and attachments, and
confirmation of the delineation for the project site. Please feel free to contact me at [phone],
or [e-mail] if you have any questions or would like to schedule a site visit
to confirm the jurisdictional boundaries.

Sincerely,
Timmons Group

Chris Inscore, AWB
Environmental Project Manager

Enclosures

ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A USACE JD Request Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Table 1. Table of Aquatic Resources
Agent Authorization and Property Owner Form
Appendix B Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Hydrologic Unit Code Map
Figure 3 Environmental Inventory Map
Figure 4 NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 5 Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map
Appendix C Wetland Determination Data Form (1 upland, 1 wetland)
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form v. 4.11 (4 forms)

APPENDIX A

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Page 1 Version: May 2017
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx ,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Page 2 Version: May 2017
Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 3315 John Adams Road
City, State: Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina
County: Wake
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0696571218
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Timmons Group (attn: Chris Inscore, AWB)
Mailing Address: 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number: 919-805-9861
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Stancil Vineyards LLC
Mailing Address: 466 Stancil Road
Angier, NC 27501
Telephone Number: 919-649-2073
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
_
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Page 3 Version: May 2017
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Chris Inscore
Page 4 Version: May 2017
Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States” on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Page 5 Version: May 2017
Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: °
Longitude: -°
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
•North Arrow
•Graphical Scale
•Boundary of Review Area
•Date
•Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
•Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
•Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
•Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
•Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Page 6 Version: May 2017
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
•PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
•AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08 -02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project areasubject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE” SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2)In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be” navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ___________________________________________________.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ___________________.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: _______________________________________________.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________________________________________________.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ___________________________________________.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _______________________________.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ___________________________.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ______________________________________.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): _______________________________________________.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ____________________________________________________________.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ________________.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ___________________________________________.
or Other (Name & Date): ____________________________________________.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________________________.
Other information (please specify): _________________________________________________.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Table 1. Table of Aquatic Resources
Site Number Latitude Longitude Estimated Amount of aquatic
resource in review area
(square/linear feet)
Type of aquatic
resources (wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters
Geographic Authority to which the
aquatic resource "may be" Subject
(i.e section 404 or Section 10/404)
A 35.584260 -78.679737 18740 square feet Wetland; PEM 404
B 35.583278 -78.679779 52060 square feet Wetland; PEM 404
C 35.583340 -78.680612 2252 square feet Wetland; PFO 404
D 35.582364 -78.683176 88990 square feet Wetland; PFO 404
E 35.581766 -78.681001 132406 square feet Wetland; POW 404
F 35.581228 -78.679067 562 square feet Wetland; PFO 404
G 35.582058 -78.683557 287 linear feet Non-wetland water;
R3
404
H 35.583378 -78.680101 709 linear feet Non-wetland water;
R4
404
I 35.584417 -78.679457 59 linear feet Non-wetland water;
R4
404

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in by Current Landowner
The Department of the Army NCDENR — Division of Water Resources
US Army Corps of Engineers 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Wilmington District 1650 Mail Service Center
PO Box 1890 Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This the day of 2019_.
(number) (Month) (Year)
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: Adams Vineyard Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC
Property Owner's
Property Owner's
Property Owner's
Property Owner's Telephone: CIA )4.39~-A10 23 Fax No. (919� 4.31 - 884 j
Property Owner's Email Address: Pee JA; CSi_aM*. I e .54an :Ibll,:Wars. e.D ^
n
0
n
N
U
Z
d]
A
IX
N
.-I
41v
Ln
x
.E
LL
r
O
M
E
0
U
N
C
O
E
E
3
3
3

APPENDIX B

U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):DATE(S):WATERSHED(S):HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER :PROJECT STUD Y LIMITS:LATITUDE:LON GITUDE:
ADAM S V INEYARDSWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP
41143
35.582846-78.679857
42.9 ACRES ANGIER2016
03020201UPPER NEUSE (NEUSE RIVER BASIN)
These plans and associated docum ents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GRO UP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIM MONS GRO UP.
Path: Y:\805\41143-Adams Vineyards\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\41143-VIC.mxd
5
0 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000Feet
Site limits are approximate.Topographic imagery from USGS.
Site Limits
^_
03010102 0301020403010106
03010103
03010104 03010107
03020102
03020101
03020201
03030002
03020103
03020203
03030003
03040103
03020202
03020202
03030004
03020204
03040104
03030006
03030007
03040203
03040201
Legend
^_Site Marker
Upper Neuse (Neuse River Basin)
Hydrologic Unit Code
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
SHEET NUMBERSCALE
1
DATE 01/25/2019
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
PROJECT NAME
A. MEHFOUD
ADAMS VINEYARDS
FIGURE 2:HYDROLOGICUNIT CODE MAP
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION
These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
PROJECT NUMBER41143ADAMS VINEYARDSWAKE COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE048
Miles
Y:\805\41143-Adams Vineyards\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\41143-HUC.mxd
NOTES:Site marker is approximate.HUC from USGS.Topographic basemap fromEsri Online.
H:1 " = 4 Miles
S h a n n aHillsDr
NC42HwyWoolard Farm RdTractor Run Path
John Adams RdNoB
NoB2 WoA
NoB
NoB2
WaA
WaB
WaB
PsA
NoB
NoB
RaA
WaB
GoA
NoB2
RaA
OrB
OrB
LyA
WaA
WoA
WoA
NoB2
NoC
WoA
NoB
WaC
W
AgC
AgC
NoBOrC2
WaB
W
HrD2
CeD OrB2
ApC
AgC2
AgB
AgB2
Legend
Project Study Limits - 42.9 Acres
National Hydrography D ataset
National Wetlands Inventory
Zone A: 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Hydric Soil Classification
Hydric
Partially Hydric
Not Hydric
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
SHEET NUMBERSCALE1
DATE 01/25/2019
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
PROJECT NAME
A. MEHFOUD
ADAMS VINEYARDS
1 " = 125 'H:
FIGURE 3:ENVIRONMENTALINVENTORY MAP
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION
These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
PROJECT NUMBER41143ADAMS VINEYARDSWAKE COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0125250
SCALE (FEET)
Y:\805\41143-Adams Vineyards\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\41143-EIM.mxd
NOTES:Project Limits areapproximate.NWI from US Fish andWildlife Service.Soils data from SSURGO.National HydrographyDataset from USGS.Aerial imagery from VGIN.
Ma punit S ym bol Ma puni t Na m eAgBAppling gravelly s andy loam, 2 t o 6 perc ent s lopesAgB2Appling gravelly s andy loam, 2 to 6 perc ent s lopes , moderately erodedAgCAppling gravelly s andy loam, 6 to 10 perc ent s lopesAgC2Appling gravelly s andy loam, 6 to 10 perc ent s lopes , moderat ely erodedApCAppling s andy loam, 6 to 10 perc ent s lopesCeDCecil s andy loam, 10 t o 15 perc ent s lopesGoAGoldsboro s andy loam, 0 to 2 perc ent s lopesHrD2Herndon s ilt loam, 10 t o 15 perc ent s lopes , moderat ely erodedLyALynchburg s andy loam, 0 to 2 perc ent s lopesNoBNorfolk loamy s and, 2 t o 6 perc ent s lopesNoB2Norfolk loamy s and, 2 t o 6 perc ent s lopes , moderat ely erodedNoCNorfolk loamy s and, 6 t o 10 perc ent s lopesOrBOrangeburg loamy s and, 2 to 6 perc ent s lopesOrB2Orangeburg loamy s and, 2 to 6 perc ent s lopes , moderately erodedOrC2Orangeburg loamy s and, 6 t o 10 perc ent s lopes , moderately erodedPsAPlummer and Os ier s oils , 0 t o 2 perc ent s lopesRaARains fine s andy loam, 0 t o 2 perc ent s lopesWWaterWaAWagram loamy s and, 0 t o 2 perc ent s lopesWaBWagram loamy s and, 2 t o 6 perc ent s lopesWaCWagram loamy s and, 6 t o 10 perc ent s lopesWoAWehadkee and B ibb s oils , 0 to 2 perc ent s lopes , frequent ly flooded
W a ke County Soi l s
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):DATE(S):WATERSHED(S):HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER :PROJECT STUD Y LIMITS:LATITUDE:LON GITUDE:
ADAM S V INEYARDSWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFIGURE 4: NR CS SOIL SURVEY MAP
41143
35.582846-78.679857
42.9 ACRES ANGIER2016
03020201UPPER NEUSE (NEUSE RIVER BASIN)
These plans and associated docum ents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GRO UP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIM MONS GRO UP.
Path: Y:\805\41143-Adams Vineyards\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\41143-N RCS.mxd
5
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000Feet
Site limits are approximate.Soils from NRC S web soil survey.
Site Limits
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
SHEET NUMBERSCALE1
DATE 01/28/2019
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
PROJECT NAME
A. MEHFOUD
ADAMS VINEYARDS
!(D
!(F
!(C !(B
!(A
!(E
")I
")G
")H
Culvert
OffsiteStream OffsiteWetland
OffsiteWetland
OffsiteStream JohnAdamsRdNC 42 Hwy3343333323
3
1
3
3
0
3
2
9
3
2
83273263
2
53243
2
3322
3
2
0319317
309
3
2
1
3
1
8
314
313
310
308315312311 335
334 331330
327
324
323
3
2
0
317
333
332
328
325
319326321
3293223 0 230 1
2952942 9 3
3 0 5
3 0 3
3003042973203193183153133123113
1
7
316
340
338 3413 3 9337
3303 2 8
327326325324313
312
310
309
308311307
318316319
317
306
3
0
4
3053033393383373393383153143433 4 2
316
315
3163073063 0 4 318315
298296314336329329
3363323313
2
2
3403 3 8
338
339331
319
319
318312
309307306 343342341339339
3383
3
8
338
338
337
3363 3 5
334332 331
3313303
2
9
3293 2 9
325
3 2 0 3213203193193 17317
316
3
1
5
3
1
4312309306
3 0 7
3063
0
4
2962952942 9 3
2933 43342
336
322
1 " = 100 'H:
FIGURE 5:WETLANDS ANDWATERS OF THEU.S. DELINEATIONMAP
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION
These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
PROJECT NUMBER41143ADAMS VINEYARDSWAKE COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0100200
SCALE (FEET)
Y:\805\41143-Adams Vineyards\GIS\WTDM\41143-WTDM.mxd
1. Waters of the U.S. within theproject study limits have beenlocated using submeter, BluetoothGPS antennas by TimmonsGroup.2.Waters of the U.S. have notbeen confirmed by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers.3. Project limits are approximate.4. Topography based on USGSLiDAR.5. Cowardin StreamClassifications are based solelyon field observations. No formalStream assessment methodologywas completed to determine theseCowardin Classifications.
Legend
Project Study Lim its - 42.9 Acres
Neuse Buffer - 50 Feet
")X Stream Identifi er
!(X Wetland Identifier
Culvert
Perennial Stream (R 3)
Intermittent Stream (R 4)
Palustrine Emergent (PEM ) Wetlands
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetl ands
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
PFO(sq ft )PSS(sq ft)PEM(sq ft)POW(sq ft)R3(lf)R4(lf)R6(lf)Ditch(lf)A 18,740 NT / V
B 52,060 NT / V
C 2,252 NT / V
D 88,990 NT / V
E 132,406 NT / V
F 562 NT / V
G 287 NT / NV
H 709 NT / NV
I 59 NT / NV
Tota l 91,804 0 70,800 132,406 287 768 0 0
* T=Tidal; NT=Non-tidal; V=Vegetated; NV=Non-Vegetated; PFO=Palus trine Fores ted W etland; PSS=Palus trine Scrub-Shrub W etland; PEM=Palustrine Emergent W et land; POW = Palus trine Open W ater; EIW = Estuarine Intertidal W etlands; R3= Upper Perennial Streams; R4=Intermittent Streams; R6 = Ephemeral Streams
Resource Identification
Confi rma tion Resourc eDescriptionNotes*
Tota l W e tla nd Are a =Tota l Stre a m Le ngth =295,010 sq ft1,055 lf 6.77 a c

APPENDIX C

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
City/County: Sampling Date:Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2 =
1. FAC species x 3 =
2. FACU species x 4 =
3. UPL species x 5 =
4.
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4. than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
8. herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 9.
10.
ft (1 m) in height.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
City/County: Sampling Date:Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY

Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2 =
1. FAC species x 3 =
2. FACU species x 4 =
3. UPL species x 5 =
4.
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4. than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
8. herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 9.
10.
ft (1 m) in height.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
8/10/2018 Adams Vineyards 35.584402
GB Wake -78.679339
Angier
Pond Feature E
0
0
0
0
This feature is now a POW
1/22/2019 Adams Vineyards 35.584306
G. Buccholz, M. Gilbert/Timmons Wake -78.679662
Angier
Stream Feature H
23
7
6.5
9.5
Midges
1/22/2019 Adams Vineyard 35.384264
M.Gilbert/G.Buccholz Wake -78.679609
Angier
Stream Feature I
23
7
6.5
9.5
8/10/2018 Adams Vineyards 35.58174
BP Wake -78.6831
Angier
Stream Feature G
33.5
7.5
9
17
Delete this form