20180990 Ver 1_More Info Received_20190606

Strickland, Bev
From: Julie Davidson <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 1:39 PM
To: Goss, Stephanie
Subject: Re: [External] Fwd: Fwd: Ridgemont, no dissipator
• Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
WoLt,[e-mail]
Yes, thank you. The second one is correct and the buffers remain the same.
I just talked to Franklin Co. They said this neighborhood predates any stormwater plan requirements. He said the new
lots would be included. This is Jason from Franklin Co. He has given me an email of their engineer to see what his
thoughts are. Honestly, I feel like no one knows the answer and I am given the run around.
I will copy you on the email.
On 6/6/2019 1:34 PM, Goss, Stephanie wrote:
Julie,
This table "A" is from the PCN submitted in 2018:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
(Uhlitsl
Parma nent
Amount Approved
(units}
Temporary
Shea m
S1- Poad Crossin
6 hnEar feet
linear fee[
S2- Road Crossing -Fill
64 (linear feet)
b (linear feet
SufFors — 2on& i
l} linear feet
linear feet
B1. Riad Cramirti
3,M(square Feetj
0 (!;q ua re fee#
BUM" -20" 2
3,840 uare feet
0 (square Fw
81; Road Crossing
2,560 uare feet
(squa re feet
This is what I understood from the Ridgemontbase 110518 Impact map:
Type of frnpaet
Amount Approved
(units)
Permanant
Ampurd Approved
(unitsl
Tampomry
Stara re
51: Road Crossing
133 llrrear feet
0 linear Feet
52: Road Crossing -rip rap
22 linear feet]
0 linear feetl
53, Road Crossing
l} linear feet
linear feet
Buffers —Zone 1
131; Road Crossing
3,840 uare feet
0 (square Fw
Buffers —Zane 2
131: Road Crossing
2,5W uare fcketj
0 tsquart feet
I am assuming the second one is correct, are the buffers the same?
Stephanie Z. Goss
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office

3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 276o9
919-791-4256
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Julie Davidson <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 11:03 AM
To: Goss, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Fwd: Fwd: Ridgemont, no dissipator
0066,External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]
The dissipator pad was removed because Andy did not think it would work well with this stream bed.
Here are the latest drawings.
Previous email sent to you to show his site visit remarks.
-------- Forwarded Message--------
Subject:Fwd: Ridgemont, no dissipator
Date:Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:45:20 -0400
From:Steve Gould <[e-mail]>
To:Julie Davidson <[e-mail]>, Mike Crowley <[e-mail]>
CC:Joe Lee <[e-mail]>, Bob Neeb <[e-mail]>
Julie,
Now that plans have been revised per ACE recommendations when do you expect them to issue permit
to start construction of crossing. Do we just copy Franklin Cty soil erosion with states approval or do we
still need their approval and permit?
Thanks,
Steve Gould
919-291-3069
Gould Development Consultants, LLC
833-A Wake Forest Business Park
Wake Forest, NC 27587

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 8:47 PM
Subject: Ridgemont, no dissipator
To: Steve Gould <[e-mail]>, Julie Davidson <[e-mail]>, Joe Lee
<[e-mail]>
Michael A. Crowley, PE
caaENGINEERS, Inc.
[phone]
1233 Heritage Links Drive
Wake Forest, NC 27587
4932B Windy Hill Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
C-2151