Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190786 Ver 1_R.157 NoSitesPresent Archaeological Form_20190614Project Tracking No.: 18-10-0038 NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES as ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES J s A. PRESENT FORM ? This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not; .., a� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the"4 Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: R.157 County: Stanly WBS No: 17BP.10.R.157 Document: MCC F.A. No: na Funding: ® State ❑ Federal Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: USACE; DENR Project Description: This project entails the evaluation and replacement of Bridge No. 167 on SR 1421, Bethany Road, north of Albemarle (PA 18-10-0038, WBS# 17BP. 10.R. 157) in Stanly County, North Carolina. No preliminary designs were available at the time of request for archaeological input. The area of potential effects (APE) measures 706 feet (nearly 215.9 meters) in length and 100 feet (30.48 meters) in width (Figure 1). The current APE encompasses 1.6 acres (nearly .65 hectare). SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed the subject project and determined: ® There are no National Register listed or eligible ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present within the project's area of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents as needed) ❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project. ® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources. ❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the National Register. ® All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project. Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: The review of site maps and files archived at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) was conducted on November 19, 2018. No previously identified archaeological sites are recorded within the APE as currently proposed. An examination of mapping on file at OSA reveals only one recorded archaeological site, 31ST137, within 0.5 mile of the proposed project. This resource was one of eight prehistoric sites recorded during archaeological investigations associated with a sewer line project along Curl Tail Creek and Town Creek in the northern parts of Stanly County (Ayers 1989). Site 31ST137 was "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 4 Project Tracking No.: 18-10-0038 characterized as a small collection of "felsic" flakes on a small rise along the Town Creek alluvial terrace. The site was considered to lack archaeological significance. Most of the other sites identified during the sewer line survey represented camps and quarry/extraction sites. An examination of the data presented on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) revealed no recorded historic properties within a 0.5-mile radius of the APE, nor are any known cemeteries within that radius. An examination of soils in Stanly County presented on the National Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/appAVebSoilSurvey.aspx) indicated the following soil types within the delineated APE: Badin channery silt loam, 8-15 percent slopes (BaD); Badin channery silt loam, 15-45 percent slopes (BaF); and Chenneby silt loam, 0-2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (CfA). Table 1 illustrates the USDA soil types present in the designated survey areas (Soil Survey Staff 2019). The soils mapped in the APE include well drained to somewhat poorly drained silt loams on slopes of ridges and floodplains. Table 1. Soil Types in the Area of Potential Effects (APE) Soil Type Percent of Permeability Locations Survey Area Badin channery silt loam, 8-15 percent 34.3% Well drained Hillslopes on Ridges slopes Badin channery silt loam, 15-45 22.4% Well drained Hillslopes on Ridges percent slopes Chenneby silt loam, 0-2 percent slopes, 43.3% Somewhat Poorly Floodplains frequently flooded drained The APE is depicted on the USGS 7.5-minute New London quadrangle topographic map. The study area is located in the Rocky River sub basin of the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin (North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 2003). The closest source of water is Town Creek, which directly intersects the APE and Bethany Road. Land use in the APE includes plowed agricultural fields, wooded areas, and disturbed areas (Figures 2-3). The area is visibly disturbed south of Town Creek, as indicated by gravel on the surface. New South Associates, Inc, (New South) conducted an intensive shovel testing survey of the APE in March 2019. Shovel tests were excavated at 30-meter intervals to locate and identify potential archaeological resources that may be impacted by the proposed bridge replacement. Fieldwork also included a visual inspection in areas with high ground visibility, such as cleared agricultural fields. New South pre -plotted 14 shovel tests in the APE. Of these, only one could not be excavated because of surface water (Figure 4). Shovel tests measured approximately 30 centimeters in diameter and were excavated into sterile subsoil, the water table, a natural impasse, or the maximum feasible depth (approximately 1.0 m) (Table 2). Soils were screened through 0.25-inch hardware cloth. No additional shovel tests were excavated and no archaeological resources were identified. "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 2 of4 Project Tracking No.: 1 8-1 O-I )038 Table 2. Shovel Test Data Shovel Level Depth Depth Munsell Color Soil Artifacts Notes Test (Top) (Base) Texture 1 1 0 10 7.5YR5/6 Yellow/Brown Silty Clay - Fill and Red/Brown 2 1 0 10 7.5YR5/6 Yellow/Brown Silty Clay - Fill and Red/Brown 3 1 0 15 5YR4/3 Reddish Brown Clay - - 4 - - - - - - - Not Excavated — Surface Water 5 1 0 15 5YR4/3 Reddish Brown Clay - - 6 1 0 15 5YR4/3 Reddish Brown Clay - - 7 1 0 15 5YR4/3 Reddish Brown Clay - - 8 1 0 10 10YR5/3 Brown Silty Loam - - 2 10 20 7.5YR4/6 Strong Brown Clay Sand 9 1 0 10 10YR5/3 Brown Silty Loam - - 2 10 20 7.5YR4/6 Strong Brown Clay Sand 10 1 0 10 10115/8 Red Silty Clay - Disturbed, Rocky 11 1 0 10 10115/8 Red Silty Clay - Disturbed Rocky 12 1 0 10 10115/8 Red Silty Clay - Disturbed Rocky 13 1 0 10 10115/8 Red Silty Clay - Disturbed Rocky 14 1 0 10 7.5R4/3 Brown Silty Loam - - 2 10 20 7.5YR4/6 Strong Brown Silty Clay The stratigraphy across the APE varied by location. The soils in the southern portion of the APE were heavily disturbed by modern construction of roads, the bridge, ditches, and driveways. STP 2, located on the south end of the APE to the east of Bethany Road, exhibited mottled yellowish brown (IOYR 5/4) and reddish brown (5YR 4/3) silty clay fill. STP 10, located in the southern half of the APE west of Bethany Road, revealed red (1 OR 5/8) silty clay and dense angular gravel (Figure 5). The northern end of the APE contained plowed agricultural fields. Shovel tests here revealed red (lOR 5/8) silty clay. The surface of this area was not as clearly disturbed as noted in the southern portion of the APE. Summary of Findings In March of 2019, New South conducted an intensive archaeological survey of the APE for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 167 on SR 1421 (R-157) in Stanly County, North Carolina. Fieldwork included the excavation of 14 shovel tests. The survey determined that there are no archaeological sites within the APE. No additional work is recommended. If the project expands and impacts subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further archaeological studies may be necessary. Samantha Taylor Archaeologist New South Associates, Inc. 'NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 3 of4 Project Tracking No.: 18-10-0038 Figure List Figure]. Location of Area of Potential Effects (APE) Figure 2. Photographs of the APE, I of 2 Figure 3. Photographs of the APE, 2 of 2 Figure 4. Shovel Test Pit Locations within APE Figure S. Photo of STP 10 Table List Table 1. Soil Types in the Area of Potential Effects (APE) Table 2. Shovel Test Data References Ayers, Harvard 1989 An Archaeological Survey of the North Stanly Sewer Project, Stanly County, North Carolina. Unpublished Manuscript. Office of State Archaeology, North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, Raleigh. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 2003 Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. Electronic document, https:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/ water-resources/planning/basin-planning/water-resource-plans/yadkin-pee-dee-2003, accessed March 20, 2019. Soil Survey Staff 2019 Web Soil Survey of Selected Area in Stanly County, North Carolina. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ® Photos ❑Correspondence Signed: , i. C. May 7, 2019 NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 4 of 4 Stanly County Figure 1. Location of Area of Potential Effects (APE) U - su ® APE riif<t/j�7 0 1,000 2,000 Feet ` 0 200 400 Meters Source: USGS New London. North Carolina Quadranale Figure 2. Photographs of the APE, 1 of 2 APE Facing Northwest APE Facing Southwest Sul i i 1�1A MM C IR Y� I a: Stanly County I7 Source: 2010 Orthoimagery Figure 4. Shovel Test Pit Locations within the APE 14 O 4 0 7 O 1 / / / I 0 1 I 1 5�1 1 1 r APE E_. O Negative Shovel Test 0 Not Excavated Immmmi APE N 0 100 200 Feet I r I r I 0 15 30 Meters Figure 5. Photograph of STP 10