20060798 Ver 1_Emails_20060830

[Fwd: Re: Fwd: Bill's Mountain -Stream Restoration] //
U
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Fwd: Bill's Mountain -Stream Restoration]
~~
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:55:34 -0400 ~ ~; ,
To: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
please add to file
Subject: Re: Fwd: Bill's Mountain -Stream Restoration
From: Kevin Barnett <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:13:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Chris:
Vista at Bill's Mountain is still loosing sediment to streams and upon my last visit, had placed
additional culverts into streams without permits.
As far as requiring a permit, The DWQ always retains the authority to require an individual
certification for activities which the Director deems necessary.
c~
This cleanup has been far too long in the process and Vista is not showing good faith efforts in that
they continue to build roads and houses in a subdivision that is a violation site.
I have no issue with the removal of sediment form the Gellar's pond as long as the actoivity does not
contrivene stream standards. Additionally, and sources of sediment which have not been stabilized
must be stabilized asap. I believe the issued 401 contained a restoration component which must be
complied with as well.
Vista should mobilize all available personnel to begi work on, and complete all soil stabilization and
stream sediment removal as quickly as possible, without violating any stream standards.
Best regards,
Kevin
1 of 2 8/30/2006 10:01 AM

[Fwd: Re: Fwd: Bill's Mountain -Stream Restoration]
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Re: Fwd: Bill's Mountain -Stream Restoration
Content-Encoding: 7bit
2 of 2 8/30/2006 10:01 AM