20060973 Ver 4_401 Application_20090809

ot,v - o c 13 V
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC p ?`f
[phone]
AUG t 5 2009
DENR. MATER C0Allffly
u?ETll?'$ AND S10RMM1AIF.R BINNCM
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE: August 25, 2009
TO: NC Division of Water Quality ATTENTION: Cyndi Karoly fl? A
RE: Birchwood Homes; DWQ Project # 06-0973
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING:
® Pre-construction Notification (PCN) ® Plans ® Maps ? Specifications
® Documents ? Other
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW
® For approval ? As requested ® For review & comment
® Please reply ? See below ® For your files
? Regular Mail ? Fed-Ex ® Delivered by KE ? Picked Up
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
1 7-24-09 $240.00 Check
5 8-24-09 Cover Letter
5 8-20-09 PCN
8-19-09 Corps 404 Permit
5 5-13-06 Agent Authorization
5 USGS Ma with property
5 Soil Survey Ma with roper line
5 7-6-09 Birchwood DWQ Application Return letter
5 4-29-09 NCEEP Acceptance Letter
5 5-3-07 Birchwood Division of Land Resources Letter of Approval
5 1-9-09 Dry Extended Detention Basin Supplement
5 1-7-09 Dry Extended Detention Basin Signed O&M Agreement
5 6-15-09 Lot 6 Wetlands Impact Ma
5 3-18-09 Draina e Area Ma w/ Impervious Area Cafes. (Sheet DA-IA)
5 4-3-09 Wetlands Impact Survey
5 2-6-06 Site Plan LS-IA
THANK YOU!
Rec'd By:
Signed ?/?" t
r
KE
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
August 24, 2009
Cyndi Karoly
DWQ 401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Birchwood Homes
Keller Environmental Job No. 0732
DWQ Project # 06-0973
Nashville, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of MAEVCO, LLC, thank you for assistance from your office. We are
pleased to submit the following project to you for DWQ 401 after-the-fact approval using
Nationwide Permits (NWP) 18 and 29 for these non-riparian wetland impacts. Birchwood
Homes is an 18-lot residential subdivision in southern Nashville, North Carolina.
Jurisdictional Impacts:
Impacts associated with this constructed project are to jurisdictional wetlands. NWP
18 will be used for the detention pond wetland impact (0.028-acre) on Lot 36. NWP 29 will
be used for the remaining lot and road wetland impacts. Mitigation for the 0.243-acre
wetland impacts will be provided by the NCEEP in-lieu fee mitigation program. The majority
of the impacts are associated with Par Drive and four adjacent lots. The proposed path of
Par Drive will provide access to this property from Golfers Lane. Upon Par Drive entering the
property, the road was immediately curved to the east to avoid the western wetland areas.
The stormwater pond on Lot 36 was strategically placed to avoid the western wetland areas
and large ditch while discharging to this adjacent ditch. The pond was also placed in an area
where the pre-existing flow discharged. As outlined in our previous meetings and
discussions, it is our understanding that the impacted wetlands conducted and proposed will
be allowed to remain.
Stormwater Detention & Treatment:
The existing dry detention basin was designed according to the Town of Nashville Pre-
and Post-Development stormwater control. This includes the 2- and 10-year storms. It is our
understanding that no modifications to this existing pond will be requested per previous
communications. Please also refer to the attached Dry Detention Extended Basin Worksheet,
Checklist, and signed Operation & Maintenance Agreement. The May 3, 2007 Division of Land
Resources Approval Letter is also attached for your files.
R
DWQ 401 Authorization
Birchwood Homes
August 24, 2009
Page 2 of 2
While under construction, temporary, custom sedimentation basins will be installed
outside of the wetland areas to protect them against sedimentation along with other appropriate
sedimentation and erosion control measures in compliance with Town of Nashville, Nash
County, & NC Sedimentation and Erosion Control requirements.
Future Project Plans & Cumulative Impacts:
Future Development of the western half of this site is anticipated. However, given current
economic conditions, no reasonable timeframe has been currently established. As a part of the
initial phase of development, improvements were made to an existing ditch along the southern
property line. These improvements have facilitated improved drainage of the entire site.
Additionally, the original approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for the site expired earlier this
year. Therefore, in order to accurately determine future potential impacts, as well as, avoidance
and minimization, a new JD will be provided prior to future development per the approved August
19, 2009 404 permit. This coupled with overall site drainage improvements with the initial
development, a conditional approval of the 401 permit application is appropriate, with any future
impacts to wetlands considered cumulative as also set forth in the 404 permit.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. We have attached several items to the
attached PCN to assist your staff's review of the project. If you should have questions or require
additional clarification please feel free to contact me at 844-7437 (office), 749-8259 (cell) or
email: [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Keller Environmental, LLC

Jay Keller
Principal
Cc: Brent Niemann, P.E.
Olo- 0 R13
0F W A TF9pG
T.
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information &! PA
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 & 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Birchwood
2b. County: Nash
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Nashville
2d. Subdivision name: Birchwood
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Maevco Development LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 2122; 645
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Claude Mayo
3d. Street address: 3051 Sunset Avenue
3e. City, state, zip: Rocky Mount, NC 27804
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ® Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jay Keller
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Keller Environmental LLC
5c. Street address: 7921 Haymarket Lane
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27615
5e. Telephone no.: 919-844-7437
5f. Fax no.: 919-844-7438
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 380016947624
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.958595 Longitude: -77.952305
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 11.20 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Sapony Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV: NSW
2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Mostly forested tract with 2 existing roads and infrastructure. A dry detention pond exists in the southwest property
corner.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
0 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed and existing impacts to the wetland areas are necessary to complete the subdivision, thus sustaining the
development of the residential areas.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
18 residential lots and one BMP lot are proposed for Birchwood Subdivision. The existing and proposed impacts to the
wetland areas are associated with one road, stormwater structure, and 3 lots. Equipment used included trackhoes,
bulldozers, and other land grading equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Keller Environmental
Name (if known): Jay Keller Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
June 6, 2007
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Include the Corps Action ID Number, DWQ Project
Number, application date, and dates permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide copies of
previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information.
Corps Action ID #200420354; DWQ Project #06-0973; please refer to the attached correspondence.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
Future Development of the western half of this site is anticipated. However, given current economic conditions, no
reasonable timeframe has been currently established. As a part of the initial phase of development, improvements were
made to an existing ditch along the southern property line. These improvements have facilitated improved drainage of
the entire site. Additionally, the original approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for the site expired earlier this year.
Therefore, in order to accurately determine future potential impacts, as well as, avoidance and minimization, a new JD will
be provided prior to future development per the approved August 19, 2009 404 permit. This coupled with overall site
drainage improvements with the initial development, a conditional approval of the 401 permit application is appropriate,
with any future impacts to wetlands considered cumulative as also set forth in the 404 permit.
Page 4 of 11
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T

Lot 6 ®P ? T Land Clearing /
Fill
Headwater ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.028
Lot 8 ®P ? T Land Clearing Headwater ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.017
Lot 9 ® P ? T Land Clearing Headwater ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.000 (10 SF)

Lot 23 ®P ? T Land Clearing /
Fill
Headwater ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ
0.020
Lot 36 ®P ? T Land Clearing,
Fill, Excavation
Headwater
[] Nos
? CDWQ
0.028

Rdway ®P ? T Land Clearing /
Fill
Headwater ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ
0.150
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.243
2h. Comments: Impacted wetlands include Lots 8, 9, and 36; and roadway. NWP 18 will be used for detention pond
impacts (0.028-acre) on Lot 36.

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER
? INT ? Corps
? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER
? INT ? Corps
? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER
? INT ? Corps
? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DW(G)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed path of Par Drive will provide access to this property from Golfers Lane. Upon Par Drive entering the
property, the road was immediately curved to the east to avoid the western wetland areas. The stormwater pond on Lot
36 was strategically placed to avoid the western wetland areas and large ditch while discharging to this adjacent ditch.
The pond was also placed in an area where the pre-existing flow discharged.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Sediment fence and numerous check dams were placed in the roadside swales and large southern ditch to protect
downstream water quality. Minimal grading was conducted in the pre-existing ditch in front of Lots 8 &9 and the access
area to Golfers Lane. Large logging mats were used during the initial clearing and grading to avoid additional wetland
impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

project? ? Mitigation bank

®Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.243 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.

Comments: Yes
? ? No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 17.9%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Total acreage: 11.20 acres. Impervious
areas: pre-existing-0; proposed- 2.00 acres. Proposed impervious areas include 0.76 acres of roads and 1.24 acres of
houses and driveways.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Town of Nashville
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ® NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ® Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWO Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ® Yes ? No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The April 18, 2007
Notice of Violation stated that approximately 12,000 square feet of wetlands and 765 linear feet of intermittent stream channel
were impacted. After subsequent site visits with Mike Horan (DWQ), Thomas Brown (COE), & Jean Manuele (COE) and
other involved parties on May 17, 2007, June 6, 2007, and thereafter, it was determined that southern drainageway was an
ephemeral non-jurisdictional ditch. Also, the road and adjacent areas impacts along with the stormwater pond area was
determined to be approximately 0.195 acres. Attempts to minimize wetland impacts to less than 1/10`h acre were conducted
while the jurisdictional determination was on-hold due to the Rapanos Supreme Court isolated wetlands moratorium.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ® Yes ? No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Future Development of the western half of this site is anticipated. However, given current economic conditions, no
reasonable timeframe has been currently established. As a part of the initial phase of development, improvements were
made to an existing ditch along the southern property line. These improvements have facilitated improved drainage of
the entire site. Additionally, the original approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for the site expired earlier this year.
Therefore, in order to accurately determine future potential impacts, as well as, avoidance and minimization, a new JD will
be provided prior to future development per the approved August 19, 2009 404 permit. This coupled with overall site
drainage improvements with the initial development, a conditional approval of the 401 permit application is appropriate,
with any future impacts to wetlands considered cumulative as also set forth in the 404 permit.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
To the Town of Nashville WWTP.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
F-1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS and NC Natural Heritage Databases and Maps were consulted. No endangered species or designated critical
habitat impacts are anticipated.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage and South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS Databases and Maps.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office Databases and Maps.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The surveyor confirmed that the project is not in a
FEMA floodplain area.
Jay Keller 8-20-2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 11 of 11
June 5, 2006
TO,
FROM:
Keller Environmental, LLC
124 Waiters Way
You gsville, NC 27596
C:laul a Mayo
PO l ox 1238
RocWy Mount, MCA 27802
Cla1 de Mayo._ -_, as a representative concerning the property on
South lVC 58 , do hereby authorize and give permission for Keller Environmental to
represent or act as, agent on our behalf and allow the COE or any other regulatory agency to
go on the property with a Keller Environmental representative for such purposes as necessary
to perform the job tasks.
i_
Mr. Claude Mayo Date
PO Box 9238
Rocky Mount, NC 27842
i
w
1
t
j
i
i
t r
I.J.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMTNGTON DISTR.IC'I'
Action ID. 200901557 County: Nash USGS Quad: Nashville
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VEIRIFICATiON
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Maeveo Development I,LC
Address: Claude.Mavo
3051 Sunset Avenue
RRoocli€V i1'lount, NC 27804
Telephone No.:
Sire axed location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The property is located North of jLwy a8,
south of Golfers Lane southeast of Nashville Nash County, .NC.
Description of projects area and activity: This after the fact permit authorizes the use of Nationwide_ grmit A8 for
iim pacts to 0,028 acre of wetland associated with a detention pond. This oerntit also authorizes the use of
Nationwide permit 29 for impacts to 0.215 acre of wetland associated with subdivision roads, and lot fill. Anv
Ntitre impacts to wetlands associated with this site will be consitered cuniulative with this permit and will reMaire
a new Jurrisdictional Delineation. A.ny deviation from the permit conditions could result in an. administrative
iwnalty, PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PERMIT SP1j UAL CONDITIONS.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Cleary Water .Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Covers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 1, 8,29
Your work is authorized by the above referenced hermit provided it is a.cconiplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation. of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work. order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below uriless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide pertrut. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to co.rmmence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of t:he date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on. a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management. .
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Thomas Brown at 919-554-4884 x22.
Corps Regulatory Of'ficialG?-?' Date: 08/19l2009
r.....__.
Expiration Date of Verification: 08/19/2oi l
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level. of support to the public. To help its ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit ,Mittp;.i!u_w??_ SatyTusace.arrr?v.mi.l/??'I? I'I,,t?tii.) i!irrdcx?l?tml to
complete the survey online, __-
Page 1 of 2
V r
Determination of Jurisdiction:
? fused on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program. Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
? There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
noti.f ication.
Z There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act ((.,W:1)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed. five years from the date of this notification.
? "Ibe jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued Action 1D
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 C.FR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form, If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed. RFA. form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wiltn.ington Regulatory Division
Attn:Thomas Brown, Project Manager,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 1- Ieritage'I'rade Drive, Suite 105
Wale Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an R:FA to be accepted by the Corns, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 11/09/09.
**It is not necessay to submit an RF ..:orm to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory
Date 08/19/2009 '-----lsxpiratioti Date 0$/1.912014
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WE'T'LAND DELINEATION I ORM.S, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Fumished:
Keller E?nvirontnental
7921 Haymarket Lane
Raleigh, NC 27615
Page 2 of 2
t f +
Action ID:. 200901557 Counties: Nash
SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS
Requiring payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program-
You shall. mitigate at a. 1:1 ratio for 0_243 acres of unavoidable impacts to wetlands
associated with AID 200901557 by payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem.
Enhancement Program (NCE P) in the amount necessary to perform restoration to 4.243
acres of non-riparian wetland in the Neuse River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020201).
Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the
perirrittee has made full payment with certified. check to the WEEP, and the NCEEP has
made written conlirmation to the District Commander, that it agrees to accept
responsibility for the mitigation work required, pursuant to paragrapl-i 1V.D. of the
Memorandum of Understanding between the North Carolina Department of l=3nvironment
and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Willriington District,
Dated November 4, 1.998.
. >
Action ID Number: 200901557 County :Nash
Permittee: iMaey o I. evel2ppnn.ent
Date Verification Issued: 8114!09
Project Manager: Thomas-Brown
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
I:,S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
POST OFFICE BOY 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1.890
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation,
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in.
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date
r y
NOTTICATION.QF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FC)R APPEAL '
ApLlicant Nlaeveo.Develo ent (I ile Number. 200901557 _ - Date 8/19/01
--
At tached is: See Section below
E INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A.

_ . crrn s iozt)
PROFFERED PERMIT Stan ard. Permit or Letter of'Lermissiott)
PERMIT DENIAL
_ ?- .----..._. -.-__
-- --
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
_
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
I ecision. Additional information. may be found at http?//www.us tce_arr7rY.mit/i.net/fitnctioiis/ew/cecwo/rte or
Corns regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
« ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final.
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission. (LOP), you inay accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the. Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly, You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within. 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and tray: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) .modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section :E3 below.
F3: PROFFERED PERMIT: You. may accept or appeal the permit
® ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of'Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its ternis and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
m APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative: Appeal. Process by completing Section If of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form most be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under th.e Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.

D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
4 ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved J:D. Failu.re to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all. rights to appeal the approved JD.
4 APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD tinder the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section li of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form trust be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRDLIMINAR.Y JURISDICTIONAL DETI:R.MINAT'ION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the prelitninaiy JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish., you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to :reevaluate the JD.
SECTION I.I. - REQUEST FOR. APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where you reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
--
AI)Di'TIONA.L INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandam for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR IINFOIWATI_ON:
I:fyou have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact: may also contact:
Thomas Brown Mr. !Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
919-554-4884 x22 C:ISAD-E T-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M.15
Atlanta, Geort~ia :10303-8801
RIGHT OF l '?1'1 RY: Youx signature below grants, the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a IS day notice of any site investigation, and will. have the opportunity to participate in all site
--• --- ___
in.vesti&catioris. __ _ ------ --- ---`_.__.-.__ -
-
ate: elephon.e number:
Bate:
Signature of.' appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved ;Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, AttwThoutas Brown, Project Manager, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, 3331 f-.leritage'rrade Dr, Suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
• L
For Permit denials and Proffered Perynits send this form to;
Division Engineer, Commander, U .S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr.. Mike .Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CE SAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9MI5, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801
f"'-'1 Mit N'c.* ¦: WO 1KUU113-1 Damn WGI3.4
LLI
GrC
�
U dr
wh !, C
NOB
BOBNashville C,cB
'S;` i f 3o B
t .
NuB d . U(j
N { i E3
1 Ra
NuD u�
NuB Ra 806
i'J J fiEll
NuB S YS rEM
Ra N u B , BSB
Bb Bb
Ra r�
NuB NrB u� NoB BoB
- BoB
INc)B
NuB Z w,,.E
� � r
BOB Ra
�. BaB - --.--
Ob — ---
� Ud
4 U F � (t � ''11
�C1
/ Noq Nok NdC
I,
c
No B �."
NuB i NaC
Ra i ` Ra 606 �3
Ra
BoR ! t� N 08
L NaC
Z NoB
NoB oA ` �" Fab C
w I }
,j NOES Noi3
N�iC; NrB G I NrBA

Jul. 9. 2009 11:45AM century 21 _ the combs co. No. 5259 P. 2
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resourc s
Division of Wafer Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 6, 2009
DWQ Project # 06-0973, Ver. 3
Nash County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Claude Mayo
Maeveo Development, LLC
3051 Sunset Avenue
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Subject Property: Birchwood - AFTER-THE-FACT
Ut to Sapony Creek [030302,28-55-(5.5), WSIV,.NSW]
RETURN OF APPLICATION
Dear Mr. Mayo:
On January 13, 2009, the Division of Water Quality (DW'Q) received your After-The-Fact application dated
January 12, 2009, to fill or otherwise impact 0.293 acres of 404/wetland, and 0.00 square feet of zone 1
Tar-Pamlico River basin protected riparian buffer, and 0.00 square feet of Zone 2 Tar-Pamlico River basin
protected riparian buffer, to construct th; proposed residential development at the site. On February 20,
2009; March 24, 2009, June 4, 2009, and June 17, 2009; the DWQ reeeived'additional information from
you, -however, the DWQ has determined that your application remains incomplete and/or provided
inaccurate information as discussed below. On Jun 4, 2009, the DWQ received your response to our April
24, 2009, "Request For More Information" correspondence. You did not respond to the following requests
(restated below) from that correspondence.
1. Are there plans to develop the remaining areas of the site that do not show lot lines on the
submitted plans?
2. The stub for Preston Drive on the adjacent property provides access to the west side of the
Birchwood Homes sites. Please provide the final site plan for the west side of the development
along with any proposed wetland impacts.
For these reasons your permit application is hereby considered returned. Once you have redesigned
your project to address the problems and inadequacies with your application as it was submitted, you will
need to reapply for DWQ approval. This includes submitting a complete application package with the
appropriate fee.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clear Water Act for this activity
and any work done within waters of the state would be a violation-of North Carolina General Statutes and
Administrative. Code. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have
any questions or concerns.
4010versighl/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., RalaUh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 919:733-17661 FAX: [phone]
Internet; hdpJm2o.enr.siale.no.uslncweUands/
NorthCarohna
'Naturally
An Equal oppodunily 1AIGrmsfive Action Employer
Ecosystem
PROGRAM
April 29, 2009
David Combs
Maevco Development
3051 Sunset Avenue
Rocky Mount 27804
Project: Birchwood
Expiration of Acceptance: January 29, 2010
County: Nash
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must also comply with all other state federal or local
government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including SL 2008-152• An Act to Promote
Compensatory Mitigation b Private Mitigation Banks.
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impact Tar-Pamlico 03020101 0 0 0 0 0.243 0 0 0
Credits Tar-Pamlico 03020101 0 0 0 0 0.243 0
1
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone] or Kelly Williams at
[phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Thomas Brown, USACE-Raleigh
Tan McMillan, NCDWQ- Wetlands/401 Unit
Jay Keller, agent
File
Resto?u?t?... E "A"... Prot" du,r.Mute
_47A
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 91 9-71 5-0476 / www.nceep.net
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LETTER OF APPROVAL
May 3, 2007
David Combs
3051 Sunser Avenue
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
RE: Project Name: Birchwood Subdivision Section 7
County: Nash
Submitted by: Joyner, Kenny & Associates
20Q1 Date Received: April 17, 2007
w? ® Date Processing Initiated: April 17, 2007
'Is V" Watershed: Tar-Pamlico #1/03-03-02
New Submittal ( ) Revised (X)
Dear Mr. Combs:
This office has reviewed the subject Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. We find
the plan to be acceptable and hereby issue this letter of approval. If any modifications,
performance reservations, or recommendations are applicable, a list is enclosed and is
incorporated as a part of this letter of approval. The enclosed Certificate of Approval should be
posted at the job site. In addition, it should be noted that this plan approval shall expire three (3)
years following the date of approval, if no land-disturbing activity has been undertaken, in
accordance with Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 46.0029.
If any modifications are not incorporated into the plan and implemented in the field, the
site will be in violation of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina
General Statute (NCGS), 113A-61.1).
15A NCAC 4B.0018(a) requires that a copy of the approved plan be on file at the job site.
Also, this letter gives the notice required by NCGS 113A-61.1(a) concerning our right to perform
periodic inspections to ensure compliance with the approved plan.
North Carolina's sedimentation pollution control program is performance oriented,
requiring protection of the natural resources and adjoining properties. If at any time during this
project it is determined that the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan is inadequate to meet
the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (NCGS 113A-51 through
66), this office may require revisions in the plan and its implementation to ensure compliance
with the Act.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
David Combs
May 3, 2007
Page 2
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with
applicable federal and state water quality laws, regulations and rules. This could include the
Division of Water Quality under stormwater or other specific water quality standards, and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Article 404 jurisdiction. Our approval does not supersede
any other required permit or approval.
Since this project disturbs one or more acres, one such approval relates to the
stormwater that will discharge from your project. This runoff is permitted pursuant to the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) administered in North Carolina by the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Attached is the General Stormwater NPDES Permit,
NCG010000, as revised October 1, 2001, covering your activity. You are responsible for
complying with the General Permit requirements and.are subject to enforcement by DWQ for
any violations of the General Permit.
Due to the location of this project, it should be noted that a rule to protect and maintain
existing buffers along watercourses in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin became effective on January
1, 2000. The Tar-Pamlico River Riparian Area Protection and Maintenance Rule (15A NCAC 2B
.0259) applies to all perennial and intermittent streams, lakes, ponds and estuaries in the Neuse
River Basin with existing vegetation on the adjacent land or "riparian area". In riparian areas
with existing vegetation in the first 30 feet directly adjacent to the stream, the rule prohibits land
disturbance or new development within the first 30 feet of land next to the water (the remaining
20 feet of the total buffer must be revegetated upon completion of any proposed land-disturbing
activity). In riparian areas with existing vegetation that is less than 30 feet wide, the rule
prohibits land disturbance or new development within the area that contains the existing
vegetation (but not the entire 50 foot riparian area). For more information about this riparian
area rule, please contact the Division of Water Quality's Wetland/401 Unit at 919-733-1786, or a
Division of Water Quality representative at this regional office.
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information
provided concerning financial responsibility. You are requested to file an amended Financial
Responsibility Form if any changes become necessary. In addition, it would be helpful if you
would notify this office when the proposed land-disturbing activity covered by this plan is
initiated.
Your cooperation is appreciated and we look forward to working with you on this project.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely, _
Karyn Pageau, EIT, CPESC
Asst. Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
KP:clm
cc: Nils W. Joyner, Jr., PLS, Joyner, Kenny & Associates
Chuck Wakild, Division of Water Quality
David Combs
May 3, 2007
Page 3
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME: Birchwood S/D Sec 7
LOCATION: Nash-2007-007 DATE RECEIVED: April 17, 2007
REVIEWED BY: JW
New Submittal() Revised (X) Approved (X) Disapproved ()
Reasons for Disapproval () Modifications (X) Performance Reservations ()
1) Provide revised mulch rate at 2 tons/acre on drawings.
2) Provide vegetative stabilization timetable on the drawings such as, Disturbed
areas left inactive between any phase of grading shall be temporary seeded
within 15 working days or 30 calendar days, whichever is shorter. Provisions for
permanent ground cover must be accomplished on exposed slopes 21 calendar
days, and in remaining areas within 15 working days or 90 calendars days,
whichever is shorter."
3) Provide 1 copy of drawings revised as result of requested changes to this office
by June 5, 2007 or prior to construction beginning, whichever is sooner.
RECOMMENDATIONS ANWOR COMMENTS:
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
Permit N

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
DRY EXTENDED DETENTION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part Ill) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all the required information.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project name
Contact person
Phone number
Date
Drainage area number
11. DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
Impervious area
% Impervious
Design rainfall depth
Peak Flow Calculations
Is pre/post control of the 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow required?
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
Rational C, pre-development
Rational C, post-development
Rainfall intensity: 1-yr, 24-hr storm
Pre-development 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow
Post-development 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow
Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peak control
Storage Volume: Non-SR Waters
Design volume
Sediment storage volume provided
Storage Volume: SR Waters
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
Pre-development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
Post-development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
Basin Design Parameters
Drawdown time
SHWT elevation
Basin bottom elevation
Storage elevation
Basin side slopes
Top elevation
Freeboard provided
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
Basin width
Length to width ratio
Additional Information
Total runoff volume captured by basin
Forebay provided
Is basin in a recorded drainage easement?
Does basin capture all runoff at ultimate build-out?
Is a sediment depth indicator included?
Does the basin include a drain?
Birchwood Subdivision - Section 7
Joyner Keeny, PLLC (Brent Niemann, PE)
252.977.3124
1/9/2009
Dry Detention Basin #1
1,537,668.00 ft2
226,037.20 ft2
0.15
2410-Yr Storm in
N (Y or N)
N/A in
0.3 (unitless)
0.3 (unitless)
N/A in/hr
N/A ft3/sec
N/A ft3/sec
#VALUE! ft3/sec
8,956 ft3
N/A ft3 OK
N/A in
N/A ft3
N/A ft3
N/A days Drawdown is too long, 5 day maximum time allowed
N/A fmsl
179.93 fmsl #VALUE!
183.00 fmsl
3 :1 OK
184.93 fmsl OK
1.82 ft OK

68 ft
23 ft
3 1 OK

2.47 ac-in Forebay is not required
N (Y or N)
Y (Y or N) OK
Y (Y or N) OK
N (Y or N) A sediment depth indicator must be included.
Y (Y or N) 0K
(to be provided by DWQ)
? K?F WATfi?, pr
O
o
Form SW401-Dry Extended Detention Basin-Rev. 1 Parts I. & II. Design Summary, Page 1 of 1
Permit
(to be provided by DWQ)
Ill, : ?' UigD TFgS G v
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
Initial Sheet No.
"
'
1. Plans (1
- 50
or larger) of the entire site showing:
- Design at ultimate build-out,
- Off-site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
- Basin dimensions,
- Pretreatment system,
- High flow bypass system,
- Maintenance access,
- Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
- Overflow device, and
- Boundaries of drainage easement.
t
N 2. Plan details (1" = 30' or larger) for the bioretention cell showing:
Basin dimensions
- Pretreatment system,
- High flow bypass system,
- Maintenance access,
- Outlet structure,
- Overflow device,
- Flow distribution detail for basin inflow, and
-Vegetation specifications.
"
'
3. Section view of the dry detention basin (1
= 20
or larger) showing:
- Side slopes, 3:1 or lower,
- Pretreatment and treatment areas, and

p+ -Inlet and outlet structures.
4. An assurance that the installed system will meet design specifications upon initial operation once the
??PrnWeV project is complete and the entire drainage area is stabilized.
P4*Y7 5. A construction sequence that shows how the dry detention basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
l1 ok
6. The supporting calculations.
rr '5040 7. A copy of the signed and notarized inspection and maintenance (I&M) agreement.
8. A copy of the deed restriction.
Form 5W401-Dry Extended Detention Basin-Rev. 1 Part III. Required Items Checklist, Page 1 of 1
Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number:
Dry Extended Detention Basin
Operation and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP.
The dry extended detention basin system is defined as the dry detention basin, outlet
structure, pretreatment including forebays and the vegetated filter if one is provided.
This system (check one):
? does ® does not
This system (check one):
? does ® does not
incorporate a vegetated filter at the outlet.
incorporate pretreatment other than a forebay.
Important maintenance procedures:
- The drainage area will be managed to reduce the sediment load to the dry
extended detention basin.
- Immediately after the dry extended detention basin is established, the vegetation
will be watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established
(commonly six weeks).
- No portion of the dry extended detention pond will be fertilized after the first
initial fertilization that is required to establish the vegetation.
- I will maintain the vegetation in and around the basin at a height of
approximately six inches.
- Once a year, a dam safety expert will inspect the embankment.
After the dry extended detention basin is established, it will be inspected once a quarter
and within 24 hours after every storm event greater than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in
a Coastal County). Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set
location and will be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element: Potential problem: How I will remediate the problem:
The entire BMP Trash/ debris is resent. Remove the trash debris.
The perimeter of the dry Areas of bare soil and/or Regrade the soil if necessary to
extended detention erosive gullies have formed. remove the gully, and then plant a
basin ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide lime and a
one-time fertilizer application.
Form SW401-Dry Detention O&M-Rev.3 Page 1 of 4
BMP element: Potential problem: How I will remediate the problem:
The inlet device: pipe or The pipe is clogged (if Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the
swale applicable), sediment off-site.
The pipe is cracked or Replace the pipe.
otherwise damaged (if
applicable).
Erosion is occurring in the Regrade the swale if necessary to
swale (if applicable). smooth it over and provide erosion
control devices such as reinforced
turf matting or riprap to avoid
future roblems with erosion.
The forebay Sediment has accumulated Search for the source of the
and reduced the depth to 75% sediment and remedy the problem if
of the original design depth possible. Remove the sediment and
(see diagram below). dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BMP.
Erosion has occurred or Provide additional erosion
riprap is displaced. protection such as reinforced turf
matting or riprap if needed to
prevent future erosion problems.
Weeds are present. Remove the weeds, preferably by
hand. If pesticides are used, wipe
them on the plants rather than
spraying.
The main treatment area Sediment has accumulated Search for the source of the
and reduced the depth to 75% sediment and remedy the problem if
of the original design depth possible. Remove the sediment and
(see diagram below). dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BMP. Revegetate disturbed
areas immediately with sod
(preferred) or seed protected with
securely staked erosion mat.
Wa
standing more than Check outlet structure for clogging.
=
5 dm event. If it is a design issue, consult an
appropriate professional.
Weeds and noxious plants are Remove the plants by hand or by
growing in the main wiping them with pesticide (do not
treatment area. spray).
Form SW40I-Dry Detention O&M-Rev. 3 Page 2 of 4
BMP element: Potential problem: How I will remediate the problem:
The embankment Shrubs or trees have started Remove shrubs or trees
to row on the embankment. immediately.
Grass cover is unhealthy or Restore the health of the grass cover
eroding. - consult a professional if necessary.
Signs of seepage on the Consult a professional.
downstream face.
Evidence of muskrat or Use traps to remove muskrats and
beaver activity is present. consult a professional to remove
beavers.
An annual inspection by an Make all needed repairs.
appropriate professional
shows that the embankment
needs repair.
The outlet device Clogging has occurred. Clean out the outlet device. Dispose
of the sediment off-site.
The outlet device is damaged Repair or replace the outlet device.
The receiving water Erosion or other signs of Contact the NC Division of Water
damage have occurred at the Quality 401 Oversight Unit at 919-
outlet. 733-1786.
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will
give an accurate depth reading and not readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
When the basin depth reads 180.7 feet in the main pond, the sediment shall be removed.
When the basin depth reads N LA feet in the forebay, the sediment shall be removed.
BASIN DIAGRAM
(fill in the blanks)
Temporary Pool Elevation 183.0
Sediment Removal EN N/A
----------
Bottom Elevatio N/A
Te nporar?
- -/Volume
25%
Sediment
Storage
Pool
-----Sediment Removal Elevation- 180.7----------- Volume
FOREBAY
Bottom Elevation 179.93 125% Vediment
MAIN POND
Form SW401-Dry Detention O&M-Rev. 3 Page 3 of 4
Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Project name: Birchwood Subdivision - Section 7
BMP drainage area number: Dry Detention Basin #I
Print name:Maevco, LLC - David Combs
Title: Partner
Address: 3051 Sunset Avenue, Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Phone: [phone]
Signature:
Date: //1/p
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
1, -Doreer" 9 , a Notary Public for the State of
/?d,elch ?rGlirl i9 , County of AIA:5,4 , do hereby certify that
(?14t/?,D G!?• Ca»?hS personally appeared before me this
day of Galumtl GUI , and acknowledge the due execution of the
forgoing dry detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official
seal,
15 EN J. WAMBOL
NOTARY PUBLIC
NA H COUNTY :C..
SEAL
My commission expires 5b2l_'Zoi0
Form SW401-Dry Detention O&M-Rev.3 Page 4 of 4

U g
-J
J v
z
yV t-= 1

Aj,
R LLJ
0- 9
1
w - ut
w o

49
w ?
d
? o

ti'o g
?+ Q

Llj T T T &
. \ 4 T T T
a T T T
c T
a T T
a T T
/ T T
T T
T
I T T
? T
/ l
.09 t T T
T

T T T
/ ----' `? N z T T

s
) T T
oo

T
°' 1 ?
a

v,
?
z QQ
J
Q
Op

?
T Zw0
?m0
$

x II
v
w T ? d ?
T
•? a O
?- vi
T O §
T
g

~ ~ ~
BIRCHWOOD PARK ~ P ! ~ ; ~ I
o I ~ i
, ~ ~
° GOLFERS LANE
0 0 m
® G~~
PRESTWICK ~ DR. > , • , ~n
5~ ,
~ H. ~,R s® c i r y
sT Grh y~,
~R s~ F~ r
NOT TO SCA!_E
VI~"I1~VI
tt
, e
1 Z00 300 ~ 100 0 00 ory ~ a J N .'i ,
T
vi'. r 4~' . 1 ~ , LL ~ / ~ Q N
~ V ~ N
s r ca e ~ Q_ ~
r r ` r N
r r , • 4
/ ? . , ,t
. , ~
. `T 1 _ r ,
T MP = 41.086 ac r` 1 i i TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA 0 B r / / ` ~ r e o= ~ ~ ~
(ON- ~ OFF-SITE AREAS) r I r , •
r , ~ r I r / ( _ r ,
T TAL SITE AREA 18 LOTS & COS = 20.880 AC ' / r I ON-SITE TO BMP 15.813 AC ~ I
ON-SITE BYPASS BMP = 5.067 AC / r / I \ ,
l r r l - 1 l r I ~ ® N
ASPHALT ROADS = 0.710 AC r ~ 1 r r
DRIVE APPROACHES IN R 0.052 AC ~ - r l 1 r ~ Y , f r I I I ~ I I r ~ ~
DRIVEWAYS 14 LOTS = 0.386 AC - r r 1 ( NOISES 14 LOT~,~ = 0.579 AC r$ , ~ / I ) ~ z M.. , S ~~'~~'e I r
1 g a TOTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS TO BMP 1.727 AC r ~:y~ r b<., ~ r y~ 1 ~,,,y,, I I ~ I r ~T~ °~t-~ I ~ I ~ c
is' M / • ON-SITE AREA PERCENT IMPERVIOUS TO BMP (1,727/95.813 AC) = 10.9 / / I I z I I ~ ° ~ ~ r j~
1 / r : ' r 1 1 ~ r.. ; ' I 1, _ l 1 I I 1... 1
N- IT I P I Y-P T I =..1 I r I r= ~ r
ASPHALT ROAD5 _ 0.000 AC - ~ r / I 1 r DRIVE APPROACHES IN R W _ .0.000 AC 1 r r . 1 ' / . II ~ r 2 1 lr I
DRIVEWAYS (4 LOTS) = 0.110 AC r 1 r I I \I` l /
/ / e TOTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS TO BMP = 0.275 AC I ~ °~v
, ~5z, l ! I ` _ F 1 tr
~r 1 ON-SITE AREA PERCENT IMPERVIOUS BY-PASS (0.275/5.067 AC) = 5.4% ; ,l. t, / / l r I p` \ "~~~~a 1 I r
r 3 r =3y; l / / ' / I ~ I l ! , . a I I r -
r 1 ~ ' t TOTAL ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA L727~F0.275 AC =.2.002 AC I / r ~ F : > l„,. C ) . 1 ~ f I
TOTAL ON-SITE PERCENT IMPERVIOUS (2.002/20.880 AC) 9.6~ , i ! / 1 / ~ I I p y l I ~ I I r '~-r`` I ~ 11 1 , ~ I 1 I
:x TOTAL AREA OF OEVEIOPED LOTS ~t R/W 11.202 AC / ~
k ~ r , TOTAL PERCENT IMPERVIOUS OF DEVELOPED AREA (2.002/91.202 AC) = 17.9 } , k +}Nr % .t , r /
z Aiy, i PROPERTY Iz _ Ir i ` I I , _ • I BOUNDARY 1 7 I I
; , i ~ \p ` LAM • f . t r ~ (nP) , ~ ~ . II ~ I .".,Q, /
. ~ ~ ~ ~ e r I I I l • Y r ~ ~0
,r ; I I f ~F: I DATE 0 _ . _
/ \ ~ qq 't( i xAS MAO ~ MARCH 1 2009 ~~,MF> $ I j t~ I 8,
~ / r5 S` way,.. w..€ PROPERTY ~ ~9 ° <s ~ ~ r _ _
BOUNDARY ~ ~ ( ~~H~ ti F , f ~ ,.I SCALE -
t f- . 4 t ~ r ~ . ~ a ~ ~ ~ . r ~ ~r 1 " - 100 Feet ~w ~ ~ r
Y' 6 k ®A A . y S 6 ~ ~""R fi ' l~ ~ r ~ ~ - DRAWN BY ' ' ~ r
Y ~ -PA ~ ~ M~ 11 - ~~,r ~ g 12 r va r BTN ~p t~
, f S 9 ' a L ~
~,y < ~ A ®41 AC e ` t r J B O 03868
s. b :'s' R ~ ,M,e"' ' ~ ~ ®TAL T® ~ ; . fT D • r• ~ , .
.x . ...:N~: 3 ~ : ~t ~ ~ r ,
~ - 4` g $ RAW ~ 1 ~ f3 \ ~ • ~
i S f 020386 chwood DA w F Aw f 1 • " , F s .
~ i r° " s w. a P.', `"itro n
;'@. fi j e`we'. to r , r.
7~ ~ / f a'i~ / / a>R~ iS 1 II
rl i Nk ~ p.M M,M / /f p}M,W i~ q.M,Hnr`~ ~P
R ~''."°~•H PROPERTY ~
~ ~ li 43 ~4 c 15 80UNDARY I ~
23 (m') 3 ~ ~ I1 ~
F, ? / 1 L ,f rl ~ ~ 9.dJ -
- -
~ ~ s' v 3 ° FI D G ~ ~ EL FIELD N 16 _ . ~ i ~
F t' DRAINAGE AREA "vw ~r ~x R ~ TOPO 7~- u__ ( .ON-SITE i ~
P ~ . ~ ~ '.y ' ~ ~ ONLY} ~ t ~ 5
~ ~ ~ a, tt , i E x t3,. s ' s,
`M<r~'f $A3 ~ R e~ti iyy C
v,R .V: ~ 5Y
z"?. x.s z~ G a i ~
3 s t ' f~ 17 ~ ~ ~ ~ F~~ NASH COUNTY ~ I ~ ~ /1
~ ~ - r y( s~ `
, t3~ rc < < t 1 r~,, OFF SI
X~ ..p A n a~. 20 . ~ ' six. r F ~ ,a - - aw> v1 Oztn
' r ®A ) , ~
, ~ e z ; = 18 ~ .i'. e
/ i'. ~ ,
i ~f~'• - . _ , ~ ~ t ~ r,
i ~ ~ '
~ , _ t. PROPERTY'". 1. ~ y ®A ®4429 AC , ~ i
BOUNDARY (TYP) -PA39) ~ , ~ ® ` r ,
I ' l + • / ' 777 J4APlD LAAIN~INyC & SURVEYING

I ~ ~ / ~ r P,O. 60X 7538, 209 N, PE4RL ST. ROCKY MOUNP, N.C. 27804
I I ~ [phone] VOICE ~ (252j 985-6026 FAX
a , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~~,
I ~ - ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @~e~ &6~OBtp~B®8 - i ~ Can
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ! i~
~ ~ , U ~ ~ I ~
3 j~ \ < ~ , a
o
~ ' n
p
i_ \ ~
/ I r ~ ~ , / ~ ~ ~ 'aa BpeBIBl917'`J~ ^ \ /
/ / ~ DA-1 A
v N

LEGEND SITE INFORMATION
EXISTING CURE & GUTTER TRACT ACREAGE: ± 20.88 Ac.
PROPOSED CURB & CUTTER F LOTS: 35 plus one BIRCHWOOD PARK 1 No.O
unbuildable lot
vac DRAINAGE PIPE, FES (FLARED LINEAR FOOTAGE END SECTION) & RIP RAP OF STREET; (2200 LF
r ~ GOLFERS LANE AREA OF 00 50'
STREET R/W: t 2.60 Ac. m D ~0 e
CATCH BASIN, DRAINAGE r G~~ \r`~ PIPE & JUNCTION. BOX ZONE: A-1 WS PRESTWICK g\~ ~ ! j~ R TYPICAL S1CHT DISTANCE ~ ~
DR. l MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK / I' ~ v EASEMENT ~ s' 24' s' s'
REQUIREMENTS: S 1 / / / ~ , (SDE)
FIRE HYDRANT FRONT: 50 Feet q / e TEE & G.V. W/BLOCKING kq H ! / l ~ ` R W
SIDE : 15 Feet FAR Sp C y I / / 70° 7~ ~ O 0.02 0.08 4 2
REAR : 40 Feet ST GTy Wy ! ! l SEWER MAIN W/MANHOLE STR S8 I / l
SIDE STREET: 25 Feet FFT ! / / 1 ~ ~'I ~ I-~ = I III-III-_ 11- - i I-i I T T=1 11=I 2~ SF95A ASPHALT I I ~Til' ~ I I~ ~ it I
MIN. LOT WIDTH ~ / / FF AT MBL too Feet NOT TO SCALE / / , BLOW 0 -i j 1- i I 1-1I L s.~ ~ ~ ~
i~ / MIN. CORNER LOT WIDTH /
VICINITY MAP _ EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY AT M8L 115 Feet ! WIRES / PRET ICI( DR, I~IRDIE DR, E®LE , PAR T CROSS SETI®N 1° I
- s EXISTING SEWER MAIN ~ / , ~ P NOT TO SCALE ~p N
et EXISTING WATER MAIN I 1 / / r`> X45 K / EXISTING GAS MAIN \f,, ' / / ` ~ S ~c I ! 49 ny 9 C NOTE: \ ~
- • • - • • - • • - EXISTING DITCH / F= \ / ! ~ ~ , / \~r ! / ! ~ /
PROPOSED WELL ~ I / SIR C~ f JOYNER, KEENY & ASSOCIATES NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR SUB&4SE DESIGN. \ ~ Q
PROPOSED STREET SIGN / \4.. mac. M ` \ \ 3 5 , 3 2 5 ~J ~ e I ~ . yy~TH THEERECOMAIENEO STREE T DES CN WtU. BE SUBM T EDL TOONHE~TH O W v PLANNMG DEPARTCpENT ~ N
~ EXISTING WATER METER _ ' TBR TO BE REMOVED / ~ ~ /
STREET CENTERLINE PC,PT,PI 0.81 acres t ! ! N
!
BM BENCH MARK / / ~ ~ / ! ; ~ / ~ ~ , ! ~ ~ Q z
~ ~ ! P/P POWER POLE and 1 ! ! : 1 l V' s . 'VC \ ~ ;~7 r ~ , ! ~T..~ ~ ~
ANCHOR GW ` 1 / ! / 1 l 9! '',g ; ~y~u . ( ) r / 1 i , ~ l Rik ~ . ~s.~. ~ ~ ! ; ~ B x'00 ~ • ' ` . ' ! ! ~ ~ ~ ~
~ T,PED TELEPHONE PEDESTAL / / ~ ~ :°,A l COCK( D N ~=s~ I
O CO SEWER CLEAN OUT / F'h~;.,~..` l G ~ l B 0 F f$ ~V„ •..,,e~1 ~8s 1 CB STORM DRAINAGE / • ! 1 , ' / K 13 & / ~z 4;. ~r ~ p~~'f ~ ! ( ~ ~ J
i , a, - AT HBASIN I / ark,?/' ~'ta l ~ ~o / •°,°0•° ~GF 9 Vr ; l ! U Y
~ DI DRAINAGE INLET ~ ~ . ~ I,1~ •t;. N_ p° , ~
l v~ . C( 4 ~f . . pq WV WATER VALVE ~ 'g ° ®''0., ' !
® GV GAS VALVE ! l l I "t^ ~ / 6~ , rE fsi " ~ sod ~ SIGN GENERAL SIGN / / '~~=:-',u A S a / ~ , 7, , ';:a, Ord .,ild/, i° ° ° ®®,e°, ~ tiil •:c I ~ ~ 00
- - - - t 32 EXISTING t CONTOURS / I 1 / ! ~ ! H,;, .,'ri *~:~e EIP ' ~1 ~ ~ , °P~®°, a r~ ~
132.56 TI P T ATI ~ 1 l l 0 >t• '=b EXIS NG S 0 ELEV ON ~ / ' , X
132.56 PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE C 9
/ I r ~ °BF S, ~ / ~ ' ~ t32 PROPOSED CON OURS \ . ~ lM1 ` !
, ° 10 ~ ~ - ri. ' ~ AR A i HT POLE ' / y"~ / o ' S7~k ° ° ° , ° ' ° d ~ : ~ E L G ` 1 ! ~ / ~ %a ~ e , ° , ° ' , / /o EIPl ® 11 ! ~ ! O / ! (l
- - PROPOSED EASEMENT ` ) / % ~ I BRIAN iRA Y BEDDINGffE o,; ~ ' ° ° ° / /i5975 s .ft, ,~8 J„~ ~ 65, C ' .,4.65 ! ! !
- - • - PROPOSED SETBACK LINES ~ ~1~ DEED BOOK 1583 P 1.® 4 '`.c' ! N' , ° , / q bl' .EIP e AGE 427 ~ , ~ / ~ ~ -~l < c ol. e'
sin , . ~ ~ ' I I ~ . ~ e,n ~ , 1~ EIP_° i ° rr' , , . ~ X9,1+1 , •1a ^ r45 * '0° ° ~~i ~ ~ °`i°. ! ' ~ ~ ElP ~ °O'°°, ! ! f
, , i 1 .1 ~ ° ° ° , e ' I ~ ~ ~ l ~ . 1 i
"fti / A? eIP ° ° ' ° + ° ° 1 ~ ,tip ~ ~ ~ ~ r ,•L ~ ,1 °R I Q ,a' ? 1 0, r ° I ~ 15,908 sq.Fl. TI ~ o° ° t , • GENERAL ABBREVIA ONS . a~,~ X31., ,a~ ° ' ° 715,908 sq.Fh ~ ( EI~'~ 1 °•~11i1 ; NA$ ~ 1 °
. l.lnes Surveyed M ` ~ d,e i aF ~ d ~ EIP `Y'' , , ° ° ° ~ ~ ~ \
Lines Not Surveyed ~ ~ 4~' ® • ' ' '~I I 'U g
EIP Existing Iron Pipe ~C d~ ~ fu ® , I I o j ` . ° , ~ Y.o it n Pi a Sek ® WI<. UR J. ',~y M;%. ~ • I t~ ohs , ~ ,1•~~`~ NIP New o ` C GIN w I P Y Q~i e ~ ° l I• I ~ Y ~ . i I I ~ . ~~fh $6~ ~ pia,°°,°~~J ~ 1 ! ~ ( ( .Qf I I 1 \ ,
PKN P K .Nail Found ® ~ DEED BQOK 809 SPA 'ry° i 12f,1 a sq.ft:~ c m ' GE 46~ q1, ors I .I 1 \ -1....21.,731 sq,ft, •~I 1+ . + 16 ~'..,~1 e / / EII~~
NI No Iron Set or Found ~ \ , + ~ ~ rY'~ ~ 1 1 ° r I l.. I R/W .Rood Right-of-Way 4. , , _ a • 1 ,1' ~ po 6,169 sq,fl' \ \ ' ~ I (+.~L. 22,477 SO. FT,', .`may. y ~ l .~g e s,i69 sq,fC ~ ,`j1y I I y y yyTy(~ , io
\ 12 C \ l 7 ~ 1 L Rood Centerline ~ ; + ' ':~0 '
o Indicates Property corners ~ ; , ; ~ ~ ~ ° . ' 1 > , , INV Pipe Invert x ~ ' •'I ° '•1 ~ ' ~y/~ /y y1 ' ~6' III ~~oy/ i 1 !l l
FI r n Section ~ i ~ "r_...._' 's p n~' 1 . ^~~O ° , ° , ° ° t+ ~ ° 1e V~ ^i FES - a ed E d ® + f % EIP 1 _ ' ° ° 1 . ' ° , 1,; a ,le° 1 ~ ~ y, ~/y,i ~d~ ~.A,y iXy i ~ v~
P R inforced Concrete Pie ~ , , • - ~ _ ° . ° ° ' ' y' RC e \ P ~ i ~ ~ r 6 r ° . ° . ' ,1" . , ~ '~Q , 4 25"y{r CONC Concrete g a ~ ~ ° ~ , ~ ~ ,s\`: 1 i % ~ i //r~tp 1 / ,e'ee°, Q'o~*i~'~.° '11.13 s,
ASP Asphalt ` la$'t Wf BUR J. + % / 304 , J ~ q ~ `•\11,135\sq,f / / ,ta t i ! :8E< O I'v, t 93 = ' ~i
EP Ed a of Pavement ` i9,:~ ~ R• COGGIN, ~ Fv D ED ~ ~ e F Foce of Curb ~ ~ ~ B00¢( 1364 PAGE 747, 0 15 ' , ' ° ' ° ° ° , ' " 1 ' C ~ 0 ~ \ ~ / C,\.._- 3,328 ~~i'~I --187 ry ~ ' E J ~ p m
° ° ° BC Back of Curb 4 <,`t f ~ ~ GE \ ' , ~ ~ . ~ , ~ s - OCT 5 2004
TC Top of Curb I ~ ~ ~ \ - . . , , ° ° , , ° . ~ ,~tf'.? ' ~ ° \ FL Flow Line of Curb I I f + ` i ° ~ i , \ \ n \ ~ e EIP O ~ , ~
I ~ I I 40 1 ° , ' , e o ° ° ° f , ° J\ ` ; \ \ / \pv r ~ SCALE
1 TRUCTION PLAT shown hereon s sub•ect to: , + / f 0~ / - CONS J s : ~ o~ , ° , ° °i ~ T n f hill Review and A roval ~ ' 1' ° A w o Nos v e ° o' 'off ) / ° ° e , i ,a ~ 7 1" 100 Feet
B NCDOT Review and Approval ' r ° ' ° / 0 M ' ' ~ \ ~ 23,335 sq.fl. i ? \ V y i +
C 404 Wetland Delineation ~ oi~, I ;,tai?,, D Field Td o ra hicai Surve 0~ ' ~ P 9 P Y ~ 96 ; ~ 1 DRAWN BY
r i n h II anform to the re uirements of the 40. For under round natural o's service contact Kim Romse ,Utilities 'Q 1 , ~ ~ 2 ~ I J.°~• 2. Street const uct o s o c q 9 9 Y r, , , ~ ~ ~ \19,997 sq. ft.\ ~ i r ~ ,r r 't DWM
n r r s h i f n 7 -1 74• ~ ~ i 25000 s .ft. NCDOT Standards and Specifications for Roadway a d St uctu e , Marketing Representative fcr t e C ty o Rocky Mou t of (252) 9 2 2 P , q ' o\•, , Januor 1 2000 or latest revision; exciudin cores where town of ,Q ~ ~ ~ t i' • •o. y g All underground City gas facilities are to be installed before installing 5' ~ ~ ~ ~ yo%,.i' ,i ;r, \ ~ ~ . i ~esti 1 r;; JOB NUMBER
Noshvflle has standards in which case will over-ride DOT standards, curb and gutter and street improvements. If curb and gutter and street o,°~; W ,j \ \ ~ \ \ ~ , \ 'goo ~ I 020386
n fr m n actual field curve . Contour Interval Is 1 . ill lin h i ill n P , ° 1 V \ •~•`l~'.: la • ~ \ 3. Topogrophfc Data take o a y improvements ore installed pray to gas ut ty es, t e C ty w of ~ rn ,::;•.i' Reference Datum is hosed on Meon Seo level, acce t responsibilit for damo es to curb and gutter or pavement, nor 00 N ~ ' ' ' \oO. ' :I,ra°' ,~Z ,
4. Boundor Information taken from on actual boundary survey. P Y h 9f r r m nt atchin or londsca in . D ® "t "•'f '•a;l'"~' 23,999sq.ft.~ Y will the cfty absorb t o cost o bo es o pave e p g p g 0 ro ,,1~ , qs:> , ~ •\15,BOO sq.ft:\ ys: ~ '7'° _ ~ - DRAWING FILE
5. Minimum Lot Size = 15,000 Sq. Ft, ~ An relocation of existin rfoturol os utilities will be at the owner/developers ~ b / • ~ ~ y~ yy I a ( r PRELIM
6. A cam lete and thorou h Surve and Soil Evaluation is required n 0 J l : ' ~ ` _ ~ ~ P 9 Y expe se. r mm n efore urchosin or develo in Lots. n e ded b t •t` a d eco p g P 9 41, Building construction is not permitted on LOT 36. ~
7 imensions shown are o roximote. f'J ' \ Lot D PP R 42. All radii of street intersections shall be 25 feet per NCDOT subdivision ° , 1 \~s \ \ \
8. Electric Power is proposed to be placed UNDERG OUND. standards, 9. NCDOT prohibits the use of plastic culvert and d a age p pe, t e
43. Traffic control si ns and street Home si ns will be installed b the Town ~ ~ ~ . ° 1 i/~,;' + \ • ' , construction of bulk heads, masonry entrances, masonry light and 9 9 Y ~ ° ;t ~ r i hin h Ri ht of Nashville er Town specifications and the developer wilt re'fmburse the ~ ~ , ~ moil box supports (i,e. any permanent structu e) w t t e g P 0., ry y 23,960 sq.ft. , , / V I
Town for the total cost of si ns and instollotion. °'~'s3 °,t, ao• , of Woy. 1 9 i:, ~~z. ~ ~ 'd - , ' \ \ 1 ~ , _J:
°t ' J • I I n he ro ert \ I '`°ak; ~ ~ ~ o o , • titi/ ~ ~ 10. A 5 foot drainage & utility easement. shall be paced o o g t p p Y 44, The Town ma require the owner to execute o stormwoter management ~y ~ ; , ° ~ ~ \ \ J ~ ~ ~l 1tiy/ ~I I ~ 122,683 sq.t~ i ; L~~~:X' ( ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
lines of each lot in this subdfvfsfon• Y A ~ 1 \s' ~o.' ' ' 1. agreement with the Town and provide an operation and mainkenonce \ ~s, ° ~ ~ 1 , ° ~ \ ~ , 11, This is a Construction Plat and is NOT to be used for RECORDATION, r m nt Ion for the facilities. The owner of the ro ert mo be I ~ ^'°~r~- ° ~ ° : . ' ' ' 4` ~ ' e , r'\
CONVEYANCE or SALES. o ee e p P p Y y ',i required to provide other documents designed to guarantee maintenance ~ \ ~ ~ sC. \ ~ 20 t'•\
12. AIL. Right-of-Woy are "Public" unless noted otherwise. of the stormwoter mono ement facilities. \ o~a•. "a.~:>.~,i'~ TT -f7s:84 \ ~ ~ t9,t8zsq.f i 13. Area computed by Coordinate method. ; n i h nit nm n I R I i n Form will ~ t ~ 8S, o ~ '~,~?i.,-~ \ \ in F mi v eta euato \ ~4, Y \ 19,182 s f ~ U U 1 ~ I U1 . _ ,e
45. A Venficot o o Co pace w t E o g ,.qR i 14. All distances are chord. n I n i r in ` ~ ' J r~ ~ fii i h th Pionin De ortment rior to a o d d stu b ~ ~ A- s \ \ i / ~ \
15. An relocokion of existin electrical facilities will be of the developers be ed w t e g p p y g ~ w i 'u'¢. ~ Y act `\\\J \ ie~i 9 i ivit on the site. ~ ® `"'F: • , . / Y v, o ! a~,° p ~Xi expense. r In i n F ill r it rior to final lot o rovol, ~ ~ ~ ~z2° ~ \ ~o• \ ~ ' ; /~0//'.~•~• \ ~ 32,7b8"sq.ft. o I j3 `O~~t`~• ~ I ' / I 4 ~ J J
16. A sign permit is required to be obtained from the Town for 46. A Starmwate spect o ee w be equ ed p p pp , J 1 ' 47. Proposed detention/retention pond must be owned and maintained by the ~,o '~~r,, \ i~'
n subdivision entrance signs. y, \ ~ • ~ 17. Surve or DID NOT visfbl see on cemeteries in on open areas unless developer or the homeowners ossociotion. ~ ~ h I ~ \ - i~ ~
h ~ i noted. Y Y Y 48. All easements shown will be dedicated to the Town of Nashville. ~ 2 4 t i ' ~ of e w se • 0 ~ 1 i n f n r round Utilities are APPROXIMATE and must be field ~ N 1~' ~ 27,651 soft. \ \1 ® I y / \ ° ~ _
8. Locot o o U de g ~ riff Call N.C. One Coll Center before di in , 1-800-632-4949). ' °i J ve ed. 99 9 ( b ~ 1 i
19. Jo Her-Keen & Associates onl located utilities that ore above ` ~ Y ~ , round of the time of field surve . Under round lines shown hereon are \ p M1 / '~\i ~ S'J~ tyf a 1S \ ~ \ \ ' ~ i ~ ~ F, ~ / 1,:'x4. I ! -,~~'"•C ' - f- I ~
a roximote or os re orted b various responsible parties. , 2 w ,
a PP P Y \ 20. Surve or does NOT uorontee that on under round structures such os ~ J `pry a.. 9 Y 9 ~ W Y ~ , I a' ilii tanks and i es ore located hereon. ~ ^
ut t es, P p ~ v p I , / ~ 21, Le al Reference: Bein a ortion of that propert described in Deed Book 905 iD 9 9 P Y ~ ~ f ~ .Q .p; T . ~ A ;r ~w SOUTH CRE4~C'
M 14 n k 655 Poe 517 Nashville Tws . Nosh Co. Re . ~ L ~ ' ~ Page o d Deed Boo g P e 9 J , M i n' h r and Shei & Keller has determined that , I n lin t o os occu ed ~ ~ ~ ~'1 ~ ~ ~ I
22. A wet o d de eo h' • o wetlands ore Isolated and that no permit is required at this time. • _ p F~~i ~ ~ ~'ss~ ! SECTION 2 PHASE 4 °
~ n rin h rou h , \ 23. This mop does not depict encumbrances that are fou d du g o t o g ~y~~'c^ ~ ¢ tJ ~PLY+~ $QOK 3t PAGE 312 fYw>-fn-ozvl
~ .title search. 24, The ro ert shown hereon is located in o WS4 Watershed Area per in ' ! Qs ~i 1
~ P P Y WYATT McGHEE from the Town of Nashville. This subdivision is being developed , ( ~ i t p~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~
~ er the low densit option (which allows o maximum of 3 dwellings per acre.) ~ ~PLUMMER L. LEONARD, InC, p y \ , ~ 1 .16 94 7624U f MAP• - ( c G ; jr i ( p ( ~ °
0 25. Tax Parcel ID: 3800.12 95 080 U & 3800 h ill ~ R~ 60 ~ OOK 24 PAGE 234 SAMUEL A, COCKRELL ~ ~ ( °
Q 26. Zoning District: Zone A-1 WS per WYATT McGHEE from the Town of Nos v e. S 'h ~ ~ ~ 27, Address is Nashville, N.C. + R ~ \ e r! ~ ° ° _ DEED BOOK 1219 PAGE 14 100 0 100 200 300
~ 28, The contractor shall be responsible for all work zone traffic control I J ~ ~ ~ in or adjacent to NCDOT right-of-way, All methods shall conform with the 11 ~ ~ ~ y ~ e dEIP
= Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and NCDOT standards. ~ ~ N 29. Contractor shall be res onsible for verif in the minimum building setback , e e i B
i P Y 9 ~ I- re uirements with the Buildin Ins ections Office before Construction, i RAPH B p ~ s C a ~ 2 1 " - 10 0' LAND PLANN NC & SUSORVEYtNG
v q 9 P i ELEG 30, An house dimensions shown hereon shall be verified b the contractor/ ~ ~ Y Q Y o_ owner rior to construction. , . ,~33 °a, ® ~ i 'EIP P,0. BDX 7533, 209 N. PEARL ST,
P ~ 1 Pr r i N T located in o Flood Hazard Zone 100- ear flood lain er t, ti 3. ape ty s 0 ( Y P ) P 1 ? (f - _ ROCKY COUNT, N.C. 27804 f ° ° [phone] VOICE
N November 3 2004 Femo Mo Panel 3720380000) and 3720381000). _ I p p R-35.0' R=25.0' ~ Z ` ° , _ ° ° ° {252) 985-5026 FAX
32. Pro ert is not located within the Town limits of the Town of Nashville except , Z P Y the easternmost art which is within the Town of Nashville b 50 Feet. a ~ \ ° _ ° Certificotion by the Town Manoger thot this Construction Plat wos opproved ~ by the Town Council on 24
g P Y , , I' 33. Water and sewer information shown hereon as reported by Lorry Williams ~ w ~ . \
~ at the Town of Noshvflle, 24,0 ~ THE V1L ~ 34. Sewer Services for Lots 9, 10, 15, 19, 20; 21, 22, 23 Shall be installed ~~.Ai SOU'fHCR~,~ ~ _ - WATERSHED
~ 1 8" er Foot, .1 MAP BOOK 29`$A ~ / p ~ GE,~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ; ~
~ 35. Each Property top should include meter setters with check valve or back flow ~ 50.0' ~ n r i r m r h t re d in ollons. ~ ~ preventers and Neptu a ado ead ete s t a o g ~ ~ \ LOTS PER Ac.' 1.6 Toven Manoger ~ ~
w T n r n r ervices ore to be extended to develo meat, ~'y ~ 36. Since ow orate o d sewe s p ~ _ •~.'0 _.~__s~,•'0_ ~ ~ PERVIOUS AREA:
ff) a eGtiOn ror annexation Will oe re uwrea ro oe sumnieu. 8,'i.3 Certification by the Public Works Superintendent thot this Construction Plot % - meets oil opplicoble Town standards.
7. Requited water and sewer permits will be obtained and copies of the some 3 sholl be submitted to the Planning Deportment.
0 38. A Sedimentation Erosion Control Pion will be submitted to the state & on approval IMPERVIOUS AREA:
o letter will be submitted to staff prior to any distributing activity an the site. / N 0 39. See sheets ALS-14 and ALS-15 for Appion Consulting Engineers, PA Water and ~i . 34 - 14.7
/ N Sanitar Sewer constuction details. STANDARD CUL-DE-SAC
rIj C> y \ . 6nREe A. ,TREE ASSOCIA rES AREA DISTURBED: Public Works Superintendent LS-1 /
a
N

~ /
/~O``.. A 1 / Q/
~~N' l l ®y4M
/
CF , 4
R 'v S ` ~o
q ~

I ~ rr, Ok a
O ~ r, A
/ A e 1 ~ .,®r,F Tow / : /
r, I .1 ~ r M \
i 1~ ~ A..`a ry r,rr,r ~ A,, .p ~ r, /
i ~ / •Oe, /
a ~ r ~ B ~ ~ r•. l
427 9 t~ ~ `1 ~ @®'®r~r l ® ~ ( 7 r,rr,
e,r o ~ ® r
9~ ~ r~rr, ! 'am,r P~~ ,r.r,r l a,rr 0!~ e ® r,rr~ B ~ ~ =~@??I ~ ~ ~ ~ rr'rr,
r ,ti4 d r,r„ a r.,rr a, , f ~ ~a ~rr,
~ ~ ~ ~ w °'r
UR J. COGGIN e 1 i ~ I ~ e r
6 { K aos PAGE 4s 9<~ ~ I ~ ' ! _ e 9
ps e , ~ g
~t ` ~ , 0.028 Acres
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ B LOT 6 1,224 Sq. Ft. 0.028 Ac 4 ~ ~ P j 0 P /
~ ~ ! LOT 8 739 Sq. Ft. 0,017 Ac 0.017 Acres
~ V~ I O ~6LBUR J, de RE COGGIN ~ ` - i LOT 9 10 Sq. Ft. 0.000 Ac 0.000 Acres
~ ! o ~ DEED BOOK 1364 P 't ~h ~ ~ ~ AGE 747 QO® 1 ~~G $ .
2 P ~ 0 ~ AY 6 537 S . Ft. 0.150 Ac ~ 9Z e h ~ ~ - ROADW q 0.150 Acres
BOO ~ ~ ~ ~ ®v ~ (Roadbed & R/W)
F.~p ~ ` t 0 9 \8\ ~ h~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ l_OT 23 853 Sq. Ft. 0.020 Ac 0.020 Acres
-
e 4 - a ® / ~ ~ A ej ~ AC 0.028 Acres
a ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 36 1,241 Sq. Ft. 0.028
ts~' ~ 23 / \ ~ ~ ~ ' Detention Pond ~ ~ ( )
` ~ ' ~ / ~ ~ V ~ ~ ® ~ PUBS t ; ps1' ~ ~ / / ~ 'V ~ / ~ B
TOTAL IMPACT AREA ~ A v , ,0'p ~ w y
`4 ~ ~ ~ G t PHASE 1 10,604 Sq. Ft. 0.243 F 0.243 Acres
~ ~ e+ `
N ~ / ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ° + ~
r ) C i e ~ ~ . ~ _ ///I E
/ B t + ® 9 C B
~ ~ i & L ANA? s ~ ~ ; ~ ~ NG SCR
. ® ~ 'I ~ B P~ ~"t ~ ~ m ~ !
. ~ ® 2 / ~ 1 _ ~ `off 6 ~ 36 ~ . _ . Q - c ~
; ; ~ " ~ ~ e B ~ ~o rJ,~ i
~ r_ ~ ~ t` .
_
` too ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 209 NORTH PEARL STREET - A.O. ROX 7533 ~ ~ + ?OX 7533
w ~ ~ ~ A w ROCXY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA 27804 27304
,e w r l ~ 1 B ~ ~ ® ~ OFFICE.° /2521 977- 3924 ® ` 9 1 J
o i ~ ~ ~ ~ FAX' 252 985- 6026 N ~ 1 ~ ( J
~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ WETLANDS IMPACT SURVEY OF ~ ` 2 r. ® ~ r OF
`i ` o ~ PROPERTY OF ~ w ~ ~ , ~ a ~ ` ~ o i
~ ` ~e ~ ~ T, LLC
• ~ ` B N.C.
OFF GOLFERS LANE, NASHVILLE, N.C. ` LUC~NDA BULLOCK
° DEED BOOK 1a60 e~
` ` PA ~ ~ ; GE aa0.' ; vd ~ TWSP.: NASHVILLE COUNTY, HASH 't PLUMMER L. LEONARp, Inc. 'a 4,
. \ ~ ® ~ It 9 ~ 3 Q, MAP BOOK 24 PAGE 2 4 ~QP SCALE: 1 = 100 DATE: 04.03.09 .09
~ a G 0
` 100 0 100 200 s00 e .300
A 0,® ¢ _
\ ` ~ _ R
~ d' ® d r av C L A TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH ~ ® DRAWN BY: BTN JOB NO.: 020386 e ~ 020386
LA~ BOOK tg PAGE 233 A P RT: Wetland Im acts SHEET NO.: 1 OF 1 ~ _ VIEW 0 p 1 OF 1
~ sir °~y p®•®'0~ ra - ~ a t ).dwg
- irchwood Wetlond Im Oct Ma .dw ~ tQ .m + _ _ DWG: 020386 B p p 9