010011_INSPECTIONS_20171231

vision of Water Quality
ivision of Soil and Water Conservation _
O Other Agency
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 11 Date ul Visit: 2/25/2004 Time: 1100
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
E Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold- -------
------
Farm Name: Ohnu.8 otbvrs.Fatm............................................................ County: AJsAA Ugr...............................3YSRO......
Owner Name: EiLlYAW Ilahby------_ Rix9n------•---------------------- Phone No: 33b 375:5588.-------------•-•-•---._._._..
Mailing Address: .A8.2..Dix9.n-Lamb..1,Aim................................................................... (;rAIjaM..N.0.......................................................... A7253..............
Facility Contact: Eddle'Dixon.......................................Title: ............................................... Phone No: ......................................
Onsite Representative: Eddie AJEIUI-•-----•-.-•---•-------•---------------- Integrator:--•-•-•-•-•-•-•-----------------•-•-•-•-•--•
Certified Operator:WIlliam.d.............................. Holliday........................................... Operator Certification Number:2.1.3.1.7.............................
Location of Farm:
ake Hwy.87 south from 1-40 to Lindley Mill Road and take right. Take left onto Dixon-Lamb Road.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 54 57 -1 Longitude 79 • 20 , 15
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca aci Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 230 0
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer - In Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 322,000
Number of Lagoons
Holdinp Ponds I Solid Trans
Discharees& Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....W.aste.P.ond..... ........................... .......................... ....................._--.. ....----.---•.----.•--- ...........................
Freeboard(inches): 72
12112103 Continued
-tl" 93� a _�

Facility Number: 0:1-11 • Dale of Inspection 2/25/2004 I •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN [] Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground [:]Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Timothy,Orchard,&Rye Small Grain(Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ® No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
•om refer to quest on xplaln a , a s er a d or n. n on or an.
Used awin of facl i o bet e e plain itua io us di Iona pa e a ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
3. Freshwater ditch looks much better this year. Suggest adding more hay to low area to help slow down soil run-off.
23. Records look real good.
11/24/03 waste analysis=0.22 lbs. N/1000 gal.
Facility no longer has dairy cattle on site. They are now raising steers from 2-day old up to 550 lbs. to be sold to a feedlot up north.
Per owner, .stream restoration project is to begin in about four weeks. Contact name is Jason Guidry with the Ecological
Enhancement Unit in Raleigh 919.715.1061
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meli sa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 01-11 10l'Inspection 2/25/2004 •
Required Records& Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes ® No
27. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑Yes ®No
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑Yes ❑No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑ No
❑Stocking Form ❑Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I",Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
ddi tonal •omments an o ra ings:
12112103

pr"° ti itt , ij y,iF it if p,li . t 1111 }i Rt +tt� 'FPf NI , `ll: tit il, nr, ?!4A A t,,ri",+tl+,hint i'irr„riln�t�tl fa ;NA Mt
( (i'tt„' rf it If,jli;j;i'rii pGli'il tt'z ,( W;u � (
III' '4 d'l' !}brit a. nC'r,iOn Of. i8tw,'G n8V= '10(+ ,t,i+u.+:iU"t'e, -h'i, t7+n,{ '! (?< +
�,( 2lri rSLlla �� FF fl ( ,f„�,#A( itl�q�7;1+ f7r tVtStOntUtSOdBaal,)Watect,Conservationitilrlitr' f,r'IF+iHu` 11+ri1Stdl+� i�rIM,;tt (j,iifk�r "f`�it+l`,i#Aal�t(f�al',It
qq
tr1.ul�„EI y'lllt.,:�y�l�,`✓Giv' d7�.k7'tj-(�.,„t Iti,diylit,,aifrd�(�(tJI1Q iOthee Agencyi;"�fnF.tii�x;J tiiNh.l(,i,rl.cl<+till ud7+,'�,h,I.hiti� 70 : �dr�lytiiiit±pi Yd��t("li'nd idi'i,',t+I i,p d i,ti.
f ,�Mr�i„ vt hl7, tlii it+,� �
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Late of Visit: Time: d
O Not Operational Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....._..................
Farm Name: ......Jxon......... ��.(:.... .................................... County: .....Oay.ah.C.e......... ..........
. .......... y
Owner Name: ...-C 1 ...° L(.1 .....�( Qn Phone No: ....� �I.tP• J7
......................... .``...,,..... ...........
Mailing Address: .. �.... ..Z.. ` YYQnz.... ....... n ...... ....
( . .........L........f....a
.........7..�...........
Facility Contact: ...E40_`Ie...........4XY0�.n........_............Title: ............................................................... Phone No: ..................................................
Onsite Representative:._15M ice.. 41.5. _!............... .. .... Integrator:..........._..............--..... �+,....../..................
.... ...... V/
Certified Operator:..�.4.� .....,� . .. .. (}..�1.�[�.( ................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: v
D 54 40 , Tk- ' e r iK or* Uridti All an `j
o —
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude =O®` ®'° Longitude I /1] I•
• li 11 Iti ir'{t qq.De51 ili�t�CUrrenttl h'i,p (� r llld ill} Oast dCUTrent lrr°y( • tt t(TTD��C51 CUrrent'9
' it r r 1 ,+ 1'�illiii i ��I i 7 rIr �' �f �i� ( 7f. t w L, J g'!;if 1 �xfl ,7,
$wine , ,,t',r k 1 .,,` +Ca act ,.,Po Mahon .Ca`acity%Po tdationr+'` ttie+, , ,, Ca aci Po tilatiop t{
:;❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer D
fl airY
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer h Non Dairy
,
t Farrow to Wean
h K n❑ ("h d i�1` h�� ��I,t ift��, r,7 t il� ,4ir6 ui o a 9G
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
ii 'i;' riGi+t i "der,"ifll�{j rd,ilN ��
❑Farrow to Finish ) ' "i i
Total Design Capacity 3
:❑Gilts 7!`7�i tt,tjy4'. G 1 irliY _' ', 1L,n 'Iih�ii
'x 1 • ,
1 ❑Boars 1!t i,ix�Ir t a I:s ,n,x ,L K i` !r ` 'fktijl`r'Total SSLW..0 p�a 9z
`1;t.. .r.e(.
Number{of La Dons 7' Pti EF] '
71 t.g P vNPrH� ,t r! g i Lgi1 (5'�it' i{ til�7r�i i Ilkiiivn r , 7d1 .fir �+1
II ritl;
Discharges&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes R*fqo
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes 0I0
Structure .Swct u 2 r ucture 3 Structur 4 St e re re 6
Identifier: �LA�.,_'� re ........St............................ ................................... ...................uctur.... 5............ ...........Structu........................
Freeboard(inches): j
12112103 Z Continued

Facility Number: 01 - 1 1 • Date of Inspection
•5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes �No
seepage,etc.) / \
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑Yes I0
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑Yes AINo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑Yes
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? []Yes A No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes o
❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with lose designated in ge Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes AVo
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑YesINO
No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes;5No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes XNo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below El Y,�—B Np
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ZNo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes KNo
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes eNo
Air Quality representative immediately.
v and/or any mow �r� v�mme a.. t y mr z e
,Comments(refer to question N) tExplarn any YES answers ndaaons or aoy other comments.,h„ , r�,rt�' �
if�T 4 t d4 lilt tit 9 d�ok Sh t i'H' t 'i hi 441t, t H as it ! S } t f°i iak tY, I `�''nd vu.0 t�' �' i y
1Use,drawtngs ofifacihty to9better3explatn stluaUons gttse addthonahpages as necessary) ,ojft,jty{Fteld Co Final Notes �tl !� ��'N
i# i ry n.: �' mP , t� i L j'� PY ❑ I t3 1
t�_.• .�! M111 G L �'�itu.1�:`Mf�'vFr 4t,wtP N d>I. 'E.,n,�1 �o.�i°t 7.�''�t.i rn �Fa'.� �'_t S,.!M1 �k",.-r E"T'.v..'C�i,T�d^._ Ti._ �. .m",. .T
Reviewer/InspectorName y,i .a 1*1„7
t. r. ....ry t,� �u^r n^R4J�.'rk�.
.Reviewer/Inspector Signature: a 4dd 4, Date:
12112103 j Continued

Facility Number: — 9of Inspection
Required Records&Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes )<No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes No
23. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes Okl�o
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes �(No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes X2-fqo
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? �/
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes o
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes "tXNo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes �\$N/o
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes �1Vo
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit?(If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑Yes f71 0
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes T❑�No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑Yes ❑No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Stocking Form ❑Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall []Inspection After 1"Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
G No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditignal CorCfinenffi and/or DraWrngs Y.W't f 6 i, �r !L f� �4 rlEi 7R� (ape �`. �' 7 t s , t i t I� pp p
t.taw. rnx ul��. ryiuit J4 Itp:�att �Iu�t�I.{7il�w'.�.tr� iktG7 � ..j ... .. .;. {�i/p,y�.(•r;
Q ) . Fes AAc_A ? t&,D-e�
_Att4j G
a q
12/l2103

Technical Assistance Site Visit RanM
vision of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 01 - 11 Date: 8/26I03 Time: 10:30 Time On Farm: 30 WSRO
Farm Name Dixon Brothers Farm County Alamance Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 1682 Dixon-Lamb Lane Graham NC 27253
Onsite
Representative Eddie Dixon Integrator
Tvae Of Visit PuER2je Of Visit
®Operation Review Q Routine
❑Compliance Inspection (pilot only) O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
❑Technical Assistance O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
❑Confirmation for Removal O Response to complaint/local referral
❑No Animals-Date Last Operated: O Requested by producer/integrator
®Operating below threshold 0 Follow-up
O Emergency
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder [I Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non-Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ®Dairy 230 0
❑Farrow to Finish ❑ Non-Dairy 71
❑Gilts
❑Boars ❑Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑yes ®no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑yes ®no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑yes ®no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑yes ®no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑yes I@ no
Structural Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier WSP -,
Level (inches) 40
CROP TYPES jCom, Silage lCom, Grain Fescue-ha
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10/03

Facility Number 01 - 11 Date: 8126/03
PARAMETER O No assistance provided/requested
❑S. Waste spill leaving site TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed Provided
❑9. Waste spill contained on site
[110. Level in structural freeboard 25.Waste Plan Revision or Amendment ❑ ❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage 26.Waste Plan Conditional Amendment ❑ ❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer ❑ ❑
[112. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need(list in comment section)
O 13. Waste structure needs maintenance 11 El
29. Missing Components(list in comments) ❑ ❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs. ❑ ❑
[115. Over application < 10% or< 10 lbs. 30. 21-1.0200 re-certification
❑ 16, Hydraulic overloading 31. Five&Thirty day Plans of Action(PoA) ❑ ❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records 32. Irrigation record keeping assistance ❑ ❑
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis 33.Organize/computerization of records ❑ ❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
❑20. Late/missing soils analysis 34. Sludge Evaluation ❑ ❑
[121. Crop needs improvement 35. Sludge or Closure Plan ® ❑
[122. Crop inconsistent with waste plan 36. Sludge removal/closure procedures ❑ ❑
❑23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency 37.Waste Structure Evaluation ❑ ❑
[124. Deficient sprayfield conditions 38. Structure Needs Improvement ❑ ❑
39. Operation&Maintenance Improvements ❑ ❑
40. Marker check/calibration ❑ ❑
Regulatory Referrals 41.Site evaluation ❑ ❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date: 42. Irrigation Calibration ❑ ❑
❑Referred to NCDA Date: ❑ 11❑Other... 43. Irrigation system design/installation
Date: 44. Secure irrigation information (maps,etc.) ❑ ❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS 45.Operating improvements(pull signs,etc.) ❑ ❑
MADE BY OPERATION 46.Wettable Acre Determination ❑ ❑
1 47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks ❑ ❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations ❑ ❑
2 49. Drainage worklevaluation ❑ ❑
50. Land shaping,subsoiling,aeration,etc. ❑ ❑
3 51.Runoff control, stormwater diversion,etc. ❑ ❑
52.Buffer improvements ❑ ❑
53. Field measurements(GPS,surveying,etc.) ❑ ❑-
4. 54. Mortality BMPs ❑ ❑
55.Waste operator education (NPDES) ❑ ❑
5. 56.Operation&maintenance education ❑ ❑
57. Record keeping education ❑ ❑
6 58. Crop/forage management education ❑ ❑
59.Soil and/or waste sampling education ❑ ❑
2 03/10/03

Facility Number 01 11 Date: 8/26/03
COMMENTS:
Waste Analysis: 7-26-03 LSD 0..27 Ibs.N/1000 gals. B, 4-01-03 ASD 0.28 Ibs.N/1000 gals. B
There are no animals confined on the concrete lot and no waste entering the waste pond.
I informed Mr. Dixon that he is still held to the Permit conditions until the waste pond was closed out to
NRCS standards.
Mr. Dixon has talked to his technical specialist about closing the waste storage pond.
Mr. Dixon is keeping freeboard, application, soil, and waste sample records.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST lRocky Durham
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/2/03 Entered By: lRocky Durham
3 03/10/03

[vision of Water Quality
5.., II SIP f. i� O Division of.Soil land Water ConsnatlOn r
�, 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O• Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 11 Date of Visit: 03/21/2003 Time: 1120
FO Not-Operational 0 Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: I.IixAn.BrolibR.r.S.Farm................................................................................ County: Alala oct......................................... W,5RQ........
Owner Name: Edls'.ardA..Babby............. D)izuA........................................................... Phone No: 33.6.37.6.:00...........................................................
Mailing Address: 1662.Dixult:D.alydl.D.alae................................................................... tiraltall..N?C.......................................................... 2.725.3..............
FacilityContact: Eddie..AlXpn....................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:Eddic.D.iX.un................................................................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.WUlianl:J.............................. Houl4ay........................................... Operator Certification Number:Zl3.1.7..............................
Location of Farm:
ake Hwy.87 south from I-40 to Lindley Mill Road and take right. Take left onto Dixon-Lamb Road.
❑Swine ❑Poultry N Cattle ❑Horse Latitude F 35 •F 54 57 Longitude F 79 • 20 IS
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca tacit Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer N Dairy 23o 29
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer I Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 322,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps E:= ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees& Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. if discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State? (If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? N Yes ❑No
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Waste.pond..... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 36
05103101 41P/6 fi>,� Continued

Facility Number: 01-11 • Date of Inspection 03/21/2003 . 0 . . ,
I 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? [I Yes ®No
(IC any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Graze) Corn(Silage&Grain) Small Grain(Wheat,Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes to No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
i
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists, design,maps, etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#): 'Explain any YES,answers and/or any recommendations or any other'c'mments.
Use drawings of facility,to better explain,situations.(use.additional,pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
3. Must keep cattle out of the fenced buffer area below the W SP.
** 3. and 8. A large amount of sediment,animal waste,and silage leachate was noted in the freshwater ditch below the silos and
stocktrail. Must be able to keep the animal waste out of the freshwater ditch. Suggest contacting SWCD/NRC$ for assistance regarding
design,culvert size,fencing,etc. Solid waste does not appear to have reached surface waters yet.
4. Waste level is just at max. liquid mark after yesterday's 3"rainfall. To pump next week.
8. Curbing around the lot looks better. Need to install another 10-20 foot of curbing to contain the waste onto the lot. Should be ok after
that.
19. 2002 soils ok. Make sure southern states checks copper and zinc too.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meli Rose rock
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur : Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-11 oI Inspection 03/21/2003 •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ❑No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional Continents and/orDrawings: ,... '..,
25. Suggest adding T-2814 F-2 to CSGH list since orchardgrass is there now.
26. and 29.-32. Not applicable to this facility at this time.
10/18/02 ALD=2.8 lbs.N/1000 gal.
05103101

0OtGer Age laC)'..°
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit xRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 91 4t Time:
10 Not Operational 0 Below Tbreshold'
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: T rM County:
Owner Name: E�L)Q ��a .t� ( X � PbonenNo: 33b) - 3710 ' 66 �U
Mailing Address: a - an�a u.�L11A n LA94iQ t Y la Wt i NL .Z-ZA
Facility Contact: .add le. � Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: , ` sty..
Certified Operator: Q. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Lr
-4 0 t7as� '40 U5 y 87 50 9 o i -
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ®•[3:!�'=� Longitude ' ®' [M-
Design.., Current,; ' ' Design Current Desigo. Current
Swine - Ca�cit4 Population 1 Poult ;� .Ca kits •�Po�lation q. C the . I ;<..� Ca)acity Po'u atiob ,pt
❑Wean to Feeder JE3 Layer '�1;� Dairy +,
❑Feeder to Finish
❑Non-Layer ( ❑Non-Dairy II
3 ❑Farrow to Wean ' ',,, , i,t,i ... ,
❑Faaow to Feeder
❑Other i
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
,Jt ❑Gilts 1 I' , i r 'IP, 1 �n ,d,l IaPt -,I.
❑Boars ��' ` "„Total SSLW`
._ O
`( Numb¢riof Lagoons �' „�, ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area I
. , j r,;e `� t r 1r
Holding'Pond' /Solid Traps 'i: ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
Is there evidence of past discharge from an p g y part of the operation. El Yes KNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? XYes ❑No
Waste Collection d Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes XNo
q_ 1Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6///��
Identifier: )IV a l A
Freeboard(inches): �7�n
05103101
Continued

• � •
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes P<No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
9. Do any stucmres lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ,
elevation markings? ❑Yes o
Waste Aonlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes xNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Pending ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes No
Required Records&Documents �/
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? El Yes LyJ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? _ El Yes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ANo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
, ..,.., .E. �t, _ ; . ,. t,i. 11 . _.
Comments(rcfer�to question#): Explain any YES answers'and/or any, ecommendutions'or anv other comments t^'
Use drawinge'of facilityto better,ezplam situations (nse addinonal,pages as necessary) i, " '
��❑Field Co➢v�. Final Notes i u '
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: dAQ 16 Date: oZ
05103101 IF Continued

' . • •
Facility Number. — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ,yo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes X No
28. is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes o
roads,building structure,and/or public property) / -
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? µo-
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) r"Iw-"ter rp
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perrnanent/tempomry cover? II vP� I—I Yn
'Additional'Cornmehts /or.Drawings:
Kb-1- alplieAb(e
9. aoa3 Pd, 4,LW 60k1,h 1+60 .
O311
m o
° ,u o �� aj
s cZ// f-C 11�
U714te doeo ��
5� W ?0�.
O cpbo a/-
05103101 A C2.!9 /b'. !VOOwIWO

f
e
s _
WHIRS TO FIBB US
w
m w Eli Whitney
To Pittsboro
5
Spring
Stockard Rd. Church
is
l-4 f
� t
w�
o fD '�
r °
3 0
Q x .
r �
� f
Lindley Mill To Siler City
Rd.
m �
C?` Snow t
�m Snow Camp Rd. Camp
i
f
0
Cn
' w
m

—g
on of Sol and WaterConservat
IJ:jM n ,• x' lion Of Water QuaI1tY(L l A
. . � tsi ion „
r Agency
Othe
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0. Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 11 Date of Visit: 7/18/2002 Time: 10:30
O Not—Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................
Farm Nance: Dixv.D.> >.RtI1xrS.t?.aLrY.FarxD.................................................................. County: Mal Altee......................................... WSRQ........
Owner Name: Edtvatd.&.Robby............. AixQlu........................................................... Phone No: 3.7.6n658.8.....................................................................
Mailing Address: 1682.Aram-Ga,D t.t atae................................................................... G.alrbi tri.AC.......................................................... 2.7.25.3..............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:,Eddie.D.ixan.&..Willy...Holliday........................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.Wj]Ualm.d.............................. RQJII.dAy........................................... Operator Certification Number:ZI3.1.7.............................
Location of Farm:
ake Hwy.87 south from 1-40 to Lindley Mill Road and take right. Take left onto Dixon-Lamb Road.
-,.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 54 ' 57 41 Longitude 79 • 20 15 41
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Ca acit Po tuI tfon Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 230 34
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder Other
Farrow
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 322,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1� ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 80
05103101 Continued

Facility Number. 01-11 Date of Inspection 7/18/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the ill grity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tr*vere erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes N No
12. Crop type Small Grain(Wheat,Barley, Sudex(Hay) Corn(Silage&Grain) Fescue(Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ❑No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes N No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre detemunation? ❑Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes N No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP, checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) N Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes N No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. 77771
,Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): 1[]Field Copy N Final Notes
# 19. The waste sample for the Feb. applications didn't get sent in until June,therefore, the sample was not within 60 days. The facility is 71
below the threshold of numbers and may go out of business. The milk herd was sold in the Spring and Mr. Dixon has heifers and calves
now. 1 told Mr. Dixon he could divert lot runoff around the waste pond as long as the lot was cleaned and there were no animals on the
lot.
# 13, The technical specialist is adding summer annuals to some of the corn fields.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
O5103101 Continued

FVIiti umber: 01-11 D f Inspection 7/18/2002 •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional, Comments an orDrawings:
Waste analysis: 7-10-02(D1) LSD 13.3 lbs.N/1000 gals. B, 18.5 S.I.
(D2) LSD 11.5 " ", 16.0 S.I.
O5103101

vision of Water Quality
vision of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 11 Date of Visit: 2/15/2002 Time: 1100
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted E Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Rixna rntltets.I?aiay..Fatm.................................................................. County: AIRMA11ce......................................... WSRQ........
Owner Name: EdwArd.A.. obbY............. AIMmO........................................................... Phone No: 33.6.17.6-6.598..........................................................
Mailing Address:.1lS2.Ltixofte anik. aae................................................................... G.0r ta m.Ac.......................................................... 2.725.3.............
Facility Contact: laddle.Diz oxL...................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: Witlly...HglUdAy..axid.Eddie..Dizrun...................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:,yyllllajnjd ............................ HoUlday........................................... Operator Certification Number:2131..7.............................
Location of Farm:
Take Hwy.87 south from I-40 to Lindley Mill Road and take right. Take left onto Dixon-Lamb Road.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude F 35 • 54 ' F 57 " Longitude F79 • F 20 ' F 15
( "T" D ies gn_.; Current: De"ign Cu�rient F esign Current yf
"` wines mod;r C upset ulatiod Poult ry Ca acit P,o ulation Cattle Cape it X P,o ulation� P,o .
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 230 158
a '
§ ❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean r.
G ❑Farrow to Feeder tI❑Other r
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars t Teo 1 SS> W 322,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps �1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees..Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 10 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......Waste.P.and..... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 58
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-11 Date of Inspection 2/15/2002 •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Pending ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Small Grain(Wheat,Barley, Fescue(Graze) Corn (Silage&Grain) Timothy,Orchard,&Rye
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes OR No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ® No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ®Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
7Continue
a
n o f 1 e in i m ❑Field Copy ® Final Notes
efforts to control burrow holes.
ood curbing looks good,just need to extend a few more feet.
o also analyze soilsamples for copper and zinc per permit for any fields receiving animal waste.
. eeto keep records of all waste applications including dry waste.
19. Will need to get waste analysis for February 2002 applications.
19. December 2001 soil analyses not back yet.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meli Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2,
05103101 Continued

7-7
Facility Number: 01-11 DWI`Inspection 2/15/2002 •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
t • n
05103101

.Mivision of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint o Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Time:
rO Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
I*rpermitted*Certified DVV pC__onditionally Certifiedd [3 Registered Date Last Operated Pr Above Threshold:
Farm Name: tjXA� �l"13TV LeIT� I f�U'`l'Q[�� County: �IG)r�/1(i{/1 GP6 . 6
, / c? r/
Owner Name: Z 1Jlly d ^}' Bnk6 Phone No: _/36 2-7 6 . 6 S O 0
Mailing Address: �� LIIX6h--/ L&" I.�.i� L �✓'CILLM , Nl� a / °a,S--3
Facility Contact: i �� Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: I �I Integrator:
1' e
Certified Operator: �� � (yi Operator Certification Number: _ak=__
Location of Farm:
SOLO r-vgk&0►* Li no e1 m i 11 pct. —
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ®e a�7J� ®« Longitude
Design Current Design "Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population -: Poultry Capacity Population C the ,4 Capacity Population
El wean to Feeder ❑La er I I I Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish JLJ Non-Layer I I I Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean - - - -
-.❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
El Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 3 02 08 EU
#Number„off Lagoons ® ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area JOSpr.y Field Area 3'i
,Holding Ponds/Solid Traps, t L "�''
., ;� �❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 0KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
it. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes XNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes )9rNo
tru tur 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Oh
3 b Freeboard(inches): s
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — • Date of Inspection P;S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes [ o
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or `
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes kNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ,��
elevation markings? El Yes Ley No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes XNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Pending ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes �No
a
12. Crop type A At A All
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t se designated n0the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan( AWMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes A_1h0
e)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes A 190
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ;KNo
Reauired Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? Cl Yes JIVo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) � �� ❑Yes �No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/ini Lion, frecb�oard,w sdste analysis&soil sample reports) Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? Yes N150
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes )k1Vo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes VNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes :[�Ko
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes )KrNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comnien is'(re
fewto question#):,Explain' any YES anawers and/air any rebommenda'tions or ii"nygotherrcommenVs.
{Use drawingsof facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages...as necessary) x
W -q, , e / s , vlty): , Field Copy ❑Final Notes <*
IQ. t lX1CZL� �i�;�Q.�(,��,/ �� i , ,•p ..Y}3j � Q/a���/J ./,a.
190 r.>z P !ham e� Tk± �c,�-,Ulh. 1�� �"C c a
190 aoo
Reviewer/Inspector Name I r .,�5
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4 It 4Z 14 Date:
05103101 V IContinued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below EI-N Vo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) 'Po
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes DeNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent temporary cover? —Bi`es"E Rmo
Additional Comments;and/orDrawings: ,.erg,;:... -z,' ,,,I
044 cj- am
70,
�
05103101

vision of Water Quality
tsion of Soil and Water conservation •
Q Dther Agency
Type of Visit 0• Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 11 Dane of Visit: S/9/2001 Time: 10:30 Printed on: 8/14/2001
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
S Permitted N Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ................................................................... County: Alumiltze......................................... WS11Q........
Owner Name: Edward.A.Robby............. Dina........................................................... Phone No: 3Jb 37.b.bS&8............................................................
Mailing Address: 16S2.t?axart-Lamla.Laue................................................................... Garbam-NC......................................................... 27.25.3.............
FacilityContact: Eddie.Dixon....................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:Willy..Holliday..and.Eddie..[)ixott...................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Wfliiam................................. Hollway........................................... Operator Certification Number:213.1..7.............................
Location of Farm:
N.Newlin Township 3 miles W.of Eli Whitnery 1682 Dixon Lamb Lane. Take Hwy.87 south form I.40 to Lindley Mill Road
and take right. Take left onto Dixon-Lamb Road.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle []Horse Latitude F 35 • 54 57 Longitude F 79 • 20 15
Design; current'' . Design Cu rent krrAti';t ,'t'" ,�, D sign: Current
nSwmet, day , n! , " ce a"pit i aP,o ulati n Poultry':r Ca° acit Po ulaho�n, cattle "x " a
,_� $$' "Cti acit zP,o uhition
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer e IN Dairy 230 130
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non Dairy
m❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish �'•i`"'v`T` tt •'�-
i Total DestgnlCapactty 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars Tod 11SSLVV 322 000
Number of Lagoons j �0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present 1113 Lagoon Area ID Spray Fidd Arca
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 0 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ®Yes ❑No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection_Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .....W.aste.P.ond..... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 31
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-11 • Date of Inspection 8/9/2001 • Printed on: 8/14/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Com (Silage&Grain) Fescue(Hay) Soybeans Small Grain(Wheat,Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
•ommen refer to qu ff MA. ain an ES e IN r n i o a of er co
se drawin off ilit ette plain sit ation . u e addi on pa a ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
2.and 8. Silage/feed/manure(?)leachate has run off the sick cow area of the barn. The swath of dead vegetation extends towards ditch _
and creek. No waste evident today,though. Suggest curbing around that corner of barn lot. May want to contact SWCD/NRCS for
technical assistance.
7. Continue efforts to control groundhogs on WSP dam.
19. Will need to get 2001 soil samples for this year.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meli a Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature ad, A2,ked Date:
05103101 Continued

7-
Number:PPPPPP
01—I1 Dif Inspection 8/9/2001 • Printed on: 8/14/2001
�.,./Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property) .
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
f.• t tdna LCommen "ian .drl rew rigs:
05103101

la '.00 m
,
r' .'✓Mi VISiOlI Of Water Q118BtY ''ti4 NuQi n`*�b i m.( ^ q .•
�,i �i,rl •i I�: a re .,� :, Gas' i r. � k� , ��r: Ir
Type at Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit XRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notdication O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: g 0 Time: M
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted Certified Q13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ...�J•�.KIIo.......B.rhT.(Q.. ....:1. oa�.n. ......... (.rm............ County: ....19.1grylance.................. .. 2
Owner Name: ....Cd. J U. T! N. ....1 ?..X.I ................................... Phone No:,...3y (0,..3.76....oSB.,�.............................
Facility Contact: .....E// L ie......:!. .'!X.D I........................Title:
I................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ......111t...�.t..2.......�Iix.QI1.- ........... .n. ... ..........111A!L1.�"1.G1.JY..1.../...r C ...................gJ..P24L3
Onsite Representative:... .J.1_1. . C1Q.L.L�. { .. ......rrdj.le_.�.1,�Mtegrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:....1/✓,�..I.�.,Cl+ V17 J IU•1,I••I• .................................. Operator Certification Number:....._...........
..................... ..
Location of Farm:
N. Newlin TawnSh'i P • 31m11e eh W I ey . -1-al�e. 'r 4.50L4-G) from
T-qC)e -to -Indl a r +. Ta Ve on 6I a - La2d
❑Swine ❑Poultry O(Cattle ❑Horse Latitude =a ' 0', Longitude EM•®' ©11
' urrent Design Current Design Current ) ip C
Ca sci Population oulbyCa Cattle Ca aci 'Po 'Maron Po u ,
P{
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy 230
Ii
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean ..
aR ❑Other I
„P❑Farrow to Feeder
'❑Farrow to Finish A 8CI TOfRI DCsIS Capacity Ce 230 ail
[3 Gilts
❑Boars _ Total SSLW a a/ 00� ri
umberdf Lagoons ® ❑Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
G= i,
N .
j Holding Ponds .Solid Trepg; ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Imoactti
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes *0
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? WYes ❑No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes xr,o
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes vo
+St
ructure I n Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .....WN�7..Q ..I..JArj............................. ................................... .............
...................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): �I
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: 0 — Date of Inspection ,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the r grity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes �No
seepage,etc.) -
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes 0 No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? *Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes �tlli)
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes KNo
11. Is there evidence f over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydrau c Overload ❑Yes No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t1lose de'sigiated in the Certified Atiffnal Waste Management Plan(C P)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes t%No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes *To
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes hrRo
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes XNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) / / / ❑Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes XNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes FNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes A1410
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes X No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes *No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes b; No
• ;�Io-tiglpti0 js;ot-00rjdjepsle$ wire pPtep•djtritig t]tts;vpsjt; 1 ojF wail•(eeeiye tto i�tjrther - `
cories v idence:abutif this visit: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . .
Comments i(refer to question#)6 Explain any YES,answers and/or,any irecom uendations or any other rn immente �,a s 1,j t h
Use tlrnwings of facllityYo better efplain situations.(use eilditlonal;pages as necessary) l la'(�n ��°„11,, It � �, {„ �•�
a. � .
fit? Feed�ma4i v ne- 2 t,(-Q d .� �c ui►�- p
- . M7WJ �,,,, d� a
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;_ (' ,, ; , '• � ,;, � y T"),
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date: g 5100

Facility Number: Q — I'� of Inspection IS(/q //)/ I •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below -E3 �^z'T.;,
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 434er-B'iQo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑YeSA110
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? -EJYrr-$No
32. Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? -ETTer'8'No
0 omments"dfor, ra n
." ,' !i ' t„ i;
_.�. gS:y. 7 �I'r i 11 i , �f dip , a, t � a i_e,F. .i "( ��'1 11 � (!��� F^ {'�t �
�o 0
�i
5/00

sP,� Q wn of Water Qu�alily
ion of Soil and Water Conservation
Q � ther Agency Nk! M�1� R
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ®Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 11 D:dc of Visit: 38/2001 Time: 11:00 Printed nn: 8/2/2001
rO Not-Operational O Below Threshold
■ Permitted E Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .................................................................. County: AIRMA11ce......................................... WSRQ........
OwnerName: Edwj%rd.,&.Bojbby............. I&Q0........................................................... Phone No: 3.7.6_658.8....................................................................
Mailing Address: 1682.DjXQlu7Leloth.LftUC................................................................... Garham..NC......................................................... 2.725.3.............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:Eddie.DjXQtt.&..WjJiY..Holild4Y........................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:..W Ullam.................................. HoU day........................................... Operator Certification Number:2131..7.............................
Location of Farm:
INNewlin Township 3 miles W.of Eli Whitnery 1682 Dixon Lamb Lane. A
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 54 57 Longitude 79 • F 20 15 "
�, r• a D"esI Cu ent Dest n Car ent d" Design Current
Swiue '. " Ca ai t P,o u ation Poult . g ,agd j `
a r'Y Cti tacit P,o ulahon Cattle Ca acit Rp;Po ulationn
a ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 230 140
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
z
{I❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other '' t e ;
c ❑Farrow to Finish ,aT'otal Design Cap city 230
❑Gilts $
{❑BoarsN, Total"SSI:W 322,000
ENmilienrdsliffl o ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area I[]Spray Field Area
Ho0WJEJ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 72
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-11 . Date of Inspection 3/8/2001 Printed on: 8/2/2001 r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tre severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Wheat Corn(Silage&Grain) Fescue(Graze) Fescue(Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit, You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Commen refer to question# : xp ain an E a we an o en recom ton or a y of er commen
se drawin of facilit to better explain ituatio use ad itional pag e ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
9.Current marker has only max.Liquid elevation marked. Recommend getting a graduated marker with top of dike marked.
19.Waiting on waste analysis to come back for March applications.
aste analysis: 12/08/01 LSD 8.8 lbs. N/1000 gals. B, 12.3 lbs.N/1000 gals. SI
08/14/00 LSD 5.9 lbs.N/1000 gals. B, 8.2 lbs. N/1000 gals.SI
Reviewer/Inspector Name lRocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
O5103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01_11 Di'Inspection 3/8/2001 isPrinted on: 8/2/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
l.' t ona 1 Qommen Ian dri R raw ngst
05103101

i
vtston of Water Quality • # r
WIN,
vision of Sml and Water Conservation � ,f,,� "� a ,..�
Sat;`' x` 2h. i•l t.cf4' 19N,
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 11 Daft of Visit; 8/15/2000 'Time: 1030 llrinted on: 8/15/2000
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
■Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .................................................................. County: AIRMA M......................................... W.SRQ........
Owner Name: F.dWArd..&...abby............. Dixon........................................................... Phone No: 33.647.64.50.8..........................................................
FacilityContact: Fddic..Di a....................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ib82.Aixart-Laxnk.Latte................................................................... Q.at'hatnl..l!IC.......................................................... 2.725.3.............
Onsite Representative:Edditi.Ai7Galt....................:........................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:..WjilAattl.d.............................. RQUWA0'........................................... Operator Certification Number:213.1.7.............................
Location of Farm:
N.Newlin Township 3 miles W.of Eli Whitnery 1682 Dixon Lamb Lane. A�
[]Swine []Poultry ®Cattle []Horse Latitude =6=1 F--57--111 Longitude 79 • 20 15
Design Current Design Current Design ; Current .
Swine Ca acit P,o ulation Poultry __ Ca Tacit P,o ulation Cattle Ca acit P,o ulation
❑Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer I IN Dairy 1 230 170
❑Feeder to Finish ILI Non-Layer I ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 322,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 0 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? , ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Wade Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......WastaP.oad...... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): 36
5100 Continued on back
,4- .?4177 &2"

Facility Number: 01-11 Date of Inspection 8/15/2000 Printed on: 8/15/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the of any of the structures observed?(ie/tre0evere erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Pending ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage&Grain) Timothy,Orchard,&Rye Fescue(Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ®Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes IN No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
No violatious;or deficiencies Vv&.e'niD d;duritlg this:visit::You:will receive i10 f6rther•;•;
cories olidence about this v1s1t. :•: . . . . : : . .
Commen refer to question ): xplaln an YFS answers and/or an ommendations or any other com ts.
Use drawings of fecilit to better exp ain situations. use a itionaI pa a menHa y
7. Need to mow vegetation on dam.
19. Need to start recording weekly freeboard. Will take soil tests in Fall.
Reviewer/Inspector Name -Meliss Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

Facility Number: 01-11 D f Inspection 8/15/2000 • printed oil: 8/15/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
I_' - tonal•ommentslan .orb raw ngs:
5/00

b :�o
ivision of Water.Quality i.
r, nsi' ^ ,
ivision of Soil and Water Coervation '•
Q Other Agency ..
Type of Visit Xcompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit )RO60utine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Q Date of Visit: 'Time: 3�D Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Nut O erational Q Below Threshold
Permitted 4Certif�ie/d [3 Conditionally Certified/�0 Registered
�p Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: t�.otj.....C1.F.xj.4.ci.. .....thU..I.R=y.....FA A... County: ...Ajj� .............. .......................
Owner Name: .... .y T /_— ..............
�..�.��..:.���� ??b.�.y.....�..l.1Co.l'.)..........................
...._Phone NO: .. ..�.. ...... ...... ...
Facility Contact: ......C(4t: _�.�...61.K 4.h...........Title: .......................... .. ..................... Phone
Mailing Address: 16. ....... .IXQn.. tCh. ....... e.. .....( poaha.m....,._ ...........a.�. as.3
..
/ Ca To �/
OnsiteRepresentative: '1,,'.. 1� 1 )� � 'J..........I ........,Q.............................. Integrator: ...................................................^................................
Certified Operator:w..�:..l.I.�..Q .........sa.......404Li(1�{................... Operator Certification Number:......(Z.t.3_0
Location of Farm:
40 ea5! 4-o -1 97 . wtxN $7 50u a e. rI } onto L Ind 10,a I I 'i
"t ToLkLe- - Lamb
❑Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ®0 F-SV' Longitude F-11TI• ®' T^Iw
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca racit Po Illation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer %Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer 10 Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity Q
❑Gilts l
❑Boars Total SSLW Q
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Disefiuraes & Stream Im acts ��J/
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ )Yes No
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑Other //,`
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Ilow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ;PNO
0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate'? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ❑No
truet....u......
re 2 . Structure 3. . u Structrc.4...... ......SIrucmre'5..... ......Struc m re.6.....
Identifier: W.`x!!."!...��.....1.. ....... .. .
\F\reeboard(inches): �tpf 1
J 5100 Continued on back

FacUity Number: — • Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ic/lred!Severe erosion, ❑Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or •�
closure plan? El Yes pp No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an 777""
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? y]Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? ❑Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes KNo
11. Is there evidence off:jver application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes No
12. Crop type (�Uf'R 5,{ U2
13. Do the receiving crops differ with tho designated in the Certifidg Animal Wast anagement fun (CAWMPV ❑Yes o
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes , K&o
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'? ❑Yes �. 0
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes Nc
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes No
Required Records & Documents �J
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? El Yes U4.No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? /�
(ie/WUP, checklists,design, maps, etc.) ❑Yes ) No
19. Does record keeping need improvement'?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) VYes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [:]Yes ko
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'? ❑Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑Yes XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
1ti yibla(ititis of detjcieucies mere noted ditri►ig this;visit; Yoit;wiil•�ecgiye titi ruftht a•-
corres oridence:about:this:visit.:
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
19 . Mee.d S + meord 1 n I,�ee-►V ree b
13-M +&U 6c id �+es�-5�
Reviewer/Inspector NameIlk
,(� r
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur 14 Date: 5Ino

Facility Number: Iif Inspection IXf/_S f[)OI • Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge At/or below -EFYrr-f 5M
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? Om I "r 02��
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ANo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes �(V0
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes$No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? B-�er-��lo
om i 7- u�jp
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? $'fes--B No
Additional Comments an orDrawings:
5/00

116!
g > t Di oPSoil and Wr Conservation 'ate y k
{K$
t '� y l Other Agaucy m
� -
a.
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Ol 11 Date of Visit: 4/4/2000 Time: E= Printed on: 8/14/2000
10 Not Operational O Below Threshold
E Permitted ®Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ................................................................... County: Alamacc......................................... !!5RQ........
Owner Name: Edtvard.&Nbby.............. Aiaxt........................................................... Phone No: 3.7.brbSd$........
............................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: 168Z.1?ixarx-l�amll.lAaxte................................................................... Garham-K......................................................... 2.7.25.3.............
Onsite Representative:};},'jiffy„HQjUdAy...........................: Integrator:
Certified Operator:l'. illiaMl............................. H01.11dtAS............................................ Operator Certification Number:213.1,7.............................
Location of Farm:
N.Newlin Township 3 miles W.of Eli Whitnery 1682 Dixon Lamb Lane.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 55 00 Longitude 79 • 20 15
t
Design Current Design Current Design Current ;
Swine Ca acit P,o ulation Poultry Ca acit P,o ulation Cattle Ca ap city Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 230 190
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean '
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSI W 322,000
j=Q—ber of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagaon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps �1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): 60
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 01-11 Date of Inspection r 4141200 printed on: 8/14/2000 "
5. Are there any immediate threats to integrity of any of the structures observed?(t ees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? - ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Timothy,Orchard,&Rye Corn(Silage&Grain) Small Grain(Wheat,Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
"Nti•violatioris:oi•:deft:iencies were:noted:duriilg this;visit::You:will receive rio further
corres orideuce.about this.vlslt. . . . .
Comments refer to question H :. Finial any ES answers and/or an e o en [ions or an other co
se rawings of facility t etter exp ain altos ions. se additional pag ecessary
Records look good.Need to make sure to use field acres in WUP and not maps.
Operation didn't have General Permit at time of review.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

Faci6ity Number: O1-11 Date spection 4/4/2000 • printed on: 8/14/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
t one Coinmen, atf or reng
5/00

d
Divisioreo 1 and Water Conservation-Operation Re
0 Division and Water Conservation-Compliance I' lion
Division of ater Quality-Compliance Inspection
Other Agency-Operation Review
Routine O Com laint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Ol 11 Date of Inspection 7-2-99
Time of Inspection 1000 24 hr.(hh:mm)
F
0 Permitted ®Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: I.1ixotallnotherA.Aaiey-FArm.................................................................. County: Alammc......................................... W..SR0........
Owner Name: Edward...&Uobby.............. Dixon........................................................... Phone No: 37b-bS6.8....................................................................
Facility Contact: Ed.mil.Aixon...............................................Title: Qwncr................................................. Phone No: saing........................................
Mailing Address: 1b82.1?ixan-Lamlt.Laxte................................................................... G.arlaatn..SIC.......................................................... 2.725.3.............
Onsite Representative:..Edwax:d.piAA.tx........................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.Wj liam.d.............................. Holliday............................................ Operator Certification Number:213.1.7.............................
Location of Farm:
................................................................................................................................................
...............................
.............
.................
.............................................................
ship. ..1b82.DixaxxLaxalt.Laxte...............................................................................................................
....
::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: ::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .
Latitude 35 • 55 00 « Longitude 79 • 20 ' =11
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acit Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 230 165
[I Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 322,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 0 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges_&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 19 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection$t Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Holding pond
Freeboard(inches): ................36............... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... .................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

'l
I Facility Number: O1-11 of Inspection 7-2.99
6. Are there structures on-site which are Oroperly addressed and/or managed through a to management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Com (Silage&Grain) Fescue(Graze) Small Grain(Wheat,Barley, Sudex (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
violatitilis:o�defcieneies were:noted:duiing•thi's visif:. ou.will�ecOve no fti.rfifet
I....correspofidehce.ab66tthis'VIS]t.''.''.''.'*.''.'..*
Comments refer to question tt : Explain an answers and/or an recommen ations or an other commen .
Use twin of facili to better explain sit anon . use edditio al pag messor
7 Request technical assistance from local S&WCD to see if additional segregation of waste is practical at north end of barn.
WUP needs to be correlated to the total design capacity of 230 animals(currently both 140, 175 and 230 are mentioned in
various documents). Actual dairy cows on site were below the 230 indicated above. S&WCD is aware of situation and will correct
in the near future.
Farm appears to be well operated and maintained. ORC is doing a good job.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

';' 0 Division clftl an_d Water,Conservation ,Operation Rem
h i+
a� e
' r I; E3.Division 01m,and Water Conservation Compliance , , cnon
®Division of Water Quality,-'Compliance Inspection a ,
17 Other Agency=Operation Revtew`
10 Routine O Com laint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection OFollow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number �== I Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection :OU 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ......fl.lX.OII........ Q0.i.r. ........F-4r. m....... county: ..........T...�a.CYl.Cin.(.. ................ .......................
_ I
Owner Name: ............ d... ."d........ .... ..tT. .y...........sl IXp.^........................... Phone No: ........7.7..K....-....2.T..lo.- gv.......................
Facility Contact: ...4.. 1:J. .(ti.!:�4....... .G:X:.4.K)..................Title: ..Q..P.04r..................................... Phone No: .54rnB
Mailing Address: .....&D......... ....... .................. . a..ffIaA'Al........),IVC.......................... z. .
Onsile Representative: .....G.d/!:!/ti.!.Y........../�/. 1.XR.r.?.................................................. integrator:.......... ........................................._..�........................
Certified Operator:......... .................................................)..�!.l,f y,`,G,i, ( rr� Operator Certification Number:...521
...................
Location of Farm:
an....J.a.lnl.!?......+. ....,3......m.i...Ez........t 1.:..........1E. .......JaX .. et�.....f(.Q ..2........ey.X--M......
. ,.e..
Latitude E•©' d0 - Longitude ®• ®' /3 " �0 ,r
. esign Current
Design Current
CurrentCSwine Capacity Population Pouifry a acit Po ulahon C Po ulatio n
" ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy y3a ,j
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
u,'';;❑Farrow to Weans,
°f,❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other i,
t
Farrow to Finish
�11
II°il❑ TOta1 Design Capacity.,
Y❑Gilts 1 Ali:. p,
❑Boars TlltaltSSLW ?j It
z2, o00
Number of Lagoons ,., ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holdmgl,Pofi&/Solid Traps , ' ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges& Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes JK No
Discharge originated aC ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes No
Structure I J Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 14o(dl^' 70^u
Freeboard (inches): ........... .................................. ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, []Yes fM No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number:0 I — /I • •te of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes W No
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding []PAN ❑ Yes ®No
12. Croptype Corn 511/a.4 Fe,5(a& 5wta./l CC'6'n - 5i,dex (
t
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes IN No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes 0 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes CO No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
fie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes Q No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes (8 No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes No
iVti Qibl'a(itjtjs; �ilgfcie;ncie$•wgre pgtea•ilStt itjg t�tjs:vpsit;o You:will•�ecgiye iao;fuj titgt •;
: : ctiries orideitce:about this:visit: . . . : . . . . . . . . . : : :
Con r mi s r i t us mn w+ s r r s a rtnumnnaxse pat r-r r n -u a+n. r.r r s en., ur r n rI f'T
mments(refer totques4on#} IEzplam`anyYE Sanswers4 anor any reicommendattons;oyanyfother comments ;k
e drawings of facthtyioibetter ekpiam situatmns:(useLr ditionallpages as�necessary)r "lt; „I €i u� err 6} } 7 q ilil ,
.,�S3rikUW+xs,eu a{,51dt7 ,a�,, .. .x,
S�,t
7 II Ol Y•evi4w bE--r rLost / -e T se-e- !P 0.cd one / 5Cyre�� n'
IS Prcr_4,:' a.�--- N6f"i � 0T 60.01
#g Oj U p n tj-s 70 fi e. C6 r,GI�Aed 7o A&- 'to u4a (2'P
013o Ayi)vKA
'a"(a• Lw �" �� A I e r ��� ,,tt,,, off �r1{{ 1�llri, z �' 17�ti Reviewer/Inspector Name i is. i4 it n ,•,y�,i t t On ul >• ' S i' Nt= r ,•i. {;.rj,l d ri a lll�{. 4r0 n�
p �f el� � � 1, 21
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

1 Facility Number:B — of Inspection —L— •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes R No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) — ❑Yes CM No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes .®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
Additional oriments and/or, rawtngs,
3/23/99

Q Division o0, 1101er
nd Water Conservation-Operation Re
0 Division ond Water Conservation-Compliance I tion
Division Quality-Compliance Inspection
13 Other.Agency,-Operation Review
Routine I Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Ol 11 Date of Inspection 7-2-99
[Time of Inspection ]000 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Permitted ®Certified O Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: Dixtta.Orathrt .t?auY..Faitn.................................................................. County: Alammice......................................... WSRO........
Owner Name: Edwmrd..&.Aohby............. Dixon........................................................... Phone No: 376-658.8....................................................................
Facility Contact: Edward.Vixam...............................................Title: Owner................................................. Phone No: same........................................
Mailing Address: 1682.Dlxaa-Lamp.Laae................................................................... G.Urham..Nc.......................................................... 2.725.3.............
Onsite Representative:E,d.W.A d.DlxAa........................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.Wjlfllam..l.............................. klalllday............................................ Operator Certification Number:213.1..7.............................
Location of Farm:
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
N iVx.»Ila.Tawuslxi .3.milt s.YY...ak.Eli..YXltltrter ..tfi82.12izcan.lwamk.I ame..................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 35 • 55 ® Longitude 79 • 20 15 1,
; R Design pq' MREFnt -'!, Ui ii, g Current §!Design, Cune�`nf
Swine i' Ca acit gP0 mlation i PooltcY Ca acrt P,o ulation Cattle Ga acit , P,o ulat;
❑Wean to Feeder 1❑Layer ®Dairy 230 165
Feeder to Finish❑ ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Uesign;Capacit`y 230
❑Gilts V
❑Boars Total SS LW 322,000
s.
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1� ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream Imps
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. 1f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DW ) Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection-.Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Strdcture 6
Identifier: Holding pond
s
Freeboard(inches): 3.6............... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
VlY\

Facility Number: 01-11 to of Inspection 7-2-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are0properly addressed and/or managed through ste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'? ❑Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes IN No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Com (Silage&Grain) Fescue(Graze) Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Sudex(Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
No yiolatR ns;or deficien'06*ere;noted;during this;Visit:Ndu;will recewe no fti.rther :
co"eS otidence:about this Asit. .
•omments ego question# : xplain a y E answers an or any recommen a ions or nny of er comments.
Use drawin of facilit to be ter exp ain situations. use a ditional pages necessary
7 Request technical assistance from local S&WCD to see if additional segregation of waste is practical at north end of bam.
8 WUP needs to be correlated to the total design capacity of 230 animals(currently both I40, 175 and 230 are mentioned in
various documents). Actual dairy cows on site were below the 230 indicated above. S&WCD is aware of situation and will correct
in the near future.
Farm appears to be well operated and maintained. ORC is doing a goodjob.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Cl n V ` -- —�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

State of North Carolin
Department of Envirorbnt
and Natural Resources 0 a
Division of Water Quality 17
',,,A
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
April 6, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL RECE{VED
RETURNIP REQUESTED Of EHNl�
war o y Vixon N.C. Dept.
Dixon Brothers Dairy Farm
1682 Dixon-Lamb Lane APR 12 1999
Garham NC 27253
Farm Number: 01 - II Winston-Salem
Dear Edward & Bobby Dixon: Regional Office
You are hereby notified that Dixon Brothers Dairy Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC,
must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter,
your farm has six 60 da s to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with hapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh,NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone]
extension 364 or Ron Linville with the Winston-Salem Regional Office at(336) 771-4600.
Zerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Winston-Salem Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

• • Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 0/ - / ? Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: Xs-au acre determination due to failure of
On-Site Representative: Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: ; V u :A, ✓Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: �l' 0 7 0 2- exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: 90-R / I Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: / 3g2 Y pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard-hose traveler; 2. center-pivot system; 3. linear-move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; &. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe IL.,., j
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART Il. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater(PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation.records. ..
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches;failure toAeduct required .
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers-orless than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

1
• • Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS'
NUMBER NUMBER''2 IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
i
FIELD NUMBER' -hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75%field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER'-must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acresMi having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years'(1997&.1998)of irrigation records, cannofserve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted inthe comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
P1 Plan lacks following information:
_ P2 Plan revision may satisfy 75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to below 75% use rate
P3 Other(ie/in process of installing new irrigation system):

4 r+ w r r - s
y , � Dinslom uf Soil and Water Go►aervatlon Operation Revtew;� � ,h h, ,, �'
�, Drvteton ofiSoil� Water Conservation Camphonce Inspec
�IltvistonofWa ably CampHnnceInspection'
' mod^ 'hlR„"' re£ 4 4 '36ka ka Y 3
OthertAge►tcy'�Operation Review
outine O Com laint O Follow-tip of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
[Time of Inspection 24 hr.(hh:mm)
13 Registered E3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 1E3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ...Y .. .0..1.�............. .1� 5...........i��1f�.�.... 1�[r7 County:.... """........ -WED.............
OwnerName:................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No: .......................�._Ci_..Q.. .P1,..Qf•E H N R
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: •�Q� 3.
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..........................................................Winsto.n-+Sai.e.m....
n
Onsite Representative:..i Regional Office
./ ... .�5.................. 1.. ..(j. l..................... Integrator:................................. ................................................
Certified Operator;.................................................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �' �°'
;Design ,`.Current Design .Current �,. o
Design , Current <,
.:,Swine Capacity'Population . Poultry. Capacity.Population "Cattle ;r . 'Capacity Pp lotion
❑Wean to Feeder C ❑ Layer Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish , . ❑ Non-Layer I 1,10 Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
`. ❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other `
❑Farrow to Finish Ttitat Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Bears rTotal SSLW
Number of Lagoons[Holding Ponds Spray" ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Field Area
.. �� ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
t� q g Y �.�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Cl Yes 01No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ErNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes JZ(No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes P(No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in ,,aUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes)2!(No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes [2 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes �110
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes IQ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes dNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes 0 No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds 3ff site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes )?(No
Structures(Laeoons Holdine Ponds Flush Pits etc ) PI
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes L YNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................. ...............
Freeboard(ft): .................lYf.............. ................_.................. ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes VNo
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes VNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes tQ N0
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes 94
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type L(38. .I...............�. .....1�l ff.....................................................................:.......................................................:.�..•................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? JO Yes ❑No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes jZ(No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes FdrNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes �*o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ;2(No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ePj'pNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes [poI 0
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? El es �No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes P6No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes No
0 No.violations or&Aciencies.weri hotedduring this:visit. You.will receive no ftirther:
correspondence about this:visit.,',
(omtn�ts,{refer to questton#) Explara any YES ans ers and/or anyrecommendah or,a y ther comments
w aetbi !R "3' P'h 4 R 'K d FroPS f'Yii }✓R s e k � i Y
Lisa d�rawrngs�offacihly;w better,explain situahons {use addrhonul pages as�necessary). �tx >"�' �> ,
x
DPP �� ��►�E �z, 1, ,..�,. N , .,
LA-A �� ,va WUP Ta
i05
7/25/97
,�,
Reviewer/Inspector Name i lr b E �. ; ` <' t( . ..t � t' •x/,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r. Date: j y

p Division of+Soila ater,Conservation Operation Review
pDrvtsioniofSoil,"ai NtttatgrConservefion Comphance'lnspecti i' ''�,•,I' {,i ',
4o�mpl nceip+ ec,tion ( �nr)"k',i pPDivisiotof�WatrQuaty C
nA ,A t " f +. ' { ill.....r
pOther(Agecy,O eviewl
pera war
Routine O complaint O o ow-up o inspection O o ow-up o review O _Other
Facility Number F11)
ale ofluspectiouiuic of Inspection ®24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not Operational Dale last Operated:
Farm Name: Dixon.Hrothers.Dairy.Earm................................................................... Cuuntr: Alamance WSRO
Owner Name: Edward.&Biabby.............. Dixan.......................................................... Phone No: a7fi-.65.8a...................................................................
FacilityContact: ................................................................................fide: ............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
MailingAddress: ................................................................... Gar.ham...N.0.......................................................... 27.251..............
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified operatm•:. .iiliam.,L............................ HalUday........................................... operator Certification Number:2.1,317............................
Location of Farm:
:.:.eix m.. .aw tA•...:dl!i ::::::::::::es.....-:a.::...1:::....i n..... ixan.......m...:.....Re:::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Latitude ©•©: ®:L Longitude ®� ®` ©`.
esign currentesign currentesign current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE3 Layer I ® airy 230
❑ Feeder to Finish 1[3 Non-Layer 1 ❑ on- airy
❑ arrow to can
❑ arrow to Feeder
❑ ter
❑Farrow to Fmts Total Design Capacity 230
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 322,000
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds 113 Subsurface Drains resen E3 Lagoon Area 113 pray ie i rea
" ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated ac ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
Et. I I'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. I f discharge is observed, dial it teach Sw't;tce Water'?(I(ycs, nolily DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
C. If discharge is obsel ved. what is the estimated flow in "Ell/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes ®No
7/25/97

Facility um er: I_ Date I fuspeetioll
8. Are[here lagoons or storage ponds once which need to be properly closed? • p Yes ®No
Structures(Lai oons.11oldini fonds. Plush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes N No
Slrucun'e 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Strucnoe 1I Struct ue 5 tiuvcnire C,
Identifier: holding pond
Freeboard(li): 3................. .................................. ...................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes N No
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 13 Yes ®No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes 13 No
Waste Annlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......C.uca.(Silage.&.Grain).............................Eescue........................Shall.Gxain.4.W.haat..Baclay.,.................Sudex.GHay).................
Milo ats)
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management P an(AWMP)? p Yes 13 No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes ®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes ®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 13 Yes ®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? p Yes ®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes ®No
Fur Urlified or Permitted Facilities Onh•
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? p Yes ®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A W MP? p Yes ®No
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? p Yes ®No
Ia.. .vvto 1ons.or tciencies•were.noe anng tsvtst :. oa.wt .reeeivenofurther. .
eo'rrespoylo t6c'e aWtit ttiis-vWt:: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Comments(re er o questions#) i Explain'any YES answers'and/or,any recommendations,or any other comments
Usse drawings�of facility to better'explain situations:(use additional Qages'as'necessary): j
Reviewer/Inspector Name Jim'Jo6nstun ` " .!` It
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

❑Division of and Water Conservation ❑Other gency .� % " �
I
_ �
_ Quality
Division of Water
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-u 'of DNVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
„•, Facility Numbe..,,..,......,,..,....t—^'--'
Time of Inspection s S 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Registered 10 Certified 0 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: .........D'r-xot,t...........FAA..c........ .!Znca................................ County:....e�.q.'..v.......e............... .......................
Owner Name:........AELUt'e......-D;.x oev.................................................................. Phone No: ..............................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ...
N.................................... ............................................a.7z., ..3..
Onsite .
Representative:......:......................................../0...��fr............ C&................................................... Integrator:................................................................7.....................
Certified Operator:..... (�i.E................../-. . � ............................. Operator Certification Number;...a..�cl_�.. .......
Location of Farm: l
................ .6....4W........Q. .. ........... ..5w ley......^,Y4., ...................................................................................................... -
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .
Latitude kSSL 10='®" Longitude [M• ®` =1
{I
5 Design ' ,Currents ; Design ;Current ' Desrgn ' Current;'
Swine , , Capacity,Population Poultry Capacity;P,opulahon -'Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer I ❑Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non Dairy r
❑Farrow to Wean ' ',;, ..
`
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity,.
❑Gilts r ": 1. • ,(
[IBoars Total SS'14J p oO
;. ro,
NumbWof Logo /Holding ,Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area ;
s', y i a ❑No Liquid Waste Management System r„ s ��.J
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes L9'tvo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes P-RD
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes EMo-
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes IS No
5. Does any pat of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑Yes No
maintenance/improvement? ,
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ElYes r-J--,,Noo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ElER Yes o
7/25/97 Conlin ued on back

' Facility Number: — • •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes
Structures (Lagoons,11oldine Ponds.Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): 3 ......................... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes E.Tgo
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes BlIq-0 -
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes 'o
Waste Auplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes Q-N-O
(If in excess of W MP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type COQ .f..��I�i .rtkp .-....... e /45 .............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑Yes 04.1do
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes PA
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes 9<
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes 0_o91<
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes 23'5
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes 0'55'
22. Does record keeping need improvement'? ❑ Yes i o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes Eq-10�
f
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes 2<0
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'! ❑Yes uqq-o*,
0 No.violatiom or delidendes.were noted during this'visit. .Y.ou4ill receive no ftirttier -
correspondence about this visit:
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers"and/orany recommendations or any,other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(Use additional pages as necessary):
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Namelow
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: y'/96:�

0�D(t)Ision of S"Ml and Water Conservation [3Other genc-
y AI ,.
Q'll1VISlOn Of Water Quality < .n, a: �s•n•�. ^-w. �*� �.� a c"
��
. ,"V u a n �+., :
outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DNVQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection L3 20 24 hr.(hh:mm)
®Registered U Certified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted [3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated
Farm Name; ..............k!!XON.....Zft.s............ ........................... County:......... '
OwnerName:....60i. .......... .I..X.t1 ............................................................... Phone No: ..3 .......-6,5...................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:........................-......................................... Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ...... �- o�t . JAe.'........�j.RF'•! ^..........aZ..r .................................. ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:....�....�....�........................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator............FSo..b.,R .............................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
.......jC1r.CanJ.... . 1dah .....k.rr!........Q...................kiN.a e.x....../!'!il.L...... .R.1. ................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude ®• S3 ` " Longitude EU10 ©` "
Design ',�a FCurrent3 �' Design �' Current r �' .Designs'N Currents
Swine Ca acit Po ulatio f Capacity Population m Poultry Capacity Populahon� Cattle CapaeiYy Population r t
❑Wean to Feeder 10 Layer IRd Dairy 1 /;Z C) I / o
•� ❑Feeder to Finish 1 "❑Non-Layer ❑Non Dairy `
❑Farrow to Wean T x % V"
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other '
❑Farrow to Finish ° Total,Desigo Capacity] !,9,
❑Gilts °
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds I I ID Subsurface Drains Present 110Lagoon Area IDSpray Field Area `
x .� ,°_ t ❑No Liquid Waste Management System ;
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes —11q—o/
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? . El Yes Il o
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No -
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gallium?
Al. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 0110
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes U.�k
5. Does any pan of the waste management system(other than lag Moons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes o
maintenance/improvement? ,,..��/!
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes L' o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? es ❑No
7/25/97 Continued an back

Facility Number: d(— (, • •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes QNW'
Structures(LaEoons.Noldine Ponds.Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes M-K6'
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .. ...................... .................................... ................................... ........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes 8-Ko"
11. Is erosion;or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes P'fgO
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes M*6'
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es ❑No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? Cl Yes I Ae
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... .../..._�.. e f.....rr�r!-cx ...... ha-'.-�.........................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes [I Now
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes O-tvo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes 0-N6'
[
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes L-Ytvo
20. Does facility iequire a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes [ .NV-
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes E'Ko�
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes B_Ko
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ❑No
lae&.violitiom-or deficiencies.were noted during this'visit. .Y.ou.will receive naftirtlier
correspondence about this visit: :
Cnmmenre(refer to question#): Explain anyNES answers and/or any recomnendat➢ons ar any otb'er c ominents ,
U $ravwings of facility to better explain situation (use addittonal pages as necessary) 2 1 `�<i y M M< y
�/- No I '
13 No Ile ,":a! inw�.[V Las�ee,,
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' ,_..,...rh.. d s .. . ?.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolin# •
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
A A&
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary p E H N F1
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
November 6, 1997
RECFnrc-p
N.C. Dep;> �:.HNR
Eddie L. Dixon NOV f 0 1997
1682 Dixon Lamb Lane
Graham NC 27253
Winrlon-Sale
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation RegionalOfftCa
Dear Mr. Dixon :
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you.were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O.Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone[phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
Sincerely,
-4.m,74�
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/beth/animalwaste/tempcertfollowup

(vDi ision o I and Water Conservation ❑Oth gency r`
ision of Water Quality
dutinc'(O Coni faint 'O Follow-u of DW ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
F�acilit Number_ Date of Inspection
1 Time of Inspection 24 hr.(hh:mm)
M-kegistered 0 Certified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JE3 Not O eratidnal Date Last Operated:
n_!ICON.....B�2o .....:..... ... .1Q.r+ ...........................
County'.........lQ.l!!ni�e�C :Farm Name:'.:...........(r!
Owner Name:...1&6/xi.e.......... ./.. .f`!.............................................................. Phone No:
...,S��
............................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address:....�.�G.. /4rh.. ....... /tl.........��R. �^ aZ7..:2.......... .....
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator..........
.. .o. h?r✓.............................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm: /
........`li.,t(v t1.....AA1,a4.....,,.r.✓..........t1...................A.L!.:R'R .4. .......1..4C!:i.12........R. ...............................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:................... .
Latitude �• 33' ' Longitude O V " � • ©� ©«
Swuie i r tDeiign Curr nt' ,� + Destgn C rren s� E � k Design." C rent z
CapacityPopulation�Poultryr, Gapacttyr,PopulaGon, Cattle. .,, ,[Capacity=Popplation
r❑Wean to Feeder. z'"❑LayerI .,EJDd Dairy I /;Z / p
• '❑Feeder to Finish 1 ❑Non Layer I 1 10 Non Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean -^aS"zt• aSsT€� "' '3fiis '*�� _
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other r�+� �
X PnJY s & 5b$n ra
❑Farrow to Finish [ `s�° t,.xsta 'z`t .
_ TotaMesigui Capacity[ /ate
El Gilts € #p g +qq t
�
El Boars tip `� '?' s �R- g Total°SSLW
;.�
eN�umberof Lagoon/Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
t ,..a�.E ,. ent❑No Liquid Waste Managem System.... ..
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes �®/�/
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 11d-No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ,U>ilo/
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes L.,t.Hvo
�
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require El Yes 1!1-
maintenance/improvement? �
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design `
'? ".: ❑Yes o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? LlesEl No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Fa 'tyNumber:_,_d( • .
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponf n site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes (ZLNe
Structures(Laioons.Holdine Ponds.Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes Mfihf'
Structure 1 - Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: . �R.9@..0.. ..... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(ft): ...... ................... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes 93-N'o
11. Is erosion;or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes t❑q<o-
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes M x<
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es ❑No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes t No
(If in excess of WNW,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... ...�..._r Lc e 1.....s r!-cs P......�� `+ ...... .....................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes ❑t_tw,No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ow
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ,[QNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? . ❑Yes grub
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes E.Ntr
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes iPNo'
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes aigo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ❑No
o.viulations oc deficiehd6.vi&i noted during this:visit, You'will i6ceive no ftiriher .
:•corresppndettceaboaffhis:visi •: : : : :• •:•:-:•. :': :•: :•:•:•:•: :':': :• •:•:•:•: : :':•:';•:•
v 'za+v-vaes-wfi'-s jai hjuest an*)., S , mr.eu�te A&a r a nrerae acarsx.e :,^ns:x �w,m•q.0�L.c#� x z 'lswa g x
Co ents(refer todqueshon#; Explain anyiXES answers and/or any,recommenn ations Warty,other comments
.dam,p. , e r.ex o f u 8 a i&,,(u aCq. en f k tl a �ri .
Use trawtngs of facrhty to Metter explain sttuahons use addthomal paged asmecessaty)
.".f,. a k a'S`��.�• .p ." �;,.^"'i.'.v ,�t i,% f.Ids
'7- No �
13 No /.re ��( ru
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name ` �� ,� �' +5
Reviewer/InspectorSignaturc: Date: /O— /.

JLL-14-1995 15:34 FROM I1iTY SECTION TO z •
WSRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. G 1—
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:, ! , 1995
Time:
Farm Nam00wnW.. LLZ. —
Mailing Address: 1692
�`w� � , � Lk �tiQ•l � �Z s�
County: .4 hi
Integrator Phone:
i
On Site Representadve:.s�'o a Phone: 3_�
Physical Addressa=adon:
Type of Operation: Swine ___ _ Poultry _ Cattle _LZ6'D&'7
Design Capacity: /z 6 Number of Animals on Site: /CG
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Celtifcation Number: ACNEW
Lstittide: Longitude:�' _ ! Elevation:
meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: ��t. _Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes ort�o Was any erosion observed? Yes or 1
Is adequate land available for spray?d or No Is the cover crop adequate? tes!or No
Crop(s)being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minim setback criteria? 200 Feet Dwellings? es No
100 Feet from Wells? a or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ofv�c
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch,flushing system,or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes,Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
S' t»re
cc:Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
t Tm P 012