20180854 Ver 1_Comments and Response to Review_20190613

ID#* 20180854
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review
Completed Date
06/13/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/13/201, -
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r— Stream r Wetlands W Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Kevin Yates
Project Information
r Yes r
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing 20180854 Existing 1
(DWR) (nunbersonly ...nodash) Version: (nurrbersonly)
ID#:*
Project Type: F DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
County: Pitt
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 2019-06-13 to K. Merritt DWR # 2018-0854
Comment -Response& Mit Plan Rev._ Wingfoot_DMS 44.16MB
Project # 100078 .pdf
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Kevin Yates

Signature:*

1 | Page  
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan DWR# 2018‐0854 
Comment‐Response Document 
(In response to DWR staff (Katie Merritt) Comments submitted 5/15/19) 

1. General Plan Comments 
a. This mitigation plan is written as if it is a proposal. However, it has come to the 
Division of Water Resources’ (DWR) attention that this site has already been planted 
without DWR approval of the mitigation plan.  The DWR viability letter issued for this 
site (which is included in Appendix D), as well as the rules governing buffer mitigation 
(Rule .0295) and nutrient offsets (Rule .0240), all require DWR approval prior to 
implementation of mitigation activities (planting, disking, etc).  How will DMS address 
this non‐compliance? 
Response: DMS has communicated to the provider that initiation of mitigation site work 
prior to DWR approval of the mitigation plan is not allowed.  Clearwater Mitigation Solutions 
(CMS)(Provider) will also implement any applicable measures or changes to the mitigation 
plan  as prescribed by DWR.  CMS understands and will not plant or initiate buffer mitigation 
site work for future buffer mitigation projects without prior approval from DWR.   
b. The terms “buffer” and “riparian buffer” are used too loosely throughout the plan. 
These terms should only be used to describe an area that is within the Neuse Riparian 
Buffer.  For this site, only the first 50’ adjacent to streams B1, below flag at B‐2 and 
below the flag at B‐3 are Neuse Riparian Buffers.  Therefore, please correct applicable 
references to “buffer” or “riparian buffer” and replace with “riparian areas”. 
Response: Noted.  Edits have been made in the mitigation plan to use the term “riparian 
buffer” where applicable and appropriate.   
c. Not all the site photos provided in the Appendix are dated.  During site visits, the 
Division observed a high number of invasive species and brush along portions of A‐1, 
B‐2 & B‐3.  However, some of the pictures provided appear to show those areas 
mowed.  Please clarify. 
Response:  The undated site photos in Appendix C were taken on March 19, 2018.  Ditch 
banks at the time of the DWR site visit were vegetated predominantly by native switchcane 
(Arundinaria).  There is minimal occurrence of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) on 
the site.  The pictures referenced reflect normal farm preparation prior to site documentation 
assembled for the mitigation plan.   
d. Please include the DWR Stream Determination letter for this site in the mitigation 
plan. In places where the mitigation plan has stream attributes provided by or 
decisions made by the provider (section 1.2 (c)), remove them and replaced with the 
decisions made by DWR in the letter dated September 24, 2018 to avoid confusion. 
Please add references to the newly included DWR Stream Determination Letter. 
2 | Page  
Response: Noted.  These changes have been made.     
e. Table 2 Project Area & Assets – changes and corrections are needed 
 Ditch segments along B‐2 (B2) and B‐3 (C) begin upstream from the DWR flags 
as indicated in the table below from the DWR stream determination letter.  
Buffer Credit along ditches can only be generated within areas that are at least 
30’ but a maximum of 50’. Therefore, this table needs to show the ditches as 
separate rows and only providing buffer credit within 0‐50’. The corresponding 
Figure 8A needs to be updated to show this as well. 
Response: The Mitigation Plan uses a maximum buffer credit width of 50 ft along ditch 
segments B2 and B3 based upon the DWR stream determination.  Figure 8A has been 
updated to more clearly depict such.   
 For the preservation table, add a column to the right of the “Creditable Area” and 
title this column “Eligible Credit Area*”. In this column, enter the maximum 
amount of credits allowed by the applicable rule referenced at the bottom of the 
table. 
Response: The eligible preservation area is shown in Table 3B. 
2. Section 2.0  
a. Clarify that the buffer credits along the two ditches begin above the DWR flags (see 
table in comment 1 (e) above) and meet the minimum 30’ and maximum 50’ width 
requirement as outlined in the Rule 0295 (o)(8). 
Response: The Mitigation Plan uses a maximum buffer credit width of 50 ft along ditch 
segments B2 and B3 based upon the DWR stream determination.  Figure 8A has been 
updated to more clearly depict such.   
b. Update figure 8A to reflect these corrections along the ditch reaches of Streams B‐2 
and B‐3. 
Response: The 50‐ft buffer width along the ditch segments B‐2 and B‐3 is depicted on Figure 
8A and labeled for clarity.   
c. Changes to acreages and square footages will need be made throughout the mitigation 
plan text, including applicable tables and figures when comment (a) is addressed. 
Response: Table B3 has been modified to call out the creditable buffer area separately from 
subject streams.  Note that the overall creditable area for buffer does not change.   
d. There is reference to the Conservation Easement in Mitigation Plan in the section 
discussing no ditch maintenance to comply with Rule 0295 (o)(8). However, that 
language is not specified. Please add references to specific section, subparagraph, 
item, etc from the Conservation Easement. 
Response: Activities that are restricted under the terms and conditions of the Conservation 
Easement are identified in Section L of the Conservation Easement Deed.  
3 | Page  
e. Where using term “buffer area”, please use “buffer mitigation area” or “area proposed 
for buffer mitigation”.  Then, remove the area (amount of square feet) that doesn’t 
qualify for buffer mitigation. 
Response: Noted.  Areas shown for buffer mitigation area are reflected accurately in the 
Mitigation Plan.  A 50‐ft buffer mitigation area is used for the ditch segments B2 and B‐3.  
There is no reduction in the proposed buffer mitigation area.   
f. Diffuse flow needs to be maintained in all riparian areas generated buffer mitigation or 
nutrient offsets.  For clarity, use the language “Neuse buffer & other riparian areas” 
instead of “buffer” in places where you want to include all areas. 
Response: Noted.  Edits have been made where applicable.   
g. Table 2 is the project area and asset table. However, I think this table is referenced as 
3b in the text and in table of contents. Please clarify. 
Response: The correct header for the project and asset table is Table 3A.  A prior table 
number was inadvertently used in the final version of the Mitigation Plan.  This has since 
been changed to reflect the correct table number and text references to Table 3B.   
3. Table 2 (or “Table 3b”?)  
a. Update this table to add ditches B2 & B3 on separate rows from other reaches and 
show their widths as 30‐50’ or 0‐50’ depending on which is most appropriate. 
Response: Table 3B has been updated to include B2 and B3 on separate rows from the other 
reaches.   
b. Add another row for ditches B2 & B3 showing widths 51‐100’ (if that’s the maximum 
width).  This would be the area that is NOT viable for buffer credit but is viable for 
Nutrient Offsets if that is desired by DMS.  DWR recommends adding a separate table 
to show Nutrient Offset only areas like these. Especially since these numbers do not 
get calculated in the Preservation amounts. 
Response: The maximum width for ditches B2 and B3 is 50 ft.  As a result, no additional 
changes have been made to Table 3B.     
c. Update “Eligible Preservation Area” to deduct the square footage originally pulled 
from the areas greater than 50’ along the two ditches. 
Response: Not applicable.  No areas greater than 50 ft are proposed along the ditches.     
d. Add a column to the right of “Creditable Area” and title it “Eligible Preservation Area” 
or whatever it should be based on conversations we have had.  This is where you will 
show the maximum area (square footage) of the creditable area that can be used to 
meet the 25%. 
Response: Not applicable.  Eligible Preservation Area is already shown on Table 3B.     

4 | Page  
4. Section 3.2  
a. Bald Cypress is considered a softwood and therefore does not fit the required 
performance standard outlined in the Rule .0295 for planting "Hardwoods". However, 
as stated in .0295 (n)(2)(B), “DWR may approve alternative vegetation plans upon 
consideration of factors, including site wetness and plant availability”. Therefore, 
please explain why this species and not another species, is necessary to be planted at 
this site so DWR can consider your proposal to plant these species and count it 
towards your performance standard.  It is recommended that a plan view of the 
planting plan be provided as well, to show where bald cypress is to be planted. 
Response: Noted.  Additional statement regarding suitability of bald cypress for planting 
within buffer areas on the site has been included in the text.     
5. Section 4.0 
a. Is the Baseline Monitoring Report also the “AsBuilt Report”? 
Response: Yes.     
b. What is the anticipated monitoring year? 
Response: Year 1 monitoring is scheduled for late September or early October 2019.     
c. Update plan to reflect that planted stems in the monitoring plots will all be flagged. 
Response: A statement has been included to reflect that planted stems in each monitoring 
plot will be flagged.     
d. DWR would prefer that this site commit to monitoring vegetation data no earlier than 
late August. This is consistent with what DWR has requested in other provider’s plans. 
Response: A statement has been included in the Mitigation Plan to commit to monitoring no 
earlier than late August.   
6. Figure 8A – previous comments indicate that this figure needs to be corrected.  Therefore, use the 
coordinates provided in comment 1 above to show where the ditch and stream reaches are for B‐1 
& B‐2. Add the 0‐50’ width boundary adjacent to ditch reaches. 
Response: The locations of the ditch and stream reaches for B‐1 and B‐2 are shown on the 
updated Figure 8A along with more clarity in labeling the 50‐ft wide buffer areas along 
ditches B2 and B3.   
7. Overall, if the riparian restoration, enhancement and preservation is done according to the plan 
and all DWR comments and corrections are addressed, the site should provide a good buffer 
mitigation and nutrient offset project. 

MITIGATION PLAN

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Pitt County, NC

DMS Project No. 100078
DMS Contract Number: 7607
DWR Project Number: 2018-0854

Little Contentnea Creek Watershed
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020203
RFP #16-007402

Prepared For:

NC Department of Environmental Quality 
Division of Mitigation Services 
1652 Mail Service Center 
Raleigh, NC 27699‐1652 

MITIGATION PLAN 

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site 
Pitt County, NC 

DMS Project No. 100078 
DMS Contract Number: 7607 
DWR Project Number: 2018‐0854 

Little Contentnea Creek Watershed 
Neuse River Basin 
HUC 03020203 

PREPARED FOR: 

NC Department of Environmental Quality 
Division of Mitigation Services 
1652 Mail Service Center 
Raleigh, NC 27699‐1652 

PREPARED BY: 
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions 

604 Macon Place 
Raleigh, North Carolina 
Authorized Representative: Mr. Kevin Yates 
Phone: 919‐624‐6901 

This Mitigation Plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following: 
NCAC rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, effective November 1, 2015 and Nutrient Offsets Payments Rule 15A 
NCAC 02B. 0240, amended effective September 1, 2010 and DWR – 1998. Methodology and Calculations 
for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment. 

 These documents govern DMS operations and procedures  
for the delivery of compensatory mitigation. 

Contributing Staff: 
Kevin Yates, Clearwater Mitigation Solutions 
Christian Preziosi, Land Management Group 
Wes Fryar, Land Management Group  
Kim Williams, Land Management Group

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  i | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 Mitigation Project Summary .............................................................................................. 1 
 1.1 Project Narrative .......................................................................................................... 1 
 1.2 Project Location and Site Description ......................................................................... 2 
        A. Watershed and Water Quality Classification .......................................................... 3 
              B. Physiography, Geology, and Soils ............................................................................ 3 
        C. Streams and Existing Conditions .............................................................................. 4 

2.0. Regulatory Considerations ................................................................................................. 5 
 2.1 Determination of Credits ............................................................................................. 5 

3.0.  Implementation Plan ......................................................................................................... 8 
 3.1 Site Preparation ............................................................................................................ 8 
 3.2 Methods and Materials ................................................................................................ 8 

4.0 Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................................. 9  

5.0        Success Criteria ................................................................................................................ 10 

6.0        Stewardship ..................................................................................................................... 10 
             6.1 Ownership ................................................................................................................... 10 
             6.2 Long‐Term Stewardship ............................................................................................. 11 

7.0        References ........................................................................................................................ 12 

LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES, AND APPENDICES 

Figure 1 ......................................................................................................................... Vicinity Map 
Figure 2 ................................................................................................................... Watershed Map  
Figure 3  ..................................................................... USGS Farmville 7.5 Minute Topographic Map  
Figure 4 ....................................................................................................... NC DOT QL2 LiDAR Map  
Figure 5 ............................................................................................... Pitt County NRCS Soil Survey  
Figure 6 ........................................................................................... 1998 NAPP Aerial Photography  
Figure 7 ..................................... 2016 Aerial with Conservation Easement and Areas to be Disked  
Figure 8A .................................................................................................. Mitigation Plan Overview  
Figure 8B .......................................................................... Mitigation Plan Inset with Plot Locations 

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  ii | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

Table 1. ........................................................................................... Summary of Mapped Soil Series 
Table 2. ................................................................................................... Stream Attribute Summary 
Table 3a ...................................................................................................... Buffer Project Attributes 
Table 3b ...................................................................................... Buffer Project Area and Attributes 
Table 4   ......................................................................................................................... Planting Plan 
Table 5 .................................................................................................... Site Protection Instrument 

Appendix A. .......................................................................................  Historical Aerial Photography 
Appendix B ..........................................................................  NC DWR Stream Determination Letter 
Appendix C ............................................................................... Existing Condition Site Photographs 
Appendix D ................................................................................ NC DWR Mitigation Viability Letter  
Appendix E ............................................................................................. Categorical Exclusion Form 
Appendix F .......................................................... Recorded Conservation Easement Deed and Plat 

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  1 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

1.0 Mitigation Project Summary 
1.1      Project Narrative 
The Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Restoration Project (“the project”) will provide high quality compensatory 
mitigation for authorized riparian buffer impacts credited through the NC DMS in‐lieu‐fee program and 
occurring within the Neuse River Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020203 and to address the watershed 
goals identified in the Neuse River Basin Restoration Plan (RBRP) (NC EEP, 2010).  These goals include: 
● Promote nutrient and sediment reduction in agricultural areas by restoring and preserving 
wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers; 
● Promote re‐establishment of riparian corridors of substantial width to improve connectivity of 
protected lands; and 
● Support implementation of Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP) strategies. 

These watershed goals will be achieved via the restoration and enhancement of woody buffer along 
unnamed tributaries of the Little Contentnea Creek (a 303d‐listed impaired waterbody).  Specific 
objectives of the proposed project to achieve the desired goals include: 

● Conversion of existing agricultural fields into wooded riparian buffer zones along existing 
tributaries via planting of characteristic hardwood species;  
 ● Enhancement of degraded riparian areas (currently in areas of fields laid to fallow) via planting 
of characteristic hardwood species;  
● Ensuring diffuse flow throughout the riparian buffer zone;  
● Establishment of a conservation easement to protect the riparian buffer restoration site in 
perpetuity and to connect to existing DMS protected site; and  
● Invasive species management (as needed) during monitoring period.   

As is well‐documented in the scientific literature, wooded riparian areas along streams and drainageways 
provide a suite of benefits not only to the localized site but to receiving waters and streams of the larger 
watershed.  Riparian buffers reduce the potential for on‐site stressors to adversely affect streams.  In 
particular, restored and enhanced riparian areas on the Wingfoot site will remove non‐point source 
contaminants associated with intensive agricultural farming practices.  This is of particular benefit to the 
Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) of Little Contentnea Creek (14‐digit HUC 03020203070030) which has 
exhibited significant water quality impairments associated with low dissolved oxygen (DO), high total 
nitrogen (N) and high total phosphorous (P).  High nutrient concentrations manifest from non‐point source 
loading associated with intensive agricultural land use practices.  The predominant land‐use within the 
watershed is agricultural production (with 49% of the land area in agricultural use).  There are 
approximately 67 miles of streams that flow through the Little Contentnea Creek TLW.  Forty‐one percent 
of these streams are not adequately buffered with woody vegetation (NC EEP, 2010).  Sediment loading 
(associated with intensive silvicultural and agricultural drainage practices) is prevalent throughout the 
watershed.  These impairments tend to be exacerbated by direct disturbances to streams and wetlands 
(such as prior channelization of streams and historic drainage of wetlands).  The cumulative effects of such 
practices result in diminished nutrient uptake and nutrient/sediment loading to down‐gradient waters.  
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  2 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

The high percentage of land in agricultural use combined with the lack of adequate stream buffers results 
in the type of water quality impairments documented within this watershed.   

The project promotes the goals of the Neuse RBRP (2010) and specifically the Little Contentnea Creek TLW 
by addressing agricultural runoff and buffer restoration.  The RBRP also seeks to prioritize the goals and 
strategies of the Coastal Habitat Protection Plan.  These strategies similarly seek to reduce non‐point 
pollution and minimize cumulative losses of fish habitat and include measures designed to reduce 
sediment pollution from agricultural sites and increasing the use of effective vegetative buffers.  The 
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Restoration Project helps to achieve these goals.     

Ancillary benefits of the proposed riparian buffer restoration effort include:  

 Increase of organic material as food for invertebrate, fish and wildlife; 
 Supply of woody debris that provides increased niche habitat for fish, invertebrates and 
amphibians; 
 Reduction of sunlight reaching the stream and modulation of surface water temperatures; 
 Floodwater attenuation via temporary storage, interception and slow releases from heavy rains; 
and  
 Habitat connectivity between currently protected riparian buffer areas (NC DMS Fox Run Site) and 
downstream riverine swamp forest via a protected riparian habit corridor (including expansion of 
refuge and foraging habitat).   

The anticipated functional uplift to be provided by the project will have direct benefits to the adjacent 
streams and to the broader ecological health of the Little Contentnea Creek watershed.   

1.2 Project Location and Site Description 
The project site is located in Pitt County, approximately three miles southeast of the Town of Farmville, 
North Carolina and east of State Route 1139 (Moye Turnage Road) (refer to Figure 1).  As indicated above, 
the Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Project is located within the Little Contentnea Creek TLW of the Neuse River 
HUC 03020203 (Figure 2).  The buffer restoration and enhancement areas are located along unnamed 
tributaries (UTs) and drainages that flow directly into Little Contentnea Creek approximately 0.3 miles 
downstream (refer to Figure 3 and Figure 4).  Flanagan Field is located 1.25 miles to the west off of US 
Highway 264 Alternate.  The entrance to the access road for the project is at Latitude 35.561732, 
Longitude ‐77.546712. 

Driving Directions to the project (from Raleigh): Get on I‐440 E from Capital Blvd. Use the right 2 lanes to 
take exit 14 toward US‐64 E/US‐264 E/Wilson/Rocky Mt. Continue onto US‐264 E/US‐64 E. Take 
exit 66 for Wesley Church Rd toward US‐258. Drive 2.8‐miles and turn left onto Moye‐Turnage Rd.  The 
dirt entrance road will be on the left approximately 2 miles from this intersection. 

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  3 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

A. Watershed and Water Quality Classification 
Little Contentnea Creek is a 303d‐listed impaired waterbody with a NC DEQ surface water classification of 
C; Sw, NSW.   

B.  Physiography, Geology, and Soils 
The Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Project site is located within the Rolling Coastal Plain Ecoregion IV (65m) 
just west of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain.  In general, this ecoregion coincides with higher relief and 
better drained landscapes north and west of the Surry Scarp.  Drainageways tend to be more incised with 
more rolling terrain along stream terraces and interstream divides relative to the flatter surfaces of the 
Mid‐Atlantic Flatwoods and Carolina Flatwoods to the east and south.   
Elevations of the site range from 42 ft above mean seal level (AMSL) along the eastern boundary adjoining 
the riverine swamp bottom of Little Contentnea Creek to 55 ft AMSL on ridges of interstream divides.  The 
soils formed in unconsolidated sand, silt, and clay deposited by water. They are nearly level to sloping.  
Soils of the site consist of poorly‐drained to well‐drained sandy loams (refer to Figure 5).    Mapped soil 
series occurring on the site and their associated properties are summarized in Table 1. 

  Table 1. Summary of Mapped Soil Series  
Map 
Unit 
Symbol 
Series Name Drainage Class Landscape Position and 
Landform 
Hydric 
Soil 
(Y/N) 
Tu Tuckerman fine sandy 
loam Poorly Drained Nearly level areas of lower 
Coastal Plain (< 2% slopes) 
Y 
CrB Craven fine sandy loam Moderately 
Well Drained 
Slopes of drainageways and 
uplands of Coastal Plain  
(0 to 12% slopes) 
N 
Go Goldsboro sandy loam Moderately 
Well Drained 
Marine terraces and uplands of 
lower and upper Coastal Plain  
(0 to 10% slopes) 
N 
MaB Masada sandy loam Well Drained Stream terraces of coastal river 
valleys (0 to 10% slopes) N 
Ly Lynchburg fine sandy 
loam 
Somewhat 
Poorly Drained 
Marine terraces and flats of lower 
to upper Coastal Plain 
(0 to 5% slopes) 
N 
WaB Wagram loamy sand Well Drained 
Slopes and shoulders of concave 
uplands of middle and upper 
Coastal Plain (0 to 15% slopes) 
N 
OcB Ocilla loamy fine sand Somewhat 
Poorly Drained  
Nearly level low uplands and 
stream terraces   
(commonly less than 2% slopes) 
N 
AgB Alaga loamy sand  Somewhat 
Poorly Drained 
Ridges and slopes of uplands and 
stream terraces  
(0 to 15% slopes) 
N 

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  4 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

C.  Streams and Existing Conditions 
The property is currently managed for agricultural production (corn, cotton, and soybean) and lacks 
existing forested buffer along a majority of the streams and drainageways dissecting the site.  Site 
drainage and hydrology have been historically altered with channelized streams and cleared agricultural 
lands prevalent on historic aerial photos dating back to the 1940s (see historical site aerial photography 
in Appendix A).  The extent of the conservation easement boundary is depicted on the 1998 aerial and 
2016 aerial in Figure 6A and Figure 6B, respectively.    
On August 30, 2018, Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted on 
on‐site determination of site channels for the applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B 
.0233).  Mr. Scarbraugh determined that three reaches (V2 A, the downstream segment of V2 B, and V2 
D are subject to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules.  Note that V2 A and V2 D were identified as perennial streams 
while the downstream segment of reach V2 B (starting at Flag 18‐0854 V2 B E/I) was identified as an 
intermittent stream.  The upstream segment of V2 B and reach V2 C were identified as ditches not subject 
to the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules.  A copy of the DWR Stream Determination letter (dated September 
24, 2018) with corresponding maps is provided in Appendix B. 

Note that for the purpose of this Mitigation Plan, the nomenclature of site reaches will be consistent with 
those presented in the project’s Technical Proposal and as referenced in the “Site Viability for Buffer 
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter” prepared by Ms. Katie Merritt of NC DWR (letter dated September 
26, 2018).   

The buffer mitigation site consists of four stream reaches (A1, B1, B2, and B3) as illustrated in Figures 8A 
and 8B.  Reach A1 (referred to as V2 D in Mr. Scarbraugh’s stream determination letter) is a perennial 
stream located on the northern boundary of the site and is contiguous with the existing NC DMS buffer 
project easement (Fox Run).  Reach A1 flows from the NC DMS easement on the northwestern boundary 
to the north and into Little Contentnea Creek approximately 1,800 lf downstream.  There is approximately 
815 lf of stream associated with Reach A1 within the proposed buffer easement area.  Reach B1 (referred 
to as Reach V2 A in DWR’s stream determination letter) is the perennial stream that dissects the central 
portion of the site.  It drains into Little Cotentnea Creek (approximately 1,300 lf downstream from the 
eastern property boundary).  There is approximately 2,690 lf of stream channel associated with Reach B1 
within the proposed buffer easement area.  Reaches B2 and B3 (V2 B‐ditch and V2 C, respectively, in 
DWR’s stream determination letter) flow into Reach B1 (Reach V2 B‐stream in DWR’s stream 
determination letter) from smaller drainage areas on the southern portion of the site.  Reach B2 is an 
intermittent stream consisting of approximately 585 lf of stream channel.  Reach B3 is a non‐stream ditch 
exhibiting an Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) and flows directly into reach B2.  Site photos of existing 
conditions are provided for reference in Appendix C.     

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  5 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

 Table 2.  Stream Attribute Summary 
Stream Attribute 
Stream Reach 
A1 B1 B2 B3 
Flow Perennial Perennial Intermittent Seasonal RPW 
Stream Length  815 2,690 585 420 
Drainage Area 557 acres 256 acres 21 acres 13 acres 

As indicated above, the site consists nearly entirely of actively farmed agricultural land (corn, cotton, 
soybean) with fields extending to the top of banks of existing streams and ditches.  Herbaceous vegetation 
along the edges of ditches and the banks of the channels generally consists of soft rush (Juncus effusus), 
broomsedge (Andropogon spp.), and cattail (Typha latifolia).  There are two smaller areas of fields that 
have been laid to fallow consisting of herbaceous and shrub species including soft rush, broomsedge, giant 
foxtail (Setaria spp.), old field blackberry (Rubus alumnus), pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), and winged 
sumac (Rhus copallinum).  Wooded areas offsite generally consist of red maple (Acer rubrum), loblolly 
pine (Pinus taeda), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), and bald cypress 
(Taxodium distichum). The adjacent NC DMS riparian buffer (“Fox Run” site) consists generally of planted 
river birch (Betula nigra), American elm (Ulmus americana), American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), 
water oak (Quercus nigra), northern red oak (Quercus rubra), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), 
and volunteer loblolly pine (Pinus taeda).   

2.0   Regulatory Considerations
2.1  Determination of Credits 
Approximately 4,090‐lf of streams and waters of the U.S. have been targeted for riparian area restoration.  
Approximately 13.16 acres of existing agricultural fields are targeted for restoration while approximately 
0.71 acres of fields recently laid to fallow are considered suitable for riparian area enhancement.  An 
additional 4.62 acres of existing, wooded riparian area will be preserved as part of the mitigation effort, 
and additional lands (both wooded and agricultural fields) will be placed within the conservation 
easement to promote habitat connectivity between the existing DMS Fox Run buffer site, the Wingfoot 
buffer site, and the riverine swamp forest of Little Contentnea Creek to the east.   
On August 30, 2018, Ms. Katie Merritt of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) performed an evaluation 
of surface water features and adjacent riparian areas within the proposed mitigation site for the 
determination of riparian buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015) 
and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240 (refer to attached Site Viability Letter, 
Appendix D).  Based upon this evaluation, DWR determined that areas within 200 ft of Reach A‐1 and 
Reach B‐1 are eligible for both buffer credit and nutrient offset credit (with the latter eligible in non‐
forested fields only).  Riparian areas along Reach B‐2 and B‐3 are eligible for nutrient offset.  In addition, 
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  6 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

the downstream segment of B‐2 is eligible for buffer credits.  Reach B‐3 and the upstream segment of 
Reach B‐2 were determined to be conditionally eligible for buffer credit value provided that the watershed 
drainage area is of sufficient size to meet the rule criteria per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (8).  Note that the 
ditches proposed for buffer restoration meet the following criteria: 
  (A) are directly connected with and draining towards an intermittent or perennial stream;  
 (B) are contiguous with the rest of the mitigation site protected under a perpetual conservation 
easement;  
 (C) stormwater runoff from overland flow shall drain towards the ditch (Not Applicable); 
 (D) are between one and three feet in depth; and  
(E) the entire length of the ditches have been in place prior to the effective date of the applicable 
buffer rule.  
Similarly, in accordance with Subparagraph (o)(8), the perpetual conservation easement includes the ditch 
and the confluence of the ditch with the stream.  The easement includes language prohibiting future 
maintenance of the ditch (which is referenced in Section II (L) of the recorded conservation easement).  In 
addition, the watershed draining to the ditch is at least four times larger than the restored or enhanced 
area along the ditch.  The watershed draining to the upper end of Reach B‐2 is approximately 782,392 sf 
(relative to a corresponding buffer area of 32,671 sf).  The watershed draining to Reach B‐3 is 
approximately 312,499 sf (relative to a corresponding buffer area of 35,609 sf).   
There are no known site constraints that would impede or adversely affect the restoration, enhancement, 
and preservation of riparian buffer within the recorded easement area.  Diffuse flow of runoff will be 
maintained in the riparian buffer. Any direct conveyances (such as pipes or drain tiles) will be eliminated 
and the flow converted to diffuse flow. 
A Categorical Exclusion document (i.e. limited environmental screening) has been completed in 
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and corresponding guidelines of 
the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ).  The completed Categorical Exclusion document verifies that 
the proposed action will not have a significant impact on the environment.  Refer to the attached 
Categorical Exclusion form with screening checklist and signatures of the NC DMS Project Manager and 
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (Appendix E).    

The proposed mitigation attributes, quantities and credits are outlined in Table 3a and 3b below.   

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  7 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

Table 3a. Buffer Project Attributes 
Project Name  Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Restoration Project 
Hydrologic Unit Code  03020203070030 (14 digit) 
River Basin  Neuse 
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)  35.565723, ‐77.533763 
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG)  DB 3765 Page 517 
Total Credits (BMU)  550,390 (sf) 
Types of Credits  Riparian Buffer 
Mitigation Plan Date  February 2019 
Initial Planting Date  March 2019 
Baseline Report Date  April 2019 
MY1 Report Date  December 2019 
MY2 Report Date  December 2020 
MY3 Report Date  December 2021 
MY4 Report Date  December 2022 
MY5 Report Date  December 2023 

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  7 | Page DMS Project No. 100078 May 2019      Table 3b: Buffer Project Areas and Assets: Riparian Buffer Credits – Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Restoration Project   *Preservation creditable area is less than 25% of the total creditable mitigation area and is therefore in compliance with 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5) which limits preservation mitigation area to no more than 25% of total mitigated area.   RIPARIAN BUFFER (15A NCAC 02B.0295)Location Jurisdictional Streams Restoration TypeReach ID/ComponentBuffer Width (ft)Creditable Area (sf)*Initial Credit Ratio (x:1)% Full CreditFinal Credit Ratio (x:1)Riparian Buffer Credits (BMU)Convertible to Nutrient Offset (Yes or No)Nutrient Offset: N (lbs)Nutrient Offset: P (lbs)20‐29 75% 1.33333                   ‐                          ‐   0.000A1, B1 30‐100        414,636 100% 1.00000414,635.600 Yes     21,637.019 0.000A1 101‐200           87,048 33% 3.03030  28,725.840 Yes        4,542.445 0.000B2, B3 (Ditches) 0‐50           71,494 100% 1.00000  71,494.000 Yes        3,730.787 20‐29 75% 2.66667                   ‐                          ‐   0.000B1 30‐100           30,855 100% 2.00000  15,427.500 No                      ‐   0.000101‐200 33% 6.06061                   ‐                          ‐   0.000604,033       530,282.940       29,910.250 0.000201,344       Location Jurisdictional Streams Restoration TypeReach ID/ComponentBuffer Width (ft) Creditable Area (sf)* Initial Credit Ratio (x:1)% Full CreditFinal Credit Ratio (x:1) Riparian Buffer Credits (BMU) 20‐29 75% 13.33333                   ‐   A1, B1 30‐100        201,074 100% 10.00000  20,107.400 101‐200 33% 30.03030                   ‐   20‐29 75% 6.66667                   ‐   30‐100 100% 5.00000                   ‐   101‐200 33% 15.15152                   ‐   20‐29 75% 4.00000                   ‐   30‐100 100% 3.00000                   ‐   101‐200 33% 9.09091                   ‐   201,074         20,107.400 805,107       550,390.340 Subject or NonsubjectRural or UrbanEnhancementELIGIBLE PRESERVATION AREARestorationSUBTOTALSTOTALSSUBTOTALSIf Converted to Nutrient Offset3SubjectNonsubjectRuralUrban2105PreservationSubject or Nonsubject1
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  8 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

3.0  Implementation Plan 
3.1 Site Preparation 
Based upon pre‐project assessment of compaction within the proposed planting areas, the project team 
has identified two select areas of the buffer restoration project that would warrant site disking (refer to 
Figure 7).  The areas include an approximate 150‐ft long area of the right top of bank of the upper end of 
Reach B‐1 and the riparian area of the right top of bank of Reach A‐1 (including the area of field identified 
as the “Riparian Habitat Corridor”).  These areas will be disked prior to planting to reduce compaction and 
to enhance microtopography.  In addition, selective mowing is proposed within the riparian area 
enhancement area to limit blackberry and smaller, volunteer red maple (refer to Figure 7).  No other site 
preparation is proposed.  There have been no observed drain tiles discharging into the subject stream 
channels or ditches targeted for riparian buffer restoration and enhancement.  However, such features 
will be removed during project implementation in the event any are observed prior to, or during, 
construction and planting.  
The proposed mitigation site will provide for the establishment of natural plant assemblages occurring 
within riparian habitats of the Coastal Plain.  Target species to be planted have been carefully selected 
based upon site‐specific information (including soil profiles and evaluation of landscape position).  The 
proposed planting regime will result in a mature community characteristic of riparian areas in the region.  
The project will include the restoration and enhancement of riparian areas adjacent to ditches and 
streams on the property as outlined in Figures 8A and 8B.  This will be achieved via the planting of 
characteristic hardwood species (as further described in Section 3.2 below), ensuring diffuse flow through 
the riparian area.  No existing exotic or invasive species have been observed within the proposed buffer 
areas.  However, an invasive species management plan and protocol has been implemented should 
invasive species volunteer into the site.   
Prior to planting, the conservation easement boundary will be marked using 6‐inch diameter treated post 
buried 2 feet, standing 6 feet above the ground surface, within the agricultural fields.  T‐posts will be 
installed to provide supplemental marking within areas between the treated post, within the 
enhancement area, and within the preservation areas as needed.  The easement boundary will also be 
marked with standard yellow Conservation Area signs, per the 01/23/14 NCDMS Boundary Marking 
Standards. 

3.2  Methods and Materials 
The planting plan consists of the planting five species on a density of approximately 538 stems per acre.  
Species selection and distribution were matched closely to micro‐site hydrologic and edaphic conditions 
and include species characteristic of riparian buffer assemblages in the watershed.  The species consist of 
four hardwoods and one softwood (bald cypress).  Bald cypress is well‐suited to the mapped hydric soil 
series of the project area (particularly the poorly drained Tuckerman fine sandy loam series) and is 
characteristic of small stream swamp communities and drainageways of the Outer Coastal Plain of North 
Carolina.As such, it is considered appropriate for planting of the riparian buffer and riparian areas.   

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  9 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

Species more tolerant of poorly drained soils (i.e. bald cypress and willow oak) will be planted within lower 
landscape positions generally consisting of the Tuckerman soil series while species characteristically 
occurring in better drained soils will be planted in slightly higher convex landscape positions.  The selected 
native trees are well‐suited to the site‐specific conditions of the property to promote high survivorship 
rates.   
The planting and re‐establishment of characteristic riparian vegetation will be coupled with controlling 
invasive species population. Herbicide applications and vegetative management may be needed during 
tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent recruitment and establishment of invasive species 
that could compete with the planted native species. The restoration area will be closely monitored, and 
invasive vegetation management will be implemented as needed, and in consultation with DMS staff.   

Table 4 summarizes the planting plan for the Wingfoot mitigation site.    

  Table 4. Planting Plan1  
1Note planted area includes approximate 1.0 acres of field included for riparian habitat corridor.  While no credit is 
proposed for this area, it will be planted per the same specifications (species density and composition) as those 
contained within final, approved mitigation plan.  

4.0 Monitoring Plan 
Upon completion of the riparian buffer restoration, a Baseline Monitoring Report will be prepared and 
submitted to the NC DMS to document the extent of riparian buffer restoration.  The report will include 
all information required by DMS monitoring guidelines including photographs, plot locations, and 
documentation of existing species density and composition. Subsequent monitoring reports will be 
submitted annually to the NC DMS (by December 1 of each year). Monitoring will be conducted during 
the growing season for a period of five years.  Year 1 monitoring will be conducted a minimum of 6 months 
from the completion of the planting.  Monitoring will be performed in accordance with the Consolidated 
Mitigation Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295) and current DMS standards. 

Vegetative monitoring will include the establishment of eleven (11) permanent plots consistent with the 
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) protocol Level 2 (version 4.2) (refer to Figure 8B for plot 
Common Name Scientific Name % Composition Acreage Quantity 
River Birch Betula nigra 25 3.72 2,000 
American Sycamore Plantanus occidentalis 17.5 2.60 1,400 
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 27.5 4.09 2,200 
Willow Oak  Quercus phellos 15 2.23 1,200 
Water Oak Quercus nigra 15 2.23 1,200 
Total  N/A 100 14.87 8,000 
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  10 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

locations).  During monitoring, the species, height, diameter at breast height (DBH), and vigor of each 
planted stem will be recorded.  Additionally, the number, species, and general height of volunteers will 
be documented. All planted stems within the monitoring plot will be flagged.  A digital camera will be used 
to take photos at each predetermined photo point location.  Any vegetative problem areas in the site will 
be noted and reported in each monitoring report. Vegetative problem areas may include areas that either 
lack vegetation or include populations of exotic vegetation. Monitoring reports will identify any 
contingency measures that may need to be employed to remedy site deficiencies. For instance, invasive 
vegetation management may be needed if exotic species volunteer into the site. 
  Annual monitoring of this site will occur no earlier than late August of each year.  The first year vegetation 
monitoring event will occur in September or October of 2019.  After the fifth‐year monitoring report is 
finalized, a close‐out report that provides an assessment of the monitoring data collected from the entire 
monitoring period will be prepared.  The project managers for Clearwater Mitigation Solutions and Land 
Management Group will attend the close‐out meeting(s) and will present the final project to the DWR 
following all DMS closeout procedures and templates. 

5.0 Success Criteria 
The site will be evaluated based upon performance criteria related to vegetative density.  Specifically, the 
performance criteria for this project will be: 

(1) “Demonstrated density of planted species to meet or exceed 260 trees per acre during the fifth 
year post‐planting;”1 and 

(2) Species assemblage must include a minimum of four native hardwood species or four native 
hardwood tree and native shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50% of stems.   

6.0 Stewardship 
6.1 Ownership 
The current owner of the property is Ham Equipment, LLC (c/o Bobby Ham).  The property owner (Grantor) 
has granted and conveyed in perpetuity a Conservation Easement (CE) along with a Right to Access to the 
State of North Carolina (Grantee).  A copy of the recorded CE deed and plat are provided for reference in 
Appendix F.  Refer to Table 5 for more detailed information related to the site protection instrument.   

1 Native hardwood and native shrub volunteer species may be included to meet the final performance standard of 
260 stems per acre.   

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  11 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

Table 5: Site Protection Instrument – Wingfoot Riparian Buffer 

Landowner 

PIN 

County 
Site 
Protection 
Instrument 
Deed Book and 
Page Number 
  Acreage Protected 
under Easement 
Ham Equipment 
(c/o Bobby Ham) 
4636538996 Pitt Conservation 
Easement 
DB 3765 
Page 517 22.31 

6.2 Long‐Term Stewardship Plan 
The site will be transferred to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) 
Stewardship Program.  This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long‐term steward 
for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in 
the conservation easement are upheld.  Funding will be supplied by the responsible party on a yearly 
basis until such time an endowment is established.  The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is developing an 
endowment system within the non‐reverting, interest‐bearing Conservation Lands Conservation Fund 
Account.  The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina General 
Statue GS 113A‐232(d)(3).  Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used for the purpose of 
stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if applicable. The 
Stewardship Program will periodically install signage as needed to identify boundary markings as needed.  

The landowner shall contact the long‐term steward if clarification is needed regarding the restrictions 
associated with the recorded conservation easement. The landowner shall also report damaged or missing 
signs to the long‐term steward, as well as contact the long‐term steward if a boundary needs to be 
marked, or clarification is needed regarding a boundary location.  If land use changes in future and fencing 
is required to protect the easement, the landowner is responsible for installing appropriate approved 
fencing. 

Long‐term stewardship activities may include (but are not limited to):  
 Signage installation and maintenance along the Site boundary to denote the area protected by 
the recorded conservation easement; 
 Evaluation and repair/remediation of diffuse flow; and 
 Evaluation and remediation of nuisance vegetation. 

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan  12 | Page 
DMS Project No. 100078 
May 2019    

7.0 References 
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Web Soil Survey of Pitt County. 
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm 
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 2011. Surface Water Classifications. 
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water‐resources/planning/classification‐standards/classifications 
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2018. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database, 
Pitt County, NC. 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal 
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Pitt County, NC. 
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/pitt.html 

Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Map Source: DeLorme 2012 Atlas & Gazeteer, Pages 43 & 65
SITE
N
SCALE 1" = 1 mile
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
L:\WETLANDS\2018\40-18-093\maps\mapset
SITE
Wingfoot Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Site
Cataloging Unit 03020203
Pitt County, NC
March 2018
LMG # 40-18-093
Public Use Airport (not listed as a general aviation airport nor listed
in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems or “NPIAS”)
Figure 2
Watershed Map
N
SCALE 1" = 10 Miles
Wingfoot Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Site
Cataloging Unit 03020203
Pitt County, NC
March 2018
LMG # 40-18-093
Legend
8-Digit Hydrologic Unit (03020203)
Project Boundary
Targeted Local Watershed (03020203070030)
Pitt
Nash
Wayne
Lenoir
Wilson
Johnston
Edgecombe
Greene
Franklin
Craven
Wake
Martin
Sampson
Duplin
Jones
Halifax
NCDOT GIS Unit, Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors, (c)
OpenStreetMap and contributors, Creative Commons-Share Alike License
(CC-BY-SA)
Wingfoot
Site
Map Source: USGS Farmville Quadrangle 7.5 minute
Figure 3
Topographic Map
N
SCALE 1" = 1,500’*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
L:\WETLANDS\2018\40-18-093\maps\mapset
Wingfoot Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Site
Cataloging Unit 03020203
Pitt County, NC
March 2018
LMG # 40-18-093
A
s
k
e
w

R
dMoye-Turnage RdBallards CrossroadsNC911, NCCGIA, Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
FOX RUN
RIPARIAN BUFFER
MITIGATION SITE
SITE
Legend
Conservation Easement
Figure 4
LiDAR map
Map Source: NC Floodplain Mapping Program 2014 QL2 LiDAR Data
N
SCALE 1" = 700’
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
L:\WETLANDS\2018\40-18-093\maps\mapset
Wingfoot Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Site
Cataloging Unit 03020203
Pitt County, NC
March 2018
LMG # 40-18-093
NC911, NCCGIA, Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
Legend
Elevation
78.49 - 83.13
73.85 - 78.49
69.21 - 73.85
64.57 - 69.21
59.93 - 64.57
55.29 - 59.93
50.65 - 55.29
46.01 - 50.65
41.37 - 46.01
FOX RUN
RIPARIAN BUFFER
MITIGATION SITE
SITE
Legend
Conservation Easement
Map Source: NRCS Pitt County Soil Survey, 1974
Figure 5
Soils Map
N
SCALE 1" = 1,000’*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
L:\WETLANDS\2018\40-18-093\maps\mapset
Legend
AgB: Alaga loamy sand, banded substratum, 0-6% slopes
Bb: Bibb complex
Co: Coxville fine sandy loam
Crb: Craven fine sandy loam, 1-6% slopes
ExA: Exum fine sandy loam, 0-1% slopes
GoA: Goldsboro sandy loam, 0-1% slopes
GoB: Goldsboro sandy loam, 1-6% slopes
Ly: Lynchburg fine sandy loam
MaB: Masada sandy loam, 0-4% slopes
NrB2: Norfolk sandy loam, 1-6% slopes, eroded
OcB: Ocilla loamy fine sand, 0-4% slopes
Ra: Rains fine sandy loam
Tu: Tuckerman fine sandy loam
WaB: Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopes
FOX RUN
RIPARIAN BUFFER
MITIGATION SITE
Wingfoot Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Site
Cataloging Unit 03020203
Pitt County, NC
March 2018
LMG # 40-18-093
SITE
Conservation Easement
Figure 6
1998 Aerial Photograph
Map Source: 1998 NAPP Aerial Photography
N
SCALE 1" = 700’
*Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
L:\WETLANDS\2018\40-18-093\maps\mapset
NC911, NCCGIA, NCCGIA, Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
Wingfoot Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Site
Cataloging Unit 03020203
Pitt County, NC
March 2018
LMG # 40-18-093
NC911, NCCGIA, NCCGIA, Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
FOX RUN
RIPARIAN BUFFER
MITIGATION SITE
SITE
Legend
Conservation Easement
SCALE 1"=400'Figure 7Conservation Easementwith Proposed Disking Areas8004002000L:\WETLANDS\2018 WETLANDS FILES\LMG18.305 --- Wingfoot Buffer Project, Kevin Yates\CAD\Wingfoot.dwgNOTES:1.BUFFER MITIGATION BOUNDARIES BASED UPON BASE SURVEY DRAWING FROM K2 DESIGN GROUP.Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation SiteCataloging Unit 03020203Pitt County, NCJanuary 2019LMG18.093LEGENDParcel Boundary(~127 ac.)Proposed Disking Area( ~1.39ac.)Top Of BankConservation Easement (Surveyed)(~22.31 ac.)Proposed Mowing Transect Area( ~0.57ac.)
SCALE 1"=1000'Figure 8AMitigation Plan Overview200010005000L:\WETLANDS\2018 WETLANDS FILES\LMG18.305 --- Wingfoot Buffer Project, Kevin Yates\CAD\Wingfoot.dwgNOTES:1.BUFFER MITIGATION BOUNDARIES BASED UPON BASE SURVEY DRAWING FROM K2 DESIGN GROUP.Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation SiteCataloging Unit 03020203Pitt County, NCJanuary 2019LMG18.093A-1B-1B-2B-3FOX RUNRIPARIAN BUFFERMITIGATION SITEINSETLEGENDParcel Boundary(~127 ac.)Top Of BankConservation Easement (Surveyed)(~22.31 ac.)Buffer Restoration - Stream (0 ft - 100 ft)(9.52 ac. = 414,635.6 BMU)Buffer Preservation - Stream(4.62 ac. = 20,107.4 BMUBuffer Restoration - Stream (101 ft - 200 ft)(2.00 ac. = 28,725.8 BMU)Riparian Habitat Corridor (1.59 ac. = No credits)Buffer Enhancement - Stream(0.71 ac. = 15,427.5 BMU)TOTAL CREDITS (20.08 ac = 550,390 BMU)DITCHSTREAMBuffer Restoration - Ditch (0 ft - 50 ft)(1.64 ac. = 71,494.0 BMU)
SCALE 1"=400'Figure 8BMitigation Plan Insetwith Plot Locations8004002000L:\WETLANDS\2018 WETLANDS FILES\LMG18.305 --- Wingfoot Buffer Project, Kevin Yates\CAD\Wingfoot.dwgNOTES:1.BUFFER MITIGATION BOUNDARIES BASED UPON BASE SURVEY DRAWING FROM K2 DESIGN GROUP.Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation SiteCataloging Unit 03020203Pitt County, NCJanuary 2019LMG18.093A-1B-1B-2B-3LEGENDParcel Boundary(~127 ac.)Top Of BankConservation Easement (Surveyed)(~22.31 ac.)Monitoring PlotsRiparian Habitat Corridor (1.59 ac. = No credits)TOTAL CREDITS (20.08 ac = 550,390 BMU)DITCHSTREAM50' RIPARIAN AREAADJACENT TO NONSUBJECT DITCHESB-2 AND B-3DitchBuffer Restoration - Stream (0 ft - 100 ft)(9.52 ac. = 414,635.6 BMU)Buffer Preservation - Stream(4.62 ac. = 20,107.4 BMUBuffer Restoration - Stream (101 ft - 200 ft)(2.00 ac. = 28,725.8 BMU)Buffer Enhancement - Stream(0.71 ac. = 15,427.5 BMU)Buffer Restoration - Ditch (0 ft - 50 ft)(1.64 ac. = 71,494.0 BMU)
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100078

APPENDIX A. 

HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 

The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Wingfoot Property
Moy-Turnage Road
Farmville, NC 27828
Inquiry Number:
March 24, 2018
5232866.1
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2014 1"=875'Flight Year: 2014 USDA/NAIP
2010 1"=875'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP
2008 1"=875'Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP
1998 1"=875'Flight Date: January 26, 1998 USGS
1994 1"=875'Acquisition Date: February 27, 1994 USGS/DOQQ
1982 1"=875'Flight Date: March 29, 1982 USGS
1977 1"=875'Flight Date: January 30, 1977 USGS
1974 1"=875'Flight Date: April 01, 1974 USGS
1964 1"=875'Flight Date: April 01, 1964 USGS
1961 1"=875'Flight Date: October 24, 1961 USGS
1959 1"=875'Flight Date: January 07, 1959 USDA
1957 1"=875'Flight Date: January 19, 1957 USGS
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 03/24/18
Wingfoot Property
Site Name:Client Name:
Land Management Group, Inc.
Moy-Turnage Road 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Farmville, NC 27828 Wilmington, NC 28403
EDR Inquiry #5232866.1 Contact:Randy Brant
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
5232866 1-page 2
5232866.1
2014
= 875'
5232866.1
2010
= 875'
5232866.1
2008
= 875'
5232866.1
1998
= 875'
5232866.1
1994
= 875'
5232866.1
1982
= 875'
5232866.1
1977
= 875'
5232866.1
1974
= 875'
5232866.1
1964
= 875'
5232866.1
1961
= 875'
5232866.1
1959
= 875'
5232866.1
1957
= 875'
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100078

APPENDIX B. 

DWR STREAM DETERMINATION LETTER 

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality |Division of Water Resources - Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
252-946-6481

September 24, 2018

Ham Equipment, LLC
Attn: Mr. Bobby Ham
963 US Highway 258
Snow Hill, NC 28580

DWR #18-0854 V2
PITT County

Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0233)
Subject Property/ Project Name: Wingfoot Buffer Mitigation Site
Address/Location: ~ 0.1 miles NE Intersection of N Pineview Ln and Moye-Turnage Rd near Farmville
Stream(s) Evaluated: Unnamed Tributaries (Uts) to Little Contentnea Creek
Determination Date: 08/30/18 Staff: Anthony Scarbraugh
Determination Type:
Buffer: Stream:
Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0233)
Tar-Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B .0259)
Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0243)
Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
Randleman (15A NCAC 02B .0250)
Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
Intermittent/Perennial Determination

*E/I/P/NSP = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial/No Stream Present

Stream E/I/P* Not
Subject
Subject Start@ Stop@ Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
18-0854
V2 A
P X Flag: 18-0854 V2 A
Begin
Flag: 18-0854 V2 A End X X
18-0854
V2 B
Ditch X Flag: 18-0854 V2 B
Begin
Flag: 18-0854 V2 B E/I X
18-0854
V2 B
I X Flag: 18-0854 V2 B
E/I
Flag: 18-0854 V2 B End X
18-0854
V2 C
Ditch X Flag: 18-0854 V2 C
Begin
Flag: 18-0854 V2 C End X
18-0854
V2 D
P X Flag: 18-0854 V2 D
Begin
Flag: 18-0854 V2 D End X X
PITT County
Page 2 of 2

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality |Division of Water Resources - Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
252-946-6481
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the streams listed above and included on the
attached map have been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of PITT County, North
Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale and evaluated for
applicability to the NEUSE River Riparian Buffer Rules. Each stream that is checked “Not Subject” has been
determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property. Streams that are checked
“Subject” have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at least
intermittent streams. There may be other streams or features located on the property that do not appear
on the maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of
Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.

This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of date of this letter to the Director in
writing.

If sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Karen Higgins
DWR – 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
c/o Karen Higgins
DWR – 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.

This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within the buffers. The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any
inquiries regarding applicability to the Clean Water Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of
Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office at [phone].

If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Anthony Scarbraugh at
[phone].

Sincerely,

Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ

cc: WaRO DWR File Copy
LASERFICHE
Kevin Yates, CMS (via email: [e-mail] )
Katie Merritt, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit (via email)
USGS Topographic Map 1: 24,000
North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission
Division ofWater Resource9
For. u5 t Basin Butter
Date , 20L
Reviewed by

1974 Pitt County Soil Survey Sheet Number 47

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100078

APPENDIX C. 

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 

APPENDIX C. SITE PHOTOS – EXISTING CONDITIONS 
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan 1 | Page
DMS Project No. 100078  

(1) Stream channel A1 along northwestern boundary with NC DMS Fox Run Buffer site on left side of bank 
(March 19, 2018). 

(2) View of existing conservation easement marking immediately northwest of Wingfoot buffer site 
(March 19, 2018). 

APPENDIX C. SITE PHOTOS – EXISTING CONDITIONS 
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan 2 | Page
DMS Project No. 100078  

(3) Reach A1 channel segment along northern project boundary (March 19, 2018). 

(4) View of upper stream segment of Reach B1. 
APPENDIX C. SITE PHOTOS – EXISTING CONDITIONS 
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan 3 | Page
DMS Project No. 100078  

(5) View Reach B1 looking upstream (riparian buffer restoration proposed for left side and riparian 
enhancement proposed for right side). 

(6) Downstream segment of Reach B1 (buffer restoration proposed for right side and buffer 
preservation proposed for left side) (March 19, 2018).  
APPENDIX C. SITE PHOTOS – EXISTING CONDITIONS 
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan 4 | Page
DMS Project No. 100078  

(7) View of Reach B2 looking upstream (near confluence with Reach B3) (March 19, 2019).   

(8) View of upper segment of Reach B3 looking down‐gradient.  
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100078

APPENDIX D. 

BUFFER MITIGATION VIABILITY LETTER 

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
interim Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 26, 2018
Kevin Yates DWR #: 2018-0854 vl
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place, Raleigh, NC 27609
Raleigh, NC 27609
(via electronic mail: clearwatenniti atg ion&gmail.com )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Wingfoot Site
Located off Moye Turnage Rd, Farmville, NC
Neuse River Basin/HUC 03020203
Pitt County
Dear Mr. Yates,
On August 30, 2018, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), assisted you and
others from Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC (CMS) at the proposed Wingfoot Mitigation Site
(Site) in Farmville, NC. Staff with the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) were also present
onsite. The Site is in the Neuse River Basin. The Site is being proposed as part of a full -delivery
buffer mitigation project for the DMS (RFP # 16-007402). At your request, Ms. Merritt performed
an onsite assessment of riparian land uses adjacent to surface waters onsite, which are shown on the
attached map labeled "Figure 8B".
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation detennination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
QA
4RTHC� DEQIQ
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000

Wingfoot Site
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC
September 26, 2018
Feature
Classification
'Subject
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
ZNutrient
Mitigation Type Determination
onsite
to
adjacent to Feature
CED&
Offset
w1in riparian areas
Buffer
(0-2003
Viable
Viable at
Rule
2,273.02
lbs/acre
A (B-1)
Stream
Yes
Mostly row crop agriculture
Yes3
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration
but also a combination of
forested
Site per 15A NCAC 0213.0295 (n)
partially forested & forested
fields only)
areas downstream
Partially Forested areas -
(see Figure 813)
Enhancement Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
Forested areas - Preservation Site
per 15A NCAC 0213.0295 (o)(5)
B (B-2)
Ditch
No
Row crop agriculture
*see note
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
upstream
.0295 (o)(8)
*Buffer Mitigation - Assessment
concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC
02B.0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More
information on watershed drainage is
needed for complete assessment. See
rule.
B (B-2)
Stream
Yes
Row crop agriculture
Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
downstream
.0295 (n)
(at DWR
Fla
C (13-3)
Ditch
No
Row crop agriculture
*see note
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(8)
*Buffer Mitigation - Assessment
concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC
02B.0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More
information on watershed drainage is
needed for complete assessment. See
rule.
D (A-1)
Stream
Yes
Row crop agriculture along
Yes3
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration
right bank w/ forested areas
forested
Site per 15A NCAC 0213.0295 (n)
along left bank
fields only)
Forested areas - Preservation Site
per 15A NCAC 0213.0295 (o)(5)
E
Not present
N/A
N/A
N/A TIA
N/A
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated September 24, 2018 using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil
survey map prepared by the NRCS
2 NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with
Riparian Buffer Establishment
3The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of
the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o) (5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o) (4). Site cannot be a
Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
Page 213

Wingfoot Site
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC
September 26, 2018
The map that is attached (Figure 8B) was prepared by CMS for DMS and accurately represents the
mitigation type determinations of each feature labeled in the table above. This map was initialed by
Ms. Merritt on September 25, 2018. This letter should be provided in all stream and wetland,
buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation plans for this Site.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate mitigation credits. Pursuant to 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to DWR for written
approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters for
buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240, a proposal regarding a proposed nutrient
load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior to any
mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
This viability assessment will expire on September 26, 2020 or upon the submittal of an As -
Built Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in all stream,
wetland or buffer mitigation plans for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
KAH/km
Attachments: Figure 8B
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Jeff Schaffer (DMS) — via electronic mail
cl�
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Page 313

FOX RUN
RIPARIAN BUFFER
MITIGATION SITE
a/%
�- •.• _tl k 1f -i..Ili
'a-����1ht�i �;31Y•, � 1.
Ak f7 F
Parcel Boundary -127 ac
L:\WETLANDS\2018\40-18-093\maps\mapset
`Boundaries are approximate and are not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2016 NC OneMap Aerial Photography
Wingfoot Riparian
Buffer Mitigation Site
Cataloging Unit 03020203
Pitt County, NC
March 2018
LMG # 40-18-093
CLE,4RWATER 11ITIGA677#N
SOL&TIONS i
LMG
LANG FSANACWENT OROCP:m_
Fnv,lunmemul Cons"huwa
Legend
Conservation Easement - 20.63 Acres:
Buffer Restoration (OFT-100FT) —11.38 ac
® Buffer Restoration (101 FT-20OFT) AacBuffer Enhancement —0.71 ac
Buffer Preservation —4.47 ac
Riparian Habitat Corridor (No Credit) —2.26 ac
Existing Piedmont Natural Gasline
NC911, NCCGIA, Esri, HERE,
SCALE 1" = 400'
Figure 813
Concept Mitigation Plan
Inset
Response to RFP # 16-007402

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100078

APPENDIX E. 

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION APPROVAL FORM 

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the environmental document.
Part 1: General Project Information
Project Name. VVingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project County Name: Pitt
EEP Number: DMS Project #100078 Project Sponsor: Clearwater Mitiqa ion Solutions
Project Contact Name: Kevin Yates
Project Contact Address: 604 Macon Place; Raleigh, North Carolina
Project Contact E-mail: clearwatermitigationqmail.com EEP Pro'ect Mana er:
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions,
mitigation project known as the
of Mitigation Services. The 20.63
three miles southeast of the Town
restoration and enhancement of
Contentnea Creek. An additional
allow for contiguous connectivity
Run Buffer Site.
Ms Lindsa Crocker
Project Description
LLC (CMS) plans to provide a full-delivery riparian buffer
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site, for the NC Division
-acre project site is located in Pitt County, approximately
of Farmville, North Carolina. The project involves the
woody buffer along unnamed tributaries of the Little
2.26-acres of riparian habitat corridor is being provided to
between an existing, adjacent NC DMS site (known as Fox
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
Date EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
outstanding issues
' / (9
Check this box if there are
Final Approval By:
Date or Division Administrator
FHWA
6
harcinn 1 4 suisinc
11/29/2018
Version 1.4, 8/16/05 7
Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question Response
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? Yes
No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
Program?
Yes
No
N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
1. Is this a “full-delivery” project? Yes
No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
designated as commercial or industrial?
Yes
No
N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
waste sites within the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? Yes
No
N/A
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
Historic Places in the project area?
Yes
No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? Yes
No
N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? Yes
No
N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act)
1. Is this a “full-delivery” project? Yes
No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? Yes
No
N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
* what the fair market value is believed to be?
Yes
No
N/A
Version 1.4, 8/16/05 8

Part 3: Ground-Disturbing Activities

Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as “territory” by the Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians?
Yes
No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? Yes
No
N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
Places?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? Yes
No
N/A
Antiquities Act (AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? Yes
No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
of antiquity?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? Yes
No
N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? Yes
No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? Yes
No
N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? Yes
No
N/A
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat
listed for the county?
Yes
No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? Yes
No
N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
Habitat?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Is the project “likely to adversely affect” the specie and/or “likely to adversely modify”
Designated Critical Habitat?
Yes
No
N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? Yes
No
N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a “jeopardy” determination? Yes
No
N/A
Version 1.4, 8/16/05 9
Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as “territory”
by the EBCI?
Yes
No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
project?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
sites?
Yes
No
N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired? Yes
No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally
important farmland?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? Yes
No
N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any
water body?
Yes
No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? Yes
No
N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
outdoor recreation?
Yes
No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? Yes
No
N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Essential Fish Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? Yes
No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species?

Yes
No
N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
project on EFH?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? Yes
No
N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? Yes
No
N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? Yes
No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? Yes
No
N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? Yes
No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining
federal agency?
Yes
No
N/A

Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site – Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100078

APPENDIX F. 

RECORDED CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED AND PLAT 

Page 1 of 11
Mail: Bailey & Dixon, LLP
Robert H. Merritt,
PO Box 1351
Raleigh, NC 27602
I IIIIIII IIIIII III VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIID VIII IIII IIII
Doc ID: 014323780011 Type: CRP
Jr. Recorded: 03/08/2019 at 11:49:46 AM
Fee Amt: $399.00 Paqe i of 11
Revenue Tax: $373.00
Pitt CountV, NC
Lisa P. Nichols REG OF DEEDS
BK3765 PG517-527
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
PITT COUNTY
SPO File Number: 74-FQ
DMS Project Number: 100078
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
-RTtm%4o: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AND RIGHT OF ACCESS PROVIDED
PURSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS, made
this day of ?y f�'Q G , 2019, by Ham Equipment, LLC, a North Carolina
limited liability company, whose mailing address is 963 Hwy 258 South, Snow Hill, North
Carolina 28580 ("Grantor"), to the State of North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address
is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The designations of Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall
include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural,
masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et sea•, the State of
North Carolina has established the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly known as the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring,
enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection
and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and
recreational opportunities; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017 411 Page 1 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq: 1
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 1 of 11

Page 2 of 11
WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between Clearwater Mitigation
Solutions, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, and the North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, to provide stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation
pursuant to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Purchase and
Services Contract Number 7607.
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United States
Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Understanding,
(MOU) duly executed by all parties on November 4, 1998. This MOU recognized that the
Wetlands Restoration Program was to provide effective compensatory mitigation for authorized
impacts to wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources by restoring, enhancing and preserving
the wetland and riparian areas of the State; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly Ecosystem Enhancement Program) is to provide for compensatory mitigation by
effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, and the National Marine Fisheries Service
entered into an agreement to continue the In -Lieu Fee operations of the North Carolina Department
of Natural Resources' Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem Enhancement
Program) with an effective date of 28 July, 2010, which supersedes and replaces the previously
effective MOA and MOU referenced above; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8h day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Division of Mitigation Services in the Department of Environmental
Quality, which has been delegated the authority authorized by the Governor and Council of State
to the Department of Administration, has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in
Farmville Township, Pitt County, North Carolina (PIN: 4636-53-8996) (the "Property"), and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 2 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq:2
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 2 of 11

Page 3 of 11
being more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 136.17
acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 3303 at Page 247 of
the Pitt County Registry, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement and Right of Access
over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the areas
of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement to the terms and conditions and purposes
hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept said Easement and Access Rights. The
Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of an unnamed
tributary of Little Contenetnea Creek.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement along with a general Right of Access.
The Conservation Easement Area consists of the following:
Conservation Easement as shown on a map entitled
"Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina,
Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation
Services, DMS Project ID No 100078, SPO File No. 74-FQ,
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site, Farmville Township, Pitt
County, North Carolina" dated January 7, 2019, and recorded in
Plat Book Page .200 , of the Pitt
County Registry.
TOGETHER with an easement for access, ingress, egress and
regress as described on the above -referenced recorded plat and this
Conservation Easement Deed.
The Conservation Easement described above is hereinafter referred to as the "Easement
Area" or the "Conservation Easement Area" and is further set forth in a metes and bounds
description attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic
habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Conservation
Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of
the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these
purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 3 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq: 3
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 3 of 11

Page 4 of 11
I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Conservation Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that
would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area by
the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any
rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Any
rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation
credits, including, but not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units, derived
from each site within the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong to the
Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are
prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses,
including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Conservation Easement
Area for the purposes thereof.
B. Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited except within a Crossing Area(s) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey plat.
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage
in educational uses in the Conservation Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, and the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area for such purposes including
organized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the
property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
D. Damage to Vegetation. Except within Crossing Area(s) as shown on the recorded survey
plat and as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, or vegetation
that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Conservation Easement Area to persons or natural habitat,
all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
E. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All industrial, residential and commercial
uses are prohibited in the Conservation Easement Area.
F. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Conservation Easement
Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 4 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq:4
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 4 of 11

Page 5 of 11
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility
pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction or maintenance of new roads, trails,
walkways, or paving in the Conservation Easement.
All existing roads, trails and crossings within the Conservation Easement Area shall be shown on
the recorded survey plat.
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Conservation Easement Area except interpretive
signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Conservation Easement
Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement,
signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Conservation
Easement Area.
J. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned
vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, hydraulic fracturing; removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock,
peat, minerals, or other materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Conservation Easement Area. No altering or
tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage
of all other water sources, water from within the Conservation Easement Area may temporarily be
withdrawn for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock on the Property.
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no further subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the Conservation Easement Area portion of the Property owned by the
Grantor in fee simple ("fee") that is subject to this Conservation Easement is allowed. Any future
transfer of the Property shall be subject to this Conservation Easement and Right of Access and to the
Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the
Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Conservation Easement Area and are non-transferrable.
O. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 5 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq: 5
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 5 of 11

Page 6 of 11
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the Division of Mitigation
Services, 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652.
III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Right of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents,
successors and assigns, receive a perpetual Right of Access to the Conservation Easement Area
over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities on the property to restore,
construct, manage, maintain, enhance, protect, and monitor the stream, wetland and any other
riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities or
a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation
Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade
materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
C. Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted to
place signs and witness posts on the Property to include any or all of the following: describe the
project, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project boundaries
and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D. Fences. Conservation Easements are purchased to protect the investments by the State
(Grantee) in natural resources. Livestock within conservations easements damages the
investment and can result in reductions in natural resource value and mitigation credits which
would cause financial harm to the State. Therefore, Landowners (Grantor) with livestock are
required to restrict livestock access to the Conservation Easement area. Repeated failure to do so
may result in the State (Grantee) repairing or installing livestock exclusion devices (fences)
within the conservation area for the purpose of restricting livestock access. In such cases, the
landowner (Grantor) must provide access to the State (Grantee) to make repairs.
E. Crossing Area(s). The Grantee is not responsible for maintenance of crossing area(s),
however, the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, reserve the right to repair
crossing area(s), at its sole discretion and to recover the cost of such repairs from the Grantor if
such repairs are needed as a result of activities of the Grantor, his successors or assigns.
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Conservation Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features
in the Conservation Easement Area that may have been damaged by such unauthorized activity or
use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the Grantee shall,
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 6 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq:6
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 6 of 11

Page 7 of 11
except as provided below, notify the Grantor in writing of such breach and the Grantor shall have
ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the damage caused by such breach. If the
breach and damage remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this
Conservation Easement by bringing appropriate legal proceedings including an action to recover
damages, as well as injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and
authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Conservation
Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b)
to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any
appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate
right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief,
if the breach is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from
this Conservation Easement, and the Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that the damage would be
irreparable and remedies at law inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided
hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to
Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right,
with reasonable notice, to enter the Conservation Easement Area over the Property at reasonable
times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying with the terms,
conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall
be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's
control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent
action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate
significant injury to life or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 7 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq:7
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 7 of 11

Page 8 of 11
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property are
the sole responsibility of the Grantor. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to
comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the exercise of
the Reserved Rights.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the
Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor
further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in
the Property is conveyed is subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
signed by all parties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws,
and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. The owner of the Property shall
notify the State Property Office and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing sixty (60) days
prior to the initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property or of any request to void or
modify this Conservation Easement. Such notifications and modification requests shall be
addressed to:
Division of Mitigation Services Program Manager
NC State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
and
General Counsel
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross
and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event
it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a
qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code,
and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 8 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq:8
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 8 of 11

Page 9 of 11
such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation
purposes described in this document.
VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Conservation
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment
of the Conservation Easement Area,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes,
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
Ham Equipment, L.L.C., a North Carolina
a limited liability company, Grantor
By: Ir(SEAL)
obb G. Ham, Managing Member
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF W/ 4_
I, Zacoi7- • W&-Rdl !/ "k , the undersigned Notary Public in and for the County
and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Bobby G. Ham, Managing Member of Ham
Equipment, L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company, Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day, and acknowledged to me that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument
in the capacity indicated.
t!
Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or s the t day of2019.
4 e
Notary Public
7JOLf //. :7,f O<M7EE
Typed or Printed Name of Notary
My Commission Expires: -5-- f ' Zvi- m p1 AR y
4
#462102 �
4- AU13 �V
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017 9�F CouN,
Page 9 of 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq:9
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 9 of 11

Page 10 of 11
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Pitt County, NC
1. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 4656-53-8996)
A permanent conservation easement over a portion of land in
Farmville Township, Pitt County, North Carolina, as shown on map
entitled "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North
Carolina, Department of Environmental Quality, Division of
Mitigation Services, DMS Project ID No. 100078, SPO File No. 74-
FQ, of Wingfoot Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site, Farmville
Township, Pitt County, North Carolina" dated January 7, 2019,
recorded in Plat Book e3 , Page 2- 0,0 , of the Pitt County
Registry, and being a portion of a parcel owned by Ham Equipment,
LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company (PIN: 4636-53-
8996), more particularly described as follows:
Commencing with an iron stake having N.C. Grid Coordinates
N=664,414.9769', E=2,434,756.9415' (NAD '83, 2011) the
following bearings and distances: South 88°30'35" East 364.99 feet
to an axle; thence North 26°51'41" East 92.01' to a
non-monumented corner; thence North 23°49'08" East 41.31' to an
iron stake, the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Thence from the POINT OF BEGINNING, North 23°49'08" East
185.38' to an iron stake; thence North 23°49'08" East 50.00' to a non-
monumented corner; thence North 37°30'32" East 148.95' to a non-
monumented corner; thence North 73°47'20" East 73.63' to a non-
monumented corner; thence North 77°22'56" East 24.07' to a non-
monumented corner; thence North 79°56'01" East 7.56' to a non-
monumented corner; thence South 55°52'52" East 99.96' to a non-
monumented corner; thence South 54°28'59" East 49.33' to a non-
monumented corner; thence South 61°56'23" East 68.12' to a non-
monumented corner; thence South 66°47'33" East 32.13' to a non-
monumented corner; thence South 52°23'21" East 61.46' to a non-
monumented corner; thence South 65°28'27" East 54.63' to a non-
monumented corner; thence North 64°22'06" East 54.55' to a non-
monumented corner; thence North 73'48'09" East 57.22' to a non-
monumented corner; thence North 80°45'58" East 93.60' to a non-
monumented corner; thence South 38°22'46" East 130.99' to an iron
stake; thence South 51'09'49" East 475.07' to an iron stake; thence
South 20°03'48" East 307.42' to an iron stake; thence South
08°57'59" West 148.01' to an iron stake; thence South 28°32'34" East
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq: 10
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 10 of 11

Page 11 of 11
251.10' to an iron stake; thence South 69°50'25" East 207.57' to an
iron stake; thence South 89°13'54" East 240.61' to an iron stake;
thence South 32°30'12" East 222.28' to an iron stake; thence South
73°34'52" West 111.81' to an iron stake; thence South 88°36'45"
West 242.81' to an iron stake; thence North 77031'07" West 188.40'
to an iron stake; thence North 61032'52" West 221.56' to an iron
stake; thence South 45°08'23" West 122.16' to an iron stake; thence
South 20°19'13" West 157.92' to an iron stake; thence South
33°04'38" West 221.02' to an iron stake; thence North 57°36'00"
West 6.00' to an iron stake; thence North 57°36'00" West 111.14' to
an iron stake; thence North 32°36'36" East 223.56' to an iron stake;
thence North 12°25'42" East 74.96' to an iron stake; thence South
78°12'31" West 256.28' to an iron stake; thence North 10°58'50"
West 128.67' to an iron stake; thence North 80°15'22" East 383.99'
to an iron stake; thence North 47°02'01" East 76.21' to an iron stake;
thence North 22°33'28" West 203.48' to an iron stake; thence North
72°21'18" West 295.77' to an iron stake; thence North 79°02'26"
West 208.20' to an iron stake; thence South 22°17'46" West 333.73'
to an iron stake; thence South 78°48'03" West 287.60' to an iron
stake; thence North 88°11'14" West 318.80' to an iron stake; thence
North 59°22'38" West 274.58' to an iron stake; thence North
44°58'49" East 230.67' to an iron stake; thence South 61°19'53" East
171.77' to an iron stake; thence South 87°40'08" East 219.29' to an
iron stake; thence North 78°38'32" East 138.37' to an iron stake;
thence North 25°05'15" East 324.46' to an iron stake; thence North
74°16'14" East 174.22' to an iron stake; thence South 78°53'40" East
268.42' to an iron stake; thence South 60°34'45" East 104.17' to an
iron stake; thence South 76°28'51" East 219.95' to an iron stake;
thence North 12°12'23" East 76.11' to an iron stake; thence North
25°19'30" West 243.54' to an iron stake; thence North -59°43'27"
West 439.25' to an iron stake; thence South 63°04'21" West 171.47'
to an iron stake; thence North 64°01'57" West 341.12' to an iron
stake; thence South 62°25'30" West 183.15' to an iron stake; thence
South 88°44'05" West 133.75' to an iron stake, which is the POINT
OF BEGINNING, having an area of 22.31 acres.
00460809
2
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Page 11 of 11
Book: 3765 Page: 517 Seq: 11

oaZ = ,.I 37VOS ?1HdV6Q9
009 004 We 0 001 OOd
1i (8L0Z N38W3030 9NRlnO 30Vld 71001 A3AilnS 01313 31-113
CO'Tl '1N3WdIn103 WIVH d3NMO 1N:;bUno)
ti (68£90 -ON 130MVd) LYZ -9d `£O££ 8'0 NI 0308003N
SONV-1 3H130 N0I1t10d V SSOUOV ONV N3A❑
rVN11OM 3 HMON `A1Nnoo 1114 `dIHSNMol 3111AWV VJ
L MIS NOILY9111W v33dn9 NrVli WIS loodVNIM
tM-IFL v39WnN 3114 odS
OL000 i 'oN q1 J.D3rOMd SWO
MIMS NOILYSI11W do No1SIAM
Ainvnc31VV1N3WNOVIAN3 do 1N3WiV Vd3C]
YN11OMVD NINON do RVIS 3Hl
Nod
A3Avns 1N3W3SV3 NQIIVAb3SNoa
ON 68�9
S0330 d0 930 sTO40TN 'd es Tl
ON Aluno3 llld
T 10 T abed 00'TZ$ :lwV aad
WV 6T'5t'.TT is 610Z1801£O :p8pj00aH
dao :adAl TOOOLL£Z£trT0 =01 000
l 1111111111111111111111 11111 1111 1111111111 d i l l 1111111111 I I I I I I I 111111111111111
a
966e -E9 -9M :Nld
LIZ -9d 'EQ££'8'O
'37VIN3WAMA WYH
Yea zs
A,dvnNVf :031Y0')C'8 3V3V (S)3NOZ
r'o0 cgi3OZLE (s)N39WnN dVW
VW33 01 JNIGUO33V ANVONn08
C[HVZVH 00013 V Ni 031V001
SI ldld SPH -LAS 031N3S3WRI
V32WV 3H130 NOLLHOd V
*1MW31VLS 00014 vW3d
1N3W3SY3
NQIlVAi13Oa IC _ _ -1
H1avN JQ do 31 31tlIS 1s
1N3W3SV3
SV91VNn1VN MM
V14110WO 1-1114ON .DE
3N11 MIN aO a3NlOr CrV
3NI1 NMOO 311 - -
9NI11N3W3SV9
NOLLVAN3SNOO
..LNAHASV3 NOIIVA163SNOO
VNI1OtMa H1NON d0 31VIS. a
:0381NOSNI dVO .W L E WnNIWn1V NV
H11M 30Vao RUM HSnli 8V838 5 'aN
0310N 3SIMH31­10 SS3_1Nn
N31MHO0031N3WnN0MNON -0
99Yd -'9d
)1008 G330 - -9'0
71008 lV1d - 8d
1N9M3AVd 3O 3903 - 403
AVM 301HJIN Mf'd
63NN00 03LN3WnNOW-NON - OWN
13S 3dld dWnd Sdd
3did dWnd 0141151X3 dd3
3)1V1S N0NI ONLLSIX3 - S13
13S 11VN DIW - SNW
TVN 9VW DMISIX3 - NW3
135 3104 39NVN - SdN
U313KVPIG 3OIs-Ln0 -'0'o
3dld 1V13n 031V0nNNOo - dW0
11VN 9VW 9NI1SIX3 NW3
I=NNS RAWO 91MRSIX3 - S03
31xV 9NI1S1X3 - V3
NOaI dO1 03HOWd - Ild
11YH WON -1119'd 9NI.LSIX3 - N8N3
3dld NOMI 9NILSIX3 - d13
N3AWN 3131dONO3 014IISIX3 - 10403
13S 3W.LS NONI - SSI
=ON31�J71
Sd9 HOJ 3l9tlllnS dY0 Oilsvid
-ON
96fi8-f`5{d£9t �Nld
M0113A H11M 30VN0 H1W HSnld ?JV93tl S
f
30181:] M0138 .Z-0 31xV 0 0.04
v�
t13MI00 031N3WnNOW-NON
LE69'99E9EVZ
3aVH9 H11M HSn13 dvo Him NV93N s -N
Q aMr L9
3aVa9 M0138 A' L 3T" '0'O .S.l
99
11438 `3aVNJ M0138 .Z O 31xY 32itlni)S .S 0xS O
59
OVON 1105 3O 3NI-IUMN3a
oNr ¢9
Ni 3UVH0 H11M HSf _H tn193d S'0N
L�I�
3CrfH'J H-LIM HSnl3
L496'9L0LEtZ
6EL L -H -S -O -N 30 3NIINAIN30 NI 11VN 9VW
VNI10NV3 HI.ZION .0£ 01411SIX3
.1N3W3SV9 NO11VAa3SNO3 VNIIOHVO HIHON
55303V 3AISnlOx3-NoN 301M zL M3N
30 31V_L& '0381aOSN1 dVO .tl L E NnNIWnw
La naH-L Lv
NV H1IM 3WUO HAAA HST13 W103N 5 'oN
966$-M-Kft :Nld
(1N3W33N:7V 31411€7NOW 0") 7133HO
� naH-L a
3O 3NI1831NBO NI a3NNOO O31N3WnNOWiJON
^
.1N3W3SV3 14011VAt13SNOO VNHOWD HILTON
LNrjWdlnm WYH
3O 31V1S.:L1381NOSNI dVO.tIL E WnmvinIV
� �
�J num OJ
NV HIM 30VN9 HIM HSn13 HV83b 5 oN
'
6960'£9049961F
LG'SL4
N011d19aS30
v858'LSEY99
84
TI3MI03
SNOMINDS30
83N>r❑3
-9LOZ =10 t138W3030 9NIan0 03131dVYOO SON033S 091,30 3V411WInWINIW H11M US N3dlH N00d01- a3A1303H SSNJ
SnNOo 9Z LOZ-01030
-S30NViSiO lV1NOZWOH 03ZI1VOO1 9NV SNOISN3WI0 NV3NI1 -17V
'1333 66't9£ 3 .5£.0£.99 S SI Q V3 LL Ol SSI
NOW 30NVISKI ONnOW)1VINOZINOH 03ZI1V001 ONV 9NINV38
01N�J 1N38WV1 'o'N 3H1 1UNnouo of ❑It19) LEML000'L NO (01-89 Ol DNnON9)
E9068666'0 SI IVId SIHI NO 035n N01OVd 01NJ 03NI8W00 3`]VH3AV 3H1
Sufi-95L'Y£v'Z = 3
fi9Lfi'ILr't99 = N
i L 1,06 VR OVN S3IVNIMMO 01 1;7 ON LL SSI
(^atL11) NHOM13N 31MLL 1V9M VNnONVO H.L80N 3H1
9NISn Ae 03HSn8V1S3 S31Vl
VN10NO0o 3Nd 31VIS VNIIONVO H1HON NO
035VO SI 1Vld SIHl?lO3 03dO13A30 W31SAS 31VNION000 03Zn11O01 3H1
NOU1110S30 wniva
.OL-S56E
03A3ANns 10N 3.YZ.5E.Z8N
095 '9d '£0££ '9'0 31411 t1WoruV �_ r
011 `1N3WdIi1D3 WYH 31VYYlxON6dVf
't 0 � 4 ul
lo,st&
w
095 '9d 'coE£ 'e'a 1010£ IL 1@ ► A'y
011 '1N3WMM WVH 3.99.L�LN NZ to
SNH i %
U,r3�
- SSI Z ra
_ l S
d V
.vU'Y6
96fi8-f`5{d£9t �Nld
L
f
�
0'11 '1Hawdinoa W V H
J J
LE69'99E9EVZ
(NOLLV1ndnOa 31VNIUM03 A8
/ aTn'A11WVd S3A33V V AaV30
658Y554 M
+S3HOV ZVL = V3NVl VNIIONYD H1NON 30
8S
L9`
31tl15 3H1 01 03A3ANOO 38 Ol SS3M93a
Z5L 9d'ZS 318
2//��
L�I�
L 1N33Stl3 31411 SV9 TdNn1VN
L496'9L0LEtZ
ZD 3143b13IN30 JNOW 1N3n3SY3
VNI10NV3 HI.ZION .0£ 01411SIX3
9
55303V 3AISnlOx3-NoN 301M zL M3N
v5
��
l 1N3W3SV3 SS39'JY
966$-M-Kft :Nld
9r81 I9E
Z8tZ
1111'129£99
LYZ'9d'£OE£'8'Q
'0'1'1
^
*90£'9£ 969£99
LNrjWdlnm WYH
t05E-6D5iZ
o�
I�
A
HO11Q
O H0110 Ll
a
C
n
vJ
91FL-£VL (S)9d '99L£ '8'0 H3d
011 `1N3nd1nO3 Y" ONV
011 'S311Zj3d0Hd A3HHdHnW N33AAL38
.0.. 01..9.. Wo9d 1Ni IMM d0 3Nn
a
W
1�
0
BL96-99{3£94ZN1d
£Z£ '9d '£64£ '8'0
011 'saim3dou A3>lHjvnw
flvvldu)
3NI1000M
O3 7
_______
------------
I! 1
F4
a
0
AHV1n91H130 3Nnt131NAO NI SH3N MOO
031NWINOWWON 3NV8 Cu
WON3 5114104 1IV
S30Ntl1SIO ONn0a9 lV1NOZIN0H 32iV NILAOHS SAONVISIO 11V
'l3omvd a3A311Nn5 SIH-L1o333V AVW 1VH1
Oa0038 30 S1N3Wno00'63H101SIX3 AVW 3a31-11 '(S33N3a3d3a
33S) N031:13H 031ON 3NY 03Ar131A3N (IN003N 30 S_LN3YYn000
1lV NOA311Nf15 3H10103HSINNnd 3N3M HOWEIS Mill d0
S1lnS3N No `1NEIKUMVIOO 31111 NON '3111130 loVa1SBV ON .310N
1333 OOOZ NIHIJM Si.SIX3 lON1NOO lV1NOZIMOH ON
411
zi E4n
F H3110 ] /
------ --
96fi8-f`5{d£9t �Nld
L
LIZ -9d '£0££ '8'0
ILL 9d'90££'8'0
0'11 '1Hawdinoa W V H
09
LE69'99E9EVZ
•.
/ aTn'A11WVd S3A33V V AaV30
658Y554 M
6yl aL %I
flvvldu)
3NI1000M
O3 7
_______
------------
I! 1
F4
a
0
AHV1n91H130 3Nnt131NAO NI SH3N MOO
031NWINOWWON 3NV8 Cu
WON3 5114104 1IV
S30Ntl1SIO ONn0a9 lV1NOZIN0H 32iV NILAOHS SAONVISIO 11V
'l3omvd a3A311Nn5 SIH-L1o333V AVW 1VH1
Oa0038 30 S1N3Wno00'63H101SIX3 AVW 3a31-11 '(S33N3a3d3a
33S) N031:13H 031ON 3NY 03Ar131A3N (IN003N 30 S_LN3YYn000
1lV NOA311Nf15 3H10103HSINNnd 3N3M HOWEIS Mill d0
S1lnS3N No `1NEIKUMVIOO 31111 NON '3111130 loVa1SBV ON .310N
1333 OOOZ NIHIJM Si.SIX3 lON1NOO lV1NOZIMOH ON
411
zi E4n
F H3110 ] /
------ --
96fi8 £S9£9v :1414 (KINO NMOO 311) 1NIOd 30N3N3d3N 'SSI
LtZ'9d'£06£'8'0 ,66'49£
01'1'1N3Wdinv3 WVH u
3 4E9BS 9Li69sL'vst'Z=3
tWOWAli
9NrK3OOM
£CIOsr
sf O a 1t1
-� 9v, "� o
Zvl L+ �1
7133140 V3N1N31NOO 31110 AO
A1itlIMMI 03WtlNNn
6L96-S9-3£94=N1d
£Z£ 9d'£6Y£ 8-0
31113111113401111d A91111Hdi1nW
0
6918 I
499
Lt -N
(A1M
NO NOO 311) Idyll
' X0£ e 3ivN�vo� dao �r
LSSI O -Z6
[AINO NMOO 311] 3.kt.LS.9ZN
AVLt �� (A1NO NM00 311.) y
3.80.64.£ZN O EL'09 8181 4£3£94=NId
O L£l X513 3.60.9029S65L'0d'SLSE'8'C
all 'AMMA SV WOHI DON
��yy
CW- S13 3 L9
££1 J ' Z5L LIL (S)9d '951£ '8'0 83d
011'1N3YYdIn43 WVH \
0 ONV 0„ `AlIYYVd
Oil SVWOHI39N N33MI.38 \
Wi A. 01..V.. W03d
GE1 4£1 f 1N3W339 DV 44D Mini \
8£1 64 1 'Jd '£L AM
Letc vNIlO9Y0 NOON 40 31VIS
8L8L-I£-9194=NId
L£1 9El 65L ''Jd 'SL9£ 8-0
9 011 'AIIWVJ SVWOH133N
u
Is
INmoo 311) V3O
.86'91
3.L5.9r.9YS ` .
Nouvindmoo 31VNIONOOo ` ~
A8 S-LN3143SV3 SS300V 11V 9NIOnlOX3
TS3NOV W'ZZ SI 1N3W3SV3 NOIIVAN3SNOO
viva 39V3v3V
Cr.00
L d0 L 133HS
NOIJANOS30 Wn1V0 33S '1Y1d H31VW
01 S31ONVIS10 (INnOW) NO ❑3SV9 RMV
NMOHS S3IYNION000 31VNIONOOo
0119 3NVld 31VIS VNnONVo H1NON
3nN1 V SI LL# H31YUOO A-INO '310N
MVEME4z
L
1.9
ILL 9d'90££'8'0
i
09
LE69'99E9EVZ
•.
/ aTn'A11WVd S3A33V V AaV30
658Y554 M
6yl aL %I
8S
g� ,
t4Z£'L£t£99
LS
SBZZ't£89EVZ
Z£09'9B££99
99
L496'9L0LEtZ
L£9v'ZOY£99
55
9
Itl3
Q
v5
£LLL i9DLEtZ
T-S3NaV L£'zz
ES
9r81 I9E
Z8tZ
1111'129£99
Z5
1NRMSY3
*90£'9£ 969£99
L5
t05E-6D5iZ
o�
NOLLVA83SNO0
'
6960'£9049961F
LG'SL4
Z996'9zY9£YZ
v858'LSEY99
84
LY06'95o9£YZ
OSLL'6113M
LY
LEL9'9L69£tZ
�� 11
94
£06L'ESBS£YZ
D4Y4'L£LY99
94
4LYz'SzBSEYZ
5£8v'LZL499
tv
£090'6LL5EYZ
5988 L69t99
EY
5LS£'6ZL5£tZ
4ZZ'9d `L£L1 '8'0
ZI
L£L90999EW
S�7 ;
all 'skiviaou A3#HdBnw
9M_t995EIZ
EZ£L'DLLMW
0r
au-16milz
SILL'Z08t99
6E
Z8L9 8955£vZ
1
9£
(NOLLVAN31Se0 SdE)
*£05198499
L£
'
zz9V988499
NO3 319Vllns) A-iN0
96fi8 £S9£9v :1414 (KINO NMOO 311) 1NIOd 30N3N3d3N 'SSI
LtZ'9d'£06£'8'0 ,66'49£
01'1'1N3Wdinv3 WVH u
3 4E9BS 9Li69sL'vst'Z=3
tWOWAli
9NrK3OOM
£CIOsr
sf O a 1t1
-� 9v, "� o
Zvl L+ �1
7133140 V3N1N31NOO 31110 AO
A1itlIMMI 03WtlNNn
6L96-S9-3£94=N1d
£Z£ 9d'£6Y£ 8-0
31113111113401111d A91111Hdi1nW
0
6918 I
499
Lt -N
(A1M
NO NOO 311) Idyll
' X0£ e 3ivN�vo� dao �r
LSSI O -Z6
[AINO NMOO 311] 3.kt.LS.9ZN
AVLt �� (A1NO NM00 311.) y
3.80.64.£ZN O EL'09 8181 4£3£94=NId
O L£l X513 3.60.9029S65L'0d'SLSE'8'C
all 'AMMA SV WOHI DON
��yy
CW- S13 3 L9
££1 J ' Z5L LIL (S)9d '951£ '8'0 83d
011'1N3YYdIn43 WVH \
0 ONV 0„ `AlIYYVd
Oil SVWOHI39N N33MI.38 \
Wi A. 01..V.. W03d
GE1 4£1 f 1N3W339 DV 44D Mini \
8£1 64 1 'Jd '£L AM
Letc vNIlO9Y0 NOON 40 31VIS
8L8L-I£-9194=NId
L£1 9El 65L ''Jd 'SL9£ 8-0
9 011 'AIIWVJ SVWOH133N
u
Is
INmoo 311) V3O
.86'91
3.L5.9r.9YS ` .
Nouvindmoo 31VNIONOOo ` ~
A8 S-LN3143SV3 SS300V 11V 9NIOnlOX3
TS3NOV W'ZZ SI 1N3W3SV3 NOIIVAN3SNOO
viva 39V3v3V
Cr.00
L d0 L 133HS
NOIJANOS30 Wn1V0 33S '1Y1d H31VW
01 S31ONVIS10 (INnOW) NO ❑3SV9 RMV
NMOHS S3IYNION000 31VNIONOOo
0119 3NVld 31VIS VNnONVo H1NON
3nN1 V SI LL# H31YUOO A-INO '310N
MVEME4z
69L4'£ZLE99
1.9
6L90'41E9E1rZ
tZL9'90££99
09
LE69'99E9EVZ
1lKAC95t£99
6S
658Y554 M
89L8'ZVS£99
8S
LEBZ'0599EVZ
t4Z£'L£t£99
LS
SBZZ't£89EVZ
Z£09'9B££99
99
L496'9L0LEtZ
L£9v'ZOY£99
55
KL Z 48LLErZ
0990-t£v£99
v5
£LLL i9DLEtZ
9544129£99
ES
9r81 I9E
Z8tZ
1111'129£99
Z5
508E'6299EtZ
*90£'9£ 969£99
L5
t05E-6D5iZ
M69'ME99
DS
L6LVZ£S9£YZ
6960'£9049961F
LG'SL4
Z996'9zY9£YZ
v858'LSEY99
84
LY06'95o9£YZ
OSLL'6113M
LY
LEL9'9L69£tZ
MY NLV99
94
£06L'ESBS£YZ
D4Y4'L£LY99
94
4LYz'SzBSEYZ
5£8v'LZL499
tv
£090'6LL5EYZ
5988 L69t99
EY
5LS£'6ZL5£tZ
5499-DZLt99
ZI
L£L90999EW
E1L0'95Lt99
k4
9M_t995EIZ
EZ£L'DLLMW
0r
au-16milz
SILL'Z08t99
6E
Z8L9 8955£vZ
LYEY WOO
9£
L£ZL 99KClFZ
*£05198499
L£
ZL89 uMc1FZ
zz9V988499
9E
6LBL'1£t9E7Z
Z£Z6'DB8499
S£
Z90V 99E5£Yz
9L9£'099499
4£
046L 9LZ5£YZ
960Z'ZVLt99
££
9965 5525£YZ
£89Y'969499
Z£
LE£L'091.9M
69L9'9z9r99
L£
609t'tL£S£tZ
5ZE8'8ZSt99
D£
556L'9Lt5£tZ
L£L9'YL9v99
6Z
L9LY£8Ls£YZ
9DSZ'99YY99
8Z
095£'9E6+5£YZ
££OBZYSt99
LZ
0969'9L£9Et71
ZBYY1Zf'Y99
9z
LYL9'6L1r9£i71
6W 10Lt99
5Z
YL9L'£0v9£iZ
£ wVzot99
Yz
L6Z6'681,9£Y71
61.EE'9L0v%
£Z
6L6L'61MN'
666Y6ZLt99
ZZ
9LOS'S£95£iZ
1RzDz'L91.*%
L
5LM'9995£tZ
YEL6'££ M
OZ
M9,009£tZ
kLZL'0v8E99
6L
99L8'48£9M
kLLWZL8£99
8L
6£9L'9LL9£tZ
LOBL'Lz8£99
LL
SLSO'SZoS£tZ
LS61.'40uu'99
91
968649vKjrz
LZED IrL£99
51
9M'96o9£tZ
699L'09M
YL
00'9 Lv%vi
4080' 165£99
E L
£vto'6695£47,
0L£6'9Y9£99
zL
ZL59 5Z95£7Z
9L LL -956£99
LL
9o90'O£09EYZ
06ZL'916E99
0L
£EL6'LLEKVZ
BLLt'9zB£99
60
94L6'69£9£Yz
£s99's£s£es
s0
ZSOZ't££9£VZ
9529"989£99
La
Z9SL'9585£1rz
L8£9'LZ91M
90
1,99Z'09BS£Vz
89Z£'SB£S99
s0
Zkvk'k£Z9£vZ
9B®9'LYv£99
t0
t600'9LZ9£YZ
90o9'YL££99
£O
ZLZ9'tMve
LOW981.£99
zo
t69£'8%9£vz
OkEWWW99
0
9NI1SV3
JNIHINON N3NN0a
S1NaWSY3 NMVANSNOa
SNOW S31vNIG4003
ns
V6117-1 = s
1V3S
JagwnN esua011-1 jnKaeunS puel leuolssalw Q.'• $ti0 016�
r
.laps.+
6110 EIS
'6LOZ " 0'V .tiered 10 Aep 4182 sit4 leas pus Jagwnu
asuaoll `ain;eu6is leui6ua ALU ww4iM papuau►e se GC-Lti's'9 Ipl aauep s ui pajedaad sumTeld s.41;eg} :+DDD OLIL sl pa;elnoleo se AoeJrme leuoglsod Ja uolsraaid 10 v+;eJ OLP IM `46ed
_>1008 ul UM14 ua;euuo;w way UmeJp Se pa;eolpul APBOP We paAetuns iou souepunoq a4i leka
(Ja(ko} (oya ' Sd37`! d ' 335 M009 ul 000/000/ uoridposap peap) uvlsuuadns Aw Japun spew
Aa►uns lerl a ue LULay uolswadns Aw Japan umeJp sem geld s!4 le4T ►(►k.lm ' Hd100nu 'Y NHaf I
{;uauiasea ua;enJasuoo} uolslAlpgns 10 LJarpugap ay; ❑; uol;daoxe Jay;o Jo 'Aauns paJapJo-}Lnao
e 'slowed 6ugslxa jo uol;eulgwoow ay; se flans AJo6a;eo JaLpaue 10 sl Awins eta jeW Ap i
��nnoys esoLp ue4; J9Lpo) pou6lsmpun aLp
Aq peAJasgo seen `oslnua4;o Jo punoJ6aAoge 'seipp Jv saue)ewea aouapine elglslA vu 'JanamOH
•umo4s asoLn ueU3 JaLpo punwD molag Jo `anoge saKgeal JaL#o Rue Jo saggpn punoJBJapun `seas
leua;ew snopJemq 'spuepam `saua;awao Cue a;e3ol of apeLu sem;dwaue ON 'aawlepslp s,JOA wJnS
S Oi1VOMM11130 $110k3AM
JOOWO malnaU aw0
-6ulpJoDw Jot s;uawannbw AJv;n;e;s i1e "W pexl a sl u01;eolg4jeo SILp
Lp!p4m o;;eld )o dew aLp Imp f4poo 'ATunoo 111d Jo JODWO malAazf
04 :10 A WOW
YNnOVVO HA001 d0 31VIS
AG
spoon jo Ja;sl6oN
AM
i Od ` 41111111111, -8 -w ul POPJ038N 'e1-A.Mo
sp800 10 J913160a OLA ul 61 OZ ` W ke uolkegsift Jot pa11d
.ZO' LZZ
M.9£.40.MS
0.1
.Z6'L91,
M.Ek.6L.OLS
091
.9k'ZZk
M.£Z.9o.sts
651
99' LZZ
NI.Z'3 ZE. L9N
951
AWUVL
M.LO.LE.LLN
LM
L9'ZrZ
.9
Mr9£.995
951
LB' L L L
M.ZS.r£.£LS
451
BZ'ZZZ
3.ZWL1£.Z£S
t51
.L9'0#z
3.tS.£L.685
£9,
M10Z
3.SZA5.69S
ZS'1
AW1.9Z
3.KZE.SZS
L91
W'8*L
A&M.L13.90S
051
ZYLOE
3.84.EO.OZS
6t1
LG'SL4
3.61.60. WS
8t1
.66'0£1
3.9r.ZZAEs
LV1
.09'£6
3699.4t.08N 1
941
ZZ'L5
3.BQ8Y.£LN
5t1
sS is
3.9o.Zz.Y9N
t41
.£9'ts
3.LZ.9Z.89S
EYl
.911 L9
3.LZ.£Z29S
Ztl
.£L'zE
3.££.Lt.99S
LYl
.ZL'88
3£Z.9s.1.9S
0Y1
.£E'64
3.8SM-MS
86-1
98'86
3.Z4.Z9.955
9£1
99'L
3.LG99#6LN1
LEI
.L0'11rZ
3.99.2Z.LL.N I
9M
XWEL
3.02.Lt.£LN
M
SB'Svk
3.ZE.0£.L£N
KI
Ao"09
3.90AW.£zN
MI
.SE'SOL
3.90.64.£zN
Z£1
5L'££ L
A L50.t4.99S
k£1
51'£81
M.OE.SZ.Z9S
D£1
zi.,1. E
M.LS. LO.t9N
61'1
.LY LL L
M. L&M.£95
821
.92'fi£t
M.LZ.U.65N
LZ'1
.VS'£t2
I M.o£.6L.5ZN
9Z'1
W9L
I 3.£Z.ZL.ZLN
5Z1
.36.6 Lx
3.15.0.9LS
K-1
LL'i0k
3.5tr£.OSS
£Z•1
ZY89Z
3.0r MALS
ZZ -1
XZTLk
3114.96tLN
LZI
.91r'M
3.9k.S0.5ZN
OM
L£'9£L
3.z£.8E.91N
611
.6Z'6Lz
3JXW*.L8S
%11
LL'LLL
3..£5.6L.1,9S
LLl
L9'OEZ
3LOVAN."N
911
.99'tLZ
NLB£.ZZASN
%_1
.08'9LE
INLM!,.98N
111
.o9-Lez
M.Mat.BLS
ul
£L-£££
AA.94.L L.ZZS
M
DZ -801
M.9Z.ZO.6LN
L Ll
LL'96Z
M.91.LZ,ZLN
00
9t'EOZ
M.9Z.EE.ZZN
fil
1,Z'9L
3.1,0.ZO.LVN
91
.66'£9£
3.Z7 -13608N
Ll
L9'VZ k
M.M.85.0 LN
91
BZ'95z
M.L£.ZL.BLS
sl
.96'11FL
3.ZV.SZ21.N
tl
.95'EZZ
3.9£.9£.Z£N
£1
YL' L L L
A+60096.L5N
Zl
AD'9
MLM9£.LSN
Ll
3ONV1810
ONINV38
3NI1
SV39V 1N31M3SV3
NOUVA13SMOO
3H19NOIV vivo 3Nn
111d dO A1Nn00
VN11011V0 HILON d0 31VLS
7.iOf I -f ldxe ualsslwuJoo Ayy .(1I ZLS lgnd AAWN L��
;o Aep sigj 11eas Jo dwels IeMWO pue Pu e4 Aw ssaumM
juawrulsui 8u1oSwo1 a4T 10 uol}noaxa aqj pa$palmoupe pue
Aep sly; aw aJopq paJeadde AiieuosJad anoge palsil (s)Jaumo 041
3e43 L41paa 'pi
esajoje aw15 pue A4unoO a4110 allgnd AaeION a `1
A1Nn004((f 'vmnovv0 WJMON
IW
so
011 `TLJewdl WeLlaWHU
•pa;ou se asn a4eAild to oilgnd of saoeds
uado Ja4lo pue 's)pvd 's�l;em'saaalas lie a;eolpap pue `um Alpgns
a41 10 spadse 194}o pue'speglas `sjuawasea'slol lie 4sllgelsa
'juasuoa aaJ} (,$no) Aw 411m ueld luawasea uopeAJasuoa s14;
Tdope AgaJa4 (am) 1 W44 pue juld s14a Aq paqu7sap pue umoys
A4jadoJd a47 jo (s)Jaumo a4l (an,?m) we I legj A_1lJao (am) 1
'NOIIVOI030 (INV dIHSIRIMMO JO 31VaHW30
-SO-330 JO MMS103L1 A1Nnoo
llld 3H130 LIZ'9d `£0££ '8'0 Ni 030140038
Alb3d021d 31-11 d0 NOLWC)d V 9NI38
q7
N
CO
0
LV
0)
cz
CL
00
�C
Go
O
O
C\I