670029_Inspection_20190409

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ,�_ - = Division of Soil and Water=Conservation-
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0Dennied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: �� Departure Time: County: hAdWRegion:
Farm Name: . v Nb('m)(J b,(V U" Owner Email
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �, ^� Title:
Onsite Representative: 14 V�1 OA A bUTS
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current -
Swine tjCapacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: (l J
Certification Number:
Design ,
Current
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop -
Layer
Non -La er
-
�-Design
Current
Dry Pnultry
C nnneity
Pnn_
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
TKO
Design,. Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Fatili ^?umber: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? A
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window J
4kM'Lt
[] Evidence of1Wiind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): f'YC/j�AA �,M l r IAA
13. Soil Type(s): I I`-'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
k No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 Yes
No
❑ NA
0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. oes the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
e appropriate box.
p�'
,
❑ WUP hecklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes XNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

F Eili l-i'umber: - Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes k No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes &o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? Y,
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �( I, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 777���
30. Did -the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) j'el
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I XI INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: i"
32. Were any additional problems rioted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
C_ommen#s3(refer=to qustai> #):pElainauy_RES aps►ve"rs and/o atiy,addiiional recoanmenilatious or_any slier coiririiets: ~ =
Use°drawingsof facilityfoetteceacplam situatioris (use additional aes as necessa -
g �Y)�`
JW-IL DW E '_U
kc, 2 c�
14-Ul�
Od'Ly 4-V
r ,
Vw4z,L'
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
q1 D --ta?i0— 1Lt9e' Leff
Phone: 0.- Cj
Date:
21412 15