20041512 Ver 1_Complete File_20050802

?rC \ NA
TFQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rT'-- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p -? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 29, 2007
DWQ Project No. 04-1512
Moore County
Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC
Attn: Ms Tara Disy Allden
220 Chatham Business Drive
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Subject Property: Stonebridge Stream Restoration
Carthage, NC
Express Review Post Construction Inspection
Dear Ms. Allden:
On January 23, 2007, Cynthia Van Der Wiele and Lia Myott conducted an on-site 401
Certification compliance inspection of the Stonebridge Stream Restoration Site in Carthage,
North Carolina. Post-construction 401 certification compliance inspections are required for all
Express Review projects. This letter is to inform you that no adverse findings resulted from this
inspection.
If you have any questions, please telephone Lia Myott or Cynthia Van Der Wiele in the Central
Office in Raleigh at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
-__ 4 K
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review
Permitting Unit
cc:
CBK/lem
File Copy
Central Files
Chris Huysman, Wetlands & Natural Resource Consultants, Inc., PO Box 224, Newton, NC
28658
Filename: 041512StonebridgeStreamMit(Moore)EXP +401
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
&ra!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
401 Certification Compliance Inspection
Form A December 2006
DWQ RO• . 4 _ A rCounty: .,
401 No: .
GC(s):,' Project Type
Project Status ..„"'
CAMA Major?
El Yes El No
Approved E&SC Plan? ? Yes [I No
State SW Permit? I Li Yes ? No

Site Name:
Owners Name:
Inspection Type:
Inspection Date:
Inspector:
River Basin:
Stream Name:
Class:
?
`.T1
cu+ ?•
Does the inspection merit an NOV?
'ermitted Impacts
Stream (If)1141 Wetland (a) D. ZS ac -5
Open Water (a) Buffer (sq. ft)
Ablation Impacts
itream Impacts-sediment (If) Wetland Impacts(a)
itream Impacts-other (If) Buffer Impacts (If)
)pen Water Impacts (a) Buffer Impacts (sq. ft)
itream Standard Violations
Removal of Use?
)ther waste (in-stream sediment)?
"urbidity?
)ther violations observed?
? Yes No
Yes No
? Yes ? No
? Yes ? No
Estimated linear ft
Estimated linear ft
Wetland Standard violation(s)? ? Yes No Estimated area of impact (a)
Liquids, fill, or other solids? .
Hydrological impacts (i.e. ditches in or adjacent to wetlands)?
Other wetland violations observed?
Wetland impacts confirmed by USACoE?
? Yes ? No
? Yes ? No
Yes ? No
? Yes No
Buffer Rule:
? Neuse
? Tar-Pam
? Catawba
? Randleman
? water su001v
On Topo and/or Soils Map?
Diffuse Flow Maintained?
Vegetation removed?
es No
es
t ? No
es
Y No
Buffer Impact Zone I: ? Yes ? No Estimated linear ft
Buffer Impact Zone 2: ? Yes No Estimated linear ft
Comments:
401 Certification Compliance Inspection
Form B December 2006
Permitted Impacts
Are there stream impacts beyond what was permitted (not including sediment)?
Comments:
Are there open water impacts beyond what was permitted?
Comments:
Are there wetland impacts beyond what was permitted (not including ditching)?
Comments:
Are there buffer impacts beyond what was permitted?
Comments:
General
Comments:

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. Exi U4- 1514
(if any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or 'N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit '? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:Nationwide Permit 27 verified
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not
required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete section
VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the
project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern
(see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC
Mailing Address: Contact: Ms. Tara Disy Allden
220 Chatham Business Drive
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Telephone Number: 919 / 459-9039 Fax Number: 919 / 463-5490
E-mail Address: taraCa,ebxusa.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Chris Huvsman
Company Affiliation: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants Inc
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 224
Newton, North Carolina 28658
Telephone Number: 828120-84-20 0 Fax Number: 828-465-3050
E-mail Address: wnrinc(Raol.com (/27
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such
as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and
development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include
a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities
must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic
Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps
may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For
administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no
larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-
Page 1 of 7
size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans
are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the
project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Moore County 638D
4. Location
County: Moore Nearest Town: Carthage
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Carthage, take Monroe Street
East. Turn left on Glendon Carthage Road (heading north). Pass Brady Road on the left, and
the site will be on the right before Old Glendon Road on the left.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35°24'51.87"N 79923'51.02"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 1,196 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT Crawley Creek (C)
8. River Basin: Cane Fear River (NCDNR 17-32-2)
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River
Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the
time of this application: Site consists of pasture and woodlands as described in the attached
Stonebridge Mitigation Plan. The site consists of the riparian zones of perennial stream
channels that are currently pasturelands. Surrounding landuse is rural and only sparsely
populated. Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Plan, Section II Study Area
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Development of a
stream mitie?ation site consistent with current design guidances as described in the attached
mitigation plan. See Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Plan Section 1.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The restoration of streams will fulfill DOT mitigation
requirements as described in the Executive Summary of the Mitigation Plan.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project
(including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE
Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were
issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful
information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated
mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior
segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules.
No prior history.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and
provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional stream or wetland impacts will be needed within the project area.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands,
open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification
for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed
herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all
Page 2 of 7
streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are
proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as
appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly
for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is
needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Numerous minor wetland impacts will be
required to re-establish a natural stream morphology through the valley. Impacts will be to
wetlands that are supported by groundwater discharges; these wetlands will experience a
functional lift with the added hydrology from overbank events and will be enhanced through
the restoration process. The existing conditions reflect historic straightening and minor
grading. The restored stream is designed to have biannual bankfull events and will provide
additional hydrology to existing hydric soils that do not currently exhibit wetland hydrology.
There will be a net gain in wetland areas. The attached maps illustrate the extent of wetlands
on the site. This approach ensures that buffer plantings will be more likely to be successful
because species will be compatible with anticipated hydrology. The restoritive actions are
described in the attached mitigation plan.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland
Impact
Site Number
(on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of

acres)
(acres) Located within
100 year
Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
12+25 stream restoration .006 yes adj pasture
19+50 stream restoration .008 yes adj pasture
23+00 stream restoration .010 yes adj pasture
25+00 stream restoration .010 yes adj pasture
25+25 20' wide farm crossing .034 yes adj pasture
26+00 stream restoration .059 yes adj pasture
41+00 stream restoration .001 yes adj pasture
44+75 stream restoration .007 yes adj pasture
48+50 stream restoration .010 yes adj pasture
50+50 stream restoration .042 yes adj pasture
55+00 stream restoration .066 yes adj pasture
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to:
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list
impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the
FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online at http://www.fema.gov.
***List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested
wetland, beaver pond, Carolina Say, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be
made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: apex.1 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: approximately 0.25 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Page 3 of 7
Stream
Impact No.
(on ma)
Type of Impact* Impact
Length
(linear ft)
Stream Name** Average
stream width
Before ct Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
UT107+50 natural stone ford crossing 20 UT-Crawley Cr. 4-5 perennial
UTI 17+00 natural stone ford crossing 20 4-5 perennial
UTl 25+50 natural stone ford crossing 20 " 4-5 perennial
UT1 31+00 culvert crossing 23 " 4-5 perennial
UTI 35+50 natural stone ford crossing 20 " 4-5 perennial
UT144+00 culvert crossing 25 4-5 perennial
UT149+00 natural stone ford crossing 20 " 4-5 perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts
and associated rip-rap, dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include
linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain), stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions,
etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the
linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed
tributary) to the nearest downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the
USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and
printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com, www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 6,247 restored, 100 impacted for
ford crossings, and 48 for culvert crossings.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and
any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water
Impact
No.
(on
map)

Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres)
Name of Waterbod
y
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill,
excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included
above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here
and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down
valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local
stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
Page 4 of 7
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial
viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and
explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the
desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during
construction to reduce impacts.
Wetland impacts are necessary to restore the stream channels that are on the site and no practical
alternative designs would result in a natural stream morpholoav. Those areas that are impacted by
the stream restoration will be replaced through the wetting of hydric soils that currently lack
hydrology: wetted areas will be planted in wetland riparian tree species. Existing wetlands will
gain function through riparian plantings. Stream crossings are necessary to provide access to high
ground. The current design strategv allows for the crossings to be installed now in anticipation of
potential land use changes. Design considerations are described in the Plan under Section IV:
Culvert Design ensures minimal impact to the restored system.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of
Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands
or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits,
published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure
that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed
impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining
acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be
appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing
and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and
replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving
similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for
USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required
mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also
choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for
Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much
information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if
offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed
(restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed
restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed
method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed.
n/a
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program
(NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at [phone]
to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior to submittal of a PCN.
For additional information regarding the application process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check
the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information:
Page 5 of 7
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public (federal/state)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of
the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure
whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at [phone] to review
current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No 0
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of
the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state
and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these
impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly
identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts
are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as
appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Neese), 15A
NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer
Requirements), or other (please identify class C waters)?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is
required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 n/a 3 n/a
2 n/a 1.5 n/a
Total n/a n/a
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of
Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or Payment
Page 6 of 7
into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within
15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0260.
n/a
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the
property.
n/a
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
n/a
XIIL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ?No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ?No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction
dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints
associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down
schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or
other issues outside of the applicant's control).
n/a
.26-2111,
Applicant/Agent's Sign ture Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
1 79.41 *66 ° W I I I 1 179.40000 ° W I I 1 1 179.383333 ° W I
NA
,?,4
??
?i?, ??? ? t
(
i'1 fC _?i?1-!
f'1-.?? ??i? ?:f q t,-? ?V -•'??
`D
-
/
`
1
V
/ J s
`
? 1,
/
??, ; l ? „} f ` ? +? ? ??
)??'t-??! 1\ 1 ) ` ? }ij? ?/ ,T i.%'f ' ? `t ? 1, ,?+ap CL?/' ?) ? `tr ??/?
.-?i? ??"'??
}

rBrit
IS VC M

ll S v t?? r V f
7:
WVf""",?,,
?
?
.
..../
(,,% 1 J `1 jN ' a, ?\ ' 1 \ \f ?~?
1^? yam`
rI?r? ! j- _? 1??\??S^?1.5..\ ? 1 ? Jf ??.. i ; f ?
?
Apr ti? ?!
?t 1 ?l?

Stonebridge --? 77
•ll( I-A
?,
Stream
e,
?
"
? ?{ l'? itt??'??'•??? ' ,,?- ? ? ,r ;l r??`?I ;??? ? art - ,.
-%v < ? ? ;? , , ??,, ,
?J f '?. 2 ?"•?1., _-? % 1. i ' +. 1 - w? f ` r - ! rT }1
)
)
?
?
?
?
?
?
.i_? :: ?
,
?> . ,? ?? ?_,•
? ? J r f ti
7
.-?r??? ??? ?? ? i ? t /r
f? ?
? ?
r?,?./ rf t `i _,?4
3o, 1 f? ?? i--_.% %,.7 ;??nSA !/ ?rl/?.r- r? \?/
? ?? - ?_ ? r
I Ji?)?.,1 _
?'%? ? ? ? •. ?? ? ?. i ( ? /.? /}? ? Jr- ' r)?.. f ? ??1 +ti ? ?i'` tf Sty-•!Jl ?i A ? / ?
%'
/lr ?? WJ r' rte'" ?( ?S
..?'? )??? }?r. ? r .? I F ?? I( 1. i ..A??? {.?.? f? JJ ?'%b ? -'''z.? /F? ????? f t '?
J ! r ) ??? ?

\ \? •?.. ?
.;?
?y
"?
?
?
? ?C~J
y
?/.?_ ? ?? ?J 1 ??
? 4 ,. ?+-?Y C`1r ?t
??
?r?
f!? lf? F
]FI ?• /?
r?\? ,..?? i ?,`• `f? ?? ? ? .?If.: .
??'?? JC v ll
' l_.1 ( Z"??}; l,, -^Z.? ?? i ha?? t?:%?^"\F?1 ` ??`??r ??` ??! 1t??>> /? ?C????J Ct?=..f?. ..i?Jff?l ' (fit i1,.`?-??'
? ??
7`/
U ?????f
p
? \)?
/?
r /.
l/, ?
' ?
.
? ?
1???'
? <
/If
?
? ?
?? ?`
?
' rT _? , 1
t
•
' ?
1?
Z .
_ J
?
?
'"4..
i? r_
_
..
?/
f
..
`
?
<
??'
,? ?
/)))(//.?
?
?
?. 1
?/?`I'? "t. ?Jl1 ?Il??i `J llf?! (1 ,/y}lli;?j' ?l ?,1???/ ??? /!i/ I \e1','\
->1 i/ ?JY/, ' /7:/ 1r?,Rf// ??' ??'"' / L?j u,(? '• ')?'`
/
'"
..
I
I
?i?
?
:? l
`'
i
,
}
?
f I,
J? F
V ` r f
. ?
?
?' t1b
'
z
p ?
.
I
+. -i r?f
\.'
:... ?
`
-
t/
,} ?
/ /
r
rf ??
...r^'??.
/,.c!'"
,: % •/
?.
?? iCi/
?

?Q?1'?f? L t o
(
1r
'
``
?
?
1
?
?
? ?
'l' i r 1 r 1
?_ `
j
? r
} _?I v-//.
???'--
}
••?y?
a1
''?,?
J /% ?`?>?` 1 ? j!/' /f??
` 1
E

IV.,+I DO-vv '/5.4U W"w1 1 179.38&1333 * W I I I
Name: PUTNAM Location: 035.4163125°N 079.3962953°W
Date: 6/24/2005 Caption: EBX - Stonebridge Mitigation Site
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
Name of Stream Description Curr. Class Date Prop. Class Basin Stream Index #
Big Juniper Creek From source to C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-2
(Juniper Creek) McLendons Creek
Little Juniper From source to Big C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-2-1
Creek Juniper Creek
Killets Creek From source to dam at WS-III;CA 08/03/92 Cape Fear 17-30-3-(1)
Carthage's water supply
reservoir
Killets Creek From dam at C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-3-(2)
Carthage's water supply
reservoir to
McLendons Creek
Little Creek From source to C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-4
McLendons Creek
Richland Creek From source to Moore B 03/01/66 Cape Fear 17-30-5-(1)
County SR 1264
Richland Creek From Moore County SR C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-5-(2)
1264 to McLendons Creek
Unnamed Tributary From source to Moore B 03/01/66 Cape Fear 17-30-5-3-(1)
northwest of County SR 1264
Mount Carmel
Church
Unnamed Tributary From Moore County C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-5-3-(2)
northwest of Road SR 1264 to
Mount Carmel Richland Creek
Church
Parkwood Branch From source to Richland C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-5-4
Creek
Toms Creek From source to Richland C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-5-5
Creek
Persimmons From source to C 09/01/74 Cape Fear 17-30-5.5
Glade Branch McLendons Creek
Big Governors From source to Deep C 08/01/98 Cape Fear 17-32
Creek River
Governors Creek
Crawley Creek From source to Big C 08/01/98
??''"" Governors Creek
%LtI i r Fromjgour(W to Big &08/111/98
DEEP RIVER From mouth of Big WS-IV;HQW 08/01/98
Governors Creek to N.C.
Hwy. 42
Line Creek From source to Deep WS-IV 08/03/92
River
Cape Fear 17-32-2
Cape
-Ah Fear
L 1K-32-iL
Cape Fear Fear 177-(32.5)
Cape Fear 17-33
Page 3 of 8
?sx ", s
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1957 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site Date: June 2005
Applicant/ Owner: Environmental Banc & Exchancle, LLC County: Moore
Investigator: Huvsman State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® No ? Community ID:old field
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No o Plot ID:hiohpround
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum
1. Festuca pratensis FACU herb 9.
2. Rubus arvensis FAC- herb 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
6. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 0
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: NfA din.} Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
"SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): (Ch) Fluyaguentic Dystrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ® No ?
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inchesl Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast structure, etc.
00-77 Ap 10YR 4/3 / sang loam
7--1_0 Bw1 10YR 514 10YR 4/3 common/distinct loam
10-17 Bw2 10YR 5/4 2.5Y 5/2 few/distinct loam
10YR 3/3 few/faint
f

f
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
0 Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION PHOTO / USGS / MRCS
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes [:] No
Is the Sampling Point .
Within a Wetland? Yes ? No Z
Remarks:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1387 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Plan Date: June 2005
Applicant/ Owner: Environmental Banc & Exchange,,LLC County: Moore
Investigator: Huysman State: North Carolina
Dar normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ® Non Community ID:wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes ? No o Plot ID:wetland
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum Dominant Plant Species Indicator Stratum

1. Juncus effusus FACW+ herb 9.
2. Carex spp. FACW herb 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 16.
$. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100

Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
? Other ? Inundated
0 Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded. Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 002 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0-2 fin.) ? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A
(in.) ? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Addendum to the Pre-Construction Notification and "Buffer Rules" Application Required for
Projects Submitted Under the
"Express Review Program"
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Version 3.0
January 7, 2004
Email Address: [e-mail]
Purpose: To provide a detailed explanation of the information required by the Division of Water Quality
in order to expedite the review of applications for 401 General Water Quality Certifications, Isolated
Wetland and Stream Permits, and Buffer Rule and Minor Variance Approvals.
Please do not leave any questions unanswered or use terms such as "N/A" without an explanation.
Fees:
Total stream impacts of less than 150 feet and/or total wetland impacts of less than or equal to 1 acre -
$1,000.00.
Total stream impacts of greater than or equal to 150 feet and/or total wetland impacts of more than 1 acre
and projects that include any kind of Buffer Rules Approval -$2,000.00. For stream origin determinations
as required by the Buffer Protection Rules the fee is $200.00 for one or two streams on the same
property, $500.00 for three to six streams on the same property, or $1,000.00 for more than 6 streams on
the same property.
Please read the entire document before attempting to determine the proper fee. Fees are additive for a
particular project.
Things to keep in mind when filling out the application:
A specific answer must be provided for each question. For instance, if a numerical answer is requested
then a numerical answer must be provided along with the supporting information necessary for DWQ staff
to verify that the number is accurate. Likewise, if explanations are presented to justify certain responses,
the explanations must be completely supported by documentation. DWQ staff cannot assume that
unsupported or undocumented information is accurate. "N/A" is not an acceptable answer for any
question since the DWQ Staff reviewing the application must have an opportunity to determine whether or
not any requested information is pertinent.
All forms, guidance, worksheets, applications, etc. used must be the current versions as posted on our
web site at http:h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. There will soon be a web site specifically for the express
review program. Please note that it will be the applicant's or applicant's consultant's responsibility to
verify that the current versions are used. The versions posted on our web site will be considered to be
the current versions.
You are a very important part of the success of this program, if you have suggestions or clarifications
please send your comments to the Wetlands/401 Unit of the DWQ (via email at
401 [e-mail]).
Filling Out the Pre-Construction Notification Application:
The Corps of Engineers (USACE)/DWQ official, joint Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
must be used as a basis for the expedited review process. The completed application should be
presented first the supporting information tabbed and collated in the same order. collated in the same
order. Using a custom format is not recommended. All supporting documentation should be presented
as tabbed appendices in the same order as the application. The open squares (_) are checklist items.
2
The following items correspond to the numbering system on the Pre-Construction Notification Form
(PCN):
USE CHECK BOXES TO TRACK PROJECT INFORMATION
SECTION I. PROCESSING
Sac:Ko r%. g041 4o f 9(1 & 2. The USACE determines which Nationwide, Regional, or General Permit is
VW.,*r CarVj? Coco fl required. If you have verified with the USACE which permit they intend to use for
N I-7 VQ-r ed your project or if you already have written approval from the USACE, please
ollOr11 t indicate by adding "verified" or "verified, attached", respectively, in the blank next
to the Permit number requested.
po nd l- /
?,V4. Y Attach the USACE Approval if you have it.
x ed; }? j rc?c.?ss /
3. It is not anticipated that the expedited process will be requested for this situation.
,ca, :w? mgvx„ sifd
V 4. If you propose to impact 150 feet or more of perennial stream or 1 acre or more
of wetland and onsite mitigation is not proposed, it is recommended that you
either locate an acceptable private bank with available credits (with
documentation to show that the bank can and shall provide the credits needed)
or obtain approval from the NCWRP for the entire amount of stream and or
wetland as DWQ will make the final determination as to whether or not mitigation
applies. Please note that the USACE may have different mitigation requirements
and thresholds.
® 9" 5. State whether your project will require a CAMA Minor, Major or General Permit
(?CS?' S fed req kA 1 0e' and give the status of the permit.
SECTION II - APPLICATION INFORMATION
15 NCAC 2H .502{t) reads as follows: "Who Must Sign Applications. The application
shall be considered a "valid application" only if the application bears the signature of a
responsible officer of the company, municipal official, partner or owner. This signature
certifies that the applicant has title to the property, has been authorized by the owner to
apply for certification or is a public entity and has the power of eminent domain. Said
official in signing the application shall also certify that all information contained therein
or in support thereof is true and correct to the best of his knowledge."
Jvoj nt ?? o r` '? Please indicate how the applicant meets the above definition and provide
,x supporting documentation.
Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax
PC N $CCh"©A T number and email address.
A+?a d 2. V Please attach the agent authorization letter if the application is not signed by the
applicant. The agent authorization letter must be signed by the applicant. The
applicant's name and position must also be spelled out as many signatures are difficult
to read.
pCN SelOrilt 3. V/ Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax number and
email address.
SECTION III - PROJECT INFORMATION
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the
information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the
types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
3
Maps and Plans:
?{ ?ry V/ The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map- Please cleanly
delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the
features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the
quadrangle name. You can go to the USGS web site (http://mac.usgs.gov/maplists/) to
verify the most recent version.
Vik*AoGv or) Part The most recent version of the NRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within
Scdior) -SL- Z the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin and Randleman Lake Watershed and
recommended for all projects) - Please cleanly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the
?r°OrLtrQ, map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy
J be provided. Please indicate the page or map number from which the copy of the map
was made. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil survey map sheets can be
obtained from the local NRCS County Office (http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/).
Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the
?2G"?l ©n Y?pUwe property and project on the map. Please indicate north and scale. Please include
J applicable road names or State Road numbers.
*onebrt'dcle Str-eawt The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide
\w()kW6& Prejck full sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
'ke e+ =nd ex
Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet must be scaled and
S+on age Nsi % include all jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features,
U State regulated buffers, topographic contours with elevations, approximate extent
`?Y1$ Sh¢ etS 1- and nature of forest, field, landscaped, or other cover. Any existing structures and
impervious area must also be shown. Existing utility lines and easements must
also be shown. Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features must be
shown. North arrow and the scale must be shown. Please note that the impact
boundaries on the maps should correspond to the flagged impact boundaries in the
field.
S+DnEbridy i Qesrsn I( Proposed conditions - These sheets must be scaled and show all existing
Nan S S heel S (? jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State
regulated buffers must be underlain on the site plan(s). The plans must show all
built out structures and impervious cover. The plans must include the final grading
contours with elevations. The plans must indicate all utilities and easements. It is
likely that several versions of the final built out site plans will be necessary. The
following is a list of layers:
Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must be included. The plans should include
SeG (o ?M the locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the collection system and
drainage ways. All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations.
Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and
policies. In certain cases, final stormwater management plans must also be
provided, but that will be addressed later in this document.
npbr?dc?F p?,gn ,? Plats - The plans must show the location and layout of all sub-divided parcels with
R i? n 51't i g lot identifications. Platted parcels must be developable without further impacts to
jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State
regulated buffers.
ACS j Clrl V/ Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland,
J _ stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on
Q?f,0Y1S , sy\eOs 1-19 the site plans. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will
be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated.
5
Wetland Impacts (on the site plan):
S+6r\e6rid e
0419rt Plans, "vats 1-g
4znebrtdge
Plans , S hr?.e.?-s 1-?
Q1o?n5? SI?I's 1-? ?
Plans Sf? s ?-?
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and
any clearing must be specified.
All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars. Construction
detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
When surface drainage features or groundwater recharge areas that feed or would
reasonably feed wetlands that are not to be filled are made impervious, it may be
necessary to direct some stormwater runoff to those areas in order to maintain hydrology.
You must identify these areas and address them. Supporting explanations and discharge
information must be provided to show that the wetland would not be eroded or receive
too much or too little hydrology. In many cases this could help satisfy part of a
stormwater management plan.
Flooding
& ? ?? Draining
P I o.n ?c 1 5 h 1r I-gStream Impacts:
??jnebr?dge 'a(
wsS qn P?o?v?s rhae4s ? "g
Culvertinc
02??g? P?Qns,sh?K'
Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks
of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be
impacted.
The inlet and the outlet of the culvert should be aligned with the stream as much as
possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and stream bed elevations should be indicated.
;*x-\c'aftC\T Any widening of the stream must be shown with elevations.
flans, &V)O +S 1-8
De-S V The extent of and plan details for all dissipation or grade control devices should be shown
>1C?>?f? with pertinent elevations.
Plans i Sheets k- 8
6
?'fDflelO<<??? V/ For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a longitudinal cross section that
O?s?g Q?0.Y1s,S ?4 shows the stream bed invert at the inlet and outlet, the existing stream bank elevations
and the invert of the inlet and outlet of the pipe(s) must be provided.
S+pf),e'o l dq OLSttt57/ For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a vertical cross section must be
Q?arn5? Shy}? l'8 provided that shows the stream cross section at the inlet and outlet overlain with the
culvert and fill cross section.
S+Uhe_V!dcr_ Ns!5N 9r For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that
shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross
section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the
J QQ edge of each footer to each stream bank.
S'j?ll9L? O??tJn? For bottomless culverts or other spans, a plan view must be provided that shows the
ai fA(1 SF ShQQS i - 8 location of the spans and the stream banks.
?Mebciac?e OeciG k V/ For longer culverts or culverts that will pass beneath substantial impervious cover, it will
J be necessary to provide adequate plan detail to show that discharge velocity/energy will
}o`nc'e 5i_"ts $ be adequately dissipated.
+/ Aquatic life passage through culverts is typically achieved by placing the invert of the
;4?nebr?d culvert below the existing bed of the stream per the USACE or North Carolina Wildlife
DDS Q?p,?S Sits Resource Commission guidelines. Other methods such as baffles may also be used.
Please be aware that such placement may require the use of grade/velocity control
$ measures up or down stream of culverts on steeper streams to prevent head-cuts or
stream bed erosion. The culvert placement relative to the stream bed can be indicated
on the longitudinal profile. Grade and velocity control measures must be indicated on the
plan view and typical designs should be provided.
??rle ?i dY 17 Multiple culverts, wide culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills,
)1esign Plans, Sirs 1-$ off-setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to
maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the
culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section
including the stream flood-prone area.
w1A i r16 dQM t" Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated
:L)nS+AAC OCI with the dam foot print, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of
stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated.
lar ?3 e c+
Stream Relocations;
'+OMbr ?dqf_ NStgn V Stream relocations must be conducted as specified in General Certification numbers
??Gf15 Shej s i V 3402 and 3404 (available on the Wetlands Unit web site). Stream relocation plans must
include:
L ?'??G1?' I ?Yl Q? c?nS lU?
>ec.+Zon W, Table 3
'tanebrr, dqe Desk/
'leans e S1rleets 1-9
Morphological measurements (see Appendix B of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina available on the Wetlands Unit web site) not all of the
measurements are applicable in every instance.
Typical stream cross sections - Typically, a riffle cross section and a pool cross section
that includes the entire flood prone area. The bankfull and flood prove area elevations
should be indicated. Similarly, a riffle cross section of the reference stream(s) should be
provided.
Plan view - Provide scaled plans that show the location of the proposed (preferably with
stationing) and the existing stream. In most instances, the bankfull contours and flood
prone area contours, in stream structures, bank revetments/stabilization, channel plugs,
planting plan, vegetation conditions, stormwater outlets, grade controls, bridges, culverts,
sewer lines, roads, fencing, and easement lines should also be provided.
W- H c?tQ? Qn ??an Ial Longitudinal Stream Profile - A scaled profile that indicates the thalweg , bankfull, and
???nd A top of bank elevations should be provided for the design and reference streams. In many
cases, it will also be necessary to show the existing land elevations for the design
stream.
V/ Planting Plan - A planting and/or vegetation management plan should also be provided
Se C,-fl CA IV , Table `A that makes use of appropriate native vegetation. The plan should indicate the extent,
density, and species of plants to be provided.
A' 9LA Art P fan ? In-stream structure, bank revetment/stabilization, and stormwater outlet typicals -
s Detailed, typical plans should be provided for all in stream structures, bank revetments or
ye (;•won tV " stabilization, and stormwater outlets. The typicals should include materials and
/ specifications as well as relative lengths, positions, and angles.
?j?-j? Ca?1 PIOLO, Sediment transport analysis - A sediment transport analysis should be provided based
>eCi bri on the current, relevant, accepted practices. The sediment transport analysis should be
relevant to the stream bed load type and should predict bed load transport equilibrium.
?t }I 91?'i Q P Ian/ Permanent conservation easement or similar means of protection must also be provided.
se cti on vll - I
Other Information:
'+one1,;,r1d9e Sfreams/ 1. The project should always be referred to by this name in all correspondence as well
A j + 9coid rv Si'hc as the DWQ # once it is provided.
Naj a 007 NIA V 2. This only applies to DOT projects which are not expected to utilize the Express
pa'secA , Review Program.
K N 1M. (p Stl 3. This should be the size of the project as identified by the USACE for 404 Permits or
by the Division of Water Quality for Buffer Approvals and Isolated Wetland Permits.
QC 4. Please provide the name (as depicted on the USGS topographic map and DWQ
Stream Classification Lists) of the nearest water body(ies) to which your project is a
tributary to (e.g. "Neuse River (Falls Lake below normal pool elevation)"). (Do not
simple state "stream", "river", "ocean", "sound" or "lake".) Please provide the "stream
index number" of the named water body or water body section (e.g. "27-(1)"). Also,
please provide the full water quality classification (e.g. "WS-IV NSW CA") of the water
body. This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.html.
>CM ? . ? U 5. Please state which river basin and sub-basin that your project is in (e.g. "Neuse River
Basin, NEU01"). This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB. html.
PCN _-7- -9 a"6 S/ 6. Conditions should also be indicated on the existing site plan where applicable.
}Onebri e S+r+ qvA Photos (including aerial photos) can be helpful in describing the existing conditions.
?? +; jai PI an - APP`ndi?c A
4l/ 7. You must provide an attachment that explicitly describes what the proposed project
Il i lAA,cf Rao - / will entail from the planning stage to final construction.
???? ©Y1 3SL hY 8. This can be a simple explanation, but it is critically important because the purpose
l;{19ct`a? P1 o?rl, dictates how the no practical alternatives is reviewed.
SECTION IV - PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
8
T1(Y'C? iS no prior
/ Please include copies of all 401 Water Quality Certifications, Isolated Wetland
Pray C ?? ?? Permits, Buffer Approvals, USACE Permits, CAMA Permits for the site as well as a
?0'r ` copy of the final approved, site plan.
SECTION V - FUTURE PROJECT PLANS
ti® act d 1 ? I otwJ V For projects utilizing the express review process, all impacts both present and
or VVEf]and potential future must be indicated. For instance, the location or configuration of
platted lots sometimes suggests that future impacts will be necessary to build,
?? access, or otherwise develop such lots. Failure to account for such potential impacts IIA could delay or disqualify a project from the rapid review process. If you believe that
y?j1i ?l Pr???cf the lot can be developed without impacts, but you anticipate that your assertion may
be questioned, it is recommended that you provide a potential building foot print
and/or grading plan to show that future impacts could be avoided.
SECTION VI - PROPOSED IMPACTS TO WATER OF THE US
>-br Vbr , d5
0,**? 1. It is recommended that the individual impacts be described if there are special things
W () Nuns a to note about the impacts. Typically the most important thing is to have detailed
accurate site plans as described above. Please make sure they are clearly labeled.
(psi c3)
P ( cA nS b/ Please include all proposed temporary impacts.
(Job V Also, a current, signed delineation map from the USACE should be provided (if
kvc, iabia, available) and a map locating the stream origins signed by the appropriate DWQ
Staff must be provided if applicable.
aor,abr-cdse V2. Each impact to a wetland must be clearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The
)e5! 159 type of impact must be clearly stated. If the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
i?a2 E'tS 1 ' $ be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please do
not list any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. If there is any
doubt, it is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams.
15+b r\eb r i die- 6Y 3. Each impact to a wetland must be clearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The
Q1 ao S ` type of impact must be clearly stated. If the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please list
any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. If there is any doubt, it
is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams. Please follow current DWQ
policy with respect to whether a stream is perennial or not. It is recommended that
you assume that a stream is perennial (unless you are positive that it is not) so if
mitigation is required then the appropriate amount of mitigation would be anticipated
or requested from the WRP or private bank. If the WRP or private bank has pre-
approved too short of an amount of stream or if inadequate mitigation is proposed,

I
/ then that situation will result in delays.
W
4 S
ti
it i
diff
lt t
d
t
i
h
th
f
t
.
`\ 5 ome
mes
s
icu
o
e
erm
ne w
e
er a
ea
ure is a modified natural channel
or a ditch, especially in the eastern part of the State. Soils, drainage features,
topography, and similar factors, all are important for making that determination.
NIA t?,/ 5. Other items to address not specifically requested in the application include
downstream sediment starvation, thermal pollution, low flow releases from dams, and
aquatic life passage. Other important considerations are buffer reestablishment or
mitigation around ponds on buffered streams. The site plan should include the
precise elevation contour of the normal pool as well as the dam foot-print. Mitigation
9
is required for wetland flooding of an acre or greater and for stream fill (if over the
150 foot threshold) under the dam foot-print and any outlet stabilization.
SECTION VI - AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization are critical aspects of an application particularly if you desire the application
to be processed expeditiously. The following is a check-list of avoidance and minimization questions that
DWQ Staff often look for in applications.
M k'? %',,)M4an Pf a rL, ia/ Are there any stream crossings at angles less than 75° or greater than 105°?
5ge C+ ion 1?1 _ y
OA 4jCp+• o r, Q JaLrx I R/ Are there any stream crossings that cross two streams above or at the confluence of those
Se Ctl6 n W-4 streams?
W1RC 0JH`4 n P14X0 , V1 Are there any stream, wetland, water, and/or buffer impacts other than perpendicular road
se C+j 0+1 IV-11 crossing near the edges of the property?
?? a Q?Qri? w' Can the stream be relocated as a natural channel design as opposed to culverted or
otherwise filled?
Seci?+ On IV -?i
oV1. ??M1? Is any single stream crossed more than once?
Se cfO? %V - .14
5n R &O V Can property access routes be moved or reduced to avoid stream, wetland, water, buffer
tAI+, `Q I iV y impacts?
40 sm4da+r>as V Can a building, parking lot, etc. be realigned to avoid impacts?
M 1 ?' C! a 'i c P1 N/ Can the site layout be reconfigured to avoid impacts?
64- ' l 0.0V1 o - C; Can headwalls or steeper side slopes be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
liii•C?? °r' PJ&n, Sec 1V-Yv/ Can a retaining wall be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
?? ?-? ?c 1ya n Pio?1 S ?\VCan cul de sacs be used in place of a crossing?
Jp dos ncl?tc??d II? Can lots be reshaped or have shared driveways to avoid impacts?
If based solely on the practicable physical possibility, the answer is "yes" to any of the above questions
then you must have to provide substantial and convincing justification as to why the impacts are
necessary. If the impacts are required by a local government or other agency the claim must be
supported with appropriate written documentation from the local government or other agency. Most
projects typically involve the need to justify avoidance and minimization. If this information is not readily
available, then the express review process may not be the appropriate venue to use because the project
may be put on hold at the end of the process. Providing alternative plans (such as plans that avoid the
impact, minimize the impact and the preferred plan, similar those used in environmental assessments)
and explanations as to why the preferred plan is needed and why the alternative plans won't work are
many times helpful in the no practical alternatives review.
SECTION VIII - MITIGATION
Mitigation for the Express Review Program, final mitigation plans must be presented up front. The final
plans (except for plans that propose payment into the Wetlands Restoration Fund, Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund, private mitigation banks, or similar banking instruments) must contain detailed plans,
specifications, calculations and other supporting data that show that the appropriate mitigation will be
achieved at the ratios required. The design plans must be developed to at least the "90%" level.
Monitoring plans must be final and specific. Any means of permanent protection, such as a permanent
conservation easement must be provided. If you elect to use the WRP or a private mitigation bank, it is
10
recommended that you request the maximum possible mitigation amount that DWQ may require so that
you will not have to get further approval from them on short notice. The WRP and private banks are not
part of the expedited review process and cannot be expected to meet any such deadlines. There will be
no conditional expedited approvals that require final plans at a later date. It is not recommended that
innovative mitigation techniques or greater than 10% preservation be requested as part of an expedited
process.
SECTION IX
If your project requires the preparation of an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA and an
approval letter has not been issued by the State Clearinghouse, then you cannot apply under the
expedited review process. I t is your responsibility to find out if such documentation is required.
SECTION X
There are many aspects of the Buffer Rules that must be addressed in every application, if applicable.
The first and most important thing to keep in mind is that allowable activities that require written Approval
from DWQ triggers a review of the entire project for compliance with the Buffer Rules.
Diffuse Flow & Stormwater Management:
r)0'r 'tmf , c+ 9 The most common issues that arise involve the requirement for diffuse flow of stormwater
through riparian buffers. Basically one of three things must be indicated in regards to all
r t `? `'?? buCS "nevi' stormwater that is collected and subsequently discharged. First, provisions for
diffuse flow through the protected buffer must be made. This usually involves the use of
level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ guidance on level spreader design,
which is available on our web site. Please keep in mind that it does not matter how far a
discharge point is from a buffer. The stormwater must be flowing in a diffuse manner at
whatever point it eventually reaches the buffer. If the stormwater will not be flowing in a
diffuse manner through the protected buffer at the point it reaches the buffer, then one of
the following options may be allowed:
You may provide a nitrogen removing measure such as a forested filter strip,
grassed swale, stormwater wetland, etc. The measure employed should be
designed according to the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual or other DWQ Guidance available at httv.
//h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/-mitresto.html. After the nitrogen is treated, the
stormwater can be directly conveyed through the buffer with written DWQ approval.
?Y U( You may discharge the stormwater to an existing man-made conveyance that
currently conveys stormwater through the protected buffer (assuming the
conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Rules) as long as that
conveyance does not need to be altered to convey the flow. Please remember that
there are no other choices. The following checklist is intended to help insure that
your application will not be deemed incomplete as a result of improper stormwater
design.
Stormwater Management (for Buffer Rules compliance only - Also, see Section XI):
N U } b'4k' 4[3"' All stormwater out-falls must be clearly shown and labeled on the site plan for projects in
Buffered watersheds. List each out-fall as labeled:
Ede Option 1: Level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ Guidance, and
N 1 N devices that merely control velocity but do not provide diffuse flow such as rip rap
dissipators are not proposed. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site
plan and provide a DWQ worksheet available at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/mitresto.html:
11
Ali K Q" Option 2: Nitrogen removing measures designed to DWQ Standards are
proposed for discharges for which diffuse flow through a protected Buffer cannot be
met. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site plan and provide a DWQ
worksheet available at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/mitresto.htmi:
N I l\ Option 3: The stormwater will be discharged to an existing man-made (not
including modified natural channels) conveyance that carries the stormwater
through the Buffer. The conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Buffer
Rules. List each out-fall as labeled:
(?OiQ?Lc071 ` All stormwater out-fall must meet one of the options above. (Note: if you cannot check this
r noIr box your application will likely not be accepted into the express review process.)
Sta?,?nwo,.)R-
; rN V ,`-J ZA Site Plans:
'l All applications on properties with DWQ protected buffers must clearly depict the buffers
?t(E'1?b and any impacts to the buffers on the site plans. The impact maps should clearly depict
p1a?5, shorcts 1"? both zones of the protected buffers and the proposed impact areas (provided in square
feet).
Surface Water & Buffer Delineations:
ik8 bT< (? ; p r, e/ Any surface waters subject to DWQ protected buffers must be field located and accurately
S, S depicted on the site plans and impact maps. The width, dimensions and pattern of the
?-s surface water must be delineated. The surface water location must not be taken simply
from a USGS map, soil survey or local municipality's map. The buffers must be measured
from the surface water as required within the applicable buffer protection rule (e.g., all
buffers along streams subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule must be measured from the "top-of-
bank" of the stream and not the centerline of the stream). All streams must be surveyed or
located by GPS and shown precisely on the site plans.
Impact Table:
P A p _C?r` oj? *41 / Please provide additional impact tables that clearly state the area of impact for each
t" corresponding impact site.
Variances:
Projects that require the Minor and "General" Variances may be eligible for the use of the
Express Review Program. However, Major Variances are not eligible. If your project
requires a Minor or "General" Variance approval, then be sure to attach a completed Minor
or "General" Variance application.
Mitigation:
Srs?ebridC?.- S 9' As opposed to applications that are submitted under our regular process, final mitigation
plans must be presented up front (see requirements for Section VIII above). The mitigation
N1?!'iGJf`pr1 Q(0. plans must comply with the applicable buffer mitigation rule.
SECTION XI - STORMWATER
Please provide the following information in regards to potential stormwater requirements:
The total acreage of the site. I P (acres)
EX,e C, AA,11 e S W-kMO" Lk
12
V The total built-out impervious acreage 0 (acres)
v/ The total area that will be disturbed '-/, (P (acres)
NJ A 94 If the total area exceeds 20% imperviousness, the development on the site is uniform in
density, and you are claim that the total impervious area is less than 30%, you must
provide a complete, detailed breakdown of the assumed built-out conditions. The
breakdown must be detailed enough to show that all potential impervious areas are
accounted for.
NIA l/ If there are concentrated areas of development such as multi-family, commercial, cluster,
club houses, etc. that exceed 30% imperviousness and the total imperviousness for the site
does not exceed 30%, a stormwater management plan will likely be required for those
areas that exceed 30% imperviousness.
Stormwater management plans must be complete with a final design and an executed
Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There will be no conditional stormwater approvals
for the express review process that allow for approval of the final plans at a later date.
Worksheets must be provided that are available at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html.
SECTION XII - SEWAGE DISPOSAL
rn `e?lareJi?A Response must be clear and detailed. Any disposal method that suggests further impacts
cc vs may be required other than those shown must be clearly addressed on the site plans.
A i gosa l
SECTION XIII
QCN fj Answering yes to either of these responses automatically precludes you from the express
review process.
SECTION XIV -SIGNATURE
C0 Q? "7 V/ The name, position and/or title of the applicant must be in type or long hand script here with
Q the signature. It should be the same person as described in Part 11.
When applying to use a General Certification it is important to review every condition of the Certification
to determine whether or not your project can and will meet all of the conditions. For each Certification for
which you have applied, you must list the number of each condition and specifically where the information
is provided in the application or how and why the condition will or will not be met if not otherwise
described in the application. The following format is provided for GC 3402 as an example:
0 GC for Nationwide Permit -( - ?
13
Remember, N/A by itself is not an acceptable answer. You must explain why you think something does
not apply.
If you have any questions about these requirements, please email the Express Review Program at
[e-mail] and include your question and phone number and the appropriate staff will
respond as soon as possible.

°
" so" ENVIRONMENTAL B A N C& EXCHANGE
L L C d1N WUNWfRIES 11YND
"K ,
STONEBRIDGE STE RALEU
" a'?
a
ftm
°.? AM MITIGATION PROJECT DICKSON
?

arp,.gp
WA3/os SHEET INDEX _ qty tino.?twe ca,?no,t,
lmo Grob
south carano itawo

PLANTING
/ ZONE 2
1f

F
i.
- ----

i
-- -- ----

... i

t?f

60
-
2 .. :..;
.
:...

.
....
..

..

...

.......
........
e e :
0 '
i
.... '_ .. i.....

?
...i..:... ... .i ... i... .i. ..
.:..
x f . .. .. ..
:b .. .'I

255
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 + k "O 6+00 6+50
aw.u LEGM
m-rrrvv-+-r.?
-%-X_
m.?N i mml -?-
p? X %
?M
nIX.m: L
Wt I=?
W:M Nn
G7
R - ..I.. T : .............
7+00 7+50 8
+Nw-+N?? '? M+°M pNN.?pl-? ENVIRONMENTAL BANC do EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS 8
`- ° WV1 50N mslm N» IsTONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT /
cnmHAca. NORTH CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 0+00 TO STA. 8+00
F?
Cp
tl{?
pya
A
?55??7?5353
?Wll
X.. ,g
REMOVE EXISTING
FENCE WITHIN LCE \
\TE /
PLANTING
- A ? - -? ZONE 1
?-Isa t ?. r ? ,.
e
arwc
.... . ` DATE
PLANTING '-
ZONE 2 -.. .. . _ \.. _
vX vx
a?
...o rX-rl raT 3.? ?M.T ! mtX
Lam
x-x-
u.o°n
x x
?n
i I
:
ObaE COr1?R . .
.
.. ...:..i ..:... i..
70
i

0 ... .....
...: ..... .:.. .'...
.....:... ..._...:..:.. :. ..
...:. ..:..:.. :... ..:..:.. .:...:..
..:.. '.. ..: .. .:....:. ..? ...

...:....:....: . .......... .... ..
-
...... ......
.........
.. ...
..
65
- ---
-?
°O1aT
---- -
-------- ------ - ------ ---- -- - - - ---- - 265
-
z __ - - - - ---- -

Q ... ..... ....... ........ :.. ... ....:.. .. .... _ ....

- - L
260
2
ss
55
8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50
wuao rm
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDCE DESIGN PLANS 2
'STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
MirenN 0° eo.o UT-1 STA. 8+00 TO 17+50
A?Itom ??ar°" !??° ?CMTNACE. NORTH CARq.WA
A D -
LE=
]? I
ma us
14Atdgp - -._
]nwn
woPln i nvN -?-
Ylro +ir
A
vww amw ? I'
]W?AM1
1255
25+50 26+00
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS
STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT 3
CMW GE. NORTH CARCLI a UT-1 STA. 17+50 TO 26+00
r
PLANTING
4

1
/

mm
.om u. mvrvrrvw?
??. -x-x-
rn snm - .......
-x-x-
¦
d
........................... ... :.
.....
i'
c3o
...:.......................: ..... i... ; ....... S.....i.....
.... .......................i..
----? - - - ---- --- -- - ---..-.--- - - --- ---- ---
....
26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50
30+00 30+50 31+00
............. .
.:......:........ ...:...
21
32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00
aw wmi10.c ism row
rts- Imi-?, ENNRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE. LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS q
9UI ?N ?STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJEC
UT-1 STA. 26+00 TO 35+00
y?,,,, CARTHAGE. NORTH CAROLNIA $
Y
(Q@y 0
P
?H

\\ J
GATE
,bhY„rrr+ ' PLAWim-
? ? . ZONE 1\
? o
i
l3
\I I

265
i i Nom:
.....i .....:..., j... .i..:..:..i.....:...i..n ..:...................... ...........:.. .
00 35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00
mntx-Y--Y-
xnwof
tlQ? a0.¢ ????
tutori
M %
tM
nsvumt . ??
IM--
t .. ... ..... .... .... ... t i 1 t ..••.. t
39+00 39+50 40+00 40+50 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE. LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS O
??, ?? m?? ^^^^^ STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT UT-1 STA. 35+00 TO 44+00
`rte ouixo, ,? cnrsn+ncc na+n+ cwcuNA $
LE=
rQ 4. .
RROROSeo - - - -- = re
x x
f ?Z.F
`PLANTING, -
? ? h & y :. i._'i- ..... ? .. \? \ ? +T$ ... / ?'? ,' ZONE }
•
,
/h •. ... ._ _. norm.,
PRDAO!
\ ZaaNn2 c
• --.,...cam '? - '' _ ?? ??
PIRWIPOSED
OVE
w A
1 1
F 2_7_0
a
i. o
a ...:...:...:..:. .: ................. .......... .... .. ..;........ ..:
..... .............
265 i i ...... ...... ........ ............. ..
1 265
i `
44+00 44+50 45+00 45+50 46+00 46+50 47+00 47+50 48+00 48+50 49+00 49+50 50+00 50+50 51+00 51+50 52+00 52+50 53+00 53+50
N ream uN°p1inm°o~1°.n ,?.„A, R .. ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE. LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS
STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
?
?rW.«rt,,.?+ ? tO°'°L°' I_ LARIHAGE. NORM CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 44+00 TO 53+50
=
H? nsna
FE m
I I E/

e
e?
e
a6?
B6
oli3
cU
Hil
53+50 54+00 54+50 55+00 55+50 56+00 56+50 57+00 57+50
as a.?is+n >m-'ais .wnwN
1
_
.
KSOW
MI
-
]
an?ce a
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC EXCHANGE. LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS
[TONE'R'D'E STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
cA Aec. NORTH CA"A UT-1 STA. 53+50 TO 57+71 g
1
h.
av "`?" :
UOD
- =an
?pC
, w=ra

a
wra. F

A)/%m
?Q?J
1 w.-em?x .. -
--. cr..wL

wmoww. ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS g
STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
CARTHAGE. NORM CARM A UT-2 STA. 0+00 TO 5+96
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 22, 2005
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project No. 04-1512
Moore County
Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC
Attn: Ms Tara Disy Allden
220 Chatham Business Drive
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Subject Property: Stonebridge Stream Restoration Plan
Carthage, NC
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Ms. Allden:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 148 linear feet of streams and 0.25 acres of wetlands for the
purpose of conducting a stream restoration project known as Stonebridge Stream Mitigation
Plan, as described within your application dated August 1, 2005, and received by the N.C.
Division of Water Quality (the "Division") on August 3, 2005. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s)
3495 (GC3495). You must comply with all of the conditions contained within that General
Certification. This Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW 27 when issued
by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and other
regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404
Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached Water Quality Certification and the additional conditions
listed below.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None ffiCaroina
Aawralllb
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Acton Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Plan
Page 2 of 4
August 22, 2005
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
general conditions of this Certification are met. No other impacts are approved including
incidental impacts:
Amount Approved (Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream 148 (feet) PCN
Wetlands 0.25 (acres) PCN
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Impacts Beyond Those in Application
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. Elimination of Impacts From Cattle
Cattle access shall be completely eliminated from the restored reaches on this project.
Constructed crossings shall be designed to allow for passage to the other side, but prevent
cattle from accessing the streams.
5. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Plan
r Page 3 of 4
August 22, 2005
within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the
project.
6 Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream
profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions,
pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert. Culverts shall be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as
to prevent head cutting of the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the
appropriate stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner,
the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
7. Stream Work
All stream work shall be constructed, maintained, and monitored according to the approved
plans in the application. Any repairs or adjustments to the site must be made according to the
approved plans or must receive written approval from the Division to make the repairs or
adjustments.
8. Macrobenthic Monitoring Requirements
Sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates shall be conducted annually at the reference sites
and at two sites within the project-one located near the center of the project and second site
situated near the bottom (toward the end) of the restored reach. Sampling shall consist of
Qua14 samples, as described in the Standard Operating Procedures for Benthic
Macroinvertebrates (NCDWQ Biological Assessment Unit, 2003,
httv://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/esb/BAUwww/benthossoi).-Dd fl, and shall be performed by people
certified by DWQ to make collections. Sampling shall occur once before construction
commences and annually, during the same month, following construction. Results of this
sampling shall be submitted to DWQ for review as part of the annual monitoring
requirements.
9. Success Criteria and Release of Credits
Success shall be demonstrated in maintaining restored reaches as perennial streams (as
defined by DWQ) prior to receiving mitigation credits.
10. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in
writing at the letterhead address within ten (10) days prior to the commencement of
construction.
11. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached Certificate of
Completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division
of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Plan
Page 4 of 4
August 22, 2005
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This Certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Cynthia Van Der Wiele
in the Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-1786. ,
Sincerely,
O " Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cvdw
Enclosures: GC 3495
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
DLR Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Chris Huysman, Wetlands & Natural Resource Consultants, Inc., PO Box 224, Newton,
NC 28658
Filename: 041512StonebridgeStreamMit(Moore)EXP +401
` O?QF w ATF9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
tom-- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 18, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 04-1512
Moore County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Environmental Banc & Exchange LLC
Attn: Tara D. Allden
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Subject Property: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICATION
Dear Sir or Madam:
On August 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) approved your Water Quality Certification to construct
the proposed stream mitigation project. Within the Water Quality Certification that you received there is a condition
that reads:
Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at the
letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during construction and post
construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of your mitigation site, you are required to notify this office
in writing by July 27, 2006. If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started, you are in
violation of the Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 21-1.0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of this new condition that has been written into the Water Quality
Regulations for projects issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott at [phone] if you
have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
(P, ??
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/lem
cc: USACE, Wilmington Field Office
DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 041512StoneBrStrRest(Moore)EXP+NOT
None Carolina
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit Naturally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/] 0% Post Consumer Paper
0? W ATF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q
`Q G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
bj 7, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
y
,C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 18, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 04-1512
Moore County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Environmental Banc & Exchange LLC
Attn: Tara D. Allden
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Subject Property: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICATION
Dear Sir or Madam:
On August 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) approved your Water Quality Certification to construct
the proposed stream mitigation project. Within the Water Quality Certification that you received there is a condition
that reads:
Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at the
letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during construction and post
construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of your mitigation site, you are required to notify this office
in writing by July 27, 2006. If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started, you are in
violation of the Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of this new condition that has been written into the Water Quality
Regulations for projects issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott at [phone] if you
have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
(P, ??
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/lem
cc: USACE, Wilmington Field Office
DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 041512StoneBrStrRest(Moore)EXP+NOT
NorthCarohna
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit AdAralll,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/n_cwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
stonebridge stream restoration.
Subject: stonebridge stream restoration.
From: Ken Averitte <Ken.Averitte @ ncmail.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:49:14 -0400
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiele <[e-mail]>
Cynthia,
I met Tara Disy Allden and Chris Huysman at the Stonebridge site in
Moore County on Wednesday, 9/10/05. Your express review cover sheet
asked for an opinion on whether or not this was a viable mitigation
site.
We walked a considerable portion of the stream(s) in question.
Although I agree that the stream is definitely a viable candidate
for restoration, I have the nagging issue of whether or not some of
it will be (remain) a perennial stream when the work is done. When
the stream floor is raised, it may be above the ground water that
provides base flow, particularly in the small tributaries. (Not
really much of a concern in the main stem). a mentioned this to
Tara during our meeting. From what I understand from her, it sounds
like this not an issue that they have to demonstrate success on. I
had this same concern at the City Pond stream mitigation site in
Anson county. Makes no sense to me.
Anyway, the existing stream conditions are pretty horrible. Near
vertical banks, deeply incised, and seriously affected by cattle.
The proposal includes several cattle fords. I mentioned that we
would require complete exclusion of cattle from the stream, which I
think is in the proposal. The only exception to this would be the
fords, which would also be fenced to keep them from roaming up or
down stream.
Once you are satisfied with the nuts and bolts review, this one gets
a favorable recommendation from this office. As is typical, it's in
an undeveloped area and subject only to agricultural impacts. I
would love to see some urban stream restoration, or a trade off in
BMP installation, if the details could be worked out.
Let me know if I can be further assistance. I can't get into FMP for
a staff report. What kind of format do you wish to receive comments
in? or is this adequate?
thanks
Ken VMA& .T ?11 of 11 8/16/200512:47 PM

Subject: comments on Stone Bridge Stream Restoration plan
From: Larry Eaton <larry.eaton @ ncmail.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 10:57:45 -0400
To: cynthia vanderwiele <cynthia.vanderwiele@ ncmail.net>`
Cynthia,
I had a chance to look through EBX's Stone Bridge Stream Restoration Plan.
EBX in the past has done good work finding projects that had the potential to
work, and it sounds like this is another place that could profit from some
restoration or enhancement. Fencing out the cattle and letting the stream
heal itself would probably give the biggest bang for the buck, but they are
going for max credits, so its all restoration, no areas just enhancement.
I am a little skeptical that running a stream through a wetland will enhance
the wetland due to more frequent wetting. On an EEP restored stream tour John
and I went on a few months ago, he seemed to think it was just as likely that
a restored stream we were looking at that now ran close to a small wetland,
could drain the wetland. You may want to check with John about the parameters
of his concern. It may or may not apply here.
Based on the size of this project, I would feel better if you required benthic
monitoring at two sites along the 6,000 feet of stream restoration - one near
the bottom of the project and one below the confluence of UT-2 plus a
reference site (possibly at their geomorphological reference site). If they
want to put one above the confluence of UT-2, that's OK too. As I explained
to a contractor who asked, these sites are to demonstrate that the project is
working like its supposed to. If something happens and a big slug of sediment
buries a big chunk of the project (it has happened), extra sampling points can
show the limits of the failure and allow full credit for the parts that have
remained successful.
If you have further things you want me to look at, let me know what they are.
Larry
e??
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources.
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #
Fax #:
919-733-0203
919-733-6893
Fax To: Chris Huysman
- -Iara_ Alec ,n
Subject: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation.
Number of pages including cover sheet: 7 /1
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: [phone]
10 2.2'!
Date: Za??=
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.715.3473.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Aff irmative Action Employer - 500% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturaliff
Staff Report
Project Num: 20041512 Version: 2
Name: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
County: Moore
Location: UT Crawley's Creek CPF basin Carthage
Latitude: +35°24'51"
SW Plan Location:
Owner: Environmental Banc & Exchange LLC
Contact Person: Allden, Tara Disy Title:
Status: Received
Project Type: Mitigation bank
Region: Fayetteville
Longitude: -79°23'51"
Phone: [phone] Ext.
Inspection Date: 08/10/2005 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Staff Report
On-Site Representative(s):
Primary Inspector: Kenneth L Averitte Phone: [phone] Ext.722
Secondary Inspector(s):
Question Areas:
Site Visit
Inspection Summary:
Visited site with Tara D. Allden and Chris Huysman. Stream noticeably incised w/near vertical banks, severely impacted by cattle.
Good candidate for stream restoration. Recommend that language be included to completely eliminate cattle access up and down
stream, including at constructed crossings. Also recommend that success be demonstrated in maintaining perennial flow in restored
reaches prior to approving credits.
109VEW191
AUG 1 7 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMOTER BRANCH
Page: 1
Project Num: 20041512 Owner: Environmental Banc & Exchange LLC
Inspection Date: 08/10/2005 Inspection Type: Staff Report
Reason for Visit: Routine
Site Visit
Do impacts described in the application differ those seen in the field? Yes
C1 No NA
M El NE
O
If yes, please describe differences:
Are the Intermittent/Perennial calls different in the application? ? N ? ?
If yes, please describe differences, and how mitigation ratios are affected:
Are there additional impacts not described in the application? 0 0 ? ?
If yes, please describe and quantify:
Were the impacts in place prior to the application for the 401 Certification? ? m o o
Additional conditions recommended for the Certification:
Recommended project modifications:
Is this a modification request to an existing Certification? 11 0 13 13
Are there additional stromwater conditions that should be required due to the following classifications: ? 0 ? 0
303(d)list, Class WS, NSW, QRW, HQW
Describe:
Is this a subdivision or otherwise part of a larger project? 0 00 0
If yes, what phase is this?
Are there prior impacts from prior phases? O M 0 0
If yes, what are the cumulative imacts for this project?
Possible secondary impacts noted:
Comment:
Page: 2
about:blank
Cynthia,
I met Tara Disy Allden and Chris Huysman at the Stonebridge site in Moore County on Wednesday,
9/10/05. Your express review cover sheet asked for an opinion on whether or not this was a viable
mitigation site.
We walked a considerable portion of the stream(s) in question. Although I agree that the stream is
definitely a viable candidate for restoration, I have the nagging issue of whether or not some of it will
be (remain) a perennial stream when the work is done. When the stream floor is raised, it may be
above the ground water that provides base flow, particularly in the small tributaries. (Not really much
of a concern in the main stem). I mentioned this to Tara during our meeting. From what I understand
from her, it sounds like this not an issue that they have to demonstrate success on. I had this same
concern at the City Pond stream mitigation site in Anson county. Makes no sense to me.
Anyway, the existing stream conditions are pretty horrible. Near vertical banks, deeply incised, and
seriously affected by cattle. The proposal includes several cattle fords. I mentioned that we would
require complete exclusion of cattle from the stream, which I think is in the proposal. The only
exception to this would be the fords, which would also be fenced to keep them from roaming up or
down stream.
Once you are satisfied with the nuts and bolts review, this one gets a favorable recommendation from
this office. As is typical, it's in an undeveloped area and subject only to agricultural impacts. I would
love to see some urban stream restoration, or a trade off in BMP installation, if the details could be
worked out.
Let me know if I can be further assistance. I can't get into FMP for a staff report. What kind of format
do you wish to receive comments in? or is this adequate?
thanks
Ken
1 of 1 8/11/2005 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: HELP!! Re: The Interim, Internal DWO Policies on Stream Mitigation
Options and Associated Macrobenthos Monitoring
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 17:06:21 -0400
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiele <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <Cyndi.Karoly @ NCMail.Net>, Larry Eaton <larry.eaton @ ncmail.net>
larry can tell you where we need additional bug data. many ecoregions have
enough data and therefore do not need bug monitoring. i would not put this
into the GCs since it is a separate policy and limited in scope. it would
belong in a separate, project-specific approval. thankx
Cynthia Van Der Wiele wrote:
Hey ya'll,
I need your assistance. Our document (on the DWQ Wetlands website),
" Interim, Internal DWQ Policies on Stream Mitigation Options and Associated
Macrobenthos Monitoring" specifies a Regulatory Requirement for biological
monitoring in the 1st sentence. However the next paragraph reads, "An
analysis of a subset of up to 80 restoration and enhancement level 1
projects will be conducted..."
Is biological monitoring an ongoing requirement, or just a temporary
requirement from 16 March 2001 that just never got updated?
The reason I ask is that I've got a couple of large (5000-10,000 linear
foot) mitigation projects to evaluate and also because this document is
referenced in our GC's...
I'd like a clarification so that I know how to procede with the project and
also for revising the GC's.
Thanks very much,
Cynthia
Subject: Re: HELP!! Re: The Interim, Internal DWQ Policies on Stream Mitigation
Options and Associated Macrobenthos Monitoring
From: Larry Eaton <larry.eaton @ ncmail.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:25:28 -0400
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiele <cynthia.vanderwiele`@ ncmail.net>
Hey Cynthia,
The biological monitoring requirement has become more of a case-by-case basis,
however really big projects (more than 2000-3000 feet) seem to be the cases
were I have been asking for monitoring. Monitoring usually consists of a
reference site and a couple of bug sites in the project, including one near
the bottom. We try to get one year of preconstruction monitoring and three
years postconstruction. I keep hoping that we will find a project that
actually shows success (improvement of the biotic community beyond where it
started before the restoration).
Any more questions, come down and talk.
Larry
Cynthia Van Der Wiele wrote:
Hey ya'll,
I need your assistance. Our document (on the DWQ Wetlands website),
" Interim, Internal DWQ Policies on Stream Mitigation Options and Associated
Macrobenthos Monitoring" specifies a Regulatory Requirement for biological
monitoring in the 1st sentence. However the next paragraph reads, "An
analysis of a subset of up to 80 restoration and enhancement level 1
projects will be conducted..."
Is biological monitoring an ongoing requirement, or just a temporary
requirement from 16 March 2001 that just never got updated?
The reason I ask is that I've got a couple of large (5000-10,000 linear
foot) mitigation projects to evaluate and also because this document is
referenced in our GC's...
I'd like a clarification so that I know how to procede with the project and
also for revising the GC's.
Thanks very much,
Cynthia
Subject: stonebridge stream restoration.
From: Ken Averitte <Ken.Averitte@ncmai .net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:49:14-0400
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiele <[e-mail]>
Cynthia,
I met Tara Disy Allden and Chris Huysman at the Stonebridge site in Moore
County on Wednesday, 9/10/05. Your express review cover sheet asked for an
opinion on whether or not this was a viable mitigation site.
We walked a considerable portion of the stream(s) in question. Although I
agree that the stream is definitely a viable candidate for restoration, I have
the nagging issue of whether or not some of it will be (remain) a perennial
stream when the work is done. When the stream floor is raised, it may be above
the ground water that provides base flow, particularly in the small
tributaries. (Not really much of a concern in the main stem). I mentioned
this to Tara during our meeting. From what I understand from her, it sounds
like this not an issue that they have to demonstrate success on. I had this
same concern at the City Pond stream mitigation site in Anson county. Makes no
sense to me.
Anyway, the existing stream conditions are pretty horrible. Near vertical
banks, deeply incised, and seriously affected by cattle. The proposal includes
several cattle fords. I 'mentioned that we would require complete exclusion of
cattle from the stream, which I think is in the proposal. The only exception
to this would be the fords, which would also be fenced to keep them from
roaming up or down stream.
Once you are satisfied with the nuts and bolts review, this one gets a
favorable recommendation from this office. As is typical, it's in an
undeveloped area and subject only to agricultural impacts. I would love to see
some urban stream restoration, or a trade off in BMP installation, if the
details could be worked out.
Let me know if I can be further assistance. I can't get into FMP for a staff
report. What kind of format do you wish to receive comments in? or is this
adequate?
thanks
Ken
Wetland and
,?lc Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
?-Tr
Facsimile
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiele From:
Cyndi Karoly Pages:
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
Phone: 828 / 465-3035
Fax: 828 / 465-3050
Chris Huysman
4
919 / 733-6893 Date: August 12, 2005
Re: DWQ EXP No. 04-1512, Moore Co. CC:
? Urgent ® For Review ? Please Comment ? Please Reply ? Please Recycle
The original has been sent in the mail. If you have questions please call me at 828 / 320-8120
D CC?rM-1 p
Q
AUG 15 2U?
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
WN;t
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
August 12, 2005
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Wetland Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250 p ? ? ? ? V ? D
Raleigh, NC 27604 ?'J
RE: DWQ EXP No. 04-1512 / Moore County A U G 1 5 2005
Response to Request for More Information-Express Review Program
Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Dear Ms. Edwards:
On August 9, 2005, we received a copy of the Division of Water Quality's Request for More Information-
Express Review Program letter (Attachment 1). On August 10, 2005, we met on site with Mr. Ken
Averitte, Fayetteville Regional Office, so that he could determine the site's viability for stream
restoration. We have incorporated thoughts from Mr. Averitte in our reply to comments from your office.
Your comments are in bold and are listed in order with the responses following each issue.
DWQ Comment:
On page II-1, you noted that at the present time, this area of Moore County is experiencing very
limited growth; a large. increase in development is not anticipated. Please provide information
that would support this statement.
Response:
There is no discrete economic driver that would serve as a catalyst for development in the project region.
Furthermore, there is no sewer or water infrastructure to support large scale development. Mr. Averitte
concurs with our assessment that large scale development should not anticipated.
DWQ Comment:
On page IV-3, it was noted that the initial stream design was modified in the field using realtime
GIS and GPS technologies to minimize the loss of large trees and reduce land disturbance. This
information was not included on either the Existing Conditions Map or the Stonebridge Design
Plans.
Response:
There is no GIS/GPS data to put on plans. Rather, the designers convert CAD drawings into a GIS format
and then import those files into GPS units and walk the design reach. This allows the designer to make
accurate field adjustments that conserve trees, optimize the use of existing features for channel stability
(e.g. take; adyantage of good root systems, outcrops, etc) and sometimes reduce land disturbance. The
results of this innovative design practice are reflected in the final construction plans.
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
wnnnc.com
canton office
68 Poplar Street
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
1
DWQ Comment:
On page IV-4, the document notes that locations for seven additional crossings along UT-1 are
identified on the plans and that the landowner has requested a crossing that would meet road
design requirements to support development that may occur in the future. Please explain the
need for seven additional crossing. Please elaborate on what development is anticipated for the
future. Since the stream design relied upon rural regional curves, the Division would like to know
if the proposed stream design accommodates this increase in built-upon area.
Response:
The need for seven crossings is related to the sheer size of the tract. The tract is approximately 1,200 acres
and the crossings will provide minimal access to the approximately 400 acres of pasture within the tract. It
should be noted that there are currently no established agricultural crossing but rather that the cattle cross
the tributaries at will through out the tract. Also, considering the size of the tract, one future crossing for
development is minimal. Since there is no sewer or water infrastructure to support large scale development
one might anticipate mini-farms to be developed on the tract. Mr. Averitte pointed out that mini-farms and
equestrian developments are becoming more common in the area and that the lots range between 5 and 10
acres. The proposed stream design would accommodate the minimal increase in built-upon areas that may
result from mini-farms.
DWQ Comment:
On page V14, Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Fish Sampling, it states that no benthic
monitoring is required. This is contrary to the regulatory requirements contained within the
Division's Interim, Internal DWQ Policies on Stream Mitigation Options and Associated
Macrobenthos Monitoring (May 2000) Website:
htty://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/rd wetlands str mit.htm. For a project the size of the
proposed Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site, benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring will be
required. This will be one of the conditions in the 401 Water Quality Certification when it is
written. For details of the monitoring requirements, you may contact Mr. Larry Eaton at 919-
715-3471.
Response:
We will be providing monitoring in accordance with applicable guidelines.
Thank you for your prompt processing of the application thus far and please contact me at 828 / 320-8120
or wnrinckaol.com if you have any questions regarding this letter.
Chris Huysman
CC: Tara Disy Allden
Environmental Banc and Exchange
220 Chatham Business Drive
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 68 Poplar Street
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
P
Michael Ellison
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
3101 John Humphries Wynd
Raleigh, NC 27612
Jennifer Frye
US Army Corps of Engineers
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Ken Averitte
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
wnrinc.com
3
Canton Office
68 Poplar Street
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
RL, T/
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Wetland Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
IR@RM9
AUG 1 5 2005
August 12, 2005
Raleigh, NC 27604 DENR WATER QUALITY
+?9ETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
RE: DWQ EXP No. 04-1512 / Moore County
Response to Request for More Information-Express Review Program
Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Edwards:
On August 9, 2005, we received a copy of the Division of Water Quality's Request for More Information-
Express Review Program letter (Attachment 1). On August 10, 2005, we met on site with Mr. Ken
Averitte, Fayetteville Regional Office, so that he could determine the site's viability for stream
restoration. We have incorporated thoughts from Mr. Averitte in our reply to comments from your office.
Your comments are in bold and are listed in order with the responses following each issue.
DWQ -Comment:
.On page II-l, you noted that. at, the present time, this area of Moore, County, is experiencing very
limited growth; a large increase in development is not anticipated. Please provide information
that would support this statement.
Response:
There is no discrete economic driver that would serve as a catalyst for development in the project region.
Furthermore, there is no sewer or water infrastructure to support large scale development. Mr. Averitte
concurs with our assessment that large scale development should not anticipated.
DWQ Comment:
On page IV 3, it was noted that the initial stream design was modified in the field using realtime
GIS and GPS technologies to minimize the loss of large trees and reduce land disturbance. This
information was not included on either the Existing Conditions Map or the Stonebridge Design
Plans.
Response:
There is no GIS/GPS data to put on plans. Rather, the designers convert CAD drawings into a GIS format
and then import those.files into GPS units and walk the design reach. This allows the designer to make
accurate field adjustments that conserve trees,optimize the use, of existing features for channel stability
(e.g. take advantage of good root systems, outcrops, etc) and sometimes reduce land disturbance. The
results of this innovative design practice are reflected in the final construction plans.

Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 68 Poplar Street
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
r
DWQ Comment:
On page IV-4, the document notes that locations for seven additional crossings along UT-1 are
identified on the plans and that the landowner has requested a crossing that would meet road
design requirements to support development that may occur in the future. Please explain the
need for seven additional crossing. Please elaborate on what development is anticipated for the
future. Since the stream design relied upon rural regional curves, the Division would like to know
if the proposed stream design accommodates this increase in built-upon area.
Response:
The need for seven crossings is related to the sheer size of the tract. The tract is approximately 1,200 acres
and the crossings will provide minimal access to the approximately 400 acres of pasture within the tract. It
should be noted that there are currently no established agricultural crossing but rather that the cattle cross
the tributaries at will through out the tract. Also, considering the size of the tract, one fixture crossing for
development is minimal. Since there is no sewer or water infrastructure to support large scale development
one might anticipate mini-farms to be developed on the tract. Mr. Averitte pointed out that mini-farms and
equestrian developments are becoming more common in the area and that the lots range between 5 and 10
acres. The proposed stream design would accommodate the minimal increase in built-upon areas that may
result from mini-farms.
DWQ Comment:
On page VI-4, Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Fish Sampling, it states that no benthic
monitoring is required. This is contrary to the regulatory requirements contained within the
Division's Interim, Internal DWQ Policies on Stream Mitigation Options and Associated
Macrobenthos Monitoring (May 2000) Website:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/rd wetlands str mit.htm. For a project the size of the
proposed Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site, benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring will be
required. This will be one of the conditions in the 401 Water Quality Certification when it is
written. For details of the monitoring requirements, you may contact Mr. Larry Eaton at 919-
715-3471.
Response:
We will be providing monitoring in accordance with applicable guidelines.
Thank you for your prompt processing of the application thus far and please contact me at 828 / 320-8120
or wnrinckaol.com if you have any questions regarding this letter.
?kA 0??WJV?
JChrVisHuisman
CC: Tara Disy Allden
Environmental Banc and Exchange
220 Chatham Business Drive
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 68 Poplar Street
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
J
Michael Ellison
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
3101 John Humphries Wynd
Raleigh, NC 27612
Jennifer Frye
US Army Corps of Engineers
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Ken Averitte
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Newton Office
PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fax
wnrinc.com
Canton Office
68 Poplar Street
Canton, NC 28716
828-648-8801
828-648-8802 Fax
WN;t
Wetland and Natural Resource
Consultants, Inc.
August 12, 2005
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Wetland Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: DWQ EXP No. 04-1512 / Moore County
Response to Request for More Information-Express Review Program
Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Edwards:
On August 9, 2005, we received a copy of the Division of Water Quality's Request for More Information-
Express Review Program letter (Attachment 1). On August 10, 2005, we met on site with Mr. Ken
Averitte, Fayetteville Regional Office, so that he could determine the site's viability for stream
restoration. We have incorporated thoughts from Mr. Averitte in our reply to comments from your office.
Your comments are in bold and are listed in order with the responses following each issue.
DWQ Comment:
On page II-1, you noted that at the present time, this area of Moore County is experiencing very
limited growth; a large increase in development is not anticipated. Please provide information
that would support this statement.
Response:
There is no discrete economic driver that would serve as a catalyst for development in the project region.
Furthermore, there is no sewer or water infrastructure to support large scale development. Mr. Averitte
concurs with our assessment that large scale development should not anticipated.
DWQ Comment:
On page IV-3, it was noted that the initial stream design was modified in the field using realtime
GIS and GPS technologies to minimize the loss of large trees and reduce land disturbance. This
information was not included on either the Existing Conditions Map or the Stonebridge Design
Plans.
Response:
There is no GIS/GPS data to put on plans. Rather, the designers convert CAD drawings into a GIS format
and then import those files into GPS units and walk the design reach. This allows the designer to make
accurate field adjustments that conserve trees, optimize the use of existing features for channel stability
(e.g. take advantage of good root systems, outcrops, etc) and sometimes reduce land disturbance. The
results of this innovative design practice are reflected in the final construction plans.
Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 68 Poplar Street
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
DWQ Comment:
On page IV-4, the document notes that locations for seven additional crossings along UT-1 are
identified on the plans and that the landowner has requested a crossing that would meet road
design requirements to support development that may occur in the future. Please explain the
need for seven additional crossing. Please elaborate on what development is anticipated for the
future. Since the stream design relied upon rural regional curves, the Division would like to know
if the proposed stream design accommodates this increase in built-upon area.
Response:
The need for seven crossings is related to the sheer size of the tract. The tract is approximately 1,200 acres
and the crossings will provide minimal access to the approximately 400 acres of pasture within the tract. It
should be noted that there are currently no established agricultural crossing but rather that the cattle cross
the tributaries at will through out the tract. Also, considering the size of the tract, one future crossing for
development is minimal. Since there is no sewer or water infrastructure to support large scale development
one might anticipate mini-farms to be developed on the tract. Mr. Averitte pointed out that mini-farms and
equestrian developments are becoming more common in the area and that the lots range between 5 and 10
acres. The proposed stream design would accommodate the minimal increase in built-upon areas that may
result from mini-farms.
DWQ Comment:
On page VI4, Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Fish Sampling, it states that no benthic
monitoring is required. This is contrary to the regulatory requirements contained within the
Division's Interim, Internal DWQ Policies on Stream Mitigation Options and Associated
Macrobenthos Monitoring (May 2000) Website:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/rd wetlands str mit.htm. For a project the size of the
proposed Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site, benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring will be
required. This will be one of the conditions in the 401 Water Quality Certification when it is
written. For details of the monitoring requirements, you may contact Mr. Larry Eaton at 919-
715-3471.
Response:
We will be providing monitoring in accordance with applicable guidelines.
Thank you for your prompt processing of the application thus far and please contact me at 828 / 320-8120
or [e-mail] if you have any questions regarding this letter.
Chris Huysman
CC: Tara Disy Allden
Environmental Banc and Exchange
220 Chatham Business Drive
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 68 Poplar Street
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
Michael Ellison
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
3101 John Humphries Wynd
Raleigh, NC 27612
Jennifer Frye
US Army Corps of Engineers
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Ken Averitte
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 68 Poplar Street
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3050 Fax [phone] Fax
AUG-12-05 11:32 AN WNRC 8284653050 P.01
L
Wetlt n and
Natural esource
Consult nts, Inc.
Facsimile
r9ewton Office
PO Box 224
IVewfon, W 28658
Phone: 828 / 465-3035
Fax: [phone]
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiese FMM: Chris Huysman
Cyrdi Ifaroly Pages: 4 -
919. / 733-6893 Date: August 12, 2005
i
DW.`Q DIP hlo. 041512, Moore Co. Cc:
? Urgent For Review ? Please C.".1 ? please Reply ? please Recycle
The original has been sent in the mail. If you have questions please call me at 828 / 320-8120
AUG-12-2005 FRI 09:31 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 1
AUG-12-05 11:32 AM WNRC 8284653050 P.02
r •z

letlend and Natur?l Resource
onsultants, Inc.
August 12, 2005
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
401 Wetland Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Alvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: DWQ E? ? No. 04-1512 / Moore County
Responsie to Request for More Information-Express Review Program
Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Edwards:
On August 9, 2005, we received a copy of the Division of Water Quality's Request for More Information.
Express Review ?rogram letter (Attachment 1). On August 10, 2005, we met on site with Mr. Ken
Averitte, Fayetteville Regional Office, so that he could determine the site's viability for stream
restoration. We lave incorporated thoughts from Mr. Averitte in our reply to comments from your office.
Your comments are in bold and are listed in order with the responses following each issue.
DWQ Comment.,
On page II- , you noted that at the present time, this area of Moore County is experiencing very
limited grov?th; a large increase in development is not anticipated. Please provide information
that would support this statement.
Response:
There is no discr4c economic driver that would serve as a catalyst for development in the project region.
Furthermore, there is no sewer or water infrastructure to support large scale development. Mr. Averitte
concurs with our, assessment that large scale development should not anticipated.
i
DWQ Commen(s
On page IV J3, it was noted that the initial stream design was modified in the field using realtime
GIS and GPP technologies to minimize the loss of large trees and reduce land disturbance. This
information: was not included on either the Existing Conditions Map or the Stonebridge Design
Plans.
Response:
There is no GIS/ Ze data to put on plans. Rather, the designers convert CAD drawings into a GIS format
and then import files into GPS units and walk the design reach. This allows the designer to mace
accurate field ad' stments that conserve trees, optimize the use of existing features for channel stability
(e.g. take advant?ge of good root systems, outcrops, etc) and sometimes reduce land disturbance. The
results of this mnFovative design practice are reflected in the final construction plans.
Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wnrinc.com 68 Poplar Street
Newton, NC 286.58 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035
828-465-3050 Fox 1 828-648-8801
628-648-M2 fox
AUG-12-2005 FRI 09:31 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 2
AUG-12-05 11:33 AM WNRC 8284653050 P.03
DWQ Comment:
On page IV-4, the document notes that locations for seven additional crossings along UT-1 are
identified o the plans and that the landowner has requested a crossing that would meet road
design req irements to support development that may occur in the future. Please explain the
need for se en additional crossing. Please elaborate on what development is anticipated for the
future. Sin a the stream design relied upon rural regional curves, the Division would litre to know
if the prop sed stream design accommodates this increase in built-upon area.
Response:
The need for seven crossings is related to the sheer size of the tract. The tract is approximately 1,200 acres
and the crossing will provide minimal access to the approximately 400 acres of pasture within the tract. It
should be noted #hat there are currently no established agricultural crossing but rather that the cattle cross
the tributaries at'wiH through out the tract. Also, considering the size of the tract, one future crossing for
development is;inimaI. Since there is no sewer or water infrastrueture to support large scale development
one might anticiOate mini-fanny to be developed on the tract. Mr. Averitte pointed out that mini-farms and
equestrian devel pments are becoming more common in the area and that the lots range between 5 and 10
acres. The prop sad stream design would accommodate the minimal increase in built-upon areas that may
result from mini-fauns.
DWQ Comment.
On page V 4, Benthic Maeroinvertebrate and Fish Sampling, it states that no benthic
monitorm is required. This is contrary to the regulatory requirements contained within the
Division's nteriar, Internal DWQ Policies on Stream Mitigation Options and Associated
Macro ent os Monitoring (May 2000) Website:
ht • /h2o. nr.state.nc.us/ocwedAnds/rd wetlands r mit.htm. For a project the size of the
proposed tonebridge Stream Mitigation Site, benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring will be
required. This will be one of the conditions in the 401 Water Quality Certification when it is
written. For details of the monitoring requirements, you may contact Mr. Larry Eaton at 919-
715-3471.
Response:
We will be providing monitoring in accordance with applicable guidelines.
Thank you for yqur prompt processing of the application thus far and please contact me at 828 / 320-8120
or wruipc[nracl.ci m if you have any questions regarding this letter.
W?kAHM)wDk?
;hris Huysman
nc and Exchange
Business Drive
C
Newton Office
Canton Office
PO Box 224 wndnc.corn 68 Poplar Street
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-465-3035 828-648-8801
828-465-3060 Fax [phone] Fax
CC: Tara DisI AlIden
Enviro ental )gBuya
2Z0 C .
Pittsbor N27312
AUG-12-2005 FRI 09:32 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 3
AUG-12-05 11:33 AM WNRC
Afthael Ellison
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
3101 Jot n Humphries Wynd
Raleigh,<NC 27612
i
Jennifer'Frye
US Arm' Corps of Engineers
FO Box 11$90
Wilmington, NC 28402
Ken Av ' tte
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Grei n Street, Suite 714.
Fayetteville, NC 28301
8284553050 P.04
Newton Office Canton Office
PO Box 224 wndnc.com 68 Poplar Streei
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 28716
828-4653035 828-648.8801
828-4653050 Fax [phone] Fax
AUG-12-2005 FRI 09:32 TEL:[phone] NRNE:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 4
P 0"
O
\N ZF
QG
( nU
-I
r. ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 9, 2005
DWQ EXP No. 04-1512
Moore County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC
Attn: Ms. Tara Disy Allden
220 Chatham Business Drive
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Subject Property: Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Plan
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Ms. Allden:
On, the Division of Water Quality (the "Division") received your application dated August 1,
2005 to impact 148 linear feet of streams and 0.25 acres of wetlands to construct the Stonebridge
Stream Mitigation Site. The DWQ has determined that the application is incomplete and/or
provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands on the subject
property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have
to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will place
this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information.
Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project:
1. On page II-1, you noted that at the present time, this area of Moore County is experiencing
very limited growth; a large increase in development is not anticipated. Please provide
information that would support this statement.
2. On page IV-3, it was noted that the initial stream design was modified in the field using
realtime GIS and GPS technologies to minimize the loss of large trees and reduce land
disturbance. This information was not included on either the Existing Conditions Map or
the Stonebridge Design Plans.
3. On page IV-4, the document notes that locations for seven additional crossings along UT-1
are identified on the plans and that the landowner has requested a crossing that would meet
road design requirements to support development that may occur in the future. Please
explain the need for seven additional crossing. Please elaborate on what development is
anticipated for the future. Since the stream design relied upon rural regional curves, the
Division would like to know if the proposed stream design accommodates this increase in
built-upon area.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone]/ Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Noo Carolina
Nawra!!r(
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site
Page 2 of 2
August 9, 2005
4. On page VI-4, Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Fish Sampling, it states that no benthic
monitoring is required. This is contrary to the regulatory requirements contained within the
Division's Interim, Internal DWQ Policies on Stream Mitigation Options and Associated
Macrobenthos Monitoring (May 2000) Website:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/rd_wetlandsstr mit.htm. For a project the size of the
proposed Stonebridge Stream Mitigation Site, benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring will
be required. This will be one of the conditions in the 401 Water Quality Certification when
it is written. For details of the monitoring requirements, you may contact Mr. Larry Eaton
at 919-715-3471.
Please respond within three (3) days of the date of this letter by sending five (5) copies of the
above information in writing. The Express Review Program is a process that requires all parties
to participate in a timely manner. If the DWQ feels the Express Review Program is the incorrect
review program for your project, then we may have to return your application and have it reviewed
through our regular 401 Water Quality Certification Program.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please contact Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Ph.D. at
[e-mail] or [phone] or Cyndi Karoly at [e-mail]
or [phone] if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to
discuss this matter.
CBK/cvdw

incerely,
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
cc: USACE Wilmington Field Office
Ken Averitte- DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Chris Huysman-Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc., 11 South College
Ave., Suite 203, PO Box 224, Newton, NC 28658
Filename: 041512StonebridgeStreamRest (Moore)EXP+hold
Chris Huy smap: Stonebridge Stream Mitigation EXP DWQ # 04-1512
Subject: Chris Huysman: Stonebridge Stream Mitigation EXP DWQ # 04-1512
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:28:58 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being forwarded
to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your response. Please
do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax. A hard copy of the
correspondence has gone out via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be mailed
via hard copy to the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd.,
Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
041512 StonebridgeStreamRest(Moore
Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 8/10/2005 7:32 AM
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE AUG-9-2005 TUE 15:26
NAME : DW?WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE
PAGES
START TIME
ELAPSED TIME
MODE
RESULTS
: 918284653050
: 3/3
: AUG-09 15:25
: 01'26"
: ECM
: OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
A?
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of water Queiity
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek. P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard. Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailiog Address: 1650 Mai] Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax H: 919-733-6893
Fax To, Environmental Banc & Exchange Fax #: [phone]
Chris Huysrnm 828-465-3050
Subject Stone Date: e • 7, a-7
Bridge Stream Mitigati on
Number of pages including cover sheet: 3
Notes or special instructions:
G1r44wa ton her- W;e le
'ne original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please cal] .
(? 010. -7fe2. syf73
101 wwd corm=d Ura
1659M649erobe C OW, nakgh NMh Cambe 27699.1869 e
2731Gm*mkW=rd,5ulbt250.eaklyl NunCarol'ina x76a . ?olhCarO rla
Pnono: 914i7S1z89/?AA919J93-0999llntorM:nmrlmzne mrF>h;.wkcwv lah
All rAWl0tpe6u:dlylAlfmvYM ACIU9 En(Jryer-SD%Regtlm710A PocltbnsumMPaper
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE AUG-9-2005 TUE 15:24
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE
PAGES
START TIME
ELAPSED TIME
MODE
RESULTS
: 94635490
: 3/3
: AUG-09 15:22
: 01' 0411
: ECM
: OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
A?
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Olvlslon of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. 191mek, P.R. Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phoue #: 919-733-0203
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Environmental Banc & Exchange Fax #: [phone]
Cluis Huysman 828465-3050
Subject: Stone Date: 944 6, 7.05
Bridge Stream Mitigation
Number of pages including cover sheet: 3
Notes or special instructions:
2t-*4Kaa tJ4n ber- Wre fe
The original will be sent in the mail. )f you have questions please call ^- - Aiiiiiwft - -
R14. `7r5.3473
01 WMiNds CoOkO n unL
1650 Ui66mk+Gm NblP% NaM Cemka 2M011860 _Ane Car
2321 C,0". SO-rd, Sulk 250. R*i9ft NPM cuoaw 2nN l -0.L
Now 918-733.1'nI91FAX019-Td°r339a/InkneCfitlrc/min cor mtitt.us/ncw-llama ????o a
ME-1C,*PduMrP'AM-"Ad. SlobyY- M P..rG1tl/10% PWCOn -Paler,
NIP&
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Environmental Banc & Exchange
Chris Huysman
Subject: Stone
Bridge Stream Mitigation
Number of pages including cover sheet: 3
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: [phone]
828-465-3050
Date: WS= lb - 7, n?
G-irl?-t?•o? Jan 4r- Wye le
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call n i. '" _a---ar& 010
qrq. -P5. 3-473
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650 One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
1)3.,01,'2005 10:28 FAX [phone] EASTERN CAROLINA ORGANIC 2001
WN;t
Wetland and Natural Reaeurce
Consultants, Inc.
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ken Jolly, Chief Reulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Quality, Wetlands Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604-2260
I, the current landowner of the property identified below, hereby authorize Wetland and Natural
Resource Consultants, Inc. to act on my behalf as my agent during the determination of regulated limits
of waters and wetlands and processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act,
Federal and State agents are authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Wetland and
Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. staff.
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants. Inc. is authorized to provide supplemental information
needed for permit processing at the request of the Corps or DWQ.
Property Owner / Applicant: E : Attn:. Tar-a Allden
Street Address / PO Box: _ 220 Chatham Business Drive
City, State. Zip Code: _ PiMboro. North Carolina 27312
Phone / Fax Number: 919-545-2929 lphpne)
Project Name: nebridge Stream Mitigation Sice
Property Street Address:
(street address.
city, State, zip)
Owners ! Applicant Signature: /
/`? '
Date: I
?a
rvewron urrrce qde Office
PO Box 224 wnrinttom ?O Box 862
Newton, NC 28658 Canton, NC 18716
828465-3035 828-64"801
828-465-3050 Fax i 828-6Q-9902 Fax
FTYWA
,rrirj?
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
June 27, 2005
Project Name: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
Moore County
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Environmental Bank & Exchange
220 Chatham Business Drive
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Subject Property: Site is located North of the intersection of Glendon-Carthage Rd. and Brady Road,
North of Carthage, Moore County
Dear Sir or Madam:
On June 24, 2005, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email request from
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. regarding a project known as "Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation"
for acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into
the Express Review Program once the following items are received:
1) The application fee of $2,000.00 made payable to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality;
2) Five complete and collated copies of the application; and
3) Five copies of all additional information pertaining to this project.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. The clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed
application package and required fee are received. Due to staff availability, please contact Cynthia Van Der
Wiele at 919.715.3473 prior to submitting the package as per our phone conversation today.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Cynthia Van Der
Wiele at 919.715.3473 or Cyndi Karoly at 919.733.9721.
Sincerely,
?j w4o?:q, dait
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
AW K/cvdw
cc: Ken Averitte- DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Chris Huysman-Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc., 11 South College Ave., Suite 203, PO
Box 224, Newton, NC 28658
Filename: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 One
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands Natumllff
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE - JUN-27-2005 MON 1618
NAME - DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL - 9197336893
PHONE s 918284653050
PAGES t 2/2
START TIME : JUN-27 16:16
ELAPSED TIME : 0015311
MODE s ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Duality
Michael F. Easley. Govemor William G. Ross, Jr.. Secretary
Alan W. KllmO, P.E., Director
L'VTn CC?C TY: ?it..r.m r
` j
Department! Division of Water Quallty` V ."M A
of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit

Street A.dd L: 2321 Crabtree Boulev+,rd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Ad Tess: 1650 Mail Service. Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact inf rmntton: .Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Chlis Huysman Fax #: [phone]
Subject: Stone Bridge Str um Mitigation. Date. June 27, 2005
I
Number of pages including dl ove, sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions
The original will be sent in the mail . if you ha-e glwstions please call Cynthia Van Der Niele at 919.715.347.;.

J11
163tk1.1171n$lRsehkCW e4fN, lq[ I:M
IN .9r, r/aM?r:.?ro!;m s?9s
'-21 vroUroa tbu ?fmM. S.dh 250, Rd'[ipA. rkd11 D1

PFtn?.X14'>'Cr7N9IFAi(91SrJ]b"0.tllrkmrA:hire:
A?EdvMplppdv?IfylAlliimBMf n.,{r?n Ertq'yar- i

65e One
1
eryt'kMT400% N ortfi Cayrol ina
rm':ncn,??'U?f':.vyJVt.,?Jrnd_ ./vQ?Li[QIIJ
POCCOrov?rc:P?er v

....
7UN-14-05 03:00 PM WNRG
.(
8204653050
a.
We11an
and
Natural
14 esource Newton Office
Coinsu [its, Inc. PO Box 224
Newton, NC 28658
• Phone: 828 / 465-3035
Fax: 828 /,05-3050
Facsi He
To: C is Vanderwhell From: Chris ".O=n
91 ?-733-093 Pages: 4
Date: June 24, 2005
Rc: CC:
? Urgent 0 For Review ? P'wm Continent ? Please Reply ? Please Recycle
Ms. Va eil,
Attached i for your review. The flit was previously assigned DWQ Project # 041512. Please
call with questions,
Best regar s,
Cl•tiris Huy n 828-320-8120
P.01
TUN-24-2005 FRI 13:03 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS
P. 1
w
.JUN-24-05 03:00 PM
.i Q
WNRC
8284653050
P.02
INMAL TEREST IN THE PARTICIPATION 1N THE EXPRESS PERMITTMG PROGRAM
FOR THE 401 WATER QUALITY CZRTMCATION,
ISOLATED WETLAND PERMITTING
OR STREAM ORIGIN DETERMINATION PROGRAMS
February 23, 2004
Version 2
Applicant Name, Environmental Bank and Exchange
Applicant A e: 220 ChpthM Business Ddye
Zusboro. North Slina 27312
Applicant's p e number: 919-545-2929 Fax number:
Applicant's erne address: tara(a ebxusa.com
Consultant Nam
Consultant adder
Consultant's phi
consultant's em
T1 pe of action r
(if applicable): --- -Chris Hilysman
(if applicable): - .E.G.$4ts W
Newton. North C..28658
number: 828-320.8120 Fax number: _ 883050
address; wnriucCr?aol.com.
under the Express Review Program (chock all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification
o Isolated Watland Permit
0 Riparian Huffer Approval
? Stream Origin Determination
# of Determinations Requested
Name of Proja
Property size (i
Nearest named
Please provide
i Stane Bridae$Mfim gjiaation
- 16.25 acres County: Moore
(from USGS topo map): Crawley Creels
description of this project (attach site plan if available):
Please attach a neap of site location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey.
.JUN-24-2005 FRI 13:03 TEL:[phone]
NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS
P. 2
JUN-14-05 03:01 PN WNRC
$184653050 P.03
Location of prof site - please include reference to the county, nearest name town and highway number:
ro i north of ggazM The site is north of
i MMi n of Qucn&-C?e Road and B _ ,
the ir
_ „

proposed impact ; +/- .24a= Acres of wetlands
Acres of isolated wetlands
5,690 Linear feel of streams
Linear feet of Isolated streams
Square feet of protected stream buffers
Has consultant o
please list which applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two years? If so,
oes. Yes. October 31, 2003
Which other em nmental permits will be needed for this project? Please list them below:
???,.?,7,?,?i?'
and y ?MLT

Does this project
Policy Act? require approval under the State Envimumental Policy Act or National Environmental
N
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management Commission"
--Ns
Are you aware o
any measures any local controversy concerning this project? If so, please describe the controversy and
have been taken with respect to public Involvement.
-Ng

This form must
(Parkview Buil
for the first throe
time will bap
be notified via
detailed procedu
the following m submitted via tmaiI (clo 401SWss( ncmail.net)_ fax [phone]) or hand-delivered
, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604) within the first three (3) working days of the month
ends of the Express Review Program (until January 1, 2004). Application procedures after that
dad at a later date. Applicants who are selected to participate In the Express Review Program will
it or fax with one additional working day. SuccessMl applicants will then be instructed regarding
for full application, Unsuccessful applicants will be queried to determine if they want to be in
tit's selection process or whether they want to follow the normal application process.
Please contact D ie Edwards at 919.733-9502 if you have any questions regarding this form.
JUN-24-2005 FRI 13:04 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 3
JUN-24-05 03:01 PM WNRC 8284653050 P.04
75.41 fib°w 79,40 00°w 79.38 339w
l•Ill. ?.: `y? iJ lj? ?1,?? r'%i y_... ,p, v 11, i , ?.. / ?•,?.^ ? ?' ( .?; ; ,J `i } ,
`7 { \ f r. , ??r (?? ? ? ??????., )r,J?,??\.., ? ?,,`O f C • ?f? f? 'i. t,J?? r? ;,C•? :'1
11. ?,,1, •? .)'G• (\ 'r? _;III'
•? '`?_ ',1' ?? ,i)i?'r?Ytilr ,?? ?:.?;,' ?f>??? - .::?:"" 1;ii?? ''?,? 1?'' .?4,?? ;?r= , t ;,:.:. t? ? •); t.'?'.(`? ,
~'3 % ° 1, ..I '/+ 1 ? `I ?t t"`?° ? ifjl?r,:-? } R ??' ?I?..? li`-?.? r(r'r?,??-' r ?„'J "? r I' -l?• "?jn?J17 ,l
?.k.J+ ? I `\`` J /' o• ?.y?.l•'r ?,. ,!`?^ r,•./ ? ? y,. } ti ?(;I lf,di'1 ??'Il.`;`ti'?hr?l'".•
? - ` ,? ,,\ ? y ? ?? Y .,.. is ,. ? • ? r`?J :'' 1 J ?;?'..
+?,r r., ;T + ??rr A?1??.,? 1 ? ??fc`r? it il' ?' ?? ? `?J f?? ? f? ??`'1rtt•J r\ J ?'?rl
r` ? ? 1 i f ? ./.,,s?? ! ,(h!•? f{(??? ?'?S? J,` ?,, ` 1 I , ti /.r•}..?, l ? , ?'? \1 ??? Slt, tIi f'??,r r?? ,.i!/ ? 6 -
41
'a tty?,f/1 ?. :? ?f`J f^ ?1 1_? (11? G/f ..? I/ (r..' .., r? ' i,) l ?' ?.,` ?"•1?.:?..if a
:.7 ? iJJ l ?j,•• ^-???•? !?-• ? p. `4?? .'? o ?l ?" ., ,r ' J.?r• /•rf'+ ii ,?? ??-' ar '??-ti ^* ?e?\r ,' ry i?i !"} I
• •' ./ ..f r t ? ? ' I r..j ?• rI- _? y` lJ -? ; }?r?? -1+o,J
' I'W. t• .1j ?-'fi-._,;?-.?.1 ' ? rJ ?•'?,? 1 r:' f?f 81rAem
MklgaUon al ` 1 r. /r t?; } `
e . ? • f'r1 , .IrfT ?/? '?r ^??. ?ti. ? ..? ??I l9 ^, "?'j P''• ?,? ? ,r"'?„?1?^ '1E \.
? r [
•h• rf..l'"+f, ?, ?" ?` (r' „?? if S _`.' ` ?±.•1 f , .? itJ?I?I? ?,/ I '% '~•• ?'i•1?? z
i(4m)N' .?r?' ` ^4 l r-' l!•/`1i. 'I'l /??,:1% r'? '•4?,:'ti `i ?rl 1???'
f _ ? J ,l ff • >/), ,{+., ?..? f'l , rid` ?- ? ? ''?` '
'- .'\ X11' _ yi - ?,«."?.? ?r-t ._? ??? .,??? (.: _.. fr^"` t, 'L :-1 //-- .,• •Q?7'f ..'% ?.= ..s/ r(, (r?.` -???}?
'.1 „ s'-?S"?f'• ? i` ? ? •y 14° ti' J k : t ti 1 r r .!: ?„!,'._? .r.:4 -- ?: ,J
r , j I.... ;;s'? / „? -? ? 1. ??'^ t. -' ?? ? ?" • f? 1;? f `? ,' • r? i r ? rti
' ?' ,?f' ?=ti., ?? ls/ ,f /'? ` r , '?'•? r,. y.,`/r / ?d+ (;r tfr ;j'r' r' rr?? >?{,
?,J ? { ( •> '' ) / /, ??UL.'r? - Ill G1 1 `( ' / ? ?.?! ,Y s'' ? ',f -+r( *rr '. ! ( , ? f
?i \I, ('?'"'._. r? "?? / r. ?? +I T' CI..'? ?' ?•r -t\' ? -? r ? .,! '?t.sr7.,y, ? ,??;,; ?? I
,?; ? ?? ..:.:y• ? ` ? `` jF . _ /? J? ? . . r ! -'j ter. r ?•! !i' .; ,.. ,? Y• ' ?.. .. r)Jt / i3'' 1 ! (? -
'? "1'?r }'? ' ••''`'1 ? „?? l?Yr•: ti, r ? I! /.J 1'''?r'/'•' ?`n;l? 1, _;?l..,l ?;? j?.
',• I J, f,it.?` .1 __.i 5 ? +! G ? !r?•?/. -:•.i.?' 'f+r'' - f} I ^•,4f``
`j?. ( `,CC.. `?tr?'r .1Ll' ??/ 1 +frJ ? ., ?? 11??:,?.. I ! ° ??? v
r .?,, r ', ,•^, ? t ? ? ? 7.? =" ??r ?-. Ur .rl??? J ,r!'• ?`'7,' fr r ?? ? ^ ItiJ' j\ ? :; ?•'! ? ? ? ? J- ? _
' rflf ?? ? W f" ' ?.., •}y'.>frr ?ir /1?? , .. ? l -`J } ?? ti?•. ??
?:4/ .°.?' 't.,.l?,? 4, ? '. `f ;'??"r ?, _ tr ? ? i !>???•{ ?,. r+~ t' c.a?_» ? ? ? ? t"`; JJ ? r.
?'• L, 1 ?""I:.`,f" ..-=':? ? f f?r?? V ?•I ! ?'j/• ,,?r,+"? / • ?/? ?' !? i.a?? ?`r?,,?T ,Ji,, „/.' ??_.? ?r ,I _.
4 t' • ',a :`, ?? ?l„x ?1??• ? ,/?? rrt,t?, ? j r,??:. ... r: `??ti???/J ?r ,.? ?•:.?? 4..,? -' IJ``??
T> "4T .?'i l E
N
+ - .l .'/! ,,y?+•?l. AN
z
o '}il ../ /'•l ,..rJ ??r':Lr ?/) /? ?'rr'1.t?.r?'`? 1 f •?:::' r ,"1 rte ) ???1?J ??? °
' °.'``?t?'( '???1??':?i'-.-f'? `? ,?,,r? r`? %?'7 -"1? .?+?? ?? t•'\ ::7 '?r:r ?,( ,r 1, _•,r::: T, , 10
J{`'??tity (jp ?,.J li+?? 7t1??+
_ L• ? C 1. / '! 4• ) ? r f•? ;?3 ',; '-r ! ~ ?? ?? ?? '
!r fit 6`,.?1! ?r=J ? ?' ' ;, ?+?^.f ! ^?/ ?: •' 'G 4.ti ?ft ??.? t
?•„y1.!?• I '1? / ,. ti`Sr?""?11 ?r ry u" ? ' \? ? -?,I..?..- i??''?: ( -?,,.'`• 'v 1?\V?J'?
79.41 66 ° W 79. 00 ° W 79,38 83 ° W 11
N e:PUTNAM Location: 035.41631259N 079.3962953°W
D e; 612412005 Caption: EBX - Stonebridge Mitigation Site
+e:1 inch equals 2000 fe it
JUN-24-8105 FFI 13:04 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 4
?OF WATF9 p Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?O G? North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r
> Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
O `C Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
January 3, 2005
DWQ EXP 04-1512
Moore County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Environmental Banc & Exchange
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200A
Cary, NC 27511
Dear Sir or Madam:
On September 8, 2004, you submitted an Initial Interest form for a 401 Certification from
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Express Review Program for your project "Stone Bridge
Stream Mitigation". This property is located in Moore County, NC. We wrote you on
September 8, 2004, accepting this project into the Express Review Program. As of today we
have not received the required seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification Application and
fee for this projects review. This project file has remained open and ready for review greater
than 3 months. In order to close out 2004, the Express Review Program and will have to
consider this project to be withdrawn.
Please be aware that we will still review this project under the Express Review Program
but a new Initial Interest will have to be sent in when/if you choose to use this program in the
future. Please telephone Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9721 or Deborah Edwards at 919-733-9502 at
the Central Office in Raleigh if you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
? Al Klimek, P.E., Director
cc: Central Files
File Copy
Chris Huysman-Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc., 11 South College Ave.,
Suite 203, PO Box 224, Newton, NC 28658

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
imap:Hdebbie.edwards%40dwq. [e-mail]:143/...
Subject: RE: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
From: "Tara Allden" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:41:39 -0500
To: "Debbie Edwards" <[e-mail]>, "wnrinc" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Cyndi Karoly" <[e-mail]>, "Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele"
<[e-mail]>
Debbie,
Thanks for the note. No problem with regard to Stonebridge. I apologize for not doing
better at keeping you up to date. We have had some issues delay that project. I look
forward to restarting the permit process for it early in the new year.
Take care.
--Tara
-----Original Message-----
From: Debbie Edwards [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thu 12/23/2004 1:26 PM
To: wnrinc; Tara Allden
Cc: Cyndi Karoly; Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele
Subject: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
Chris & Tara,
I wanted to send you a "thank you" for utilizing and supporting the
Express Review Program this past year. However, in order to clean up
and close out the first year of Express Review-2004, I am going to have
to withdraw/return the Acceptance of the Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
project. The Acceptance letter was written on September 8, 2004 and we
have yet to receive the package. Please be aware that we will still
review this project under the Express Review program but a new initial
interest will have to be sent in when/if you choose to use this program
in the new year.
thanks and have a great holiday,
debbie
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist III
401/Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
[phone]
1/3/2005 4:03 PM
imap://[e-mail]:143/...
Subject: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
From: Debbie Edwards <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:26:25 -0500
To: wnrinc <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
CC: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, "Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele"
<[e-mail]>
Chris & Tara,
I wanted to send you a "thank you" for utilizing and supporting the Express Review
Program this past year. However, in order to clean up and close out the first year
of Express Review-2004, I am going to have to withdraw/return the Acceptance of the
Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation project. The Acceptance letter was written on
September 8, 2004 and we have yet to receive the package. Please be aware that we
will still review this project under the Express Review program but a new initial
interest will have to be sent in when/if you choose to use this program in the new
year.
thanks and have a great holiday,
debbie
Deborah Edwards
Environmental Specialist III
401/Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
[phone]
1 of 1 12/23/2004 1:26 PM
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William.G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
September 8, 2004
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Environmental Banc & Exchange
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200A
Cary, NC 27511
Fax #: [phone]
Project Name: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
Moore County
Subject Property: Site is located North of the intersection of Glendon-Carthage Rd. and Brady Road,
North of Carthage, Moore County
Dear Sir or Madam:
On September 8, 2004, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email request from
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. regarding a project known as "Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation"
for acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into
the Express Review Program once the following items are received: 1) a fee of $2,000.00 made payable to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2) seven complete and collated copies of the application and 3) seven
copies of all additional information pertaining to this project. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed application package
and required fee are received.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call John Dorney at
919-733-9646 or Deborah Edwards at 733-9502.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
AW K/dae
cc: Ken Averitte- DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
File copy
Central Files .
Chris Huysman-Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc., 11 South College Ave., Suite 203, PO
Box 224, Newton, NC 28658
Filename: Stone Bridge Stream Mitigation
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 One (,
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/100/6 Post Consumer Paper
M., WA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Dhrtslon of Water Quality
Midtael F. Easley. Govemor M111am G. Ross. Jr., Secretary
Nan W. Ktmek. P.E., Gkedor
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Muffing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Environmental Banc & Exchange 'Fax #: [phone]
Chris Huysman 828-465-3050
Subject: Open Springs Stream Mitigation & Stone Date: /8/04
Bridge Stream Mitigation
\1
Number of pages including cover sheet: 3
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Debbie Edwards at 919-733-9502.
101 tYelYSbCA Wiaaatm WY
rmourse?oed.w.a.r'en aermcewya zrseatsw _ Dnc CH
zsziaaovroeartire,s?msso.awgn.aam000Srxna 1V F
Peansa,crasatea,ruts,a.,sseesa,wmer? aturaaI'O!!?
MFquaoppunngarnarreAdenEnel?.r- p„j1a6Y0%wnaenwn,rPW
• • •QBZd,INSNK2IS INHKIIDW IM32 130 BJKd ZS2IIJI
XO sslinssx
w0a HUOK
rr81,TO HKIS QBscl=
Z'b:ST 80-cIIS SEZ JIUVIS
£/£ S80Kd
OSO£99Ii8Z88 HNOHd
£689££L6T6 rIIs
SQNtdUJSM-6WI aKVN
VV:ST QOM POOZ-8-d8S BZKQ
1 OUVEal 00 OIVIMS
ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of water duality
Michael F. Easley, Oovemor Wham G. Floss, Jr., Seasury
Alen W. Klfm K P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unlit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Carter
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Environmental Banc & Exchange Fax #: [phone]
Chris Huysman 828-465-3050
Subject: Open Springs Stream Mitigation & Stone Date: 9/8/04
Bridge Stream Mitigation
Number of pages including cover sheet: 3
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Debbie Edwards at 919-733-9502.
- t?
/o+wasmaumuronum
raven,rsrvwstoea,.a?Whrruuc.mrn. 27eWHO ,one
tttt 00" fkArd. SUM250,ftW, NmaCao6a 27W N??,t,?{_?hu jaaro ina
PEme : 9197W176P/PNte19.73sM/W"t ./?/rK!!y
MEgWepmukfAMmNMAd.E.VW-60%R-i'*MO%PatCmamuhp. YYY ?-?r
• • *(Ta11IidSNK?IS dd WfIOOa INHOH 1 aO Hf)Vd 1SHI3
NO : ssznsax
NOE : BaON
,.L9,00 : HKIS clasdvga
0V:9T 80-dHS : Hwis 1EVIS
E/E : saovd
06i'9E9V6 : aNOHd
E689EEL15M Iml
sQNFi'Iim-6ma • aKvN
TV:ST am V00Z-8-dHS a1va
NOIZffIiN00 ONIMS
2. l
Wetland
Impact

ite Number odiv duall Irst vm-,w

oflmpaot»
Type
Area ?.

pact

(amen)
Located wuL'm
nsfaa
to

N=Med
S
?

do&.*
12+25 stream restoration .006 yes adj pasture
19+50 stream restoration .008 yes adj pasture
23+00 stream restoration .010 yes adj pasture
25+00 abeam restoration .010 yes adj pasture
25+25 20' wide firm mussing .034 yes adj pasture
264% stream restoration .059 yes adj pasture
41+00 stream restoration .001 yes adj pasture
44+75 stream restoration .007 yes adj pasture
48+50 stream restoration .010 yes adj pasture
50+50 stream restoration .042 yes adj pasture
55+00 stream restoration .066 yes adj pasture
• List each impact sepamawry auu a,w..w,y .vwyunay autmw. m%l wc, % uw. arc a ,uw w
.,bsaiwd clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, drtchmog/dminage, etc. For dams, separately lis
impacts due to both stm- and flooding.
•? 100-Year floodpbuns are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flooc
Insurance Rate Map. (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the
FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online at httpJ/www.feina.gov.
'ei Li.t a wetland type that best descnbes wetland to be impacted (e.g., f vshwater/saltwater marsh, foreste(
wetland, beaver pond, Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to Ix
made by USACE only). -
List the total acreage (estimated) of all adsting wetlands on the property: anuz 1 acres
EBA.-Meuse I, LLC
NCDIV NC Division of Water
DATE INVOICE NO DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT DEDUCTION BALANCE
7-14-05 071405 Stonebridge - 401 per 2000.00 2000.00
EXP
K 7-15-05
I

CHECK
2444

TOTAL> 2000.00

2000.00
DATE UMBER
N
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
PLEASE DETACH AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS
NCDTV NC Division of Water
DATE INVOICE NO DESCRIPTION INVOICEAMOUNT DEDUCTION BALANCE
7-14-05 071405 Stonebridge - 401 per 2000.00 2000.00
04_151Z
15-05
K 7- CHECK
2444
TOTAL> 2000.00
2000.00
,
DATE N
UMBER
?"
I Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
I Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the" card to you.
Attach this card to the back of the `mailplece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:

Environmental Banc & Exchange
80000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200A
Cary, NC 27511
DWQ# 04-1512 - Moore
A. si re
L 1 Sv.-? ? '3 Agent Add"
Received-by (Pflnted Name) C. Date of Delivery
?t mU•-,o} L •T s o?
D. Is slivery address different from Item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below. E3 No
3. Service Type
,Certified Mail ? Express Mail
0 Registered F_Retum Receipt for Merchandise
1 Insured Mail ? =.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extfa Fee) Q Yes
Article Number 7004 1160 0002 2706 7 216
(rnwsfer from sem a taabe
3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 1102595-02 Wtsa
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
111111 USPS
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
Permit No. G-10
?• ? 3Et?Ei?E}ii}?}itiltft3?}!It!{!?ll?Iif??ElEE!!}3311l?!lllii?It?
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
23,21 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Environmental Exchange 1LC
Attn: Tara D. Auden
8000 Regency Parkway Ste. 200
Cary,NC 27511
DWQ# 04-1512-Moore
A. Signature
X ? Agent
? Address,
B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Deliver:
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No .
3. Service Type
WMertified Mail ? Express Mail
'0 Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number
7006 0810 0002 3962 1573
(transfer from service label)
7e G...... 45211 L...L.......... nnne
t/1 Q
~YC9
03~ 40
F Z zra z
w~ UO~
WUOw
~w~ a
w~~ m UT-1 65
~~w r--
O~U I
O€O Fri U r~~ _
~QH a iYZO 4: Q ~ _ -1 REACH A W ~ . r ~ UT
a-~N r; m _
Roza O ~O~U i i
~~w~ UT-2 W 4 ~ UT-1 B3
w?~r UT-3 + ~F~o z I C S 2 -~,lj i~ W I m e~' , y' m p~
0 ?w~y 4w m - i;r
KUWm gy »-""tB ~Ila
O a `C~' ~~0~ aNOa UT-1 lg . ~----a~--_ ,y UT 1
FJW UT-1 UT-1 CRAWLEY CREEK U ~ Q
ZpOp N ~ ~ , , te;. o I ~ REBAR
p VI Z U~W~
°~WmW OWOm
O J ~~a=
OONN APPROXIM, a EICIST. 60" _ ~ APPROXIMATE ~ ~ DIA sTEp. -
3o?a LOCATION F t~ LOCATION OF + cuwEST ~ -~AW~
.p oZ EXISTING ~Va EXISTING DAM 1~ r ' r",> ~ f
rF~W ~ ~
~f0~ C S1
OOV~ UOOUI f~`_~ UT-2
( ) I,~:.
J
PROPERTY BOUNDARY UT-2 B~2 <<,
C S 1' ii
UT-2 ~ (
PROPERTY BOUNDARY MAP I
~ F ~i
NTS r/
i
r- C/S ~
r~' (UT-2) ' T-2 811
. t~ y
r
CS3 '
UT-1 ~a ( ) i, m
~ UT-1 REACH B
UT-1 B ~ y _ ~s~
~
;~e ~ ~ ~ a'
~ i ! j
' ~ t~ i C/S 2
f I ~ Q7 j
f ca r r ~ {m r ~
1~ /y
U t l,,
~I ~~0 >j i ~ t Q ,'~0 . ~ T-1 66 _ ~f ~ W
U r~ ~ (Y r . m j
s~~~~uu~~~~uu~y r i i x
--e~.~ r~~ I W ,
? -
~ i'
~ i 1 ~ '~~~3., * ~;I
'ti ~ ~iB ~ q~ t l f'- ~ ~ ~ m
' ~ f~ ~ r x B!_ A,A
'CS3 S2 ? ~ r'` / C ~ _ / , ~
~ ) ~~~~~0
~ UT-3 ? UT-1 69 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T@- _ j
U ~ . ~ _J ;j w _ s, FL ~ ~ --18- ~ ti
~ ~r9 ` C/S 1 ? ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ¦ I ~
~a , ~ _ 0: - re , ~ , ~ UT 3 61 ~ ~ ~ ,
? , ~ r ~
r

..r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ y .gym

~'ti.___ 1"= 100' HORIZONTAL SCALE.
~ T-1 REACH C ? U LEGEND
~ r~~~~~~~~~~~~¦
UT-1 86 SOIL BORING AND NUMBER
CROSS SECTION
~ ~ VEGETATION AREA A
VEGETATION AREA B
VEGETATION AREA C
Tg-- TOP OF BANK
STREAM CENTERLINE
NOTES:
1 PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON DEED BOOK 556 PAGE 599.
2. TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING AND ELEVATION DATA OBTAINED FROM WK DICKSON FlELD SURVEYS PREPARED IN NOVEMBER 2003. ELEVA110NS ARE
REFERENCED TO NGVD 1988 WITH A 1-FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL.
3. VEGETATION SURVEY PREPARED BY CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.,
NOVEMBER 2003.
~
RELEASED fOR DATE ~
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWNG SCALE 3101 JOHN HUMPHRIES WYND STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
MSE 1" = 100' RALEIGH, NC 27612 APPROVALS` DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE [phone] ' PREPARED FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
AMH 01/2004 BIDDING
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER Office Locations: ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC
MSE 30246.00.RA lin Geor is CONSTRUCTION E PLOT DATE community infrastructure consultants North Caro a g
DESCRIPTION DATE RLE NAM South Carolina Florida V. NO. TaNS O6 24 2005 RECORD DWG. RE DOST CONa / /
REVISIONS

a - ~y~
O ~ .
m p j z~a
LEGEND
oZ~ ~ ~ N 3 00 _ ~ . Ao a PLAN TI ww N PLANTING EXISTING r
F Q N ZONE 2 WOODS uNE .
~ ~ ~ ' o ~ w~~ ~ ~ , , • _ . FENCE LINE X X
_~W r , .I
o~~ ~ i o ~ _ MAJOR CONTOUR
zoo o 6~„ MINOR CONTOUR _ _ _
~a~ a, OIP o . - p; ; , WETLANDS
oaw . ze~
~ ~f oZo , , l ~ ~o % PROPOSED
~ _ PROPOSED
~ ' ~ ~~w ` , w ~ l s CENTER OF CHANNEL - - GATE
w?~ ; ~ ~F~d , TOP OF BANK
~~oa ` _ a , w~~ x~ , LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
~?~Nw r'; r l 301 _ 30l 30 301 ~ 8 W m y.t, ~ ~ 30l 30~ 301 34l 34l o ~ ~ ~ O - _ 3C~ 3 '~j~ I EASMENT (TO BE FENCED) LCE
w ~ ~ _~w r' O i PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARY - - - - -
zooo ' ~ PLANTING D FENCE X X
o~ o~ , . X ~ X • PROPOSED CONTOUR
ZONE 1 °o~~ ~ _ `~Wmw D ~ i~~ C) ~ PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
Wp > \ n fTT ~ ROOTWAD
y~dQ ,,:J~ o ~ ~ N N ~ C X
YOUw N ~ 26 ~ X U1 ~ LOG VANE
3p?~ .g .o \ \ D CUTTINGS BUNDLE
0<°Z ~ 263 . ~ C \ ~ CHANNEL PLUG ~ ~
W z ~ ~ ~ a 3xX / x,50 o ~ ~ / SO ~ / 0 X LOG GRADE CONTROL
aoY< 0~ ~ C8 v ~ ~ S~ 26 LOG TOE PROTECTION
°o o ~ C3 ~x5~ 262 `'x 00 ~ - FORD CROSSING
i 1 " - o -F 62~ o 6 a ~ °
~ k FUTURE CULVERT CROSSING d ~ ~ o
_.263__----_ - - - o ~ h kh - ~ _ _ - C?2 FLOODPLAIN SILL
_ _ - o dx TEMPORARY CROSSING
r ~ Y~ + G. ~C7 rr l ~p ._-~0:.
t , s . , 2+ 26 t Xs ~ f NOTE: SOD MATS TO BE PLACED ON ALL Cpl NEW CHANNEL BANKS
0 n. ° ~ C9 ~ ~ 26
~ ~ ' ~ 1.a - f 64~
E ~ A ~a`~~ ; 6
2 X w o ,5 ~o so J.
- -
. 1 inch = 30ft.
C ~ CF _ PROPOSED ~ " ~ CURVE TABLE
_ r.__ - STOCKPILE ~ _r,..____ r AREA \
t; C~ G ~ CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH C1 515.31 49.35
r , LCE C2 29.26 13.48
LCE LCE ¦.....n-„~. E .••~¦LCE LCE ( C3 28.89 55.51
Ii,CE L E LCE L . CF C4 27.33 50.83
z ; PROPOSES C5 23.52 59.44
GATE cs 2s.o2 63.33 _ C7 27.70 59.35
. k ' r ff, C8 25.75 59.01
t~ - ~ `ti ' - C9 20.90 55.36
.y p F - . , r ~ C10 25.90 63.64
_ i C11 34.57 44.91
J~ / C12 26.25 28.96
. ..i
i
12.8' 12.8' 12.8'
BANKFULL ELEVATION BANKFULL ELEVATION L ELEVATION_ _ _ - _ _ _
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12.8'
0.9 BANKFULL ELEVATION 0.9
2.8 2.8 1 1'
0.8' ' 1' .8'
2.1' 0.2'
0.5'
5.5' 0.5'
0.3' I---- 5.15' 5.15'
11.0' 1.8' 10.3' 0.7' 0.7' 10.3' 1.8'
TYPICAL RIFFLE DESIGN CROSS-SECTION - UT-1 TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-1 - DfS LIMIT TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER POOL SECTION Ul OL SECTION UT-1 - D/S LIMIT ;ALE
NOT i_ 4LE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
= ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = GRADE C NTROL STRUCTURE
270 : 270 . .

. ~
EXISTING 6 " CIdP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : D
. . ~
. .
5 ~ ~ : 26 - 265 r
z---
. P PO . ED ~ STREAM -BED..... . .

. : : -11E ° IN.......:....:.....:.....:.........:....., , ADIEfdT A7 BAWKFU ~L ~ $XAGE' _ ~ CI.( ~ .y .r ~ ~ . ~ . .
- ~ ~ 260
260
. . - - : - : rn ~ m : :aq -o ''o~. r:~ : a - - a ori.. .NO.... +o .r rN
~ . m . .r N. . ~ d :d u7 :N O m0 OHO - m. ~ : ~ bN - ~ :aod: - pppp :u~a - :d dw r
N: t0 f0 Nn r'r Nr N Mr t0 ~ 1bN ~ ..:....:.........N... ...:i90f--.. ~ jr}.:.. N.........:.M..:..........:... . ~ a N -a N : AO O - O rn > . + t0. tp. > + + tp W r N r : V1 li[ f!I ~ > W ...:...0• .:.....+~.:........+tn...:....~.W....Q ----:~fiN:-....:~N:........Q.W...-:-~Qitl....:..0 11 ...Qw.
Dorn ~ {N.. ~ r.. ..:..}~...NN.. .~N.....:....,N o;-. - mod, r~ 00~ - :rrn- :O : ~N O -Oi cVN : N~ ~Oi MO( - ' PlOi MOB ~ + ~ d ~ ~ rn r. tr! O~ cV~ ~ :+N: ON Ori MOD: r00 a0J :H W: J +N +N ~hJ M 1V QW 4W: aN : ~'V ~W fFJI ~ ~ •W>: u~if~ V1W : - - W ~ QW Q tbW : ~ .tV : W V}l W : ] • 5 :Q W. :F J: Q F W : : (F/f W (n
+ ? V7 N.. .N ~.....'......N W.... M M ' M-:....;.Q W..... ....q - --++~...I:.........Q W..;..Q W...cV - ...'..V).t+?....fflW..:...., .................pty..C) (V...Nj OP.,.O W....
? > QN .O Q F-•J :V1W (fIW VIW V1W QW QW QW QW H ~ J rnw : - -
Fa- ~ F J W: UI W~•~ Q W ~ W F- J H 1 - VI W S W ~ N w W ......._....._.a ........_...................yr J J........_........._....(Q W.. .UI W................_..............._....._..............._................_.... .~w..~W...~~..:.F F. VIW V1W ~ - :
255 W : N : : : : : 255
0+00 0+50 1 +00 1 +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 )0 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWNG SCALE RELEASED FOR DATE
ME 1" = 30' 3101 JOHN HUMPHRIES WYND N ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS L S
AWN BY PROJECT DATE RALEIGH, NC 27612 APPROVALS DR RHN 03/30/2004 [phone]
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING TONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJEC
3024600RA DICKISJON Office Locations: n~ NAME PLOT DATE community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION CARTHAGE, NORTH CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 0+00 TO STA. 8+00
REV. NO. DESCRIPTION DATE design Jayout.dw 06/23/2005 South Carolina Florida RECORD DWG.
REVISIONS

- _
_ < ~ N Y ,z _
-
o " Foz LEGEND

ZN~ O U O EXISTING
WOODS LINE -
FENCE LINE X X
war. .r < ~ ~ V O MAJOR CONTOUR
o ~ Q' MINOR CONTOUR - - - - -
Z ~ $ 2 ~ ~ a . 2sx--_ REMOVE EXISTING WETIANOS
oar 2 FENCE WITHIN LCE ~ ~ ~r /
ss_ _ ~ ~ZO ~ - ,4 . ~ ~ _
, - t11Xi-SL+d1~1 '
r ~~ow , r ~ r.. ~ ~ CENTER OF CHANNEL
w~ ? T
r A t = s. ~ ~ 3~1 OP OF BANK E T /'~/~c,_ OMITS OF CONSERVATION
WZOC ~ t > ~ \ ~e ;r'F~RV.~'V.~tD' EASMENT (TO BE FENCED) ~C'E
w ~ ~ ~ p oa ~ o - _ PLANTING T ~ ~ E PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARY - - - - -
o 0 0 ~x t ~ _ QNU n~,J 1 _ o ~ ,S ~ ZONE 1 FENCE X X ,
n f . . ~ ,.a'
r ~ o m z + pp PROPOSED CONTOUR
diFrv i ~ „ _ r PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
~ - f m G1 ~ ROOTWAD ~j ,
~ LOG VANE
oN_~ m o - ~ , Y ZO V Q O ~ .~1 r,., f ` ~ CUTTINGS BUNDLE
r -o yC CHANNEL PLUG
i p ~ \ ~ J - ~ ~ ~ -L ~
=z ~ ...r • , rr~iw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I LOG GRADE CONTROL / C1~3
` LOG TOE PROTECTION
s FORD CROSSING C25
1 C? >~00 ~ i p ~ FUIURE CULVERT CROSSING
r, FLOODPLNN SILL
N^v ' ~ ryp ry" T ~ ~o , TEMPORARY CROSSING
~ h x ~ x ,266,.~W ~o
kp0 0 ?6 r " NOTE: SOD MATS TO BE PLACED ON ALL
n ( i NEW CHANNEL BANKS
~ ~ h ~ 7~ ---267-
i• + ~ ~ ,f ~ ~ + 65~
c2 / l o ~ ~ "9 30 0 15 30 60
r ~ ~ < 1 ~ ~ T'
s' ' s ~ X~ 7~ ~ Gib 26 h x o / ~G
G ~x~' ~ PROPOSED ~ ~ - 6x x~ ~ ~ 1 inch = 30ft. ~6 ~
~ STOCKPILE gxs \ t czz - ~ AREA ~ .f,
7 CF
LCE 3 E
~ F CURVE TABLE ~ L
~ ~,R~ `G"; ROP05ED ~ ROPOSED cuRVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH 'STOCKPILE ~ GATE
/ S70CKP ~~E / AREA AREA ~ GE ~ C13 29.70 78.93 C14 25.56 33.58
j ~ ~ i f C15 28J 4 46.86
GE ~F ~ ~ GE~y`' C16 27.76 53,31
C17 46.43 31.17
LCE LCE '""`LCE ~~"""LCE CE , v, C18 28.63 53.50
f- C19 29.46 75.38 C20 26.75 67,53
PLANTING C21 22.76 23.52
ZONE 2 _ _ _ C22 29.49 28.71
C23 39.50 35.99
C24 34.67 26.44
C25 30.76 24.62 - C26 33.15 12.45
C27 27.14 11.86
2.8' , 2.8' 12.8' C28 24.73 36.41
- - - - - - BANKFULL ELEVATION- - - - - - - - - - - - - BANKFULL EL BANKFULL ELEVATION- _ _ _ _ _ _
12.8'
0.9~ BANKFULL ELEVATION 0 9' 2.8 2.8 1'
~ , J 0.8 1 L
2.1' 0.2'
0.5' 5.5' 0.5'
0.3' 5.15' 5.15' f
11.0' 1.8' 10.3' 0.7' 0.7' 10.3' - 10.3' 1.8'
=ANDER PO L SECTION UT-1 - D/S LIMIT
TYPICAL RIFFLE DESIGN CROSS-SECTION - UT-1 TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-1 - DfS LIMIT TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER POOL NOT TG SCALE NIT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
: : : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MM =GRADE CONTROLS UGTURE ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ = . . . . l.J`J
=FORD CROSSING:
270
70 - :

Q : :
. . OPOSED STREAM`.'BE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . : ~ ~ - ---.-j- 265
- - - : : - ~ w
- ENERGY ADIENT AT BANK . ° . _ ~ _ . ~ _ ~ - - -
: : : J
z
. ' - - - ~
U ~ - - ~ ' - . : . . - - rn . - _ p~....._ p N.._ _ M. .Ol
' Q ~ ~ ~ : ' - ~ ~.r ~r O~ M M: w ~ fD :01 mr0 10 .mar O t0 ~N .OMj ~ .r O., N - - - + :N - t0 + + sD m+~ Nh'"~A N N ~ +
' : ~ ~ - ~ d' - N....:..+ N ~ d • M3 ~ to.:. n . m ~ + ro ~ ~ N + N ~ N N..+ N..:. j.:.. gyp..:..., W? ~ N.. ~ N..... N:...N ~ ~N' N' N'O ~ cG W
: : r :MOMI•: W 1 ~fV ~fV ~ r: :r Nla ~ N - fV0 - N ~ MN : +N +N 01D Or00 ~N _ ~c',1 O h .f`N .fN iA~~fIO WO100 QW Wr-I~I .-N : F : F~J N M Ip M3 !p !n N N N ~ 1. (p fp ~ ~ N ~ N D ~ ~ N ~ N ~ N ~N +11I i. + Q Y1N ~N Q Q Q W W FJ J .1. N NW ~ 6 _
: I-J : HJ : : ~ : 1,~ ViW W W : : : : : :
N r r~ ; N :r N: N~ r r ~ Q W: NO ~ Q. s0' rMr O ~D :+N: r :t00f 01 r - ~ Q +O +t0 dW Q~ •~N: ~N H W ~N N NW • O r' :N V) N Q ~ HJ V1W - fnW ~ ~W aW ~ N.J!~!7W f-~1-J (~l~l V141 : N W VJ W Q LJ Q- W: ~ W : : F-• J F- J W (A W VI W - - I-J NW Fn W . J
Nr. +N ~N ~ N N ~ .....:}~0.....: p~ p Q -~-.''N 14J7 {~!)Fd.....:... W O p.:..~............:... .p...:.....r.~ ~.._.....:QJ:....:.'{. .p~H HJ - - 'VlW' rN rN ; V1W ~ ~ .Q aW - : : E.Wj : : {.tb. ~C W W ~ NW Q W QW .F~• HJ W W J : : : - ~ - - - : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
N. w t0 + J F'-~' Qj ~ 1 ~J F. .J NW. InW NW ~ H'J N - BD~`1 W :In W, d Q~ Q W NW NW W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w Nw .
. . . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
255
5 : 5 .
+ 0 11 +50 12+00 12+50 13+00 + 10+50 11 0 +50 10 00 9+00 9 0 8+50 8+0 3+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50
E 1" = 30' RALEIGH, NC 27612 gppROVALS ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS 2
AWN BY PROJECT DATE [phone] HN 03/30/2004 BIDDING %
fAPLE OECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 3101 JOHN HUMPHRIES WYND RELEASED FOR DATE PROBY PROJECT NUMBER STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJEC
3024600RA DICKSON Office Locations: E CONSTRUCTION CARTHAGE. NORTH CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 8+00 TO 17+50 8
DATE NAME PLOT DATE community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia REV. N0. DESCRIPTION designJoyout.dw 06/23/2005 South Carolina Florida RECORD DWG.
REVISIONS

V7 Q
~YU 03~
O ~~Q LEGEND
W
ZN~ PLANTING oo~ EXISTING
WzY ZONE 1 _ _ ; WOODS LINE
FENCE LINE X X
W~F- Q' - ~ _ ,r ~z ~ ~ W ~ ~ . ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ PR.~~C~~E PR.~POSEU _ MAJOR CONTOUR ~ _ x,,,.".301
o°~ _ . SATE _ GAT ~~1 MINOR CONTOUR
~ _ o -7~~. ~_..r-- O ~ - - ~ Mir. s
a ~ , .a ~ ~ - ~ - ~ WETLANDS F.
• r
_ r,~ Q ~ V J l' 7~ ~ ~ ~ R P
n G CENTER OF CHANNEL
rc ~ ' - 3y (n w W~ i" G t~ TOP OF BANK
N z ~ - 3+ite ~ ~ ~r o ~ LIMITS OF CONSERVATION LCE
N?~a _ x,01;' I ~ EASMENT (TO BE FENCED)
V-' ~ N W . 6:~W61 ~ _ PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARY A
QN~~ _ . _ . ~ 67~ 2s8 t ° +6 2gk 0 FENCE X X
f , - ~ ~ n , . N Zppp '~^~n,.
N 1 ~ ~ OZpO ~j`J ~ 0 .26 PROPOSED CONTOUR AS +
.~m_ _ kr PROPOSED SPOT EIfVAT10N v, ? E t 'f";,..... ?
owo / ~ C4 ROOTWAD
~°aa - i ~~NN ?6J o 2 ~ LOG VANE
Ill .J A CUTTINGS BUNDLE
3ozw C ~ i ~ ~2 ~ C36 k X
~ sp ~ + OaUQ ~ / t CHANNEL PLUG
rr~`iw IZ ~ - a LOG GRADE CONTROL
U~O~ C acoiYZ ~ ,~~k ' +s _ - LOG TOE PROTECTION
O°°`~ 6 PROPOSED 7~ - ~ - FORD CROSSING
ti STOCKPILE FUTURE CULVERT CROSSING
~9x - - i- AREA pp ~ ~ ` FLOODPLAIN SILL
\ ~ ~ i \ ~
i ''C~ TEMPORARY CROSSING E
_ ~ 26 / ~ ~ L ~E _ _ 2~0~- PPOPOSED NOTE: SOD MATS TO BE PLACED ON ALL
~j ~ ro N r , _ , x~, PROPOSED ~ LGE p ~ 19 NEW CHANNEL BANKS
STOCKPILE / LCE LCE LCE
~ AREA / CE ' l ~ r
' ~ 's i E ff N ,
30 0 15 30 60
~ ~ ~
X r . 18+00 ~ _ ~f ,r, r 1 inch = 30ft.
26~

~ PLANTING t ZONE
x ~
1 w`
CURVE TABLE
w p` LCE ! CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH
C29 23.22 33.45
C30 26.41 31.64
C31 25.33 50.56
I C32 25.11 55.78 C33 23.82 51.72
r r C34 25.14 49.10
C35 15.00 27.17
C36 23.23 39.73
C37 48.36 29.97 C38 41.66 30.48
C39 8.64 11.06
12.8' 12.8' 12.8' C40 37.34 28.08
BANKFULL ELEVATION BANKFULL ELEVATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ELEVATION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ C41 26.84 30.08
C42 20.64 15.05
12.8'- C43 45.93 19.77 C44 31.22 31.66
0•9 BANKFULL ELEVATION 0.9 1. C45 26.09 12.00
2.8 2.8 1 -I 8, C46 21.37 19.12
0.8' ~ 1'L C47 30.83 16.47
2.1' 0.2' C48 26.49 46.04
0.5' 5.5' 0.5' C49 29.60 42.00
0.3' 5.15' 5.15' -•---I
1 8'
11.0' 1.8' 10.3' 0.7' 0.7' 10.3' OL SECTION UT-1 - D/S LIMIT
TYPICAL RIFFLE DESIGN CROSS-SECTION - UT-1 TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-1 - DDS LIMIT TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER POOL SECTION Ul NOT TG _CA._E N T T~ ~~~_ALt NOT TO SCALE :ALE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M =GRADE :CON OL: STRDCTURE W
=FORD CROS ING
: : 7
7 : : : 20 . . 20

. .
: _ .............:...PROP SED:STREAM BED_... .~-T---- -
r.........._...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- - . ENERGY` GR _ AD E~1 -AT- $ANKF LL- . .
. . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . : . ~
. . . . . . D
265 : ~ ~ X265
- ~ vi a - io - ~ ~ r ~ ^ ~ I
. . Q.:.......... _ . ....ao..... . n ~ ~ ~ ....N r ~ ~ N ~ N r } O } O N .N M..~...} O ~ O 1n ~ ~ O ~
q _ ~n m~ }1n IA } in t~ tN tN 00 ~ O ~LV aN ~}In N NN
raj a~ ~ Mme. .r~?. ao'° rn r~ N~ .t coo moo.:. ~ ..o~'.. : ~ r : : + .,+o_.+~. . D - ?0 m T t~.~ N N N N tp m ~ :f t ~ M N t } t } t ~ ~ ~ ~ r.;.....~0. ....N~.......:.~~... ON:....,..N~...-.... N.------:-.~N.....~ ....NN..,..cV.....}~. ....t,n..,.. ~..~m..,...:;....;~.. NNN..:.,QW...Qw.. Z
- r: o r ~ - +a ~ td r~ w so ~o: ao~ N: NN o°0 :df0- rr d'r O~ '+t q '1A h: X10 O~ M~ CDM ON a0r pp NN cVN- .iA :N _ M D Om M - :NN (VN : ~ O j 1 }!f + ~ ~ cyN NN < QpJ N NN Q < - F.~ HJ rn d OCO NOO : }!t }t: Q W Map .M it ~ ~ :N ~ ~ ~ N~ : InW UIW
1p r M ~ m ...:.Old C!O .r N N 4V M~ NN...N M...+ - - - M+ N M.._...~ ~ W ~ ~ M1. > y > > -Orp O d QW - W-Q~ N O 1~N: r~ : rn : (VO ~N M. ~ : ~ :010: QW Q 010 b~ Qw ~ W NN N - I-•J t-J' NN •F J- F- N. ..}M...}M.:....:A~. ....4L~1._.....:.N~... ~~:....:..~J..._... '~.:....._..l`1N..._.N.......~~.:..ID ..~W. F' _ - N~ ~ NN NN fn ~ J T~~ Fr V1~. J NN NN _ ~ J NW _ f}I1W fAW W fAW N
IM ~ N +N ~N: :d1 Q N .~N J N~ NN NN ~J N W V1.W W: > :N W: V1W d> Ha H 4J ...k 4~l+ N tit Vl W:....:....:.....-..... ....:.....•...V! L1....:.(/1 . .
WW F o: ~o..:.... ~o..~....Q~....4 ....r..:.....~.r a~..d ...t w....... W.... - - - - - '~~li!':'~'J N ~N F-J :U34! N : :a W: ?iW d~. N WN• NW V1 4! h W :
//fW~ fnW fnW .Q .Q J FJ. fJ f'J _ Vl~ : 260 W > Q> W :a W. (AW V1W ~ : : ' W W ::::0260
W ~ : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
255
255
1 + 0 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21 +00 21 +50 22+00 17+50 18+00 8 5 ~2+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00
PROJECT MANAGER DRAVANG SCALE RELEASED FOR DATE
ME 1' = 30' 3101 JOHN HUMPHRIES WYND ~ ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS L81
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE RALEIGH, NC 27612 APPROVALS [phone] RHN 03/30/2004
BIDDING APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER DICKSON Office Locations: STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJEC
ME 3024600RA CONSTRUCTION CARTHAGE, NORTH CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 17+50 TO 26+00
REV. NO. DESCRIPTION DATE ME NAME P<or DATE community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia designJoyout.dw 06/23/2005 South Carolina Florida RECORD DWG.
REVISIONS

t!1 Q
~Y V,
p30 a
2pa ~ w _ _ ~ , .v. za --~--,Y,~
_v x•._ f WU~ ,~7 - . , LEGEND
.y • . ~ ~ -x_. -x~ .r." l 1 / EXISTING
~ ~ - r" ,.w......r ' ~~...,1 ~ . „ ~ .r f.' p PLANTING ~ ~ ~ ~ .A. __A "~rv~_, 1' ! i ~ . WOODS UNE f` n~,
~ _.w._.. _ . _ _ _ W , ~ . y r' z Z NE 1 . __x N j FENCE LINE
p~ w ~ • w - r X X
~ ~ - _ , _ ~ m _ ~ - F to „ - 7 ff 1' ` ~ ~ MAJOR CONTOUR . r` ~ r ~ = n r ,
~i - , U ~ / ~ ..M ____ss LL r ~ ~ r f ~ 1 ~ MINOR CONTOUR 1 ~ ~
- ~ - f ~ ~ Z O ' ~ ,w i ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 . f ~ t ( ~ ~ 4, WETLANDS ir~ ~ r°~ ~ ik ` I ~
~.~..,~i y ~ S ~j~ r - nM..,...,,,..., za , ~ ~ _ ~y ~ t , v ~ q j ~I`I 11 ti
. W CD p i ^,.v..„.,..,,. " ~ / r' r'r ~r r 1 ~ 's..: ;A" „ 7`' j p 1 ` t` r y.... ~ tie ' ~ .1 ``'w~. . ' r'r 'a,, ~ ~ '`t .f M „ _ ~ M, a~ ~ ~ f~ j ~'`~~I ~Ir i '7`~ Ait I !~XY4Y ,f. t~",S t~.l
W ~ ( - ~ ~ r, e, k 'fir I lktp, ~ ~
V t , ' p J N t ~ " . . r ~ , y.,, tip, , _ e ~ ; ~ W ,Y~, ~ CENTER OF CHANNEL - - f ii f~'~
. ~ . ~ r . sw h ~ , w < ~,-'fie. ~ , ~ ~ TOP OF BANK
- , ~ ~r ~j~r s r t . ; ` ~ ' UMITS OF CONSERVATION
..x_ _ _w j _ <~,U r _a ~ t EASMENT (TO BE FENCED) LCE , f ~ ; F I
~ > w ` ~ ~ ~ t z p p w i(, ~ C Op t W 4 J wu~ ..v,. / ~r,~` , ~r , P - - - - - 1 r,, r~~,-_• I t CANTING ZONE BOUNDARY 't i
r- 9 ~ ' . l w . ZS} p ~ IE , ~ . d„ , ov,oz i ~ ~ C54 0 ' ay i.~,..~ b 0 ~ FENCE r ~ h ~ ~ X X
Uo~~ C 1 5 0 ,,r ~r ! ( ~Fmw .0 G5 r` i'tf 'II x ,~r,r' / ~,jr ~ PROPOSED CONTOUR
W z Jv ~ r fJ, ~ + ~'I , M. f~. i 000 +6 00 ~Cr l / ,r;' f.1 > ~ ~,r 1 i~~` ~ + ~ r' PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
x a Q ' ~f i r''~ ~j +50 1 G §i ~ ~j ''s w _ E~ ~ 1€_ PR P t' r 1 ~ ~ ROOTWAD
_ _1,~I 0 OSED v ~ ~r _._..~.w"._._.,~_ r, t;,~ ~ ~ j1 ,,...,STOCKPILE f
Z W ~ t i} i t 3F-~ ~ ~r ~.,I ~ ..,AREA •o ~ ' ; ',rr,~, j' LOG VANE ~j ftFri~i f 4 ff~r r,,j,li
p o°z ~f. C51 1 j', 1 ~a U a J ~ ~'S 1 i'tL -I'6~ t ~ X44 r'~ CUTTINGS BUNDLE ~ ~
~~~W ~ PROPOSED ~ ~ i ~ 1 f;' r~' CHANNEL PLUG
~~o~ STOCKPILE ~ / 3 G ~ ti, r ~ ~ ~ < AREA F ~ , _ 0~'SA `~i li~ 1 ` r Y z ~ f-' p UU J Frj r~'i~' , 1 lOG GRADE CONTROL t
UOOVI ~0 h~~ (i.~l ~f Q l~ ~ f /r ~ ~ 7C~ ~ ,r ~ LOG TOE PROTECTION
~ F .Y ~ , ~ ~ ~ ,r 1 ~ ~ r,, ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ; i FORD CROSSING
p~ /jr f ?ii.~ 11,1 j dff~ ~ 4y' tl1 1 fi 9 ~fy I r 1 r , f L r'' ( 1 f 1 r y--• I I I l l i l r .r
~ ~ E ~ LC F • s t r ~ , . f,,~''~ } s 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 FUTURE CULVERT CROSSING
• . r.~ ~ 1 'n i . rt. 3?x F . . .r ~ ~ , CE ,E ~ r' ~ I s . ~ 1 1 1 ~ i 1 i j ~ j t ~ FLOODPLAIN SILL r` t i r , m ~y y I r
L ,...-w,....~ ~ 69m r~~ r r , 7 ~ ri' ~t 0 6~ y rj j TEMPORARY CROSSING
-I-69~
F ~ ' CE L 41 t ~ NOTE: 50D MATS TO BE PLACED ON ALL C62 ~ I NEW CHANNEL BANKS ~fj ' •F`. F ffJ~~
s ! t
C J~ I
LCE 0 ~ r{ ~ n~ i~ a ; r ri. J
i ~i 1 j
I ~ ~ I
' ~ ~ ~ , 0~ 4 ~ ~ ~..M._~..~,~ P f . i 1 inch = 30ia.
t'` U `4'1;tt , , ~ . .,.w k ~ 1' f' f
~'r PLANTING r ti. ~ :ti i
~ r~ w ~ ~ I
r< ~......m.. ZONE 2 r~r~ ~ k ~ . ~ ,r o ~ .
-mm. ~ - r,, ,te, ~1'. "i _ 1 ~~Q ~ ~ 1
r' ~ ` t a~°~ 00
4,~~` i ~,7, c r ~ , r ~ti,„ aY `~M 4• N
r 'stiff ~ , C I ` m._" ,
~ ® '7sa~.
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH
C50 24.91 47,15
C51 21.47 46,45 C52 28.07 43.52
12.8' 12.8' -12 8' C53 24.09 21.30
- - - - - - BANKFULL ELEVATION- - - - - - - - - - - - - BANKFULL ELEVATION KfULL ELEVATION C54 19.32 10.68
12.8' C55 22.60 36.87
C56 21.98 63.11 C57 22.91 50.36
0'9 BANKFUIL ELEVATION 0.9~ 1 2.8 2.8 C58 23.34 42.26
0.8' ~ ,L 1~ C59 25.83 16.53
2.1' ~ 1 .8° C60 26.71 27.14
0.2' C61 20.67 33.72
5.5' 0.5' C62 24.13 38.98 0.5' C63 26.77 34.16
0.3' 5.15' 5,15' C64 27.30 45.92
11.0' 1.8' 10, 3' 0.7' 0.7' C65 23.20 52.05
10.3' TYPICAL RIFFLE DESIGN CROSS-SECTION - UT-1 TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-1 - D/S LIMIT TYPICAL L FT M AN ~.3' 1.8'
E E DER POOL SECTIOP NuT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE P00 S CTION UT-1 - D S LIMIT ro sca~E
275 ~ ; --G
. - RADE CONTROL STRUCTURE ~
: 275 : : : = CI~LVE T CROSSfNG ~ ~ - - ~ - - - - - -
o . . .
o . • .
270 . ROP!OSED STREAM :BED - . - - O
: - ~ : O - 270
W~
z - • ~ EROIf•GRADIE A~~$A1VKFl~LL STA .=.O.OQ2~.FT....:.........:.. . +..rrt.-. - - -
~ : ~ : ~ - - . LIJ
- _~r. r rnM ~ ...r~.. .moo
. . 265 ~ . . . . - . ~ . " . : - - - -
CV s} .F r. .+r- - 'fytD• N~ N MN cil~ W~ MN ~fY ..NOf.~Q.;....~N• U - .~I~ }I~ Nom: :N~: pp IO MN: MN app ~O1 ~ ~0~ ~O - 1 ,r ID ~o a~0 MN. MN. U1m ~md N~ : > : d~ ~ - aw ~265
t0 ~Itr +tD: r -FcO+(D :1~~+f0 (O~~Wyp 0}f~ O+i tp~D: ~1~ ; ON; SON MO: d• NJN :M3 N: ' W Q Q tp h 1 tp: ~tp ; tC .1. N~ W qN N ~ - ~ ~ f ~ Q W. .Q N N 1"J- F-J .M~ ~N W V1W - M (n W f!)W N~ 4~
+ iA + ~ • ~ ~ + ~ iM ~ +M tD . R tp d ~ ~ ~ ~p~ 00 ..OD !0 t0 ~ N - /0 r' p0 r M + iip + tp W....p 50... pl......(~I N..... ~ M 17 ......CV. N N N ~ N N tD • + p ~ r0 NN NN :I~ N NN N.. M.: a0..... ...NNLIIS.V...+. !n N N+IA+in ~+~....is~........ +cD. > MN N: Q • Q W d W HJ- •M M- ll1W~ VfLJ
iA In +In}N +1A +N > +iA IA - 5 ~N la-J: IQ-J...~N..~ .h~}..HJ- •U1 + + t0 > ~ > r~r~ dw rm (D dW :QW N > •NN••> >NNNN dw - Q .J IG~lp10 - •r' :tD~QO W: dWQW •Q J ;N N ~ •N NNN..... Q Q 1+~...:~1..: N...... .:.Q N.N.N N.... J ~ h J N N N h J h J Jh J • ~ , > j (T W ~ Vl W: V1 W d W : d Ul W UI W: d W M ~ - U11af V1W j ....:.....:.a ..~W y..... ..................hJ.. }Q.,Wj-H.Wl--......... ~ WW QW QW H HJ ~ :a4! Q W : (~W V1W fAW fAW -
J J .W.:....(p w .......Vx W 1+1..Q sl Q - h J W ~ w..:st tow W.Q wQ.W.......... . !~W - (nW - W .UIW > h 'h~: ?-~JhJ {r! ...f-..1:.h -.V1.i+l... . > -Q W Q W Q W : Q W W ~ .fn W. V) Wf~ k1 : h J h W : ~
Q WdW - - .h hJFJ FJ J V1w VtW : - : h Jk- J - - ~ . w N W N W Vl W W ~ 00 I~ -
1Q N N
- - -
w : d 3 : . 260 J . . .
260
26+ 00 26+50 27+ 00 27+50
28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00 30+50 31+00 1+0 0 31+50 32+ 00 32+50 33+ 00 33+50 34+ 00 34+50 35+0
0
C~C~R~INATI~N
ME 1" 30' D
RAWN BY PROJECT DATE RALEIGH, NC 27612 ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS 4
919 782-0495 APPROVALS RHN 03/30/2004 l
[APPROVED ROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 3101 JOHN HUMPHRIES WYN RELEASED FOR DATE BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING M STO E 3024600RA DICKSON Office Locations: STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJEC
REV. NO. DESCRIPTION FILE NAME PLOT DATE communit i fr CONSTRUCTION DATE y n astructure consultants North Carolina Georgia
REVISIONS design Jayout.dw 06/23/2005 South Carolina Florida RECORD DWG. CARTHAGE, NORTH CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 26+00 TO 35+00 8

a Y
03~ 40 LEGEND
ZWOa
rZW~ EXISTING
UUO§ 2WUW WOODS LINE -
F W ~ - w,~ FENCE LINE X X
o .v .......w....._.._. W 1- aw MAJOR CONTOUR
Z W ~ " - ~o LC~_.MV_ wv.,._~ ._~~E T""~..----,.____.. ~ .,.,_......_~--__r_~ MINOR CONTOUR
~ r,r P 1~QS€D - _x. LcE _ ~ " ~G w. __L~E Z w~ _ o ~ ~ -m,....
~ ~ _x_.~ _ ~ . ~ f ~ ° ~ _ ~ _ v ~ x n _ ~1 _ _ - _ w~ _
_.w....w v °e., i~ _ V . . . ~ ww . m,_. _.w.__ _ _
_ , ~ ~..w________.._. ~ - y.~ , RP OPOSED .___-~.m-w._...~._.~._
_ _ _.~.._-_--._-_-_,_k___.~.~~._ CENTER ~ CHANNEL
W ~ . ti~.~ _M..x._ X * ` .~_M~.____ ~ uw...,.m.. % TOP OF BANK
W W ~ k W t / - v... ~ n. _ e,.. ~ a ~ 1 r,. , - , / _w_ ~L,~-----~~~CE n. , ' (JMITS OF CONSERVATION
, ~ ~ , W ~ - C~ LCE - _ ~ _ M ._.v .v ..,,.r EASMENT (TO BE FENDED)
~ ; . / r , `--------._____xµµ.- ~ PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARY - -
w-_M-_.- ~ .....--x--xx._. FENCE X X
( ~ s ~ t~ v ~7~ "w._. p 'E V r Q U i ll-` ~ h W i ~ ~ 0 ` ~ ~ r --_._._.._.._.w.._..._ w ~C
Z ? o 0 0 271 --•X.... , ~ . ' . o ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ i r• ~ r' f: g 40t ~ ~!,t. . Zoo M... 4 ~ ~ w,--__" PROPOSED CONTOUR _w"._--w
~ t _ -..--x._._" PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ~r ".w ~ ~ r' ,v....~ `w
~ _ ~ ~Q C72 ~ ~~i" a, f +7~ W m ~ 7~ s 1 yo ~ ~ 3 272~~~ 71 . ~ , -www"_m......._. . ~ _ C1 ~ ROOTWAD y ti F ,
oho xS x ~ 1 9~,0~ y _ _ ~ Y ~ Q ~ r „ ,6 ~ E ~ LOG VANE ~ ~ l i
, Ir ~ ~ CU GS BU DLE
N ~ 1 YUUa i / 1 X ~ F Z ~ ~ r" _ ~ k5~'~ p _ `~._w ~ i
-o :o ~ ~ _ s ' ~ CHANNEL PLUC ~
R~Q 1, ~ ~ ~ X80,- ~ ~ 7 C, ~ ~ ~ • ~ y,~( ~x~ - - f ~ ; LOG GRADE CONTROL l r 1, ~ ~ ~ 1 Y' _ 5t ~ i
, _ PROPOSE % 71 ' ~ ~ ~ LOG TOE PROTECTION
~ ~ ~ Y i D. ~ ~ ,,w z , v~ . ~ , v o o'a ~ ~ 0 1 STOCKPJL'E` " , 'r~ ' , ~}b - _ ± 7 ~ FORD CROSSING
~ ~ ~ -AREA ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~.w.~ k tF_,y > t ~l ~ ~.:"-%-'~3k ~ FUTURE CUL RT R N + ~ 4 , VE C OSSI G
~ r J ~ r w~ 27 r % ~ ~ . FLOODPLAIN SILL
f ~ ~ - , 3 ~ _.M ~ r ~ ~ ~ l
. / t~ _ Y t 'r ~~1 F ~.w Yom-.'' ~ / ~ ~ ~ i.- ~,~F` ~ TEMPORARY CROSSING r f
~r / . - i a ~ ~ f 4\ i NOTE: S MAT T P N A OD S 0 BE LACED 0 LL
is - % " / ~ .,^v _~m ~ 3~T w ,k ~.r ~ NEW CHANNEL BANKS
30-1. ,~r,~ .w d~ s~ ~ " ,..i .m 301 ~ ~ ry .44 ~ - . ~ ~ ~~'ROPOSED ~ . .
r F x.. ~ • i -w_ y~ „A r ~ 'GATE " ~ 30 0 15 30 60 27 Y ~ ~ r 6.~- PROPOSED ~
• ! r a' ....w x r w ~ .M...~- _-x-" f ~ ` .278"-"~' STOCKPILE 'k ~ ~ -
. f ~ ~ 3 .r ' 1 inch - 30ft.
x.._...__ _ y - ~ ~ ~ -~r- N ~ f, 4. ~
i B3 w_ ~ ~ CURVE TABLE . ~ ~ ~ k
~ C 1'~. ~ i ' ~ ~ CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH y ~ yA I' i i ~ ~ 4 1 L~ 4 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ I. _ ~ ~:t ~=,2 ~ C66 23.20 38.54
. - ~ f~,A~S) TI M~G 1, ~ ~ ~ Cs7 27.48 17.02 ~w~ , ~ C68 23.77 15.75
` ~ ~ t 5 ~k ~ ~ C69 23.84 43.54
4..4 ~ ~ ,4 C70 27.20 35.45
, .t C' ~ ~ C71 23.39 21.11
~ .S ~ , C72 25.11 39.83 t ~ • ,.k ~ ~ C73 23.94 15.44
C74 25.97 31.42
C75 26.35 50.60
C76 23.88 34.95
C77 26.46 45.31
C78 28.86 27.54 C79 18.70 27.21
C80 25.08 51.27
C81 23.15 54.22
C82 24.30 41.38
C83 26.19 26.86
C84 12.43 13.87 C85 24.33 29.66
C86 242.05 12.50
11.6' 11.6' - 11.6' C87 23.10 6.38
- 11 6' _ _ _ _ BANKFULL ELEVATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BANKFULL ELE BANKFULL ELEVATION
10.0' 0.8' BANKFIA.L ELEVATION 0.8'
2.3' 1' - J ~ i~2.3 ..3'
0.6' 0.6'
J
0.4' 0.4' 0.3'
4.75' I----- 4.75'
0.7' 9.5' 1.4' 1.4' 9.5 9.5' 0.7'
TYPICAL RIFFLE DESIGN CROSS-SECTION - UT-1 - U/S OF UT-2 TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-1 - U/S OF UT-2 TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER P001 NOT TO SCALE NOI f0 SCALE NOT TO S 280 MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-1 - UPS OF UT-2 NOT TO SCALE
:280

- . .....Y..GRAD C -
E GON:TROL BTRU -TUBE - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- :-..FORD- - ROSSIN6 : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . - - - - - .
275 :275 .
o: .
. - - - - - . :
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BATVKF L = . - - N RAY GRADIE T AT U L STAG 0.003 FT T E E _
~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ ~ . . ~ . . . . . r ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~I W s . ~ ~1 T ~ . ~ .
O _T_ : 270 . - 270
. -
+ : ~ ~ • - ~ U:
'v 1 - ~n Mao - rnt o.-: ao~ao Mrn apD o 1~~d
. . . . . . . ~ r. ~ . • , d ~_.1~ ....:..M ~ CO....-: ~ N - + N r r 01 d Ol M P M Oi Oi -d N +GD 01 + rp~tgtD. f~.....N _ d. N. N.._ .r...,.N CV. .._.4l~.r4~...._.... N ~ '
7i +Of ~ •+CO• +W pro m ~N ~N; ~ N i(i N dN NaD d ~Dri Na1~1 : +0i+1` d .m .h~ MN O) O~ :d N: dN tpNdM' dN N •N d• d Nap ap 1n r > > aD MaD -+0i + 'a
. N N -t0 N O N ~ + i'O M: :O~Om ~ :WN: Wt0 d N M M ...0_r .........MN. .N........rrR...W O. flS...~. rtp"-t+ld..~ ..pQtp..q~rp.-:-r0 t'.F N....0~..01 d + ~ In: O~ Nf0 : > ~N - dW +m ~Ll l~i d~1 dNQ W Q ~~HMH 1~/1 W ,J W S• ~ prp' :Q>'.'Q>' }ad}ap•. ~ww tJ..+~. ~~.....~J H~: N....~N... y~ d - Nw dN d~ WN
.I O : : • . ao + O O m t0 ~ Oi t0 tp t0 O O r n m c0 M ~ ~ Ol N : ~ N uD ' : b~ ~ r~ N M N : ~ O + O+ + t0 O.... Q W...Q W • ..O }90 .}OD 00 ~tb Om ~ MN N MN 00 - Oi MN MN +O tO .J + !D y y cp tOap y y TAN N HJ F-J M ~z0 (V d/ N'" IA ID t0 MN 1rJN + +n +r + +r .y rf0 r!0 y ~t4 Q W d W n>NM .Q ~W » N~ NW • QW M dN W O~~DDpp~ d FJ - QW lJ - - J F-J - -~J: N~ dtvdN: fnW fnW ~N d•N (~W NW: > j fAW ; F-J 1-J - :Q Q41 ~ fnW > :N W. Q QLJl Q W V1W V1LI - •H~FJ
tp WW ..q,~N..~yM.~~..NxtV. N .....t0~. y. ...,tp y..:... ..~0...:.0 ...,y....:y.l~ .r ..~N.O.N. ..a.W..d I~~`! N -E-JHJ ~J" F-J r0 Q ~ W J..; ..•.N W'N W..... y.. ....~W.; •N W....•., y..,>.;.....• .......d r+r > ~W WW ~ MN pJ Q QW ~ ~ J: I-J u~iw InW y ~ Q QW W H H H J Q ~yyQ W . W . tp ~ to W (A W - -
~ +cp +S W W : Q FJ y: y J F-J F.~ 1-J W NW 1 ~ Qy W 1-JF I-J J N 265 U ~W ~jNMN J J NW ~W (flW aW W (~W ~ V1W Q~ Q'w QW aW :F-la[ J f/FWfn (~W W Vl (nW F-JHJ. F~ J HJ : V.1 W V)41 ~ N~ - V1WV1W NW 49W : _ - - - 265 . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . - -
= I- J UI W Q Q W ~ ~ F- J F J 1 QW QW (~W U1W NW N ~ tAW fnW Q - NJ F'J 0p MO : O~ : : - - : : : : : : : : : : : : : . . . . . -d d. - - . . . - - - - •
.....+~.....+r. . :dw dy .:.t _.r...h.- . . . rn LLr v? W .
: M MN - MN :
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35+00 35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40-+ 40+00 40+50 41 +00 41 +50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE RELEASED FOR DATE
ME 1" = 30' 3101 JOHN HUMPHRIES WYND ~ RALEIGH, NC 27612 DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE APPROVALS ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS 5
[phone]i' RHN 03/30/2004
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING - STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
3024600RA D I C lwx%ej 0 N Office Locations: FILE NAME PLOT DATE community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION REV. N0. DESCRIPTION DATE CARTHAGE, NORTH CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 35+00 TO 44+00 8
South Carolina Florida REVISIONS designJayout.dw 06/23/2005 RECORD DWG.

N Q
~YZ
O7'~ LLO
ZOQ LEGEND
~w~ OZ ZNz~
Upo SWS W ExlsnNc
FWK ~ Q _ , WOODS LINE
OK~ W~F- . FENCE LINE X X
to ~ ~]w - - MAJOR CONTOUR
oo~ _,LC€-~~LCE ~~LCE _ Zoo _ MINOR CONTOUR - -
o ~f, ~ F N _
~Q€ ~ oaa , C~ WETLANDS
n. WrcJw - ~C.~1
aoza C~ _ . 0 1, . - ~w ~ ' U PROPOSED
o~~ _ 7 CENTER OF CHANNEL - -
~ - c WZ~ - o ~ ~C TOP OF BANK
F Z ~ ~ - " , . Wes.., _~._.w , LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
w , ~~'a, -o~w ~ . ~ • ~ EASMENT TO BE FENCED LCE ~ ~ ~ )
_ . PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARY- - - -
PROPOSED E " ~ _ Y - _ . ° c F _ o ~ ~ s PRaPGSED~ , GATE - r ,._.._~z~~o - , ~4 +oo ~ ` ~ ~~E - FENCE X X
Z ~ ~ o - c _ ~ ~ t~, ~ GATE - _ ~ ~ t, ~ f ; , 2 N m_. - r 096 s ~ sv "'i '"'L ~.f ~C~- ° ~
' l"t PROPOSED CONTOUR _ #I~#
~FmW ~ 2 ~ ` ~ f ~ r i w ~ i _ . - ~ PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION i s ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~-~-m.._
- ow~, CCE f X G 11-~ _ ~ • , ~ "1~ , ~ ' . ' .LCE ' t ' ~ ~~i ROOTWAD 4
~ , . . 00~o r O9 ~ ~ yy ~ ~ ~ „ _ - _ _ ~ LOG VANE 1 . ~
m .J F M ~ ~ v 1 . r` . j 1 - _ ' '`-'"282 _ _ _ _..v_._ CUTTINGS BUNDLE
x ~ ~P , ~ '1 , ; . n v., ~ ~ ~ CHANNEL PLUG
Q° ° z J Vj c9 `r~ <VQ ~6 r', I i 1' i= /~I ~ ~ .1 ~ ~1 ' Lr ' Y"~ ,/`';fir _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ lOG GRADE CONTROL
O r J V I 9 1~ JV _J ;~1 _ _
ao z / PROPOSED ~ v t oc~ k ~ r. y'~ r ] ' ~ STOCKPILE o: f { ~ ~ ~~L~~~ ~ 8 y,; • - - - LOG TOE PROTECTION - n _ ~ _ ~ ~ .v .
. ~ P . / - 8 - - FORD CROSSING cat ~ ~ - .
~ ' r"`~~~`~ % ~ AREA v= , ~ Q k ~ ~ - i ~ r • j r FUTURE CULVERT CROSSING l~ N
,yFf~.~~ 1,r r ~ q~~ _ .t5` 1 ~ , - - FLOODPLNN SILL
~f w, fir' _ ~ r~ , 2~
_ ~ ' _ _ , .Y]tl , ' 1 t t r - TEMPORARY CROSSING ~ _ . .
. , . i . ~ 00 r r 5~ ~ NOTE: SOD MATS TO BE PLACED ON ALL
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; - - NEW CHANNEL BANKS ~ ~ ""118 ~
y i O . y l C 1 ~ ~ ' 0 . ~ ~ y , ~ Cpl , . ..,..a~ ~ F.. w, ~ - ~ - -
J ~ s 8 - _ _..m
9 SO r' ~ 107 I,:' ~ ~
" 7 ~ ~ 1 inch = 30ft. PROPOSED CURVE TABLE
k _ _w. ~ STOCKPILE
~ PROPOSED AREA CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH C88 191.74 29.43
GATE C89 40.06 31.68
~C _ . J , , ~ 3~) ~C C90 33.03 27.89
GR ~ ~ C91 37.33 16,55
N~ ~ ~ . 30 8 . 0 ~ 3C~ C92 29.58 44.86 ~
_ N _ C ~ ~ C93 17.47 20.94 C94 20.21 18.37
SOT' ~ 30l PLANTING
~0 r C95 25.58 26.90 N Z O N E 2 1 C96 29.93 12.86 ,
PR.OPOSEa _ C97 29.93 23.63 1
``4 GATE _ - ` C98 35.74 20.27
' C99 19.79 20.13 ~4 e \ ! C100 29.44 22.76
'"r~ v. 7~ C101 22.57 28.29 ~x
C102 30.76 14.57
C103 21.79 30.48
C104 38.19 26.93
C105 1113.75 34.96 C106 100.75 9.01
C107 16.63 16.02
11.s' C108 392.70 13.72
BANKFULL ELEVATION 11.6' - - - - - - - - - - - - - C109 52.54 12.18 11.6'
11 6' - - - - BANKFULL ELEVATION - - - - _ _ _ _ _ BANKFULL ELEVATION C110 49.16 23.88 C111 33.02 21.00
BANKFULL ELEVATION 0.8' 0.8' I C112 66.05 10.78
' .L 2.3' C113 40.67 39.63
u.4' 2.3' ~ I' 1 J ~ 12.3 C114 45.32 31.74 1~
1.8' 0.3' ~ 06' 06' 0.3' C115 31.59 21.42 0.6'
0.4 C116 35.80 16.41 J C117 18.06 17.35
0.4' 0.4' 0.3' ~ 4.9' 0.4' Ci 18 15.88 10.76
4.75' 0.9' 9.8' 0.9' 0.7' 9.5' 1.4' 1.4' I---- 4.75' C119 22.40 31.07
-1.4' 9.5' 0.7' C12D 29.76 36.88
TYPICAL RIFFLE DESIGN CROSS-SECTION - UT-1 - U/S OF UT-2 TYPICAL STRAIGHT REACH POOL SECTION UT-1 - UPS OF UT-2 TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-i - U/S OF UT-2 TYPICAL RIGF NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-1 - U/S OF UT-2 NOT TO SCALE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - -
: : ~ ~J`J =GRADE CON OL :STRUCTURE : :
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - -
280 =FORD CftOS ING . 280
-.;~;y = CULVERT C SSING - - - - - - -

. -
275 . Pl~OPOSED STREAM ED : : 27 cj . . O

. . . . .F.T - 3A - KFULI ~ STAGE ~ 0:00 ~ -
- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E RGY GRADIE~tT -AY A - K - O PROPOSED TREAM B€D - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - - ~ - - - - -
. _ _ _
- - r ~
. ~ . : d ~cn .rah a. a - ^o....r~. N. +N ...+~..fH -~~'{.~rQ
W 270 : ;:~:~_t ~ - - - ~ N~ ~ N~ .r ao.. - rn ao r Nr rn+~ Nr Nr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ _ :ttl O~ ~fD +r• - - d Old *r. N hn N~` ar It7N ~N : a~plC tD :~N ~N +N+ 270
O :N~:m~ ~Nr;N N.- tOr M~ i0N r~ ND N~ r~~0r ~O/l~ cD 1~ OS I` r ~ ~ : d r; O ~ ~ ~ ~ :a ~ : ifI N if1 H ~ ~ Q - N N N Q W Q - - - O! ~ Of W WW N N r r t,! Q lil rn ao f N > r r
oaD - - 0D~ .r~`.a0~: NOD.rr°~mt0 +r ~o~ : ~ ~ ~NdN ~rd~ - - d~ d O a ...:..+p .....:..........:.......fQ;..~~.~ ...apC1...f'O {.OM~ ~ t0N r r~ RN N~ ~N dt`l +I`, ~r ~u7:~tfi W .O oo J F-J ~ HJ H~ ~N N .FJ FJ j . rn .o~a~? aN ~,r art° rnr > - > :d d - tV > ''N N. Q N t(I Q W Q - O r O W~ O O- ~(1 ~ W UI W fn W (A W. Ul 41 W Q Q C
I 'F ~ h ~ R .N Os O ~ OD + : u0 CV ~ N...~ N...+ Wa GD W rQ 4,? dN O _ dN dN ~ .dN.d~ + i.p dN N N +a O :nN r~ Q~ Q : ~ ~ : r- F-JH~d dNFJ ~ ~ rQ 41 Q - > O O Vf W VI W , : N lil` VI {il ~ N ~ N - N W N W Q WW Q W . H J H ~ (A W (A L d dNF J d W W ~r OJN •>W - F-J 4-J. V1W (/1W F..~ J .
U d h ~ d, r: O d t4 ~ . . iA t0 : > : . Q Irl Q W t0 1~ f~ Q W ~ WW d d i- J F- + ~ Q W 4 `r cV" ~ tV pl WfJI W VI 41 ..........:.....:.....>...N...:......~'~_....QI~..~~.......Q.>........,I, ...40~....Q -Q .d.tV...QLI.QW..J~..F'J FJ dN.... N...FJ I-J ~ r > ~VI 41 V) W f. J : Q N d. : H J F J Q W 4 W: VI lil :V1 W: Vf l+J W:
Q ~ W .~~.I-~ F-J1-JQ t~tTJ'.~w....... ~W....NW..:Q>..QJ...V~W.(/7 ...~.N.._.~F.~..1...F-.J.....>-..,)....._.......~Q ~.W......, W > + Ol I- J F- a N ~ tD W ~ . > - W 4! - - W fA W Q W : Q ~ F- F- J Q ~ J W • d c0. t0 Ul lil : (11 W d N ' V7 W : f~ W > N W N WH .J F- J f- ...t FQ- Hj.............VJ.41......_.... .Q~.Q ..............._....._.....y1W..~{~{........_..............1,,J..~J......_..............._.....:.....:...............:...._.....:..........:...........:.....:.... - :O r: F J ~ ~ f!1 W ifl W f~ VI liJ . ~ N to 4J N LJ
- H F ~ N tv H J J : !Jl W V1 tJ Q 4 W ~ Vl W : VI ~ f~ VI liJ .Q > ~ J. ~ : ~ ~ ~ .a N.
-Vl W' : s0 - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d -Q W : : :V1 W. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
265 = ~a . ~ . . . 265
. .

44+00 44+50 45+00 45+50 46+00 46+50 47+00 47+50 48+00 48+50 49+00 ~+00 49+50 50+00 50+50 51 +00 51 +50 52+00 52+50 53+00 53+50
PROJECT MANAGER DRAWING SCALE 3101 JOHN HUMPHRIES WYND RELEASED FOR DATE ~ W'MLVd
ME 1 = 30 RALEIGH, NC 27612 DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE APPROVALS ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS 6
[phone] CADD 03/30/2004
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJEC
3024600RA DICMOON Office Locations: LE NAME PLOT DATE community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia CONSTRUCTION REV. N0. DESCRIPTION DATE Fl CARTHAGE, NORTH CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 44+00 TO 53+50 8
REVISIONS design_layout.dw 06/23/2005 South Carolina Florida RECORD DWG.

N_ Q
~Y~
03~ w0
FpZ ~WQ LEGEND
• -
_ - J t W~2pW ~ LCE - EXISTING
rW~ k4 ~~O WOODS LINE
_ ~ Q ~ v FENCE LINE X X
P x , W ~o~ ~ t~ MAJOR CONTOUR --w-w-~-
p~u ~ t le Z~~ MINOR CONTOUR _ ...,M,
O ` t` y4 . Fpm _
~a~ ~ C o a °a ` F WETLANDS
i , °~zo ~ ~ a: ~ i w~~w f t 9~
1 CE 2 j .wd ~ oo~~ v._ eo 1 PROPOSED
tt~wp CQ f CiE rF-F __.....~;CE ; CENTER OF CHANNEL - -
c ~ w TOP OF BANK
~FOg ~ - z a - , , ,
~w~> ~ E E G - 4F + REMOV XISTIN _ ~ ~ s o ~~~w ~ ~ ~ - LIMITS OF CONSERVATION LCE EASMENT (TO BE FENCED)
pp wm k k FENCE WITHIN LC JOpr ~ ...+7 O~~ PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARY - - - -
~ . ~ "r~'.~a.~ ~ ~ .
~ FENCE X X
t' PROPOSED CONTOUR
r .r i Z ro I; PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
z ~.w 276 ' ~ - ROOTWAD
v~~i ! ~ ~ ti - 5) -om,~ + tia ^ ~ 1t r~~ o~ ~ of ~ n, f t ~s-s LOG VANE
.J i fi 3p2N ,q sf,' fJ CUTTINGS BUNDLE
.o ~ a 4 ~°a ° i l~ c
•1 h ' ~ ~~2~w 1` , sh ' CHANNEL PLUG
Q } -w ~ ' ~ (t _z~ ,r o.~ f / o ~ LOG GRADE CONTROL CTS
a~~~ PLANTING-.. ~ i °pob~i ~ ,'I LOG TOE PROTECTION
~ ;`w ~ ZONE 2 w ~ FORD CROSSING
,i~1 FUTURE CULVERT CROSSING
o' h ~ . ~ ~
_ ~ x FLOODPLAIN SILL ,r
S~ i 0 ~ ; ~ ' ~ ~ h ~ - ~ 4 TEMPORARY CROSSING
I ti /~;r.- 5 1 ~4 ll I 1 S ti, _ f' „ 1 1 ~ - NOTE: SOD MATS TO BE PLACED ON ALL
I ~ ~ti~ ~ ~ t NEW CHANNEL BANKS

J v k o~ t n ~ ~ ~ 1- 30 0 15 30 60
~ r `~~ti ' `fir 6~ ,%t
/ ~ I 1. r
, / ~ 3, 1 inch = 30ft. CURVE TABLE
_ __^._r~~,,, t~ G!J~ i ~
~J ~ CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH
~ ~ \ C121 29.20 9.40 C122 17.16 22.73
r ( C123 31.19 8.67
j 1 PLANTING G~' C124 45.95 28.26
~ , 301 ` ~ ZONE 1 C125 72.81 13.83
F 3~1 C126 24.17 40.71
CONSTRUCTION C127 278.78 18.67 C128 164.45 19.58
~ ' ACCESS C129 27.60 35.17
C130 57.49 22.27
C131 21.23 11.16
C132 27.69 23.54

r----_~
11.6'
BANKFUIL ELEVATION 11.6' 11.6' - - - - - - - - - - - - - -11.6' FULL ELEVATION _ _ _ -
116' - - _ - BANKFULL ELEVATION - - - - - - - - BANKFULL ELEVATION
0.8' BANKFUL~ ELEVATION 0.8' I
~,L ~~2.3' 0.4' 2.3'', 1' 2.3
~4~ J ~ 1.8' 0.3' 0.3'
~ o.s' o s'
0.4 _ 4 9' 0.4' 0.4'
0.3' 4.75' -------I I'~
0.9' 9.8' 0.9' 0.7' 9.5' 1.4' 1.4' 9.5' I---- 4.75' -9.5' 0.T
TYPICAL RIFFLE DESIGN CROSS-SECTION - UT-1 - U/S OF UT-2 TYPICAL STRAIGHT REACH POOL SECTION UT-1 - U/S OF UT-2 TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-1 - U/S OF UT-2 TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER POOL SECTI ~R_POOL SECTION UT-1 - U/S OF UT-2
Nor ro sca~E Nor ro scn~E Nor To sca~E Nor To sca~E uor To sca~L
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: =GRAD CONI =GRAD CONTRQL STRUCtl1RE : :
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: : : =FORD CROSS =FORD CROSSING . . . . . .
O :
280 + . . 280
Lr~ .
.
w z .
J . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ .filE iN.........
. . . . . .
U . .
Q : 275 _ : 275
- ~ T ~ ~ . ~ T - . . . . - - - - . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
ar: ~ rn~
}r~ M rtp }r } MO ~pl~ ~r: rc Oil r r1` r
r~t0~ N W. tr0~ 0~~ t~ t - M Nr r M iA~tO~ tN tN. ~ d tN tN ifJN h Old N ~ ~ r o0 ~ ao rv cp N ~ ~ N ~ N. N ~ ~ N + M pN N ~ N vyN to }N }M }N~ }M ~ry :
.....a r`....~r....m ar ~ _ + M r ~ ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N M ro.... N... ~ N..... ~ 0..... . > } N..... ~ . Q~ W NN NN Q Q N ~ H7 F F 1-'J
270 _ ' tN N - ~ - t tom' dW Q N N ~h ~r - - VIW W rnw Q w aw J . 270 nw w a a w F
I-JHJ ~N ~N V1W :!!)W: .j f~W f~W : Q QW (AWU1W QW W > - - - F-~ FJ ~ rn w ~ ~ w ~ w ~ w : ~ ~ EXISTINf - - - -
Q W dW F-J J Q 4 - - - U)W V) W . . to W In W ~ ~ ~ CHANNEL
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BEb . . . . .
53+50 54+00 54+50 55+00 55+50 56+00 56+00 56+50 57+00 57+50
IF, PROJECT MANAGER DRAIWNG SCALE RELEASED FOR DATE WYND ME 1" = 30' RAL EEIGH, NC HRIES 3101 JOHN H 27761612 2
r IG ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS 7
DRAWN BY PROJECT DATE [phone] APPROVALS RHN 03/30/2004
APPROVED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING ST( STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJECT
3024600RA DICKSON Office Locations: CONSTRUCTION
REV. NO. DESCRIPTION DATE FILE NAME PLOT DATE community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia design to t.dw 06/23/2005 South Carolina Florida REVISIONS - RECORD DWG. CARTHAGE, NORTH CAROLINA UT-1 STA. 53+50 TO 57+71 8

2N_2 Q
~YU 03~ O li _
FOZ ZHa LEGEND
~w j s r O z ~ ~ L~~ LG GE
0 r-' p WUt9, ? L EXISTING
~wtt LCE WOODS LINE -
Oki ~ G cCe ,.,f, ~G ~ FENCE LINE X X
N ~ ~ 7 ~ W Y - n~ ~ MA,mR CONTOUR
~o; 9a ~ icE , ~ MINOR CONTOUR
ono ~A~O ` x , ,
PLANTING ~Q~ ~ oa ` C - E WETLANDS
&Z~ 7 a_ LONG 2 ~ JN 0
0'~aW . ! Zg _ PROPOSED
o'~~~ LC ~ooW 7 CENTER OF CHANNEL
~ ~ W W~ WZ~ _ i.- 6`' <n ~ 33 ~ ~ TOP OF BANK
~ _ o GE ~ r' F z a C k ~ LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
" ~ EASMENT TO BE FENCED LCE f )
~~Wm ~ ~00~ ~ I / n~ j , / V O PLANTING ZONE BOUNDARY - - - -
N ~0 ~ . p FENCE X X
z z W n1 O
a~ .i ~ f~ ozoo v / 1 D' ~ PROPOSED CONTOUR +
~Fmw 1-- ~ PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
z N ~ ~ ism ooo~ X~ ~ ~ ~ O O J ROOTWAD
Y~a< N ~ O o°~~ _ _ ~ ~ k ~s ~ O LOG VANE
Yo~< ~6 6 r CUTTINGS BUNDLE
U°oZ ~
1, ~ U Q '1 ~ S.Cl1 71 ~~~w CHANNEL PLUG
4 ` ~ ~ LOG GRADE CONTROL C~
r _ 1 ` 1 - • ~ r ' LOG TOE PROTECTION
_ ~ ! FORD CROSSING ,
' 1 ? i FUTURE CULVERT CROSSING
V _ ti O FLOODPLAIN SILL
5~ ~ 0 k ~ ~k5 5 2,c - ~ ~ >0 ~ T
SO Cy ~ TEMPORARY CROSSING X~
~ 4 i ~ ~ O NOTE: SOD MATS TO BE PLACED ON ALL
0 2'I ~ , ^ 0 7 ~ NEW CHANNEL BANKS
/ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ til
~ 'i' zo 0 to 20 ao
~ PLAN G
~ ZONE 1 7 ~ CURVE TABLE
- rn 1 inch = 20ft. ti CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , C133 23.22 19.18
. ~ j`4 ` Ci34 13.79 26.74 ~ C135 13.06 29.18
" ~ , _ PROPOSED ~ A O' l` C~ C136 9.09 17.51
` STOCKPILE ~ O C137 18.90 13.20
f ~ AREA _ ~ C138 13.34 31.34
- ~ ~ ~ C139 14.24 26.20 C140 13.32 32.73
~ r" > y ~ ' C141 13.56 32.25
C142 11.63 13.21
--F ~ ~ ~ , I C143 1267 7.85
> C144 15.63 31.19 33+50
~ 3~1 ~ ` C145 15.33 29.75 ,
~ ~ ~ 01 C146 1293 18.06 C147 13.03 23.61
3~1 ~ 3~l ~ f' C148 18.09 18.50
~ ' ~ ~ i C149 14.97 21.34 J
' 1~ i C150 14.01 35.83
~ C151 15.26 15.83
C152 10.65 11.30 C153 14.87 14.24
0.4' S.0' 0.8' 6.2' BANKFULL ELEVATION 0.8' 5.0' 0.4' 0.4'
0.6' S.o' 0.6' - - - - - - - - ~ANKE!lLI~F~A.¶41`L
BANKFULL ELEVATION - - ~ 1.T
1.7' 1.7'
1.3' 1.5' 0.3'
0.2' 0.3' 0.3'
2.5' 2.5' 2.5' ---I---- 2.5'
TYPICAL RIFFLE DESIGN CROSS-SECTION - UT-2 TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-2 T_Y_ PICAL RIGHT MEANDER POOL SECTION UT-2
- ~ NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: RA
. G DE CONTROL. STRUCTI~RE
. ~ - ; ..~--_.r.::.:_ . - ..E . GY-~ . BRA . . Dr~N
- TA . . T ~B . - r AN~CF . ULL N~CF - ULL S.TA _ G
270 ~ : - ~ : . :0.007 ~ - 270 FT
265 ~ rn ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ : :N ~ : o N ~ : ~ ~ - o o~ N a ~ 265 :(0 ~N d~
~ O ~ O O: O: CT) 0) : ~ : 0) ~ CO : 0) O
r r n co cD : co : : co co co : : co co - CD : : t0 (0 ~p
N..N....N ~ N~.......~ N...........N. N ~ N - N N ~ - N N..~ (V. ............N.........~.4~1...:.... . - N N: N................~.. .
W W W W W; W W: W W ~ : W W :W WW- :W W
J J J J J ~ J~ J ~ J~ J• J J J: J :J J J: J ..W ..LLI.. W..... W.... W;........W.................:... W:.......:.. • • • W...........W.:... . • W....:....W.....W.:.... J: _I ~ J J J . J J J: J: J • J J W : ~ . - W. W........... W W W:...... tr..F . W................:.. .
O O O O: O O; p O O ~O O O: ~ O O O O O O O: O ~ - O; O O O ~O O O O : O :O 00: :O O O O :O 00~ :O Q
- tf1.: . . ~ . : } 90 d.:..... . ~
O rn I` O d~ N ao r'') ~ CO : 00 : c~ ~ ~ : N 00 : to cfl cD: d' : ~ r- :
+ + + + -F . + + . + N : ~ ~ 00: O ~ O ~O O -
i i t i '
Q Q Q Q ~ Q~ Q ~ Q Q: Q Q Q Q~ Q Q Q: Q Q Q . . ~ ~ I- ~ . 260
260 ~ I- I- I-. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ ~ - ~ cn • cn rn~ cn - • ~ ~
2+50 2+00 1 +50 1 +00 0+50 0+00
5+50 5+00 4+50 4+00 3+50 3+00 6+00
CT MANAGER DRAMN5 SCALE 3101 JOHN HUMPHRIES WYND RELEASED FOR DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC STONEBRIDGE DESIGN PLANS g
BY PROJECT DATE (919 782-0495 APPROVALS D 03/30/2004---J
VED BY PROJECT NUMBER BIDDING STONEBRIDGE STREAM MITIGATION PROJEC
4 R DICKSJON Office Locations: 302 600 A CONSTRUCTION CARTHAGE, NORTH CAROLINA UT-2 STA. 0+00 TO 5+96 8
[designJoyout.dw~ 1" = 20' RALEIGH NC 27612 DATE AME PLOT DATE community infrastructure consultants North Carolina Georgia REV. N0. DESCRIPTION O6 South Carolina Florida
REVISIONS /23/2005 RECORD DWG.