20190289 Ver 2_Combined application with final amendments_20190521

Guilford County Planning and Development Department
OF GUS Guilford County 301 West Market Street
Greensboro, NC 27402
RTH CARO Legislation Details (With Text)
File #:
2019-230 Version: 1 Name:
Type:
New Business Status: Passed
File created:
4/18/2019 In control: Board of Commissioners - Work Session
On agenda:
4/30/2019 Final action:
Title:
AFFIRM AND SUBMIT THE PLANNING BOARD'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
APPROVE THE MAJOR BUFFER VARIANCE FOR PUBLIX SUPER MARKET'S, INC. PROPOSED
CORPORATE CAMPUS, BEING TAX PARCEL #117416, LOCATED AT 311 BIRCH CREEK RD., AS
GUILFORD COUNTY'S PRELIMINARY FINDINGS TO THE NC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments:
1. Publix—Major—BV 19-02-GCPL-01468.pdf, 2. Planning board power point 4.10.19.pdf
Date
Ver. Action By Action Result
TITLE
AFFIRM AND SUBMIT THE PLANNING BOARD'S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE MAJOR BUFFER VARIANCE FOR
PUBLIX SUPER MARKET'S, INC. PROPOSED CORPORATE CAMPUS, BEING TAX
PARCEL #117416, LOCATED AT 311 BIRCH CREEK RD., AS GUILFORD COUNTY'S
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS TO THE NC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
SPONSOR
J. Leslie Bell (Teresa Andrews)
BACKGROUND
Publix Super Markets Inc. (Publix) is requesting a major variance from the Jordan Lake Buffer
Rules per Guilford County Development Ordinance 7-1.9. The major variance is requested for
the purposes of establishing a corporate campus designed to meet the needs of Publix Super
Markets, Inc. Based on both the Guilford County Development Ordinance and the State of NC
Model Local Riparian Buffer Protection Ordinance for Lands within the Jordan Watershed, if
Guilford County determines that a Major Buffer Variance meets requirements for such, the
County shall prepare preliminary findings and submit it to the NC Environmental Management
Commission for approval.
At its April 10, 2019 Regular Meeting, the Guilford County Planning Board having held an
evidentiary hearing (quasi-judicial) for Major Buffer Case #19-02-GCPL-01468 voted 6 to 0 to
Guilford County Page 1 of 3 Printed on 5/2/2019
powered by Legistar-

File #: 2019-230, Version: 1
recommend to the Guilford County Board of Commissioners that the Major Buffer Variance
Request be approved and that the Findings of Fact and conclusions be affirmed (attached).
Staff requests that the Guilford County Board of Commissioners accept the Planning Board's
recommendation to approve the major buffer variance and submit its Findings of Fact and
conclusions as Guilford County's preliminary findings, on behalf of Publix Inc., to the NC
Environmental Management Commission in its consideration for a final
decision/determination.
The subject property is located at 311 Birch Creek Road, McLeansville, NC 27301 being Tax
Parcel #117416, approximately 338.69 acres, located in the Jefferson Township. Publix plans to
build a corporate campus which includes a refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse, return
center, food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for tractor trailers, parking for
associates, and ancillary support facilities.
The Jordan Lake Buffer Rules apply to jurisdictional features that are found on either the most
recent version of the soil survey map prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service
of the United States Department of Agriculture, or the most recent version of the 1:24,000 scale
(7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic maps prepared by the United States Geologic Survey
(USGS); any alternative maps must be approved by the NC Environmental Management
Commission and the Geographic Information Coordinating Council prior to their use in a
determination. The Jordan Lake Buffer Rules consist of a 50 ft. buffer, beginning at the top of
the bank and extending outward, perpendicular to the stream. There are two zones to the buffer
- Zone 1 shall begin at the top of the bank and extend landward a distance of 30 ft. on all sides
of the surface water measured horizontally on a line perpendicular to a vertical line marking the
top of the bank; Zone 2 shall begin at the outer edge of Zone One and extend landward 20 ft. as
measured horizontally on a line perpendicular to the surface water. The combined width of
Zones 1 and 2 shall be 50 ft. on all sides of the surface water.
The stream buffer must remain undisturbed except for the uses provided in the Table of Uses,
Table 7-1-2, Section 7-1.9(A)6)b (attached) of the Guilford County Development Ordinance.
Any use within Zone 1 not listed within the Table of Uses (Table 7-1-2) in the Guilford County
Development Ordinance requires a major variance. Thus, Publix is proposing grading/fill
impacts not categorized within the Table of Uses totaling 54,019 sq. ft. in Zone 1 and 39,616
sq. ft. in Zone 2, and plan to pay mitigation on a 3:1 basis for Zone 1 and a 1.5:1 basis for Zone
2 (see attached power point presentation).
BUDGET IMPACT
NO ADDITIONAL COUNTY FUNDS REQUIRED
REQUESTED ACTION
Affirm and submit the Planning Board's findings and recommendation to approve the major
buffer variance for Publix Super Market's, Inc. proposed corporate campus, being Tax Parcel
Guilford County Page 2 of 3 Printed on 5/2/2019
powered by LegistarTM

File #: 2019-230, Version
#117416, located at 311 Birch Creek Rd., as Guilford County's preliminary findings to the NC
Environmental Management Commission
Guilford County Page 3 of 3 Printed on 5/2/2019
powered by Legistar-

BK: R 8145 III
PG. 858-869
2019018940
RECORDED
NC FEE $2600
04-18-2019
GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
10:40:07 AM
JEFF L. THIGPEN
BY HSIAO-WEI AHERON REGISTER OF DEEDS
DEPUTY -GB
/A
/L
`J2.�V OF Gb,<�O9
GUILFORD COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
400 W. Market St.
CA"Oy P. O. Box 3427
Greensboro, NC 27402
[phone]
RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT MAJOR STORMWATER BUFFER
VARIANCE
At its meeting on April 10, 2019, after conducting a duly advertised, quasi-judicial hearing
and after considering the application materials, testimony, exhibits, and other evidence
presented at the hearing or otherwise appearing in the whole record, and the approval
criteria of Section 7-1.12 of the Guilford County Development Ordinance, the Guilford
County Planning Board voted 6 to 0 to RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the Guilford County
Board of Commissioners of the Stream Buffer Variance Application submitted by Publix
Super Markets, Inc. (Major Buffer Variance Case #19-02-GCPL-01468), for a 338.69
acre tract located at 311 Birch Creek Road being Tax Parcel #117416, and ADOPTING
the following FINDINGS OF FACT and draws the following CONCLUSIONS:
1. It is the Board's CONCLUSION that, if the applicant complies with the provisions
of this Ordinance, they will not secure reasonable return from, or make reasonable use
Page 1 of 12 Not to be separated.

of, his/her property. Merely proving that the variance would permit a greater profit from
the property shall not be considered adequate justification for a variance. This conclusion
is based on the following FINDINGS of FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings by the Board adopted herein bV reference.
2. It is the Board's CONCLUSION that the variance is the minimum possible
deviation from the terms of this Ordinance that shall make reasonable use of the property
possible. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS of FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings by the Board adopted herein by reference.
3. It is the Board's CONCLUSION that the hardship does result from application of
this Ordinance to the property rather than from other factors such as deed restrictions or
other hardship. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings bV the Board adopted herein by reference.
4. It is the Board's CONCLUSION that the hardship is due to the physical nature of
the applicant's property, such as its size, shape, or topography, such that compliance with
provisions of this Ordinance would not allow reasonable use of the property. This
conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings by the Board adopted herein by reference.
5. It is the Board's CONCLUSION that the applicant did not cause the hardship by
knowingly or unknowingly violating this Ordinance. This conclusion is based on the
following FINDINGS OF FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings bV the Board adopted herein by reference.
6. It is the Board's CONCLUSION that the applicant did purchase the property after
the effective date of this Ordinance, and then request a variance. This conclusion is based
on the following FINDINGS OF FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings by the Board adopted herein bV reference.
Page 2 of 12 Not to be separated.

It is the Board's CONCLUSION that the hardship is rare or unique to the applicant's
property. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings by the Board adopted herein by reference.
8. It is the Board's CONCLUSION that the requested variance is in harmony with the
general purpose and intent of the State's riparian buffer protection requirements and this
Ordinance and preserves its spirit. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS
OF FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings by the Board adopted herein by reference.
9. It is the Board's CONCLUSION that the requested variance is ensuring that the
public safety and welfare have been assured, water quality has been protected, and
substantial justice has been done. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS
OF FACT:
In accordance with the attached findings by the Board adopted herein by reference.
THEREFORE, on the basis of all the foregoing, the Guilford County Planning Board
recommends that the application for a major stormwater buffer VARIANCE be
GRANTED subject to compliance with all applicable state, local, and federal laws.
Signed, this the 1�7 day of April, 2019.
Frankie Jong, Jr., &VairmaOr
CERTIFICATION
I,���L l(i( , Clerk to the Guilford County Planning Board, do hereby
c ify the foregoin to be a true copy of a Resolution Adopting Findings and Recommending
Approval of a Major Variance — Publix Super Markets, Inc. (19-02-GCPL-01468) duly adopted
by the Guilford County Planning Board at a meeting,held on April 10, 2019. In witness whereof,
I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the se8ljof uittord County to be affixed this the
Z day of April, 2019.ilajl� ; }' •,t/� ''%
<:> .••....� ' .l Wil;
Ssc.
Page 3 of 12 Not to be separated. ,

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF GUILFORD
I, the undersigned, Notary Public for said State and County certify that Frankie Jones, personally
came before me this day and acknowledged Frankie Jones as the Chairperson of the Guilford
County Planning Board, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina and Chair of the
Guilford County Planning Board and that by authority duly given and as the act of the County, the
foregoing instrument was signed in its name by him as its Chairperson of the Guilford County
Planning Board.
WITNESS my hand and notarial seal this V'�day of April, 2019.
,�pnrrrrq
NOTARY
PUBLIC a
(Official Seal)
Page 4 of 12 Not to be separated.
CU. 4d
Tonya W. Hodgin, Notary Public
My Commission Expires: q " z I -19

Fc GUILFORD COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
o DEPARTMENT
400 W. Market St.
CAR0 P. O. Box 3427
Greensboro, NC 27402
[phone]
ATTACHMENT
FINDINGS FOR RECOMMNDATION TO GRANT MAJOR
STORMWATER BUFFER VARIANCE
CASE #19-02-GCPL-01468
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.
1. Applicant is the owner of the Subject Property.
2. The Subject Property is a 338.69 acre tract bearing property identification number
8804593177 and identifiable as Guilford County tax parcel 117416.
3. The Subject Property is currently zoned LI—Light Industrial, per the Guilford
County Official Zoning Map.
4. Applicant is seeking to establish on the Subject Property a secure corporate
campus and integrated food warehousing and distribution facilities and systems use that
will include a refrigerated warehouse facility, dry warehouse facility, return center facility,
food manufacturing facility, parking and staging for commercial vehicles, parking for
vehicles of Applicant -employed associates, and support facilities (the "Proposed Use").
5. The Applicant is seeking from the Environmental Management Commission a
major variance as to the application to the Subject Property and the Proposed Use of the
riparian buffer protection and maintenance provisions of the Jordan Water Supply Nutrient
Strategy Rules (the "Rules").
6. The Applicant and the Timmons Group submitted a Stream Buffer Variance
Application (the "Application") to Guilford County for the Subject Property. The
Application is on forms provided by Guilford County, and the Application contains all
pertinent information as required by law.
Page 5 of 12 Not to be separated.

7. The Timmons Group is Applicant's authorized agent for purposes of the
Application.
8. The Application and other records pertaining to the Application are part of the
record of the hearing.
9. In January 2019, the Applicant submitted the Application to Guilford County, which
was accepted by Guilford County.
10. On March 19, 2019, at its regularly scheduled meeting, the Guilford County
Technical Review Committee (the "TRC") reviewed the Application. In that meeting, the
TRC conditionally approved the Application and forwarded the Application to this Board.
11. On April 3, 2019 and April 4, 2019, the Timmons Group submitted minor revisions
to the Application, which are part of the Application and which were accepted by Guilford
County (the "Supplements'; together with the Application, hereinafter the "Application").
12. Guilford County provided notice of the Application and notice of the quasi-judicial
hearing, as required by law.
13. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that the Proposed Use on the
Subject Property requires significant area to house the +/-1.1 million sq. ft refrigerated
warehouse component space, the +/-1.3 million sq. ft dry warehouse component space,
the return center component space, the 120,000 sq. ft food manufacturing facility
component space, the commercial fleet and associate access and parking component
spaces, and the ancillary support (i.e., commercial fleet maintenance, commercial fleet
fueling, dispatch, and security) component spaces, each and all of which are critical to
the Proposed Use and any one of which the Proposed Use cannot exist without on the
Subject Property.
14. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that the Proposed Use must be well-
designed and well-managed to ensure food safety, as well as to ensure the efficient and
effective use of space and resources while maintaining a high level of associate safety.
Efficient and effective use of the Subject Property for the Proposed Use, as well as food
safety and associate safety, requires that the component spaces are contiguous.
However, associate safety also requires separation of associate pedestrian and vehicle
traffic from the commercial (e.g., forklift and tractor trailer) vehicle traffic on the Subject
Property, while maintaining the overall contiguity of the component spaces. That safety
design requirement necessitates the separation of the associate parking areas and
Page 6 of 12 Not to be separated.

associate pedestrian access areas from all commercial vehicle traffic movement. The
design requires warehouse associate to use a dedicated entrance to the Subject Property
and to park in a dedicated, secured parking area, both of which are segregated from the
commercial vehicle areas on the Subject Property but are nonetheless contiguous to the
component spaces on the Subject Property. From the dedicated, secured parking area,
warehouse associate enter the core support areas of the warehouses along elevated
pedestrian walkways through controlled access points. The design also requires
associates working in the dispatch component space, return center component space,
and fleet maintenance component space to use a separate, dedicated entrance and
dedicated parking area that are likewise segregated from the commercial vehicle areas
on the Subject Property, but are also nonetheless contiguous to the component spaces
on the Subject Property.
15. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that the design of the Proposed Use
is compliant with the Rules in all but one area of the Subject Property. That one area
impacts a limited section of stream "Sl", on the western edge of the Subject Property (the
"Buffer Impact"), which results from the necessary, contiguous location of the dedicated,
secured parking area for the warehouse associates, the food manufacturing facility
component space, and the refrigerated warehouse component space. The Buffer Impact
is unavoidable on the Subject Property for the location of the contiguous, dedicated
parking area and pedestrian access area for warehouse associates that are segregated
from the commercial (e.g., forklift and tractor trailer) vehicle traffic areas necessary for
associate safety as well as for the location of the contiguous, controlled access area for
the refrigerated warehouse component space necessary for food safety.
16. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that without the Buffer Impact the
Applicant cannot secure a reasonable return from the Subject Property. The Subject
Property's shape, size, and location support it as a unique site for a food warehousing
and distribution facilities and systems project of this scale and complexity, and the
Proposed Use is a return reasonably expected from the Subject Property. The design of
the Proposed Use provides sufficient area to construct and house the +/-2.5 million sq. ft
of component space, in a contiguous arrangement critical for associate safety and food
safety, while segregating access, traffic, and parking areas between the commercial
vehicles and associate vehicles and pedestrians, all of which are necessary for
Applicant's Proposed Use on the Subject Property. Without the Buffer Impact, the Subject
Property cannot accommodate the +/-2.5 million sq. ft of component space, in a
contiguous arrangement critical for associate safety and food safety, while segregating
access, traffic, and parking areas between the commercial vehicles and associate
vehicles and associate pedestrians.
Page 7 of 12 Not to be separated.

17. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that without the Buffer Impact the
Applicant cannot make reasonable use of the Subject Property. The Subject Property's
shape, size, and location render it reasonable for large-scale uses, such as Applicant's
proposed food warehousing and distribution facilities and systems use. Without the
minimal Buffer Impact, however, the Subject Property cannot reasonably accommodate
large-scale uses. To the contrary, almost any large-scale use on the Subject Property is
likely to result in more significant impacts to the riparian buffer protection and
maintenance provisions of the Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Rules than in the
Buffer Impact. Without the Buffer Impact, Applicant cannot locate its proposed food
warehousing and distribution facilities and systems use on the Subject Property, which is
a reasonable use of the Property.
18. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that the Buffer Impact is the
minimum possible deviation from the Rules that shall make possible Applicant's
reasonable use of the Subject Property. Several alternative design iterations of the
Proposed Use on the Subject Property were developed by industry experts and analyzed
to determine, if at all possible, alternative layouts that avoid or, if not avoid, further
minimize impacts to areas governed by the Rules, while providing the design necessary
to house +/-2.5 million sq. ft of component space and allow for the efficient and effective
use of that component space though ensuring a high level of associate safety and food
safety on the Subject Property that are critical to the Proposed Use on the Subject
Property. Applicant considered utilizing 2:1 slope versus 3:1 slope design and./or the
installation of retaining walls to further minimize or avoid impacts, however it was
concluded that the soils on the Subject Property may not be able to structurally withstand
steeper sloping and that retaining walls would require the relocation of critical utility
infrastructure that the relevant utility companies could not place behind retaining walls or
within geogrid systems. None of the alternative design iterations avoided impacts or
further minimized impacts from the Buffer Impact, or was otherwise possible for the
Subject Property. The Buffer Impact, which is the minimum possible deviation from the
Rules, is necessary for Applicant's location of its Proposed Use on the Subject Property,
which is Applicant's reasonable use of the Subject Property.
19. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that the hardship necessitating the
Buffer Impact results directly and entirely from the application of the Rules to the Subject
Property. There is no factor causing the hardship other than the application of the Rules
to the Subject Property. Aside from the Buffer Impact, the design of the Proposed Use is
not inconsistent with any Guilford County, North Carolina, or federal law or regulation or
private restriction. The design of the Proposed Use on the Subject Property can meet all
Guilford County, North Carolina, or federal laws or regulations or private restrictions, but
if the Buffer Impact is not allowed, the Applicant cannot locate its Proposed Use on the
Page 8 of 12 Not to be separated.

Subject Property, as the application of the Rules to the Subject Property is the sole cause
of the hardship.
20. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that the hardship necessitating the
Buffer Impact results from the physical nature of the Subject Property, which is different
from that of neighboring properties. The Subject Property is bound by second order
perennial streams along both the eastern and western boundaries, which is a physical
nature unique to the Subject Property and which requires a careful design in order to
avoid impacts. The design of the Proposed Use on the Subject Property avoids these
impacts, but results in the Buffer Impact. Shifting the design of the Proposed Use in an
attempt to avoid, or even further minimize, the minimal Buffer Impact will result in other,
more significant impacts to streams, buffers, and wetlands on the Subject Property, such
that the physical nature of the Subject Property renders the Buffer Impact the minimum
possible deviation from the Rules and renders the Buffer Impact necessary for Applicant's
proposed use. The size and shape of the Subject Property are different from neighboring
properties, as are the topographical features such as the streams, and these unique
physical features are the sole cause of the hardship necessitating the Buffer Impact.
21. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that the Applicant has not violated
the Rules as applied to the Subject Property, and the Applicant has not caused the
hardship necessitating the Buffer Impact. Rather, the Applicant is seeking approval of
the Buffer Impacts prior to development of the Proposed Use on the Subject Property.
22. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that valid hardship is demonstrated.
Applicant purchased the Subject Property after the effective date of the Rules applicable
to the Subject Property. However, Applicant's careful design of the Proposed Use on the
Subject Property meets the food safety and personal safety requirements critical to the
large-scale Proposed Use, without which Applicant cannot reasonably use the Subject
Property, while minimizing deviation from the Rules. The Buffer Impact is the minimal
deviation from the Rules for Applicant to develop the Proposed Use on the Subject
Property. Neither Applicant's design of the Proposed Use, nor the resulting necessary
Buffer Impact, is to maximize use of the Subject Property. Rather, the design and
necessary Buffer Impact make reasonable use of the Subject Property and secure a
reasonable return from the Subject Property.
23. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that the hardship necessitating the
Buffer Impact is unique to the Subject Property and is not widespread. The hardship
results from the physical nature of the Subject Property, which is different from other
properties. Approving the Buffer Impacts would not be a special privilege to Applicant that
is denied to other property owners because other property owners are not facing the
Page 9 of 12 Not to be separated.

hardship faced by Applicant and its Proposed Use of the Subject Property, as a direct
and sole result of the application of the Rules.
24. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that there are practical difficulties in
the way of carrying out the strict letter of the Rules as applied to the Subject Property.
Efficient and effective use of the Subject Property for the food warehousing and
distribution facilities and systems proposed by Application, as well as food safety and
associate safety, requires that the component spaces are contiguous. However,
associate safety also requires separation of associate pedestrian and associate vehicle
traffic from the commercial (e.g., forklift and tractor trailer) vehicle traffic on the Subject
Property, while maintaining the overall contiguity of the component spaces. The design
of the food warehousing and distribution facilities and systems proposed on the Subject
Property provides sufficient area to construct and house the +/-2.5 million sq. ft of
component space, in a contiguous arrangement critical for associate safety and food
safety, while segregating access, traffic, and parking areas between the commercial
vehicles and associate vehicles and associate pedestrians, which are necessary for
Applicant's food warehousing and distribution facilities and systems proposed on the
Subject Property.
25. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that there are unnecessary
hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the Rules as applied to the Subject
Property. Without the Buffer Impact, Applicant cannot develop the Proposed Use.
Without the Proposed Use on the Subject Property, Applicant cannot make reasonable
use of the Subject Property nor secure a reasonable return from the Subject Property.
The Buffer Impact is the minimum possible deviation from the Rules that shall make
possible Applicant's Proposed Use, and none of the alternative design iterations
developed and considered by Applicant and its experts avoided impacts or further
minimized impacts from the Buffer Impact, or was otherwise possible for the Subject
Property. The strict application of the Rules to the Subject Property, and denial of the
Buffer Impact, is an unnecessary hardship to Applicant.
26. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that approving the Buffer Impacts is
in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Guilford County Development
Ordinance (the "Ordinance") and preserves its spirit. The general purpose of the
Ordinance is stated "to promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the
residents of Guilford County through the regulations of this Ordinance". Without the
Buffer Impacts, which are the minimum possible deviation from the Rules, Applicant
cannot locate its Proposed Use on the Subject Property. Applicant's Proposed Use is a
significant economic development opportunity in Guilford County, contributing towards
the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of Guilford County and its citizens. The
Page 10 of 12 Not to be separated.

strategically efficient and critical capacity provided by Applicant's Proposed Use enables
Applicant's food retailing growth in and around Guilford County, a citizenry need. The
Subject Property is served by Burlington Road (Rt. 70), a Major Thoroughfare, and the
Subject Property is intended for Light Industrial Land Use on the Guilford County
Northeast Area Plan. Within the Proposed Use on the Subject Property, multiple site
features promote public health, safety, morals, and general welfare, including (1)
separation of associates vehicle and pedestrian traffic from commercial traffic, (2) multiple
levels of security, including keyed entry gate and badge security between parking and
warehouses, for food safety and associate safety, (3) wayfinding signage and striping for
traffic circulation control, (4) internal pedestrian connectivity and striping/wayfinding to
ensure safe circulation between buildings, (5) stormwater management controls will meet
or exceed standards set forth in the Ordinance and the State of North Carolina
Stormwater Design Manual, (6) redundant power (generator) and fire protection systems,
(7) sufficient pavement area for safe circulation of WB -67 and larger commercial trucks
within the Subject Property, (8) a return center component facilitating recovery and
processing of cardboard and other recyclables from Applicant's stores, and (9) proposed
buildings on the Subject Property are distanced significantly from the property line, and a
vegetated buffer is provided on the west, south, and east sides of the Subject Property.
Outside the Subject Property, multiple features also promote public health, safety, morals,
and general welfare, including (1) the North Carolina Department of Transportation is
widening U.S. 70 to a four -lane road from Mt Hope Church road to the Subject Property,
for safe access to the Subject Property, (2) the two driveway intersections of the Subject
Property will be signalized, (3) the City of Greensboro will develop a wastewater sewer
outfall extension to serve the Subject Property and surrounding area of the Subject
Property, (4) a security fence will surround the full perimeter of the Subject Property, and
(5) preservation of the second order streams and associated riparian buffers on the
eastern and western boundary of the Subject Property. The Proposed Use necessitating
the Buffer Impact, and therefore the approval of the Buffer Impact, is consistent with the
purpose and spirit of the Ordinance.
27. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that approving the Buffer Impact is
in harmony with the stated purpose of the watershed protection provisions contained
within the Ordinance. The Subject Property is not located within a Watershed Critical
Area as defined by the Ordinance. The design of the Proposed Use minimizes land
disturbance with a contiguous arrangement of built upon area along the existing ridgelines
of the Subject Property to avoid impacts to the second order streams and associated
riparian buffers on the eastern and western boundary of the Subject Property, and by
keeping significant undisturbed vegetative buffering along the west, south, and east sides
of the Subject Property. The design of the Proposed Use reduces the volume of nutrients
and other chemicals which could enter the water supply, will manage the stormwater on
Page 11 of 12 Not to be separated.

the Subject Property, and will reduce the probability of the release of harmful chemicals
into water supply reservoirs through stormwater controls on the Subject Property that will
meet or exceed standards set forth in the Ordinance and the State of North Carolina
Stormwater Design Manual, which will provide stormwater quality treatment and which is
an improvement of the Subject Property because stormwater presently runs off the
subject Property and continues downstream untreated.
28. The evidence presented at the hearing shows that approving the Buffer Impact on
the Subject Property assures public health and safety, protects water quality, and does
substantial justice. Public health and safety is assured by the many internal and external
features of the Proposed Use. Water quality is protected because that the Buffer Impact
is the minimum possible deviation from the Rules that shall make possible Applicant's
reasonable use of the Subject Property, and because the Proposed Use will have
stormwater controls that will meet or exceed standards set forth in the Ordinance and the
State of North Carolina Stormwater Design Manual. Applicant is also mitigating the Buffer
Impact through the purchasing of mitigation credits through the South Fork Nutrient Offset
and Buffer Mitigation Bank and the UT to Pine Hill Branch Nutrient Offset and Buffer
Mitigation Bank. Substantial justice is done because the Subject Property's unique
physical features require a careful design in order to avoid impacts though necessitates
the Buffer Impact for the development of the Proposed Use. Without the Buffer Impact,
which is the minimum possible deviation from the Rules that shall make possible
Applicant's reasonable use of the Subject Property, Applicant cannot make reasonable
use of the Subject Property nor secure a reasonable return from the Subject Property.
Substantial justice requires approval of the Buffer Impacts for a Proposed Use protective
of public health and safety and water quality.
29. Compliance with all local, state, and federal laws.
[END]
Page 12 of 12 Not to be separated.

Guilford County
PRELIMINARY
Stream Buffer Variance Application
Guilford County
Preliminary Stream Buffer
Variance Application
Page 1 of 6
Riparian Buffer Rules Applicable In Project Area:
High Point East and West Fork Deep River Water Supply Watershed
□Major Variance □Minor Variance
Jamestown Deep River Water Supply Watershed
□Major Variance □Minor Variance
Jordan Lake Water Supply Nutrient Strategy (15A NCAC 02B.0267)
□Major Variance □Minor Variance
Polecat Creek Water Supply Watershed
□Major Variance □Minor Variance
Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0250)
□Major Variance □Minor Variance
Sandy Creek Water Supply Watershed
□Major Variance □Minor Variance
1.General Information
A. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name):
B. Applicant’s Information (if other than the current property owner):
Name:
Title: V.P. Industrial Maintenance & Industrial Operations Purchsing
Street Address:
City, State & Zip:
Telephone:
Email: [e-mail]
C. Property Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance):
Name:
Publix Distribution Center
Publix Super Markets, Inc. Attn: Mr. Randy Barber
501 North Galloway Road
Lakeland, FL 33815
[phone] ext. 88425
X
X
See attached property owner list.

Guilford County
Preliminary Stream Buffer
Variance Application
Page 3 of 6
Date property was purchased: October 19, 2018
Deed book and page number
Map book 198 and page number 86
Attach a copy of the recorded map that indicates when the lot was last platted. Appendix C
G. List any permits/approvals that have been requested or obtained for this project in the past (including
all prior phases).
2.Proposed Activity
A. Project Description
i.Provide a detailed description of the proposed activity including its purpose:
ii. Attach a site plan showing the following items as applicable to the project:
 Development/Project name
 Revision number & date
 North arrow
 Scale (1” = 50’ is preferred)
 Property/project boundary with dimensions
 Adjacent streets and roads labeled with names
 Original contours and proposed contours
 Perennial and intermittent streams, ponds, lakes, rivers and estuaries
 Mean high water line (if applicable)
 Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
 Location of forest vegetation along the streams, ponds, lakes, rivers and estuaries
 Extent of riparian buffers on the land including Zone 1 and Zone where applicable
 Location and dimension of the proposed buffer impact (label the area of buffer impact in ft2
on the plan)
 Details of roads, parking areas, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and curb and gutter systems
The purpose of the proposed project is to establish as secure corporate campus which: (1)
includes the following components arranged in a contiguous, functional, efficient manner:
refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, parking and
staging for tractor trailers, parking for associates and ancillary support facilities; and (2) is located
at a site that will efficiently serve its current and future grocery stores within North Carolina,
South Carolina and Virginia. The facility components include a 1.1 million square feet (sq.ft)
refrigerated warehouse, 1.3 million sq.ft. dry warehouse, return center, 120,000 sq.ft. food
manufacturing facility, parking and staging areas for tractor trailers, parking for associates, and
ancillary support buildings (i.e fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security).
Guilford County
Preliminary Stream Buffer
Variance Application
Page 4 of 6
 Footprint of any proposed buildings or other structures
 Discharge points of gutters on existing structures and proposed buildings
 Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, and pipe dimensions
 Drainage areas delineated
3.Proposed Impacts and Mitigation
A. Stream associated with riparian buffer to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Feature Name of Stream Water Quality Classification
B. Individually list the square footage of each proposed impact to the protected riparian buffers:
Feature Buffer Impact
Number1 –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Reason for Impact Buffer
Mitigation
Required
Zone 1
Impact
(square feet)
Zone 2
Impact
(square feet)
B1 - P T □ Yes □
No
B2 - P T □ Yes □
No
B3 - P T □ Yes □
No
Total Buffer Impacts
1Label on site plan
C. Identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation from the
table above. Calculate the amount of mitigation required.
Feature Buffer
Number Zone Total Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3
Zone 2 1.5
Zone 1 3
Zone 2 1.5
Total Buffer
Mitigation Required:
J UT to Little Alamance Creek WS-IV;NSW
K UT to Little Alamance Creek WS-IV;NSW
I UT to Little Alamance Creek WS-IV;NSW
See attached table
See attached
Guilford County
Preliminary Stream Buffer
Variance Application
Page 5 of 6
D. Provide a description of how mitigation will be achieved at your site pursuant to the mitigation
requirements of the applicable river basin/watershed.
i.Is buffer restoration or enhancement proposed?□ Yes □ No
If yes, attach a detailed planting plan to include plant type, date of plantings, the date of the one-time fertilization in the
protected riparian buffers, and a plan sheet showing the proposed location of the plantings.
ii. Is payment into a buffer restoration fund proposed?□ Yes □ No
If yes, attach an acceptance letter from the mitigation bank you propose to use or the NC Ecosystem Enhancement
Program stating they have the mitigation credits available for the mitigation requested.
4.Demonstration of Need for a Variance
The variance provision of the riparian buffer rules allows the Division or the Environmental Management Commission
to grant a variance when there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships that prevent compliance with the
strict letter of riparian buffer protection.
A. Explain how complying with the provisions of the applicable rule would prevent you from securing a
reasonable return from or make reasonable use of your property. Merely proving that the variance
would permit a greater profit from the property shall not be considered adequate justification for a
variance. The Division will consider whether the variance is the minimum possible deviation from the
terms of the applicable Buffer Rule that shall make reasonable use of the property possible.
All compensatory mitigation requirements for unavoidable buffer impacts can be satisfied by the
purchase of buffer credits from both the South Fork Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank and the
UT to Pine Hill Branch Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank.
X
B. Explain how the hardship results from application of the Buffer Rule to the property rather from other
factors such as deed restrictions or other hardships (e.g. zoning setbacks, floodplains, etc).
Attached Narrative
C. Explain how the hardship results from physical nature of the property, such as its size, shape, or
topography, which is different from that of neighboring property.
See Attached Narrative
D. Explain whether the hardship was caused by the applicant knowingly or unknowingly violating the
applicable Buffer Rule.
See Attached Narrative
E. Did the applicant purchase the property after the effective date of the applicable Buffer Rule and then
request a variance?
See Attached Narrative
F. Explain how the hardship is rare or unique to the applicant's property, rather than the result of
conditions that are widespread.
See Attached Narrative
S. Applicant's Certification
Signature: " &—,
a r1 d y Ali r b er, v. P. % I , 0. lel a u J 3 Pu rc-h .
Date: 9
Guilford County
Preliminary Stream Buffer
Variance Application
Page 6 of 6

4A. Explain how complying with the provisions of the applicable rule would prevent you
from securing a reasonable return from or make reasonable use of your property. Merely
proving that the variance would permit a greater profit from the property shall not be
considered adequate justification for a variance. The Division will consider whether the
variance is the minimum possible deviation from the terms of the applicable Buffer Rule that
shall make reasonable use of the property possible.
Food warehousing and distribution facilities and systems must be well-designed and well-
managed to ensure food safety. Grocery distribution sites area designed to assure the most
efficient use of space and resources while maintaining a high level of associate safety. A
typical grocery distribution center has significant space requirements to house the
refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, tractor
trailer and associate parking, and ancillary support facilities (i.e fleet maintenance, fleet
fueling, dispatch and site security). These components must be contiguous in order to
function and adjusting the layout on the site would require separation of these components
and would not be suitable for proposed project.
Safety on these sites starts with the separation of associates from forklift and tractor trailer
traffic. This design concept begins with the associate parking areas being separate from all
tractor trailer movement. Associates are required to use the dedicated entrance for
personally owned vehicles and park in the secured parking area. From the secured parking
area, associates enter the distribution center complex and make their way along elevated
walkways to the center core support areas of the warehouses. Associates that work i n our
dispatch office return center, and fleet maintenance garage are provided a separate entrance
and secured parking area. This continues the design concept of separation of associates and
personally owned vehicles from tractor trailer and forklift traffic.
The proposed facility components include a 1.1 million square feet (sq.ft) refrigerated
warehouse, 1.3 million sq.ft. dry warehouse, return center, 120,000 sq.ft. food manufacturing
facility, parking and staging areas for tractor trailers, parking for associates, and ancillary
support buildings (i.e fleet maintenance, fleet fueling, dispatch and site security). The
proposed project is compliant with the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules in all but one area of the
Site. Based on the table of allowable uses included in Section 7 of the Guilford County Unified
Development Ordinance, proposed impacts to the buffers of stream S1, as shown on the
attached figure, are prohibited. Impacts to S1 and its riparian buffer will result from the
proposed parking lots, manufacturing expansion facility and loading docks proposed in the
western portion of the development. As stated above, the proposed design allows for
separate parking for the associates working in the refrigerated warehouse from the loading
docks and tractor trailer parking. This lot also allows for a controlled access to the
refrigerated warehouse in order to protect the products housed inside. In order to provide
adequate room for the tractor trailer trucks to load, unload, and turn around 60-80 feet of
pavement is required adjacent to each loading dock area. Therefore, impacts to S1 and its
riparian buffer are unavoidable based on the minimum requirements for the proposed
operations of the facility.
Several design iterations of the proposed project were analyzed in order to examine
alternative layouts that avoid and/or minimize impacts to environmentally sensitive area to
the maximum extent practicable while meeting the development needs of the Client. The
proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 2.5 million square
feet development and allows for separate entrances and parking for both tractor trailer and
personal vehicles, a critical site criterion for the proposed development.
4B. Explain how the hardship results from application of the Buffer Rule to the property
rather from other factors such as deed restrictions or other hardships (e.g. zoning setbacks,
floodplains, etc).
The proposed Project is compliant with all other federal, state and local regulations. No other
site constraints such as deed restrictions, zoning setbacks, floodplains, etc. impact the
proposed site plan. The facility components must be contiguous in order to function and
adjusting the layout to avoid all riparian buffers on the site would require separation of these
components and would not be suitable for proposed project. Therefore, the proposed
hardship is a direct result of the application of the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules to the property.
4C. Explain how the hardship results from physical nature of the property, such as its size,
shape or topography, which is different from that of neighboring property.
Additional off-site properties were reviewed for the proposed Project, but similar site
limitations were identified at all other locations. Furthermore, numerous on-site layout
variations were considered for the proposed alternative. The selected alternative meets the
purpose and need for the Project and results in the least overall environmental impacts. The
project Site is bound by second order, perennial streams along the western and eastern
boundary. The proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct the proposed
distribution center along the existing ridgelines which will serve to avoid impacts to the
second order streams and associated riparian buffers. Shifting the facility to avoid this
particular impact would also be an unnecessary hardship as it would result in additional
impacts to streams, buffers and wetlands in other parts of the Site. As stated above, the
facility components must be contiguous in order to function and adjusting the layout to avoid
all riparian buffers on the site would require separation of these components and would not
be suitable for proposed project. The size and configuration of the parking areas,
manufacturing expansion area and loading docks are specific to the intended use. For
example, tractor trailers require approximately 60-80 feet of paved space to effectively turn
around after they are loaded and unloaded. Adhering to the required specifications of the
layout for the Project are critical for the facility’s success.
4D. Explain whether the hardship was caused by the applicant knowingly or unknowingly
violating the applicable Buffer Rule.
Due to the existing conditions of the preferred site location and the sizing and configuration
requirements of the proposed distribution center, buffer impacts resulting from the
proposed grading and fill required for the associates parking, tractor trailer parking and
manufacturing expansion facility are unavoidable. The applicant is aware that a portion of
the proposed activity is only applicable under the approval of a Major Variance. Multiple
design variations were analyzed to potentially avoid or reduce impacts to environmentally
sensitive areas. Design variations considered include utilizing a 2:1 slope verses a 3:1 slope
and/or the installation of retaining walls to reduce impacts. A geotechnical investigation for
the property concluded that the soils would not be able to structurally withstand steeper
slopes, especially given the heavy level of traffic that the internal roads would be supporting.
Furthermore, it was concluded that retaining walls would require the relocation of power
and communication lines. Given the importance of these lines, the utility companies will not
allow them to be placed behind walls or within a geogrid system.
4E. Did the applicant purchase the property after the effective date of the applicable Buffer
Rule and then request a variance?
Yes, the purchase of the property was completed after the effective date of the Buffer Rule.
The applicant is aware that a portion of the proposed activity is only applicable under a Major
Variance. However, numerous design variations were reviewed in order to avoid impacts to
environmentally sensitive areas. The proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct
the proposed distribution center along the existing ridgelines which will serve to avoid
impacts to the second order streams and associated riparian buffers. Shifting the facility to
avoid this particular impact would also be an unnecessary hardship as it would result in
additional impacts to streams, buffers and wetlands in other parts of the Site.
4F. Explain how the hardship is rare or unique to the applicant’s property, rather than the
result of conditions that are widespread?
The preferred alternative meets the minimum site requirements for the distribution center
and was determined to be the most practicable long-term solution to the distribution issues.
In selecting a suitable option, the applicant applies criteria it has developed based on over
75 years of grocery distribution experience. Efficiency of design begins with the selection of
the geographical area for the campus.
Current growth projections include an average of 17 stores per year added outside of Florida
through 2028, at total of 584 stores. The proposed Greensboro facility relieves capacity
constraints existing refrigerated facilities, reduces transportation costs by $23 million, and
meets the preferred site requirements since it is a centralized location where there will be
more store growth, presence of a solid interstate system, and significant government
incentives. This option also enables Publix to provide the expected level of service, quality
and lead times throughout the network and allows for delivery using Publix’s fleet. Finally,
the proposed Greensboro facility provides long-term capacity to support future growth,
provides support to the existing networks during unexpected events as well as supports 144
stores in 2002 and 196 stores in 2028 based on current projections.
Efficiency of operations and minimization of operating costs are crucial to company viability
and success. Inefficiencies in site selection, layout or design would have long lasting negative
effects. A typical grocery distribution center has significant space requirements to house the
refrigerated warehouse, dry warehouse, return center, food manufacturing facility, tractor
trailer and associate parking, and ancillary support facilities (i.e. fleet maintenance, fleet
fueling, dispatch and site security). These components must be contiguous in order to
function.
The proposed project is compliant with the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules in all but one area of
the Site. As stated above, numerous design variations were reviewed in order to avoid
impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. The proposed layout provides sufficient area to
construct the proposed distribution center along the existing ridgelines which will serve to
avoid impacts to the second order streams and associated riparian buffers. Shifting the
facility to avoid this particular impact would also be an unnecessary hardship as it would
result in additional impacts to streams, buffers and wetlands in other parts of the Site.
Therefore, this hardship is unique to the applicant’s property based on the size and
configuration requirements of the Project.

Feature
Buffer Impact Number
- Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Reason for
Impact
Buffer
Mitigation
Required
Zone 1 Impact
(sq ft)
Zone 2 Impact
(sq ft)
J B1-Z1 (P)Grading/Fill No 2784
J B1-Z2 (P)Grading/Fill No 0 1595
K B2-Z1 (P)Grading/Fill No 717 0
J B2-Z2 (P)Grading/Fill No 0 2523
K B3-Z1 (P)Grading/Fill Yes 54019 0
K B3-Z2 (P)Grading/Fill Yes 39616
I B4-Z2 (P)Grading/Fill No 843
K B5-Z2 (P)Grading/Fill No 3421
105518
Table 3B. Proposed Impacts to Riparian Buffer
Total Buffer Impacts
Feature
Buffer
Number Zone
Total
Impact
(sq ft) Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
(sq ft)
J B1-Z1 Zone 1 2784 0 0
J B1-Z2 Zone 2 1595 0 0
K B2-Z1 Zone 1 717 0 0
J B2-Z2 Zone 2 2523 0 0
K B3-Z1 Zone 1 54019 3 162057
K B3-Z2 Zone 2 39616 1.5 59424
I B4-Z2 Zone 2 843 0 0
K B5-Z2 Zone 2 3421 0 0
Total Buffer
Mitigation
Required (sq.ft):221481
Table 3C. Buffer Mitigation Table

APPENDIX A
FIGURES

U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):DATE(S):WATERSHED(S):HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:PROJECT STUD Y LIMIT S:LATITUDE:LON GIT UDE:
PUBLIX DIS TRIBUTION CENTERGUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP
42407
36.079016-79.663402
342.5 ACRES MCLEANSVILLE2016
03030002HAW (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
These plans and associated docum ents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GRO UP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
Path: R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-VIC.mxd
5
0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000Feet
Site limits are approximate.Topographic imagery from USGS.
Site Limits
^_
03010102
03010103 03010104
03040101
03020101
03020201
03030002
0303000303040103
0303000403040104
03030006
Legend
^_Site Marker
Haw (Cape Fear River Basin)
Hydrologic Unit Code (03030002)
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
SHEET NUMBERSCALE
1
DATE 11/29/2018
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
PROJECT NAME
A. MEHFOUD
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER
FIGURE 2:HYDROLOGICUNIT CODE MAP
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION
These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
PROJECT NUMBER42407PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTERGUILFORD COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE03 6
Miles
R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-HUC.mxd
NOTES:Site marker is approximate.HUC from USGS.Topographic basemap fromEsri Online.
H:1 " = 3 Miles
Sm a t h e r s LnMyrna RdBirchCreekRdCarlann Valley RdSun Lake DrHartsfieldForestDrL o o kout PlLou DrSmathers Ln
Debanne Rd
Burlington Rd
Hooper RdHooper Rd RustyLnVerna Rd
L
o
uDrEastcrest RdSprucetree DrPaisley Farm Rd Sue DrEnC
EnC
EnC
EnC
EnC
WkE
EnC
EnC
EnC
EnBApB
ApB
EnB
EnB
EnB
EnB
EnB
EnB
EnC
EnC
EnC
EnC
EnB
ChA
VaB
EnB
EnB
VaB W
WwC
W
EnB
EnB
W
EnD
ChA
WkD
WkE
EnC
EnCEnC
EnC
W
WkE
MhB2
EnCWwC
EnD
EnB
WkE
W
WkD
EnC
EnC
EnBEnB
EnB
WkE
EoC2
W
ApB
MhB2 W
WkE
CcB
CcB EnB
CrB
Legend
Project Study Limits - 342.5 Acres
National Hydrography Dataset
National Wetlands Inventory
Zone A: 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Hydric Soil Classification
Hydric
Partially Hydric
Non Hydric
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
SHEET NUMBERSCALE1
DATE 11/29/2018
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
PROJECT NAME
A. MEHFOUD
PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTER
1 " = 250 'H:
FIGURE 3:ENVIRONMENTALINVENTORY MAP
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION
These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
PROJECT NUMBER42407PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTERGUILFORD COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0250 500
SCALE (FEET)
R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-EIM.mxd
NOTES:Project Limits areapproximate.NWI from US Fish andWildlife Service.Soils data from SSURGO.National HydrographyDataset from USGS.Aerial imagery from VGIN.
Ma puni t Symbol Ma punit Na meApBAppling s andy loam, 2 t o 6 perc ent s lopesApCAppling s andy loam, 6 to 10 perc ent s lopesCcBCecil s andy loam, 2 t o 6 perc ent s lopesChAChewacla loam, 0 to 2 perc ent s lopes, frequently floodedCrBCoronaca c lay loam, 2 to 6 perc ent s lopesEnBEnon fine s andy loam, 2 to 6 perc ent s lopesEnCEnon fine s andy loam, 6 t o 10 percent s lopesEnDEnon fine s andy loam, 10 to 15 perc ent s lopesEoC2Enon c lay loam, 6 t o 10 perc ent s lopes , moderately erodedMhB2Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 2 to 6 perc ent s lopes , moderat ely erodedVaBVance s andy loam, 2 to 6 perc ent s lopesWWaterWkDWilkes-Poindext er-W y not t c omplex , 10 to 15 percent s lopesWkEWilkes-Poindext er-W y not t c omplex , 15 to 45 percent s lopesWwCWynott-W ilkes-P oindex ter c omplex , 2 t o 10 perc ent s lopes
Gui lford County S oil s
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):DATE(S):WATERSHED(S):HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:PROJECT STUD Y LIMIT S:LATITUDE:LON GIT UDE:
PUBLIX DIS TRIBUTION CENTERGUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFIGURE 4: NR CS SOIL SURVEY MAP
42407
36.079016-79.663402
342.5 ACRES MCLEANSVILLE2016
03030002HAW (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
These plans and associated docum ents are the exclusive property of TIM MONS GRO UP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
Path: R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42407-NRCS.mxd
5
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000Feet Site limits are approximate.Soils data from NRCS w eb soil survey.
Le gend
Project Study Limits - 342.5 Acres

APPENDIX B
STREAM DETERMINATION

March 14, 2018

Attn: Steven Ball
Soil and Environmental Consultants PA
8412 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615

Re: Birch Creek Road Site
McLeansville, NC
PINs: 8804299638, 8805302214, 8805305168, 8804493712, 8804388471, 8804696116,
8804778968

Dear Mr. Ball,

This letter serves as confirmation of the stream determination performed by Sue Homewood from
NCDEQ on February 1st, 2018 for the referenced property. Guilford County is the local delegated
authority for enforcing the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules. Please see the Guilford County Development
Ordinance Article 7-1.9.

The feature(s) listed above have been located on the Soil Survey of Guilford County, North Carolina
and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic Map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is
checked “Not Subject” has been determined not to be a stream or qualifying feature, or is not
present on the property. Features that are checked “Subject” have been located on the property and
possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be other streams located on your
property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be considered
Feature Subject Not Subject Start Stop Soil Survey USGS
Topo
A X Throughout
the property X X
B X Off Site Confluence
with J X X
C X Off Site Confluence
with A X
J X Throughout
the property X X
K X Flag S14 Confluence
with J X X
I X Flag S02 Confluence
with A X
Pond 1 X X
Pond 2 X X X
GUILFORD COUNTY
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 3427
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Phone: [phone]
http://www.myguilford.com/
Page 2 of 2
jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water
Quality.
The Jordan Lake Stream Buffet Rules require a 50 foot wide riparian buffer directly adjacent to
surface waters within the Jordan lake watershed, this includes intermittent streams, perennial
streams, lakes, reservoirs, and ponds. The 50 foot buffer consists of two zones. Zone 1 begins at the
top of the bank for streams, and at the normal water level for ponds, lakes, and reservoirs, and
extends landward a distance of 30 feet. Zone 1 must remain undisturbed vegetation, except for the
uses provided in Table 7-1-2 of the Guilford County Development Ordinance. Zone 2 begins at the
outer edge of Zone 1 and extends landward 20 feet. Zone 2 can consist of managed vegetation as
long as the health of the vegetation in Zone 1 is not compromised. Please see Table 7-1-2 in the
Guilford County Development Ordinance for potential uses of Zone 2. Stream Buffer Width
Requirements according to the Guilford County Development Ordinance 7-1.9.(A)5)a-d
This determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by Guilford County may request a determination by
NCDEQ. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the
date the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A
request for a determination by NCDEQ shall be referred to: (Win ion Salem Rgional Offen; 450 Wert
Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300; Winston-Salem, NC 27105)
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal
within sixty (60) days. The owner/future owners should notify the Watershed
Protection/Stormwater Management Section (including any other Local, State, and Federal
Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property
(stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Pemut for the proposed activity. Any
inquiries should be directed to the Division of Water Quality (central office) at [phone], and
the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at [phone].
If you have any questions, please call Teresa Andrews at: [phone].
Sincerely,
Teresa ndrews
Stonnwater Program Administrator
Attachments: S&EC Comprehensive Site Map
S&EC USGS Topographic Map 1:24,000
S&EC Soil Survey Map
CC: Frank Park, Watershed Protection/Stormwater Management

Burlington Rd (Hwy 70)Birch Creek Rd!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
!?A
B
H
C
D
E
F
G
I
S08 Start Ch
S09 Stop Ch
256 TT Ch
278 TT Ch
S10 Start Ch267 TT Ch
266 TT Ch
309 TT 300
310 TT 345
279 TT Ch
288 TT Ch
145 cl 2'
147 cl 2' TT Ch
173 & 174 TT Ch
162 & 163 TT Ch
148 TT Ch
184 TT Ch
215 TT Ch
208 TT Ch
202 to 207 TT Ch
185 TT Ch
189 TT Ch
190 TT Ch
196 TT Ch
197 TT Ch
199 TT Ch
200 to 201 TT Ch
216 TT Ch
219 TT Ch
255 cl TT Ch
S06 Start Ch
247 cl252 cl
246 cl stop
245 cl TT 243244 TT 238
237 TT 230 cl
230 cl TT 231
223 cl 2'
S07 Start Ch
220 cl
222 cl TT S07
144 cl stop
142 cl TT S05 144 cl TT S04
130 cl 2'
118 cl 4'
121 TT S03
S03
117 TT Ch
110 & 111 TT PL
121 TT S03
102 TT Ch
17 TT Ch
60
12 TT Ch
01 TT Ch
16 TT Ch
13 TT Ch
S02 Start CH
SB50 Start LW
Start LW flag
These flags missing; will need to be reflagged
above 118; LW needs to be flagged
Determined to be LW; not stream
this section determined to be LW; previously stream
Stream continues; no stop point
Start Perennial point at confluence
SB 14 Start LW CL 3'
This area need to be flagged
This area will be reflagged; wetlands
will be broader than linear features
break; ok
!?
!?
!?
!?
J K
O
M
L
425 TT 419
414 cl 4'
418 cl 4' TT Ch
413 cl 4' TT Ch
409 TT Ch
404 TT Ch
400 TT Ch
403 TT Ch
S14 Start Ch
S15 Start Ch
S13 Start Ch
365 TT S12
S12 Start Ch
378 TT S12
369 cl
373 cl
368 & 374 365 cl TT Ch
361 cl
354 & 355 TT Ch
360 TT 350
Centerline widened in one area
Linear wetland; not stream
SB12 tt 412CL
SB 06 tt 412 CL
SB03-SB05 CL tt CH
SB01 CL - SB02 CL
Channel stops at culvert
Not JD
Not JD
Wetland; needs to be flagged
Wetland; needs to be flagged
upper extent now linear wetland
S01 Start Ch01-03 tt CH
S02 Stop Ch/Start LW
04 tt Pond
22 tt Pond
SB14-SB18
SB19-Sb21
NCCGIA
Legend
Perennial Channel
Intermittent Channel
Jurisdictional Linear Wetland
Potential Guilford Co. Buffers
Jurisdictional Wetland
Pond
Birch Creek Road Site Boundaries
Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US
Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only

S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork,
and any other additional information. Approximations were mapped
using
topographic maps, air photos and ground truthing. If the site is going
to be disturbed, S&EC’s detailed delineation should be approved and
permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of
this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by
S&EC, they should retain a NC Registered Professional Land Surveyor to
locate S&EC’s flagging.
NC OneMap
Guilford County GIS
Project No.
13038.W1
Project Mgr.:
SB
Scale:
1" = 200'
2/5/18
0 200 400 600
1" = 200'μ Figure 3 - Wetland Sketch Map
Post USACE and DWR site visit
Birch Creek Rd Site
Guilford County, NC

APPENDIX C
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION

N
N
N
Do
O
N
O
C
O
4)
O
.1
H
g
a
U)
fA
x
x
N
CP
Iq
C)
O
03
G
APPROVED BY THE PLANN/NG DEPARTMEMOFGUILFORO CIX/MY, NORTH
CAROL INA ON 7)E IBJ �L DAY OF�•�.201B PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE OF THE GUILFORD Cq/MYDEVELOPMEMORDINANCE.
ag
NG DIRECTOR
�LS PLAT DOES NOTREQUIRED CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BYTNE D/V/SKN/OF
HIGHWAYS//A,// RPA's40VV�Iq/ED /N N.C. G. S. 136102.6, SUBSECTION (G).
SIGNED a/DATE I If •(
PLANNING DIRECTOR
OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION CERTIFICATION
WE ME UNDERSIGNED HEREBYACANOWLEDGE THAT WEARE THE OWNERS
OF THE PROPERTY SHOWNAND DESCRIBED HEREON AND THAT WE HEREBY
ADOPT THIS PLAT AND ALLOTMENT TO BEA FREE ACT AND HEREBY
DEOICATF(S) 7O PUBLIC USERS STREETS, PLAYGROUNDS PARKS. DRAINAGFWAYS
AND OPEN SPACEAND EASEMENTS FOREVER ALL AREAS SO
SHOWN OR INDICATED ON SAID PLAT AND AUTHOR/2E THE COUNTY OF GUILFORD
TO RECORD THIS PLAT IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF GUILFORD
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
/ I
'EAsroso HOLDINGS, uc I r 117wsn•erl
12o/90'R/WBY0EEr�( ( I © I O
J
0 0
K
®
© 9i
N86°152278 /
751.18'
STATE OF NORT H CAROL INA
COUMYOF
I, PaJ\ L.OVJr<. REV/EW OFFICER OF GUILFORD COUNTY, CERTIFY
THAT THE MAP OR PLAT TO WHOM THIS CERT/FICA TON /S AFFIXED MEETS ALL
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING.
REVIEW OFFCER
DATE IO- I9 - 1:
SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION
CURVE TABLE
®3-�-
3
O
CENTER
R,
DELTA
CHDROB54RMD
CAVW
�b
h
� �
J
0 0
K
®
© 9i
N86°152278 /
751.18'
STATE OF NORT H CAROL INA
COUMYOF
I, PaJ\ L.OVJr<. REV/EW OFFICER OF GUILFORD COUNTY, CERTIFY
THAT THE MAP OR PLAT TO WHOM THIS CERT/FICA TON /S AFFIXED MEETS ALL
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING.
REVIEW OFFCER
DATE IO- I9 - 1:
SURVEYOR CERTIFICATION
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENBTN
TAN/FENT
DELTA
CHDROB54RMD
CAVW
CS
205000'
136.7
8903'
35125"
SM -5336'E
137.97"
C9
7994.85'
150.10'
7509'
4'1910'
S89V452E
150.06'
C10
1984.86'
18819'
6314'
414730'
Nfi67140E
16614'
DEED 0
7
© N3°40'57F
PARCEL# 0119080
EAST GSO HOLDINGS, LLC
DBj D11e,PG 18)1
0CENTER
b �
• I
PAT
01161107
E4STGSO HOLDM/OS. LLC
LTB otb.PGvw1
\ � a, I
PARCEL#- 01191/3
EASTGSO HOLDINGS, LLC
DB 156, PGA%31
0
AS SURVEYS OFAMOTHER CATEGORY SUCHAS A RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS. A
TE
COURT ORDERED SURVEY OR OTNE ^EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION
fKeVTuv,OA
1. MICHAEL S MILER, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MYSUPERVISION FROMM
ACTUAL SURVEYM40E UNDER MY SUPERVISION DEED DESCRIP770N RECORDED IN BOOK 31943, PAGE
512AND MAP BOOK 51 PAGE 169, THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLYINDICATED AS
DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN BOOK PAGE (AS SHOWN); THAT THE RA TIO OF PRECISION AS
CALCULATED IS 1: 10.000•: THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G. S. 47-30 AS
AMENDED.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LCENSE NUMBERAND SEAL THIS 7 1 DAYOF a'q. A.D,
AAAAp11111111/,,,'
tieED, Ed
r
` SEAL
:r L-3677 QY6
SUR
0
BK: P198 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIE111III
LINE
BEARING
L6467N
L1
S2.34'15'W
40.63'
Ill
II11111111
9.98'
PG: 85-86
20IMS5255
FFIoFoIn
L4
10-19-2018
GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
09:37:49 AM
JEFF L. THIGPEN
BY DEBORAH CITTY
REGISTER OF DEEDS
OFITI OF
4255'
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
L6467N
L1
S2.34'15'W
40.63'
L1
A034'15'E
9.98'
L3
AW5r44E
12064'
L4
S2wwlIF
11397'
L5
N88-J272'E
33.71'
LB
S483426E
4255'
RESIDUAL AREA
PARCEL#0117411
REBECCA LOWDERMILK
DB 2333. PG 478
176,439SFOR4.OSOAC
RAV 30' FROM
CENTER
e
PARCEL# 0117421
EAST GSOHOLDINGS LLC
PAVED PATH (TTP)
PARCEL# 0117426
EASTGSOFOLDINGG-S.. LLC
PG J
N88Y4TNYY 1390
2B016'(TO7AL)
S2 '7 z51�I
199.99'
L)
/ ® 514.4r
1
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS USED TO
PERFORM OPS SURVEY'
(I)CLASSOFSURVEY.' "CL4SSA-
(2) POSITIONAL ACCURACY 0.04-
(3) TYPE OF GPS FIELD PROCEWRE NCVRS
(4) DATE OF SURVEY' OIQ6018
(5)DATUM/EPOCH NAD83(2011)-EPOCH2Of0.00
(6) PUBLISHEDIF/XED-CONTROL USE I NCVRS
(7) GEOID MODEL: 2012 /CONVSI
(8) COMBINED GRID FACTORS): 0.99%4979
(9) UNITS: 1/S SURVEYFEET
w FEEU2 W
ZNjTO ARAp S87°3519'E
309r
N2'54111
108.85'
14
BURL/NGrCWD
SITE
SCALE 1=2000'
®
REFERENCES:
Adoinin9
®
De 2153, PC 286
Key IT PARCEL4
2
1 0119087 Fre, ur $168-129 139-91
AG
DB 2958. PG 595
2
0119092
T,, I, Cerw Church of God
R7215-1959
13391
AG
F
PARCEL# 0117416 AND
0117473
EASTGSOHOLDIMCS,LI
DBS(-, PGJUj
DQ SOy(. Pe f$jl
429
COMBINED PARCEL CEL
5566 BURLINGTON ROAD
74.153710 SF
fJR 338.6MACRE536
DB fi2D5, PG 196
la "
-4
Pest PG94
0119691 pl, zrol 7 349
LI
01 15XI!*1 11 2"rminn
T 5-07
011741- R 73711
GO -M
8 01114^. ,, 3a Gst Church Inc O/MCLearmvee 5726196
AG
9 O11Jen ,a a CNet Inc 2 15 21-15
R11
0117411 Net Inc 15 11-15
R
1 011741 =nn & Sara L Szoslak R7928,2&V 21-15
RS40
13 011741 m & Sero L Szoslak 879262602 21-15
RS40
14 011746, 1 R7Y28-2S02 21-15
RS40
1 471 n L S R792 -26(12 1-7
16 1174 -. n & Sara L Szosmk R'.928-2602 2145
RS40
17 01174 ^ A Sam L Szo nak 87928-2602 2145
RS40
18 01174Ir1' R7661-3026 2059
RS40
19 011741' R7741-1802 2059
RS40
20 01174 2242-305 2059
.JMr R714-5148 20-59
RS40
J & Cnansr H M whe0 R6610-2339 2059
RS40
A
l?"—RAOnr.CchMn 1 59
RS -40
J;)7497 Dan L men h nn R
R
o+n5036- I�
RS40
- /rout L,,M Tnrsf Les Cailbul Trrshw Rr'^?-IImp 21"
RS -40
28 ',Rd Lin Tnrst Les Cailbul Trustee R.- -'119 20-60
8-40
1L1• Gera A ,119
RS-401AG
o:: :.:1_ _errlanL'ym Trosf Tmsree 68
AG
f 0117570 fat n, bymo Trus( C j9a Lama, Tcs- ii2
RS40
32 0117567 Wafter Lee Jr& Deborah S Chamber 'IJ3 _
RS40
33 0/175M Julian T&Lir Ma W Parham _r...::�552
RS40
31 0111392 WWinktn R%204-2019
AG
33 0117364 Della l WilM1 R72 4703
1787535
AG
0117374 L,• ., R 14-'-
BIRCH CREEK ROAD
_ AREA ABANDONED
EAST GSO HOLDINGS, LLC
OBr�G�c/ vy
37
0117370
RMAes Estn1,
30467e
AG
011771 R Esta Hlddna.. 610527
A
39 0117 CPa LwI Tmn. 5462-1,105
AG
40 117417 MarMa Baleman R7 1677
A
42 0117425 Ngnng S 6183-1917
45 /7
47 0119106 Family TNsf of RoOw Warne Smith R7759-682
&195-292
AG
011 114 1 Andrea G,,' '' R7195-2735
AG
0119107 1 T n H S - t! Ir In i. RMOL1435
AG
so 0'!9'^'I R6596-2171
1 6054-2363 17 94
53 1 R7719-776 17-94
RSAV
RS -40
1794
58 01194z
59 011945, R7 1-959 7-94
R • q IN':I 1:I x2579-733 1794
61 011W14
73820'
REFERENCES:
®
De 2153, PC 286
DB 2333, PG 478
OB 23M PG 414
DB 2958. PG 595
DS 3572, PG 4
OB 3576 PG 1230
08 3697 PG 550
DB fi2D5, PG 196
DB 6226. PG 1416
Pest PG94
SCALE 1"= 300'
0 300' 600'
SS
RECOMBINATION PLAT
FOR
PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC.
338.688 ACRES
CASE # 18-08-GCPL-05162
MCLEANSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER: EAST GSO HOLDINGS, LLC
1 DATE: Oct 16. 2018 1 SCALE: 1"= 300' 1
SHEET OF
0
z
0
E
f
C
S
K

NOTES:
1. AREAS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD.
2 PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT TO ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY EASEMENTS
AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD
3. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ON SURVEY ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. RIGHTS-OF-WAY INFORMATION IS BASED ON DEEDS AND MAPS OF RECORD.
5. BASIS OF BEARING SHOWN HEREON IS NC GRID NAD83 (2011)
6. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS BASED IN PART, ON DEEDS AND MAPS OF RECORD,
AND IN PART. BY AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY BY THIS FIRM
7 NO NGS MONUMENT LOCA TED WITHIN MIX FFEET OF THE SUBJECT TRACT.
8. SOME OF THE EXISTING SITE PLANIMETRIC FEA TURES ARE FROMAN AERIAL
SURVEY PERFORMED BY TIMMONS GROUP AND TUCK MAPPING SCALE OF
PHOTOGRAPHY. 115400(GSO 6CM). DA TE OF PHOTOGRAPHY 141-1B. GROUND
CONTROL PROVIDED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
9. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE MONUMENTS FOUND OR SET AT THE CORNERS OF
THE PROJECT TRACTS ARE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY
III THE PUT CORRECTLYSHOWS THE SURVEYOF 14,753,140 SF -338.688 ACRES OF
THE PROJECT TRACTS GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
11. PROPERTYZONING IS LI BASED ONAPRIL 12, 2018 LETTER FROM GUILFORD
COUNTYPLANN/NG BOARD REGARDING REZONING CASE0i8-03C'CPL-01499
12. THE PURPOSE OFTHIS PUT IS TO COMB/NEA PORTIONOFTAX PARCEL 117421
AND TAX PARCELS 119061. 117426, 11110110, 117441, 119113. 117416 AND 117423ARD
AND THEABANDONED PORTION OFBIRCH CREEK ROAD RIGHTOF WAY.
13. OWNER: EASTGSO HOLDINGS. LLC. 201 N ELMSTREFT ffi 1. GREENSBORO, NC,
27401. [phone].
14. BELCH CREEK ROAD ABANDONMENT -ADOPTED RESOLUTION CLOSINGAND
REMOVING FROMDED/CATION,ROAD CLOSING CASE NUMBER 18-08-GCPL-05162
HEARD SEPTEMBER 4TH MIA DB 8093, PO, 1797,
REFERENCES
DB 2153, PG 286
DB 2333. PG 478
DB 2333 PG 484
082956 PG 595
OB 3572, PG 4
DB 3576 PG 1230
OR 3697 PG 550
OB 6205 PG 896
OB 6126 PG 1416
PB 92, PG 94
LEGEND
N6 '14W
28016'(TO7AL)
Qo /PF -IRON PIPE FOUND
O ti
,
O IRF- IRON ROD FOUND
CLASS OFSURVEY' 'CUSS A'
�JQ?O
® IRS - IRON ROO SET
S2°23'46'W 251
CP- COMPUTED EASEMENTPGNT
199.99'
ED CMF- CONCRETE MONUMENT
- SEAL : 2
Q MNF- MAO NAIL FOUND
)
/Q-/ /,gIr- L-3677 �t
• CP - COMPUTED POINT
°
RCP- REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
(®
514.4T
CMP - CORRUGATED PIPE
q7
LASTI
CPP -CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE
(6) PUBLISHEDiF'IXED-CONTROL USE NCVRS
•. ,SURD.••
DIP- DUCTILE IRON PIPE
– _
HOPE - HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE
FES - FLARED END SECTION
R/W-RIGHT-OF-WRY
PIL -PROPERTY LINE
C/L -CENTERLINE
NTS - NOT TO SCALE
DB -DEED BOOK
PS -PLAT BOOK
PG -PAGE
SF-SOUAREFEET
-SITEADLMESS
DEED LINE
LINE NOTSURVEYED
FENCELINE —X---%
OVERHEAD POWER LINE — — — GHp— — —
PA/NTED GAS LINE — — G— —
PA/NTED TELEPHONE LINE — — — UGT— —
PA/NTEDWATERLINE — —W— —
PAINTED FIBER OPTIC LINE -- 11F0
© S67°35'4s'E
IvryPupg.27"V0IUS.�
LOTIH
COMBINED PARCEL
5566 BURLINGTON ROAD
14,753,240 SF
OR 336666 ACRES
30.97'
NZ'S4'41'f
i10685
430.14' 138
m
Ui/IWAY
PG. 657
Holm
CENTER
rs]
0
`
O "
THE FOLLOW/NG INFORMATION WAS USED TO
PERFORM GPS SURVEY:
O ti
V"1
CLASS OFSURVEY' 'CUSS A'
�JQ?O
(1)
9
�
2
(2) POSITIONAL ACCURACY: 0.04'
- SEAL : 2
2
(3) TYPE OF GPS FIELD PROCEDURE NCVRS
/Q-/ /,gIr- L-3677 �t
(4) DATEOF SURVEY' 01416'X/18
N4D53(M11)-EPOCH2Of0.
Y O
(5)DATUMEPOCN
q7
(6) PUBLISHEDiF'IXED-CONTROL USE NCVRS
•. ,SURD.••
(7) GEOID MODEL ' 2012 (COMES )
�i y4,C-Nt '0
5.
41I2jIHAfWt```
(8)COOMBIN D RAD FA TOR((S): 0.99984979
P
8
BURL/AG7pA,,,,
SCALE 1=20017
E
SITE
S3.36V7'W
44(TOTAL)
S89'45TM"E
175.42'
N �
O \
t \
m
N88'1450W56062' N66'4352W 70714'
RECOMBINATION PLAT
RK: P 198 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FOR
PG: 85-86 PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.
Fa° M 2018065255 vc=7'r sn�s
10-19-2018 GUILFORD COUNTY, NC 338.688 ACRES
09:37:49 AM JEFF L TNIGPEN
B. DEBT" 'rJv REG1$iM °`°M°� CASE #18-08-GCPL-05162
By X°a
MCLEANSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER: EAST GSO HOLDINGS, LLC
SCALE 1"= 300'
0 300' 600'
I JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP I Guilford County
I SHEET2 OF 2 1 J.N.:410I0
z
0
f
f

APPENDIX D
SITE PLAN

XX
N85°56'44"W 2484.7
7
'

(
T
O
T
A
L
)
N88°14'50"W 560.62'
S
6
0
°
1
3
'
1
7
"
E

1
7
0
1
.
3
7
'
S73°
1
4
'
3
6
"
E

3
0
9
.
1
6
'108.83'N2°54'55"EN86°15'22"W 251.78'N2
8
°09
'
5
4
"W

3
3
4
.74
'
N87°19'54"W 577.78'N1°07'21"E 1006.69'N88°44'04"W 1390.12' (TOTAL)N3°40'57"E 253.69'N87°54'03"W 953.10'
450.14'
238.21'
349.39'
1447.04'
875.65'514.47'406.12'24.77'126.40'101.05'304.53'102.69'199.67'L4S2°23'46"W199.99'N88°44'14"W
280.16' (TOTAL)
251.09'29.07'BIRCH CREEK ROADBIRCH CREEK ROADSANSANDNDN
DN
DN
DN DN DNDN
DN DN
1
2
3 4 5
6
7
8 8
9
10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
40
41
42
43
44
454647
50
58
59
60
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
59
61
49
48 675675675
6956956906
7
5
6
8
0
685
690 695700695675695 695
695
700 700
6956906856806906
8
5
675655650675
650
700 690685685
690
695
JOB NO.
SHEET NO.
SCALE
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BYDATEDRAWN BY
DATEREVISION DESCRIPTIONYOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but notlimited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.Site Development Residential Infrastructure TechnologyR:\107\42407-Publix_Distribution_Center_Greensboro\DWG\Sheet\Exhibit\Preliminary Site and Grading Exhibits\_Environmental Exhibits\Environmental Impacts Exhibit.dwg | Plotted on 4/3/2019 9:06 AM | by Jacob MooreVAR-1.0 STREAM BUFFER IMPACT EXHIBITJ. MOORE
J. MOORE
J. MATEY
04/03/2019
PUBLIX - GREENSBORO DISTRIBUTION CENTERGUILFORD COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA42407
1" = 200'8642 W. Market Street Suite 136 | Greensboro, NC 27409TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.comTHIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THEGREENSBORO OFFICE0
SCALE 1"=200'
400'200'
STREAM BUFFER
(TYP, SEE DIAGRAM)
BURLINGTON RD (U
S
-
7
0
)BIRCH CREEK RDBUILDING #2
(DRY STORAGE
WAREHOUSE)
BUILDING #1
(REFRIGERATED
WAREHOUSE)
BUILDING #3
(PREPARED
FOODS)
BUILDING #5
(RETURN CENTER)
BUILDING #6
(FLEET SERVICES)
BUILDING #4
(ADMIN.)
SCM #2
SCM #3
SCM #4
BIRCH CREEK RD
TERMINUS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SUN LAKE DRLOU DRSUE DRSPRUCE TREE DRPUBLIX TRUCK
CAB PARKING
ASSOCIATE PARKING
(TRUCK DRIVERS)
OVER-THE-ROAD
TRUCK STAGING
AREA
RESTROOM
BUILDING #7
(DISPATCH)
TRAILER
STORAGE
LOADING AREA
TRAILER STORAGE
LOADING AREATRAILER STORAGE
SECURITY
CHECKPOINT #2
ASSOCIATE
PARKING
ASSOCIATE
PARKING
LOADING AREATRAILER STORAGE
SECURITY
CHECKPOINT #1
DRIVEWAY #1
(ASSOCIATES)
DRIVEWAY #2
(TRUCKS)GATEHOUSE #1 GATEHOUSE #2
DRIVEWAY #3
(AUXILIARY)
Key # PARCEL # Owner Name Db-Pg Pb-Pg Zoning
1 0119082 Fred E & Kathy M Burgin, et ux 5168-129 139-91 AG
2 0119092 Triad Worship Center Church of God R7215-1959 139-91 AG
3 0119098 Gloria Poole 3207-975 70-53AG
4 0119691 Pierre A & Carolyn E Goria 2750-749 LI
5 0119090 Mary T Weddington 4391-1160 101-8 AG
6 0119098 David T Turner & Mary T Weddington R7355-452 101-8 AG
7 0117464 NSR Company R7079-711 GO-M
8 0117452 Calvary Baptist Church Inc Of McLeansville 5726-196 AG
8A 0228392 Rebecca P Lowdermilk 2333-478 AG
9 0117465 Southern Net, Inc 3442-81521-15 RS-40
10 0117452 Morris E & Barbara G Carter 4713-515 RS-40
11 0117466 Southern Net, Inc 3442-815 21-15 RS-40
12 0117467 Morris P Allison & Sara Lyn Szostak R7928-2602 21-15 RS-40
13 0117468 Morris P Allison & Sara Lyn Szostak R7928-2602 21-15 RS-40
14 0117469 Morris P Allison & Sara Lyn Szostak R7928-260221-15 RS-40
15 0117470 Morris P Allison & Sara Lyn Szostak R7928-2602 21-15 RS-40
16 0117472 Morris P Allison & Sara Lyn Szostak R7928-260221-15 RS-40
17 0117471 Morris P Allison & Sara Lyn Szostak R7928-2602 21-15 RS-40
18 0117490 Ahmad H Hamze R7661-302620-59 RS-40
19 0117491 Gladys Barrera Flores R7741-180220-59 RS-40
20 0117492 William S Hodgin 2242-305 20-59 RS-40
21 0117493 Thomas W & Carol J Miles R7142-968 20-59 RS-40
22 0117498 Paul J & Chanisty H Mitchell R6680-2339 20-59 RS-40
23 0117495 Leroy A Harper 3850-45320-59 RS-40
24 0117496 Roger B & Donna G Gannon 5036-1364 20-59 RS-40
25 0117497 Danielle Lehman & Joshua Mann R7794-2220 20-59 RS-40
26 0117486 Roger B & Donna G Gannon 5036-1364 20-59 RS-40
27 0117481 Caillout Living Trust, Les Caillout Trustee R6897-118920-59 RS-40
28 0117482 Caillout Living Trust, Les Caillout Trustee R6897-1189 20-60 RS-40
29 0117450 Eddie Gene & Laura Newsome R7524-1019 RS-40 / AG
30 0117342 Lamarr Living Trust, C Jack Lamarr Trustee 5107-568 AG
31 0117570 Lamarr Living Trust, C Jack Lamarr Trustee 5107-56229-37 RS-40
32 0117567 Walter Lee Jr & Deborah S Chambers 4346-1803 29-37 RS-40
33 0117570 Julian T & Linda W Parham 2653-552 29-37 RS-40
34 0117382 Joseph W Willien R7204-2019 AG
35 0117364 Della I Willien R7202-1703 AG
1787-535
36 0117374 James & Reita Tuttle Living Trust R7784-1422 AG
37 0117370 Daphne R Miles, Estates 3048-78 AG
38 0117371 Dees Real Estate Holdings, LLC 6105-27 AG
39 0117433 C Paisley Gordon Living Trust 5462-1205 AG
40 0117417 Martha Bateman R7560-1677 AG
41 0117432 Bernard F Gabriel 2800-766 AG
42 0117425 Norma S Bolejack 6183-1917 AG
43 0117424 Alma Miles Isley 5735-359 AG
44 0117431 Lowdermilk Family Irrevocable Trust of 2013 R7551-979 AG
45 0117420 Bennie S Bradley R7837-2143 190-30AG
46 0117427 Daphna L & Wayne Wagoner 1553-274 AG
47 0119106 Family Trust of Roger Wayne Smith R7759-682 AG
6495-292
48 0119114 Andrea Gail Williams R7195-2735 AG
49 0119107 Tanya L H & Tommy M Jr Ingle R7800-1435 AG
50 0119118 CM & DR Clapp, LLC R6596-2171 RS-40
51 0119464 Norman Lee Bridges, Jr R7398-46 17-94RS-40
52 0119463 Moses Jr & Brenda F Ortiz 6054-2363 17-94 RS-40
53 0119462 Joshua S Neas & Sarah C Gulley R7779-776 17-94 RS-40
54 0119461 Dolly R Pope 2720-34917-94 RS-40
55 0119460 Dolly R Pope 2720-34917-94 RS-40
56 0119459 Claude V & Pamela W Harvell 3040-582 17-94 RS-40
57 0119458 Gary L & Sherree B Roberts 2991-356 17-94 RS-40
58 0119457 Deborah H Coley 4901-122217-94 RS-40
59 0119456 Brian & Patricia Kelly R7941-959 17-94 RS-40
60 0119455 Roy A Jr & Martha F Wilson 2579-733 17-94 RS-40
61 0119414 Gerald D & Hazel J Powell 3002-126 17-94 RS-40
ADJOINING PROPERTIES
48
BUFFER ZONE 2: EXEMPT OR ALLOWABLE IMPACTS
BUFFER ZONE 1: EXEMPT OR ALLOWABLE IMPACTS
BUFFER ZONE 2: PROHIBITED IMPACTS
BUFFER ZONE 1: PROHIBITED IMPACTS
BUFFER IMPACTS LEGEND
FEMA FLOODPLAIN
FEMA FLOODWAY
PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS
EXISTING 5' CONTOURS
PARCEL BOUNDARY
RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED STORM PIPE & OUTLET PROTECTION
PROPOSED LEVEL SPREADER
800
800
SITE LEGEND BIRCH CREEK RDUS-70 ROAD WIDENING
(BY NCDOT)
SCM #1
STREAM
TOP OF BANK
30' ZONE 1
BUFFER
20' ZONE 2
BUFFER
30' ZONE 1
BUFFER
20' ZONE 2
BUFFER
STREAM BUFFER DIAGRAM
8A

APPENDIX E
BUFFER IMPACT MAPS

DRAWING DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
SHEET NUMBERSCALE1
DATE 12/18/2018
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
PROJECT NAME
L. MAJOR
PU BLIX
FUTURE DRYWAREHOUSE BUILDING(TRUCK DOCK COUNT TBD)
MANUF.EXPANS.
57,000SQFT.
FUEL BAY
FUEL TANKS
FUEL DELIVERY PAD
FLEET SERVICESBUILDING
DISPATCH BUILDINGPUBLIX TRUCK TRAFFIC ONLYPUBLIX TRUCK TRAFFIC ONLYALLTRUCKSENTER
ALLTRUCKSEXIT
GUARDBUILDING #1
GUARDBUILDING #2
FUTURE 100KSF BUILDING REFRIGERATEDWAREHOUSEW/ 162 TRUCK DOCKS
REFRIGERATEDWAREHOUSEEXPANSION(216,800 SF)TRUCK DOCKCOUNT TBD
219 TRAILER SPACES
129 TRAILER SPACES
131 TRAILER SPACES
214 TRAILER SPACES
40 TRAILER SPACES54 TRAILER SPACES54 TRAILER SPACES54 TRAILER SPACES54 TRAILER SPACES54 TRAILER SPACES58 TRAILER SPACES31 TRAILER SPACES27 TRUCK &TRAILER SPACES38 TRAILER SPACES28 TRAILER SPACES12 17
33 33
2525 2525 2525 2525 2525
14 20
FUTURE PARKING(181 SPACES)
8' WI DE STREETYARD
50 ' BUIL DIN G SETBACK
8' WI DE STREETYARD
50' BUIL DIN G SETBACK
8' WI DE STREETYARD
50' BUILDIN G SETBACK
8' WIDE STREETYARD
50' BUILDING SETBACK
8' WIDE STREETYARD
50' BUILDING SETBACK
8' WIDE STREETYARD
50' BUILDING SETBACK
50' "TYPE-A" BUFFER25' BUILDING SETBACK50' "TYPE-A" BUFFER
25' BUILDING SETBACK
50' "T
Y
P
E-A" B
U
FF
E
R
25' B
UIL
DIN
G S
E
T
B
A
C
K
50' "TYPE-A" BUFFER
25' BUILDING SETBACK
50' "TYPE-A" BUFFER25' BUILDING SETBACK50' "TYPE-A" BUFFER
25' BUILDING SETBACK
50' "TYPE-A" BUFFER
25' BUILDING SETBACK
50' "TYPE-A" BUFFER
25' BUILDING SETBACK
50' "TYPE-A" BUFFER
25' BUILDING SETBACK 25' BUILDING SETBACK25' BUILDING SETBACK25' BUILDING SETBACK25' BUILDING SETBACKSTOPSTOPDO NOT ENTERSTOPSTOPSTOPEXITEXITSTOPSTOPSTOP
STOP
DO NOT ENTERDO NOT ENTERDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOL DOLDOLDOL
DOLDOL DOL DOL
DOL DOL DOL
DOL DOL DOL DOL DOLDOLDOL DOLDOL DOL DOL DOL DOL DOLDOLDOL DOL DOL DOL
DOLDOLDOL
DOL DOL
DOLD
O
L
DOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOL
D
OL
DOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOLDOL!(B1-Z1
!(B2-Z2
!(B3-Z2
!(B2-Z1
!(B3-Z1
!(B1-Z2
!(B4-Z2
!(B5-Z2
!(W9
!(W8
!(W7 !(W18!(W15
!(W6
!(W3 !(W13
!(W12
!(W11
!(W4
!(W5
!(W19
!(W14
!(W10
!(W17
!(W16!(W2
!(W1
")S1
")S5
")S3
")S4
")S2
")S6
")S7
Myrna RdL ook out Pl
Carlann Valley RdSun Lake DrSky Hill DrStoneyRun DrL
o
u
D
r
S m athers Ln Sm a t h e r s LnDebanne Rd
Burlington Rd
Barbell Cir HartsfieldForestDrHooper Rd Groves Stone DrCliffDrBirchCreekRdHooper Rd
ArborHill
P
l
Verna Rd RustyLnEastcrest RdSprucetree DrPaisley Farm Rd Sue Dr1 " = 300 'H:
PRELIMINARYJURISDICTIONALWATERS OF THEU.S. IMPACTS MAP
REVISIONS
MM/DD/YY#DESCRIPTION
These plans and associated documents are theexclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP andmay not be reproduced in whole or in part andshall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,and/or construction staking without the expresswritten consent of TIMMONS GROUP.
PROJECT NUMBER42407PUBLIX DISTRIBUTION CENTERGUILFORD COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300Richmond, VA 23225TEL [phone]www.timmons.com[
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE0300600
SCALE (FEET)
R:\805\42407-Publix Distribution Center\GIS\Wetland Impacts\42407-WTIM.mxd
1. Waters of the U.S. within theproject study limits have beenlocated using submeter, BluetoothGPS antennas by TimmonsGroup.2.Waters of the U.S. have notbeen confirmed by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers.3. Project limits are approximate.4. Topography based on USGSLiDAR.5. Cowardin StreamClassifications are based solelyon field observations. No formalStream assessment methodologywas completed to determine theseCowardin Classifications.
Legend
Project Study Lim its - 342.5 Acres
DOLDOL
DOLDOLLimits of Dis tur bance - 219.9 Acres
")X Stream Impact
!(X Wetland Impact
Stream Buffers
Zone 1 Buffer Impact
Zone 2 Buffer Impact
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Stream Impacts
Stream Top of Bank
Wetlands
Wetland Impacts
Te mpora ry Pe rmane nt (Ope n Wate r)Pe rma ne nt Temporary Pe rmane nt Temporary Pe rma ne nt Temporary Perma nent
W 1 142W2764W36,203W41,468W566,963W6 2,281W79,160W8 255W9976W10261W11519W121,282W135,896W147,167W15132W1667W1787W183,354W194,932S1 1,030S2318S3192S4283S557S6373S72,249B1-Z1 2,784B1-Z2 1,595B2-Z1 717B2-Z2 2,523B3-Z1 54,019B3-Z2 39,616B4-Z2 843B5-Z2 3,4210 sq ft 76,123 sq ft 35,786 sq ft 0 sq ft 0 sq ft 0 sq ft 105,518 sq ft0.0 a c 1.8 a c 0.8 ac 0.0 a c 0.0 a c 0.0 a c 2.4 ac
Strea m (lf)Impa ct
Impa cts Table
0 lf 4,502 lfTotal
W e tland (sq. ft)Stre am Buffers (sq. ft)Impact Conversion Impa ctImpact ID
HOLDINGS*
Riparian Buffer Credits Statement of Availability
Cape Fear 02 Jordan Lake - Haw River Subwatershed
June 10, 2019
Mark Miley
Publix Super Market, Inc.
3300 Publix Corporate Parkway, Building #3
Lakeland, FL 33802
RE: Availability of Riparian Buffer Credits for the "Publix" project
Bank Name: South Fork Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings, IV, LLC
DWR Project Number: 2016-0225v2
Permittee: Publix Super Market, Inc.
Riparian Buffer Credits Available: 4.06acres (176,811.65 sq. ft.)
Cape Fear 03030002 River Basin
Dear Mr. Miley:
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC currently has sufficient riparian Buffer credits from the South Fork Nutrient
Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank to satisfy some or all of the riparian buffer mitigation requirements
related to the above-mentioned project (including attached Pine Hill SOA). The project is located within
the service area (HUC 03030002) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. Although current
inventory is high, the letter is not a guarantee of availability as credits will be sold on a first come, first
serve basis. An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will formally reserve
both the credits and price quoted for a period of 30 days from the invoice at no cost.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the 401 Water Quality Certification
Authorization Certificate from the NC Department of Environmental Quality approving the Riparian
Buffer mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holdings IV,
LLC. We will then issue a credit transfer certificate verifying your credit purchase to the North Carolina
Division of Water Resources and to you for your records
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
205-807-0800 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

HOLDINGS*
Sincerely,
Ian M. Hazelhoff
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Land Acquisition
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ex. 120
M: [phone]
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

HOLDINGS*
Riparian Buffer Credits Statement of Availability
Cape Fear 02 Jordan Lake - Haw River Subwatershed
June 10, 2019
Mark Miley
Publix Super Market, Inc.
3300 Publix Corporate Parkway, Building #3
Lakeland, FL 33802
RE: Availability of Riparian Buffer Credits for the "Publix" project
Bank Name: UT to Pine Hill Branch Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank
Bank Sponsor: Wildlands Holdings, IV, LLC
DWR Project Number: 2017-0886v2
Permittee: Publix Super Market, Inc.
Riparian Buffer Credits Available: 3.30 acres (143,748 sq. ft.)
Cape Fear 03030002 River Basin
Dear Mr. Miley:
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC currently has sufficient riparian Buffer credits from the UT to Pine Hill Branch
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Mitigation Bank to satisfy some or all of the riparian buffer mitigation
requirements related to the above-mentioned project (including the attached South Fork SOA). The
project is located within the service area (HUC 03030002) of the Bank.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. Although current
inventory is high, the letter is not a guarantee of availability as credits will be sold on a first come, first
serve basis. An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your request and we will formally reserve
both the credits and price quoted for a period of 30 days from the invoice at no cost.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the 401 Water Quality Certification
Authorization Certificate from the NC Department of Environmental Quality approving the Riparian
Buffer mitigation purchase from the Bank and upon receipt of your payment to Wildlands Holdings IV,
LLC. We will then issue a credit transfer certificate verifying your credit purchase to the North Carolina
Division of Water Resources and to you for your records
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation requirements. Please contact me at
205-807-0800 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609

HOLDINGS*
Sincerely,
��X
Ian M. Hazelhoff
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Land Acquisition
[e-mail]
0: [phone] ex. 120
M: [phone]
Wildlands Holding IV, LLC • Wildlands Engineering, Inc • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225, Raleigh, NC 27609