20190549 Ver 1_401 Application_20190424

DWR
f O vislan of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20190549
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Wilmington Regional
Office - [phone]
Version# *
1
What amout is owed?
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Robb Mairs:eads\rlmairs2
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Burgaw Jeep Dealership
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Kim Williams
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/24/2019
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

Nearest Body of Water
UT of Burgaw Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C; Sw
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
34.535512 -77.904960
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Pender
Is this project a public transportation project?
Yes No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (I P)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39 - Commercial/Institutional
Developments
Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):

1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual Permit
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written
approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1 i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No

2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
6421 Westgate Realty Inc
2b. Deed book and page no.:
4662/1332
2c. Responsible party:
Mr. Ehsan A. Khani
2d. Address
Street Address
6312 Westgate Road
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27617
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province I Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Mr. Ehsan A. Khani
3b. Business Name:
Westgate of Burgaw, LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
6312 Westgate Road
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27617
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
N/A
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Burgaw
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
3228-97-7767-0000
11.5
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1320 Highway 117 S
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Burgaw
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28425
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT of Burgaw Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; SW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300070801
4. Project Description and History

4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application: *
The western half of the site closest to Highway 117 S is developed and currently contains a Chevrolet
car dealership. The eastern half is forested and undeveloped. A maintained powerline corridor runs
north -south this the undeveloped section of the site. Vegetated uplands support a canopy of loblolly
pine and sweetgum with a fairly dense shrub layer of horse sugar and Chinese privet. Wetlands support
a canopy of water oak, sweetgum, and loblolly pine and a moderately dense shrub layer of Chinese
privet.
Adjacent land use is undeveloped and forested to the east and southeast and a mix of residential and
commercial to the north, west, and south.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases)
in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating
the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Westgate Fig2_Topo.pdf
273.27KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey
map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Westgate Fig4_Soils.pdf
1.2MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
6 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
N/A
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the project is to expand the existing Chevrolet car dealership to include a Jeep
dealership in order to grow the business and provide a service for the Burgaw community. Wetland
impacts are needed to construct a parking lot for vehicle inventory.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be
used:
The applicant proposes the addition of a 19,500 sf building and associated parking to support a new
Jeep Dealership. Parking will be allocated to cars for sale and employee parking. The dealership will
include a new car showroom and a section for car repair and maintenance. A temporary office is located
in the northern part of the site and is needed for Jeep to begin selling cars while the new facility is being
built. This temp office will be removed from the site upon completion. Drive isle width is 24' and parking
spots will be a minimum of 180 sf (10' x 18') per local ordinances.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Burgaw Jeep Site Plan 4-8-19.pdf 301.52KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas? *
Yes No Unknown

Comments:
LMG delineated the site in March of 2019. A preliminary
wetlands map and data sheets are included in this
application.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Cameron Owens
Agency/Consultant Land Management Group
Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used,
to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.380
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.380
2h. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the
project:
The applicant attempted to avoid and minimize wetland impacts as much as
possible. However, because of the location and amount of wetlands within the site,
some wetland impact was necessary. The original site plan (attached) showed 0.66
acre of wetland impact. This was considered excessive by the applicant and the
proposed expansion was reduced to minimize impacts to 0.38 acre.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques:
Silt fencing will be used to ensure sediment doesn't leave the site during
construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of
the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the
State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
..2e.
ype of
2g.
2c. Type of W.
pn
(?t
type* (?)
name*
ForestediciImpact
EurTisd
area
1
Fill
P
Hardwood Flat
N/A
Yes
Both
0.380
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.380
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.380
2h. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the
project:
The applicant attempted to avoid and minimize wetland impacts as much as
possible. However, because of the location and amount of wetlands within the site,
some wetland impact was necessary. The original site plan (attached) showed 0.66
acre of wetland impact. This was considered excessive by the applicant and the
proposed expansion was reduced to minimize impacts to 0.38 acre.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques:
Silt fencing will be used to ensure sediment doesn't leave the site during
construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of
the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the
State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Northeast Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Non -riparian wetland 0.4
Attach Receipt and/or letter
3c. Comments
A 1:1 mitigation to impact ratio is proposed because the wetlands contain a great
deal of Chinese privet, an invasive.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan
(required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC
Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H
.1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state
stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
3. Stormwater Requirements

3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval
or if calculations are provided to document the project will not cause degradation of downstream surface
waters. *
Stormwater Management Antidegradation Calculations
Plan
3b. Stormwater Management Plan
3c. Antidegradation Calculations:
Comments:
Project engineer is in the process of preparing the stormwater plan and will submit it to the State within
the next few weeks.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer
Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water
quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project will not provide utilities or access to other tracts. Additionally, no future
wetland impacts are anticipated within the site.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)

4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant,
list the capacity available at that plant.
Site ties into municipal waste treatment system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps
Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by
machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or
Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program Database was reviewed. No rare species are
known to occur on or within a one -mile radius of the site. Forested sections of the
site support a canopy of loblolly pine, sweetgum, and water oak and a fairly dense
shrub layer of Chinese privet and horse sugar. The northern long-eared bat is known
to occur in Pender County. Forested areas within the site support suitable roosting
habitat for the bat. Some of the trees will be cleared for site development. However,
no maternity roost trees or hibernacula are known to occur near the site. Therefore,
tree removal is an exempt activity per the 4(d) rule for the species. Additionally, the
site appears to be too densely vegetated to provide appropriate habitat for the red -
cockaded woodpecker or federally -protected plants known to occur in the region.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish
Habitat?*
The NOAA EFH Mapper was reviewed.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated
as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources? *
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service website was
reviewed. No cultural resources were noted within or adjacent to the site.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood Map Service Website was reviewed.

Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Burgaw Jeep Original Site Plan with more impacts.pdf 375.7KB
1320_Hwy_117S_WetSketch_3_11_19.pdf 2.04MB
Fig1_Vicinity.pdf 3.64MB
Westgate DP1-up.pdf 196.3KB
Westgate DP1-wet.pdf 196.34KB
Fig3_UDAR.pdf 697.57KB
Signature
,✓ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC
General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as
a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kimberlee C Williams
Signature
�t�Pl�Yr � �llrixar�t
Date
4/24/2019

R
R
NCCGIA
1320 Hwy 117 SPender County, NC
Map Date: 03-11-19LMG19.072 3805 Wrightsville AvenueWilmington, NC 28403(910) 452-0001
Preliminary Wetland DelineationSketch
0 150 30075Feet¯L:\WETLANDS\2019 WETLANDS FILES\LMG19.072 --- 1320 Hwy 117 South, Ehsan Khani\MAPSBoundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.Map Source: 2016 NC OneMap Aerial Photography
NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are consideredapproximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes.A survey of delineated areas and review and approval by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific site planning.
Legend
Parcel ~ 11.5 acres
Uplands ~ 5.5 acres or 48%
Wetlands ~ 6 acres or 52%
Waters of the US (Relatively Permanent Waters) ~ 2,225 L.F.
Non-Jurisdictional Ditch/Swale ~ 360 L.F.
R Data Points
A1 tt PL
A12
A18 tt PL
A19 tt PL
A30 tt PL
A24
A6
DP-wet
DP-up
XX75.00150.0047.2012.0030.00ofJOB NO.SHEETCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGN BY:
DATE
7332 Cotesworth Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
License Number C-2525
NUMBER DATE REVISION
1320 HWY 117S
BURGAW, NC 28425SITE DATA0%10'Ä%#..%'06'4$'(14';17&+)%#..Ä+6ž56*'.#95612
XX10.0035.00100.00ofSHEETCHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGN BY:7332 Cotesworth DriveWilmington, NC 28405(910) 619-9990License Number C 2525BER DATE REVISIONSITE DATAWetland Impact #1: 0.38 acre (16,351 sf)SCALE: 1" = 100'
1320 Highway 117 SPender, NC
Map Date: 03-06-2019LMG # Proposal 3805 Wrightsville AvenueWilmington, NC 28403(910) 452-0001
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
L:\WETLANDS\2 019 WETLANDS FILES\BIDS\WES\1 320 H wy 117 S\MAPSBoundaries are app ro ximate and not meant to b e ab solute .Map Source: 2008 DeLorme Atlas & Gazettee r
0 1 20.5 Miles¯
Site
Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
1320 Highway 117 SPender, NC
Map Date: 03-06-2019LMG # Proposal 3805 Wrightsville AvenueWilmington, NC 28403(910) 452-0001
Figure 3 LiDAR Map
L:\WETLANDS\2 019 WETLANDS FILES\BIDS\WES\1 320 H wy 117 S\MAPSBoundaries are app ro ximate and not meant to b e ab solute .Map Source: NC DOT LiDAR
0 200 400100Feet¯
Site
Legend
Elevation
Value High : 54
Low : 39

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for the Burgaw Jeep Dealership project located in Burgaw, NC. All questions in regards to this
project should be directed to Land Management Group.

Sincerely,

________________________________________
Applicant

Ehsan A. Khani
________________________________________
Print Name

03/27/2019
________________________________________
Date
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
No X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X No X
NWI classification:
Water Marks (B1)
Sampling Date:Pender
NCWestgate of Burgaw, LLC
1320 Hwy 117 S City/County:
Slope (%):
uplands
DP1-up
convex
Section, Township, Range:Cameron Owens
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
0-2%Local relief (concave, convex, none):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Yes
Remarks:
Gr: Grantham loam
34.536054
3/8/19
-77.905059
No
Burgaw
HYDROLOGY
NAD-83
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?Yes
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
hillslope
Yes
LRR T, MLRA 153A Datum:
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Yes
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Field Observations:
Water Table Present?No
No
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Saturation Present?
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Requirement Control Symbol
EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
paragraph 5-2a)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Saturation (A3)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Yes
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
8.
x 1 =
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 3 =
1.x 4 =
2.x 5 =
3.Column Totals:(B)
4.
5.
6.
7.X
8.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
30' r )
10
20
Smilax laurifolia
10
FACW
Yes
Yes
Gelsemium sempervirens FAC
)
Arundinaria tecta
Ligustrum sinense
Tree Stratum
Pinus taeda
Liquidambar styraciflua
Quercus nigra
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total % Cover of:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Dominant
Species?
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
37
40
Multiply by:
UPL species
)
=Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
FAC
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
2
FAC
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
Yes
No
8
FAC
FAC
DP1-up
6
6
FACU species
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
No
(B)
Indicator
Status
20
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
100.0%
(A)
10
Ilex opaca
Ligustrum sinense
Absolute
% Cover
12
No
)30' r
10
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
11
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Yes
FAC
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
No
19
FACW
30' r
26
52
2
3
4
6
10
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
=Total Cover
12
30' r
Symplocos tinctoria
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain – Version 2.0
X
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)X
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Depth (inches):X
(LRR S, T, U)
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Remarks:
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
SOIL Sampling Point:
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
NoYes
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
DP1-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
95
M10YR 6/2 75
(inches)Color (moist)
10YR 3/1
25
C
98
10YR 6/6
5-11
11-14 10YR 4/1
0-5
10YR 6/8
5
10YR 2/2
Loamy/Clayey
2
10YR 6/8
Loc2
M
Texture Remarks
Prominent redox concentrations
Prominent redox concentrations
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
%
M
Histosol (A1)
Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
C
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
%
Matrix
14-24
Color (moist)Type1
C
Redox FeaturesDepth
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Prominent redox concentrations
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Hydric Soil Present?
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain – Version 2.0
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X No
NWI classification:
Water Marks (B1)
Sampling Date:Pender
NCWestgate of Burgaw, LLC
1320 Hwy 117 S City/County:
Slope (%):
uplands
DP1-wet
concave
Section, Township, Range:Cameron Owens
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
0-2%Local relief (concave, convex, none):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Yes
Remarks:
Gr: Grantham loam
34.535974
3/8/19
-77.904915
No
Burgaw
HYDROLOGY
NAD-83
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?Yes
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
toeslope
Yes
LRR T, MLRA 153A Datum:
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Yes
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Field Observations:
Water Table Present?No
No
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
(includes capillary fringe)
10
10
10
Surface Water Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Saturation Present?
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Requirement Control Symbol
EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
paragraph 5-2a)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Saturation (A3)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Yes
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
8.
x 1 =
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 3 =
1.x 4 =
2.x 5 =
3.Column Totals:(B)
4.
5.
6.
7.X
8.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:X
30' r )
10
5
25
Gelsemium sempervirens
10
FAC
FACW
Yes
Yes
Yes
Smilax glauca FAC
)
Ligustrum sinense
Tree Stratum
Quercus nigra
Liquidambar styraciflua
Pinus taeda
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total % Cover of:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Dominant
Species?
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
50
25
Multiply by:
UPL species
)
=Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
FAC
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
FACW
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
Yes
10
FAC
FAC
DP1-wet
9
9
FACU species
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Yes
(B)
Indicator
Status
20
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
100.0%
(A)
5
Ilex opaca
Ligustrum sinense
Absolute
% Cover
15
No
)30' r
5
15
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Yes
FAC
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Yes
25
30' r
15
30
2
2
5
4
13
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Smilax laurifolia
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?Yes No
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
=Total Cover
7
30' r
Arundinaria tecta
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain – Version 2.0
X
X
X
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)X
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Depth (inches):X
(LRR S, T, U)
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Remarks:
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
SOIL Sampling Point:
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
NoYes
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
DP1-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
60
(inches)Color (moist)
10YR 4/1
C
90
10YR 6/8
6-12
12-24 10YR 5/1
0-6
10YR 6/6
40
10YR 2/1
10
Loc2
M
Texture Remarks
Prominent redox concentrations
Mucky Loam/Clay
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
%
M
Histosol (A1)
Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
C
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
%
Matrix
Color (moist)Type1
Redox FeaturesDepth
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Prominent redox concentrations
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Hydric Soil Present?
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain – Version 2.0
1320 Highway 117 SPender, NC
Map Date: 03-06-2019LMG # Proposal 3805 Wrightsville AvenueWilmington, NC 28403(910) 452-0001
Figure 2 Topographic Map
L:\WETLANDS\2 019 WETLANDS FILES\BIDS\WES\1 320 H wy 117 S\MAPSBoundaries are app ro ximate and not meant to b e ab solute .Map Source: USGS Burgaw Topog ra phic Q uad
0 600 1,200300Feet¯
Site
Gr FoGoA
Gr
Ra
Ra
Wo
GoA
Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
1320 Highway 117 SPender, NC
Map Date: 03-06-2019LMG # Proposal 3805 Wrightsville AvenueWilmington, NC 28403(910) 452-0001
Figure 4 Soils Map
L:\WETLANDS\2 019 WETLANDS FILES\BIDS\WES\1 320 H wy 117 S\MAPSBoundaries are app ro ximate and not meant to b e ab solute .Map Source: GIS Soils Data
0 200 400100Feet¯
Site
LegendFo: Foreston loamy fine sand GoA: Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopesGr: Grantham loam