20041929 Ver 1_Complete File_20040121

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Barnett. Kevin
WQ Supervisor: Forrest WPstall
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Yancey County Long Branch EWP County Yancey
Project Number 04 1929, County2
Recvd From APP Region Asheville
Received Date 12/1/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type debris removal, stream channel and streambank
Certificates Stream
Permit ',Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prima Supp. Basin Req. Req.
37 Stream O Y O N F 7-2-52-31 C F Tr 4x0,306. F r 150.0(
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres
Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y Q N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Issued uhder 04-1925
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
c. i
o??F W ATFRQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
m William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
tom- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
.? Division of Water Quality
(February 16, 2005
DWQ Project # 04-1925
Yancey County
Michele Lawhern, County Manager
Yancey County
Room 11, Courthouse
Burnsville, NC 29714
Subject Property: Long Branch EWP 2004-11
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mrs. Lawhern:
You have our approval; ? iw accordance with the attached conditions and those: listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 1,289., feet of streams for the purpose of
streambank stabilization at the subject properties, as described within your application
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on January 19, 2005. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General
Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3376 (3376).. The Certification(s) allows you to
use Nationwide Permit(s) 37 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not
limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and stormwater regulations.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts
to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404
or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland
or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in
15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in
the attached certification and any additional conditions. listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Intemet: httD://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Nose Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Yancey County:
Page 2 of 6
February 16, 2005:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount
Approved Units Plan Location or Reference
Stream 1,280 feet Lon Branch
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed; operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North -Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
Yancey County:
Page 3 of 6
February 16, 2005:
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Long Branch is classified C, Trout. As such, the following Administrative Codes
apply: 15A NCAC 04B.0125 and 15A NCAC 02B.0211
7. Sediment and erosion control measures must be implemented prior to construction
and maintained on the sites to minimize sediment`in downstream areas. Seeding for
a temporary cover of wheat, millet, or similar annual grain or permanent herbaceous
cover should occur on all bare soil within five (5) days of ground disturbing activities
to provide long-term erosion control. The projects should be accomplished in stages
instead of leaving large tracts exposed to further storm events. Erosion control
matting should be used in conjunction with appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in
steep slope and riparian areas, unless authorized under Division of Land Resources
Erosion and Sediment Control approval. Matting should be secured in place with
staples, stakes, or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. Straw mulch and
tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas. In addition, because of an
anticipated difficulty in establishing ground cover during the winter, reseeding should
be conducted, as necessary, in the spring-time with a native annual and perennial
seed mix with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet or other grain.
8. Only clean, large, angular rock, large woody material, or other natural stream design
materials and techniques should be used for bank stabilization. Rock should not be
placed in the stream channel in a manner that constricts stream flow or that will
impede aquatic life movements during low flow conditions. Filter cloth should be
placed behind large rock that is used for bank stabilization. Properly designed rock
vanes should be constructed wherever appropriate on bank stabilization and
channel realignment stream reaches to improve channel stability and to improve
aquatic habitat. Root wads should be installed low enough in the bank so that a
significant portion (at least one-third) the root wad is inundated during normal flows.
Yancey County:
Page 4 of 6
February 16, 2005:
9. The channel must be restored to a more stable condition. However, under no
circumstances should river rock, sand or other materials be dredged from the stream
channel under authorization of this permit except, if necessary, in the immediate
vicinity of the eroding banks for the explicit purpose of anchoring stabilizing or
flovr/grade control structures or for reestablishing the natural and more stable stream
channel dimensions. Stream bed materials are unstable in flowing-water situations
and are unsuitable for bank stabilization. Stream dredging has catastrophic effects
on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form of the stream channel can cause
downstream erosion problems. The natural dimension, pattern, and profile of the
stream upstream and downstream of the permitted area should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or changing its depth.
10. Stabilization measures should only be applied on or near existing erosion sites,
leaving other stable stream bank areas in a natural condition. Grading and
backfilling should be minimized and tree and shrub growth should be retained where
possible to ensure long term availability of stream bank cover for aquatic life and
wildlife. Backfill materials should be obtained from upland sites except in cases
where excess stream bed materials are available. Berms are not permitted because
they block the floodplain, constrict and accelerate flood flows, and often fail or
impede drainage during large flood events.
f
11. Repairs to eroded banks should be conducted. in a dry work area where possible':
Sandbags or other clean diversion structures should be used where possible to
minimize excavation in flowing water. Channel realignments should be constructed
by excavating the new channel from downstream to upstream before connecting it to
the old channel.
12. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank whenever possible. All
mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials. Equipment used in stream
channel must be clean, new or low hour equipment.
13
As long-term
recommended
possible. Any
the Gui
stream stability is a concern with this type of work, it is strongly
that woody vegetation be established along stream banks where
riparian vegetation planting should be performed in accordance with
13. Monitoring
The Permittee shall examine the stabilization work done under this Certification
on an annual basis for three (3) years following the completion of the restoration
efforts. This field evaluation should note the condition and stability of the
measures installed and how well the repair is holding up. A written report must
be provided to DWQ's Asheville Regional Office by June 1St of each year. The
report must describe inspection results, include digital photographs, list the date
of inspection, and describe any needed repairs or corrections.
14.The permittee will provide on-site supervision of stability work including, but not
limited to bank re-sloping, in-stream structure placement, and riparian zone re-
establishment, by an appropriately trained individual.
Yancey County:
Page 5 of 6
February 16, 2005:
15. If pasture along the stream is to be used for grazing, the permittee must inform the
appropriate landowners that cattle should be prohibited from damaging riparian
areas and from de-stabilizing the stream banks and channel.
16. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance. outlets shall be directed and maintained
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected riparian zones
such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream.
17. Water Quality Certification Notifications
The permittee must provide a copy of this issued Water Quality Certification and
attached cover letter to each property owner where the approved work will be
performed.
18.Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 10 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 26..0200. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
r
Yancey County:
Page 6 of 6
February 16, 2005:
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Mr. Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at 828-296-4657.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW K/khb
Enclosures: GC 3376
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: USAGE Asheville Regulatory Field Office'
DWQ_ Asheville Regional Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 04-1925.EWP. Long Branch.Approval
Triage Check List
ILE C
Date: 2/3/05 Project Name: Yancey County: Long Branch EWP
DWQ#: 04-1929
County: Yancey
To: Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
60-day Processing Time: revised 1/25/05 to 3/25/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 2880
TEL. [phone] FAc. 828.281.3351 D E9 ? ?5 an/]'L5 D
www.altamontenvironmental.com 1? Vv D
JAN 2 5 2005
January 21, 2005 ° Lit 01" , DENR - WATER QUALITY
l , WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Ms. Cyndi Caroly
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Yancey County EWP Project Revised Pre-Construction Notification Application for
Long Branch EWP 2004-11
Dear Ms. Caroly:
Enclosed is the revised Long Branch exigency site 2004-11 application for Section 404 nationwide
permit 37, and corresponding DWQ 401 water quality certification. Exigency work applied for in this
permit includes streambank stabilization, stream realignment, and debris removal. The primary goal in
conducting the exigency work is to protect property, and to return the channel to pre-flood conditions. 1
have signed the application as an authorized agent for Yancey County. A letter of authorization is
included. Additionally, we have sent one copy of the enclosed permit application directly to Mr. Kevin
Barnett in the Swannanoa office, Mr. Brian Cole in the Asheville U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service office,
and Mr. Dave McHenry in the Waynesville N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission office.
Altamont appreciates your assistance with this revised application. If you would like additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G.
Enclosures: PCN - Long Branch EWP 2004-11
Letter of Authorization
CC: Michele Lawhern - Yancey County Manager (transmittal letter only)
Cliff Vinson - District Conservation Officer NRCS (transmittal letter only)
PAYancey-EWPWRCS EWP\Correspondence\DWQ permit cover letter-Caroly-DSE I I.doc

l {E
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ©-t 1 Z !
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing ??
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is
not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4),
and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Michele Lawhern, Yancey County Manager
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse
Burnsville, NC 29714
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must
be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Stuart A. Ryman
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental, Inc.
Mailing Address: 50 College Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (828) 281- gD
E-mail Address: sryman@altamontenvironmental. com D C
p05
AN ? 5 2
wA??auA?B
0?-t gypSTORMNA
Page 5 of 16 W60-
III. Project Information
Attach al -0etn t-, map4clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
U SACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Long Branch EWP Site 2004-I1
?. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table I
4. Location
County: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
Follotiv Higlns-av 19E through Burnsville. Approximately 8 miles past Burnsville (and less than
one mile after crossing the South Toe River), turn right on Sycamore Circle. (Note: Sycamore
Circle intersects Highway 19E t}vice - these directions assume turning right at the intersection
nearest Burnsville) From Sycamore Circle, turn right on Ed Young Road. This EWP project
begins where Long Branch jloivs under Sycamore Circle, and continues upstream (adjacent to
Ed Young Road) for approximately 1,200 feet. See Figures 1 and 2.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35°54 8" N/82° 10'39" W (approximate
center of project area). Project is linear but follows the same waterbody, which is Long Branch,
a tributary of the South Toe River. (Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach
a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Yfultiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Long Branch
S. River Basin: French Broad
Page 6 of 16
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River
Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application:
The proposed project site consists of residential uses. The stream and stream banks were heavily
impacted during Tropical Storms Frances and Ivan. The streambank is littered with excessive
woody and non-native debris, and if suspended during another high flow event, could clog
downstream bridges or culverts and direct channel flows into vulnerable stream banks. On the
uppermost reach of Long Branch within the project area, the channel is severely eroded for
approximately 130 feet, where the stream cut a new channel during the storms. The extent of
channel relocation along this reach is approximately 50 feet. This portion of the channel is
severely unstable, threatening an existing structure (house). This area is located entirely on
parcel 075900985178000, the uppermost parcel within the project (see Figure 2). Aside from
this reach, channel realignment is not necessary, although the existing stream banks are topped
with unconsolidated material in many cases and lack appropriate vegetation.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
All work will be performed as per conversations between Altamont Environmental, US Army
Corps of Engineers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, and on-site consultation with the US
Fish and Wildlife Service personnel. Work will include a) channel realignment in the 50 foot
reach described above; b) stream bank stabilization above the normal water line where required
in the remainder of the project area; and c) non-native and excessive woody debris removal from
both right and left banks for the length of the entire project area. Equipment used to accomplish
the above tasks include: rubber tired skidders, 15 ton dump truck, hydraulic track mounted
excavator with thumb, chainsaws, and hand tools (shovels and rakes).
Channel Realignment
As mentioned, channel realignment will occur for a length of approximately 50 feet, located
entirely on parcel 075900985178000 (see Table I and Figure 3). This reach has an
approximate drainage area of 0.5 square miles. Per conversations with US Fish and Wildlife
Service personnel on January 6, 2005, the potential impacts of sediment from channel work at
this site is a particular concern due to its proximity to the South Toe River. To minimize such
impacts, all work will be conducted in the dry. Before beginning work in the channel, a sand
bag dam will be constructed just above the upstream end of the reach (see Figure 3) to prevent
flow from entering the work area. The stream discharge will be pumped from the pool behind
the dam, around the reach to be realigned, and returned to the stream below the existing culvert
at the downstream end of the reach. A second sand bag dam will be constructed just above the
return discharge to avoid potential back flow into the work area. The contractor will be
required to keep a back-up pump on site. Work should take no more than two days and will be
conducted only during a period of predicted dry weather.
Working in the dry, the channel will be reconstructed in its prestorm location (see discussion
below), and the existing channel filled in. To minimize mobilization of sediment when water is
Page 7 of 16
returned to the realigned channel, the upper dam will be removed one sand bag at a time to
ensure a gradual release of hater from the pool above the reach. Prior to returning water to the
channel, a pump will be set up at the lower data. Discharge from the reach will be pumped from
the pool behind the lower dam and discharged on the downstream side of the dam through a
filter bag system, until no turbidity is evident in the discharge. The lower dam will then be
removed one sand bag at a time to minimize sediment remobilization.
If necessary, one to ttit.-o-vertical-layers -of boulders-will-be-installed in--order to protect the
batik and stabilize the toe. The area behind the boulders will be backfnlled with rocky debris
material excavated from the floodplain or imported material, and topsoil will be placed on the
top of the reconstructed batik to aid in the establishment of vegetation. The area will be seeded
with grasses upon completion of heavy equipment work TVith landowners' permission, live
stakes and bare root stock native trees and shrubs will be planted on top of the stabilized bank.
Except as noted above, standard erosion and sedimentation control measures will be utilized
throughout the project.
Figures 3 illustrates the pre-and post storm channel locations. A typical existing cross-
section for the impacted channel section is included in Figure 4. Figure S is a conceptual
drativing of the proposed post-construction channel cross section. Figure 6 is a conceptual
drawing Illustrating stream stabilization measures on digital photography. The stream in
the realignment area will be returned to its pre-storm dimension, pattern and profile, as
determined froth available information. Appropriate dimensions will be determined from
field indicators at the site and an examination of stable or near stable reaches in the
vicinity. Pattern and profile will be determined from field indicators and aerial
photography.
The work addressed in this application is intended to improve the post flood hydraulic
capacity of the stream reaches discussed and stabilize severely eroded stream banks that
are threatening structures on the property. Die proposed actions are not intended to
enhance existing conditions or restore the stream reach using natural channel design
techniques. Such activities would require detailed engineering evaluation and design,
which are beyond the intent of the ETVP program. The proposed work has not been
reviewed or sealed by a professional engineer.
Strewn Bank Stabiliza on
Stream bank stabilization will occur in remaining portion of the project area not included in the
stream realignment work described above. Stream banks in much of this area are topped in
unconsolidated rock and soil that are either in an unstable position and in danger of slipping
down the bank into the stream, or which may be remobilized by future storms. Stabilizing
vegetation is often absent. Batik stabilization work will be conducted in the dry above the
normal water level. This ticork will consist of the shaping of the top and upper portion of banks
in unstable areas using hand tools. The area will be seeded with grasses upon completion of the
work TVith landowners' permission, live stakes and bare root stock native trees and shrubs will
be planted on top of the bank stabilization work All work will be performed from the stream
Pale 8 of 16
bank and heavy equipment will not be used. Standard erosion and sedimentation control
measures will be utilized throughout the project.
Removal of Organic mul Rocky Debris
Debris removal will occur for the length of the project site. The applicant recognizes that some
woody debris in the riparian zone is a necessary component of habitat integrity and will strive
only to remove non-native objects and those debris elements considered an immediate or
impending threat to life and structures. Given the small size of the stream, debris removal can
be readily performed without heavy equipment entering the stream. Contractors performing
debris removal tasks will be instructed to access debris from the bank on which the debris is
located. Contractors will be instructed specifically to keep heavy equipment out of the stream
channel. In some circumstances, chainsaw operators or heavy equipment support personnel may
need to enter the stream to cut or help free debris jams being removed. In addition, large debris
being pulled from the bank may result in some stream bank scour. The applicant will instruct
contractors performing the work to refrain from cutting any live vegetation unless it is leaning
toward the stream at more than a 30 degree angle and the stream is entrenched or the bank is
unstable at that point. Debris removed will be hauled off site or chipped and disposed of in the
flood plain. In cases where it is determined that large woody debris can be utilized in current or
projected future bank stabilization work, such as in log veins or as root wads, these articles may
be stored on site out of the floodway upon landowner permission. All areas disturbed due to
debris removal and equipment access will be reshaped and reseeded. Access to the channel will
be perpendicular to the channel. Precaution will betaken to protect mast production and stream
canopy trees. Dead trees that provide den habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the
channel shall be protected.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work.
The work being described is exigency work under the Emergency Watershed Protection program
to protect existing property and structures. Streambank stabilization will also prevent further
erosion and sedimentation to the South Toe River resource.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V, Future Project Plans
Page 9 of 16
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
X 4
NIL Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a titiTitten description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include stream realignment, stream bank stabilization and debris removal.
As discussed, all work will be conducted in the dry. Sediment and erosion control measures,
including sand bags, silt fences and reseeding, will be utilized to minimize sedimentation.
The applicant recognizes the natural resource significance of the South Toe River downstream
of this site, which is designated Critical Habitat for the federally endangered Appalachian
elktoe inussel. Upon consultation with the US Fish and Mildlife Service, Altamont understands
that additional federally listed plant and aquatic species may occupy nearby sites in the South
Toe River watershed.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
There it-ill be no wetlands impacted at this site.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

I
? j
I 4
I
t
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching'drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Page 10 of 16
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: NA
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (linear Stream Name** Average Width of Intermittent?
(indicate on map) feet) Stream Before Impact (please specify)
EWP 2004-02; Stream realignment 50 Long Branch 15 Perennial
Yancey County PIN
075900985178000
(see Parcel Map Figure
2)
EWP 2004-02. Entire Stream bank stabilization 1,230 Long Branch 5 Perennial
project area
EWP 2004-02 Floodplain debris removal 1,230 Long Branch 5 Perennial
Entire Project Area
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: approximately 1,230
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
There will be no impacts to open waters.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

Page 11 of 16
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
foodi.-t-- dra rage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be
described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-
down valve or spillway, etc.): MIA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: XIA Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Altamont will provide contractors engaged in the implementation of this work both written and
verbal instructions of all impact avoidance statements provided below. Stream realignment work
will be conducted in the dry. A sand bag dam will be constructed upstream of the realignment area
and the stream discharge will be pumped around the work area. Outside of the channel
realignment area, bank stabilization work will be conducted in the dry using hand tools. Heavy
equipment will be kept out of the stream channel during streambank stabilization and debris
removal work Xo excavation will be done within the wetted channel area during bank stabilization
activities. Ao boulder, cobble, gravel, or sediment will be collected from the stream channel to
perform streamnbankstabilization it.•ork Temporary grass cover shall be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days ofgrounnd disturbing activities. Provided landowners give permission, herbaceous
and woody shrub and tree vegetation will also be installed on the riverbank upon completion of
bank stabilization work Since all work will be performed in the dry, Altamont does not feel it is
necessary to install check dams or other sediment filtration devices in the stream channel. During
debris removal work; contractors will access debris from the bank on which the debris is
located No henry equipment will enter the stream: channel to access debris. If landowners do
not provide access agreements to pick up and haul away debris, the debris on their riverbank
properties will be left undisturbed. Altamont will provide a site manager to periodically inspect
and supervise contractor work
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 12 of 16
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as
much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of
mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description
of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate
sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior to
submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the
NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 13 of 16
M
Y.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? \T0
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NT-PA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated -,with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact
mitigation is required calculate the required
multipliers.
to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone Z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Page 14 of 16
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
Xl.
XII.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage will not change.
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this project
primarily through proper water management, construction sequencing, proper staging and
stockpiling of materials, and the maintenance, at all times, of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events. Equipment, fuels, lubricants, or other potential sources of water pollution
will not be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Page 15 of 16
Michele P. Lawhern, County Manager
John Renfro, Chairman
YANCEY7 COUNTY Blain)eWhitson,Commlissioner
County Courthouse, Room 11 • Burnsville, North Carolina 28714
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone] • EMAIL: [e-mail]
November 10, 2004
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
50 College Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stu,
At the regular monthly meeting of the Yancey County Board of Commissioners last
evening, the enclosed contract for professional services was executed, relative to EWP
Section 216 work. Pursuant to, or in the spirit of the further intent of this contract, this
Yancey County Local Government hereby authorizes Altamont Environmental, Inc. to
sign and execute all necessary permits and coordinate communications with said
regulatory agencies.
If there should be any questions about the above, please feel free to call me at any time.
Sin ely,
?4i/P. Lawhern
Yancey County Manager
Work: 828/682-3971; Cellular 828/284-0746
Table 1
Affected Parcels
- Long Branch
DSR 2004-11
Yancey County, North Carolina
MAP ID PIN OWNER PARCEL SIZE
(acres) ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CHANNEL
REALIGNMENT STEAMBANK
STA13IL17ATION ROCKOEBRIS
REMOVAL WOODY DEBRIS
REMOVAL COMMENTS
61 075900889362000 YOUNG CLYDE D JR & ELEANORA 3.50 246 SYCAMORE CIRCLE BURNSVILLE NC 28714 x x x A rox stream frontage 60 ft
62 075900887568000 ROBINSON GLADYS H LIFE ESTATE 0.29 RT. 2 BOX 523 BURNSVILLE NC 28714 x x x Approx stream frontage 115 ft
63 075900888399000 RAY BROTHER TRUCKING COMPANY INC 0.45 105 BOONE BRANCH RD BURNSVILLE NC 28714 x x x Ap ox stream frontage 300 It
64 075900887494000 RAY FREDIA NIAPHRATA H 0.40 284 SYCAMORE CIRCLE BURNSVILLE NC 28714 x x x A rox stream frontage 60 ft
72 075900985178000 FOX RANDY SHERMAN & TERESA F 1 88 223 BLUE ROCK RD BURNSVILLE NC 28714 x x x x Approx stream frontage 350 ft
74 075900983380000 PATE ROY WAYNE & GEORGIA 0.77 P O BOX 17041 ASHEVILLE NC 28816 x x x Approx stream frontage 225 ft
76 075900981060000 DAVENPORT RICHARD C It BENNA KAY 2.60 100 ED YOUNG RD BURNSVILLE NC 28714 x x x A rox stream fronta a 120 ft
P:\Yancey County\NRCS EWP\Emergency Repairs\Bowlens Creek\2.parcels table Long Branch acoe revl Paae 1 of t -
? r
??.. S
Downstream
Project Limits
? ? "? ?? '',• ' ,? ? `"gip ''` `?`.- /c
Minn
1, F, --- _'-" ? _"_?_`: __ -c =_ __?•.,y, "qua%%.
00
trr; o
3'e
_V,\4
CrJ

• r3 id ch i
p j r Upstream
'-` Project Limits
ILI
tri
" It

Figure 1
Site Location Map

January 17, 2005
d
USGSMi
ill
l ENGINEERING & HYDROG EOLOGY
eQua
rang
cav
e
Scale I inch = 2000 feet 50 COLLEGE STREET, A$HEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
Long Branch
Yancey County, North Carolina
PATemplatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc
jrr
119
F` y,# 66000
8 4000
d t N 4. D` .
+;:_ {?/ 5 0888399D00 4h
0098380 0:x
?. `.F' a i 4i ,•4 I! 'f.I4 '*t ta'?C ??• - `'T ?'. a?! t _ it y.
r 4
600
0

Figure 2
Parcel Identification Map:
Properties Associated with EWP Site 11
January 17, 2005
Long Branch
Yancey County, North Carolina
600
'Rr
a
# to
? f
51 r iF' ?
1200 Feet
t ,? d
ea p 4,
y;? w
v a?.,, a,.ru kz`.
41-
Aft
100 0 100 200 Feet
MMMMMMM?
Figure 3
Stream Realignment Site , ,MIS
EWP Site 11
January 17, 2005 E N -GI N E E R I N G & H Y D R O G E O O G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEVILLE, NC 28801
Long Branch TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
Yancey County, North Carolina www.altamontenvironmental.com
4801) Lumm
O'9ti 0'OV 0'9£ 0'0£ 0'9Z 0'OZ 0'96 0'0L 0'9

43!m pall! AIle!lied)
lauuegO pooh-aad

oepnS jajeM i

wJON
I
lauueyo
POOIJ-ISOd

'Juee 491
jo dol
LPJud
?fUeB 14 !?
;o dol 1°
aaujoo
L 6 OPS dM3
Ajunoo AeoueA `youea8 Ouo-!
eeiy }uauauBIIL'GN louue4:0 u! uol;oes ssoa:o 6ui;slx3
t, wnB!A
0'0
Z-
L-
0
L
v
Z

v
9
9
(;aal) 43p!M
0'9v 0'017 0'9£ 0'0£ 0'9Z O'OZ 0'9 ? 0'0 L 0'9
lauueu?
Pooh-Isod

qm pall!; (Ile!}aed)
lauuegO Pooh-aid

oelanS ialeM

ewJoN

(len;daouoo)
uoljoas
-ssoa:D pasodoad

?
o dol t4ijud

;o
?lue8 3y !?
;o dol Jewoo
? ? OPS dM3
/}unoo Ao:)ueA `youea8 Cuo-1
eaad juauau6ileeM lauuey:D ui uoi}oeS ssoao pasodoad
9 aanCi=l
0'0
Z-
V
0

v
Z
ZD"
m
9
9
v I r
BANK WITH 'L` GE x: �a
OULAR . S (K
t _ IN TOE TO . S'CABILIZE
FE N G I N RING & H Y D R O G E OL O G Y
4.4
50 COLLEGE STREET, AsElEVILLE, INC 28801
`* TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altainoiitetiviroiiineiltal.com
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN NOT TO SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DATE: 01/20/05
STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
MEASURES
EWP 2004—II
LONG BRANCH 6
YANCEY COUNTY, NC
FILE PATH: P:\YANCEY-EWP\EMERGENCY REPAIRS\LONG BRANCH\CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHOTOS.OWG
•
Z*
Vs�af
,r s
�
�•
it
�
•
` 4e
• '1
rti '
< {
• '
• •
Y a
_
n
v I r
BANK WITH 'L` GE x: �a
OULAR . S (K
t _ IN TOE TO . S'CABILIZE
FE N G I N RING & H Y D R O G E OL O G Y
4.4
50 COLLEGE STREET, AsElEVILLE, INC 28801
`* TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altainoiitetiviroiiineiltal.com
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN NOT TO SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DATE: 01/20/05
STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
MEASURES
EWP 2004—II
LONG BRANCH 6
YANCEY COUNTY, NC
FILE PATH: P:\YANCEY-EWP\EMERGENCY REPAIRS\LONG BRANCH\CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHOTOS.OWG

.? Vii: ^? •,:?'S.

" jet =

Figure 7
Pre-Construction Photographs:
Long Branch Site 11
January 17, 2005
Long Branch
Yancey County, North Carolina
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL9 INC.
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE. TIC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
\vww.altamontenvironmental.com

Steam stabilization area, middle of project
Figure 8
Pre-Construction Photographs:
Long Branch Site 11
January 17, 2005
Long Branch
Yancey County, North Carolina
E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R O G E O L O G77]
50 COLLEGE STREET. ASHEVILLE. NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
r
Date:
From:

r-,
? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919) _
-9 Z9 V
7?
The file attached is being forwarded to our for your evaluation.
Please call if you need as4stance.
"E Stream length impacted `E
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
Triage Check List
Proiett Name:
4W Q #: 0 e7
County: _ c
lar') /

To: FRO Kevin Barnett
O Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
ENGINEERING & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEviLLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
`°`
November 18, 2004 PAYMENT
Ms. Cyndi Caroly RECEIVED DEC €0 1 2004 ???fff
Division of Water Quality 0 1 9 t1ENH' WATER QUALITY
401 Wetlands Unit ? rL?1"?sA?`n'TOR'1RWATERBRANCH
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Yancey County EWP Pre-Construction Notification Applications
Dear Ms. Caroly:
Attached are six applications for Section 404 nationwide permit 37, and corresponding DWQ 401 water
quality certification. Exigency work applied for in these permits includes stream bank stabilization,
debris removal, and channel relocation. The primary goal in 6pnducting the exigency work is to protect
property, and to return the channel to pre-flood conditions. Please note that the applications are signed
by myself as an authorized agent for Yancey County. A letter of authorization will follow.
Altamont appreciates the opportunity to provide these applications. If you would like additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G.
Enclosures: PCN -White ak Creek
PCN - Long Branch
PCN - Cane River
PCN - Cattail Creek
PCN - Bowlens Creek
PCN - Ayles Creek
CC: Michele Lawhern - Yancey County Manager
Cliff Vinson - District Conservation Officer NRCS
t
P:\Yancey County\NRCS EWP\Correspondence\DWQ permit cover letter.doc

FILE COPY
Office Use Only: 041929 Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
P??ufi,? }T F-1 Section 10 Permit F1 Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
RECEIVED
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information U [2??5? V
D
1. Owner/Applicant Information 'O V Y 9 2004
Name: Michele Lawheln, Yancey C91D Manager
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse WEP ENR -WATER QUAU
Burnsville, NC 29714 R etzWH
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:_ [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/ap ' cEn 0Wr=
Name: Stuart A. R Man
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental, Inc rDEr11 2004
Mailing Address: 50 College Street,-
Asheville, NC 28801 DEINR - WATER QUALITY
c i d' Attip ST0,;i RATER BRg4CH
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: srymangaltamontenvironmental.com
Page 5 of 14

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Lon Branch DSR 2004-11
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table 1
4. Location
County: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phasellot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Follow Highway 19E through
Burnsville Approximately 8 miles past Burnsville (and less than one mile after crossing the
South Toe River) turn right on Sycamore Circle (Note: Sycamore Circle intersects Highway
19E twice these directions assume turning right at the intersection nearest Burnsville.)
From Sycamore Circle turn right on Ed Young Road The DSR begins where Long Branch
flows under Sycamore Circle and continues upstream (adjacent to Ed Young Road) for
approximately 1,000 feet
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 54' 8"N/82' 10' 39" W (approximate
center of project area) -
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Multiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Long Branch
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 14
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed project site consists of light residential uses
The stream and stream banks were heavily impacted during Hurricanes Frances and Ivan. The stream is clogged with woody, rock and non-native debris The channel has moved
significantly from its original location and is threatening an adjacent propem.
Additionally, extensive stream bank erosion threatens the stability of existing structures
including houses and bridges.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Clearing and Debris Removal
Fallen trees, limbs and dislodged brush within the cross section of the existing or original
channel up to and including the debris line shall be removed Any foreign debris will be
removed. Trees whose near term fall is apparent will be removed Live trees designated for
removal will be cut three feet above the ground surface and the root masses will be left
Disturbance of channel bottom and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the
minimum necessary to allow the construction equipment to remove debris All areas
disturbed due to debris removal and equipment access shall be reshaped and reseeded
Access to the channel will be perpendicular to the channel so cutting of trees is held to a
minimum with precaution taken to protect mast production and stream canopy trees Dead
trees that provide den habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be
protected. A stream area debris conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 2
Stream Channel and Streambank Restoration
When possible excavation equipment will access deposition areas at a safe distance from
the streambank and do not need to track into the stream channel. Material excavated from
these deposition areas can generally be placed with only one motion of the excavation
equipment. Most of these sites include a steep eroded streambank opposite or adjacent to
the deposition area. Where there does exist an eroded streambank in the vicinity of these
deposit in areas, the material removed from this area will be used to stabilize the
streambank. Where suitable material is available rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
fill. At sites where there is no eroded streambank in the immediate vicinity, the excavated
material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of the streambank or will be hauled off
site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an elevation higher than the
existing, streambanks.
In cases when the channel has relocated it will be necessary to re-establish the stream
channel to its pre-flood location and ca acity Work in these cases shall proceed from
downstream to upstream to reduce sediment loading Restored channel dimensions will be
established in the field using reference data from appropriate nearby stable or nearly, stable
sections. The restored profile and facet slopes will be established in the field using site
elevation data and appropriate nearby reference profile data The restored channel pattern
will be determined using field indicators aerial photographs and interviews with
landowners. Where suitable material is available rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
Page 7 of 14
fill In several cases where a major channel shift has occurred, all streamflow can be
diverted into the flood channel allowing for all restoration work to be performed in the dry
bed of the original channel In cases where the original and flood channels overlap, work
shall be_ain by re-establishing a narrow diversion channel at the approximate location of the
original channel Excavation of the channel shall begin at the downstream edge of the
deposition area and will progress upstream Material excavated from this channel will be
placed at the waters edsze between the existing stream flow and the new channel. Care will
be taken to maintain an adequate berm area to prevent the flow of the stream from entering
the channel being excavated When the excavation reaches the upstream edge of the
deposition are the stream flow shall be turned into the re-established channel. A berm will
then be established to block as much of the flow as possible from moving through the flood
scoured channel. Once flow is diverted to the re-established channel and the flood scoured
channel is reduced to a minimum flow, the re-establishment of the full original capacity of
the stream and stabilization of the eroded streambank will beszin. Beginning at t he most
downstream point of the deposition area. the material will be moved to the outside of the
curve to re-establish the original stream location and capacity. Care shall be taken to move
the material in such a manner as to minimize sedimentation. As the material is moved to its
final position on the outside of the curve the streambank shall be sloped to a stable slope.
Larne rock encountered during this phase of the excavation shall be placed at the toe of the
slope used to construct vane structures or used to anchor root wads to protect
unconsolidated fill As a final operation the berm placed at the upstream end of the channel
shall be removed At no time 1vill excavation proceed below the normal channel bottom
depth.
A stream channel and streambank restoration conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 3.
Equipment that may be used to accomplish the above listed tasks include; Rubber tired
skidders 15 ton dump truck hvdraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chamsaws.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
EYig_ency work to protect existing property and structures Stabilize streambanks to
prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
IV. Prior Project History
if jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
Page 8 of 14
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include limited streambed disturbance, debris removal, and stream bank
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hqp://www.fema.g_ov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
Page 9 of 14
I Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stye m
Length
Imp act of Average Width Perennial or
site Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Before Intermittent?
(linear Impact (please specify)
(indicate feet)
on map)
1 Stream bank stabilization, 150 Long Branch 10 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal ,.. a : toA
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts include, out are not milieu to: cuive LZ a.,u asso ,-.. -=uF,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles shoeing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
d0«nstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
«%'.'w.usZs.2ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mam"Iest_com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact

Tumber
Site I`
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres) Name of

(if applicable) Waterbody Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary' sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

A d'
' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to. fill, excavation, re gmg,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-dawn valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
Page 10 of 14
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
When at all possible equipment will be kept out of the stream channel, stream crossings will be
minimized, and no excavation will be done below the existing channel bed. When at all
possible stream material will be moved from dry areas to banks, minimizing the movement of
wet (or below water line) stream material. Restored channel dimensions and profile will be
determined by evaluating apyropriate, nearby stable or nearly stable reference sections, regional
curve information, and suitable reference data from the consultants reference librga. Specific
attention will be given to the establishment of bankfull benches and appropriate bedform
sequencing throughout the restored areas. The temptation to create a wide, shallow channel
will be avoided. Any channel relocation activities shall be limited to returning the channel to
pre-storm conditions. Temporary and/or permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on
all bare soil within 15 dam ground disturbing activities. Rocky material shall not be used for
bank stabilization above the normal high water mark.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://`h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Page 11 of 14
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. ]%litigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCNVW is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
folloNving information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian Nvetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
DC
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at (919) 733-083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SERA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Page 12 of 14
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (s uImpct are feet) Multiplier MiRequired
tigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage will not change.
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this project
primarily through proper water management construction sequencing proper staging and
stockpiling of materials, and the maintenance at all times of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events No equipment fuels lubricants or other potential sources of water
pollution will be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project
Page 13 of 14
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DAVQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site.
XIII. Violations (required by DSVQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? NTo
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
IA
/y - .v
Applicant! g nt's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is alid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
Table 1- Long Branch Property Owner Information
PARCEL ID PIN OWNER AREA
61 075900889362000 YOUNG CLYDE D JR & ELEANORA 3.59
62 075900887568000 ROBINSON GLADYS H LIFE ESTATE 0.29
63 075900888399000 RAY BROTHER TRUCKING COMPANY INC 0.44
64 075900887494000 RAY FREDIA NIAPHRATA H 0.40
72 075900985178000 FOX RANDY SHERMAN & TERESA F 1.86
74 075900983380000 PATE ROY WAYNE & GEORGIA 0.77
76 075900981060000 DAVENPORT RICHARD C & BENNA KAY 2.59
1
W E \_ -
?J 4t
h ?
,-.? - CD
_ yy
--'^ Downstream .?
Project Limits v O
l N ??
2
? / N 0
I ' I ? • • k
? (r
Upstream
Project Limits .b
?'??%:J??y:-`?'l-' ?-":5_?:??_ ?_?:- i??f•_-jam ,/ O ` '.•, •• '? {/?,.+
- „••.- t• 151 1ti11'li }}}..W?W/////
?.? ?J J 1 , " ? a ?f!ri•
10
J R
G
Figure 1
Site Location Map with Stream Impact Site
Numbers ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
November2,2004 ENGINEERING & H Y D R0 GEOLOGY
USGS Micaville Quadrangle 50 COLLEGE STREET, A$HEvILLE, NC 28801
Scale 1 inch = 2000 feet TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
Long Branch www.altamontenvironmental.com
Yancev Countv. North Carolina
PATemplatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc
PRE-STOR?i4 CONDITION
! ! I NORMAL WATER LEVEL
I
i ORIGINAL STREAM DOT7OA4
CHANNEL TOP OF DANK
/AFTER-STORM CONDITION NVOODYiOTHER DEBRIS j
Jam:-ROCK DEDRIS'= :...u
Z
C
_1 V+
i J
RESTORED CONDITION j
I
t
RESTORED STREAM 1301'1-01i'I
I
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 400 - STREAM AREA DEBRIS REMOVAL m-m STREAM AREA DEBRIS FIGURE
$E N•G I?N`EiE3R'I N;Gfi'W!H-YD.R`O.G EEO L`p:G= REMOVAL CONCEPTUAL
50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com 2
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 2004
r?
Original Stream Bottom
Rack Erosion Debris
Eroded Area
BEFORE
Restored Stream Bottom
O o 0
Eroded Rock Debris Backfill O 00
1.5 O O O
1? O O
o O O 00
00 00 0
oo_oo
AFTER
Channel Bank
I
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 480 - STREAM CHANNEL AND STREAMBANK RESTORATION
', STREAM CHANNEL AND FIGURE
• .E`N:G'I:N E E R-IAN G-4'&`,H Y0TR. E o:? o o Y STREAMBANK RESTORATION
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVU LE, NC 28801 CONCEPTUAL
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamoiitenvironmental.com EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
Office Use Only: 041929 Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
kit any parucuiar item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Or ? `aE ® Section 404 Permit [I Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
Z 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information 19 19 0 ll
D
1. Owner/Applicant Information NOV 1 9 2004
Name: Michele Lawhem, Yancey County Manager
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse WER; os y? sto?tRiuwn'aRR"H
Burnsville, NC 29714
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: m.lawhemgcgip manager.yancgycgIM.org
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent thorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applic
Name: Stuart A. Rvman e Illl
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental Inc Cl
Mailing Address: 50 College Street
Asheville NC 28801 DE14R _ f1
- ? ? ',D JTGr?hIYrIATER BRAh?H
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: sryman cr,altamontenvironmental.com
Page 5 of 14
UL Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as toxins, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Long Branch DSR 2004-11
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table 1
4. Location
County: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Follow Highway 19E through
Burnsville Approximately 8 miles past Burnsville (and less than one mile after crossing the
South Toe River) turn right on Sycamore Circle (Note: Sycamore Circle intersects Highway
19E twice these directions assume turning right at the intersection nearest Burnsville.)
From Svcamore Circle turn right on Ed Young Road The DSR begins where Long Branch
flows under Sycamore Circle and continues upstream (adjacent to Ed Young Road) for
approximately 1.000 feet
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 54' 8"N/82' 10' 39" W (approximate
center of project area)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Multiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Long Branch
8. River Basin: French Broad
rote - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http•//h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/map-/.)
Page 6 of 14
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed project site consists of light residential uses
The stream and stream banks were heavily impacted during Hurricanes Frances and Ivan. The stream is clogged with woody, rock and non-native debris The channel has moved
significantly from its original location and is threatening an adjacent property.
Additionally, extensive stream bank erosion threatens the stability of existing structures
including houses and bridges.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Clearing and Debris Removal
Fallen trees, limbs and dislodged brush within the cross section of the existing or original
channel up to and including the debris line shall be removed An foreign debris will be
removed. Trees whose near term fall is apparent will be removed Live trees designated for
removal will be cut three feet above the ground surface and the root masses will be left
Disturbance of channel bottom and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the
minimum necessary to allow the construction equipment to remove debris All areas
disturbed due to debris removal and equipment access shall be reshaped and reseeded
Access to the channel will be perpendicular to the channel so cutting of trees is held to a
minimum with precaution taken to protect mast production and stream canopy trees Dead
trees that provide den habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be
protected. A stream area debris conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 2
Stream Channel and Streambank Restoration
When possible excavation equipment will access deposition areas at a safe distance from
the streambank and do not need to track into the stream channel. Material excavated from
these deposition areas can generally be placed with only one motion of the excavation
equipment. Most of these sites include a steep eroded streambank opposite or adjacent to
the deposition area. Where there does exist an eroded streambank in the vicinity of these
deposit in areas, the material removed from this area will be used to stabilize the
streambank. Where suitable material is available, rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
fill. At sites where there is no eroded streambank in the immediate vicinity, the excavated
material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of the streambank or will be hauled off
site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an elevation higher than the
existing streambanks.
In cases when the channel has relocated it will be necessary to re-establish the stream
channel to its pre-flood location and capacity. Work in these cases shall proceed from
downstream to upstream to reduce sediment loading. Restored channel dimensions will be
established in the field using reference data from appropriate nearby stable or nearly sable
sections. The restored profile and facet slopes will be established in the field using site
elevation data and appropriate nearby reference profile data The restored channel pattern
will be determined using field indicators aerial photographs and interviews with
landowners. Where suitable material is available rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
Page 7 of 14
fill In several cases where a major channel shift has occurred all streamflow can be
diverted into the flood channel allowing for all restoration work to be performed in the dry
bed of the original channel In cases where the original and flood charnels overlap, work
shall begin by re-establishing a narrow diversion channel at the approximate location of the
original channel Excavation of the channel shall begin at the downstream edge of the
deposition area and will progress stream Material excavated from this channel will be
placed at the waters edge between the existing stream flow and the new channel. Care will
be taken to maintain an adequate berm area to prevent the flow of the stream from entering
the channel beina, excavated When the excavation reaches the upstream edge of the
deposition area. the stream flow shall be turned into the re-established channel.A berm will
then be established to block as much of the flow as possible from moving through the flood
scoured channel. Once flow is diverted to the re-established channel and the flood scoured
channel is reduced to a minimum flow the re-establishment of the full original capacity of
the stream and stabilization of the eroded streambank will begin. Beginning at t he most
downstream point of the deposition area. the material will be moved to the outside of the
curve to re-establish the original stream location and capacity. Care shall be taken to move
the material in such a manner as to minimize sedimentation. As the material is moved to its
final position on the outside of the curve the streambank shall be sloped to a stable slope.
Large rock encountered during this phase of the excavation shall be placed at the toe of the
slope used to construct vane structures or used to anchor root wads to protect
unconsolidated fill As a final operation the berm placed at the upstream end of the channel
shall be removed At no time will excavation proceed below the normal channel bottom
depth.
A stream channel and streambank restoration conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 3.
Equipment that may be used to accomplish the above listed tasks include; Rubber tired
skidders 15 ton dump truck hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chainsaws.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Exigency work to protect existing property and structures. Stabilize streambanks to
prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdraN;m. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Page 8 of 14
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include limited streambed disturbance debris removal and stream bank
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
Page 9 of 14
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Length
Impact of Average Width Perennial or
Site T}pe of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Before Intermittent?
Number (linear Impact (please specify)
(indicate feet)
on map)
1 Stream bank stabilization, 150 Long Branch 10 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts include, but are not nmtteu W: l:uivclLJ a,iu assucx=a U „Y-ar,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downsire...m named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.toi)ozone.com.
v.-tiziv.marguest.com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 150
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name
(if Name of Wate applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, out are not 11m1Leu tu: nu, cncavauvu, u,wsu,g,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
Page 10 of 14
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
When at all possible equipment will be kept out of the stream channel, stream crossings will be
minimized and no excavation will be done below the existing channel bed. When at all
possible stream material will be moved from dry areas to banks, minimizing the movement of
wet or below water line) stream material. Restored channel dimensions and profile will be
determined by evaluating ppropriate, nearby stable or nearly stable reference sections, regional
curve information and suitable reference data from the consultants reference librga. Specific
attention will be given to the establishment of bankfull benches and appropriate bedform
sequencing throughout the restored areas. The temptation to create a wide, shallow channel
will be avoided. Any channel relocation activities shall be limited to returning the channel to
pre-storm conditions. Temporary and/or permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on
all bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities. Rocky material shall not be used for
bank stabilization above the normal high water mark.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to* ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stn-ngide.html.
Page 11 of 14
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCVV- P). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
UL Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at (919) 733-083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been fmalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Page 12 of 14
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (s uImpct are feet) Multiplier Mitig t uired
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage will not chance.
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this project
primarily through proper water management construction sequencing, proper staging and
stockpiling of materials, and the maintenance at all times of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events. No equipment fuels lubricants or other potential sources of water
pollution will be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project
Page 13 of 14
Xff. Sewage Disposal (required by D`VQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site.
3M. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? IvTo
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
'A
,-- - -?
Applicant/ g nt's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is alid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
Table 1- Long Branch Property Owner Information
PARCEL ID PIN OWNER AREA
61 075900889362000 YOUNG CLYDE D JR & ELEANORA 3.59
62 075900887568000 ROBINSON GLADYS H LIFE ESTATE 0.29
63 075900888399000 RAY BROTHER TRUCKING COMPANY INC 0.44
64 075900887494000 RAY FREDIA NIAPHRATA H 0.40
72 075900985178000 FOX RANDY SHERMAN & TERESA F 1.86
74 075900983380000 PATE ROY WAYNE & GEORGIA 0.77
76 075900981060000 DAVENPORT RICHARD C & BENNA KAY 2.59
N
T _ ry
///?'lll/VVV111 II Yo Q? `
r• . Downstream
Project Limits
C-D
Upstream t
- - - Project Limits
?`?-_.._. --u • yam. ? ./
, u
Q

M"il (A

df(10
4
Figure 1
Site Location Map with Stream Impact Site
Numbers
2004
N
b
2 E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
ovem
er
,
USGS Micaville Quadrangle 50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEviLLE, NC 28801
Scale 1 inch = 2000 feet TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
Long Branch
Yancev Countv, North Carolina
PATemplatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc
(? I / PRE-STORM CONDITION
!1 NORMAL 1VATER LEVEL
I
i ORIGINAL STREAM BOTTOM

CHANNEL TOP OF BANK
i
I /AFTER-STOR1,1 CONDITION \` : WOOD)';OTHER DEBRIS
z ROCK DEBRIS` _
z
r ;
_1 C1
1( RESTORED CONDITION
I I?
RESTORED STREAM Boi"1-Onl
i
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 400 - STREAM AREA DEBRIS REMOVAL
i, STREAM AREA DEBRIS FIGURE
,E N..'G'UNE;E'RING:?:&-fH Y., D. R%O_6'E'O' LO'G4, REMOVAL CONCEPTUAL
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com 2
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
Channel Bank
1

Original Stream Bottom
Rock Erosion Debris

?
O ? O CtO O ?? Eroded Area

BEFORE
Restored Stream Bottom
:lr
O O O
Eroded Rock Debris Backfill. Q 00
1.5 00 O
1? O 0
O O 00
O
o
0
T?O- 0
O 00(
AFTER
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 480 - STREAM CHANNEL AND STREAMBANK RESTORATION
STREAM CHANNEL AND FIGURE
E N N E:E !R'I'NG <H Y o;R:.o 3,E o;L o_a Y STREAMBANK RESTORATION
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, TIC 28801 CONCEPTUAL TEL.[phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamoiitenvirorunental.com EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
AL:AMUN I CIyVIr ?S AL, IM
NC DWQ 11/29/2004
Date Type Reference Original Amt. Balance Due Discount Payment
10/04/2004 Bill 475.00 475.00 475.00
Check Amount 475.00

UEC t 2004
WETU11 S AND S74R MNATER BRANCH
4428
BB&T- Business Checking 475.00