20041928 Ver 1_Complete File_20050306

MEMORANDUM
TO:
John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Barnett. Kevin
WQ Supervisor: Forrest Westall
Date:
SUBJECT:
WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Yancey County Ayles Creek EWP County Yancey
Project Number 04 1928 ? County2
Recvd From APP Region Asheville
Received Date 12/1/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type clearing/debris removal, stream channel & bank
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
37 Stream 7Y -@N F- 7-2-52-33- F_c- Tr 40,306. ? 150.00
s-?eam O Y O N F- 7-3-14-3=(1 WSII HQW 40,306. F 310.00
[---F-O Y O N F_F_F_F_[__'F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y * N Did you request more info? Q Y Q N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y (0 N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y * N Recommendation: Q Issue 0 Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Issued under 04-1927
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
F Date: 2/3/05 Project Name: Yancey County: Ayles Creek EWP
DWQ#: 04-1928
County: Yancey
To: Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
60-day Processing Time: revised 1/24/05 to 3/24/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEviLLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
January 18, 2005 q Ms. Cyndi Caroly
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Yancey County EAT Project Revised Pre-Construction Notification Application for
Cane River EAT 2004-02, White Oak Creek EAT 2004-13, and Ayles Creek EAT
2004-18
Dear Ms. Caroly:
Enclosed are the revised Cane River, White Oak Creek, and Ayles Creek EWP exigency sites 2004-02,
2004-13, and 2004-18 applications for Section 404 nationwide permit 37, and corresponding DWQ 401
water quality certification. Exigency work applied for in this permit includes streambank stabilization
and debris removal. The primary goal in conducting the exigency work is to protect property, and to
return the channel to pre-flood conditions. I have signed the application as an authorized agent for
Yancey County. A letter of authorization is included. Additionally, we have sent one copy of the
enclosed permit application directly to Kevin Barnett in the Swannanoa office.
Altamont appreciates your assistance with this revised application. If you would like additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G.
Enclosures: PCN - Cane River EWP 2004-02 l o? y
PCN - White Oak Creek EWP 2004-13 ''?u=&
PCN - Ayles Creek EWP 2004-18
Letter of Authorization
CC: Michele Lawhern - Yancey County Manager (transmittal letter only)
Cliff Vinson - District Conservation Officer NRCS (transmittal letter only)
PAYancey-EWMRCS EWP\Emergency Repairs\Ayles Creek\DWQ permit cover letter-Caroly.doc

? ? ? ?? fry !v
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 011full
lil ally lJWLil:Ulal RUM is not appacame to tms project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information -°r? -
Name: Michele Lawhern, Yancey County Manager
JAIN
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse
Burnsville, NC 29714 c.-;.;:;
:ate .vtS
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Stuart A. Ryman
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental, Inc
Mailing Address: 50 College Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: sryman@altamontenvironmentaL com
Page 5 of 15
III. Project Informpti4on.
Attach a vicinity F'map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of prof ect: Ayles Creek EWP 2004-18
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table I
4. Location
County: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
Follow Highway 19E through Burnsville. Four miles past Burnsville, take the exit for NC
Highway 80 South. After less than a mile on Micaville Loop, turn right to remain on
Highway 80 South. From this intersection, follow Highway 80 South for 2-3 miles, until
turning right on Hickory Springs Road. The project site begins when Hickory Springs Road
crosses Ayles Creek 500 feet from Highway 80, and continues upstream until the bridge just
past the Hickory Spring Plant. See attached Figure I and Figure 2
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 52'55" N1820 13 ' 13 " W (approximate
center of project area)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 1Llultiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Ayles Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad
Page 6 of 15
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admirt/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The proposed project site consists of light residential, commercial, and agricultural uses.
The stream and stream banks were heavily impacted during Tropical Storms Frances and
Ivan. The stream is clogged with woody, rock, and non-native debris. Extensive stream
bank erosion threatens the stability of existing structures including houses and bridges.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
E" 2004-18
This project area begins at the Hickory Springs Road Bridge over Ayles Creek and extends
approximately 2, 000 feet upstream. Highwater flow has severely eroded the right riverbank
upstream of the Hickory Springs Road Bridge (location 1 Figure 1). The right riverbank is
over-steepened and is unstable in several locations (locations 1, 2, and 4 Figure 1). The
confluence ofAyles Creek and an unnamed tributary (location 2 Figure 1) is clogged with
rocky debris, and the channel or the tributary has relocated to an apparently stable location
approximately 20 feet west of the original location. Additionally, the channel ofAyles
Creek has relocated to an unstable location in one area of the project reach (location 3
Figure 1). At location 3 the pre flood stream channel is blocked by large amounts of rock
and woody debris. The blockage has moved the stream such that it runs on both sides of an
existing powerline pole. Tthis configuration could potentially cause harm to life and
property by making the pole unstable. Three of the four locations shown of Figure I are
exigency sites. It is our professional opinion that it is preferable, at this site, to complete all
repairs during one site mobilization, rather than to disturb the creek and riparian area
multiple times.. Repairs at this DSR will involve the following:
• Remove rocky and woody debris from floodplain.
• Stabilize the channel at locations 1,2, and 4 in its post flood configuration using
organic and rock structures.
• Protect the right wing wall of the bridge using large angular stone.
• Channel realignment at location 3 will entail moving the stream into its pre-storm
channel by clearing debris blockages, which are forcing the channel to its new
unstable location. The affected reach of stream at location 3 is approximately 100
feet long.
• Streambank stabilization at location 4 will entail installing a Jhook to deflect flow
away from the steep eroding bank. Additionally, large boulders will be placed at the
toe of the slope to stabilize the bank.
Removal of Organic and Rocky Debris
Fallen trees, limbs, dislodged brush, and non-native material within the cross section of the
existing or original channel up to and including the debris line shall be removed. Any
foreign debris (e.g., trash, appliances) will also be removed. Trees whose near term fall is
Page 7 of 15
apparent will be removed. Rooted trees designated for removal will be cut three feet above
the ground surface and the root masses will be left in place. Disturbance of channel bottom
and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the minimum necessary to allow the
construction equipment to remove debris. All areas disturbed due to debris removal and
equipment access shall be reshaped and reseeded. Access to the channel will be
perpendicular to the channel so cutting of trees is held to a minimum with precaution taken
to protect mast production and stream canopy trees. Dead trees that provide den habitat
and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be protected. The applicant
recognizes that some woody debris in the riparian zone is a necessary component of habitat
integrity and will strive only to remove non-native objects and those debris elements
considered an immediate or impending threat to life and structures.
Rocky debris within the flood plain will be removed using an excavator. The removal of
rocky debris will proceed from the stream channel back toward the stream bank allowing
the excavator to work on the debris pile. The reconfigured floodplain will be shaped in a
manner intended to restore the hydraulic capacity of the stream system. Rocky debris
removed from the floodplain will be used to stabilize the streambank, or will be hauled
offsite. At sites inhere there is no eroded streambank in the immediate vicinity, the
excavated material will be used to strengthen the natural bean of the streambank or will be
hauled off site. 112 no case shall the deposited material be placed at an elevation higher
than the existing streambanks.
Streambank Restoration
When possible excavation equipment will access streambank repair areas from the dry and
will not track into the stream channel. Most of the steep eroded streambank are opposite or
adjacent to the debris removal areas. At these areas, the rocky material removed from the
floodplain will be used to stabilize the streambank, with the addition of large boulders
along the toe of the slope as necessary to stabilize and protect the toe. Where suitable
material is available, rock vane and root wads will be installed in the restored bank section
to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated fill (typical structure
cross-sections and plan views are included in Figure 3).
Any channel work will take into account existing upstream and downstream channel
dimensions. At 770 time shall excavation proceed below the normal channel bottom depth.
Stream bank stabilization and debris removal work will be done such that there is a smooth
transition from upstream to downstream through the repaired channel. The temptation to
create a wide, shallow channel will be avoided. Temporary andlor permanent herbaceous
vegetation shall be planted on all bare soil within 15 days ofground disturbing activities.
With the landowner's permission, live stakes and bare rootstock native trees and shrubs will
be planted on the top of bank stabilization work.
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this
project primarily through proper water management, construction sequencing, proper
staging and stockpiling of materials, and the maintenance, at all times, of suitable channel
capacity for expected flow events.
Page 8of15
The work addressed in this application is intended to improve the post flood hydraulic
capacity of the stream reaches discussed and stabilize severely eroded streambanks that are
threatening structures on other property. The proposed actions are not intended to enhance
existing conditions or restore the stream reaches using natural channel design techniques.
Such activities would require detailed engineering evaluation and design, which are beyond
the intent of the EWP program. The proposed work has not been reviewed or sealed by a
Professional Engineer.
Figures 4 through 6 are conceptual drawing illustrating proposed stream stabilization
measures on digital photographs.
Equipment that may be used to accomplish the above listed tasks include; Rubber tired
skidders, 15 ton dump truck, hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chainsaws.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Exigency work to protect existing property and structures. Stabilize streambanks to
prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
Page 9 of 15
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include limited streambed disturbance, debris removal, and stream bank
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, nil,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:/h,,Ati-Nv.fema.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes Nvetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
Page 10 of 15
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Average Width
Stream Impact Length of of Stream
Site Number Impact (linear Stream Before Impact Perennial or
indicate on ma Type of Im act* feet Name** M Intermittent?
Stream Bank
Stabilization, Debris Ayles
1 Removal 200 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank
Stabilization, Debris Ayles
2 Removal 100 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank
Stabilization, Channel
Realignment, Debris Ayles
3 Removal 100 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank
Stabilization, Channel
Realignment, Debris Ayles
4 Removal 60 Creek 20 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mMguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 460
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 11 of 15
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local storm-water requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
When at all possible equipment will be kept out of the stream channel, stream crossings will be
minimized, and no excavation will be done below the existing channel bed. When at all possible
stream material will be moved fi-om dry areas to banks, minimizing the movement of wet (or
below water line) stream material. The temptation to create a wide, shallow channel will be
avoided. Temporary andlor permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities. Rocky material shall not be used for bank
stabilization above the normal high water mark. Large rocky material will be brought in to
stabilize the toe of impacted stream banks where necessary. 41tamont will provide a site
manager to periodically inspect and supervise contractor work to help ensure impact avoidance
instructions are being followed.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
Page 12 of 15
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wM/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
Page 13 of 15
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No N If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
15npervious acreage will not change.
Page 14 of 15
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this project
primarily through proper water management, construction sequencing, proper staging and
stockpiling of materials, and the maintenance, at all times, of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events. No equipment, fuels, lubricants, or other potential sources of water
pollution will be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project.
XU. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A

Applicant/Agent's S' ature Date
(Agent's signature is valid o y if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 15 of 15
Michele P. Lawhern, County Manager
John Renfro, Chairman
YANCEY COUNTY Blaine Whitson, Commlissioner
County Courthouse, Room 11 • Burnsville, North Carolina 28714
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone] • EMAIL: [e-mail]
November 10, 2004
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
50 College Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stu,
At the regular monthly meeting of the Yancey County Board of Commissioners last
evening, the enclosed contract for professional services was executed, relative to EWP
Section 216 work. Pursuant to, or in the spirit of the further intent of this contract, this
Yancey County Local Government hereby authorizes Altamont Environmental, Inc. to
sign and execute all necessary permits and coordinate communications with said
regulatory agencies.
If there should be any questions about the above, please feel free to call me at any time.
Ze ely ,
le P. Lawhern
Yancey County Manager
Work: 828/682-3971; Cellular 828/284-0746
Table 1
_ Affected Parcels Ayles Creek
Yancey County, North Carolina
MAP ID PIN OWNER Property ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP Exigency? CHANNEL STEAMBANK ROCK DEBRIS WOODY DEBRIS COMMENTS
Size REALIGNMENT STABILIZATION REMOVAL REMOVAL
acres
Approximately 200 feel of stream
frontage
127 74900618705000 CARROLL JAMES FREDDIE 8 LINDA KAY 0.60 96 COUNTRY HEARTS LN BURNSVILLE NC 28714 Y • • •
Approximately 150 feel of stream
frontage
116 74900619826000 CARROLL MARY o.so 50 COUNTRY HEARTS RD BURNSVILLE NC 28714 N • • •
Approximately 200 feet of stream
frontage
135 74900616670000 CARROLL TOMMY 0.40 343 SPAR MILL ROAD BURNSVILLE NC 28714 N • • •
Approximately 450 feet of stream
121 074900616728000 CARROLL JAMES FREDDIE 8 LINDA KAY 1.79 96 COUNTRY HEARTS LN BURNSVILLE NC 28714 Y • • • frontage
Approximately 200 feet of stream
134 074900614771000 EARP AUDREY ETAL 0.19 373 SPAR MILL ROAD BURNSVILLE NC 28714 Y • • • frontage
Approximately 100 feet of stream
136 074900615506000 EARP AUDREY o.59 373 SPAR MILL ROAD BURNSVILLE NC 28714 Y • • • frontage
Approximately 400 feet of stream
143 074800699557000 HARLEM ACRES LLC 95.74 486 VANCE STREET FOREST CITY NC 28043 Y • • • - • frontage
Approximately 1,200 feet of
149 074900517267000 YANCEY COUNTY 3.0s R00M11,COURTHOUSE BURNSVILLE NC 28714 Y • • • stream frontage
Approximately 150 feet of stream
166 074900508484000 HICKORY SPRINGS MFG CO INC 24.90 P.O. BOX 128 HICKORY NC 28601 Y • • • frontage
PAYancey CountyWRCS EWP1Emergency RepairMAyles Creeklparcels Ayles acne Page 1 of2
N
\< W?E
J S
N
/f ? nom` (11
, 7+

;Nil
Downstream
Project Limits

O

0"
0
Red - Exigency Sites
Blue -Non Exigency Sites
Upstream
Project Limits
Figure 1
Site Location Map with Stream Impact Site
Numbers
January 14, 2005
USGS Micaville Quadrangle
Scale 1 inch = 2000 feet
Ayles Creek
Yancev Countv, North Carolina
O
01r
j?
E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www. altamontenvironmental. com
PATemplatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc

r
r? asp ,? F y •,.??. „?, - - s".';, ,_ i 4
Fri 7
%
4V,. Y9; hit .]
f `'h. v ? f. 3.1? `f } fir. : S - ? ? :d=.:.. ? ¢+Y
Mill! 11PRTmi ?lj _71- 1. 11
r1
-..,, ? r ??- 7)..' .a, ?2't'w;'1. ??,????2 .' r r s?! v \ ??Lt;? fir. •,' } a
?`'+••?, •q. WI?`. erg... c ? ?, srr ,'Y? r =-o+' ? > .?.#, 'r< ? ti.
•` fiT
s
'--
r? •r it ?
X11 r 1?, ? '+ ?i ? ?-?- • „`,r' ?$?'?.,".,? t'L` "' "-?'? ?'/fi ss ? ` f?._ f_. ? "? ?e ?rj ?- ? 5'.
,f.? n r ? ;?' s.>''r,,'., r°a8? qtr'' 1 .a?•:r""? -r?..r` ?? .?
`d ww"` S .y 2 j s ?` ?! L ^ ?`' F -.,'?,.lij•" ;..ct>tl" 7r,.: 4 ?,.;-. `.
i' I rte- 1
t wv ?'ANOW
F r f i .,
si ? ?1 s • ? ?.,?''? +ti. + Yz ?, r'f,W t s ? ?? ? , z.
?/P??ii a /`B l-•'' •6-•._? 1 z S *tb .!-jam •I4"?1?? ?0' c ?. d J Zi
`t 'r3yf ?taA. 4aJ, .? 14
, ?`
r., L:? 6 - '.?- ??F ? •. a?` ?"a yr?
??i?• ?c.u•„y ? ? ', ?•? I `,°:f J ?. , ?"'-s.?"?'? .. ".9J{y-+. 7, S'w. i4?}?ff?3`, Y? AVA ?•? ?? ? ?
r -+v v
,... s
y S VOW v?
w
STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
y?tx. *,} . ;?" •, ..R' - r• :T N I N R I N & H Y D R G 0 Y MEASURES-SITE #1
s:• ,- , s' tr,!?' ,?? 50 COLLEGE STREET ASHE\ ILLE, NC 23501
?. M TEL altam;;;o EnC8282813; l EWP 2004-18
wwS.altaontcneaonmentlLc,om
AYLES CREEK
* .:, . DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
fem.
PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN NOT TO SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NC
&
?sr? T? ' tt•,*ses- CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
4 '?;.' aSl• DATE: 01/10/05 FILE PATH: P:\YANCEY-EWP\ENERGENCY REPAIRS\AYLES CREEK\CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHOTOS.DWG
n^D
TYPICAL J HOOK DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
J
A
92
FLOW
RECTION
A
9¢? 1/3 W
G
!! 1/3 W
3 W
GAPS
(1/4-1/3 RO K DIA.) /
? 00
2
1
I
SCOUR POOL l
PLAN VIEW
FLOW
DIRECTION J
I ?
a
ANKFULL
CROSS SECTION VIEW
m:N
FLOW
-?2-7% DIRECTION
/'BOULDERS
PROFILE VIEW
2
SCOUR
TYPICAL CROSS VANE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
W-? /3t?-? /
UOO,
PLAN VIEW
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASUEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www. altmnontenvironm ental.wm
SOURCE: APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC
DATE
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART A. RYMAN
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DESCRIPTION BY CHK APV DATE: JANUARY 12, 2005
SCALE:
NOT TO SCALE
YANCEY COUNTY, NC
FIGURE
3
24" FIELDSTONE
S
LDERS
TRENCHED IN 3' MIN.
AND COVERED
SILL MUST BE TIED IN TO
BANKFULL ELEVATION
TYPICAL J HOOK AND
CROSS VANE DETAILS
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
r
*n
Ge 4i +t?.

v n a •? r'
a?
41 111
tft-
r " -
2,3,¢¢^x^
. rPs?s.K t. '
#4
Ae?'
4 4, 4
?? ? y rt
S
4.r?.•.,r? 4 ti°' Y
is !
J

Va.
it
S? t
v r
?a Ott .?? ????'? a ?? ; ?'?c.?:??-? y{ ., ,•
?-
J.I
vl?x5 v "' u+? e+e. #?`I` ai,e?+- fir- *.?r,''•?" ?
! '.,[ 9? I .i:. ?. 1' f Si }? ?z-a, l ?r `-?Y n ? $.t?J..: t: "_.,yY?t?W " r'?>` {n?•w'i ?,? ? y _
? ? ? t«.rt a ,."-. J,n ? }'St*„Y?is?,?. Ssk": ,te ?y........ "" ? - F,' , ?' +; t `;» ? ..,, !'r yg sri,.:;.'_ f
??1? ?,..` y •. 3 yi `$. .? ?'" '+... w? ft. ?4. _• s„°•T•?.??-. x??y,+"r"y..rekWW? 'r' ..'?.? S?'
.. ` r Y 8Fr'._ -t.• , ?, w`. ?,? ,.do- _y,yy ra ,ty,?,-. '?'l' .. _. ??rF
•_ ? _ 1 ?r f `? ,, i.: • .h v3' 4 _ ,?' _ Y.4 i ^ may,,.- 'y ?yL? - ?`.. ' ?'? i 'f
?,-_?R bc.y e•'"''aA'° ?• ice"
ior
03+,! r s
R
? *Lt?,14

- r r - I
T.±
w ?Y t ,iS'"ws ?'
T`v
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www. altatnoiatenv ironmental.com
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE NOT TO SCALE
et PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN
' CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DATE: 01/12/05
STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
MEASURES-SITE#3
EWP 2004-18
AYLES CREEK
YANCEY COUNTY, NC
FILE PATH: P. \YANCEY-EWP \EMERGENCY REPAIRS\AYLES CREEK\CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHOTOS.OWG

le?

Y
r?
- MA"

.°•., :'?' 50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
li4l ` ' ytt f e?•«++?' .' TEL.[phone] PAC 828.281.3351
4 www.a]tamontenvtronntental.coin
'`M #\ DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN NOT TO SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DATE: 01/12/05
A
R ?41

Y tiA 1? f
°"
'
em
'
, ?
s - A?
?,? Sri `?r
? ? k ~<, . :r3Y"? ••. Vrva? „
„?...
ate. -
STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
MEASURES-SITE#4
EWP 2004-18
AYLES CREEK

YANCEY COUNTY, NC
FILE PATH: P:\YANCEY-EWP\EMERGENCY REPAIRS\AYLES CREEK\CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHOTOS.DWG
9 S
41
?.A
?wlf?67 ?'' •?.a}-•'., -?,. 'v`':x_ Y' =a spa :s'*'a'"4

E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
50 COLLEGE-' STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] Fac.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
CE.. @I
V
November 18, 2004

Ms. Cyndi Caroly IJ
???? it 1 2004
28
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit 0419
`ENR _ VVAI-EH QUALITY
fir? 4;; At) ^7-Z; "
TER BRANC

1650 Mail Service Center H
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Yancey County EWP Pre-Construction Notification Applications
Dear Ms. Caroly:
Attached are six applications for Section 404 nationwide permit 37, and corresponding DWQ 401 water
quality certification. Exigency work applied for in these permits includes stream bank stabilization,
debris removal, and channel relocation. The primary goal in conducting the exigency work is to protect
property, and to return the channel to pre-flood conditions. Please note that the applications are signed
by myself as an authorized agent for Yancey County. A letter of authorization will follow.
Altamont appreciates the opportunity to provide these applications. If you would like additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G.
Enclosures: PCN -White ak Creek
PCN - Long Branch
PCN - Cane River
PCN - Cattail Creek
PCN - Bowlens Creek
PCN - Ayles Creek
CC: Michele Lawhern - Yancey County Manager
Cliff Vinson - District Conservation Officer NRCS
P:\Yancey County\NRCS EWP\Correspondence\DWQ permit cover letter.doc
_NT

ENGINEERING. & HYDROGEOLOGY
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
I -J
November 18, 2004 RID L` i 0 ULR nq
IEC• 0 1 2004 sJ
Ms. Cyndi Caroly
Division of Water
Hands Unit Quality O 41928 v1'?TL ?E VMTER 7CR? ??R QUALITY
BRANCH
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Yancey County EWP Pre-Construction Notification Applications
Dear Ms. Caroly:
Attached are six applications for Section 404 nationwide permit 37, and corresponding DWQ 401 water
quality certification. Exigency work applied for in these pent its includes stream bank stabilization,
debris removal, and channel relocation. The primary goal in Cpnducting the exigency work is to protect
property, and to return the channel to pre-flood conditions. Ple*e note that the applications are signed
by myself as an authorized agent for Yancey County. A letter of authorization will follow.
Altamont appreciates the opportunity to provide these applications. If you would like additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G.
Enclosures: PCN -White ak Creek
PCN - Long Branch
PCN - Cane River
PCN - Cattail Creek
PCN - Bowlens Creek
PCN - Ayles Creek
CC: Michele Lawhern - Yancey County Manager
Cliff Vinson - District Conservation Officer NRCS
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
r-
PAYancey County CS EWP\Correspondence\DWQ permit cover letter.doc
Triage Check List
Date, ,V oje6 Name:
•
DWQ#: ? 2 _
County: t

To: ARO Kevin Barnett ? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
? RRO Mike Horan
F hone: (919)
Tele
rom. p

The file attached is being forwarded to our for your evaluation.
Please call if you need as4stance.
`1 .
tream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings? -
? Cumulative impact concern
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No.
Processing
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1.
i
L C iv
}?+?
II.
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Form Version May 2002

Owner/Applicant Information i ???o V
Name: Michele Lawhern, Yana Coun Manager U
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse
Burnsville. NC 29714 iu RPM, WATen _.
Applicant Information
419 2 8
DWQ NO.
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: __(828) 682-4301
E-mail Address: m.lawhemgcgiD mana er.yancecount?org
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Stuart A. R man Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental Inc L!= U Xi I
Mailing Address: 50 College Street DEC 266 d
Asheville, NC 28801
M= WATER ptlAIITY
WETLANDS AND STORA HATER BRANCH
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 14
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Ayles Creek EWP 2004-18
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table 1
4. Location
County: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Follow Highway 19E through
Burnsville Four miles past Burnsville take the exit for NC Highway 80 South. After less
than a mile on Micaville Loop turn right to remain on Highway 80 South. From this
intersection follow Highway 80 South for 2-3 miles until turning right on Hickory Springs
Road The project site begins when Hickory Springs Road crosses Ayles Creek 500 feet
from Highway 80, and continues upstream until the bridge just past the Hickory Spring Plant.
See attached Figure I
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 52' 55" N/82° 13' 13" W (approximate
center of project area
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Multiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Ayles Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 14
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed project site consists of light residential uses.
The stream and stream banks were heavily impacted during Hurricanes Frances and Ivan
The stream is clogged with woody, rock and non-native debris In some cases the
channel has moved significantly from its original location and is threatening an adjacent
property. Additionally, extensive stream bank erosion threatens the stability of existing
structures including houses and bridges.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Clearing and Debris Removal
Fallen trees, limbs and dislodged brush within the cross section of the existing or original
channel up to and including the debris line shall be removed. Any foreign debris will be
removed. Trees whose near term fall is apparent will be removed Live trees designated for
removal will be cut three feet above the ground surface and the root masses will be left
Disturbance of channel bottom and banks, and equipment access areas shall be held to the
minimum necessary to allow the construction equipment to remove debris. All areas
disturbed due to debris removal and equipment access shall be reshaped and reseeded
Access to the channel will be perpendicular to the channel so cutting of trees is held to a
minimum with precaution taken to protect mast production and stream canopy trees Dead
trees that provide den habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be
protected. A stream area debris conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 2
Stream Channel and Streambank Restoration
When possible excavation equipment will access deposition areas at a safe distance from
the streambank and do not need to track into the stream channel. Material excavated from
these deposition areas can generally be placed with only one motion of the excavation
equipment. Most of these sites include a steep eroded streambank opposite or adjacent to
the deposition area. Where there does exist an eroded streambank in the vicinity of these
deposit areas, the material removed from this area will be used to stabilize the streambank
Where suitable material is available, rock vanes and root wads will be installed in the
restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated fill
At sites where there is no eroded streambank in the immediate vicinity, the excavated
material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of the streambank or will be hauled off
site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an elevation higher than the
existing streambanks.
In cases when the channel has relocated it will be necessary to re-establish the stream
channel to its pre-flood location and capacity. Work in these cases shall proceed from
downstream to upstream to reduce sediment loading. Restored channel dimensions will be
established in the field using reference data from appropriate nearby stable or nearly stable
sections. The restored profile and facet slopes will be established in the field using site
elevation data and appropriate nearby reference profile data. The restored channel ap ttern
will be determined using field indicators, aerial photographs and interviews with
landowners. Where suitable material is available, rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
Page 7 of 14
fill In several cases where a major channel shift has occurred all streamflow can be
diverted into the flood channel allowing for all restoration work to be performed in the dry
bed of the original channel In cases where the original and flood channels overlap, work
shall begin by re-establishing a narrow diversion channel at the approximate location of the
original channel Excavation of the channel shall begin at the downstream edge of the
deposition area and will progress upstream Material excavated from this channel will be
placed at the waters edge between the existing stream flow and the new channel. Care will
be taken to maintain an adequate berm area to prevent the flow of the stream from entering
the channel being excavated When the excavation reaches the upstream edge of the
deposition area, the stream flow shall be turned into the re-established channel. A berm will
then be established to block as much of the flow as possible from moving through the flood
scoured channel. Once flow is diverted to the re-established channel and the flood scoured
channel is reduced to a minimum flow, the re-establishment of the full original capacity of
the stream and stabilization of the eroded streambank will begin. Beginning at t he most
downstream point of the deposition area, the material will be moved to the outside of the
curve to re-establish the original stream location and capacity. Care shall be taken to move
the material in such a manner as to minimize sedimentation. As the material is moved to its
final position on the outside of the curve the streambank shall be sloped to a stable slope.
Large rock encountered during this phase of the excavation shall be placed at the toe of the
slope used to construct vane structures or used to anchor root wads to protect
unconsolidated fill As a final operation the berm placed at the upstream end of the channel
shall be removed At no time will excavation proceed below the normal channel bottom
depth.
A stream channel and streambank restoration conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 3.
Equipment that may be used to accomplish the above listed tasks include; Rubber tired
skidders 15 ton dump truck hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chainsaws.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Exigency work to protect existing- property and structures. Stabilize streambanks to
prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Page 8 of 14
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include limited streambed disturbance, debris removal, and stream bank
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
Page 9 of 14
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Average Width
Stream Impact Length of of Stream
Site Number Impact (linear Stream Before Impact Perennial or
indicate on ma Type of Im act* feet Name** ft Intermittent?
Stream Bank Stabilization, Ayles
1 Debris Removal 150 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank Stabilization, Bowlens
2 Debris Removal 50 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank Stabilization,
Channel Realignment, Bowlens
3 Debris Removal 100 Creek 20 Perennial
Bowlens
4 Debris Removal 100 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank Stabilization,
Channel Realignment, Bowlens
5 Debris Removal 60 Creek 20 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flow's. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wN«v.uscs.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
,,ww.mapguest.com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 460
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: tilt, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
Page 10 of 14
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
When at all possible equipment will be kept out of the stream channel stream crossings will be
minimized, and no excavation will be done below the existing channel bed. When at all
possible stream material will be moved from dry areas to banks minimizing the movement of
wet (or below water line) stream material. Restored channel dimensions and profile will be
determined by evaluating appropriate nearby stable or nearly stable reference sections regional
curve information, and suitable reference data from the consultants reference libraa. Specific
attention will be given to the establishment of bankfull benches and appropriate bedform
sequencing throughout the restored areas. The temptation to create a wide shallow channel
will be avoided. Any channel relocation activities shall be limited to returning the channel to
pre-storm conditions. Temporary and/or permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on
all bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities. Rocky material shall not be used for
bank stabilization above the normal high water mark.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
Page 1 I of 14
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncNvetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NIA
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
M Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Page 12 of 14
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (s uare feet) Multiplier Mitig ton
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Zone i extends out A feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation. is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Page 13 of 14
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage will not change
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throup-hout this project
primarily through proper water management construction sequencing proper staging and
stockpiling of materials and the maintenance at all times of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events No equipment fuels lubricants or other potential sources of water
pollution will be stored in areas that could be flooded during this proigct.
X11. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site
XUL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Applicant/Agent's
(Agent`s signature is valid i
ture
if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
L6_dy
Date
Page 14 of 14
Table I- Ayles Creek Property Owner Information
PARCEL ID PIN OWNER AREA
121 074900616728000 CARROLL JAMES FREDDIE & LINDA KAY 1.79
134 074900614771000 EARP AUDREY ETAL 0.19
136 074900615506000 EARP AUDREY 0.59
143 074800699557000 HARLEY ACRES LLC 95.74
145 074900517267000 YANCEY COUNTY 3.06
149 074900517267000 YANCEY COUNTY 3.06
152 074900515100000 SILVERS NEALY & PATRICIA 1.75
153 074900503906000 GILSON HERBERT D & MARIAN J 2.64
163 074900504776000 MCINTOSH CLYDE & GLENNA 0.80
166 074900508484000 HICKORY SPRINGS MFG CO INC 24.90
169 074900502518000 LUCAS BRYANT L & JACQUELINE ANN 2.15
\• W?E ? ? ? /N
V
_-
1?h?
Downstream ?j Project Limits
N S
1!
says y z_i.', ? i
ss iq?s H ?
Upstream s _
Project Limits
26
'?-\? _ 117 /ti.• , .if f? /?- ?, I l
Figure 1
Site Location Map with Stream Impact Site ALTAMONT ,
Numbers
November 12,2004 ENGINEERING & HYDR0GEOIOGY
USGS Micaville Quadrangle 50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEEvtLLE, NC 28801
Scale 1 inch = 2000 feet TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
Ayles Creek
Yancev Countv, North Carolina
PATemplatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc
/ PRE-STOR.%l CONDITION
CHANNEL TOP OF BANK
ORIGINAL STREAS1 BOTTOh4
ROCK DEBRIS __-.- - -=- _ ......?•..
7
- z
I j
- U
a
_n q
RESTORED CONDITION i
i
i
RESTORED STREAM BOTTOM
I
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 400 - STREAM AREA DEBRIS REMOVAL
ALTAmoNT ?, STREAM AREA DEBRIS FIGURE
?,_:...,_..e.:.,.._._._ _:.. REMOVAL CONCEPTUAL
50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION 2
YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Channel Bank
I
I, ,,
Original Stream Bottom
Rock Erosion Debris
Eroded Area
BEFORE
° 0 °
Restored Stream Bottom Eroded Rock Debris Backfill Q Q Q
.5 °0
,?- Q
o ° 0°° - .
00 ° °
Qo_°o
AFTER
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 480 - STREAM CHANNEL AND STREAMBANK RESTORATION
RUIN i STREAM CHANNEL AND FIGURE
EtNtc°I N E,E,.R, N a, ,, STREAMBANK RESTORATION
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801 CONCEPTUAL
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altainontenvironmental.com EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY. COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER Il, 2004
Office Use Only: 0 4 q 9 2 {dorm Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. t Q
err any parucuiar item is not appitcante to tors project, please enter "Not Applicab e" or "N/A".)
*EN
1. Processing
MME C E 1 V E D
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Michele Lawhem, ) an County Manager NOV D
1 9 2004
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse
Burnsville, NC 29714 WEDS in6 S arFR aD „
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: m.lawhemgcountymanager.yancg coon .or
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the A ent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/ t 0 WO n @aj Name: Stuart A. R man
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental, Inc 9 Ezv1 2994
Mailing Address: 50 College Street
Asheville NC 28801 DE!JR - WATER QUALITY
WtiW.,05. 40 IUttx, A t
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 14
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Avles Creek EX VP 2004-18
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table 1
4. Location
County: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phaseilot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Follow Highway 19E through
Burnsville Four miles past Burnsville take the exit for NC Highway 80 South. After less
than a mile on Micaville Loop turn right to remain on Highway 80 South. From this
intersection follow Highway 80 South for 2-3 miles until turning right on Hickory Springs
Road The project site begins when Hickory Springs Road crosses Ayles Creek 500 feet
from Hiahwav 80, and continues upstream until the bridge just past the Hickory Spring Plant.
See attached Figure 1
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 52' 55" N/82° 13' 13" W (approximate
center of proiect area)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Multiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Ayles Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 14
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed project site consists of light residential uses.
The stream and stream banks were heavily impacted during Hurricanes Frances and Ivan
The stream is clogged with woody, rock and non-native debris. In some cases the
channel has moved significantly from its original location and is threatening an adjacent
property. Additionally, extensive stream bank erosion threatens the stability of existing
structures including houses and bridges.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Clearing and Debris Removal
Fallen trees, limbs and dislodged brush within the cross section of the existing or original
channel up to and including the debris line shall be removed. Any foreign debris will be
removed. Trees whose near term fall is apparent will be removed. Live trees designated for
removal will be cut three feet above the ground surface and the root masses will be left
Disturbance of channel bottom and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the
minimum necessary to allow the construction equipment to remove debris. All areas
disturbed due to debris removal and equipment access shall be reshaped and reseeded
Access to the channel will be perpendicular to the channel so cutting of trees is held to a
minimum with precaution taken to protect mast production and stream canopy trees Dead
trees that provide den habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be
protected. A stream area debris conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 2
Stream Channel and Streambank Restoration
When possible excavation equipment will access deposition areas at a safe distance from
the streambank and do not need to track into the stream channel. Material excavated from
these deposition areas can generally be placed with only one motion of the excavation
equipment. Most of these sites include a steep eroded streambank opposite or adjacent to
the deposition area. Where there does exist an eroded streambank in the vicinity of these
deposit areas, the material removed from this area will be used to stabilize the streambank
Where suitable material is available, rock vanes and root wads will be installed in the
restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated fill
At sites where there is no eroded streambank in the immediate vicinity, the excavated
material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of the streambank or will be hauled off
site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an elevation higher than the
existing streambanks.
In cases when the channel has relocated it will be necessary to re-establish the stream
channel to its pre-flood location and capacity. Work in these cases shall proceed from
downstream to upstream to reduce sediment loading. Restored channel dimensions will be
established in the field using reference data from appropriate nearby stable or nearly stable
sections. The restored profile and facet slopes will be established in the field using site
elevation data and appropriate nearby reference profile data. The restored channel pattern
will be determined using field indicators aerial photographs and interviews with
landowners. Where suitable material is available, rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
Page 7 of 14
fill In several cases where a major channel shift has occurred all streamflow can be
diverted into the flood channel allowing for all restoration work to be performed in the dry
bed of the original channel In cases where the original and flood channels overlap, work
shall begin by re-establishing a narrow diversion channel at the approximate location of the
oriainal channel Excavation of the channel shall begin at the downstream edge of the
deposition area and will progress upstream Material excavated from this channel will be
placed at the waters edge between the existing stream flow and the new channel. Care will
be taken to maintain an adequate berm area to prevent the flow of the stream from entering
the channel being excavated When the excavation reaches the upstream edge of the
deposition area. the stream flow shall be turned into the re-established channel. A berm will
then be established to block as much of the flow as possible from moving through the flood
scoured channel. Once flow is diverted to the re-established channel and the flood scoured
channel is reduced to a minimum flow, the re-establishment of the full original capacity of
the stream and stabilization of the eroded streambank will begin. Beginning at t he most
downstream point of the deposition area. the material will be moved to the outside of the
curve to re-establish the original stream location and capacity. Care shall be taken to move
the material in such a manner as to minimize sedimentation. As the material is moved to its
final position on the outside of the curve the streambank shall be sloped to a stable slope.
Large rock encountered during this phase of the excavation shall be placed at the toe of the
slope used to construct vane structures or used to anchor root wads to protect
unconsolidated fill As a final operation the berm placed at the upstream end of the channel
shall be removed At no time ivill excavation proceed below the normal channel bottom
depth.
A stream channel and streambank restoration conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 3.
Equipment that may be used to accomplish the above listed tasks include, Rubber tired
skidders 15 ton dump truck hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chainsaws.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Exigency work to protect existing property and structures. Stabilize streambanks to
prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
IV. Prior Project History
if jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Page 8 of 14
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include limited streambed disturbance, debris removal, and stream bank
stabi 1 i 7ati on _
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: NIA
Page 9 of 14
3I Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Average Width
Stream Impact Length of of Stream
Site Number Impact (linear Stream Before Impact Perennial or
indicate on ma Type of Im act* feet Name** (ft) Intermittent?
Stream Bank Stabilization, Ayles
1 Debris Removal 150 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank Stabilization, Bowlens
2 Debris Removal 50 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank Stabilization,
Channel Realignment, Bowlens
3 Debris Removal 100 Creek 20 Perennial
Bowlens
4 Debris Removal 100 Creek 20 Perennial
Stream Bank Stabilization,
Channel Realignment, Bowlens
5 Debris Removal 60 Creek 20 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditch ing/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
?r?r?r.u es.?ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
Nv% w.mapgue_t.com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 460
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site :Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
Page 10 of 14
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
When at all possible equipment will be kept out of the stream channel stream crossings will be
minimized, and no excavation will be done below the existing channel bed. When at all
possible stream material will be moved from dry areas to banks minimizing the movement of
wet (or below water line) stream material. Restored channel dimensions and profile will be.
determined by evaluating appropriate, nearby stable or nearly stable reference sections regional
curve information, and suitable reference data from the consultants reference librga. Specific
attention will be given to the establishment of bankfull benches and appropriate bedform
sequencing throughout the restored areas. The temptation to create a wide shallow channel
will be avoided. Any channel relocation activities shall be limited to returning the channel to
pre-storm conditions. Tempor and/or permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on
all bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities. Rocky material shall not be used for
bank stabilization above the normal high water mark.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
Page 11 of 14
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
h"://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/nc-,vetlands/strrngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http•//h2o enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Page 12 of 14
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify V
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Gone 1 extends out 3U teet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Page 13 of 14
Xl. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
do«nstream from the property.
Impervious acreage Nvi11 not change
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this project
primarily through proper water management construction sequencing proper staging and
stockpiling of materials and the maintenance at all times of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events No equipment fuels lubricants or other potential sources of water
pollution will be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project.
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
_14$ _d y
114 / Applicant/Agent's ' ature Date
(Agent's signature is valid o y if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
Table I- Ayles Creek Property Owner Information
PARCEL ID PIN OWNER AREA
121 074900616728000 CARROLL JAMES FREDDIE & LINDA KAY 1.79
134 074900614771000 EARP AUDREY ETAL 0.19
136 074900615506000 EARP AUDREY 0.59
143 074800699557000 HARLEY ACRES LLC 95.74
145 074900517267000 YANCEY COUNTY 3.06
149 074900517267000 YANCEY COUNTY 3.06
152 074900515100000 SILVERS NEALY & PATRICIA 1.75
153 074900503906000 GILSON HERBERT D & MARIAN J 2.64
163 074900504776000 MCINTOSH CLYDE & GLENNA 0.80
166 074900508484000 HICKORY SPRINGS MFG CO INC 24.90
169 074900502518000 LUCAS BRYANT L & JACQUELINE ANN 2.15
W !j ji E
1? • M
1
1
b

Downstream
Project Limits

A
Upstream
Project Limits

0
(CC((, I
eC
1
Figure 1
Site Location Map with Stream Impact Site ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL., INC.
Numbers
November 12, 2004 ENGINEERING & HYDROGEOIOGY
USGS Micaville Quadrangle 50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEviLLE, NC 28801
Scale 1 inch = 2000 feet TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
Ayles Creek
Yancev Countv. North Carolina
PATemplatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc
PRE-STORI`i CONDITION
! I I NORMAL 1VATER LEVEL
I
i ORIGINAL STREAM BOTTOM
FTER-STORM CONDITION
Y
CHANNEL TOP OF BANK
NVOODI'iOTHER DEBRIS
y ?.
z , ROCK DEBRIS . . _. --.- ;....? ... .
- - ------------
t ?
C
n n
i J
RESTORED CONDITION
I
RESTORED STREAM 1301701`4
I
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 400 - STREAM AREA DEBRIS REMOVAL
STREAM AREA DEBRIS FIGURE
+E WG I N E;E'R 1'"N"G."&'p: H'.Y D R'01. E'O'Lto`G?Ye REMOVAL CONCEPTUAL
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
w4vw.altamontenvironmental. com
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
Original Stream Bottom
Rack Erosion Debris
Eroded Area
O
BEFORE
Channel Bank
O o O
Restored Stream Bottom Eroded Rock Debris Backfill Q Q Q
1.5 00 O
tF'? O O
?To- Q O Qo
OOOO O
o
AFTER
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 480 - STREAM CHANNEL AND STREAMBANK RESTORATION
STREAM CHANNEL AND FIGURE
?
, ( E'N.G'I N E'E!R!I N.aJ&r'Z HiY"D; RHO STREAMBANK RESTORATION
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801 CONCEPTUAL
TEL.[phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004