20041926 Ver 1_Complete File_20050306

c, \QF W ATFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
(bid) r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 16, 2005
DWQ Project # 04-1926
Yancey County
Michele Lawhern, County Manager
Yancey County
Room 11, Courthouse
Burnsville, NC 29714
Subject Property: Cattail Creek EWP 2004-03, EWP 2004-05
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mrs. Lawhern:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 1.250 feet of streams for the purpose of
streambank stabilization at the subject properties, as described within your application
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on January 13, 2005. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General
Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3376 (3376). The Certification(s) allows you to
use Nationwide Permit(s) 37 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not
limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and stormwater regulations.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts
to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404
or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland
or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in
15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in
the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
N ethCarolina
Noafirra!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
Yancey County:
Page 2 of 6
February 16, 2005:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount
Approved Units Plan Location or Reference
! Stream 1,250 feet Cattail Creek
1. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
Yancey County:
Page 3 of 6
February 16, 2005:
3. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
4. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Cattail Creek is classified Water Supply II, Trout, High Quality Water. As such, the
following Administrative Codes apply: 15A NCAC 04B .0125 and 15A NCAC 02B
.0214
7. Sediment and erosion control measures must be implemented prior to construction
and maintained on the sites to minimize sediment in downstream areas. Seeding for
a temporary cover of wheat, millet, or similar annual grain or permanent herbaceous
cover should occur on all bare soil within five (5) days of ground disturbing activities
to provide long-term erosion control. The projects should be accomplished in stages
instead of leaving large tracts exposed to further storm events. Erosion control
matting should be used in conjunction with appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in
steep slope and riparian areas, unless authorized under Division of Land Resources
Erosion and Sediment Control approval. Matting should be secured in place with
staples, stakes, or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. Straw mulch and
tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas. In addition, because of an
anticipated difficulty in establishing ground cover during the winter, reseeding should
be conducted, as necessary, in the spring-time with a native annual and perennial
seed mix with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet or other grain.
8. Only clean, large, angular rock, large woody material, or other natural stream design
materials and techniques should be used for bank stabilization. Rock should not be
placed in the stream channel in a manner that constricts stream flow or that will
impede aquatic life movements during low flow conditions. Filter cloth should be
placed behind large rock that is used for bank stabilization. Properly designed rock
vanes should be constructed wherever appropriate on bank stabilization and
channel realignment stream reaches to improve channel stability and to improve
aquatic habitat. Root wads should be installed low enough in the bank so that a
significant portion (at least one-third) the root wad is inundated during normal flows.
Yancey County:
Page 4 of 6
February 16, 2005:
9. The channel must be restored to a more stable condition. However, under no
circumstances should river rock, sand or other materials be dredged from the stream
channel under authorization of this permit except, if necessary, in the immediate
vicinity of the eroding banks for the explicit purpose of anchoring stabilizing or
flow/grade control structures or for reestablishing the natural and more stable stream
channel dimensions. Stream bed materials are unstable in flowing-water situations
and are unsuitable for bank stabilization. Stream dredging has catastrophic effects
on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form of the stream channel can cause
downstream erosion problems. The natural dimension, pattern, and profile of the
stream upstream and downstream of the permitted area should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or changing its depth.
10. Stabilization measures should only be applied on or near existing erosion sites,
leaving other stable stream bank areas in a natural condition. Grading and
backfilling should be minimized and tree and shrub growth should be retained where
possible to ensure long term availability of stream bank cover for aquatic life and
wildlife. Backfill materials should be obtained from upland sites except in cases
where excess stream bed materials are available. Berms are not permitted because
they block the floodplain, constrict and accelerate flood flows, and often fail or
impede drainage during large flood events.
11. Repairs to eroded banks should be conducted in a dry work area where possible.
Sandbags or other clean diversion structures should be used where possible to
minimize excavation in flowing water. Channel realignments should be constructed
by excavating the new channel from downstream to upstream before connecting it to
the old channel.
12. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank whenever possible. All
mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials. Equipment used in stream
channel must be clean, new or low hour equipment.
13.As long-term stream stability is a concern with this type of work, it is strongly
recommended that woody vegetation be established along stream banks where
possible. Any riparian vegetation planting should be performed in accordance with
the Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration.
(httr)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/pdf/buffers.pdf )
13. Monitoring
The Permittee shall examine the stabilization work done under this Certification
on an annual basis for three (3) years following the completion of the restoration
efforts. This field evaluation should note the condition and stability of the
measures installed and how well the repair is holding up. A written report must
be provided to DWQ's Asheville Regional Office by June 1St of each year. The
report must describe inspection results, include digital photographs, list the date
of inspection, and describe any needed repairs or corrections.
14.The permittee will provide on-site supervision of stability work including, but not
limited to bank re-sloping, in-stream structure placement, and riparian zone re-
establishment, by an appropriately trained individual.
Yancey County:
Page 5 of 6
February 16, 2005:
15. If pasture along the stream is to be used for grazing, the permittee must inform the
appropriate landowners that cattle should be prohibited from damaging riparian
areas and from de-stabilizing the stream banks and channel.
16. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected riparian zones
such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream.
17. Water Quality Certification Notifications
The permittee must provide a copy of this issued Water Quality Certification and
attached cover letter to each property owner where the approved work will be
performed.
18.Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 10 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B. .0200. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
Yancey County: !
Page 6 of 6 ,
February 16, 2005:
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Mr. Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at 828-296-4657.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW Klkhb
Enclosures: GC 3376
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Asheville Regional Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 04-1926. EW P.CattailCreek.Approval
Triage Check List
Date: 1/18/05 Project Name: Cattail Creek EWP
DWQ#: 04-1926
County: Yancey
To: Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
60-day Processing Time: revised 1/18/05 to 3/18/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
E N G I N E ER I N G & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
January 12, 2005
Ms. Cyndi Caroly
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650

af-
Y „_
?s
Subject: Yancey County EWP Project Revised Pre-Construction Notification Application for
Cattail Creek EWP 2004-3 and EWP 2004-5
Dear Ms. Caroly:
Enclosed are six copies of the revised Cattail Creek EWP exigency sites 2004-3 and 2004-5 application
for Section 404 nationwide permit 37, and corresponding DWQ 401 water quality certification.
Exigency work applied for in this permit includes stream bank stabilization and debris removal. The
primary goal in conducting the exigency work is to protect property, and to return the channel to pre-
flood conditions. Please note I have signed each application as an authorized agent for Yancey County.
A letter of authorization is included. Additionally, we have sent one copy of the enclosed permit
application directly to Kevin Barnett in the Swannanoa office.
Altamont appreciates your assistance with this revised application. If you would like additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G.
Enclosures: PCN - Cattail Creek EWP 2004-3 and EWP 2004-5
Letter of Authorization
CC: Michele Lawhern - Yancey County Manager (transmittal letter only)
Cliff Vinson - District Conservation Officer NRCS (transmittal letter only)
P:\Yancey Coun"RCS EWP\Emergency Repairs\Cattail Creek\DWQ permit cover letter-Caroly.doc
?} rti? gypp.. J ? Y
3 t.1 L L3
V
1141.
Office Use Only: versi? a 2
?y
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ?s?,osQT??@s
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/ x4T
6
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Michele Lawhern, Yancey County Manager
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse
Burnsville, NC 29714
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Stuart A. Ryman
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental, Inc
Mailing Address: 50 College Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: sryman@altamontenvironmental. com
Page 5 of 16
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
L Name of project: Cattail Creek EWP 2004-03 and EWP 2004-05
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table 1
4. Location
Count}: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phasellot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
Follow Highway 19E East through Burnsville. After passing Ingles and Texaco on the
right, turn right on NC Highway 197 South. After approximately ten miles (and just past
the intersection with Cattail Creek Road), Highway 197 crosses Cattail Creek. The
project extends upstream approximately two miles from the bridge. Upstream locations
are accessible by turning from Highway 197 left on Cattail Creek Road before the
bridge. See attached Figure I for specific locations of each discrete EWP project reach.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35'50'26" N/82° 17'54" W (approximate
center ofproject area)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): ,tfultiple -See attached Table I
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Cattail Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad
Page 6 of 16
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at hUp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The proposed project site consists of light residential and agricultural uses. The stream
and stream banks were heavily impacted during Tropical Storms Frances and Ivan.
Extensive stream bank erosion threatens the stability of existing structures including
houses and bridges. Extensive deposits of rocky debris have reduced the hydraulic
capacity of Cattail Creek.
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Two exigency EWP project areas are addressed by this permit application (EWP 2004-03
and EWP 2004-05, see Figure 1). An additional exigency EWP site occurs on Cattail Creek
upstream of the Highway 197 Bridge. However, The NC DOT is currently completing
repairs in the vicinity of this EWP site. The specific extent and nature of exigency repairs
will not be known until the NC DOT completes their work. It is anticipated that bank
stabilization and debris removal will be required. Workprocedures will be similar to that
described for EWP 2004-3 and EWP 2004-5. The following activities are proposed at EWP
2004-3 and EWP 2004-5.
EWP 2004-03
This project area begins at the highway 197 bridge and extends upstream approximately
450 feet. Highwater flow has severely eroded the right riverbank and exposed the right
wing wall of the Highway 197 Bridge. Approximately 450 linear feet of river channel has
moved approximately 75 feet west of its pre-flood location and the channel has
reestablished itself immediately adjacent to the right riverbank. Extensive amounts of rocky
debris were deposited in the former channel and flood plain. The right riverbank is over-
steepened and is very unstable. Local emergency repairs completed between the two storm
events resulted in an unstable dike on the right riverbank immediately upstream from the
eroded streambank. Two buildings and the bridge foundation are threatened by the current
channel and streambank configuration. Repairs in this reach of stream will involve the
following.
• Remove rocky and woody debris from f oodplain and from beneath the river left
portion of the bridge.
• Stabilize the channel in its post flood configuration using organic and rock
structures
Protect the right wing wall of the bridge using large angular stone
Stabilize the right river bank by removing unstable vegetation, placing large angular
stone at the toe of the slope on the right side of the new channel to an elevation just
above the water level, backfilling behind and above the stone with rocky debris
removed from the f oodplain, topping with planting media and planting native
Page 7 of 16
vegetation. Additionally, j-hooks will be used to deflect the flow from the
streambank.
• Lower the dike that was created just upstream of the bank repair area.
• Enhance the high flow channel located on the river left bank.
EWP 2004-05
This project area includes approximately 850 linear feet of Cattail Creek adjacent to
Cattail Creek Farms. Highwater flow has severely eroded the left riverbank and breached
the river left bank. Several structures were damaged during the flooding. Property owners
have constructed an unstable dike using small and large rock deposited during the flood.
The dike height is greater than the height of the pre-flood level bank. Extensive amounts of
rocky debris it-ere deposited in the former channel and flood plain. Three buildings and the
bridge foundation are threatened by the current channel and streambank configuration.
Repairs in this reach of stream will involve the following:
• Remove rocky and ivoody debris from floodplain.
• Stabilize the channel in its post-flood configuration using organic and rock
structure.
• Protect the foundations of existing buildings using a combination of large rock on
the toe of the slope, and in-stream structures to deflect flow from the banks.
• Lower the dike that was created.
The techniques that will be utilized for the proposed repairs at the EWP sites listed above
are described below.
Removal of Organic and Rocky Debris
Fallen trees, limbs, dislodged brush, and non-native material within the cross section of the
existing or original channel up to and including the debris line shall be removed. Any
foreign debris (e.g., trash, appliances) will also be removed. Trees whose near term fall is
apparent will be removed. Rooted trees designated for removal will be cut three feet above
the ground surface and the root masses will be left in place. Disturbance of channel bottom
and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the minimum necessary to allow the
construction equipment to remove debris. All areas disturbed due to debris removal and
equipment access shall be reshaped and reseeded. Access to the channel will be
perpendicular to the channel so cutting of trees is held to a minimum with precaution taken
to protect mast production and stream canopy trees. Dead trees that provide den habitat
and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be protected.
Rocky debris within the flood plain will be removed using an excavator. The removal of
rocky debris will proceed from the stream channel back toward the stream bank allowing
the excavator to work on the debris pile. The reconfigured floodplain will be shaped in a
manner intended to restore the hydraulic capacity of the stream system. Rocky debris
removed from the floodplain will be used to stabilize the streambank, or will be hauled
offsite. At sites where there is no eroded streambank in the immediate vicinity, the
excavated material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of the streambank or will be
Page 8 of 16
hauled off site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an elevation higher
than the existing streambanks.
Streambank Restoration
When possible excavation equipment will access Streambank repair areas from the dry and
will not track into the stream channel. Most of the steep eroded streambank are opposite or
adjacent to the debris removal areas. At these areas, the rocky material removed from the
floodplain will be used to stabilize the Streambank, with the addition of large boulders
along the toe of the slope as necessary to stabilize and protect the toe. Where suitable
material is available, rock vane and root wads will be installed in the restored bank section
to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated fill (typical structure
cross-sections and plan views are included in Figure 2).
Per conversations with US Army Corp of Engineers, NC Wildlife Resource Commission,
and NC Division of Water Quality personnel on January 4, 2005 the existing channel
location and profile will be maintained, and work in-stream will be minimized in order to
minimize water quality impacts. A key in trench will be excavated on the outside of the
curve at the base of the existing slope as necessary at EWP 2004-03 and EWP2004-05.
These trenches will be constructed in the existing channel, in wet conditions. Large
boulders (four to five feet in diameter) will be placed in the trench. Two to three vertical
layers of boulders will be installed in order to protect the existing bank and stabilize the
toe. The surface of the water at normal levels will fall somewhere on the second layer of
boulders. Space behind the boulders will be filled with rocky debris material excavated
from the floodplain, and topsoil will be placed on the top of the constructed slope to aid in
establishing woody native vegetation.
A typical existing cross-section for the impacted channel section EWP 2004-03 is included
in Figure 3, a similar cross-section for EWP 2004-05 is included as Figure 4. EWP 2004-
03 has an approximate drainage area of 8 square miles. EWP 2004-5 has an approximate
drainage area of 7 square miles.. Theoretical "ideal " channel dimensions for an 8 square
mile and a 7 square mile drainage area were determined by using regional curves found in
"Bankfull Regional Curves for North Carolina Mountain Streams" (Harman, W.A. et al,
2002). Using the referenced information, a watercourse in the North Carolina Mountains,
with a drainage area of approximately 8 square miles, has a typical cross sectional area at
bankfull stage between 84-94 square feet, a bankfull width of approximately 39-43 feet, and
a typical bankfull mean depth of 2.0-2.3 feet. A drainage area of approximately 7 square
miles has a typical cross sectional area at bankfull stage between 79 -85 square feet, a
bankfull width of approximately 38-42 square feet, and a typical bankfull mean depth of
1.9-2.1 feet. As shown on Figure 3 the existing channel dimensions for EWP 2004-03 are;
approximately 28-32 feet wide, approximately 1.8 feet maximum deep, and approximately
80 square feet cross sectional area. As shown on Figure 4 the existing channel dimensions
for EWP 2004-05 are approximately 22 -25 feet wide, approximately I foot maximum
depth, and approximately 34-40 square feet cross sectional area. The placement of large
boulders at the toe of the slope will reduce the existing cross sectional area. Therefore,
minor excavation would be necessary to restore the channel cross sectional area after the
Page 9 of 16
placement of large boulders. As discussed above, the permitting agencies have requested
minimal in channel work. As a result, significant channel reconfiguration is not proposed
for EJTT 2004-03 or EWP 2004-05. However, based on referenced regional curve
information leaving the existing channel dimensions in place while stabilizing the bank will
not adhere to natural channel dimension design parameters.
The work addressed in this application is intended to improve the post flood hydraulic
capacity of the stream reaches discussed and stabilize severely eroded streambanks that are
threatening structures on other property. The proposed actions are not intended to enhance
existing conditions or restore the stream reaches using natural channel design techniques.
Such activities would require detailed engineering evaluation and design, which are beyond
the intent of the EWP program. 771e proposed work has not been reviewed or sealed by a
- professional engineer.
Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the pre-and post storm channel locations, proposed in-stream
structure measures, and stream stabilization measures for EWP 2004-03 and EWP 2004-
05. Figures 7 and 8 are conceptual drawing of the proposed post-construction channel
cross sections for EWP-2004-03 and EWP-2004-05. Figures 9 through 13 are conceptual
drms-ing illustrating stream stabilization measures on digital photographs for EWP2004-03
and EWP 2004-05.
Equipment that may be used to accomplish the above listed tasks include; Rubber tired
skidders, 15 ton dump truck, hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chainsaws.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Exigency work to protect existing property and structures. Stabilize streambanks to
prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Page 10 of 16
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include limited streambed disturbance, debris removal, and stream bank
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Page 11 of 16
Stream Length
Impact of Average Width Perennial or
Sity' T}pe of Impact* Impact Stream Name" of Stream Before Intermittent?
nuber (linear Impact (please specify)
(
(indicate
feet)
on map)
EWP Stream bank stabilization, 450 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
2004-03 debris removal
EWP Stream bank- stabilization, 800 Cattail Creek 22 Perennial
2004-05 debris removal
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
d ms (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
\v'WIN.us_s.Zov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
tzv_ma av st.co n etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1.250
q. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
SiteNumber f
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact# Area of
Impact
(acres)
(if Name of applicable) Waterbody Type of Waterbody
(lake' pand estuary' sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not ttmttea to: ttty excavauun, urcugu,g,
flooding drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
Page 12 of 16
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
When at all possible equipment will be kept out of the stream channel, stream crossings will be
minimized, and no excavation will be done below the existing channel bed. When at all possible
stream material will be moved from dry areas to banks, minimizing the movement of wet (or
below water line) stream material. The temptation to create a wide, shallow channel will be
avoided. Temporary and/or permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities. Rocky material shall not be used for bank
stabilization above the normal high water mark. Large rocky material will be brought in to
stabilize the toe of impacted stream banks where necessary.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
Page 13 of 16
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
IVZ4
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NTCNVRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PC-N. For additional information regarding the application process for the
CZVRP, check the NCWRP N ebsite at http•//h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the \CWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
follow. ing information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of 'Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NM
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
M Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes N No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
Page 14 of 16
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Gone 1 extends out 3U teet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
M. Stormwater'(required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage will not change.
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this project
primarily through proper water management, construction sequencing, proper staging and
stockpiling of materials, and the maintenance, at all times, of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events. Equipment, fuels, lubricants, or other potential sources of water pollution
will not be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Page 15 of 16
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the ivork site.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
MV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
-/0-0
Applicant/A
(Agent's signature is
s Signature Date
l only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 16 of 16
Michele P. Lawhern, County Manager
John Renfro, Chairman
Dean Hicks, Comm
YL 11 ?I?TCEY COUNTY Blaine
Whits n,Commlissioner
County Courthouse, Room 11 • Burnsville, North Carolina 28714
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone] • EMAIL: [e-mail]
November 10, 2004
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
50 College Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stu,
At the regular monthly meeting of the Yancey County Board of Commissioners last
evening, the enclosed contract for professional services was executed, relative to EWP
Section 216 work. Pursuant to, or in the spirit of the further intent of this contract, this
Yancey County Local Government hereby authorizes Altamont Environmental, Inc. to
sign and execute all necessary permits and coordinate communications with said
regulatory agencies.
If there should be any questions about the above, please feel free to call me at any time.
The ely,
le P. Lawhern
Yancey County Manager
Work: 828/682-3971; Cellular 828/284-0746
Table 1. Affected Property Owner Information for Exigency Sites on Cattail Creek
Yancey County, North Carolina
DER Number MAP ID PIN OWNER Property Size ADDRESS CITY STATE LP CHANNEL STEAMBANK ROCK DEBRIS WOODY COMMENTS
REALIGNMENT STABILIZATION REMOVAL DEBRIS
REMOVAL
Approximately 80 feet of stream
EWP 2004-03 19 07170099934700 PENSACOLA METHODIST CHURCH 1.33 Burnsville NC 28714 • • • fronts e

Approdm
ately 80 feet of stream
EWP 2004-03 20 07170098496700 WILSON BENJAMIN B 30.30 29 CATTAIL CREEK RD Burnsville NC 28714 • • • frontage
Approximately 120 feet of stream
EWP 2004-03 24 07170099934700 PENSACOLA METHODIST CHURCH 1.33 Burnsville NO 28714 • • • frontage
Approxdmately 250 feet of stream
EWP 2004-03 29 07270009306700 WILSON BILLY BROOKS 2.67 19 PENSACOLA SCHOOL RD Burnsville NC 28714 • • • fronts e
Approxun
ately 220 feet of stream
EWP 2004-03 32 07170098496700 WILSON BENJAMIN 0 30.30 29 CATTAIL CREEK RD Burnsville NC 28774 • • • fronts e
Approxdmately 150 feet of stream
EWP 2004-03 38 072700082962000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 1 28 29 CATTAIL CREEK RD Burnsville NC 28714 • • • frontage
Approximately 800 feet of stream
EWP 2004-OS 10 072704535916000 PIETRYKA FREDERICK F & JEAN K ETAL 1.19 3890 B SIMMONS MILL CT S W TumWaler WA 98512 • • • frontage
Approxdmately 100 feet of stream
EWP 2004-OS 14 07270454452600 POOLER PAUL E & MARY MARGARET 0.3 1279 N GERMANY MTN RD Clayton GA 30525 _ • • • frontage
Approximately 200 feet of stream
EWP 2004-05 18 07270454541900 THOMAS RICKIE M 8 DUVJNE Y 0.52 7904 ROBINSON CHURCH RD Charlotte NC 28215 • • • frontage
_ Approimately 200 feet of stream
EWP 2004-OS 21 07270454533800 LAMB EDGAR L 8 PARTICIA 0.83 5115 33RD TERRACE N St Petersburg FL 33710 • • • fronts e
Approximately 100 feet of stream
EWP 2004-O5 24 07270454412500 WOLFENSON JACK 8 ELAYNE 0.25 28422 B LTMORE ST. Sorrento FL 32778 • • • frontage
Approximately 100 feet of stream
EWP 2004-O5 26 07270454400500 BoRRAS-ROSELIO ISAAC 8 AURA L 0.21 3341 ATHENA DRIVE Winter Park FL 32792 • • • fronts e
Approxdmately 100 feet of stream
EWP 2004-05 29 07270453399500 GARVIN JANICE 0.25 13085 HIGHWAY 92 Dover FL 33527 • • • frontage
Note: It is anticipated that the total disturved area on each property will be less than 1 acre.
PYYancey/NRCS EWNEmergency Repairs/Cattad Creek/parcels_Cattail acne
N
ao We
1 5
r
Downstream
Project Limits
1
9
A
1 ?
. ,
r
e
I
e BM
293 r/
,
I
1 I
e
?C
Upstream
Project Limits

Figure 1
,
Site Location Map with Stream Impact Site [INN 0 D101,11 I
Numbers
January 11, 2005 ENGINEERING & HYDROG EOLOGY
USGS Mt. Mitchell Quadrangle 50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
Scale 1 inch = 2000 feet TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
Cattail Creek www.altamontenvironmental.com
Yancey County, North Carolina
PATemplatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc
24" FIELDSTONE
CROSI
i
.W
OULDERS
TYPICAL J HOOK AND I FIGURE
CROSS VANE DETAILS
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
CATTAIL CREEK
SOURCE: APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERV YANCEY COUNTY, NC
Figure 3. Existing Cross Section of Cattail Creek at EWP 2004-03
10
Top of Right Bank
8

Debris Filled
Floodplain
6

Pre-Flood

?
4 Unstable
Channel
a Streambank
d

2 Post-Flood

Channel
0

2 3 4 5 -6 _7 8 9 1 ffl o
-2

Width (feet)
Top of Left
Bank
Normal
Water
Surface
Elevation
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
Figure 4. Existing Cross Section of Cattail Creek at EWP 2004-05
10
8
6
w
Q
JT
w
t 4
w
CL
m
0
2
0
-2
Width (feet)
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
-
N ?..
r" IMML
I
Bank stabilization
4
e right bank into--- with boulders at base,
existing bridge wingwallwith fill above water line
.t - W S E
' W
J-hooks as necessary V zc
y
r?Z, - _ _ .-_ ,?,., S?-'
Approximate post-
flood stream location` .
Root wads a rock
< y structures to stabilize bend
:.w
Z Approximate pre- x
i
flood stream location
Flow direction
LEGEND Figure 5
ENVIRONMENTAL,
ALTAMONT -JN-^- Approximate post-flood stream location Cattail Creek
-?- Approximate pre-flood stream location FEN G I N E E R I N G & H Y O R O G E O L O G Y
Road EWP 2004-03 50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
Property boundaries www.altamoutenviroiunental.com
0 50 100 200
eet Yancey County, North Carolina 0I-1I-05
f
HApproximate pre- and post-
? flood stream location _ ,,• R
0
111 v
* w `Yid .t , ep 'Ff0 i - _ *F w?
y_ y ti
.w
_ t
Flow direction
y -
C?
v?
" n
41
,,f s Bank stabilization} r
P with boulders at base,
with fill above water line _
J-hooks as necessary
41
LEGEND Figure 6 ENVIRONMENTAL, ALTAMONT ^?+^ Approximate pre- and post-flood stream locatio Cattail Creek E _N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R 0 G E O L 0 G Y
Road EWP 2004-OS 50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
Property boundaries www.altamontenviromnental.com
0 50 100 200
eet Yancey County, North Carolina 01-11-05
PROPOSED STREAMBANK STABILIZATION CROSS SECTION AT EWP 2004-03
10-

TOPSOIL .
R IGHT BANK
$

BACKFIL WITH EXCESS
ROC KY DEBRIS
6

w
EXI
TING CROSS SE
CTION
v
d
4

ARGE BOULDE S REM OVE DEPOSITED
° ROC KY MATERIAL
2

0

2 4 0 6 8 10 0 12 0
/INCRE ASE CHANNEL
WIDTH AS NECESSARY
-2

Width (feet)
--?-- EXISTING CROSS SECTION L
1
I t PROPOSED CROSS SECTION -
FIGURE
N G I N R I N G & H Y D R 0 G 0 G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351 EWP 2004-03
www.altainontenviroiunental.com
CATTAIL CREEK
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN YANCEY COUNTY, NC
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DATE: JANUARY II, 2005
PROPOSED STREAMBANK STABILIZATION CROSS SECTION AT EWP 2004-05
8
TOPSOIL
6
BAC FILL WITH EXCESS LEFT BANK
ROCKY DEBRIS
d
w
4
n. ,
d
LARGE B ULDERS
2
0
10 20 3 4 5 6
-2
Width (feet)
EXISTING CROSS SECTION
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION I FIGURE
N I N R I N G H Y 0 R 0 G 0 L 0 G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET. ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altainoiitenviroiimental.com
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DATE: JANUARY II, 2005
EWP 2004-05 Q
CATTAIL CREEK V
YANCEY COUNTY, NC
a?1
7k 4
?i''i?

. f
? `
hU'. \7
IA ? (1 wt .??'?1 1
•
_
C

?
%#:.

$
y ?Za?? a• 4y$-' 1
•• • -
. - a

?o?o40odro4ro4wo4p c40 I II 111 :111
R .?
Mao
r'
?.. _ -„ram-.,..?i ? -•- _ ? '? ? *'9 1"f?`.? ? '4??^k !'
?. .?iL _ ?.r,Z• i 1 .c?? __ u.
?r+nai, s r
b!w?{ I.it,?I'ii-.
_` '' r.? .a fat :..t ..r-+.• - r - 'i?'?+r'" -- . , •?_ ? _ - ?`` T .-.+^ ` - - -
?_ ti Y" ?? .?_...,.a Wit: _•-.......:. ,L, ?:
1
y` y TR
"n ._ yrlt.? 'T
STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
N I N R I N H Y R Y MEASURES
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
'4 . >.
14 .. y - {?, .w s° ?« i .2813350 FAC.828.281.3351
www.
wwwaltamontenvvonmental.com EWP 2004-03
CATTAIL CREEK
_ s DRAWN BY: CHRIS GILBERT
tom` _ PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN NOT TO SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NC
?..
k ?{y CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
".f1 11.,4: ,_ ?Q.,ie_- e+• ?rir - -? DATE: 01/10/05 FILE PATH: P:\YANCEY COUNTY\NRCS EWP\EMERGENCY REPAIRS\CATTAIL CREEK\ CULVERT REPAIR.DWG
A-2 A?A IF 'T*
17,1
L1: to
51 ?;
k6k i x
M rot

f / Z,,,r

? ?7 r
7
N I N R I N Y R Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenv ironmental. coin
DRAWN BY: CHRIS GILBERT
!-m:
a PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN NOT TO SCALE
,-.? CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
?• ?' „ats -. DATE: 01/10/05
} (f ti. ` L? /
? [ L
7 S
1J; w?? r ^
r 3 ? a 7 ? - , - 1. 1x t r ?'r 1? *p- a
J
I

STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
MEASURES
EWP 2004-03 ? 0
CATTAIL CREEK
YANCEY COUNTY, NC
FILE PATH: P:\YANCEY COUNTY\NRCS EWP\EnERGENCY REPAIRS\CATTAIL CREEK\ CULVERT REPAIR.I)
? d
J..

.x?,( ; >?•?, . ?i ?i ? ? Y ++ 1j -31
7,Yt1?; ?• "'7•.•tP-fit ?? k? r ?lj. •?',???+ ? x .. ? ? e w <.:'??:.. .
- x
+r F'5 ?,;fix?c ?•7 • '? y r!L r ` \?- jy ?,.' , y ae ;rYf i'x"yy`.'??"„?`.j a, 4?
.4- ?at . x ?•?f?? +c ?.'r 4` ? kATS <? : -? ? s ? ?: t.,.,r As .?,± ? « .
"!t P` 61f .+4:4 0 <. »?q '?, iTtt ?.F it:??
"` s y
Rw4tg ?Ez 1. ,.,v
Mr. .('T"J yt (
lt7
'f~ '?ta??'4-~ uY l.' { i F 't ?•1X? •R 'X9 .y??pA.] "4 'l•. ?••;If R I,k kq? {i ., ???
'y } _fM^n??= rf -_y^" ?..\ .F' V'? / kl'? • A k ?'T' IPA y 3 ?'.'r Tr:
Tlw
`sir. ? 2. _ •'
4 l 4w ? r
77,
w
4
A
r'

r

r STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
Ito

'"- N G I N E R I N G & H Y O R O G O L O G Y
MEASURES
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801 -
_ TEL-828.281.3350 FAC.828.281.3351
www..a altamonte nviromnental. com EWP 2004-03 1
CATTAIL CREEK
s DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN NOT TO SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NC
--_ ••-..: CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DATE: 01/10/05 FILE PATH: P:\YANCEY COUNTY\NRCS EWP\EMERGENCY REPAIRS\CATTAIL CREEK\ CULVERT REPAIR.DWG
I

DEE

i? ? I ??:Y ?
J\tiR, U'{ x•14 M ,V r`?

III
,
e
}
fl
'? ? h
1 `
? a ,
Y ?

"'^ ?"" {'r 4. h'y r°h,.. r...-r ? - 'r..' w' "rp' --. .ti'' 'A`' - ,tom;'
'`f h ? .9 ky. I,CM _._ rs „ yrJ ?r'.• •iW',g, r? ?,
L +? ?_ Q'.?k '3 h `r?+1, ?'••(...a:?•'?, r •y?II+ +sit ? .?. • ¢.,,.t??.s f a,4,
,,t.y,,.??."i q.i'? !? Ate` P .'r rf t ?''?C+' ?'' 4?;r'f"i-'mss??'. d-. wt `~ __ .' Yr _ •? 1 _• 4 J
Q-. r t :? Y ice' '--, m ?,,.,,,,;, .?_;? J^•y*• _= .iY L.. v??
1
!> ? ,q.V /f"? ?T ? rte` ;'? .. „ .? . ? - Y _ + ? .r:ir- .. +. .?' s• ,:` r,,r.,.
4w 46K
??y S
w A,
±? y
7 ?MY• -'. ,: !iasaw'1" .-4 ? 1 ?.„/• n'.
P
a
.
.. ?? , ._ . ter'-? r' .Y?+._•?
-
t fir, s--• -4 ,a, •, ' ?.?°.=...,A "`" ? x--?'?a.?,s _ ~` -"? •wm.^` ,

50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHE\ ILLE. NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAC828.281.3351
www. altam ontenv ironmen tal. coin
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE
PROJECT MANAGER: SYU RYMAN NOT TO SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY
DATE: 01/10/05
J
STREAM STABILIZATION FIGURE
MEASURES
EWP 2004-05 13
CATTAIL CREEK
YANCEY COUNTY, NC
FILE PATH: P:\YANCEY COUNTY\NRCS EWP\EMERGENCY REPAIRS\CATTAIL CREEK\ CULVERT REPAIR.DWG
Triage Check List
. r
Date: Projetct Name:
DWQ#:
County: ?- c-?
? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
From:
Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to Tour for your evaluation.
Please call if you need as? stance.
Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: ??iL/? ?°?t/
? m
/1-,/ C??71
3)6-?z
RO Kevin Barnett
To: JQ---A'
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
ENGINEERING & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
lug,
November 18, 2004
Ms. Cyndi Caroly 0 4 1 9 2 6 DEC 1 2004
Division of Water Quality DENR H QUALITY
401 Wetlands Unit v3E?l 'TOI7MWATERBRANCH
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Yancey County EWP Pre-Construction Notification Applications
Dear Ms. Caroly:
Attached are six applications for Section 404 -nationwide permit 37, and corresponding DWQ 401 water
quality certification. Exigency work applied for in these penpits includes stream bank stabilization,
debris removal, and channel relocation. The primary goal in 6pnducting the exigency work is to protect
property, and to return the channel to pre-flood conditions. Ple*se note that the applications are signed
by myself as an authorized agent for Yancey County. A letter of authorization will follow.
Altamont appreciates the opportunity to provide these applications. If you would like additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G.
Enclosures:
CC:
PCN -White ak Creek
PCN - Long Branch
PCN - Cane River
PCN - Cattail Creek
PCN - Bowlens Creek
PCN - Ayles Creek
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
C
Michele Lawhern - Yancey County Manager
Cliff Vinson - District Conservation Officer NRCS
PAYancey County\ CS EWP\Correspondence\DWQ permit cover letter.doc
FILE COPY
Office Use Only: 041926 Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
k11 ally 1J4111GU1ar Mln is not appncaoie to ttus project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
\11! FIN IT ? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DW
IN ® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Michele Lawhern_ Yana
m@W V O
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse NU V y nn ?.
Burnsville, NC 29714 ?-
DENR - WATER QUALITY
Telephone Number: _ [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: m.lawhern (a countymanager.anceycounty.org
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/ap} ( V
L? V
Name: Stuart A. R an
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental Inc
Mailing Address: 50 College Street
Asheville NC 28801 ??.
4cwcsANDS70RP gT.RBRANCH
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:_ [phone]
E-mail Address: srymanna,altamontenvironmental.com
Page 5 of 14
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Cattail Creek EWP 2004-03 EWP 2004-04, EWP 2004-05
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table 1
4. Location
County: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Follow Highway 19E East
through Burnsville After passing Ingles and Texaco on the right, turn right on NC
Highway 197 South After approximately ten miles (and just past the intersection with
Cattail Creek Road) Highway 197 crosses Cattail Creek. The downstream point of the
project is the confluence with the Cane River, which is accessible by turning from
Highway 197 right on a grass road immediately before crossing the bridge. The project
continues upstream approximately two miles from the bridge. Upstream locations are
accessible by turning from Highway 197 left on Cattail Creek Road before the bridge.
See attached Figure 1
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 50'26"N/82' 17' 54" W (approximate
center of project area)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Multiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/oceari/lake): Cattail Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad
Page 6 of 14
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the' time of this application:The proposed project site consists of light residential and
agricultural uses. The stream and stream banks were heavily impacted during Hurricanes
Frances and Ivan. The stream is clogged with woody, rock and non-native debris In
some cases the channel has moved significantly from its original location and is
threatening an adjacent property. Additionally, extensive stream bank erosion threatens
the stability of existing structures including houses and bridges
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Clearing and Debris Removal
Fallen trees, limbs and dislodged brush within the cross section of the existing or original
channel 0 to and including the debris line shall be removed. Any foreign debris will be
removed. Trees whose near term fall is apparent will be removed. Live trees designated for
removal will be cut three feet above the ground surface, and the root masses will be left.
Disturbance of channel bottom and banks, and equipment access areas shall be held to the
minimum necessary to allow the construction equipment to remove debris. All areas
disturbed due to debris removal and equipment access shall be reshaped and reseeded.
Access to the channel will be perpendicular to the channel so cutting of trees is held to a
minimum with precaution taken to protect mast production and stream canopy trees. Dead
trees that provide den habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be
protected. A stream area debris conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 2
Stream Channel and Streambank Restoration
When possible excavation equipment will access deposition areas at a safe distance from
the streambank and do not need to track into the stream channel. Material excavated from
these deposition areas can generally be placed with only one motion of the excavation
equipment. Most of these sites include a steep eroded streambank opposite or adjacent to
the deposition area. Where there does exist an eroded streambank in the vicinity of these
deposit in areas, the material removed from this area will be used to stabilize the
streambank. Where suitable material is available, rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
fill. At sites where there is no eroded streambank in the immediate vicinity, the excavated
material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of the streambank or will be hauled off
site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an elevation higher than the
existing streambanks.
In cases when the channel has relocated it will be necessary to re-establish the stream
channel to its pre-flood location and capacity. Work in these cases shall proceed from
downstream to upstream to reduce sediment loading. Restored channel dimensions will be
established in the field using reference data from appropriate nearby stable or nearly stable
sections. The restored profile and facet slopes will be established in the field using site
elevation data and appropriate nearby reference profile data. The restored channel attern
will be determined using field indicators, aerial photographs and interviews with
Page 7 of 14
landowners. Where suitable material is available rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
fill In several cases where a major channel shift has occurred, all streamflow can be
diverted into the flood channel allowing for all restoration work to be performed in the dry
bed of the original channel In cases where the original and flood channels overlap, work
shall begin by re-establishing a narrow diversion channel at the approximate location of the
original channel Excavation of the channel shall begin at the downstream edge of the.
deposition area and will progress upstream Material excavated from this channel will be
placed at the waters edge between the existing; stream flow and the new channel. Care will
be taken to maintain an adequate berm area to prevent the flow of the stream from entering
the channel being excavated When the excavation reaches the upstream edge of the
deposition are the stream flow shall be turned into the re-established channel. A berm will
then be established to block as much of the flow as possible from moving through the flood
scoured channel. Once flow is diverted to the re-established channel and the flood scoured
channel is reduced to a minimum flow, the re-establishment of the full original capacity of
the stream and stabilization of the eroded streambank will begin. Beginning at t he most
downstream point of the deposition area the material will be moved to the outside of the
curve to re-establish the original stream location and capacity. Care shall be taken to move
the material in such a manner as to minimize sedimentation. As the material is moved to its
final position on the outside of the curve the streambank shall be sloped to a stable slope.
Large rock encountered during this phase of the excavation shall be placed at the toe of the
slope used to construct vane structures or used to anchor root wads to protect
unconsolidated fill As a final operation the berm placed at the upstream end of the channel
shall be removed At no time will excavation proceed below the normal channel bottom
depth.
A stream channel and streambank restoration conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 3.
Equipment that may be used to accomplish the above listed tasks include; Rubber tired
skidders, 15 ton dump truck hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chamsaws.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Exigency work to protect existing property and structures. Stabilize streambanks to
prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
1V. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
Page 8 of 14
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include limited streambed disturbance debris removal and stream bank
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

T List eaca impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
Page 9 of 14
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Length
Impact of Average Width Perennial or
tu Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Before Intemlittent?
ber
Nt (linear Impact (please specify)
(mdtcate feet)
on map)
1 Stream bank stabilization, 500 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
2 Stream bank stabilization, 150 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
debris removal
3 Stream bank stabilization, 250 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
4 Stream bank stabilization, 100 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
5 Stream bank stabilization, 350 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
6 Stream bank stabilization, 50 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
debris removal
7 Stream bank stabilization, 50 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
debris removal
8 Stream bank stabilization, 80 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
debris removal
9 Stream bank stabilization, 110 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
debris removal
d'
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associate np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
ww'.v.usQs.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol)ozone.com,
Nvww.mapguest.com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1,640
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

(acres) Name of

e)
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
lake, pond, estuary, sound,
( , etc.
ba , ocean
)

Page 10 of 14
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
When at all possible equipment will be kept out of the stream channel stream crossings will be
minimized, and no excavation will be done below the existing channel bed When at all
possible stream material will be moved from dry areas to banks minimizing the movement of
wet (or below water line) stream material. Restored channel dimensions and profile will be
determined by evaluating appropriate nearby stable or nearly stable reference sections regional
curve information, and suitable reference data from the consultants reference library Specific
attention will be given to the establishment of bankfull benches and appropriate bedform
sequencing throughout the restored areas. The temptation to create a wide shallow channel
will be avoided. Any channel relocation activities shall be limited to returning the channel to
pre-storm conditions. Temporary and/or permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on
all bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities Rocky material shall not be used for
bank stabilization above the normal high water mark.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 11 of 14
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strrngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 12 of 14
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (s uare feet) Multiplier Mitig ton
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or. 0260.
Page 13 of 14
M. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acrea e will not change.
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this project
primarily through proper water management construction sequencing proper staging and
stockpiling of materials and the maintenance at all times of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events No equipment fuels lubricants or other potential sources of water
pollution will be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site.
X111. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
/A
1g_0
Applicant/ gent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature s valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
Table 1- Cattail Creek Property Owner Information
PARCEL ID PIN OWNER AREA
148 071800902117000 WILSON MAX ETAL 1.01
160 071700891655000 HOLLIFIELD JACK 31.07
8 071800802542000 BLANKENSHIP ALVIN & LUCILLE 28.23
9 071800902117000 WILSON MAX ETAL 1.01
15 071700984967000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 30.30
19 071700999347000 PENSACOLA METHODIST CHURCH 1.33
20 071700984967000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 30.30
24 071700999347000 PENSACOLA METHODIST CHURCH 1.33
29 072700093067000 WILSON BILLY BROOKS 2.67
32 071700984967000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 30.3
37 072700180841000 CLARK EDWARD 4.21
38 072700082962000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 1.2
43 072700196010000 LEADBETTER LOUIS D 6.71
44 072700078674000 ROBERTSON C W JR 33.00
48 072700183108000 BYRD GLADYS 1.73
74 072700178960000 RIDDLE JERRY D & BARBARA F 2.34
78 072700271829000 YANCEY STONE INC 3.81
80 072700176241000 HIGH JAMES & KATHLEEN 3.78
83 072700270654000 PEAKE BARBARA 1.84
93 072700273494000 PENLAND CLARA 13.67
106 072700276093000 CLARK MARY LOUISE 0.79
107 072700373065000 ELSEGOOD JOHN EDWARD & LINDA VICKERS 5.43
108 072700361624000 BLALOCK MARTHA & MARY SPARKS 8.66
111 072700264677000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 8.48
112 072700163066000 HIGH JAMES M & KATHLEEN 62.89
120 072700366782000 RISNER THOMAS N & BETTY DELORES 4.47
143 072700350474000 CALDWELL ROBERT E & JOYCE A 14.15
151 072700462034000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 5.89
152 072700355338000 EDWARDS J RANDOLPH & JUDITH W TRUSTE 17.85
163 072700456674000 MCMAHAN OLLIE LIFE EST 20.39
168 072700452013000 MCMAHAN OLLIE LIFE EST 2.06
169 072700347505000 EDWARDS J RANDOLPH & JUDITH W TRUSTE 18.56
174 072700440130000 EDWARDS J RANDOPH & SHELBY JANE PRIN 6.7
176 072704535916000 PIETRYKA FREDERICK F & JEAN K ETAL 1.19
177 072700443038000 LOWE L EDWARD & ANNETTE S 27.95
10 072704535916000 PIETRYKA FREDERICK F & JEAN K ETAL 1.19
11 072704540660000 PATE RONALD D & PEGGY D 0.79
12 072700443038000 LOWE L EDWARD & ANNETTE S 27.95
13 072704542663000 HORN MARK & YAEL 0.97
14 072704544526000 POOLER PAUL E & MARY MARGARET 0.34
18 072704545419000 THOMAS RICKIE M & DIANNE Y 0.52
21 072704545338000 LAMB EDGAR L & PARTICIA 0.8
24 072704544125000 WOLFENSON JACK & ELAYNE 0.25
26 072704544005000 BORRAS-ROSELLO ISAAC & AURA L 0.21
29 072704533995000 GARVIN JANICE 0.25
31 072704534806000 JOHNSON JAMES HENRY & JANICE IRENE T 0.28
34 072704539572000 THEODORIDES EVANGELIA 2.27
36 072704534725000 ENOS JEFFREY J & DENISE B ETAL 0.3
38 072704535584000 CERTAIN LEONARD L & SUSAN A 0.95
39 072704534634000 CERTAIN LEONARD LOWE & SUSAN A ETAL 0.68
49 072704526575000 MCMAHAN ROBERT DONALD 4.44.
50 072704535432000 DOWDA JOHN E & EUGENIA 0.92
54 072704535279000 BELLINO MARK & LINDA 0.59
62 072600488084000 ANSPACH WILLIAM E & KENNA L 397.36
66 072700522857000 AUSTIN GEORGE R & WILMA J 9.96
111 072704528422000 MCMAHAN ROBERT DONALD & BRENDA GAIL 0.1
N
W?E
ruS
Downstream
Project Limits
I) ))W
NO
1.
t
M
j •
6
293
3 s [)?
1 • rA

'e
Upstream
Project Limits
Figure 1
Site Location Map with Stream Impact Site ENVIRONMENTAL, Numbers
November 11, 2004 ENGINEERING & HYDROGEOLOGY
USGS Mt. Mitchell Quadrangle 50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEVILLE, NC 28801
Scale 1 inch = 2000 feet TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
Cattail Creek
Yancev County. North Carolina
I I f
PATemplatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc
( VINO PRE-STOR><4 CONDITION
!1 RMAL \VATER LEVEL
ORIGINAL STREAM BOTTO1,4
CHANNEL TOP OF BANK

X.AFTER-STORNI CONDITION
%%'OODYiOTHER DEBRIS
z ':ROCK DEBRIS'-? •.i:.. .
- z
C
? q
i
RESTORED CONDITION
i
i
RESTORED STREAM BOTTOM
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 400 - STREAM AREA DEBRIS REMOVAL
STREAM AREA DEBRIS FIGURE
E'N"G'I N E E'R'f N (3"&'^;H=Y D'R o:a:E o Lo GY. REMOVAL CONCEPTUAL
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351 ^
www.altamontenvironmental-com L
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE SCALE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
` Channel Bank
I
/ Original Stream Bottom /
? Rock Erosion Debris
Eroded Area
BEFORE
Restored Stream Bottom Eroded Rock Debris Backfillr
- O 0 a AFTER

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 480 - STREAM CHANNEL AND STREAMBANK RESTORATION
ALTAMONT i? i STREAM CHANNEL AND FIGURE
9E'N,G' N E'E R"('NAG &1%H Y."D R O"G`EO G Y STREAMBANK RESTORATION
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, TIC 28801 CONCEPTUAL
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenviromnental.com -`/{)
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
Office Use Only: 041926 Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(ifa„A, _,_.
r----__••• ••••••• ••, ..v. _FF.a,.av U Una Yl UJULI ., !n ust; enter ",Not Applicable" Or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
iICEIVET) ? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of. North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
o ?c0Rod
II. Applicant Information D
NOV 1 9 2004
1. Owner/Applicant Information fq,
Name: Michele Lawhem. Yancey Coup M er DENR - WATER QUALITY
Mailing Address: Room 11, Courthouse AND 3
Burnsville NC 29714
Telephone Number:-[phone] Fax Number: (828) 6824301
E-mail Address: m.lawhemna countvmaner yancYe c gIM org
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/ap fi?j
Name: Stuart A. R an F 111 ii::I!
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental Inc
Mailing Address: 50 College Street
Asheville NC 28801 C,,, -,,,,_
WETLAD3 AND STORI.q. 4E'R BftAjNCH
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 14
ENGINEERING ,& HYDROGEOLOGY
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
November 18, 2004 Q
Ms. Cyndi Caroly 041926 DEC o 1 2004
Division of Water Quality ` ENR' VVA7-?R gggLiTY
401 Wetlands Unit ??7=A14')SAV'n5TO?? rQUALBRgN?H
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Yancey County EWP Pre-Construction Notification Applications
Dear Ms. Caroly:
Attached are six applications for Section 404 nationwide permit 37, and corresponding DWQ 401 water
quality certification. Exigency work applied for in these permits includes stream bank stabilization,
debris removal, and channel relocation. The primary goal in dpnducting the exigency work is to protect
property, and to return the channel to pre-flood conditions. Ple?se note that the applications are signed
by myself as an authorized agent for Yancey County. A letter o?authorization will follow.
Altamont appreciates the opportunity to provide these applications. If you would like additional
information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
PAYMENT
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G. RECEIVED
Enclosures: PCN -White ak Creek
PCN - Long Branch
PCN - Cane River
PCN - Cattail Creek
PCN - Bowlens Creek
PCN - Ayles Creek
CC: Michele Lawhern - Yancey County Manager
Cliff Vinson - District Conservation Officer NRCS
P:\Yancey County\NRCS EWP\Correspondence\DWQ permit cover letter.doc
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Cattail Creek EWP 2004-03 EWP 2004-04 EWP 2004-05
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table 1
4. Location
County: Yancey County Nearest Town: Burnsville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Follow Highway 19E East
through Burnsville After passing Ingles and Texaco on the right turn right on NC
Highway 197 South After approximately ten miles (and just past the intersection with
Cattail Creek Road). Highway 197 crosses Cattail Creek. The downstream point of the
project is the confluence with the Cane River, which is accessible by turning from
Highway 197 right on a grass road immediately before crossing the bridge. The project
continues upstream approximately two miles from the bridge. Upstream locations are
accessible by turning from Highway 197 left on Cattail Creek Road before the bridge.
See attached Figure 1
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 50' 26" N/82° 17' 54" W (approximate
center of project area)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Multiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Cattail Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad
Page 6 of 14
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the' time of this application:The proposed project site consists of light residential an
d
agricultural uses. The stream and stream banks were heavily impacted during Hurricanes
Frances and Ivan. The stream is clogged with woody, rock and non-native debris In
some cases the channel has moved significantly from its original location and is
threatening an adjacent property. Additionally, extensive stream bank erosion threatens
the stability of existing structures including houses and bridges
9. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Clearing and Debris Removal
Fallen trees, limbs and dislodged brush within the cross section of the existing or original
channel up to and including the debris line shall be removed Any foreign debris will be
removed. Trees whose near term fall is apparent will be removed Live trees designated for
removal will be cut three feet above the ground surface and the root masses will be left
Disturbance of channel bottom and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the
minimum necessary to allow the construction equipment to remove debris All areas
disturbed due to debris removal and equipment access shall be reshaped and reseeded
Access to the channel will be perpendicular to the channel so cutting of trees is held to a
minimum with precaution taken to protect mast production and stream canopy trees Dead
trees that provide den habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be
protected. A stream area debris conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 2
Stream Channel and Streambank Restoration
When possible excavation equipment will access deposition areas at a safe distance from
the streambank and do not need to track into the stream channel. Material excavated from
these deposition areas can generally be placed with only one motion of the excavation
equipment. Most of these sites include a steep eroded streambank opposite or adjacent to
the deposition area. Where there does exist an eroded streambank in the vicinity of these
deposit in areas, the material removed from this area will be used to stabilize the
streambank. Where suitable material is available rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
fill. At sites where there is no eroded streambank in the immediate vicinity, the excavated
material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of the streambank or will be hauled off
site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an elevation higher than the
existing streambanks.
In cases when the channel has relocated it will be necessary to re-establish the stream
channel to its pre-flood location and capacity. Work in these cases shall proceed from
downstream to upstream to reduce sediment loading Restored channel dimensions will be
established in the field using reference data from appropriate nearby stable or nearly table
sections. The restored profile and facet slopes will be established in the field using site
elevation data and appropriate nearby reference profile data The restored channel pattern
will be determined using field indicators aerial photographs and interviews with
Page 7 of 14
landowners. Where suitable material is available rock vanes and root wads will be installed
in the restored bank section to reduce bank stress and provide stability to the unconsolidated
fill In several cases where a major channel shift has occurred all streamflow can be
diverted into the flood channel allowing for all restoration work to be performed in the dry
bed of the original channel In cases where the original and flood channels overlap, work
shall begin by re-establishing a narrow diversion channel at the approximate location of the
original channel Excavation of the channel shall begin at the downstream edge of the
deposition area and will progress upstream Material excavated from this channel will be
placed at the waters edge between the existing stream flow and the new channel. Care will
be taken to maintain an adequate berm area to prevent the flow of the stream from entering
the channel being excavated When the excavation reaches the upstream edge of the
deposition area, the stream flow shall be turned into the re-established channel. A berm will
then be established to block as much of the flow as possible from moving through the flood
scoured channel. Once flow is diverted to the re-established channel and the flood scoured
channel is reduced to a minimum flow, the re-establishment of the full original capacity of
the stream and stabilization of the eroded streambank will begin. Beginning at t he most
downstream point of the deposition area, the material will be moved to the outside of the
curve to re-establish the original stream location and capacity. Care shall be taken to move
the material in such a manner as to minimize sedimentation. As the material is moved to its
final position on the outside of the curve the streambank shall be sloped to a stable slope.
Large rock encountered during this phase of the excavation shall be placed at the toe of the
slope used to construct vane structures or used to anchor root wads to protect
unconsolidated fill As a final operation the berm placed at the upstream end of the channel
shall be removed At no time will excavation proceed below the normal channel bottom
depth.
A stream channel and streambank restoration conceptual drawing is attached as Figure 3.
IV.
Equipment that may be used to accomplish the above listed tasks include; Rubber tired
skidders 15 ton dump truck hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chainsaws.
10. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Exigency work to protect existing property and structures. Stabilize streambanks to
prevent further erosion and sedimentation.
Prior Project History
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
Page 8 of 14
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include limited streambed disturbance debris removal and stream bank
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***

- List eacn impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
Page 9 of 14
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Length
Impact of Average Width Perennial or
site TNpe of Impact* Impact Strewn Name** of Stream Before Intermittent?
(linear Impact (please specify)
(indicate feet)
on map)
1 Stream bank stabilization, 500 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
2 Stream bank stabilization, 150 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
debris removal
3 Stream bank stabilization, 250 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
4 Stream bank stabilization, 100 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
5 Stream bank stabilization, 350 Cattail Creek 30 Perennial
channel realignment, debris
removal
6 Stream bank stabilization, 50 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
debris removal
7 Stream bank stabilization, 50 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
debris removal
8 Stream bank stabilization, 80 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
debris removal
9 Stream bank stabilization, 110 Cattail Creek 25 Perennial
debris removal
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditch ing/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wtivw.usf 'ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
wwtiv.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1,640
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,

bay, ocean, etc.

Page 10 of 14
-7
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
When at all possible equipment will be kept out of the stream channel, stream crossings will be
minimized, and no excavation will be done below the existing channel bed. When at all
possible stream material will be moved from dry areas to banks, minimizing the movement of
wet (or below water line) stream material. Restored channel dimensions and profile will be
determined by evaluating _appropriate, nearby stable or nearly stable reference sections, regional
curve information, and suitable reference data from the consultants reference libLm. Specific
attention will be given to the establishment of bankfull benches and appropriate bedform
sequencing throughout the restored areas. The temptation to create a wide, shallow channel
will be avoided. AM channel relocation activities shall be limited to returning the channel to
pre-storm conditions. Temporary and/or permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be planted on
all bare soil within 15 days of ground disturbing activities. Rocky material shall not be used for
bank stabilization above the normal high water mark.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 11 of 14
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource Nvill be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
tml.
hgp:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/nc,,vetlands/strmgide.h
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 12 of 14
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Page 13 of 14
M. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreaae tivill not change.
Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be maintained throughout this project
primarily through proper water management construction sequencing proper staging and
stockpiling of materials and the maintenance at all times of suitable channel capacity for
expected flow events No equipment fuels lubricants or other potential sources of water
pollution will be stored in areas that could be flooded during this project.
XIL Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/ gent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature s valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
Table I- Cattail Creek Property Owner Information
PARCEL ID PIN OWNER AREA
148 071800902117000 WILSON MAX ETAL 1.01
160 071700891655000 HOLLIFIELD JACK 31.07
8 071800802542000 BLANKENSHIP ALVIN & LUCILLE 28.23
9 071800902117000 WILSON MAX ETAL 1.01
15 071700984967000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 30.30
19 071700999347000 PENSACOLA METHODIST CHURCH 1.33
20 071700984967000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 30.30
24 071700999347000 PENSACOLA METHODIST CHURCH 1.33
29 072700093067000 WILSON BILLY BROOKS 2.67
32 071700984967000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 30.30
37 072700180841000 CLARK EDWARD 4.21
38 072700082962000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 1.26
43 072700196010000 LEADBETTER LOUIS D 6.71
44 072700078674000 ROBERTSON C W JR 33.00
48 072700183108000 BYRD GLADYS 1.73
74 072700178960000 RIDDLE JERRY D & BARBARA F 2.34
78 072700271829000 YANCEY STONE INC 3.81
80 072700176241000 HIGH JAMES & KATHLEEN 3.78
83 072700270654000 PEAKE BARBARA 1.84
93 072700273494000 PENLAND CLARA 13.6
106 072700276093000 CLARK MARY LOUISE 0.79
107 072700373065000 ELSEGOOD JOHN EDWARD & LINDA VICKERS 5.43
108 072700361624000 BLALOCK MARTHA & MARY SPARKS 8.66
111 072700264677000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 8.48
112 072700163066000 HIGH JAMES M & KATHLEEN 62.89
120 072700366782000 RISNER THOMAS N & BETTY DELORES 4.47
143 072700350474000 CALDWELL ROBERT E & JOYCE A 14.15
151 072700462034000 WILSON BENJAMIN B 5.89
152 072700355338000 EDWARDS J RANDOLPH & JUDITH W TRUSTE 17.85
163 072700456674000 MCMAHAN OLLIE LIFE EST 20.39
168 072700452013000 MCMAHAN OLLIE LIFE EST 2.06
169 072700347505000 EDWARDS J RANDOLPH & JUDITH W TRUSTE 18.56
174 072700440130000 EDWARDS J RANDOPH & SHELBY JANE PRIN 6.77
176 072704535916000 PIETRYKA FREDERICK F & JEAN K ETAL 1.19
177 072700443038000 LOWE L EDWARD & ANNETTE S 27.95
10 072704535916000 PIETRYKA FREDERICK F & JEAN K ETAL 1.19
11 072704540660000 PATE RONALD D & PEGGY D 0.79
12 072700443038000 LOWE L EDWARD & ANNETTE S 27.95
13 072704542663000 HORN MARK & YAEL 0.97
14 072704544526000 POOLER PAUL E & MARY MARGARET 0.34
18 072704545419000 THOMAS RICKIE M & DIANNE Y 0.52
21 072704545338000 LAMB EDGAR L & PARTICIA 0.83
24 072704544125000 WOLFENSON JACK & ELAYNE 0.25
26 072704544005000 BORRAS-ROSELLO ISAAC & AURA L 0.21
29 072704533995000 GARVIN JANICE 0.25
31 072704534806000 JOHNSON JAMES HENRY & JANICE IRENE T 0.28
34 072704539572000 THEODORIDES EVANGELIA 2.271
36 072704534725000 ENOS JEFFREY J & DENISE B ETAL 0.37
38 072704535584000 CERTAIN LEONARD L & SUSAN A 0.95
39 072704534634000 CERTAIN LEONARD LOWE & SUSAN A ETAL 0.68
49 072704526575000 MCMAHAN ROBERT DONALD 4.44
50 072704535432000 DOWDA JOHN E & EUGENIA 0.92
54 072704535279000 BELLINO MARK & LINDA 0.59
62 072600488084000 ANSPACH WILLIAM E & KENNA L 397.3
66 072700522857000 AUSTIN GEORGE R & WILMA J 9.96
111 072704528422000 MCMAHAN ROBERT DONALD & BRENDA GAIL 0.1
N
W-<?- E
S
Downstream
Project Limits
2

r B
e
293
1 '.
CIA
Upstream
Project Limits

Figure 1
Site Location Map with Stream Impact Site
Numbers
November 11, 2004 E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R O G E O L O G y
USGS Mt. Mitchell Quadrangle 50 COLLEGE STREET, AsHEVILLE, NC 28801
Scale 1 inch = 2000 feet T )EL. 828.281.3350 FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
Cattail Creek
Yancev County. North Carolina
PATempiatesTigures in WordTigure Border.doc
PRE-STORh4 CONDITION
CHANNEL TOP OF BANK
! 1 I NORMAL WATER LEVEL
I ORIGINAL STREAhi BOTTOM
A \ ` t WOODYiOTHER DEBRIS
' AFTER-STORM CONDITION ,
z ROCK DEBRIS
z
1
n L7
i
RESTORED CONDITION !
- - I; - - -
RESTORED STREAM BOTTOh'1
I
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 400 - STREAM AREA DEBRIS REMOVAL
STREAM AREA DEBRIS FIGURE
REMOVAL CONCEPTUAL
E•N"'G IIN E'E Wt N"G^,& -H?YO R'O G?E,0'L+O"G_Y,j
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com L
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
r
-? Original Stream Bottom
Rock Erosion Debris
Eroded Area
BEFORE
Channel Bank
I
Eroded Rock Debris Backfill' Q OOQ 0
Restored Stream Bottom 0
t.s 0 O 0
0 0000
00 00
QO QO
AFTER
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION

SOURCE: USDA NRCS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 480 - STREAM CHANNEL AND STREAMBANK RESTORATION
i, STREAM CHANNEL AND FIGURE
E,N G1'4e E R F N G, &'H Y.'D-RiOE 0,L o;- Y STREAMBANK RESTORATION
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, TIC 28801 CONCEPTUAL
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351 n
www.altamontenvironmental.com vK
EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE YANCEY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN SCALE
CLIENT: YANCEY COUNTY NOT TO SCALE
DATE: NOVEMBER II, 2004
ALIAPAUN 1 CIVVIKUNAnCIV IAL, INN.
NC DWQ 11/29/2004
Date Type Reference Original Amt. Balance Due Discount Payment
10/04/2004 Bill 475.00 475.00 475.00
Check Amount 475.00
12-- (- o4{
4426
BB&T- Business Checking 475.00