20171292 Ver 1_Compass Point_FinalMitPlan_20190610

ID#* 20171292
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review
Completed Date
06/11/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 6/10/2019
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
W Stream r Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Brad Breslow
Project Information
Existing 20171292
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
I D#: *
Project Type: f DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Compass Point
County: Yadkin
Document Information
r Yes t: No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing 1
Version: (nun-bersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Compass Point _Mitigation-Plan_Submittal.pdf 23.45MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jamey McEachran
Signature:
J" Va6&1b

fires
June 6, 2019
Steven Kichefski
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Dear Mr. Kichefski,
302 Jefferson St. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RES is pleased to submit the Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Instrument (LIMBI) Compass Point
Final Mitigation Plan (SAW -2017-01465) and Nationwide Permit 27 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN).
As outlined in the 2017 RES Yadkin 01 UMBI Final Prospectus, the Compass Point Site is being developed
concurrently with four other mitigation sites to establish the UMBI. The Mitigation Plan submittal includes
a response memo addressing all IRT comments on the draft plan. The attached PCN package includes PCN
Form, PCN supplemental information, supporting figures, and an updated aquatic resource inventory table
and Waters of the US Map to accompany the previously -confirmed PJD. The PCN has also been submitted
to NCDWR and USACE via the joint online submission tool.
As specified in the mitigation plan, RES requests that the initial allocation of released credits, equivalent to
15 percent of the restoration/enhancement credits, be released by the IRT with written approval upon
satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a) Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
b) Approval of the final mitigation plan;
c) Mitigation site must be secured;
d) Delivery of financial assurances;
e) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
f) Issuance of the 404 -permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
According to our accounting, this request represents 619.50 SMUs.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this important project. Please contact me at 919-209-1066 or
kcarreregres.us if you have any questions or require any additional information.
Sincerely,
RES, LLC
Kasey Carrere
Project Manager
res. us

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
CESAW-RG/Browning
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
May 1, 2019
SUBJECT: RES Yadkin 01 Compass Point Mitigation Site- Draft Mitigation Plan Review, Yadkin
County, NC
PURPOSE: The comments listed below were received from the NCIRT during the 30 -day comment
period in accordance with Section 332.8(g) of the 2008 Mitigation Rule.
USACE AID#: SAW -2017-01465
30 -Day Comment Deadline: November 21, 2018
Mac Haupt, NCDWR:
1. DWR noted all the stream name changes in RES's August 3, 2018. In the future, please refrain from
extensive stream name changes, it makes it difficult to follow changes from the prospectus stage. If name
changes are required, please provide a copy of the concept map used from the initial prospectus so a
comparison can be made.
2. DWR believes this stream temperature is warm and not cool.
3. DWR requires that the existing wetlands need to be shown in Figure 5 -Existing Conditions. While the
existing wetlands are shown on a map buried in an Appendix, this resource should be a prominent feature
of any restoration project.
4. Section 5 makes no mention of wetlands whatsoever while almost half the project site is underlain by
hydric soils. DWR recommends inserting an objective that elucidates that the project will at least
enhance and perhaps restore relic wetlands on site. DWR realizes that wetland credits are not offered by
this project, however, given that fact that these resources are regulated, providers should take care to
make sure all wetland resources are accounted for and demonstrate that the project will provide a net
benefit for the resource.
5. Section 6.4 — in the last paragraph, RES states the project "...will provide an overall increase in wetland
function...". Unless RES plans to monitor and document the hydrologic function RES cannot make that
statement. DWR recommends RES install several gauges to document the increased overbank events and
maintenance or increased hydrological performance of the adjacent riparian wetlands.
6. Section 7- Performance Standards- please note that the 30 day flow metric is applicable to intermittent
streams only. Therefore, please remove this metric from Table 15. Since the streams on site are
perennial, DWR expects continuous flow.
7. DWR recommends installing a few wetland gauges to document the maintenance of proper hydroperiods
and in -stream transducers (1 or 2) to document overbank events. Transducers are more accurate and
reliable than crest gauges.
8. DWR requires that the existing wetlands be shown on the design sheets.

9. DWR requires that the proposed channel bed slope show bedform changes and not simply show a straight
line. In addition, DWR would like to see the location on the design sheet of the boulder outcrop just
above DWI -C.
10. Design sheet S4 shows a break of the proposed channel bed at station 23+00, what is the reason for this?
Is this where the bedrock outcrop is located?
11. Is there a map showing the location of the cross sections shown in Appendix B?
12. DWR noted the increase in smus from prospectus stage to draft mitigation plan stage. DWR does not
agree with the ratios shown for DWI -C, DW2-A and DW3. First for reach DW2-A, this reach was
initially proposed as E2 at 2.5:1, the draft mitigation plan is proposing E1. After examining the design
sheets and recalling the site visit, DWR believes the enhancement level 2 is more appropriate at the initial
2.5:1 ratio. Reach DW3 basically shows planting and fencing only, and DWR recommends a ratio of 3:1
for this short reach. Finally, reach DWI -C was discussed in the field (then as DW1-B) as a mixture of E1
and E2. DWR noted RES comments in the August 3' letter about this reach needing more work.
However, until DWR can see the updated design sheets showing the bedrock outcrop, and exactly what is
happening with the bedform (also, cross sections shown in Appendix B also confirms initial call, except
we need to know the location of those cross sections), DWR is sticking with our initial comment of
recommending E1 for this reach (at 1.5:1).
Kim Browning, USACE:
1. The reach name changes from the prospectus document made it very difficult to track.
2. DW 1 C: My notes have that as originally being proposed as EII at the bedrock outcropping.
3. Table 9: Highly Functioning (HF) is not a category in the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework.
4. There is a small wetland within the easement boundary identified in the JD along DWIB. This should be
depicted on the plan sheet, as well as the conceptual map, and though it's a small area, hydrology should
be monitored to ensure no loss of wetlands occur. It's also recommended to place a veg plot in this area.
5. Where C channels are proposed for this project: Please update Table 15 in the Stream Geomorphology and
Hydraulic Performance standard to include "The Entrenchment Ratio (ER) shall be no less than 2.2 for all
measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach." The Cross Sections performance standard in Section 7.1
should be updated to reflect this as well.
6. Section 7.2: Vegetation—Please add "260 trees" to the statement for year five.
7. Please provide a Service Area Map.
8. Please provide a monitoring map (or include on the Conceptual Plan Map) the location of the gauges,
existing wetland, veg plots, photo locations, etc.
9. Long Term Management: UP2S provided annual monitoring costs, but perhaps this list should be
amended to include signage, fence monitoring, encroachments, etc.
10. Monitoring Bond: Typically we require an itemized list to calculate the Monitoring bond. Please provide
an itemized breakdown for the monitoring costs.
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager
fa,z Steve Kichefski

MEMORANDUM res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 919.209.1052 tel. [phone] fax
TO: NCIRT
FROM: Brad Breslow and Kasey Carrere - RES
DATE: June 6, 2019
RE: Yadkin 01 Umbrella Bank, Compass Point Mitigation Bank Site, EPA, USACE and
NCDWR Draft Mitigation Plan Comments (SAW -2017-01465)
Mac Haupt, NCDWR:
1. DWR noted all the stream name changes in RES's August 3, 2018. In the future, please refrain
from extensive stream name changes, it makes it difficult to follow changes from the prospectus
stage. If name changes are required, please provide a copy of the concept map used from the initial
prospectus so a comparison can be made.
RES completely understands this comment and we have refocused on getting reach labels finalized
in the initial concept plans going forward. Please see the below Reach ID Summary table.
Original Reach
ID
Revised Reach
ID
Latitude
Longitude
Length (ft)/Area
ac
DWI -A
DW2-B
DWI -B
36.26465
-80.6386
306 ft
36.26729
-80.6386
2014 ft
DWI -13
DWI -C
36.27037
-80.6382
600 ft
DWI -C
DWI -D
36.27099
-80.6366
741 ft
DWI -D
DWI -E
36.27201
-80.6352
432 ft
DW2
DWI -A
36.26464
-80.6393
288 ft
DW6
DW2-A
36.26394
-80.6364
968 ft
--
DW3
36.26388
-80.6378
93 ft
WA
WA
36.2675
-80.6385
0.05 ac
WB
WB
36.2698
-80.6386
0.03 ac
WC
WC
36.2702
-80.6377
0.13 ac
Total Existing Wetlands
0.21 ac
Total Existing Stream Length
5,442 ft
*Lengths have been updated to reflect the surveyed length of the streams

2. DWR believes this stream temperature is warm and not cool.
RES relied on information provided in the USACE North Carolina Stream Temperature
Classification GIS file, available on RIBITS, to identify the stream temperature classification.
According to these data, the stream is classified as cool.
DWR requires that the existing wetlands need to be shown in Figure 5 -Existing Conditions. While
the existing wetlands are shown on a map buried in an Appendix, this resource should be a
prominent feature of any restoration project.
Existing wetlands have been added to Figure 5.
4. Section 5 makes no mention of wetlands whatsoever while almost half the project site is underlain
by hydric soils. DWR recommends inserting an objective that elucidates that the project will at
least enhance and perhaps restore relic wetlands on site. DWR realizes that wetland credits are not
offered by this project, however, given that fact that these resources are regulated, providers should
take care to make sure all wetland resources are accounted for and demonstrate that the project will
provide a net benefit for the resource.
RES appreciates that DWR anticipates our work will enhance and perhaps restore wetlands on-site,
as we also feel that the site will likely recognize benefits in increased hydrology and have an overall
increase in wetland function. However, because we are not seeking any wetland credit on the site,
we do not plan to include an objective relating to the restoration or enhancement of relic wetlands
on-site.
RES has performed a jurisdictional determination for the site and has identified regulated features
within the project limits. All regulated features will be properly managed as required by the Clean
Water Act throughout project development. We will install a wetland gauge in each of the three
existing wetlands on-site post -construction, and provide well monitoring data in our monitoring
reports. No monitoring criteria will be proposed for these wells.
Section 6.4 — in the last paragraph, RES states the project "...will provide an overall increase in
wetland function...". Unless RES plans to monitor and document the hydrologic function RES
cannot make that statement. DWR recommends RES install several gauges to document the
increased overbank events and maintenance or increased hydrological performance of the adjacent
riparian wetlands.
RES does not plan to monitor the hydrologic function in the on-site wetlands during or post
construction as we are bit requesting wetland credits for the project. Therefore, we have removed
this statement from the mitigation plan.
6. Section 7- Performance Standards- please note that the 30 day flow metric is applicable to
intermittent streams only. Therefore, please remove this metric from Table 15. Since the streams
on site are perennial, DWR expects continuous flow.
This statement has been removed from Section 7.
7. DWR recommends installing a few wetland gauges to document the maintenance of proper
hydroperiods and in -stream transducers (1 or 2) to document overbank events. Transducers are
more accurate and reliable than crest gauges.
Table 15 has been updated to specify the installation of stage recorders, which include both a crest
gauge and signal transducers. This update was also made in Table 9 for consistency.
One wetland gauge will be placed in each existing wetland for a total of three wetland gauges across
the site. They will be installed post -construction to facilitate site access during construction and
prevent cattle from interfering with the equipment prior to their exclusion from the project area.
There are no monitoring criteria proposed related to these gauges.

8. DWR requires that the existing wetlands be shown on the design sheets.
Plan sheets revised to show existing wetlands.
9. DWR requires that the proposed channel bed slope show bedform changes and not simply show a
straight line. In addition, DWR would like to see the location on the design sheet of the boulder
outcrop just above DW1-C.
Plan sheets revised to include a detailed bed profile. Sheet S4 was revised to include the location
of the bedrock outcrop above DWI -C.
10. Design sheet S4 shows a break of the proposed channel bed at station 23+00, what is the reason for
this? Is this where the bedrock outcrop is located?
This is the location of the existing bedrock outcrop. The proposed channel will tie-in to the existing
channel for approximately 30 feet to maintain the bedrock feature.
11. Is there a map showing the location of the cross sections shown in Appendix B?
The cross section locations have been added to the map in Appendix B title Survey Data Collection.
12. DWR noted the increase in SMUs from prospectus stage to draft mitigation plan stage. DWR does
not agree with the ratios shown for DWI -C, DW2-A and DW3. First for reach DW2-A, this reach
was initially proposed as E2 at 2.5:1, the draft mitigation plan is proposing E1. After examining
the design sheets and recalling the site visit, DWR believes the enhancement level 2 is more
appropriate at the initial 2.5:1 ratio. Reach DW3 basically shows planting and fencing only, and
DWR recommends a ratio of 3:1 for this short reach. Finally, reach DWI -C was discussed in the
field (then as DW1-B) as a mixture of E1 and E2. DWR noted RES comments in the August 3rd
letter about this reach needing more work. However, until DWR can see the updated design sheets
showing the bedrock outcrop, and exactly what is happening with the bedform (also, cross sections
shown in Appendix B also confirms initial call, except we need to know the location of those cross
sections), DWR is sticking with our initial comment of recommending E1 for this reach (at 1.5:1).
RES agrees that the proposed work along Reaches DW2-A and DW3 justifies credit ratios of 2.5:1
(Enhancement Level II) and 3:1 (Enhancement Level III) respectively. All relevant tables have
been revised to reflect the adjusted approaches and ratios.
As for Reach DW1-C, RES feels that restoration is the appropriate approach for this reach given
the channel exhibits a high degree of lateral instability (appears to be widening) and the channel is
currently located along the north edge of the valley.
Kim Browning, USAGE:
1. The reach name changes from the prospectus document made it very difficult to track.
RES completely understands this comment and we have refocused on getting reach labels finalized
in the initial concept plans going forward. Please see the below Reach ID Summary table.
Original Reach
ID
Revised Reach
ID
Latitude
Longitude
Length (ft)/Area
(ac)
DWI -A
DW2-B
DWI -B
36.26465
-80.6386
306 ft
36.26729
-80.6386
2014 ft
DWI -B
DWI -C
36.27037
-80.6382
600 ft
DWI -C
DWI -D
36.27099
-80.6366
741 ft
DWI -D
DWI -E
36.27201
-80.6352
432 ft

DW2
DWI -A
36.26464
-80.6393
288 ft
DW6
DW2-A
36.26394
-80.6364
968 ft
--
DW3
36.26388
-80.6378
93 ft
WA
WA
36.2675
-80.6385
0.05 ac
WB
WB
36.2698
-80.6386
0.03 ac
WC
WC
36.2702
-80.6377
0.13 ac
Total Existing Wetlands
0.21 ac
Total Existing Stream Length
5,442 ft
*Lengths have been updated to reflect the surveyed length of the streams
2. DWI C: My notes have that as originally being proposed as EII at the bedrock outcropping.
Restoration is proposed immediately upstream and downstream of the bedrock outcrop. Since the
bedrock outcrop extends for less than 30 LF, this section was changed to restoration as grading will
be required to tie-in to the newly constructed channel both upstream and downstream.
3. Table 9: Highly Functioning (HF) is not a category in the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework.
All references to Highly Functioning have been removed and replaced with Functioning.
4. There is a small wetland within the easement boundary identified in the JD along DW1B. This
should be depicted on the plan sheet, as well as the conceptual map, and though it's a small area,
hydrology should be monitored to ensure no loss of wetlands occur. It's also recommended to place
a veg plot in this area.
Existing wetlands have been added to the appropriate figures. Hydrology will be monitored by a
wetland gauge which will be installed post -construction. A vegetation monitoring plot will be placed
in the general area around this wetland.
5. Where C channels are proposed for this project: Please update Table 15 in the Stream
Geomorphology and Hydraulic Performance standard to include "The Entrenchment Ratio (ER)
shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach." The Cross Sections
performance standard in Section 7.1 should be updated to reflect this as well.
The referenced table and Section 7.1 have been updated.
6. Section 7.2: Vegetation—Please add "260 trees" to the statement for year five.
This statement has been updated.
7. Please provide a Service Area Map.
Figure 1 has been updated to serve as the Service Area and Project Vicinity Map.
8. Please provide a monitoring map (or include on the Conceptual Plan Map) the location of the gauges,
existing wetland, veg plots, photo locations, etc.
Figure 11 – Monitoring Plan has been added to address this comment.
9. Long Term Management: UP2S provided annual monitoring costs, but perhaps this list should be
amended to include signage, fence monitoring, encroachments, etc.
As noted in Section 10, UP2S has provided engagement letters that state their responsibilities to
include the maintenance of easement boundary signage, annual on-site monitoring/inspections

(which will include fence monitoring, where applicable), and encroachments. Any potential
violations, including encroachment, will be promptly communicated to the landowner.
10. Monitoring Bond: Typically we require an itemized list to calculate the Monitoring bond. Please
provide an itemized breakdown for the monitoring costs.
An itemized breakdown of the monitoring costs has been added to the mitigation plan.

FINAL MITIGATION PLAN
Compass Point Mitigation Site
Yadkin County, North Carolina
USACE Action ID SAW -2017-01465
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101
Prepared by:
fires
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-209-1052
June 2019
"This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33 Navigation
and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(14). "

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Compass Point Mitigation Site ("the Project") is located in Yadkin County, approximately 4.5
miles northeast of Boonville. Water quality stressors currently affecting the Project include livestock
production, agricultural production, and lack of riparian buffer. The Project presents 5,304 linear feet
(LF) of stream restoration and enhancement generating 4,130 Cool Stream Mitigation Units (SMU)
along three unnamed tributaries that drain directly to the Yadkin River.
The Project is located in the Yadkin River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03040101, 12 -digit USGS
HUC 030401011001, and NCDWR sub -basin 03-07-02. The current State classification for the Yadkin
River at this location is Class C (NCDWQ 2011).
Consisting of cattle pastures and wooded areas, the Project's total easement area is approximately 16.5
acres within the overall drainage area of 271 acres. Grazing livestock have historically had access to
most stream reaches within the Project. The lack of riparian buffer vegetation, deep-rooted vegetation,
and unstable channel characteristics have contributed to the degradation of stream banks throughout
the Project area.
Goals for the Project include an increase to hydrologic function and restoration to ecological function
within the existing stream and riparian corridor and protect these features in perpetuity. These will be
accomplished by returning the existing streams into stable conditions by constructing an E/C type
stream with appropriate dimensions and pattern, reconnecting the channel to the floodplain, and
backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures will be utilized for vertical stability and to
improve habitat. Buffer improvements will filter runoff from agricultural fields, thereby reducing
nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. Livestock exclusion fence will be installed along the
easement boundary. The widening and restoration of the riparian areas will also provide wildlife
corridors throughout the Project area. Benefits to be accrued from these activities include improved
water quality, and terrestrial and aquatic habitat.
The stream design approach for the Project is to combine the analog method of natural channel design
with analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and
floodplain. The analog method involves the use of a reference reach, or "template" stream, adjacent to,
nearby, or previously in the same location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog
reach are replicated to create the features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when
watershed and boundary conditions are similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al.,
2001). Hydraulic geometry is developed using analytical methods to identify the design discharge.
After completion of all construction and planting activities, the Project will be monitored on a regular
basis throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring period, or until performance standards
are met. Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to Unique Places to Save (UP2S). This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term
steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions
required in the conservation easement are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold easement and
deed restrictions will be finalized prior to site transfer to the responsible party.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan ii June 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Project Components................................................................................................................
1
1.2 Project Outcomes....................................................................................................................
1
2 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION...............................................................
2
2.1 Site Selection..........................................................................................................................
2
3 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS..............................................................................
4
3.1 Watershed Summary Information..........................................................................................
4
Drainage Area and Land Use.........................................................................................................
4
Surface Water Classification..........................................................................................................
4
3.2 Landscape Characteristics......................................................................................................
4
ExistingVegetation........................................................................................................................
5
ExistingWetlands...........................................................................................................................
6
Geology..........................................................................................................................................
6
SoilSurvey.....................................................................................................................................
6
3.3 Land Use - Historic, Current, and Future...............................................................................
8
3.4 Regulatory Considerations and Potential Constraints............................................................
8
Property, Boundary, and Utilities...................................................................................................
8
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/ Hydrologic Trespass ....................................
9
Environmental Screening and Documentation...............................................................................
9
Threatened and Endangered Species..............................................................................................
9
CulturalResources........................................................................................................................10
3.5 Reach Summary Information...............................................................................................
10
ChannelClassification..................................................................................................................
11
Discharge......................................................................................................................................11
ExistingChannel Morphology.....................................................................................................11
Channel Stability Assessment......................................................................................................12
BankfullVerification....................................................................................................................14
3.6 Site Photographs...................................................................................................................
15
4 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL.......................................................................................
17
4.1 Anticipated Functional Benefits and Improvements............................................................
18
Hydrology.....................................................................................................................................18
Hydraulic......................................................................................................................................18
Geomorphology............................................................................................................................18
Physiochemical.............................................................................................................................19
Biology.........................................................................................................................................19
5 MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES............................................................
20
Best Management Practices (BMPs)............................................................................................
21
6 MITIGATION WORK PLAN.....................................................................................................
23
6.1 Reference Stream..................................................................................................................
23
Reference Watershed Characterization........................................................................................
23
ReferenceDischarge.....................................................................................................................
23
Reference Channel Morphology...................................................................................................
24
Reference Channel Stability Assessment.....................................................................................
24
Reference Bankfull Verification...................................................................................................
24
6.2 Design Parameters................................................................................................................
24
StreamRestoration Approach.......................................................................................................
24
DesignDischarge..........................................................................................................................
27
DataAnalysis...............................................................................................................................
28
6.3 Vegetation and Planting Plan...............................................................................................
31
Compass Point Mitigation Plan iii June 2019

PlantCommunity Restoration...................................................................................................... 31
On Site Invasive Species Management........................................................................................ 33
SoilRestoration............................................................................................................................33
6.4 Mitigation Summary ............................................................................................................. 33
6.5 Determination of Credits...................................................................................................... 34
7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS................................................................................................ 36
7.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria..................................................................................... 36
BankfullEvents............................................................................................................................
36
CrossSections..............................................................................................................................
36
DigitalImage Stations..................................................................................................................36
Table 4. Compass Point Vegetation Plot Summary ...............................................................................
SurfaceFlow.................................................................................................................................
36
7.2 Vegetation Success Criteria..................................................................................................
36
8 MONITORING PLAN.................................................................................................................
37
8.1 As -Built Survey....................................................................................................................
37
8.2 Visual Monitoring................................................................................................................
37
8.3 Hydrology Events.................................................................................................................
37
8.4 Cross Sections......................................................................................................................
37
8.5 Vegetation Monitoring.........................................................................................................
38
8.6 Scheduling/Reporting...........................................................................................................
38
9 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN.........................................................................................
40
10 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN.....................................................................................
41
11 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE...............................................................................................
42
11.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits..................................................................................
42
11.2 Subsequent Credit Releases..................................................................................................
42
12 MAINTENANCE PLAN.............................................................................................................
44
13 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES......................................................................................................
45
14 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................
46
List of Tables
Table 1. Compass Point Project Components Summary ........................................................................ l
Table 2. Project Parcel and Landowner Information..............................................................................
3
Table 3. Project Watershed Summary Information................................................................................4
Table 4. Compass Point Vegetation Plot Summary ...............................................................................
5
Table5. Mapped Soil Series...................................................................................................................
7
Table 6. Regulatory Considerations.....................................................................................................10
Table 7. Summary of Existing Channel Characteristics.......................................................................
11
Table 8. Channel Stability Assessment Results....................................................................................13
Table 9. Functional Benefits and Improvements..................................................................................
22
Table 10. Peak Flow Comparison........................................................................................................
29
Table 11. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Shear Stresses......................................................
30
Table 12. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Velocities.............................................................
30
Table13. Proposed Plant List...............................................................................................................
33
Table14. Mitigation Credits.................................................................................................................
35
Table 15. Monitoring Requirements.....................................................................................................
39
Table 16. Stream Credit Release Schedule...........................................................................................
42
Table17. Maintenance Plan.................................................................................................................
44
Table18. Financial Assurances............................................................................................................45
Compass Point Mitigation Plan iv June 2019

List of Charts
Chart 1. Stream Functions Pyramid......................................................................................................17
List of Figures
Figure 1 — Service Area and Vicinity
Figure 2 — USGS
Figure 3 — Landowner
Figure 4 — Land -use
Figure 5 — Existing Conditions
Figure 6 — National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7 — Soils
Figure 8 — Historical Conditions
Figure 9 — FEMA
Figure 10 —Conceptual Plan
Figure 11 — Monitoring Plan
Appendices
Appendix A — Plan Sheets
Appendix B — Data/Analysis/Supplementary Information
Appendix C — Site Protection Instrument
Appendix D — DWR Stream Identification Forms
Appendix E — USACE District Assessment Methods/Forms
Appendix F — Wetland JD Forms and Maps
Appendix G — Invasive Species Plan
Appendix H — Regulatory Agency Scoping Letters
Compass Point Mitigation Plan v June 2019

I PROJECT INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Components
The Compass Point Mitigation Site ("Project") is located within a rural watershed in Yadkin County,
approximately 4.5 miles northeast of Boonville. The Project lies within the Yadkin River Basin, North
Carolina Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) sub -basin 03-07-02 and United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 12 -digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) 030401011001 (Figure 1). The Project is being
designed to help meet compensatory mitigation requirements for stream impacts in the HUC 03040101.
The Project proposes to restore 3,549 linear feet (LF), enhance 1,755 LF of existing stream, and provide
water quality benefit for 271 acres of drainage area. The Project is in the Northern Inner Piedmont
Level IV ecoregion.
The Project is comprised of a single easement location along three unnamed tributaries to the Yadkin
River, totaling 5,350 linear feet. The stream mitigation components are summarized in Table 1 and
Figure 10. The Project is accessible from Pulliam Road. Coordinates for the Project are as follows:
36.269624, -80.638420.
1.2 Project Outcomes
The streams proposed for restoration have been significantly impacted by livestock production,
agricultural practices, and a lack of riparian buffer. Proposed improvements to the Project will help
meet the river basin needs expressed in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Restoration
Priorities (RBRP) as well as ecological improvements to riparian corridor within the easement.
Through stream restoration and enhancement, the Project presents 5,304 LF of proposed stream,
generating 4,130 Cool Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) (Table 1). This mitigation plan is consistent
with the October 20, 2017 IRT site visit notes (Appendix H).
Table 1. Compass Point Project Components Summary
Mitigation Approach Linear Feet Ratio Cool SMU
Restoration 3,549 1 3,549
Enhancement II 1230 2.5 492
Enhancement 11 (3) 93 3.0 31
Enhancement III 432 7.5 58
Total 5,304 4,130
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 1 June 2019

2 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The DMS 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP identified several restoration needs for the entire Yadkin
River Basin, as well as for HUC 03040101. More specifically, goals outlined in the 2009 RBRP for the
watershed include:
1. Restoration of water quality and aquatic habitat in impaired stream segments;
2. Protection of high -resource value waters, including HQ W, OR W, and WSW designated waters
and those containing large numbers of rare and endangered species (Natural Heritage Element
Occurrences);
3. Continuation of existing watershed restoration and protection initiatives and projects,
including efforts funded by Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF), DWQ's 319
Program, NC EEP, Ag Cost Share Program (A CSP) and Community Conservation Assistance
Program (CCAP);
4. Collaborative efforts with local resource agencies, land trusts and willing landowners to
implement new stream, riparian buffer and wetland restoration, enhancement and preservation
projects within TLWs;
S. Improved management of stormwater runoff (including the implementation of stormwater BMP
projects), especially in urban and suburban areas contributing to downstream degradation of
stream habitat and impairment of water quality; and
6. Implementation of agricultural BMPs in order to limit inputs of sediment, nutrients, and fecal
coliform to streams from active farming operations.
2.1 Site Selection
The Project was identified as a stream and buffer restoration opportunity to improve water quality,
habitat, and hydrology within the Yadkin River Basin within the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP.
The site lends itself to accomplish multiple RBRP goals along Project reaches due to an absence of
riparian buffers, cattle access to the stream, and the historic land use, which has led to channelization.
Many of the Project design goals and objectives will address major watershed stressors identified in the
2009 RBRP. Project -specific goals and objectives will be addressed further in Section 5. A project
watershed map with the Project's drainage areas is shown on Figure 2 and watershed planning priority
boundaries are shown on Figure 1.
The Project will address two of the six goals outlined in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP.
Establishing riparian buffers, instream structures, and increasing bedform diversity will help address
RBRP Goal 1, but achievement will not be quantified. The Project will include the use of agricultural
BMPs to limit inputs of sediment, nutrients, and fecal coliform to streams from active farming
operations (RBRP Goal 6).
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this Project includes one parcel
in Yadkin County with the following ownership in Table 2 & Figure 3. Once finalized, a copy of the
land protection instrument will be included in Appendix C. The Wilmington District Conservation
Easement model template will be utilized to draft the site protection instrument.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 2 June 2019

Table 2. Project Parcel and Landowner Information
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 3 June 2019
PIN
Owner of Record
Or
Stream Reach
Tax Parcel ID#
Winnie Wagoner
5912705289
All stream reaches
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 3 June 2019

3 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Watershed Summary Information
Drainage Area and Land Use
The Project area is comprised of three tributaries that converge, flow south to north, and drain directly
into the Yadkin River. The total drainage area for the Project is 271 acres (0.42 mi2). Primary land use
within the rural watershed consists of approximately 60.4 percent forest and 33.7 percent agricultural
land. Impervious area covers less than one percent of the total watershed (Table 3 & Figure 4). Within
the agricultural land use, pastureland accounts for 62.5 percent of the area, and row crops account for
approximately 37.5 percent of the area. Although the project watershed is primarily forested, the
majority of the agricultural areas within the watershed are in close proximity to the Project and play a
significant role in the degradation of the Project streams. These activities have negatively impacted
both water quality and streambank stability along the Project streams and their tributaries. The resulting
observed stressors include excess nutrient input, streambank erosion, sedimentation, livestock access
to streams, channel modification, and the loss of riparian buffers.
Table 3. Project Watershed Summary Information
Level IV Ecoregion
45e — Northern Inner Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 12 -digit
030401011001
DWR Sub -basin
03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (acres)
271
Percent Impervious Area
1%
Surface Water Classification
The Project streams drain to a portion of the Yadkin River that has been classified as Class C Waters
(NCDWQ 2011).
Class C waters are protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption,
aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture.
Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with
water where such activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner (NCDWQ
2011).
3.2 Landscape Characteristics
The Project is located in the Northern Inner Piedmont Level IV ecoregion, which is characterized by
rolling to hilly higher elevations than the Southern Outer Piedmont, more rugged topography, and more
monadnocks or mountain outliers than other areas of the Piedmont. It has colder temperatures, more
snowfall, and a shorter growing season than in Southern Inner, Southern Outer, Northern Outer, and
Carolina Slate Belt Piedmont regions. It has mostly mesic soils rather than the thermic soils that cover
other regions of the Carolina Piedmont. The region contains more Virginia pine and less shortleaf pine
than Southern Outer Piedmont and Carolina Slate Belt, more chestnut oak, and many mountain disjunct
plant species. Streams tend to have higher gradients than in the Outer Piedmont regions and contain
many mountain -type macroinvertebrate species.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 4 June 2019

Existing Vegetation
Vegetation around the unbuffered reaches of Project streams are primarily composed of herbaceous
pasture weeds, fescue, and some scattered trees. In general, these riparian zones are disturbed due to
regular land management activities, including active pasture and crop land. On June 21, 2018 three
100m2 plots were surveyed along the floodplain of Project tributaries, to categorize the existing
vegetation communities. Forested riparian areas along the majority of Project have been intermittently
cattle -grazed and lack a well-developed understory and shrub strata. Additionally, a portion of the left
bank of DWI -13 shows signs of being historically managed for timber harvest, resulting in an early
successional habitat with young trees and many invasive shrubs and herbaceous plants. For this reason,
representative plots were surveyed along reaches DWI -13 in active pasture, DW1-C in historic timber
harvest disturbance, and DWI -D in historically used pasture land (Appendix B). Within each
vegetation plot, all trees having equal to or greater than a five -inch (12.7 cm) diameter at breast height
(DBH) were identified, measured, and used to calculate both basal area and stems per acre. Trees equal
to or greater than 54 inches (137cm) in height were used to quantify tree species diversity. Canopy
species data was calculated to quantify the existing natural community (Schafale, 2012) (Table 4).
Shrub species and herbaceous species were also identified, and the percent cover was estimated.
Table 4. Compass Point Vegetation Plot Summary
Basal Area
Plot t_21�_� Avg. DBH (cm) Trees per Acre Total Tree Species Natural Community
0 Disturbed Piedmont Alluvial Forest
2.59 9.03 162 2 Disturbed Piedmont Alluvial Forest
0 Disturbed Piedmont Alluvial Forest
AVG 0.86 3.0 54 0.67
Dominant canopy species across the Project included tulip -poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), redcedar
(Juniperus virginiana), American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), white oak (Quercus alba),
northern red oak (Quercus rubra), American holly (Ilex opaca), black walnut (Juglans nigra), Virginia
pine (Pinus virginiana), red maple (Acer rubrum), boxelder (Acer negundo), American beech (Fagus
grandifolia), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), pignut hickory (Carya glabra), and black cherry
(Prunus serotina). Sub -canopy species included eastern redbud (Cercis canadensis), blackgum (Nyssa
sylvatica), flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus). Herbaceous
species included white avens (Geum canadense), woodsorrel (Oxalis stricta), horse nettle (Solanum
carolinense), common blue violet (Viola sororia), frostweed (Verbesina virginica), trumpet creeper
(Campsis radicans), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), roundleaf greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia),
grape (Vitis sp.), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), white snakeroot (Ageratina
altissima), lyreleaf sage (Salvia lyrata), tall hairy agrimony (Agrimonia gryposepala), prostrate
ticktrefoil (Desmodium rotundifolium), southeastern wild -rye (Elymus glabriflorus), sedges (Carex
sp.), silvery sedge (Carex canescens), poverty rush (Juncus tenuis), deer -tongue grass (Dichanthelium
clandestinum), thistle (Asteraceae family), annual ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), dogfennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), shiny cudweed (Gnaphalium spicatum), smartweed (Polygonum
pensylvanicum), white aster (Symphyotrichum ericoides), meadow garlic (Allium canadense), partridge
pea (Chamaecrista fasciculata), hairy leafcup (Smallanthus uvedalius), hog peanut (Amphicarpaea
bracteata), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), dock (Rumex sp), plantain (Plantago sp.), and goldenrod
(Solidago sp.).
Invasive species were also found within the vegetation survey plots, and in the vicinity of the site: tree
of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
oriental bittersweet (Celestrus orbiculatus), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Non-native
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 5 June 2019

species included smooth brome (Bromus inermis), red clover (Trifolium pratense), white clover
(Trifolium repens), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), black medic (Medicago lupulina),
mock strawberry (Duchesnea indica), annual meadow grass (Poa annua), tall fescue (Festuca
arundinacea), bush clover (Lespedeza sp. ), shameplant (Mimosa pudica), ox -eye daisy (Leucanthemum
vulgare), common mullein (Verbascum thapsus), sacred bamboo (Nandina domestica), common
chickweed (Stellaria media), and common stork's -bill (Erodium cicutarium).
Existing Wetlands
A survey of existing wetlands was performed on November 16, 2017. Wetland boundaries were
delineated using current methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). Soils were characterized and classified using
the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0 (USDA-NRCS 2010). Within the
boundaries of the proposed Project, three jurisdictional wetlands are present near Reach DWI
(Appendix F & Figure 5), and are labeled as WA (Wetland A), WB (Wetland B), and WC (Wetland
Q. WA is approximately 0.05 acres in size, WB is approximately 0.03 acres in size, and WC is
approximately 0. 13 acres in size. Large portions of WA are under active management for cattle. WB
and WC are located on either side of an agricultural culvert crossing where the outlet from the off-site
pond drains into Reach DWI -B. Vegetation within the wetland areas was made up of white oak, eastern
redcedar, Virginia pine, Chinese privet, tag alder (Alnus serrulate), blackberry, tearthumb (Persicaria
sagittata), Pennsylvania smartweed, common rush (Juncus effuses), dogfennel, yellow nutsedge
(Cyperus esculentus), and swamp aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum). Outside of the easement and
wetland areas, cattle are actively managed for, and fescue is the dominant forage. A preliminary
jurisdictional determination (PJD) request was sent to the USACE on December 8, 2017 and an
approved PJD was received on March 6, 2018 (SAW -2018-01462) (Appendix F).
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) does not depict
any potential wetland areas within the Project, but there is a freshwater pond mapped east of the Project
area (Figure 6).
Geology
According to geology data from the North Carolina Geologic Survey, published in 1985, the Project is
located in map unit CZmg, occurring in the Inner Piedmont, Chauga Belt, Smith River Allochthon, and
Sauratown Mountain that formed in the later Proterozoic to Paleozoic era. This rock type is comprised
of metagraywacke (biotite gnesiss) interlayered and gradational with muscovite -biotite schist with
minor marble and granite rock.
Soil Survey
Existing soil information from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) shows the property
is located within the Cecil-Appling soil association. This association is deep, well -drained, medium -
textured soils found over gneiss, granite, and schist, located on broad, gently rolling ridges.
The Yadkin County Soil Survey shows eight mapping units across the Project. The soil series found on
the Project are described below and summarized in Table 5. Project soils are mapped by the NRCS as
Codorus loam, Delila fine sandy loam, Fairview sandy clay loam, Fairview-Gullied land complex,
Fairview -Stott Knob complex, Ronda loamy sand, Ronda sand, and Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield
complex within the easement (Figure 7). Codorus loam is occasionally flooded, somewhat poorly
drained soil that is found on depressions on floodways. Delila fine sandy loam is poorly drained, occurs
on depressions and is found on approximately 43 percent of the Project. Fairview sandy clay loam is
moderately eroded, well drained, and found on interfluves. Fairview-Gullied land complex and
Fairview -Stott Knob complex are both well drained and occur on hillslopes on ridges. Ronda loamy
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 6 June 2019

sand and Ronda sand are both excessively drained and found in natural levees on floodplains.
Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield complex is moderately eroded, well drained, and found on hillslopes
and ridges.
Codorus loam. This is a very deep, somewhat poorly drained soil that occurs on depressions on
floodplains. They formed in loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock and generally
occur on slopes less than two percent. Runoff is very high. Major uses are for cultivated crops or
pasture. Codorus loam occurs in 11.1 percent of the easement.
Delila fine sandy loam. This is a very deep, poorly drained soil that occurs on depressions and
toeslopes. They formed in alluvium and/or colluvium over saprolite derived from granite and gneiss,
and generally occur on slopes less than six percent. Runoff is negligible, and permeability is slow.
Major uses are for pasture and idle land. Delila fine sandy loam occurs in 42.7 percent of the total
easement area.
Fairview soils. These are very deep, well -drained soils that occur on Piedmont uplands, hills, ridges,
and interfluves. They formed in residuum from felsic metamorphic or igneous rock and generally occur
on slopes between two and 60 percent. Runoff can be low or high and permeability is moderate. Major
uses are cultivated crops and pasture land. Fairview soils occur in 33.2 percent of the easement.
Ronda soils. These are very deep, excessively drained sandy soils on nearly level to gently sloping
floodplains in the mesic southern Piedmont. They formed in sandy alluvium washed from soils formed
in residuum from schist, gneiss, granite, phyllite, and other metamorphic and igneous rocks. Slopes
ranged from zero to six percent. Runoff is very slow and permeability is rapid. Major uses include
cultivated crops or pasture land. Ronda soils occur on six percent of the easement.
Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield complex. This is a very deep, well -drained soil that occurs on
hillslopes on ridges in the Piedmont upland. They formed in residuum from felsic or intermediate
metamorphic or igneous rock, and generally occur on slopes between 15-45 percent. Runoff is high and
permeability is moderate. Major uses include cultivated crops, pasture, and forest. Woolwine-Fairview-
Westfield occurs in 6.9 percent of the easement.
Table 5. Mapped Soil Series
Map
Unit
Map Unit Name
Percent
Drainage
Hydrologic
Landscape
Symbol
Hydric
Class
Soil Group
Setting
CrA
Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes,
7%
Somewhat
B/D
Depressions on
occasionally flooded
poor
floodways
DoB
Delila fine sandy loam, 0-6%
90%
Poor
D
Depressions
slopes
FdE2
Fairview sandy clay loam, 15-
0%
Well
C
Interfluves
25% slopes, moderately eroded
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 7 June 2019

Map
Unit
Map Unit Name
Percent
Drainage
Hydrologic
Landscape
Symbol
Hydric
Class
Soil Group
Setting
FhE
Fairview-Gullied land
0/o o
Well
W
B
Hillslopes on
complex, 15-25% slopes
ridges
Fairview -Stott Knob complex,
Hillslopes on
FsF2
25-45 slopes, moderately
/o
o
0%
Well
B
ridges
eroded
RnB
Ronda loamy sand, 0-5%
1%
High
g
A
Natural levees on
slopes, occasionally flooded
floodplains
RoB
Ronda sand, 0-5% slopes,
0%
High
g
A
Natural levees on
occasionally flooded
floodplains
W oolwine-Fairview-Westfield
Hillslopes on
WsF2
complex, 25-45% slopes,
0%
Well
C
ridges
moderately eroded
3.3 Land Use - Historic, Current, and Future
Historic aerial imagery indicates that the Project area has been used extensively for agricultural
purposes, and that the location of the streams has not significantly changed in over 50 years (Figure
8). Several watershed characteristics, such as groundwater, vegetation, surface drainage, and potentially
soil parameters have been modified. Soil structure and surface texture have been altered from intensive
agricultural operations.
The Project area is currently still in agricultural use and is being used as pasture for cattle. Livestock
have full access to the project reaches, and these reaches remain heavily impacted. The middle area of
the Project has been somewhat revegetated with invasive shrubs and the northern portion shows far less
cattle disturbance since the 1970s. Outside the Project area is also mostly in agricultural use and where
it is not, remains heavily forested.
The future land use for the Project area will include an established 16.5 -acre conservation easement,
that will be protected in perpetuity. The Project easement will have 5,305 linear feet of functioning
streams, a minimum 50 -foot riparian buffer, and will be protected with fencing. Outside the Project
will likely remain in agricultural use. Much of the forested area in the immediate vicinity of the Project
has steep terrain, and if it is cleared, will likely be used for pasture rather than cropland due to the
erosive properties of the soils in the area.
3.4 Regulatory Considerations and Potential Constraints
Property, Boundary, and Utilities
There are two planned crossings within the Project. These crossings will occur at easement breaks and
will allow landowners to continue current land -use and access as needed. One crossing will be a new
culvert and one will be an improved ford. The first (a culvert) is between DWI -C and DWI -D and is
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 8 June 2019

approximately 60 feet wide. The second easement break (a ford) is directly below the DWI -A and
DW2-13 confluence and is approximately 40 feet wide. An existing powerline easement is located at
the southern edge of the Project, limiting the extent of headwater reaches. The final reach that drains
the Project to the Yadkin River experiences frequent flooding from the river and therefore will be
enhanced with exclusion fencing and supplemental planting as needed.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/ Hydrologic Trespass
According to the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Information System, the Project includes a
portion of the of Project within the FEMA 100 -year flood zone (Zone AE, one percent annual chance
of flooding) (Figure 9). Reaches DWI -E and DWI -D, where the Project connects to the Yadkin River,
is in a regulated floodway zone. Hydraulic modeling will be required to determine whether restoration
activities will have an effect on 100 -year flood elevations downstream. The design and permitting of
the mitigation will include coordination with the Yadkin County Floodplain Administrator and a No -
Rise Certification or CLOMR/LOMR will be secured. No hydrologic trespass will be permitted to
adjacent properties upstream or downstream of the project. The Project can be found on Flood Insurance
Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 37171C (map number 3710590000K), effective date August 18, 2009.
Environmental Screening and Documentation
To ensure that a project meets environmental screening, scoping letters were sent to the regulatory
agencies of the IRT (Appendix H).
Threatened and Endangered Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of endangered or threatened are protected under
provisions of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The USFWS
database lists one Federally listed species that may occur in proximity to the Project: the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). No protected species or potential habitat for protected species was
observed during preliminary project evaluations. Species and species habitat listed in the USFWS
database was inspected during the field investigation to determine whether they occur at the Project.
No individual species or habitats were identified on site. Potential impacts to species and habitat off-
site, downstream, and within the vicinity of the Project were also considered.
Formal USFWS consultation for Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is not required for this Site since it
is entirely located outside of the confirmed hibernation and maternity site for the species. Therefore,
this project has met the criteria for the 4(d) rule, any associated take is therefore exempt. Furthermore,
the USFWS encourages to remove trees outside the pup season (June 1 to July 31) and/or active season
(April 1 to October 31) to reduce the chance of impacting unidentified maternity roosts; and to avoid
clearing habitat within a 5 -mile radius of hibernation sites when bats are emerging from or preparing
for hibernation (April 1 to May 15 and August 15 to November 14, respectively).
The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act requires consultation with state fish and wildlife agencies when
"waters of any stream or other body of water are proposed or authorized, permitted or licensed to be
impounded, diverted ... or otherwise controlled or modified. The North Carolina Wildlife Resource
Commission (NCWRC) responded to the USACE Public Notice, issued on September 6, 2017, on
October 26, 2017. The NCWRC indicated that there is potential for two rare mussels, the brook floater
(Alasmidonta varicosa) and creeper (Strophitus undulates) (state endangered and state threatened,
respectively) to be present in the Yadkin River in the vicinity of the Project area. NCWRC recommends
riparian buffer widening and protection, as well as erosion and sediment control at this site.
Documentation is included in Appendix H.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 9 June 2019

Cultural Resources
A review of North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service (accessed
June 11, 2017) database did not reveal any listed or potentially eligible historic or archeological
resources on the proposed Project property. There is one site, half a mile away, on the other side of the
Yadkin River. The site is listed as the Rockford Historic District (Site ID SR0004). There are no
anticipated impacts from Project activities to state surveyed properties as there are none in the proposed
project vicinity or watershed.
A letter was sent to SHPO on July 7, 2017 with the prospectus. The letter described the Project and
requested a review and comment of potential cultural resources occurring within the vicinity of the
Project. SHPO responded on November 7, 2017 stating that there will be no effect on historic resources.
(Appendix H).
Table 6. Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
No
Appendix H
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
No
Appendix H
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Appendix H
National Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Appendix H
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
/Coastal Area Management Act CAMA
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
No
Appendix H
Magnuson -Stevens Act - Essential
Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
3.5 Reach Summary Information
The Project area is comprised of a contiguous easement area along three unnamed tributaries that
converge and drain directly to the Yadkin River. The easement has two agricultural crossings; one
between DWI -C and DWI -B, and the second easement break is on DW2-B near the confluence with
DW 1-A. The stream channels include the main unnamed tributary and two additional tributaries that
converge from the east, then split into eight reaches based on proposed treatment type (Figure 5).
Results of the preliminary data collection are presented in Table 7.
In general, all or portions of all eight Project reaches do not function to their full potential. Current
conditions demonstrate significant habitat degradation as a result of impacts from agriculture, livestock
production, and lack of riparian buffer. Being heavily eroded and incised, some of the streams do not
access their floodplains as frequently as they naturally would have prior to agricultural operations. In
many cases in the lower elevations, the riparian buffer is in poor condition where much of the riparian
buffer is devoid of trees or shrubs up to the edge of the existing channel or comprised largely of invasive
species. In some reaches, trees are present, but understory riparian buffer has been heavily impacted by
cattle. Habitat along the majority of the restoration reaches is poor in that there is little woody debris
or overhanging vegetation for fish cover or protection for other aquatic species. Morphological
parameters are located in Appendix B.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 10 June 2019

Table 7. Summary of Existing Channel Characteristics
Reach
Drainage Area
(acres)
ABKF 1
(ft')
Width
(ft)
Mean
Depth (ft)
W/D
Ratio
Sinuosity
Slope
(ft/ft)
DW1-A
96
5.0
7.9
0.6
12.4
1.09
0.023
DW1-13
237
13.7
11.5
1.2
9.6
1.09
0.014
DW1-C
256
12.0
13.6
0.9
15.5
1.09
0.020
DW1-D
269
15.3
12.9
1.2
10.8
1.09
0.010
DW1-E
271
20.1
12.6
1.6
8.0
1.09
0.008
DW2-A
83
8.1
13.0
0.6
20.9
1.15
0.024
DW2-13
90
8.5
6.6
1.3
5.1
1.15
0.009
DW3
28
2.6
6.6
0.4
16.7
1.07
0.050
Channel Classification
All stream reaches have been classified as perennial using the NCDWR Stream Identification Form
version 4.11 and are B-, C-, and G- stream types as classified using the Rosgen stream classification
system (Rosgen, 1996). Channel characteristics are summarized in Table 7 and Appendix B. Stream
determinations have been verified by the USACE.
Discharge
Estimating flows (discharge) for the Project is difficult due to the channelization and agricultural
impacts of the existing streams. A combination of gauge analysis, regional curves, and hydraulic and
hydrologic analysis were used to estimate existing bankfull discharges. Land use and slope were
considered when the discharge calculations were developed. All hydraulic and hydrologic analyses are
discussed in Section 6.2. Data and analysis of the hydrologic and hydraulic models are included as
Appendix B.
Existing Channel Morphology
DW1-A
Reach DWI -A is 315 linear feet and is located in the southwest corner of the Project area and flows
northeast to a confluence with DW2-B. The reach is straightened, with almost no riparian buffer and
primarily fescue up to the banks. Bed and bank stability are good throughout the reach due to extended
riparian buffers upstream and a relatively small watershed size. The channel top width ranges from 10-
13 feet with maximum depths of two to three feet. The drainage area for the reach is approximately 96
acres.
DW1-B
Reach DWI -B is 1,955 linear feet and, combined with DWI -C and DWI -D, comprises the primary
Project reach, flowing from the confluence of DWI -A and DW2-B in a northerly direction towards
reach DWI -C. The reach is mostly wooded along the banks, but disturbance to the understory,
particularly at the top of the reach, remains widespread due to cattle access. Bed and bank stability are
low throughout the reach due to heavy cattle access and increased water transport. The channel top
width ranges from 10-20 feet with maximum depths of five to six feet. The drainage area for the reach
is approximately 237 acres.
DWI -C
Reach DW 1-C is 604 linear feet and located along the northern portion of the Project where an easement
break exists at the proposed agricultural crossing. There is a dirt road that comes within 50 -feet of the
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 11 June 2019

channel near the downstream end of the channel. The reach begins in the forested downstream end of
DW1-B and flows northeast towards DWI -D. The reach is mostly wooded along the left bank with a
mixture of sparse vegetation and minimal buffer on the right bank. The reach is laterally unstable with
moderate to severe bank erosion along the riffles and outer meander bends. The channel top width
ranges from 15-30 feet with maximum depths of three to five feet. The drainage area for the reach is
approximately 256 acres.
DW1-D
Reach DWI -D is 677 linear feet and located in the northern portion of the Project area and flows in a
northerly direction from an agricultural crossing to reach DW 1-E. The reach has a small riparian buffer
but remains highly disturbed from the agricultural road and cattle access. Bed and bank stability are
low throughout the reach because continual cattle access, increased water transport, and channel
straightening have led to heavy bank incision. This reach has patches of high quality cobble and
bedrock. The channel top width ranges from 20-40 feet with maximum depths of four to six feet. The
drainage area for the reach is approximately 269 acres.
DW1-E
Reach DWI -E is 432 linear feet and located in the northernmost portion of the Project area and drains
the entire Project watershed to the Yadkin River. The channel has some large trees on the banks, but
the riparian buffer consists mostly of row crops and disturbed brush habitat. The channel has been
widened and deeply incised from straightening, watershed land practices, and intermittent flooding
from the Yadkin River. Due to its high disturbance, particularly from flooding events, bed and bank
stability are low throughout the reach. The drainage area for the reach is approximately 271 acres.
DW2-A
Reach DW2-A is 968 linear feet and located in the southeast portion of the Project area and flows west
to a confluence with reach DW3. This reach maintains some disturbed buffer as it is bordered by upland
pasture on the right bank and an upland powerline easement on the left bank. There are areas of
moderate to severe bank erosion scattered throughout the reach while other banks are stable due to the
influence of rooted woody vegetation. Bed stability is good throughout the reach because of the small
watershed size and undesirable habitat for cattle, despite allowing cattle access throughout. The channel
top width ranges from 10-30 feet with maximum depths of two to three feet.
DW2-B
Reach DW2-B is 306 linear feet and located in the southern portion of the Project and flows northwest
from the confluence of DW2-A and DW3 to the confluence with DW1-B. Channel banks are incised
throughout the reach due to the lack of riparian buffer and cattle access. The channel top width ranges
from 10-15 feet with maximum depths of three to five feet. The drainage area for the reach is
approximately 90 acres.
DW3
Reach DW3 is 93 linear feet and located in the southern portion of the Project. The reach flows from
the bordering powerline easement, north to a confluence with DW2-B. Existing land use along this
reach is disturbed woodland, with occasional cattle access and a maintained powerline upstream. The
reach is fairly stable. The channel top width ranges from five to 10 feet with maximum depths of two
to three feet.
Channel Stability Assessment
A modified version of the channel stability assessment method ("channel assessment") provided in
"Assessing Stream Channel Stability at Bridges in Physiographic Regions" by Johnson (2006) was used
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 12 June 2019

to assess channel stability for the Project's existing channels. This method may be rapidly applied on a
variety of stream types in different physiographic regions having a range of bed and bank materials.
The original channel assessment method was designed to evaluate 13 stability indicators in the field.
These parameters are: watershed characteristics (frequency of watershed disturbances such as
agricultural activities, urbanization, etc.), flow habit, channel pattern, entrenchment/channel
confinement, bed material, bar development, presence of obstructions/debris jams, bank soil texture
and coherence, average bank angle, bank vegetation/protection, bank cutting, mass wasting/bank
failure, and upstream distance to bridge. See Appendix B for a detailed description of the stability
indicators. As this method was initially developed to assess stability at bridges, a few minor adjustments
were made to remove indicators that contradict stability characteristics of natural channels in favor of
providing hydraulic efficiency at bridges. First, the "channel pattern" indicator was altered such that
naturally meandering channels scored low as opposed to straightened/engineered channels that are
favorable for stability near bridges. Secondly, the last indicator, "upstream distance to bridge", was
removed from the assessment as bridges are not a focus of channel stability for this project. The 12
indicators were then scored in the field, and a rating of excellent, good, fair, or poor was assigned to
each project reach based on the total score.
The channel assessment results (scores and ratings) for the Project are provided in Table 8. Two of the
eight project stream reaches received "Fair" ratings, one reach received a "Poor" rating, while five
reaches received "Good" ratings. Most Project streams were observed to have relatively high bank
angles and many were found to be actively eroding. A majority of the channels have been impacted by
farming practices or livestock production, and most are slightly entrenched. These characteristics are
reflected in the higher channel assessment scores for average bank angle and bank
vegetation/protection. Most reaches also scored poorly for watershed characteristics since the
surrounding land use is dominated by agriculture activities.
Table 8. Channel Stability Assessment Results
DWI- DW1- DW1- DW1- DW1- DW2- DW2- DW3
A B C D E A B
1
Watershed
7
8
8
9
8
7
7
7
characteristics
2
Flow habit
7
7
7
9
10
4
7
3
3
Channel pattern
3
6
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
Entrenchment/channel
3
9
3
8
10
4
3
2
confinement
5
Bed material
7
6
7
7
12
3
6
3
6
Bar development
4
6
4
5
10
3
6
1
7
Obstructions/debris jams
3
5
4
6
3
4
3
4
8
Bank soil texture and
7
8
8
9
12
5
6
7
coherence
9
Average bank angle
3
10
4
10
12
6
10
4
10
Bank
12
10
8
10
12
5
9
9
vegetation/protection
11
Bank cutting
5
6
4
8
9
5
6
6
12
Mass wasting/bank
4
3
4
5
9
5
7
2
failure
13
Upstream distance to
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
bridge
Score
65
84
63
89
110
56
63
51
Rating*
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Good
*Excellent (0 < Score <= 36), Good (36 < Score <= 72), Fair (72 < Score <= 108), Poor (108 < Score <= 144)
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 13 June 2019

Bankfull Verification
Bankfull is difficult and often times impossible to accurately identify on actively maintained channels
and agricultural ditches. The usual and preferred indicators rarely exist, and other factors may be taken
into consideration in order to approximate a bankfull stage. Other factors that may be used are wrack
lines, vegetation lines, scour lines, or top of a bankfull bench; however, complete confidence should
not be placed on these indicators. Along the proposed restoration reaches, the channel is generally
entrenched and actively maintained, which means bankfull indicators were very limited or non-existent.
Therefore, bankfull stage was estimated by using Piedmont Regional Curves and other hydrologic
analyses, existing cross sections, and in-house spreadsheets to estimate bankfull area and bankfull
discharge.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 14 June 2019

3.6 Site Photographs
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 15 June 2019

Compass Point Mitigation Plan 16 June 2019

4 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL
The Stream Functions Pyramid Framework (Harman et. al. 2012) uses stream functions to describe
project objectives, existing condition assessments and monitoring, performance metrics, and design
criteria. The Framework separates stream functions into five categories, ordered into a hierarchy, which
communicate the interrelations among functions and illustrate the dependence of higher level functions
(biology, physiochemical and geomorphology) on lower level functions (hydrology and hydraulics).
Functions that affect the greatest number of other functions are illustrated at the base of the Pyramid,
while functions that have the least effect on other functions are illustrated at the top. The Pyramid is
illustrated below Chart 1.
Stream Functions Pyramid
A Guide for Assessing & Restoring Stream Functions N ovmvi m
Chart 1. Stream Functions Pyramid
wharmnn®sIream-mec4an ics corn 'd StreamMechanies
Fischenich (2006) found that the most critical functions include those that address hydrodynamic
processes, sediment transport processes, stream stability and riparian buffer restoration. By addressing
these fundamental functions and processes, a restored stream and riparian system are capable of
supporting more dependent functions that typically require time to establish, such as diverse biological
communities, chemical and nutrient processes, diverse habitats and improved water and soil quality.
The objectives of the Project will address the most critical functional objectives that will allow for a
more restored stream and riparian buffer over time.
While traditional mitigation approaches have generally relied on surrogate measures of success (i.e.
linear feet of restoration) for determining SNfU credit yields, a function -based approach provides a
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 17 June 2019

more objective and flexible approach to quantify the expected ecological benefits of a mitigation
design. Additionally, a functional based approach broadens the reach -scale goals of a restoration project
by contextualizing the functional uplift to the watershed scale. The Project will provide numerous
ecological and water quality benefits within the Yadkin River Basin by applying an ecosystem
restoration approach. The restoration approach at the reach scale of this project will have the greatest
effect on the hydraulic and geomorphology function of the system but will benefit the upper-level
functions (physiochemical and biology) over time, and in combination with other projects within the
watershed. Anticipated functional benefits and improvements within the Project area, as based on the
Function -Based Framework are outlined in Table 9.
4.1 Anticipated Functional Benefits and Improvements
Hydrology
According to the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, hydrology is defined as the transport of water
from the watershed to the channel. Therefore, this Project intends to make significant improvements to
the hydrology in order to uplift function. Much of the improvement will come from altering land use
within these reaches' catchment areas. By converting land -use for a significant percentage of the
catchment area from pasture to riparian forest, curve numbers will decrease and reach runoff will
improve.
Hydraulic
The hydraulic function of the Pyramid is defined as transport of water in the channel, on the floodplain,
and through sediments. Perhaps the greatest potential uplift at the Project will be achieved through
establishing healthy floodplain connectivity. Reaches in the Project do not have functioning floodplain
connectivity or stable flow dynamics. Reaches where floodplain connectivity is not -functioning or
functioning -at -risk will be improved to functioning by reducing bank height ratios and increasing
entrenchment ratios. Reaches in which stable flow dynamics are not -functioning or functioning -at -risk
will be improved to functioning by constructing a new channel that is geometrically stable based on the
Project's hydrology inputs. Additionally, instream structures will be installed to address the energy and
erosive power of the water so that a stable base flow is achieved post -project.
Geomorphology
Geomorphology as defined within the Pyramid Framework, is the transport of wood and sediment to
create bed forms and dynamic equilibrium. Sediment Transport will be improved in reaches that
currently function -at -risk or not -functioning by designing channels that transport sediment until it
reaches an appropriate place to settle, like a point bar. Large Woody Debris Transport and Storage will
be improved through the use of woody debris such as log vanes, root wads, log weirs, and log toes for
in -stream structures on restoration and enhancement I reaches. The restoration reaches are also designed
to accumulate woody debris by having defined shallow riffles where cobble catches and holds woody
debris and leaf packs. Riparian vegetation is functioning in some areas, but is either functioning -at -risk
or not -functioning on most reaches. Therefore, riparian buffers will be planted out to a minimum of 50
feet to improve the riparian vegetation to functioning levels. Bed form diversity will be improved in
restoration areas by using a natural riffle pool sequence from the reference reach to inform design of
functioning riffle pool sequences in constructed channels based on reference reach conditions. This bed
form diversity will also further improve aquatic habitat. These functional parameters are interconnected
and ultimately depend on each other in order to function properly. Therefore, by focusing improvements
to these parameters, the restored channels will achieve dynamic equilibrium and provide maximum
geomorphic functional uplift.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 18 June 2019

Physiochemical
The Pyramid Framework defines the physicochemical category as temperature and oxygen regulation
and the processing of organic matter and nutrients. Although this Project would support the overarching
goal in the Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP to promote nutrient and sediment reduction in agricultural areas, it
is difficult to measure nutrient and sediment reduction at this project level because they can be affected
by so many variables. However, several restoration actions are known to help reduce nutrients and
sediment even though they may not be measurable at the project level. These activities include cattle
exclusion and direct removal of fecal inputs, filtering of runoff through buffer areas, the conversion of
active farm fields to forested buffers, and improved denitrification and nutrient uptake through buffer
zones. Additional benefits may also come from functional uplift of the lower level stream functions
(hydraulics and geomorphology), which will reduce sediment and nutrients in the system through bank
stabilization and reforesting. Temperature regulation will also be improved through the restoration of
canopy tree species to the stream buffer areas. Oxygen regulation will occur through two actions: first,
the temperature of the water directly impacts the amount of gas held by the water. Therefore, through
planting the buffer to shade the channel the temperature is decreased, and dissolved oxygen is increased.
Second, the log structures placed in the stream create mixing zones where oxygen dissolves much faster
than the standard exchange rate of oxygen to dissolved oxygen. The processing of organic matter will
be improved once healthy riffles are shallow enough to catch twigs and branches that then retain leaves.
Many of these physiochemical benefits occur slowly over time and are dependent on multiple variables
within the stream ecosystem. Therefore, it is not practical or feasible to directly measure these
parameters within the monitoring time -frame of this project. With that said, it is logical to use existing
riparian buffer and visual performance standards to demonstrate the positive correlation between
geomorphic parameters and physicochemical parameters. For example, as riparian buffer trees grow,
as represented in annual monitoring reports, it is anticipated that canopy cover is actively shading the
stream channel and reducing water temperature. This is not a substitute for direct physicochemical
monitoring, but it is a useful tool to help project the long-term benefits of the Project in terms of its
functional uplift.
Biology
The highest category of the Pyramid is biology and is defined as the biodiversity and life histories of
aquatic and terrestrial life, specifically referring to animals. As mentioned for the physiochemical
stream function, it will be difficult to measure the functional uplift of the biological functions at this
site within the monitoring period of the project. However, since the life histories of many species likely
to benefit from stream and wetland restoration are depending on all the lower -level functions, the
functional uplift from the hydraulic and geomorphic levels would have a positive effect to the biology
over time and in combination with other projects within the watershed is anticipated. Again, there is no
substitute for direct biological monitoring, but it is important to understand the hierarchy of the Stream
Functions Pyramid Framework in order to help project long-term benefits of the Project though only
categories two and three (hydraulics and geomorphology) will be directly measured during the seven-
year monitoring period.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 19 June 2019

5 MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream
Functions Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives will be realized by the Project.
These goals clearly address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were
identified as major watershed stressors in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River RBRP. The Project
will address outlined RBRP Goals 1 and 6 (listed in Section 2).
The Project goals are:
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non-erosive manner in a stable
channel;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbank flows and
connection to the active floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation; and
• Indirectly support the goals of the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP to improve water quality
and to reduce sediment and nutrient loads.
The Project objectives to address the goals are:
• Design and reconstruct stream channels sized to convey bankfull flows that will maintain a
stable dimension, profile, and planform based on modeling, watershed conditions, and
reference reach conditions;
• Add in -stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced
streams;
• Install habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of
varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduce bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions;
• Increase forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel along the
Project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community;
• Treat exotic invasive species; and
• Establish a permanent conservation easement on the Project that will exclude future livestock
from stream channels and their associated buffers.
Anticipated functional benefits and improvements within the Project area, as based on the Function
Based Framework are outlined in Table 9.
Limitations to achieving these watershed goals arise by remaining constrained to the project boundaries.
While we are restoring the habitat and streams to stable and effective conditions that achieve our goals
within the Project parcels, we are unable to influence the effect of all riparian buffers and livestock
impact in other areas within the watershed. However, with responsible restoration and stewardship of
the majority of reaches within this small watershed, overall watershed functionality and health will
improve to meet the RBRP goals.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 20 June 2019

Best Management Practices (BMPs)
A suite of agricultural BMPs will be utilized for the Project to reduce direct effluent inputs, pollutant
contamination, and sediment loading. The combination of the following agricultural BMPs: riparian
buffer planting, bank stabilization, stream restoration, livestock exclusion, livestock watering facilities,
and pipeline, will ultimately lead to the functional uplift of the site, while still allowing livestock
production to persist through the installation of alternative water sources.
The riparian buffer will be restored along all project reaches. Restored riparian buffers are established
adjacent to and up -gradient from watercourses of water bodies to improve water quality. The main
advantages of the restored riparian buffer will be to provide water quality treatment, erosion control,
and water temperature benefits. Moreover, there will be significant reductions in sedimentation,
nutrient input, and fecal coliform input.
Approximately 12,250 linear feet of livestock exclusion fencing will be installed along the easement
boundary; therefore, livestock will no longer have stream access. Woven -wire fence with treated posts
will be used for boundaries adjacent to pasture and barbed wire will be used within the Yadkin river
floodway. The main advantages of exclusion fence are that there will be significant reductions in
sediment, nutrients, and fecal coliform. To account for eliminating livestock water access, landowners
will be provided an alternate water source. Up to four watering facilities will be installed to provide
high quality drinking water to livestock.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan 21 June 2019

Table 9. Functional Benefits and improvements
Not Measured (NM); Not Functioning (NF); Functioning -at -risk (FAR); Functioning (F)
° These categories are measured indirectly; *These categories are not quantifiably measured
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
22
Existing
Level
Function
Goal
Functional
Rating/Projected
Objective
Measurement Method
Parameter
Rating
Reach
Channel -Forming
Discharge
Precipitation/Runoff
Relationship
Hydro lo�y
to transport water from
Flow Duration
Convert land -use of
Percent Project drainage
1
Transport of water from
the watershed to the
F
streams and their
headwaters from
area converted to
forestpasture
the watershed to the
channel in anon -erosive
Flood Frequency
(All Reaches)
riparian
channel
manner
to riparian
(indirect measurement)
Catchment
forest
Hydrology
Reach Runoff
Baseflow Alteration
F
(DWI -C, DW2-
A, DW3)
Cross sections
Flood Bank
Hydraulic
FAR/F
Improve flood bank
Stage recorders (crest
Transport of water in the
to transport water in a
Connectivity
(DWI -A)
connectivity by
gauges and pressure
Z
channel, on the floodplain,
stable non-erosive
Flow Dynamics
reducing bank height
transducers)
and through the sediments
manner
Groundwater/Surface
NF
(DWI -B, DWI-
ratios and increase
entrenchment ratios
Bank Height Ratio
water exchange
D DW2-B)
Entrenchment Ratio
FAR/FAR
(DW 1-E)
Sediment Transport
Large Woody Debris
(LWD) Transport
F
Reduce erosion rates
and Storage
(DWI -C, DW2-
and channel stability
A, DW3)
to reference reach
As -built stream profile
Channel Evolution
conditions
Geomorphology
to create a diverse
FAR/F
Cross sections
Transport of wood and
bedform
Lateral Stability
(DWI -A)
Improve bedform
3
sediment to create diverse
to achieve dynamic
diversity (pool
Visual monitoring
bedforms and dynamic
equilibrium
Riparian Vegetation
NF
spacing, percent
equilibrium
(DWI -B, DWI-
riffles, etc.)
Stream walks
Bedform Diversity
D, DW2-B)
Bed Material
FAR/FAR
Increase buffer width
Vegetation plots
(DW 1-E)
to 50 feet
Characterization
Sinuosity
Unmeasured
F
Objectives
(DW1-C, DW2-
Improve stream
to achieve appropriate
Water Quality
A, DW3)
temperature
Vegetation plots
Physiochemical o
levels for water
FAR/F
regulation through
(indirect measurement)
Temperature and oxygen
temperature, dissolved
Water Temperature
(DWI-A)introduction
of
4
regulation; processing of
oxygen concentration
and other important
Nutrient Load
canopy
Established fencing and
organic matter and
nutrients including but
NF
Decrease nutrient
perpetual conservation
nutrients
not limited to Nitrogen
Organic Carbon
(DW1-B, DWI-
loading through
easement
and Phosphorus
D , DW2-B)
filtration of planted
(indirect measurement)
Bacteria
FAR/FAR
riparian buffer, and
(DW I -E)
removing livestock
from the riparian
areas
Microbial
F
Communities
(DWI -C, DW2-
A DW3)
Unmeasured
Macrophyte
Objective
to achieve functionality
Communities
FAR/F
Biolou �
in levels 1-4 to support
(DW1-A)
Improve aquatic
Biodiversity and life
the life histories ofMacroinvertebrate
Benthic
habitat through the
histories of aquatic life
aquatic and riparian
NF
installation of habitat
Vegetation plots
histories and riparian life
plants and animals
Communities
(DWI -B, DWI-
features, construction
(indirect measurement)
D DW2-B)
of pools at varying
Fish Communities
depths, and planting
FAR/FAR
the riparian buffer
Landscape
Connectivity
(DW I -E)
Not Measured (NM); Not Functioning (NF); Functioning -at -risk (FAR); Functioning (F)
° These categories are measured indirectly; *These categories are not quantifiably measured
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
22

6 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
6.1 Reference Stream
The restoration portions of the Project are characterized by livestock practices. Portions of the Project
were historically diverted to form poorly -functioning stream channels. Physical parameters of the
Project were used, as well as other reference materials, to determine the target stream type. The
"Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina" was also used to narrow the potential
community types that would have existed at the Project (Schafale, 2012). An iterative process was used
to develop the final information for the Project design.
Targeted reference conditions included the following:
• Located within the Physiographic Region and ecoregion,
• Similar watershed size,
• Similar land use on site and in the watershed,
• Similar soil types on site and in the watershed,
• Ideal, undisturbed habitat — several types of woody debris present,
• Similar topography,
• Similar slope,
• Pattern common among Piedmont streams, and
• Minimal presence of invasive species.
Obtaining property owner information and owner authorization for access was another factor in locating
suitable reference sites for the Project. There was no predetermined amount of reference sites needed
as long as the site was suitable and met the parameters. Many streams in this watershed are impacted
by cattle and agricultural practices, having a minimal riparian buffer, making it difficult to find an ideal
reference for the Project site. Two reference reaches, UT to Smithy's Creek and UT to Grassy Creek,
were selected for use in developing design parameters.
Reference Watershed Characterization
The first reference reach, UT to Smithey's Creek, is also located within the Yadkin Pee -Dee River
Basin. This reach is 150 feet in length, with a drainage area of 0.18 square miles (118 acres). The land
use in both watersheds is characterized by mostly agricultural, with mixed pines and hardwoods (42%),
and a small amount of residential. The second reference reach, UT to Grassy Creek, is also located
within the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin. This reach is 318 feet in length, with a drainage area of 0.67
square miles (426 acres). The land use in both watersheds is characterized by mostly agricultural, with
mixed pines and hardwoods, and a small amount of residential
Reference Discharge
Several hydrologic models/methods were used to develop a bankf ill discharge for each reference reach.
Existing drainage area, land use, slope, roughness, and cross-sectional area were all factors considered
when performing the calculations. Using a combination of regional curves, in-house spreadsheet tools,
and a project specific regional flood frequency analysis, the existing bankfull discharge for the
references reaches was estimated at 25-28 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) and 50 cubic feet per second for
UT to Smithy's Creek and UT to Grassy Creek respectively. See Section 6.2 for a more detailed
description of the hydrologic analyses performed for this project.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
23

Reference Channel Morphology
Two reference reaches, described above, were selected for use as a line of evidence of stable stream
morphology to evaluate the proposed stream morphology. The morphological parameters for the
reference reaches are presented in Appendix B.
Reference Channel Stability Assessment
Both reference reaches UT to Smithey's Creek and UT to Grassy Creek were stable and showed no
evidence of incision or erosion in the portions that were surveyed and analyzed. Each stream appeared
to maintain its slope and had sufficient amounts of vegetation to secure its banks. Riparian buffer widths
exceeded 50 feet on each side. The reference reaches received a "Good" rating as the channels each
demonstrate a stable meandering pattern and a well -vegetated riparian buffer.
Reference Bankfull Verification
Typical indicators of bankfull include vegetation at the bankfull elevation, scour lines, wrack lines,
vegetation lines, benches/inner berm, and point bars. Throughout the entire length of the reference
reaches, bankfull is located at the top of bank elevation. The accuracy of this bankfull stage is verified
by the Piedmont Regional Curves and hydrologic analyses using existing cross sections to calculate
area and discharge. Evidence that can further support the location of bankfull is the lack of any bench
or berm features within the channel, and wrack lines present within the floodplain.
6.2 Design Parameters
Stream Restoration Approach
Stream restoration efforts along the tributaries of the Project will be accomplished through analyses of
geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach applies a combination of
analytical and reference reach -based design methods that meet objectives commensurate with both
ecological and geomorphic improvements. Proposed treatment activities may range from minor bank
grading and planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic geometry. For reaches requiring
full restoration, natural design concepts have been applied and verified through rigorous engineering
analyses and modeling. The objective of this approach is to design a geomorphically stable channel that
provides habitat improvements and ties into the existing landscape.
The Project will include priority I and II stream restoration, enhancement I, enhancement II, and
enhancement III. Stream restoration will incorporate the design of a single -thread meandering channel,
with parameters based on data taken from reference sites, published empirical relationships, and best
professional judgment. A conceptual plan view is provided in Figure 10.
Current stream conditions along the proposed restoration reaches exhibit habitat degradation as a result
of impacts from livestock and channelization performed to promote agricultural activities. Additionally,
the riparian buffer is in poor condition throughout most of the Project area, where much of it is devoid
of trees or shrubs, and active pasture is present up to the edge of the existing channel.
The Project design approach began with a thorough study of existing conditions, including the onsite
streams, valleys, and watershed. Design parameters, including active channel, habitat and floodplain
features were developed from analyses performed on the reference site data. Analytical design
techniques were used to determine the design discharge and to verify the design as a whole.
Engineering analysis will be performed using various hydrologic and hydraulic models to verify the
design. A combination of methods will be used to estimate bankfull discharge, and larger flood events.
A HEC -RAS model will then be used to simulate water surface elevations of flows generated by the
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
24

hydrologic analysis. The development of the HEC model is an important component to the design;
therefore, model input parameters are field verified when possible. Through this hydrologic analysis,
the design discharge (typically referenced as bankfull or dominant discharge) will be determined. The
subsequent design will be based on this calculated discharge. As part of the design process, a qualitative
analysis of sediment supply will be performed by characterizing watershed conditions. A combination
of windshield surveys, existing land use data, and historical aerial photography, followed up by ground
truthing, will be analyzed to assess existing and past watershed conditions and to determine if any
changes occurred that would significantly impact sediment supply. Design parameters developed
through the analyses of reference reach data, watershed characterizations, and hydrologic and hydraulic
modeling will be confirmed with shear stress and velocity analyses.
Geomorphic and habitat studies will be performed concurrently with the engineering analyses. While
stream design will be verified by simulations of hydrology and fluvial processes, analogs of desirable
habitat features will be derived from reference sites and integrated into the project design. Both in -
stream and riparian habitat features will be designed. In -stream structures will be used throughout the
project to act as grade control and for bank stabilization by dissipating and redirecting the stream's
energy. Bank stability may further be enhanced through the installation of brush toes, live stakes and
cuttings bundles.
Sections of abandoned stream channel will be backfilled with material excavated from on site to the
elevation of the floodplain in areas adjacent to the new channel, installing channel plugs where
necessary. The floodplain will be planted with native species creating a vegetated buffer, which will
provide numerous water quality and ecological benefits. Stream banks will be stabilized using a
combination of grading, erosion control matting, bare -root plantings, native material revetment
techniques (i.e., bioengineering), structure placement, and sod transplants where possible. The stream
and adjacent riparian areas will be protected by a minimum 50 -foot conservation easement which will
be fenced to exclude livestock as needed.
The Project has been broken into the following design reaches:
Reach DWI -A - This reach begins on the southwest end of the Project, flows northeast to a confluence
with DWI -B and DW2-B, and totals 262 linear feet of Enhancement 11. Open pasture is located adjacent
to the reach. Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through livestock exclusion fencing
and riparian planting. The livestock exclusion fencing will provide wildlife corridors throughout the
Project area and will remove livestock access to the riparian areas. A flow gauge will be installed
midway on the reach to monitor hydrology.
Reach DW1-B - This reach begins on the southern end of the Project from DWI -A and DW2-B, flows
north to DWI -C, and totals 1,948 linear feet of Priority 1/II restoration. Actively managed pasture is
located adjacent to the reach on the upstream end. The downstream end is surrounded by intermittently
grazed pasture and disturbed secondary growth in an area with previous timber harvest. Restoration
activities will include constructing a new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions
and pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes,
and log vanes will be installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat will further be improved
through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Proposed buffer activities will improve riparian areas
that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the
channel.
Reach DWI -C — This reach begins on the north end of the Project from DWI -B, and flows northeast
to a culvert crossing and DW 1-D. This reach totals 566 linear feet of Priority UII restoration, beginning
immediately downstream of a bedrock drop structure at the bottom of DWI -B. Any sections of the
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
25

existing road will be decommissioned in the easement and planted. Intermittently active pasture and
disturbed woodland is located adjacent to the reach. Restoration activities will include constructing a
new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern, cutting a floodplain
bench and backfilling the abandoned channel. In-stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, and log
vanes will be installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat will further be improved through
buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Livestock exclusion fencing will provide wildlife corridors
throughout the Project area and will remove livestock access to the riparian areas.
Reach DW1-D - This reach begins at the downstream end of DWI-C and proposed culvert crossing in
the northern end of the Project, and flows northeast to DWI-E. The reach totals 758 linear feet of
Priority FII restoration. Restoration activities will include constructing a floodplain bench to aid in
connectivity to the existing floodplain and constructing a new channel with appropriate dimensions and
pattern. When possible, bed material will be harvested and reused to create stable bed features post-
construction. In-stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, and log vanes will be installed for
stability and to improve habitat. Habitat will further be improved through buffer plantings and livestock
exclusion. Proposed buffer activities will improve riparian areas that will filter runoff from adjacent
pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
Reach DWI-E - This reach begins on the north end of the Project, from DWI-D and flows north until
it drains to the Yadkin River. This reach totals 432 linear feet of Enhancement III. Managed cropland
is located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through livestock
exclusion fencing and installing a boulder grade control structure at the top of the reach where DWI -
D
W1-
D enters to prevent further upstream channel erosion during Yadkin River flood events.
Reach DW2-A - This reach begins on the southeast end of the Project, and flows west to DW2-B. The
totals 968 linear feet of Enhancement I. Sparse woodland and actively managed pasture is located
adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities will include targeted bank stabilization, riparian buffer
planting, and installation of livestock exclusion fencing. An existing ford crossing will also be removed.
Proposed buffer activities will improve riparian areas that will filter runoff from adjacent pastures,
thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
Reach DW2-B - This reach begins at the downstream end of DW2-A, and flows north to the confluence
with DWI-A to become DWI-B. This reach totals 277 linear feet of Priority I Restoration. Actively
managed pasture is present on both sides of the reach. Restoration activities will include constructing
a new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions pattern and backfilling the
abandoned channel. Native bed material will be harvested when possible. In-stream structures such as
log sills, brush toes, and log vanes will be installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat will
further be improved through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. A ford crossing will be installed
along this reach (Figure 10). Proposed buffer activities will improve riparian areas that will filter runoff
from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
Reach DW3 - This reach begins on the south end of the Project at the adjacent powerline easement,
and flows north to DW2-A. This reach totals 93 linear feet of Enhancement 1. Disturbed woodland,
intermittently grazed pasture, and a maintained powerline easement is located adjacent to the reach.
Enhancement activities will include improving habitat through livestock exclusion fencing, and riparian
buffer planting. The livestock exclusion fencing will provide wildlife corridors throughout the Project
area and will remove livestock access to the riparian areas.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
26

Design Discharge
Design Discharge
Based upon the hydrologic analyses described below, design discharges were selected that fall at or
slightly above the 1.1 -year and no greater than the 1.25 -year flood frequency analysis for each reach.
The selected flows for the DW -1 restoration reaches are between 40 and 50 ft3/s and between 30-40
ft3/s for DW -2B. These discharges will provide frequent inundation of the adjacent floodplain.
The design discharges were selected based on the following rationale:
• The calculated bankfull discharge for the analog/reference reach and existing reaches are
comparable to the flood frequency analysis,
• The results of the 1.1 -year flood frequency analysis are comparable to the discharges calculated
from regional curve and
• Selecting design discharges near the 1.1 -year storm events allows frequent inundation of the
adjacent floodplain.
Design Methods
There are three primary methods that have demonstrated success in stream restoration: analog,
empirical, and analytical. All three methods have advantages and limitations, and it is often best to
utilize more than one method to address site-specific conditions or to verify the applicability of design
elements. This is particularly true in developed watersheds where existing conditions do not always
reflect current inputs and events, and sediment and hydrologic inputs may remain unstable for some
time. Combinations of analytical, empirical, and analog methods were used to develop the stream
designs for the Project.
Analytical Approach
Analytical design is based on principles and processes considered universal to all streams and can entail
many traditional engineering techniques. The analytical approach utilizes continuity, roughness
equations, hydrologic and hydraulic models, and sediment transport functions to derive equilibrium
conditions. Since the Project is located within a rural watershed, restoration designs are based on
hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, including rainfall -runoff models to determine design discharges
coupled with reference reach techniques.
Analog Approach
The analog method of natural channel design involves the use of a "template" or reference stream
located near the design reach and is particularly useful when watershed and boundary conditions are
similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al., 2001). In an analog approach, the
pattern, dimension, and profile are used to inform design parameters for the subject stream.
Empirical Approach
Empirical design is based on regional mathematical relationships among measured channel variables.
The flood frequency analysis and regional curve evaluation described above are examples of empirical
design methods to select a range of channel forming discharges for a given watershed area.
Typical Design Sections
Typical cross sections for riffles and pools are shown on the design plan sheets in Appendix A. The
cross-section dimensions were developed for the three design reaches by using an in-house spreadsheet
described in Section 6.2 of this report. The cross sections were altered slightly to facilitate
constructability; however, the cross-sectional area, width to depth ratio, and side slopes were preserved.
Typical pool sections include pools located on straight reaches and pools on meander bends.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
27

Meander Pattern
The design plans showing the proposed channel alignment are provided in Appendix A. The meander
pattern was derived directly from the analog reach and was altered in some locations to provide
variability in pattern, to avoid on site constraints, to follow the valley pattern, and to make the channel
more constructible. The morphologic parameters summarized in the Appendix B were applied
wherever these deviations occurred.
Longitudinal Profiles
The design profiles are presented in Appendix A. These profiles extend throughout the entire project
for the proposed channel alignment. The profiles were designed using the analog reach bed features as
a template for feature lengths and slopes. The bed slopes and bankfull energy gradients were determined
for each design reach based on the existing valley slope and the sinuosity of the design reach. Log
structures will be utilized in the design to control grade, divert flows, and provide additional habitat
diversity and stability.
In -Stream Structures
Structures will be incorporated into the channel design to provide additional stability and improve
aquatic habitat. Native materials and vegetation will be used for revetments and grade control structures
where applicable. Additionally, rock structures will be utilized intermittently along the restoration and
enhancement reaches to provide increased stability and habitat. Typical rock structures that will protect
the channel bed and/or banks will include riffle grade controls and cross -vanes.
Woody debris will be placed throughout the channel at locations and at a frequency that is similar to
those observed in the analog reaches. Woody habitat features installed will include dead brush, root
wads, brush toes, and log vanes. To provide additional bank stability, sod mats harvested on site will
be installed along stream banks during construction if and when feasible. Sod mats will only be
harvested and used if comprised of appropriate vegetation. The use of sod mats that include aggressive
turf grasses will be avoided. Sod mats are natural sections of vegetation taken from the banks when
they were cut during construction and are about nine inches thick. Before installation, proposed banks
are graded lower than specified to accommodate the thickness of the mat. The mats are placed on top
of the bank to act as a natural stabilizer of native species, and they grow much faster than the
combination of coir fiber matting and seeding. Other bank stability measures include the installation of
live stakes, brush toes, and log vanes. Typical details for proposed in -stream structures and revetments
are in Appendix A.
Data Analysis
Stream Hydrologic Analysis
Hydrologic evaluations were performed for the design reaches using multiple methods to determine
and validate the design bankfull discharge and channel geometry required to provide regular floodplain
inundation. The use of various methods allows for comparison of results and eliminates reliance on a
single model. Peak flows (Table 10) and corresponding channel cross sectional areas were determined
for comparison to design parameters using the following methods:
• Regional Flood Frequency Analysis,
• NC and VA Regional Curves
Regional Flood Frequence
A flood frequency analysis was completed for the study region using historic gauge data on all nearby
USGS gauges with drainage areas ranging from 0.3 to 16 mi'. Regional flood frequency equations were
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
28

developed for the 1.1-, 1.25-, and 2 -year peak discharges based on the gauge data. Discharges were
then computed for the design reaches. These discharges were compared to those predicted by the
discharge regional curve and the reference reach discharges.
Regional Curve Regression Equations
The North Carolina Piedmont regional curves by Harman et al. (1999) and Doll et al. (2002) and the
Maryland/Pennsylvania Rural Piedmont regional curves by White (2001) for discharge were used to
predict the bankfull discharge for the Project. The NC regional curves predicted flows are lower but
similar to those predicted by the 1.1 -year flood frequency, while the MD/PA curves are much lower
flows predicted by the 1.1 -year flood frequency equation. The regional curve discharge equations for
are:
(1) Qb =89.04*(DA)073 (Harman et al., 1999)
(2) Qbk191.62*(DA)0.71 (Doll et al., 2002)
(3) Qbkl 43.895*(DA)0.9472 (White, 2001)
Where Qbkf=bankfull discharge (ft3/s) and DA=drainage area (mi2).
Table 10. Peak Flow Comparison
Reach
Drainage
Area (Ac)
FFQ Q1.1 FFQ Q1.25
NC Regional
Curve Q (1)
NC Regional
Curve Q (2)
PA/MD Design/
Regionna(l3Curve Calculated Q
DW2-B
90
28
39
22
23
15 38
DWI -13
237
48
64
44
45
32 51
DWI -C
256
50
67
46
48
34 53
DW1-D
269
51
68
48
50
35 62
Sediment Transport Analysis
An erosion and sedimentation analysis was performed to confirm that the restoration design creates a
stable gravel bed channel that neither aggrades nor degrades over time. Typically, sediment transport
is assessed to determine a stream's ability to move a specific grain size at specified flows. Various
sediment transport equations are applied when estimating entrainment for sand and gravel bed streams
found in the Piedmont. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) report, Stability Thresholds for
Stream Restoration Materials (Fochenich, 2001), was used to obtain permissible shear stresses and
velocities. Data found in this document was obtained from multiple sources using different testing
conditions. The following methods and published documents were utilized during the sediment
transport analysis:
Permissible Shear Stress Approach, and
Permissible Velocity Approach.
Shear Stress Approach
Shear stress is a commonly used tool for assessing channel stability. Allowable channel shear stresses
are a function of bed slope, channel shape, flows, bed material (shape, size, and gradation),
cohesiveness of bank materials, vegetative cover, and incoming sediment load. The shear stress
approach compares calculated shear stresses to those found in the literature. Shear stress is the force
exerted on a boundary during the resistance of motion as calculated using the following formula:
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
29

(1) r=yRS
i = shear stress (lb/ft')
y = specific gravity of water (62.4 lb/ft')
R = hydraulic radius (ft)
S = average channel slope (ft/ft)
Table 11. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Shear Stresses
I(Fischenich, 2001
Review of the above table shows that the proposed shear stresses for the Compass Point design reaches
fall between the critical shear stress (shear stress required to initiate motion) and the allowable limits.
Therefore, the proposed channel should remain stable.
VelocityApproach
Published data are readily available that provide entrainment velocities for different bed and bank
materials. A comparison of calculated velocities to these permissible velocities is a simple method to
aid in the verification of channel stability. Table 12 compares the proposed velocities calculated using
Manning's equation with the permissible velocities.
Table 12. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Velocities
Permissible
Reach Manning's "n" Value Design Velocity (ft/s) Bed Material Velocity'
(ft/sec)
Proposed Shear Stress
Allowable Shear Stress'
Reach
at Bankfull Stage
Critical Shear Stress
(lbs/ft)
Coarse Gravel
Cobble
Vegetation
z
(lbs/ft)
cobble
(lbs/ft2)
(lbs/ft2)
(lbs/ft2)
DW2-13
1.25
>0.54
0.33 to 0.67
0.67 to 2.0
0.7 to 0.1.7
DWI -13
0.89
>0.54
0.33 to 0.67
0.67 to 2.0
0.7 to 0.1.7
DWI -C
0.67
>0.54
0.33 to 0.67
0.67 to 2.0
0.7 to 0.1.7
DWI -D
1.08
>0.54
0.33 to 0.67
0.67 to 2.0
0.7 to 0.1.7
I(Fischenich, 2001
Review of the above table shows that the proposed shear stresses for the Compass Point design reaches
fall between the critical shear stress (shear stress required to initiate motion) and the allowable limits.
Therefore, the proposed channel should remain stable.
VelocityApproach
Published data are readily available that provide entrainment velocities for different bed and bank
materials. A comparison of calculated velocities to these permissible velocities is a simple method to
aid in the verification of channel stability. Table 12 compares the proposed velocities calculated using
Manning's equation with the permissible velocities.
Table 12. Comparison of Allowable and Proposed Velocities
Permissible
Reach Manning's "n" Value Design Velocity (ft/s) Bed Material Velocity'
(ft/sec)
'(Fischenich, 2001)
Sediment Supply
In addition to the stability assessment, a qualitative analysis of sediment supply was performed by
characterizing watershed conditions. A combination of field reconnaissance and windshield surveys,
existing land use data, and historical aerial photography were analyzed to assess existing and past
watershed conditions to determine if any changes occurred that would significantly impact sediment
supply. As discussed in Section 3.3, the land use throughout the site has changed little since 1950.
Much of the Project area has been used primarily for agricultural purposes over the past 60 years. Much
of the forested areas are located either within the headwater portions of the watersheds or along existing
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
30
Coarse gravel to
DW2-13
0.0425
4.7
2.5-7.5
cobble
Coarse gravel to
DWl-B
0.0375
4.6
2.5-7.5
cobble
Coarse gravel to
DW1-C
0.0350
4.3
2.5-7.5
cobble
Coarse gravel to
DWI -D
0.0400
4.8
2.5-7.5
cobble
'(Fischenich, 2001)
Sediment Supply
In addition to the stability assessment, a qualitative analysis of sediment supply was performed by
characterizing watershed conditions. A combination of field reconnaissance and windshield surveys,
existing land use data, and historical aerial photography were analyzed to assess existing and past
watershed conditions to determine if any changes occurred that would significantly impact sediment
supply. As discussed in Section 3.3, the land use throughout the site has changed little since 1950.
Much of the Project area has been used primarily for agricultural purposes over the past 60 years. Much
of the forested areas are located either within the headwater portions of the watersheds or along existing
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
30

stream channels to the north and to the east. Land use has remained relatively constant within this rural
watershed, and significant land disturbing activities are not anticipated for the future.
Observations and assessments of these reaches upstream show little signs of aggradation (deposition)
or degradation, and that the streams appear physically stable. This indicates the reaches are able to
effectively transport the sediment supplied by their respective watersheds. There are several localized
areas of instability and erosion along the channels, which appear to be a result of cattle activity and
agricultural activities occurring up to and along channel banks and not from watershed activities. It is
anticipated that sediment supply from agricultural land adjacent to the project will decrease as buffers
are enhanced and widened, and flow from existing agricultural ditches will be diffused before entering
the proposed channel.
Since little deposition or degradation (scour) was observed along the restoration reaches, it appears that
the channels are able to effectively move the sediment supplied from the surrounding watershed.
Because observed areas of degradation can be attributed to farming practices adjacent to the channel
and not watershed activities, a threshold channel design approach was used. This approach assumes
minimal movement (vertical or lateral migration) of the channel boundary during design flow
conditions, and that the channel is not sensitive to sediment supply. Additionally, grade controls have
been integrated throughout the design to provide vertical stability in the event scour should occur.
6.3 Vegetation and Planting Plan
Plant Community Restoration
The restoration of the plant communities is an important aspect of the restoration project. The selection
of plant species is based on what was observed at a reference reach, species present in the forest
surrounding the restoration Project, and what is typically native to the area. Several sources of
information were used to determine the most appropriate species for the restoration project. A nearby
tributary "UT to Hauser Creek" is used as a vegetation community reference due to close proximity to
the Project. The reference stream is located within a disturbed Piedmont Alluvial Forest. On April 3,
2018, two 100m2 plots were surveyed using the same protocol described in Section 3.2. Basal areas for
the plots were 12.5m2/ha and 49.6m2/ha and stems per acre was 81 for both plots.
Dominant canopy species across the reference reach included sweetgum, tulip -poplar, American beech,
pignut hickory, eastern redcedar, green ash, red maple, and boxelder. Sub -canopy species included
musclewood, sourwood, and sawtooth blackberry. Herbaceous species included cranefly orchid,
Christmas fern, rattlesnake fern, woodsorrel, perfoliate bellwort, partridgeberry, hairy solomon's seal,
round leaved greenbrier, strawberry bush, common blue violet, downy yellow violet, bedstraw, white
avens, rue anemone, tall hairy agrimony, mayapple, and sedge (Carex sp.).
Invasive species were also found within the vegetation survey plots and in the vicinity of the reach,
including: multiflora rose, and Japanese honeysuckle. Non-native species included Japanese stiltgrass,
common chickweed, buttercup, wooly mullein, and onion grass.
A Piedmont Stream Headwater Forest will be the target community type for the top of the Project
(Reach DW2-A); and a Piedmont Alluvial Forest will be the target community for the remaining
reaches (DWI-A/B/C/CD/E, DW2-B, DW3). These community types will be established to include a
diverse mix of species and will be used for the planting areas within the Project shown in Appendix A.
The plant species list has been developed and can be found in Table 13. Species with high dispersal
rates are not included because of local occurrence, adjacent seed sources, and the high potential for
natural regeneration. The high dispersal species include red maple, tulip poplar, and sweetgum.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
31

The restoration of plant communities along the Project will provide stabilization and diversity. For
rapid stabilization of the stream banks (primarily outside meanders), silky dogwood (Cornus amomum)
and black willow (Salix nigra) were chosen for live stakes along the restored channel because of their
rapid growth patterns and high success rates. Willows grow at a faster rate than the species planted
around them, and they stabilize the stream banks. Willows will also be quicker to contribute organic
matter to the channel. When the other species are bigger, the black willows will slowly stop growing
or die out because the other species would outgrow them and create shade that the willows do not
tolerate. The live stake species will be planted along the outside of the meander bends three feet from
the top of bank, creating a three-foot section along the top of bank. The live stakes will be spaced one
per linear foot with alternate spacing vertically.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
32

Table 13. Proposed Plant List
Bare Root Planting Tree Species
Species
Common Name
Spacing (ft)
Unit Type
% of Total
Species
Composition
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
9X6
Bare Root
15
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
9X6
Bare Root
15
Betula nigra
River birch
9X6
Bare Root
15
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
9X6
Bare Root
15
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
9X6
Bare Root
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
9X6
Bare Root
10
Driodendron tulipifera
Yellow Poplar
9X6
Bare Root
10
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
9X6
Bare Root
5
Nyssa sylvatica
Black Gum
9X6
Bare Root
5
Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree Species
Species Common Name % of Total Species Composition
Salix nigra Black willow 60
Cornus ammomum Silky dogwood 40
On Site Invasive Species Management
Treatment for invasive species will be required within all grading limits associated with stream
restoration. Invasive species will require different and multiple treatment methods, depending on plant
phenology and the location of the species being treated. All treatment will be conducted as to maximize
its effectiveness and reduce chances of detriment to surrounding native vegetation. Treatment methods
will include mechanical (cutting with loppers, clippers, or chain saw) and chemical (foliar spray, cut
stump, and hack and squirt techniques). Plants containing mature, viable seeds will be removed from
the Project and properly disposed. All herbicide applicators will be supervised by a certified ground
pesticide applicator with a North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
(NCDA&CS) license and adhere to all legal and safety requirements according to herbicide labels, and
NC and Federal laws. Management records will be kept on the plant species treated, type of treatment
employed, type of herbicide used, application technique, and herbicide concentration and quantities
used. These records will be included in all reporting documents.
Soil Restoration
After construction activities, the subsoil will be scarified, and any compaction will be deep tilled before
the topsoil is placed back over the Project. Any topsoil that is removed during construction will be
stockpiled and placed over the Project during final soil preparation. This process should provide
favorable soil conditions for plant growth. Rapid establishment of vegetation will provide natural
stabilization for the Project.
6.4 Mitigation Summary
Natural channel design techniques have been used to develop the restoration designs described in this
document. The combination of the analog and analytical design methods was determined to be
appropriate for this Project because the watershed is rural, the causes of disturbance are known and
have been abated, and there are minimal infrastructure constraints. The original design parameters were
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
33

developed from the measured analog/reference reach data and applied to the subject stream. The
parameters were then analyzed and adjusted through an iterative process using analytical tools and
numerical simulations of fluvial processes. The designs presented in this report provide for the
restoration of natural Piedmont cobble/gravel-bed channel features and stream bed diversity to improve
benthic habitat. The proposed design will allow flows that exceed the design bankfull stage to spread
out over the floodplain, restoring a portion of the hydrology for the existing wetlands.
A large portion of the existing stream will be filled using material excavated from the restoration
channel. However, many segments will be left partially filled to provide habitat diversity and flood
storage. Native woody material will be installed throughout the restored reach to reduce bank stress,
provide grade control, and increase habitat diversity.
Forested riparian buffers of at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel will be established along the
project reach. An appropriate riparian plant community (Piedmont Stream Headwater Forest along
DW2-A, DW3; Piedmont Alluvial Forest along DWI-A/B/C/D/E, DW2-13) will be established to
include a diverse mix of species within the Project. The plant species list has been developed and can
be found in Table 13. Although there is one planting zone, certain targeted species will be planted in
the appropriate target community location. Replanting of native species will occur where the existing
buffer is impacted during construction.
Due to the nature of the project, complete avoidance of stream and wetland impacts is not possible.
Proposed stream impacts, including stream relocation and culverts, will be replaced on site. Wetland
impacts associated with restoration and enhancement efforts will only temporarily impact wetlands.
Additionally, native trees and shrubs along the stream banks. All stream impacts will be accounted for
in the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) form.
6.5 Determination of Credits
Mitigation credits presented in Table 14 are projections based upon site design (Figure 10). Upon
completion of site construction, the project components and credits data will only be revised to be
consistent with the as -built condition if there is a large discrepancy and with an approved mitigation
plan addendum. This will be approved by the USACE.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
34

Table 14. Mitigation Credits
*Easement break linear feet subtracted from the proposed reach length
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
35
The Compass Point Site Mitigation Credits
Cool Stream
Riparian Wetland
on -Riparian Wetland
Totals
4,130
NA
NA
Reach
Mitigation Type
Proposed Stationing
Existing
Length
(LF)
Proposed
Length
(LF)
Mitigation
Ratio
SMUs
DWl-A
Enhancement II
00+58
to
03+20
315
262
1: 2.5
105
DWl-B
Restoration
03+20
to
04+30
48
110
1:1.0
110
DWl-B
Restoration
04+70
to
23+08
1,907
1,838*
1:1.0
1,838
DWl-C
Restoration
23+08
to
28+74
604
566
1:1.0
566
DWl-D
Restoration
28+74
to
31+33
262
259
1:1.0
259
DWl-D
Restoration
31+93
to
36+92
415
499*
1:1.0
499
DWl-E
Enhancement III
36+92
to
41+24
432
432
1: 7.5
58
DW2-A
Enhancement II
00+00
to
09+68
968
968
1: 2.5
387
DW2-B
Restoration
09+68
to
12+45
306
277
1:1.0
277
DW3
Enhancement II 3
00+00
to
00+93
93
93
1: 3.0
31
Totals
5,350
5,304
4,130
*Easement break linear feet subtracted from the proposed reach length
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
35

7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The success criteria for the Project will follow accepted and approved success criteria presented in the
2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update and
subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
7.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
Bankfull Events
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years. Crest gauges will be installed on DWI -B and DW2-
A.
Cross Sections
There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -
cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall
be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should
fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio
shall not exceed 1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 1.4 within restored reaches. The
entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given reach.
Channel stability should be demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events documented in
the seven-year monitoring period.
Digital Image Stations
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images
should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
Surface Flow
Stream restoration reaches will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface flow. This
will be accomplished through direct observation and the use of stream gauge transducers with data
loggers. One flow gauge will be installed on DWI -A.
7.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project
will follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project will be the
survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, at least 260 planted
five-year old trees at seven feet in height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria
will be 210 trees per acre with an average height of ten feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees will
be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but will not be counted
towards the success criteria of total planted stems. Moreover, any single species can only account for
up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of
50 percent will be shown in the monitoring table but will not be used to demonstrate success.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
36

8 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the NCIRT monitoring template. The monitoring report
shall provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends,
research purposes, and assist in decision making regarding project close-out. Monitoring reports will
be prepared annually and submitted to the USACE. Monitoring of the Project will adhere to metrics
and performance standards established by the USACE's April 2003 Wilmington District Stream
Mitigation Guidelines and the NC IRT's October 2016 Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update. Table 15 outlines the links between project goals, objectives, and
treatments and their associated monitoring metrics and performance standards within the context of
functional uplift based on the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework.
8.1 As -Built Survey
An as -built survey will be conducted following construction to document channel size, condition, and
location. The survey will include a complete profile of thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of bank
to compare with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by USACE. Stream channel stationing will be marked with stakes
placed near the top of bank every 200 feet.
8.2 Visual Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas will be conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year
by qualified individuals. The visual assessments will include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species,
and easement encroachments. Visual assessments of stream stability will include a complete
streamwalk and structure inspection. Digital images will be taken at fixed representative locations to
record each monitoring event, as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of visual
monitoring will be presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital
images. Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank
erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
8.3 Hydrology Events
Crest gauges will be installed to document to occurrence of bankfull events. A minimum of one gauge
will be installed on each tributary that is greater than 1,000 feet in length, with one gauge required for
every 5,000 feet of length on each tributary and a maximum of five gauges per tributary. Reaches with
Priority 1 Restoration (designed to reconnect the stream to its floodplain), gauges will be capable of
tracking the frequency and duration of overbank events. Where restoration or enhancement activities
are proposed for intermittent streams, monitoring gauges should be installed to track the frequency and
duration of stream flow events.
8.4 Cross Sections
Permanent cross sections will be installed at a minimum of one per 20 bankfull widths with half in
pools and half in riffle on all Restoration and Enhancement I reaches. All cross-section measurements
will include bank height ratio and entrenchment ratio. Cross sections will be monitored in Years 1, 2,
3, 5, and 7. There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should
be evaluated to determine if they represent movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
37

cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio).
8.5 Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a minimum of two
percent of the planted area. There will be eleven plots within the planted area (12.92 acres). Plots will
be a mixture of fixed and random plots, with eight fixed plots and three random plots. Planted area
indicates all area in the easement that will be planted with trees. Existing wooded areas are not included
in the planted area. The following data will be recorded for all trees in the fixed plots: species, height,
planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. For random plots, species and height will be recorded
for all woody stems. The location (GPS coordinates and orientation) of the random plots will be
identified in the annual monitoring reports. Vegetation will be planted and plots established at least 180
days prior to the initiation of the first year of monitoring. Monitoring will occur in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and
7 between July 1 st and leaf drop. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored so that none become
dominant or alter the desired community structure of the Project. If necessary, RES will develop a
species-specific treatment plan.
8.6 Scheduling/Reporting
A baseline monitoring report and as -built drawings documenting stream restoration activities will be
developed within 60 days of the planting completion on the Project. The report will include all
information required by IRT mitigation plan guidelines, including elevations, photographs and
sampling plot locations, gauge locations, and a description of initial species composition by community
type. The report will also include a list of the species planted and the associated densities. Baseline
vegetation monitoring will include species, height, date of planting, and grid location of each stem. The
baseline report will follow USACE guidelines.
The monitoring program will be implemented to document system development and progress toward
achieving the success criteria. The restored stream morphology will be assessed to determine the
success of the mitigation. The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final
success criteria are achieved, whichever is longer.
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to the IRT.
The monitoring reports will include all information and be in the format required by USACE.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
38

Table 15. Monitoring Requirements
Level
Goal
Treatment
Outcome
Monitoring Metric
Performance Standard
To transport
Improve the
water from the
Convert land -use of
transport of water
1
watershed to
Project reaches from
from the watershed
NA
NA
is
the channel in a
pasture to riparian
to the Project
x
non-erosive
forest
reaches in a non -
manner
erosive way
Stage Recorders (crest
Four bankfull events occurring in
gauges and pressure
separate years
At least 30 days of continuous flow
Reduce bank height
Improve flood
transducers):
ratios and increase
bank connectivity
Inspected semiannual)
each year
s
To transport
entrenchment ratios
by reducing bank
Entrenchment ratio shall be no less than
2
water in a
stable non-
by reconstructing
height ratios and
1.4 within restored reaches
Entrenchment ratio shall be no less than
?.
channels to mimic
increase
Cross sections: Surveyed
erosive manner
reference reach
entrenchment
in
2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections
conditions
ratios
years 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
on a given reach
Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2
As -built stream profile
NA
Entrenchment ratio shall be no
Reduce erosion
less than 1.4 within restored
Establish a riparian
rates and channel
Cross sections: Surveyed
reaches
To create a
buffer to reduce
erosion and sediment
stability to
reference reach
in
years 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
Entrenchment ratio shall be no less than
diverse
2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections
`off°
•
bedfonn
transport into project
conditions
on a given reach
3 ,y
streams. Establish
Improve bedform
Bank height ratio shall not exceed
c
To achieve
stable banks with
diversity (pool
Visual monitoring
1.2
o
�
dynamic
livestakes erosion
control matting, and
spacing, percent
Visual monitoring:
Identify and document significant
equilibrium
q
other in stream
riffles, etc.
Performed at least
stream problem areas; i.e.
structures.
Increase buffer
semiannually
erosion, degradation,
width to 50 feet
aggradation, etc.
Vegetation plots:
MY 1-3: 320 trees/acre
Surveyed in
MY 5: 260 trees/acre (7 ft. tall)
ears 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
MY 7: 210 trees/acre 10 ft. tall
To achieve
Improve stream
p
Vegetation plots:
MY 1-3: 320 trees/acre
appropriate
levels for water
temperature
Surveyed in
years 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
MY 5: 260 trees/acre (7 ft. tall)
temperature,
regulation through
(indirect measurement)
MY 7: 210 trees/acre (10 ft. tall)
y
dissolved
introduction of
en
oxygen
Exclude livestock
canopy
from riparian areas
�
4 m
concentration,
with exclusion fence,
Decrease nutrient
Visual assessment of
o
and other
and plant a riparian
h
loadin through
g g
established fencing and
Inspect fencing and signage.
important
buffer
filtration of planted
conservation signage:
Identify and document any
nutrients
riparian buffer, and
Performed at least
damaged or missing fencing
including but
removing livestock
semiannually
and/or signs
not limited to
from the riparian
(indirect measurement)
Nitrogen and
areas
Phosphorus
To achieve
Improve aquatic
functionality in
Plant a riparian
p
habitat through the
installation of
Visual monitoring of in-
*
levels 1-4 to
buffer, install habitat
habitat features,
stream habitat features:
Identify and document significant
5 o
support the life
features, and
construction of
Performed at least
stream problem areas; i.e.
o
Cl
histories of
construct pools of
pools at varying
semiannually
degradation, aggradation,
aquatic and
varying depths
depths, and
(indirect measurement)
stressed or failed structures, etc.
riparian plants
planting the
In
and animals
riparian buffer
° These categories are measured indirectly; *These categories are not quantifiably measured
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
39

9 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of Project construction, RES will implement the post -construction monitoring
protocols previously defined in this document. Project maintenance will be performed as described
previously in this document. If, during the course of annual monitoring, it is determined that the
Project's ability to achieve performance standards are jeopardized, RES will notify the USACE of the
need to develop a Plan of Corrective Action. Once the Corrective Action Plan is prepared and finalized
RES will:
1. Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as
necessary and/or required by the USACE.
3. Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Prepare Corrective Action Plan for review and approval by IRT.
5. Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
Provide the IRT a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions. This document shall depict the extent and
nature of the work performed.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
40

10 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval of the Project by the IRT, the Project will be transferred to Unique Places to Save
(UP2S):
Unique Places to Save
[phone]
PO Box 1183
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
[e-mail]
UP2S will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the
Conservation Easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld. Easements will be stewarded in
general accordance with the guidelines published by the National Land Trust Alliance. Specific
responsibilities include:
• Monitoring of site is conducted on an annual basis.
• An on-site inspection is conducted once per year.
• Visits to the site are coordinated with landowner when possible.
• Annual monitoring reports are sent to the landowner when possible.
• Signage for the easement boundary is maintained.
• Violations and potential violations of the conservation easement deed are promptly
communicated to the landowner.
A model conservation easement and engagement letter from UP2S are included in Appendix C. The
engagement letter includes itemized annual cost accounting of long-term management, total amount of
funding, and the manner in which the funding will be provided.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
41

11 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported in the approved mitigation
plan of the site. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary DA
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise
provided written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for
construction of the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the IRT, will determine if
performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules
below. In cases where some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released
depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending
on the extent to which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of Project
credits will be subject to the criteria described in Table 16.
11.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the IRT
with written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a) Execution of the UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
b) Approval of the final mitigation plan;
c) Mitigation site must be secured;
d) Delivery of financial assurances;
e) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
f) Issuance of the 404 -permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
11.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
The second credit release will occur after the completion of implementation of the Mitigation Plan and
IRT approval of the Baseline Monitoring Report and As -built Survey. All subsequent credit releases
must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a determination that required
performance standards have been achieved. As projects approach milestones associated with credit
release, the Sponsor will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation
substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included
with the annual monitoring report.
Table 16. Stream Credit Release Schedule
Release
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total Released
Milestone
Release
1
Site Establishment (includes all required criteria
15%
15%
stated above
2
Baseline Monitoring Report and As -built Survey
15%
30%
3
First year monitoring report demonstrates
10%
40%
performance standards are being met.
4
Second year monitoring report demonstrates
10%
50%
performance standards are being met.
5
Third year monitoring report demonstrates
10%
60%
performance standards are being met.
6
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates
5%
65%
performance standards are being met.
(75%**)
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates
o
10 /0
75%
performance standards are beingmet.
85%**
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
42

Release
Milestone
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Release
Total Released
g
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates
5%
80%
performance standards are being met.
(90%**)
9
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates
90%
performance standards are being met, and project
10%
(100%**)
has received close-out approval.
** 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
43

12 MAINTENANCE PLAN
The Project will be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection will be conducted a minimum
of once per year throughout the post construction monitoring period until performance standards are
met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance.
Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction
and may include the following:
Table 17. Maintenance Plan
Component/Feature
Maintenance through project close-out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of
in -stream structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and
supplemental installations of live stakes and other target vegetation along the
channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain flows intercept the channel
may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and head -cutting.
Stream maintenance activities will be documented and reported in annual
monitoring reports. Stream maintenance will continue through the
monitoring eriod.
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may
include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic
invasive plant species shall be treated by mechanical and/or chemical
methods. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be
performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules
and regulations. Vegetation maintenance activities will be documented and
reported in annual monitoring reports. Vegetation maintenance will continue
through the monitoring period.
Site Boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction
between the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries will be
marked with signs identifying the property as a mitigation site and will
include the name of the long-term steward and a contact number. Boundaries
may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means
as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary
markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as -needed basis. Easement monitoring and staking/signage maintenance
will continue in perpetuity as a stewardship activity.
Road Crossing
Road crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed by
Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way,
or corridor agreements. Crossings in easement breaks are the responsibility
of the landowner to maintain.
Livestock Fencing
Livestock fencing is to be placed outside the easement limits. Maintenance
of fencing is the responsibility of the landowner.
Beaver
Routine site visits and monitoring will be used to determine if beaver
management is needed. If beaver activity poses a threat to project stability or
vegetative success, RES will trap beavers and remove impoundments as
needed. All beaver management activities will be documented and included
in annual monitoring reports. Beaver monitoring and management will
continue through the monitoring period.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
44

13 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
CONFIDENTIAL
The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of a $609,000 Construction Performance
Bond to the USACE to assure completion of mitigation construction and planting. Construction and
planting costs are estimated to be at or below $609,000 based on the Engineer's construction materials
estimate and recent bid tabulation unit costs for construction materials. Following completion of
construction and planting the Construction Performance Bond will be retired and a $156,479
Monitoring Performance Bond will be provided to assure completion of seven years of monitoring and
reporting, and any remedial work required during the monitoring period. The $156,479 amount includes
contingency and estimated monitoring costs from the Engineer. The Monitoring Performance Bond
will be reduced by $22,354 following approval of each annual monitoring report. The Monitoring
Performance Bond will be retired in total following official notice of site close-out from the IRT.
Financial assurances shall be payable to a standby trust or other designee at the direction of the obligee.
Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the USACE in the event of default by the Bank
Sponsor are not acceptable. A financial assurance must be in the form that ensures that the USACE
receives notification at least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation. The Performance
Bonds will be provided by a surety listed with the U.S. Treasury and has an A.M. Best Rating of B or
above. All Performance Bonds will be submitted to the USACE in draft form for approval prior to
execution. In the event of Sponsor default, UP2S has agreed to receive the funds and ensure the work
is successfully completed.
Table 18. Financial Assurances
Construction Costs AM
7iw
General (e.g. mobilization, erosion control, etc.
$85,000
Sitework
$105,000
Structures (e.g. ditch plugs, logs, rocks, coir, etc.)
$189,000
Crossings
$33,000
Vegetation
$45,000
Miscellaneous/Admin Fees
$152,000
Total $609,000
Monitoring Costs PF
Monitoring Set -Up & As -Built
$21,000
Monitoring Year 1 and Report
$12,000
Monitoring Year 2 and Report
$12,000
Monitoring Year 3 and Report
$12,000
Monitoring Year 4 and Report
$9,000
Monitoring Year 5 and Report
$13,500
Monitoring Year 6 and Report
$9,000
Monitoring Year 7 and Report
$18,000
Equipment e. au es, markers, etc.
$12,350
Maintenance
$37,629
Total
$156,479
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
45

14 REFERENCES
Chow, Ven Te. 1959. Open -Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological
Services, FWS/OBS-79/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Dalrymple, T. 1960. Flood Frequency Analyses. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1543-
A.
Doll, B.A., D.E. Wise -Frederick, C.M. Buckner, S.D. Wilkerson, W.A. Harman, R.E. Smith and J.
Spooner. 2002. Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for Urban Streams throughout the
Piedmont of North Carolina. Journal of the American water Resource Association. 38(3):641-
651.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
Mississippi.
Fischenich, C. 2001. "Stability thresholds for stream restoration materials." ERDC Technical Note
No. EMRRP-SR-29, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg,
Miss.
Fischenich, J.C., 2006. Functional Objectives for Stream Restoration, EMRRP Technical Notes
Collection (ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-52), US Army Engineer Research and Development
Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi. (available online at
h!Ltp://el.erdc.usace.gmy.mil/elpubs/Tdf/sr52.gdf)
Harman, W.H. et al. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams.
AWRA Wildland Hydrology Symposium Proceedings. Edited By: D.S. Olsen and J.P.
Potyondy. AWRA Summer Symposium. Bozeman, MT.
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-
K-12-006.
Johnson PA. 2006. Assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions. U.S.
Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Report Number FHWA-
HRT-05-072.
LeGrand, H.E., Jr. and S.P. Hall, eds. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal
Species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
Lotspeich, R.R., 2009, Regional curves of bankfull channel geometry for non -urban streams in the
Piedmont Physiographic Province, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations
Report 2009-5206, 51 p.
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
46

NCDENR 2012a. "Water Quality Stream Classifications for Streams in North Carolina." Water
Quality http://portal.ncdenr.or web/wq/home. (February 2012).
NCDENR 2012b. "2012 North Carolina 303(d) Lists -Category 5." Water Quality Section.
hllp://portal.ncdenr.or web/wq/home. (August 2012).
NCDWQ (North Carolina Division of Water Quality). 2011. A Guide to Surface Freshwater
Classifications in North Carolina. Raleigh. http://portal.ncdenr.ora/c/document_librarL/
get file?p 1 id=1169848&folderld=2209568&name=DLFE-35732.pdf; accessed October 2017.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). "Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009."
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina: North Carolina
Geological Survey, General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000.
Rosgen, D. (1996), Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), 2002. Regulatory Guidance Letter. RGL No. 02-2,
December 24, 2002.
USAGE. 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
USAGE. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and
C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR -10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and
Development Center.
USACE. 2018. Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator.
USACE. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS).
1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release 55.
USDA NRCS. 2007. Stream Restoration Design Handbook (NEH 654), USDA
USDA NRCS. 2007. Soil Survey of Yadkin County, North Carolina.
USDA NRCS. 2010. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0. L.M. Vasilas,
G.W. Hurt, and C.V. Noble (eds.). USDA, NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical
Committee for Hydric Soils.
USDA NRCS. Web Soil Survey; http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov (June 2018).
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
47

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. EPA Manual. Quantifying Physical
Habitat in Wadeable Streams.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. "Threatened and Endangered Species in North Carolina."
North Carolina Ecological Services. http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/. (September 2014).
Compass Point Mitigation Plan June 2019
48

Figures List
Figure 1—
Service Area and Vicinity Map
Figure 2 —
USGS Map
Figure 3 —
Landowner Map
Figure 4 —
Landuse Map
Figure 5 —
Existing Conditions Map
Figure 6 —
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 7 —
Soils Map
Figure 8 —
Historical Aerials Map
Figure 9 —
FEMA Map
Figure 10
—Concept Design Map
Figure 11—
Monitoring Plan

Rucktnl(I
Compass Point Site
VJ'A
1Ninsto a
Lenoir
SCate-'Ville
F,lorgantcxs Legend
BroclKlard Salisbury
Proposed Easement
Moaresr le
Service Area - 03040101
N
Date: 5/6/2019
Figure 1 - Service Area and Vicinity Map
w e Drawn by: MDE
0 500
5 1,000 Compass Point Mitigation Site
Checked by: KAW res
Yadkin County, North Carolina finch =1,000 feet 10
Feet

Rmkzv;
r i
'.----�-
-
'� 4
-
.` ' [ 4
s
C •��pA
DW1 E �
269 ac/>"`' f 4Tr
271 acDWI
rry
DWI
,, KAcc}'. 256
r
DW2-B
90 ac
DW2 A
It=
}'r `` •
I.
j�
.�,
3
ar
Y Ar) ,5w
}'a "�"`'�c,".t' P l�h.�i,e •;��.. ,. -- - ��..` - it, .l ..��� �,. r`f .moi •W �.t .,
f `
Proposed Easement
t,
Drainage Areas
Figure• Date:
Copeland 1973
+1 Drawn by: EWT
Compass Point Mitigation Site Checked by: MDE
•+«�!1 111 111
YadkinCounty, North Carolina2,000 --

WINNIE,WAGONER J
5912705289
a
71
t
uL
Legend
a
s Proposed Easement
Project Parcel
a
4
"
{ Parcels
i Caw_ . -. ..
N
Date. 7/31 /2018
Figure 3 - Landowner Map
w w e Drawn by: EWT
Compass Point Mitigation Site res
s Checked by: MDE
0 500 1,000
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 1,000 feet
s Feet

'r 7[
4 4
r
$i
Mw
_ x
4 "F,
4 A r
� y 1tY
��v hir y.�.,���• may#
Am

i'
n,
"
wB
sox.
' '+ '' �• I�y7 ��'
414
* `
w. e
�TOt
fr
r },•+ r
E ICY �'. l• _ ��
Existing Forth
Y
Legend
Proposed Easement
Parcels
® Existing Wetlands
Existing Streams
T----T Powerline Easement
N
Date: 5/6/2019
Figure 5 - Existing Conditions Map
w — e Drawn by: MDE
5 Compass Point Mitigation Site
Checked by: KAW
0 250 500
Yadkin County, North Carolina finch =500 feet
pres
�

R2UBH
r t
a
,Y s,
'
t.
PUBHh w • !�Si,
*N r
w
y� A
•' f a
PUBHh j,
Legend
Proposed Easement
PUB NWI Wetlands
N
Date: 7/31/2018
Figure 6 - NWI Map
w w e Drawn by: EWT
Compass Point Mitigation Site
res
0 25s0 500 Checked by: MDE
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch = 500 feet
Feet

..^a �.ts - .+ r f• ,ems. ,.,tiJ
#.
y •
t
ALI
� M. r ^�. .. K,;{ ti`s ' � Gam, •.•4,�.� -r ''`" ,. �'.
N, t d
Lech
.r.
+ Proposed Easement
FEMA Zone AE
FEMA Regulatory Floodway
.2% Chance Annual Flood
N
Figure 9 - FEMA Map Date: 7/31/2015
w E Panel: 3710590000K, eff: 08/18/2009
_ Drawn by: EWT res
0 250
s 500 Compass Point Mitigation Site Checked by: MDE
s Feet
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 Inch = 500 feet

Culvert Crossing
E
H a,
J
Ford Crossing
p -
w
Legend
Proposed Easement (16.5ac)
Project Parcel
Reach Mitigation Type Proposed Length Ratio sMU c'{ Approach
DW1-A Enhancement II 262 2.5:1 105 Restoration
DW1-B Restoration 1,948 1:1 1,948
DW1-C Restoration 566 1:1 566
e` DW1-D Restoration 758 1:1 758 ••„ Enhancement II (2.5:1)
DW1-E Enhancement 111 432 7.5:1 58
DW2-A Enhancement II 968 2.5:1 387 — Enhancement II (3:1)
DW2-B Restoration 277 1:1 277
DW3 Enhancement II 93 3:1 31 Enhancement III
Total 5,304 4,130
N
Date: 5/29/2019
Figure 10 - Conceptual Map
Drawn by: MDE
Compass Point Mitigation Site
VOW Checked by: KC res
0 250 500
Yadkin County, North Carolina 1 inch 500 feet
Feet

3
r
�' A-
� fires
Note: There will be a total of 11 vegetation plots;
eight fixed vegetation plots, and three will be randomly placed
each monitoring year.
Random vegetation plots are not shown in this monitoring plan
Random plot will vary by location and dimension.
Flow gauge crest gauge, cross section, and
vegetation plot locations are all proposed locations.
W
Z+-
0 150 300
Feet
Figure 11 - Monitoring Plan
Compass Point
Mitigation Project
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Date: 5/7/2019 Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: KAW 1 in = 300 feet
Legend
F1 Proposed Easement
® Existing Wetland
Planted Area (12.92 ac)
© Vegetation Plot
® Stage Recorder
00 Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauge
Cross Section
Stream Mitigation Approach
Restoration
Enhancement
Enhancement II
Enhancement III

Appendix A -Plan Sheets

r
z
r 6
7 �
a
W,
�Ix
� t
PROJECT LOCATION
w.cw 3 iApOln rv.�,11[.,nWw.
'W6 R�r�.4 wii
_ J
rrv�
VICINITY MAP
NTS
USACE ACTION ID #: SAW -201 7-014G5
COMPASS POINT STREAM MITIGATION SITE
YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
YADKIN 01 RIVER BASIN: HUC 03040101
JUNE 2019
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
302 JEFFERSON ST, SUITE 110
RALEIGH, NC 27605
REACH DW I
51TE MAP
NTS
DWI -E
res
Sheet L15t Table
Sheet Number Sheet Title
-
COVER
A I
OVERALL AERIAL VIEW
E I
GENERAL NOTES AND LEGEND
E2
EXI5TING CONDITIONS
51
DWI -A*DWI -B
52
DWI -15
53
DWI -B
54
DWI -5 � DWI -C
55
DWI -C * DWI -D
5G
DWI -D * DWI -f-
E57
57
DWI -E
58
DW2-A
59
DW2-A * DW2-B
5 1 O
DW3
P I
PLANTING PLAN
D I
DETAILS
D2
D ETAI L5
D3
DETAI L5
D4
DETAI L5
D5
DETAI L5
DG
DETAI L5
res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
W W W.res.us
SEAL
Li
a.
o 0
0
J
a �
0
U
U)
0
U
x
0
O
-
o
NZ
o
a >
o a
a
o z
0
U5
m
W J
a W
W t
m
m a
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECTMANAGER.
CC
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
----
SHEET NUMBER:

Op
@No
I
I \
Compass Point Mitigation Site Credits
Reach
Mitigation Type
Proposed
Length (LF)
Mitigation Ratio
SMUs
DWI -A
Enhancement II
262
1 :2.5
105
DWI -B
Restoration
110
1 : 1.0
110
DWI -B
Restoration
1,838
1 : 1.0
1,838
DWI -C
Restoration
566
1:1.0
566
DWl-D
Restoration
259
1:1.0
259
DWl-D
Restoration
499
1:1.0
499
DWl-E
Enhancement 111
432
1 :7.5
58
DW2-A
Enhancement II
968
1 :2.5
387
DW2-B
Restoration
277
1:1.0
277
DW3
Enhancement II (3)
93
1 :3.0
31
Total
o
5,304
4,130
I
I
I
I
10
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=250
0
250
500
2" - FULL SCALE
1 " = HALF SCALE
6i
0
0
N
Hco
O
N
IL
o
z
O
F --
C) U
Z)
z
O
z
O
o
LL
I
cr
O
z
U
w
OQ
LU
LL
Q
Z
D
z_
O
U)
o
Q
>
W
-iW
W
fr
Ir
Q_
w
U
Q
z
z
O
-:i
Q
0
O
Q
W
U
>
�
=
J
Q
W
z
W
Q
U
J
J
Z)
Q
z
OU
O
W
a_
>
w U)
z
J
O
Y
z QM
i=
0
Q
0
w
}
Z
oO
Q
a U
cc
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
CC
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
Al

STREAM CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
I . ALL PROPOSED CHANNELS AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT CROSSINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
A DRY CONDITION VIA OFFLINE CONSTRUCTION WHERE POSSIBLE. PUMP AROUND OPERATIONS
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO AREAS WHERE THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS OVERLAP.
2. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND PUMPING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM AT THE END
OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER. WITH APPROVAL, A PUMP AROUND MAY BE ALLOWED TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY IF THERE
15 NO FORECAST FOR RAIN OVERNIGHT, AND/OR THE PUMP APPARATUS IS MAINTAINED AND
MONITORED CONTINUOUSLY.
3. CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE CHANNEL FIRST, WORKING IN AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
4. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL WITHIN AREAS THAT ARE TO BE CUT 9" OR MORE BELOW EXISTING
GRADE. STOCKPILED TOP501L 15 TO BE PLACED ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN BENCHES.
5. STRUCTURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN SHEETS (AS INDICATED ON THE
STRUCTURE TABLES) U51NG METHODS DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL 5HEET5. PRIOR TO FINE GRADING,
OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER ON INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES.
G. NATIVE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL SHALL BE TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CHANNEL AND INSTALLED ON THE
PROPOSED BED OF 5HALLOW/RIFFLE CHANNEL SECTIONS. IN AREAS WHERE THERE 15 NOT ENOUGH
NATIVE SUBSTRATE TO PLACE A MINIMUM G" LAYER ALONG PROPOSED SHALLOW/RIFFLE SECTIONS,
SUPPLEMENT THE NATIVE SUBSTRATE WITH A 5C/5o MIX OF #3 AND SURGE, OR RIVER ROCK WITH A
Dso=2.0".
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS (BRUSH TOES, LOG
VANES, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL
FROM DESIGNER.
8. UPON COMPLETION OF FINE GRADING, INSTALL STREAM BANK STABILIZATION INCLUDING, EROSION
CONTROL MATTING OR 50D MATS ALONG CHANNEL BANKS.
9. FILL AND STABILIZE ABANDONED SEGMENTS OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL PER DIRECTION OF THE
ENGINEER.
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR — — —50—
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
50EXISTINGCONTOURMINOR-----46-----
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND D
EXISTING STREAM
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
—------------------- —
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
— ---- ----- ----- —
EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PROPERTY LINE
— —
EXISTING FENCELINE
—x— x— x— x— a— x— a—x—
EXISTING TREEUNE
Qm
EXISTING TREE
�1
r J
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF CHANNEL
—_—_J--_—
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK -----------
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LCE
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
(SEE DETAIL DWG D2) mm
PROPOSED FILL AREA
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
(SEE DETAIL D3)
Main: 919.829.9909
LOG SILL
W .res.us
(5EE DETAIL D4)
SCALE: AS SHOWN
OT VANE
(SEE DETAIL D3)
LOG CR055 VANE
Qm
(SEE DETAIL D2)
DOUBLELOG DROP
(SEE DETAIL D6)
H N
N
ROCKVANE
(SEEE DETAIL D6)
ROCK VANE
Z
(SEE DETAIL D6)
pppppppp
ROCKWOOD RIFFLE W/ SILL
�[���[y
\y
(SEE DETAIL D5)\�
ANGLED LOG STEP POOL
III
(SEE DETAIL D4)
LOG ELEVATION
0
(PROFILE)
o
ROCK ELEVATION
a
(PROFILE)
o
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
W .res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
Li
Qm
� o
H N
N
a N
Z
O
U
U)
Z
O
O
LL
n
H
O
N
?
0
O
N
O z
o
W
m
m a
W
H
(n <Q
Z Z
O
z
W
Q �
CD
O
W
U
J
z
F
Q O
LU Z
LU
U)
z
O
Z
D
Z O
J
U
Of
d
w (n Z
J W
z Q 0
F W
Q a
z
'o O
a
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
E1

BEACH DWI -C
FA
I\Ll�l� l I LJ V V I -/-\
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 200'
0
200
400
2"
= FULL SCALE_
1"
= HALF SCALE
w
Q
C)
C)
N
O
N
C
o
z
O
U
z
O
z
O
o
IL
a
cr
O
z
U
w
O
LL
Qw
Q
z
z
o
0OU)
w
J
Y(n
Cc:>
Q
WW
-JW
cr
m
w
I --
U)
Q
z
z
O
-:i
Q
�
z
Z
v
O
o
�
�
Q
O
z
z
O
�
U
~CD
U)
(D
Z
Z
�
�
0
U
X
W cn
J
W
Y
z Q0
U
Z
O O
a
U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
E2

PROPOSED FORD
CROSSING
885
moll
875
8G5
REACH DWI -5
RE5TORATI ON
STA 3+20 TO 4+30
STA 4+70 TO STA 23+05
iI k
�
or,�
S3
J
1
/
PROPOSED FORD / TOO
CRO55ING
_ G+00 /
X � T� J
�—
00
r) 78 A
V Q/
16
n J
SO
i
4 50
4C \ i�
J/
p
4C \� -� 3+50, x` Q)
REACH DWI -A O !/
ENHANCEMENT II O 547 1 O
STA 0+58 TO STA 3+20 CC� \ / O+
\ \
z
APPROX. LIMITS
OF GRADING
REACH DW2-B
0+00 0+50 1 +00 1+5 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
�+tvv
/-ft0V
D five
Dfiov
885
Me]
875
G+00
G15V
REACH DWI -B STA 03+4G TO 5TA 23+08
m
13'
3' 3.5'
CL
TYPICAL 5HALLOW CROSS SECTION
N
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CRO55 SECTION
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
rpres'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
LLi
C)
o
N
ON
CL
o
z
O
z
O
z
O
o
LL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
o
0-1
LU
Q
z o
z
�Lu
OU)
(n
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
W
U)
Q
Z
Z
O
-:i
F-
O
Q
0�
C)
m
<
Q
O
D
LLI
Z
06
U)Q
Z
I--
0
O
0
z
w U
Li
Y
J
Z Q
0
U
Z
Lu
O O
a
U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S1
0
+
ENT o
EXI
TIN
G
DE
51
o
+ C C N5EF,VATION
o EASE
_
\
ALONG
CE
TER
5TREAM
INE
52
PROP05ED
OF BANK
I I
TOP
�
73
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
-
I
I
1
0+00 0+50 1 +00 1+5 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
�+tvv
/-ft0V
D five
Dfiov
885
Me]
875
G+00
G15V
REACH DWI -B STA 03+4G TO 5TA 23+08
m
13'
3' 3.5'
CL
TYPICAL 5HALLOW CROSS SECTION
N
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CRO55 SECTION
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
rpres'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
LLi
C)
o
N
ON
CL
o
z
O
z
O
z
O
o
LL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
o
0-1
LU
Q
z o
z
�Lu
OU)
(n
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
W
U)
Q
Z
Z
O
-:i
F-
O
Q
0�
C)
m
<
Q
O
D
LLI
Z
06
U)Q
Z
I--
0
O
0
z
w U
Li
Y
J
Z Q
0
U
Z
Lu
O O
a
U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S1

REACH DWI -B
RE5TORATI ON
STA 04+70 TO STA 23+08
93�
93�
93�
�k50
55
TB----
52 _ v 0 X O,� 1 +00
— T�
50
X00
L J �X �e ' � 58 ` o J
lo
TB
51 1 l
E
Lc
E \
----------
LCE
� X
— ----- -
00 ,� \ \ 13+00
APPROX. LIMITS
-I-
OF GRADING G� 5 \
� S12
875 875
870 F5-31 1 54 I 870
S5
EXISTING GRADE
ALONG STREAM 56
CENTERLINE 5 / 58 V
Q SQ
P OPO ED OP ✓ S I O
O BA K
8G5 8G5
PRO OS D
I_ C11A NEL BED
-1.73%
I
1
I
8GO \ 8GO
4
855 855
G+00 G+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
BEACH DW I -B STA 03 +4G TO STA 23 +08
MI
13'
3' 3.5'
TYPICAL 5HALLOW CR055 SECTION
�'
N
rL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
w
C)
N
O
N
CL
o
z
O
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
iz)
oc
o
0-1
LU
Q
z o
z
�Lu
OU)
(n
W
J
Y
rC
Q
>
W
-jW
W
w
U)
Q
z
z
O
F-
O
Q
�
O
U
Q
O
m
i
LLI
z
�>
O
U)
z
I--
::)
z_
O
z
w U
w
Y
J
Z Q
0
U
Z
O O
a
U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S2

5►0
S9
vct
i.•
855
850
845
REACH DWI -B STA 03 +46 TO STA 23 +06
i 51
i
ZZ / / / / /
ti \ APPROX. LIMITS / �j �
X i r
OF GRADING / � / / / \00
/X-'SII
\ \� �XS
o _-U/3 \
� 3�
c�
13'
3' 3.5'
CL
TYPICAL 5HALLOW CR055 SECTION
`7X
\ °O
4c
` 5�
5► 3 1 5+= 15+50
\G- A
vG-
VGA
REACH DWI -B
RE5TORATI ON
STA 04+70 TO STA 23+08
�>
O
SII
S12
EXISTING GRADE
ALONG STREAM
CENTERLINE
PR PO EDT P S 1 4 S 15
OF 5AW, S IGi
PROPOSED
CHANNEL BE
-/•73% \
v �
12+
I
I Gfi�V I �fiVV I �fi�V I �FfiVV I GFfi�V I DfiVV I Dfi7V
SCALE: HOR 1''=30'; VERT 1''=3'
I bfiVV
I bfiDV
8G5
i.•
855
0
18+00
rL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q�
C)
o
N
ON
CL
o
z
O
U
z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
iz)
oc
o
0-1
LU
Q
z o
z
�Lu
OU)
W
rC
J
Y(n
Q
>
W
_3W
W
w
(�
Q
z
z
O
-:i
F-
O
Q
O
U
Q
O
m
i
LL1
z
�>
O
U)
z
OU
O
0-
z
w U
w
Y
J
Z Q
0
U
Z
O O
a
U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S3

17+50
� 18
b51G
a
r=
z�rn
00
-f
0
/ no15+00
-
l
-CE
855
i� •
835
mro
LCE
LC E
REACH DWI -B
RE5TORATI ON
STA 04+70 TO STA 23+08
LC E
519
20f.Sn
REACH DWI -C
VV A y V A RESTORATION
STA 23+08 to 5TA 28+74
2��50 \ y y A
\ k0% /
220
92 \ —
1
\
i a --
+5 523
23+ 0 — TQ 524 ��vv
re
SO
`
—
�� 2
i
EX15TING BEDROCK
OUTCROP\\�
APPROX. LI M ITS
OF GRADING
Z
v
LCE LC E
LC E LCE
REACH DWI -B STA 03+4G TO STA 23+08
m
13,
3' 3.5'
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CR055 SECTION
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
855
845
835
IN
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
REACH DWI -C STA 23+08 TO STA 28+74
»
TYPICAL SHALLOW CRO55 SECTION
N
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
l�
EL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
ores
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
6j
Q�
o�
N
ON
CL
o
z
O
U
z
O
z
O
o
U-
0
cnw
o
QLU
Q
z o
z
�uj
OU)
W
J
Y(n
cC
Q
>
W
-iW
W
LU
(n
Q
Z
Z
O
=i
Q
�
Q
517
—\
�
U
518
Q
O
ww
z
06
m
cn
z
z
o
0
U
PROPOSED TOP
OF BAN
7TPROPOSED
CHANNEL BED
Z
w U)
w
Y
J
z Q
0
U
520
S21
O O
a
m U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
[5-19
DS
EXISTING GRADE
ALONG STREAM
CENTERLINE
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S4
�
522
523
-1.73%
IS
%
524
-
�
—
I
\
-x.27%
-
-A
+00 18+50 19 00
9+00 1 9+50 20+00
20+50
21+00
21+50
22+00
22+50
23+00
23+50
24+
SCALE: HOR I "=30'; VERT I "=3'
855
845
835
IN
CL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
REACH DWI -C STA 23+08 TO STA 28+74
»
TYPICAL SHALLOW CRO55 SECTION
N
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
l�
EL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CR055 SECTION
ores
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
6j
Q�
o�
N
ON
CL
o
z
O
U
z
O
z
O
o
U-
0
cnw
o
QLU
Q
z o
z
�uj
OU)
W
J
Y(n
cC
Q
>
W
-iW
W
LU
(n
Q
Z
Z
O
=i
Q
�
Q
�
U
U
Q
O
ww
z
06
m
cn
z
z
o
0
U
Z
w U)
w
Y
J
z Q
0
U
Z
O O
a
m U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S4

a�
45
N
V -
c0
N
3
7q
N
U
0
0
Q
U
cz
ns
0-
E E
0
UI
N
O
00
O
0
N
0)
U
I
E
2
LI
C
0
d
c�
Q
E
0
U
CD
0
v
0
co
co
m
c
co
cz
cz
U
r
0
z
U
0)
2
a -
U)
LU
m
ui
Q
z
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
Lii
p
o
N
O
N
CL
0
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
0
LL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
Z
0
Z
OU)
(n
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
w
U)
Q
Z
Z
O
-:i
F—
O
N
U
p
2
�
<
O
0
N
7
z
Ax
W
U
U)
vJ
z
�>
Z
�
0
U
Z
w U)
w
Y
J
Z Q
0
U
Z
Lu
O O
a
U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S5

a�
45
N
r
c6
N
3
7q
N
U
0
0
Q
U
cz
ns
0-
E E
O
UI
N
O
00
O
0
N
0)
U
I
E
O
LI
C
O
d
c�
O_
E
O
U
CD
0
v
0
co
co
m
c
co
cz
cz
U
r
0
z
U
0)
2
a -
U)
LU
m
ui
Q
z
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
Lii
p
o
N
O
N
CL
0
Z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
0
LL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
OQ
0-1
LU
LL
Z
0
Z
OU)
(n
w
J
Y
cr
Q
>
W
-JW
W
w
U)
Q
Z
Z
O
-:i
F—
O
N
U
W
2
�
C
�
QO
Q
N
z
Ax
W
I
Q
V)
z
z
O
0
U
Z
w U)
w
Y
J
Z Q0
U
Z
OO
a
a U
Ir
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S6

0
m
I
<9 W
�z \
J
L -
U- ------------ -
REACH DWI -D STA 26+74 TO STA 36+92
kT��—__ 00
36 00 \ 40+50
35+50. rB��_� �zF�— 0 —
A0 — �--�
541 �� 0 39+50 �T6
76 542 37+50 A- 0
o — \
38+00
TB
\ / I— Tem /
CE TF, J
825
820
nom
F: •
WON
LCE
LCE
REACH DWI -E
ENHANCEMENT III
STA 3G+92 to STA 4 1 +24
\- —— ra
LCE GE
L I
/
/
LCE
AGE
I
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
(525
820
ro
ON
805
PEO
T
C\
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
15'
U)
N
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
15'
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
1 0
res,
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
— FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
O
N
ON
CL
o
z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
O
LL
QLU
Q
z o
z
�Lu
OU)
(n
W
cC
J
Y
Q
>
W
-jW
W
W
U)
Q
Z
Z
O
�
O
Q
O
U
Q
W
O
i
z
�>
�
�
>
0
U)
F.—
z
I--
::)
z_
OU
O
z
w U
w
Y
J
Z Q0
U
Z
OO
a
a U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S7
z
w
w
541
542
Q
w
z
O �
� N
>+
Fn<
0 �?
EXI5TING GRADE
PR
OF
PO
BAN
ED JOP
v
ALONG STREAM
CENTERLINE
_2
FROP05ED
CHANNEL BE
+00 3C+50
37+00
37+50
38+00
38+50
39+00
39+50
40+00
40+50
41+00
.
41+50
..............................
42+
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
(525
820
ro
ON
805
PEO
T
C\
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
15'
U)
N
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
15'
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
1 0
res,
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
— FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
O
N
ON
CL
o
z
O
U
Z
O
z
O
o
IL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
i
O
LL
QLU
Q
z o
z
�Lu
OU)
(n
W
cC
J
Y
Q
>
W
-jW
W
W
U)
Q
Z
Z
O
�
O
Q
O
U
Q
W
O
i
z
�>
�
�
>
0
U)
F.—
z
I--
::)
z_
OU
O
z
w U
w
Y
J
Z Q0
U
Z
OO
a
a U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S7

0 00
C GRADE BANK AT 3:
O _ 5p / \
O MAT # LIVE STAKE (TYP.)
+0
+ _
\ - _
t � I
x00 — - LCE
Iv X LCE
�� /X�� 2+00 -
Q \ S
\ �G1 m
LCE —
LCE \ DW2-A
ENHANCEMENT I I
LCE �(�� STA 0+00 TO 9+68
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
W .res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: V=30
0 30 60
�2" = FULL SCALE
HALF SCALE P
v;
Qm
� N
O
a o
z
0
U
U)
z
O
z
O
O
LL
a
0
N
z
Dcc
0 }
(Y
N
0 z
❑ O
LD
Q
w W
E m
m a
LU
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
U)Q
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
O :]
O
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
W .res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: V=30
0 30 60
�2" = FULL SCALE
HALF SCALE P
v;
Qm
� N
O
a o
z
0
U
U)
z
O
z
O
O
LL
a
0
N
z
Dcc
0 }
(Y
N
0 z
❑ O
LD
Q
w W
E m
m a
LU
U)Q
z z
O :]
O
C¢7 Q
U
H
Q
Q
O
LU z
I
�
>
D
z
z
O
d
z
w to
J
I
zY
Q0
a }
z
O
it
U
cc
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S8

I
X �
/
/
/
/
1p/x
— 91 ��-
T6 _ TB \
r.
9 D I
REACH DW3
-Ay
131
\ — T5 ., \ k�j0 � �L — , \
00
TB_ _\
\TB—
v
VGt
REACH DW2-A
ENHANCEMENT II
STA 0+00 TO STA 9+G8
LCE
APPROX. LI M ITS
OF GRADING
CE
937
S44
REACH DWI -A
/ C'�
REACH DW2-13 /
RESTORATION r /
STA 9+G8 TO STA 12+45 l I\
1 -A,
cn
/ I
I @y
I /
�1
XO
�I 0+50 O 1
V/� /2f� SI
\ So _ _ o 4
� 4S
4c
890
885 \ — —
-\
EXI TIN TO
\ \ — OF BANK
\ \I PR6POE EDT P
\ OF BAN
880 \
\ PROPOS ED
7z
CH NNE BE
J
2.60%_
875
E I5TIl G GPAD`
ALONG STREAM
CENTERLINE
870
L
G+00 G+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 II+00 11+50 12+00 12+'
SCALE: HOR 1''=30'; VERT 1''=3'
885
875
REACH DW2-13 STA 09+68 TO 5TA 12+45
re
CL
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
Ln
N
CL
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
No]
rL
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
res,
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
W
Q
�
O
N
ON
CL
o
z
O
0-1
z
0
z
O
O
LL
cr
O
z
Lu
o
Lu
Q
z o
z
�Lij
OU)
(n
W
J
W
Y
rC
Q
>
W
W
(n
Q
Z
Z
O
F-
O
Q
0�
U
pp
Q
O
ID
�
Z
�
U)Q
Z
N
Z
0
0
�
U
Z
w U
w
Y
J
z Q0
U
Z
OO
a
a U
Ir
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S9

/
/
/
/
/
�-0
��O
REACH DW3
ENHANCEMENT 1 1
STA 0+00 TO STA 0+93
REACH DW2-A
REACH DW2-13 /
543 -�
544
/ - A
895 895
EXI TIN TO
890 890
FEXISTING GRADE
ALONG STREAM
�^ CENTERLINE
885 \ 885
880 880
875 875
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'
x
545
T8
0
resi
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1"=30
0
30
60
2"
= FULL SCALE
1"
= HALF SCALE
Lii
p
o
N
O
N
CL
o
Z
O
1-
Z
0
z
O
O
LL
cr
O
�
Z
LU
o
0-1
LU
Q
z o
z
�Lu
OU)
W
rC
J
Y(n
Q
>
W
_3W
W
W
(n
Q
z
z
O
-:i
F-
O
Q
0�
O
U
Q
O
M
w�
z
�
�
O
U)
z
I--
D
z
Ov
O
w U)z_
w
Y
J
z Q
0
H
U
Z
O O
a
U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
S10

PLANTING LEGEND
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION LCE
EASEMENT
EXISTING TREE LINE
PLANTING TABLE
Permanent Riparian Seed Mix
Common Name
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
Virginia Wildrye
Elymue virgimcus
25%
Indian Grass
Sorghastrum nutans
25%
Little Blue Stem
Schizachyrium scoparium
10%
Soft Rush
Juncus effusus
10%
Blackeyed Susan
Rudbeckia hirta
10%
Deertongue
Dichanthehum clandestmum
10%
Common Milkweed
Asclepias syriaca
5%
Showy Goldenrod
Solidago erecta
5%
Live Staking and Live Cuttings Bundle Tree 5peae5
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
40%
Black willow
Salix nigra
GO%
Bare Root Planting Tree 5pecie5
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
15%
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
15%
River Birch
Betula nigra
15%
American Sycamore
Platanas occidentahs
15%
Northern Red Oak
Quercus rubra
10%
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10%
Yellow Poplar
briodendron tuhpifera
10%
Persimmon
Diospyros virgimana
5%
Black Gum
NY -9,5a sylvatica
5%
PLANTING NOTES
ALL PLANTING AREAS
1 . EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED UNTIL PERM
IS ESTABLISHED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT EROSION CONTROL MEA
OF EACH WORKING DAY TO ENSURE MEASURES ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY
2. DISTURBED AREAS NOT AT FINAL GRADE SHALL BE TEMPORARILY VEGETATED
WORKING DAYS. UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING, PERMANENT VEGETA
ESTABLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS. SEEDIN
ACCORDANCE WITH EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED PRIOR TO PLANTING BY DISC OR
CHISEL PLOW TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. MULTIPLE PASSES SHALL I
PLANTING AREAS WITH THE IMPLEMENT AND THE FINAL PASS SHALL FOLLOW 7
CONTOURS.
4. BARE ROOT PLANTINGS SHALL BE PLANTED ACCORDING TO DETAIL SHOWN 01
STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED ACCORDING TO DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET D2.
5. TREATMENT/REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES, PINES AND SWEET GUMS LESS
BE PERFORMED THROUGHOUT THE PLANTED AREA.
G. SPECIES SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED SUCH THAT 3 TO G PLANTS OF THE SAME SPECIES ARE
GROUPED TOGETHER.
7. BARE ROOT PLANTING DENSITY IS APPROXIMATELY 800 STEMS PER ACRE.
8. LIVE STAKES ARE PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS AND ALONG BOTH
BANKS OF STRAIGHT REACHES ADJACENT TO POOLS.
3. TEMPORARY SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 LBS/ACRE TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS
WITH SLOPES EQUAL TO OR STEEPER THAN 3: 1.
10. PERMANENT RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AT A RATE OF 15 LBS/ACRE.
1 1. PERMANENT HERB SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT BREAKS AT A RATE OF 15 LBS/ACRE.
l
1pres'
302 Jefferson Street, Suite
110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=150
0
150
300
2"
= FULL SCALE
1 "
= HALF SCALE
I`
w
Q�
p
o
N
O
N
J
11
U-)
O
z
_O
U
H
z
O
z
O
o
LL
a
Ir
O
z
U
LU
o
W
ILL
Q
Q
z
o
z
O
(n
0
U)
W
J
Y
o�
Q
>
W
—JW
W
cr
rr
D_
LLI
z
z
O
=i
�
Q
U
Z
�
�
J
Q
O
w
z
z
z
Q
z
D
O
�
U
z
W U)
W
Y
J
H
z Q
0
WC�
z
G
O O
a
� U
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
p 1

WHEN AND WHERE TO USE IT
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
SILT FENCE 15 APPLICABLE IN AREAS: 1,25 LB./LINEAR 7. STEEL P05T5
SEAL
FLOW
WHERE THE MAXIMUM SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOW PATH LENGTH TO THE FENCE 15 100-FEET.I
WHERE THE MAXIMUM 5LOPE 5TEEPNE55 (NORMAL [PERPENDICULAR] TO FENCE LINE) 15 2H: I V. EXTRA STRENGTH
THAT DO NOT RECEIVE CONCENTRATED FLOW5 GREATER THAN 0.5 CFS.
W
0 m
g MIDDLE LAYER
1+ BOTTOM LAYER
TOP LAYER
FILTER FABRIC
6•',y
d N
DO NOT PLACE SILT FENCE ACROSS CHANNELS OR USE IT AS A VELOCITY CONTROL BMP.
Nry�
z
EARTH SURFACE
Sr4NOq
A A
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
\
I . USE A SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF POLYOLEFINS OR POLYESTER, WHICH IS
C
�B
CERTIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER AS CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM D 6461.
HEAVY DUN PLASTIC TIE
TRENCH 0.25' DEEP
ONLY WHEN PLACED ON
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC SHOULD CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND 5TABILIZER5 TO PROVIDE A
1�7, FOR STEEL P05T5
`\
PLAN VIEW ENDS OF BAGS IN
EARTH SURFACE
MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS OF EXPECTED USABLE CONSTRUCTION LIFE AT A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF D° TO 20" BACKFILL TRENCH WITH
F.
ADJACENT ROWS BUTTED
COMPACTED EARTH
2. ENSURE THAT P05T5 FOR SEDIMENT FENCES ARE 1 L&LINEAR FT STEEL WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 5 FEET.
\\
SLIGHTLY TOGETHER
a
.33
MAKE SURE THAT STEEL P05T5 HAVE PROJECTIONS TO FACILITATE FASTENING THE FABRIC.
SEE NOTE LOWEST POINT
SECTION E-15CONSTRUCTION
N
GROUND LEVEL
RUNOTX
I . CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENT BARRIER OF EXTRA STRENGTH SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS.
2. ENSURE THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SEDIMENT FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED 24 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND
BURY FABRIC
D O
SURFACE. (HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF WATER SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE USE EITHER FLAT -BOTTOM
STRUCTURE.) OR V -BOTTOM TRENCH
EARTH SURFACE
3. CONSTRUCT THE FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID SHOWN BELOW
JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER CLOTH ONLY AT A SUPPORT P05T WITH 4
SECTION A -A
FEET MINIMUM OVERLAP TO THE NEXT POST.
4. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FEET P05T SPACING DOES NOT REQUIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE.
SILT FENCE INSTALLATION
NOTE: END OF DIKE AT GROUND LEVEL TO BE
SECURELY FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC DIRECTLY TO P0515. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE MINIMUM
50 POUND TENSILE STRENGTH.
HIGHER THAN THE LOWEST POINT OF FLOW CHECK.
1P
SUFFICIENT SANDBAGSSANDBAG BARRIERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF THREE
ARE TO BE PLACED TO
LAYERS OF SANDBAGS.
5. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE OF
THE BOTTOM LAYER SHALL CONSIST
PREVENT SCOURING. EE 3 ROWS OF
ER
BAGS, THE MIDDLE LAYER
PO5T5 AND UP5LOPE FROM THE BARRIER. FILTER FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
SHALL CONSIST 2 ROWS OF BAGS AND THE TOP LAYER SHALL CONSIST Of I
ROW OF BAGS. THE RECOMMENDEDDIMENSION OF A FILLED SANDBAG SHALL BE
6. PLACE 12 INCHES OF THE FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND 51DE OF THE TRENCH,
7. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT. THOROUGH COMPACTION COMPACTED -
COMPACTED
APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT X 0.5 FT X I .5 FT.
OF THE BACKFILL 15 CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE. EARTH O
EARTH NO
LU
8. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES.
RUNOFF ro
MAINTENANCE:
RUNOFF '4
SANDBAG IMPERVIOUS DIKE
I
NTS
INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. MAKE ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS -III -I
-III -III
U
IMMEDIATELY.
N N
co Y
SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT PENCE COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT I
(-
W IZ Q
z
PROMPTLY.
Q
a 0
o
FILTER
REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO FABRIC 4'
FILTER FABRIC
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE PENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING THE PENCE DURING CLEANOUT.
DS
DRAWN:
JK
REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE FLAT -BOTTOM TRENCH DETAIL
V -SHAPED TRENCH DETAIL
SHEET NUMBER:
NOTES:
I . EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED ONLY IN DRY AND/OR ISOLATED SECTIONS OF
IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
CHANNEL,
2, IMPERVIOUS DIKE5 SHOULD BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK AREAS FROM STREAM
FLOW.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB MORE AREA THAN CAN BE STABILIZED IN
ONE WORKING DAY. A MAXIMUM OF 200 FEET MAY BE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
STONE SZEGR2G3TE -
OERESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PUMP SIZE
CONTRACTOR
4. THE TOPUMP BA5EFLOW,
NT5
y4X�G�0PM
5. DIKE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED OF NON -ERODIBLE MATERIALS SUCH AS SANDBAGS.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:
-
-- --
`
I . INSTALL STILLING BASIN AND STABILIZED OUTFALL U51NG CLA55 A RIP RAP AT THE
DOWNSTREAM END OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT WORKING AREA.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE PUMP AROUND PUMP AND THE TEMPORARY
PIPING THAT WILL CONVEY THE BASE FLOW FROM UPSTREAM OF THE WORK AREA
WOODEN STAKE MINIMUM 9" EROSION
CONTROL STRAW WATTLE NOTE:
ON CONTROL WATTLES OR COIR LOGS/WATTLE5 MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF
EXISTINGGRADEE OR COIR WATTLE/LOG =ION SILT FENCE.
- '� J�pU
I
+\
�![,
TO THE STABILIZED OUTFALL.
3. INSTALL UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR
STREAM DIVERSION.
4. INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM MPERVIOUS DIKE AND DEWATERING PUMPING
I
S0, `�
MN %
APPARATUS IF NEEDED TO DEWATER THE ENTRAPPED AREA. THE PUMP AND H05F
FOR THI5 PURPOSE SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA.
SLOPE
\j� y�
A
��• �4_�
THI5 WATER WILL AL50 BE PUMPED TO AN OUTFALL STABILIZED WITH CLA55 A RIP
l"7\�� fir/
EROSION CONTROL WATTLE
'�%
. i; JP�S�Q�
RAP.
5. RE
TORSHALLEXCAVATE ANYCUMULATEDDEWATERING
//�j
�% -
REMOTHIEC AITOf AREA, LDIRDEWAT WATER
REMOVAL OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE. WHEN DEWATERING AREA, ALL DIRK WATER
MUST PUMPED THROUGH A SILT BAG. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS,
NT5
AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSFIPIPING STARTING WITH THE DOWNSTREAM DIKE
INSTALL WATTLE IN 3' TO
FIRST.
5' TRENCH
6. ONCE THE WORKING AREA IS COMPLETED, REMOVE ALL RIP RAP AND IMPERVIOUS
PURPOSE:
DIKE5 AND STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH SEED AND MULCH,
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHOULD BE USED AT ALL POINTS WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE LEAVING A
7. ALL WORK IN CHANNEL MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE REMOVING IMPERVIOUS DIKE.
CONSTRUCTION SITE AND MOVING DIRECTLY ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD.
KEY -IN MATTING PER
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
INSTALLATION NOTES:
2.0'
FIG. oK FIG. z
1 . CLEAR THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT AREA OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL AND
517E PREPARATION M
I I
PROPERLY GRADE IT.
2, PLACE THE GRAVEL TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL, AND SMOOTH IT.
INTAKE H05E
GRADE AND COMPACT AREA. ---
--
3. PROVIDE DRAINAGE TO CARRY WATER TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR OTHER SUITABLE OUTLET.
4. USE GEOTEXTI LE FABRICS BECAUSE THEY IMPROVE STABILITY OF THE FOUNDATION IN LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO
CLA55 A
STONE
2. REMOVE ALL ROCKS, CLODS, VEGETATION, AND OBSTRUCTIONS 50 THAT MATTING WILL I
-1
SEEPAGE OR HIGH WATER TABLE.
HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE SOIL.
3. PREPARE SEEDBED BY LOOSENING 3 TO 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL ABOVE FINAL GRADE,
STAKE MATTING JUST
PUMP AROUND
PUMP
4. TEST SOILS FOR ANY NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES AND SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO THE
ENGINEER. APPLY ANY TREATMENT SUCH AS LIME OR FERTILIZERS TO THE 501L IF NEEDED.
ABOVE CHANNEL TOE
AND BACKFILL W/
MAINTENANCE:
SEEING
RIFFLE MATERIAL
MAINTAIN THE GRAVEL PAD INA CONDITION TO PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE,
THI5 MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH 2 -INCH STONE, AFTER EACH RAINFALL, INSPECT ANY STRUCTURE
WORK
DE -WATERING AREA
PUMP
1. SEE PLANTING SHEETS FOR SEEDING REQUIREMENTS. --------
6" RIFFLE
USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND CLEAN IT OUT AS NECESSARY. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS
2. APPLY SEED TO SOIL BEFORE PLACING MATTING. MATERIAL
-------
SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS, OR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS.
INSTALLATION - STREAM BANK
DIK
1. 5EE GRADING NOTES ON PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS AND DETAIL SHEETS FOR
INFORMATION REGARDING WHAT AREAS ARE RECEIVE COIR MATTING.
TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
2. OVERLAP PARALLEL
ACROSS THE OVERLAP. THE UPSTREAM MAT SHOULD BE PLACED OVER THE DOWNSTREAM 8" WIDE X 8" DEEP
YFROIOM THEFLOW OF yy O RAND ANCHOR EVERY 12" FROM TRENCH TR INCH APPROX.
3. EDGES SHOULD BETSH (IN
MAT. SOIL PILE
TRENCH AP
DE PRO%. SOIL PILE
8"',VI 'DEEP FROM TRENCH
FLOW
NT5
4. LAY AT LOOSE TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH SOIL. DO NOT STRETCH TIGHT.
�� I8"
FLOW
D15CHAKGE H05E
5. ANCHOR MAT USING BIODEGRADABLE STAKES O
_ _
n
CLA NE A
STONE
6. GUT 8'. 8' TRENCH ALONG TOP OF BANK FOR MAT TERMINATION AS SHOWN IN FIGURES FLOW
< 2. EXTEND MAT 2 TO 3 FEET PAST TOP OF BANK. i� �-
7. PLACE ADJACENT ROLLS IN THE ANCHOR TRENCH WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OVERLAP. �,-^
SECURE WITH BIODEGRADABLE STAKES OR PINE5, BACKFILL ANCHOR TRENCH, AND a\ -
i,/ /.
-� //A//i
`- \
T
^"✓ K//.\//.�
GENERAL NOTES: B �/ # 5 WASHED STONE
CONSTRUCT DAM ACCORDING TO NCDENR EROSION CONTROL
MANUAL.
N H
OTE: HOSES SHOULD BE
KEPT OUTSIDE OF WORK
_ _ / //
COMPACT SOIL. -" _ \/\
�•1 {
2, ROCK DAM MPRAP SHALL BE 50/50 MIX OF CLA55 I AND II. 1
3. PLACE ROCK DAM AS SHOWN ON PLANS. EXTEND CLA55 B RIP
SILT BAC: AREA
8. STAPLE AT 12" INTERVALS ALONG OVERLAP. \�j\r
9. STREAM BANK MATTING TO BE INSTALLED FROM TOE OF BANK TO A MINIMUM OF 2.0' ��y/� /\/
L '�
v 1 ROW OF
RAP ROCK APRON 5 FEET DOWNSTREAM FROM TOE OF ROCK
DAM. A
LOCATION
PAST TOP OF BANK. SEE FIGURE 3 FOR TERMINATION AT TOP OF BANK.
BIODEGRADABLE
10. IF MORE THAN ROLL 15 REQUIRED TO COVER THE CHANNEL FROM THE TOP OF BANK DOWN / I ROW OF
STAPLES OR STAKES,
TO THE TOE, THEN OVERLAP MATTING BY A MINIMUM OF 1'. ?\ BIODEGRADABLE
MIN. OF 24"0,C
STABILIZED OUTFALL
• STAPIiS OR STAKES,
MIN. LE OR24" STAO.0
STEP
STEP
.5' THICK CLAON
BROCK APRON
B
CLA55 A STONE FILTER FABRIC
ROW OF
BIODEGRADABLE
FLOW STAPLES OR STAKE S,
MIN. OP 24' O.0
1 ROW OF
BIODEGRADABLE
STAPLES OR STAKES,
MIN. OP 24" CO
FLOW
5r�IN PLAN
SPILLWAY CREST I- -I
IW (SPILLWAY )
' MIN OF # 5
M N. A STREAM WID 11
CLA55 AND II'RIPP WASHED STONE
DISCHARGE
EXISTING H05E
GROUND
STABILIZED
OUTFALL CLA55 A 1 5' TO 20'
-"" •\
STONE
ct¢
2MIN, BELOW
I.5'T1IGK CLA55 - aFLOW LOWEST BANK
B ROCK APRON LEVEL
SOIL FILLED7
FROM SOIL PILE,\\�
/\\ \
N
EROSION CONTROL MATTING MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE COMPACT WITH FOOT
/\ SOIL FILLED
/ \//��
F LL WING RE UIREMENT STEP 2
COMPACT WITH FOOT
f ` CLA55 I AND II
FILTER FABRIC
• %COCONUT FIBER (COIR) TWIN WOVEN INTO A
CUTOFF TRENCH
FILTER RIP RAP FILTER FABRIC
8" OF CLA55 A
STONE
H STRENGTH MATRIX.
HIGH
• THICKNESS-0.35IN. MINIMUM.
STEP 2
FABRIC SECTION A -A
SECTION B -B
EXISTING
• 5HEAR5TKE55-51B5X3QFT FIGURE I
• FLOW VELOCITY- OBSERVED I G FT/SEC
FIGURE 2
CHANNEL SILT BAG PROFILE
• WEIGHT -29 OZ/5Y
• OPEN AREA - 38%
SOPES - DP TQAMAXIMUM QF 1:1 COIR MATTING
TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM
PUMP AROUND * DEWATERING DETAIL
NT5
NT5
NT5
res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax [phone]
WWW.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
0 m
H N
N
d N
z
O
U
U)
z
0
cr
z
O
O
LL
a
H
N
?
0 }
� Q
o z
D O
Q
W
EL
Lid
U
z
z -
O J
O
F-
Q 0,
V Q
U
O
LU
Z
Z
O O
U
a U) z
I
co Y
(D Q
0
W IZ Q
z
Q
Q
a 0
o
PROJECT NUMBER:0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
D1

FLOW
TOE OF BANK, TYPICAL— STREAM BANKS,
\\`l TYPICAL
I
BANKPULL
I
BANKFULL VANE ARM LOG
STREAM BANK COARSE AGGREGATE
CUT LOGS TO MAKE FLU5H BACKFILL (I .5" TO 5') POINT REFERENCED
I* REBAR AND/OR \\\ \\\/ IN PROFILE
CONNECTION. REBAR END OF POINT REFERENCED CABLING, TYP.
LOG5 TOGETHER. OVERLAP IN PROFILE COARSE AGGREGATE SEE NOTE
WITH FILTER FABRIC BACKFILL (2' TO 6") 3% TO 8% \/ 0.8' MA%. -
REBAR AND/OR �—
CABLING, NOTE
4 _
EE N _
CROSS LOG
VANE ARM FILTER FABRIC
/ \ VANE ARM FOOTER LOG INVERT LOG
H FADER LOG
/ \ KEY STRUCTURE INTO BANK. CRO55 LOG 5ECTION B -B'
ELEVATION VARIES BASED
NAIL ALL UPSPROFILE VIEW
\ ON ARM SLOPE
TREAM ZU,3� / \
FACES OF LOGS \
WITH FILTER FABRIC
\+ VANE ARM HEADER LOG
NOTES:
COARSE AGGREGATE / I 1 / \ VANE ARM FOOTER LOG LOG5 SHALL BE OF A MINIMUM OF 15' IN LENGTH AND 12" IN DIAMETER AND RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD, RECENTLY HARVESTED.
BACKFILL (2" TO G')� 2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE GAP5 BETWEEN THE LOG(5) AND THE STREAM BED, UNDER THE COARSE BACKFILL MATERIAL.
\\ OPTIONAL BALLAST BOULDER THERE SHALL BE NO FILTER FABRIC VISIBLE IN THE FINISHED WORK; EDGE5 SHALL BE FOLDED, TUCKED, OR TRIMMED AS NEEDED,
3. COARSE BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED TO A THICKNESS EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE LOG5 AND SHALL EXTEND OUT PROM THE VANE
FILTER FABRIC / \ ARMS TO THE STREAM BANK AND UPSTREAM.
4. AS AN OPT ON, FLAT -SIDED BOULDERS MAY BE PLACED AS BALLAST ON TOP OF THE STREAM BANK 51DE OF THE EMBEDDED VANE ARMS.
REBAR OK DUCK BILL ANCHORS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF BALLAST BOULDERS.
/ STREAM BED—.I \ 5. REBAR OK DUCKBILL ANCHORS WITH GALVANIZED CABLE ATTACHED MAY BE USED TO SECURE LOG5 INTO THE STREAM BED AND/OR
/ I \ BANK5. FLAT SIDED BOULDERS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF THE LOG INVERT/DUCKBILL ANCHOR SYSTEM.
I �MIN�
PLAN VIEW LOG CROSS VANE
NTS
BANKFULL STREAM BANK
COARSE AGGREGATE BANKFULL ELEVATION
\ \ BACKFILL (2' TO G")
VANE ARM \ \ / 1/4 TO I/3 Of LOG
HEADER LOG / / DIAMETER CAN BE EXPOSED
PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING
VANE ARM
FOOTER LOG \ —PROPOSED BED
BED IN POOL
FILTER
SECTION A -A'
NEW CHANNEL TO BE
CONSTRUCTED
FLOW
OLD CHANNEL TDO BE CHANNEL PLUG
DIVERTED OR
ABANDONED
PLAN VIEW
UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL
I.5' MINIMUM
COMPACTED BACKFILL
(12" LIFT5)
IMPERVIOUS SELECT MATERIAL—
(PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER) TYPICAL SECTION
CHANNEL PLUG
NT5
/ , `MINIMUM OF 1/2 TO 2/3 OF LOG
WOOD— ,y `CANNEL INVERT BELOW
STAKES
CHANNEL INVERT
12" LOG DIAMETER DYE.)
NOTES-
I . INSTALL STAKES ON 3' CENTERS ON EACH 51DE OF ROLL. TOP OF STAKE SHOULD
NOT EXTEND ABOVE ROLL.
2. EXCAVATE A SMALL TRENCH (DEPTH APPROX 1/2 TO 2/3 OF LOG DIAM) FOR
PLACEMENT OF ROLL.
3. COIR LOGS SHALL BE 10 FT LONG AND HAVE A DIAMETER OF 12 IN.
COIR LOG (TOE PROTECTION)
NT5
FLOW
EXCAVATED POOL. SEE
TYPICAL CPO55 SECTIONS
FOR DEPTH
45 DEGREE
TAPERED BUTT END
NOTE:
I . ACCEPTABLE SPECIES INCLUDE BLACK WILLOW (SAUX NIGRA), SILKY WILLOW
(SALIX 5ERICEA) AND SILKY DOGWOOD (CORNUS AMMOMUM).
2, LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED IN AN AREA EXTENDING 3 FEET OUT FROM TOP
OF BANK TO JUST BELOW BANKFULL.
3, LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED 3 FEET APART. ALTERNATE SPACING.
LIVE STAKE
NT5
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
U51NG THE KBC PLANTING BAR
I. INSERT 2. REMOV- 3. INSERT
PLANTING BAR AS PLANTING BAR PLANTING BAR 2
SHOWN AND PULL AND PLACE INCHES TOWARD
HANDLE TOWARD SEEDING AT PLANTER FROM
PLANTER. CORRECT DEPTH, SEEDING.
FIBER
ING
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
COIRFIBER
0.75' TO 2"
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
MATTING
FLAT TOP END
-
W
Qm
� o
O
HOLE PEN.
PLA5011L SOIL
LATERAL BUD
DETAIL
UVE STAKES SHOULD BE LONG ENOUGH
d N
TO REACH BELOW THE GROUNDWATER
z
TABLE. (GENERALLY, A LENGTH OF 2 TO 3
O
MAX. 75'
FEET 15 SUFFICIENT.) ADDITIONALLY, THE
U
5TAKE5 SHOULD HAVE A DIAMETER IN
SIDE BRANCH
EXISTING CHANNEL
TOP OF BANK
THE RANGE OF 0.75 TO 2 INCHES.
REMOVED AT
SLIGHT ANGLE
PLANTING NOTE5: NOTES:
WATER TABLE
45 DEGREE
TAPERED BUTT END
NOTE:
I . ACCEPTABLE SPECIES INCLUDE BLACK WILLOW (SAUX NIGRA), SILKY WILLOW
(SALIX 5ERICEA) AND SILKY DOGWOOD (CORNUS AMMOMUM).
2, LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED IN AN AREA EXTENDING 3 FEET OUT FROM TOP
OF BANK TO JUST BELOW BANKFULL.
3, LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED 3 FEET APART. ALTERNATE SPACING.
LIVE STAKE
NT5
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
U51NG THE KBC PLANTING BAR
I. INSERT 2. REMOV- 3. INSERT
PLANTING BAR AS PLANTING BAR PLANTING BAR 2
SHOWN AND PULL AND PLACE INCHES TOWARD
HANDLE TOWARD SEEDING AT PLANTER FROM
PLANTER. CORRECT DEPTH, SEEDING.
FIBER
ING
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
4. PULL HANDLE OF 5. PUSH G. LEAVE
BAR TOWARD HANDLE COMPACTION
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
Qm
� o
MIN. 25'
HOLE PEN.
PLA5011L SOIL
H N
N
d N
ARB0 OM. FIRMING WATER
AT TOP.
z
O
MAX. 75'
THOROUGHLY.
U
EXISTING CHANNEL
TOP OF BANK
U)
z
PLANTING NOTE5: NOTES:
O
BOTTOM _
BARE ROOTS SHALL BE PLANTED G
z
O
()
LL
EL
EXISTING CHANNEL /
PLANTING BAG FT. TO 10 FT. ON CENTER,
H
_
O
L T
/
DURING PLANTING, SEEDLINGS SHALL
BE KEPT IN A MOIST CANVAS BAG OR
RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 8
0
0 }
O 2
z
O z
51MILARCONTAINER TOPREVENTTHE
ROOT SYSTEMS FROM DRYING.
G5 ON CENTER, APPROXIMATELY
6B0 PLANTS PER ACRE.
Q w
W
w tY
m
m EL
Lid
COMPACTED BACKFILL
KEG PLANTING BAR
BANKFULL ELEVATION
O J
O
(I 2" TO B' LIFTS)
MLATRIASMALL HAVE A DE
NGULAR GROSS SECT O
V Q
U
�
AND SHALL BE 12 INCHES LONG, 4
_
J
L
INCHES WIDE AND I INCH THICK AT
NEW CHANNEL BANK SHALL
r
F- >
LL
U)
CENTER.
BE TREATED AS SPECIFIED
Z O
O
ROOT PRUNING
IN PLANS
a z
w
Q Y
NOT 5:
ALL 5 FDUNG5 SHALL BE ROOT
W Q
z
cIcZ
G
Q
m 0
1, FILL EXISTING CHANNEL TO TOP OF BANK ELEVATION WHEN POSSIBLE,
PRUNED, IF NECESSARY, 50 THAT NO
PROJECT MANAGER:
BE
DESIGNED:
DS
2. CHANNEL MUST BE FILLED IN 2' TO 18' LIFTS,
ROOT5 EXTEND MORE THAN INCHES BELOW THE ROOT CO10
LLAR.
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
D2
3. IF CHANNEL CANNOT BE COMPLETELY FILLED TO TOP OF BANK, FILL TO TOP OF
S tf"
BANK FOR 25' OUT OF EVERY 100' SEGMENT.
PROPOSED
a
? c�
ANNEL INVERT
LOG TOE OR COIR LOG
CHANNEL BACKFILL
BARE ROOT PLANTING
NTS
NT5
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
Qm
� o
H N
N
d N
z
O
U
U)
z
O
z
O
()
LL
a
H
a
O
0
0 }
O 2
z
O z
Q w
W
w tY
m
m EL
Lid
`n
z z
O J
O
F
QLY
V Q
U
�
� �
J
Oz
W
Q
F- >
LL
U)
Q
Z
Z O
O
U
a z
w
Q Y
0
W Q
z
cIcZ
G
Q
m 0
o
PROJECT NUMBER:0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BE
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
D2

0
LU
Q
U)
3
0
O
O
Q
U
U)
U)
c»
a
0
U
N
0
CO
0
co
0
N
U
i
0
ILLI
0
0-
U)
U)
c»
a
E
0
U
0
0
0
0
c
cz
m
c
0
cz
cz
S
0
cz
0
z
U)
0
.2
0
0-
U)
LU
Ir
w
Q
z
pres'
3' MAXIMUM STREAM CHANNEL
BANK HEIGHT
Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SURFACE FLOW
DIVERSION
I G' MAX.
LINE POST WOVEN WIRE BARBED OR LINE POST
ELECTRIC WIRE
J✓� - -
IIII � IV�II � — — J–� --
Q
C)
�
—� INSTALL COIR MATTING PER DETAIL
'�
O
SEE DWG D I
I
EXCAVATE / GRADE UPPER BANK
STONE APPROACH
/ SECTION: 2:1 MIN., 5:1
I III
LINE PANEL
z
MAX. SLOPE ON ROAD
INSTALL LIVE STAKES
(SEE PLANTING PLAN)
CLASS A STONE OVER
FILTER FABRIC
EXI5TI NG CHANNEL
BANK
SURFACE FLOW
DIVERSION
BARBED OR LINE P05T
ELECTRIC WIRE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE \\ \\\\%/ //\%j\%j\ j\ 1 •0'±
MIN SLOPE 2.5H: I V\\//\ \\\/ \\\\\\ (DE5IGNERTO MARK IN FIELD
EXISTING STREAMBANK
3" MIN.
4" TO G" WOVEN WIRE:
/ PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION)
�„ „
W
Nil A5TM CLA55 3 GALVANIZED.
TOP AND BOTTOM WIRES MIN. 12 GAUGE.
Z
WOVEN WIRE O INTERMEDIATE AND STAY WIRE5 MIN.
12 I/2 GAUGE.
O
GROUND 1_1 NE Nil
z
O
O
CLA55 A STONE
LL
—I
FILTER FABRIC
N
ICE
EXISTING
O
NOTES: I O' TO 15'
BENCH
CHANNEL BED
NOTES:
1 . CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS LOW.
Z
WOVEN WIRE WITH ONE BARB DETAIL
I . TREE5 NOT INDICATED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE
2. HAVE ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ON-51TE BEFORE WORK BEGINS.
PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION IN
3. MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS. DO NOT EXCAVATE
ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS.
CHANNEL BOTTOM. COMPLETE ONE SIDE BEFORE STARTING ON THE OTHER SIDE.
2. SEED AND MULCH ALL BANKS PRIOR TO INSTALLING
4. INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW.
NOTES:
COIR MATTING.
5. GRADE SLOPES TO A MINIMUM OF 2:1 SLOPE, MAXIMUM
G. MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE CONSTRUCTION ROAD DOES NOT
I . LINE POSTS (WOODEN): MIN. 4 IN. DIAM. OR 4 IN. SQUARE.
ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
Z0
2. LINE POSTS (STEEL): STUDDED OR PUNCHED T, U, OR Y SHAPED, WITH ANCHOR PLATES.
7. A STABILIZED PAD OF NATURAL CLA55 A STONE, G TO 9 INCHES THICK, LINED WITH
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
3. MIN. WEIGHT 1.3 LBS./FT. (EXCLUDING ANCHOR PLATE). POSTS SHALL BE DRIVEN A MINIMUM
Y
FILTER FABRIC 5HALL BE USED OVER THE BERM AND ACCE55 SLOPES.
Q
OF 18" DEEP AND MUST BE AT LEAST 5.5 FT IN LENGTH
W
8. FILTER FABRIC USED SHALL BE NCDOT TYPE 2 ENGINEERING FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT.
4. SPECIES AND TREATMENT FOR ALL WOOD: USE UNTREATED DURABLE POSTS OF SPECIES
cr
D_
9. WIDTH OF THE CROSSING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT (8' MIN.) TO ACCOMMODATE THE
SUCH A5 RED CEDAR, BLACK LOCUST OR 05AGE-ORANGE WITH BARK REMOVED, OR
LARGEST VEHICLE CROSSING THE CHANNEL.
NON -DURABLE WOOD THAT 15 PRESERVATIVE PRESSURE TREATED (0.40 LBS./CUBIC FOOT
10. CONTRACTOR 5HALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP ANGLE ACCORDING TO
ZJ
CCA, OR EQUIVALENT NON -CCA TREATMENT). DO NOT USE RED PINE.
Z
EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
�_
1 1. TEMPORARY CROSSINGS ARE TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE.
O
Q
WOVEN WIRE FENCE (NKCS DETAIL 382A)
TYPICAL BANK GRADING
U
Q
NTS
NTS
U
FORD CROSSING
C�
G
NTS
TOE OF BANK
NOTES:
I . LOG VANES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ONE OR MORE LOG5 HELD IN PLACE BY EITHER BALLAST BOULDERS, DUCKBILL
Z
Q
ANCHORS, OR REBAR. LOGS SHALL BE OF A LENGTH AND DIAMETER SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER AND BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT
HARDWOOD, RECENTLY HARVESTED. THE LENGTH SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE LOG 15 BURIED INTO THE 501L OF THE STREAM
coZ
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILEO�
BANK (ON ONE END) AND STREAM BED (ON THE OTHER END) A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 4.0'. FLAT -SIDED BALLAST BOULDERS
STREAM BANK
FABRIC (NCDOT TYPE II)
SHALL BE OF 51ZE 2'X 2'X 1 .5' OR A5 SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER.
D
i2 wlDrh
2 ELEVATIONTHE VANE 5HALL INTERCEPT THE REAM LT BETWEENNK AT A HEIGHT EQUALTO I/
S EAMB A DE. AN
CONTROL POINT MAY BEESAB5HED THE LEFT OR RIGHTR K/VANE INTERCEPTPO NT. THE VANE
NOTES:
INTERCEPT LOCATION MAY BE OTHERWISE DESCRIBED BY ITS RELATIONSHIP TO BANKFULL STAGE OR BY THE LENGTH AND SLOPE
OF THE VANE ARM. BANKFULL IS NOT NECESSARILY THE TOP OF THE STREAM BANK SLOPE.
0-
INSTALL COIR MATTING PER DETAIL I . OVER EXCAVATE THE OUTSIDE BEND OF THE CHANNEL. PLACE LARGER BRANCHES
20° TO 30° v
Q U)
Z
diU
SEE DWG D I AND LOGS IN A CRI55-CRO55 PATTERN. LOCK IN PLACE WITH FILL COVERING G IN
a
BALLAST BOULDER
3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE GAPS BETWEEN THE LOGS AND UNDER THE COARSE BACKFILL MATERIAL OF THE
TO 12 IN OF THE LARGER BRANCHES/SMALL LOGS.
OR DUCK BILL ANCHORS
/
VANE. THERE SHALL BE NO FILTER FABRIC VISIBLE IN THE FINISHED WORK; EDGES SHALL BE FOLDED TUCKED, OR TRIMMED AS
KEY COIR MATTING
W
2. PLACE SMALLER BRANCHES AND BRUSH OVER THE LARGER BRANCHES/SMALL
COMPACTED 501L LIFT
z
NEEDED.
INTO BANK
LOGS (HARDWOOD SPECIES ONLY) AND COMPACT LIGHTLY TOGETHER. BACKFILL
<
O
AND COMPACT TO LOCK IN PLACE.
q I
4. LOG VANES SHALL BE BUILT TYPICALLY A5 FOLLOWS:
MIN 2.0'
3. PLACE LIVE CUTTINGS OVER THE SMALL BRANCHES AND BRUSH. ACCEPTABLE LIVE
PROJECT NUMBER:
A. OVER -EXCAVATE STREAM BED TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE TOTAL THICKNESS OF THE HEADER (AND FOOTER IF SPECIFIED)
PROJECT MANAGER:
LIVE STAKES CUTTINGS SPECIES INCLUDE BLACK WILLOW (5ALIX NIGRA) AND SILKY WILLOW
COARSE AGGREGATE I
"
LOGS.
B. PLACE FOOTER LOG OF THE VANE ARM IF SPECIFIED. THE SLOPE OF THE VANE ARM 15 MEASURED ALONG THE VANE ARM
DS
(5ALIX 5ERICEA). WILLOW CUTTINGS SHOULD BE RINSED AT CUTTING POINT TO
TOP OF BANK ALLOW BETTER ROOTING.
BACKFILL (I TO 5") BANKFULL
WHICH IS INSTALLED AT AN ANGLE TO THE STREAM BANK AND PROFILE.
C. HEADER OF THE VANE ARM ON TOP OF AND SLIGHTLY FORWARD OR BACK FROM THE FOOTER
JK
� �
LIVE CUTTINGS 4. INSTALL ER0510N CONTROL (COIR) MATTING OVER COMPACTED SOIL PER
q I
INSTALL LOG LOG.
D. NAIL FILTER FABRIC TO THE HEADER LOG U51NG A GALVANIZED NAIL WITH A PLASTIC CAP. THE 51ZE AND GAGE OF NAIL
/
DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. COIR MATTING SHOULD BE KEYED INTO TOP OF BANK.
5. INSTALL I TO 3 ROWS OF LIVE STAKES ABOVE THE LIVE CUTTINGS LAYER PER
°
AND NAIL SPACING SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER.\\/A
E. PLACE BALLAST BOULDERS OR DUCKBILL ANCHOR ON THE VANE.
SMALL BRANCHES \\ \ DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
AND BRUSH \ CUTTINGS SHOULD NOT EXTEND PA5T/3 OF CHANNEL BOTTOM WIDTH.
—ACKFILL
G. LIVE
°
F. PLACE COARSE BBEHIND LOGS ENSURING THAT ANY VOIDS BETWEEN THE LOGS ARE FILLED.
—
LOG VANE
G. BACKFILL REMAINDER OF VANE WITH PREVIOUSLY EXCAVATED MATERIAL.
1/4 MAX POOL DEPTH
O
5. IF ANY EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS SPECIFIED FOR USE IN THE VICINITY OF THE STREAM BANK/VANE INTERCEPT POINT THE
MATTING EDGES SHALL BE NEATLY SECURED AROUND THE LOGS.
1/4 MAX POOL
DEPTH \\/�/I
j\\ j\\ j\\ j�\
�✓ / /\\
° LEFT OR RIGHT VANE
° POOL I ARM BANK INTERCEPT
"\//\\
I CONTROL POINT
SMALL LOGS AND/OR \\/�\�j� /\\��\�\\�\ \\�
LARGE BRANCHES WITH A
MIN DIAMETER OF 4"
COIR MATTING
F�p�N
BANKFULL
BALLAST BOULDER
TOE PROTECTION
OR DUCKBILL ANCHORS LEFT OR RIGHT VANE ARM BANK INTERCEPT
(LARGER CHANNELS)
SECTION A -A
CONTROL POINT
PLAN VIEW
CHANNEL TOP
FLOW Q O
OF BANK
7-0
3% TO 7% — —1 —
BAN KFULL
\/ \/
STREAM BANK
COARSE AGGREGATE
FLOW
// /X�
�011
j/ BACKFILL (I " TO 5")
\\
/��\ \ FOOL
FOOTERLOG �\\i/��`
A
HEADER LOG
��/����������\�/
CHANNEL BOTTOM
HEADER LOG
BRUSH
TOE OF BANK
FOOTER LOG
TOE OF BANK
STREAM BED
IN POOL
PROFILE VIEW
NTS
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
NON-WOVENLE
OTY
BRIC (NCDOT EI 1)
VAR IES
O' Toy WIDTH \� /
LOG VANE
NTS
SECTION A -A
pres'
302 Jefferson
Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
www.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
Q
C)
�
N
O
N
+1
L0
z
_O
H
H
W
Z
O
z
O
O
LL
ICE
O
�
Z
LU
OW
LU
Q
Q
Z0
Z
O
(n
Lu
U)
W
J
W
Y
Q
W
W
cr
cr
D_
LU
ZJ
Z
�_
O
Q
U
Q
U
C�
G
J_
W
Z
Q
LU
coZ
Z
D
O0
0-
Q U)
Z
diU
Z C
W
z
C�
C
0 G
<
O
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
D3

COAR
BAC
NOTES:
I .LOGS SMALL BE OF A MINIMUM OF 15' IN LENGTH AND 12" IN DIAMETER AND RELATIVELY STRAIGHT
HARDWOOD, RECENTLY HARVESTED.
2. A SINGLE LOG MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF A HEADER/FOOTER LOG COMBINATION, PER DIRECTION OF DESIGNER.
3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE GAPS BETWEEN THE LOG(5) AND THE STREAM BED, UNDER THE TOP C
COARSE BACKFILL MATERIAL. THERE SHALL BE NO FILTER FABRIC V151BLE IN THE FIN15HED WORK; EDGES
SHALL BE FOLDED, TUCKED, OR TRIMMED AS NEEDED.
4. COARSE BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED TO A TH ICKNE55 EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE HEADER (AND ANY
FOOTER) LOGS AND SHALL EXTEND OUT FROM THE VANE ARMS TO THE STREAM BANK AND UPSTREAM.
5. A5 AN OPTION, FLAT -SIDED BOULDERS MAY BE PLACED AS BALLAST ON TOP OF THE STREAM BANK SIDE OF
THE EMBEDDED VANE ARMS. DUCK BILL ANCHORS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF BALLAST BOULDERS.
G. DUCKBILL ANCHORS WITH GALVANIZED CABLE ATTACHED MAY BE USED TO SECURE LOGS INTO THE STREAM
BED AND/OR BANKS. FLAT SIDED BOULDERS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF THE LOG INVERT/DUCKBILL ANCHOR
SYSTEM.
TIE-IN TO
BE
—FOOTER U
OF BANK
AST BOULDER
O.5' MA% (TYP.)
\
STEP ELEVATION
BACKFILL WITH COARSE
AGGREGATE (I" TO 5" DIA.)
CONTROL POINT
SEE PROFILE FOR
POOL DEPTH
UPSTREAM POOL ELEVATION
CONTROL POINT
A6GKEGATE (1 " TO 5" DIA.)
5ECTION VIEW
PLAN VIEW
ANGLED LOG STEP POOL
NT5
BANK
ON
EVATION
L POINT
LOG
BOULDER
TIE-IN TO STREAM
DANK OYR)
STEP ELEVATION
CONTROL POINT
TOE
C
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
PROPOSED
DEBAR OR DUCKBILL
ANCHOR
STREAM BED
FLOW MIN- 5 0
BACKFILL WITH COARSE
AGGREGATE (I" TO 5" DIA.)
�/ /
SEE PROFILE FOR
POOL DEPTH
BACKFILL WITH COARSE
A6GKEGATE (1 " TO 5" DIA.)
W
Qm
� O
0 N
N
1441wl
d N
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTI LE FABRIC TACK FABRIC
(NCDOT TYPE 11) TO LOG
5EC7ION A -A (OPT 1)
PROPOSED
STREAM BED
FLOW MIN- 5.0
—�
DEBAR OR DUCKBILL
ANCHOR
5000RPOOL
SEE PROFILE FOR
U
POOL DEPTH
BACKFILL WITH COARSE
AGGREGATE (I"TO 5"DIADj�\\%
//
NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTI LE FABRIC TACK FABRIC
(NCDOT TYPE II) TO LOG
SECTION A -A (OPT 2)
K, 4' MIN. LENGTH) OR
DUCKBILL ANCHORS INSTALLED PER
MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS (TYP.)
SECTION B -B
LOG SILL
NT5
NOTES:
ILOGS SHOULD BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED
2. HIGH 51DE OF LOG SHALL BE APPROX, 0.2' HIGHER
THAN LOW END
3. LOG DIMENSIONS:
MIN DIAM. = 12", MIN LENGTH = 18'
NAIL FILTER FABRIC U51NG 3" I OD GALVANIZED
COMMON NAIL EVERY .5' ALONG THE LOG
4. DUCKBILL ANCHORS MAY BE USED IN PEACE OF REBAR
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax [phone]
WWW.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
Qm
� O
0 N
N
d N
Z
O
U
U)
Z
O
2
O
()
LL
I
H
N
?
0 }
O 2
N
O z
z
D O
LD
ILL
Q
Q w
W
tY
W W
� rr
rr a
W
H
U
z
z -
O J
FO
Q 0-1
V Q
U
c�
G
QO
LU z
Q
F_ >
LU
U) z
O
Z_ Z:)
O O
� U
a z
Lu Lu
Q Y
P-
w Q
Z
}
¢
a 0
o
PROJECT NUMBER:0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
D4

FLOW
CHANNEL BEGIN RIFFLE
4,0' (ryp) BOTTOM WIDTH q.0' (NP)
RIFFLE MATERIAL 7 /STOP OF BANK
j
THE RIFFLE AND THE DOWNSTREAM RUN -POOL. THE FINISHED CRO55
I
SMALL Pool.
COARSE AGGREGATE
MIN. 2' COVER (#5 WASHED STONE) 6" DEEP
(UNLESS ADDITIONAL COVER IS
AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION WITH SOME
LA GE COBBLE/
2.
OO
SMALL BOULDERS
CHANNEL. SURVEY OF CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO
H N
N
STRUCTURE (LOG 51 LL OR J -HOOK).
Q'I
LOG5/ WOODY
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
30.2'.
DEBRIS
3.
GRADE CONTROL ROCK SHALL BE COMPRISED OF A 50/50 MIX OF CLA55
A AND B RIPRAP. GRADE CONTROL ROCK SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT
TOP OF BANK
TIMBER MAT
THE Of THE SPECIFIED OF RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL
DEE51GNATED
/�K RIFFLE MATERIAL; EQUAL MIX
TOE OF BANK
ACHIEVE THE GRADES.N
OF #5/#57 STONE, SURGE
PLAN VIEW
A
END RIFFLE
ROCIUWOOD RIFFLE
NT5
SMALL POOL, TYF
Tl'P
\ \/\
0,75'M11 \
1 .25' MIN
LOG5/ WOODY DEBRIS
MATERIAL
RIFFLE MATERIAL; EQUAL
MIX OF #5/#57 STONE,
SURGE STONE AND NATIVE
SUBSTRATE MATERIAL
MI
BEGIN RIFFLE
CONTROL POINT
FLOW -►
CHANNEL
BOTTOM WIDTH
CR055 SECTION A -A'
VARIES
THALWEG
�^ L
LOGSAVOODY
DEBRIS
PROFILE
LARGE COBBLE/SMALL NOTES:
BOULDERS, IYP
4.0' TOP OF BANK I CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN NEWLY GRADED CHANNEL
T�
THE RIFFLE AND THE DOWNSTREAM RUN -POOL. THE FINISHED CRO55
SECTIONS, AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER.
SECTION OF THE RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL GENERALLY MATCH THE SHAPE
COARSE AGGREGATE
MIN. 2' COVER (#5 WASHED STONE) 6" DEEP
(UNLESS ADDITIONAL COVER IS
AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION WITH SOME
�\ ��\�j�\�j �
2.
ELEVATION HE BEGINNING
AND END OF RIFFLE POINTS TO ESTABLISH PPOINTS SHALL 13E ART HEAT T ROFILE OF THE
POOL5 AND LOGS.
CHANNEL. SURVEY OF CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO
H N
N
STRUCTURE (LOG 51 LL OR J -HOOK).
ESTABLISH ACCURATE RIFFLE INSTALLATION WITHIN A TOLERANCE OF
l PROPOSED TOE OF BANK
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
30.2'.
C/
3.
GRADE CONTROL ROCK SHALL BE COMPRISED OF A 50/50 MIX OF CLA55
A AND B RIPRAP. GRADE CONTROL ROCK SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT
\
TIMBER MAT
THE Of THE SPECIFIED OF RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL
DEE51GNATED
/�K RIFFLE MATERIAL; EQUAL MIX
PRIORIN A "KEY' MAY NOT BE USED (OR THE DIMENSIONS MAY BE
ACHIEVE THE GRADES.N
OF #5/#57 STONE, SURGE
APPROACHES OR CROSSING.
STONE AND NATIVE
4.
RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPRISED OF ROCKS AND WOOD. THE
SUBSTRATE MATERIAL
\\`
�NOTES:
--�'1-----.__ I . INSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW 15 LOW.
ROCK MATERIAL SHALL CON515T OF AN EQUAL MIX OF #5 / #57 STONE,
SURGE STONE AND NATIVE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL RIFFLE MATERIAL
I r 2. IN5TALL5TREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAKTO FLOW.
SHALL BE EXCAVATED, STOCKPILED, AND RE -USED FROM ABANDONED
GRADE CONTROL ROCK
CHANNEL SECTIONS. OTHERWISE ROCK RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE
50/50 MIX OF CLA55 A AND
B NPRAP
SLIGHTLY ROUNDED, "RIVER -TYPE" ROCK, UNLESS OTHER ROCK
TOE OF BANK
IM MEQUIVALENT.
5.
SINGS
-III-III-III-III-_ - 5. WIDTH OF TYPICAL FARM CROSSINGS SHALL BE PER PIAN OR A MINIMUM OF 12'.
G. WHEN REQUIRED, CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE PIPE MATERIAL AND COVER MEET H-20 LOADING
CHARACTERISTICS ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE CHANNEL. IN ADDITION,
(TYP)
APPROXIMATE BASE FLOW
LOGS AND WOODYDEBRIS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE ROCK
-III-�—�-III: I - �- �- �-
�` �1=VIII III=III=III=III=III-III= -III=III-III=III-III=111 REQUIREMENTS.
WATER SURFACE
MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BYTHE DESIGNER.
cc
O 2
5.
THE PLACEMENT OF GRADE CONTROL ROCK AND/OR RIFFLE MATERIAL
4'
O z
SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER TO CREATE A SMOOTH PROFILE, WITH NO
MIN
SECTION VIEW
ABRUPT "JUMP' (TRANSITION) BETWEEN THE UPSTREAM POOL -GLIDE AND
Q w
THE RIFFLE, AND LIKEWISE NO ABRUPT "DROP" (TRANSITION) BETWEEN
PROPOSED TOP
THE RIFFLE AND THE DOWNSTREAM RUN -POOL. THE FINISHED CRO55
OF BANK
SECTION OF THE RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL GENERALLY MATCH THE SHAPE
COARSE AGGREGATE
MIN. 2' COVER (#5 WASHED STONE) 6" DEEP
(UNLESS ADDITIONAL COVER IS
AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE RIFFLE TYPICAL SECTION WITH SOME
®Illllll'Illy-VIII,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'.-�
VARIABIL11 OF HE THALWEG LOCATION AS A RESULT OF HE SMALL
-END IFFLE CONTROL POINT
POOL5 AND LOGS.
G. THE END OF RIFFLE CONTROL POINT MAY TIE IN TO ANOTHER IN -STREAM
H N
N
STRUCTURE (LOG 51 LL OR J -HOOK).
THALWEG
CARRIAGE BOLT
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
7. HE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE SHALL BE KEYED IN TO HE STREAM BANKS
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
AND/OR BED AS DESIGNATED BY THE DESIGNER. THE "KEY' SHALL EXTEND
2. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN FLOW 15
BEYOND THE TOP OF BANK AT THE BEGINNING (CREST) OF THE RIFFLE.
TIMBER MAT
WHERE PRESERVATION OF EXISTING STREAM BANK VEGETATION 15 A
GRADE CONTROL ROCK
PRIORIN A "KEY' MAY NOT BE USED (OR THE DIMENSIONS MAY BE
50/50 MIX OF CLA55 A AND
B RIPRAP
ADJUSTED) TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE.
RIP
R(AP,�''.OACH
v" "' ✓�"
TIM11E1MATCROS51N1 TIMBERMAT APPROACH
Main: 919.829.9909
COARSE AGGREGATE
MIN. 2' COVER (#5 WASHED STONE) 6" DEEP
(UNLESS ADDITIONAL COVER IS
I . TIMBER MATS SHALL BE USED FOR TEMPORARY
®Illllll'Illy-VIII,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'.-�
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TO TRAVERSE WET AND/OR MUDDY
REQUIRED BY MANUFACTURER
A ADJACENT TO THE STREAM AND TO CROSS THE
H N
N
EARTH FILL COVERED BY
CARRIAGE BOLT
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
LARGE ANGULAR ROCK
2. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN FLOW 15
O
TIMBER MAT
PARALLEL
FILTER FABRIC
TOP OF BANK INSTALLED PARALLEL
CHANNEL BED AND BANKS AS A RESULT OF INSTALLING THE
APPROACHES OR CROSSING.
CLA55 B RIP F' .F
O r O O O
3. THE LENGTH OF TIMBER MAT REQUIRED TO CR055 THE
f \\
�NOTES:
--�'1-----.__ I . INSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW 15 LOW.
STREAM OR CONCENTRATED FLOW AREAS SHALL BE SUCH
THAT THE TIMBER MAT EXTENDS PAST THE TOP OF BANK ON
EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING A SUFFICIENT DISTANCE TO
I r 2. IN5TALL5TREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAKTO FLOW.
SUPPORT THE MAXIMUM EQUIPMENT 51ZE USING THE
cr
3. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE APPROPRIATE BEDDING MATERIAL WITH MANUFACTURER.
FILTER FABRIC USED SHALL BE TYPE 2 ENGINEERING FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
4. STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE TIMBER
MAT LENGTHS ORIENTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE TOPS OF
TOE OF BANK
IM MEQUIVALENT.
5.
SINGS
-III-III-III-III-_ - 5. WIDTH OF TYPICAL FARM CROSSINGS SHALL BE PER PIAN OR A MINIMUM OF 12'.
G. WHEN REQUIRED, CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE PIPE MATERIAL AND COVER MEET H-20 LOADING
THE STREAM BANKS. TIMBER MAT STREAM APPROACHES
(TYP)
APPROXIMATE BASE FLOW
SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE TIMBER MAT LENGTHS
-III-�—�-III: I - �- �- �-
�` �1=VIII III=III=III=III=III-III= -III=III-III=III-III=111 REQUIREMENTS.
TIMBER MAT INSTALL
PERPENDICUL
AGE BOLT
)ER MAT
I
INVERT PER PLAN BURY
CULVERT 0.G' UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE BY ENGINEER
SECTION VIEW
PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING
NT5
517E PER PLAN
PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
WWW.res.us
I . TIMBER MATS SHALL BE USED FOR TEMPORARY
®Illllll'Illy-VIII,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'.-�
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TO TRAVERSE WET AND/OR MUDDY
LARGE ANGU R ROCK
A ADJACENT TO THE STREAM AND TO CROSS THE
H N
N
STREAM AND OTHER CONCENTRATED FLOW AREA5.
CARRIAGE BOLT
TIMBER MAT INSTALLED
(TYP)
PERPENDICULAR
2. THE STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN FLOW 15
O
TIMBER MAT
LOW. THERE SHALL BE MINIMAL TO NO DISTURBANCE OF THE
CLA55 B RIP RAP
TOP OF BANK INSTALLED PARALLEL
CHANNEL BED AND BANKS AS A RESULT OF INSTALLING THE
APPROACHES OR CROSSING.
O r O O O
3. THE LENGTH OF TIMBER MAT REQUIRED TO CR055 THE
f \\
STREAM OR CONCENTRATED FLOW AREAS SHALL BE SUCH
THAT THE TIMBER MAT EXTENDS PAST THE TOP OF BANK ON
EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING A SUFFICIENT DISTANCE TO
0
SUPPORT THE MAXIMUM EQUIPMENT 51ZE USING THE
cr
CROSSING.
FILTER FABRIC
4. STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE TIMBER
MAT LENGTHS ORIENTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE TOPS OF
TOE OF BANK
THE STREAM BANKS. TIMBER MAT STREAM APPROACHES
(TYP)
APPROXIMATE BASE FLOW
SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE TIMBER MAT LENGTHS
?
WATER SURFACE
ORIENTED PARALLEL TO THE TOPS OF THE STREAM BANKS.
cc
O 2
5. STREAM CROSSING APPROACHES FROM DRY AREAS SHALL
In
O z
BE CONSTRUCTED U51NG CLA55 B RIP RAP PLACED OVER
D O
LD
SECTION VIEW
FILTER FABRIC.
Q w
G. ALL TIMBER MATS, FILTER FABRIC, AND RIP RAP SHALL BE
0:10:
COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE SITE WHEN THE CROSSING
LLQ
IS REMOVED.
TIMBER MAT TEMPORARY CROSSING
Z
z -
NTS
O J
INVERT PER PLAN BURY
CULVERT 0.G' UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE BY ENGINEER
SECTION VIEW
PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING
NT5
517E PER PLAN
J I I STREAM CHANNEL I l
LOG SILL SET TOP OF LOG I FT.
TOP OF BANK ABOVE CULVERT INVERT
PLAN VIEW
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
WWW.res.us
SEAL
®Illllll'Illy-VIII,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'.-�
LARGE ANGU R ROCK
H N
N
d N
Z
O
U
• • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
J I I STREAM CHANNEL I l
LOG SILL SET TOP OF LOG I FT.
TOP OF BANK ABOVE CULVERT INVERT
PLAN VIEW
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, INC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax: [phone]
WWW.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
Li
Qm
� o
H N
N
d N
Z
O
U
U)
Z
0
cr
z
O
O
LL
n
H
N
?
cc
O 2
In
O z
D O
LD
Q
Q w
ILL! W
w Of
0:10:
a
LLQ
Tn
Z
z -
O J
O
F NN
Q LL
V Q
U
c�
G
Q O
LU z
Q
F_ >
LU
z
zZ:)O
O
U
6j 0—
(n Z
J
Q Y
0
W Q
Z
QQ
D_ 0
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
D5

BANKFL
TOE OF BANK FLOW
STREAM BANK
BANKFULL
JCC ANNEL YCIDTH J�3 CHA NEL '/
COARSE AGGREGATE
BACKFILL (I"TO 5") I IDTH WIDTH MollI CRO55 VANE INVERT TOE OF DANK -
CONTROL POINT
I I
FILTER FABRIC
BANK
COARSE AGGREGATE
BACKFILL (I' TO 5")
HEADER BOULDER
� \ \ FOOTER BOULDER
5T FAM N FOOL BED
..., O'VAW15
20°T030° MIN TO�\DTH
50ULDE
FOOTER
SECTION A -A'
RIGHT VANE ARM I 1 I BOULDERS5
BANK INTERCEPT
CONTROL POINT
=I'.TER FABRIC
13 CHANNEL Y� CHANNEL CHANNEL
q - } WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH
LI J
VANE ARM BANK VANE ARM BANK
B - - I � I B INTERCEPT CONTROL INTERCEPT CONTROL
POINT POINT
LEFT VANE ARM _
BANK INTERCEPT
CONTROL POINT
PLAN VIEW
FILTER -
FABRIC
HEADER BOULDER
BANKFULL
COARSE AGGREGATE FOOTER BOULDER
BACKFILL (ITO 5") LEFT OR RIGHT VANE ARM SECTION B -B'
BANK INTERCEPT
CONTROL POINT
FLOW VAR E5 NOTE5:
0' TO 0.8' 1 . 5EE STRUCTURE BOULDER SIZE TABLE FOR APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS OF
BOULDERS. THE UPPER LIMIT FOR BOULDERS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURE.
2. CRO55 VAN E5 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED 50 THAT ADJOINING BOULDERS TAPER IN
_ -_-- _----- FLOW AN UPSTREAM DIRECTION, FROM THE BANKFULL ELEVATION TO THE STREAM
/\\% INVERT. THE UPSTREAM END OF THE CRO55 VANE 15 5ET AT AN ANGLE OF 20 TO
POOL /1
/�/\/\/\/\ 30 DEGREESTANGENT TO THE PROJECTED STREAM BANK DIRECTION. THE TOP \
FOOTER ROCK \/�\\�/\\ \�/\\ \ \\\ \\�\\�/�/ \ CHANNEL.ON OF BOTH VANES WILL DECREASE TOWARD THE CENTER OF THE
3. THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE CR055 VANE SHALL BE KEYED INTO THE
HEADER ROCK 5TREAMBANK AT THE BANKFULL ELEVATION. THE CROSS VANE SHALL BE KEYED A
PROFILE VIEW MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET INTO THE 5TREAMBANK. THE UPSTREAM END OF CR055
VANE SHALL BE KEYED INTO THE 5TREAMBANK AT THE DESIGNED 5TREAMBED
INVERT ELEVATION. 3 PRIMARY ROCK DIMENSIONS:
ROCK CROSS VANE 4. VANE BOULDERS SHALL BE PLACED IN A LINEAR FASHION SO AS TO PRODUCE THE
SLOPING CRO55 VANE, AND SHALL BE PLACED WITH TIGHT, CONTINUOUS SURFACE X. LONGEST DIMENSION
NTS CONTACT BETWEEN ADJOINING BOULDER. BOULDER SHALL BE PLACE 50 AS TO Y. SHORTEST DIMENSION
HAVE NO 51GNIFICANT GAP5 BETWEEN ADJOINING BOULDER. Z. INTERMEDIATE DIMENSION
5. VANE BOULDERS SHALL BE PLACED 50 A5 TO HAVE A FINAL SMOOTH SURFACE
ALONG THE TOP PLANE OF THE CROSS VANE. NO VANE BOULDER SMALL PROTRUDE
HIGHER THAN THE OTHER BOULDER IN THE BOULDER VANE. A COMPLETED CROSS
VANE HAS A SMOOTH, CONTINUOUS FINISH GRADE FROM THE BANKFULL
TOE OF BANK, TYPICAL FLOW 5TREAM BANK, TYPICAL ELEVATION TO THE 5TREAMBED.
G. AS THE CR055 VANE 15 CONSTRUCTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHINK ALL VOIDS
BANKFULL TYPICAL BETWEEN THE FOOTER BOULDERS, AND BETWEEN THE FOOTER BOULDERS AND
VANE BOULDERS. VOIDS SHALL BE CHINKED WITH SMALLER ROCK SUCH THAT NO
VOIDS GREATER THAN FOUR INCHES IN SIZE WILL BE PRESENT.
y C ANNEL A CHANNEL A CHA NEL
DTH WIDTH WID
COARSE AGGREGATE
BACKFILL 0" TO 5') I I CROSS VANE INVERT
CONTROL POINT
I I STREAM BANK
BANKFULL
COARSE AGGREGATE
BACKFILL (I" TO 5")
20° TO 30° `1 '/��
STEP INVERT
%\\/ HEADER BOULDER
CONTROL POINT �/�
J� I HEADER AND FOOTER FOOTER BOULDER
q I POOL BOULDERS TOE OF BANK
RIGHT VANE ARM FILTER FABRIC \ /\\/\ \/ \\ \ N FOOL BED
BANK INTERCEPT q / /� //
CONTROL POINT FILTER
VARIES \\ \/ \Y
0'TO/ WIDTH / i
B I I B
MIN POOL
5.0' SECTION A -A'
LEFT VANE ARM
BANK INTERCEPT
CONTROL POINT
PLAN VIEW
STRUCTURE BOULDER SIZE
REACH
DIMENSION LENTGH (INJ
D I
X 24-30
Y 18-24
Z I8-24
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
VANE ARM BANK
J CHANNEL i CHANNEL J�CHANNEL
WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH
VANE ARM BANK
COARSE AGGREGATE
BACKFILL ("TO 5')
BANKFULL
LEFT OR RIGHT VANE ARM
BANK INTERCEPT
INTERCEPT CONTROL
POINT
INTERCEPT CONTROL
POINT
CONTROL POINT
FLOW
VARIES
d N
01 TO 0.8'
2�
z
- -
\\\\\\\\\\
l
---- -- _
OOL /\\\\\
FILTER-
FABRIC
•_�•
� HEADER BOULDER
H
U
BOULDER
FILTER FABRIC
HEADER ROCK5
SECTION B -B'
fOOTER ROCKS
PROFILE VIEW
ROCK A -VANE
NT5
res 1
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Main: 919.829.9909
Fax [phone]
WWW.res.us
SEAL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
W
Qm
D
H N
N
d N
z
O
H
U
U)
z
0
z
O
O
LL
a
H
cc
O
N
O z
W
a
m
m
Lid
U)
Z ZJ
O
O
QLY
V Q
U
�
Q O
LU z
Q
F- i
LU
U)
Q
Z
z
O O
� U
a U) z
Q Y
W IZ Q
z
Q
0
a 0
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
0404
PROJECT MANAGER:
BB
DESIGNED:
DS
DRAWN:
JK
CHECKED:
FM
SHEET NUMBER:
D6

Appendix B —
Data/Analysis/Supplementary Information

6,1,5
S
op S. 4.1
,� 3 ,.
4
2- #�
1 �

Existing Conditions Vegetation Survey
Date: - I f
Latitude:
(VOTES: �PEr'ES SIVIL/ 4W"r
Site: ©trs",
Plot: VP/
Longitude:
Personnel: - ^7`e—
Azimuth:
For
SEEDLINGS -
Height Classes
SAPLINGS - DBH
TREE - DBH
Est. % Cover
Species
T
S
H
0-9cm to socm
$1-100cm
(19.&
101-137cm
0-1cm
1-2.5cm
2.5-5cm
5-12.7cm
>10cm =Measure Size
Record 5% to 100% in
r 0-3.5in (3.6-19Jin)
39.4in
(39.5-54in)
r )
0-0.4in
� 0.5 -lin )
1 -tin )
2-5in )
>5in )
incrementsanything
g Belo %for
anything below
'41
7Tt,&
-
a
Avg
ev
D J i
wta
1 / a
_
o
Irk lAN
.A
�
/�
M
.4 l
V�V_ , .,�
I=mo �,,
A
List unidentified species stat r�with UNK-1; Take pits and/or pressings for later ID
E

fes,
s7vp'Ks(3cLt, ', �o FYcgaj\)W
s
(, j ,CCV-�Aq-iv NJ

Existing Conditions Vegetation Survey
-
Date: 6 z! � �
Latitude:
NOTES: `5Vt, V G (3 Y^�-
W1� � j E. A'� �
) n YY-, C`,� CAMS C �o i ° 9 fge.490RZ
�`.a''a
Site: %,� riJti > N
v�
Plot: 3
Longitude:
Personnel: €_ t
Azimuth: s
For
SEEDLINGS -
Height Classes
SAPLINGS - DBH
TREE - DBH
Est. % Cover
Species
T
S
H
0-9cm
(0-3.5in)
10-socm
(3.6-19.7in)
51-100c 7
(19.8-
39.41n
101-137cm
(39.5-54in)
0-1cm
(0-0.4in)
1-2.5cm
(0.5-1in)
2.5-5cm
(1-21n)
5-12.7cm
(2-5in)
>lOcm =Measure Size
(>5in)
Record S% to 100% in
increments of 5; <5% for
anything below
�T 0?
✓
'
j
�o
<1'j•
Y-,`
+
s
4` Y,-
r
*List unidentified species starting with UNK-1; Take pits and/or pressings for later ID

�,:. `. -� �-1•J , vVI MOW, � � � 182- �moa;,,M
co X1'1 rof
V 1 �c '% T� %}! V ci CUA (7G J R 1 eV \ `1 % ✓Y �� � �'�i(_l '�
r
5ycC,_

Existing Conditions Vegetation Survey
Date: /.. r�
i�
Latitude:
NOTES: �� �� . sere:
J7r
G�
Y
Site:Plot:
Longitude:
Personnel: s t-%
Azimuth:
Forni
SEEDLINGS -
Heiilht Classes
SAPLINGS - DBH
TREE - DBH
Est. % Cover
Species
T
S
H
0-9cm
0-3.5in
( )
10-50cm
3.6-19.7in
51-100cm
1198
39.ain
101-137cm
39.5-54in
0-1cm 1-2.5cm
0-0.4in 0.5-lin
( ) ( )
2.5-5cm
1 -tin
( )
5-12.7cm
(2 -sin)
>10cm = Measure Size
(>5in)
Record 5% to 100% in
Increments of s;<s%for
anything below
PAJ
�a
"->& D
/
</
_
fey- r -P
ow -1%S
Meta ,
1` 4,t- V3 !
OPUS
a
wN t'C
Pq� SG14
rAweavl
t
mac'
✓
,, :
j �'
C4A
eic
sG+
P V,1
- 4
v
1-
Lo
73
mh�
as
�,�,�►�
S f
o
G �a
*1 ist unidentified
species startine with UNK-1:
,o
Take nits and/or oressines for later ID
�501141 �kovjkei Y01+ LUfli

4 ✓ ' ,, 17CV YM} .�

Protocol for Existing Conditions Vegetation Surveying
Plot Selection and Setun
Survey multiple plots on-site, which together are representative of all ecotypes present within the
easement boundaries. Each plot is a 5m X 20m belt transect, positioned parallel to the channel in the
floodplain or adjacent upland.
Take a GPS point at the origin and set the bounds with 5m as the "x-axis" and 20m as the "y-axis." Set
the plot with the y-axis as the side parallel to the stream channel. Record the y-axis azimuth to allow for
future resampling. Conclude selection and set-up with a representative photo of the plot taken from the
origin.
Data Collection
Identify each plant in the plot to the species level. Sort and measure tree species by height class and
diameter at breast height (DBH). Count seedlings <54in (137cm) in height into height categories 0-9cm,
10-50cm, 51-100cm, or 101-137cm. Count saplings >54in (137cm) in height into DBH categories 0-lcm,
1-2.5cm, 2.5-5cm, or 5-12.7cm. Measure the DBH of all trees >5in (12.7cm) DBH. Shrubs, vines, and
herbaceous taxa receive an estimation of their percent cover over the substrate within the plot. If the
personnel are unable to identify to the species level, collect voucher photos and/or specimen(s) for later
identification. Record these on the data sheet as UNK-1, UNK-2, etc.
Data Processing
Begin processing collected data by identifying the unknown species observed from voucher photos and
specimen(s) collected. When species present are sufficiently identified, use the dominant canopy species
assemblages and ecological region to identify a habitat type from Schafale (2012).
Calculate both basal area and stems per acre for each plot surveyed using the formulas below. These
metrics help to inform the existing conditions of the canopy on-site and inform the development of the
project's planting plan.
Basal Area Formula:
Basal area of each tree (m2) = 0.00007854 X (DBHcm)2
Basal area of plot (m2/ha) = (sum of basal areas for all trees in plot) X 100
•100 is to scale up from our 0.01ha plot to lha
Stems per Acre Formula:
Stems/Acre = (# of stems)/0.02471

Compass Point Morphological Parameters
Bankfull stage was estimated using INC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions data
2 NC Piedmont Regional Curve equations source: Harman et al. (1999)
3 NC Piedmont Regional Curve equations source: Doll et al. (2002)
Reference Reach
Existing
Design
LIT to Grassy Creek
LIT to Smithey's Creek
DW1-A
DW1-B
DW1-C
DW1-D
DW1-E
DW2-A
DW2-B
DW3
DW1-B
DW1-C
DW1-C
DW2-B
Feature
Drainage Area ac
Riffle
426
Pool
Riffle
118
Pool
Riffle
96
Riffle
Riffle
237
Pool
Riffle
256
Pool
Riffle
269
Pool
Run
271
Riffle
83
Riffle
90
Riffle
28
Riffle
237
Pool
Riffle
256
Pool
Riffle
269
Pool
Riffle
90
Pool
Drainage Area mit
0.67
0.18
0.15
0.37
0.40
0.42
0.42
0.13
0.14
0.04
0.37
0.40
0.42
0.14
INC Regional Curve Discharge (cfs)Z
66.4
26.4
22.7
43.5
46.0
47.7
48.0
20.4
21.7
9.5
43.5
46.0
47.7
21.7
INC Regional Curve Discharge cfs 3
68.6
27.6
23.8
45.3
47.8
49.5
49.8
21.5
22.8
10.0
45.3
47.8
49.5
22.8
Design/Calculated Discharge (cfs)'
Dimension
BKF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
18.1
S0
23.4
6.7
25-28
10.9
21.2
5.0
53.9
_
14.5
71.4
13.7
16.7
12.0
60.5
19.5
15.3
60.7
22.6
66.8
20.1
30
8.1
35.7
8.5
8.8
2.6
11.1
51
21.0
12.2
53
22.4
13.0
62
21.3
8.0
38
15.0
BKF Width ft
13.7
15.0
7.1
9.0
7.9
17.7
11.5
10.3
13.6
12.4
12.9
13.3
12.6
13.0
6.6
6.6
13
13
14
14
15
15
10
10
BKF Mean Depth ft
1.4
1.6
1.0
1.2
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.6
0.9
1.6
1.2
1.7
1.6
0.6
1.3
0.4
0.9
1.6
0.9
1.6
0.9
1.4
0.8
1.5
BKF Max Depth ft
1.7
2.7
1.2
2.1
1.1
1.3
1.5
3.0
1.3
2.6
1.9
3.0
3.2
1.6
1.7
0.8
1.3
2.8
1.3
2.8
1.1
2.5
1.1
2.5
Wetted Perimeter ft
14.9
16.8
8.2
11.0
8.4
18.1
13.0
12.8
14.1
14.0
14.0
16.2
14.2
14.4
8.1
7.2
13.4
14.6
14.3
15.5
15.4
16.2
10.4
11.7
Hydraulic Radius ft
1.2
1.4
0.8
1.0
0.6
0.8
1.1
1.3
0.9
1.4
1.1
1.4
1.4
0.6
1.1
0.4
0.8
1.4
0.9
1.4
0.8
1.3
0.8
1.3
Width/Depth Ratio
9.8
9.6
7.4
7.5
12.4
21.6
9.6
6.4
15.5
7.8
10.8
7.8
8.0
20.9
5.1
16.7
15.3
8.0
16.1
8.8
17.3
10.6
12.5
6.7
Floodprone Width ft
>50
NA
>30
-
24.9
13.1
-
-
-
26.7
-
28.1
10.9
17.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
NA
>4
>2.2
1.4
1.1
>2.2
2.1
2.2
>2.2
1.6
2.6
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
Substrate
Description D50
Gravel/Cobble
1.3
Gravel
1.0
1.8
Gravel
1.7
2.5
Gravel
1.0
Coarse Gravel
1.5
Gravel
2.7
Silt/Clay
1.8
Gravel
2.5
Gravel
1.0
Gravel
1.0
Gravel/Cobble
1.0
Gravel/Cobble
1.0
Gravel/Cobble
1.0
Gravel/Cobble
D16 mm
2.8
14
1.5
6.7
9.1
5
0.062
1.8
4.4
6.9
D50 mm
11
49
11
15
41
21
0.062
41
19
25
D84 (mm)
Pattern
Min
16
Max
Min
99
Max
35
Min Max
Min
36
Max
Min
88
Max
Min
95
Max
0.062
Min Max
93
Min Max
80
Min Max
100
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Beltwidth ft
26.3
55.5
20.0
30.0
24
76
24
76
24
76
30
36
Beltwidth Ratio
1.9
4.1
2.8
4.2
1.7
5.5
1.7
5.5
1.7
5.5
3.0
3.6
Radius of Curvature ft
13.5
103.3
7.0
15.0
30
80
30
80
30
80
23
40
Radius of Curvature Ratio
1.0
7.6
0.9
2.2
2.1
5.7
2.1
5.7
2.1
5.7
2
4
Meander Wavelength ft
49.4
66.0
33.0
49.0
95
181
95
181
95
181
82
87
Meander Width Ratio
Profile
3.6
Min
I
4.8
Max
2.9
Min
4.3
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
6.8
Min
13.0
Max
6.8
Min
13.0
Max
6.8
Min
13.0
Max
8.2
Min
8.7
Max
Riffle Length (ft)
6.0
18.0
6.0
16.5
13
50
13
50
10
20
Run Length ft
5.0
13.0
3.0
8.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Length ft
5.0
42.0
3.0
6.2
14
88
14
88
14
88
23
41
Pool -to-Pool Spacing (ft)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft
18.0
279
64.0
8.0
118
31.2
264
1884
550
734
396
842
266
91
31
1799
125
31
525
125
31
710
125
33
230
52
Channel Length ft
318
148
288
2054
600
800
432
968
306
97
1922
566
758
277
Sinuosity
1.14
1.25
1.09
1.09
1.09
1.09
1.09
1.15
1.15
1.07
1.07
1.08
1.07
1.20
Valley Slope ft/ft
0.0
3.25
0.025
0.015
0.022
0.011
0.009
0.028
0.010
0.054
0.018
0.014
0.022
0.031
Channel Slope ft/ft
0.0
2.5
0.023
0.014
0.020
0.010
0.008
0.024
0.009
0.050
0.017
0.0127
0.0210
0.0260
Ros en Classification
E4
E4b
C4b
F4/G4c
C4b
B4c
E6
C4b
G4c
C4b
C4
C4
C4b
C4b
Bankfull stage was estimated using INC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions data
2 NC Piedmont Regional Curve equations source: Harman et al. (1999)
3 NC Piedmont Regional Curve equations source: Doll et al. (2002)

Compass Point
Reference Reach
UT to Grassy Creek
UT to Smithey's Creek
426
0.67
118
0.18
Reach
DWI -B
DW1-C
DW1-D
DW2-13
DA (ac)
DA (sqmi)
237
0.37
256
0.40
269
0.42
90
0.14
Ex. Conds XSs
26
28
18
QBKF
54
61
61
36
FFQ Analysis
QLI
Q1.25
Q1.5
48
64
77
50
67
80
51
68
82
28
39
46
Rural Piedmont Regional Curves
NC-QBKF Harman
NC-QBKF Doll
MD-QBKF White
44
45
32
46
48
34
48
50
35
22
23
15
Recommended Design Flows =
Qbnkfull
51
53
62
38
Average Q1.1 & Q1.25
75% Q1.5
56
48
58
50
60
51
33
29
Reference Reach
UT to Grassy Creek
UT to Smithey's Creek
426
0.67
118
0.18
5o
25-28
66
87
104
33
45
54
66
69
50
26
28
18
77
65
39
33

Upstream
Downstream
96.5
Reach DW2-A - XS1 (Riffle)
96
95.5
95
94.5
C
94
0
>
93.5
_0
Lu
93
92.5
92
91.5
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
--e--Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

96
95.5
95
c
0 94.5
Y
i
d
W 94
93.5
93
0
Upstream
Reach DW3 - XS2 (Riffle)
5 10 15 20 25
Distance (ft)
♦Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Downstream
30 35

Upstream Downstream
Reach DW2-13 - XS3 (Riffle)
96
95
94
93
C
0
R 92
>
m
W 91
90
89
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
—*—Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream Downstream
Reach DW1-A - XS4 (Riffle)
94.5
94
93.5
93
c
0
M 92.5
>
m
W 92
91.5
91
0 5 10 15 20 25
Distance (ft)
--*--Ground Approx. Bankfull Flood prone Area

Upstream Downstream
Reach DW1-B - XS5 (Pool)
89.00
88.00
87.00
r
86.00
c
0
R 85.00
m
W 84.00
83.00
82.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
--e—Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

� w
��
P.S_�. r �
ii ii�R�
A
'.., f - J � :.4��. ..
��, �_
� ., c.y' i ...
�, ,
. �
�
r":,�
��
■
��! +LST
�1c �
.�
r���l� :
r}.
-
_
-
r �
�_.
_�,�
_ _.
gyp
�� x. .-
��
f
,. ��'�.'-
T r
� w
��
P.S_�. r �
ii ii�R�
A
'.., f - J � :.4��. ..
��, �_
� ., c.y' i ...
�, ,
. �

Upstream Downstream
Reach DW1-B - XS7 (Riffle)
95
94.5
94
93.5
93
C —
0
R 92.5
w 92
91.5
91
90.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
—a --Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
df
9J
k
•l:E
Upstream Downstream
Reach DW1-B - XS7 (Riffle)
95
94.5
94
93.5
93
C —
0
R 92.5
w 92
91.5
91
90.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
—a --Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream Downstream
Reach DW1-C - XS8 (Riffle)
94
93.5
93
1 1000-
92.5
C
0
R 92
m
uJ 91.5
91
90.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Distance (ft)
Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Reach DW1-C - XS9 (Pool)
93.5
93
92.5
92
—
91.5
C
0
'� 91
90.5
W
90
89.5
89
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Distance (ft)
—��Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Upstream
Downstream
Reach DW1-D -XS10 (Pool)
103.00
102.00
101.00
100.00
99.00
c
0
98.00
LU 97.00
96.00
95.00
94.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
—��Ground Approx. Bankfull Flood prone Area

Upstream Downstream
Reach DW1-D - XS11 (Riffle)
101.00
100.00
99.00
98.00
c
0 /000
R 97.00
>
d
ui 96.00 — —
95.00 — —
94.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
—e—Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

98
96
94
i 92
C
0
90
m
W 88
86
84
Upstream
Reach DW1-E - XS12 (Run)
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Distance (ft)
♦Ground Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area

Compass Point Channel Stability Assessment Summary Table
DWI -A DWI -B DWI -C DWl-D DWl-E DW2-A DW2-B DW3
1
Watershed characteristics
7
8
8
9
8
7
7
7
2
Flow habit
7
7
7
9
10
4
7
3
3
Channel pattern
3
6
3
3
3
4
3
3
Entrenchment/channel
4
3
9
3
8
10
4
3
2
confinement
5
Bed material
7
6
7
7
12
3
6
3
6
Bar development
4
6
4
5
10
3
6
1
7
Obstructions/debris jams
3
5
4
6
3
4
3
4
8
Bank soil texture and
7
8
8
9
12
5
6
7
coherence
9
Average bank angle
3
10
4
10
12
6
10
4
10
Bank vegetation/protection
12
10
8
10
12
5
9
9
11
Bank cutting
5
6
4
8
9
5
6
6
12
Mass wastingibank failure
4
3
4
5
9
5
7
2
13
Upstream distance to
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
bridge
Score
65
84
64
89
110
55
73
51
Rating*
Good
Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Fair
Good
* Excellent (0 < Score <= 36), Good (36 < Score <= 72), Fair (72 < Score <= 108), Poor (108 < Score <= 144)

ftmchl: `
Dale:
Weather: •- 1
Lo mad on:
stadiliN IndiCemt FaaNtara p -11
Observers: 'rl
Project: f '-s"
I
D2h1age Nrea:
I. - 1
ran lt-o
Poor(10-12
$parry
1. Walersletl r4lbW painatl
a rvty
andClNlaclNelas
Slade. IpasteE, uMieaCM
Ocrasgiel mom tlulvplces in the
hepuenl d¢lurbardes In the
CgNilwltl'oNharces In the
watgsM1M
walmshd, ecludim W111e WINO
wSMdslBd lKhq'eg cantle Slower,
WdIMhad Slgniflcdm calls activity.
(gluing aN/p stuns to slreamt,
landslides. chamel saw or somata
Iandodes. champ Same a 0raar
caeb Pion 4ggMo. Or Iter minor
MINN, posing, lamlinp. or
MIMn forgnq. lmmim or cw¢hcclbn
�h
aerommlpn. Lxnnm aoreMn.d
ca,6m,gl0n of daaings, macs a
of bundags. roads, or arer
adianres
NWmNenvclure. UT nkat cyw
iM sh e. HOINyurpar¢Na
sSmaN paibn a waters))
npiluswims walaphand
2Fkw MM
Permll sh MAwAware,
Perrmal steam aepl wN him-
pbarvial OfNYermMeeR skr wth
Egremtly llasly,nashnrods dowel
Isdravn
Order sltrom with slighly ins W
Mlry Eehavpn
mode Of d¢clarge; ephemeral steam
rel
rate atloWlg
o than nrslardM strum
3,CNm N pelWnttw6W)
Noevidenm OfclamalWyon.
pppma to mve pevk'usty demi
AOIII to luvepeviasly dam
Appsan to Mveprevl 0.vn
hMsmla'ing. Slade da Or
clwrplaap tweamismartmely
chamelured steam b poodY
Stanwood. slmameac may
slregn lstelr sidam. renes
shade. Clannta Not some mnders
dtrame(meaWekg)', socalmad
adjrslire (101>auy all va(rany)Wh
'2
valky). stable clannef
tlw to periods cM dlwlmM.
areas of implably nodi mole n
new, hews, slragm. unstablereacM1.
-�
rmW bodl saagMered, stale
Stewart.
4.Erimlvradif wreN mnhg M
ASweh Igelnmbk IS ppN
Across llaE pain abvtlmlW, tN b
MWeramwMlrrmeNkvaWym
WrchpaiMsysidedmmrs m:
he imsgn Mragnnalhg
cure" reGterre; miNmal charm
cMmM well, some mandate a
upld water lines or olum
ialattr m: no MINN
mnhemeN:Irltfitulme not
Isapdoudae: teaac6s easli flWd
infrastructure: clvrval-walM1rmlppd-
uPOSEEM. s are IOW add set wall
arm a4awdM; asomed we mWmals
NNs morn small. dwagy SmorrS:m
(9
back tom the drawn
in sue all Roe minimal SMb sham
prime Md o1mr: ewers ares held are
%V\
the hep
aMp Xa clmaW masa
S. ddmm W
Fs=appoe'snale pWbn or maw In the
AasasW smd Nlydy Wcked
wdapvg, coq lmdiuted.
MWeralalY pgckd wM sane
LaaeavaMmmlwlhnap+ M
Very bpd assmlmera w[hnpachry.
bW
a25ksty
wreloong. VarYsmatamwMaa
ovWat swat to mdkmi amaeAe st
tanssamwmedmmerIS<ammq
Most matpN a a mm. Fs p%
mdgbl<amm. 20<Fs,5
mmerW<amm. W<Fs<ro%
s2096
r
6. Ba dwtlopmais
F7s<002aWwlya12, baMSMS
Fas<002aW wlyrn2, Wn
Fms<OO2 atl w/ya l2. by Ndlle
Bar walFa amgevany grearm Iran
mma.renow rga(rvw to steam
may have vpwhalbn aWlm be
Iedbbe wiX aw mmouedd
12 the abmm wN at TON
vid0rat
w mwolcgxsesra w
rally dereail l cores sad to amtll
,Oars
a wmpxd aealerorve Opals of
and parrupW d wane dome to
robbers. but mlnmal lams gnMR a
mbbles addrm mar bw sparser
fire panidu up to coarse drivel math
cabbka. Fas1002awwryae<
barwWma tyladcat eyNalbn
veoaale0ell fixmlrg or ss0.02
ImkmmvelWralpn. NomrstOrs<
12, mbam are avaers
mlgdpa p(tle Car, Fass002
mtlwry<12
002awwly>i2
j
mtl why 112. No hers am eaidme
i. Obslrvclpre. Mathew harrods
Bare a rclpmeM
Occasbre Csm'Mgmms wneorM1blma*fth
u Wpaasi Y
Tremas' aw dMnuahade, Wriakga
pRcap. amm layer. LWO lams,
pole wMrN. brMsp�peving,
yMMIWWMSa Wanawbn
unrshade dnhucllwe, cause
COMMON small d sWvnto aw flaw.
revetments. dap a varied. neap
nlbeable maim a the WMlel.
tram are euoyrekd. cmahg clarvN
twoamadesemmmn amamwenpn
romremaarwa ween
��
behind ammalea

inismailibr Indicator excellent(141) (fOOd p-9 Fair (T-9) la"W0-12)
TOUT SCOra t,'
8. Bank sal texture and commerce
Car and silty clay, cornea minimal
Clay loam to sandy clay ham: maem
Sandy clay b sally Man:
Loamy sand 0 was. mtcolmove
answers of rorwM1esiva or
uncp¢aNalnd mlpues of ghost w
mate(gl:uKorsoptlaM miqurctd
urrwrpagaleE mulles: layers may
aha maMk6; seen mays; and
glacial or dicer taxable. layers of
deet. Mare Cohesive malerel
been of rcrcglgsive or
areas In MrJude Meadows" same
xvsyxmdaMr mb(ves
and graves
9. Average book slcge argle(whers,
Bank sb0es<M,1V ow) far
Rork shoes W to 2HAV(27°) In
Bark slopes to M 1V NIP) In
Bank sbgesover W nomination or
waver" bark)
rnrcol eaurconSdkilW
rcrcWesrve or urcwmismad
rorcdmsiaewurwradgaletl
Unconcern and«dab or over N' in
materna to< 1'. 1 W.) In days on
melaa610 08: 1(50°)incame on
materiae to 0.6: 1(60°)'n days
days common an me«WM WrMx
Irma son
«w+;aslwdty hdM1 bats
mononomabaa banks
t0. VpNaBve or ttgireerep pone
Wkle band Ol waMyvegetarinnwgM1
fM yxm amofxpalyvegelan«r
Small team of wemY
wOMrvapelatun OarrE may vary
IceaeLtl«r
9be 1%I%Jnnsnr Md cove.
wnh 7090% pad density am Cover.
50-70% am coicnwitfr
pasoferaitamcw«.APro
da0a and wash Ms
wacd,leary, a6cwucoa
Amunycorous 0 food
trejpMdsoft
realln
lhen5pM16paM dmanya. cover.
latnt density
sees arynara
IRBs wdM1 taalure. FManlry.am
nesvthmannH,
eecNuwS o-etl corm Taludre.
hemwla Y«mgeb venorttln
atmg or Oil
anon
PnmaMrsoft wma tested. star
voaea(r^.nbraled once
meed seasnalM ontlx:
In ylccalednnor mer
ismed
Trees conn very young, as am erirg.
dytro.
Wase
War Wocdyvyelalion«eKm
book.
bm'k, Warlvegolvn
the Me bark,
Ilcwol Womyvncycomn
mo
I
90%hwn M1v inerde]60-
mkwnal red
at 70
aieMed a170E0%hem MKwyd,
ma Mrs.woodyvegnation
baht, Worry vegetation
orfrogataticn,
tra WWa ere tvM orlwvlty
bramarr am tried
u liNtln
esgnure. Palallirvrg «armonrg
rwtwwsaa. No
oving0
normal
aierketl et lots dant 70%han
am«e1
dglxw MhbaNU
ay,I
limo el In easse mglrg
llong conn
mayW in one onore tank
in on orsem
No ening of ayasp]sure.
NO Imre aarmcMo oftanks
it. borrowing
IYM or rvmwiaen, wreomn may
Sema lMmnnlerNY Borg a®nrel
SYgrKican dna hecuen on MM1baMs.
Almml mMmudn aK an Mn Wits.
tanks, Fognif MlmCenage of
cern am N prominent oonslrkmre.
Rax baNti comprise lige gasonM
Sverre exlemNg ova mmld111e
Mal bark
Raw banks cmnp%e minor lamer of
CeMr in sMkal dirednn. Rod met
wK Uma "amswF
"y
Ni N vaTcal common
amMngs
maelstrom
i.
12. Plan waoirg or Wast kine
NpalinlcevgarceWgMenial«
EvMmn+of iMreprmM arWpmlry
Ellen of framers eater SuWWW
FlepueN amepertivemasa wastbo.
vary same amounts M mass waono_
manwatmg. Mally Kglmever
Ccpmoces of mass wastlrg the can
TIpp,Merpbl lw WMt liar¢, as
Uniform CW«N wglh ow lM entire
wAM1vegamon. RelromymrstaM
be aggravated by ltleM flora, M¢h
evienced by ansem crackm, massive
reach
dlnnml wNln and min'unal moment
may caber macaroni am mass
umaCMn'sgz. and tank slumplrgp
dbaks
wasting d uretabk Wnks CN
cwaitladie, Clarxnl small s hairy
wNa gryla regular. am acclaimed of
Mgular,am WnFsareacelbasa
tanks lamer
13. Ugheam dislecoe to MEge hen
Mee lNn95 m: bna2e is sM-
20.M m: snk!ge6 aNgretl wrist limon
10.70 M. dodge It dummol b nov, w
I Leer man lO m: facts seemly doasa
meamer enpap Coll em algreneM
aNgrpd xryh nYYflw
flow alum" IS dMWe TI
WM nyx
cMered Eermath bogs
TOUT SCOra t,'

Stream:
7w
i -
Reach:
CCNinual a'mwbsnds aloe
Dale:
ant Nalaclerslics
vvwmea
Weapon
I
walersKtl. sgal Nobmwwfty,
1=atiom
IS�1:
(graxmg atWw words on aVwm),
Stabile Indicator
Observers: CC f 1
gZGr..S/f (Ills
pralnaye Area:
Stream Type:
Cnwl a. 61 L,:, n. at
I. walershad am llpW gam Randy
stable, M1veged. Unopposed
O Rmdal mincer cimxWned; in the
Fraueal abmxaMea Mlle
CCNinual a'mwbsnds aloe
ant Nalaclerslics
vvwmea
searched, ayuding cable adrvAy
awarded, mcluam wade Tommy,
walersKtl. sgal Nobmwwfty,
(graxmg atWw words on aVwm),
bntldbes, themed Waal wpav9
Iambldm. agnrelamH«royal
Wfahucl bggim,« game mimm
minew. loot farmag,«
miMre,logger,ramtg, «canlrvctlon
madefeetation
comiwm of Wi'Ahgs. roads, Or
of Wllallgs. down, aro ever
sermons
allwrinhasLUclure Urbanizalbnw«
akestrus re. HgHY uhao¢at«
significant pMbn of wal«SMO
Iapdywaming"Restart
2 Flow tube
pererial$seem voth re, party
Perenrcel stream or epxemerel Red-
Presidential or waerraixmi sheam weer
EaVpnay Awst(. Amh deep averaged
teM/br
«am stream wax YgMly ilvereea
flash lalwvbr
mode a dissMrye: wevera rval seemed
raledflotlaq;
Mlbrtlpnl tad mslream
3.Chamelohern(evW)
NpevbeCeedCM1nwlvatmn.
Appears to leve lmv4valy Caen
Ypres to have Re:wsly peon
Appears to leve pevommy Ween
MOMer", SWHe charnet or
ch«vqued. Stream Is slummy
darn Bred. Sheamhadwety
Cameraman! Sheam¢xtively
toward (step" system, NTgv
suHectarval l¢5 some madtleds
adiadxgtdneartledlCg): doomed
adjusting WeemlY smaller vMkaflY)w4x
van"), wage cxavoc
due to panus chomtl adjustment,
game of idslabAM trader arwbn
Iso Wends. Sort unalade reach.
MUM [ends. ShagMeMd. wade
Cannel
O.ENrerchmmllcamal cmflmmendPc1'rveM
p( some at toga
Adve goad FlalnabaModal. We a
Abderale mrtremM In valley or
xnkkpgNs shards donnsheam:
bans: an man or unces"Cg
cumrAly Mbuidon; mkmnd Clowned
cadvq ural¢: sense e$oswe d
echoed order urea w tamer
YMgtructure., an nerds;
co em:a sttWl K1
inlea$mF1aR: lenders axed., flOW
iMra$auclwB., Cmnne.wi wtY try .
exPo;dd: lemees we be aM sl, vell
yarn abaMpaQ lees are moderate
Was imen small. dopy attended. de
3
mach hpntl¢(iv«
In else am ave minimal apparel, from
atone flacd new ', teres; are Whets
therNH
along ire cMM1M edge
5 Bed maternal
ASSMed seed army packed
Moderately packed with some
LomaSsodmmsxNx meoaM
Very Mar: assonmem with To awring
Fs= amwearmse warm or road in tie
ovegapyng, am paslHy imdulo.
ovedewast, Very small amgab of
OVII Seen 0 medium amways of
Large amwd5 of mwMul< O mm. Fa
Wd
Mori materyl>bmm. Fs<p%
materal<a mm. 20<Fs<50%
malmal<amm. W<Fs<70%
>y0%
S. Bar dereMdnem
F S<0,02ardwly>12, arsaM
FwS<0A2mn ly>12, ars
Fw S<0,02aMw/y112.hrwWas
Bar wpW we pryingly greaw now
damper chews Raine to person
may ave vpaalbnadWwpe
iwtllta We wpeaM cwnpaedd
I/21M attmm wdlh el Naw flax. ams
wNlh as Mflwn, weFmepelalM,
epMpsed gCpadse goon ata
oMy demaHea wane ¢edit MsmaA
are epmposed aexkreise aepxbaLi
aMwm Wdoasegavato
Cotlm. but normal neon grown off
Widens aMlw may W wersdy,
We Ded"es up to corse grad wOh
coper. Fw S>0.02aMwlyere<
areveent by Mkdvepetatlm
sggatmi Bars brmidgM S>002
M tom,ogelation. NoarsMS<
12. oars are evident
oprlbrs ollM an F"3>002
am way<12
002 am wry >12
"way <12. no ars are demand
].Obab 1be, aeluag bedMclt
Rare per not postal
Ccomerst Wrong crags can
MoeantlyfwuM ant occasionally
Fraluend ant often stamps. drains
Moscow armor layer, LVAD Wear
a nal mior ank aro Wtlore woman
upgrade, obSWuclom. plea
onnalsNfl elaedimem ant flux.
grade control, midge bed paring,
Miceaee erasonoltre aanrH.
nap are many now, causing carnal
nveMdfAS. 6*por vary, map
CArcigenbKeedimFy accunnAalM
romrrme aM1Yw wean
aMm wwlrudona

Stabilby Intliator Excellent (1 -3 ) Good a-6) F ' g
av -91
reser Ou-iq
scows
6. Bank sm! 1pmre as mlerexe
clay am my day neeswe means
Clay Main to sway day loam', mxnr
Sandy Wymmucylwm:
Loamy, sand to says: romvhswa
7
mourn of rorcolewsin
unconsisdaml matures of game or
maximal. amosommon mimaasa
Uncommitted mutves; Layers may
affair maiereb; small Isom am
ifecal of oder materials', layere of
epil hurt we cdnalre mamr�
brows of twncdcsive or
Ieaes nal laude mrcolent esand
urcoreditlMedmwaes
ano yams
CXJ
9. Averag¢park abpeargl¢fwMe
6avabpm13HaV(1r)W
Benksloac W lo2HaV (2T) a
6wMabMWH'.1V(W)in
Bank,4x er05°inrmimwo
9B'kaverlMN baNrl
arxnMarre wurwwrisdidatm
rnrodcsivearurcomofltlaled
romoM1azNewvcorsolida4tl
urmrsdbaied materials Or Una W in
amarines to v is 1(45') In days an
makes 10 0.8'. 1(W) m days on
mNerms m 0.6:1(M.) ncbys
mayscwnmononaaaM WAS
Lif•
Inch since
ons W occasionally bash case
common on are w Mall WMm
10. Veg¢Wlivewergemvred WM
WWe[andalwbadyveg Wnv
Mmkun Wa of yy wiseladcn
Small mW Of woo* vcywanan mNih
Woody mosenton WWWam ovary
aroWnarl
abed 90%tlempyaa cwx.
Wil MW% qM derailo as cave.
50-I0% pad density and mass. A
deI>mdlr9 on ago wd FadM1 win alas
Mmwty fmrd fwd, bafy, Wadmua
A myodty d hard eatl, leafy,
m 0m, M son wood. lary, comma ;
then 50% part density am ower,
Coca won mature. We". aof
daNlmus mass wlm notarial,
hem with young or and vagetalbn
Pdmaryy sari wood piney, ccNferous
always vegaWfen locamd on the
M' a5a vegmWnlocated on ill
Yoking M dlvenady loamed on or mer
vces with very past. an am dyrg.
Cmk. WW]Y wegeWlwn dieraed
WMc Wow vegNel'wnorieMod 60-
Me mai of May Wady vyeWlkm
warm momstea vagemkin mCebd
vedially In alssea¢af vegebliory
SU% ham Immortal on in"malrM
moved at 10.80%from faiymom.
offathealnk. WoodyvegeWlbn
Wlfurdsarelimuormaviy
wanrmur¢. Pada l':yrg mamlwkg
wan w911evEeN rcIX aapasure. No
wanted at less law, 70% from
armwed
moreaedn WNµ
WIN Of hanks. to some asmoirvy
IIw¢gyal vAn awamrva real exgmVe.
mays Mpbce Doom Wri
No ling u Women of Larks
11. BeNaMlry
LaWwmre evtlev. InhegmNraw
Game baxnrNeNlY abrg charwM
yid- d aMfragumt an com Woks.
AM.acicoNirww wlamLonl banks.
make. ImgMrant pamallage of
Wnds and at ammyma cwndnata.
Raw Wnks ampm Wage wascn of
ome whealaver d lW
[Nat Wnk
Raw llaN:s amwae Mow mains
bank M venial direction. Rat mal
maks. uaerWlire sMsMrrot
ma in valWl dm ion
ovedwos
overhangs
12. M11aa wml9gw Wrk Wbaa
No a nes evxeow of Is"non w
Evperrasmirnrory aftm MIX
Evid¢rcedheguem aeWwslgNficaa
Irrpaert anal meeive mass waa".
way smdllemons a man waling
mamsaffe. latlo Wmawa
commences a mass waMM fret can
Tiny pKeNbIW WnV Wasowe
Uniform canml wMl walW emire
MilveyOntiwr. ReWrvdycwaWra
beagyevmm dy M1gMflwrs, wTiM1
ewvleaa by lambnaazks,masrve
LI
yah
marvel wealth sail minimal minimal sma
may rause uamceg am mass
uyswalhrgs, am bank slumpko m
r
of bans
wastkg of ummm wW Conrad
corekemak. CmmW wtlW a hill
wknh face inegJm, ald aNlcpag m
mal W Wyss are scmlyad
ranks s evident
13. Uatreamdbvrce to bridge mom
kMa n 35 an, bridge as wall-
20.35 m: Wbge is mg^m wad flay
10.20m: 4Wge'n Stamm to low. w
Less mon 10 m; pagem pcaly gumma
meaa6r vnpaa aiN as dgmnaa
agJnayxNh rtya My
flpW elgmmmaoMmWbB al
wthimy
casted Woman bridge
h I(w
H = M1rnbngal. V F� _ aana.n
m
Total Score
7

Bheam: DSI -(
Reach'
Data:
WwlM1er ' If I A I
Locaflon:
SlabllM Indicator
obaevers: C F�
prefect CFir,. /p(C g
OraiwPe Mee: �
1. WNbsoso am florm pain activity
Some , finejest wN¢amio
I% Iml miv detuberees in the
F '••••-al
rcyoeMdwNarc¢sbeM
eoorows Ilu ina
tlbtvbarcnd in am
gppsa
aM cnarxtxathsji;
wa195M1aE
vc4gicess cameactno
weleacce. ircAgkgcm
%Wer
wNwsME.hannH mcahpgisind .
(mninM.
(gratvg arYVwarig.Of
oedMly.
a". wgravd
IaMNtlea.cnam'gaaltl w
wrotruclicn,ggBilg,pdFermil
missmin.
mlarom. coming In
midrg,hoorM larmirother trudbn
son
tlehnwis . Limflpl aprkahurol
Wholnuloggirf
NS lu
cpnVu ibn of Wigirgs, matls,v
dWYdags. metla.wdM
acNVAies
stircarx
acres
orflon. mmersladmnover
agMAcam pMlonmwatnared
scanngHVad'an¢eEw
repay wlrerakq wwtersred
2.Fbu lwted
pdevislatream wiFroflxhy
pmemul dream wepMndal lest-
Vn—"MnmfieMsbewnwm
Eelremely fi hy AAash flowas mevsM
calendar
wtic atrown wan sllgMy irmmaam
Paan whavie
nose Of discaarge; spMmaral stream
U
raw of llmJkg
cpp than fisa-= rsheam
3.CNmtl pmem0eveesf
Naevtlercedclgrintlltalkrt
Ammons to havepev been
Amsewsw Mvep¢vbeNVnaen
Appmrs
Ir*
stablestslmilw
crerle wmaemaraiy
cremNem.Shown s amrety
ed. Slower is ac
rerrg2es.6hwme,"Itc
rertnx
wlNo. Chaves was
achisgreas ag(meagertwg): bcmmo
3
OtStranMSamCharrall
vNleyl. stale clervW.
clor"emwrgps
due to pevbw slvrvNayualmeM.
jormi'
areal ritaNllyaMlw ammo
SallarWaverlkaam
few
la's peMs. ShapN,wsRpe reach
arwatl baMa.6hregMeras, stable
charlinc
ErtencbnnNclumelwMFemn[
WWM�I.
mJgn OF ww al ta0d
aG rgwel,MLa
MWerab �remem ipoweyf
lrla wm;
owes:
barMs:malgn d g
cweMlwtgab
confinement. rg', mlrlimsot
clarvdcture. swneeanosv¢d
expose
exposed war WasOrm
dM
iMrastrucnea: rolevees
arnies
confinement.
es aslncureM
InNashkmwre:lnracesmarc nco
iarasothan,calmer-wglhdotopd-
comarm
I O
knees
eavnses:wveesartlwvaMsonwell
paw aWMwca bvew are
balks small, directly a:m
Oack hon tM river
sebacknam
In seaflorry am nave minpnalaMtack from
flood a ns, high
acWeflmlpdn; levees ae ngFartl
tM/iver
abrg lnecnarxel Mpe
S 6esmawsy
artetl tphllyw,
IAplgattly wµb wllhspna
Lwse wawlmga wllhroavverem
sop
vaybwe usaaneM µV nomckeg_
Fs=awroxlmahe lvlbnpf sartl in lM
onaales
wesappng,aM p5531y11nMuandl.
mo
ovnlagp'rg_ VerysmaAamWMsd
onwap SmN, w macum amwMs d
Lar0¢aM dM:ly mm. Fs
!as
Most mdail>4 mm. Fs<p%
mdMal<Omm. 2pefs<5pq.
ma1nW <4 mm. 50<M
>]0%
I
6. Ba devahpned
FWS<002az w/y>12, barsers
FMS<002x Wy>12, Mrs
Fw5<002 aM wry>12, brvMlb
Bsrw aregemallygrwtxhan
motors, renax Namis to sawin
maycavev¢ mtw arW w
lerdbrewbeartl mnrwald
1rR lhestreun wkAb al bwflay. Bars
eternal bvflw.wat-vpNawd
wmysed dcoals¢9ravNw
hai demAp coarse Sam an small
a wmpwaddmsercrve sepwbd
as.
W compxed OF coarse Drava to
cobdw, bd mlMmN recent grniAh d
cobbes awLm mai W spersW
Are painces W to corse gravN son
I U
cOOLI FWS>002aMw/iare<
lowevocn by lackdvwtlafwn
vgotaws Bas fmnirg lw S> 002
IXtlawmvgehaliarr. Nobarsfn6<
12, rodrs are evgent
On palurs of the her. FWS>002
annw/y<12
002md Wy>12
aM w/y <i2 m Fera xeevtled
2.0hawmvio MuMudm betook
RrewMM
lie aOccwiwW,c Mcrosa clareMs
Misorm Ynaryeda naRy
tronas arq ofl5
grac mw Hyer,LWDlama,
am mux reM artl pOrypm nmbn
orarabuemmw brs,wwe
CAMUSS
1 eattl¢,caleirga
wdhualsnMo'rgtt7 and fluv,
toms
graft wrtsol.brgge maningsws,rar
Miceadeermigment clams.
TAps one wsilV Blms. yl¢itg eFamN
ned
elments. sikeswvarea,apap
cwageraLVe sM6mnt axumrlalpn
wmgrate aMlw Milan
betYrtl oR trWkrs

ElmalleM It .A
8. Bank sol Mance am mMrence
Clay am arm, day. ommendve material
Clay earl to sorry day loam, minor
SaMydayrosaNytosm:
m lw. Oct
�mY Sam to saM:SIMMONS lve
ertiwAs of remdpsive or
orcorrsmow malteds of glnw or
mNmal; ulcorsdpdeE mWuresM
dnditlaletl nNWas: layers may
MMr nomas: small loyps am
glacial or alter matemb, layers of
wdo. bid ere wyeave materials
Iel6M of MrCpteeN2o-
manes flet vClWe arc ive same
uroplmdwalad muNas
am game;
9.Avweger Is dope angle lwhpe
Bark segsaIV (V(181(a
Bart slc{aa W In -2HIV
Barkalo SmIH:lV(W)In
BaMtabpes avp s5°mrcrcMairep
5o°Is a varmal End)
romoM1esive p urmrsMtlayy
npedpive or unwcolwmw1
rwncgesirapvmpgdwaRC
urcmnUM m maerlak or mar 80°e
maKnaY W s 1-1(0.5°) OR day's on
mom h to 08: 1(50°) in days on
mNe'Ia4 to 06: 1180°)e days
days cpmmon on ore m Edh banks
1 a
math swes
ON 7accasiaMly tgnlrais
rommuramormeater LMM1 WMS
1o. veaNattvear w-gineered Bank
WiJebaM a woodyvegeWtbn with
Matlum bard&w veg m
small baMM needy, veadomr. ilM1
ham may' vary
WooEYve9OR
ppleclbn
atbasl9]%dwoodd amcovn.
wvM]0.g0%geMwarod,yam rover
50-7056 Nam Oar¢ am cover.A
nY
cion
depemwV onage am lvsphwith lase
Fhmpilyhaadard.bary, decwuds
AmgpAY ds;
maloNYdsoflworodvgeration
l tlereMam uw'er.
e ary,
were meting
dxwuauslreemonsmad
brolookswph yourgpowvas
remnlypenl
dwbaray
e9M1maton
dwm5 be Ml
diverbank ue9ebxbn kreledmlhe
on IN
on or
loo# onmrn
mydvesvBywood
ymand idamkms
trees Wkhvery yWrg,pwamoado
oodyven
raname
Ramo. WaWrvag&s,
bank. WCWvpNalwhaMWMW
tN WpdJink Wcmy vegexatun
aWmat
vsgpNunstrain
aveaMed
veMcbanksaahsmcegvegHetun
Re
90% man MrhmgN wlM mMmy awl
animal at 70-
perM1m at ]Ot0%Fmn mrapMao
oXoftM Ct
tel S
Windy vagealan
Goal tanks are luedpteavily
opssure. Putksl fnrtgmarmu'xg
No
often of bored,
prenmdawmsltwnmerham
are
rmpad
alomarrVm roMma
Wlspneammdirq
comm mm
bixmgl with emmtercrve red eswsure.
maryldmpane
may Remgawwaw bank
No lirvrm9 pammarirgmtmp's
11. B Md*g
tale or mare Hoed, dreymmY maySoma
M1serm YN cKrcM
9908 Mand hee mm MM beak.
Afarand paIr cup on mM pianos.
WOO vsgrYf rtdercerrage of
pamsamalpromkmeM cw¢Irki'rors.
Rau bankscpmgae large (grfenal
same Mlem iMtM1e
(}
load torr
Raw halos compiled manor paten of
baa'n vedical doecton Rwt mal
NrNa. UmaMhg am sodawx
l�I
bent in vandal daredbn
ova ona;
Hwlunga
12. Agan wasfig an baa lapmw
rMmlmk HwercemwleMialp
Evdl edinlMpwM mmimr
EvklMce MfialumX.rcY«s9relwrt
Fregmred aM exlersne maaawaslhp.
Vary smM amwMe d masa way"
mmawaahmq.1 UYleaadmm
wastrances d may wabn0 mat can
Tt¢mmodialoalassfaWd, as
Ury Mm and dhm fta
With vegaapm. Rdaavdy Combine
Leel9raValed by M1glu'flw.a, wlvcb
HVJermced by lereunaxhs. massive
each
cM1anM rMdMarW miNmal scaMplg
may wwe umercuttvg am moss
umaouirgs, am Lao, SNmgrgp
M banks
waslVgdu WW Was. Ctammd
wrsitlaraMa. ClanMfvMlhclgidY
wwM pure ine9dan, and scllepog of
rtegder. arq tanks are smllrpm
WMS Is Hided
Vi . UpsVeemdWameLo bkge Loma
Fee avn 35 m; edge is web
MM al pwga4aly Wthllox
10-20 m; bkl9e bskaved toflvx,p
tau 1Kn10 m.p
- w9eo%alr Ngm!
meamer lmdst pals and legitimates
aligned set M1 rcm now
gm, NlgnrrerYpdWrwleaM
with flow
wraped Wre.md;dge
��, �4
H=l nwo v=vne. Ic._cwn,
.
Total score

Stream:
Reach: w t is
—
nate: S $I I R
weather.
StaWllty Indicator
Omeri lr-L—�r
Project el Mf^s Ai
Good lei. at 1117. as
1. WatasM1Cd artl flcW poen acliviy
Slade lamsleY. unMOnba1
tRaasdalmldydbtrxMnoe%i Me
FrallreN thermosets MOc
Candi l domsmances In lice
am cM1sla le%M1s
walenl'ed
wMa'SwN, vqudla cart acMM
splash]. mcnixig mine smarty,
Walensed. SpnRmaN rslrleaclHly.
lgrafig sola maess W stream),
Iewel , cored santl or grand
landslides. conrel saw or graved
cm'ttri hegira.« afm minor
mining, bag". morning, or
in". legging. larmlrg. a wrsW2tim
ly
deforestation Umma mwWLLned
cormiumon a Wpdrys. ram, or
M Wlleings, rows. oraIIM
aaNNies
aMiMIEIMMUR. urpaMa1u11
nhmmwture. NreNYmor swim
sgn NadMowtl M
Mooy✓ba"i watershed
2.FIo'.v Mhil
Pmannal stream hh mflash
Peramual stream or eplcemel& ft
PttnNd or Herne stream whh
Eabemery oaM flash Pros prevahM
behavior
pthxslream xilhsllgMlyimmsM
gamine oMvor
rade a thhsiwge: armament stream
ralealMMlrg
dMr Inds firsFCrder stream
3.CMrM pallem lrarbW)
NoevCenoe deiamelpalion
Almost to lave previously oln
Appears to Mve isevuusly been
Appears to have wevbsly been
MandxMgsladeCrossed v
KdNMy
rhannsmear, ehan
ajiming .SVeam eaoflicAme
cgeningM,slreamor
sbtigd land ch an ystrm,r¢nox
valley), sUdecorsal.
amoo CFemdl�same mnMa4
lassos
deco pevbus aaiaNadjalmerY.
adjrslvg jmeaMenrg); localhed
areuevryerWwem
vary
adjislvg (Ialxary aNVa veNrarly)wXll
kw hews. 5ln'gm.unlade reaYr.
rwndlberasSttagdeed, made
shah.
4. ENremMnere Crammed commands
ACltve food pard ii at la a
Mme Med PWineoMarN. W e
hbderam mMHamnt In vakey or
WYckpairrts v'sside dnxrslreem;
Wadi No son of uwercUlirg
cunadNroalism: miNmat cMNJ
Crossed wads; some exposure of
ur{med water dares or other
hhasnWlme; movers
ca6rlsrnerd, inhandi NA
hdraaiNCMB', lents add. 6Wd
reaWdure, clan }wimlHplq>a-
mpand;lenders; are bxamset "it
plain aMrvbred;leveesare remained
ati ration sman! damplyanflrM;nor
ock ham Me mar
m sire am rove min" legal fids
activeflma Pain, levem are high am
tomer
adso d¢CronM edge
6. Bea memM1tl
Amai deadlg"McMd
jkd dd pxkMw Swne
Laae asswimwl wilfl m WMreN
Vey lase assortment wM m packkg.
FS=appoximde patbndsad dlM
avmosill g,vo assldy unM[del.
ovwlapplrg. VeyamaY amwnEa
miam Small Wmedium amaMsd
Urge amounts of maraid<4 mm. Fs
bed
Malmdaial>4mm. Fs<20%
maiddl<gmm. M<Fe450%
mdedd<4mm. W<Fs170%
>M
/u^(
6.B>davtloprnwi
FwS<002awwly>12, baste
ForS<0.02aww/y>12 on
Fw S<002awwly>l2,orwCmc
Parxitlll®era garenNygMartlan
nadae.r®rox remlive ioslreem
may Navy, daemon shadow be
latllo onto maw compweda
112 da stream math at low flow. gam
wothm Idvflwv. well-vegelaled,
wnposej a course gram 0
ready deposied aarse sand to small
a ampc¢eddexme¢Nampoails of
am composed d same pwd to
U4des. W mlNmY ream Ween a
reM!a ari may de spandy
free ardi up to cared gravel v h
modes. Fw S>002awwryere<
MrevWeY Ey lack avegelmun
vegffirem Sers rwmim to S>002
may 10 a vegedlun. No Mrs for S<
1 n
12, no on are "dead
an anomdlM or. Fm S>002
and wly<12
002 and wN>r2
LY
and Wy <12. no ors as e+oert
]. Oobaatom. Imldeg Mtcck
Rare or me emotions
paeimd, aaeg crag curets
Morden hglcemaM mgssaWN
Frequed am often immerse, ormaga
Weimar. armor Wyly LWO jams,
and Manu wm am Wlall erabrl
unstable Wffiudyns. Cheer
mantissa she or sediment am flet.
grade oaMd, ydgo locale ,
rslicade mosicndtle CM1amel.
Trams we easily Mad coming charnel
redoaYs, den or vanes, ramp
Consdenti sediment mmumdalon
WmgrmeaNYoworn
behindaohltclbn

Stability lnd"tor Excallnnt it -AI
B. Bank and lemma all Coherence
Clay aha any clay: caeowe material
Clay lrem to sgayday Nome. mew
Sally Gay laseMylwm:
yamore
Lmmy, Sam to saes: micolesrve
mounts of rormhestrew
mcpndgalea mmumm of glacig ar
minnow, mmm analed mixtures a
mcwsaldetea elements: laws may
other malerbh: small layers and
alocis a other materials: bass
sees, on are coleswe mateaps
Nelson; of mrcdeaNe or
lease; that wage rlrcdiesrve saE
\(h/J
urawcMiislel mlxturm
all graves
9. Average banns angle abase
Bakspea�3H:tV 118'1 be
Baht sbace an b2 I:IV I3 )In
Baan spas rolH.lV(4 )In
F"— topesow4r inmrcoheaivem
00•IsavaliCy LOMI
nocoNawe amaoredbaea
nMaalysiveainmmdbelM
rrcMeaveor wageababtl
raaoreditlatee malaigpoease 60. Is
mataNs m< 1:1(1 S) in dag an
materiels ro a e: l(W) In Gays on
manuals to 06: 1(M.) in days
clays commm on one a hah NWE
lath sties
«ocuslwwlly pato OeRt
monmaembaM Ness
/D
IO. Ve tWewmgkec 11wk
wide bard awooOrvWaamn Wlh
M 1Ym NrW avecdyvegaelbn
smaA heMa warty vegetelbn wAh
NMmq vary
on
protection
a1 Nas190%aemCyarN cw¢r.
Mh]0.&1% qaN dera9yara cove.
50.10%qaM Eercpy artl cover. A
disbanding
CepeMing mage aro NallM1 wilM1 as
age
osnmry Nmw,healy aeciawus
team,
Amelourstimes
ims
malmyasonowaliagmanslilerws
curer.
loss Iwum, all
With
aeddmu Vemen
naeswMi pmgorMfied
Non5o%ed wow span,
asMy
dhawesnmeNre.
aiverme vegeblion located on tins
make! onm.
vw0etalion make! on
in on or
lowleemme,
Mike yovelnay.walsing
val
Nat. WmiY veaaaNn biaMea
blank Wttavegemlbnmieaea A0.
fttep beenspy
coemed hark. carom vegeblbn
anivavans
anq/onimnsWM vegetanm scam
vedemn ca
Vegetation.
90%
90ry. npn luNOMalwM minimal red
mkaeea110-60%M1pnlarixonlaL
onat
Nothwvemcaffy.lnaNerce heavily
NICs are lireaor hpaviY
e. Nang aammeg
fflan rsee No
atlas din fromtipn
aeKa]Nlecs gain lG%hwn
arm
enmonea
ofone hie
ofomaCdh NKs
oilM1eds.
arnee.
firing a NMs,M sambarmwiy
IpnzaNal wiheFtemive Na evgcanae.
may Nin pbcemore bank
No liMg ar armvvgaNMs
Ti_ Bahr Nllrg
LMleor erne evNantt mooliearaw
Some lMermmerNy a" chesty
sgrificar6.M hryuvEmlgh Naa.
ammlroMbuoe urs cn lNdn Nara.
Nks.imgMr as grroMagea
Irercb all at pwnlrea mmo-blianu.
Ran Nees Compose lege Mellon of
aomeeeleigiig overmmlalN
tool bank
Ra.a Caren cwnpse mimrponionnt
NMinverHral auecf n. Rosman
Was, UNerenmkg ural sadrad
CD
hank in vertical&eckon
omrhags
ovpNiga
12. Mass waslirgw Nk false
Noor) dN emcee peassales
Tv- Mrequ arbor mio
Evbence ao-eomM eNlnalgnas^sN
ReeuM all nkmlve me se aaea
veysmalNmwasamma wasting.
man vemba. MmarhMlea ovenmQuaffeel
Of mass xasnrg that can
1N satirist lw Nk base. as
UNmm cNrc4 wNlM1 overlN er4've
x8h vegaslbrt Reativ&Ycpmsnl
N agiravalea by alter bas, Which
ermenoa by lesson hacks. massive
sato
GwnrM wmnaM mvvmal sraticpNg
may mom uMacuon, alt mass
uMualegs. aro bank slumping is
goal Na
fire aurtlable Nks. CNrvvA
nonmember CNmtlx+shbleghty
vimlh cute Ryder, and swloping of
senator. all NM2 ane scalbpeo
hanks 5 eiWant
13 Upslraam"Ia tobopehom
Mpe1NnD5 m; bnlege Olsen-
20.]5 in arms b signed xMM1 flox
10.20 m: Voaeazkewed to goes, a
Nes lNnfO m; prYJgah pyeyalgsad
meaMxlmpacl polM eN &gmmnA
a gree wiN rr✓a. Aox
now algrvneMbdranNee rim
vsnnow
ccaer� Cerealh Mvge
H=Menweal V=u 11e_1,..M
ToblScom
—L--

Stream
Reach:
nab: '
Wermer, is w ;4, -1 C,
Location: IVe to w Ll ll
F>nnllanl It _V 1 jo-11, 11
Observers: _
PrrJ-
orang�waeArca: T
Stream Type:
L WaI¢rsFM argflM ily
pale wev
61ade, lemalM, uWalwded
C¢aslwp mind d'elwwmes in me
r
FreluMdhh rw in Me
I'm ter -sq
Colonial dlatwbomo in the
arwrf
and CMralaislks
wariel
walamom.irrJWir9 came adWdy
waerarm. nckgirg orme we",
walershd. 5gnificaq ®11b acMpy.
(Waing arWm access to western.
tattletales. Glarrel aeM or pwtl
Naval danrel sand m gravel
cwnmcl'mn, logging, or dta mode
along. lonah", farming, a
along, IcgJlrp, larmkg, wcorsOwXm
deiormtalbn LanXed agdwXraal
cwslrevin d thwart rwW,w
of LWdlrga.rmys. wolMr
Nannies
mMrlMrasmclwe Wbamalbnovb
bormin sere. NgNyurWrrsellw
agnlficarn pxtkn awalemM1e]
emery urban:eg watershi
2F1wv bh
Perennial stream Wil no flatly
Powmal wherein MmwN fist-
Pwem4 wirtlermMb slrcam with
Eahemtly Ili ',flahb sgevakm
behavior
order alWm with sligdN inverse]
NahylaMvka
matlaaNSCIBrOe: epFemwal steam
medmwXg
gbortwn6rslararSlmam
3.GNrcel lallem (rev&ed)
No rvNwae al ctampinalun.
Amwere to Nae wa+lwulY were
Appears to have wrva�4y been
AI'Frorslahm wev1u51Y hsn
IMartlalre. sladecMmelw
channel Steam ftmome i,
cwnmlized. Stroam®xlirety
clmmwunal 6neambacmely
ebagM(slelfroCA sygem, m4
Sol Chants has some maLHws
adlualkg(Mormowbg); Iwy¢e]
edllraXy (klwaXY aeWwvBolkayl wind
vaAey),sbbb Dreamt.
tlua ro prcvlwe Chamd adlustmef2
seas WInst Xy aMlw well
yew what. Strand, unlade reach
Mwaa weds. SIMJNeem, all
Clamel
a, E^InarclvrleoX/daoanl woltMMn11
ACINeflro]GkIn Ws6 al lopd
Aetwo Oil pant abandoned, M is
Pannonia confinement in valet' or
Knlgowe5 vKW4 davmsheam;
wdu: ro sgn r undecreem;
o "way redwilmo; minimal chew
clarM MAS sone weenam of
vpnedwaler Ives or aloe
NFashl6lwe;to 1ev80a
eominal
lntawrbndo:lanacnr am Pend
/m
mann are loecture w
nare low and ad will
V:Iwms arcmMe'am
rami
banks town smah.dm*nerfitwo;n
baterck
Oacx hop Xa giver
in war am It
ue am Pave minimal salbrcx fiom
whim era hghare
wnl:were woN ham
alongthCga
S
the aver
Reams
akre lw Mww4 edge
ler4
Assorted a2ed19MY packer].
61MwelWpacwdwlm sone
Tawe Wmerewghm Vpre
MOF etas rtwAnn Wckiraa
FFSM
a=appotlmapa grlbnof sand ante
orMape^B, artl Presibry vndicaletl.
wwleFgilg. VerysmeAemanlsr
ww4p, Small to medal amwMs d
Idea rmauMe& material <a mm. Fs
�]
tad
Mat material >4 mm. Fs<20%
ma1gW<4mm. 20<Fs<5M
material <b mm, 50<Fs ayO%
>]0%
11
6.Bardeveklwem
VMS 0W2 Wry512. wlxe
F—W <0,02artlwry>12, bona
FwS< 002 am wiy> 12, tad wWwBar
wglw gegewaly Beal, Xan
manes. narrow Mal" to stwm
may leave vagebXonawlrww
brtl to atone aetl cwnpuedd
IR Xe abeam wMlhal bxflw. Bars
'akin al k.>n'flyw'.wMvelaated,
CCTgsed dCOarse glwtll0
MNy rIP.pYllnd cpysa seotlrosmeA
ora cwnposad NealeraiwdepnasN
I
ark we orS>002 eJWywe
mal recto grmsOrbl
Cobdawart maywspYaely
to pmlkles uproCoarse OravdwXn
(7{
WEdea. Fw5>002aMwly we<
twevidaert
bar naked by bckNvepelalk.0
N. Ban lwmirg Mr S>002
mtla lam n. No taws for S<
12,robars arcwker
Wo re S>0.02
amvVy
eN w/y<12
002 and w/y>12
rt', 12
ow w"1 Was
am wry <1z. ro ors areeakem
]. Mebucliwe,mcbdLg bMrmk
Roew M peltas
OnraskN. noire eros wrteM
M1bdenlW haiuer artl ecaesbnAY
Frequent and mean urtleHe. canMga
odwape.amwr ayw. Lwolams.
am moanb am Wom wontwerabkawnucnws,cause
cominual shM 0 warrant new flow
7
delost.
e arn.
gracontrol.dktae
mlkudemoon NlwcMnrwl.
Tula war Mary fillsd, caution cl
thermal other or vacs. remit
Cwetlwade SePamA accumulation
romgmla wWwwtdm
J
belt awwgko

Stability indicator E ... I'M aa.al
8. Bem sail leave am cIXvaca
Gay am o"y; coM1 emalarial
clay Into to sandy clay Into: mtrn
SaMyclaymolloybam:
W,ln,- raj
Loamy sand to saes; mrcexeshre
towns olrorcgM1 wm
urca¢afaated matures of Italian Or
materol; uncowditlaletl mdturm of
urcamalNatal matured: fryers may
dlw matervals; amaX byes aid
glacbl or WMr mebrbb: ones
rest. be ares we menuls
kreeaMrorc wea
ler¢m for include mr<en Ne same
rmredbaf N mixtums
and gravels
9. rlven9e tons sbM argk NNN
Barkslcgs<311:11108•I for,
Elank apFsa ug to 2H: 1V (2T) in
time sloper tolH:IV (45•)0
Banti slated ovx l5•in imcolpaWed
M.a a Ventral Nm)
nmcolpsHeautc watsd
mncoMZWa wurlmnsdLL%ed
rorcdesWe muKprsofrlalaE
vCgcdNated nlalala6 moot 8o'll
mabrub b< 1:1(05•) In cans an
mate,Nls to 08:1(S.) in clary on
mdeah to 061(8x•) in ck)s.
cbya wmmmma¢n Wlxbank<
WnsHm
ons« occasionally actin Marts
common on ore or both larks
18. vegefMWenengMeeel Mena
wpe WVlMxct\tvyegeyfipn wtln
MBOWi &m watt' Vegeufbn
smell tend m wooayv9eaNn wM
waW bammay vary
pdeclbn
mlmt9G%desifyam corer
wax]aAo°b ofaM aa¢kyam ewer.
5a-]a%pNMaerew,aan mrer.T
Do
dmeMy,to a geed c� fees
RimawyfwawsMeality, ae�Mtcyq
gmainM oacesye maturny.
ma)ailydsM wool. dray, wrlswa
town am over
maW am
aecNmusfrees wnx mabreg,
treeswim ywgar Vag autbn
Noseyaftrder. partymver.
Nosey
dreafiressimt located
vegalalbn kcefea cit IN
]OnIM
INfirif ss
Wecywayeadenit an or
same wibvotand y,
way yoa,pimynd ran.
took,
MCNo. Wady regaapon vpMW
tank. social
yank. Wml wgefatbn aieMel80.
IN bOWaaM. Wm]Y v¢geUbm
oacP of
"a tested
andle mmncslam vegeMbn bcafel
lafbn.
arricalyWhban. In atoead
� from"Pairs WnlwMal win miNnal rcd
pynlea&]0.80%hpn Fgiaugd.
hart.. Wordy Veg&Nicn
orrea
adxbaKa are linin pYgaviy
expaure. Penial llmng ¢armoriq
e8an vpxevki&araq eeprsve, No
mdxe
max ass tbn]pbhom
a^norel
Wanee balM1 tanks
dinrem Mur aomearmwvg
to
Mnkont; rmfaxpccure.
axecong
may
mrybabpam onorebark
or
NOlmirgaarmairM al Hanks
of
11. BankcMkg
Late W mm evident. IMrmueM may
Same Information, abnq cWnnM
8gn?¢aM eM hpueM anaalx patio.
NTml caekaxus ppa On[dM1 paha,
banks, ii¢gnlficaM perceyaged
hems and al pwn'tow mneblvom
Raw bads comm§e was Weeny
aomeeaeMkp ae, mint dlxe
1dal Mart
Raw ManYs connotes mins Fwlan of
ares in osteal dregim. Red mat
pads. Umacutlug and sedrad
NM in Vesical akaibn
werxangs
ovefarga
12. Mars Merging p Not Name
Ibar lana EVWerce o/cdensul or
Evidmecl klheyuaN amrd miner
Evitleoce of hmueN arWp spmYnanp
Frepuer am ead¢ivt mass writing.
very stoat ameums d mss wasting.
mase vastly. MxNynea'alaver
ocomences of mass wasted MM can
The pdenW fa as Want, as
Unapmdomel wath over IN edit
yrovegdebn RrlativoymnetM
lae aggravated! by Mgler hw3, watch
ornarmxl pt' lerebn cmcka, massive
reach
channel wqM aM Moral sgllmtrq
may case Wardroom and mis
vdercunirgs, am ar alxnakq's
ofbaMa
wasting ofaretade tens. cMrvM
Monomaniac clvrrtlwiMhbhgNy
amain quite land. W scomill of
Irt"" am Notes sm acnopea
Name b evNen
13. Updmamd5te wb iyehom
Mpadpn 35 m: bNgeewn-
N 35 m; binge b aligned wM for
10.20 m;image IS Ss 10to Mx, or
Leas than la in bridgek pwrly al®netl
meamalmadi pont and afternoon
stares will mer few
flpyagnmMsaffnrwae red
wM Boa
cotenant bvw1M1 broge
k
H-MManMa1 V w
Total $Call

Stream:
Reach: 2aa+ 3
Dale: S 8 14
Wmther:
Stalk Indicator Esenllent 11 .3 1 antra re At
Dmhmp Area'
ur
1. WNNsIIM am flwal plain smarty
Slade, interim. wakbNea
o asarwl minor dklluWnces in IN
Fre;ll»rl Mandamus; in IN
contrast ae0e4Naes in the
ala clreradenatws
welersnea
wNenrea. inivaug cane edits
wNoahea inowirg cam Mmy.
watershed. SVrllkan tame edtNy.
(grwM amVw a¢sss to stream).
armament. clnmN sand or gravel
andspdn. cMnrel sand or gram
construction. mains. or whey mem
minikggra, famous, or
a". Infirm, arming, awawn
sano
aMaesmmn LNnnndmmunm
nuclM adeaings, marks. a
of amounts. woes, or anx
wtibr ids
dMiMraln ywe. UTanaatbnda
Mhnn We. HgHYlnhan¢ea«
agoTuw Punwi of wN«aMa
tamely, uNnitlry wabrshM
2 Fera mm
Samar wallas flnM
pbemlal stream a earemum fait-
Paas Or oNoned stream Vital
EandnelyflnM: rsnnlwMa pCvakd
hehaN«
aaa Bream wnneagrdrimonea
nnM eawvwr
mcde a alacmma: agemNa snmm
res aflmltg
molar train fniwaw stream
a.creraW pNfwn lrevkM)
Noevwercadd¢nmlvzrwn
Amounts bhrvepreviasly Nam
Appmrs to havepelwslr been
award to hava«wM YWeen
Meandering. sale rim" or
chamlbm. Stream k relatively
denmew. Snmm is WN*
clwmellzM Salam a wYlvdy
stags lsepwd assay. nam
sada. Garp for imme mmMw9
ad(wpng lmmrrmn0l; l«gma
Mwliry(lateraYry arglm vwnnW) want
valet'). sada channel
but to previau chants aapsymam.
areas aimtaWAyarW«erpsbn
!camera. ShalgM. ureaL'brean.
rwnd mama. Snagdagd, side
dowel.
<, Edemllnew/ Chat waNwmer{
Adrve lbcJ dsnez¢a Nlcp oh
Active fam gainahamamd. Mk
bMererewribremed Yt vallryw
1llmufada visible dovmtream;
harts; magnortmlmcMkg
wnenW reWiWg. mromal CrimM
control wilts some emoave of
mpvM water bass or most
Infrastuture: no even
wasemad: mmvnui not
Inhnnuwae: terraces mm: food
'v(raSlrvclwe: channel -wYelnlobl>of-
maturity. Manamlow, amNowar
man amamowa, evem yo mmNNe
minim ralbn small: assay commad;w
back man IN raw
bs¢e am have mkimN sgbxk own
Was flood plain; even are high am
IN many
abng IN dunrlal nose
s. Eed ma�ial
AsaMMabea npMr wcktl.
klmNNdr wsked wMnspme
Lowe nswlmeN with M apparent
vayloaeaswmmeM wgnmpxkpg.
Fs= appormale"am atom to tors
commons. am possWy vndbai
ryaaaeppy, veysmoampudad
(Areaap. Smau ro wNibm emwntb of
Large amwma of maN'm1<a mm. Fs
W
klwlmalNW>amm. Fs4M%
mq«al<amm. M,Fs<M%
ybayaW<amm. W<Fs<)o%
>7M
s. Pnoeva)WM"
F«S<ogzemwry>tz, mwsare
F«S<g.gzandwy>tz. baa
Fw S<yMa,dwN'12.WvtdffN
Sarwrlrnxager gn fon
malwe, rarrav rgallvebaMam
maynave ameafwnaml«toe
tem to be waeam canwseda
to the so -mm wamNhvflow. Ners
wvmhal Wxflw�. weY-vegNetM.
gravgb
realYaemsbday
era[areaea6rw.Freannmol
emcanposeda002and"arre
bafcwrse
amassour ommal rewnlgmMha
Wsaysrosmae
coumbid armmarm
fias wrnce%uprora
wry ere<
antitumor
bar evNen Meckdor
by
vc�Naled. Bars lwmhgb S>g.g]
Intra tom sholbovelwi)
No hats la $<
12Gdas.rt am em um
Iz.roMaare evwerd
S>yn
mpMlwaolnebar For z
end wry<tz
y, 12cn.
ooz and wry>t2
I
and wry <13, ro hers are evrarA
). OMluiww.tm Mbblock
Rare wrcAwn l
OcrosbwkwMlm cross anenlz
Mcaereley heymnam ox»IwetlY
FreotgM am den u¢ade. rausuge
alumni armor li tWD lams,
am minor boat am LMlml«wwn
aromas debcliaR, cause
wrNyel stMdaeaimer6am lbs.
grade coma, brage and wvim.
noticmde Nwwnatre crewel.
tmw «e msW bled, wtnlrg 111131
LL �'
y..
Nosmads, day«vares, firap
Cwabmadesedlm"a=mmalbn
amlmae am/w xNm
/
beNm aMnClww

BIabIIRy Indicator Excellent 11.lI
Total &ore
_
_
nun VU'rq
aeon
e. Bank sm leslu am cdnenre
CVY all silty day mnesive mMahl
ebsy It M so" day lmm:mayor
sandy day to sandy lwm,
Loamy sa lm sono: zroncre e
amounts W roM4nesNe or
YrKomolodeled mu4aea of Orical or
mate" umorsdMalro naYlaSd
rsd:dtle] matures: layers nuy
door Monsoon, amid ayws all
glacial a other malate%: assay
egsl. not are mnesire mNeNb
bmndi of es New
team thal incpge nywcamve saw
untollsortalaDd Modurss
all gravers
9 Average Cart snow ar9b(wlpre
BeM aspor < 33".JV(Jar)tor,
Bank snows Ugtom 1V W.) In
Bank slows bI 1V1V(W)to
Berk slopes ww aS to
W. Is a andicdl bank)
m(CdvsNemlMaida91a1
ronmllesrva wulYYnWJalro
lsalcdesiveauM1VMdklaletl
wadaalea mNmlab or over W.h
materials w c l:1(5r) in days M
PVdamsa W o 9:1(50') In days an
malMak to0fi:1(W°)In days
Gays mmmmmaeaLahhaNs
bdnal0es
Onto wmcazanky both Was;
mon on aewCdn UaMs
1o. Ve0¢a1Ne IXecgkapea WM
Wqo Wrdawaa{Y v¢gdalbn wan
VeEWm Wnd of awdy vegetation
Smaf WWINwm! vvWelalan w9n
wroiyvegelalicnWM mavvay
pdedbn
mlmst80%EwoMaM corer.
Mhz] 110% pbm dere' aM covw.
M
50 -]Ox
]Tier tlerodyaM mer.Aaran
depeMirgmroeaM llw9nwan less
ollf
AmajaMdflara%oW.aefv,
majabyMsofl ward prey, mn'Ilaws
11an50% Ed. ewer.
MFaEwmdleary. andWrmrs
bass
bees wtlh mature, neallly, and
tlecNwl¢beas W9n mellvmg.
Yeas% young IXdstalonrn
FtitMiysMy
old or pay.
tlrvase wgealbnarat Hna
v¢gelalunbcatal on Ve
in bass
Ins
pen yort do am
Wa. Wmtly n IXbaW
bank geaWna'anetl
W%
"of WoodeEcnwrew
Woody vegdalkn
(Mases
Monsyon MeadaMoaste
offa momsW H
In sense ofnon.
rotor Ino holonal ns
$Oxhwn Maonaling
t71)
orbraeE at ]OAO%M1cm taaaray,
dfldme roomy,
WCrl70 enm
oarm
Whbvisraoy.
Wlnbarhs are lireE or Inanely
®r Itodanely
aradramd
e:pwure. Partld kirgadmmpg
Hell No
Matadidbss Men ]Ox horn
al bay
`�If
rmdred
dwealpinWM
a was but sonspwue.
mwhg
bbmrg Minpr
kx¢dgal win Marawa rcM apwwe.
mar Win pace pit ale WM
on ratioW
Ro nrlrlgwamaagamnks
11. cu"
7ft1g Ldbas We'rouaed. brlM1ml Mray
some bnlamalerftabM cWrctl
sgrsflwKarG rcaluaton lrNn baKs.
Abmrol cal(nms ass onngnbarq.
tanks, iro®INkalq cemedegea
bells arodaanllwrtca¢Mk1an.
Rae naris comprW arae pHbna
wreaeanfsg over mml INUe
Mal WM
RawbankscwrryMsembmrourtmof
WrJl non valbd Elredicn Rcgmd
anis. Urggmamg all sw.rw
WM a vertical aiafbon
overangs
oveelwlgs
1/VI..')
72 sw uMb WMWure
Rowlatle evitlwced pddaala
Evri dbnhNmM mLar minor
Evberlce allrealxn arWa sgMficda
Frepred aMevlanbve mass%aping.
rerysmasamaMad Ma mstng,
m wast% hlaeltylerect aver
sacan
rcu a mass wag del
Te pMaabW
l to M allure. as
udlwmcWaM wbm overlMenite
wimraoaawn Renvorlycoslam
be Motivated by now dory. wMch
yorad Y by rereon dodo, masann
reach
cranial wrcXn alp tram[ sdalmpug
may case retlb*cMbp am mass
nNowdYga, and Wink saanpage
of Was
asstingauml etarts. CWatl
ewoodaade. cWrrNMdIM1§ngdy
wamalae kregdar.am smeopirgd
Maguar, and WMs are scabbproa
Was'a emki t
13. UpslrnmdbMm Iobdgehdm
Kwrn35m:b Woe l-
26% in bodge a aligned with Age
11}20 m: dkge is Mead bflav, a
Less ban 10 in bodge is many dgra]
meads Wpacl m%aacd abionmed
alielN wilM1 manwv
flo-edgwnerYa dhdwbaM
wlmflav
wMmM beredn bridge
N =MmnMar V = vandal Fc _ Ira�.a.=..a
Total &ore

$tsar: OVJc- R
ReaoH:
Dem:
70
elM1er.
Loogon: ISgNy1 J�_Lvul,lf Yti
StabilHv lndicaanr 1
Observers: Cc, E T _
Pmject Id -./UV
Of-
Dminaab Mea:
I. wal«sleE aM lbN plan aaMy
mels. l«eale].umismrtcS
Dmaennal minx aislvMeem in"
F t -
repuent aaNrbercesmlM
near lsu-na)
CgMrhodS tGnca in Ila
IiOon
eM deraclerkliu
walarslreE
walerslwl, freluMlg ulM activity
wamrsltel.IrcWegcwbaclaws
watashtl.sgnf Meankraftel
(gtvllq alWvegesa lDslream),
annotations mgrevel
s.clugNaaM v
7I
COrelrvrJiwn bgpkq, «dM"
mMrg, togging, lamins «
M16N cons
M, v corohuclnn
1. LunNod agrNlurdl
«sbuclun dLWN
dbumkgs,
of bunt gs. rm o, w
T1
aWthries
adNHea
dM1S lMrastruclve UAanbadw0vw
Umaiwino
HighlydM
Ktue. HgHyerOan¢e!w
5gnfeara pMm WwatanlpC
rupgiy vpan¢kg walerStgE
ralwy
2 Fpxtwdl
Poremal abeam wXM1ro6aalry
Pe'mial sheen vednm«al (nl-
Pq¢nliWl«ad«mNmM Slmam MM1
FAIemtlY flashy: flab hood Mewing
behavior
pCV So-emn wen slgM1NY ircIaaM
flash bdnvbr
molls of Nsawigo; erimmeral stream
wed1lp«1ilg
gnertmn flatuE« stream
TCMmaJ Miamimv¢ws
Noevtlerce no damtliaaWn.
gppeas to Mve«e Ill Inion
ppp®rs to vive aeviousy bean
Boman to lnvepWv ly been
MeaMerbg. atone clvmY or
cnarmiluadstream la MetNelY
damtliza l Sbeam is acwHY
tivmglkee. Stream a aclivtiv
ioagm(step-pod syslgn. renew
stable. Clmael lbs some misnomersa
a)talitg(meanaxbg): lommito
ealuallro 0smaey andlw v=olly) w h
valley), stable Cane.
Ma 10 laevuus clbnnl Willitmetq.
Sol lrulaHlilyamlvemsnn
low bards. somam, unstade eesn.
5
roum hems. Shagmvetl, acne
Cannel.
4,Emtn )eneMclbmdC wmlm
ger Se Oainezesaltty&
Acthm Orad Main aWmO .mfS
IM Imtomnfire Ie ,aMyw
KNckpMvebe Enxrstrearn
bods', msgndu cWhguneMry
woAdg; minmtl clamel
dme
owal6: somewW
azpwe
myat
sed inner lines or ole
nams"Une: m Wattscongmmem
Mrasm Lea rcl
IMrmWdwe., Imams ezial:flw]Ilamelrvcmre:
Channel -wiamo-Iopof-
aaOnnon knees are mlv and 50 well
Main alaMowd, laveur are moderate
bads ratan mint deeply cmfineb:w
Mck from the mw
Ms[!e am terve mktlmal s&bxkfrom
active flm]Main; events are M1gn eM
11e m«
Wong tine dvnnel epga
5. BeimalWOI
Asa«md SUMlgmly piked,Ab]eraIllYpac
We hSone
Lacaeass«OneM wen mappa'em
Verylwseaa5gtmWd 110peckbg.
Fa= appmumale Mali d sato In ma
Wabpprg, am wa iblylminimand
onalappilg. Very smallam«aY9d
ov«Iap. Smak to medhm arum. of
L«geamvaasdmale lel ,Imm. Fs
W
toot MNetltl>a mm Fs<20%
mamre<amm. 20<Fs<M%
matme<lmm. 50<Fs<70%
>70%
-
W
6_8ardevtlwmM
fay<002 am wly>12 ban ere
Fg5I0.02 am xrY>12, tors
Fq5<002amwty>I2,Maao t
Bar Indama 9g mm ygreater than
manure. RnW IWNNe m$beam
nay love vegemlGn amlw ba
IaWno Le wMe am wmlasedd
112tMslrearn N allowfim BSI$
wkNW Wx lNw. xtlpvpNalad,
Wlxlpceed dCoane gravtlm
rpMy depwilad wane saws no amNl
ere wmpwaddeMltlNe UBpSpsd
am 00mpweddCoaeSe gnvtlro
Cobbles, bd minimal recon groom of
wWm alWv may b: spoway
fre paNlym up to mase gravel wNn
robbers. F«S>002amwlyan<
bgavk b/ INckolvagelalbn
vegablad. Barslvmilgmr S>002
Hldelono tion. Nobnlw5<
i2,mbars areevkl«i
on«a6xKd0»bal. F«s>002
all wry<12
0.02 and wh>12
ado 112. no bars are ancient
2O trait Wer, Mfuding Ydmh"
Rarea Mg
kOc kraal, ryaNg cross cunena
M1,kilureOueOamwnasnlah/
FreOwmem dmnurtlalYa, oaakga
Mgcq, armor laver LWD)ams,
all map MIA am Wllom mason
unSlaloW OMaucwm Cause
mrtllnalamfldsal'mea aM flan.
ra
grade cWld. bope hd wvlrg.
Intimate inumn of me[lens.
law ere mNYfllod. cauaNg clvpg
mvNmeM. notes or vanes, resp
fgrspaabe smlmeM awumulallon
mmgrWe a5Www4en
5
beam omtubolu

Stability Indicator Excellent 11-31 GavM a -B1
TPbI $COrO
9. Bank so11es1ure all coMrerce
clay and silty cHy:wMsiVe malarial
Clay own to saMY°cky, tram', mimr
sancy day to sancy land:
Loamy sank In read cdsdive
mounts of randomness or
ure«edMaz i mkM1ves W glacul w
mwwbl: urc«adp mulwesM
oradgelel MhN ty moray
Other malxbk: grant lavers all
gbcial ordR malerlNs:layarsa
east, Ml one conative mommy;
seems of mrcvMwd
brew then surface rptd Ne salla
madNa[ro mhNes
all Wavels
Tavel bask M. age arg'e feature
Bank sbPre e3H:1V(IS-)I«
Bark alloys u mM 1V(2F°In
Bank eb0e5 to 1H'.1V(6°)in
Bank sbpes Dean 45°mrorcdmNew
90°aavwMal Bark)
n'uhesive «urcuntnuealaE
ruredvyge«wcpsdkiaMtabnormal
ureoeadkMeJ
urcwsOtaateY mate cooter W°in
Mat" a 1:1 f45°I In clays en
mdarials loos 1(30°)n data on
malerlals w 0&1 IPU°ISclays;
date c«nman on am or WM MKs
tramemse
ma«asbnaMY OOM bank¢
monwrorewOnllMNn
'O
10. VegNetiueaenplre«ee funk
WgebaMdwx¢yvagdaWneilh
nM.N mperd MwMYVegeG4on
SmYl beNdlrcWyvegel&imvAh
WOMYvapelaAon tbM mat vary
"Ceram
at least 90% derWy all cover
with 70.W%call density art cover.
PO-FO°b fled JanllYaM cevx.A
tleFadep entad all KSlM erin was
Pr'maMYMN wN.way, dahaduos
n malty d hard entad. lady.
majorirydsyfi waod.prey. mrK¢rous
men sU%dartdersbeN wen.
trees wen maws. Math, and
thousand trees wit mama,
lrcea w4h yossg or dd vagdaion
PrMAY doh wand. PMy. ceraerew
eMerse Ve2NYlynbcated aniM
diverse vegetation loo ee on lM
Idckpg nQwvseybcaed onprear
heyy won vary Haaq. dot and arm,
bank. we VdJtlalionug
bank wWtivegaatlancrieroed BO-
the loo of bank. wwtly VegNalbn
moor mrumm" visommon medical
VMcdly. In ece ed vep&dim,
9.M, firm nyin van material best
aknRd al]0.90%kym hyo¢ 1.
Md me Lank. Woodyvgelabn
both Mnke are lvpd or MaVay,
moment Partial lirvrq aarmwioa
often won esklenl awl eaweue, on
encored at Islas lMn 70%from
ermael
dmeor Min Mnl¢
Iirvrg dbdnW.bN entre arc«adg
ho immal won massive real expMwe.
mayMirpsamonorebaM
NOlping warmorkgdMnkg
Tl_Bans umig
LAOS or me bawd. Infrequent cow
Sane iMenmMeMlr amgclarvM
s Mad amn
ig eouerven Mm Mnks.
almulwrXhsw
halls. Islam m pH Maga
Ceras aroxpydvwYwrehklnrs.
Raw MABcal wiac Ian
mu tbelnbarMa,
Mvgow moat alk
area M^k
paw Car�Bmm lwrMnd
Reatmat
MM in vatcd tlireclim. Rod mal
banks
banks ong ad a[LLroa
wymbanrxa
MM'm vMial tlireelisn
ovnhacgs
overlarge
12. Mass wtlirg or MK%am
WwlitM Wt edwX wler
Entrn.e ofInfrequent "for mina
EvMerce of Fullawuwsgnq M
Frequent allmm"memasa eamost
verysmall aowuMsdmass waathg.
massawamill. MlosuYMdMova
occurrences of mass washrg oat Can
TM Polemwl fan bank (acre, as
Canyon cMn i such over the abuse
wonvergetalkn. Rdaimlydamam
he Maravaed b) Ngher floats. which
wkebal by leraim crocks, mass"
each
dwml exact all minimal scdlo0irg
may case wd«wment and mass
urdercullMgs. are Mnk$humeral•
d Wma
was6rg aursbble Mnks. eNmH
cu¢iumbe. eluwG wklmsngHy
wiem bolt kregWar. and scalloping of
negadar, am banks are ewgroed
Mme Is wberd
13 Upstream tlManewhgge hen
M1lcre lnen35 m:WNgebxeF
2635 m: brkge a algred such any
10,21) an brige a annual wfl«v or
Less den to m: Mudge S doody algree
dander knpacl Pa" ant algmnenl
atgeKIvm rvwllon
floxal®ral SdMwile ram
won Aou
reMxetl ben¢Ih Mane
k\I�,,
TPbI $COrO

Stamm:
Reach: w2
Dale:
Wealter.
Sgbility rMkator Excellent (1-31 Gard lk-Aft
aburhem: r �
Project zf-7�P?f5 PJJ✓i
I
1. Wamry� all flmE pain ami
SIffik. krab:E, uw%twW
Cttaskrvl mhp disturbances m ill
Freginm aslwbemR lnllg
coming( dslvbaiem in"
all charadmint 5
weUmmail
walemited.h mpfCelle aclh6V
va0l pC, WudWlg cello wr$My.
marromgQ. Significant cam ahoy,
(Paairyaldfw saes babmmj.
IaN¢11es. clamltl sand or gravel
wroslNes, clang sand or gimml
ammaman, IWi Or anar am
MIIMM. loggii9, lmnM. or
mimm, IWgtr9. larmiy9. or cotsmchnn
CeWebldan. Lknlalagrouima'
corsummon of bleltlings, rwL. w
of buddincs. roaas, or all
Wirings
dl%rlMrashuWe UNanOliwlevel
imrosbucame. HgMy abaNsam
/y
sgnircanl ellen of walmlea
rapgrywbanaim wetasllN
2Flc W
Tpaemtlal sbwmwMra flashy
Pwemsl abeam aelAgmery fnH
PerenvalplMamXlemsllrom will
Evhamelyflastry: flash OCMs pevabrs
laY qw
Marry Lel w
mMe of a'3clarge ei emeral stream
mreanmekg
aper thane t-oraxstream
9 Clmtlpallen(revbM)
No avpatedcnamels&im.
Algeeis to Faveaa Iy been
Appears rol welu bBanApgewswl
epevigslYbeen
IAeaMlKIN stable camel
clamalkea. Streamb Ja1M1Y
clwnlH6M. BhdmbxWely
damal¢ea. Stream ¢afNely
sbaght(skpp^d spllem, renew
slide. Clwnrel ram sane meaNps
aajuallg (memtlormi b aaa
WjwtN(lineally manor vatkally) Wh
van). Stable elWntl.
aW M previous cbnMl MNalment
areas ashimabley aaYgaossn
fMll"i $baghl. iX88mMB Pch
X11
roux bells. Stragmaxa, stable
Channel.
O. EaroncmaN cNrvel cpMremem
ACVre tall pan enols or am d
Adve Mwa pain ataaaea. but s
Wilerats wNiremeK in vaOeV or
Npekpans YmMe—doxmheam;
baNS: msgnauaercmliy
cuneay reWadrg: minimal mamma
cfwnrel costa: asme4 Fucose(
eapoarawder lmas or olM
nhmhudve', montes
cMfiremeno. mhasm1cture Mt
irmaslNwve. maracas cool: loin
pAraslrWhae:clanre4wNtr.ptcpaf-
emmaa;leveesaremar arm setwen
plain abpgorea; nevem are moderate
barks Milan soar: eeeprycanfinrea;"a
bade from IN my
in sae aml have minimal salaam from
scene fli pai. lneesarehghaa
tamer
pori Oe chenrel Wage
5. BMmalw
Assonl0s 041 mcr pxMM.
MWoalery{y Ww awns
Lwve ssMm9a whM1 mappareK
Vaylccse asoame9wMropsUllq.
Fs= approximate CM'en of saa n Me
wMapping amF may marom M.
ovMappep. Verysmanmmam,d
aa4p. Small la medum amara d
W90 mnwMs of minimal <a mm. Fs
bed
Moat material > L mm. Fs<20%
maklW<Omm. 20<Fs<$p%
Malarial <a mm. 50<Fs170%
>]0%
6. Bar tlevebwnem
F0wS<p02amJWyl12. banxe
FmS<0.02aFEwlY'12, bas
Fw S<0.02 as wry >12, bar w4Mls
Barwialls are yercaAY grealw Man
maNre, renow aMive lo stream
may lave vegWUlon area be
as to be wvJe as comppa d
112" stream width at low flow. Bas
wyMal Iwvflav, weUvagNgNa,
pnppseE gCoarse gravHm
newly aeacew coarse Send to small
are canpaed deneahede�sis of
as comFosMdcmmaegrav¢Ib
cNAkS, but mimmal rw¢m groMlm d
wRiles atllp may be spmamy
fine par111es an lo came Pavel wlM
(�
cobbles. FOS>002aawlYMe<
Eerevgac bYlackdvegdaron
VmWmmd. SOMfwmirgfa S>002
NMelomvegealvm. Nolmfw5<
f2abm are evtlers
on rodnrsdMa bar. ForS>003
and My, 12
002 and any >12
J>
anal wiy 112. no ben are evNem
].D rraorae, FdMhq beNWk
Rae Of Wpaaem
QcesipW, taebg mass wrteM
MMebely Oeamerl as ammsoalty
Frequent am often urslsW. aWinga
wlcrcos, armor amm LVID (ams,
arol maim bank am balbm mason
ualable mMlnMoa, aur
advrnl shMgsMYmRM as flan.
grade card. aNge burl a m.
Mkabb nosnn dlM1ecnemel.
rrdrus ere easilr NlM.rainkg clmarM
revameds aloes w vanes. riprap
comweade reconvert accumulation
wmgrwe aww waren
edea mss time

sbDillh Indicator Excellen111 a1 ri. fA al
a. OaM soil Ii mo cdrseae
aM aYlrclar: colesive matefgl
alar mwa
sands cartosanar Idem;
Laamr saw maar4 vwrcoM1eswc
amounts of or
urcwsdblalae miMwes of glamal or
matrle', maotdbmal mmmms of
MAI6d',iat¢a mutual layers may,
dips missiles: sma arms eM
alaclBtaallX mMViab: fayersa
mtiat bur are coesroe mMaNk
Names of manaaaire or
Ices mart roWb mNnlasrvs sad
romaaarea incomes
am graves
9. Avefage bank sbce argle(wlpre
BaMsltpea<3H;1V(1a°)(d
BaM sbOes ups 2WN(2]°)in
Bank slope to IH;1V(<5°) M
lism: slope ovm<S in mrwhnirsa
9M as a vertirl will
rlmlcalaWea uxwsdYJeIM
rgrmlceaire duricwsW0.He]
rcriwlpaive o•urmr6olye1a0
d¢dyayaletl maleiab or orer w in
materials to< 1:1(65°)b days, on
nmalerles Is 08:1150°) in clays w
maters to06:1(60°) in days
days wmmwworerbdh parka
ECMsaft
am or owaslomlly bons Certs
common on ore or both barks
y1
10. Vegemlrre wergbaererl bark
Wiae bad Dismay v¢gelasbnwiM1
M1%dWm[aM of woMy ysliftbn
SmaW lweq olwwdY�egdatn wYM1
WwtlYvegelalen LWd maY vary
"KIM
at beat 90% dersiryard camp
sonMy Mary carmiy ano wax.
�-]0%pbN tlsrellyaM awe. A
aene"i on ata Has 1pa'MwXh less
I'mmsi1YMdwwd,'say. tlesgrrois
AmaprXyoltsN wwd, Iealy,
maloriya soft vol prey. wniferus
Ilan 50%pbN tlarsdy arq roves.
Iree Mh malate. ImMry, and
decdayar lreas Mh clamant.
tram Mh youry or do vegetation
Pmnasiy soft seal Marey, condamas
dffia a immersion Milled on tM
aNersevegetaficnbcaLLN nn(M
bodiN in Messy located m w Mr
aces wen very Mmff old aM fast.
tnk. WmaY vegeWlbn onMed
loans. WOW vepelalbn oebNed Q0.
memp Nbank. WwdY vegdasbn
aM/a morlmand vellelasbn balled
vmtiwgy. Inablencedvmdalbn
W%hdn 1=20,1e1 win) minimal man
gbMed M)060%"in mammonist,
off oflMnsnk, lewd gn
bore Mas are llred d maHr
enflame. PMaI IkMt clamoringamen
wXM1 evNartroa ezpwme. No
apMeadlmstMn]0%ham
0%from
mwe0
aoremCdM1 banss
Nrvrg abaeYs. bu[sane armpirt
fame roil eapays.
isM1marim
martbMawwae bark
NO or
NO nmw pram)mereaforms
0
11. Banclaxit
LAtledmMa'aigeM. InneaueMraw
SwnevtaMi Yalq Ca l
KT am a al M1epuens in Win banks.
Almost wMiwaus curs on Win Mass,
braks. tratrefcaa prcrna9ea
bartlsaM al pmmirMswrshkibre.
Rax baNu cpnpae lx9e psrnonIX
one mleMbg ma mini alt
fowl Milk
Raw banks wmpke all pWon a
dial in vertical dKtM ROd mat
rials. UMttgrtnrt am ena-trot
Oafk bveasal dkeclron
owtrgs
oaeasry5
12. Masswastaff or rd Will
No or Idle ¢vberpedwleNlev
Evi]ence of Mrenuent and/or minor
Evidence of lrepuedaMlmsignlfMt
Toxicant amete mea socal"
very Sinal an amass wari t.
mass warshurst hMny M1eaba wen
wicamanom a mass wastrt fast can
Tt wlem'al br bad Milano, as
Unarm ctmd Mth wen na erXtre
wfn veaaalbn. RelHivey wmbm
tfralfr sM by al flows which
normal by Mal cracks. mmsive
each
Mamd wNband mrmal uaAopng
may wise mimmunff ano mass
uNencMnts, anJ trt. sixnpiws
G
abarns
xa51i)g of mslaMebanks. Ctrr51
canskMable. Ctmd wblha Ni
vadlh quit ineguWr, I scalping of
mag)Ix, ani bads are swPoped
trb3 a eNaem
/)
13.Updrem disarms lohbge Win
Mreftn 35 an. salts k scall -0-35
m', Mdges 'altrea wM nw
1620m; MkgeaskaneEtotbw, m
Lesathanl0m; badge is pmay Ngre]
maaMrim{att wM artl ekgmn¢nl
&tsps wiM SWrflax
nw altvnMsdtrvae int
wMflnx
unsr,+ed bemdh sage
Total Beon

Appendix C —Site Protection Instrument

Unique Places
May 11, 2018 To Save
Care Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Ms. Conder,
This letter confirms that Resource Environmental Solutions has agreed to engage Unique Places to Save
("UP2S"), a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization located in the State of North Carolina, as the conservation
easement grantee and long-term steward for the Compass Point Stream Mitigation Project ("Site") located near
Boonville, Yadkin County, North Carolina. As the conservation easement grantee and long-term steward, UP2S
has agreed to and shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in
the conservation easement are enforced and maintained. Specific responsibilities include:
• Monitoring of Site is conducted on an annual basis.
• An on-site inspection is conducted once per year.
• Visits to Site are coordinated with landowner when possible.
• Annual monitoring reports are sent to the landowner when possible.
• Signage for the easement boundary is maintained.
• Violations and potential violations of the conservation easement deed are promptly communicated to
the landowner.
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX), LLC shall act as Bank Sponsor of the Site. UP2S shall receive a
stewardship endowment in the amount of $30,957.14 to ensure annual Site inspections occur and that the terms
of the conservation easement are legally defended into perpetuity.
As the bond obligee for the construction and monitoring phase of the Compass Point Stream Mitigation Project,
we agree to abide by the terms of the bond agreement(s) in the event that Resource Environmental Solutions
fails to perform or no longer exists.
David Harper, Executive Director
Unique Places To Save
5/11//2018
Representative Si nature Resource
Environmental Sol ions
Printed Name
L�NW
Date
PO Box 1183 . Chapel Hill, NC 27514 , 585-472-9498 infoa-unigueplacestosave.oro

Unique Places to Save Annual Monitoring and Legal Defense Endowment
Compass Point Mitigaton Easement - CONFIDENTIAL
Units
Hours
Cost/Unit Frequency
Annual Cost
Annual Monitoring
Staff time to monitor mitigation easement, including file
review, travel time, on site time, post visit report production
14 acres
4
$
60.00 Annual
$ 240.00
Staff time needed to address minor violations or issues
N/A
10
$
600.00 Once every 10 yrs.
$ 60.00
Mileage
100
N/A
$
0.54 Annual
$ 53.50
Meal Costs
1
N/A
Annual
Insurance
1
N/A
$
100.00 N/A
$ 100.00
Total Annual Funding Amount
$ 453.50
Capitalization Rate
3.50%
Monitoring Endowment
$12,957.14
Accepting and Defending the Easement in Perpetuity
Staff time for major violations
N/A
50
60 N/A
$ 3,000.00
Legal Counsel
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
$ 10,000.00
Other Incidentals
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
$ 5,000.00
Monitoring Endowment
$ 18,000.00
Monitoring
DefenseTotal
and Legal

Unique Places
To Save
Unique Places To Save
Property Monitoring Report 2017
I. PROPERTY INFORMATION
• NAME OF PROPERTY:
• PROPERTY ACREAGE:
DATE EASEMENT GRANTED:
• DATE OF ANY EASEMENT AMENDMENT(S):
• OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT INFORMATION
• GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (acreage, general biophysical characteristics, land/resource use):
• DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF SPECIAL CONCERN, FEATURES OR RESTRICTIONS (building envelopes, areas of intensive
management, riparian areas, access points, historic, etc.)
II. MONITORING INFORMATION
DATE(S) OF INSPECTION:
• GENERAL WEATHER CONDITIONS (temp, cloud cover, precip):
• IF AVAILABLE, APPROXIMATE PRECIPITATION TOTAL FOR PREVIOUS YEAR:
LIST ALL PERSONS ATTENDING INSPECTION:
TIME SPENT ON INSPECTION: hours
• WAS THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACTED PRIOR TO INSPECTION? Y N
Unique Places
" To Save
Owner
Manager/Representative
Name(s)
Address
City, State, Zip
Phone
Email
• GENERAL PROPERTY LOCATION
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (acreage, general biophysical characteristics, land/resource use):
• DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF SPECIAL CONCERN, FEATURES OR RESTRICTIONS (building envelopes, areas of intensive
management, riparian areas, access points, historic, etc.)
II. MONITORING INFORMATION
DATE(S) OF INSPECTION:
• GENERAL WEATHER CONDITIONS (temp, cloud cover, precip):
• IF AVAILABLE, APPROXIMATE PRECIPITATION TOTAL FOR PREVIOUS YEAR:
LIST ALL PERSONS ATTENDING INSPECTION:
TIME SPENT ON INSPECTION: hours
• WAS THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACTED PRIOR TO INSPECTION? Y N
Unique Places
" To Save

DID THE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE ACCOMPANY MONITOR? Y N
WAS THE EASEMENT REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSPECTION? Y N
WAS THE PROPERTY TRANSFERRED SINCE THE LAST REPORT? Y N
o IF YES: DEED FROM: DEED TO:
IS THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY FOR SALE?
r=011
III. MONITOR OBSERVATIONS
• NATURAL AND/OR AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITIES OBSERVED. Note any rare species.
• DESCRIBE CURRENT MANAGEMENT AND LAND USE WITHIN THE EASEMENT:
• LIST AND DESCRIBE ANY MANAGEMENT CHANGES SINCE LAST INSPECTION. Describe the activity or alteration. Note
location and extent. Document with maps, photos, and/or illustrations.
♦ AGRICULTURAL/OPERATIONAL CHANGES:
♦ LAND USE CHANGES:
♦ ECOSYSTEM/SPECIES PRESERVATION:
♦ SCIENTIFIC (research, surveys, etc.):
♦ RECREATIONAL OR EDUCATIONAL:
♦ WILDLIFE OR HABITAT MANAGEMENT/RESTORATION:
♦ EXOTICS OR DISEASE CONTROL:
♦ OTHER:
• LIST AND DESCRIBE ANY MAN -INDUCED ALTERATIONS SINCE LAST INSPECTION. Describe the activity or alteration.
Note location and extent. Document with maps, photos, and/or illustrations.
♦ CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS:
♦ EROSION OR OTHER SOIL DISTURBANCE:
♦ OHV/ORV USE:
♦ FERAL ANIMALS AND/OR EXOTIC PLANTS:
♦ TRESPASSING AND/OR BOUNDARY ENCROACHMENT:
♦ TRASH DUMPING AND/OR VANDALISM:
Unique Places
To Save

♦ CONTINUAL OVERUSE:
♦ DISEASE (plant or animal):
♦ POLLUTION:
♦ DEFERRED REQUIRED MAINTENANCE:
♦ OTHER:
• DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES AND/OR ACTIVITIES PERMITTED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE EASEMENT. Such as
construction of buildings, facilities, general improvements, roads, water infrastructure. Include all reserved rights
exercised since last inspection. Note location and extent and any changes and/or activities and attach maps, photos,
and/or illustrations as necessary.
• DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE EASEMENT.
Such as construction of buildings, facilities, general improvements, roads, water infrastructure. Note location and
extent and any changes and/or activities and attach maps, photos, and/or illustrations as necessary.
• NOTE ANY OBSERVED CHANGES IN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERSHIP OR CONDITION. NOTE ANY CONTACT WITH
NEIGHBORING LANDOWNERS.
• LANDOWNER/REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS. Include any landowner/representative comments specifically related to
the terms of the conservation easement and changes in land use or management.
IV. SUMMARY, STATUS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
• SUMMARY. Provide a brief narrative. Information from previous reports must be incorporated if available. Include
impressions of long-term trends and conditions of the site.
• STATUS OF COMPLIANCE.
o NO VIOLATION(S) OF EASEMENT TERMS OBSERVED
o UNSURE DUE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR EVALUATION
o SOME EVIDENCE OR ACTIVITIES WERE OBSERVED WHICH MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF THE EASEMENT
• SUGGEST ANY ACTIONS THAT SHOULD BETAKEN ASA RESULT OF THIS SITE MONITORING VISIT:
INFORMATION AND SUGGESTIONS FOR 2013 MONITORING VISIT:
V. MONITOR CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME:
TITLE:
Unique Places
To Save

ADDRESS:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
SIGNATURE OF MONITOR: DATE:
*This report is a record of one person's observations during one visit. It is not intended to be a statement of landowner compliance of the conservation
easement.
VI. DESCRIPTION OF ENCLOSURES AND ATTACHMENTS
Indicate the number of the following items accompanying this report:
Aerial photos
Ground photos
Maps and Illustrations
Additional documentation
Other
If attachments are separated from this report, note their location:
Unique Places
To Sage

VIII. PHOTODOCUMENTATION LIST
Fill in the table below for all photos taken during the monitoring site visit. Also attach a map showing the location where the
photo(s) were taken.
UTM Northing UTM Easting
Photo # Photopoint Description (meters) (meters)
Unique Places
} To Save

",. Unique Places
To Save
Unique Places To Save
Stewardship Monitoring Procedures and Guidelines
Unique Places To Save (UP2Save) is dedicated to upholding and defending the
conservation values of the easements it holds. An important aspect of achieving this is to
conduct our stewardship monitoring practices in a professional, accurate, and efficient
manner. The following procedures and guidelines will help ensure that staff will have the
guidance and expertise to properly monitor UP2Save's conservation easements.
UP2Save's stewardship monitoring procedures and guidelines are separated into three
stages: (1) pre -monitoring due diligence; (2) monitoring of the easement property; and (3)
post -monitoring due diligence. Each stage in the monitoring process is crucial in
employing sound monitoring practices and creating accurate and reliable documentation.
Pre -monitoring Due Diligence:
Pre -monitoring due diligence includes components that prepare the monitor for the
impending field work and documentation of their stewardship activities. The following
procedures shall be followed prior to all conservation easement monitoring visits:
1. Contact the landowner to schedule a monitoring visit at least one to two weeks
prior to the scheduled visit either by phone, email, or letter (make an effort to
group monitoring visits to multiple easements in the same general area in one
trip).
2. Make an effort to invite the landowner to be involved in the monitoring process.
Usually having the landowner available for questions or discussion of issues
before and after monitoring is fine. It is not necessary that the landowner
accompany the monitor around the property unless the landowner prefers to do
SO.
3. If unknown, acquire any information needed to access the property (e.g. lock
combinations, gate locations, road/trail locations, contact information for land
managers and neighboring landowners).
4. A few days prior to the monitoring visit, make an effort to contact the landowner
to confirm the monitoring date.
5. Prior to the monitoring date, review the conservation easement deed, baseline
documentation report, most recent monitoring report, and any other pertinent
information (e.g. landowner correspondence, older monitoring reports).
6. Create a monitoring map of the property using aerial imagery or a topo map as
the base layer. Ensure that the property boundary is clearly depicted on the map
as well as any building envelopes or other important boundaries or landscape
features (e.g. stream buffers, forest management plots, property points of access).
7. Enter the property boundary and BDR photopoint locations (if available) into a
GPS unit for field reference.

8. Inform at least two staff members of your schedule and destination(s). Have an
emergency contact phone number available at the office.
9. Monitoring material that is needed on the monitoring visit includes:
a. Stewardship Binder
b. Monitoring map
c. GPS unit (with extra batteries)
d. Compass
e. Camera (with extra batteries)
f. Notepad
10. Prepare for your field work. Bring necessary field equipment to conduct a safe
and effective monitoring visit. Field equipment should include:
Required
a.
Sunscreen
b.
Extra water
c.
Extra clothing
d.
Extra food
e.
Extra cash
f.
Topo map of greater area
g.
First Aid/Survival Kit
h.
Blanket(s)
i.
Shovel
j.
Spare tire(s)
k.
Cell phone
1.
Flares
in.
Bolt cutters
n.
Crowbar
Optional
a.
Tent
b.
Sleeping bag
c.
Firearm(s)
d.
Stove
e.
Laptop computer
f.
Bear spray
Approximate pre -monitoring due diligence completion time: 3 hours
Monitoring of the Easement Property
The field portion of the monitoring effort should be interpreted as (1) an opportunity to
maintain and improve relations with landowners and/or landowner representatives; (2) a
small-scale duplication effort of the baseline documentation report; (3) an opportunity to
enhance, alter, or correct any deficiencies or errors in past monitoring efforts; and (4) a
check on the activities within and conditions of the property under easement.
The following procedures and guidelines will help ensure the efficiency, accuracy, and
safety of a monitoring visit:
1. The monitor should have a clear strategy of how the property will be monitored
prior to the site visit.

2. Meet with the landowner if possible prior to engaging in field work. Ask about
land management activities (past, present or future), activities on adjacent lands,
and any other issues related to the terms of the conservation easement.
3. Invite the landowner to accompany the monitor in the field. This is not necessary,
but it is polite to ask.
4. Enact the monitoring strategy laid out prior to the visit using all tools available
(e.g. GPS, compass, maps, photos).
5. Use GPS to track the monitoring route and take coordinates of photopoint
locations. Use the compass to take azimuth readings at the photopoint locations
(direction photo was taken). All photopoint coordinates must be taken in UTM
coordinates, Zone 13. All azimuth reading must be taken using the 3 -digit method
(0 to 360°) to decrease ambiguity as opposed to using quadrants. For example, recording
a bearing of 192° is much clearer than 12° W of S, or S12°W.
6. Walk or drive as much of the property as possible making an effort to visit all access
points, boundary lines, and property corners. Pay special attention to building envelope
areas and other areas that may have more restrictive covenants (e.g. stream corridors, no -
timbering zones, high quality habitat areas).
7. Duplicate the photopoint locations that are depicted in the BDR. If new photopoint
locations are required; develop the new photopoint locations based upon current
landscape conditions and activities. Document these new locations in the monitoring
report and make notes that future monitoring efforts should follow the new photopoint
format. Note: the original photopoints portrayed in the BDR must always be replicated
unless the BDR is amended to not include certain photopoint locations.
8. TAKE FIELD NOTES! Do not rely on memory to complete the monitoring report.
9. Make an effort to meet with the landowner after the field visit to discuss any minor, non -
violation issues or other observations made while conducting the field visit. Do not,
under any circumstances, discuss potential minor or major violations to the
conservation easement with the landowner. UP2Save has specific procedures to
follow when addressing potential violations (see UP2Save's Conservation Easement
Violations Policy).
Approximate monitoring completion time: 4-16 hours depending upon driving time and
size/complexity of property.
Post -monitoring Due Diligence: -
Post -monitoring due diligence primarily consists of developing documentation of the
monitoring visit. This documentation consists of -
1 .
£
1. Filling out the monitoring report
2. Creating a monitoring map including the photopoints, access points, monitoring track,
and any other points of interest.
3. Writing a letter to the landowner that summarizes the monitoring visit and also states that
the landowner is in compliance with the terms of the conservation easement. If the
landowner is not in compliance with the terms of the conservation easement, then staff
will follow the UP2Save's Conservation Easement Violations Policy.
4. Properly duplicate the monitoring report and file all copies according to the
UP2Save's Stewardship Records Management Policy.

Mail the signed monitoring report and compliance letter to the landowner and any
representatives listed in the baseline or that have received monitoring reports in the past.
Schedule the next monitoring visit based upon observations in the field and seasonal
access to the property.
Approximate completion time: 3 hours

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this
day of , 201_ by and between
("Grantor") and ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine,
feminine or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue
Code, the purposes or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) — (d)
listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real

property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational,
or open -space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following
natural communities: add or delete as appropriate: wetlands, streams and riparian
buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands
and riparian resources and other natural values of approximately _acres, more or
less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement Area"), and
prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any purpose
or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument
(MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Mitigation Bank, Department of the
Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW- , entitled "Agreement to Establish
the Mitigation Bank in the River Basin within the State of
North Carolina", entered into by and between acting as the Bank Sponsor
and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Mitigation Site has been
approved by the Corps for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable
stream and wetland impacts authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement
shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third -Party," to
include any successor agencies), and may be exercised through the appropriate
enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these rights are in addition to, and
do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the Army instrument
number SAW- ("Mitigation Banking Instrument"), or any permit or
certification issued by the Third -Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby
unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area
described on Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation
values thereof, as follows:

ARTICLE I.
DURATIONOF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is
an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with
the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation
Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any
development that would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and
uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any
introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising
display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other
temporary or permanent structure or facility on or above the Conservation
Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are
prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming,
cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement
Area except as provided in the Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous
vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved
in the Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five consecutive years
from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed
by and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways
on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing

roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement
Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation
values of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules
and regulations for the use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying
the Grantor as owner of the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage,
waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or
other materials on the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any
manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or
drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands
within the Conservation Easement Area, is allowed to perform grading,
filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by
Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or
alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition,
diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered
or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by the Enter Sponsor Name, the Grantee, its
employees and agents, successors, assigns, and the Corps for purposes of
constructing, maintaining and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and
Dreservation of streams. wetlands and riaarian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area..
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation
Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant,
the preservation of the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural

condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area
for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not
limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights
of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement
Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement
Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to
the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area in accordance with the approved Mitigation Plan, and the
Mitigation Banking Instrument described in the Recitals of this Conservation
Easement.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all
reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to
determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns,
is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantee, Enter Sponsor Name, and its authorized representatives,
successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon the
Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational
observations and studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do
not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are
allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is
inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such
areas or features of the Conservation Easement Area that may be damaged by such
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by
Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the
Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such
notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains
uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by

appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without
notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if
the breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances
damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate.
The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to,
and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection
with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration,
including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by
Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps
shall have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and
conditions of this Conservation easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition,
or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of
a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to
entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control,
including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except
Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor
under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life,
damage to property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such
causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property
which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor
further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend title to the Property against the claims of all persons._
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any
interest in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to
provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the
transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement
shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation

Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or
terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the
Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this
Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified
holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 501 (c)(3)
and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and
agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or
assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes
described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MBI
with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the
entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and
supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to
the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except
those incurred after the date hereof, which are expressly subject and subordinate to the
Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any
kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the
Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor
of the obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits
that may apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the
property, Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated
with fencing to ensure livestock do not have access to the Protected Property. These
activities include the maintenance and/or replacement of fence structures, as deemed
necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource functions within the
boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial
proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area
is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the
Restrictions imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in
appropriate actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking,
and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.

I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation
Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an
extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair
market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time of the
extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter
specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Sponsor:
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's
interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an
appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in
a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not
affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee
under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this
grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation
Easement Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section
of the Mitigation Plan,_prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor
and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and
Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any
future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with
the terms of this Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to
preclude the use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the

Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
(Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form)

Appendix D — DWR Stream Identification
Forms

NC DWQ Stream Identification
Form Summary
REACH
DW1
DW3
DW2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =)
26.5
16.5
19.5
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3
3
2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
3
2
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
2
3
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
3
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
3
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
3
0
3
8. Headcuts
2
0
0
9. Grade control
1
0
1
10. Natural valley
1.5
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
3
0
0
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =)
9
7
11.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
3
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
2
14. Leaf litter
1
1.5
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1
0
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
3
j 0
j 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =)
9.25
14
5.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
3
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
3
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
3
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
3
0
22. Fish
0.5
0
0
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1
25. Algae
1.5
0
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0.75
j 0
j 0
Total Points (Subtotal=) 44.75 37.5 36.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11n pp� yy
Date: 5 Ix I l k I ProjecllSae: l i ybl ! I'i,n I Latitude:
Evaluator. ( _ ra. i r I County: \I„d [(f , I Longitude:
vwr mune: y1 ' / Stream Determination (clrele ane) Other
Stream rs of least infemMMnt / N. ��
az remnA.a��lmnz.an/ Ephemeral intermittent Perennial e.e.0uad Name:
A. Geomo holo Subtotal= Li
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
5
0
3. In -channel sbucturet ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
d le I s uenm
0
1
2
3
4. Panicle sae of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bans or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent allwlal deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 V 1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es= 3
Sketch: Sly mg�la7r jJfh7
artificial ditches are not rated; see dillsslons in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = M )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
23
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
3
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
.51
1
5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. SoH-based evidence of hig water table?
0
No = 0
es =
G. tdloloDy (Subtotal= 7iLi )
18. Fibrous roots in streembed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
20. Macrobenlhos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
MIJ-5
0
0.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
25. Algae
0
1
7.5
26. Welland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Sly mg�la7r jJfh7
j'p1,�(fn-e. S/10.1�

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Dw
Date: jj.�j
Profectl5ite: ,^�.,. r-_
Latitude:
Evaluator: ��
County:
Longitude:
la
1
2
Total Points: �,%�-' '-
Stream Determination(Ci.
Other
Stream is etJeast intemrrttent y
Ephemeral Intermittent forenniaD
e. g. Quad Name:
1219 or erenniali23p'
0
1
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = lu ,-
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
i'Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1. t
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
731
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, slap -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Panicle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
1.5
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headculs
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
Notes:
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
NW=
0
Yes = 3
Sketch: p,✓(ci Jnr 1 )'lec.t icy
'arfificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = `' 1
12, Presence of Baseflow
0 1my.=3
2
1
13. Iran oxidizing bacteria
0 73
2
14. Leaf litter,
1. t
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 �. ,_1.5
731
21. Aquatic Mollusks
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.51.5
00
2
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0.5
1
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = )
16. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
731
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25, Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streari
FACW =0.75;
OBL= 1.5 er=
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: p,✓(ci Jnr 1 )'lec.t icy
(b[...���
�-. �.'�
Clpy IS� n.��ll�
itP.�

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: S
Project/slue:Go^''P9fi Pv(^'i
Latitude:
Evaluator: M�
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (ci
Other
St..Stream is at least ife _
of S -�'
Int.nn0'
Ephemeral Intermittent erenmal
e.g. Quad Name:
or erenni l 30-
0.
3
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = / i -s 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1eContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
/ 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
12
0.
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
d le- of sequence
0
4
2
3
4. Panicle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict Floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
(,2p
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1.5
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.6
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1,
11. Second or greater order channel
No -
V
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a aNficiai ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = i/ )
12. Presenceof Baseflow
0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf lifter
1.5
1
0.5. 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.
0.5
1CIS-
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
YAS=
G Biology Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambad
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenlhos (note divemdy and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be merged using timer methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Appendix E — USACE District Assessment
Methods/Forms

Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet Summa
DW2-A
DW2-B
DW1-A
DW1-B
DW1-C
DW1-D
DW1-E
DW3
1
Presence of flow / persistent
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
pools in stream
2
Evidence of past human
4
2
3
3
4
2
1
4
alteration
3
Riparian zone
2
1
0
1
2
2
1
2
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
4
discharges
5
Groundwater discharge
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
1
v
T
r
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
CL
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
3
4
1
0
3
0
0
2
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
Channel sinuosity
4
2
1
0
3
1
2
3
10
Sediment input
3
2
3
2
2
2
0
2
11
Size & diversity of channel bed
4
3
2
4
3
3
0
4
substrate
12
Evidence of channel incision or
3
4
2
0
3
0
0
3
widening
13
Presence of major bank failures
3
3
1
2
4
2
1
3
14
Root depth and density on banks
2
3
0
2
2
2
1
2
N
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock,
4
2
0
0
2
1
1
2
or timber production
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool
5
4
2
5
4
4
1
3
complexes
17
Habitat complexity
3
4
1
3
4
3
0
5
18
Canopy coverage over
5
1
0
2
3
2
3
2
streambed
x
19
Substrate embeddedness
3
3
1
2
2
2
0
3
20
Presence of stream invertebrates
0
3
1
1
5
3
0
4
21
Presence of amphibians
2
1
2
1
4
2
0
2
0
0
op
22
Presence of fish
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
23
Evidence of wildlife use
1
3
2T
2
4
2
2
4
Total Score: 1 61 1 56 1 33 1 41 1 67 1 42 1 25 1 62

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
mese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
( extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max ints)
0-4
0-4
4
Q1
5
Groundwater discharge
U
(no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
0- 3
0- 4
0- 4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
0- 2
yi
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
�i
p"'
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(dee 1 entrenched = 0; fr uent floodin = max ints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-3
10
Sediment input
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
0- 5
0- 4
0- 4
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate(�
(fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max ints
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points0-5
0-4
0-5)
aH
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
( severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max points)
pdq
1413
Root depth and density on banks
')
E.,
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
rA
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
f
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
H
(no riflleski les or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)0-3
0 - 5
0-6
17
Habitat complexity
( little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats= maxpoints)
0-6
0-6
0-6
f'
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
0-5
0-5
0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
f
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
NA*
0-4
0-4
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
>4
no evidence = 0; common. numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0-5
0-5
U
O
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous i3 es = maxpoints)
0.4
O
22
Presence of fish
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max
0-4
0-4
0-4
points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
(no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = maxpoints)
0-6
0-5
0-5
'
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
mese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

cornpqSS fool'p�
Cc
n, j a Jn STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
inese characteristics are not assesses in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0- 6
0- 5
0- 5
(extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points)
a
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer= 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max ints)
0-4
J
5
Groundwater discharge
discharge =
0-3
0 - 4
0-4
U
(no 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
0- 4
0- 4
0- 2
/
Entrenchment / floodplain access
Q'
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-2
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
0-6
0 - 4
0-2
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
07
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
3
line, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max ints
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 - 3
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
( substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
C?
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
0-3
0-5
0-6
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
0-6
0-6
0-6
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max points)
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
19
F-
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0-5
0-5
G7
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence offish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common numerous tv es = maxpoints)
O
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
inese characteristics are not assesses in coastal streams.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
fi hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
l
(no flow or saturation = 0; strongflow = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0 - 4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; springs, se s, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
,114-1-
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
0- 2
7�
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
00
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-2
'
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
!
10
Sediment input
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
'
(extensive d sition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 - 5
0-4
0-5
>0
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)'
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
/
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
/
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
(no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max points)
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
-
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
I
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0-5
0-5
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O(no
evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0- 4
0- 4
0- 4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous s = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
S'
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
fi hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

�W� s STREAMUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Q ET
i uwc %,iiaia%,miistn;s aic nut assessed 1n coastal screams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREO ON POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0; strongflow = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
3
Riparian zone
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
0-4
�j
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
V
(no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
0-4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
un
(no floodplain = 0: extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
0-4
0-4
0-2
fid+Entrenchment
p"
/ floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max ints)
0 - 6
0 - 4
0-2
Q
9
Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander= maxpoints)
0-5
0- 4
0-3
10
Sediment input
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)J
NA*
0-4
0 -5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
0-5
0 - 4
0 - 5
O
a
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints)
0-5
0-5
pQq
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max oints)
0-5
p7
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(substantial impact =0; no evidence =maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0- 3
(no riffles/ripples les or is = 0• well-developed = max points)
0-5
0 - 6
17
Habitat complexity
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points
0-6
0-6
0-6
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
NA*
0-4
0-4
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0-5
0-5
21
Presence of amphibians
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0-4
0-4
22
Presence of fish
0- 4
0- 4
0- 4
(no evidence = 0• common, numerous es = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
0 - 6
0-5
Q - 5
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
t
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
i uwc %,iiaia%,miistn;s aic nut assessed 1n coastal screams.

DWI -C
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECO CION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
'Z
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 - 4
0-4
U5
(no discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
0- 2
y,
(no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = max points)
�i
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0 - 4
0-2
a"
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent floodin = max points)
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0- 6
0- 4
0- 2
(no wetlands = 0;1 a adjacent wetlands = max
9
_points)
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
(e ve channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
�+
(dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
` J
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
F.,
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or p2ols = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxPoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
(no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0• common, numerous tv es = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O(no
evidence = 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

(ompif Not 5)1I1(
DWI -0
CL STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
.ttwc LittataL LcllJlllis UCG nUL assessed to coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0, strong flow = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
Riparian zone
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max ints
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
( extensive discha es = 0; no discharges = max ints)
0 - 5
0-4
0-4
5
Groundwater discharge
(no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
0-3
0-4
0-4
4
G
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
y,
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
0- 4
0- 2
3
�+
p'
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
n
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = maxpoints)
0 - 2
V
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands = 0; large ad'acent wetlands = max points)
0-6
0-4
0- 2
a
9
Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-3
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
a
(extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = max oints
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
NA*
0-4
0-5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points
0-5
0-4
0-5
13
Presence of major bank failures
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
0-5
0-5
0-5
14
Root depth and density on banks
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points
0-3
0-4
0-5)
15
impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
( substantial impact =0; no evidence = max oints
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
H
(no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0; well-developed = max oints
0-3
0-5
0-6
Q'
17
Habitat complexity
0- 6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
0- 6
0- 6
3
is
Canopy coverage over streambed
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy=max points)
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
a
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = maxpoints)0-4
0 - 5
0-5
21
Presence of amphibians
0
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
22
Presence of fish
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
0- 4
0- 4
0- 4
23
Evidence of wildlife use
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
0-6
0-5
0-5
Total Points Possible —F
100
100
100
a
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
.ttwc LittataL LcllJlllis UCG nUL assessed to coastal streams.

b i- E
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
=,w......cwavwi aua aw iivL asscssvu in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
Riparian zone
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
0-6
0 - 4
0-5
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
'
5
Groundwater discharge
(no discharge = 0; springs, se s, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
0-4
0-4
0-2
/ floodplain access
1 entrenched = 0; fre uent floodin = max ints)
0-5
0-4
0-2
Presence of adjacent wetlands
tEntrenchment
wetlands = 0;1 a adjacent wetlands = max ints)0-6
0-4
0-2Channel
sinuosityive
channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
0-5
0 - 4
0-3
10
Sediment input
(extensive deposition--- 0; little or no sediment = max oints)
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max ints)
NA
0-4
0 _ 5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)0-5
0 - 4
0-5
a
13
Presence of major bank failures
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
0-5
0-5
0-5
/
14
Root depth and density on banks
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
0-3
0-4
0-5
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
( substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
F
(no riffles/ripples or Pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
0-3
0-5
0-6
I
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; fruent, varied habitats = max poi s)
0-6
0- 6
0- 6
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shadi vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)0-5
0 - 5
0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
(dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max)NA*
0-4
0 - 4
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0-5
O
21
Presence of amphibians
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max ints)
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
''
1.4
O
22
Presence of fish
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max ants
0-4
0-4
0-4)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence =max Dints}
0-6
0-5
0-5
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
=,w......cwavwi aua aw iivL asscssvu in coastal streams.

po
co
0
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
muse cnaractenstics are not assessea to coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECO ON POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
� f
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
`Y
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
0 -
0 - 4
4
5
Groundwater discharge
(no discharge = 0; springs, se s, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
0-3
0-4
0-4
I
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
0- 2
.7
p"
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
a
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(�
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-3
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
d�
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
NA*
0-4
0-5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
0-5
0-4
0-5
13
Presence of major bank failures
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
H
(no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)0-3
0 - 5
0-6
E '
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats =
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
S
max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
(no evidence = 0• common numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0-5
0-5
G7
O
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
a
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
022
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
H
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
muse cnaractenstics are not assessea to coastal streams.

Appendix F —Wetland JD Forms &Maps

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: SAW -2017-01465 County: Yadkin U.S.G.S. Quad: Copeland
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Donnie Wagoner
Address: 4650 Pulliam Rd.
Boonville, NC 27011
Telephone Number:
Size (acres): 14 Nearest Town Boonville
Nearest Waterway: UT to Yadkin River Coordinates: 36.269624.4013914.995077
River Basin/ HUC: Upper Pee Dee
Location description: The site is located at 4650 Pulliam Rd. in Boonville. NC,
Indicate Which of the Following ADDIv:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminaryjurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clem Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely
an effective presumption of C WA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area,
which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have
the waters of the U.S. on you property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Sermon 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWAX33
USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the daze of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA
jurisdiction on you property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.

X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on_ Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the dare of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Elliott at
828-271-7980, ext 4225 or [e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
See attached preliminaryjmisdictional determination form.
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont
Region (version 2.0). These wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators
of ordinary high water marks.
D. Remarks:
The potential waters of the U.S., at this site, were verified on-site by the Corps on 1/24/2018 and are as approximately
depicted on the attached Potential Wetland/Waters Map (dated 1129/2017)
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/deternination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate
participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the
Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approvedjurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to
this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Par[ 331. Enclosed you
will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Atm: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOMI5
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria
for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the
NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A (Preliminary-JD).

+•Jt isnot necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division 007ifyou do object to the determination in this
correspondence."
Corps Regulatory Official: _ 2e 'VYi
Igam Elliott
Issue Date of 1D: March 6.2018 Expiration Date: N/A Preliminary JD
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure
w continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
tLuv:/Icorpsmou.usace.army.mil/cm apex/Vv=136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Jeremy Schmid, 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27605

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
A rant: Donnie Wagoner File Number SAW -SAW -2017-01.165 Date: March
6, 2018
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
rSECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://%ww.usace.army.mil/MissionstCivi]Works/Regulator ProgramandPerinits asox or
;91W regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section Il of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
Q PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved 1D, you may appeal the approved 1D under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this forth and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved 1D (which maybe appealed), by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.

11- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN IMTIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
,SECTION
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record
of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may
provide additional information to clavi the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the if you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Atm: William Elliott CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M 15
828-271-7980, eat. 4232 Atlanta. Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any govemment
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of an site investi tion, and will have the o rtunit to artici ate in all site inves[i at ons
Date:
Telephone number:
Si nature of Ilant or ent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Arm.: William Elliott, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Atm: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JD: March 6, 2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Donnie Wagoner
4650 Pulliam Rd.
Boonville, NC 27011
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
CESAW-RG-A, SAW -2017-01465,
D. PROJECT LOCATIONS) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The site is located at 4650 Pulliam Rd. in Boonville, NC.
State: NC County/parish/borough: Yadkin City: Boonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): 3&269624,4013914.995077
Universal Transverse Mercator: N/A
Nameofnearestwaterbody: UT to Yadkin River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: March 6, 2018
Field Determination. Date(s):
Use the table below to document aquatic resources and/or aquatic resources at different sites
TABLE OFAQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
Site
Centered Coordinates
Estimated Amount
Type of Aquatic
Geographic
Number
(decimal degrees)
of Aquatic Resource
Resources
Authmity to Which
in Review Area
Aquatic Resource
Latitude Longitude
(linear feet or acre)
"May Be" Subject
DWI -A
36.267474
-80.638581
2374
Wetland
Saction 404
® Non -wetland Waters
® Section 10/404
DWI -B
36.270364
-80.638258
510
j@ Wetland
®Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
® Section 10/404
DWI.0
36.270969
-80.637379
733
Wetland
JR Section 404
Non -wetland Watersj
M Section 10/404
DWI -D
36.271846
40.635361
414
®Wetland
®Section 404
Non -wetland Waters
[j] Section 10/404
DSV -2
36.264420
-80.639616
342
© Weiland
® Section 404
Non -wetland Waters
❑Q Section 10/404
DW -6
36.263885
-80.637124
652
® Wetland
Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
® Section 10/404
WA
36.2675
-80.6385
0.05
® Wetland
Section 404
Q Non -wetland Waters
© Section 10/404
WB
36.2698
-80.6386
O03Wetland
®Section 404
®Non -wetland Waters❑*
Section 10/404

WC
36.2702
-80.6377
0.13®Wetland
®Section 404
®Non-we[land Waters
® Section 10/404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may bcjurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requester of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AID) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of IDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AID for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware than (1) the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g, signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated asjurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID or a PJD, the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographicjurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the
review area, or to provide an official delineation ofjurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, the Corps will provide an AID to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PID
finds that there "may be" "ten of the U.S. and/or that than "maybe" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA
Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply) - Checked items should be included in subject file.
Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
10 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester Vicinity, USGS, NWI, Soil, Existing
conditions WOUS
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delinemion report.
❑ Office does not concur with dam sheets/delineation report. Rational:
[,] Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable wavers' study:
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Atlas: 24k Copland
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 5 and 12 digit HUC maps.
USGS map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Copeland.
' Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey.
Citation: Yadkin County, NC
National wetlands inventory (N W I) map(s). Cite name:
Q State/Eocal wetland inventory map(s):
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) / Hood Insurance Race Map (FIRM) maps:
Q 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Damm of 1929)
Q Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Q Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and
should not be relied upon for later jurisdic l'"al determinations.
' 3 I7.-N15�
William Elliott, March 6, 2015 Jeremy Schmid
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting
staff member completing preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
preliminary JD signature is impracticable)
Two,,pies of this Preliminary JZ) Farm have been provided. Please sign both copies. Keep one signed espy jar your record
and return a signed copy to the Asheville Regulatoty Field Office by mall or earmlt
US Army Corps of Engineers-WJlmingmn District
Asheville Regulatory Field Ofee
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 18801-5006
I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. Ifthe requester does not respond within the established fire
frame, the district tray presume concurtence and on, additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an anion.

t
4
Y`l'l SE)t 'r

Appendix G —Invasive Species Plan

INVASIVE SPECIES PLAN
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project. These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. RES will treat invasive
species vegetation within the project area and provide remedial action on a case-by-case basis. Common
invasive species vegetation, such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
tree -of -heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), will be treated to
allow native plants to become established within the conservation easement. Invasive species vegetation
will be treated by approved mechanical and/or chemical methods such that the percent composition of
exotic/invasive species is less than 5% of the total riparian buffer area. Any control methods requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules
and regulations. If areas of invasive species exist within the easement, they will be monitored yearly as part
of the monitoring protocol, and treated if necessary. If required, problem areas will continue to be treated
until the project easement shows overall trending towards meeting all monitoring requirements.

Appendix H —Regulatory Agency Scoping
Letters

Regulatory Division
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
November 15, 2017
Re: NCIRT Review of the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Prospectus:
Gideon Site (SAW -2017-01462), Compass Point Site (SAW -2017-01465), Green Mesa Site
(SAW -2017-01466), Twiman Site (SAW -2017-01467), and Scout Site (SAW -2017-01469).
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
Attention: Ms. Cara Conder
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Dear Ms. Conder:
This letter is in regard to your prospectus document for the proposed RES Yadkin 01
Umbrella Mitigation Bank. The proposal consists of the establishment and operation of the
mitigation sites listed below:
Corps Action ID
Site Name
Easement
ac
County
Stream/Receiving
Water
Latitude (°N)
Longitude (°W)
SAW -2017-01462
Gideon
8.6
Surry
Mill Creek
36.3967
-80.8584
SAW -2017-01465
Compass
Point
13.73
Yadkin
Yadkin River
36.2696
-80.6384
SAW -2017-01466
Green
Mesa
19.96
Yadkin
N. Deep Creek
36.2132
-80.7181
SAW -2017-01467
Twiman
32.06
Yadkin
N. Deep Creek
36.2130
-80.6902
SAW -2017-01469
Scout
14.0
Davie
Hauser Creek
36.0322
-80.5166
The Corps determined the prospectus document was complete and issued a public notice
(P/N # SAW -2017-01462) on September 6, 2017. The purpose of this notice was to solicit the
views of interested State and Federal agencies and other parties either interested in or affected by
the proposed work. In addition, the Corps and members of the Interagency Review Team (IRT)
conducted field reviews of the proposed mitigation sites on October 16 - 18, 2017. Attached are
comments received in response to the public notice from the North Carolina Wildlife Resource
Commission, and a field visit memo incorporating comments from the attending IRT members.
The Corps has reviewed the information provided and considered the comments received
in response to the public notice and the field site visits. We have determined that the proposed
mitigation bank appears to have the potential to restore and protect aquatic resources within the
Upper Yadkin 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin.
Therefore, the bank sponsor may proceed with preparation of a draft Mitigation Banking
Instrument (MBI).

We appreciate your interest in restoring and protecting waters of the United States. If
you have questions concerning the path forward for the proposed mitigation bank, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone] extension 59.
Sincerely,ly signed by
`A,
H U G H ES.A N D R EA. V V DHUGHIES.AND EA WADE.1258339165
DN: c=Us, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI,
ADE.1258339165 Dat SA,c =HUGHE255A1NDRE1.15 11 A ADE.1258339165
Andrea Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager
Enclosures
Electronic Copies Furnished:
NCIRT Distribution List

0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Andrea Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager, US Army Corps of Engineers
FROM: Andrea Leslie �J
Habitat Conservation, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE: 26 October 2017
SUBJECT: Comments on RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Davie, Yadkin and Surry Counties
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed
the final prospectus for the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Site. NCWRC staff
attended site visits with regulatory agency staff October 16-18. The prospectus proposes stream
restoration, enhancement, and preservation on over 29,800 feet of stream to net over 18,000
SMUs in the Yadkin River Basin (03040101).
The bank includes five sites, and general comments on each site follow:
• Gideon Site. Located on a 76 -acre parcel and sandwiched between two Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) sites, this agricultural site will involve restoration, enhancement,
and preservation on 4,092 ft of Mill Creek and unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Mill Creek,
netting 2,664 SMUs. The site is less than a mile upstream of the Mitchell River, which
serves as habitat for Brook Floater (Alasmidonta varicosa, US Federal Species of Concern,
NC Endangered). Excellent erosion and sediment control is especially important at both this
site and the adjacent DMS sites to minimize impacts to this mussel.
• Compass Point Site. This site is located on a 209 -acre parcel in agricultural and forestry
uses. It was recently logged. The project will involve restoration and enhancement on 5,024
ft of UTs to the Yadkin River, netting 3,709 SMUs. The downstream end of the site is at the
confluence with the Yadkin River, and protection and enhancement of riparian habitat at this
location is especially ecologically beneficial, as it will provide a wildlife corridor that is
connected to the Yadkin River. We recommend that the landowner expand the forested
riparian area along the Yadkin River, as well. Two rare mussels [Creeper (Strophitus
undulatus, NC Threatened) and Brook Floater] are found in the Yadkin River in the vicinity
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

RES Yadkin 01 Mitigation Bank Page 2 October 26, 2017
Davie, Yadkin, Surry Counties
of the project, and erosion and sediment control is especially important at this site to
minimize impacts to these species.
Green Mesa. This site is on a 273 -acre parcel in agricultural use, and project activities
include restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 7,776 ft of UTs to North Deep Creek,
netting 3,531 SMUs. The old dam structure downstream of the present dam may serve as bat
habitat, and NCWRC biologists may perform bat surveys there in 2018.
Twiman. This site is comprised of 10 parcels totaling 266 acres in agricultural use, and
project activities include restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 10,477 ft of UTs to
North Deep Creek, netting 5,766 SMUs.
Scout. This site is on two parcels totaling 522 acres in agricultural use, and project activities
include restoration on 2,467 ft of Hauser Creek, netting 2,467 SMUs.
Detailed comments on the mitigation approach are captured in RES staff's October 16-18 site
visit summary. NCWRC staff has reviewed this summary and has provided comments on it in a
separate email.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact Andrea Leslie at [phone] or at andrea.leslie(&ncwildlife.org.
ec: Travis Wilson and Oliva Munzer, NCWRC

M E M O R A N D U M
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
TO: NC IRT
fires
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 919.209.1052 tel. [phone] fax
FROM: Cara Conder, Brad Breslow- RES
DATE: 11/14/2017 (revised)
RE: RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Bank IRT Site Visits
Attendees: Mac Haupt (NC DWR), Kim Browning (USACE), Andrea Leslie (NCWRC), Olivia
Munzer (NCWRC), Cara Conder (RES), Brad Breslow (RES), David Godley (RES)
Dates: October 16, 17, and 18, 2017
Gideon Site —10/16/17
The Gideon Site is located between two disjunct portions of the recently contracted DMS Little
Sebastian full delivery site. While each project could be developed independently of the other,
the combined easements will result in a much larger contiguous protected corridor and high-
quality aquatic habitat. WRC mentioned that there are known occurrences of the brook floater
(Alasmidonta varicosa) in the Mitchell River, approximately 0.5 miles downstream of the
project area which RES mentioned in the Prospectus. Connecting the Gideon and Little Sebastian
Sites offer opportunities to create and protect habitat for the State protected species. IRT
members agreed the Gideon site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final credit ratios
will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• DWR requested that RES determine the potential wetlands on site. RES is currently
delineating the site.
• MC3-A: Group agreed to restoration at 1:1 ratio as originally proposed in prospectus.
RES explained that cows have full access and the landowner has historically moved the
channel. RES affirmed that construction sequencing would harvest native bed material
when possible (e.g. cobble). The crossing will be a culvert.
• JN5 — Group thought that Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio would be more appropriate
approach for this reach instead of Enhancement II. Enhancement measures will include
grading banks, installing grade control structures (including at the tie-in with MC3-A),
planting the buffer, and cattle exclusion.
• JN4 — Similar to JN5, the Group thought that Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio would be a
more appropriate approach for below the crossing. Enhancement measures will include
removing pipe in old channel, fixing current culvert, grading banks, installing grade
control structures, planting the buffer, and cattle exclusion. Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio
is the approach for above the crossing and includes cattle exclusion and light
supplemental planting.

• MC3-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1, but the Group agreed to
change the approach to Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio because of channel condition and
cattle access. Enhancement measures will include planting the buffer on the left bank and
cattle exclusion.
• JN6-C — RES originally proposed restoration on this reach and Group agreed to that
approach. However, proposed alignment and restoration approach will need to be dictated
by topographic survey data. RES is in process of data collection, including delineating
slough feature. WRC suggested fencing slough area if not in alignment of proposed
restoration area. Barns will likely be removed and the culvert at the driveway will be
reset to improve hydrologic connection to JN6-B. WRC Comment: At the break between
JN6-B & JN6-A, there is an old road that is eroding. RES agreed to stabilize this road.
• JN6-B — RES originally proposed Enhancement II on this reach. DWR did not agree to
2.5:1 ratio due to buffer being intact, but does agree this reach should be part of the
overall project. The consensus was Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of
removing the crossing and cattle exclusion.
• JN6-A — RES originally proposed preservation on this reach. Group agreed to including
this top part of the reach as preservation. The JD will determine the limits.
Compass Point Site —10/16/17
IRT members agreed the Compass Point site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final
credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are
below.
• DW6: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio. WRC and DWR
recommended more of an Enhancement I approach (ranging from a 1.5 to 2 ratio), which
would include bank work (spot stabilization), riparian buffer planting, and livestock
exclusion.
• DW1-A: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio and Group agreed, with the
exception being the upstream most portion that ties into DW6. Group agreed that a mix of
Enhancement I and II would be best approach on the first 250 feet of DWI -A.
• DW2: Group agreed to Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio as originally proposed in
prospectus. RES confirmed that cows have access. Enhancement measures will include
planting the riparian buffer and cattle exclusion. DWR and RES agreed to installing a
stream gauge midway on the reach to monitor hydrology.
• DW1-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio. Group discussed
Enhancement I at a 1.5:1 ratio with enhancement measures including a combination of
bed and bank work, complete riparian buffer planting, and cattle exclusion. DWR
Comment: there was some discussion of E1, however, if that ratio is proposed vs the E2,
then the work needs to be justified in the mit plan. For the reach DWI -D, DWR believes
while it is a benefit to have a corridor connect to the Yadkin River, however, the ratio
that is appropriate would be no better than 7.5:1. USACE Comment: This will transition
from restoration in DWI -A at bedrock point. Buffered on one side, some areas do need
bank shaping. EII only if the banks are addressed. The existing road may cause the buffer
to be pinched to less than 50' at the end of the reach.
• DW1-C: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. This reach has patches of high
quality bed material including cobble and bedrock. Group agreed a Priority II Restoration
approach, including benching to aid in floodplain connectivity, would be the best
measure.

• DW1-D — RES originally proposed Enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio on this reach. WRC
wants to see this reach protected and included in the project. DWR and USACE
recommended a 7.5:1 ratio. The approach will be cattle exclusion and installing a boulder
grade control structure below the limits of restoration on DWI -C. WRC Comment: We
support the protection and riparian buffer enhancement of this reach, which would protect
a riparian corridor that would connect the Yadkin River to the site.
Green Mesa Site —10/17/17
Overall the site has clear potential for functional uplift, but there are a few notable constraints
including powerline easement and a large pond that will remain (landowner will not allow pond
to be part of project). Because the pond will remain in place, RES and USACE discussed
potentially retrofitting the riser structure to include a bottom pond drain to release cooler water.
IRT members agreed the Green Mesa site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final
credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are
below.
• FF4 and FFI-D: RES originally proposed restoration at a 1:1 ratio. The approach is a mix
of Priority I and II restoration with potential for enhancement level I above the powerline
based on bedrock in the channel. USACE said clearly justify rationale for restoration
measures.
• FF 1-C: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio. DWR and USACE
stated if channel was left in place and enhancement II approach was taken that it was
likely for no credit to be given due to powerline and lack of buffer near the road. Group
discussed starting restoration immediately below Baptist Church Road and RES agreed
this was best option if feasible. WRC Comment: There was discussion of raising the bed
elevation to lessen the DOT culvert perch. The discussion on lower FFI-C being too
close to the road also applies to upper FFI-D. Turning the channel into the field
upstream of where it turns now could allow R credit for both.
• FF1-C (below pond): RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an
approach of cattle exclusion, buffer planting, and tying into the restoration area. There is
a large stone wall in this reach with a culvert that might need to be retrofitted (if
possible). Group agreed the best approach is probably to leave the wall in place and credit
the enhancement at 3:1. USACE Comment: I agree with your summary for both areas
above and below the pond. It's recommended that SHPO review this area (and the area
where the other historic wall is in the buffer in FF1-A).
• FF5: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, invasive species treatment, and supplemental planting on right bank. DWR
stated there is no cattle pressure and there is decent buffer on the banks, but invasives are
problematic (high density of privet). WRC would like some of the black walnut removed
and those areas replanted with a more diverse mix of native hardwood vegetation.
USACE and DWR suggested a ratio of 7.5:1; however, if buffer planting and easement
was extended to at least 100 feet a higher ratio could be approved.
• FF3-A: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of
cattle exclusion and buffer planting. During the site visit RES suggested enhancement I at
a 1.5:1 ratio with an added measure of bank stabilization to reduce shear stress and in -
channel erosion. WRC agreed to rationale for enhancement I approach, but DWR stated
that there isn't much work needed on this reach and a ratio of 5:1 is likely most
appropriate (see FF3-B below). DWR Comment: I had FF3A and B combined at a ratio

of 7.5:1. WRC Comment: We did not agree with the E1 approach, as this reach has a
stellar riparian forest; definitely agree on an E3 approach here, as light tough is needed
and riparian area is too nice to justify getting heavy equipment to address channel
erosion. USACE Comment: Widening the buffer and invasives control are necessary
here. My notes indicate a ratio of 5-7:5:1, depending on justification of functional uplift.
The historic house in the buffer should be addressed.
• FF3-B: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and light supplemental planting. IRT suggested combining FF3-A and FF3-B
into one reach and having the entire crediting approach be enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio.
This area might be generating wetlands that RES would not be claiming credit. RES is
currently delineating the site. DWR Comment: I had FF3A and B combined at a ratio of
7.5:1. USACE Comment: Widening the buffer and invasives control are necessary here.
My notes indicate a ratio of 5-7:5:1, depending on justification of functional uplift,
especially considering these enter the pond. A narrative of historical farming practices
would be beneficial.
• FF1-B: RES originally proposed enhancement III at a 5:1 ratio and Group agreed and
stated to justify the uplift in the mitigation plan. WRC Comment: There is evidence of
beaver here.
• FF2: RES originally proposed preservation and Group agreed to a 7.5:1 ratio with an
approach of fencing where needed. DWR Comment: DWR could go with 7.5:1 on the
preservation (FF2) but would like to see the reach extended above the crossing at the top
and fenced out. WRC Comment: There was a discussion on preserving a little more
above the fence line and whether the old road would be planted/fenced. There was a
question on the location of the property line and end of preservation. USACE Comment:
Channel in good condition, USACE feels preservation at 10:1 is appropriate. The
discussion of 7.5:1 would be entertained if the upstream portion excluded cattle, as well.
• FF 1-A: RES originally proposed enhancement II at a 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of
cattle exclusion and buffer planting. While there might be some opportunities for bank
work, the group agreed that the enhancement II approach was best based on the amount
of bedrock in this reach.
Twiman Site —10/17/17
IRT members agreed the Twiman site is acceptable for compensatory mitigation, and final credit
ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• TC2-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement I at 1.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, and bank stabilization. Group agreed to this approach.
• TC2-B: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. Group generally agreed with this
approach, but did note there is a section of potential enhancement I below the pond. Upon
further data collection/analysis, RES will determine the best approach for this section of
TC2-13. WRC Comment: The group discussed establishing the break between EI and R
at the bedrock nickpoint.
• TC1-A: RES originally proposed restoration at 1:1 ratio. Group agreed to this approach.
• TC3-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, invasive species treatment and spot stabilization. Group
agreed to this approach with a ratio ranging from 2.5 to 3 to be justified in the mitigation
plan.

• TC1-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT suggested restoration as the approach. RES is open to
examining restoration along this reach based on watershed size and design discharge.
DWR Comment: these reaches should be restoration. If RES decides that restoration not
feasible then the ratio for enhancement would be greater than 5:1, could be as high as 8:1.
Planting outer 20 feet just does not do a lot for this system. USACE Comment: This
channel is incised, poor substrate, no buffer, channelized, with an available floodplain.
USACE & DWR feel restoration is appropriate.
• TC4: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT suggested restoration as the approach. RES is open to
examining restoration along this reach based on watershed size and design discharge.
DWR Comment: these reaches should be restoration. If RES decides that restoration not
feasible then the ratio for enhancement would be greater than 5:1, could be as high as 8:1.
Planting outer 20 feet just does not do a lot for this system. USACE Comment: This
channel is incised, poor substrate, no buffer, channelized, with an available floodplain.
USACE & DWR feel restoration is appropriate.
• TC5-B: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, and minor spot stabilization. IRT suggested a lower ratio of
3:1 in some areas based on existing buffer condition. RES recommends potentially
splitting the reach into different treatments based on level of intervention and will justify
rationale in mitigation plan.
• TC7: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion, buffer planting, invasive species treatment and spot stabilization. Group
agreed to this approach with a ratio ranging from 2.5 to 3 to be justified in the mitigation
plan. USACE Comment: 3:1 ratio would be more appropriate.
• TC6: RES originally proposed Enhancement II at 2.5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. This reach is in a deeply formed gully, but is currently
stable with the exception of multiple headcuts at the top of the reach. DWR suggested
"filling in" the reach to bring the bed up and credit as restoration with a 1:1 ratio. RES
expressed concerns with filling in the gully because thee stream might lose jurisdictional
status after construction with such a small watershed (roughly 20 acres). DWR Comment:
Reach TC6 may not be a creditable reach. While I feel that the only beneficial treatment
would be filling like a RSC approach it is likely the stream would lose flow. Planting the
outer 20 feet for this reach would not be creditable enhancement either. USACE
Comment: I would question whether there would be flow if the bed was raised with
restoration. USACE would not release credit if the restored channel was not
jurisdictional. The channel is part of the larger system, and the lower portions of this
reach would benefit from cattle exclusion. I would suggest a lower EII ratio of 5-7.5:1.
• TC5-A: RES originally proposed Enhancement III at 5:1 ratio with an approach of cattle
exclusion and buffer planting. IRT agreed that this is an appropriate approach, but RES
needs to clearly justify the rationale for the enhancement on this reach. DWR Comment:
IRT suggested 7.5:1, would consider 5:1 if justified in mit plan. WRC Comment: RES
will need to address the issue of cattle accessing land via passage under the bridge and
the associated erosion. USACE Comment: USACE and DWR agreed that 7.5:1 would be
more appropriate, unless 5:1 can be justified.

Scout Site- 10/18/17
The Scout Site is located just upstream of the lower portion of the recently contracted DMS
Mockingbird Site. While each project could be developed independently of the other, the
combined easements will result in a better project and most importantly provide the opportunity
to add over 2,000 linear feet of priority I restoration and limit the amount of priority II
restoration on the Mockingbird Site. IRT members agreed the Scout site is acceptable for
compensatory mitigation, and final credit ratios will be determined in the Approved Mitigation
Plan. Reach specific comments are below.
• HC3: Group agreed that restoration at 1:1 ratio is the best approach for this reach and
including it will improve the development of the Mockingbird project. USACE
commented that a hunting blind within the proposed easement area will need to be
removed. There is an existing crossing that will be removed as part of the design. RES
also showed a tributary that was not included in the prospectus that would be eligible for
potential restoration credit at the tie-in with HC3, but would more likely be Enhancement
II for the rest of the reach.

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ra,llolla NI, Bwoe, Ad.1i.i.ttOhR
Govcmpr Rap Caper
Secmary Sv IT. H,M],.
November 7. 2017
Daniel Ingram
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, #110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Re: RES Yadkin 01 Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank, ER 17-1991
Dear Mr. Ingram:
Thank you for your letter of July 7, 2017, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and I lismq
D pup 4veary Kcdn Chc,ry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above -referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
F116amona M. Bartos
Loeavov: 109 P.ampms gve<p 0.akigF Nf.2]!AI Mo iva AddrzrH617Nlail Senke(: wrt Itahigh NC07699AN17 Tekpheve/Fix(919)&)]65111/&17-6599

Memorandum to the Record
October 6, 2017
Response to Public Notice and agency comments on the Prospectus to establish
the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW -2017-01462) in the Upper
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101, North Carolina.
Andrea,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback and comments on the Public Notice (SAW -
2017 -01462) for the RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank) Prospectus. The bank
Sponsor, Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC wishes to establish a commercial umbrella
mitigation bank to generate mitigation banking credits to provide compensatory mitigation for
unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources associated with Section 404 permits within the Upper
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101. The Bank consists of establishing five mitigation sites
expected to provide approximately 6,373 cool Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) and 11,764 warm
SMUs by restoring, enhancing and preserving over 29,800 linear feet of stream and riparian
corridor. The project is designed to address stressors identified in the watershed and provide
improvements and ecological uplift to water quality, hydrologic function and both aquatic and
terrestrial habitat.
The EPA Region 4 Ocean, Wetlands and Stream Protection Branch offers the following
comments as they pertain to RES Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Final Prospectus dated
July, 2017 and the Public Notice dated September 6, 2017.
Section 1.4/Page 3: The project goals stated are too broad and somewhat vague. For
example, the goal: "Nutrient removal" and a few others may be better presented as
"Intercept, filter, minimize and potentially eliminate nutrients (such as...), sediment and
other pollutants/pathogens before entering the aquatic environment".
o The goal of "Improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat" is also vague and does not
address any particular habitat or species of interest. Since we have cool water
habitats being presented for restoration/enhancement then the goals should
address the habitat types and rationale for considering them.
o "Invasive species treatment" is more of an objective or action (and is stated as
such in the document) to address the real goal of "Eliminate competition to
native vegetation from exotic and invasive floral species".
o I understand that many of the "goals" presented are at the prospectus level and
not necessarily applicable to each site but without clear goals, the establishment

of objectives and performance standards that relate back to the goals and
functional uplift of the site becomes more challenging.
• Section 3.7/Page 6: The last sentence should read: "If planted tree mortality affects 40
percent or greater of the initial planting in a stream or wetland restoration or
enhancement area, then a remedial/supplemental planting plan will be implemented
for the affected area(s)." This addresses "planted" vs. "volunteer" mortality and defines
the starting point to consider mortality.
• Section 5.1/Page 9: Be sure to continue coordinating the work at the Gideon Site with
the Little Sebastian sites and ensure the Mitigation Plan is updated with relevant
information about the adjacent restoration site. NCDMS' Little Sebastian site is now out
on Public Notice, SAW -2017-01507, dated September 21, 2017. The Mitigation Plan
should address how the Gideon Site will tie in with the adjacent restoration work so that
the projects connect seamlessly and minimize disturbance to one another.
• Section 5.4.7/Page 13: Be sure to identify the adjacent restoration work at the Little
Sebastian site upstream and downstream of the project as a potential constraint. See
comment above.
• Section 5.5/Page 14: Table 6 does not match Figure 8. Be sure not to carry error forward
into the Mitigation Plan for Gideon Site.
• Section 5.5.1/Page 14: Second paragraph should state Enhancement Level II instead of
Level I. 1 also recommend 50 -foot riparian buffers be considered for this site due to the
high potential for nutrients and fecal pathogens to enter the stream from the adjacent
pasture.
• Section 7.1/Page 21: SMU discrepancy should be corrected to match Table 6 on page 26.
• Section 7.4.2/Page 22: Information on FF -5 is missing.
• Section 7.5.1/Page 26: Enhancement Level I is not being utilized at the Green Mesa Site.
Level II is proposed for Reach FF3-A.
• Section 8.5.1/Page 34: Priority Level I is proposed for TC3-13 only. Be sure to note pond
removals in this paragraph and restoration plan in general.
• Section 8.5.1/Page 35: Enhancement Level II includes TO -A also.
• Section 9.1/Page 36: Recommend continuing to coordinate with NCDMS and the
adjacent Mockingbird site currently out on Public Notice (SAW -2017-01505) dated
September 15, 2017. The Mockingbird site is considering a Priority II approach to
restoration along Hauser Creek at the terminus of the Scout Site which is considering
Priority I approach on Hauser Creek (HC3). I agree that the sites can be developed
independently but they should complement each other and provide for a seamless
transition as one moves downstream from Scout to Mockingbird.
• Section 9.4.7/Page 39: See comment above.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback, comments and concerns with the RES
Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank Prospectus and associated proposed sites to provide
compensatory mitigation in the Upper Yadkin River watershed of North Carolina. I believe the
sponsor has provided a viable plan to offset warm and cool water stream impacts that will be
incurred within the proposed service area. If you or the sponsor have any questions or need
clarification on any of the comments stated above, please contact me at 404-562-9225 or at
[e-mail].
Best Regards,
Todd Bowers
Comments submitted to Andrea Hughes (SAW -PM) via email on October 6, 2017.