NCS000530_Compliance Inspection Report_20190606

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000530 Effective: 10/01/09 Expiration: 09/30/14 owner: Carolina Marine Terminal Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Carolina Marine Terminal - River Rd
County: New Hanover 3330 River Rd
Region: Wilmington
Wilmington NC 28412
Contact Person: Michael E McCarley Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/06/2019
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe
Secondary Inspector(s):
EntryTime: 10:OOAM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Certification:
Phone:
Exit Time: 11:OOAM
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCS000530 Owner - Facility: Carolina Marine Terminal Inc
Inspection Date: 06/06/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
First inspection since 2009. Met with Michael McCorley, owner. He was aware of the permit, but employees handle
documentation and sampling. The facility has CAMA permits, Air permits, E&SC permit(NHCo), Stormwater permit
(CoWilm). Mr. McCorley will provide documentation of SPPP and sampling to this office.
The facility manages and stores urea, potash, rock granite, differing grades of NaCl, HBI steel, pig iron, and chromium ore.
The stockpiles are well maintained and use BMPs that differ for each product. The urea is stored in the three domes on the
north side. The chromium ore is sprayed with a dust control product. The salt is covered with plastic. The prevalent dry
conditions of the last month has made the site very dusty. There was some issues with the road access with sediment.
Suggest utilizing a sweeper.
Outfall 1 is located in the south ditch. Some erosion was evident and will need repair. Outfall 2 is the stormwater basin.
Review of sampling data is needed.
The maintenace shop is in need of cleaning up. The used oil container should be in secondary containment. The containers
inside the shop should be cleaned up to prevent oil product from leaving the building. The drum containers should be labeled.
Liquid storage containers should be in secondary containment.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCS000530 Owner - Facility: Carolina Marine Terminal Inc
Inspection Date: 06/06/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: Mr. McCarlev could not produce SPPP during inspection.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Records could not be located during inspection.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: Records could not be located during inspection.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page 3 of 3