20190753 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190607

DWR
MOM— of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
21nitial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20190753
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Navaho Dr. Sidewalk
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Heather Smith
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
6/7/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
QNSW
Version# *
1
Reviewing Office*
Central Office - [phone]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.825082-78.619088
FA. Processing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r' No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
* Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwde Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified bythe Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?"
f Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes IT No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh, Drew Peoples, PE
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
222 West Hargett St.
Address Line 2
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
State / Ftwince / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
Project Information and Prior Project History

1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1305 Navaho Dr.
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Cade
27609
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Crabtree Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
QNSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010804
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
2.6
State / f+ovince / legion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The land surrounding the project site is urban, with commercial properties on all sides. There is one perennial stream within the project area, UT to Crabtree Creek. The stream corridor
is wooded with an wasting sewer line crossing on the downstream side of Navaho Dr.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig 1 Navaho Dr USGS Topo Map.pdf
2.34MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fig 2 Navaho Dr Soils Map.pdf 879.91 KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
40
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to add a 6' concrete sidewalk along 0.298 miles of Navaho Dr. from east of Executive Dr. to Bush Street.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project is to add a 6' concrete sidewalk, guardrail, curb and gutter, and a retaining wall along 0.298 miles of Navaho Dr. from east of Executive Dr. to Bush Street. Standard
construction equipment will be used, cranes, bulldozers, dump trucks etc.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
18055.01_Navaho_Dr_05-22-2019_65 % Plans.pdf 15.86MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
r: Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
R Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r^ Unknown r N/A

Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Lane Sauls
Agency/Consultant Company: VHB (formerly Ecological Engineering)
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Email from Ross Sullivan on 2/21/2019 stating we accurately depicted any potential jurisdictional waters of the United States, see attached email PDF.
SM. Jurisdictional determination upload
[External] RE_ Pre -JD Package Navaho Dr. (UNCLASSIFIED).pdf 15.01 KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands r Streams -tributaries W Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
V Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba r Randleman
r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone t impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Ilowable P TT to Crabtree Creek No 173 98
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00
0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 173.00
98.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 173.00 98.00
6i. Comments:
The majority of the work for the sidewalk installation will occur within the epsting transportation facility. The rock plating for the retaining wall ends at
the extsting toe of slope. The only impacts will be for clearing of vegetation for the installation of sediment and erosion control devices, which will be
removed after construction.
Supporting Documentation
18055.01_PermitDrawings_20190606.pdf 1.59MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation v
1. Avoidance and Minimization

la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The project was designed so the majority of earthwork within the Neuse riparian buffer zones will be within the existing transportation facility. The only
impacts to the Neuse riparian buffers is from sediment and erosion control features.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Impacts to the Neuse riparian buffer canes will be minimized and avoided during construction by having construction equipment work from the existing
roadway and only placing sediment and erosion control measures in the Neuse riparian buffer zones and not within the stream channel.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
R Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:
Locally funded project, not subject to NEPA/SEPA
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project area is already developed and the addition of a sidewalk is not expected to result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r^ Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r- No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r- Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS Self -Certify submittal and on -site Michauxs sumac survey and RCW survey. See attached
Consultation Documentation Upload
USFWS_ConcurrenceRequest_ Nava hoDrive_Submitted_20190114.pdf 9.65MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r- Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r- Yes
r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office online mapping. The project is within 1.0 mile of the Nathaniel Jones Jr. House, southeast of Wake
Forest Rd. This structure is listed on the National Register and was moved 5 years ago to its current location. The project is not anticipated to affect
this property due to the development and distance between the house and the project area. The sites soils were previously disturbed during road
construction and the installation of the sewer line. The project has not been evaluated for archaeological resources.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r- Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Floodplain Risk Information System Map ID 3720171500J
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
U
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:

• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
. I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Heather Smith
Signature
37-,7�
Date
6/7/2019