20190752 Ver 1_ NWP-38 Supplemental Information_20190606

!.!.
!
!
!
!
!!!
!!!
!!
!
!
!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!
!!!
!!!!!CAPE FEAR RIVERThe Chemour CompanyFayetteville WorksCumberland County, N orth CarolinaProject Feature Map [
0 250 500125Feet
Seep B
!.Culvert
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
! Data Point/Flume Location
Seep C
Seep A
!
!
!
The Chemour CompanyFayetteville WorksCumberland County, N orth CarolinaProject Feature Map [
0 75 15037.5 Feet
Seep A North
Seep A Mid
Seep A South
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
! Data Point/Flume Location
!.Culvert
NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if • 19 or perennial if • 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 01 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0123
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: /8BUFS
FNFSHFT'MPXT
VOEFSHSPVOE
$IBOOFMJ[FE
'MPX 4BNQMF
QPJOU %SZ
DIBOOFM
'MPX'MPX
05/07/2019 Chemours 34.84541
Luke F. Eggering, PWS Bladen County -78.82558
35.5 Duart
18.5
8.5
8.5
Seep A North is a channelized stream that was likely used to drain the area at one time.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Upstream view of Seep A North (facing north). Flow goes under the ground surface both upstream and
downstream from this point. The flume would be positioned here.

Seep A North showing variable flow above ground (foreground) and below ground (background in
headcut) (facing north).

NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if • 19 or perennial if • 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 01 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0123
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: /8BUFS
FNFSHFT'MPXT
VOEFSHSPVOE
$IBOOFMJ[FE
'MPX
%SZ
DIBOOFM
'MPX'MPX
4BNQMF
QPJOU
05/07/2019 Chemours 34.84544
Luke F. Eggering, PWS Bladen County -78.82599
36 Duart
20
11
5
Seep A Mid appears to be a very shallow perennial stream with multiple feeder streams upstream. Some lizard's tail (Saururus cernuus)
was observed below the ordinary high water mark.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Seep A Mid facing downstream toward Seep A North confluence (facing east). The flume would position
in the foreground at this location.

Seep A Mid has a very shallow but continuous flow (facing east).

NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if • 19 or perennial if • 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 01 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0123
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: /
'MPXT
VOEFSHSPVOE
$IBOOFMJ[FE
'MPX
%SZ
DIBOOFM
'MPX'MPX
4BNQMF
QPJOU
'MPX
'MPX
05/07/2019 Chemours 34.84505
Luke F. Eggering, PWS Bladen County -78.82561
34.75 Duart
18.5
10.5
5.75
Seep A South has multiple branches upstream. The streambed is 90% sand and 10% silt.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Seep A South facing downstream showing the shallow flow and sandy substrate (facing north). This will
be the flume location.

Seep A South facing upstream showing the sandy substrate.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Approximately 50 yards upstream from the Seep A South flume location, bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum) knees are present below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) in the stream.

Downstream view of the confluence of Seep A South (right) and Seep A Mid with the Cape Fear River in
the background (facing east).

!
!
!
!
!
!CAPE FEAR RIVERThe Chemour CompanyFayetteville WorksCumberland County, N orth CarolinaProject Feature Map [
0 100 20050Feet
Seep B North
Seep B West
Seep B South
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
! Data Point/Flume Location
NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if • 19 or perennial if • 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 01 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0123
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: /
4BNQMF
QPJOU
05/08/2019 Chemours 34.84259
Luke F. Eggering, PWS Bladen County -78.82544
28 Duart
13
8
7
Seep B North has flow but just downstream, approximately 20 yards, it flows underground. There are multiple seeps in the channel side
slopes about the ordinary high water mark. These are likely jurisdictional wetlands, but the higher stream terrace immediately adjacent is
well drained. Approximately 30 yards upstream, the channel is very deeply incised and may have been channelized at some point.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Seep B North facing upstream has a well-developed channel at this flume location (facing north).

Seep B North channel facing downstream (facing south). Notice that some wetland plants, primarily
lizard’s tail (Saururus cernuus), are above the OHWM growing in seep water from the adjacent uplands
that emerge through the upper portion of the stream bank above the OHWM. The flume will be
positioned upstream from the seep in the defined channel.

NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if • 19 or perennial if • 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 01 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0123
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: /
4BNQMF
QPJOU
'MPX
'MPX
)FBEDVUT
CFHJO
8FUMBOET
05/08/2019 Chemours 34.842272
Luke F. Eggering, PWS Bladen County -78.82606
36.25 Duart
19
10.5
8.75
Seep B West is where the stream enters the upland bluffs of Chemours. Downstream, the tributary braids into a very wet area with wetland
plants in the floodplain. The side slopes here are very steep and the channel is stable with a sandy bottom.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Seep B West facing upstream has a well-defined steep-sided channel emerging from the adjacent
uplands/hillslopes west of the Cape Fear River floodplain (facing west).

Seep B West facing downstream at the flume location (facing east). In the background of the
photograph, the stream enters the Cape Fear River floodplain.

NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if • 19 or perennial if • 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 01 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0123
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: /
4BNQMF
QPJOU
'MPX
%SZ
DIBOOFM
BCPWF
UIF
IFBE
DVU
05/08/2019 Chemours 34.84192
Luke F. Eggering, PWS Bladen County -78.82537
37.75 Duart
18.5
11
8.25
Seep B South is a deeply incised tributary in the Cape Fear River floodplain. Approximately 30 yards upstream above a head cut, the
channel is dry. Below the head cut, there is flow from a seep that appears to be perennial.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Seep B South facing upstream toward a headcut in the channel (facing southwest). The channel is
ephemeral above the headcut.

Seep B South at the flume location facing downstream and showing the continual flow from
groundwater (facing north).

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Seep B South facing downstream from the top of the headcut (facing north). The flume location is
approximately 30 feet north of the headcut.

Seep B South facing upstream from the top of the headcut (facing north). Notice that the channel is
strictly ephemeral from this point south.

!.
!.
! !CAPE FEAR RIVERThe Chemour CompanyFayetteville WorksCumberland County, N orth CarolinaProject Feature Map [
0 100 20050Feet!.Culvert
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
! Data Point/Flume Location
Seep C
NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if • 19 or perennial if • 30*
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
ripple-pool sequence 01 2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _________)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0123
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch: /4BNQMF
QPJOU
$VMWFSU
"DDFTT
3PBE
8FUMBOE4FFQT
05/08/2019 Chemours 34.83855
Luke F. Eggering, PWS Bladen County -78.82461
35.5 Duart
17.5
9.5
8.5
Seep C is located just south of the access road near the outfall to the Cape Fear River. A large seep enters the channel just downstream of
the flume location.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Seep C facing upstream showing a well-defined channel that is suitable for the flume location (facing
north).

Seep C stream channel facing downstream (facing southeast). Notice that seep water is emerging from
the adjacent hillside (right) and wetland plants are dominant, including bald cypress and lizard’s tail. The
flume location is approximately 30 feet upstream from the wetlands.

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
Typical upland soil near Seep C that was well-drained. This soil sample was taken approximately 20 feet
up slope from the wetland soil shown below.

Typical wetland soil found in the seeps near the Cape Fear River floodplain. Long-term groundwater
interaction is the primary reducing condition, but infrequent backwater flooding from the Cape Fear
River also contributes to the area hydrology and reducing soil conditions.

Cultural Resources Summary
Cultural Resources Assessment for Flume Locations along the Cape Fear Floodplain, Chemours
Fayetteville Works, Bladen County, North Carolina
No cultural resources investigations have been conducted along the Cape Fear floodplain east of the
Chemours Fayetteville Works and no archaeological sites have been recorded. Limited archaeological
investigations have been conducted in Bladen and southern Cumberland Counties.
Prehistoric archaeological sites recorded in the general vicinity include small lithic and ceramic scatters
associated with Archaic and Early, Middle, and Late Woodland period occupations located on several
different types of landforms including along the bluff edges of the Cape Fear River, near drainage
divides, and upland areas which may or may not be associated with Carolina Bays. Most of these sites
represent limited occupations with little research potential to be considered eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). To date, no prehistoric archaeological sites have been
identified on the floodplain or bluff slopes along the Cape Fear River. Archaeological site probability is
expected to be low as this area has undergone extensive flooding and erosional episodes and any
archaeological sites are expected to be heavily disturbed. The probability for intact prehistoric
archaeological sites with research potential to address NRHP eligibility criteria is considered low.
Historic archaeological sites recorded in the general vicinity include late 19th and early 20th century
historic debris scatters (architectural and domestic debris). These sites represent dispersed scatters with
little research potential to be considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. During the site visit in February
2019, several types of historic features were observed on the floodplain of the Cape Fear River and bluff
slopes: short segments of rusted and partially downed fence lines, an old road bed, irrigation ditches,
and several isolated glass bottles. Based on the archival research and archaeological observation, no
historic buildings or structures were located on the floodplain; however, this area was used by local
landowners as evidenced by the presence of the old road, the ditches, and the fencelines. The
probability for intact historic archaeological sites with research potential to address NRHP eligibility
criteria is considered low.
The proposed locations of the flumes on the Cape Fear River floodplain occur at the base of the bluff
slope and cross cut the incised drainages. The flumes will be installed within the drainages and will not
impact the drainage banks or adjacent floodplain areas. No archaeological sites are expected to occur
within the drainages where the flumes will be located.
Chemours Water Flow Monitoring

Chemours Water Flow Monitoring
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Coordination

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2019-SLI-0487
Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-02224
Project Name: The Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works

Subject:Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed
project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
June 03, 2019
06/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-02224   2

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
06/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-02224   3

Attachment(s):
▪Official Species List
06/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-02224   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]
06/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-02224   2

Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN2000-2019-SLI-0487
Event Code:04EN2000-2019-E-02224
Project Name:The Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works
Project Type:** OTHER **
Project Description:The Chemours Company Fayetteville Works manufacturing site (Site)
produces fluoroproducts including refrigerants, ion exchange membranes,
and other essential products. The site is located on a 2,150-acres site in
southeast North Carolina, in Bladen County adjacent to the Cape Fear
River, of which approximately 400 acres is developed. The purpose of this
project is to assess potential environmental impacts related to the design
and implementation of remedial actions at the Site.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/34.839149740142126N78.83230057799494W
Counties:Bladen, NC | Cumberland, NC
06/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-02224   3

Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1.NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Threatened
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
Wood Stork Mycteria americana
Population: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477
Threatened
1
06/03/2019 Event Code: 04EN2000-2019-E-02224   4

Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
Insects
NAME STATUS
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly Neonympha mitchellii francisci
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5419
Endangered
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Endangered
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Endangered
Rough-leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
Excerpt from USGS 7.5-Minute Duart Quadrangle, North Carolina

Soil Map—Bladen County, North Carolina
(The Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/27/2019
Page 1 of 338561003856400385670038570003857300385760038579003858200385850038588003856100385640038567003857000385730038576003857900385820038585003858800697200697500697800698100698400698700699000
697200 697500 697800 698100 698400 698700 699000 699300
34° 51' 11'' N 78° 50' 40'' W34° 51' 11'' N78° 49' 12'' W34° 49' 35'' N
78° 50' 40'' W34° 49' 35'' N
78° 49' 12'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Feet
0 200 400 800 1200
Meters
Map Scale: 1:14,400 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Bladen County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 22, 2015—Nov
28, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Bladen County, North Carolina
(The Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/27/2019
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ch Chewacla and Chastain soils,
frequently flooded
6.6 0.9%
Cn Congaree silt loam, frequently
flooded
45.7 6.4%
DyF Dystrochrepts, steep 212.9 29.9%
JO Johnston mucky loam 20.0 2.8%
LaB Lakeland sand, 1 to 7 percent
slopes
1.8 0.2%
NoA Norfolk loamy fine sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
46.8 6.6%
NoB Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
8.5 1.2%
NuB Norfolk-Urban land complex, 0
to 6 percent slopes
156.5 22.0%
W Water 15.3 2.1%
WaB Wagram fine sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
177.4 24.9%
WmB Wickham fine sandy loam, 1 to
6 percent slopes
21.2 3.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 712.7 100.0%
Soil Map—Bladen County, North Carolina The Chemours Company -
Fayetteville Works
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/27/2019
Page 3 of 3
FEMA Flood Map Service Center: [https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search#searchresultsanchor]