20061374 Ver 1_Application_20060825

.~ ANF o
e ~'
~~ wM ~/~
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
August 17, 2006
Mr. David Baker, NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager
~, ~ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
o Asheville, NC 28801-2714
~~ Subject:
~~.,
LYNDO 'TIPPETT
SECRETARY
061374
Nationwide 14 Permit Application
SR 1400 -Rocky Branch Road
Jackson County
State Project No. 140.050058 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $200)
Dear Mr. Baker:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to widen, grade, and
pave SR 1400, Rocky Branch Road, in Jackson County from SR 1397 for a distance of 5,380
feet. This proposal entails widening and paving the existing gravel road to a standard 18-foot
roadway. The proposed improvements of SR 1400 have been identified as necessary
maintenance and safety improvements. Funds have been allocated for this project, and NCDOT
would like to perform these activities sometime during the 2006-07 paving season.
I am sending astraight-line diagram with the proposed erosion control and construction limits
along this project. In addition, I am sending a typical section of the road, cross sections,
drawings for pipe culvert replacements as well as a marked county map and USGS quad map.
We propose to install the new culverts slightly below the existing streambed elevations where
bedrock is not encountered to minimize impacts to aquatic habitats and allow the existing stream
gradients to remain as unchanged as physically possible.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Database was checked for records of threatened and
endangered species. There are no records of listed species for the Rocky Branch watershed.
Additionally, there are no records listed for the adjacent watersheds, Baumgarner Branch and an
unnamed tributary. Rocky Branch is a small (3 feet in width) stream and is too small to support
mussels. However, there are records from the Tuckasegee River, which is 500-600 feet
downstream of the confluence of Rock Branch with Baumgarner Branch. This reach of the
Tuckasegee River is occupied critical habitat for the Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta

raveneliana). The project will require culvert replacements and extensions, a channel change
and bank stabilization. The impacts from this work should be minor and of short duration. After
the project is completed, sedimentation from the road should be reduced significantly. However,
during construction, there is some potential for minimal adverse effects. To minimize these
effects, NCDOT will implement stringent erosion and sedimentation control measures.
Ms. Denise Moldenhauer, Biologist, with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service met on site with
NCDOT engineers on August 7, 2006. Based on the site visit, the following BMPs, including
specific U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recommendations will be implemented.
Stringent measures to control sediment and erosion will be implemented prior
to any ground-disturbing activities. Storm water will be diverted through
vegetation-lined ditches and basins. Erosion-control measures will be
checked daily for maintenance and/or integrity of the structures, and
appropriate corrective measures will be taken for structures that need repair.
Erosion- and sediment-control measures shall be cleaned when half full.
2. Excavation for the stream crossing will be conducted in the dry.
3. Clearing will be minimized, and if grubbing is necessary, it will be conducted
only immediately before grading operations.
4. The culverts must be designed to allow for the passage offish and other
aquatic life and to accommodate the movement of debris and bed material
within the channel. Flat bottom pipes will be used at Sites 1-3 to help enhance
aquatic life movement.
5. Seeding and mulching of disturbed areas will occur on an ongoing basis as the
project proceeds.
Based on strict adherence to best management practices, including those listed above, we believe
this project "may affect but is not likely to adversely affect" the Appalachian elktoe or the
Appalachian elktoe's habitat.
Impacts to historic or cultural resources are not anticipated. If the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) and the Office of State Archaeology determines that further investigations are
required, NCDOT will conduct the appropriate site investigations and obtain compliance from
SHPO prior to project construction.
The best management practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and erosion
on this project. The construction foreman will review all erosion control measures daily to
ensure sedimentation and erosion is being effectively controlled. If the planned devices are not
functioning as intended, they will be immediately replaced with better devices. The rock silt
screens and other erosion control devices will be in place prior to pipe culvert construction and
will remain in place until the project is stabilized.

Impacts to Waters of the United States
Rocky Branch is shown as a perennial stream on the USGS topographic map and does in fact
have perennial flow. The stream channel is composed of cobble, gravel and sand. The channel
lacks vegetation. For these reasons, we believe this stream is under the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. In order to construct the project in accordance with our current
secondary road standards, it will be necessary to impact waters of the United States in the Little
Tennessee River Basin. Specifically, NCDOT is requesting to extend/replace six metal culverts,
to stabilize four sections of bank and to relocate two sections of channel in Rocky Branch and
UT's to the Rocky Branch (DWQ Class C). Listed below is a summary of the proposed impacts.
Site No. Existing Proposed Net Impacts
Station Condition Condition
Site 1 30' x 48" CMP 90'x58"x36" 60' extension
4+85 Arched CMP
Site 2 32'x36" CMP 85'x58"x36" 53' extension
14+38 Arch CMP
Site 3 40' x 36" CMP 50'x50"x 3l" 10' extension
22+40 Arch CMP
Site 4 40' x 18" CMP 47' x 24" CHIP 7' extension
32+20
Site 5 45' x 24" CMP 47' x 24" CNiP 2' extension
41+78
Site 6 32' x 15" CMP 60' x 24" CMP 28' extension
50+87
Site 7 Eroded Bank Stable Bank 25'
4+30
Site 8 Eroded Bank Stable Bank 5'
8+90
Site 9 Eroded Bank Stable Bank 15'
26+00
Site 10 Eroded Bank Stable Bank 10'
26+71
Site 11 Linear Wetland Fill for road .04 Acres
50+70 to 51+50
Site 12 Stream Relocated 0'
7+50 to 8+50 Stream
Site 13 Stream Relocated 0'
34+20 to 35+67 Stream
Permanent Wetland Fill 0.04 acres
Permanent Stream Impact 215 linear feet
Relocated Stream 2471inear feet

Permits Requested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed
with the construction project outlined above. ;By copy of this letter, I am asking Mr. David
McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit request.
Also, by copy of this letter, I am requesting authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR),
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). In addition, I am requesting Mr. McHenry and Mr. Ed Ingle,
Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer (NCDOT), to comment directly to me
concerning this permit request.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Your early review and consideration will be greatly appreciated.
Sin rely,
~1
athan L. Woodard, P.E.
District Engineer
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ, DENR, Raleigh (seven copies)
Ms. Denise Moldenhauer, Biologist, USFWS
Mr. Mike Parker, DWQ, DENR, Asheville
Mr. David McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, NCWRC
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E., Division Engineer, NCDOT
Mr. Mark Davis, Division Environmental Officer, NCDOT
Mr. E. L. Ingle, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Ms. W. H. Roach, County Maintenance Engineer, NCDOT

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ 3 7 4
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCEEP prior to submittal of PCN),
complete section VIII and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: 345 Toot Hollow Road
BrXson City, NC 28713
Attn : J. L. Woodard, PE District Engineer
Telephone Number:~828) 488-2131 Fax Number:~828) 488-3518
E-mail Address: jwoodard(a~dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
Telephone Number: N/A Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
Name of project: Widen grade drain and nave SR 1400 Rockv Branch Road in Jackson
Coun
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 140.050058
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIl~: n/a
4. Location
County: Jackson Nearest Town: Dillsboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): n/a
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Dillsboro take US 441/US
74 for approximately 6 0 miles Turn left onto SR 1534 Take the first road to the right
After ou cross the Tuckase ee River. This will be SR 1397. Go 0.4 mile and turn left on
SR 1400 Rock Branch Road. This is the ro'ect.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Attached
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 2.22 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rockv Branch C
8. River Basin: Little Tennessee
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http~//h2o enr state nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Residential woodlands
Page 2 of 9

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project includes cutting and filling earthwork where needed replacing old drainage
structures that are inadequate making the road safer by chanain~ the road profile, and
paving. Equipment to be used will be Track Hoes Back Hoes Dump Trucks, Bulldozers.
Manual Labor etc. '
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:-
To pave, widen the shoulders and improve the alignment of SR 1400 to meet current
NCDOT standards.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No additional permits have been applied for in the past
V. Future Project Ptans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional„permits are anticipated
VL Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Culvert Replacement &
Extensions Bank Stabilization and a Channel Change
Page 3 of 9

2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-yeaz Floodplam** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
indicate on ma) (acres) ~ (es/no) linear feet)
11 @ Station Fill 0.04 No 100 Riverine
50+70 to 51+50
* List each impact sepazately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains aze identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps aze available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
**' List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Cazolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (detemunation of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.04
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:

Stream Impact Site
Number
(indicate on map)

Type of Impact* Length of

Impact
(~~

Stream Name**
Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1@ Station 4+85 Culvert Replace & Extend 60 Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
2 @ Station 14+38 Culvert Replace & Extend 53 Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
3@ Station 22+40 Culvert Replace &Extend 10 Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
4@ Station 32+20 Culvert Replace & Extend 7 UT to Rocky Branch 2' Perennial
5@ Station 41+78 Culvert Extension 2 UT to Rocky Branch 6" Perennial
6@ Station 50+87 Culvert Replace & Extend 28 UT to Rocky Branch 6" Perennial
7@ Station 4+30 Bank Stabilization 25 Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
8@ Station 8+90 Bank Stabilization 5 Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
9@ Station 26+00 Bank Stabilization 15 Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
10@ Station 26+71 Bank Stabilization 10 Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
12 @ 7+50 to 8+50 Channel Change 0 Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
13 @ 34+20 to
35+67 Channel Change 0 UT to Rocky Branch 3' Perennial
List each impact sepazately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (sepazately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the lineaz footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
"" Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the neazest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
~~1~tiv.usas.oov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., «ti~~~.topozone.com,
~r~ti~v.mapquest.cont, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
Page 4 of 9

4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact

Site Number
indicate on ma)

Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres)
Name of Waterbod
(applicable) y Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
ba ,ocean, etc.
N/A

List each unpact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this ap lication.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands [stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts cannot be avoided. Culverts must be extended in order to gain the necessary width
to improve SR 1400 to current NCDOT standards All pipe extensions/replacements will be
placed below the existingLstream bed gradient so natural substrate can be re-established
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 9

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final, Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands/strmgide. html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://www.nceep.net. If use of the NCEEP is
proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following
information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Page 6 of 9

Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federaVstate) land?
Yes ® No ^
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ^ No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify N/A )?
Yes ^ No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* ~ nape feet) Multiplier MiU ~~ rio
1 3
2 1.5
Total
" Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 ea~tends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
Page 7 of 9

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Stormwater will be diverted through settling basins or grass lined buffers prior to entering
streams. (See erosion control plan).
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated from the~roposed proiect
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 9

SITE COORDINATES
Site 1 ~ Site 7
N 35.401° N 35.401°
W 83.321° W 83.321°
Site 2 Site 8
N 35.401° N 35.401°
W 83.319° W 83.321°
Site 3 Site 9
N 35.398° N 35.398°
W 83.318° W 83.318°
Site 4 Site 10
N 35.396° N 35.398°
W 83.319° W 83.318°
Site 5 Site 11
N 35.393° N 35.391°
W 83.319° W 83.319°
Site 6 Site 12
N 35.391° N 35.401°
W 83.319° W 83.321°
Page 9 of 9

'~ra~c~ S; ze ~'~x8 l~ ,1 S~oU
PR~P• .txlr ~
~xls~ 30' x y8'' GMT s 7~~ ~ 3; ~.
• I I- ~ t
4 P.o~ 90 X ~8 ~` C~cP
~ ~, ~ ~
• ~--~~v ~z I '~
I I ,;
I I P.e~ v
I .D~e.
~- I V ---~
~O /~~
I I 1
{f ~ ~ ~ ,
,gyp x,sr ~
P~ ~ ~ ~
c P ,ode c ¢ e ~ ,
T~
SC,9/E" •S/o,e.~,Z - / = /O ~ T I3 Nt E/C'V_ _ /hU U
I:~ I I I 1 11 1 1 I I I I I I i I I I I
' I I 1 I I l~ I f I I I i I I I I I ~ j ~ l
II II I 1 III I I I I I I
t l I ~ l i i~ ~ _~ I I I I l l i
I I ~
I I I
i I I
I
I 1 ~
I 1
I
I I ~ i
I I
~ I
1 I I
I
I I
I_ I I I I I 1
- -I I i ; I ,
I I I I ~ I t l"
I ~ I I I
I ' I I I I
I I I I I I l i
I I t ( I I I 1 1 1
I ~_ I I 1 I _LI 1 I'
I ! I I I I
_ 1 I I
I !
I I I
I 1 I !
I
~ I I I I
I 1 i 1 1 I I!.
1 I I '
I I
I I

SITE
STA,
BRANCH SIZE
EXIST.
PROP.
SKEW
PROP. SKEW
•2 PROP. EXIST. JACKSON CO.
14.38 CL ~ CL SR ]400
3' W X 8' D I 1 I ROCKY BRANCH RD.
32' X 36' CMP 1 t I '
1 1 I
85' X 58'X36' CMP `~/ I 1 I
135' EXT. INLET ~_~~ t I 1
I I
155' END 19' ~ ~~' + 1 135i'
~ 1
~ ~ 1
\~ ~ 1
k ~ 1 1 N
1 ~ ~~ 1
1 ~ I
I ~ I
1 ~ ~
~ ~ I
1
I ~~ 155j'
I ~ 1
1 ~ ~ 1 ~
1 - 1 .,'-
1 1 ~ `^
`~
I I ~ ~~ 1 w°w
1 1 ~ 1
1 I ~
1 1 ~1
i I ~~ ~
I 1 ~
1 1 ~ ~
1 1 ~ ~
1 1 I~ ~
1 9• 1 9' 1 ~
1 I I ~` ~ EXT. OUTLET
I 1 1 ~ ENO 34'
1 1 I ~
I ~ I ¢ W i ~..
a Wl N° 1 a 1 1^: 20'
W W
T.B.M. ELEV. 100.0
NAIL IN 6' HICKORY
25' RT. STA. 14.38
1 ~ -20~ EXISTING GRADE- 2.5%
PROPOSED GRADE- 3.5%

SITE •3
EXIST. STA. 22.40
PROP. STA. 22.48
BRANCH SIZE 3' w X 8' D
EXIST. 40' X 36' CMP
PROP. 50' X 50'X3]' CMP
EXIST. SKEW 35'
PROP, SKEW 30'
PROP. EXIST.
CL CL EXT. INLET
~~'~ END 5'
~ ~
1 ~
I
I
I
i
! / ,
PROPOSED
HEADWALL
~ I
~ ~
9' ~ 9'
EXT. OUTLET I.~I'II j I ~
END 5' ~-.~ ~
PROP, EXIST EXIST PROP.
EP EDGE EDGE EP
TL TL
PROPOSED
HEADWALL
JACKSON CO.
SR 1400
ROCKY BRANCH R0.
f
1~=20'
T.B.M. ELEV. 100.0
NAIL IN PP
50' RT. STA. 23.15
.•«•
1 ~ • 10 ~ PROPOSED GRADE - 3.3% p

SITE # H
STA, 32.20
BRANCH SIZE 2' W X 2' D
EXIST, 40' X 18' CMP
PROP, 47' X 24' CMP
SKEW 115'

X T. I NL E T-----^--~~
END 7' C
~
®

ROP,EXIST.
CL CL
1 ~ 1
1 I I
1 1 1
1 I I
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 115 j
1
1 1
1
I i
1 1
I i I
1 1 1
I I I
1 I 1
j 9 j 9'I
1 1 I
I I 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
PROP,EXIST PROP,EXIST
EP EDGE EP EDGE
TL TL JACKSON CO.
SR 1400
ROCKY BRANCH RD.

N
1'=20'

T
M
E
.B.
. EL
V. 100.0
A
4' P
P
R
N
IL IN 2
O
LA
' RT
T
. S
A. 31.80
15

.~
X E

1 ' ` 10'
PROPOSED GRADE- 6.0%

SITE # ~ JACKSON CO.
STA. 4]•78 SR ]400
BRANCH SIZE 6' W X 1' D ROCKY BRANCH RD.
EXIST. ~fjl X 24' CMP
PROP. 47' X 24' CMP
SKEW 115'
PROP.EXIST.
CL CL

1
® 1
I
1 ~ 1
I
1
N
1
I 1
1
1 115'
a
I
EXIST. ROCK WALL I
TO BE REMOVED I
1
1
a
1 I
1
1 1
1 EXT. OUTLET

1
1 END 2'

j
I
1 9' j
I
I 9'
I 1
1 1
PRDP,EXIST
EDGE

PROP,EXIST
EDGE
EP EP
TL TL
1''20'

T
.B.M. ELEV. 100.0
CORNER OF ROCK WALL
20' LT. STA. 41.75

T 2

1 ' • 10'
PROPOSED GRADE- 6.8%

SITE # ~j JACKSON CO.
STA. 50.87 SR 1400
BRANCH SIZE 6' W X 1' D ROCKY BRANCH RD.
EXIST. 32' X 15' CMP
PROP. 60' X 24' CMP
EXIST. SKEW 100'
PROP. SKEW 95' PROP. EXIST.
CL CL
~
1 I
1 1
I 1
I
N
1 1 I
1 I
® 1
1 I 1
1
1 95'
~, ... 1

I 1 ~~i ~~ ~~ ~

....
1
1 I ~ EXT. OUTLET
j I j END 28'
I 1
I 1 I
1
I I I
1 9' 1
1 I 1
I I 1
1 1 I
1 I 1
~ 1 ~
PROP,EXIST PROP,EXIST
EP EDGE EP EDGE
TL TL
1 ~ ' 2 ~ '
T.B.M, ELEV. 100.0
NAIL IN 6' BEECH
27' LT. STA. 50.25
EXISTING GRADE-12.5%
1 ~ - 1 ~' PROPOSED GRADE - 18.7%

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUBJECT PROJECT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS COUNTY
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY DATE STATION
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27611 CHECKED BY DATE STR NO SHEET OF_
_ .. _ _. t- - - ,_ _. _ ._.
~I ~'G ~ T _ ~ca h ~ ,5~ ~i biz a f~ o h
~GC ~san Co. _
~. ~°~ Fps
~t ,~,,
~2
yf 5.~ - - - - - - - ,~:~
C/~ ss
~~
Fow
_3=
~y
Eo~~ SOS
t0, 2
~ .~
Clgs.s - Q
Taco
/ ~
a~. ~
Eor,~
-3.0
/9
%D b
,x,2.3
So-o

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUBJECT PROJECT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS COUNTY
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY DATE STATION
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27611 CHECKED BY DATE STR NO SHEET OF_
___ , . _ _ ~
,:
~~kso~ C~
Rocky ~3r. S~. t~DC~
~op. _
_ Ex;s-f:
o ~
E gt~z
b~ ~~ ~
~~
Cr//ass B
,~,~ ~9~ -
,
q, s
baw FaW
7d 6
_%
~.5
So-o

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUBJECT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27611 CHECKED BY _
COUNTY
DATE STATION
DATE STR NO SHEET OF_
~~.
~ /
;~bt04 ~ ;-
--- - -
E. c~7' Fps
-a, 2

._ TZ2 ~ Ears • -
-a ~
~~
__

~ro~ _- __

. ,~ n_
~~ 5~ , _ -.
~ DHSS a j

FoT

~,a ._
- io - G'/~ss-
,~Jo ,~.q
Eow
-33
a3
PROJECT
r
a~~
EDw
~'~-
ao
Tod
,o
a
-o i

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUBJECT PROJECT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
COUNTY
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY DATE STATION
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27611 CHECKED BY DATE STR NO SHEET_ OF_
Sr t+C #~ /D ~ _ L . _ d
,g `r rC ~~ .~z,g-fah
~~ f 7~
Jgc~Sa~ L~ __ _
PrC p,
~~~ _~OS
b~ ~~ ~~ Q
~z ~s
a ~-f-7

°v
a%
,Eo~,/
`3~~
~~
J
~,

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA sueJECT PROJECT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS COUNTY
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY DATE STATION
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27611 CHECKED BY DATE STR NO SHEET_ OF_
_.
%so,~ ~o .
_.
___
~ c% ~i~.
_ ~o
~ ~. ~ '~
~/ C ~ _~
` ~~~J~,
--
~'`f
_ ~ Z=' z°
~ -
sy~
~: e
`, ? o
~O
_ ~,
-/~O
1 ir• ,. ,
i
~ s~~

so-o ~

ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RELOCATION
BUCHANAN ROAD (SR 1400)
JACKSON COUNTY
July 12, 2006

TABLE OF CONTENTS
...................................
STREAM RELOCATION PLAN ...............................
...........
......................................
ti
s
Ob ............................... 3
.........................................
ve
jec
.................................
tion
t Descri
P ............................... 3
.................................
p
rojec
.....................................
ce Reach
f
R ............................... 3
................................
eren
e
.....................................
s
Ma
Sit ............................... 3
...........................................
p
e
....................................
Plans
Sit ............................... 3
.............................................
e 4
Biological Community Types ................................................. ...............................
ical Stream Classification .....................................
holo
M ............................... 4
g
orp
.................................
Enhancements
bilit
St ............................... 4
..........................
y
a
....................................
ort
ent Trans
di
S ................................ 4
............................
p
e
m
Buffer and Planting Requirements ......................................... ................................ 5
5
Potential Problems ................................................................. ................................
SUMMARY TABLES .............................................................. ................................ 6
.....................................
ROCKY BRANCH .............................. 12
..............................
..................................
s
n Ma
ti
L .............................. 12
.....................................
p
o
oca
..................................
Views
Pl .............................. 16
...........................................
an
Profile, Existing and Proposed ............................................... .............................. 18
Cross Sections, Existing and Proposed .................................. .............................. 22
25
Rock Weir Detail ................................................................... ..............................
........................................
ional Curves
R .............................. 27
.............................
eg
Stream Habitat Evaluation .................................................... ............................... 28
32
Pebble Count ......................................................................... ...............................
UT SOLS CREEK (REFERENCE REACH FOR LOWER SECTION OF ROCKY
BRANCH IN JACKSON COUNTY) ...................................... ............................... 33
..........................................
Location Ma ............................... 33
p .............................. 34
Plan View .....................:........................................................ ...............................
3 5
Profile .................................................................................... ...............................
36
Cross Section ........................................................................ ...............................
Stream Habitat Evaluation .................................................... ............................... 37
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO ROCKY FORK, TRIBUTARY TO MILLS
RIVER (REFERENCE REACH FOR U.T. ON UPPER SECTION OF ROCKY
BRANCH IN JACKSON COUNTY) ...................................... ............................... 41
41
Location Map ........................................................................ ...............................
43
Plan View .............................................................................. ...............................
44
Profile ................................................................................... ................................
Cross Section ....................................................................... ................................ 45
2

STREAM RELOCATION PLAN
Objectives
The NC DOT proposes to pave Buchanan Road, SR 1400 in Jackson County. Rocky Branch runs
adjacent to the existing gravel road. This will require relocating the stream for approximately 100
feet to accommodate the new fill slope on the lower section and approximately 139 feet on a small
tributary on the upper section.
Project Description
This road is a dead end road and provides access to homes and farms in the area. Farming is the
primary activity in the lower watershed. The upper watershed is wooded. The existing stream
segment is in a cleared Type II valley. The existing segment of the stream adjacent to the road is
severely impacted by being confined between the gravel road and a pasture. Numerous cobbles
and the presence of bedrock in the stream bed and trees along the side opposite the road have
limited erosion of the banks. Plans, profile, and cross sections are attached.
An unnamed tributary to Rocky Branch adjacent to roadway station 34+201eft will also require
relocation. This unnamed tributary appears to have been diverted from its original location in the
edge of a field to the roadway ditch. This plan will relocate it to the edge of the field. Trees
separating the roadway from the proposed location will remain to the extent possible. Hand tools
will be used to limit impacts to the minimum necessary to divert the stream. Channel remnants will
be used to the extent possible.
Reference Reach
The reference reach used for the lower section is on an unnamed tributary to Sols Creek, located
1.9 miles north of NC 281 on Charlies Creek Road, SR 1756.
The reference reach used for the proposed upper section relocation is in the Mills River Watershed,
located 0.6 miles west of Mills River Campground, 0.45 miles west of the bridge over Mills River,
and 984 feet north of North Mills River Road on an unnamed tributary to Rocky Branch, itself a
tributary to Mills River. Although the reference reach is in a different watershed, it is similar in
valley type, slope, and watershed area.
Site Maps
Location maps of the site and the reference reach are shown on the following pages.
Site Plans
Plans for the restoration include the plan view showing relative locations of proposed features, a
profile view showing grade control, typical sections at specific locations, and details of various
structures used for stability.

Biological Community Types
The existing stream is heavily affected by channelization and confinement in the past and due to
being immediately adjacent to the roadway fill.slope. The proposed stream will have some flood
plain bench width separating it from the fill slope, which should allow better habitat to develop.
The bottom substrate tends toward a bimodal distribution of sand and cobble. This maybe
primarily a result of high sediment supply from the gravel road and farming activities. Pools of
beneficial size were essentially absent in the existing reach. More defined pools beneath each step
should benefit habitat.
Habitat in the proposed stream relocation can be enhanced by "re-using" natural woody material
from in and around the existing stream.
Morphological Stream Classification
The Rosgen stream classification system was used to classify the stream to be relocated and the
reference reach. The reference reach initially surveyed exhibited an entrenchment ratio and width
depth ratio found on "E" channels, although the stream was in a valley type and slope setting which
normally produces "B" channels. This was attributed to the dense vegetation and root structure
which may have prevented normal sloping of the channel sides. Across section more typical of
"B" channels was found further upstream.
Due to the limited space for the proposed stream relocation which prevents meander, a type "B"
stream was used. A table of morphological characteristics and supporting data is provided in the
following pages.
Stability Enhancements
Much of the sediment supply on the existing stream is from road materials. Aside from
establishing a stable channel, pavement of the roadway and constructing a shoulder will reduce the
amount of sediment that reaches the channel.
The lateral stability of the existing stream is supported by the large woody vegetation and
associated root mass on the side opposite the road. The side adjacent to the road has no woody
vegetation and tends to erode during high flows.
Vertical stability of the existing stream is supported by bedrock and large cobbles which can be
utilized in the proposed stream channel. Measures to provide stability in the relocated section
include decreased slope between steps that are grade controlled with rock weirs.
The upper section will be relocated on the opposite side of the row of maples and poplars. It
should stabilize quickly from the existing adjacent vegetation which will be undisturbed. Rock
weirs will be used to provide stability in the interim. It will be constructed at as flat a slope as
possible to bring it out of the existing channel, then it will follow the existing topography to the tie
in point at the stream remnant at the lower end.
Sediment Transport
Entrainment calculations on the existing channel indicated that particles up to 300 millimeters were
being transported. Particles larger than 300 mm tended to be dull and imbedded.
4

The proposed stream is designed to transport particles in the range of 250 - 300 millimeters by
setting the step spacing close enough to cause a relatively uniformly sloped bankfull height along
the reach. Care should be taken to avoid long step spacings which will isolate the slope between
steps and result in a local slope that is insufficient to transport sediment particle sizes.
Buffer and Planting Requirements
Native grass seeding and mulching shall be performed on the disturbed areas adjacent to the
stream.
Stream bank reforestation will be planted along both stream banks. Limited area will prevent large
vegetation from being established adjacent to the road. Coir fiber mat shall be installed on the
stream banks where live staking is to be planted as shown on the stream bank typical cross section
and in locations as directed by the Engineer.
Standard seeding and mulching and reforestation specifications are included by reference and can
be provided upon request.
Potential Problems
One of the primary constraints associated with this project is the lack of available width for flood
plain and buffer requirements. A flood plain is proposed between the proposed stream location and
the roadway to minimize impacts to the stream from the roadway. The right bank of the proposed
stream will be adjacent to the existing or proposed fill slope of the roadway. Where this slope is to
be disturbed, stability will have to be assured by placing erosion control matting on all slopes 2:1 or
greater. Coir fiber matting will be used below the bankfull water level.

SUMMARY TABLE iTREAM RELOCATION
i
SUMMARY TABLE FOR: Rocky Branch Stream Relocation for 5R ~4uu, ~acKSOn moo.
Lower section -Roadway stations 7+50 to 8+50
NCWRC Reg. Rocky Br.
Reach Name or Info Source: Rocky Branch UT Sols Creek UT Sols Cr Curve (1) Design
Reference for
Study segment location: Lower section reference Lower section Lower section Lower section
BANKFtlLL `MEASUREMENTS
W bkf (ft}
Bankfull Width 9.9 11.8 9.0 14.3 11.0
,
Dmbkf (ft)
Bankfull f~~ean De th 0.80 1.10 0.89 0.83 0.91
,
Bankfull Max De th. Dmax (ft) 1.60 1,5 1.2
11
3 1.3
00
10
Bkf Cross Sec Area. Abkf (s ft) 8.30 12.9 8.0 . .
5
50
Bankfull Discharge, Qbkf (cfs)2 9.0 45.0 59.6 .
CLASSIFICATION' ]ATA
Stream T e B Boa 64a-B3a Boa
Entrenchment Ratio. V'Uf a/W bkf 1.6 5.0 1.7 1.4
Wbkf%Dmbkf
Width/De th Ratio 12.4 10.7 10.1 12.1
,
Sinuosit , KI=Lchan/Lval 1.03 1.10 1.03 1.01
052
0
ft/ft
S(o e 0.052 0.039 0.069 .
,
Channel Material D50, mm 11.0 40.0
WATERSHED DATA
Draina e Area (acres) 258.0 344.0 227.0 258.0 258.0
Draina a Area s . mi. 0.403 0.538 0.355 0.403 0.403
Valle T e
Soil T e II
SaC II
CuC II
CuC
SaC
Stream Order 2 2 2 2
C
Stream Classification C WS-III Tr WS-III Tr Little Tenn
Watershed Classification Little Tenn. Little Tenn. Little Tenn .
CHANNEL DIMENStONS
Low Bank Hei ht Start , ft. 2.1 2.9 1.2 0.91
Low Bank Hei ht End , ft. 2.2 2.9 1.1 0.91
8
1
ft.
Mean Pool De th 1.4 1.20 .
,
ft.
Pool De th
Max 2.4 2.10 2.30 24
,
.
'~IVidth of Flood Prone Area, Wfpa 16.0 59.0 15.0 15.0
CHANNEL RATTERN
Minimum Riffle Len th, ft. 1.3 0.80 2.00 2.2
ft.
Max Riffle Len th 34.0 22.50 21.00 25.3
,
Median Pool len th 7.3 10.50 15.00 7.7
Pool Len th
Min 3.3 6.30 10.00 3.6
.
Pool Len th
Max 8.4 22.8 24.0 11.0
.
Pool to Pool S acin
Av 10 20.0 26.0 22
.
.
L s ft
Min Pool S acin 5 8.0 8.0 10
,
Max Pool S acin , L s ft 20 35.0 35.0 28
Avera a meander len th, Lm ft 133 107
Min. Meander Len th. Lm fft 82.0
Max. meander len th, ft 131.0
w1ean Belt V~Jidth, VVblt (ft} 15 30.0
Min Belt Width, Wblt ft 23.0
Max Belt Width, W blt ft 37
Mean Radius of Curvature, Rc ft) 150 50.5
Min Radius of Curvature, Rc (ft 12.0 24.0
Max Radius of Curvature, Rc (ft) 350.0 77.0
CHANNEL"PROFILE
Valle slo e, Sval ft!ft) 0.052 0.0410 0.070 0.052
Valle Len th, Lval ft 100 213.0 190 100
Stream Len th, ft. 103.0 235.0 195.0 100
Elevation drop in stream, ft. 5.4 9.1 13.3 5.4

SUMMARY TABLE STREAM RELOCATION

Reach Name or Info Source:
Rocky Branch
UT Sols Creek
UT Sols Cr NCWRC Reg.
Curve (1) Rocky Br.
Design

Study segment location:
Lower section
reference e erence or
Lower section
Lower section
Lower section
FACET StfJPES
Mean Riffle Slo e, ft/ft
Min. Riffle Slo e, fUft
Max. Riffle Slo e, ft/ft
Mean Pool Slo e, ftJftl
Min. Pool Slo a ft/ft 0.175
0.014
0.540
0.0050
0.0024 0.088
0.045
0.44
0.050
0.001 0.060
0.047
0.50
0.017
0.001 0.05
0.04
0.4
0.01
0.001
Max Pool Slope ft/ft 0.0098 0.030 0.030 0.02
FEATURE. M I DPOINTS
Mean Riffle De th, ft. 1.6 1.70 1.00 0.91
Min. Riffle De th, ft.
Max Riffle De th, ft. 1.1
2.1 1.10
2.30 0.87
1.23 0.91
1.27
Mean Pool De th, ft.
Min Pool De th, ft.
Max. Pool Depth, ft. 2.5
2.4
2.6 2.20
1.50
2.90 1.80
1.40
2.27 1.8
1.5
2.4
DESIGN'DIMENStONS
De th of tra ezoidal channel 1.15
Base of tra ezoidal channel 6.40
Avers a ste dro , ft 0.70
Avera a ste len th, ft 1.00
Number of ste s 5
Ste + riffle s acin , ft 20.0
Avera a len th of riffles and ools, ft 19.0
Avers a dro in riffle + ool, ft. 0.38
Avers a slo a between ste s, ft/ft 0.020
Elevation dro in ste s, ft. 3.50
Elevation dro in riffle + ool, ft 1.91
Distance in ste s, ft. 5.00
Length of riffles and pools, ft 95.00
RATI05 -CHANNEL°DtM'ENSIONS
Bank hei ht ratio, LBH/Dmbf 2.6 2.6 1.4 1.0
Min. Riffle De th/Dbkf 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0
Max. riffle De th/Dbkf 2.6 2.1 1.4 1.4
tvlean Pool De th!Dbkf 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Min. ool De th/Dbkf 3.0 1.4 1.6 1.6
Max. pool Depth/Dbkf 3.3 2.6 2.6 2.6
RATIaS -CHANNEL PATTERN
Minimum Riffle len th/Wbkf 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
Maximum Riffle Len th/Wbkf 3.4 1.9 2.3 2.3
Mean Pool len th/Wbkf 0.7 0.9 1.7 0.7
Min. Pool Len th/Wbkf 0.33 0.53 1.11 0.3
Max. Pool Len th/Wbkr 0.85 1.93 2.67 1.0
Paean Pool S acin Ratio. L s,'lNbkf 1.01 1.69 2.89 2.0
Min Pool S acin Ratio, L s/Wbkf 0.5 0.68 0.9 0.9
Max Pool S acin Ratio, L s/Wbkf 2.0 2.97 3,9 2.5
Meander Len th Ratio, Lm;VVbkf 13.4 9.0
Mean PJ1W Ratio, Wblt%VVbkf 1.5 2.5
Min MW Ratio, Wblt/Wbkf - 1.9
Max MW Ratio, Wblt/Wbkf 3.1
Mean Rc Ratio. RciVUbkf 15.2 4.3
Min Rc Ratio, Rc/Wbkf 1.2 2.0
Max Rc Ratio, Rc/Wbkf 35 6.5

SUMMARY TABLE FOR ROCKY BRANCH STREAM RELOCATION LOWER SECTION

Reach Name or Info Source:
Roc Branch
UT Sols Cree
UT Sols Cr NCWRC Reg.
Curve 1) Rocky Br.
Desi n

Study segment location:
Lower section
reference Reference for
Lower section
Lower section
Lower section
RATIOS -£FACET:SLOPES -
Mean Riffle Slo a Ratio, Srif./S 3.4 - 2.3 0.9 0.9
Min. Riffle Slo a Ratio 0.3 1.16 0.7 0.70
Max. Riffle Slo a Ratio 10.4 11.38 7.2 7.20
Mean Pool Slo a Ratio, S /S 0.10 1.29 0.25 0.25
Min. Pool Slo a Ratio 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.01
Max Pool Slo a Ratio 0.19 0.78 0.43 0.43
SEDIMENT TRANSPORT
Mannings n (2) 0.047 0.045 0.057 0.057
Bankfull Mean Velocity, vbkf (ft/s) (2) 5.8 6.2 5.5 5.1
Bankfull flow = vA, cu.ft./sec. 48.3 79.5 44.0 - 50.5
Bankfull Mean Velocity, vbkf (ft/s) (3) 0.7
Bankfull flow = vA, ft/sec. 9.0
H draulic radius =A/Pw=A/ 2D+W 0.72 0.92 0.74 0.78
Slo eat cross section 0.055 0.042 0.067 0.052
Tau= 62.4'R's Ib/ft2 sC~3 XS 2.48 2.41 3.10 2.53
Particle size moved, mm 4) 300 500 300 300.00

(1) Wbkf, Dmbkf, & Obkf equations from Micky Clemons, NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
Abf from NC Rural Mtn. & Pdmt. Regional Curve
(2) n from Table 11, FHWA Hydraulic Design Series 5 & FHWA Table 1
(3) Average of u/u' methods
(4) Colorado Data (Wildland Hydrology)
~8

SUMMARY TABLE I :STREAM RELOCATION
SUMMARY TABLE FOR: Rocky Branch Stream Relocation for SR 1400, Jackson Co.
Upper section near Roadway Station 34+20 left

Reach Name or Info Source: UT Rocky
Branch
UT Sols Cree UT Rocky
Fork Mills R. NCWRC Reg.
Curve (1) UT Rocky Br.
Design

Study segment location:
Upper section
reference Reference for
upper section
Upper section
Upper section
BANKFULt_ MEASUREMENTS
Bankful! Width, Wbkf ft) 4.5 11.8 4.4 4.4 4.0 -
Bankfuil Mean De th, Dmbkf ft 0.27 1.10 0.20 0.30 0.28
Bankfull Max De th, Dmax ft 1.5 0.50 0.5
Bkf Cross Sec Area, Abkf s ft 1.20 12.9 1.0 1.2 1.10
Bankfull Dischar e, Qbkf efs 2 9.0 6.7 5.4 4.3
CLASSIFICATION DATA
Stream T e B Boa 64a Boa
Entrenchment Ratio, Wf alWbkf 5.0 2.6 2.3
WidthlDe th Ratio, Wbkf/Dmbkf 10.7 22.0 14.5
Sinuosit , KI=Lchan(Lva1 1.10 1.04 1.01
Slo e, ft/ft 0.042 0.039 0.110 OA45
Channel Material D50, mm 11.0 13.0
WATERSHED DATA
Draina e Area acres 9.5 344.0 10.3 9.5 9.5
Draina a Area s . mi. 0.015 0.538 0.016 0.015 0.015
Valle T e II II II II
Soil T e SaC CuC TsC SaC
Stream Order 1 2 1 1
Stream Classification C WS-III Tr WS-II Tr HQW C
Watershed Classification Little Tenn. Little Tenn. French Broad Little Tenn.
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS
Low Bank Hei ht Start , ft. 2.9 0.33
Low Bank Hei ht End , ft. 2.9 1.0 0.33
Mean Pool De th, ft. 1.20 0.58 0.6
Max. Pool De th, ft. 2.10 0.58 0.6
Width of Flood Prone Area, Wfpa 59.0 11.3 9.0
CHANNEL PATTERN
Minimum Riffle Len th, ft. 0.80 80.00 1.0
Max Riffle Len th, ft. 22.50 80.00 20.0
Median Pool len th 10.50 2.00 6.0
Min. Pool Len th 6.30 1.70 2.0
Max. Pool Len th 22.8 6.0 12.0
Av .Pool to Poal S acin 20.0 80.0 15
Min Pool S acin , L s ft 8.0 80.0 8
Max Pool S acin- , L s ft 35.0 80.0 28
Avera a meander len th, Lm ft 140 107 44 140
Min. Meander Len th, Lm ft 82.0 44
Max. meander len th, ft 131.0 44
Mean Belt Width, Wblt (ft) 25 30.0 8.3 7
Min Belt Width, Wbtt ft 23.0 8.3
Max Belt Width, Wbft ft 37 8.3
Mean Radius of Curvature, Rc ft) 8 50.5 31 40
Min Radius of Curvature, Rc ft 7 24.0 31 40
Max Radius of Curvature, Rc ft 9 77.0 31 40
9

SUMMARY TABLE CREEK STREAM RELOCATION

Reach Name or Info Source: UT Rocky
Branch
UT Sols Cree UT Rocky
Fork Mills R. NCWRC Reg.
Curve (1) UT Rocky Br.
Design

Study segment location:
Upper section
reference e erence or
upper section
Upper section
Upper section
CHANNEL PROFILE '
Valle slo e. Sval ftlft 0.044 0.0410 0.105 0.044
Valle Len th, Lval ft 140 213.0 86.0 140
Stream Len th, ft. 147.0 235.0 84.0 139
Elevation dro in stream, ft. 6.2 9.1 9.3 6.2
FACET SLOPES
Mean Riffle Slo e, ft/ft 0.042 0.088 0.04
Min. Riffle Slo e, ft/ft 0.045 0.01 0.01
Max. Riffle Slo e, ft/ft 0.44 1.10 0.6
Mean Pool Slo e, ft/ft) 0.050 0.03 0.01
Min. Pool Slo a ft/ft 0.001 0.03 0.01
Max Pool Slo a ft/ft 0.030 0.03 0.02
FEATURE MIDPOINTS
Mean Riffle De th, ft. 1.70 0.20 0.28
Min. Riffle De th, ft. 1.10 0.40 0.20
Max Riffle De th, ft. 2.30 1.00 0.40
Mean Pool De th, ft. 2.20 1.0
Min Pool De th, ft. 1.50 0.6
Max. Pool De th, ft. 2.90 1.4
DESIGN DIMENSIONS
De th of tra ezoidal channel 0.33
Base of tra ezoidal channel 2.68
Avera a ste dro , ft 0.55 0.30
Avera a ste len th, ft 0.5 0.50
Number of ste s 9
Ste + riffle s acin , ft 15.4
Avera a len th of riffles and ools, ft 14.9
Avera a dro in riffle + ool, ft. 0.39
Avera a slo a between ste s, ft/ft 0.026
Elevation dro in ste s, ft. 2.70
Elevation dro in riffle + ool, ft 3.50
Distance in ste s, ft. 4.50
Len th of riffles and ools, ft 80.0 134.50
RATIOS =CHANNEL DIMENSIONS _ .
Bank hei ht ratio, LBHlDmbf 2.6 1.1 1.2
Min. Riffle De th/Dbkf 1.0 2.0 0.7
Max. riffle De th/Dbkf 2.1 5.0 1.5
Mean Pool De ihlDbkf 2.0 3.6
Min. ool De th/Dbkf 1.4 2.2
Max. pool DepthlDbkf
2.6 5.1
~~

SUMMARY TABLE f STREAM RELOCATION

Reach Name or Info Source: UT Rocky
Branch
UT Sols Cree UT Rocky
Fork Mills R. NCWRC Reg.
Curve (1) UT Rocky Br.
Design

Study segment location:
Upper section
reference e erence or
upper section
Upper section
Upper section
RATIOS - CHANNEL'PATTERN
Minimum Riffle len th/Wbkf 0.1 18.2 0.3
Maximum Riffle Len th/Wbkf 1.9 18.2 5.0
Mean Pool len th/Wbkf 0.9 0.5 1.5
Min. Pool Len th/Wbkf 0.53 0.39 0.50
Max. Pool Len th/V1lbkr 1.93 1.36 3.00
Mean Pool S acin Ratio, L s/Wbkf 1.69 18.18 3.75
Min Pool S acin Ratio, L s/Wbkf 0.68 18.18 2.00
Max Pool S acin Ratio, L s/V11bkf 2.97 18.18 7.00
Meander Len th Ratio, Lm/Wbkf 9.0 10.0 35.0.
Mean MW Ratio, WbIUWbkf 2.5 1.9 1.8
Min MW Ratio, Wblt/Wbkf 1.9 1.9
Max MW Ratio, Wblt/Wbkf 3.1 1.9
Mean Rc Ratio, Rc/Wbkf 4.3 7.0 10.0
Min Rc Ratio, Rc/Wbkf 2.0 7.0 10.0
Max Rc Ratio, Rc/Wbkf 6.5 7.0 10.0
RATIOS -FACET SLOPES
Mean Riffle Slo a Ratio, Srif./S 1.0 2.3 5.0 6.8
Min. Riffle Slo a Ratio 1.16 0.09 0.22
Max. Riffle Slo a Ratio 11.38 10.00 13.33
Mean Pool Slo e Ratio, S !S 1.29 0.27 0.22
Min. Pool Slo a Ratio 0.03 0.27 0.22
Max Pool Slo a Ratio 0.78 0.27 0.44
SEDIMENT TRANSPORT
Mannings n (2) 0.040 0.045 0.086 0.04
Bankfull Mean Velocity, vbkf (ft/s) (2) 2.9 6.2 2.0 3.2
Bankfull flow = vA, cu.ft./sec. 3.5 79.5 2.0 3.5
Bankfu{{ Mean Velocity, vbkf (ft/s) (3) 0.7 6.7
Bankfull flow = vA, ft/sec. 9.0 6.7
Hydraulic radius =A/Pw=A/(2D+W) 0.24 0.92 0.21 0.24
Slope at cross section 0.042 0.042 0.083 0.045
Tau= 62.4`R's(Ib/ft2) (s@ XS) 2.41 1.08 0.68
Particle size moved, mm (4) 500 100 100.00

(1) W bkf, Dmbkf, 8 Obkf equations from Micky Clemons, NC W ildlife Resources Commission
. Abf from NC Rural Mtn. 8~ Pdmt. Regional Curve
(2) n from Table 11, FHWA Hydraulic Design Series 5 & FHWA Table 1
(3) Average of ulu' methods
(4) Colorado Data (Wildland Hydrology)

~~
~~
1091.00
1090.00
1089.00
1088.00
1087.00
1086.00
c
0
.~
w 1085.00
1084.00
1083.OC
1082.0(
1081.0(
1080.OL
0
10 20 30 40 50 tiu r v ...,
Channel Distance, ft. Beginning 1064 ft. North of Road Center Line
Segment 1, UT Rocky Fork, 0.6 mile west of Milts River Campground, Henderson Co.
- -- --- --
---- _.
--- -
-^--thalweg -~- bankfull 0 x-section 1 o riffle crest o pool x Top of low ban

Cross Section 1, 984 feet north of road, UT Rocky Fork, 0.45 mile west of bridge at
Mills River Campground, Henderson Co., Riffle

c
0
a~
w
1081.5
1081
1080.5
1080 -~~ ~ ,--,-~ ~~
7 8 9 10 11 12widtl, 13 14 15
~-cross section _ flood prone area _ bankfull _,
16 17 18

JACKSON COUNTY
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
ROAD NAME Rocky Branch
SR 1400
FROM SR 1401 5380 feet to end of proiect
ADDITION
IlVIPROVEMENT YES
TO BE PAVED YES
R/W WIDTH 45'
VERTICAL SCALE 1" = 50'
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 25'
DATE 3-07-06

EROSION CONTROL PLANS
Jackson County
SR 1400 Rocky Branch

Erosion Control Schedule
• Install erosion control measures according to plans in all outlets and at other
discharge points after clearing but before grubbing
• Clear and clean outfall ditches leaving side slopes at an angle that can be retained by
vegetation. These areas will require stage seeding and mulching.
• Begin grading of roadway ditches. Place erosion control measures along roadway
ditches as grading progresses and conditions allow.
• Seed and mulch all disturbed areas as soon as any phase of grading is completed.
(Note there are 15 working days/30 calendar days to complete seeding and mulching.
A working day is defined as a day exclusive of Saturday or Sunday during which
weather conditions or soil conditions permit land-disturbing activity.)
• Clean out and/or rework all temporary erosion control measures after any significant
rainfall event (or as otherwise needed). These measures should be maintained until a
permanent vegetative cover is established.
Wet Pipe Installation Schedule
• Install erosion control devices.
• Remove material and existing pipe while limiting, as much as possible, material and
sediment from entering the stream andJor escaping from the project.
• Prepare pipe foundation while taking care to limit material and sediment from
entering the stream and/or escaping from the project. Where possible new grade
should be below the existing streambed. If needed, bedding material will be clean
stone (especially in Trout and HQW waters).
• Place new pipe and compact fill.
• Install slope protection on outlet and inlet ends of pipe. Also complete installation of
erosion control measures and perform maintenance as needed on existing measures.
• Establish permanent vegetation as soon as possible.

SR: 1400 Rock Branch
Count : Jackson If the existin roadbed is stable and will be maintained stable
Date: 3/1/2006 use the followin a uation to determine area.
Pre ared B W Jamison Area (ft^2 =Len th * 0.5 R/W Width - 0.5 Stable Width
R/VU: 45
Stable Width 16 If the existin roadbed is not stable or will not be maintained stable
Water Qualit Class C ie. new ali nment or raisin the rade use the followin a uation
to determine area.
Area ft^2 =Len th * 0.5 R/W Width

HWQ, Trout, ORW

Sta to Sta
Left /Right Stable
Roadbed
Length
Area (ft^2)
Area (ac) Storage space
needed (ft^3)
0+00 to 1 +35 Left Yes 135 1957.5 0.04 81
1+35 to 5+40 Left Yes 405 5872.5 0.13 243
5+40 to 7+40 Left Yes 200 2900 0.07 120
7+40 to 11 +00 Left Yes 360 5220 0.12 216
11+00 to 14+35 Left Yes 335 4857.5 0.11 201
14+35 to 16+50 Ri ht Yes 215 3117.5 0.07 129
16+50 to 22+40 Ri ht Yes 590 8555 0.20 354
22+40 to 27+90 Left Yes 550 7975 0.18 330
27+90 to 32+15 Left Yes 425 6162.5 0.14 255
34+00 to 35+15 Left Yes 115 1667.5 0.04 69
36+90 to 41 +70 Left Yes 480 6960 0.16 288
41 +70 to 43+95 Left Yes 225 3262.5 0.07 135
43+95 to 46+40 Left Yes 245 3552.5 0.08 147
46+40 to 49+00 Left Yes 260 3770 0.09 156
49+00 to 50+85 Left Yes 185 2682.5 0.06 111
50+85 to 53+80 Left Yes 295 4277.5 0.10 177

32+15 to 34+00 Fill both sides
35+15 to 36+90 Fill both sides

Sta to Sta
Left /Right Percent
Grade Silt Check
Spacing (ft) * Recommended
Ditch Treatment
0+00 to 1 +35 Left -2 150 Straw & Tack
11+00 to 14+35 Left 2 150 Straw & Tack
14+35 to 19+50 Ri ht 2 150 Straw 8~ Tack
19+50 to 22+75 Ri ht 1 300 Straw & Tack
22+75 to 35+00 Left 1 300 Straw & Tack
35+00 to 42+50 Left 3 100 Straw & Tack
42+50 to 47+50 Left 4 75 Straw & Tack
47+50 to 53+80 Left 2 150 Straw & Tack

* In ditchlines where stone liner is used siltchecks are not needed

Basin Stora a Calculation = # of Basins X Basin Len th X Basin Width X Basin De th )
In most cases onl the # of Basins and Basin Len th should chap ed

Sta to Sta # of Basins Len th ft Width ft De th ft Storage Needed Basin Stora a Calculated
ft ft ft ft^3 ft^3
0+00 to 1+35 2 7 3 2 81 84
1 +35 to 5+40 4 11 3 2 243 264
5+40 to 7+40 2 10 3 2 120 120
7+40 to 11 +00 3 12 3 2 216 216
11+00 to 14+35 3 12 3 2 201 216
14+35 to 16+50 2 11 3 2 129 132
16+50 to 22+40 5 12 3 2 354 360
22+40 to 27+90 5 11 3 2 330 330
27+90 to 32+15 4 11 3 2 255 264
34+00 to 35+15 1 12 3 2 69 72
36+90 to 41 [phone]
41 +70 to 43+95 2 12 3 2 135 144
43+95 to 46+40 3 9 3 2 147 162
46+40 to 49+00 3 9 3 2 156 162
49+00 to 50+85 2 10 3 2 111 120
50+85 to 53+80 3 10 3 2 177 180

TEMPORARY L[NER - - - - - -
STRAM & TACK - - - - - '
5+~~
t
i
i
i
L l tXN3VIX 2
t\ 1
Llx3xz
I
I
R /W11X~3X2
i
i
I
11XIX2
~®z
l
i
7 XIL~^3\VyfXI 2
~l
1
I
.~
.,
I
I
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-~
I
I
I
I
I
l
i
l
T
l
I
I
I
1
I
La• ~~ ~ISTL~
i
l
l
l
i
I
I
I
I
I
~_
R/W
5+~~
2
1.35 GRADE CHANGE
-2
t ~~

15+~~
ROCKY BRANCH
TEMPORARY LINER - -- - --•
STRAY & TACK - - - - -
I
tzx~ xz
I
R/W
I
I
tzx~ x2
1Q~+~~
Iz::3x2
I
T ~
I I
I
I
I ~~
~I i
I I/
/~} ~3xz
ClY+ E~ ING /
~I
~~ /
~I
~~ i
" R/W
T
i
1
I
I
18' CMPI PROPOSED

15+~~
2
1~+~~

2~+~~
TEMPORARY L I NER - - - - - -
STRAM & TACK - - - - -
15+~~
R/W
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I ~ <3;<
I
I ~1
I I
I
i
I ~
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
1
I 1
I
I
l2',;3 XZ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
_L_. ~
I
I
I I
I I
I
,~~3Xz
I
~a~ ~ ~~o
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
~ I
I
I
I ~:X3Xz
I
I
1
I ~
I I
I
I
I ~
I '
I I
.L
R/W
2~+(~~
1
19.50 GRADE CHANGE
2
15+~~

• 25+~~
ROCKY BRANCH
TEMPORARY LINER - -- - --•
STRAM & TACK - - - - -
2Q~+~~
R
I 1 XI X2
1 1 IhX^\V3yIIX 2
nl
1
1
I
l1 Xd
25+~~
. ,
1
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
~ i
% I // / /,
~ t~ /
~1
~ i
I/
i~ ~~
j ~ CSI EXISLIN6 1
~ ~ ~ ~~ RAW
/ 1
/ j
~ ~ 1~,
~.
;i ~ i
i/ ~~
%~~ 1
i 1
I
~ I
I
I
I
~ I
I
i
~ 12X3X2
I
1
1 I
I ~
I
I ~
I '
I 1
I '
I ~
I '
I
I '
I ~
I
I
I 12X3X2
I
I
2~+~~

3~+~~
T
i
i
i l
. .
i l
i
i
l I t~Xn~V3V'IX 2 l
I
nl
T
I
l
I l
l
1
I
I
l I
~ / /
~ I ~ ~
i
i~~ ~~ ~ ~
~, , ,%
~~ i ~%.
~X3X/ ~
® / I
3~+~~
~~~V~
UNAMED TRIBUTARY ~'`X,y ~~ EXISTrN~ ~ ~~
/ ~; ~/
TO ROCKY BRANCH
// i //; l // , j
jl,/ l ~
~ ~' ~~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~~ /
R kW~ -i
TEMPORARY L t NER - - - - - - •
STRAM & TACK - - - - -
25+~~
l IILXNVV3 X2
nl
l l It~X^\V3VI'X 2
^1
l~
i
l
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
25+~~

;~ i 'I
/i, -
I ~~~ i
I I
• I
I
. I
I I
I
I I
IZX;R2 I
I
~~ I
i I
°` _ / '
Q U ~ ~ 1
I- Z I
m ~ ~ ,~ I
~-. m
~ I
F- >- / I
Y I
D U ~~ I
W O
E ~ I
Z O ~ ~
~ F- I
% I
~ ~ ~
I
~ I
I
I
~/ I
I
,I
~~~ ~~
R/W /I /
;' ~
~ ~~ I
I
~8'%18' C1i E%IST
UNAMEO TRIBUTARY ~ ~ ~~
TO ROCKY BRANCH / T/
~~~, ~
~ /I
/ ' ~~
~~
Ii I
I
I
I
I
I I
I t,<"s;i2 I
I
I '
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I ~
TEMPORARY L[NER - - - - - - • I I
STRAM b TACK - - - - - • ttx3x~ I
I
3~+~~

35+D~
I
3D+~~

4~+~~
12x3x2
1
12lx~NV3IX2
~l
R/W
R/W
4~+~~
3
UNAMED TRIBUTARY
TO ROCKY BRANCH
TEMPORARY LINER - -- - --•
STRAW & TACK - - - - -
35+~~
35.00 GRADE CHANGE

45+~~ 1 -r 45+~~
ax3r' ~
I
UNAMEO TRIBUTARY
TO ROCKY BRANCH
TEMPORARY L[NER - -- - •~
STRAM & TACK - - - - -
4~+~~
9Y'.;~2
Izx~3,
1
,W
18' CM E%IST Ir+G
4
I
i
i
i
i
i
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
42 50 GRADE CHANGE
I R/W
i
I j 1
/I ,~ ~ i
~~ I
I~ ~ ii
%~,~%
~-"®; ' ~
38'X21' CW
~ ~ ~"
~ I / ~ ~/
~, / , .
;, ~
i ~ ~~ ~
;~i / i i ~ %
i ;' ~
i i
I ' 3
I
I
I
Iz,~~;~
I
1
I
I I
~' ~ 4~ + ~~

5~+~~
L©X3X2
~l
1©X3X2
TEMPORARY LINER - -- - --•
STRAY & TACK - - - - - •
45+~~
R/W
9x3X2
1
I
9X3X2
I
I
9X~X2
9X3X~
1
I
5~+~~
18' CMP PRDPDSED
I
I
'T
I
1
1
~ 8.9fd GRADE CHANGE
R/W
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
le• as PaDPOSeo
I
I
I
4
i
i
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
45+~~

° ~~' ~49" NY ~ ~ ~ ~ i°~~°i2P' °r~'i 4"i i i ~ ~ 4~~° ~ ~' '49" NY i i i i i°~~°i'~' °r9°'i `Ni i i i i S'~~° i ~' .y'9" NY i i i i i°~°i'~' °~9°'i `Ni i i i i i
`~.~ ~' . _ _ "'~~e ~ ~//~ ,~ ~ -\ _- ~ ~ ' it ~ /. J ~ ' • ~' ``\
~
r _ 1851 • ~6 . ~ _ •~• •`, ~l.' ~~

``
I ~
, it u
~!
;'r,
- O, N
~
v
Yor , `.
~Ch ptl rl
'
~ `
'
`
~
O ^gt„t. 7
o~ ,
c~ ~ 2~
~- ~ '~
~ ~. _a - o

~ ,,. .:

`.
,
~ ~
~
~
- ~.1c ~ ~('y
~~ \ r
~
! ~ ~, ' Sw(mminQ pa 0.
}~ ~ _
I i ~
y ~ .. /. ~
r ~

l
B ~~
` 2~ J` • rf' = -',
',
GO
/ i ~.
~ .~ . ~
i:
~~ir ; . Bumga~ner ~~ ~
7 t'.p ` ~ _
`~~~ ~ )

V7 ~-~ _ -~ '~{ _ ( _ ). ^ (- ICJ ~ iii br `\ ~ ~ i'~ t ~~' ~'~t ~/ - o

r' ~~ ~. J!,)i
.~ .,.

_
d. -y i ~ }~ -rya
~Iy ~ ! B' r~{
~ 1~ 1, - :;.\ `~~
I

,
~r ~ I~
.- ~ ( ,`~ ~~
} ..
1
1 `~ ` `
i

r /

JO
J
~
~~ f QO .
It• W ~`
•
\
Z
B ~ .y ) ~ \ -
.

' r ws sa ( O

In _ ~ °
` - ~
~.
r
'
- - ,
-
~
~ (~
` U t _
~
_ ~ ~ p r'
san / ~ ~ v
~ m.~

w i ~ .
? c i
i C
. ..:~ ~ 1•
r
_ ~:
~
. 0' t$9 (GREENS CREEK
166•SE) = 1
4354 !V Sf
SCALE 12~+C00
o I
5°
I(YY; ._ _~~
G I~Y'A
l ? 1'Xyl
'Y)G
•^ F: ~ T
°~b ~d~ ~.~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~°i26~ d.do} ~v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b~3b ti~ ~.~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ei,d d.do~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ bib ~~. ~.~.' 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~°~,~~ d.dot,~~ V I I I
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.

SR 1400 Rocky Branch Road
Inlet
Outlet

bite
Inlet
Outlet

Site 3
Inlet
Outlet

Site 4
Inlet
Outlet

Site 5
Inlet
Outlet

• ~ e M
Site 6
Inlet
Outlet

Bank Stabilization #1
Bank Stabilization #2

. ,
Wetland Fill
Bank Stabilization #3

\ \ ~ \ \ ~\ \ \ ~ \ \ ~ \ e
~ g
~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~
~~
~~~~.~~a~~ ~
]](rr( rr11yy 1r1r 94 1r T1 1 yt
II!~'~~I I7•~~11~1~~ ~~i,.(~,y~~©~ if ~ I I+IIIIJ~ 1 S Il~l~v III I~~~a~,~..'~•~~'•••®wrl•~~^~ 0+9~ O J ~3 O~ - ~ 1 i
U o °~ ~ ~= 1
_~~
z ~ ~ ~
~ °~ ~ ~~
O io ~ ~
to ~` ~ ° -
0
U '~
\ -s Z N
Q ~
7. a i
3
4 h
o ~ { ~ /
3 ~
Y ~ a 9
T R A N S Y l V A N I A ~ g~
/~
4 '
L
C O ti,
U
N T p
rd Y jL
~9 ~ I ~ ~ O J
•'' ~-~.
~ ! r'~~~~ , y~~1,~„ C ~ _ : - Q~J y\. {~ e~, fl~ V ~ ;r, ~'', ~ 03.E
~ ` ~ ( ~Z~i.,I tf~ ~ ~'y ~at~ 1$~a~ 4I~~~~ s~~~f~ `r„ 1'.`~i._,E ~+ ~ ,`~-/`~~ ~h~ ~ ~ >>~~~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~<`~'~~ ~ ' ~'~ t _/~ }ice 1J.1~Yt 7 y FY i ~ F t ~ ~ ~,~ J ~ ~ '1~
~, S S~~ r ~- -~ ~ j- ;$`?~ ~ `''+, ~ ,,~ ~~} _ III"'
o s s ~ ~ z t 1r~~ ~r ~ y cap ,~ ~~ ~{~.~+ ~,o ,r~+ i
' a g!p ~ ~~ I S ~~/~~~~~ ~~- Y~( jr ~ ~~' ~ r p~ '~~~ / .s`; ~~ a ~1 v~~ % f ,ti~ \ ~~r ~. .~t~ , `~T~1 -- ,.~ _
~a Z I ti r~ ~ ~ P+~ ~ ~ ~ c1 m
~V{J 6 c
~ ~a I~r`~C~" ~~~ ~. ~~ / A ~ _ •F`~~,M ~~ ~: 1 ',.'r LEI -
~ ~ s-~ ~ L-~ ~?'z / t~~ i l ~ ,~ 9 ~/ ~ ~~ - ~ _l,,
~ ~,,,~ / ~ ~~~. ' j ~ '1 ~ =~, ~ ~ ~,. ~'
~~ 4~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ Y~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~.
L E~ , \
~} J°~ ~ r~ 1 n~ ~ ~~ ~
r \ . ~~ y _ L _. Jr
~~'?.~ j~- '~ ' ti -~ ~ _ ~ - •
gin. i ~~ ~~ - F~' J Q ~ ~''~ ~ ~ @~ ~iS~Ji. '~q ~, ,j`~ ~~i~ • ~ ~~
~~an T~ d
~p~~'J ~' ` h~ ~ ''` ~~SY ~ t
~. ~~ ~~ `~ v ;~
..~ _ -
~ ~ _~ ~
ti , ~~ ~ J __.~_._.
1
i o I ~ W
o
i M S
N I V L~
U >-- ~~
I O ~
~ U
O
•...
~

..
,,,_
_- -- ~-~,
~~ - ~~~?r
~~ J
~ ~~1 - ' _.l L~

~ ~~~~
Il
@I

,\ ~
G
~.,-~
~~/ ~.~ ~ 1~~~ "~' r'te` `"_~~~~,~ 1 ~~ 0
\ ~ I r
'1~~-~';_~,x:tll ~ ,;~ --= Ipllllllllll z ~~ ~F Z
~ ~-
\ / ~~ o~ ;~
_ ~ ~ ~ Q
~---`s" /~ f~
.~, 9~ a~ U
_~ ;~
~~ 1CK 1~~- ~~~ ~~f~ ~ f..
~~.
.~~
'~
~~',
gi ~
~. ~
/
~~fl
,,
~ ~
~~ 1 ~
.1 `~ ~~ ~r-~~- ~
7 ~ ~ 'J
.~
~,~~ - ~ ~~, yyJJ ~ ~
~ q ~ c.~ ~ ~
_~ ~ k~~ ~R~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~~
~~M" .i
~t-~ ~~~;, ~ ti_ ~ ~ Z,~ ~..~; Jz_ ~ a,, ~
~ .~':~ , ~ ~ -~ - - ~.~- l ~~ ~
z
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a71 i ~~' ~~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~I ~
- - _ ,~I
~ ~ ~ yf ~di~. - jai ,~-- ~~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5. - >
~/ ~~}. ~~ ~.~ ~ t,_
~~ ~ ~ ~t'~ ~~~ _ ~ ~ n ~~~
\ ~ ~
~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u~\ ~
---m--~ ( "~ _ '.1.,~~ j ~ ~ -
~~ ~_ ~ r ~
`~` ~ _I/ `
~' __~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ ~
~~_ ~ .
~ ~~ ~ ~
R ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ (.J ~_~ i 4~\
_ ~ '`~~
~ ~R' ~~~ ~ \ r~
d,.
~.,~ ~
r//`~JC\ r I O
J~ ~
9- ~ ~ ~~ ~_
\ ~
~~ ~
/ °~~~ ~ S ~ ~~ -~~
_ ~ ~~ ~
` EI
~~.
.~_
~~~~ :~.
~ ~~
,`..
~~/ y ~ Ai ~, ~ C~
.~
~~
"-. J
~,._. ~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~ O
_~ -~,=~ ~ ~ ~,-~ l ~
~ ;'
,m. ~
.a„.e..,. o ..~ ~,:,.

r~
a~. ~~ ,.
r
.. ~ ~ -
~+. ~e,.~
..
__
-.
,_ s, -,• ~ _ ~~ , ~~ ~,~~
,,
,~ r;~'. ~ -- a~t~rrt~ar~~ ~~,~ ~.~
CC
i 1
I ~{
r
r,, _ . ~.
_ .`
{
:~ r "
_~ ~ _~. ~ .~ r - -~ ~.. ~ ? r ~ ~ . '
S y
,4y~ ti a irE~ ,
`~-~~~- 100 FEET CHANNEL CHANGE ~`~~ ~~' ~~~~ •~ ~~'~ '~~`~~ `~~~=
~,°~~,r~~, DRAINAGE AREA = 258 ACRES :. ~, ~ `+ ~ . { I ~~ rr~ r ~~.~; ~ ~,.~ ,~
. ~.----
} ~ • t1 4~ ~ ~ ~'`,~~
i r ~~~
, "'
1
mss. T~"'4~'' k ~__.~r ~r 4 ~~ ~`... 1 ~ y ~ ~~ ,~~ ~ ~ _) •~ ~~,'',~ !' ~ . .I ",~,e
~~
~~ --- ~ ~'~ 147 FOOT CHANNEL CHANGE ~ .- .~
~ - ~ `. .4 i~ ~~ -.: f ~ . ~ i~ 7`
..; ~, -
DRAINAGE AREA = 10 ACRES ~ ~ '~ ' ~I ~ ~ `~ ~" ~ ~ ~~~-~~
I ~k ~ ~ ~' . l t r' f'" "ter ,,.
,
~ war _ e~ ~ F..-
. __ ._~ - _ - t ~
W ~ ~
\ '
X11 ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~. , . ~ _ ' ~ x ~ _ ~. j - ~ ~. ~ ~'-,~
f ,. _ ,,
_ . ~ ~ _ ',
,~ i ~ ,• ~ ~ rti ~ ..: Y,l i ~sy '' r,,l r ~ t ~ } ~•,f ~ r ^ t" J~/ ... ~ 1 f~ 1~~~ - /
<. ..~
t ~,`~ l'r' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~...._..
=x ~ ~ ..~..f[pp ~~ ~j .~. • r f e • _ ~ -__~T't t 5 ~ ~~~~ ~ -~ ~' -..f j ~ mow. r..~-..-.. ~'~ ~ ~ ~~4 i k'~., _~ '~
•, . ~ .
15 V t ~t 2'°~ .~ ~ r ~ ~ '` ~ 1
.
e•
7E . ~ ~ -. -_ a f r
l ~ ~ ~~ ~ . ~5 ~. e ~r _ ,. /~ `~,~r ~ ., f q v ~ ~
,j~.r !
r,~,.. -- i ~ t ! ~ ..~,
_ _ ,
~.~
,.
~~ ~ ~~
~~ r"fY~' ,. ~~ ~ "'~~ ` ~ ~~ ~t.~'~~-~~ C'~"4J~. ~ ~,:, r ~~~~.j;`~y~~",~~r"~ i' /'L,.;'` 1 R.~ r
~~ r
~4.!/ i ~P
.,
,
ter, ~_~"~ ~ _„~__ :~~ f ~~ a
r
_ ~ _ -~
4
f f ~ ~~
e'' -~ ~ `, 4 ~~' ~~ ~ ~ ti's 1- 1 r~~~~ ~ ~ !~ ~ ~ t ~ Y.
~ y _
~ ~ ~ ~
_, -~. -', ~ 1 .~ p
•
ti .. is
.. •
~' _ _
.~ i - _
_ ~. 1 1 / ~ ~ ~ 1 `~ ~ ~ ` ` ~~"•. '^~'~F; ~ Y~ ~ f ~ e 'fir' ~ 1 ,~_ •w^^-~'' ~J
tea. ~ ~~• ~ P ~ ~ ~r ~~ ~ ~ ~ y~ ~i''~r~ \ •~ ~ ~ ~ J(. , ~ "~
ljjL„ ~f`Yh~ ~ _ Jr ~ ~1 •v ~ ~~`ti ~) ~r'f .,,.~:. ~~ , 1,~ ~t s,f~
,.• v-. ,~~, 1~`, .r/•r - ~~` t ~ '•, j t~ ~ V~. 4ti ~~.• ,~~r r~~ ~^F f~f ~~ ,i ~ t~ 'i'f ~",*.
.~ r ~` ~ ~ ~
r ~ - ..,~
.~ ~ ~ ~. ~ 7 ~~~ f k`~r __
i
.,~ + f
- ~ ~~.
Name: WHITTIER Location: 035° 23' 35.25" N 083° 19' 26.50" W
Date: 7/6/2006 Caption: ROCKY BRANCH - SR 1400
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet BUMGARNER ROAD
6 MILES WEST OF SYLVA - JACKSON COUNTY
Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc. I I'

s~
~o
~~
x~
~~
~~
~~
ox
~~
~o
~~
i~ y
o n
o x
~ Z
rr
~~
~x
~~
~~
y ~
O.
~d
r~
cz
~~
,~
~~
~~
x~
~y
° ~~
~~
o~
~~
~n
~~

ROCKY BRANCH - SR 400
CHAf~~IEL CHA~JGE
BUILDING JACKSOf~ COUf~TY
0 5.0 10.0
0 0
5
.
. ROADWAY STAT Ofd 7+50- 8+50

PROPOSED EDGE OF ROAD
POOL CROSS SECTION
RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
EXISTING EDGE OF ROAD
------ ------- ~ IN TREAM
-- ------ - _ ------- ---I~RaPOSE~D'TOE-E}F-RIL-L---- --
_ - - PROPOSED STREAM
----\--- ---i~ _____
----
-___-- - -~-
\
\
y I \
________ -- - ~-
- -
- - _ _ 1 - -
~ ~~~~
~~
i ~,
~
- P ROCK WEIR (TYPICAL)
~
PRO OSED
ov
m
m

TEMPOR RY CONST UCTION EASEMENT
E
E E E E E
BEN MARK "X" ON CORNER OF OLLECTOR BOX
BEGIN CHANNEL CHANGE
END CHANNEL CHANGE
ROADWAY STATION 8+50
ROADWAY STATION 7+50
~,
1
Y
~~

eANKFUU wloTh
4.0'
'"'-"-- CONt FIBER uaTTwG BOTH SIDES ~ 033'
NOTESo
USE HAND
26a
PROPGSED CROSS SECTION
0.5 0.0 0.5 I.0
SCALE FOR CROSS SECTION
TOOLS ONLYo
PRESERVE EX ST NG VEGETATIONo
1IARY STREAM MEANDER W TH N CO~STRA NTS OF M N MUM
ROCKY BRAi~JCH - SR 400
CHANNEL CHANGE
JACKSON COUNTY
ROADWAY STATON 34+20 LEFT

RAD USo
EX~STfNO STREAM
BELOW TH S POl~1T (3/ 5/06)
PROPOSED STREAM
5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0
..;

~.
R _~
~ V ~ l `~~ ~ / - - -
.----- --- -- \ \------------------------------------------ ---OSED CUT L LINE
PROP
EX STING STREAM ~3/ 5/06)
EX STING ROADWAY ~ PROPOSED ROADWAY
,~
~ --1

Existing Rocky Branch Profile
1009
1008
1007
1006
c
1005
m
a~
w
1004
1003
1002
1001

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Channel Distance (ft)

1009
1008
1007
1006
c
1005
ca
d
w
1004
1003
1002
1001
Existing and Proposed Rocky Branch Profile
C~v~er~. it S )c~p2. = D. 05~
~.Verc~9 ~. S1opQ $etweeYl ,Urvps = ~•~°~
A v e ra :~ ~e d r~ N y c~. 7 -~-f-.
..s~
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Channel Distance (ft)

1007
1006
1005
1004
1003
c 1002
1001
w
looo
999
998
997
996
0
Existing Rocky Branch Profile -Upper Section
I I _ _ L_ _ I _ - - ! ~ I _ - - 1 - -1 - ! -
~ ~ C - low bank • Beg in chann el change • End c hannel ch ange- - Ex isting ro

_ adway 2- 3 ft. beyo nd - ~ Wate
_ r sui
.-
-- ---
- ------- -----
__--

---

-
~~ ,~ Begin channel c ange
~' ' ' - ' ' - ' ~' - .
. istin roadw y 2-3 ftJ beyond
~
- --
-

-
- - -- ~- ~L.._ - --
. ~
~-- - -- - -
• -
--
-

- Z .
\
.`

-
I _- --
`
.
I
--_---
--- - - -- - - - _ I
~
.
~,
l
~nd cha
nel cha
ge

--
-- - -- -- - - --- _ _ _ - -
_
~ - --
•

I

-

-

-

- -

-

-

-
x

~
_
_
- -
~ -

-x~
- .

~ ' --
face
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
Channel Distance (ft)
i~

Proposed Rocky Branch Profile -Upper Section
C"
I

X ---
- 9C - low bank •
Begin ch
annel ch
ange
En
d channe
l change
--~-
Water s
urface
T
ie in to e
xisting or
iginal cha
-- -
,w Be --
in chan
el chap
e

. - - - - -- --
`
___. __-._-___ --...._ _-_ __. - __._- - __4 _-_-_
r -

--

-- -_

~, - _. ___-_. ---_

-- - ___ ._._ __- -- -
- ---
` Ti i
n
t h
fi
l nnel
e n
o o na
c
` ~ End hannel hange
~
--
-
-----

. _.__
__.___
.. _
_ _-
___ _ __
_._ -- --
a

• •

~ ~

nnei
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
Channel Distance (ft)
1007
1006
1005
1004
1003
~_
c 1002
0
;.
1001
w
1000
999
998
997
996

n + 97 Rockv Branch, Existing, Riffle

1005
1004
~:
c
1003
m
a~
w
1002
1001 ~
0
Width, ft. ---~--cross section - - - - - -fpa
- - - Bankfull

1009
1008
1007

c
1006
ca
m
w
1005
1004
0 + 47 Rocky Branch, Existing, Pool
1003 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Width, ft.
i~

CROSS SECTION DIMENSIONS AT ROADWAY
BANKFULL WIDTH
~,
PROPOSED ROADWAY
EXISTING ROADWAY `\'~
.~
~`.
ROCKY
EXISTING FENCE
STATION 8+00
STABILIZE WITH NATIVE WOODY
VEGETATION BOTH SIDES
COIR FIBER MATTING
BOTH SIDES
~I~
6.4'
1.2'
BRANCH IN JACKSON
COUNTY

CROSS VA71iE ROCK
not to scale
top of bank at bankfr~U stage rrB
WEIR DETAIL
~ ~ ~,
20 - 30~ ~ channel width = 11.0 ft.
,,,-_
/3 degrees ~ , '
- - ~ floodplain above weir
------ - -,-~- I -Tbight of vane = 1.15 ft -
pal a `_~~. - - -
a flow ~ ~ floodplain below ` ~r , o ;
1/3-~ ------------c~ r ° ~.o
.°~ , ~~° a
o ~ ~ small boulders a > D .~~ ;`'
~ e0:~ D Q° v °O°
.aQ,~~~n-jc D.G e^o ~e It a ° ~ ~ D:U
- . , ~ footer rocks ~~• °, ~ Q . c°~ °~~J~ a ~ ~~ a ° ~? ~ °° e e
1/3 t - - . ~ large boulder used to ° ' °_ ~ ~ ~ ~ °_ ° =- ~ ~
boulders `~ ~'~ ~
~ J~ key into stream bank goul d ers should be not i ve stone
r ~ top of book. at bonkf ull ~ rr,
;~.
ti ?~ `~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~' or shot rock9 angular and oblonge
B
native ~'lantings ~ sillloptional) Minimum intermediate axis = 1°T ft,
Minimum depth of footer rock Is
3 times protrusion height of sill rock
for gravel, 6 times protrusion
hei ght f or sand bed streams.
K~
,~ ~ ~
-- - ~ N. C. ~E~T. ®~ T~.~NS~~~T~1'I`I~N
_~ 2% - 7%~ I ~9I~I~I®N ®~` IiIG~IW~~S
flow ' ~~ ~1~'!
pool de ~ 1.5 ft =-~4-ft. K®CI;~ BI3~NC~I
cl~lnne! bed
o , oo ~ ~ avero e channel drop = 0.7 ft.
o. a 0 ~ 1 g I9~~NSTAEA~i I,®C~TI~N
D~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ 71,- - °- -~ ~ _ - - - ~; ~~a0p0 . Q ~®AD~'~Y ST~.TI®N ~ + 50 - 8 + b~
{{{{ 0
a ~ a ,~ ~ ,~p~l~ ',~,I> ° ~~ ~ O ~~ ~ s D ~ ' 6 FILES ~'E~T ®F ~~I,VA
D p
p O D 6 O p 0 \~ D -
footer rocks extended pool length - 3.6 ff. - ILO ft. JACKS®~, C®UNT`I'
0.5 foot post sill rocks.
~~

CROSS
top of bank at Bnkf~ll stage rrB
20 - 30 ~ ~
/3 deg~'ees
-~
I .~ " flow ~ ~,~
~, ~ -; ~ -
~ ~'~
r ~ ~ ~_
/3 ' ~/
bould~-~s/ rJ'C
ton of bank at bonkfull
i ~~
native ~~7antings ~ ~~ e
VANE ROCK WEIR DETAIL
h
~\
_ 11
;" ~ CI10Met W1 d tl~i = ~r.0 f 1,
floodploin above weir
_ - _ - _ _ - -T _ - _
pool A ~ ' ~ heigkit of vane = ,33 ~ , ;: o_ _ _ -
floodploin below ° ~~°r \ ° a s
------..-off ) ~.a
small boulders o , a , ~,~ ~° ° ~°°
°Q e ° o de~
~1-~ e _ ~
e e °O e
footer rocks ~~•°u~..~~°,~oe ;~ ~ ,° °°a;
~ ~ ~ , ~~ large boulder used to ° ' ° ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°~ ~_ -
' key into stream bank ~ J
-~ Boulders should be native stone
~~
~~
~r ~~~ or shot rocBangular and oblong°
sill roptionall Binimum intermediate axis = 1°0 ft°
BiBBUB depth of footer rock is
3 limes protrusion height of sill rock
for gravel9 6 times prof ruse on
hei ght f or sand bed s treams°
~N ~~~
-~ i -- --, ~--,
_ \ \ 1~ ,J
flow 2 - 7%~ ~~, ,~
-~ ~ ,6 ft, - rt~fte
pool de
channel beG , i
d ° o Oo ~ o ~~ ~' ~ h ~ average channel drop =
• ~ ~~ ~
D ° ° -~ 1~ 4 ~ ` ~ '
°~ ~ o~~~ I i~~--`1--= - -- as °
~ o ~ ~, .~~a a ~ °a
l~ ~ } a
° / ~ ~ / I u ° ° ° ~ 6
° p ~! Up, (~1 °
^~ o ~ C ~ C D I ~ I ~ L:J~ 6~ ~l v D O
' ° e ~ o a °
a
DOO O°~~~'°~a~b ~ ° D~ °~a ° p a t
o n a° a , o U e
footer rocks extended col length = 2 ~te -
05 foot past sill rocks,
?~ < ~, ©IEP~°. ~F 7Clf~ AN ~P~~~ ATI~iti
~I~1~5Ic~~~ ~~ ~-I~~~I~A~i'~
0,3 fi o IT°1° ~3~~C~~' ]B~A~?~~I
~T~~~'I?~~Ai~~ ~,~~A~'~~~
~~A~~4'A~' S~"A°~'~~N ~' ~ 5D I,~F~[i'
5~ ~ "~~D
B fto
J A~~~®1~ ~~UI~~~'~

Bankfull Width
100
w ~
i
_ ~ i
° 10 - ~ ~
~ ~ ~
LL ~ I
I
m 1
100 DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES 1000
-NCSU Req. Curve Wbf=19.9Aw^.36
• Sols Creek -lower
O Rocky Branch -Proposed
Bankfull Depth
X10
LL
2
H
a
W
I
J --- ---~---
`1 -------._-~ ~'
2 O
Q
m
100 pRAINAGE AREA, ACRES
-NCSU Reg. Curve Dbf=1.1Aw^.31 • Sols Creek -lower
O Rocky Branch -Proposed O UT Sols Cr. USFS + 157
X UT Sols Cr. USFS + 307
1000
Bankfull Area
W100
W
LL
Q
W
X10
LL
Y
2
a 1
m
100
DRAINAGE AREA, ACRES
VC Rural Mtn. 8 Pdt. Reg. Cur. Abf=20.87Aw".68 • UT Sols Creek -lower
2ocky Branch -Proposed NRCS, NCDSWC, NCSU O UT Sols Cr. USFS + 157
JT Sols Cr. USFS + 307
1000 I
~~

`,\
`,
,.
Appendix E DWQ Stream Habitat Evaluation Form
5/99 Revision 4
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Directions for use of this Assessment: The observer is to survey a minimum of l00 meters of stream, preferably in an upstream
direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of--way. The stream segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. In order to perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. All meter readings
need to be performed prior to walking the stream. When working the habitat index, select the description which best fits the
observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions, select an intermediate score.
There are eight different metrics in this index and a fmal habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different
metrics.
Stream Ro~~~ W/'a~2G~ Location.iRoad ~IL ~~yy County TCdI~j~SDjL
Date /-{~a.7- ~ [~ CC#
Basin l..,l~$ /$~~S~Subbasin
Observer(s) ~l ~`j,~ {..~ Office Location ~ V . ~~ Agency !~[ ~i DD~
Type of Study: Fish Benthos Basinwide Special Study (Describe) C~/171 e~ e~ia>l4e
Latitude J~S.zw~ 0,3~~Longitude ~3~lq~~s ~t Ecoregion (circle one) ~ P Distance Surveyeds~ meters
Physical Characterization: Land use refers to immediate area that }you can see from sampling location -include what you
see driving thru the watershed in the remarks section. Also use the remarks section for such descriptions as "deeply
incised" or "exposed bedrock" or other unusual conditions. '
Land use: Forest S % Active Pasture°io Active Crops ~ % Fallow Fields % Commercial ° o
Industrial % Residential~% Other %-Describe:
Width: (meters) Stream~_ Channel~_ Average Stream Depth: (m) ~, ~ Velocity ~, S m/sec
Flow conditions (circle one): High Normal Lo
Manmade Stabilization: Y(~ N(] Describe:.Sj
~1
Water Quality: Temperature °C Dissolved Oxygen mg/1 Conductivity µmhos/cm pH
Turbidity: (circle) Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Tannic
Weather Conditions: C~~L'tL7' (,!/Q T 1-1. Photo #
Remarks:s f re~l/II't lGGj~!'dl~y (,L9-n~ J,~p,~ , i Y1Gi 5 e~. SD j?le PXDO.f~ ~~lc
The Internal Technical Guide for Stream TFork in Iv"orth Carolina

//
Typical Stream Cross-section
Channel Modification (Use topo map as an additional aid for this parameter) ~
A. channel natural, frequent bends (good diversity of bends or falls) ...................................................
B. channel natural, infrequent bends ............................................................................
.........................
C. some channelization present ...............................
..............................................................................
D. more extensive channelization, >40% of stream disrupted .........................
......................................
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ...................................................
Rem

II. Instream Habitat: Consider t rcenta?e of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization o
Circle the habitats which occur- ocks (Macrophytes) (sticks and leaf packs) (snags and logs) undercut banks or root
mats) Definition: ]eafpacks cons of older leaves that are packed together and have begun to decay. Iles o eaves m pool
areas are not considered leaf packs. EXAMPLE: If >70% of the reach is rocks, I type is present, circle the score of 17.
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVER
Remarks
>70% 40-70% 20-40% <20%
Score Score Score Score
4 or 5 types present ................. 20 16 12 8
3 types present ......................... 19 15 11 7
2 types present ......................... 18 f 14 1 p 6
1 type present ........................... 17 13 9 5
No types present ........................ ... 0
Subtotal
III. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look
at riffle for b dd d
em e e ness.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel cobble and boulders

1. embeddedness <20% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders) ......................... Score
15
2. embeddedness 20-40%
.............................................................................
.............................
3. embeddedness 40-80%
12
.........................................................................................................
4. embeddedness >80% ...........
: 8
..............................................
...............
...................................
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddedness <20% ............................................................................................................
2. embeddedness 20-40% .................................................................... 1
.....................................
3. embeddedness 40-80% .................................................................
6
.......................................
4. embeddedness >80%
............................................................................................................
C. substrate mostly gravel 2
1. embeddedness <~0% ...................................................................... 8
......................................
2. embeddedness >50%
........................................................................................................ ~
....
D. substrate homgeneous
1. substrate nearly all bedrock ....................
.
..
............................................................................
2. substrate nearly all sand .. 3
......................................................................................................
3. substrate nearly all detritus 3
....................................................................................................
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay .................................................................................................. 2
1
Remarks ~ Subtotal
The Internal Technical Guide for Stream York !n North Carolina
~~ ~9
Score
4
'~
2
0

IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with Iittle or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
Iarge high gradient streams.
A. Pools present ~ Score
1. Pools Frequent (>30% of 100m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes .................................~...:.................................................................. 10
b. pools same size ........................................:...:................................................................... 8
2. Pools Infrequent (<30% of the 1 OOm area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ...........................................................
b.pools same size ........................................................................................................
ools absent
1. Runs present .................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Runs absent ...................................................................................................................................... ~
Rem
V. Riffle Habitats
Total ~'
Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream..... 16 12
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width ..................................... 14 7
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ................................ 10 3
D. riffles absent..... ...................................................................... .........0
....................................
Subtotal
VI. Bank Stability and Vegetation
A.
B.
Banks stable
I. no evidence of erosion or bank failure, Iittle potential for erosion ...................................
Erosion areas present
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ................................
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ......................
3. sparse vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding .......................
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high ersosion and failure potential at high flow
5. no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ............................................
Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
6 6
5
3 3
2 Q
0 0
Total
VII. Light Penetration (Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block
out sunlight when the sun is directly overhead).
Score
A. Stream with good shading with some breaks for light penetration ............................................. 10
B. Stream with full canopy -breaks for light penetration absent ..................................................... 8
C. Stream with partial shading -sunlight and shading are essentially equa ....................................
D. Stream with minimal shading -full sun in all but a fe~v areas ....................................................... 2
E. No shading .................................................................................................................................. 0
Remarks Subtotal 7
The Internal Technical Guide for Stream lVork in North Carolina ~ ? ~

~%
/III. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: A break in the riparian zone is any area which allows sediment to enter the stream. Breaks refer to the near-stream
portion of the riparian zone (banks); places where pollutants can directly enter the stream.
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. zone width > 18 meters .....................................................................................
2. zone width 12-18 meters ...................................................................................
3. zone width 6-12 meters .....................................................................................
4. zone width < 6 meters ......................................................................................
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. zone width > 18 meters .:.......................................................................
b. zone width 12-18 meters .......................................................................
c. zone width 6-12 meters .......................................................................
d. zone width < 6 meters .........................................................................
2. breaks common
a. zone width > 18 meters .........................................................................
b. zone width 12-18 meters ......................................................................
c. zone width 6-12 meters .......................................................................
d. zone width < 6 meters .........................................................................
Remarks
TOTAL SCORE ~j
5/99 Revision 4
The Internal Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina
~l
Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
3 3
2 2
1 1
Total
?~-

Bed Surface Pebble Count, Rocky Branch, Lower Section
-~-cumulative % # of particles
W
100%
90% ',
80%
~ 70%
co
r
y..
L
~ 60%
~..
c
v 50% ------ ---- - -- ----- ----•
L
Q.
40% -
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10
particle size (mm)
100
1000
12
10
8
v-
m
6 °
_~
n•
m
4
2
--E- 0
10000

1' t F' ~ r ~ ! ~ y,. I ~ ~ ,'' ~ 1 ~ (, ...
' ,, ._ _ -
~,
~ j ems-- _~.,_ , ~. ~ ''+, .`a~ ° . ~, ~~ `o.
t. 'kt ~, .. ~ y 4 i h
~ .~ ~~' f ~d/ , C~ i fi ~ A yA.~o-. ~-s... ~ ti ~"" ._...n ,,.,. ~ ~ ~ ~,•ti ~ ~ E_~. ~~.1 ~i. 1 ~ ~`. ~ ~ i . y , ,
~ ,F•`~~ of a~~'."}' ~~," 74F~ ~'~,j~ ~-,., "k l ~ t,P~„,q ~ ~ 44 -i ...,~n J ri {~~~R'~'~f~~~ i
rh d ~ 5 •~ '' r .,~;~Q~ '~ ~ ... ~~ 'S!' ~ J~ ~.~` r ~f v ~~` ~ x { ~ ~{ ~ ~r ~~ ~ ~~ I,t t ~ ~ 1
~ ~ ~~ ~ n~~ ~f Yet ~ ~~ I' n ~ ~'~ , ~ '~ !~{• i [
y ~4
-t' r ti. v~r 1 I ~ ~
~~ " ~~~ .. ,,~ i ~ 1Fr _ ~.,,...r 3 _"" _ r. ~ n ~ ~ A 1 ~ ••~ ~ 4 t^*
s
f--` s~ f ~ T~'~ ~.rr E _ '•Y ,~ "a d- ,.~. .+ ~Tf~ r.r' ~' ~ ~ ~ y v ~, ~,, ~ `V `ka ~ ~ ~ 1 !r ~ ~ A ~e'
r~ j ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " t +f~ ~r'~f '.~'f ,+t ~ ~• 'tom I ~ ~'a ~ 1,'`+., 't. '' ," 4 i ~ ~~ ^'4 fi
x d !" w+ ~.. ~ t -
' ~ ~ r '
-m..J ~ '4 ,f 'jt f~ ~ .'~ f _ l~ 1~, _ „~.''1. ~_~Lr'~y,~ ; F'r ~ s''~~"r :i"k
~.
,.
~ ~ ~ Fes; y, ter, ~+ _ ~ y ~,,,,;.+''~
~:
. •~ ~ - ,
x ~~ ,, ,-_,_rt
y ~ ~ .,~
~,
-~..
_,. ..
-.,. ,-; ~ ~ ~~ l ~~
• r - ~ /'
~ _ r t
-.
., ~ _ ,.~
r.
t /
~ ~ y,,..'-.-.~
1 !~ I !t ~ Yyy ,fY
`i'~r~t/ 7 J.., 4 ( ~#f ~f P ,.. Y d ~ ~i. ~ .. .! - ' ~ '~I ~ ~/ r ~ \~~ti~
'° ~~° ~"~ ~~- ~ '~- UT SOLS CREEK REF. REACH. BEGIN 307' `~ '`~ -~`~,~ ~ i~ ~ ~ `-`
`~~ ~ ~` ~_~ 1 ~~~- ~~~ E. OF USFS ROAD 2200' E. OF SOLS CR. ~ ~~~~-~- ~ ' ~ ~~~-~~
~~ :~' ° ~ ~ - r:~ BRIDGE ON CHARLIES CR. ROAD, SR 1756 ~`-:~°~~~~ . ~, ~ 1, ~ ~I
- `~~.. i ''~.
' r' f h 4 t.+' ,rL ~ fir. "'~ ~ ~( SiY`
I s ~ '~,,., ~ ~ t ~'~ ~ r ~ ti ~ +,, *, o_ `,V w "'b:~r..-.. ..".,1 i ~ ~ r t k44~~ ~.,~1v '1.,~ ~a .
~ r 1
4
~.; t ~,. ::~ , fir.
y. r ~. ,,~ ,...,.... ~.. ,v, ~ ~ i , ~i ~ r. a °'' ~ 'e+r',~c., ~' r~~ ~h ~ ~..
^~
. _ ~ ~~ `~, 5w...
n r ~_,# `~a"`~ ....1-. y ~ ti! _ ! s' ,,'"~ .,f' ~ r"" r .!r ,71~, °' ~,,, 'tic ~~,-.^,.., "a.
a"
E ~ ,
~' j ~ ~'" 1. +"^+yh`yy.,5 j •..,.~ _.... f~ r'~ 5 ~'r'A,. ;''•,,k ~ "~. 'l. ~ r
t" P~ rf d ~"'".,,- }~ ' i PF`'r`~'~,,. ~.,'""'' -.._„ ~ J~'~ 4.r...,..--+.,~5~ +, `'r._/,,rJ/.
._
,;
w
,,
t; t
} °- -.
~ ~ _ - - ~ r
,,, ~ f ~;~,. ~ ~.,.~ ~, _,,,~ k
,. '~ ~ ~. .~ .-.._. .- ~ _. z ~ .~
~-..,
Name: TUCKASEGEE Location: 035° 16' 31.22" N 083° 00' 14.11" W
Date: 7/12/2006 Caption: LOCATION FOR UT ROCKY FORK, HENDERSON CO. -
Scale: f inch equals 1000 feet REF. REACH FOR UT ROCKY BRANCH JACKSON CO.
Inc.

USFS ACCESS ROAD
\ 2200' EAST OF SOLS
CREEK BRIDGE
SR 1756
CHARLIES CREEK ROAD
UT SOLS CREEK
307'
50 0 50 100
RIFFLE CROSS
STATION 32
SECTION
c,~
-~

UT Sol's Cr. Upper Reach
109
108
107 ,~<,.
106
105
104
.~.103
102
101
co
d 100
w 99
98
97
96
95
94
93
0
'f--~
,,
_..~ ?._ -
0 •.~
X S 1 ~ ..:
-..,~.
Slope = .067 _
-._ ~ __. X-S2
`dope = .0
~~
•--...
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190_'
Channel Distan~Thalweg ---}--Water surface --~-Bankfull ~ X-S 1 O riffle crest O pool_® run X Low bank ~ X-S 2
w

108
UT Sol's Cr. Riffle at Sta. 0+32, 307' E. of USFS Rd. on SR 1756
107
C..)
G
LL
C
°106
a~
w
105
104 ~
6
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 _ _ 22
width, Ft. ~-+~-Cross section - _ Flood prone area - - - - - - BankfullJ

Appendix E DWQ Stream Habitat Evaluation Form
5/99 Revision 4
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Directions for use of this Assessment: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters of stream, preferably in an upstream
direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of--way. The stream segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. In order to perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. All meter readings
need to be performed prior to walking the stream. When working the habitat index, select the description which best fits the
observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions, select an intermediate score.
There are eight different metrics in this index and a final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different
metrics. / C r~~ ~ y Gl'- ~~
S l~ ~ ocation/Road S ~1 ~ ~1 S ~O County ~G ~ k Soh
Stream u T e~~s r L
Date S- 4`D (' CC# Basin ~ Itf~B ~+BIIYI'eSSPGSubbasin
Observer(s) W ~ t +e" Office Location ~ r ~/ ~~ Agency ~~``N C .4l 0 ~ 1
Type of Study: Fish Benthos Basinwide Special Study (Describe) ~Q?_~or ~ft°Cl.~?? r'et'y4tTt d~-
Latitude Longitude Ecoregion (circle one) MT P Distance Surveyed meters
Physical Characterization: Land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location -include what you
see driving thru the watershed in the remark section. Also use the remarks section for such descriptions as "deeply
incised" or "exposed bedrock" or other unusual conditions.
Land use: Forest S % Active Pasture
Industrial % Residential 5 % Other
Active Crops % Fallow Fields,
°io-Describe:
Width: (meters) Stream Channel Averase Stream Depth: (m) Velocity~m/sec
Flow conditions (circle one): High Normal Low
Manmade Stabilization: Y[ ] N[~(J Describe:
Water Quality: Temperature °C Dissolved Oxygen mg/1 Conductivity _~mhos/cm pH
Turbidity: (circle) Cle Slightly Turbid Turbid Tannic
Weather Conditions: C I ~7" L(~'~r~'`1 Photo #
Remarks:
I. Channel Modification (Use topo map as an additional aid for this parameter) co e
A. channel natural, frequent bends (good diversity of bends or falls) ................................................... O
B. channel natural, infrequent bends ..................................................................................................... 4
C. some channelization present ............................................................................................................. 3
D. more extensive channelization, >40% of stream disrupted ............................................................... 2
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ................................................... 0
Commercial
Z3
lq
The Internal Technical Guide for Stream YY'ork in North Carolina '~
3 `1

Remarks

II. Instream Habitat: Consider~~centage of the reac for b hes-c ti
Circle the habitats which occur- oc (Macrophytes) (sticks and leaf pac (snags and logs undercut banks or root
mats) Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that aze pa ~ e er and ha n o decay. i es o eaves m poo
areas aze not considered leaf packs. E AMP If >70% of the Teach is rocks, 1 type is present, circle the score of 17.
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATIO)\' OR COVER
Remarks
at rdfle for embeddedness.
- A. substrate with good mix of gravel cobble and boulders Score
1. embeddedness <20°io (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders) ......................... 15
2. embeddedness 20-40% .......................................................................................................... 12
3. embeddedness 40-80% .........................................................................................................
4. embeddedness >80% ............................................................................................................ 3
B. substrate gravel and cobble (~ s~> ~~
1. embeddedness <20% ............................................................................................................ 14
2. embeddedness 20-40% ......................................................................................................... 11
3. embeddedness 40-80% ........................................................................................................
4. embeddedness >80% ............................................................................................................ _
C. substrate mostly gravel
1. embeddedness <50% ............................................................................................................ 8
2. embeddedness >50% ............................................................................................................ 2
D. substrate homgeneous
1. substrate nearly all bedrock ................................................................................................... 3
2. substrate nearly all sand ........................................................................................................ 3
3. substrate nearly all detritus .................................................................................................... 2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay .................................................................................................. 1
Subtotal oC t~
III. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look
Subtotal
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than averaje maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams.
A. Pools present core
1. Pools Frequent (>30% of 100m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ........................................................................................................ 10
b. pools same size ................................................................................................................ 8
2. Pools Infrequent (<30°io of the 100m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ......................................................................................................... 6
b.pools same size ................................................................................................................. 4
B. Pools absent
1. Runs present .................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Runs absent ...................................................................................................................................... 0
Remarks
V. Riffle Habitats
Total ~ 0
Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
c r core
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream..... 16 12
The Internal Technical Guide for Stream i~L'ork in North Carolina
>70% 40-70% 20-40% <20%
core c re c re core
4 or 5 types present ................. 20 16 12 8
3 types present ......................... 1 ~ 11 7
2 types present ......................... 18 14 10 6
1 type present ........................... 17 13 9 5
No types present ........................ ... 0
3$

B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width ..................................... 14
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ................................ 10
D. riffles absent ...........................................................................................................:............0
VI. Bank Stability and Vegetation
A. Banks stable
Subtotal ~~
Left Bank Rt. Bank
c re Score
1. no evidence of erosion or bank failure, little potential for erosion ................................... 7 7
B. Erosion areas present
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ................................
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ...................... 5 5
3. sparse vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ....................... 3 3
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high ersosion and failure potential at high flow 2 2
5. no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ............................................ 0 0
Total
Remarks
VII. Light Penetration (Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block
out sunlight when the sun is directly overhead).
IA. Stream with good shading with some breaks for light penetration .............................................
B. Stream with full canopy -breaks for light penetration absent .....................................................
C. Stream with partial shading -sunlight and shading are essentially equa ....................................
D. Stream with minimal shading -full sun in all but a few areas ......................................................
E. No shading ..................................................................................................................................
Remarks
Score
10
7
2
0
Subtotal V
The Internal Technical Guide for Stream tii'ork in North Carolina ya_
3q

VIII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: A break in the riparian zone is any area which allows sediment to enter the stream . Breaks refer to the ne
t

portion of the riparian zone (banks); places where pollutants can directly enter the stream
. ar-s
ream
' ~ Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks) Score Score
1. zone width > 18 meters ....................................
................................................. ~ 5

2. zone width 12-18 meters ................................................................................... 4
3. zone width 6-12 meters .
....................................................................................
4. zone width < 6 meters ... 3 3
...................................................................................
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks) ~
` 2
1. breaks rare
a. zone width > 18 meters .................................................. 4
.......................
b. zone width 12-18 meters 4
.......................................................................
c. zone width 6-12 meters 3 3
...............................................................:
.......
d. zone width < 6 meters ..........................................

1 2
...............................
2. breaks common 1
a. zone width > 18 meters ............................................... 3
..........................
b. zone width 12-18 meters 3
......................................................................
c. zone width 6-12 meters 2 2
.......................................................................
d. zone width < 6 meters 1 1
.......................................
..................................
0 0
Remarks Total
TOTAL SCORE _ ~~
5/99 Revision 4
The Internal Technical Guide for Stream Tb'ork in North Carolina ~`
~~

~ ±[ ~M,- ~,r ._i s ~t ~ t f{ ~ _._\4~ y f /'**+~, :1,.i ~5. ~l.~~f ice`
i ~ a_ ~ 4 - -- - ~~ .~~i Ii~ ~~~
f~ ,~,nw. ~ ' ~ I
'-~~ ~ S ~ °~ea.~ 4 ~ 4_ -~ ' ,rte r ` _ _ ~ ~f ~~~zt'C2~'_
I F
w
i~ ~~f ~t ~t 11 ~ ~, ~ ~ ,+~~ f~~. 5 ti 1, 4 `F 1 ~~ ±~ 1'4~ f
f i 4 ~ 111 5~ i ! ~._,~^` ~- ^.._1 ~ r~ !,~ 1~ } ~ ~j _s't ~ t i1 i .
i-~''i~5 ''~ r s "= ~ ~. ~ ,~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~',
k `y_,~: ti
. ~
i
~ .. ~ J ~
1r X S 5 _ '+~
` r~
n...~.

~~ Y
x -`1
~ _
4 ---_ ~~
~ i~ .~+`
~~

f
~~ iE- l i
r ~ 5~ 1 1y •~`ti 44
t
'~ ~ 55 l 5 ",V 5
I 1 1 ~i 4
C ~', '~~
3
a~ ~ ~~''.
r '~~ '~~
i`,~ } t
~~ ,, C
j t
f _ '
jj t _
Pr
.. ~,~~~
.J.y -.."°~. r~
.tom'" ~-' ,f w _ ,, ,
a
~4~~ 0.45 M I. FROM BRIDGE ~ .." ~ ~ ~=~=~~ ~~y~:
~ ~-
\`5 f

~~l
c`r~~..'~~ r
Name: DUNSMORE MT
Date: 7/12/2006
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet
1 ',~ - -,.:~"_ ~ '~~° r tr; r s~f 1. ~i *5' ~) ,F~'~tet'f~ f t~ ~ ~/
,.
rf ', i~
+`~~~~ ~ '` ,~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~
r.
1
L ~ ''4. kr_..f'. ..., 1 1
r 1~" j ' r'~j1~
,.~ ~- SS! ~f'
rJ
t
Y ~~
A
Y~ ~~
L,~
f , 4 ',r.~~.,,~ ,
r ~..+
_ ,s _
. -• r ~ -=
J r~ ,rt f ..~ ~ y ..-~ -.
/~ r !
d ~ +f f fC rte, 9 j ~`
/ ' +~ ~~-
~ f l tit ~y}/'~ ~
~`'~,'~t i ~ ~ j )! i fr `(' ::~ ~ f~'.'^tT y r~~,~,.~-- ~ + `-max ~..
1" ~y ~,ti r ~ \r~~'~} rte( ~~ ,ti ~~{)I~ _.-~" ~.~"r"~ .`' ,~ .~ ~f
--- ~ ~ ~ {1 ~.f'~r~i+''~ ter-- +aj}Y^'',Vs/Rv*'l~~~,-`i
Location: 035° 24' 07.5" N 082° 38' 47.11" W
Caption: LOCATION FOR UT ROCKY FORK, HENDERSON CO. -REF. REACH FOR UT
ROCKY BRANCH JACKSON CO.
Inc.

_... ~ ~ ~ i ~f ~ i1 fi v !r{
~ ' ~},~~,
'~ r `. ~~,
~'' S e ~ lin..+. ~ +
~~ ~ `.,t ~ +~,~
~l
~ _ • ~. I, ~, . ,',4~
t ~ ~ ~ -`~ =
z „P .
(' ' ~ ~ -..
;~~ ,~ ,~ d
~~ _ ~ _~`~ ~ f - ry_ ,
.~-- ~
.~~ -.~ 1:~~~ _ ~ ,~ t ,~
~~, ~, ~ r-
a ~ . ~+'.
~}~ Ilye 1 ~l:S. C 'A ti F
t~s ~•'. ~.~ t
~ ~,, ',.` j ~ ~,,
t~ \ ~,.
..r"`.y
! ~~~ '
;~~*~ , iJ~~~t~,.'t
ti~
i g ~~ `.y~ 5 ~ ~ F. - f ++ i
.e~ ~ ,~S 5 11 ~.. i R f ,[ ~~ 14 l
t 1
~~ ~y r
CROSS SECTION 1
10.3 ACRES
~ 984 FEET N-d~TH O F
~~
CENT~R~ LINE OF ROAD
~~ -F- ~ ~'4. n_,~ ~ ~ ~~. ~r j ~ /l `~ /~

°`~
r ~~~
"+' V --
., ~
~ ~J
.! _
L5~
} ~ ~` ~ .
f
i~ ti,. ~:,
~~' `~~`. ,«1
''~ `~`~~`~ l~~ ! t. ',,~•,~ ~f ~ ~1',~~ cif
+~ 4 ~ ~L~~
~r•-, ~
f cF~
r 4
~...~`~ r, .,{
{ \ / j
~:
r ..
. ~rT
__,! i
~' .
~; R ~
~;~r ~~~~ 0.45 MI. FROM DRIDGE _~~ ~'` -~ ~_:
Name: DUNSMORE MT
Date: 7/12/2006
Scale 1 inch equals 1000 feet
Location: 035° 24' 31.52" N 082° 38' 49.90" W
Caption: LOCATION FOR UT ROCKY FORK, HENDERSON CO. -REF. REACH FOR UT
ROCKY BRANCH JACKSON CO.
'`~ ~,
i "': "w.
_ r >

r

+t ~ f~_/
/
}
~ 4i _.
~ 'f
~+ ~ 1
}~ ~~

~`~~ ~ ~ 1 1
y ~
~ 4~`
5

` ',
~~4 ~ ~~
'~ S
'•,, °~,, j ~..
~ ~~~
1

', i ~ I - Convriaht (Cl 199A, Maptech, Inc,.

~i
REFo ~
REACH
i
l
1
1
l
I
1
i
1
1
i
i
.r.
i
i
i
GEARING ~
i
i
i
i
i
i
TRAIL ' !~
~----BEGIN SEGMENT 19 STATION ~
-~--- CROSS SECTION 19 STATION 80
~--END SEGMENT 19 STATION 86
E BEGIN SEGMENT 29 STATION 286
-~-~- CROSS SECTION 29 STATION 382
-E- END SEGMENT 29 STATION 402
,
POINT OF STREAM PIRACY
,
,
,
,
,
POINT OF STREAM RESURGENCE
,
-----BEGIN SEGMENT 29 STATION 644
-~--- CROSS SECTION 39 STATION 655
!~-END SEGMENT 39 STATION 701
-~-POINT OF PIRACY
,~ POINT OF STREAM RESURGENCE
~ STATION 1064
s
MI~~S RIVER ROAD (GRAVE~>
MI~~S RIVER 0045 MIo
ROCKY FORK
REFERENCE REACH FOR
UT Rocky Branch
Buchdn~n Rodd (SR 1400) no scale
Jdcl~son County
w
'~