970006_INSPECTIONS_20171231

State of North Carol
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Danny Smith
Danny Smith Farm
1883 N. Minton Rd
Millees Creek NC 28651
Dear Danny Smith:
A41V
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N
UeRAUAT RAtrRESOURCES
mas
hi-n- Dem. Of F-HR
February 20, 2002
FEB 2 i 2002
Subject: Removal of Registration
Danny Smith Farm
Facility Number 97-6
Wilkes County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management.plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant at
[phone] ext. 571or Steve Lewis [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Gregory1. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Wilkes Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10% post -consumer paper
A

,y
State of North Carol
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Danny Smith
1883 Minton Road
Millers Creek NC 28551
1 &199;W,J •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Danny Smith Farm
Facility Number 97-5001
Wilkes County
Dear Danny Smith;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Ranking
1 0.18 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 Telephone [phone] Fax (336) 77J-4631
An Equal Opportunity Aftirmalive Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk 0
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Wilkes County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

' 's �VtStOIItpf Wasel' QL{sllty ._ f � t r � '• - .
�' + st ivl5ton df Sotl and Water. Conservation F-
`.♦ i'S,, F.L;. s i - ""t°". r• r- �r F41x'" tit s -e. .
y �Wiez A
ge
Oppen
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review © Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Numher 97 SOOI
M Permitted D Certified © Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date al• Visit 21I7/2t►110
10 Not Operational Q Belo-w Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 9111.96
Farm Name: 1?4AXtx.,59xith.F:ajC1R ............................. ....... County: yYilkes ................................................ YN!,SRO .......
Owner Name: I?atnrtx..................................... smilk .......................................................... Phone No: 0.10.97..1-47.26...03.0-957-1f.72.0.htagcr.........
FaciljttyContact:...............................................................................Title:...................................................... Phone No
Mailing Address: 10,81N lAtia[A.Mad .............................. ..
OnsiteRepresentative: ............................................. Integrator:...............................................................................
Location of Farm:
4M1.1�p�:tit.from.J?Y.i�l�asbaxa,...�a.2.nai�sis.tiro:n,.�i$btt..amka.�i�kQzt.�aa�,,.. �o.3a�-4.�rmixe�,..k'�armt..iS.a�GK�ss..fxal�n.�iic,Fuars�.�?.ef<k�......
PQWW................................ ......................................................................................................................................•••...............................................I..............
ED Swine ®'Poultry '® Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity 'Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ® Non -Dairy 200 071
® Other 23000 23000
Total Design• Capacity 23,200
Total SSLW 160,000
Number, of Lagoons I Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Inipaclr'
1, is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li' discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made! ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. It' discharge is observed. did it reach W.iter of the State'.' (If yes. notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. 11' dischar tc is observed, what is the estimated [low its t allmin'?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate`? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/1 2/2000

Facility Number 97 — 5001 lagoon Number 1............. Lagoonantifier By.karn
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude 556
Waste Last Added1.1,1.9_Q ..................................... Longitude 81 15 55
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS021716A
Surface Area (acres): Q.,1.8........................
Embankment Height (feet): 2.5,,0........................
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet 0250 feet- 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement []Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 0 < 5 O 5 - 10 O > 10
overtopping from outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 18
Inspection date 2/17/2000
appearance of Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 2.0
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
lication equipment fail to make contact O Yes 0 NO
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes O No O Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments NRCS design. Mr. Smith plans to close out the Summer of 2000.
#15. Would hire Southern Dairy to pump out.

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 5001
0 Permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 01 Registered Date of Visit 2J17�2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: I)Wfay.,S Wtl►..F,arm ................................................................................ County:.W.itlke................................................ WSW ........
Owner Name: INgnllax.................................... Stpukh.......................................................... Phone No: 03b}.97,3 42,216..Q.36a.9S.7.-.RZ,2Q.pogrr.......
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: JA63..MIAdt9la.l3pAd............................................................................. .............................................. 26.CS]1..............
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:...............................................................................
Location of Farm:
42X.�l�xltl.�fxaaa..Y.Y.itllt;�shaxa,...�a.2.►mttil�s..tart.xitgbtt.Q�t>kn.�itttt��..�i�:aa,...�a.�,S.:4.nai�lf�,...k:a�r�ut.is.��x�a�s.i;tzQ�.tii�lat�:d. �)�eele......
Swine ® Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Canacity Pnnulatinn Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer IN Non -Dairy 200 0
® Other 23000 23000
Total Design Capacity 23,200
Total SSLW 160,000
Number of Lagoons `Folding Pond's`% So id-'] raps
.. „
Discharees &,,,,,F StregLU Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection _& Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Imelliss.a.Rosebroek
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 4/b/Z000

Fciiity•Number 97 — 5001 goon Number,,.,.,.,.,., Lagoon ItifierY..b.an....................
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude 3610 18
Waste Last AddedQ/.1/..0...........................................
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres): QJ.8........................
Embankment Height (feet): 2,5,,Q........................
Longitude 81 I 15 55
By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS021716A
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet O 250 feet - 1000 feet OQ >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? 0 Field Measurement [I]Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes OO No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 0 < 5 O 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes # No O Unknown
Inspection date 2/17/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (Inches): 2.0
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ication equipment fail to make contact O Yes 0 NO
and/or Sprayf laid (0 Yes O No O Unknown with representative
unavallable
comments MRCS design. Mr. Smith plans to close out the Summer of 2000.
#15. Would hire Southern Dairy to pump out.

Initial Evaluation O Follow-up Evaluation 0 Denied Access ❑ Does Facility Require a Follow-up
Facility Number Ste) Date of Evaluation
Time of Evaluation 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 CertTiied -Registered 0 Non -Registered 10 Inactive Facility Date (L'a�stl IU�perrateed:
Farm Namst a 'n' `` ad ...mw. County- . -•_• i/r_,L 1�-i wi(%— 7 _W_
Owner Name: !� lr� �. • i r •J ... _ _ _...__.. .. Phone No:5(�.:
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address: ..�'.;.i r.aQy..__.P___j .....
OnsiteRepreaentative:.—^-------- _.�-------... _ _m. Integrator -
Location of Farm:
orrw ,:o.... umn
❑ Swine Pow ry r Gsttle
_ ro��tn, v �,.isii�..,',. t
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
1 ', [INon-Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Other
-. .... ,,. ..- ............ ....... .....:
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Farrow to Finish Total+Design1
srn?3, �iF'j -. ...�,. YY:..Pitlmbet�' I.8 �•:�:, � '. R . • ,
:....:..:. ' Nu�rr�dEHbldin$ondslSolidTrapd? ._ 1
Discharges & Stream Imeacts
1. Is any discharge observed fmm any lagoon? ❑ Yes KNo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance. man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any lagoon? ❑ YesXNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
3. Estimate Fr"boa d. Level: ❑ Spillway gYes a
Structure 1 .r� structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 4,,,�gj- a
Fra'b.211
Reviewer/inspectorName E 's - __
Reriewer/Inspector signature Date:

L J
•
inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Facility Number: © NA Inactive Lagoon Number: l�
Latitude I�
4. Waste Last Addcd (mnt/yy)
5. Estimate of lagoon surface area (acres)
6. Effective height of embankment (feet)
Longitude ®• ' ®" XGPS [I Map /
Owner ❑ Estimated QQIt)l f q �
fig I
X
7. Distance to Blue Line or Intermittent Stream (feet)
Determined From Field Measurement [:]Map
8. Down Gradient Well
0< 250 ❑ 250 - 1000 > 1000
a. Is there a down gradient well located within 250 feet? ❑Yes No
b. Is an intervening stream not located between any part of the lagoon and the nearest well? ❑ Yes 0
9. Distance to WS waters or HQW (mi.) < 5 ❑ 5 - 10 ❑ > 10
10. Does the representative know of overtopping from outside waters? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ Unknown
11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Sludge Near Surface
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear
12. Embankment Condition
a. Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc.
b. Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current MRCS Standards
13. Outside Drainage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
e. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
14. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc.
b. No Liner, SoiI Appears to Have Low Permcability
c. Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
15. Application Equipment and/or Sprayfield Not Available
16. Contact could not be made with on -site representative
Rol
m
Yes [:IN, ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes VNo

Comments (Refer to Question fit): Explain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
NP.CS des n- Mr. SM4
o u -HAP-- 5
S 716 A

0 0
Site Sketch Showing All Active and Inactive Lagoons
1LEF

i
a

p Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow -tip of DSWC review p Other

.f
,y • 6. Is facility not in compliance with arloplicable setback criteria? 0 p Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)? p Yes p No
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
p No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9.
Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
0 Yes
p No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
....................................................................................................................
Lagoon 4
......................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
p No
IL
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
[]No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
0 Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
p Yes
[]No
Waste Application_
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
l7 Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type LY4.0
16.
Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
p Yes
p No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
18.
Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
p No
19.
Is there a lack ofavailable irrigation equipment?
p Yes
p No
For. Certified .__FaciiiWLsl Only
20.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
21.
Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
Yes
p No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes p No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Revewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Is Division of Water Quality
0 Routine O Con► laint O Follow-up ofDWQ inspection. O Follow-up of I)SWC review• O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number, D
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted Iff Not O erational Date Last Operated-, „��•,�9�
Farm Name: ......,ol rxw....., rr ...... Lh n........................I.,........... County:....,....... ......................... t ..
4
Owner name:.............................r !}x r.t................................,.,.. Phone No:......q�.p...... 12.6...........................
Facility Contact: ...... Ots►rrkyr....... , r,.> ,4.�. ..... Title: ,,d."W,..,i"'�ti,..............I..... Phone No:....,..„�%r! "-^ .....,.
4 � d_n
Mailing Address:.................f.....'rkto7tt,............ ............a ..................... ...y...,#r....,,........................... ..�F�..'.u�.Jf..
Onsite,Representative:
Certified Operator. ..................................................
Location of Farm:
Integrator:....
......................................... Operator Certification Number;.........................................
.Z....Me�f t lr4'. •.jr�... x..... &3!A......
- ..�.... :f. ..,� x�...... ..
Latitude ®• =` " Longitude =' ©' =11
k Design ` Current, Design Current, S k Design . : Current`
,
Swore Capacity,. Papulatron ...Poultry Capacity xPopulation Cattle C apacityPopulak3on =<_
x ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Non Layer a Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean '
n.
❑Other � x
❑ Farrow to Feeder,_,`
❑ t
Farrow to Finish Total Design•'Capacity
t] Gilts F
F
❑ Boars Total.SSLW
Number of Lagoons Holding,Pondsf�] ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area ,
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System s
P'sRY 69'
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
91No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
jR(No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
�'No
b. If discharge is observed, dill it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
C1 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
50 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
IVNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste Management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require
❑ Yes
{� No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
UkNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
IX -Yes
❑ No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: — © •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (I_,agoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):........................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
15. Crop type{.r......................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Faciliti2n�
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
...................................
P:No:violationsor. deficiencies:were;noted,duringthis;visit:,.Y.ou'will ikei i-�earo:furtheF_
:. correspbndei�ce tiboid this:visit::.. ...:.: . .. .. ...:.:... .: . . .:. ...: .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
Kr No
❑ Yes
"No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
f � No
❑ Yes
RI No
❑ Yes IM No'
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes EM No
❑ Yes (C No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes CC No
❑ Yes 54 No
7/25197
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �,� Date:

!g Sr;h.iv;f�:r;?�i�.F?I�r,:.rarr. t?e�;R]:tSsrl.G:—T.__."-.-• — —•---'--�—_...__`.""':�.._.Y."'�.'
�F�i;T: "'.�._-._-_-�"-"_
_— �t
�y»..�,.,.,,r.,.s..,.».,v.,�.,,„.,,.,.M.........,,....,.r;•"�'.. �n..,.,,.,,,�,.._.,r..�,r�.,.,�..,......__..s.-n.,,,,..,........,,,..r.,,,.«.�.,,...r�."�
�.,.,�..�::..,....,w,...,..,t,..,.,,.....,l..,e.....,,
}
i
E
a
.
_
yyesi FfY.Yi-la3i,� il� �;ii„r.}i,,;;, �t'>E,4C�,jF.��1,.C���S'a:,�'+S,}si�l�ifF�c°' tl€1;'_4. x.9Hi�'sl''i1:i� ,.':3:'cf I ! N1.f£.lc"dia •
�
E
9 �;£.7si,,,,3 •e?zc l..w ff S ,•, i�+7Y.:ra:i.J3C t,: L t i]pwm !jn' �4 yi r3 :P1%:Ad.C.i.l:.l.iiyjtS3' I;;', r.::11:'e1.1i.x1+y+„y.-:i1
r?�, ,••4sre1 . .�:. _ „,_U , ...4r.
S
�wFE,3;' :qiti�•
V',sdi-<r'- m b aprlux !ia':.cs yep!(r a:: ter. v !u blpv-r,r :E ;; 5,:r I;;y
i J A 4
�f[[
C-!' ,licit -slsi; i€€rffiCt3 r ri 1:i_?ds)IMJ,: zCVC; Opp p Sr?'-, r}rtF;_.r,S111]pmi ... quy ;!L'J„r 1 ym"
'kr{
A' DMA Is 9'L:I-i,. pf i; q c h 111:;J'r j-::(; :1` I "M
.. '`�..Y .,�i;.xti ��'. � _.�r• :�., f--1 °•i iiili.:�r M1" it,
11
1", }:r msu!- HCOOL NJ C.-&
v W. 0,Mwl
&';rlcu 'mf. )m-;.rrc lej. :.
l
p, JdSif, 7r''f in 't
7'
(,!u -', •5
r
:Y 1�14, 1,� '.r S,It. •J7. . '+r ,a. ,
'�ii i�. .:�E
r,Cjnlr :�.. .rr1 s
�i; cir,'-t:a:6['.t',' ^lrJi}i: +t;.`•,._:r:,i[tll)T.v
d , t.? lEit 1-Iq! . ! r'.i a d: r' d :`. p:;t' ;liil•r4CFfrfSiU,i
i1 11€.; +,i. ;.i:'.iA• ! , S1'}.. •:d . i' 'i.`. j�a>'r S,gr,b�i .:i� +j u 7' .. „ rr + r�L .r.. ,
• J 4 �,. '
10 il! r 1eM :5te:?' OL 101 0 COMM a I}f Y 0 rr,r" ?I 'r . 2Pq:,.r :aF;
1•� •' it
fl: EJrS 'r + l..F, tit .. r'[!11•I-yr:. .. .. •'+L::z '1i+,�." ,
.rta q '}, r• � , ,r:" 'L.. n: '/ls 1, ,:. `I L:r' �'3' , , in'. �,J �: - '.i ,
'l.
3... .1 Si[lL Fr r ;i 1• !i.lLt �E(r l' ,. jj t+,j,
............ .... ........ .. .. .. .... .. ... . .
..- „ lf'', '):r %E :jl'. , .I� lyl: .(r'• J ,I+'f„J' , i' ,. {.i x.

Site Requires hvbxmdiatc Attention:
Facility No. ,�Z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DAZE: 1995
Farm NamcMwner.
• ni l i lT: �. �.z :���r1'l� S'L���J.Y 7 7�3•
i�. •ti �
•, ..nl
Type of Operation: Swine . Poultry F ! Cattle -,&—
Design Capacity: _F=Q0, Number of Animals on site; 3
DEM Cknification Number: ACE______ DEM Certification Number. ACNEW_______
Latitude: ,.2L_. to —L�t_" Loonguude: ? j ,LZ � Elevation- _,--JFmt
Ckcle Yes or No
Dots the Animal Waste Lagoao have sufficient f wboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) e or No Actual Freeboatrd:t. Inches
Was any savage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or &Was any crosioo observed? Yes or(i
Is adequate land available for spray? (t or No U the cover crap adequate? 6W or No
Crop(6) being utilized: + 4
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings�Yejos 146
100 Feet from Wedls?
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes crg;
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lim. Yes �r9'
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing sysrJa. or other
similar man made devices? Yes oar g If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management :reo ds (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray h-,igated oo specific acreage with cover clop)? T4*w-No N 09
Additional Cements-
Ia6P'ori'at sme
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

OPERATIMS BMCH - WQ Fax:[phone]
Jul 24 195 1_ ; 14 P.10/15
I site 1ias IetmQLll IAMAuCmmu..,....r
r
n�Gilit f Nan,har: �^r., ,
SrM VISITATION RUCOM
DATR �3��� 1995
Owact: ^a. � *„3�r�- farm Nu►z�:.�
Agong VisitingSfta iY1: tca. .t; -- 5c. ( �, Av00 Pllorle: 3A
INO- -7 ,
On Site Repru nudlyc: N
Mys`cal Aftessi „ _1 .f.Zr f�`�`7 0 •�T [�--.- �. �- 4_
Mailing Additss, . • . I z c0
Type of Opcodca: _ SWIne PoWtry C!*Wo _sC
DrJign Cbpallyr. _2 ._ NUnAvr of AnlvWx an She:
LAIj tl e:43 _..9 _...10—' _1. _-' Loegiludo; � �o ! 5 ' •
Type of lnapeclion: oround y Aaxial
arde Y13 or No
Deis llae AitiirW Waslc Lagccn hAye KuMelct frccbnard of 1 Foot + 25 yea 34 bout tivm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 In Ye or No Actual rreetvAA: 4 t'acl ! bww
ror facil iliac with t010M tbaa OM la$noi), } loM gditg,% tht ctlrcr lrgovat' frwbwH waver tbo
CGINUCtIts Mono.
Was any aftysp obscrye d hem the lagoon(s)7 Yes �_ �a Wlttety c,rasloo oftlro dam?. �t'es .0 a r
is adNuaW land aysllslrla rot land applicuinn7 w Rc Is the cavor =y sdagnate7 a% of No
C111
Fat to (r19) 7I5-3559
5ipalum of Ascut
i99806L916 -ON XV3
mi 5o5 vasn 12 ' b 1 (13h 56 •-4 t -10f ,
IN

e
l
A;
rAU