970005_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Facility Number I Q _7
�ivision of Water Quality
ivision of Soil and Water
Other Agency
nservation
Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
xRoutine O Complaint
O Follow up O Referral O Emergency
O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: j 0 ~] a7 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: W Region:'w
Farm Name: LJ l l i'a Cl s a r yy) Owner mail•
Owner Name: I t l i1r V-- 1&.) I L I Gi N 4 __ _ Pho 3319)
Mailing Address: ti 105 V"J tri6AA G" I�- l r N 1 1 �� e5 �7o r0, N C, a '
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: __Ma)l L l�0. [ti/Title:
Onsite Representative: IA-)_1_k. IAA 5
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feedei
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: F c ©` �" Longitude: I° ©`
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
[:]Layer
I! ❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑
Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑
Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑
Turkey Poults
❑
Other
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
1v
"Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
b
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
DQ Non -Dairy
00
Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
n
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Y Date of Inspection 5571,7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Struc,ture }1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: S
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?, ❑ Yes ❑ No [)(NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crap Wind
ow
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) p� ; V °� re
13. Soil type(s)
go the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
9 No
' ❑ NA
❑ NE
id the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
oes the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
V
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 2� 1
❑Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
W
e- 4A-
Reviewe /Inspector Name Phone: S oZ g
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ate:

,4
Facility Number: 6n — 402te of Inspection t7 7
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No L'ANA ❑ NE
626. oes the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes El No El NA El NE
athe appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No A NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Arn.«i rA4i firs o
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stacking ❑ Crop Yield s ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No qNA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No _NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ix
NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No 4NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No I9NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No INA ❑ NE
Other Issues
eDi
ere any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ElYes ElNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
d the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes NINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: SA
Is"e. Netis�r, - �.� psi ras Asaps'l ?
' !
L�imm All
CrOV' I
♦ i ♦ ' r . `

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine X Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Duce or visit: 8J27/2002 Time:
rO Facility Number 97 OS
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted Q Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: IY.Durk.1'.4'.itUiimm.Extrin................................................................................. County: WAkca ............................................... W,SRQ........
Owner Name: I! xk....................................... lZir�llllarm.................................................... Phone No: -254- 1 1...........................................................
Mailing Address: ..7.QS..S�. Yiltudy..G .�is7a.....................:......................................... N.Qdh.Wj%g§b9xv..N.0 ...................................... 2065.9 .............
FacilityContact: Mark.willia ls.............................................. Title................................................................. Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Mark..WjUiMU.....
............................. :...::....[ntegrator:......................
................. ....................................................................
Certified Operator:..........................................................--.................................................... Operator Certification Number:...............................:..........
Location of Farm:
Location: Hwy 421 north and exit 277,Windy Gap Road and go south. The farm is located on the corner of Windy Gap &
Little Hunting Creek roads.
'[]Swine []Poultry ® Cattle []Horse. Latitude 36 OF 06 ° 33 64 Longitude 80 • 57 48
l'—'fiY7.�°a?.:
Destgn
F "m;i . �
Current
'
_. o' -,_ -,CS "i 't 'i9
Design Current y I)esign� Current
�:' �
Caacit
Po ulation Poultry .I
io",
Capacity, O ulation a acto elatio
Ct ,Pn �
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
❑Dairy
q
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
®Non -Dairy
300
30
❑ Farrow to Weans
❑ Other '
-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
' z
Total Desi n Ca acit 3QQ
g P Y
❑ Gilts`
>r.
h
y
Total SSLW 24Q,QQQ i
❑ Boars
ell ;Number of Lagoons
® ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag-m Area jo Sprayi Field Area
Holding Ponds /solid Traps
r.__❑ No
Liquid Waste Management System
DiKhar=-&Strea Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes []No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yeti, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [:]Yes ® No
Waste Collection _& Treatment r
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... aste.P.and..... .....................................................................................................................:..........................................................
Freeboard (inches): 18
05/03/01 7oG Ad
- /

(Facility Number: 97-05 I 0 Date of Inspection i gl27/2002 1 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [:]Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(Many of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes IN No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes IN No
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN []Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Fescue (Hay)
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [:]Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes IN No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
in is„__, respondence about t 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further cothis visit.. ^
o ents efe to 10 # : Explai an. a d/or any recommendatio or any other com ents.
wings of acili o etter explain situatio u final pa es n ary .0 Field Copy ❑Final Notes
16. Operator has access to pump if needed.
T'oday's visit was a result of a complaint alleging that the waste storage pond was overflowing. Questions that were left blank were not
pplicable to this facility at this time.
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock _-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
O5103101 Continued

.— I •i.
Facility Number: 97—OS l�nl' l llspeoim) 8/27/2fl02 •
22r 1e
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes ❑ No
❑'Yes ❑ No
ona +omineh n or raw!;rigs:
05103101
05103101

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine ® Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 97 $ Date of Visit: 8/27/2002 Time: 71300
Q Not Operational Helow Threshold
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:... ..............•
Farm Name: Har1t;..W.iJllialn7s.i±',axxtl...................................................................... ........... County: l�!'.iUkr*............................................... MRA........
Owner Name: Mark ....................................... ) 91jams......:.......................................I..... Phone No: 33tS-9.�..4.-�1�t..................................................... I......
Mailing Address: ri3.QS..S�.S3'Andy.tau.�tAasl.::...........:.......:....................................... N.Qrtk.W?.i1k4*bQlf?AC...................................... 23.659 .............
Facility Contact: IYIAKLMlAalO 5................ ........................Title:
Onsite Representative: Mark 1W'.illi>3►tlot;;:...
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
................................. Phone No:
Integrator: ..........................
... Operator Certification Number:
.ocation: Hwy 421 north and exit 277,Windy Gap Road and go south. The farm is located on the corner of Windy Gap & i
Attle Hunting Creek roads.
[]Swine []Poultry ® Cattle []Horse` Latitude 36 • 06 G 33 AL Longitude $0 • 57& F-48-1
- Yi'7` "" .2. tir -
Swme�, ;,CDesignCuJre
• � 12
act
PIl
e
...o.t%;
-_ .. CuentCur
ultrCa acit Lal?o ulraetan:ia
tP
an to Feeder
❑ Layerder
to Finish
F row to Wean
❑ Non-Layer'
�i; ®Non -Dairy 3t30 30
' r
❑Farrow to Feeder
❑'Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
+' Total Desi6gn Capax�city 300
1[j Gilts
❑Boars<
r., SSLi?V 240,000 €
: .� , ,Total:
�pNumber of Lagoons © ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area ".
Holdin Ponds /Solid T Tans I ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes I® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... asieTtaad.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 18
05103/01 J.� Continued

Facility Number: 97-5 . Date of Inspection 8/27/2002 is •�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes IN No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
f6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[:]Yes r❑ No
[r No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
o ents efer a Ex lain any a a d/or any ecommendations ar an th oe comments.
awin of facll tte explain sltuatio a d�tional pages as necessary : ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
15. Pastures are well vegetated and appear healthy.
_
t6. Per owner, he has access to pumping and irrigation equipment. Hydrants are still functional per owner. Per operator, waste pond has
not been pumped since 1996.
Questions that were left blank are not applicable to today's inspection and/or this facility.
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meliss osebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

F,aeility Number: 97-5 1)04111spection 8/27/2002
( dor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
ALI
J
05103101

0
COMPLAINT REPORT
Division of Water Qualit
Y
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DATE •
0
TIME:TA
MJ
PM
DID CALLER ASK
TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS? Yes
NoX
(If yes, skip
to 'DIRECTIONS)
NAME OF CALLER:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
i
DIRECTIONS:
SOURCE OF POLLUTION:
I
COUNTY.:
NATURE OF CALL:
0
REPORT REFERRED TO:
IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN: l' L�Lrri'� . �
. / _I _ h _ � _. . 0 r. _ _ .
COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY:
1/

oo/s%o ' I*
O-n
`�P�07 6p,`V 6
rp
- r
�wm �muvvP 4�
09
14,0 (-VP
n+vdrvJ
/wi>/dun sry-.

10 Routine 0 l unlplaint 0 Ponowl-up of uwt� inspection 0 vortow-up os uswt review 0 t.nner �
Facility Number D) )te of i ispecdoii
I imc of Iiitilsc•ciion 16:45 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Nol 0IeraUorla Dale Last ()peratcd:
Farm N:ime: Maxk.W. Mianas.Farm................................................................................. Counrv: Wilkes WSRO
Owner(Name: Mark ...................................... Williams .................................................... Phone No: 336-98.4-31.31 ...........................................................
Facility Contact: Maxk.W. Miams...............................................Title: Qwjacr ................................................ Phone No: 2t,3.6-M-3l.3a........................
flailing Address:1.2l1S.,S....W..lady..Gad►.R.oad................................................................ North.li!'.illceshom.NC....................................... 28659 ..............
Onsite Re presentative; Mark..M.IIAat; s....................
Certified Operator: .................................................. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:............. ............................
Location of fart]]:
oca on:., wlt.. niur. .ala .ext . . ,...in y.. apt. oa .an .ga.sa rzri.ts. oca a .on. e.corner..o ....m y.. ap. A,
Litklr~.Hu�ttila.Cret:I�.rrxads............................................................::::.............................................................................................................................................;j
r
Latitude ®0®: © Longitude ®0 ©i
Swine Capacity Populatiow Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
13 Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to can .
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Fmis
p Gilts
p Boars
[3 Layer I[3 atry
p Non -Layer I IS on- airy
p Other
Total Design Capacity, 300
Total SSLW 240,0
Number of Lagoons /, Holding,Ponds ;0
Subsurface
rains
resen
Q
agoon Area
113 Spray ,e rest
[3
No
Liquid Waste
Management
System
Ccueral
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
13 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
® Yes
p No
Discharyc originated at: ® Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. Il dischargc is observed, was the conveyance illan-made?
® Yes
p No
1). lI dischargc is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
®No
c. If discharge is observed. whip is the estimated flow in gal/lnin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (Ifycs. notify DWQ)
®Yes
p Na
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes
®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
13 Yes
®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
® Yes
p No
m ai nten an celi m provem ent?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
® Yes
p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
® Yes
p No
7/25/97

Fatifiy Number: 97_,5 D.,11cllrspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Slr'nctures Lo oons.l'loldln,(T Ponds, Mush Pits Cie.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
® Yes
p No
structrll-C I S[rtiCtury 2 structllry 3 titructllre'I 5[1'UCtltl'C 5
"N'tRIC[n1'e
6
Identific]': Parlor
Fivebon rd 0i1):...............Q.5............................................................................................................................................................
...................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
0 Yes
N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
M Yes
p No
Waste, Alrt}lic.:rtir>n
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
N Yes
p No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....................... Esscuc...................... ...................................................................................................................... ...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 0 Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? [3 Yes ® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 0 Yes ® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
® Yes
p No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
p No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
M Yes
p No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
0 Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Nncilities Uttiv
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Yes
p No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
A• �NoyiuLaflons.or ierenries'were.no aduring this visit.,. You will .receive na further.,.
Comments (refer`,to question N) °tExplam deny YES; answers and/or anyirecommendations or, any o€ther,comments
Use drawings of facthty,tolbetter explain sttuattons (use atltlrtlonsl pages jas necessary)f
l�_ iA A � �. ...z4€ € ¢ 1 u
(1) Some work around the parlor needs to a done to divert stormwater. Certified pan Is not yet compete .
(2) NRCS contacted this office on June 30, 1998 and reported the lagoon was pumped and may be entering surface waters. Upon
arrival the evidence of lagoon was pumped using a 4 inch pipe down to a pasture. Waste ran through a ditch approximately 200
yards and stopped 200 feet short of a stream.
(3) Lagoon was topped previously, with no freeboard.
(5) Stormwater management and waste storage pond need attention. Needs better pumps & irrigation equipment.
(6) The facility needs to be certified.
(7) According to a letter dated April 17, 1998 this facility has not designated an OIC, according to Technical Assistance &
Certification Unit. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
f w r
Reviewer/]nspeCtnr Name !Grge'Smlth u.� 1 , ,!!•,. I ,;� ��- ­
eo
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

e p Complain
up or [)WV inspection 0
IFacility Number �....� I
E Registered o Certified v Applied for Permit o Permitted
Farm Name: Maxk..\?I'.lfaianas.k:arm...........................................
Owner Name: Mark ...................................... Williams...............
Facility Contact: Mark.Williams.................................
Mailing Address: .1.2:Q5.S..W..iady.Gapl.R.oad............
Onsite Representative: Mark.Williams.......................
Certified Operator: .................................................. ..........
Location of Farm:
Latitude
Title: Owner.
-up or i»wl, review p vtner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection r 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
County: Wilkes WSRO
Phone No: 3.3.6-98.4:.31.31..........................................................
........ I .... I ...................... Phone No: 3.3fi-984:3.1.3.1........................
North . Wil ke s b o x a.KC....................................... 2809 ..............
Integrator: .......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number :.........................................
Longitude
Swtne CA�aelt Po 'I tion Poultry;p -,Capacity:
: to,,.,; eactt P,o ulat
g
. u
Catt tan,
p y j P, �+ .=Capacity Population Cap„ y P
p Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
[3 Farrow to Wean
Ij Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Fims
p Gilts
p Soars
1=226�ow
ttt
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ® Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. 11' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. Ifdischairge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
® Yes p No
® Yes p No
p Yes N No
® Yes
p No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
0 No
® Yes
13 No
N Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
N Yes p No �

k'acility Number: 97_5 Dateispection .
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
0 Yes
® No
Structures (Laaoons,Holdina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9.
is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
® Yes
p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: Parlor
Freeboard(ft):...............0.5................................................................................ ..
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
N No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
N No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
® Yes
p No
Waste Annlication
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
® Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
5.
Crop type ......................Ftscuc............................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
a No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18.
Does the'receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
® Yes
13 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IN Yes
p No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
® Yes
p No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
[3 Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
.24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
Z .. o.viQ ions.or iicrenries:were.mo e . uring is visit: . on. willreceive no, ur. er . • .
Cotninen`t§ "(''refer to question #): lz�ilnin any Y1,S 3agswers and/or ariy'recatntiiendatiiins or any ot�corfflm—Cdt@W
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as niece sar,.y}:
(1) 5ome work around the parlor needs M be done to divert stormwater. Certified plan is not yet chinpieted.
(•2+) NRCS contacted this office on June 30, 19 Oa —Rd reported the lagoon was pumped and may be entering`surface waters. I T "
arrival the evidence o lagoon was pumped using a 4 inch pipe down to a pasture. Waste ran tlirough a ditch approximately 200
a . s and stopped 200 feet short o a stream.
(OL YoUnilwasitopped previously, with no freeboard.
Stormwater management and waste storage pond need attention. Needs better pumps & irrigation equipment.
(6) The facility needs to be certified.
(7) According to a letter dated April 17, 1 98 this facility has not designated an QIftaccordi!ng to'I'echnical Assistance & _
Certification Unit. (CONTINUED ON NE�XGi PAGE)
Reviewer/Inspector Name `Ge-eSinitFiIA .i ;�„
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: d-;t, � L�::2L Date: r

a Fadh ty Number: 97-5 D•if Inspection- 8�� •
I
pdd�t�onal Comments and or Drarvings
(9) Lagoon only has 0.5 feet of freeboard.
(12) Parlor area needs to meet certified plan.
(13) No markers are installed. It is difficult to determine the low side.
(14) The lagoon was pumped dawn 6 inches and the waste wasnot agronomical ly applied. It was pumped through a 4 inch pipe to a
ditch which ran approx 200 yards and the waste stopped approx 200 feet from a stream.
(19) Pump was not working properly, so that the irrigation equipment was not able to be used. According; to phone conversatioon
with Mr. Williams.
(20) Mike Mickey, of this office, will visit Mr. Williams on July 1, 1998.
(21) Nobody was on site. An administrative search warrant was issued by the magistrate. We were accompanied by a deputy sheriff.
6-30-96� ..._.

❑ DSWC AniMl Feedlot Operation Review 'qv
® DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
O Routine O Complaint O Follow -tie of D'41'0 iris ection 0 Follow -tip of DSNVC review O Other
Date of inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection '� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Diegistered [] Certified © Applied for Permit d Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: , , %
Farm Name: L l&R.k..... ....... Eo..R1'!] County:......itxxrz.g................................ .-SAD...
p
Owner Name: ...... ...1aR.k............................../1/1.1. K.I.I X']5.................................. Phone No: ... ,..,..?...`,.,1.. .y.-..,.%...j..............................
Facility Contact:...i'.1.{.&R.k....... M..LLiig.t??5.................. Title :........... 1r2WNE.&............................ Phone No: ...
Nlailing Address:.... I..7.0S...... ........Y..Y..1. .'...Gn.p.......RD...................... ... /...Y..acri.4....... ............ ....s�lrt.?��.
Onsite Representative,.....1.;,l..IG}� k.........�1. �.�. l.l�i /'!).5............. ............ Integrator:.............................................................
Certified Operator, ............................................... .. Operator Certification Number;........,,,,,,,,,,,,...
Location of harm:
.......w..,y................................6-4i.T....Z.7...7.....}...W..IAIA.y.....,AP ..... ia........ di... .....
lN...T.. .�' .TLC. ....o..,.
...w1ma.y.......0 ....a-....L..t'r ..... v..wT,<N ...Ct�. >.....IQax.............................................................................................................................
Latitude �• 06 -�" Longitude QO ' ©�F YS «
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current.
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity. Population .
❑ Layer Dairy ?00
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy ❑z 0
10 Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW I 2 y0, 000
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds JE1 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
❑ ,NO l.,iyuid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ® Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -mach?
b. If discharge is observed, diet it reach Surface Water? (If yeti. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in mllmin`?
d, Dries discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
® Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
CK Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
0 Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
($j Yes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No
M Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: JU — Q5— •
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes PQ No
Structures fLagoons,11olding Ponds, Flush fits, etc_)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. �3�}1Q j,i2R
Freeboard(ft):.......................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 29 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes 99 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improve ment?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Annlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type........iFa6r,laE...........................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21.1 Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Perntitted Facilities Only;
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[]• No.violations or..deficiencie's.were-noted-during this visit. -You 'will re'cei.ve''no' ftirtlier
correspande'ncea�outthis:vis.it:'.�.:•�..:•: �.:•�.:.�." .:.�. ."• .�•�.:.:.'• •:.'..'.'• .'.
ition #),.. Explain. any YES answers and/or any recommendations nr
to; better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary)
;>
OR Yes ❑ No
J[ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
Q Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
��d� o-dia-Z � f✓t p,,,�.a,C �LC.-�✓ �
N P. C,$ c..> •� .tea. a n, G /3 a / 9 f w4 Zjr-"�,
.(. �
,� �, due-t�- ,w�+�L • -"P��'tr"t'
a Y u-jtc�-
,..(, S00'-1-rLat-� �y-�-ric. •d l ' !
�3� ..►�l-a-�. �� � ',�+Q,•M,0- .�lt,tP,U'n'pJ-+tom . �+'~-G .-d�rai.+r.�� o(A-d�.�-�yC. �-`�'L °G"".`..`'ij�
7/25/97
.-
ReviewerlInspector Name :f Gf i7i i' 7-14 z
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ` 711 17 9

Facility Number: --
of inspection
r)
`! �'-Q -u - `T7'c" !�•°'W-n. G f' Q•"L Ae, AV-Af, .-.IA- -- t
mod.-,Pe-,c.,(•a,
= .�..
'1✓.r.-s eo, 7 11 l Sr,
7125/97

v Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection !D-2y-91
Time of Inspection �'. 47 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: URegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:I.25 for I hr .15 min)) Spent on Review .O
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted lor Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:............................................................................................................................ ........................
FarmName:....... Rr...••............................................................. ........................ V.S40..
LandOwner Name:...�r r.......................rYA4................................... Phone No: .... 110::... .........................................
Facility Conetact:.......................................
............................................... Title:................................................p Phone Na:..........................................................
MailingAddress:......�Q.....,........A/................. ................tY.Ar4........................... ..'2,(.S'...
OnsiteRepresentative:........ � .........?;(d a4a:+!.c............................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator: .............. ................................... ................................................ . ........... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Loeatinn of Farm!
Latitude Longitude ®• ®
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes X No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 14 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d..Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes $1 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes X No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes gNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ❑ No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on hack

Facility Number: ..... �...Q, .
6. Is facility not in compliance with anyvicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and1pr ligiding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
.......... J: r- ...... ..... ...................... ............................
Stricture 4
❑ Yes No
{Q Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
IN Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate pubtiie health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
❑ No
)Paste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
04 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
rt...t.04 ................................................................................................................................
15. Crop type....4'
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
AgNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
R No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
RNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
RNo
For Certified Facilities I)nly
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Commenfs {refer to question'#) ' Exj lri any YES.answers and/or any recommendations or any other.comments k'
Use drawirtgs.of facility to better explain situatiaris.; (use additional pages as necessary
cam: �K t
i 1,
Reviewer/Inspector Name % '' H . � : ' s g 12
--
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

p Division of Soild Water
13 Division of Water Quality
n M
16 ttouane 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of uwct Inspection 0 Fc
Facility Number
■ Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Mark.H.J.111l.rm ......
up of u�wL review p vtner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 13:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Operatrona Date Last Operated:
County: Wilkes WSRO
OwnerName: Mark ...................................... . infants.................................................... Phone No: 9$4-3131....................................................................
Facility Contact: ..................................................................... .Title: .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: RU.Rox.334.......................................................................................... No.rth.Wi.Ikesboira,NC....................................... 2809..............
Onsite Representative: N:a.u.tue.ivailable....................................................................... Integrator.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: .................................................. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®0 ®° ©�� Longitude
Design: -Curren ,,, ��,-; csign!. urren estgn, urrea
Capacit�Popolation� Toultry s Capacity,- Population :<, Cattle C.apacity;,Popuiation
p Wean to Feeder
p Feederto Finish
p Farrow to can
[3 Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
13 Boars
Number of Lsilgaons /'H. oldtng fonds i i (3 u sur ace rams Present JJE3 Lagoon Area p Spray Held Area "r'
r r�1 'lli
E1[30 Liquid Waste Management System
P
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon p Spray Field 13 Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? Pond effect
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II'yes. notify DWQ) E3 Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 13 Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ® Yes p No
7/25/97

+acility Number: 97_5
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? []Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons,Hold ing Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Yes p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Iden ti l ier:
Freeboard(ft):..... ............Q................ ................................................................................................................................................................................
t0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
H Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
I& Yes
p No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
0 Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ....................... Ecacue...................... ....................................................................................................................... ...............................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
-p Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
13 Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
® Yes
p No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
(3 Yes
p No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
p No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
O No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
rl No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
q .. o'via wns.or def-irienzies ,unng is visa You will.receive no further . .
cox�re§...........this y....... .................... .
'Comments refOrto gileginn #) x Ini- any YESVanswers and/or ariy'ree6mrrien'daI jli o"r` any othe°r`'co,in'm`en "° r
Use drawings of facility to'better explain sltuattons. (use additional pages as necessary):
i P i . �� d' I.i• e�PieW i'
Question I East side of barn, ne t(o gravel road liar 41 er jsmalliaitiourittoflvegetatEon"tforscover. This area drains to a road
culvert wh".ch goes fo the stream belo(LitteummmgbirdCreek):
Question 2 I did observe a small disch ra gcSichistbeingxcausediby.�the.,pondsbe.ing,full,and�,overtopping on the north side. The
soft moist area is approx 10 x 10 , there i ra good grass bi fferobetweenWwastelpondiandjstream ,..
�y Qaevzte toris�de�of4heast�soruestion, Signpastdishrage ge pond;
Question 5 East'sade of the barn needs to bevegetatedt°)filterirun of}f+
y�Za ,TN "Vl��'Ifig-
Question 7 Certified operatogciasse have�not been offeredlin this areaw �*• '
k � , p M a,1r r
Question 9 Waste stora e ondlprull
�g p ,.�. ,
Que'�sti�o' !"i, astelstorage pondinee,dsltotbe "'umped down: 7/25/97
.r'�.'4'ik a iv.n h LM�. �: x t _.
♦.
Reviewer/Inspector NameH-l�1f ,&fiF� A
}Ui�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

'7�-nl-fir
``'d 1

COMPLAINT REPORT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT {
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE DATE: � �d 19�i"�
TIME: Z5 am
NAME OF CALLER:-7'l�h�Dt� Pm
ADDRESS:
Street \ P.O.Box
City Zip
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
POINT OF POLLUTION:
DIRECTIONS:_
SOURCE OF POLLUTION:
REPORT REFERRED TO:
IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN'
SIGNED

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. - �T
DIVISION OF EKMONMENTAL MANAMMEENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA ONS SII•E VISITATION RECORD
DATE: N c 1995
Time: ' Do Pm
Farm Namp0wner
0=1�-
Ydff 1tw
bpi'
i l i I% ,•f
Physscal Add W&A
Type of Operation: Swine — Poultry .
Cattle
Design Capacity: -L�� - Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Cwtification Number: ACE DEM Gasification Number: ACNEW.
Latitude: jk_'.r•-13-" LCMgitude: -fa-' r' ',W
Cfmk Yes or No
Elevation:,�eet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or JG� Actual Freeboard: . O Ft. CZ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Y�e or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or&o
Is adequate land available for spray? Yr os No Is the cova crop adequate? �cr No
Crops) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from DwellingsTYejor No
100 Fat ft= Wells? (j� No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orco)
Is animal waste land applied or spray i37igated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lime? Yes o N�
U animal waste discharged into waters of the uate by man-made ditch, flushing sytc h% or other
mar man-made devices? Yes 09 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the f c9iry maintain adequate waste maavgement rV=* (volumes of manure, land applied,
way hori8ated on sped acmge with cover crop)? Yes or Not
AdditionalOommezts: �-
hspector Name
z��sy
cc: FwMty Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Keededr

JLiL-14-1995
0:34 FROM AEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
W �Ku r . We., +uc
• Site Requires Itnte Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS STTE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:&;�,1995
Time: /Z2 3� -2— /l0 �� Z�5_,
Farm Namc/Owner. �f�
Mailing Address:.. Z
County-
integrator:- Phone:
On Site Representative:.
Physical Add ressa ocation•
Type of Operation;__ Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: f Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Ccrtficajion Number: ACE DEN! Certification Number: ACNEW_
Latitude: 36' ,..sue" Longitude: KQ r 2 9" Elevation- -- Feet
Camle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour stoma event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes o Actual Freeboard: ��t. .3� Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes owWas any erosion observed? Yes or P
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? ��,saar No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellingsy6 or No
100 Feet from Wells? res'or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feat of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes 0416)
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes 091110)
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oz�� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
qmy irrigated on specific acreage with cover crap)? Yes or No
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
tnTM 0 M )

OPERPTIONS BRANCH - W0 Fa :919-r 15-6045
7u1 24 95 15: P.06 15
Facflity Numbw.
SrM VisirA'110N RECORD
Owaer: Nomiti
County:
Avot V41ting Site: ti . C-,t&e Phone: - (a �
Operator - k_26 Phone `l t �53� -1 C-11
On $im Aepmentadva;
mysleal Addreerr
Mailing Addms: i 0 u �
Type of []pc dvo: Swino ,�.�.., Poultry Cattle
Design Cepacttyr. ^ Nun*er of Anfauds an Site:
ZAflaitfd: .� (moo �_��+ ---� ` I,,brt�lU(lG; � ��,a 5��+ ,�•
Type of 111R[Mxtion: Cround �G _ Aerial
Ciecla YLM oe No
Does the An{irW Wrale. lagoon have suflicicnt fmcbnard of 1 Foot + 2$ yesv 24 boar a(mm wont
(rppmx1mwely i Foot + 7 Ruches) Yea or & A001 Freehavd:. Q Pact rriYCh" r o,r P la
Poe faciliuiex with sAOM tlift ane lagoon, p1me address tluc uthtr Injeons' kcbowd aWar the
eUfill 11Crt16 swunn. r oLte rho
Was say swvaeo obscsyed tam the I11toon(s)Yd r No W&5 Iliac cl'oSlon of danl?: Yes Na
is ad4.}uat>r'.Ar:+ ay'a4labla cr:e►c1 ilfir�iC�;i:.7c: 'l�bi4i;;a i& die cs IP7 L:r:;p C:.JNtto[r7.Yr� rNo �
Additivnnl Cocament,u ,` tic. �-�C_ 1..> : 11 n.
4-1
rnx to [phone] Sigaaturo of Agent
w c►.v �..:i ��� � � G� q�7r' i i'�; p�o,�.: o ..� Fes.. � p � (7�v � „�� -� bra
i��a I�BGOSL6I6 'Qfi{ xu� S;fil S�� btlSf� 1Gcbi �311 �6-zt��Elf

•
•
COMPLAINT REPORT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
�
NAME OF CALLER: �A� , �'�'�
DATE: ao 1914-
IMF� C
T� � S" am }.
pm
ADDRESS:. - CSL 2J LJ,4
S reef I P.O.Box jb%` S WI+�h1� Co., gn
. Cc7
City Zip �o IC�1H ,lV1ck�Sdoao� 1VL 2AJJ ?
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
POINT OF POLLUTION:
DIRECTIONS: �. Uaw.4.4 (M�" Ls9 21.E-t8-) SB l tJCam. xA,*-t dAw &a bd
SOURCE OF POLLUTION: A AAi,.A
11
REPORT REFERRED TO:
IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN: - au%_d� �, �� t e=� i[
SIGNED
ASSIGNED TIO 6�,, _ ..
ti DUE DAYF..,-, .�..,...

MR
•

$3-71 M
jf

AnyWho - Map Search Result
i. _ :Z
wysiwyg;ll54/htip://www.anywho.coni/cgi-b...ng=-90990I &event=zoom&1eve1=6&even1=zoom
• •
AT&T
a ! 0
I N F
• !&_Z LUM
• Csk2DigJsm
• AT&T Catalog
• ShoppingDeafs
I
Z
0
MAP RESULTS
Location: 1705 s windy gap road north wilkesboro nc 28659-7542
5A .5
© center O Zoom In O zoom out Q Identify icon
Street City Regional National Zoorn
Driving Directions j
Use subject to License/Copyright
AT&T AnyWho Home I dit I Privacy I Atoms I Link To Us I j4a
The AnyWho Advantage I Advertise with Us
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of usg.
See our privacy policy.
ANYWHO is a service mark of AT&T.
M
E
a
I of I V 14/2000 1:09 PM

Anywho - Map Search Result
wysiwyg:l/52fhttp:Hwww.anywho.corn/cgi-b... at=361259&Ing=-809901 &level=7&event=zo0m
AT&T
Elm
INFO
•.&Zt Plan
• Click2Dials'
• AT&T Catalog
• Sh000ina Deals
a
z
3
Location: 1705 s windy gap road north wilkesboro nc 28659-7542
19A .5
Q center Q Zoom In O Zoom Out O Identify Icon
1?Street City Regional National Zoom
Driving Directions
Use subject to License/Coovriaht
�AT&T I tLWU I Priyacy I About Us I Link To Us I IolaThe AnyWho Advantage I Advertise with Us
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.
See our oriva[v ogloCy.
ANYWHO is a service mark of AT&T.
M
E
SE
1 of 1 1 / 1412000 1:08 PM

Anywho - Map Search Result
. .
wysiwyg://50/http://www.anywho.com/cgi-b...nor[h+wi lkesboro&state=nc&zi p=28659-7542
0 0
AT&T
0
N F
• k Zt Plan
• Cl0ck2Dialsm
• AT&T Catalog
• 5honning Deals
u
Location: 1705 s windy gap road north wilkesboro nc 28659-7542
BA .
QQ Center Q Zoom In Q Zoom Out O Identify Icon
T T q (2D
Street City Regional National Zoom
Driving Directions I
Use subject to License/Cooyriaht
AT&T AnyWho Home 11� I Privacy I About -Us I Link To Us I �
Advertise with Us
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use.
See our rivacy_nolicy.
ANYWHO is a service mark of AT&T.
E
a
1 of 1 1l14/2000 1:08 PM