860027_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

Animal Wast gtorage Pond and Lagoon ClosW Report Form
(PleasdW or print all information that does not requirewgnature)
Name of Farm:
Owner(s) Nam
Facility No:-�
Mailing AddressJS12 Wh,le
Di /
Rd
Phone No:34�6' ;� 34 2�
�_ _
7 70) %
County: .5u?/t y
Operation Description (remaining animals only):
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish /S0
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: D
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number of Animals:
Yes o No •
Yes o No •
(Name)e 1,'55A Rd Vhedek of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on 9- 7. 06 (date)
for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the
start of closure, which began on 1- c-06 (date).
1 verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. 1 realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Ple se Prim): I'• �N kle
Signature: r Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): J • R CyrRIIAR4--
/ V/
Affiliation: RC5
Address (Agency): f as
Signature:
6so,*,AlC 7D�
No.: 786. 9 7S % Yam]
Id •II.06
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC - 1 March 18, 2002

y��-�,--•
-�,► lady. . ..-
♦t���. _.d.� � ice`. ,. 15 I I
\ ' I^Cem
G
fO Frank Sprinkle
B6-27 C�

State of North Carol
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Frank Sprinkle
Rt. 1
Dobson NC 27017
4
0 �Lf
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Frank Sprinkle Farm
Facility Number 86-27
Surry County
Dear Frank Sprinkle;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Ranking
1 0.26 Medium
2 0.24 Medium
3 0.26 Medium
4 0.38 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% reeycled/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk • •
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and' storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken -as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

tt"5 vision of Water uallty
s r w7 s��, .t i r «Vlslon Of Sozl4n4Water Conservation N� + �.}i wA =3qs- 't i`rw.
Other-A'
a", At s' w s."
•' "�Yrr: ..a • 5 r. ` �7w: ::n.=. _ice: �.._ �'c._ _ ..r �
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review © Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 86 27 1
0 Permitted [] Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit 1 2/3/2000
10 Not Operational •O Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 21119.5.............
Farm Name: FrQixk..Sprjnk1e.kArm...................... ........... County: Surry.................................................. .Y.Y.SIZO.......
Owner Name: Frank .............................. . S'phumc ..................................................... Phone No
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: fitj......................... .................................................................................. D.05 ix..NC.............................. . 2.7.917...............
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:...................................................................... ................
Location of Farm:
CQ.cax .Axl. k�it�.dxril.r��tt,.1.t/..a►xilcs.txaxtlx,. f>�d.1Q�at�xt.Qt c it..:77.,....................................•.......................................................................
®Swine ❑•Poultry ❑ Cattle .❑ Horse
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capaeity Population Poultry *Capacity Population Cattle 'Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
0
0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 0
Total -SSLW 0
Number•.of,Lagoons 4 Holding. Ponds / Solid Traps
Discharges & Streatn lint acts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convevance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharue is observed. did it reach Water of the State'! (It' yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. if discharue is observed. what is the estimated flog in ,,al/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Wwste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne Cartner
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facility Number 86 •--- 27 &goon Number 1............. Lagoon &tifierppr......................... ..........................
....
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude 36 7, '24 3L
Waste Last Added 21..1.L.5................................ .. . Longitude 80 i47 '23
Determined by: ® Owner ® Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS020320a�
Surface Area (acres): ,2.6
Embankment Height (feet): 5..........................
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes* No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 0 < 5 '0 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes # No O Unknown
Spillway *Yes O No Adequate Marker *Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 2/3/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark,' Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 18
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
0 Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
plication equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes (g No 0 Unknown with representative O Yes 0 No
unavailable
comments
VF

Facility Number 86 -- 27 agoon Number 2............ Lagoon #ifierC9n�{ary
O Active © Inactive Latitude F367 F247 38
Waste Last Added 2/..1l.9 .................. ...........................
Determined by: ® Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): 24
Embankment Height (feet): 6................................
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet
Longitude $0 47 24
By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: JS020320a
Q 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes O No
Intervening Stream? O Yes O No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): p < 5 p 5 -10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? Q Yes p No Q Unknown
Spillway *Yes O No Adequate Marker *Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 2/3/2000
appearance of O Sludge'Near Surface
lagoon liquid , O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
Q Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 24
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
*Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
Q Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
© No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ration equipment fall to make contact
and/or Sprayfield O Yes ® No O Unknown with representative O Yes O No
unavailable
comments Has a few muskrat or ground hog burrows
EVrI

Facility Number 86 — 27 goon Number .3........... Lagoon NE
tifier 4n.d..se.GQndiCy ........................
0 Active Q Inactive Latitude '36 24 39
Waste Last Added 2/1.L95.....:...........I......................... Longitude F8 07 47 25
Determined by: ® Owner ® Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: JS020320a
Surface Area (acres): .2.6...........................
Embankment Height (feet): 5................................
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet O 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ®Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes # No
Intervening Stream? O Yes 0 No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): Q < 5 O 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes # No O Unknown
Spillway *Yes O No Adequate Marker *Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 2/3/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 18
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
Q Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in.Design
Q Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or sprWleld 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown with representative O Yes ) No
unavailable
comments A few animal burrows
� T
E

Facility Number 86 — 27 agoon Number 4........... Lagoon ntifier P,glj..k�ing,.
.1j
O ActiveO inactive Latitude 36 24 38
Waste Last Added/1/..5 .................................... ....... Longitude 80
Determined by: ® Owner ® Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: S020320a
Surface Area (acres): h................
Embankment Height (feet): 5................................
Distance to Stream: # <250 feet 0 250 feet- 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? []Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): Q < 5 0 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway Q Yes ONO Adequate Marker O Yes ONO
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 2/3/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
QQ Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 48
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
#Construction. Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
lication equipment fail to make contact
and/or 5prayfield 0 Yes OQ No 0 Unknown with representative O Yes +,O No
unavailable
comments Drainage area is strictly from upper lagoons

t
0
REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 2H .0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number: S& — 2-:-
Faun Name: Eyn n kL SPri n 0e. Farm
Owner: Fi-o-n 1L 5pr n Y- -
Mailing Address:
Dob%Qn , NJ C 2 To I -- ---
County: SurrLE T
This Operation is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out of business/no animals on site
closed out per NRCS standards
---X below the threshold (less than 250-swine, 100-confined cattle, 75-horses, 1000-sheep or
30,000-poultry with a liquid animal waste management system)
Comments:
I am fully aware that should I decide to increase the number of animals beyond the threshold limit
or the operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for any reason, I am required to
notify the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals.
Signature: RJVV11, RCWL,i2-WL
Please return completed form to: DEHNR DWQ
Water Quality Section
Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Date: 1 q
.RR-4/97

ft AtequfreS F . Ntxsno. ti�a. �
DIVISION OF 12%W tONWNTAL MANAGEMENT � ~
ANUAL FEEDLOT OFERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1945
j _ Time:
Farm NaMAIOWDA Fr 14 {� 1_ r n i���
r
On Site Repreieatadve:
P�rsiuJ A+d�resa�.+x;tom:
Type of OPWzdaa: "We Poot y . CatsAe .
Deap verity: Nambez cf Animais am Site: 55 s c W 5
DER UnLft4on Number. ACE—. .,_ DDI CcrdPcad= Number. ACNEW...
Iaair e: ' 4 50 `
CkrkYesorNo
_'.: M+ Animal Warn Lage ce have :uf ciaut fieeboud of i Foot + 25 year 24 how mm r.,mt
(appro4u Ely 1 Foot + 7 iachtC& ar No AvuW F*cbosrd: 1 L inches
Was any u*pagc obwvtd from the Iagooa(s)? Yu of Xo Was,my umbe obu rvpX Yes or A W
Is adequate Iand avnlabk far spmy ar No Is the nova m'p &*um? das or No
Clog(t) beiq udhzed:
Does dm fuVty mutt SCS mird.mum setback criteaia? 200 Fact from V*vI iags? Q or No
I00 Feet from W&O IGi w No
L &t a iuW wuu svoatipilcd within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Une Stream? Yes or I&
•' Is animal *uu Und applied or spray irrigated within 25 Fee of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes cr
b attimsl wuu discharged into crams a the state by man-made ditch, flushing symm, ar othar
similar man-made dcrr m? Yes a& If Yes, Please FVWu.
DMS the fixity maintain a+daquatr wise; V=&&t aaat records =volumes of roar =, Sand applied,
MDMV ifri ¢AtPA b" tMeARr sm ah" uAth elyVe e" 61? Yet er No
.
bipttar SAM 'gnttv:e
oc: FacMty Aissessmcttt Vast
UK Attachments VNeed4
4pM- M !

N
4031
03 N
r 'CP
f
Frank nk Sprinkle
86-27 -2 5'
V
K�
Ct! x
4029
r
V
A
N
\j
L A 028
t 13
Mark Johnson 100
86-13
rk-4r h
7 ------ -
am
Eddie Johnson
86-4
"o
CD
7
Billy C. White
86-6
e
SM 3
Jeffre
y Hodges
86-9
I MILE
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Primary highway, Light -duty road, hard or
hard surface improved surface
Secondary highway,
&---A ....4— 1 KmnrnvPd mad ---------
0260mN.
Bottom
B15NE
"CO
7000 FEET
METER

OPE
RATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] Jul 20 '95 'a:46 P.09/15
•' • Sit�c a 3i�satc�iaic Arurxti�n .....r.-..-,
rsvw ty Number u —r
ST v�S-L,A'riZW ACC%=
DA i s 1995
Ownef (. iNarrt:.
,:,aelrrt�:
Ngcnt#visltins Size: C, Aui�1`aa�.sr� t'.`tva,. C �
InSitRe�smcn;ativn:_�a,:dr_ _-- _ s'cicc•„ ,..�
•i:� i 3 i c� �tLtL: �: �-_
'y�:e pia C?;r,'c��ien: �p{i� l� �u3Lrl C�'atLc
'Nm r-.r -r cf e\.nimalft cxt Sim.
�=.caCD: Gnr,1r:� _ ,?.r.:t3
GiM!0 ` %-S ct N
Cs:S iyC 1t:Larly,3 tiri1`�tiw QC411 j ".`1y RULiG:^^� .Fi".'.2tczs-- of 1 i +C't + S � ' •- ` . `VC3� J P.i.Y � . v'.Ii � C C'77
`. Ely :rIV ;��1: �t'�' vl1SCf`l t_'vi.'. .'"" •�: t:`3%r b ���{��S'l' �:C: ` C:iti``I4^, �~s3 L �"1t,3�. �V� Or ]
'8 � 111121bFef<Jfi3r:.«� iC:ilCf :CStiC7fYi'3 ;;�'u;tiL: �rC1 C.,��: �(: :PNa
k-
�`•s��.ii:fii.3 �Oli�fT;t:iCy.44 1c�, �
ac,+