Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout860023_INSPECTIONS_20171231I a • ��A�R' I I - INr�4 71 i, Z •:4r '.i d�,.s�i r,�.. i �'� ip �.; 'any r4e . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... Wl 01 'se M., NOW '"lilt l ..1 - i - IYRYY49fa:'s .. y`� .�4y{J'^•: R! t ; ' •'" �y Jrt r- " hy, 'qF Frj I .xW ;5. z i s S Y ZZ �� I � � 1 ,�4i-F !{ #� �,oF�7 „ • i.:- "1+� '�1ate � y s, -.� . r " •-� sy"FFl. 1 y1 1 y it � k M'r' S pur-_' • Q� k a - '� r •�t'�� it .. \ i' �. S-,+ r,)�+,:. 33�r, �' �w Al Ali Y,//�•� 1 h N r• 1 �- yf t 1 �. � � . F �`� .411111� j Tv_ I r -•--'� _--- �. ,� ,• /f -:- i�. �� �� .4:s,6 rt, .-ray � J� +�t.�={f' .. 1 - - -y; —� - ��..,i�T•�"�a"xT`_ -S• . f - ! N" �, �;- I �' �j •r r .rs= � :~.,.5 .( Y .� j Z� �' .r •��''_ ��- - �- -as`. ..,r-. ryh�y, rs �i1 w. ..- �.- ��_� �i �lt `i'��'i�`.� �~j, � t•4. �? -,`� .. ��I�p�r•csyl�ih „� r ly' - _ �+ ' t� -`dam- ,t. . , -�• _ ° f �.��, ti•�({ _ r '� �'.�'Y" 's• .. �'w - rs,''i' .. _ �(f 1 i i i�=�s.}��w�� �.`/.l': ��.�� � t s, r �, y.a-+y�,'."� f� •Y. ""fir,`.` c�_L` - a- ^ i �� F' j,�. � i�a,�4..�'X_�.R�.�y ��• ��'r �� � f. ynrr - w� - J �.• � - ,�w �� L -:y, y ~ � i �'c 4. -- __ "^ r rn '-l'- y I• _may,, - �y. i �•-Z 3�.+it,`j 4 r. �'',. >T � !r PQ �� £ r � �" � ^� +� • y � � � � .: � s' y r q A4 .��b',�,i'wC r a� c .� � i *-'�'r.,i s., •.. �r,�}-t. y�"' y. • p 1 -L< y Y - f Ire 1• - K :ter✓}' f `�� .V--+'�...� �•' r r,{, r � ri� .die` ``��tt `�t� c/�/ i:J�..-.0 _ F __77 ar te t - vl •' aF�.. � ;f '• ::.�1--��T � .{ �� `-��4` . � � ��� ='L •;�.yp?r�`�"+ "''r ,r • �;� - �> -e � ,lam •l�r r '� K� t,�•� ���yyy jf �;�'r�c�,� � `� - 1`t,' +�.J� �e�`..r��= �'� � _ �"_t'�'� �-�y`�.. � i'�,� - .4 it y ,� �����•` - '+4�,1�! , •\ �r ��Ry�,'� i� �•� � �.� to ��� ,� •�. # �--- � r,�' ��'�T'M_." �� �� •" _ \ ^ k�'.' -- ..g. � - !. ` _'� Imo. i•:r��, {'. r � y � .0 ' ice` �_ - �$° i �:4�, � � �F'-'i.."•� �=� �Y. .er __ ��i•. � ;.k�cr - ,•... i _ •. �.- its � l� �-" �•!- �5'�,tr.. . r -•.'f' _ .. 4 - � - 'jam.'+. i - .� w: r. .. �} - •� '' ' , , `�- -��,p� ,,�'''�,�:"�*t� � {r �} ° "�� �'� : ' � „�� ram- • � , � � /. !` r �•^x . i -�„t` �•`� .off~ • I eC; •. •i r�. �4ii 4:i p y.YG .J' •�'j 1 Ati ntl �,.w' �'�l� � • '! �-,_ 1 aur# }� ` _ .•'�j1• 'k'' $�ti tom. 7 is:. _i \. s 4Ati� ��� � ..i.b • '�+Si •�► � f' �• - -� -.. ,� r ` Tom.. Nk AA ► �l✓' . • � �. ♦ is _ J[/f •S�. .� _ � � '• ii Y-a �t wLi'���"'t' r�t`�ep�. ^ ��•�F- ti ' 1 .��� y _ .. �• s y'-'' �`- `fir -r' � -;.. �l?!R-'' t .,�. ����' a �. � ' .��''i "�l 1 . ?�'s ,_s,`�q fi k ����A� r ia' �"1 �T"d' ��l h �A� s ✓J ' •Y .4 ...4{T•�/T �x � kJ�'"".s„'. a��"'���/yr�.a xj' ti u'. .S-"J � +k ...:Id.0 y,�C r %vim n „•. „Y,pa - ,�i.a. .C'- ;b� fir. IA wry �ppIt � tow rIII y� JG x,.� a 4 y L' Ic IA wo 41. r J+ Ate _ ,9 < �i (. ,Jr 1.+ sf^' i sY _ + f j , Y +• ` / •.r..:r+k`t• It, 11— �' �` if Ilk - ya...y- ^ rr St ALL" MAU NAME ,/ COUNTY NO. INSPECTED BY DATE 1 S�z N A S b r r cry y r O4y G. ADDRESS '� Deer S PHO v c � TYP DAM [3Concr6WWv&y ❑C:anaeaaerch [lppg TYPE INSPECTION ❑pyM� SITE NDI ONS as mbanknfent ❑Conveee buttress ❑Sane ffmonary ❑ Irm E3 Falaxr4 P16har 0 Dry 0 ameam ❑ Other HAZARD DESCRIPTION Nlej)e,li R I L z�f)54yveav,,k HAZARD CLASS ❑ fine wdiste (a) Ak❑Low wj ❑Hiah(c) REMARKSI - J �1_ {� C� 7r7s�7ec e�c� �Crf�l d or � h+l'f 11� T�;r 1� �� ACT ON NNor* RECOMMENDATIONS Inspectlain ❑ inspection isnar � Se C Me SsR RU>� I�Y� GIL) ❑ maintenance ❑ ely�E ❑ y Defi ien kaw ❑ rceme Enfont ❑ t Monitoring ❑ mtrtorrapatr RE nDtlae 13yAdWlc relrtspectlon ❑ Enga�ng away ❑ Engineering Other relnspectlon ❑ Inspectlen by RE AR..., ..`.....$ PADLAIS..° � <..: _ •: COYIINTS �.r.. ❑ 1.NDne ❑11.131splaced dp mp COVER egeatlon ❑ Rlp rep ❑ Concrete ❑Asphatt ❑ Otter ❑ 2.Trees 01ZCracks E(3.HIgh birettas ❑13.Undermining I V l� Z' ►}JC_ZYZ �l lia S / le v_' i { �j (_ =au[# ? ❑ 4.Burrows ❑14.Mo1e9 ❑ S.wave eroslan 1315.Spallinp ❑ 6.Llvestock damage ❑irs.Dlspiaced joints ❑ 7.SIIdea ❑17.13eterlorated Joints ❑8. i18.E reinforcement �cessons ❑xpsaed ce ❑ 9.Bulgoa 9.17[hef ❑ IO,sp. dP rep ❑ 1.Wor1B ❑11.Crtacks COVER: egetlon ❑ Gravel ❑Concrete ❑ Asphatf ❑ Odw (('' 1:i7- t�1Own CVt,r J >s ❑ 2.Tmes ❑12.Spalling C High bushes ❑13.DeterioratedJoints rt�fC��tiCe; I n ❑ 4.BUMMS 0114.131splaced joints ,+ 5 , � - Y ",, w�:::: O ❑ 5.Ruts ❑15.Exposed reinforcement ,.., es G1 ❑ S.UmtDck damti.Other ❑//7 Depressions ��e -> 4- IVk1t C( 0 S.Unievel ❑ 9.Mlsalignment �10.Has overtopped <'? ❑ 11.Seepage COVER ep ton ❑Rip rap ❑ Concrete ❑ Olher O ,❑,/1.None �2.Tr."s ❑12.Bolls 93 ❑ Q 3.High bushes 13.cracks (34.Burrows ❑14.Holes ` + I _ [t�Ctt'i( VZ��TL��ZA Ili 5.Eroalon ❑15.Spalling ( ;M ❑ 6.Llvestockdamage ❑ 16.Dispiaced joints 1 CAS i b IYJo�j-c(- "' cis ❑ 7,Slldea El17.Doteriorated Joints S e ressions sed reinforcement �18.Ex 9.Bul es fad 19.Other E O.Wetness 13 .None ❑ 11.Seepage COVER: Vegetation El PUP rap ❑Concrete ❑Other r- 2 Trees ❑ 12.Bolis [3"3.High bushes ❑13.Cracka c"') r t' eU5 h m�L�z�y . 04.Burrows ❑14.1-11oles >`> ❑S.Eroslon ❑15.Spalling <v< ❑ 6.Llvestx* damage (3 1 S.Dispaced Joints ❑ 7.Slldea 17.Deteriorated joints ❑ a.Deprossions ❑ 1S.Exposed reinforcement zr ❑ 9.Buiges ❑ 19.Undennlning',. 1310.wetness ❑20.Other A kx .... ......... jEri.None E] 1 I.Seepage oovER: ofopw*n [3 Rip rap 0 concrete 13 oew ME] 2.7'rees 2, 0 3.Ho bushes 13 I&cradw 4.Bumms [314.HoWs S.Eroslon IS.Spalling O.Ltwesto(* damage 16MV01aced joints 7.511das [317.Dotwkwatod joints posed a nformmen B.Depressions [3 I&EX r I I 9.Bulges I S.UndermiNng .......... 01O.Wetness D 20,0iher &I mne [3 1 lJoInt d"Oemeffl TYPE/SUE: 2.No Mhguard 12.Undermined 0 3.Obsiructed [313.Volds E3 4. Pfugged 13 14.Erealon S. Rusted a a (3 1 S.H le [36.Damaged [3 1 B.Condult collasped (3 7.Gatea feakIng 13 17-Spalling 8.JoInts Waking [3 1 8,0utlet undercutting 0 9,cradw 0 19.Misalignment 1G.JoInt deterforadon [120.0aw 1.None 0 1 lJoInt displatoment TYPE/SIZE: El 2-No Fs E] 12.UndermInIng 3: 03.Same as n [I IS.Volds []4.Obsiructed 14.Holes IL EIS.Eroslon IS.Exposed reinforcornent 06.DIsptaced rIp rap 16.Spalling 07.Sparse dp rap D 17,0utlet erosion jeaking [3 IsAfsaili;nffient c3g.cracits (I 113.1nadequate capadty Ell O.JoInt deterioratlon [3 20.Other /,None Ty c, 2.No bottom draln E)3.BottDm drain Imper"We 0 4.Subsudaca drain dry 0 S.Subsurface draln muddy Ilow 13 6. Subsurtace draln obsDucled 7.No itnimal guard 8.Other 5 K ETCH ESICOMMENTS SAFETY INSPECrIAN RE T /> '•' — �/. ` WIT W. /� /, /TE F,AAN (�c¢�P QCQom�, 0O>f� fL ■IMECTIOM QCSLWHEN OA - DCorotn bAmm OSdrr MMMMy Q 1� 0 rtM Oht i'. •., y/, Q cq 13 aN•mt Q ofm ACTION REC01111LNOATiONs DSE yC%. Pvlodc C.J%• c .� .� .� : A Minw MW Egg E go MV IULVOr+w mftpocmn Edon IR ME AREA ►RoilMtis COYI1ENTt ., 0 COWR: Yw mrt 0 mow a comma DAww Q ors► a tyT c1mc / p xHW hohn Diukdomm, Q 4jkpon Mmmow r f p twaw vown 1319 &v p cumna ft,rp. pfe.M*v d prr O 7.smm 017AMrrbar0 pr,d a..Dwmuws a,&� i mftwim a mq.s D I.Iibrr Q,, gyp. QYmpoftn p am* pcomwm o Odom o on. [313,01,mb Pon a 13 &Rw p�pewo.w ►arrft wmN o {i7 0.171+M�or Q tmim f fflmd p Iowa p 11.MNqeP a>,+Ea Q'vopuw+ Ow O corvon Q ohr 0 l.Tr omem 3.Flbrti Q 1! CIiMd►� Q 4.%or 14lb4� © ! l.*"to dim 131 p&m 13 tookk v 131AEwnd rth�rt7Mlllifst 13 tAuvn r- O p,O.lM�+rrn /� r, GrX:? �� v ,_ - y.•r ' i .r, %' / � r /J _ .�/ . � � , 113 13 'jam o,,.SWPM . W4It y.or► c Rono ❑owwm a Cow a 1312ftb 4,bmm 1314.FNIM. ' v c. �, `f I Cl LE roam Q, LS{Aq f/ N J✓ .� !,� /�, r_ Q 6.�k�sbdt d lrtflgil 0 f S Dk�br. jOrr /i % , �- %t O r d / .... i �� . w Q 7.IM 0,7 DlrlrrloreiQ pM1M �J t !i ✓ j / r i r .y 13 towssebm 131&rxp wo rm%brmmwo �� Qte•wrvrraN ®7o•ONrr � � r�; . Ah F— -4 MCA p000LKING 13 liwo ampm 13 po ap 13 awcrm p cow 13 13 74- 13 O L1 011upswo 13 TABOO D Lowumm rlPEAIZL- 13 Lm 13 13 mvwo 0 141 711 13 s Sum"ofts Dis-conam (3 m%mmmm aj*w w" C3 &auto w*~" Co-amm 13 to-movii w i (31 13L1dES [3StLNdwtpl"kV 013as Ps 13 wow Q..oe. C314jum 136.1-polon D impond mwb OgLD*ftmd Ave (3 is. spa% D 7. spm op jop 13 i7.ou*K woom Osmm w" D 1 tmwav vow l3s.cmas 13 is.weft*^* mommy ❑10.40% dlMW kX tbn 13 =.OVW 13 i.pwa TYR: 13 2.pa imam dmo 13 s.somm *w a o"oft 4 &AUP%M ~ Or O fsometm *m ng", %w E3 & (3 T-m v" two 711-1 Facility Number 86 23 Date of visil: 09l021Z003 'Time: 1Z00 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold 13Permitted ECertified 0 Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ... . Farm Name: S1e00A.D.OkY ...................................................................... County: SltrXX............. ......................... WBRO ..... Owner Name:f:itt�_____-_-_-- Stb1�A&----------_._------------- Phone No: lltitcpo]YA--------------------------------- MailingAddress: U.akno.wxt........................................................................................................ Facility Contact:Title: ............................................... Phone No: ...................................... Onsite Representative: �LQU!`-------------------- _ _----------------------- Integrator:. ------------------------------------------ Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:......................................... Location of Farm: Hwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after bridge and follow to the end. V I- 0 Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3ti • 17 43 Longitude 80 • 48 �F 48 K -" W);gn Cu' r' ren die v .�'i..^R D�{e�sign C•n�rrent D ise gn@�Current' ;. t - :.J..`,'b. Swlne Ga aci � Po ulation Poultry Ca aci Po ulatlon Cattle. Ca aci Po ulatidif ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ®Dairy 250 0 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Other ❑Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder " ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Deslgn Capacity Total SSLW 250 350,000 ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Number of Lagoons ® ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? to Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: .... VyastaP.aad.................................................................................... Freeboard (inches): 32 05103101 Continued Facility Number: 86-23 * Dale of Inspection 09/02/2043 0 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type ❑ Yes M No []Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes M No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes M No ❑ Yes M No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes M No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes M No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Renuired Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes M No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Coin IsUsKeterAtorauestl •xplaln any M. ans a any recommendations or any other comments. Used a of facility to to xplaln situation . use a a a pages as necessary : ❑ Field Copy M Final Notes The purpose of today's visit was to follow-up on a complaint alleging the discharge of animal waste from the waste .storage pond. _ arm Credit has began foreclosing on the property and Mr. Stephens has declared bankruptcy. 2. There is a dark colored, low area, on the south side of the structure where there is evidence of a previous overflow. 7. Embankment of waste storage pond needs to be mowed. 9. If facility were to be certified/permitted again, the maximum liquid marker would need to be re -set. 16. David Branch, certified operator, has been contracted by Farm Credit to pump the waste pond. 18. A new WUP would need to be written for the Certified Waste Management Plan if the new owner of this facility plans to confine 100 or more cattle in the future. er/Inspector Name Melissa sebrock M EReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: qt F V L O5103101 Continued FmAity Number: 86-23 �te of Inspection 09/02/2003 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1. If facility were to be certified/permitted again, a certified operator must be designated. left blank were not applicable to this visit. l 05103101 Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation in Reason for Visit O Routine O tatnplatnt ® Follow up Emergency Notification O Other ©Denied Access Facility Number 8b 23 Date or N,isii: Ob/13/2003 Title: 1400 Not Operational O Below Threshold © Permitted ®Certified r] Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: L�lQI/2QA�.. Farm Name: S 99heias.D.81a.................... .. County: SuA'�'3:.................................................. WSR.0 ........ ....................................................................... OwnerName: Kedth....................................... stephells........ ............................. I ............ ... Phone No:....................................................................................... MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... .................................................... U.676 ............. FacilityContact: .......................................................................... ....Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................................... OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:...................................................................................... Certified Operator:Kdth.L................................. SUPhats .......................................... Operator Certification Number:240.32 ............................. Location of Farm: iwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after A fridge and follow to the end. w ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 ' . 17 6 43 46 Longitude SU • 48 6 48 ff uy ign Cur�ren't 3, 'WbQyM' nt`w;, i;s Desi Curren,Swine '' .a. .�Ca" acit °° P,a elation Poultry sett ;Pii iilation `: Gattle a acit ; Po elation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ® Dairy 250 0 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Non -La er y ❑Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean r' " Mpg- ❑Other 0 Farrow to Feeder _° ` Total Design Capacity 250 ❑ Farrow to Finish +; I i.W �� o 'ss 5o,aoo Li G ilts ❑ Boars Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area µ;Holding on /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ; Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [3 Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ® Yes ❑ No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ......W=e.pond..................................................................................................................................................................................... Freeboard (inches): 0 05103101 Continuer Facility Number: 86-23 1 0 Date of Inspection 06/13/2003 . 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? i (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Applt , , 10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) CO Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No e) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? RCquired Recorda & DqpUrnents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No C1 Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Co en refer to qu • Ex lain any Y ans an any recommendations or any other comments. U ravings of facilit t tte explain situations. us a i ona ages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes The purpose of today's visit was to follow-up on the waste level in the waste pond and the condition of the dam. No one was onsite. _ r, Stephens has reportedly moved to Florida. DWQ has been unable to locate a correct address or phone number for him. 1.4. The discharge trail from the waste storage pond continues to widen. Evidence of recent discharge was observed from the south side of the waste pond, and 7. A new 8" rut has started on the south slope of the waste pond due to the continuing discharge and pooling of waste as it overflows. Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock Reviewer/Inspector Signature:. Date: 05103101 r V, I V t Continued Facii:ty Number: 86-23e (if Inspection r06113120031 Odor hHum. 26. Does the discharge pipe From the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No C. ' Mona �� ornments�ari or1 _raw rigs: 15. No corn or small grain has been planted for waste application. There were some possible fescue fields nearby. 16. Two manure tanks, owned by David Branch, were located onsite. Mr. Branch is to pump the waste pond for NC Farm Credit next week. 24. DWQ needs to continue to monitor this situation for possible future court action until the waste pond is pumped at least 18-24" below the spillway. Questions left blank were not applicable to today's visit. 05103101 Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access t)atr ul' Visit: t15/28/ZD03 '1'inu•; 1300 Facility Number 85 23 ro Not Operational O Below Threshold ❑ Permitted ■ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... Farm Name: S plivisDaft:x................................................................................•....•...•.... County: S.uxter............................................. ..... .4'ASRA........ OwnerName: KCiltht....................................... SjCPj;eats......................................... •........... Phone No:Q3.6)_3.66::32ZQ ....................................................... MailingAddress: 1.Ci.5.OAlf,.L,elatc....................................................................................... .SUMAtlW.B.0........................ ............. .............. x0.ft7.6............. FacilityContact............................................................................... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:.................................................. OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator: ...................................................................................... Certified Operator:.................................................................................................•...•.......... Operator Certification Number:......................................... Location of Farm: Hwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left alter + )ridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 43 Longitude 80 • 48 48 it t ` ..reg i benign ?,-w,:ct�NarW Currentgn:• '-�YY: .. 7A1. k.. Eattli Current t rne Poultry " A r' Ca acrt Pultion aCa acit Po ulation `—Ca acit .Po ulation ,. • ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 0 Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy' ❑ Farrow to Wean":. �;,�:` ❑'Other ~' 1. ❑ Farrow to Feeder f, A: ❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 250 ❑ Gilts=. t :;Totl 5W 350,000 ,x ❑ soars Number of so® ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area 1 H ng Ponds ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r, , a_ DischgW,ei & Stream Jrpacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No Discharge originated at: N Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. if discharge is observed, wits the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collettion K Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Cl Spillway ® Yes ❑ No Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3. Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ...... asm.F.ond......................................... ............................ ........ ................................... .....................................•....•........................... Freeboard (inches): 0 05103101 d y�- U � Continued Facility Number: 86-23 Date of Inspection 05/28/2003 5. Are there any immediate threats to the i egrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ treeevere erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes IN No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes IN No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Co men refe to ques x lai any Y •S a -We a d/ r onvmromnfetfmti6nsr6riAnviotnerLcommeits. Us dra of facilit t ter ex Eain situations. u additional pages as necessary : ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes Today's inspection was a result of an annonymous complaint alleging that the waste storage pond was overflowing. Questions that ave been left blank are not applicable to this visit. 1. Waste from the storage pond was observed to be overflowing the southside embankment, and flowing downhill towards an UT to Mitchell River. At the time of this investigation, the flowing waste was observed to stop approximately 30 feet from the UT. The unpermitted discharge of animal waste is an immediate threat to water quality. 4. Waste was observed overflowing the embankment on the south side of the. structure. The spillway is located in the southwest corner of the structure, however. The waste storage pond needs to be pumped and the animal waste land applied immediately. Reviewer/Inspector Name :Melissa Rosebrock Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 05103101 Continued racility Number: 86_23 Df lnspcctioit 05/28/2003 Odor Issues • 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 0 No 28. its there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No �9L t#t"enjs orb raw rigs: 7. The vegetation on the waste storage pond needs to be mowed as soon as possible to allow for a thorough inspection of the A condition of the embankment. 15. It appears that no corn crop has been planted. Waste needs to be applied and a crop planted within 30 days. Fescue hay fields should be available for waste application. 16. There is no waste application equipment onsite and Mr. Stephens nor Farm Credit has contracted with a commercial applicator for waste application. Per attorneys for DWQ, a court order will be required for DWQ to hire someone to pump animal waste from storage pond. 21. Facility no longer has a certified operator. 23. No one was onsite. Both Mr. Stephens and Mr. Bobby Goodin (Farm Credit) have been mailed copies of this report and are aware of the environmental violations that currently exist. 24. DWQ needs to continue to monitor the situation for possible enforcement action. 05103101 �amofWater Quality � f O on of Soil and Water Conservation • Other; Agency,-,.,-, Type of Visit O Compliance-Inspection—O.Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routinel O Complaint q`.Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 86 23 Date of Visit: 03/20/2003 Time: 1430 O Not Operational 40 Below Threshold 13 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............. Farm Name: StrAk►l:>pa,t?air:x.......................................................................................... County: 5.urry ................................................. W.S.RA........ OwnerName: KCittx.......................................'9je'P.hC.jM ..................................................... Phone No: ( .C]i. C........................................................ MailingAddress: P.Q.Rvx.31.4............................................................................................ 5.tA(.V..RQjKd..N.0 .................................................... 2076............. FacilityContact: K0111.51ewhgns.............................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................................... OnsiteRepresentative: �?a.Y.lid.XRhe11S.......................................................................... Integrator:...................................................................................... Certified Operator:KAtb.L.................................. SIPPM115.......................................... Operator Certification Number:ZMM.................... ......... Location of Farm: Hwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after + bridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 •F 17 4 43 Longitude F 48 Design Current Swine Vnnnrity Pnnulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer I I Dairy 250 10 ❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 250 Total SSLW 350,000 Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ® Spray Field ❑ Other a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No 3. Were there any adverse impacts, or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stricture 6 Identifier: ......Waste.pond....................................................................... ................... ............................................................................................ Freeboard (i.nclies): 2 05103101 ��� _ Continued Facility Number: 86-23 Date of Inspection 03/20/205 5. Are there any immediate threats to the0grity of any of the structures observed? (ief tr, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level elevation markings? { Waste Aamlication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type ❑ Yes Z No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes. ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IN No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No 15, Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? B Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? 6e/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comments (refer to question #): 'Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any!other comments. Use drawings offacility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):. ,❑ 1~ield Copy ®Final Notes Today's investigation is the result ofa complaint received by the Surry SWCDINRCS office alleging that the operator was applying waste in the rain.. Questions left blank were not applicable to this facility and/or this investigation at this time, 1. WSRO staff observed that animal waste was in fact being irrigated during a rain event onto a cattle pasture owned by Mr. Medley. The soil was so saturated that animal waste was observed flowing off of the application pasture and into a ravine, and then discharging into a freshwater pond owned by Mr. Medley. Freshwater and the dark colored animal waste was also observed discharging through the freshwater pond's spillway where it mixed with other freshwater run-off and flowed into a UT to the Mitchell River. Parameters and ramples were obtained for: pH, DO, temp., fecal colifornt, turbidity, BOD, and nutrients. 3. The waste level in the storage pond is two inches below the top of the dam. Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date: 3 05103101 Continued Facility Number: 86-23 Date 'Inspection 03/2Q12003 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No [] Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No AdditionaComments, an orDrawings:, 7. WSP dam area near spillway needs to be repaired and re -seeded. Damage from heavy traffic during rain events was observed. 16. Per Farm Credit, equipment has been re -possessed. Mr. Stephens stated that he no longer had a honey wagon for waste DWQ staff will continue to monitor the situation until a suitable buyer is determined who will pump the waste level below the liquid pipe. address for Mr. Stephens:2671 Poplar Springs Rd., State Rd., NC 28676 J 05103101 4 ision,of Water Quality ision"of Soil and W6ter.Conservation ' 0 Other Agency Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access -1 acility Number 86 23 Date Of visit: o1/2912063 Tune: tto4 rO Nut Operational Q i3clo►v Threshold Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... FarmName: S19ph as.Rairy.............................................................................................. County: S.urjry .................................................. WSRQ........ OwnerName: Kea.th....................................... Shcp.lmits.............................. ..,.................... Phone No: (33.61(IiXzo....................................................... MailingAddress: a.GS..Qajj.LAaet....................................................................... ........... ..................... ............... I.... U.676 .............. Facility Contact: Kci.tl0.1.eAhus.............................................. .fitle:................. -............................................. Phone No:............ Onsite Represenlative: N9ag................... . integrator: Certified Operator: ......... ................. ... . ....... - ......... ... ....... ............................................. Operator Certification Number: ............................ ............ Location of Farm: wy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after A bridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 36 • 17 43 f' Longitude $0 - 4$ 48 « Design Current Design Current . Design Current Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacitv Population ❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer I IN Dairy 1 250 1 0 ❑ Feeder to Finish JE3 Non -Layer I I JCI Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 250 ❑ Gilts Total SSLW 350,000 ❑ Boars I J Number of Lagoons 4 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 1 (3 No Liquid Waste Management Systent Discharges & Stream lntnacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWt) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway. Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: .....Waste.Paud............................................................. Freeboard (inches): 13 ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Structure 6 05103101 =# 7,4076 Continued Facility Number: 86^23 Date of Inspection 07/24/2003 ~i 5. Are there any immediate threats to the in ity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ treQevere erosion, ❑ yes ® No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? Yes ®No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes [:]No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding [J PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? Ge/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) E 1 i 23. Did ReviewcOnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes []No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes []No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any'other comments. Use drawings of _facility to better explain situations, (use additional pages as necessary): t 1~ield Copy ® final Notes 4. Operator needs to pump immediately or consider hauling to another waste storage structure. Waste level was only one inch below the maximum liquid level mark. 7. Spillway still needs to be repaired. 19. Per compliance schedule, application records for January 2003 are to be received by the WSRO by February 15, 2003. 23. Today's unannounced visit was to follow-up on the January 15, 2003 compliance inspection in which the waste level in the waste forage pond was noted to be only two inches below the maximum liquid level mark. A copy of this form has been mailed to owner at address shown on this form. Reviewer/Inspector Name Mel' sa Rosebrock Qq Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: O5103101 1 Continued Facility `umber: 86-23 D f Inspection 01/29/2003 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted'? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No 32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No Additional Comments an or ravings: A 1 w 05103101 ` ston of Water Quality �ision of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency „ ; Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O'Complaint. O Foliow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility dumber 86 33 mate Of Visit, Of(1512003 Time: 13t0 O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold 13 Permitted ® Certified M Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 1.4L301.z4Q�.. FarmName: S.t phems.Raky.............................................................................................. County: SM0 .................................................. !'.1'.$R(. )........ OwnerName: Kei.tlj....................................... stcpheus ..................................................... Phone No::32Z.R........................................................ Mailing Address: 1.6.5..�?a .L,�l'ae............................................................................ Stjttc.RQaA..N.0 ............................... ......... ...,..... ... M6.7.ft............ .. Facility Contact: Keitb..Skpb s.............................................. .ritic:................................................................ Phone No: ccU-#-336.J26 Z71............ Onsite Representative: RAttt..�t�d..A. Y1143.S,te la�lgS................................................... Integrator:..,., Certified Operator:Kkith.L.- ................................SUPheah......................,..........,........ Operator Certification Number:2.48.3Z. Location of Farm: lwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after A )ridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 17 43 �� Longitude 80 • 48 48 Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ::��]® Dairy 250 1 ❑ Feeder to Finish IQ Non -Layer 1 1[3 Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 250 ❑ Gilts Total SSLW 350,000 ❑ Boars Number of Lagoons 0 1 JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps L1 10 No Liquid Waste Management System Discharees & Stream 1111naets 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (]f yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ......Wute.poud ........................................................... Freeboard (inches): 14 E ^1 . 05103101 7$P 7173 5� zmr� con i))ued Facility Number: 86-23 Date of Inspection OS/S5/2D03 5. Are there any immediate threats to the in rity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ treeevere erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the strictures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Annlicati2n 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type Rye ' ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comments (refer t6 question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Field Copy ®Final Notes 4. Need to pump as soon as weather permits- Waste level is only two inches below maximum. 7. Spillway is higher than it was originally. May need to repair spillway since marker doesn't seem to match. 19. Operator applied some waste last week onto fields beside driveway into facility. Application records for these events is to be sent to SRO by 2/15/03 per compliance schedule. 25. Field labeled DURS needs to be added to WUP since waste was applied here in 2002. Per Farm service agency, operator has applied for tract number and it may take awile to process his request since the are back -logged. Per Greg Goins, the new WUP program must have a tract number, can't use letters. 27. Burial of calves is approx. 300' from flowing waters, Reviewer/Inspector Name Meli a Rosebrock Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: O5103101 .. Continued Facility Number: 86-.23 DIlt' Inspection 01/15/2003 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? [] Yes ® No 28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29, is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No e Additional Comments and/orDrawings: #17., 22., 26., 29., 32. Not applicable to this facility at this time. I1/6/03 0.56 lbs. N/1000 gal. Operator was questioner) about sampling technique. Sample was taken from the surface and from only one cornerprior to agitation. Operator was instructed to agitate and re -sample within 60 days of recent applications. compliance schedule, operator needs to provide WSRO with letter from Tommy Surchette stating that a soils investigation, a Pey report, and a hazard verification has been completed. Operator needs to furnish DWQ with contractor's name/phone/address copy of contract. Facility has received approval to construct new WSP from Land Resources. J 05103101 Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I Reason for Visit xRoutine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: Facility Number 0 Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Farm Name: hP..riS I r Owner Name: Is Mailing Address: r + O L -e vt &A) br'l ✓e- ► S Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: ] Certified Operator: !— Location of Farm: ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry � S Time: rO Not Dagrational Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: County: u rr Phone No: 334 a 3 aZ-10 (0 . 11�e Rd. N C ZY6 7 _ ja-7f If (016r1, Title: -ba V %,onl Phone No: Operator Certification Number: Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 1 i `t l " Longitude ®0 �.Mrr Design Current. Design Current Design,. Current Swine Capaeltv Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I IN Dairy ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean - ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity a L. ❑ Gilts Total SSLW 3 d ®00 4. ❑ Boars Nirober,ofLagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La ooi HoldingxPon, I Solid Traps, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges &.Stirearn Impacts 1, is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? WasteCollection & Treatment 4. 1s storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway Struct re I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: 2 PAIJ Freeboard (inches): 05103101 ❑ Spray Field Area ❑ Yes ANo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Cl Yes Cl No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No Structure b Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes JKNa seepage, etc.) ////// ��'��' 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes No immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONO 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes No Waste AIRplication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic pverload ❑ Yes No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving cro s differ with those designated in the Certifi d Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes )ONO 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N0 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o Required_ ccfds & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? - S— * m -E3+10 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes XNo 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ;,No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes PqNo 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IgNo 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) B N'm—ffwo 23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 0 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? XYes ❑ No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comments (refer to question#) Al ,Explain any YES answers addlor�any recommendations or any other.co tNilncnts Use drawings of facility to better explain situnadns use.additional pages as necessary) Field Copy Final Notes It I -II 94o aq i 32 zz 3 b wary. no+ appi Ica +j c l i 0-+ 4k%5 fi me, `j� 7, U 161 wer/Inspeetar Namewer ERevie /Inspector Signature. .Date: 05103101 7 Continued ��.�i55�. �o5��ro�lL"CM���, tie•-� • 0 Facility lumber: — Date of Inspection T �v dor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads. building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes A No ❑ Yes ANO es t o ❑ Yes K No i9-v� 1Io Additional Comments and/or Drawings: Fa.cr R le o f 5+&- ir-d ixna- e mom -- I n p Jan , R P lan fit.+e4-- 11 &1. Z a S J tc�tft!5/ . 03 50 *1 I5 r n ve 5}�� Q or)►D 1, u duly oz "L 5 u r V Q U Diu e- ru i y %O Z zed Ve'C r an t� 0 -T-0 WAJ-- V "�Pp('VO - a 2 &)n4-rd C..+or .306'� .,�l��.eaL�.2P• O 05103101 U ez A ffrr," 4- 1 art7L) I Facility Number: — l f .Inspection Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No 28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate' cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No Additional Comments and/or Drawings, w 5/00 Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint ® Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 86 23 1)atc nl' Visit: 7/26J2002 I'inu: 1430 0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold 0 Permitted ■ Certified Q Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............ Farm Name: S4991ItrMDATa•.Y..........................:............................................................... .... County: S.urjry ................................................. WSRQ........ Owner Name: Keiitbt....................................... Skepbens....:..:............................................. Phone No:(,33.61.3.66.-3220 ....................................................... Mailing Address J140. akt xisen.t?I;lrt�.................:..: .... Stat.P.AQP.diXC......................... .... 20.676 ............. ................................................... ........................ Facility Contact: Kcikht.&APb9as...................... ... Title Phone No: Onsite Representative:&itb.Skt:Rhtcn&.................... I ................. ... Integrator: Certified Operator: Kdth.L.................................. s1z.P ltYm.......................................... Operator Certification Nurnber;U= ............................. Location of Farm: Hwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after A, bridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 17 43 {� Longitude 80 • 48 48 it Design b i Current ,y, Design - :& 'a . Currents cL yirtYT i6k: ke Design ��Current � }t sSwine �� •ate a�cit C P,o ulation Poultry Ca acit P,o °u a ion Cattle l 4 Ca acit Po ulatton: �; ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 s ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy Ii ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Other 'rota! Design,Cspacity 250 ❑ Farrow to Feeder . ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts s ; � �. Tatar SSLW > , 350,000, ❑ Boars a Number of Lagoons �0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑. Lagoon Area][]Spray Field Areall . Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Disch:trLes c_ic Stream Im ac s 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other it. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. Ifdischarge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in g*,alltrtin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yeses❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ......W..aste.Pond.................................................... Freeboard (inches): 24 05103101 Continued OWI / v' /' Facility Number: 86-23 Dale ul' Inspection 7/26/2002 . 5. Are there any immediate threats to the to egrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste ,% 1j ;etinn t0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type Sudex (Hay) ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No N Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required RegQrds & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? IS. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes N No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. ❑ Field Copy N Final Notes estions left blank were not applicable to this visit andlor this facility at this time. purpose of today's visit was to meet with operator and clarify PAN balance recordkeeping errors and to remind operator to collect I sample for Slaughter field. Operator has already been to SWCD office to add fields that had been receiving waste that were not in his .WMP. Marker does not appear to have correct maximum level marked on post. Suggest re -checking this white in the process of building the and waste storage pond, which is to be staged, per operator. environmental concerns or violations were observed on the date of this inspection. I+ Reviewer/inspector Name 'LT Rosebrock -� _w.. Reviewer/lnspector Signatur Date: 05103101 Continued Eac:lily Number: 86-23 I): f Inspection 7/26/2002 r dur Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 05103101 Facility Number 86 23 Date of Visit: 6/27/2002 Time: 11:30 O Not O erational O Below Threshold Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... Farm Name: St!ep)a!~.1?aiuy............................................................................................. County: S.ujrry .................................................. WSRO ........ Owner Name: Keith ....................................... S>tcphetls..................................................... Phone No: Q3.6j.3.66.!322Q ..... Mailing Address: 1.4Q.JUtk Y.Yi-,.13:.Dtt y0.......................................................................... S.titteA40,d,..NC. FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: Onsite Representative: &M.Stepltens.................. Integrator: M.76............. Certified Operator:Kcith.L................................. SUPWts .......................................... Operator Certification Number: 24S32............................. Location of Farm: iwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after + Bridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 17 43 « Longitude 80 ' 48 1 48 is Design Current Swine Canacitv Ponulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 528 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 250 Total SSLW 350,000 Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JOSprayFieldArea Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps L—I ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges R ,, Stream Im� 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes IN No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ................................... ............................. ................................................................................................................................................... Freeboard (inches): 36 05103101 Continued Facility Number: 86-23 Date or Inspection 6/27/2002 0 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑Yes ®Na (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No 12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Suinmer annuals Corn (Silage & Grain) 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ® Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iet irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (lei discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No []Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No []Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No 113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. ►omments efer to gties x lain any a ny commendations or an e c wents. dra in facility to e e lain situatio . u a es as necessary in[:] Copy ®Final Notes 8, Mr. Stephens is under a compliance schedule to construct a new waste storage pond and push -off ramp from the new free -stall barn. Work is being persude as scheduled. 13. The current waste plan needs to agree with Mr. Stephens application fields and crops. 25. Mr. Stephens has a new waste plan for 725 head +1- . Facility is trying to get waste structures approved and constructed to be certified for the 725 head. Currently the facility is certified for 250 head of cattle. Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 Rocky Durham 1 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 05103101 Continued Facility Number: 56-23 Ote of Inspection 6/27/2002 41 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No Vx . iti6na C ►oriimen Iari or a� gs: Waste�analysis: 5-7-02 ALD 4.1 lbs.N./1000 gals. B FCD 4.9 lbs.N./ton B Soil analysis dated 5-24-02 05103101 L Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: 2l19/2402 Time: 1015 Facility Number 86 23 0 Not Operational 'O Below Threshold Permitted ■ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... Farm Name: S.telthwS.Ra1ltX................... .............................................................. ............. County: S.urjry .................................................. SJRQ........ Owner Name: Keith........................................Skohe.tGs.................................................... . Phone No:(33.61.3.66::322,9 ...................................................... Mailing Address: 1.49-La rxim.Dritn.......................................................................... $.tAts..RQAd..N.0 .................................................... 20.6.7.6 ............. FacilityContact: Kd1h.S.tvpbc1as.............................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:................................................... Onsite Representative: ��,,S1�g11�115�.................... „ Integrator:..................... Certified Operator:Xdth.L ................................. S.tk'P 4elaS.......................................... Operator Certification Number: 14832............................. Location of Farm: 3wy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after A )ridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Pout" ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 17 43 Longitude 80 • 48 6F 48 ' h Design Current Design Current '" �D sign Current Swine Ca acit P,o elation Poultry Ca aeit P,o ulatton Cattle Ca acit P.o elation at ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ""' ❑ Farrow to Finish '1'otalDesign Capacity 250 a [] Gilts" i ❑ Boars Total ;SSI,W 350,000 Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray U ❑ Field Area Holding Ponds /Solid Traps No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges � Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made! ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'' d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: .....Wasta.Pomd.......................... .............. ...... I .................... ......... ......................................................................................................... Freeboard (inches): 48 05103101 Continued --& /0a '7,�� v>—� Facility Number: 86-23 q I)ate of inspection 1J19/2002 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (U any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? 4 Waste AUPI icaition 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ® Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type Rye ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No IN Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No I c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? I ❑ Yes ® No Required Recoils & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) '� ❑ Yes ❑ No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No 22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) i ❑ Yes ® No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? i ❑ Yes ® No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? �, ® Yes ❑ No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. C►om en efer to questio xplain any Y)JS an amirecommendation or an' h menu. • Used aw'n facility to b t explain situation . na ages necessary : ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes 2. Past evidence of discharge from freshwater drain. Wooden curbing has recently been installed to keep waste from entering the drain. _ Discharge should cease now. Repairs look good. 18. and 19. Did not look at records or count animals today. oday's inspection was to follow-up, at owner's request, on repairs made as a result of the 1/16/02 DWQ Compliance Inspection. Parlor pipe has been extended and is no longer eroding side of WSP. Looks better. Wooden berms were recently installed around parlor barns and sick cow barn to keep waste out of freshwater drain. Looksgood. Reviewer/Inspector Name �Meli sa Rosebrock Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date: alm IL�. 05103101 1 f il Continued •Facility'Number: 86-23 DaaInspection 2/19/2002 Odor Issues ` 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? If current WSP is not to be enlarged, then the dam needs to be re -graded and re -seeded. ❑ Yes ❑ No []Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No �l tee. . Waste was applied 1/29/02 to Durwood Stephens property (Tract 1918 Fields I and 2, 15.18 acres) that the owner has a signed reement with. This tract is not yet a part of the WUP per Surry SWCD/NRCS and technical specialist. Per owner, he has a deed this property. 15. and-25. Waste was applied to the old exterior lot (Tract 2089 Field 1) which is in the WUP but this field did not have a crop on i yet. Per operator, waste was applied three weeks ago. 111. Waste was also applied too heavily to parts of this field. J 05103101 1 0 0 Type of Visit Accompliance inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit C) Routine O Complaint ollow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Date of Visit: ime: r--� Not U erational el w Threshold 0 Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: Farm Name: TP h,�'15 �_ Q1 f y County: 55urr Owner Name: �rQ]`t't� mi,, Phone No: as Mailing Address: I'd {� U�L� „� r ' - - f� �-' l' Facility Contact: kMATitle: Phone No: Zffi Onsite Representative: # Integrator: "ter Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: 30 Location of Farm: ❑ Swine [3 Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ' " Longitude ' �-.t , Design Current - Design Current Design Current Swine Ca aci ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ 13oars �. . Number,oMagoons Holding 06nds,1. Snlid'Traps Poultry Capacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ La er I I IDairy o� ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity p2 Q Totat.SSLw 1 3 a "ILJ Subsurface Drains Present o No Liquid Waste Managen Discharges & $trearn Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Wttste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway Struct re Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: Freeboard (inches): 05103101 J Spray Field Area i ❑ Yes �No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes V'No ❑ Yes G Structure 6 ' ` Continued . FacilityNumber: Date of Inspection 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Cl Yes Y o seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (if any of questions A-S was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes . V`o immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Ikrfes ❑ No S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �j(No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes No Waste Annlication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo If. Is there evidence application? Excessive Ponding El PAN El Hydraulic Overload �1'es El No Pver 12. Crop typeip 13. Do the receiving crop differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes VNo 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes PgNo b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes NNO c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes CR-Ko 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? xYes ❑ No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes '"5;�Tqo Reguired Recgrds & D cum nts 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) m 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 19+es­—E1No 20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes g No 21. Did the facility fail to have a activeiy certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ArNo 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? ❑ Yes a —No (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes APdo 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 'ISKes ❑ No © No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. F_ Y ,. _ Comments (refer to question'#) lax lain an . Y1S answers hndJor,any recommendations or, any-otti r,cmm�ients a, Use.drawings,of facility tn,better explainiituations ,(use dditional pages as necessary) Field Copy ❑ Final Notes t.k. fl:-. UF.. '4' _ "'"b'4•h 4,4w, '^Yn �+'.'SS:.R EeW :,«» Ya.��"".'-+YMv!".yY..'...."..""""'++e.. +h#W...:. a �Pa even e- off' j f schc�.r e, Tro;m � n� I, 5f2 fro wl rQ + scan e_ Sha O Am �o oa' i too �- qt�d Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signatur . Date: 05103101 Continued y Facility Number: VO — Date of Inspection 0 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? El Yes .�'No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? El yes E9 114V 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) $ Yes --8 Nu 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? -Yes-0 big 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? d es—E�mt Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Vielt O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number $(► 23 Date or Visit: 1/16/20U2 Time: 0945 to Not Operational Q Below Threshold E3 Permitted E Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... Farm Name: StleJ,lhlrAtSDUArY.. Owner Name: Kealth....................................... &cpjjm............ Mailing Address: AQ.aAC.Y.i1�33.A?t11Y.�...................... County: S.urjry......... WS.RO........ Phone No:(i.CA.Cb.:320........................................................ taitc..Bard..NC.................................................... MOO ............. Facility Contact:>Kedth.SteFAl9ak..............................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: 33.6,902,92.07 ....................... Onsite Representative: Kt~Ath.51whtR[AS....................... ............. . Integrator:..................... ........ ............................................................................................... Certified Operator:Kdth.L................................. S PhRIMN.......................................... Operator Certification Number: 24 2............................. Location of Farm: Kwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after A )ridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3ti • 17 43 Longitude F 80 •F 48 , 4864 € ; ': '.Destgn Current b ::Wigi Curentn Crrentgn Poultryacit ihCa acit uation Po ulation Cattle 0 ulation ri ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 250 500 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Feeder to Finish € ��I, ❑ Farrow to Wean +: ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other g ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ' Total Design Capactty 250 ❑ Boars .. L,n 35 a1 SSLW{ 0,0 t 00 Number of'Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area][]Spray Field Area Holes dtnPo/Solid Traps 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ,y a Discharees 8� team Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? IN Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6 Identifier: . iiWasle P nd. ....................... ........ ............................................. ............................. :..... ...................................................................... .Freeboard (inches):, 42 05103101'� f `!/. Continued Facility Number: 86-23 • Date of Inspection 1/16/2t102 . -• . 5. Are there an immediate threats to the rote rrt of an of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ' Y g • Y Y ❑Yes ®No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ®Yes ❑ No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No to Anligation 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ® Yes ❑ No 12. Crop type Rye (Graze) Sudex (Hay) Sudex (Graze) 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ® Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes IN No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Byes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes IN No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No IN Yes ❑ No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. C•ommen efer to questio MUOUX131flinlany YES answers agilranygrecommendations or any other comments. Used awin of facility to b e lain situations. use addit' a UNEesiasinecessary : ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes 3. Still getting waste into surface water drain. Discharge into and from freshwater pipe has not reached waters of the State, yet. 6. The current CAWMP does not include waste from the new freestall barn and the additional cattle onsite at this time. 7. Area on waste storage pond (next to parlor barn) still needs to be repaired where pipe from parlor is cleaned out. 8. Curbing around barns needs to be repaired/rep]aced to keep waste out of surface water drains. 11. Layer of waste, 4-5" thick, was noted on pasture at draw to creek. There is the potential for waste to run off and enter waters of the State during rain events. Per operator, this area is to be scraped and excess waste removed today. 14a. The current CAWMP does not include enough acreage for the number of cattle at this facility. 15. Fields below the calf hutches that received waste in November 2001 still have no crop to utilize nutrients. Was sown in r e last Reviewer/Inspector Name ,Melissa Rosebrock Reviewer/Inspector Signature: li�Date: 05103101 Continued Facility Number: 86-23 �e of Inspection 1/16/2002 • Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No f.` it! onaMC, 6m We ntsla n 64I raw 1&0 15. (continued) week, per operator. • 17. and 22. Not permitted, yet. 19. Need to update mortality checklist to include rendering. Per operator, soil samples have been taken for 2002 but results are not back, yet. No soil analysis was obtained for 2001. No waste analysis was obtained within 60 days of October 2001 waste application events. Other applicationevents were ok. 25. Facility is still operating above the certified number of cattle for this facility. Per operator, the WUP is currently being revised for 725 cattle and that the current waste storage pond will be expanded or another one built for the additional cattle. 26., 29., 31., and 32. Questions are not applicable to this facility. O5103101 9 0 93a,4m IType of Visit N Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit x Routine O Complaint o Follow up C) Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Dale of Visit: Il 'Time: Mim rO Not U erationa B I w Threshold Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: Farm Name: County: S t )rr Owner Name: S j/�,, Phone No: (0. 9 a d Mailing Address: � F£vjeo r t Ye, S 1 226 76 Facility Contact: o5 Title: Phone No. 334'' q6; ' Wd -] Onsite Representative: K10 CV61 S-VZO Integrator: Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: a 4 '23 9- L ocation of Farm: Aj _h,kro of' c�le nVOPIO-r �}h . 'Tum Tr on 14)e-1 e ❑ Swlne []Poultry Wcattfe []Horse atitude'Longitude�eu Design Current r L)0 9 d `! J � � awme ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish El Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feedei Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑Soars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacitv Population ❑ Layer Dairy 0 Non -Layer ❑Non-Daiyj In Other Total Design Capacity S I Total SSLW I � SC) ) 60 Q tu �,. �� ::_Nirinber of Lagoons _ " ® ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area 10 Spray Field Area v.. .:..wHoldiitg Ponds,/ Solid Traps �, :. ❑ No Liquid Waste Mana ement S stem Dischar¢es ¢t tre m Impacts , f ICJL Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes b No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other r a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ❑ No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes 'KNo Struct re 1 n� Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6 Identifier: Freeboard (inches): 05103101 Continued 0 0 Facility Number: — 3 Date of Inspection 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an Yes ❑ No immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes NNo 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuetures lack ade uatc, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Cl Yes No Waste Anulication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 1N0 11. is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload tO Yes ❑ No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving cro s diA witJ those des pate hn t e Certified Animal qaste Wriagement P1 ( AWMP)? ❑ Yes No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? '$ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes XNo 1 c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes VNo 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?, b6es ❑ No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No Rgquired Records & Documents i 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Go feral Permit or other Permit readily available? $Tes tea 18. Does the facility fail to have all component o�'the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes Kf No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation; freebearet, waste analysis & soil ssaamplple reports) XYes ❑ No 'r %: 20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N(No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) `B YesRo 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ( No 24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes XNo 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?] Yes ❑ No 113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comme©t (refer to question Explairl any YsES,answets and/or nny recommendations,dr;any'othericommenik �..� „Q �. €.� dam, 'I1sedrawln s of rarity toybetter eaplasitutions(usetadditionalpagesasneces ary) j Field Cotry ❑ Final Notes _ C'umen �� � � � o es not r+��'l u e �o �h eve. not + nc � ode (,1)Q5 �fe fro n'1 n e0 D/V lf)e' «< u rren+ C q uiVe. � 4 Ae. ajd'1 � o na( axis' �.-F-mi If Sit ll a &ra. I nq a.b o ve_-[�t Ca+ 'ed n u+wbb Peo4H Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Stgnaturc: Date: oZ_ ' ! !Continued 14 ! r i=iL� r r i 0 Facility Number: — Date of inspection Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below .1v1 .❑ � liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes kNo o 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? N fA-9-y� M Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or x or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? N f� "-" 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? �KAddition'a`I'Gommentsaandlor Dirawins:�''' a �o 2q j�3 j 3:a . (ue5f t ores a r� n C)+ "P l coo le- 4fi IS bQWL �v �S n Ov LN, -��`-- OJtAV IJ r/ 1 "Ar A s � ! I l F / /4F-AF, a Qlliihf) rl d peryp�•. iFrR/ i 3 3� 1 �T i�tston of Sorl'au(I 1��ater Conser attou ; „ O Otlter'Agencw r ,u• Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection •$ Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Oth�r �tO "'-E1 Denhied Access 'r ��rrlr. % Date of Visit: 9/17/2001 1"irne: I3:00 Printed on: 9/27/2001 Facility Number 86 Z3 -j O Not O )erational O Below Threshold © Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or AboveThreshold: ......................... FarmName: .......................... ......... ............ ............................................. County: Surn .................................................. WRO........ Owner .Name: K61h....................................... NIAI.cats............................ ......................... Phone No: (U.61.4C8: 2.1f54..........,............................................. Mailing Address: 3.1.45. .uc1►. lttl.tt]4..13U.aci................................................................... Vi ant.Gr.o.xe....N.C............................................... 2.M.9 .............. Facility Contact: ....... ...... ............ ..... .... ......... I .................................. 'Title:................... Phone No :................... Onsite Representativc:..0 Tanis..(1texdSxItAUA}.................................................................... Integrator:....................................................................... Certified Operator:.gj0i....................................... S.wpltexts.......................................... Operator Certification Number:14,IJ32.......................... Location of Farm: Hwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. "Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after + bridge and follow to the end. w ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ElHorse Latitude 1 36 17 43 •s Longitude 80 • 4$ 48 °• Design Current �wme Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish El Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish ILJ is 10 oars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 518 [] Non Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity r 250 Total SSLW Number or Lai;uons ❑Subsurface .Drains PresentJJEI Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps I ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharecs & Strearn Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated ar, ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, [lid it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min! d. Does discharge bvpass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & 'Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure I Stroctur•e 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 StrUetU1'e 5 Structure 6 Identifier:....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Freeboard (inches): ............... 22................. .............. 05103101 Continued LFacility'Number: 86--23 [3stte oi' Inspection 9/17/2001 Printed on: 9/27/2001 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tre s, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markets with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste A )licatian 10. Are there any buffers that need ntaititettatice/improvement:1 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type Fescue (play) ❑ Yes ®No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge`? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ®No ® Yes ❑ No © No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comments (refer to question # : Cx �laiti=any YF5 .tuswcrs �tndlot; and reaon>mendattoris ortan ( q ) = 1 y y atherGcomments Use drai`mgs o1 facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as n4cessary)❑ Field Copy ®Final Notes l T , _' _ .. i 3 .` ,i, _ r,—it E 14-i C�k'.1 "tt, •µfs f Y .31 f, .. # 2. Evidence of some discharge from piles of solid waste that are piled in a couple of areas outside the barns. Also, some evidence of small amount of discharge that spilled over concrete curbing. # 6. The amount of waste from the new barns and additional eota,s is not accounted for in the current waste utilization plan. 7. Waste pond embankment needs to be mowed and weeds need to be killed for easy visual inspection and control of vectors. # 8. Washing machine water needs to be routed to the waste pond. ("Phis is the washer for the milk room only). # 18. Mr. Stephens was not present for the review and the waste utilization plan and records were not available for review. I called Mr. Stephens the first week in September and left a message that 1 would be here today and to call and reschedule if today was not � convenient. I also called and talked to his 11 ife this a. in. to remind Mr. Slo hens I would be here today. Cont. P. 3 erlInspector Name Rocky I)itrh:rni [Re:viiewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 9" -7-0/ O5103101 v Continued Faciilify Number: 86--23 of Inspection 9/17/2001 Printed on: 9/27/2001 Odor Issues 26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals seed storage bins I'ail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No Additional Comments.antl or Drawings: # 21. Need to designate a operator in responsible charge for the facility. I left a designation form to send in to Raleigh. # 25. Facility is still operating above the certified number of'cattle f)i• the facility. Cattle should be reduced to the original number until the facility can be certified and the waste plan updated for the additional. cattle. Received a NOV from the DWQ for this violation last year and this year cis well. Questions were left blank that could not be ansivered due to no records being available during the review. 05103101 Division of Water Quality WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE DATE: TIME AM PM DID CALLER ASK TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS? Yes A No^ (if yes, skip to'DIRECTIONS) NAME OF CALLER: Tin T Qdm � S S fjl 1 Ur r v CO 336 -R6 7V ADDRESS: i yb UCOLC Ut e.o_� r a - e ° , r"� C' S.62 2 ]�� 1`i 5 ergs TELEPHONE NUMBER: DIRECTIONS: SOURCE OF POLLUTION: r COUNTY • :DU NATURE OF CALL: Y` SUh��� Ll 0 REPORT REFERRED TO: IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN: 19416 COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY: 5 0e , '39 �) !� ✓I�u-�-02� ���t��t ��o iu�i ba D�c�4) cj� 3//�a/. ✓2�=1Y,=�.-C.t-0'� � L-�c�ra0 !� /cam . &;ed -A6ut &-XY-160, �ic�L.�ttF.J�LGo.v�wG�baadz.-tiLad �vex�.ed Ze 'op "51--11161 Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access FFacility Number 8b 23 Date ur visit: 5/10120t}1 Time. 0915 Printed on: 5/25/2001 0 Nnt O erational O Below Threshold 13 Permitted ■ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... FarmName: StarRift:xts.tZaiU'y............................................................................................. County: S.Ur'.y................................................... WSR.() ..... Owner Name: Kelill....................................... step em.................................................... Phone No: Q3.Ct1.3.66 UQ..................................... Mailing Address: i.4Q.LalCtArm.Drin.......................................................................... Scatte..t;aad..N.................................................... 20.6:I.6............. ..Title• Phone No: Facility Contact: veilZlll.Stet?lalvtlS............................................................................................................. ............. OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:................................................ Certified Operator:KrAth.Sitepitew............................................................................... Operator Certification Number:.... Location of Farm: 4wy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after )ridge and follow to the end. w ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 17 43 Longitude SU • 48 48 Design Current Design Current Design Current ine Ca acit P.o ulation Poultry Ca acit P.o ulation Cattle Ca acit 1?o ulation Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-DairyFarrow to Wean rBoars Farrow to FeederFarrow to Finish Ttl DiCacity 250Gilts Total SSLW 350,000 Number of Lagoons ® ❑ Subsurface Drains Present C7 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Holding Ponds /Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discha[M.. Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Was Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: .....Was:te.Fomd...................................................................................................................................................................................... Freeho.trd (inches): 60 05103101 Continued Facility Number: 86-23 Date of Inspection 5/10/2001 Printed on: 5/25/2001 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, []Yes ® No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑Yes ®No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public stealth or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ® Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No 12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No Reguired Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ® Yes ❑ No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ® Yes ❑ No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ® Yes ❑ No 113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Field Copy ® Final Notes . Waste structure looks better. Some repairs have been and still need to be made. Grading and straw noted. _ 8. and 27. Exterior lots (not allowed per the CAWMP) were still being used and were denuded. 9. Marker still not correctly set. 3. (Old form #25) Today's inspection was a result of an annonymous complaint call received by the Surry SWCD 5/9/01 which was eported (as required) to the WSRO DWQ. The complaint alleged overapplication of animal waste on the field behind the trailers at the farm. Today's inspection was unannounced and operator was not on site. Left field copy of this report in the office in the milk barn. 24. and 25. (Old form #26 and #27). Facility is still operating above certified number of 250. 464 total dairy cattle were counted on site today. Of this total, 336 dairy cattle were being confined, and 128 were on unanvroved exterior lots. � Reviewer/Inspector Name �Meli Xa Rosebrock Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Date: .� OSIO3101 Continued I* C y Number: 86-23 a of Inspection 5/10/2001 � Printed on: 5/25/2001 .Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No SWCD Staff were also present during the inspection. �&l W 05103101 Type of Visit Vcomptiance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason far Visit O Routine 14Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Date of Visit: d Time: Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold [] Permitted OfCertified0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................ Farm Name: .........'i��C:................................................................ .. County: ... sv.Y i.-.y//................. ....................... Owner Name:.... ,�-e .........5 f ��.............................................. Phone No:...........:��..1r✓...... 1....6-:............... . 22120....... Facility Contact: ...l.�-Cd }........: ,..�.....Tttic• Phone No :.................................................... .............................. C .................................. Mailing Address:............1....T..a.......`....................v".".............!...�.�� h �!.:.� .....n....h... ....° 6... ............ Onsite Representative: ................f integrator:.................. Certified Operator:... ?j '�.,..�1. � Q.......................................... Operator Certification Number: ...... Q�...."......................... Location of Farm: ❑ Swine ❑ poultry Swine Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �'� I__RT C._.L_I" Longitude ®0 Design Current Canacitv Pnoulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer Dairy ❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design :Capacity Total ss ' W , i' O C) Number of Lagoons' 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Holdtgg Ponds / Sohd Traps ' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharees & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? 9s^ ''❑ Yes No ZV ❑ Yes []No ❑ Yes ❑ No d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes (dNo 01/01/01 Continued Ilk,, 6 Facility Number: _ �' of Inspection O 0 30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface 6f the lagoon? 32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipc or a permanent/temporary cover? Printed on: 1/4/2001 [] Yes WNO ❑ Yes kNo 0 Yes kfNo ❑ Yes ONO 113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Field Covv ❑ Final Notes Ltd- a Owd O ` 7 ;�tz %-U O# c l /j t (. R7 • 1 44,E 1 Reviewer/lnspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Date: 01/01/01 Facility Number: — � Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? A Spillway ❑ Yes XNo Structure 1 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: 11.E ���r��rl�t ............................... Freeboard(inches) ........... ......�................................................ ................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, (] Yes No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure ❑ Yes �No plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? V1 Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? 4Yes ❑ No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes Po 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes A No 17. Are rock outcrops present? 3 *so--E3-No 18, Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown -E5-Y ❑-No ❑ On -site ❑ Off -site Required Records & Documents 19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? o 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No 22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No 23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No 24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No 25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? Yes ❑ No 26, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑ No 27, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? , Yes ❑ No Odor Issues I 28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �[ No ��� 0110I/01 Continued Type of Visit QQ Compliance inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 8ti 23 D.11V of Visit: 3/13/20l}1 ' ima: 1310 O Not O erational 0 Below Threshold Q Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................. Farm Name; 19 W. AirY..................... County: su rry. WSW....... OwnerName: Kelltb....................................... SIP.Pitcus .................................................... Phone No: 1L 1. fil-....................................................... Mailing Address:.t4R1Akt~ykw..t?lraxC........................................................................... SJ;A1c.R9ad..NC .................................................... Z$6716 .............. Facility Contact: Keith.51tiphte.0..............................................Title:.......................................•---.................... Phone No:.................................................... Onsite Representative: Ke tht.Stepittrns......................................................................... Integrator:....................................................................................... Operator Certification Number: CerNfeed Operator: Litt . 3eA xl�................................................................................ I? ............. ......... ........ Location of Form: iwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after A )ridge and follow to the end. T []Swine ❑ Poultry J@ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 a 17 4 43 64 Longitude 1 80 • 48 ' 48 66 Swine :�. Design Ca acit - b_� Current Po ulatlon 1Fd�'. '9Cr8� : ,r Design Current Design ? CitrNA K,, ; Pouitiy Ca aci1 P.o uiation Cattle Ca • acit : Po ulation ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 3$0 ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy a ❑ -� Other � •'� _ Total Design Capacity 250 Iot{ 11 �Ik'SSLW - a. 350,000 .,.,. ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish 0 Gilts ELI Boars Number of Lagoons 0_J ❑ Subsurface'Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area Hatding Ponds /Solid Traps �I ❑ No Liquid Waste Management -System Discharges & 'tre m Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated ate [:]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other a. il' discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ®Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Stateotherthan from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No 01/01/01 T a /' Continued Facility Number: 9b-23 40 Dale ol• Inspection 3/13/2001 Waste Collection R Treatment 4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: ......W. le.pS)jad....................... ................. .................................... ................................... ............................ Freeboard (inches): ...............2Q....._......... 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ief trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6, Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12, Crop type Sudex (Hay) Fescue (Graze) Rye 44 ❑ Yes ® No Structure 6 ............................ ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ®Yes; ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No 17. Are rock outcrops present? ❑ Yes ❑ No 18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ On -site ❑ Off -site sAWIred Records &_J)ocaments 19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No 22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No 23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No 24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No 25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No 26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? i i ❑ Yes ® No 27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No Odor m! 4 28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes M No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ® Yes ❑ No 01/01/01 � � Continued • FacPity Nugnber: 86-23 1) Inspection 3/13/2001 Printed on: 3/15/2001 30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit, ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes Past discharge of soil and waste off the denuded, exterior lot to UT to the Mitchell River. AL and #8. Feed and bedding waste is getting into a fresh/surface water drain by the sick cow barn and being discharged onto an exterior I - It was difficult to determine freeboard due to damage on and around the dam. Cows have been turned -out onto the upper, inside e, of the northeast corner of the waste pond and fenced in using electric wire fencing. Cattle need to be removed from dam ly. Vegetation needs to be established as soon as possible. #5. and #7. Dam is severely damaged and eroded in several places. Spillway area is also eroded and damaged. Soil from the new/larger freestall barn area is also eroding into the waste storage pond. Extensive repairs need to be made immediately. Operator has been told of this previously (see 2000 DWQ and SWCD reviews, 2000 DWQ NOV and NOI). #8. Large quantity of animal waste is comming off the concrete lot onto the stock trail and denuded, exterior lot (see 2000 DWQ inspection, 2000 DWQ NOV and NOI). #9. Marker is still not installed correctly. Operator was previosly told that he needed to install marker (see DWQ and SWCD reviews 1997-present, and 2000 DWQ NOV and NO)). #10. Vegetation in buffer area of exterior lot is very sparse. Need to re -seed buffer area to control run-off as soon as possible . #21. No soil or waste analyses were available for 1998-present. Operator has previously been told that he needs to take soil and waste samples (see 1998, 1999 and 2000 SWCD reviews and 2000 and 2001 DWQ inspections, 2000 DWQ NOV). #2T Facility was operating above the certified number of 250 cattle on 3/1/01. Facility was also operating above the certified number on today's date. This facility has had previous problems with "being over certified numbers" (see 1998 DWQ NOI). Cattle are still being kept on an exterior lot which is not allowed per the CAWMP. Operator has previously been told to to move cattle off this lot or to have the CAWMP revised to include this lot (see 2000 SWCD and DWQ reviews, and 2000 DWQ NOV and NOI). #29. A dead cow was noted near the feed storage area. Operator says that the cow died yesterday and is to be picked -up by Lewis Stevens today. Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector brook Date: 01/01/01 1: 3a p m (Type of Visit - ` . Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason far VisitiRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Date of visit: Time: L — I Facility Number Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold d Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .•..........J..__............ FarmName: ....... Q l.. ... .......... r.............................................. County:.... �.?.r r .......................` 1 Owner Name:..........,l................. .[.la`�.............................. Phone No:...:...... ......`................. ...................... Facility Contact: ... Yli ...........�.Tit le : ...................................... .. Phone Nr+:.............................. ........... ................ laj Mailing Address: .....1[...1 .0........... .I�e. V. ...... ..r �.. v'�� ....... ..... .4q—te— Ro .�..�:-.......-9 76 76 OnsiteRepresentative: .. 1.................................................. Integrator:...................................................................................... Certified Operator:.._I:""`: ...........�„ . , ...........I ........................ Operator Certification Number: .... at3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Location of Farm: AoHli a t f tin fe at- Si,�r 1� S 'burn r I g h art 6 aX 1A)e[ 6mrrn `M• nA2nf 1Pnola-r- Snrt ina Kd..rh lef'-� wf6-16i ;"bJ j] Swine ❑ Poultry QM Cattle ❑ Horse Design ' Current Swine Canacity Ponulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars lode Longitude • « 'Design. Current" Design Curreipit Poultry Capacity PopulationCate . Capacity,,Po Watian ❑ Layer Dairyt ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Other I I r ' Total Design Capacity Total SSLW Zj QQ ';; Number of Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present F3 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps IM No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. if discharge is obsen-ed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c, II'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? �j Yes ❑ No Waste Collection & Treatment I - 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Strucure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Idend Fier: .5 ...PI:iXid... ................ Freeboard (inches): �. Q S/00 Spillway ❑ Yes No Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure Continued on back Facility Number: Date of Inspection / Printed on: 1/9/2001 5. Are there any immediate threats to the qinegrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes 0 No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes WNO (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? XYes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? XYes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? XYes ❑ No Waste Application 10- Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes jkfNo 12, Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ wit those designated the Certified Animal Waste Managemcn la (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes VNa c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes YNo 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes S 0 16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? lee. Tq 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, was4nalysis & soil sa t�i le reports) Yes ❑ No 20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes XNo 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes *KNo 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [I Yes XNo 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes XNo 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes XNo 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Yes ❑ No ,-NQ j+iQla ilgEjS:e dgi e e lies ry re iH`i*g #]hls:VJSjtr • YQ0 '*j1j-1; eWgiye ti 14010 corres• otid6ce: aboti this visit i - - r '; ¢ 1' .1f "AP�CI'U`yk c6mmenis.'(irefe;r to question #) `Ezplaen.any,YFS answers an qr any recommend>rttions oeany other cont>nnents: tyto b... .,a,nee3esar)Use drawings,of facUi etter ex laimsituations,uadditio,7.,i� e ulw- zi J cue -�a=tom rna e ors= = a u - �o,�--haUe_I4en +vs-net=buy--^-,.r �p�;.nora5.r✓ar- o n u_ w a�5 �- rpwi, -4 - 'e; sc d iy s°<<�• Q 1e x[ i�+re-;- c v�� eye—fo _iA- sl� �• t' S t s LL �' E erRnspector Name]er/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00 Facility Number: — '*of inspection Printed on: 119/2001 2LJJOdor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 0 No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within'24 hours? j Yes %No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes A No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes )RVO 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 4�rNo 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes A<o 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill por perma ent/t porary cover') P M �wjw. a iffy I ona , omments and/or Drawings,li-* y VAac��# Jim me k �r ed r s 1 NNW n U � -� � rl b,®t-�►aid►�Oil IMO AI �����fd�a�ie� a ,rs�rME _ �a ioo� PE -'i �'S Com i In r�a ,i�a, . �� • �-d��,o�,n n,}�ur}.F f, :q .: _�a .1� ,off-� .._,r KIT Q - �n s •� .tea-�(�aSS� •}5srf� J �� +flR-i� az o s a r u:aa5 f e. Z�1 Ca l l? i �-j�l � � jNOV ;� uAiex- i or l o - ,► h�i � � � 5 t -1 milk 6FRa a�D F1,16 Uguff-MAN pt ft� 16 1 1 Mwn-m--oegvb� imq-�-)ez �nvVMI(02- T , OI � �t F4 ed c F d y oil 3ffM®y<< pqTeTip,j.�dPro �p-� r�l� type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation leason for Vlslit O Routine O• Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 86 23 Dsdc ul' �'i -it: 3/1/21101 Time: 11t10 Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold 0 Permitted N Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold .......................... FarmName: StQhe.►IsDAirl.............................................................................................. County: Sutrry................................................... .W.S1i,S.?........ OwnerName: Kdth....................................... SUPhats .................................................... Phone No: lL f1. -�tf....................................................... Mailing Address: 31.45,A ck.Shaah.Road.................................................................... UR10.0-Gir xt....N.C............................................... 28689 ............. FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:............. Onsite Representative: Gbrjs[.ajtd.).!'I�.t'.kuS........................ .... Integrator: ............................... Certified Operator: Rc1ttx...................................... Skgph.................. t m.................. ...... Operator Certification Number:... Location of Farm: Iwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after A ridge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 17 43 Longitude 8l} OF 48 48 `' D si n Current'' '`. Design Current g '~ , ;,Desi" u�rent� gn C V P Dula Swine Ca acit P,o ulation Poultry Ca acit Po ulation Cattle Ca i n .:: ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 271 i ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy to ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other 'Total Desi 250 acit n`Ca` g P Y ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Total SSLW 350,000 Number of Lagoons ® ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharees & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other a. li' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin'? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No 01/01/01 Continued Facility Number: 86-23 Date oP Iuspection 3/I/2001 Waste Collection $ Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: ..... Was51G.Fpnd.................................................................................................................................................. Freeboard (inches): ................1.B............... ❑ Yes ® No Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ® Yes ❑ No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑Yes ®No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'? ® Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ® Yes ❑ No I I. is there evidence of over application? ' ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes IN No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No 17. Are rock outcrops present? ❑ Yes ❑ No 18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? 0 Unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ On -site ❑ Off -site Re(juired Records & Documents 19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No 22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No 23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No 24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge. freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes IN No 25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ® Yes ❑ No 26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ® Yes ❑ No 27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ® Yes ❑ No Odor 155.M 28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No O1/01/01 Continued Facility Number: 86-23 of Inspection 3/112flfl1 • 30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt roads, building structure, and/or public property) 31, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Printed on: 3/12/2001 ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes Past discharge of soil and waste off exterior lot (approximately 50 feet) into creek. No flow on the date of inspection. . Was difficult to accurately determine freeboard due to damage on and around dam. Cows have been turned out onto the upper side waste pond in a fenced area. Cattle need to be removed from dam immediately and permanently. Vegetation needs to be established this area as soon as possible. . and #7. Dam has been severely damaged in some areas on the side adjacent to the freestall barn/push off ramp. Area needs to be )aired and vegetation re-established. Erosion is still occurrring from area of newest, larger freestall barn into the waste pond. Area -ds to be stabilized and vegetation established. Spillway area has been severely eroded and damaged when the waste pond is pumped t. Area needs to be re -graded and vegetation established. Marker is still not installed. Needs to be installed immediately. 10. It appeared that a 50' buffer (at minimum) had been established between the denuded exterior lot and the creek using electric wire. 'egetation was very sparse in this buffer area. Need to re -seed buffer to control run-off as soon as possible. 25. This visit was as a result of a complaint called into our office 2/9/01 regarding odor from farm and possible overapplication of ,aste. Caller also alleged that the farm was confining more than their certified number. Dropped by farm while I was in the area. itor had just left. Facility is to go through a regular compliance inspection soon. Will re -check operation again and review records at that time. At least 102 cattle were noted on an exterior lot below the barns and waste pond. CAWMP specifically states that there are to be exterior lots on this farm. :ility was operating above their certified cattle number of 250. reviewed milk records while at this facility today. Milk is being picked up each day and averages about 23,000 lbs. per day. 'oyee stated that they were milking about 350 at this time and that additional cattle had been brought in February 15, 2001. count of at least 271 confined cattle was very conservative or "gracious. " Reviewer/inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signa Date: 01/01/01 Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Date of Visit: 9/27/2000 Time: t3:E10 Printed on: 2/22/2001 86 23 O Not Operational O Below Threshold Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:... .............. Suxxy' . Farm Name: $19phew.D.01 X.............................................................................................. Count X.......... ........................................ W�S�i.Q....... Owner Name: KcAlA........................................SXcphet1.5..................................................... Phone No:(33.61.4.6&Z16.4 ........................................................ FacilityContact: ................. ............................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................................... Mailing Address: 45...u��C.btl7als.ouS�........................................ Onsite Representative:gAt�1.,���D1A�Ib5............................................... Certified Operator:Kf!tJh.L................................. $4909115............... Location of Farm: U nim.Grug...NC'............................................... 2N.".9 ............. ... Integrator: ...................................................................................... ... Operator Certification Number:248.32 iwy. 21 North of Elkin to Popular Springs Rd. Turn right on Fax Welborn Rd. off of Popular Springs Rd., turn left after midge and follow to the end. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 17 6 43 .t Longitude 80 • 48 4$ .1 .far. ' �:.+ 4: 5'^.. WT.' : - yr W .u. t..:d'"k'„ -.p.. k { DesignCurrent , , ,;Design Current y Design f .Current �Swtne h;�v,'fi;Poult ,a may. r�-.� s.., ...�,a ��:.. .•„ a;Ca acrt s;:Po ulation, .� �Y : Ca deli Po ulation Cattier: Ca act I?o ulatioa' ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 209 ❑ Feeder to Finish % ❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ps r r 4n 4 n ❑ Other tY ❑ Farrow to Feeder y ! 1 ❑ Farrow to Finish _'� " x' Total Desigit gxap� ac ty 250 0 Gilts ❑ Boars t�Ti `" TotaltSSLW 350 000 I Br EHo umber of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag(mn Area ❑ Spray Field Area 4ngPonds /Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Dischar=_& St am Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/rain? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No Waste Collection R: 'Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: ............................................................................................................................................. Freeboard (inches): 48 5100 ❑ Yes ® No Structure 6 Continued on back ' - 1 Facility Number: 86-23 1Date nl' 111spectiml 1 9/27/2000 Pri n t etl on: : 2/22/2001 5. Are there any immediate threats to the 01megrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ weevere erosion, ❑ Yes ® No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ' ❑ Yes ® No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No 12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Hay) 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes to No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? Reg aired Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 0:'Nd-y1o1ati61is:or deficiencies•rvtre noted'dart ing•this visit: N6u'will e&i. ve,n6•f4r-thef.' • : corr6' ' idence: about this :visit. - :: :: . ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes CM No ❑ Yes C9 No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 19. Had dates, fields, crops and number of loads applied. Need a waste analysis within 60 days of application. Need annual soil samples on waste application fields. 9. Need max, liquid marker put in and have the technical specialist shoot the elevation. 8.Owner is working to get exterior lots certified for cattle. Presently is not certified for exterior lots , but has cattle on these lots: He has moved his fence 100' off the creek and seeded and mulched this area. 3. Still has erosion from graded area for the new free -stall barn. Owner is trying to get grass established on these slopes. May have to install a berm and slope pipe. 18. The WUP will need to have windows of application included for the General Permit. Also, storage pond design and operation and 1 -w , ._.,..._ _._____.._ __ _- ._ _ . . __ -- __—_._.—_- ­ I--._.. ___- —.— __ - Reviewer/Inspector Name !Rocky Durham Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100 Facility Number: t3(r-23 Da e. l Inspeclinn 9/27/2000 printccl on: 2/22/2001 dor Issue 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged till pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No " t ona ► mmen an iir rawtn s: L 5100 Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation O Other Reason for VIsIt O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Sb 23 Date of Visit 3l30/2000 Printed on: 3/31/2000 Not Operational O Below Threshold 0 Permitted ■ Certified © Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : ................... Farm Name:S19.09ms.Daiu'.X................................................................... Owner Name: Kcilh....................................... swpba,[1.5.......................... Facility Contact: Kd111.Stx.Pb9x1s.............................................. Title: Mailing Address: X.40.L8Ji9.A9.?T.Vr..................................................... Onsite Representative:.Kexth.,Slcphkt 0............................................... County: Suxxx.................................................. WSRQ........ ............... I .......... I Phone No: (,33().. (fin 10............................................. .................................... Phone No: 1►�tlJtZill�..7.4}�, fEO,SQ G........ .......................... State..iiaad.... N.C................................................... NATO ............. .............. Integrator: ............................... Certified Operator: Nam y..Kdth..................................................................................... Operator Certification Number: ZI.41$............................. Location of Farm: t��rx,.2�1.t![nt:kh..aft.>:.Lls,;tnt.ka.lPapulax.S�x�n�s..fi;st,...�:>xtiA.right.um.k'�tx..l�'.cl>�nxa�.li�dti.a�.a£.�npukar.�Fran�gs.�d..,.l►xrn►.lett.aftt:�:...... � falla�r..tkQ.kh.Otad............................................................................................................................................................................................................ ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑ Hor.Latitude 36 ' 171 43 « Longitude 8 • 48 ' 48 :, V Destgn Curet Design `Currents Dgnn Currrent +{ , • t.± Swine , _,Y „�,Ca actt "P.o ulation Poultry Ca acit Pi; ulation Cattle, Ca acit Po ulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 248 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑Other ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ll ` f Total DesignCapactty 250 35a floa �a '' ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Numbf Lagoons L �_J ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Holding,P,onds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System �: Discharees & Stl:eam Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ® Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ® Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? Not determined d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ® Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4, is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Freeboard (inches): 48 _rt 19 6.5- VP"- Continued on back • Facility Number: 86-23 Date of inspection 3/30/2000 • Printed on: 3/31/2000 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ® Yes ❑ No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste ApI�utiou 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN 12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 0: "No yibl;atioris:oir deficiencies•were'noted'd i "ring"this: visit:'You:will receive no fiirther : " ::"cor:resnondence.a�boutthis:visit:•:":•:•:•:":•.......•:":•:•:•:•:•:•::":::":::::::::":": : ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes IN No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No , 8. Need berm around Group #1 barn to keep waste and feed out of clean -water drainage box. Pipe from drainage box leads A' through underground pipe to outfall which is approximately 50 feet from creek. Concrete berm was laying off to side of barn, partially cov reb with soil. and 7. Northwest corner of dam has sediment run-off coming into it from site of propsed barn that is being cleared. Is eroding the side of the dam. rSt erms of waste push -off area of Group # 3 needs maintenace. Solids are running off lot into lagoon on both sides of push -off. Is ing side of dam. Need to cover/reseed pipe that is exposed in this area. ock trail needs maintenance. Reviewer/Inspector Name (Melissa Rosebrock Reviewer/Inspector Signature ,w, Date: Facility Number: 86-23 *of Inspection 3/30/2000 � Printed on: 3/31/2000 Odor Jssues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No o gauge marker. Was removed during pipe repair mentioned in #7. Need buffers on exterior lot (late lactation field) mentioned in #25. and 18. CAWMP and maps were to be sent by March 11, 2000. Have not been sent to Raleigh yet, eed to update waste application records for 2000. No application, soil, or waste analysis records were available for 1999. Cows on late lactation pasture are not in plan. Plan does not include any exterior lots. Mr. Stephens stated he didn't have roan them in the barns. Waste had been applied (verified by visual inspection), to fields not in plan (Motsinger and Medley properties ithern property agreement form was not signed by owner, just leasee.) that berm be extended from feed bin (west end) to contain feed and keep nutrients from getting into nearby water drain. IV `rv, "' :.� J _ ,��� Dav�ston'o�l ar�d•Watero _ ,, I�s�oa ot'Soi! and=Water Aq.iAsion of Water Quality F Y� a eau Other, "ricy`.,- Operghon`e. Routine 7D Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ insp .� Facility Number E3 Permitted'UCertified © Conditionally Certified !ction Q Hollow -up of DSWC review Q Other Date of Inspection Q Time of Inspection I 'J a j- 24 hr. (hh:mm) T �, ©Registered `q Not Operational Date Last Operated: Farm Name: ..... llJ...`�Jl..i.......................................................... County:..,...Urr. �' l ^� Owner Name:.....)E.`'...........1..is.............................................• Phone Nn:...i�.a... �.. .............p��o c 4y �..... ....... 47.T.I1� 1!1.. Title: 33 8311.. FacilityContact: ............................................................... hone N ................ �7tD Mailing Address:... .... ��...5............` Onsite Representative: .... ....v���:....�.`111.i.... Integrator:...................................................................... Certified Operator:,,,,,AAC ,...........-1,.`�'/1�........................................ Operator Certification Number:.....,�..y..�.��............. Unrnfinn nf' Farm- w.......... ........ o........ n.... a .... b0u.......p ....... . :.........v rr�� ..r ......Y>...1........ ........ .................... ......... - ... Latitude ®•=, EZ1­ Longitude ®'6 66 Design ` .Current:, CaDaclty • ' Pooiilation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean 0 Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Cprrent . Poultry Capacity, Po ulatiori,', Cattle, '„4 ❑ Layer Dairy ❑ Non -Layer FrNon-D ❑ Other To#aVMsign Capack . .. °Total SSL ;n �Curri;nt ` a °Nnmber'of I,a oons t, ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area g N 461ding_Ponds /Solid Traps° :_ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System �. ,. Dischar& Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? �j Yes ❑ No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field x Other j t a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? KYes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of' the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes f No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il' yes, notify DWQ) Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? P(Yes ❑ No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or DgI&Ltia) adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes )J�No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes )<No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Freeboard (inches): .........LAS .+ r............................................................................................................................................................................................. 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,es []No seepage, etc.) 3/23/99 Continued on back acility Number: — e of Inspection 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? I ❑ Yes ((Vo (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level �Yes elevation markings? ❑ No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes )(No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes VNo 14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 1ANo b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes YNO c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes XNo 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes rNo 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Required Records & Documents IVNo 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? olk Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with dny applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? viola . OS;O 0000enf •wire jngfe$ ¢tti;ir�g thls;visXt= • ;Y;oO ;wili•t�ee$iye do fufth�e ; corres�6ridence: about: this :visit: ❑ Yes ❑ No P�yes ❑ No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes PfNo Yes ❑ No XYes ❑ No Comments (refe"r to question #)E Explain any YES 3ariswers and/or any`tecomniendations 111 1- orrany other comments i Use drawtngs;of factlity, to better, explain situations (use addittona! pages�as4necessary) # , r3r r� I. CA G) M iP a n M,a 5 W re, � �Q en t b y ma- re h I I z cab a r A, 4 p o rece>I Q!. Cer-76eA Cper-o+er day ha4oah Fortq A La. c 10- e-4A *ioh -Poe ids has n o 51 la .e� roe h-� i n &U �erV rn4-G� 61 Ae, a,r�A n � ,<, m w ih 4-en an e e_ Reviewer/Inspector Name r u f Reviewer/Inspector SignatjAef :�Jj/j ;- '�/� l f i d A� A4 p% h.A-[ r Date: n A 1qf)j An • 'Facility Number: of Inspection 0 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? ON r - 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes )(No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes A No 31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes j No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? dm I T Ac1Uittonal Uommenrs ancitor Urawmgs: s" G ;?. a ; , r �oir�Qs push ofC �-ea nceh /Morin funar) ce--., curo, ruy\vw\� OR �w� tim,c ran b , s �dg-sa �J<4k&C . i oir COU %r, N rvr, :S Z OF p r6 rv, -Ged loa rn 1 Ia, bleed, fie, m "round 0 r6u f 4+t Bo r M4�b Loa* 66� Pi pe. rrbm d - , �oX � e o& - o u--qa 5r� � i-' d ��V� S� iJ e, � P PiS �x�pos�e o .VIA �ed �ran� ��d � � Ka., h4 fece O(raRom o Sr 1A, Inas bV-0 ed on � etd �a� � h lan . � v� Pryf"s- 4 � ��� Pa Sow n ' No y rnAD� Q/L �� d u r ,� 2 �pipe r e o aS. Cows an aS�+�re. Kok Vx 1a►'1 t d . er5 0 0 a Lft �� e� S -� U pdav �asf e- records Facility Number 86 23 Date o1' Inspection 5/28/1999 Time of Inspection 10:20 24 hr. (hh:mm) 0 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated: Farm Name: St!e11hmaS.I?aitry.............................................................................................. County: S.urry .................................................. 11'SR. ... Owner Name: Keith.... steplac ts..................................................... Phone No: Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:.......................... Phone No. Mailing Address: 314S.Batstc.j5hoGIs.X9.Ud................................................................... Uniam.GrQ.xt:.... SIC. ................ ............ Onsite Representative: Mth.'steathco....................... Certified Operator: ................................................... ............ Location of Farm: .......... Integrator: .................................... 26.659.............. .................................... Operator Certification Number:.......................................... >xx....... aridg�.�tmd .tails?w..tn..t�►n............................................................................................................................................................................................................ Latitude 36 ' 17& F 43 1, Longitude F 80 • 48 6 48 66 Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated'at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: Freeboard(inches):.........24........ :....... .................................... ... ................................ .................................... ............................ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 3/23/99 ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Structure 5 ❑ Yes ® No Continued on back Printed on 3/16/2001 Facility Number: 86-23 1) of Inspection 6. Are there structures on -site which are no roperly addressed and/or managed through a *management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Anplicution 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN 12. Crop type 5128/ 1999 ❑ Yes ® No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Rcuuired Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 0: No A61.6ti0iis;ot. deficiencies -were noteit dulring this visif.:Yau;will receive tnti fulrther ; :: correspondence: about this :visit. • :::: ::: :. ................... ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 2 Small amount of waste runoff from lot on lower corner. Waste ran down bank and entered WSP. Recommend speed bump type curbing in this area. 7 Need to mow around WSP for easy visual inspection ( 18" or less). 8 Facility was certified with no exterior lots. Cattle were on 2 outside lots at time of inspection. Need to recertify with exterior lots if they are planned to be used. 9 There was no visible marker in WSP. Contact technical specialist about having elevation shot for marker. District said they had given the elevation in the form of a stake to Mr. Stevens before. 12-15 No application records on site. No WUP on site. Cont, on page 3 wr Reviewer/Inspector Name rRocky Durham Tony Davis Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Printed on 3/16/2001 Facility Number: 86-23 I d, Inspcclion 5/2$/1999 • Qdnr Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No 16 Operator doesn't have application equipment. Plans on having contract to haul. Need to have a applicator agreement. urrently borrowing equipment. 18, 19 No certification, WUP or records on site. 21 No designated certified operator. Left OIC designation form. eI J Printed on 3/16/2001 10 RoI]tlit! 0 Colit piaIII t 0 Follow-ap of MVQ rnspectlon 0 1'oIlow-11p of D'SWC reNIew 0 Ulhcr Fneilily Number ® . 24 hr. (hh:mm) p Permitted p Certified p Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not 0peraiulrla Dale Last Operated: Farm Name: Steprh.ctlsftilty................................................................ ............................... (_.'oum): Sorry WSRO Owner Nantc: Keith ....................................... Stephens .................................................... Phone No: 166-.43.76 ................................. Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title: ........................ Phone No: klailinr Address: .1i45..6uck.SJwa1rt.Road.................................................................... Eiduin-Grax.e.—MC ............................................... 28689............. OnsiteRupresentative:......................................................................................................... Inlc;. ralot':,......................................................,............................... CertifiedOperator: .................................................. .............................................................. OperatorCertification Number:......................................... t-ocatron of ! arok: ►y�..... nx. .sx .. tn.. n...gpu r. ftl:).ttgs. .....uxn..rt t.>an...ax....e .arn. .p .n ..aftu ar.. Rr.togs.. .,.kux�rt. a k.a ker....... � b.r id and.failov�...katl�e.end. Latitude ®�©® Lojigitude ®0 Swine Capacity Population [3 Wean to Feeder [3 Feederta Finish ❑ rarrow to can Ij Farrow to ee er ❑ Farrow to Finish p Gilts 0 Boars Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer 11p Dairy ❑Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 110 Total SSLW , Number of Lagoons I Ip Subsurface Ora Ins Present I p Lagoon Area ILI Spray kicfd-Area Holding Ponds /Solid Traps C� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System )Ise Iar4_'CS .\ ,ylreilln 1111pitels 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a No f)ischnr e ori��inctted cu: p Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other 'I. li'disch;ir-'c is observed, was the Conveyance III all -III adc" ❑ Yes p No b. If discharue is observed, did it reach Water of the State? ( It'yes. notify I)WQ) p Yes ❑ No c, II'Jischar,e is observed, what Is the estlniated thow in galimin" d. Does discharge bypass a la,oun system? Ol' yes. notih, I)1 ')) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other (Ilan from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No WIINtc COltedinn & TITAtmertt 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No S11'HOUIT I S1111C(rlre , tilrllctnre " s1ructurc 4 Structure 5 siniculre !) Illl'11I It I�'I':................. I................. .......................................................................................................... ................................... ................................... Ircchc�,ircf (inchrsl:............ 2.teet.._...... .................................... ................................... .......................... ,......... .........,.................... ...... ....... ............................. 5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No seepage, etc.) 1/6f99 Cotttintren' on hack acility Number. 86_23 I „ • :.t.l: 6. Are there s ructures on -site w ich are �operly addressed and/or managed through aloe management or® closure plan? p Yes ® No (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? l7 Yes ® No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? - Cl Yes N No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ® Yes p No Wiistc AptIlication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No 11, Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN ❑ Yes p No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes p No 14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? p Yes p No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes p No 16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Q Yes M No Required Rucurds & Dociinicu "; 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ® Yes p No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ® Yes El No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) p Yes p No 24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? p Yes ® No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) Cl Yes p No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes ® No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes M No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes p No . Q .o vialations.or i�erencies_were.nate unn�g t is visit:, You. wi .receive nofurther. .. ' t~Oj`r606,n�ietie� a�(?tlt :t�jiS'Yi§�>tc' .... ' .... .. ' . . Comments'(referito question;#)x,,Eiplam any,Y,�ES;aiiswer�s and/or any recommendations or,any other;comments y ; f Use drawings uflfacility to better explain sttuationsu(iise additional pages as necessary): �� 'n kT'Y' ..f .... Mr. Stephens is currently working with NRCS to obtain a CAWMP. Since Mr. Stephens does not have a CAWMP some of the questions that dealt specifically with the CAWMP could not be answered. V Reviewer/Inspector Name Jenny'R'ankin; Reviewer/inspector Signature-. l�Ct ,N Date: 2_7�_qCj 1/6/ Facility Number 86 23 Date of Inspection 6/17/1998 I'i►ne of Inspection 14:00 24 hr. (hh:mm) Registered [3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Opera( Date Last Operated: Farm Name: RRind.Satxt)ttord............................................................................. ...... ...... County: S.Urry .................................................. WSR0........ Owner Name: tiuntald.................................... lig.uAllumd .................................................... Phone No: 3.6-4,37G............................... FacilityContact: ........... I................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:................:.................................. Mailing Address: fit A.B.o x.49........................................................................................... EWA... NC.............................. . ZR6.7.6 ............. ................................ Onsite Representative: jKt;itll.5tt;1.ljcw.......................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................... ............................ Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.......................................... Location of Farm: 1y.,.Zl.NQtttt..a�.]�lkiat.ka.�acpulaxSpxau�gs.�tst,..Tlxrtx.Kig>xt.a>u.karttilb!nr.ttd...aid.af.t'.>tu>a�.Sfl�rAnga.d.,.kl��ut.t�ft.aclt�z...... A ttrida.mtad..lallow..xt? 1hcmid. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... Latitude = • 17 , = I. Longitude 80 • 48 ,=11 ' Swine ign:. Ca acit �P.—Y Cu�>rent Po ulation P e= Current '" Design "Current IN "t�sig"- Poultr�' �ait�Po ulation Cattle Ca acit Po ulaho W. Y P. _ Y P _-._1L__Y ►h _Yh ❑ Wean to Feeder Layer ®Dairy 1 ! 0 150 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑Other ► : rt, Total:Design Capacity , 110 y �_. �� k TotaISSL,W 154,000 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish' ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Number of Lagoons /Holding Ponds L^J ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Central 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field, ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No 7/25/97 Continued on back Facility Number: 86-23 Date (9pectioll 6r/1711998 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? []Yes ® No Structures f l.argons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: .................................... ............................. ................ ............... ........... .................................... .................................... ..... ................... I........... Freeboard (A): ................ ................ ......... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes ❑ No (if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ® Yes ❑ No Waste A 11pligNition 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ® No (if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crap type F..ttiSttiu.G............................................................................................................................................................................................... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes IN No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes ® No 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No 21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No 22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No For Certitied1w Pe-rmitted Facilities Onik 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No No:violations•tii defikie&i s:were-ntited dtiririg:thi' visit.: -V66-will i,&eKe;tiolitlr'ther: -: correspanBence: about this visit::::: • :: : 112. Holding pond dam needs mowing. I `_I 10. Surry Soil & Water will work to install marker. Records at other farm. •t Reviewer/Inspector Name I Reviewer/lnspector Signature: R. Davis Date: „.a.. Divisionof Soi1WaterConservation 13 Other AIPW '` Division of Water Quality 1 Routine p Complaint p Follow -tip of DWQ inspection p c Facility Number Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted Farm Name: ...................................... Owner Name: Keith.Steveus ..................... ........................... Facility Contact: Maxi:us.Radriguez.......................................Title:...... tip of DSWC review p tier Date of Inspection Time of Inspection.) 24 hr. (hh:mm) in Not perationa Date Last Operated: County: Surry WSRO .. Phone No: ........................................ Phone No: (W..)..91o,-.wam ............ Mailing Address:.. 139..W..esxglarr.RoadRoad ........................................................................... Siatesyllle,.NC ...................................................... 2867.7 .............. Onsite Representative: Marrus.Radr1gmcz.................................................................. Integrator:....................................................................................... Certified Operator: Keilh.Shayens................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:......................................... Location of Farm: Latitude ®0©1 ®” Longitude ®• ®` ®Y4 p Wean to Feeder p Feederto Finish p Farrow to Wean p Farrow to Feeder p Farrow to Finis pGits p Boars eslgnf,'= urr.enva, Desi Curren,,, trCapacity Pop.ulation,,;' Cattle Caactty Populatioi Ayer In Dairy on -Layer 1[3 Non -5airy t er �,,, uia waste ivianagemen General I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Pieid p Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? E3 Yes ® No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No 7/25/97 Facility Number: 86_23 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on Ipewhich need to be properly closed? Structures (Lagoons,14olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Structure 1 Stricture 2 Structure 3 Identifier: I Freeboard (ft): ............ l..inch........... ................................... .................................... .. 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? • Structure 4 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No ® Yes p No Structure 5 Structure 6 p Yes g No p Yes g No g Yes p No ® Yes p No p Yes ® No 15. Crop type .............................. lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniy 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? 0 o.vta ions.or acrencees-were.non uring is visit.,. You. will.reicesve nor : further . . �ohes�io�ene� abouw� t�iis vsi::: p Yes p No g Yes p No p Yes g No g Yes p No ® Yes p No p Yes g No p Yes g No p Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No Comments (refer to question #}; Czlilain any Y . a`nsivers ianii/or ang ecomendations orany ether comimeiit`s`Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pas as necessar,,y): T h—el Ronald 1 Southard 10airy was repossessed by the Farm Credit Bureau and t - rilwasi bouglit by Kleith Stevens. He Itas been given a DWQ change of ownership forms and DSWC is helping him with them. This Facility was inadvertently taken off the registration list by IaWQ. The Keith Stevens f7airy needs to be placed back on the registration list. y:a !,he"potd desperately needs to be pumped down. The heavy weeds around the pit she design capacity for this facility is ] head of cattle. NRC•S is helping Mr. Stevens with his CAWMP. �. z .�t xa e Reviewerlinspector Name,ie"' y Rankin Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 10 tcoritine 0 t omplalnt 0 ronow-up of uwt,t Inspection 0 rc Facility Number Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted up of uaw%_ review 0 utner . Date of Inspection 11/30797 Time or inspection 9:30 24 hr. (hh:mm) in Not Operational Date Last Operated: Farm Name: JWth.S1eYen&.Dairy................................:................................................... County: Surry WSRO -t) Lj -7-0q Owner Name:Keitlt.Slexeu............................................................................................ Phone No: H}:. &-5 �-aQ3S.. 1?!'}:.. #?-59Z-211kT...... Facility Contacf: NlazcinRodrigaez.......................................Title: .. Phone No: 4W�:.91.0 36i6-3Q6.8............ Mailing Address: .139..W..es1glow.Road........................................................................... St,atesville,NC....................................................... 28,672. Onsite Representative: M.arrits.R diriguez..................................................................Integrator:.......................................................................... Certified Operator: Keith.Sta.veas................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:............................. Location of Farm: Latitude ®• ©� ®�� Longitude ®• ® ® a >a 1 f irra��l�pnv+Fr agent ax< = CSlgn UCCCn ; L F't f ,+ z x �u CSr nN IirreU qr :e k CSI n ,, -urreri .! r I a:"�Fft'. l�ETr;Ff ; ry:f:r+t3�+r..t,�ir..r.:,rf<;�tt�,.a'f)u..�..,f<j,.;.a:- e l:.r;.;+�tP,, f Swine k i�f w Capacity Ropulatran„a Pouitryik� s f, Capacityr � opulatlon Cattle p Capacity Population , s!y .?iFIBfiJ�a :.$:�'�..F p can o ee er p ayer 11 r airy p ee er to mis .".V p Non -Layer '; a p Non -Dairy Rr arrow t0 Farrow t0 Feeder ❑ t er ,- ,i f. j t h? I e& � 3 Farrow to Inis� ''�✓, f t , :rrTotal"DesxgnsGapactty110 f� l,�S.a,` r�jitf'f 1' j� rrf��'�'j��! gjrr�f.Jl f�p�Y7�{��....�x[�,, .�`+ �`.� f4�"x�f �i•••Sr[`�y�C W1 r. f�l p t;rlits .. .. __.. _ .... ,.. ,�'1� i%Lx�114Tti'34T�Mvr�M f �FQtaK �f �iN T1 4+•Y ' y �,r, p Boars i, , f nj1 &n'! ���Subsurface rains resent noon r@A rl Ie rep Number ot. Lagoons l Holding Pontis�� . pp g S P Y .¢r 7 �f r •r' Y F �'M i �`e 'k�f �t'�"' r� i -''a Z r x �� _ ..... _ h', 1. 4 r " t�r1`r�fr�+•w�nar��'i`M�.'�d'1��t4rv�fEri'.l�i 0 Liquid a5 C Management System General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No Dischm-ge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 17 Yes p No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p Na c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (117 yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? r ❑ Yes. ® No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No 7/25/97 .lFaci!itjuro er: 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on which need to be property closed? Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) .9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Structure I Structure.2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: I Freeboard (ft): ........L.inch.............................................. .............................. -.... ............................. ...... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) p Yes N No ® Yes 13 No Structure 5 Structure 6 p Yes ® No p Yes H No p� Yes p No R Yes t3 No p Yes N No 15. Crop type ....... C.ozn (Silage.&GrJain.)........................................................................................................................................................................................ 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? a. Noyior tons.or a�crencies•were.note raring t is vtst You will.receive no' r er . 'Corres�iojr�06ci 4W10-'.HW.*isii}: p Yes p No ® Yes p No p Yes ® No IR Yes p No IN Yes p No p Yes 11 No p Yes ®No p Yes p No p Yes p No 4 p Yes p No Reviewer/Inspector Name lie ray nlin . 4 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 11 110 19-� i'* p Division of SoilVd Water Conservation 0 Other Adw 13 Division of Water Quality`' 3�Fz. Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other Date of Inspection Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm) 0 Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted In Not Operationa Date Last Operated: 3/31/97 Farm Name: Ronald.South,aim........................................................ County: Surry WSRO Owner Name: Ronald ................................... Southard. FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title: ..... Mailing Address: RL.2.Hax.362..................................................................... Onsite Representative: NONE........................................................................ CertifiedOperator: .................................................. ....................................... Location of Farm: PhoneNo: 366.4316.................................................................... ................................. Phone No:........................................ ......... SU1c.Road...NC................................................... Ufa% ....... Integrator: Operator Certification Number: ............... mn: ..........::::::....................... .& ... .... . Latitude ®• ®° 743744 Longitude ®• ®� ®b esig urren 7- esign ,e.urren .;, Capacity Populations, ,.Cattle,._, Capacity' Population p Wean to Feeder "r E pLayer p Feeder to Finish do Non -Layer p Farrow to can:,„- p arrow to ee er p Farrow to Finis ,a ` ❑ ter ,` ''Total7dWst 3 z � 7 © Gilts p Boars an ® airy 11 Area IQ Npray 1`100 Area I" General I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes- p No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes p No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes Cl No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes p No maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes p No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? []Yes p No 7/25/97 Facility Number: , S _23 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures (Laeoons,HHoldingPonds, Flush Pits, etc.) 9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Identifier: Freeboard (ft): 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? Structure a 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) p Yes p No p Yes p No Structin'e 5 Structure 0 ........... I ......... I ............. ... ......... I...................... p Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No 15. Crop type............................................................ ...................................................................................................................... ........................................................... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes p No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? Q .. o.via ions.or ereneics-were.na a uring is visi :. You. will.rer-eive nofurther. • . 0 Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No Yes p No p Yes p No p Yes p No Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 roifow-up of uwtt inspection 0 rt Facility Number Registered p Certified 13 Applied for Permit p Permitted Farin Name: K.e1'lth.Sleplicu.Dairy.............................................. Owner Name: Keith ....................................... S.tePheus.. -tip or u6wc; review 0 vtner Date of Inspection 11/7797 Time of Inspection F—TFUT—_1 24 hr. (hh:mm) In Not perationa Date Last Operated: ......... County: Surry WSRO ....... Phone No: ... 7Q4-S4Z:210.7..... Facility Contact: Marcus.R.adriguez.......................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: 4W..).:'910:-3filin3.06S ............ Mailing Address:.1.39..WrAglon.Road........................................................................... state5ville'.NC ...................................................... 280.7 .............. Onsite Representative: N.Ur us.Radraguez................... Certified Operator: Kcilh.Sitcph ens .................................. Location of Farm: .... Integrator: ............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ......................................... Latitude Longitude ®•' ®" i 7� ,yr„qa esrgn�:p urren �� esrgne urren esigu> urren , Capacity+iPopulation,q rPoultr'yF a, ;Capacity Popula I Cattle Capacity °Population; : [3 Wean to Feeder [3 Feeder to mts [3 Farrow to can [3 Farrow to ee er p Farrow to Finis p Gilts p Boars u rains ��=�= w. b. -- General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes g No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes g No Discliarge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Fieid 13 Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No b..If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Writer? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rain? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes p No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes g No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes g No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes g No maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes g No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes p No 7/25/97 ti ace tty Number: 86_23 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on thichneed to be properly closed? Yes pq No Structures (Lagoons,Holdind Ponds, Flush _Pits, 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Yes p No Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G Identifier: I Freeboard(ft):..........1/.2..f=t....................................................................................................................................................... ................................ 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes N No It. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes H No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? R Yes p No (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ® Yes p No Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type .......1~orn..(Silage..&.C.rain.)................................................................................................................................................ lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes p No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? Q ....o.via ions.or crencies-were.nn e . uring is v1s1 :. You w>I .receive no. further .: . p Yes ® No p Yes ®No p Yes ®No p Yes ®No Yes I& No p Yes ®No p Yes p No p Yes []No p Yes p No 'Comments (refer to. question.#): ;.E,xp1Rsn a,siy YES:IRpswers Rza[fior d► y,re0inmeudatriinS QM� dily Other Conlment5 "1 ' ' ` 1¢' n - 1 r It ij : €-t.:�'�'i .ea,i ;UseAr ings of facility to,lbetter explain situations, (use Rdditioii�ii<pages as necessar Y83,�r i Storage pond was being pumped down at the time of inspection. The area around the storage pond needs to Have weeds removed, revegetated with grass, and.continue to be maintained. There are a few holes around the storage pond where animals have burrowed that need to be filled. 7/25/97 Reviewer/Inspector Name rJenny`Runkin�" "" 4 T" " ` 13''rt""` 3' W yr rirrr+*rr" �� r t t ij iiti , u i- 1 113 �:�:. .% ....'..{€�� .t,.l.._3 i'.A�a.Ift Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: PERAT I ONK' &RANC'H - I JQ Fax • 919-715-6048 Jul 19 ' 95 IS'. 40 P. 09/ 16 0 SoLim f=Lc4ft A vindor, -- Ijaoi}i!l NtfMb"! (° _0 SITS VISITA'tIQN t}R3n DAM Owner. NS yam Nan= Coanty: Stir Asont Visiting Slux v' 01 tar. PhOW: aR 3ttt Repr=cnt4va: rhozrC: Type aF O;crz�oa: Swinc , _..._ i vuIL-/ C WC ; tts 3 3 l0 _a 17 _` _ �, r�C� o yS + y 'v Type of rn spcxticx;: Cr;a>zd ✓"f ;kmiz�..._.._�,._. o� '74 � Circi,s Ygs or Nc i!f�'.t,1,..:.���:t��'= ' 25,y= 24 hour stom 4vrr�.ot y I .' oot �` � ��n�•Pr`3� .. �D or :=or fac:Iitil.S `'r-WA,IAcM'— 7:412ft:i3, r,JXSL lddras: the R$ooas' {r1 Ca:d under the ec;ln�I:cssts sce;.i►�c. �Itins an OWarvied ► Z!m r.= a3ccI2(S)`6 Yet or; 'a `,Yav on cf U`.o Yem or Nc #s acT,::ua:t larri av30able fez :arid app.,Cubup? Ycs r %%; is ,hc my = cma ;doaaa:z? Yes c.r itiT� ddiu_on 1 coul.Mcmt5; Lvly r. - cma /� a�..e .C�r.s•�,w /s�� �...,1•..M..i._ � ,rn..- i Mull. G�••r� _775 ,i�. F it «� fir' j C 71 •.S �cz