860012_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of ENR
MAR 0 5 2008
� alam
WinstonOffice
Regional Qffice
r
f / /
7t

r ision of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other'Agency' i
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaivation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notiocation O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 86 12 Date e1" W'Jil: 01/29/2003 'rinse: 1030
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : .........................
Farm Name: IY.tomatAlia Yid.-Dalry.......................................................... ... County: S.0 rxy.................................................. W5RQ........
.... .................
OwnerNance: My -Ray ................................ Badges ........................... ........ ..................... Phone No: M - ,52..7.:Az...........................................................
MailingAddress:r.1�b.Rd<................................................................. .. ......................................................... 27M ..............
Facility Contact: MItit,,HadgeS...............................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: ........................
Onsite Representative: jUgift y.HtldZes............................................................................ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of li arm:
Operator Certification Number:_
1S Hwy 52 north to I-74 west to US Hwy 89 exit. Turn left at end of ramp and follow to Beulah Church Rd. and turn right. +
+arm is on the left. Danny's address is 125 Boone Trail, Low Gap, NC 27024
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 36 • Longitude 86 •F 477, 11
Design Current
Swine Canneity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 10 Dairy 218 30
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 218
Total SSLW 305,200
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier; .......New-WSP........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches); 144
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 86-12 1 Date of Inspection 0112912h03
5. Are there any immediate threats to the int drity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other, than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
s`
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[]No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
Questions left blank are not applicable to this facility and/or this visit.
+
7. New waste storage structure looks great. Dam and surface water ditch are to be seeded as soon as weather conditions permit. See
attached photos.
16. Facility does not have a "honey wagon." Is looking into getting one. Facility has capability to irrigate waste if needed,
This visit was to follow-up on closure of lower solids basin and lower waste storage structure, "These have been closed per NRCS
standards. No water quality concerns were noted during today's unannounced visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meli a Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:- Date:
05103101 Continued

. -Ai
ly
29_- 2003 �QO �
-- -

16_.
i.jl w;_ a4� `j„ �2r ��`��" ,'�.>' ..-•_"''5� •`.-, j :ice �'
•r

IType of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lag" Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Sis 12 fDatc ol, Visit: t31i812002 I'uuc: 1t00
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
O Permitted U Certified © Conditionally Certified NRegistered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.................
Farm Name: 1l QLWtAin..Y.kW.D.A1y........................... ............. ,............. ....................... .. County: 5.virry ................................................. W'SRQ........
Owner Name: R l y..RAY ............................... JlQdg6 .......................................................... Phone No: 336:!3,5j:,47.42............................... ............................
Mailing Address: 223.Z.CRj;9 h.G ztic��►. s.................................................................. LO.W.GaNC ......................................................... 279 4............. Facility Contact: Vaw,Ho.dgi*...._....................:................Title:................................................................ Phone No::, . .p. .......Jr. ..�........ r C
5v
Onsile Representative: H y, g;,q ;, �' , ... Integrator:
Certified Operator :.. ......... ... k ............ ...� ....... ..�................. Operator Certification Number:...,.,........... � . ...- .
Location of Farm:
US Hwy 52 north to I-74 west to US Hwy 89 exit. Turn left at end of ramp and follow to Beulah Church Rd. and turn right. A%
Farm is on the left. Danny's address is 125 Boone Trail, Low Gap, NC 27024 T
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 ' 29 ®�� Longitude SO • 47 . 11 .4
' ,
DesiIty
"Current
tea;
h si .A . �,,R� t o
Design Current Desrgn Current
`t. �. „Ms.�
Swinei.
P.o ulatiiin
1?nultry Ca acit P,o ulatian Cattle -up po ulationr
❑Wean to Feeder
❑ L yer ® Dairy 218 30
a, ❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer ❑Nan -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
} ❑ Farrow to Feeder
Other -
��� Totat Design Capacity 218
, A;
f.
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
TotatSSL'W 305,200
_r
Boars
::;.. Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoaa Area ❑Spray Field Area
-" Number of La Dons WE-2-No
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps Liquid Waste Management System
r ism.
Discharaes & Stmam Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste -Co.11-ectionSte, Trtatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: W=e.pond
Freeboard (inches): 18
05103101 Continued
rJDd; 3 V>% /

Facility Number: 86-12 4p Date of Inspection 8/28f2002 •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Pasture
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records_&_ Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
3. Earthen wall between freshwater and parlor waste ditches has been built-up since last visit. Cattle have also been fenced from the area
to allow vegetation to establish. Soil has been added to the lower corner of the waste storage pond to help contain heavy rainfall. Waste
was not in danger of entering waters of the State on today's visit.
5. No severe threats on today's date but operator will still need to maintain the dam on the waste storage structure and earthen divider
that seperates freshwater ditch and milk parlor waste ditch.
6. Per operator, a design for a new waste pond has been done and Surry SWCD is to lay out the design next week.
16. Facility does not have an irrigation gun yet to apply waste correctly. Operator is supposed to have irrigation system installed by this
winter. Operator was instructed to install anoroariate gun prior to oumoine attain.
Reviewer/Inspector Name jMeli Ros hrock e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: 6a�
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 86-12 I*if Inspection 8/28/2Q02 .
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Odd It o` ` [ •omirien Tan �orl�.ra4gs:
24. The purpose of today's visit was to document that the waste storage structure was not overflowing and that parlor waste was not
AL
entering a freshwater ditch that flows to waters of the State. Another complaint was.received by DWQ about two weeks ago. The
repairs made since the last inspection are a temporary solution only. Facility may need to be checked until the new waste storage
pond and irrigation system is installed.
Questions that were left blank were not aplicable to today's visit and/or this operation.
05103101

W A r,�- Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O�� I William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
IQ North Ca partment of Environment and Natural Resources
• � Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
> Division of Water Duality
O `C
July 31, 2002
Mr. Danny Hodges
125 Boone Trail Road
Low Gap, NC 27024
SUBJECT: Follow -Up Inspection
Hodges Farm (Formerly Mountain View Dairy), #86-12
Surry County
Dear Mr. Hodges:
This letter is to summarize our follow-up inspection and conversation of July 29, 2002 regarding animal
waste management issues observed on your dairy farm in Surry County- Last Friday's visit was a result of a
Notice of Deficiency (NOD) issued by our office in April 2002. A copy of the final inspection report is enclosed
for your review.
As we discussed, there are four main issues that could/are affecting the water quality in an unnamed
tributary to Beaver Dam Creek. The items described below are to be addressed iinmediately and a written
response to these items is expected within two weeks of receipt of this letter. Your response is to include
statements and specific descriptions as to how the following water duality concerns have been addressed:
1. On July 26, 2002, only six inches of freeboard was observed in the waste storage
structure. While we recognize that a significant amount of rainfall had occurred
within the 24 hours prior to our follow-up inspection, this situation continues to pose
an immediate threat to the environment due to the potential for an unpermitted
discharge to waters of the State. The waste level should be pumped down to at least
18 inches below the lowest point on the darn and the waste land -applied to an actively'"
growing crop. As we discussed, pasture is an acceptable receiving crop.
2. After our initial inspection in April 2002, the waste level in the storage structure was
lowered with a 6hp pump and flexible 4-inch hose. The waste was pumped from the
waste storage structure and allowed to just run out onto the pasture on the top of the
hill. Although we did not find any evidence of over application or discharge to the
creek last Friday, simply pumping onto the ground from the hose is not an acceptable
method of waste application. You should consult with an irrigation specialist and/or
the Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District for the proper application of
waste using an irrigation gun appropriate for your particular situation.:>
3. Run-off of sediment, manure, and feed was also observed entering a surface water
ditch that eventually flows into the unnamed tributary mentioned above. As
suggested, the cattle should be excluded from the lot containing the surface water and
parlor waste ditches and the area seeded with a permanent type of vegetation.
N. C. Division of Water Quality/Water Quality Section 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 (3351 771-4608
Customer Service
7 rann F93.7748

•
•
Hodges Farm
July 31, 2002
Page 2
4. The earthen divider between the surface water and waste ditches needs to be built-up
immediately. Cattle traffic and precipitation has worn this "wall" down so that less
than 12 inches separates the milk parlor waste from the surface water ditch. As
described in #3 above, the cattle should be fenced from the area and permanent
vegetation established as soon as possible.
Once items 1-4 have been addressed you should continue working with the Surry County Soil and Water
Conservation District to derive a permanent solution to managing the manure and parlor waste on the farm.
Please address your prompt response to my attention at the address listed on this letterhead. If you have any
questions, please feel free to contact me at 336.771.4608 ext. 265.
Sincerely,
Melissa Rosebrock
Water Quality Specialist
cc: DWQ - Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District
Marlene Salyer — DSWC WSRO
-ins alem.Regional_Offfice_Fi cility Filest
Central Files

Facility Number $( 12 Uate ut' Yitiil; 7R6J2002 Time: 12ott
Q Not Operational Q Below 'Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: •....•..:................
Farm Name: MARtaijaNi9H.Dalr. .............................................................................. County: S.urxX............................................,... IYiS Q........
IY�
OwnerName: Eft-RaY ............................... Ho.dw........................................................ Phone No: 33.631Z47.42.......................................::.................
Mailing Address: 22.�11t1t9th.Glltu[fClt.did.................................
Facility Contact: Dat7:D,X.HQdges...............................................Title:
..... Ltaw.GAP..N.0......................................................... VAN .............
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: D.anjay..ajad.D11Jy..Ho.dgcs....................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:...........................................
Location of Farm:
[2 miles west of Mt. Airy -Hwy. 89 west to Beulah Church Road, take right 1 1/2 mile on left. Danny's address is 125 Boone
Frail, Low Gap, NC 27024
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3b • 29 < 3464 Longitude. 80 • 47 & 1166
..:
Dust n Cu"rr'ent "
g
,
Design Current ,Design Current, ,
;5M 5
bap.itIP lion Poultr.Y
Ca acit Poul ton,
i..Ca" actt d. P,o ulation:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
®Dairy
218
30
P.4:
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean.
'
❑Other
- - -
'''" T,otal Design
,- ,
Capacity
�" � �' �N�
❑ Farrow to Feeder
i
❑ Farrow to Finish
228
Gilts
�. '
k.. �,
TotaltSSLW
305,200 J.
❑ Boars
693
Li�
Number of Lagoons 0�
❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lal;unn Area
❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps r__
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar'hes _& Stream Impimts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other _
it. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. [f'discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass it lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6-
Identifier: .....1i`1r;aae.,Pandt.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 6
05103101 7,,/ fq Izl_,� Continued

Facility Number: tab-12 Date III' Inspection 7/26/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plea? El Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
'4 ast ° Anplivation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Grass Pasture
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14_ a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
t6.
is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
® Yes
❑ No
Required &,ids & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 1❑
Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. use ndditional ages as necessary : ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
3. and 8. Are getting run-off of sediment, feed, and waste into a freshwater ditch which flows into waters of the State. Also, there is the
potential for the waste from the milk parlor ditch to mix with the surface water run-off ditch. Suggest fencing cattle out of pasture where
itches and drains are located and re -grading earthen wall between freshwater ditch and milk parlor ditch. Need to re -seed area, too.
4. Waste storage pond waste needs to be pumped immediately and land applied to a receiving crop (pasture). Lowest point on dam_is
next to a freshwater drainage ditch which leads to waters of the State.
7. Need to remove solids from waste structure and land apply. Suggest enlarging current waste structure or building new one. Per
operator, he is working with Surry SWCD regarding money for enlargement of current waste structure, a new pond, and/or irrigation. Are
Igetting a large amount of surface water into the waste storage structure.
sr
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'Mel' a Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: .
y
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 86 112 nt' Inspection 7lZ6/2tf02
I & 0
( dnr Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
' tooti •otiitrit;nts titi or raw rigs:
16. Waste pond is being pumped down with a 6hp pump and allowed to just run out through the end of a 3-4 inch flexible hose onto
the ground on pasture land adjacent to the waste pond. Need to install a type of nozzle or gun to try to keep the waste water from
being applied too heavily in one area.
24. Need to re -check this facility regarding fencing and irrigation nozzle. Need to check waste levels in pond until a new pond/tank
is installed or the current pond is enlarged.
05103101

.: -1� ---� �.
s��;
_- -_

•
April 29, 2002
Melissa Rosebrock
DENR Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, NC 27017
Dear Ms. Rosebrock,
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of ENR
MAY 0 2 ZJ02
Winston-Salem
Regional 00100
We plan to take the following actions to address the concerns outlined in a letter dated
April9, 2002. At no time has the waste holding pond overflowed, We started milking in
March, 2001 and no liquid has ran out of that hole. What was observed in the two
corners was material that was dug out of the pond. No feed or hay has been put in the
holding pond.
Surry Soil & Water has come out and think we will be able to get some money for an
irrigation system. They won't know if additional funds will be given to them until July or
August. They have suggested adding 20 feet length to the holding pond and damming 2
feet around the lower side, This will take care of the 1 1/2 foot freeboard required by the
state. The Soil & Water people want to do some figuring on volume and location of the
hole.
Let us know if this does not address the concern that you have.
Thank you,
Danny Hod s
Hodges Dairy

a
REC, E'VFC}
N.C: Deapt. of EF
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CbewLstry Laboratory Report I Water Quality SAMPLE TYP'APR- 1 8 2.002
W❑ E Al �I
COUN-!Y SURRY PRIORITY
FJVER BASIN : AMBIENT QA STREAM Fj,
REPORT TO : WSRO Regional Ofita COMPLIANCE Xa CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE �� f f i
Outer - � EMERGENCY VISIT ID � ESTUARY ��..//
COLLECMR(S) : M ROSERROCIC_ 2
Lab Number 2W I797
Date Received: 2/25/2002
Time Received; 9;45 AM
Received By HMW
Ih
DatarRcicascd : AR
Datc Reported: 4/16/2002
Esdmated ROD RatW: Station Lotatina: DISCHARGE SITE WASTE STORAGE POND
Seed: Cblorbsated: Remarks:
Islaw bate Beth (y)-lmmldd) Dote End (yylmmtdd) Time Betln Time End I Deptb - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A, Fl, L Compmile-T, S, B Somple Type
20020325 1 1 1200
X
DOD310 ax 140G m /L
COD High 340 M&IL
COD Law 335 L
Caiiform: MF Fecal 51616 / 100ml
Colirorm: MFTotal315W /loom,
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Few Suep 31613 /10Dmt
Residue. Total 500 m /L
Volatile 505 L
Fixed 510 - m L
X
Residue: Suipmded 530 ftlillf JC> 160 m L
Volatile 535 m
Fazed 540 m L
H 403 units
Aci4ty to pH 4.5 436 mg1L
Addity to PH 8.3 435 /L
AWlinity to p1l 8.3 415 m /L
a]Wty to Eli 4.5 410 m L
680 nWL
lTu*&ty 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/ I00 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m /L
Chi a: Tri 32217 u /L
Chi w Corr 32209 u L
Phm h -n a 3220 u /L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color (H) 83 ❑H= C.U.
Caton. pH 7.6 62 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride 951 m L
Formalde de71W m L
Grease and Oils 556 L
Hardness Total900 m /L
Slydfic Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 39260 rn L
Phenols 32730 u /L
Sulfate 945 L
Sulfide 745 m /L
Boron
TanI & Upun u L
HexavalentChromium u L
X
NH3 asN610 O
9.4
m L
X
TKN an N 625
57
m L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.02
m L
X
P: Total as P 665
20
m /L
PO4 as P 70307
m /L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m /L
K-Potassium
m L
Cd-Cadmium 1027
u L
CrChromium:Total 1034
u /L
Cu- Copper 1042
u L
Ni-Nickel1067
u L
Pb- Lead 1051
u L
Zn- Thee 1092
o L
V-Vanadium
u /L
A -Silver1077
u L
A€-Aturnmum 1105
u /L
.
St- Beryllium 1012
u L
Ca-Calrium916
m /L
Co. ColnAt 1037
u /L
Fe- [ran 1045
u /L
Li -Lithium 1132 u /L
M -Ma ium921 m L
MnMa nest €055 u L
Na. Sodium 929 m L
Arscnic:Total1002 u L
Se- Selenium L 147 WL
Hg- Mawry 71900 u L
6a_Ilarium u /L
OTganocKlorine Pesticide
Organophosphorus Ptsticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/Neurral&Acid Extractable organics
TPH Diesel Ra
Purgrable Organics (VOA bottle 'd)
TPI€ Gasoline Range
TPH/STEK Gasoline Ran
Phytoplanktan

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM iDM11
COl1N* -S
V r r
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN
❑AMBIENT
❑COMPLIANCE�eo
❑ EMERGENCV
❑ QA
CHAIN
Y
EFFLUENT
❑ LAK❑ INFLUENT
❑ STR;ODY
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO WIRID WSRO S
AT BM
Other
Shipped by: Bus le . Staff. Other
Far Lab I1ae ANI_V
Lab Number: :4l/�,��� _
Date Received:` �l)3oR p Tfine: D /
Rec'd by; �ihl/liI From: Bus ouxa Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S):_ F-Qrje b q1S(_ ice— \
Estimated ROD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65 40.130 100 plus STATION LOCATION: iSGh e. �� LDS ��� r Po n
Seed: Yes ❑ NoIV Chlorinated: Yesid No ❑ REMARKS:
5tatian # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) I Time Begin I Date End Time End Depth DM DR DBM Value Type Composite Sample T e
O Z �� a� of . f OZ 03 a 101. o A H L T S 8 C G GNXX
1
RODS 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/l
3
COD Lour 335 mg/1
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
5
Coliform: MF Total 315M /IOOml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /IOOml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
58
esidue: Total 500 mHA
9
Volatile 505 mg/l
10
Fixed $10 mgA
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4S 436 mg/l
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/l
17
Aikalinity to PH 8.3 415 mgA
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mgn
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color -,(PH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 62 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mgA
Formaldehyde 71890 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Conti. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ugA
Sulfate 945 rtG/1
Sulfide 745 mg/)
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
N as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
Total as P 665 mgll
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/i
Cd Cadmium 1027 ug/l
Crthromfum:Tota11034 ug/I
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NI-NlekeI 1067 USA
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zir-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag-Sliver 1077 ugA
Al Aluminum 1105 ugA
Be-Serylilum 1012 ugA
Ca -Calcium 916 m9Vl
Co-Uobalt 1037 USA
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/1
Li-Llthlum 1132 USA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodlum 929 m!jA
grsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Se-Selcnium 1147 ug/l
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
OrganochIorine Pesticides
Osgarxvhosphoaw Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature U
D.O. m!jA
PH Q /�Q
Alkalinity
pH 8.3 pH 4,5
Acidity
4.5 8.3
Air Temperature (C)
[ -S• 50
0 t O �
l3 e V D
pH pH
2
94
10
300
400 is
82244 431
82243 182242
2D
Salinity X
Precipitlon Qn/day)
Cloud Coves X
Wind Direction 0egj
Stteam Flory Seventy
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/If
Kenn Stream Depth EL
Sueam Width ft.
O.0
3O
5 C_
10
1O � �
490
45 w/ i A a q ti
36
1350
35
64
4
zor

s�
The condition of these samples were not acceptable because (check all that apply):
❑ Coolers ❑ Samples (affected samples are described below)
❑ Samples were not received on wet ice ❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ No temperature blank submitted ❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
❑ Cooler T° reading: °C ❑ Samples not received, but listed on COC
❑ Temperature >6°C. T° reading: °C ❑ Samples received, but not listed on COC
❑ Samples frozen ❑ Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Containers ❑ Improper container used
❑ Leaking ❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Broken
❑ Without labels
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Container Labels
❑
Not the same ID/info. as on COC
❑
Not the same ID/info. as on fieldsheet
❑
Incomplete. Missing the following:
❑ Station #/Sample ID
❑ Collection date
❑ Collector
❑ Analysis
❑ Preservative
❑ Other:
❑
Markings smeared or illegible
❑
Torn
Comments:
Corrective Action:
Form completed by:
unit Leader Review (initial):
NUT VOA
WCH PEST
.O• Chain of Custody
❑ No custody seals
❑ Custody seals not intact
E] Not relinquished.
❑ No date/time relinquished
❑ No signature
❑ Incomplete information
❑ Documentation
❑ Fieldsheet wetlillegible
❑ Fieldsheet incomplete:
❑ Records not
written in indelible ink
1� Other (specify)'CfE c' ,
177
Y
not be
sect.i•ed
SVOA MET
MIC
0
QAIForms\Samplc Recciving\SCUR
3129101dbs

NC DENR/DWQ Chemistry Laboratory
Report to: (/V .S R 0 . Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: 2 W / Z' Y_ Sample ID:
Station Location: Disc,( -Arse Sife. County: $t V-y y_ Region: W S RO
Sample Type: ffJkvLKt Priority: COcx Collector: _ M , jlose_k-pck
Date collected: O zt, /c,3 / Jar S Date received: O ' — Date analyzed: 0 2— / 03 / 2, to
Affected Parameter(s): 6 o D
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑ METALS
❑ NUT ;q MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑ Samples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspaee
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on beldsliect
❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
❑ Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
Cl Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑ Sample: battle broken in lab - no reportable results
❑ Other (specify):
Comments:
❑ VOA
❑ PEST
❑ SVOA
Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure — no reportable results
❑ Analyst error — no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ Internal standards
❑ Blank contamination
X QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
Cl SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
❑ Insufficient sample volume
0. 2,r ' 0. 2. Y ,,, vai�s
Corrective Action:
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date: _I 1.
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until:
Xt Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used: C
Cl Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes No
Person Contacted: Date: I 1
J
Form completed by: Date. 0 2—! O' I 03
Lad Chemist R ew initial):
•rf BIOCHE 0 PEST ❑ SVOA_
METALS ❑ VOA
Branch Head Review (initial
QA/QC Review (initi ): Logged into database by (initial):
QAVFomuSLaborotory%SAA . 10i7y0l dbi

`O�OF W K r9QG Michael F. Ross
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
• North CarDlina�artment of Environment and Natural Resources
� t< Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
= I Acting Director
O `C Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL 7099 3400 0006 9313 7243
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Billy Ray Hodges
911 Beulah Church Road
Low Gap, NC 27024
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Mountain View Dairy, #86-12
Surry County
Dear Mr. Hodges:
The purpose of this letter is to summarize the findings of a compliance inspection performed March 25,
2002 at your dairy in Surry County. Staff of the Division of Water Quality -Winston-Salem Regional Office
performed an inspection at your dairy as a result of a complaint received by our office alleging an overflow
from the waste storage pond into the creek. Mr. Danny Hodges (manager of the dairy) was also present and
accompanied Staff during the inspection. A copy of the final inspection report is enclosed for your review. Our
investigation, unfortunately, revealed some concerns that warrant your immediate attention and action.
On the date of the investigation, Staff observed that the settling basin/waste storage pond had only five
inches of freeboard before waste could discharge over the spillway. It appeared that waste had previously
spilled -over the embankment and that 6-12 inches of feed and/or bedding had been piled in the two lower
corners of the structure to help contain the waste. This situation poses an immediate threat to the environment
due to the potential for an unpermitted discharge to an unnamed tributary Beaver Dam Creek (Class C Waters
of the State), which is only 480 feet downhill from the waste storage structure. Run-off of sediment, manure,
and feed was also observed entering a surface water ditch, then dispersing onto a grassed waterway, prior to
entering the creek.
A fecal coliform sample taken from the waste structure near the spillway had a reported result of 48,000
colonies/100 mL. Please note that the North Carolina water quality standard for fecal coliform is only 200
colonies/100mL. A dissolved oxygen reading, taken in the same corner of the waste structure, was only 0.07
mg/L. The water quality standard for this parameter is 5.0 mg/L. We are still awaiting results on the nutrient and
total dissolved solids analyses.
- .----This situation --is of particular concern to the State in that an unpermitted discharge from your waste
structure would most assuredly cause a water quality violation in Beaver Dam Creek. A review of our files
indicates that you were previously issued a Violation for an illegal discharge observed on November 14, 1995.
Your written response to our office stated that you were working with the Surry Soil and Water Conservation
District (SWCD) to derive a permanent solution to managing the manure and parlor waste on the farm. To date,
a permanent solution does not appear to have been implemented.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107-2241
Water Quality Section Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: httpJiwq.ehnr.state.nc.us
Customer Service
1-800 623-7748

0
0
Hodges
April 9, 2002
Page 2
Be advised that the non -permitted discharge of any type of wastewater to the waters of the State is
illegal as per North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and could subject you to civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day per violation. You should also be aware that the non -permitted discharge of any type of
wastewater to the waters of the State is illegal and is a violation of North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 143-
215.1 (a), which states:
No person shall do any of the following things or carry out any of the following activities until
such person shall have applied for and received -from the Commission a permit therefore and shall
have complied with such conditions, if any are prescribed by such permit ... Make any outlets into
waters of the State.
This means that you could be subject to this penalty even though the farm is below threshold numbers.
Note that, in this region of the state, you must have a minimum of 18 inches of extra storage in your waste pond
at all times. You should pump waste from structure immediately and land -apply the waste at agronomic rates to
an existing crop, or to a crop that is expected to be actively growing within 30 days. You may wish to consider
the construction of a larger waste holding pond or the installation of a tank to contain the parlor waste. These
and other options were discussed with Danny Hodges during the inspection. We encourage you to contact the
Surry SWCD at 336.386.8751 ext.3 for further technical and/or financial assistance,
Please respond, in writing, within 30 days of receipt of this Notice. Your response must indicate your
intentions to correct the referenced concerns. A detailed explanation as to "how" and "when" the existing
problems are to be addressed should also be included. Your response should be addressed to the attention of Ms.
Rosebrock at the address on this letterhead.
Our office appreciates your prompt attention to the concerns outlined above. If you have any questions
regarding this Notice, please contact Melissa Rosebrock or me at 336.771.4600.
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: DWQ - Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Surry County Soil and Water Conservation District
Marlene Salyer — DSWC WSRO
Danny Hodges
Winston-Salem-Regional-WEce.Fac111ty_Fil0
Central Files

' coision of Waier Quality
Q Division of te SoiE•and War Conservation
Agency
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O-Cow mpla f 1 O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
FFacility Number 86 I2 liate of � isit: 3/2S/2�02 Thne: 1035
0 Not O erational O Below Threshold
© Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 11'ta.tn.ta W,Y19.v >l?8xry..................... County: S.uxx,X..............................................,,.. WSRA........
OwnerName: R11 Y.RaY ............................... H.Qd,9PS........................................................ Phone No: 33.6r.352:4.7..4.2....... ............... ,.,..................................
it'iailing Address: 91.1.. .t1l�h.Gltttr lt. 3 t.............................................. .................. ......................................................... Z7.92.4 .............
Facility Conrnct:Wn.ay. aid. B.ttlx.tZ.ayDotif;is.................. Title: ............... .. .,.,.,............. Phone No: ���.�,5
..................,,........ 33.6,3.5132.46 .......................
Onsite Representative: a� y.. Qd �S................. .........................Integrator:...,....,,.................................
Certified Operator:, .................................................. ...... ...................................................... Operator Certification Number:.....,....................................
Location of Farm: _
12 miles west of Mt. Airy -Hwy. 89 west to Beulah Church Road, take right 1 1/2 mile on left. A.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 73670 F 297 Longitude F 80 • 47 11
Design Current
Swine CanaCitV PODUlation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish,
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ® Dairy 218 29
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 218
Total SSLW 305,2
Number of Lagoons 1 0 . 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. 1f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ;al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than From a discharge? 0 Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ....SeaUg,pctnd....................................................................................................................................................................................
Frceboard (inches): 5
05103101 a,s-"j Continued

Facility Number: 86-12 1 Date of Inspection 3125120U2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inte rity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ treesovere erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain)
0- . %L.
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
M Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answer's and/or any recommendations or any other coinm' ents.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): El Field Copy MFinal Notes
ny questions left blank tivere not applicable to this farni and/or this visit.
The farm also had an additional 50 milk goats on site on the state of this complaint investigation.
2. The old waste storage pond below the settling basin has been pushed in and is covered in grass. Waste from the settling basin and
surface rain had recently overflowed and was ponding in this grassy area. Old bedding/feed had recently been piled into the lower two
corners of the settling basin to help contain the waste.
-
rr
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis a Rosebrock
Review erllnspector Signature Date:
05103101 i v r Continued

Facility Number: 86-12 Date of Inspection 3/25/2002
�v • •
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
3. and S. Run-off of sediment, manure, and feed waste was noted to have entered a surface water ditch near the waste storage
structure. The ditch disperses onto a 237'x 18' grassed waterway prior to entering Beaver Dam Creek.
The old waste storage pond was not closed out according to NRCS standards. The dam was reportedly just pushed in.
DWQ staff should follow-up on any pumping, construction, etc. that is done to assure that an immediate threat to the envi
longer exists.
1 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
} ■ Print your name and address on the reverse
ti so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiec
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
i Mr Billy Ray Hodges
911 Beulah Chm cl, ':~load
Low Gap NC 27024
i
A. Signature
r�tQ.Date
Agent
X�CAddressee
B. Received by( Printed Name) of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
s.' If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3.. Service Type
? *ertified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered Kteturn Receipt for Merchandise
C1 Insured Mail T3 C.O.D.
I 4:: Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes j
1
2. Article Number
fi (Transfe_ r from service label) 3Vo6 mA ' 3 7 a
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 1025 t`•M-25W
J
05103101

11
_.. COMPLAINT REPORT
Division -of dater Quality
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DATE:
TIME:
PM
DID CALLER ASK TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS? Yes No
(if yes, skip to DIRECTIONS)
NAME OF CALLER:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NUMBER: -IS -cz
DIRECTIONS: �i(i l! _ TO / % , 27
L mil/
SOURCE OF POLL�UTTION:
COUNTY:
NATURE OF CALL:
7;
REPORT REFERRED TO:
IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN:
COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY:
9

'Name of Stream Description Curr. Class Date Prop. Class Basin Stream Index #
Endicott Creek
From dam at Raven Knob
Ws-II;Tr,H
08/03/92
Yadkin
12-63-5-(3)
(Branch)
Lake to F'-sher River
QW
Red Hill Creek
From source to Fisher
WS-II;Tr,H
08/03/92
Yadkin
12-63-6
River
QW
Fisher River
From Burr''-s Creek to a
W5-II;HQW
08/03/92
Yadkin
12-63-(7)
point 1.0 mile
upstream of the Town
of Dobson water supply
intake
Burris Creek
From source to Fisher
WS-II;Tr,H
08/03/92
Yadkin
12-63-8
River
QW
Fisher River
From a point 1.0 mile
WS-II;HQW,
08/03/92
Yadkin
12-63-(8.5)
upstream of Town of
CA
Dobson water supply
intake to Town of
Dobson water supply
intake (Located 0.9
mile upstream of Burry
County SR 1345)
Fisher River
From Town of Dobson
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-(9)
water supply intake to
`
Yadkin River
Little Fisher
From N.C.-Va. State
C;Tr
07/01/73
Yadkin
12-63-10-(1)
River
Line to Surry County
SR 1615
Little Fisher
From Burry County SR
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-10-(2)
River
1915 to Fisher River
Ring Creek
From source to Little
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-10-3
Fisher River
Heaver"dam^'Creek'•-.From
source to Little
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-10-4
ffFiaher..River: -
Wood Fork
From source to
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-10-4-1
Beaverdam Creek
Hatchers Creek
From source to
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-10-4-2
Beaverdam Creek
Jackson Creek
From source to Fisher
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-11
River
Cooks Creek
From source to Jackson
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-11-1
Creek
Beaver Creek
From source to Fisher
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-12
River
Little Beaver
From source to Fisher
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-13
Creek
River
Cody Creek
From source to Fisher
C
04/06/55
Yadkin
12-63-14
River
Page 4 of 8

1. Vl\ J 11 t+J%V L11 If —VVI%J%1 VV,
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
518 47'30" 1519 1520 1480000 FEET ;521 522 80°45'
3(
13.\`0 403!
,
Billy Ray Hodges
'` li I ," yl,• F. ^ I /i III
1 II � I `�. ��� (ram � •\ , � a 6 - 1 2.
. � ✓mot %� � l
\ \ � rr •��
,
s Q l L1
FEE
fill
it . C\�\l __1\� � ' 'c�try _'1� \` \, � `� � �• � � ' 1 / • • I ' A
1 i'7`+ /y �`, �� I1by �/�% �� \ � � � J� , � .4/ ✓
)1 /1 1 tt:j��r �Y/9tP ��, sposal •f� \, \IV`
�403E
����ff�_('`��.�.��� `fin �--� �� �. t `� ,•. � '� ,�� _ � ' , �;' 1 � ,�( '' 1l3 °
ou
�'�,., _' �• `� i 1ll
�' � "� l � . � $' �� !I �• �-' 19 MF,1P85 � (��i' �24 c\ �� �$ J a � j -.� 2
�ll��/lit C.%///��—�.L�„`_
I� �;i r��•` 71 �li g �/ I I � � ii � ' ��/ /;`. ' � !'�l..f,}/" �.1
s
i
4034
r t
275
,zr\
� oo
1033

For Lab Use ONLY
UIV1510hI OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMI)
COUNTY
V r ry
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
U
RIVED{ BASIN
❑AMWENT
❑ QA
❑ STREAM
EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO F O MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO S
AT BM
❑COMPLIANCE
Kn
❑
❑
Ocher
Shipped by; Buse
❑EMERGENCY
CHAIN
OF CUSTODY'
LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
INFLUENT
,Staff, Other
Lab Number.
Date Received: Time:
Rec'd by: From: Bus-Courler-Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
{} DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S): r-oSeA)nC 1�- C
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65 40-130 I00 plus STATION LOCATION:
�J
Seed: Yes ❑ No)( Chlorinated: YesX No ❑ REMARKS: T T iJ
Station # Bate Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time BeginND",
te End Tlme End Depth DM DB DEM Value Type Composite Sample T e
dZ 0-:5 AT [a:c Z Qj � +oZ.d A H L T S B C G GNXx
J 1
A
BOD5 310 mg/1
40
COD Nigh 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/l
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100m1
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliformc Fecal Strep 31673 /100m€
S
esidue; Total 500 mg/I
Volatile 505 mg/i
14
Fixed St0 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
11
Volatile 535 ma/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4-5 436 mg/1
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 4I0 mg/I
191
TOC 680 mg/1
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 USA
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color. True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADM]
Color_ pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oits 556 tnsA
Hardness Total goo mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 tnq/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/l
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved its P 666 mgA
Cd-Cadmium 1027 u9/1
Cr-ChromiurnJota11034 ug/[
Cu-Copper1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel. 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zr-Zinc 1092 USA
A9411ver 1077 ug/1
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/l
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 m2A
Co -Cobalt 1037 u2/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/i
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 ugA
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mertury 71900 ug/1
Organachlor€ne Pesticides
Organophospixmis Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytopiankton
Sampling Point R
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature OQ
D.O. mg/l
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
t)
0. o-
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1.
400 .
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity X r
Preclpition an/day)
Cloud Cover
Wind Direction Meg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Stream Depth it.
Stream Width it.o3o
1
15 c480
[can
45 V-�/ n a
36
1351
1350
35
4
DMI/Revised 10/86

Report to: My-115 j0. WATER QUALITY SECTION
R.06(?,Vy WHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENRlDWQ LABORATORY (check one): ,XtENTRAL I I ARO t ] WaRO
P;:ge i of
For Investigation of C j
Q. N6
Sample collector (print name)
and DM -I forms completed by:
WA t'JJG�. _L5�'��- l- Sample collector's signature:
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
rL®b_Use;Onty ;'+
.LA&NO `" '%!'•
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
UMBER
or
CONTAINERS
2
`gyp
�jy
S
uis d'bv signs
Date
Time
Received by (signature);
Datc
Time
Rein uis ed by (si i• ure :
Date
Time
Rec ived by (signature):
Cate
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
-Received by (signature);
Dale
Time
Method of Shipment (circle one):
GCouri)Hand-delivered Federal E\press UPS Other:
ecurit Type and Conditi s
Wt
Scaled by:
�5 f- t3r—OC
Broken by:
1NTRALABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
PROEM- B NUMBERTliRS -sH I NUMBER
OTTES � REQUESTED STEM' I RELINQUISHED I RECEIVED - - + DATE I TIME
QA\FormslSampla Receiving%COC form WQ 4110101dbs

Report to: �_ It.�IS�t7l. WATER QUALITY SECTION
Ros�broo-� CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENR/DWQ LABORATORY (check one): AftNTRAL I j ARO [ I WaRO
Page _L of
For Investigation of:
OU
o_, bc6 rl
Sample collector (print name)
and DM-1 forms completed by:
5 3
�/
C- Sample colleetar's signature:
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
,ILabUse Only
ll;
LAB N0.
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
E,w '•3 e9l P�F A;
I
ydty
uis signa
Date
Time
:
Recea
f
D t
o 3
6
Tim
0
ReIin uis ed by (si ture :
Date
Time
Kec ived by (signature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment (circle one):
and Conditi s
ecuri'NoistConditions:
:
WA
EEErie)Hand-delivered Federal Express UPS
Scaled by: 7%aN
+' I . Bose broC/
Other:
�
�
.
•v cuuS Coy ZwA la
LIN INALaADVAtA AVKY t "ALLN VC GUa1VUT
- L10 Useumy
LAB NUMBERS `;.,
NUMBER
ANALYSES ,
RELINQUISHED
RECEIVED
DATE
TIME '
FROM ° ''.THROUGH
BOTTLiES .
:RE QUESTEDy;':
BY"„
BY:
,
c�(!V /�
214491
1 :
r
QuC�
1'17
I
S M,
9.
,
n:
Ili.
ylf
f r Irl r lI
�j�j�L.IFV�
2:
,
AR::.
Pia+
ol.3
,I

WATER QUALITY SECTION Page of�
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENR/DWQ LABORATORY (check one): { ] CENTRAL i i ARVF4,"RO
For Investigation of:
Sample collector (print name),
and DM-1 forms completed b
n ! _ /}
nk
A
a plc collector's signature.
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
Lob Lase Only
LAB NO. '
STATION NO.
S{TAATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
Or
CONTAINERS
ta
Date
D
Tim
D
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
.Received by (signature):
Da' c
Tinie
Relinquished by (signature):
pate
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment (circle one):
Hand -delivered Federal Express UPS Other: f��
IF
c r ge C
Seal b
i
Broken by:
INTRALASORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
NU ERi ' ANALYSES RELINQUISHED RECEIVED DATE TIME
FROM THROUGH BOTTLES +
. ER: B
REQUESTED BY: BY:
I '

March 27, 2002
CLIENT NAME
CLIENT NUMBER
SAMPLE NUMBER
COLLECTED DATE
RECEIVED DATE
DESCRIPTION
TEST
FECAL COLIFORM
CERTIFICATION #
CERTIFIED BY:
HYDRf ANALYTICAL LABORAMORIES
6300 Ramada Drive, Box C-2
Clemmons, NC 27012
[phone]
Fax [phone]
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DENR 1 DWQ
800132
224953
3125102
3125/02
DISCHRG
UNITS RESULTS
91100ML 48000
NC 103
NC 37733

FILE NAME: 5020f-"':HAIN2 (2-01)
HYDRO ANALYTICAL
6300 RAMADA DRIVE
.-
CLEMMONS, NC 27012
TELEPHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
❑ PRETREATMENT Gl NPDES ❑ DRINKING WATER ❑ OTHER
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT NAME
s
z
Z
V
z°
REQUESTED PARAMETERS
REMARKS
PRESERVATIONS
SAMPLERS: (SIGNATURE)
(PRINT)PRO
�L
Q
t
�4'�
rq'LAB
SAMPLE
LATE
TIME
IF COMPOSITE
LOCATION
m
c¢7
a
v
DATE
TIME
w
Na.zS z0
R LINPLMABREMIVRKS:
HED BY: (SIGNATURE)DATE
TIME
RECEIVED
BY:
DATE
TIME
LAB USE ONLY.
SAMPLES 54°C:
SAMPLES PRESERVED:HOLDING TIME: CHLORINE: '' -Ail
CHECKED BY: n
CUSTODY SEAL-
aS
a ��
M
�s -�
125-

}2;-_ FILE NAME: 5020011CHAIN2 (2-01)
' HYDRO ANALYTICAL
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
�300 RAMADA DRIVE
REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
CLEMMONS, NC 27tT12
PRETREATMENT tid NPDES 0 DRINKING WATER ❑OTHER
TELEPHONE (336j 766-7846 FAX (3�s) 7ss-23�a
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT NAME
�
REQUESTED PARAMETERS
REMARKS
WS
U
PRESERVATIONS
SAMPLERS: (SIGNATURE)
(PRINT)
d
��
0! .
�y
f' iE. a Ko e 6rora
LAB
SAMPLE
IF COMPOSITE
LOCATION
m
a
DATE
TIME
TIME
U
Z
Waas2b
R uNQ
HED BY: SIGNATURE
DATE
TIME
RECEIVED
BY:
DATE
TIME
LAB USE ONLY.
SAMPLES 5 A'C: cyl ca-
SAMPL' ES PRESERVED: t%
2.
HOLDING TIME: t/
LAB REMARKS:
CHLORINE:
CHECKED BY: (I`/P
CUSTODY SEAL:

rl
����•t- f 777` .1� s �_ r_ '�,.. �.r _ .,i„=mow - -
.,3. 25. 2002
ram-',' <= -. -'� " .. i � .. 7/'�J � .±`' �>,r •: :.F . re r:. ^: �� .sue. _
.- • - �+ ±.^�i'`,ra ��'�' 't.• �! _�_'_�:� ��i }frJ'•••=r�•.�;r'i3 �..�^ �..r j�:- •!�! =s` =
` � i _ } � :s.�} ". i, � � �; � � r - at VI' ` =; - _.r •.� •may y"r� . ''`. _. : r. r _ '�
^�ni+,t' .i•.• y ,l��.y. M r, • i • : -.� , r*r r ,' � '_ : , - • f t' f' - ' �` - '�' -.. -
- ..� �✓ a c4' :�� ',S'/• .•,� .ri �'-�` { �'"rc. '= tea. 7 �:i .'•'r.' p .�- -
.P' �: �'L ',- ���.'�>g�s(M_i�:.Y'__.�,a,� r- �-Y'�! M1 - ,• Rsi�.tiJ •."r ,._ '
��, .�c'�_•"!_^Y'�:. ��� ti,.ti hz ��`'4�. ••^ •�Y-•• :l •+�.: �. � •ram'-' �,y-
Nis,RZ
^'""`i, �'. �• �� ``rej,-� ,.fir"=': 7=`' _
= �-s �.... y: ?�•W°' .:- : •�°' yam" � • 'KF"w .. � .
I, y'L4(
„y'.�,�n�`%, .,ate.;_'"•', ..•.- ^ z° �'.,aY ,.,� ,� g`� -^r-�, � 1�:� •�--'. - - -
�'=�--� t = -�' �� -,�;• ,fit
-.� � fir- � _-� i �_1--...F .-:� �s�: ��-•`�"+b.��/
2-5. 2 0 0 2
1, s': yf" "`r•�•'+� ,p _ :fir .mot-:s;.��'
mil_ _ .0. ••��-• ".-,�L„4. _f'•,�L j
Yrx7

. - _ -Writ• .-�w�jd- .. a
. a t

3 -1
9iS E
..[F.-'9
4�
F
Al
I NV
y " t. 1'� +14 IA 1, r 4 rryye� ♦ </tit;
s

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division.of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
Lisa G. Hodges
168 Neal Road
Mount Airy NC 27030
Dear Mr. Hodges:
L'
Al
C)EHNR
November 6, 1997
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
NOV 10 1997
Winston-Salem:
Regional Officer
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or. more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December It. 1997, in Williarnston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
Sincerely,
1)OV)4�1
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/beth/animalwaste/tempcertfollowup

State of North Cara
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Billy Ray Hodges
Mountain View Dairy
293 Beulah Church Rd.
Low Gap NC 27024
Dear Billy Ray Hodges:
4
000.
E)IFE.
August 5, 1997��
. n
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 85-12
Surry County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management -system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste nanagement plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to S10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level,
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes tem 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
-qiz
cc; Winston-Salem Water Quality Regional Office
Surry Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File .
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

�_
�.�.�t_
:\.tll�tt:+� i'';•�'_iI1�r. �.�T'k::":ii'1+)tl 't�TE:•.._ _. _ _.__ ---
-It1111!inR
-=�./
1_tVrI1111:51!1� �l;.�:oiInw_.1 l-V
I} iLw. _.�"!F 1� '!It.• •' 1:7 )f a� rr .'r' iC'.t' °lt;lt!r
_.....
........
.........
.......
{ U;:tr, �lr ►.nsrlec:+nr: � 6�/�•Q�1,
I
i T,Iral Time lilt 'tntlrsi Spenc )nR2v1;a!v
tmpecrion rinc:udes travei 2nd'aroce-,'sin,;' L---
l'arttt:\ante: 0 ��1V....!.!! .....11A.l.&_..................... ......._................... -
Owner ... (1ZIS
G TL Q_I
�•i:tilin' .\tlliress:.�.. j�.`.� �1,i�.�,.�. �rl..—^Ll_.
..•...................I......
:. rtiliss4 c)pFrrat'.tt:._.!�i!`iH'� ...._1�....!^i.r............. ................ _......
._
_............_..-"................
Incc;rarllr :..._................ ......... _....__......_............r..............
.
Operaror':•r*ilic::dun ':umber:
f_-cation of Farm: k-3[ �CA C � yw y I? — - --
i
! ;ItltUtiC 4 _1q I'; Luug!t�ude 70 I- F�2]t F ,0
:l'ot ;?nerad-orlal D-ita Last OreratcCi: ... �.l.+ ( .J........... ._,..... ........... _... ---.._«...... _............... ..........
.....
-C�'Ite of Operatitln and T)esi-2-1 t":1il_tcity
Swine i�lsm�ier ... I'�1litry `{u1s11tt:r
1D '-G'' mn to Fe �cler # ❑ ` :cr # F �C Dair✓ L F' eticr CC' Finish l L .an -Laver
� T' ;lrit]tV lc} •:' �.•3.IZ t r i„
:LI Farrow to Ftede-
+� Farrow ro F;nistt # `❑ ;?the i vpe o. L. %estCc `
Subsurfa Dr sent c_ t s Pre
Number of IJagaons ! Haidini�Potids, _ ❑ -
loon Area C! Sprav Fie Ore
m n ❑ I,a Fi s.;
Generni
i. Are there anv buffiers that nerd maintenanccl:mprovement? L7 Yes Q:No
?. Is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation? [] Yes 0 No
a. If discharge :s observed, was the conveyance man-made'? Q Yes ❑ No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surfst:u Water? (If yes, notif} DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) " Oyes ❑ No
Is there evidence of past discharge fmm any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4. \has there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ❑ No
Does any psrr-of rhe,wv stc management system (other than lagoon9holding ponds) rewire ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenancelimprove nent•?
r..—.._.,.....1— L.,,•�.

6. Is facility not in compliance with anyWcable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility `ail :a have a certi^ed opa:ator in responsible charge (if irspection after I/I197)?
3. .._ :: C:_ 'aeacrs or ;tar:ge ?or.;:s :in nice which nee :D c
Str-tenures f1,a2no_nt and/or llnldia- Pnndsl
1 _ _
9.-,:Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
F:cebuard (ft): 3goon ! 3
1 10, Is seepage observed from any of :he structures?
11. Is erosion. or any other threats to the integrity of any of the sm-ccures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
' 13. Do any of the structures lack adouate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste ARpliention
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of `,VMP, or runotr entering waters of the State, cqy DWQ)
IS. Crop We
16. Do the active crops diner with those designated in the Animal Waste M=agement Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? -
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lath of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plaza readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply wit.'3 the :animal Waste Management Plan is any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewedl=ector fail to discuss reviewftuspection with owner or operator in charge?
C es C No
C `;z C NO
C : es C .•;n
C Yes C No
Lagoon s
C Yes ❑ No
C Yes C No
C Yes C No
❑ Yes C No
C Yes [,l No
C Yes C No
[] Yes C No
Yes ❑ No
C Yes C No
Dyes ❑ No
C Yes C No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
C Yes ❑ No
Cbmments.(refet•;W:questiott#): ;Etplai.atty,YFS answers:wind/ar gay tzcvmineadavnsorany�atfiercoriimeats
-..
iJse drawtngs oEfactliey so better explamasttuaaons'�use a�tanst:pages as aeaessasX)_ ,"a, .�
lit, RAt s,6l4 a« c✓s .�. ; th 4XU?04,'aN of I Q cows *AJ A 9 4
hAby ca l tMSi he- 5AJ;d Ae hod ihro P AM6 OF CO VA'N l" ? ANC Mo&
Anmils , We >vepd OWQ com'r%AM440A1 40 R*Made bPeaus-e 13;11
AA,S'Q NJ,
Reviewerl[nspector Name
Revi%verAnspector Signature:
r
-Date. �i f � 7
C�
cc. Division of Water Oualin,, fearer
Section. Facility .-lssessment Unit

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan a. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Billy Ray Hodges
Mountain View Dairy
Rt. 1 Box 139
Low Gap NC 27024
Dear Mr. Hodges:
0 VA
SOL
�EHNR
Subject; Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Mountain View Dairy
Facility ID #: 86-12
Surry County
E C 2
�: ; 01 iCe
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an 01C.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Winston Salem Regional Office
Water Quality Files �W ]
Water Pollution Control System 7 Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission N'wfvcAn Equal Oppcutunity/Afflrmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number: -/Z
flovision of Environmental ManagemenR
Animal Feedlot Operations
��,S,,itee��.Visitation Record
Date:440AA
Time:1;
General -Information: '
Farm Name: fSl) �4l ]�.� �4rax-y County:
Owner Name: LnMG es Phone No: 116 -- 352 =4 Z
On Site Representative: i t A�� 24y &ag'es ,_^Integrator:
Mailing Address: 2q3 �3r J�sit+ Ct ler•_� _
LaLo6A P _7-702A- _-
Physical Address/Location:
Latitude: 3& / Zq I L.W Longitude: &5 -4-7l /r ,
Operation Descriotiojj:, (based on design characteristics)
Type of :Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals T e of Cattle No. of Animals
Cl Sow ❑ LayerDairy ZOo
❑ Nursery Cl Non -Layer AL
Beef
❑ Feeder
QtherType of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: _L_ (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility n ecti
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes ❑
No ❑
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: 99
Yes ❑
No ❑
Is erosion observed?: Al.E .
Yes ❑
No O
Is any discharge observed? N, e •
Yes U
No ❑
O Man-made Q Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No�
Does the cover drop need improvement?:
Yes ❑
Nopr
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? .
Is Lnunal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AO — January 17,19%
Yes ❑
No�
--Yes ❑
No
Yes ❑
Not
Yes ❑
No

Maintenance 0 •
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes
No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? NC-- Yes 0 No ❑
Does record keeping need improvement? NL Yes O No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? /It�' Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes -answers:- Due- A-0 local s UJIan , moon bras nOA FU6
insgc,�,ed ur, Do,S C"Q in � rtrlCS Cd,rreJ
iA� da r� s T blems _ ---- --
t
Signature: C ,_ _ Date:
cc. Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachn,enu if Needed
ra 'n s or Observations:
-f"f4�5 ��G([.tTz( i4� dllir�Ai. rJdS'ig �br�6
Ar 3;,rrClk "TD T-mv STl✓MsA . 4 .N" da MbC. [lids7a
� d>ae.roe�uT sY572i'T �►s B� AE�[lv�� d•N%,7 DF��2�vt-'�
j�&lD AJP-. j-6 r>64 S ' p eavl 1S rV N&VX7- -fa 13c
✓ j,�rr..16 si'�Dd� 13 0 e0 A-APZ E7V� 7r P:U [.Z .
AOI - January 17,19%

JUL-14-1995 15:34 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
W=mw r . Wlr.' c+r—
Site Requires itai-ate Attention:
Facility No. "L- Z
DMSION 07 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Aar; 1 10 , 1996
Time: 15
Farm Name/Own=
Ls ;� R C 1 )_LJ�es
Mailing Address: _CkjrCk ROG%l 1-01 N1C 7-7oZ�
County: 'Su�� r - �—_
Integrator. Sm, Gc, s v,,< Phone:
On Site Representative: 0 �'l Q �14(3M e -� Phone: Lq i 0 35 Z - Ll -) 4 Z
Physical Address/iocadon: 5t e cc4 c,( ?_��--WA40
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle 1
Design Capacity: _ _ X Number of Animals on Site: 0
DEM Csrrifncation Number: ACE_ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3_� - Z 01 - 31 " Longitude: j� ' �1�' I ( " Elevation: Feet
Circle' Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or& Actual Freeboard: �kt. Inches
1'Was any seepage observed from the lagoons)?NYes or No''�Was any erosion obscrved7,vYes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? D or No Is the cover crop adequate? �& or No
Crop(s) being utilized.
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 1s or No
100 Feet from Wells? )ra-or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(§0
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or 0&
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? (%4 or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
4(-- N= tiaf e✓cfu0ted
Use Attachments if Needed.
T0TAL F.02

7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
Ila 47,3011 519 t20 1480 000 FEET; ,Ilk 62 1 $22 80*45'
31
-31
IF
zo,
Billy Ray Hodges
8 -12 6
e.
kin
I ,o
r)
N
p
Of" Lo
�FEI
7,,
Qj
JIt
G
711
it
x-FIFFIIF"
It.
L 403E
K N
136 A:
140
w od
%
27
N It
am 32115
i U
A— A
L
a.
Ebd=
Ea -
us

•
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
1 Health and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Leesha Fuller, Regional Manager
December 5, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL #P-536 316 620
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Billy Ray Hodges
293 Beulah Church Road
Low Gap, N.C. 27024
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
i
E)F.:HNF;Z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
Farm Waste Management Systems
Discharge of Wastewater Without A Permit
Sorry County
Dear Mr. Hodges:
On November 14, 1995, Allan Smith of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) inspected your farm's animal waste facilities, accompanied by a representative of the
Sorry County Natural Resources Conservation Service. The inspection was conducted in
order to determine the waste levels and structural integrity of the waste lagoon as well as
overall waste handling capabilities.
Observation at the site revealed serious problems with respect to proper disposal of
animal waste. The farm appears to have a old lagoon that has been full for a long time,
judging from the amount of solids and the heavy vegetation in the lagoon. Any wastes that
go to the lagoon immediately flow over the solid waste that is in the lagoon and into a ditch
that carries the waste products to the stream. Emptying,waste from the lagoon should be
incorporated into your farm's management plan so that at least 18 inches of freeboard is kept
on a regular basis. This amount of freeboard will protect you from the 25 year-24 hour storm
event which could cause an overflow if adequate lagoon storage is not available.
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer UM recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper'

•
i • Complete items 1 andlor 2 for additional services.
niso wren t, to Icuaivu an
i • Complete Items 3, and 4e & b.
following services (for an extra
m
r • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so
i
that we can
feel:
return this card to you.
j • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back It space
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
t41
does not permit,
• Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the
article number.
2. El Restricted Delivery
CL i
• The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the data
i delivered.
Consult postmaster for fee.
0
I 3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
BILLY RAY HODGES
293 BEULAH CHURCH ROAD
4b Service Type
nc
LOW GAP NC 27024
❑r Registered ❑ Insured
1
f
19Certified ❑ COD
{
ID Express Mail ❑Return Receipt for
Merchandise
c
7. Date of Delivery
2 r _
w '
5. Si ure 1 ddressee
- •
S. Addressee's Address (Only if requested x
and fee is paid)_
6. Signature 1 g nt)
PS Form 11, December 1991 eu.s. QP0.' 10 a-,%52 t4 DOMESTIC RETURN
4

Billy Ray Hodges
December 5, 1995
page 2
This office has received complaints in the past about the operation of this dairy.
Personnel from this office visited the dairy on April 27, 1994 and January 9, 1995 concerning
reports of improper waste disposal. During those inspections, no problems were noted due to
inaccessibility to the illegal discharge area. On the day of the lagoon inspection the waste
stream was flowing from the lagoon, down the ditch to the stream.
The non -permitted discharge of any type of wastewater to the waters of the State is
illegal as per North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1. Steps should be taken immediately
to remedy the problems associated with animal waste runoff. If you have any questions about
how to handle these problems, please contact the Surry Soil and Water Conservation District.
You are requested to respond in writing to our Winston-Salem Regional Office on or
before January 22, 1996 advising what corrective actions have been or will be initiated to
prevent future illegal discharges from the waste lagoon. If the Winston-Salem Regional
Office has not been contacted by you or a Surry County representative by January 22, 1996, a
follow-up inspection may be conducted, Please be aware that continued violations could
subject your farm to enforcement action with the possible assessment of civil penalties of up
to $10,000 per day per violation.
Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions
or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Allan Smith or Steve Mauney at (910) 771-
4600.
Sincerely,
"_� D 60t�
Larry D. Coble
Regional Supervisor
cc: Surry County Health Dept.
Surry County SWCD
Surry County NRCS
Compliance/Enforcement Group
Central FilesfWSRO

Iry -r4 2oD co1✓s

r
i
'JAN 1 1996
Regional. 01'fice-

j%L-is-i99'S 15:34 FW= W tip o jFLt TY SECT t LN To
a
Bite Regnires Z=AArzftd
Facility No.
DN ION OF Eh'VMOh'N1i3NTAL MANAMMEN7
A UAAL FEMLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION REOORD
DA7£r 'y i�►3
Magin Address:
S�
State m' ! b n; n a s I phone:
Can Six ReFrawt&dve: PbMe:.9 ca�Z-�7q2-
Pbyxke Add?essfl oc dM:
Type of Oy=w Swint Fostitry CChule ,L
D+edp Capaclty: Number of Animals cm Site: 2QiO
DEM Cu ficaban Number. A(X_,_____ DBI Qrdfiioad= Number. ACrEQ4'__r____.
Ladrv&: -_I • 3 `� L�dnxin dt: $ `.r,.'!L" Ble+�at3w: t
!� gSP 3 5 3 25 Circle Yes or No
P-- 6,* Animal Wtm Lase = have euffi6 nt frW=ud of I Foot + 25 7m 2A how omm eat
(tppra:dm ly I Foot + 7. inrins) Yes or& AcWC Pmobocd: ,..L-A. bau
West my ieepsge obw ed frm the lagoon(&)?6Pcc No Was any acpsioa obsarvtd? JGW- No
Is adegtuie land tv Uble tag spray'! Yes ar No Is the oova crap a*= ? Yes cr No
C mp(s) Dexag rdUzed:
Does the fkV y meet SCS ®admum setback eritia? 100 Foot from D d1iaVz& eu No
!o0 Feet b= wells? IQ w No
Is the animal wute ttockp1W with 200 Fiet of USGS Bine Line Strum? Yes or 60)
Is animal wm land applied or spray ixrlgattd within ?.S Fact of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes erd)
Is untrul wasu discltiltd into w7tzn of tbG we by man-made ditch, flushing sYsro = ca other
Skrzu man-made des AM! EYes�or IC-) ? if Yes, Please Explain.
Dots the fairy =?nudn adequua waste mttwagerment raco is (volums of rw t, land app3ic4
qny bTiP td be tpcdfk acMP WU &ewer =P)? Yes cr No
Ad&dotW Crrtmmeats• F o 1, *,'es s Le5 ever a
�.
4re AMM" :� �s , �4 rd „!d ,Cannte+ Aho4 �� � IOA IN urea #t .,�-S r'ec�
MIN
N i _ Oq
I.
i
LL;UMj61 1.1.!L=
m: FwM y Asses== Unit
Vie Attac?=Dw if NeadeL
qprj� �I-

7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
47.30" S19 AOL $20 1480 000 FEET in 80*45'
31
,, sr,-- �,`� %'
Billy Ray Hodges 12
`7
Ira
a
A
till 403k
A,
_77)
71-4 1P
;4V
I K 10
FEI
m -6
JL*n
7'
06
Z.
lab
L
\1L
J..
AA
4m
7
J'
op
9c
L
I LOD ­7
A
CSOMM
� 1 4035
2T
r'o
4034
MUM
4 �33

OPEPHTIOPdS BRRICH - WO Fax -919-r 15-6048
Ij.- 0
3Ll1 19 '95 15;41 P.16f16
0
Site Raquim r=-e 4iato
Fatuity Numw-. S?4P —j Z
SI T:I- VISlTATIO i RECO=
DATE: 1995
owner; Pam
Catmty :
Age:st Visiting Sit= _ �T _ ;s _ ..._ Phone,;
0n Site Rellmr.KMIl[va: '201,,, _ J l'taapa:
]-4►yalu,1 Addms: D t--
Mailing Addaess:
Type of e?peratina:— Swine _ _ Poultry
Dopian C:apedry-, _ A ;Number of Animtle on Slit:
3 V 1,aug31Cdc.: _.° J7 1 r
Gird$ Y= o: No
Dccs ILC Anihz:{A+Wam Lcti:t `;a;,a tLOI-I ent helra.,-,idof 1_tFcct T i-_S�yea 24 hour ;tom) avtvat}.�,
ti�r%p'�rC if7liiel 1 root r 7 iza '..ij or No
FOr faciii(I'v" lPh mow;1! , cze Addr--ss the c;U" A ?.90,r7o0.1' fsrr�.rxrd .,,err the
CvjrPIICni3 SCCbOd.
1as Any ,eWl i$a 0b;w,'t ::i —V- lapol.(s)') Yw 0r SO W a4 tttUo]Un oi'.l".? vr:cnl: Year ar No
Is EdLY P-:a It;rr; IVAab,e CQr,ssd a0plicabon? Ye$ or;,to Is the et�v�.' e:ag ;dcgQa,--? Ycs or NNO
Fxt to (9 i 9) 71 ;-35,59
4 �c
�'t/Je- A1C'l � _ cv�� O�ip: CS _ p lr,., _
Um o(ARC:tt
A-TC- t � E
0

TV
1W
ell,
- A
JWL
0'.. ..............
AA MMVWU&W,br'' 1,VV-�-AL