340007_PERMITTING_20171231

. �r ! h
N
r
Jr %n T.. ; �WF
�..
.-, _..
�� �-
�,
��!w
` � � f
Nj7 ��
,.. -

������ �
�� .�y�

It
CO

������as

H

\����6 �� ��,y���

a i
R.. AT
f°'

.;r,.
I � - I.I. `) , � ��'y✓ '-�_
-.� dui-
" •. o. -

� 5�

r r. �, �
�� � i w � i
„"5 � �: i
�� _ � ; �
�- _ � `�
:.
•w�
".Y ....nA 17f�� �' ..

Y

:��
.f�.r �'-may f "`'- 'l - --�

pil
✓a�`m'lki�
SEP.1997
SEP.1

-_ � ,i
_ AS .r
p'- _
,z'�. �.. _ ..
.. �,. _ _. y4 a ..� _
•SiyS �?p .� e^.'
�,.. '� r- ,re'-
�_ _
� � �_
K 4-- =.

�� 7�� `�
\ -tt-

�r.r
s:r.zss7

ro r� Cl A L.U.
S E
Certit;ea Fee
E,
-3-
Postmar
Retum Receipt Fee
µere
O(Endorsement
RequIred)
Q
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
O
�
Sotol Post
Mr John Kapp
ru
sent ro
2105 Kapp Farm Road
,.q
• SUIDet, APU
Rural Hail NC 27045
a
or PO Box t
Q
City, Stere.
,I
...-.
I

rtified ail Provides:
a maif';nc �t
A unique ter for your mailpiece
A signature upon delivery ~ -
A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
,portant Reminders:
Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail,
Certified Mail is nor av0able for any class of International mail,
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mall,
i For an additional fee, a Return. Receipt rniy be requested to provide proof of
deli"C' To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return'
Receipt {PS Form Sal l� to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt. a USPS postmark on your Certified Mall receipt is'
required.
■ For art adaitional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or
addresseo's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with tho
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
■ if a postmark er1 the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti-
cle at the post office fo• postmarking. If a posirnark on the Certffrad Mail
receipt is not needed, detach and affix $abet with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT: Sacra this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
'rr1 .P,V" ) 142595-01-M-I046

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mall
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name des, and ZIP+4 in this box •
SEP 1 3 2002
' �}rfy�
NCDENR _ � �� gionak CAlice
Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem NC 27107

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A.
Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired. X
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Mr John Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall NC 27045
Name)
Is deliv4ry address different from
If YES, enter delivery address b
❑ Agent
❑ A dressee
to f Delivery
Ej Yes
0 No
3. Service Type
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7001 2510 0001 4778 5789 NOV
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt .102505-01-M-250

United States Department of Agriculture
o NRCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
1450 Fairchild Road, Room 11
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
February 3, 2003
Johnny Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall, NC 27045
Dear Johnny,
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
i= E ® t Q 2003
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
The purpose of this letter is to summarize our meeting on January 28, 2003. At this meeting,
Tommy Burchette, NRCS Civil Engineering Technician; Daphne Cartner, DSWC Environmental
Engineer; Mike Bowman, Forsyth County Soil Conservationist and myself walked over your
farm and discussed ways to solve the water quality problem.
Our technical assistance was requested after you received a Notice of Violation from the NC
Division of Water Quality for "settleable solids & turbidity" violations. According to the notice,
these violations were due to excessive streambed and bank erosion.
During our field evaluation on 1/28/03, we discussed the streambank erosion problem and the
possibility of fencing the cows out of the creek. Due to the difficulties in getting adequate
amounts of water from existing wells (you said that you only get about 2-3 gallons per minute),
we decided that providing an alternative watering system was not feasible on this faun. Also, we
looked at constructing several stream crossings. Suitable sites could not be found due to the very
steep terrain.
In addition, we discussed the construction of a pond or sediment basin to catch the soil before it
leaves your property. According to Tommy Burchette, building a pond would be very difficult
and expensive due to site conditions (i.e., state road below dam & a tremendous amount of soil
would need to be moved to construct an emergency spillway).
Based on these observations, we decided that the most severe erosion is caused by inadequate
vegetation on the pastureland, steep terrain and overgrazing. We can provide assistance to
address this erosion problem. At this time, I will provide you with general recommendations
to accomplish this task. Specific guidelines (seeding rates, etc,) will be provided as needed.
PHASE I
• Plant perennial grass (fescue) in areas along the creek and hillsides that are bare or do not
have a good stand of vegetation.
• Install permanent fence along the creels from the road culvert to 200' upstream.
NOTE: Phase I is essentially completed. The Dept. of Transportation plans to install a
larger road culvert in the near future. Since this area will be disturbed, we will need to re-
evaluate after pipe installation is completed.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

United States Department of Agriculture
o N RCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
1450 Fairchild Road, Room 11
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
PHASE It
You need to be able to relocate your cows for a substantial period of time, long enough to
get the grass well established.
• Take soil samples as soon as possible to determine lime, fertilizer and other nutrient needs. It
usually takes 4-6 weeks to get the results back so gather samples soon. The sample boxes and
info. sheets are available at the Extension office (767-8213).
• Existing gullies need to be filled and graded to a uniform shaped and seeded. Temporary
electrical fencing will need to be erected for whatever period of time it takes to get the area
stabilized and the grass established. Also, a diversion will need to be constructed to divert the
water coming through the pipe under the gravel road. We will need to survey these areas and
flag off the practices. Cows [rust be removed before flagging.
• We will permanently fence off the largest gullied area below the silage pit. The area will be
graded in such a way so that water will spread out. This area will be used for filtering
purposes before water reaches the stream,
• The diversion and grassed waterways will be seeded and mulched according to our
specifications.
• Completely renovate the existing pasture. As soon as you can get the cows off, apply lime
and fertilizer according to soil test recommendations. In absence of a soil test, apply 2 tons of
lime per acre and 1000 lbs. of 10-10-10 fertilizer per acre at seeding time. The pasture will
need to be top dressed again in the fall.
• Re -seed fescue (minimum rate of 15 lbs. per acre) using a sod drill.
PHASE 11
• Provide me with the number of cow/calves and their weights that will be using this pasture. I
will base the grazing plan on these numbers.
• Follow a prescribed grazing system. I will provide you with guidelines concerning the
appropriate start & stop grazing times, rest periods, approximate yields, etc.
• Reduce the number of cows that depend on this pasture. You stated that when you
completed the new silage pit (across the road), that you would decrease the number and size
of cows using this pasture. You must be committed to this approach or all the work will be a
waste of time.
Consider planting rye or other winter annual for dormant season.
We may recommend cross fencing for rotational grazing.
I hope that our office can provide financial, as well as technical assistance. Right now, I do not
have federal funds for cost share assistance. However, we are expecting funds in April or May_
Remember, if you want cost -share assistance, you can NOT begin work prior to approval
of the contract. All practices will have to meet our standards and specifications before you are
paid.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

United States Department of Agriculture
o N RCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
1450 Fairchild Road, Room 11
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Please let me know if & when you plan on starting this project (April? May? June?). I know you
said that you need to finish the new silage pit first. I agree, because once you start this project
you will not be able to put cows back until the grass is well established. Please call if you have
any questions.
Again, let me know if you want to move forward on this project and when you might be ready to
start. We will need to work together on the time frame if you want cost -share assistance.
Sincerely,
'aj'
Dede DeBruhl
District Conservationist
Cc: Melissa Rosebrock, DWQ
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

a �tif WF y �" �r. L;{F t X3• .{,.�IpSAt''• �= r s - s ' ilk ; ._ .�. r { , ' • «, , ,, ti r F h. � .r.
f •�� Or+A!TF a r 1}1 ,. :' L' 4, +.' i :s INiChael FaF.asiey: (ipVBrnOr,f.iw
•x 'JV'YL #. � ,� 9f i%'+J�'.T'i• ` '*. �'-� �^�, `.+w -stir',}+5.�- ��1•_x ti. '. _ .� �;,•�'�' WIIIE'i a�rOti�F�BsJr;S.eoretary�'' .h�:
%]orth Cerolinaiatit of Fiivir+onmetrt:arid'NeduraliReso_'u c{.
- ' �',\� -�`41 ' ~ �,,•R�r:'ry .'�' � '?�F fr�,.�,_ •ti. ,+.-�,• �• ., .1' ,'._ 'l . �.. +.. », •. ,r. � y,+.c:+�-• cka`'h ^,
1 f, Allen W Kllmek,' -.:.
Dhrl&kilt OT Waterr Quality:_ � �`;
{'
S eptem6er.20; 2002
_L4W 16&,Kapp.
.2105 KdO . Earm` Road
. -• �Rural�Ha11; NC=270�45 �-. .. .. - ..
{SUBJECiT f , Red ponse'to'Notice of Violation'a'nd •Recommendation for Enforcement Action'. �.
i, ';.�Stream Standard Violations
' Kapp''Livestock Farm - Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Kapp:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your written response to a "Notice ofViolation and
Recommendation to Enforce" letter that you received from our office. This violation was issued after Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) staff documented that approximately 900 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to
Beaver Dam Creek had been impacted by stream bed and bank destabilization and the subsequent deposition of
sediment into waters of the State.
As a result of these observations, we confirmed violations for settleable solids, turbidity, and removal of
best usage. Your letter indicates that you would Iike an opportunity to resolve the water quality issues at the
Kapp Livestock Farm. Specifically, your letter states that you are in the process of fencing out approximately
200 linear feet of the creek immediately upstream from the culvert at the end of your property. We further
understand that this buffer area is to extend out 15 feet from the,top of the bank on each side of the creek. As
noted during previous DWQ inspections, grassy vegetation is also being established on the streambarik:in_ this,
area.
The Division appreciates your efforts to correct the..violations described above. Our intention islfor you-
•.._ : wie` r •, .—z.r 't,^� '-•i f''�, •, ,<
to come into complete compliance by affording you a reasonable period of time in whicrh to dstrate the . • a
effectiveness of the measures proposed. DWQ staff will then.perform another follow-up 'inspectioii-to'deteriii_ine .
if the corrective actions are satisfactory. Please be advised, however, that the corrective measures proposed
may not be effective in preventing future violations. It may become necessary, in fact, for.you to'ex*d�the
cattle exclusion area and/or peifarm additional repair work in order to bring your operation into full compliance
with State and Federal environmental regulations. We urge you to continue working with the Forsyth County
Soil and Water Conservation District in developing Best Management Practices far your farm. rV
' • ,' lr. .;; J" I i.. ., G '•♦ 1 , . x. 'd .kF� .� fF�6r
Thank you for your attention to these matters. Should,you have fuither,questions;;please contact Ms:,
Melissa Roscbrock of'rh,6 dt (336) 771=4b00. '4 ti
'Steve Mauney' A ,,:' " <r,•. �, ' ;';
,' ' : �. • • 1 :Acting WQ Regio, .,,. Supervisor
cc: Forsyth Courity_Soil and Water'Conservation DistrictlNRCS, 1450 Fairchild Rd. Room ! 1; W-S IYC-27105.yi
;•'''� ,:;= "�y
ti ` Novi,` -Discharge CotnpliaircelEnfQrcemerit,Vnit
Marlene Salyer ,;WSRO DSWC ;°_ `�,� r;��
...Jr7.L 1 ; +, sR^' - Yi 7 '{
'r•++.•s..,ti ,r r?fiw 'yfy, �` ''si r.�}. r t} r '� w 7J,, ^ f f i5 r„ ' N
t7 1 Ceritrat FilesNV,SRO rc§i�w �yA. S a76 r'y ' e r+`it a rt �5�" y�'� r r. yt .'`�}E a�j1z.{H,yr
a �, , } Y , Ef+Y e '2 * r f .•1 y _ F 3 rr�, nn s i r - ! ,j'` • ,�,R(
, ,, , h m •. r. r .. s sir ...Its. '� •��z, � = r =. - ,i-.qL � L .�. ti a 4�r ,�'w, .r., _,r: .•y_.«:;,. Ira, r ,.
, h, ,,,„ � �r r' as '•,. ,..r... a ym•Z+•-+.,%v- -" aii, •�,'t!", - rt:5 .�.r r,� _p "J;�u� s,���
' S851Neu Fitown Street r •�Wlnstori"Salem C27107�' r �CusiornerServ_iceJ " r N. C. Division of1V11eter C,lualitylWater Quality Sectica� . • g r _ [phone]' j'` }ccy
i" i ',p. • t ••4 _ cTe,-f , n ,.r :'S, 'J.'�i.4�J- 623-�
.ti:, +5,; •f•�s ; e r�. ,.r f-;,,, '„ - ;>w.;a, ,,}, ..S,i't,{rr '!. 4F•i_ /"',_r�4 F 3. • v':}tkh i'1 �- -k' �''.

STATE of NORTH CARQLINA
C, tHNrT
SEP 9 7 2002
negional Office
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,.
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYMO TMPEW
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
September 3, 2002
Mr. John Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall, NC 27045
RE: Unnamed Tributary upstream.of Shore Dr., SR 1632, Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Kapp:
At your request, I visited the site mentioned in my letter dated August 21, 2002 with you
and your son on August 27, 2002. At that time, the pipe was open and the banks seeded. I could
see no other work that was needed.
The blockage was apparently caused by branches and silt. I could find no evidence that
the blockage was caused by your actions. I have requested that our Hydraulics Department
investigate the site to determine if the proper pipe size .was initially installed. If significantly
larger pipe is needed, we will install it as soon as our schedule permits.
Sincerely,
Michael T. Patton
Division Maintenance Engineer
MTP: saf
cc: Mr. Pat -Ivey, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Ronnie Joyce, Bridge Supervisor
Ms. Diane Hampton, P.E., Division Environmental Engineer
Ms, Deridre De Bruhl, NRCS
Ms. Melissa Rosebrock, NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Highways - Division Nine - 2125 Cloverdale Avenue - Winston-Salem - ' North Carolina - 27103
Telephone [phone]o - Fax [phone] - Courier BOX 13-12-04

0nited States Department at Agriculture
4 N RCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
1450 Fairchild Rd., Room 11
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
September 12, 2002
Johnny Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall, NC 27045
Dear Mr. Kapp,
i'i ... r=IVEO N.C. tort. of E�- NA
S E P 13 2002
Regio,'1s! 00400
This letter is a follow-up to our phone conversation on August 30, 2002. I visited your farm on
August 28, 2002 per your request. We looked at the streambank erosion problems associated
with your cow pasture. At that time, you had already seeded fescue and the grass was starting to
come up. We discussed various options to solve the problem. Fencing the cows out of the entire
creek, digging a well and installing watering troughs is probably the best solution. As stated, you
can apply for cost -share assistance through our office for these practices. We will need to
develop a detailed plan and submit to Raleigh for approval. This process may take as much as
two months. If approved, the practices will need to be installed according to our specifications
before you receive payment. Our office will be glad to work with you if you wish to proceed
with this approach.
In the meantime, I suggest the following measures:
I . Install a fence from the culvert to 200 feet upstream. The fence should be 15 feet from the
top of the bank on each side of the creek.
2. Sow fescue in areas near the creek that are eroding or have very little vegetation. You told
me in our phone conversation on August 30'h, that you had planted more fescue along the
banks and the hillsides.
3. Continue to rotate the cows among other pastures to allow the vegetation to get established.
These measures may not solve the problem permanently but should improve the current erosion
problems near the culvert. According to the letter from Mike Patton, the NC Department of
Transportation will investigate the site to determine if the proper size pipe was initially installed.
Installation of a new pipe may destroy some of your new grass so we will probably need to
review the situation again.
Melissa Rosebrock will re -check the site again in approximately six months to see if the problem
has been solved. In the meantime, please call our office at 767-0720, ext. 3 if you need further
assistance or would like to apply for cost -share assistance to fence out the entire creek. Thank
you for your cooperation in this matter.
P
el eBruhl
District Conservationist
Cc: Melissa Rosebrock, DWQ
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

NJArF Michael F. Easley, Governor
`OHO 9pG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
} North Carol! rtment of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
o -r
September 11, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL 7001 2510 0001 4778 5789
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. John Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall, NC 27045
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement Action
Stream Standard Violations
Kapp Livestock Farm
Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Kapp:
On August 14, 2002 Melissa Rosebrock of the Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted an inspection
of the subjem facility in response to a recent complaint alleging that soil and cattle waste run-off from your farm
had cloggeda, culvert located beneath Shore Road. A subsequent inspection was performed August 26, 2002. A
"final.notes"_copy of each of the 2002 inspections is also attached for your review. -Our investigation revealed
that approximately 900 linear feet of an unnamed,tributary to Beaver Dam Creek, Class C waters, Yadkin -Pee
Dee River Basin, had been impacted by stream bed and bank destabilization, resulting from cattle access, and
the subsequent deposition of four to nine -inches of sediment.
As a result of these observations and a Regional Office file review of your facility, the following items
.are confirmed: (1) settleable solids violation, (2) turbidity violation, and (3) the removal of best usage. Please
note that,the need to address streambed and�bank erosion was previously outlined during an August 13, 1997
compliance: inspection in which our records indicate that you were present.
Item 1: Settleable Solids
From visual inspection, a large deposition of solids to surface waters has clearly occurred. The addition
of a notable accumulation of settleable solids, approximately four to nine inches in depth, to waters of the State
for approximately 900 linear -feet of the unnamed tributary to Beaver Dam Creek iss-a violation of 15A NCAC
02B .0211 which states: "Water quality standards far all fresh surface waters are the basic standards
applicable -to -Class C waters. " Water quality standards for Class C waters are outlined in 15A NCAC 02B
.0211(3)(c) which states: "Floating solids; settleable solids; sludge deposits; only such amounts. attributable to
sewage, industrial wastes or other wastes. as shall not make the water unsafe or unsuitable for aquatic life -and
wildlife or impair the waters for any designated uses."
Item 2: Turbidity
It was determined from stream samples obtained on August 26, 2002 that a violation of the turbidity
standard for Class C waters has occurred as a result of streambed and bank erosion associated with excessive
cattle traffic in the unnamed tributary to Beaver Dam Creek. The water quality standard for turbidity, outlined
in 15A NCAC 02B .0211(3)(k), states that: "The turbidity in the receiving water shall not exceed 50
Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) in streams not designated as trout waters..." A stream sample taken
approximately 752 feet upstream from the culvert had a reported turbidity of 150 NTU.
NDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality/Water Quality Section 5a5 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone] Customer Service
1800 623-7748

•
•
Kapp Livestock Farm
September 11, 2002
Page 2
Item 3• Best Usaee
It was also determined that approximately 900 linear feet of stream impacts have occurred from
destabilization of the streambed and streambanks. These impacts to the stream represent a violation of best
usage. Specifically, 15A NCAC 02B .0211(2) states that either a short-term or long-term preclusion of best
usage, which includes aquatic life propagation, biological integrity, wildlife, agriculture, and secondary
recreation, represent a water quality standard violation.
This Office requires that violations, as detailed above, be abated immediately. Also please note, these
violations and any future violations are subject to civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000.00 per day, per
violation. We request that you respond to this letter, in writing, within 10 days of receipt of this Notice.
Your response should include the following items:
• Clearly discuss your efforts to abate impacts to surface waters. This Office understands that a second site
visit was conducted by Ms. Rosebrock on August 26, 2002 and that improvements to the stream channel and
- -- streambanks-had clear]y-occurred as a result of the. establishment of fescue. and oats. The Division
appreciates your'cooperation. However, this Office feels that additional work can be accomplished,
specificallythe removal of cattle access .to.the stream channel. Please address this issue.
• Discuss.your stabilization and sediment removal efforts and explain how you propose to prevent this
problem from occurring in the future. Please keep in mind that even though you are attempting to resolve
this issue by stabilizing the stream banks and removing excessive sediment, care must be taken so that these
violations do not reoccur or continue. We strongly.urge you to contact the Forsyth County Soil and Water
Conservation District (336.767.0720) for continued assistance in developing Best Management Practices
for your farm.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. This Office is considering the recommendation of an
enforcement to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. Your response to this correspondence will be
considered in this process. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ms. Melissa
-Rosebrock or me at (336) 77.1-4600:
Sincerely,
Steve Mauney
Acting WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: Forsyth County Soil and Water Conservation DistrieLINRCS. 1450 Fairchild Rd, Room 11. W-S, NC 2710i
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Lint
Marlene Salyer — WSRO DSWC
Central FilesfLWSRO i

RECEIVED
N,C. Dept. of I
S EP �- 9 2DDZ
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA Reg f or4 l -office.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MIGHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
September 3, 2002
Mr- John Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall, NC 27045
RE: Unnamed Tributary upstream.of Shore Dr., SR 1632, Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Kapp:
LYNDO TIPPM
SECRETARY
At your request, I visited the site mentioned in my letter dated August 21, 2002 with you
and your son on August 27, 2002. At that time, the pipe was open and the banks seeded. I could
see no other work that was needed.
The blockage was apparently caused by branches and silt- I could find no evidence that
the blockage was caused by your actions. I have requested that our Hydraulics Department
investigate the site to determine if the proper pipe size was initially installed. If significantly
larger pipe is needed, we will install it as soon as our schedule permits,
Sincerely,
Michael T. Patton
Division Maintenance Engineer
MTP:saf
cc: Mr. Pat Ivey, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Ronnie Joyce, Bridge Supervisor
Ms. Diane Hampton, P.E., Division Environmental Engineer
Ms. Deridre De Bruhl, NRCS
Ms. Melissa. Rosebrock, NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Highways - Division Nme - 2I25 Cloverdale Avenue - Winston-Salem - North Carolina - 27103
Telephone [phone] - Fax [phone] - Courier Box 13-12-04

RECEfVEL
DIVISION OF WATER QUAL" "� . C. Dept -of EH
Chemistry Laboratory Report I Water Quality �}
COUNTY FORSYTH PRIORiT-Y � S�r��� ��� � 4
Ca��
RIVER BASIN., AMBIENT a QA X❑ STREAM EFFLUENT
REPORT TO WSRO RcponalOfxt COMPLIANCE 0 CHAINOFCUSTODY 0 LAKE F? �1FiQ1fNI'`t v
Other EMERGENCY VISIT ID ESTUARY -
COLLECTOR(S) : M R0SF.BR0CK i
FAtlmated BOA Raaje: Statlne Lacatlon: UPSTREAM
Seed: ChbHtutc -, Remarks:
Stadia 0 Rare Bela (yylmmldd) pate Ead (yylwmldd) Tlma Beds Time Ead Depth - Dbt, DE� DBSS Valve Type - A, H, L
1 20t120826 l 1522
BOD 310 L
COD Hie 340 mvL
COD Low 335 mWL
Colifomw MF Fecal 31616 /i00m1
Caliform: MFTma13IRM /IOQrtil
Q44orm: tube Faa131615 /loam)
Coliform: Fecal 31673 /loom)
Residue TOW 501) /L
Volatile505 mjVL
Find S 10 m 1-
Residue: Suspended 530 m /L
Volatile 535 mg/1-
Fixed 540 m /l,
H 403 units
Addity to pH 4.5 436 m L
Acidity to pH8.343S m /L
Alkali miy to pH 9.3 415 m /1.
Alkalinity to pH A 410 m L
TOC680 m /L
X[Turhidiy
76 150 NTU
Celiform Total Tube- V 100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chlonde 940 m L
Chl a: Tti 32217 u /L
Chi a: Corr 32209 u L
Pbecphyfin a 32213 u /L
Color. True 80 C.u.
Color 11 ) 8J PlI= C.u.
Color pf1 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride Q51 m /L
Formaldehyde 71880 m L
Grease and Oils 556 m /L
Hardness Tmal900 m /L
Spenfir Conti 95 umhas/cm2
MBAS 38260 m /L
PheWls 32730 u /L
Su€fatt945 mg/ L
Sulfide 745 m /L
Boron
Tannin&Ii in u /L
Hexava€ent Chromium u L
Bicatbonatc m L
Caftnalf L
NH3 as N 610 L
TKN an N 625 L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 MFVL
P: Taal as P 665 m
Pik u P 70507 L
IL Dissolved as P 666 m L
K-Potassium mgfL
Cd-Cadmium 1027 u /L
Cr-Chmmium:Tael 1034 u /L
Cu- coppe, 1042 u L
Ni-Nickel 1067 u /L
Pb- Lcad 1051 u L
Zn• Zinc 1092 u L
V-Vanadium u L
Ag. Silvis 1077 u L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ugfL
Be. Beryllium 1012 u
Ca- Calcium 916 mg1L
CCr Cobalt 1037 u
Fe- Iran 1045 u
I ab Numbez : 2WG085
Date Reonved : 8/27/2002
Time R=vesl - 9:15 AM
Rcmved By DS
Data AR
Date Reported : 8/30/2002
Compulte-T, S, a Sample TYPe
.
Li-Litluum 1132 u L
M - Magnesium92T
MmKanganesc 1055 u L
Na- Sodium 929 L
ArstmicTotal1002 u
Se- Selenium 1147 u
H - MercuTy 71900
Ba_Barium u L
orpnochlolirr Pesticides
0Tgan22hmph=s Pesticides
And Herbicides
Banc/Neulral&.Acid Extractable 2Wnk3
TPH Viesel Rangr
PuTgrable OTp nkm (VOA bottle 'd)
TPH Gasoline RAnEr
TPI V BTEX Gasoline Ran=

_ . —.—.,« . I itL i-Ir AAULI+IL'NT WATLH ju
'
COUNTY PRIORITY
R[VF�f BASIN
REPORT TO: AR FRO MHO RHO WaRO WIRO WSRO S ❑AMBIENT
AT SM
Other ❑COMPLIANCE CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: us Courl , Staff, Other EMERGENCY
COLLECTOH(S): �.7��d
Estimated BOD Rao0-5/5g 5/25-65/40-130 or I00 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes ❑ N-1 Chlorinated: Yea ❑ N.X REMARKS:
Station #% ro
te Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End
i 2 08 Ab 15z-
1 BOD5 310 mg/1
2 COD Hlgh 340 mgA
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Colliorm: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
5
Colliorm: MF Total 31504 /loom]
6
Colliorm: Tube Fecal 31615 /106m1
7
Collform: Fecal Strap 31673 /100mi
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 Mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4-5 436 mgA
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/l
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mgA
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
19
TOC 690 mSA
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
R% FORM (DM1)
SAMPLE TYPE
STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT
❑ LAKE ❑ (NFL[JEFT
❑ ESTUARY
Lab Number:
Date Received: lme,
Hec'd b From: Bu ou:ter nd Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
me End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type
A H L
Chloride 94Q mg/1
Chi a: Trl 32217 ugA
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/l
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADM[
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADM[
Cyanide 720 mg/l
Fluoride 951 mgA
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 rag/]
Hardness Total900 mg/l
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ugA
Sulfate %S n*A
Sulfide 745 mgA
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 nrgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 Ing/1
P. Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
Cd{'admtum 1027 ugA
CrChromiluueTota11034 ug/[
Cu-Copper 1042 ugA
NFNlckel 1067 u9A
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
A liver 1077 ugA
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/l
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 -9/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ugA
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Composite Sample T
T S B C G GNXX
Lf-Lithium 1132 ugA
Mg-Magneslum 927
Mn-Manganese 1055
Na-Sodium 929 eng(/1
Arsenic -Total 1002 ug/l
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Otgar�apltt:epixmts Pesticides
Acid Herbicides i
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle raga)
,I
Phytoplankton `
Sampling Paint %
2
Conductance at 25 C
94
Water Temperature
a � ' �
10
D.O. mgA
� ��
300 10
pH .
q
400 to
Alkalinity
pH 8-3pH 4.5
82244 1431
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH &3
82243 182242
Air Temperature 10
a
20 d
Salinity X
Precipltion On/day)
Claud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Strvzm Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth fL
Stream Width fL
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
DM1/Revised 10/86

COUNTY
FORSYTH
RIVER BASIN:
REPORT TO
WSRO ReVomlOffim
Other :
COLLECTOR(S) :
M ROSEBROCK
Estimated HOD Ranw:
Seed:
chlorinated -
SWIM f
Date Re#. (yyhamldd)
BOD 310 L
COOMigh 340 m L
COD Low 335
Coliforra MF Fwa131616 / 100ml
Coliiorm: MY Total 3151)4 Awed
Collfrnm: tube Fecal 31615 / 100m1
CoGfor= Foal 31673 /100mi
Residue: Total SW mgtL
Volatile 505 m L
Filed 514 L
Residue 530 L
Volatile 535 m L
Fixed 5/0 L
H 401 units
Acklity to pH 41436 m L
62ft to pH 8.3435 m /L
AlWirdij to pH8.3415 m /L
Alialiai to pH 4.5 410 m L
TOC 600 m L
X
ITrbidiq 76 27 NTU
Coliform Total Tube `/ too MIS
COMMENTS:
131"S1O1N OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report I Water Quality er.
HN
SA A4P1 F 7VPF
EKLOR
El
AMS(ENT QA X❑ STREAM —EFFLUENT
L3 COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY � LAKE a���+����
Cl EMERGENCY MIT ID a ESTUARY Reg, ��� ff#c7 ,
2
Station Lem0e : MIDWAY
Remarks:
Date End (yyfmtp/dd) T1aae He& Time End I Depth - D.►i, DK DBM Va1ae Type - A. H, L
1535
Chloride 94D L
Cbl a: Tri 32217 u
Chl a: Carr 32209 u L
Pheophytin a 32213 u /L
Color. TmC 8D C.U.
Color. H 83 PH. C.U.
Color. pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyarfide 724 L
Fluoride 951 awL
Fomialdehyde 71990 m L
Gsease and Oils 556 m L
Hardness Total 900 m L
Specific C6nQ 95 vvntm1cm2
MB 6 M60 m /L
Ptsenals 32730 u L
Sulfate 945 m L
Sulfide 74S WZL
Boron
Tannin A Lipin u L
He xavalent Chromium u L
Bicarbonate rngfL
Carbonate mlyl.
NH3asN610 m L
TKN an N 675 m L
N01 phn NO3 as N 63D m L
P: Total as P 665 m L
PO4 at P 70507 m /L
F-. Dinalvcd its P 666 m L
K-Potassium
Cd-Cadmium 1027 u /L
Cr-chrataivarTotal 1034 tJ /L
Cu 1042 u L
N -Nirid 1067 u L
Pb- Lr4d 1051 u /L
Zit- Zuw 1093 L
V-Vanadium u L
A Silver 1077 u L
AI -Aluminum IIDS u L
Be Rium 1012 u /L
Ca- Callum 916 m L
Co- Cobalt 1037 u /L
Fa Iron 1045 u L
1 Lab Number :
2W6086
Date Rmeive d :
8/27/2d02
Tame Received:
9:15 AM
Received By
DS
Da :
AR
Date Reported:
8/30/2002
C—PaaltsT. S. a + Sampk Type
Li -Lithium 1132 u L
M . M 927 m L
Mnnose loss u
Na- Sodium 929 L
ArseniaTotal10D2 u
Se. Seirnium 1147 u L
H Mt=ry 7000 u
Ba-Barium u
noehiarim Pea lades
OWphosptrus Pesticide
Acid Herbicides
Baw/Neutml&Add Extractable Orlpaics
TPH Diesel Ra
Pu airs A bcmlc
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
ENnoplankton
1b

.... ... ... .. ..... ..... .. •.. r. v.�r•a ._..
., r. a a_ic 1'Ul1M lUD111
COUNTY
011-
PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE'
U
RIVER BASIN AD oe:=h
❑AMBIENT
❑
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO WIRO SRO S
REAM
EFFLUENT
AT BM
❑COMPLIANCE ❑ LAKE
❑"
Other
CHAIN
INFLUENT
OF CUSTODY
❑
Shipped by; us Cour r, Staff, Other�/
EMERGENCY ESTUARY
COLL£CTO I (S): rolls-�
STATION LOCATION:
Estimated HOD Range 0-5/5 5/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ N-A Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No REMARKS:
r777
/'� Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End
C ! 02 , d8 , a(0I5-3s ,
1
BUD5 310 mg/I
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform; MF TotaI 31504 /100m1
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /IOOmI
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
g
Residue: Total 500 m'J/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
1s
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
19
TOC 680 mgA
--
urbld(ty 76 NTU
Lab Number:
Date Recelved: Ti..:
Rec'd by: From: Bus Kul Del
DATA ENTRY HY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Time EndjDepth DM DB DBM Value Type
A H L
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chl a: Trl 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 USA
Pheophytin a 322I3 ug/1 _
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADM]
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1.
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond, 95 2
uMhoslc m
MRAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/(
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mgA
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmium 1027 ugA
CrChromlumTota11034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/l
Ni-Nickel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag-Silver 1077 ugA
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be-Beryl]lum 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
Composite Sample T e
T S H C G GNXX
L!-Lithium 1132 USA
Mg -Magnesium 927 A
Mn-Manganese 1055 /1
Na-Sodium 929 mg/1
ArseniCTotal 1002 ut1A
Se-Selenlum I147 ugA
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
Organochlorine Pesticides
OTganophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle re
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature 10
D.O. mg/i
6
Of
-7O C)
Alkalinity
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
Acidity
pti 4.5 pH 9.3
Air Temperature 0
OLJ..4
-yl
aR.
2
94
10
300
400 1 •
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity Z
Precipition (In/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flout Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity N/H
Can Stream Depth It.
Stream Width ft.
OC)
}
480
145
32
136
11351
1350
135
64
14
DMI/Revised 10/86

•
Report to: _ Irl 4sebrOCAL
ws rz-o - �Q
0
WATER QUALITY SECTION
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENRIDWQ LABORATORY (check one): I I CENTRAL I I ARO I I WaRO
Page _ _I__ of J
For Investigation of: `—q P Farm
Sample collector (print name)
and DM-1 Forms completed by: -Mg
I1554
Pz ce- br0 Lk- Sample collector's signature..q*b4,49
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
Lab Use Only
LAB NO.
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
D
U eq
0,2 6? A&
1.5-2-z.
0.
b 2-0$ a
15
1
`
,jnsta
•-5a e
Regional
nq 'sht:d y ature):
rMellinquished
Date
oaba��
Time
! Sl.3a
ec 'v d by (signature
ate
ime
by signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Ti e
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shi ment circle one
tate Courier Hand -deliver d Federal Ex UPS
Other:
Security Type and Con di ions:
Br ke
Met+550 b�C�
INTRALABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
LAB NUMBERS
FROM THROUGF
-AN�ESr
REQUESTED
r
BY:
r
:�lW-I NN
V M
QA\FormslSample RcceivinglCOC form WQ 4/10/01dbs

WOER CALIBRATION SHEE*
UNIT DATE �:TLME NAME. /205e-broCk
Meter Number
Meter Number
Meter Mfg. by fi t CL)Y)1(2 /9 P4
Membrane Last Replaced.23 0--Probe Last Replace
Meter Number,5N 13 LS-t-�
Batteries Last Replaced .� 11
Batteries Last Repl ced
Probe Last Replaced.& W 02- ;200,p?-
teed Gino-
Red Line El
Batteries Last Replaced
Zero
Zero
Buffer Sol. Last Replaced _W.2_4 lo a.
on
----A-nitial Calibration
. n Itiai 001 ration
-initial Calibration
Air
Standard 01 (147 ur4*.)
Buffer #11 464W-o .
Temperature a2 'a
Temperature
Temperature _,Z3
D.O. from Table '9 - (o
Std. after Temp. Correcti
Buffer after Temp. Correction
Barometric Pressure or Aft. Factor 9 7
Meter Reading
Meter Reading lb, 6/
.'actor X D.O. from Table = Calib, D.O.
K Value - Std after Temp, orrection
Meter Corrected to /0 . 0()
I :z x '3.3 -7
Meter Read ng
Meter Reading &
K Value - ( -
T
Buffer #2 (4.01 or 9.18)
Meter CorrecIto 3 S-
K Value =
Temperature . �2-3-3
(pa
Winkler
Buffer after Temp, Correction
4,
Winkler #1 Value
Standard #2 (718 urnho
Meter Reading
Winkler #2 Value
Temperature
Meter Corrected to
Std. Temp. Correction
0/
qu q? 7%
Meter Readin
after
M ",ter r,ectd to
eter
Meter Reading
i avc lib ...
n a ration
.. ...
tion
F1 nal Calibration i.
Air
Standard Value
Suffer Value
Temperature o
Tempera 'Z 3
Temperature
Temperature 4(
D.O. from Table Z
Std. after Temp. Correction
Buffer after Temp. Correction -----------
Barometric Pressure or Alt, Factor
Meter Reading
Meter Reading ­7 -0/
Factor X D.O. from Table = Calib, D.O.
Meter Corrected to
8.42-- ed' 17
Iql x --
Meter Reading A 2)
Meter Corrected to
COMMENTS,
Winkler
Winkler # I Value
e al l Winker #2 Value
a'
MeterP R ing
eter
er Corrected to

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint CAD Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 34 i Dau. nt' Visit: IiC16/2002 Time: 1400
r Not O eradonat Q Below Threshold
❑ Permitted [3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: KappliyalACJifaJCm............................................................................... County: F.Qx'Syth.......................................... ... WSRQ........
OwnerName: Jnk)a........................................ Kapit............................................................ Phone Nn: br.9(-6.G3O...........................................................
Mailing Address: 2105..Kjspp.k'A►r l.Rd............... .... .............
........................................ Run1. k1.AN.................................................... .7.Q4 ..
Facility Contact: JobjulayKapp.............................. .............. ....:. Title: .............................................. ...... I........... Phone No:..........
Onsite Representative: JAIdl0.t1�C, , p �bp yg,��g �.............. Integrator:
Certified Operator:......................................................-........................................................ Operator Certification Number: ....................... .:......... I.......
Location of Farm:
Nit off Hwy. 52N at Westinghouse Road, turn left onto Westinghouse, Farm entrance is 1st on the left. A
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry CR Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 80 • 19 20 '
�rM zy,X)esegn Current Destgn Current ' ; Destgn • Currrent
}t ;a ?�ua m ,'-'n $.,+,'#. `.4�t,A'S4 .,°i �, `'+'a r , .r'a .G
y 5wme � Ca acit . P,o utatton Poultry Ca itcit Po ulation Cattle Ca actt Po ulatton; `
"t ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ® Non-Dairyl 150
❑ Farrow to Wean
;r
• �� ❑Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other x .'
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 150
❑4 r
Gilts
❑ Boars. t , 'Total,SS�LVV 120,000
, k r
Nu, er orf Lagoons 0 =MID Subsurface Drains Present ❑ I-ugvnn Area ❑ Spray Field Area ;
�Ho)dtngP°n s 1'Solid Traps Liquid Waste Management System i, a -:ri
© No L_
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection tic 'T•tattgtenl
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3. . Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...lVstt..applicable...................................... .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 -ego '1 2 Continued

Facility Number: 34-7 . Date of Inspection F 8/26/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ❑ No
()if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Soybeans Pasture
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
R ri Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
Approximately 900 feet of creek is still impacted due to streambank/streambed erosion causing sediment to accumulate in an unnamed
ibutary to Beaver Dam Creek. Sediment has accumulated to a depth of 4 to 5 inches in most of the creek and 9 inches at the culvert. Mr.
app and his son have removed most of the sediment from the culvert itself. Per Mr. Kapp, the sediment was piled onto the creekbank,
ien removed, and spread on the surrounding pasture and into low areas. The disturbed areas have been have been seeded with fescue
id oats and covered with straw. Vegetation is about 2 inches tall today and appears to be holding the bank for now.
rhe culvert was estimated by DWQ to be 36 inches, while Mr. Kapp stated that it was 42 inches in diameter. Was difficult to determine 1-1
due to the sediment still remaining in the culvert. I suggested to Mr. Kapp that he fence the cattle from the creek permanently but he did Jrj
Reviewer/Inspector Name (Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
OSIO3I01 Continued

Facility'Number: 34-7 c. of Inspection 8f26/ZQQ2
or Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond.or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged FII pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
want to pursue that option. I also suggested rotating the pastures more often. I also suggested he contact the Forsyth Co.
CDINRCS for additional suggestions regarding erosion control and streambank stabilization. Mr. Kapp mentioned that he
sted to try fencing -out the area immediately uphill from the culvert.
Will need to re -check in six months to see that sediment is not continuing to cause a water quality violation for turbidity after
e are fenced from an area immediately upstream (200 feet) from the culvert.
pH, and DO were taken approximately 752 feet upstream from the culvert:
=150NTU**
H=6.98
00=5.84 mg1L
"Water quality standard for turdity in a class C stream is 50 NTU. Facility is in violation..
hidity, pH, and DO were also taken approximately 386 feet upstream from the culvert:
bidity=27 NTU
=7.51
)=6.47 mg1L
4-11. 1.3-14, 16-22, 25-26, and 28-32 are not applicable to this faciliry at this time.
�&1
05103101

.f•Miy 'xl i Qc�� 1 .
_-
,� r x rt
- - 'J- iY �-_ k��"r. =� �.Tt�.wit t - .��•c ? .. M -- - - .. 4
I
• Y{ S r
- '
i- ol�.�
�� .. C i.--��"'��tii..~y41s'�♦ `46"��_� •t M1�>.• X t 1�, r.�+_ z+-gip ' .-.;.
��... _ 1'eDZ +S.AS
/Try.
y
pp
a b - - •1,4 - !Xr r
��
�./

�r
'l
i ~ a sty • t°"� �• t - - -.., fre
y 1
Ar
r "f ^!r a,�" ,� 1�f i �:�•. _• i - �... .. � _ - '- --- yr. x}►_ - � — �
J Ay-'
-.- �- � .L �.. .��^� -. �,•_� r1i•�=, "1 t -- r.'�i�� '� -+_ ter_ M1 � - - .r" 7 -
�5 - -F -4 _ �� � �FR � ' Imo/ -,i =��}r� i �• '.Y �'�`:'y1..� 1- � ' .y �, ]('�� 4�f] - lj'�',-!{j
,� ` - ' y !. !•.. �,r�'' - o 2L.,'-�l 2, 0 ` .4 - 3. - --eyV'-26- .202,
- t f_ P .� . •.4 p

1
Ink
rr�r -
r
11
Mtai
rlZ
i R _
?002,; , I 6,200pli
4
,e. 7M
sy+'
a \ .3 y '� J 4 '� wNY}AY •Y}'_ 1 �! 1Y+
_ �_• �,�k .ea���' k'�i'.w�i ') � yy�� T�.�`. ir. `�r. '�'1f {'�
.. _ �� 2 � ,�+�>, x'l' 'i `.r -:Y� r• � lr.°7}s ice" �'i i � -`� � 9^

-- i -:+_ _ - Yam' - �. - - . - w:r ;1', it n! , � ' rr, . � • `^,,�, - . . -' . «� -
i W '� +� �� �. ��• � � I:fJ � � t #� � • ~ � � �. i /t KIT. -
.1'• a- - ter:" y' - _ ',:. _
- . �*�, _ 2 �`4Z+Ya� a ;, �Y _^++Fs. '�--�' � '. - - �w • - - - -
. !- :f,• }. -. .} 1. _
_ � a- rf -�� �'_ �� Y �.�:�. i�' `a*.'• Qom'. of -�-` �t �5�..
.. - ., s-...i��'•z•'�el - ''-ter � - -- - r4' .. - _ � a:Y -
■
lt+."
� c� r
a

RECEIVED
04-C. Dept. of EHN"
� AUG 2 6 1802
STATE ol, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPET
GOVERNOR SrCRETARY
August 21, 2002
Mr. John Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall, NC 27045
RE: Unnamed Tributary upstream of Shore Dr. SR 1632, Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Kapp:
We are writing to you about a potential safety and water quality hazard concerning material
coming from your property which is clogging the pipe under Shore Rd This pipe was inspected several
times over the past few weeks and remains in a state of obstruction due to the cow manure and sediment
from your property. The latest inspection was made on August 20, 2002, and there appeared to have been
some effort to clean out the pipe and creek, but it is unsatisfactory. Pictures have been taken during these
inspections. The material needs to be removed completely and taken to an off -site disposal area where it
will not run back into the creek during rain events. The potential for street flooding due to the material
obstructing the pipe is a safety hazard Also, the material may be degrading water quality, which may be a
violation under the jurisdiction of the Department of Environmental and Natural Resources.
The State has cleaned this pipe out in the past, but it is unfair to the taxpayers to foot the bill for a
continuous problem, which is privately caused_ There is an agency that can help offer long terse solutions
to this problem and if you would like to have some assistance, Ms. Deridre De Bruhl of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service can be contacted at 336-767-0720.
Because of the safety issues involved, we would appreciate the prompt cleaning of this material
out of the creek and pipe. This is your responsibility. An inspection will be made on September 6, 2002,
and if the creek and pipe have not been cleared, we will initiate enforcement action in accordance with GS
136-92 which states "It is unlawful to obstruct a drain along or leading from any public road in the state. A
person who violates this section will be guilty for an infraction.". If you have any questions, call me at
(336)-631-1340.
Sincerely,
Michacl T. Patton, R E,
Division Maintenance Engineer
CF: Mr. Pat Ivey, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Ronnie Joyce, Bridge Supervisor
Ms. Diane Hampton, P.E., Division Environmental Engineer
Ms. Deridre De Bruhl, MRCS
Ms. Melissa Rosebrock, NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Highways a Division Nine a 2125 Cloverdale Avenue, Winston-Salem, NC 27103
Telephone [phone] a Fax [phone] a Courier Box 13-12-04

L
f Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit O Rout i Compi;int • Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 3Q "'� Date col, Visit; S/t4120112 'I'inu•: 1300
O Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted © Certified Q Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: W1311M. ....
Farm Name: KUPA.LitnsltoAk.Farm .............................................,..,............................... County: FQray.th.............................................. WaSRQ........
Owner Name: dQiln........................................ Kapp .........
............ ........... ............ I................ Phone No: 33fing(2-fth3.Q...........................................................
Mailing Address: UQ5.KaRtJFArpit.Rd....... ..........................:....I..... I. ......... furx1.jWt11.xC................................ .. 2,70.45 .............
.................. ...................
FacilityContact: 1 uhtl#7ay..Kapp................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................„..............................
Onsite Representative: johaDy.KApp...............•_, ' Integrator:
Certified Operator:,
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
:xit off Hwy. 52N at Westinghouse Road, turn left onto Westinghouse, Farm entrance is 1st on the left.
❑ Swlne Q poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F —36--1 • 134 1 28 1& Longitude F 80 ' l9 ZO44
"'�� gJ-Wz"-WwvrM*t D2e gn Currt s Design 'Gtiire'Des
°S,gax:jy Ca aci P,o ulsUon Poultry Ca actt P.o ulation Cattle @a `acit ivcPo ulatton r
Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
t
❑ Feeder to Finish r ❑ Non -Layer ® Non -Dairy 150
❑ Farrow to Wean ?
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity 150
,. ❑ Cilts b
# ❑Boars Tots "SSL 120�000
Numbeof•hagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Presert# _❑ Lagoon Arca ❑Spray Field Area
Holdiitgonds /Solid Traps 0 ®No Liquid Waste IVlanagemen# System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
it, Il*discharge is observed, was The conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. ]f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
J. Does discharge bypass a IagiHm system? (ll' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? N Yes ❑ No
Waste Collation & Treallmkrit
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..NAtapp&ahIe...................................... .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
05103/01 �/l6 7'f Continued
AJ1.�.J

Facility Number: 34-7 0 Date of 111speclion 8/14/2002 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AD1JliC11ti0fl ' \ .
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Soybeans Pasture
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16.
is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ReutriredRecords
&Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
mments {refer to queston #i]: Lxplain any E ans n or any ecommen ations or any oth r c
se drawings of facillt o better explain situations. i i pa ecessary : ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
I
Questions 4-14, 16-22, 25-26, and 29-32 are not applicable to this facility at this time.
AL
3. Today's visit was a result of a complaint alleging that cattle waste from this facility had stopped -up a 52 inch culvert located at the
downhill end of the cattle pasture. I was not able to see the culvert since sediment had completely buried the culvert. Approximately 900
feet of stream uphill from the culvert is mpacted due to heavy cattle traffic. Streambank/streambed is eroded and void of vegetation. The
stream actually begins as a spring in the pasture. Lots of sediment was noted in the stream. Some cattle manure was noted in the stream,
however, sediment appears to be the main concern. Pastures are well vegetated.
24. This facility will need to be checked again after the culvert under Shore Road has been cleaned -out.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

.j /dirty Number: 34-7 nl' Inspeclion F8/14/20072
Odor Issues %
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan bells, missing or
'or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
■71
J
05103101

-z� .r a � _'t j. - SF- - ate+.. •ram �� •� i -

A�l I
_ E
_�, J� � � _�•4 � � ��� I �. !r — ""L Y:�: ♦�+ �,�.. - may' -
�, �,- -:.' •��.�`:�� , '°max„ - _
_ 4 `' �w r S �t+ '• {aa� ' �7. J@' 6 ram.
',..-'�+y-s' ems.-_ - 1 w� '�a^w•_ TY ... r1 r ..r_ yyS': } .'ii .. "-_ .
PAN
41
f�
r'1+

It-
-_�.
14
Jp
T
Z
�"' -; «'�4+ �-> y '}_fir. ,� '�=-:s.•� � mow.'- +-- d'}' _

State of North Caro
Department of Envi ent
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 3, 1998 R F C 7 r V 7. 71
John Kapp N.G. D_ it)i, t) i
Kapp Livestock Farm '��
210S Kapp Farm Rd.
Rural Hall NC 27045
Winston-S(-Oem
Subject: Removal of Registratioaegjonal Gimice
Facility Number 34-7
Forsyth County
Dear John Kapp:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality maybe
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water
Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans
are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 11000
Pouk with a ILquid wastes tern 30,000
If you have questions regarding this Ietter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,
&C�
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Winston-Salem-Waterl. uality.ltegionat:Office>
Forsyth Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
F.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SO% recycted/10 % post -consumer paper

unrtea states
C .•.�_ --- r._ ■►' •'*ice_=_,■,Rom.
DWO Water Quality Section
Attn,: Sue Homewood
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Nis. Homewood:,
1450 Fairchild Drive, Room 11
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
[phone] ext. 202
January 14, 1998
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
JAN a 6 1998
Winston-Salem.
Regional Ofce
This letter is in regards to the Kapp Livestock Farm (Facility Number 34-7) located in Forsyth County,
Johnny Kapp has requested that his operation be removed from the .0200 registration list. 1 have
visited this farm three times since I started my job as District Conservationist in June, 1997. Though, I
have not physically counted the number of cows on the farm, I have not seen 100 cows concentrated in
a confined area.
During a December 1997 visit, I explained the .0200 regulations to Mr. Kapp. Mr. Kapp told me that he
had 50 cows and 45 calves on his "home" farm. These cows are allowed to graze and roam on pasture
land.
Mr, Kapp has five non-contiguous tracts of pastureland (approx. 200 acres) that he uses for cattle
grazing. He stated that he decreased the number of cows raised on his home farm but he had never
had over 100 cows confined on one farm.
He believes that he was misled when told by a former employee of another agency that he had to
register.
In my professional opinion, the Kapp Livestock Farm should be removed from the .0200 registration list
because he has less than 100 head of cattle on one farm. The cattle are raised on pastureland. The
cattle have access to a feedlot but they are not confined for 45 days cut of a year.
Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Deirdre A. DeBruhl
District Conservationist
cc: Mike Mickey

V!
•
•
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Kapp Farm, No. 34-7
Date sent: Tue, 24 Feb 199813:58:56
In a letter to you dated 1/14/98, NRCS requested that the Kapp
Livestock farm be removed from the list of registered facilities.
The owner has agreed to confine less than 100 head at his winter
feeding lot. Based on this information, WSRO concurs with the
request for removal.
Mickey
-- 1 -- Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:58:57

;Stag, of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman.
John H. Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall NC 27045
Dear Mr. Kapp:
•
Aldft
E::�EHNR
November 6, 1997
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
N.C. Dept. of 99R
N OV 10 1997
Wit-ston-Salem
R,�i�'3onal Office
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about, this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.Q. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/beth/animalwaste/tempcertfollowup

State of North Caro4*
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1
Winston-Salem Regional Office f
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary [DIEHNFR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
-- Water Quality Section ---
August 14, 1997
Mr. John-H. Kapp
2105 Kapp Farm Road
Rural Hall, N.C. 27045
SUBJECT: Animal Operation Site Inspection
Kapp Livestock Farm
Facility No. 34-7
Forsyth County
Dear Mr. Kapp:
The purpose of this letter is to summarize the inspection of Kapp Livestock Farm. Ron
Linville and I from the Division of Water Quality and Mike Bowman with Forsyth S&WCD and
Dede DeBruhl with NRCS met with you on August 13, 1997. Attached is a copy of the Animal
Operation Site Inspection form that was left with you.
The inspection found numerous water quality concerns that need to be addressed. Stream
bank erosion was noted along all streams in pasture areas. In addition, the heavy use areas at
both barns were severely eroded, with little means to control animal waste. Please be aware that
the cuirent rules require your beef -cattle operation obtain and implement a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan by December 31, 1997. '
Your cooperation in this matter would be appreciated. Please contact me if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Michael M. Mickey
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Forsyth S&WCD
Central Files
WSRO
585 Woughtown Street, 714.C
FAX [phone]
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 2241 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-771-4600 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number
Farm Status: "mastered [IApplied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection -
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:.1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection includes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...... ................... ........ ....... ..... . . ..... . . ................... .... ._,........ ......... .............. ................
Farm Name: County:.»O .... ». » ...... .
Land Owner Name: ............ . ;u�i,%\ .... _.1..Y-I.&. ................
.......... Phone No:.,...1»1.�.. 5���0......................
Facility Conctact:..................... �'...................................... Title: ....... Us�............... Phone No:..........................................................
Mailing Address: ...�15�Qi�L' ��►...... ........ ...... �4,�r»...._.....�
Onsite Representative: ................. .....SR........,................................................ Integrator:......,�1.................._........ ...................... I .................
.
Certified Operator:. ...... ............................... . Operator Certification Number:...........`...........................
Location of Farm:
............................................................................._..._._....... .._.. ...., ... _�............,................ �_...»......
..»� �N... ....... �k•C..n..\5�.. . -=4%' .. A 9 h...NP,*.. ..... a
LatitudeLongitude ®•� �� ��
Type of Operation and Design CapacityDesigt►� Ci�rrent,�1Design° Current ��W
Design Current
SWine n,:�u'aw< a k ai yPo ulatfon; Poultry a';Ca aci Fo ulat16n _ Cat*Ca aci Pv ulahoa�
Wean to Feeder er ❑ Dairy
❑ er to Finish ❑ Non er ❑ Non -Dairy
Farro WeanF
Farrow to der Tt,talDestgn Capacity"
I El Farrow to FiniAN ORAMp1;l
.Lp h
.W ❑Other Yi. " dE ., �, "A' 1aA,"'. ['� -:
,R�iiZlr
N
X4MVP �$4
Number of Lagoons</, IioitiingPvnds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present .
�<a3 r n n ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Areaf>
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
VYes
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
014o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
Vio
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
M'510
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
j'No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
[(Yes
❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding Ponds) require
9Kes
❑ No
4/30/97 maintenancelimprovement?
Continued on back

.Facility Number:. �...—..�....
.•` . 6. Is -facility not in compliance with an able setback criteria in effect at the time oft? ❑ Yes WNO
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? D Yes VNo
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes [/No
capacity (freeboard plus sto storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
rd (11): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
1ge served f many of the structures?
❑Yes
❑ No
11.on, or a they threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Xestructure
El Yes
❑ No
1of a structure eed maintenance/improvement?
❑Yes
❑ No
of questions 9-12 s answered yes, and the situation poses an
iate public health or vironmental threat, notify DWQ)
1of the structures lack adequa minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑Yes
(] No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
&Ko
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.......................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Phan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? N \ �
❑ Yes
(DI�o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
gKo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RNO
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
1.4I'No
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For_ CertifiesCFacilities
*Yes
0No
Unly
22, es the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
El Yes
El No
23. Were a additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑Yes
❑ No
24. Docs record kee ' need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ev'^5 (�- �\%NV e. VQ4 \-Z.
, a
Reviewer/In spector Name �. .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, {Eater Quality Section, Facility AssessnApt Unit 4/30/97

p DSWC An' eedlot Operation Review
�,. M DWQ Ani eedlot Operation Site Inspection
yi�� 11q j d- .4+.MrI
i�d'Y:�['.,N?�91hdf3
19 Routine O Complaint..0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up o review p Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: M Registered .p Applied for Permit
13 Certified p Permitted
p Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Kapp Livestock Farm County: Forsyth .............................................. .W..SRO........
OwnerName:John........................................ Kapp........................................................... Phone No: 9.69463lf............................................. I.....................
Facility Contact: lame ...................................... I ............ ................. Title: Owincr................................................ Phone No:(9.10)9.69A6,30 .....................
Mailing Address: 211R5..Kapp.harm.Rd..............................................................•..••..... Rural.Hall.NC ...................................................... 270.45 .............
OnstteRepresentative: Jakn.M.Kapp.......................... ................................................... Integrator: .... ........... ....................... ................................... _............
Certifies! Operator: ............................................... . . ........................ . ................................... Operator Certification Number: ....... ................................ ...
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ©° ®�� Longitude ®,
Type of OperationQ i, � ,k Design Cui rent . 6esi n' Currenf
�� CapaClty ;Pop�ula'ti fig "Poultry;$�rG Capacity'"P.sipulatioii»i:,Cattle" A --
Capacity Population
g4rF .�1JU31h.xh v:�"..'..: ris laU'�.OJ T�1'pax :1 ::��i."
p can to Feeder p Layer "' pDairy
p ee er to finis "<t' p Non -Layer I I® on- airyi
�1 CI arrow t0 can3? a { " i� .4' i dl i4 Y' ; �A a W q fiti II,
pi}i'i'' Total Design Cagactty; a..... �� , a
arrow to ee er > i A
tiJ #� a�6 n
arrow to Finish �t+ �d r s r �� d
,` �a'I'otal�SSLW ' ,Ai
h�[3 Other ' M �` ; ,` 11 ' s'; L,_.N•,
•.�'
Mtn
CSIM
n a{� jnrx f .........._........ mbenof{Lagoons�lding�Ponris �� Eu Sur ace rains resen 13Pgoon rci ❑ prsiy re � re:►"r ] 1 :' :' "41 .1! lil y ❑
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it teach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rain?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
IS Yes p No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® Na
p Ycs ® No
[:]Yes No
[]Yes ® No
N Yes []No
® Yes []No

Facility Number: 34._7
6. Is facility not in compliance with anA*ble setback criteria in effect at the time of e ?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
p Yes M No
Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes q No
Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
H . Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
I3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify D WQ)
15. Crop type.................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ONO
p Yes ® No
p Yes []No
p Yes M No
p Yes p No
p Yes M No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes ❑ No
p Yes p No
(Questions �l;"4 .5)'.FJohn KappFoperates a beef cattleioperation;with approximately head 250 "spread over six or seven pastures. A.
Per�odicaliy, the cattle".are confined in a feedlot across -from his house. The feedlot area and adjacent pasture are severely eroded
due to the heavy use Streainiiank erosion is also a.prablem. - These areas will be addressed by the CA WMP.
kz
(Questions 13jManure waste handled by scrape and haul. No lagoon present.
,
i7,3,(sQ3 , r�ltdi t�" r a. 'S1♦ ". r
Questions H 6� 3i18 �22 24) rFacility not yet certified 'No plan in.place.
.rM}L A yry r si u
2...:
o,direct discharge was observed during the inspection r
L-
'�
:✓?4Lt. .s fi$..+[r.�:a"n�tt'':.�i.r.r. }v�t..........e'1 w���, Sad.a �c-.t . � I .� ...�:� . e ., - -. .... ... .. T I
Reviewer/Inspector Name M ilce Mickey <. P°.y���!!99t ' a� _: +N!} + � 1�, .v k sae ; }} h' ' , f" E `t`i i t' ry,��
`.e.'liali°1"�` „'.sr.li`.;GN':�rc:-�.��i�...J:.»4s..l:��il¢E i3tU..�::�.41�'�'• _rhk.j^.�,:.Id"?AfCili.eu '!q .r,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: $:��.-0�"\

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr,, Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, ChairmanDecember 5, 1996
John Kapp
Kapp Livestock Farm
2105 Kapp Farm Rd.
Rural Hall NC 27045
Dear Mr. Kapp:
1DEHNR
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Kapp Livestock Farrn
Facility ID #: 34-7
Forsyth County
11,+�C11'
DEC i 2s9s
. �-._.'• jr.lP�
ice
" J
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996, This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an 01C.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
'Me W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Winston Salem Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System W 4Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission NVf C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0536 W% recycled/ 100% post-consurner paper

15 , 34 FRC DEM TER D. AL_ I TY SECTION TO
W5fKU r . rsv % F
Q~=s�-lss5
S
Site Requires Ir=aiatc Atteetion: ��•
Facility No..,' LI
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANUAAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS STTE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: — , 1995
Time; 'Osna
Farm Naax(Ownm
MaM4 Addrw: w�.\�� , Nk-NPr o ActR �►� .� t��y�R�
IatCgraLo�r: Phone:
On Site Repmactadve: :S�c, .wy ���' u; ' F'bone:
Physical Addmss/L.ocation: t- ` �y l
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry . Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Numb: ACE_______ DEM Ccttifleation Number: ACNEW
Latitude:•'." Longitude:- °�' ao " Elevation: t
Cftle Yes or No
Does the AairrW Waste Lagoon have sufficient free board of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour sto m event
(Appm)dmately i Foot + 7 inches) Yes err No Actual Fmboard: ____FL � Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available far spray? Yes or No Is the cove= crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Foot from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from wells? Yes or No I
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste lend applisd or spray irrigated Within 25 Fret of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is annual waste discharged into wags of the state by man-made ditch, flushing symna, ere• other
similar man-made devices? Yes of No if Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land
Way irrigated on epccific a areage with cover mop)? Yes or No
AdditiorW Comments:
NOW
7- n, � ` f
cc: FacWry Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

4956 IV St
559 _ _ 2Q' 5m s61 (KING) v KING 4.1 NJ. $63 17
ti t
I12''�•>
Q71\
�if � • I � �1 9� I r �\�a •µ _ �� 1
�� / r� •'� % /, c�1 � : J� J k �� J 77��� ��• , �,�-- ,9y r `��• L y� � ��a� �`�,� `, I �
/ter f r l G 1! r. I� • !'rr`� \ o ✓ ��1`�: '' { - 9,.
' ��\ J ri f � 1_ '! ���!'�'.l�,jJ ���'4% r � fr `4 iii '�p �'~�.�' .• �,I.yr
�''� a \` � x . Lf � .r rf ram. r,; 7 �` o � ,� IFO •',� ' �--
•� 1� r \�V v � Rb� ,� �,, �+ � •i l�� "' `� 1 � r� � � � a1 ,•.�--:'E lrel� / -_
c� � , •. J gyp � a
�,,�4 / 1 _ y 1y ram/ @ ,� G ' •� %� yr
. 7:7n
��� lJ'� `�1 `•�• / � J' 1 SIC, r �/ ' � �'�(� •! -'' �•'•�•
I If
�, � v � `r'• ``T.J g� 7 �Sti = \, �1 /1 1r oy rr ... ���' ;' Q .',` ; •,tL.��
l_____� �-�� + •'�7 '`� � % �/r� � � .','"r� •.b• ',j-.• '�.gip '
D ti\`�'• r Y••. -^-� \ a � , `fir `'t � p i /f / >. ` �r :: .r ,I^i, II�('•\.
�y�� `� � ��-..Y`� ! � +i � lJ �i of � r. S 1 �\3, i 32 � t, lv � '"J� ',�``�� � -�•
� � �«-tiJ �� o� � _ _�--ter_ y�� — �� \� � ` . \� i �fl �r� . f i � C_� ill =•,y� •� \',� '�'"�' �,`�. ��!
Kapp Livestock Faun
J, Mr John Ka
PP, Owner
-� Facility No. 34-7 (Beef Cattle) ;`{'
' !f �o �• Forsyth County C—l7—NE
o —z cW.
FX
W.-.�