300002_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Jerry K. Foster
Jerry Foster Farms
951 Dulin Rd
Mocksville, NC 27028
Dear Jerry K. Foster:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 8, 2009
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept of ENR
0CT f 3 ZQ09
Wlnaton-Salem i
Reglonal Office
Subject: Permit No. AW1300002
Jerry Foster Farms
Animal Waste Management System
Davie County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with your permit renewal and modification request, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Permit issued to Jerry K. Foster authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system. You had indicated the animal population at this facility to be zero until such time as the waste
storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Jerry Foster Farms, with an annual capacity of no greater than an
annual average of zero (0) Swine.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until August 31, 2014 and replaces the COC No.
AWS300002 issued to this facility on October 1, 2004. You are subject to the conditions of this permit
until the closure of all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a letter to
the Division of Water Quality to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of closure
of all containment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a 100-ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
1636 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Bli Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6746 North Carolinra.
Internet: www,ncwaterqualiry,org Naturally
/��
An Epual Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Ewp oyer � �/ `

0
0
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this P,ermif;,please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H, Sullins
CC' Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Davie County Health Department
Davie County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AW1300002)
AFO Notebooks

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 300002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS300002 t_1 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Davie Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 12/15/2008 Entry Time:10900 AM Exit Tlme: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Jerry Foster Farms Owner Email:
Owner. ,may K Foster Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 951_Dulin Rd
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°56'11" Longitude: 80"29'29"
40 West to 801 exit, left onto Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Jerry K Foster Operator Certification Number: 17938
Secondary OIC(s):
OnSite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry K Foster Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jerry K Foster Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

s �
Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Date: 1211512008 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Today's inspection was to check closure procedures for lagoon.
Waste applications were made about three weeks ago onto three different fields containing corn stubble that are to be planted in
wheat as soon as the fields dry, Application to fiel behind church was within 35 feet of the church's property line and about 120 feet
from the church, DWQ nor SWCD received any complaints. Applications were thin with no evidence of run-off from any of the fields
Contractor is Brent Galliher C-704.902.4358 H-704.546.5521.
3. Two large areas (and two smaller areas) on the lagoon embankment are eroding sediment due to land disturbances associated with
the closure. Approximately 4 inches of sediment in stream at end of notched ditch due to disturbed soil from embankment, Tech
specialist and contractor were instructed to install a sediment catch basin at the corner of the lagoon to contain the flow of solids
(mostly sediment) from the lagoon. Installation is to commence on 1218108. Silt fencing and rip -rap are to be installed as needed along
with seeding for establishment of vegetation.
The inside slope of the lagoon is to be used to fill in the "water area"in the bottom of the lagoon so that grass can be seeded to fulfill
NRCS requirement. Sludge was first moved from end nearest freshwater pond then moved back towards spillway. Maybe 3 inches of
waste in some areas.
Mr. Galliher contacted DWQ-WSRO to say that the silt fence was installed and that the sediment basin had been dug and appears to
be containing the sediment.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Data: 12/15/2008 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
taste Pond WSP 18.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
■ ❑
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ MOO
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Page: 3

Type of Visit �) Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit x Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: �LO
Farm Name: n C Owner Email:
� t1i�' �� .
Owner Name: Jr- r-_1J1 �OS L.tr _ Phone: 9 9 $ 75
l ,
Mailing Address: U 110 0 , NC. a ._ b 9S-
Physical Address: _ _ �� Lim e,
Facility Contact: ,7e_4 V—NJ L05+e.r Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: S �Y'Y'V C`C)S {'e lm Integrator: Tb&4'eMPxnt
Certified Operator: �Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [�° [� i [ Longitude: [M° �
0 801 So 0%, • t h-� on to1~�w s$ - Le f b n
ffi C owe � . mfo butr p_r- bn [Q-F+
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pou Its
❑ Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
EjDry
Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
yNo
❑ NA
❑ N E
[--]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[--]Yes
[--]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ElNA ❑ NE
ElYes tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3a- az Date of Inspections .2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 tructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Orl
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes IgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes L� No ❑ NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? D Yes WO
`❑ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? �No
1I. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes [INA ElNE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) `.1
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes XNo ElNA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ElYes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'! El Yes �N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes k
o[INA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
±omment(referrto question #) Expisin any,�YES�`answersand/or.any recommendati�ns'or any other comments.
Jsel'drawings�oftfacility to`bettcr eaplain situations �{use additionai.page§has nece��syys7a�ry) �.
-� €.�',:.�.b.✓. 9.. ?. . 4 � �A k...^ :ih�. eu� � -�� �i9w...4%7t4�'�!P1i;"y �',
/1J aC�ogo �-O
Reviewer/Inspector Name rpC'�,L , , �;� Phone: �0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: a
i.LS h �' E U'-`i-���'l'nXE, . CO ('_ r� I�1PP ] •DU�`�i'Y1�-CC_I b.StL'J �r_'

Facility Number: W—b Ste of Inspection b •
Re
uired Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? 1
❑ Yes�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
E�V aste Application L1�Weekly Freeboard E Vaste Analysis [Soil Analysis [�Wste Transfers
//
pdRainfall [Stocking 5ycrop Yield Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections 04ather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
*o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
XNA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification'?
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
A,
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
El NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
IV
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
m
Does facility require a follow-up visit by sae agency? �Lt.��
(� Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional i 1
lqUP-1-h)( L4JjdA C re
ana_lpiS - I -DA5. • i • • ��
l t Ir �� � �' � �Git� j' �r y 1 � + �"' ��1•
II
6,44 alL-)
r
A if
It
1 - 12128104

A , A . — .n _ A bA w `
Division of Water Qualit-W /T4-Av 1 {' M
Facility Number 1, Division of Soil and Water Conservatio
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit (Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: : 3 1 Departure Time: 10 1 0 County: `► Region: La- p-0
Farm Name: C Owner Email: Q
Owner Name: _ ,P_,ir r Ut Fn S Fear Phone:
Mailing Address: S V t h at 0 L L V t N L- ,2 2 d a
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: \JZ4r r ' R-4-- Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: FQS Integrator: Si'1G� {YC
Certified Operator: r Fos bgAc Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: �° ®4MCA Longitude: 80 ° � oZ ��
LL:> • -tD 'Sd l sa �,`t�► Z+. o r�fo 1 S Le f -- o vIfo
Hbt,,__rd -moo w n rnq-o -Du k n - Fa_)r m o r)
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
II❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharp,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dai Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes U(,J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3 . Date of Inspection 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
�,/
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
}�l No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1� Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
D Identifier: bd�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
g o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
N<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes C' '" ❑ NA ❑ NE
8: Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ArNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window, ❑.Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
❑ No
O NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2 �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: J�oZ
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur A4 4 Date:
V V L A V— 12128104 - Continued

4Facility Number: � Q ate of Inspection al d 10
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ; No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes M/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
M Waste Applica 'on Vee Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil A ysisEl-w�� D;m@ainfall Stocking Crop Yield Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections Bather Coda
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No VNA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
Other Issues ,�
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [IE Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [� No El NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately l_�
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by El Yes B o ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes off❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ljd'1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
' a dos,LAe
5• U s`%-�2S4� S l r U ci-u r•f..
.3/s f o 7
{ S� IV to
M-X
12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 300002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS300002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance InApectmon Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: County: Davie Region: Win§jgn-Salem
Date of Visit: 01/12/2006 Entry Time: 01:20 PM Exit Time. 02:05 PM
Farm Name: Jerry Foster -Farms
Owner., JerQj K Foster
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 951 Dulin Rd Mocksville NC 270287208
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°56'1 Longitude: 80°29'29"
40 West to 801 exit, left onto Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
Question Areas:
N Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
ij Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry K Foster Operator Certificatlon Number: 17938
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Jerry K Foster Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Jerry K Foster Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrack Phone: [phone]Ext 383
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Inspection Summary:
7. Lagoon embankment looks much better.
21. Rocords look greatl
21. Recent records are based on 3.0 lbs. N11000 gal. Check records next visit after recent waste sample result has come back.
21. Waste analysis for Fall 2005 applications was slightly outside the 60-day window. New waste sample was sent yesterday,
Page: 1

•
Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster
Inspection Date: 01/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 300002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine '
O Swine - Farrow to Finish 225 225
Total Design Capacity: 225
Total SSLW: 316,825
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 18.00 72.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number,. 300002
Inspection Date: 01/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dlscharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
MOO
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ M
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS300002 owner- Facility: Jerry K Foster
Facility Number. 300002
Inspection Date: 01/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Melt: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidenoe of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crap Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Al
Page: 4

Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Date: 01/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? .
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

•
Permit: AWS300002 Owner- Facility: Jerry K Foster
Inspection Date: 01/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 300002
Reason for Via It: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
Q ■
❑
32. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ M
❑
33. floes facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
Page: 6

Type of Visit {� Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ,xRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 10 111.1 Arrival Time: 0 %�.O Departure Time: OS County: b6" Region:w5(Z()
Farm Name: EaS r QrLrns r �� C_ - Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ zeXr `+!4"a5 1 �� Phone:-.q q
Mailing Address: a s bu l ihRdfo V L NC- a -70 a-!r
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: -__ _ \ i ��r � 1 f?� Title: Phone No: 1 ! � r ?Y a 7
Onsite Representative: 1 Integrator: 2LM a4_*\�
Certified Operator: S2.rr Eosler Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: �� Longitude: g M o
3 .� 02
U W e-Sk o o onto IS .- e o In o of-o..n-
w� l L�e4 onto Sul Farm on ��•%�
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
i
i ❑ Layer
I; ❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ I a ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: m
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes MNo ElNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: U— Q DAInspection •
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes Ltd No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, 'check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WCp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Doe record keeping neeVW
rovement`? If yes, chec the appropriate bo�elow. ❑ Yes L�Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application eekly Freeboard Waste Analysis IJ Soil al sis lr-1 . _
Y
Rainfall NJ Stocking [Crop Yield Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? e.0q44 Yes
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge'?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pennit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit'? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
L0,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]No
,%NA
❑ NE
b6No
❑NA
ONE
❑ No
*A
❑ NE
PrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No VNA ❑ NE
❑ No
�No
O(No
XNo
)dNo
VNo
El NA ❑NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
i i Drawings:
itAL
U 12128104

Facility Number:—07-1 is Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structur 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
t"
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
IXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
�(4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
( o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
j\
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
ElYes
❑ NA ❑ NE
�(No
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn,
etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside
of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
L o
[I NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
ElNo
t
ElNA
ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
YesNo
1XNA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
I%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name ; A Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: OfI Id-L
12/28/04 Continued

Re: Davie co.
z � •
Subject: Re: Davie co.
From: Rocky Durham <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 12:46:07 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Thanks Melissa,
Jerry Foster's is a waste storage pond. He agitates it and broadcasts the
slurry. -I think the local guys wrote the waste plan based on his waste samples.
Do you want me to send you copies of my reports or are you OK with looking at
them on BIMS?
Thanks again,
Rocky
Melissa Rosebrock wrote:
three so far ... for your files.
Melissa Rosebrock
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone] ext 3B3
FAX: [phone]
Rocky Durham - [e-mail]
Environmental Engineer
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Div. of Soil & Water Conservation
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: [phone]
i of I 8/5/2005 1:46 PM

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS300002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RQUjine County: Davie Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: Q810412005 Entry Time: QB:55 AM Exit Time: -10:05 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Jerry Foster Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Jerry K Foster Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 951 Dulin Rd Mocksviile NC 270287208
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°56'11" Longitude: 80°29'29"
40 West to 801 exit, left onto Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
0 Waste Collection & Treatment 0 Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry K Foster Operator Certification Number: 17938
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry K Foster Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jerry K Foster Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa M Rosebrock Phone: [phone]
Ext 383
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
7. Need to cut a few trees on dam between the two ponds. Need to spray broadleaf weeds on lagoon embankment.
21. Records are great!
24. Honey wagon was calibrated July 2005. Not due again until Dec. 2008.
25. Check with Rocky. May be a waste pond per operator.
6/17/05 Waste sample= 2.4 lbs. NI1000 gal.
Page: 1

•
Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster
Inspection Date: 08/04/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
0
Facility Number: 300002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Finish 225 225
Total Design Capacity., 225
Total SSLW: 318,825
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 18.00 60.00
Page: 2

0 0
Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Date: 08/0412005 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NF
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ m ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse Impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
iEs
M ❑ ❑
No NAME
Waste Cnllartinn, Rtnrgge R Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑ ❑
It yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑
M ❑ ❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
M ❑ ❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures tack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9, Does any part of the waste management system other then the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑ ❑
Improvement?
Yes
No NA NE
Warta A Iipj� catlon
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compllance alternatives that need maintenance or Improvement?
❑
M ❑ ❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

• r
Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster
Facility Number: 300002
inspection Date: 08/04/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Male 6onlicca ,tion
Crop Type 6
Yes
No -NA -NE
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
s ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
E ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
0 ❑ ❑
No NA NE
Recnrds and Documents
19. Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
n ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 Inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fall to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPOES only)?
❑
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fall to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS300002 Owner • Facility: Jerry K Foster
Inspection Date: 08/04/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 300002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Qlbm luum
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the Inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fall to discuss review/Inspection with on -site representative?
33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
[Is ❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ m ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Type of Visit IC pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit[ Foutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County.� i t✓ Region: �0
Farm Name: Klitin C- ' Owner Email:
Owner Name: �`� �`�(�Jr - -- -- Phone: } O g�Ta
Mailing Address: �,�.� _ �1�% r ��-�� j I "L L'�5 V le. ! ! v � �'` ­7 V
Physical Address:' - Q j
Facility Contact: Title: Phon$No: V — + �
Onsite Representative: ��pX 1A V-7r)5� Integrator:
Certified Operator: 14 • r�bS±2Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ®' EU Longitude: 9M
Io w �s %6 So �h . + oni o .15�
o Lo a1 r- win , d� rn 1���. Le- -� o rrfo Du l i h
On VP
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other j
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from'any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: U`
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: 3 o Z • Date of Inspection •
Waste Collection & Treatment *No
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stormstorage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Con
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): U10
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes *o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA El NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA Cl NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
El NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:(]
Yes
No
N/NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
El NA
El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a� c� ((-7l�s Loos+-? 6" �� a.� (ems. N��000
ac
Reviewer/Inspector Name�����®s ` —�
U[_itrG� Phone: 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — O D-O' Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes biNo
❑ Yes , <O
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does cord keeping need improvement? If yes, check t e appropriate box elow. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application [ Veekly Freeboard aste Analysis Soil A lysis �awsfe ticatiea
❑ Rainfall Stockin Cro Yield Monthl and 1" Rain Inspections
Weather Code
g r Y
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�No
[-INA❑
NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
l No
VNA
❑ NE
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? OCA' 0 ❑ Yes
'% No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pen -nit? CX4 .V d
1 ❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
D❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
WA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'?
❑ Yes
No
1A
ElNA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector rail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative'?
ElYes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
k Los b� P
I2128104

0' 0
❑ Division of Water Quality
E Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 2Q0002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS300002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: OnerationsReyiew Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Davie Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 03/16/2005 Entry Time:12045 PM Exit Time: 02:15 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Jey Foster Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Jay K Foster _
Mailing Address: 951 Dulin R¢. _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant . Integrator:
Phone; 336-998-8427
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*56'11" Longitude: 80°29'29"
40 West to 801 exit, left onto Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church,
Question Areas:
® Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents 0 Other issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Jerry K Foster
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Rocky Durham Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary: -
Waste analysis: 12/13/04 ALS 2.0 Ibs.N11000 gals. B. 08/17/04 ALS 2.4 Ibs.N11000 gals. B
Soil samples dated 03/26/04
#21. The new permit requires rainfall events to be recorded per event. The new permit requires monthly stocking rates to be kept.
The new permit requires that crop yields be kept on each application field. The new application records require a weather code to be
recorded on the dates of waste application.
*Remember to calibrate your slurry tank within two years of Oct. 1, 2004.
Page: 1

0
Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Date: 03/16/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Finish 225 225
Total Design Capacity: 225
Total SSLW: 318,825
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 18.00 54.00
Page: 2

• •
Permit: AWS300002 Owner- Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Date: 03/16/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Qisrharqe,5 S Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ NoO
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse Impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
M ❑ ❑
No NA NE
Waste Collection_ Stnrage & Trealpent
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
n ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑
M ❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
0 0 ❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or Improvement?
❑
M ❑ 11
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
0
0 ❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
0 ❑ 0
Improvement7
Yes
No NA NE
Waste Arplication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or Improvement?
❑
0 11 ❑
1 i. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to Incorporate manure/sludge Into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

• •
Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Date: 03/1612005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application xes No NA NE
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Enon
Soil Type 2 Mocksville
Soil Type 3 Wedowee
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the Irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
■ ❑ ❑
No NA NE
Becords and Documents
19. Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑ ■
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■ ❑
26. Did the facility fall to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Page: 4

•
•
Permit: AWS300002 Owner- Facility: Jerry K Foster
Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Date: 03/16/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit* Routine
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
1101113
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
❑
0 ❑
❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
❑
[Don
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
01113
32. Dld Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
01111
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
moo
34. Waste plan revision or amendment ❑
El
35. Waste plan conditional amendment
❑
36, Review or evaluate waste plan w/producer
❑
13
37. Forms need (list in comment section)
38. Missing components (list In comments)
❑
39.2H.0200 re -certification
❑
40. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
El
41. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
42. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
43. Sludge evaluation
❑
13
44. Sludge or Closure plan
❑
11
45, Sludge removallolosure procedures
❑
❑
46. Waste structure evaluation
❑
47. Structure needs improvement
❑
48. Operation & maintenance improvements
❑
11
49. Marker check/calibration
❑
50. Site evaluation
❑
Page: 5

• •
Permit: AWS300002 Owner - Facility: Jerry K Foster Facility Number: 300002
Inspection Date: 03/16/2005 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
11
51. Irrigation calibration
■
52, Irrigation system design/installation
❑
53. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
54. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
55. Wettable acre determination
❑
56. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
57. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
11
58. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
59. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
60, Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
61. Buffer improvements
❑
62. Field measurements (GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
63. Mortality BMPs
❑
64, Waste operator education
❑
1-71
65. Operation & maintenance education
❑
66. Record keeping education
■
■
67. Croplforage management education
❑
68. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
69, PLAT Assessment
❑
70. Other
❑
Page: 6

Type of Visit O• Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 30 2 Date of Visit: 2/5/2004 Time: 1000
Q Not O perational Q 13elow Threshold
M Permitted M Certified © Conditionally Certified D Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : ... ..........
Farm Name: F.QsXer. FaraaJnc ............................................................ ...... County: ]DA. i.C........._....._...................... }?YBRQ .....
Owner Name: dehtYFt]stet-----------------------_--.-- Phone No: 3�Ct99_$=$427._._._------------------------
Mailing Address: 9511.ulixt.Rd......................................................................................... 1!acku..i11c...NC..................................................... 27.928 ..............
Facility Contact: .1lCrxy.Foxtrx .......................................Title: ............................................... Phone No:
Onsite Rep resentative:.jgrnJEQ5ter___.__-._----------.-.-...- __.---------- Integrator: __._..__._.---------------.-._---_---------•
Certified Opera for: .ttCjrIy................................... FRSt�I................................................ Operator Certification Number: 17.93$.............................
Location of Farm:
10 West to 801 exit, left onto Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 56 i 1 t '< Longitude
D se ign Current Design Current Design Cu rr ent
f[I
wine Ca sel I?o ulation Poultry Ca aelt P,o ulation Cattle C•a acit P,o Wation
Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy P
Feeder to Finish ❑Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
y
® Farrow to Finish 225 Total Design ;Ink a 225
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW 318,825 �.
-a
Number of Lagoons 1
fly
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........ Lagoon ........ .................... ....... .......................... ........ -•--•--•--.................•--•-............. ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 63
12/12103 Continued
-it Vh,--

Facility Number: 30-2 Date of Inspection 2/5/2004 •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes (9 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ®No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
I4. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the -discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes to No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to ciuestion # : ExplaINS HT YES answer OWED ations or an. other cum S.
s—e drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use dditional pages a necessary : ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
3. No soil analysis results for 2003. NOV Operator has already pulled samples for 2004 and is ready to send.
9/11/03 waste analysis--l.5 lbs. N/1000 gal.
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name !,Melissa Rosebrock —
ReviewerlInspector Signature. Date: Q
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 30-2 1)of Inspe �ction 2/5/2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ® Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form -❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[:]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
12112103

J . . �Ol•7
1�7
Type of Visit P Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of visit: d Time:
y� rO Not O erational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Fos+er Fa rCounty: [_JCaV'l Q..
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: A I, ^_ Title:
Onsite Representative: Z&1:1
Certified Operator: ��"f Pamir
Location of Farm:
Phone No: 3 �� • I 17. 7 q 27 -- -
�
o�ne o: �
Integrator: TJ
''.. epe �1„T?_Lt
Operator Certification Number: _
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Worse Latitude ®' ®, �" Longitude ®' �� �.
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
oultry
CapacW Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
I
10 Layer
Dairy
!!
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
I
I
JE1 Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Wean
El
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
�2
El Gilts
Total SSLW
$ 2 S
,.
❑ Boars
NumbewofLagoops 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEI S2ray Field Area
HoldingiPonds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &.Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [N0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other z `
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection _, Tpeatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches);
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

• J r •
Facility Number: 3 Q — Z Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ADMIcation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? / , ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type (LAM 1
13. Do the receiving crop iffer with those design,n the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the rtified Ani I Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, free card, w to analysis or sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes 1)9�No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes 1XNo
❑ Yes qN0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
ElYes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes to
o
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes
❑ Yes *o
ElYes to''
es J
_ Yes ❑ No
Yes 1p,
El Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�3�i.i..
'Comments (refer to'question fl Explain any YES -answers andlor.'any recoutmendattons or any other comments.,
.; 4� w@.
Use drawings of facility to better explain sitruations"(use adiiitional,pages as`necessary) ❑ Field Copy Final Notes
"
1 [[ 63 = /.5� l . /V /coo
2 003- njaV. 1he,
.
T
— ' ', � -- — '•� Jac` ti" f
Reviewer/inspector Name ro
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: S
05103101 1 " . Continued

chnical Assistance Site Visit RepoAj
1'D on of Soil and Water ConservatioME
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facillty Humber 30 - Date: 123103 Time: 1 10:30 Time On Farm: 75 WSRO
Farm Name Foster Farms, Inc. County Davie
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 951 Dulin Rd Mocksville NC 27028
Onsits
Representative Jerry Foster Integrator [independent
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse
OQ Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
Q Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
❑Wean to Feeder
Capacity Population Capacity Population
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer FEd
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish 225 225
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure) Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier WSP
Level (Inches) 22
CROP TYPES Fescue -ha
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES EnB WeB Ms13
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure) Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier WSP
Level (Inches) 22
CROP TYPES Fescue -ha
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES EnB WeB Ms13
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure) Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier WSP
Level (Inches) 22
CROP TYPES Fescue -ha
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES EnB WeB Ms13
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

•
Facility Number 30 - 2 Date:
7/23/03
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
[110. Level in structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
21-1.0200
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Latelmissing waste analysis
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
[121. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DW Q Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation designlinstallation
❑
❑
❑ Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop oval uationlrecommendations
❑
❑
The waste plan was revised 5-8-03.
2. Mr. Foster buried the exposed waste discharge
49. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
pipe, noted by the DWQ.
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55, Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

C
I Facility Number 30 - Date: 1 7123103 I
(COMMENTS:
Waste analysis: 6-25-03 ALS 1.7 Ibs.N11000 gals. B
Soil analysis dated 10-03-02
Provided Mr. Foster with some freeboard forms. The facility and records look good.
The waste plan was revised on the !Nutrient Management software based on Mr. Foster's waste samples over the past
roe years.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IRocky Durham
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 7/23103 1 Entered By: Rocky Durham
3 03/10/03

ision, of Water Quality
Q vision of Soil and Water Conservation
Other,Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 30 02 Date of Visit: 02/10/2003 Time: 1320
0 Not O erational C Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
. County: 1 zyk...................... .. W. 's .0........
Farm Name:)FQS.t�x.,l±.ax2txSa.In,G....................... ...... ..........................
..................................................... ....
OwnerName: decry ........................................ A�.Qster........................................................... Phone No: 3.9.8.-.8.42.7 ..............................................
MailingAddress: 9S.><.Aglill..tid......................................................................................... IY. Q9M Alle.M..................................................11, 27M ..............
Facility Contact: dexry.losicr................................................... Title: .. Phone No:
Onsite Representative:J.crxx.k'oater................................................................................. Integrator: lro.ftpgjttlextt...........................................................
Certified Opera tor:acrxy..K.................................. F.05.(gr ............................................... Operator Certification Number:170A .............................
Location of Farm:
10 West to 801 exit, left onto Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church. +
O Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 56 ' 11 .9 Longitude 80 • 29 1 29 L<
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Pnnnlation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
225
225
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons I 1
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 1 0
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 225
Total SSLW 318,825
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..........Lagoam...................................................................................................................................................... .......
Freeboard (inches): 36
05103101
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Stnucture 6
Continued

Facility Number: 30-02 40 Date of Inspection 02/10/2003 1 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
[] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
,Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): T❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
8. Exposed waste drain pipe (8" PVC) freom swine houses to lagoon is exposed along the farm road and needs to be re -buried beneath
the soil surface before the pipe breaks and leaks waste and/or freezes/clogs and breaks.
17. Permit has not been issued yet.
19. According to 2002 soil test results, several fields reportedly have zinc levels around 1000. Siuggest applying on fields across the
road for a few years.
27. New dead hole is >300 ft. from flowing waters.
Waste analysis; ALS 7/26/02 2.5 lbs. N/1000 gal.
er/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
E
er/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number. 30-02 D t' Inspection 02110120030
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
®No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
® No
Additional ommen s and/orDrawings:
.&i
05103101

! ! V'50
DlV1 }' 4d3 B s iW�t�ieQniElit�
r >H iJa
E 40e--...e:;6k ,?. Iae - e •¢rb -ra;¢° ..r . ., >°a;: dr € ,...irx�r - - . ' pA i},. € ea I I 3-I ��i f 4 #' E i a r3 k r . 3iP ° k;r 1 c �' ':
# liiV�9�Q11 0� a�'14i1?Siid lW$el' �OiE$CiVB�Oa t t 3# 3: i i e E r i ':k }} gi I i k ,3EtEEE ¢ > a { l r t dq ¢3fa k,
Other Agency H' kr 3 F I
°a...x, :HTa.. fr • 1.. °Z.. .xz€-, rl .i+.' a& I1, . 3. _. i,i •.�... �.. r_nI i <. .k.. - - ..-. r 1 ify i s, rr F&.>.. r ,. �x ,. tr:.t f3 A I .34 . �,. ePef
Type of Visit M Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit/ Routine OComplaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Time: L-1=�
Facility Number
Not O er tional 0 Below Threshold
U Permitted VCertified 0 Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Ajove Threshold:
Farm Name: Fb,& r Ea- ram, 17N G County: I -)_" Le
« C
Owner Name: 1� ��� Ph ne No:
Mailing Address: R5 i �in ��
Facility Contact: T Fb TPA Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: m r05+:,e� Integrator:. qj
Certified Operator• �O j—_ 11 • �62 _ Operator Certification Number: V
Location of Farm:
LJ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feede
Farrow to Finisl
Gilts
[ , Le-" to
d4firr,
LJ Horse Latttuae ©'
Current Desin;
Po eilation Poultrr el, Cn 'achy
. _ ❑ Layer
AWL
r
FIR �-r•� F� F3-�
current Design Current
inulation Cattle ..; Ca, ity 'Population;;.
°iLJ er 1 li .1LI Non -Dairy Non -Lay
❑ Other
To11 tal iDesign Capgcit�F �
W.
1.,
of 1 L f I }
i Number,of Lagoons ; I Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area
.''ii
iHoldingPonds 1°Solid Traps I r f' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
D15charges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Laizoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: oon
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Spray Field Area ii
❑ Yes . PNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
'�rNo
El Yes
)�No
❑ Yes
( (No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: — Q Z Date of Inspection KNO
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie((/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes �(No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes Wo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12, Crop type
13. Do the receiving 410ps differ with those designifed in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes IN
o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yeso
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?❑ Yeso
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yeso
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?. ❑ Yes o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Re uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? y es
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CertifieV
imal W to Management Ian readily available?
(ie/ WLiP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) El Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, fre oard, w to analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 11
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes YNO
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
24. Does facility require afollow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes is j<
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �(No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments {refe Fto.,questian #) Explain a,ty YES enswersiattfti any rec" or an�.ather,ciimments E i ommend' il'
Field Conv L-..1 Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101
Date:
Continued

4
Facility Number: — Date of Insl►cetion
ada Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ElYesONoo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 'No
❑ Yes o
dd
AFAMAWAVO
i
50
I IWi
05103101

0
€ i ;� �� s1OnOf Water Quality 9
Qlsiori.of Soil and Water Conservation ...��
Q f0ther Agency
4fi
. _• .. ,i �'_ _. � ._ .. o� ....— k i..— .. i
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 30 2 Date of Visit: 9/5/2002 'Time: 13:10
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
Farm Natne: FAs1er..Farxm,.b1r........................ ........... County: Dayie .................................................. WRO........
OwnerName: Jaerrx........... :........................... oster........................................................... Phone No: 3.G. Q. - �k2.7........... .................................................
MailingAddress: 95,l.,AmjjR.Rd......................................................................................... lY1Q 1 �Alle....................................................... 27M ..............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title Phone No:
Onsite Representative: aerrx.FgStf:r................................. -............................................. Integrator: iadg9?,j3sleni>x...........................................................
Certified Operator:aerrx.K.................................. F.QSAcr ............................................... Operator Certification Number:1.793R .............................
Location of Farm:
0 West to 801 exit, left on 801 to stoplight, right on Hwy 158 to Howardtown Rd. Turn left on proceed to stop sign. Turn •
left on Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude 35 56 11 LongitudeF 8 07 jr 29
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
225
1 225
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps i l
Design Current Design Current
.Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JE] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 225
Total SSLW 318,825
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Id �ntitler•
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Stnicture G
c........................... ................................... ...... ,............................. ................................... ........... I ............... --- ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 72
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 30--2_71 Date of Inspection 9/5/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i!!!_grity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tr _ evere erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation posas an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.,
g ) p ( tionalany recommendations or any other. comments. Comments (refer to question # : Explain any YES, answers and/or . _
"Use'drawings s of facility to`better ex lain situations. use addi 'pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
Facility and records are in compliance.
* Remember to get the 2002 soil samples before the end of the year.
Mr. Foster has not heard anything about his General Permit since his technical specialist sent in addition information in 1999.
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
O510.3101 Continued

Facility Number: 30-2 Dat f[nspection 9/5/2442
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below,
❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an or, rawings;
Waste analysis: 7-25-02 ALS 2.5 Ibs.N11000 gals. B
5-23-02 ALS 3.1 " "
3-21-02 ALS 2.2 " "
J
05103101

',.a' {:, I�€� `i� r ri 1p 1 I r. €��� .. ,. � € I I'r�i lyr: I. i € ,r• I I i_._ -�.
!! onof Water Qualify
CIl 3 € w r:.` i 3 I 4lfiif r iyk I E S i'if lY I I r11 U.,
Ir II 141 f i Ml:�•' I IRi lr�;'1�4 r.3 ;: _4 I1.1�I 3 i , y. I I I'isl" €p 41 a r�. r r (iEo
0:.�7 on,
ofjsoil and Waterr Co,nserVat Y �I '�- I I , Ia I p EE u I i Its., i
0r Other Agency
♦,. rl. ,. a._ lF,.,.,. t. ri,,,r I �.€P�.a: r-., i .r i lr .1 .,- i, it I t �i I �
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 3D 02 Date of Visit: 3/28/2002 Time: 1320
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: hnsirlr..FArxw lne................................................................................... ..... County: DAyie .................................................. WSRQ........
Owner Name; dun ....................................... FoRt.ex ........................
Mailing Address: 95.1..Q1a1kd..Rd...................
Facility Contact: Jltir:ry..k t?Slfrlr.....................
Phone No: 33.G.99.8-1342.7...................................................:..."...
...................... Ru1aville.M.................................................... 2.7.02,8 ..............
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:..............
Onsite Representative: Jerry,,fp. �tj 1;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
.............................
Certified Operator: ,.errs...K................................... Fosteir................
Location of Farm:
....... Integrator: indxptrla&jaj.........................................:.................
................. Operator Certification Number:1.791a .............................
i0 West to 801 exit, left on 801 to stoplight, right on Hwy 158 to Howardtown Rd. Turn left on proceed to stop sign. Turn +
eft on Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
® Swine []Poultry []Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 •F 56& 11 LL Longitude 8D •F 29 29 6.
M
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
225
225
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design . Current Design Current:
Poultry Ca acity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Nan -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 225
Total SSLW 318,825
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid T Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ..........LaguwL.........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 54
05103101 Continued

Facility Dumber: 30-02 Date of Inspection' 312$/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees,Vere erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
$. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? '
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
rtIC,ot;.!u,.#pin?ayinwe;mnh
li�,I!! II {€tf€EJ fl . �It;ql€.;� -itl,�,/, �- 'I fhr..,':'4pI;.. J„Jl �, 1f1f I,- I,i(.!j,iift;.#,t{ i1i{,, i€IiI°P,, €' I,1'€F,I,f�Iitr.I .{1 lI"jIlI"iI�!'i.Ptpii}�.Jl(;:1"'1.R9I ;,I<II ii I III G€I€ �i]rI(;l_: [Lipil{€,'Ii{>iI.1II1+fI1I€EL�f'6Itf1I•li1 1i.i1pI',,:Il;,iI€. "!,� t"!,3 I!1Ii,9 I3fI '�ri �fIIl'',.,�„� If�I�t.�iI.''..
,Useidrawings offacility to€better,eX"plam situdtibhs� (useadditionIal!pages'as)necessary):`(❑ Field Copy ®!�;�'m.I'.,Finalotes
inal;rI Notes
..cmzrrc[Tr
If�!J..i.,.,e {I€..r€,1.rlt 1 ..
Waste sample dated 3/21/02 was 2.2 lbs. N/1000 gal.
+
Burial of mortality is ok.
Records and operation look good!
rr
-" 1-lk;��'':.€I ^z3:il'f,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Me"I sa Rosebrock I q#� j i.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature I A4 a Date: (�
05103101 F v Continued

racilityNumber: 3a-02 Da t nspection 1 3/28/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
Additional Comments and/or YflWIRgS .'
05103101

iType of Visit /m Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation i
for Visit XRoutine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other 1 ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
Q Not O erational Below Threshold
13 Permitted [Certified Q Conditionally Certified�0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ........ fWar.... FL m,5.y .. N. v © ........................... County:.... V.� e......................................................
Owner Name:..... 1 1 ........ Q�rTt?d.......................................... Phone No: ...�,./.tL1..........f L. .:...Q.��.�......
......... ...... ....
Facility Contact: ...... ............ R.►51-e- ! .. .. Title:. ............................:.. .................... Phone No:..................................................
MailingAddress:.........I...�r..J.............`l..I..U.I..�.......I" .:......t.....Amits.V �...�.i. ... f...l." .......................................... ^.-�? ..'.—..^...................
Onsite Representative:..... '.x.. .5....................................... Integrator�..�.��....3.!t'.....� ! ".'.--�-..-• !J„....I.................
Certified Operator:.... ,��'34........... 0-fa+Q„ Operator Certification Number:...�r,�1zQ,,
Location of Farm: r - 3 cd
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude -
Design Current' Design Current Design' "` Cariresnt
Ca aci Po elation ,Poultry , , ..,,, ;Gii aci
:; Po PulationCattle
'Capacity:;IPo ulatfon,,;`
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
1
Dairy_
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
ua
arrow to Finish
S
Total Design Capacity;
S
Gilts
Total SSLW
❑ Boars
Nombec;of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area ra'
� - - - - - - - - Sri
Holding Poucts, / Solid -Traps ; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Fl
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �' `` �No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [ISpray Field [IOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Vspillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..... 0rl ..................................... ..................................................................
;�-
board (inches):
5/00
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
Structure
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of oveA application? . ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type _ y/ AAIAJ IRliiAA,
13. Do the receiving crtk
differ with those desigUated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) / /analysis
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation; rte bem—d, wast& soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Yere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes *o
❑ Yes �KNO
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes jNo
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yeso
Yeso
Yeso
Yes o
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yeso
JN
ElYeso
ElYeso
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ Yes
No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Com ants (refer.to 'question'#) fExplaii'any`YES'answers and/or any recon bdations 6i ny"� tt er canriinents
rations.
Use drawin s of facili to better ex lain sit use uddttianali a es as necessar
�- .� p ( V �P,�g Y � Field Copy ❑Final Notes
a �3/al�n9_ (_ a.a /,I s. /1!/I(nod ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name rno
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:WUA Date:
05103101 F r L I i"" ~_ — Continued

acility Number: — 04 I*f inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below []Yes VNO
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes KNO
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes )(No
Addition a omments andforrawin r
I .. N
>3�e� �.
J
5100

®R 'vision of Water Quality •
i4wision of Soil and Water Conservation
IO ther Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 30 02 Date of Visit: 10I2A/2001 Tinly: 1330 Printed on: 10/24/2001
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted ■ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:... ......................
Farm Name:F9s1rr.FAmisjrxc,—............................................
Owner Name: dglt:rx....................................... JF.MtCj:.................
Mailing Address: 95.1.Dmjjn.R4.....................
............................
Facility Contact: .near dos)k r...................................................Title:..........
Onsite Representative: 1grry..F.9,st r.................................................................
Certified Operator:jcriry...................... F.051gr ................................
Location of Farm:
County: AAIXI'lg..................................
Phone No:15.�9.-1�z.7...............................................
..................................................... 27M .............
Phone No: 33.G,99.&7.1.7.........................
Integrator: jtxdrpgxl(1t<Att...........................................................
Operator Certification Number:,179.39 .............................
10 West to 801 exit, left on 801 to stoplight, right on Hwy 158 to Howardtown Rd. Turn left on proceed to stop sign. Turn AL
eft on Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church. "W
I—
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 35 • 56 & 11 [i Longitude 80 • 29 29 66
Design Current
Swine Canaritv Pnnulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
225
225
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I I[] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I 1E] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 225
Total SSLW 318,825
Number of Lagoons �1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE3 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I@ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..........Lagoon .......... ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 84
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 30-02 Date of Inspection 1d12412001 Printed on: 10/24/2001 . ,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ Aevere erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & DocumentE
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
IM No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
US/dJ/Ul Gonhnued

Facility, Number: 30_02 l); 11' lnspcc�tinn 10/24/2001 • Printed on.- 10/24/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
I
al
J
05103101

(Type ofVialt %Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Vielt oRoutina OComplaint. OFollow up 0 Emergency Notification 00ther [3 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Time:
Facility Number 10 Not Oeerational 0 Below Threshold
Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
13 Permitted Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .......... ......................... County: ..... Id".6g . . ............................... ........................ .
Owner Name- ...... R,5+e...f . . ............................................................... Phone No: �.7 .............
Facility Contact: ..-d.g.KEA ........ ............ Title: .......................... I ..................................... Phone N_
Mailing Address:....... j;S.J ............ o ...... I ............. N,,
............................................. ..........................
(Ir_" fwr';�v
I Integrator: ....... ....................... . ..
Onsite Representative:_ ........ . . . .......................................................
Certified .0perator:..a,ia,�.(.!L..I ....... V .......... fr'G ......................................... Operator Certification Number: ...... U-1.37 ............
Location of Farm;
Design, Curri
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
10 Boars
. I - I
t Design . Current DesignCurren
nPoultry . 'Cattle Cipaifty Populildon. . . . . Capace *.,'"Oo 'ulatiap
F[:] Layer L airy
10 Non -Layer 1 0 Non -Dairy
I[] Other
P,
Total Design Capacity
Total SSM'
Number of WTL'
::Jj[]
r
Subsurface Drains Present
�agoonAres
Spray Field Area
=EE
10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0 Yes KNo
Discharge originated at. [] Lagoon [] Spray Field [:1 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes [] No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Watei of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
0 Yes 0 No
c. li'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
D Yes [3 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
[] Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes No
at
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? O(Spillway
❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 . Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6�
Identifier: .. ............ ................................... I ................................... .................................... ..........................
T.,
Freeboard (inches):
'Xa 5/00
Continued on hack

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection .
,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the Ority of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or X
closure plan? Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [XNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level �No
elevation markings? ❑ Yes
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes O(No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes A-WO
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crap differ with those desig ted in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes NNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes XNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ;�No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes VNo
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan r adily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 1• �/ ❑ Yes �o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freebomd waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes 3� o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes (j�No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ro
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? L,`J
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes J/`INo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes R No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Kj No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �No
4 Y�Q1RiW>ds:o#' 0r1eie ! t -ftre lm0t.Qfl• jiiWift 4bis•visit; •Yost w��i•>� if 4 #'th r
• cor'res' oridence: a�auli: this visit.
_ ,.., :.. _ , :...,..• r. sr_ r.:- i- - s..n.:. ,• r_ •_ ....,:. , - - - :. ...•r,r ,,._ . ,.i .... �•e.. .. ., ,. .v:,r .- .,>•--., ,gin _._c-e:-.-_, . , ...,,r,„:, o., ,., r.� .W , ... , .
/ l
r
Reviewer/Inspector NameN--
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
5100

[Facility Number: a of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 'Ei-Yee- 4; .No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ElYes 00
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or ,,``
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes XNO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes XN 0
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
,Additional ownments an or rawings: , k
>3Mf
i
J
5/00

Type of Visit O Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 3f) 2 mute or visit: 5/17/2001 Time: 13:00 Printed on: 10/17/2001
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted MCertified 0 Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: F.05 terfurrim.1111G.................................................................................. ...... County: DAYle .................................................. WBRO........
OwnerName: dVr:t:y........................................ Foster................................... Phone No: 33,6,9.9 r.$.42.7................................................. ...........
Mailing Address: 95.1.)lAlitlt..Rd............................................................... .. MQc�CsYgle-M.............................. .... 27.028 .............
........................ ..................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title::............................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ,)erry..FQsts ................. Integrator: ItLS]lGAlrA dent........................
Certified Operator:Jcr y........................................ F.0,51cr ............................................... Operator Certification Number: 179.38 .............................
Location of Farm:
10 West to 801 exit, left on 801 to stoplight, right on Hwy 158 to Howardtown Rd. Turn left on proceed to stop sign. Turn +
eft on Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 56 11 Longitude 86 • 29F 29 T,
Dischargea & Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway []Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 80
05103101 Continued

C .
0-2 Facility Number: 3Date of I nspection 5/17/2001 Printed on• 10/17/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the• grity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ try, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? []Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? []Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
® Field Copy ® Final Notes
rall facility and records look good.
AT & AB fields called for lime on the soil sample. Mr. Foster intends to apply lime now and then take this years soil samples a few
the later.
local NRCS/Soil &Water district of plans on providing Mr. Foster assistance for installing a graduated lagoon marker, to be
to easily record freeboard elevations for the general permit.
Waste Analysis: 3/28/01 ALS 3.6 lbs.N/1000 gals. B
8/08/00 ALS 2.4 " 1.;
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

rFoiciNy Number: 30-2 D: 1' Inspection SI1712001 Printed on: 10/17/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
[]Yes []No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[)Yes ❑ No
[_ _ ' t tine L!i2ttimeti Tan' orb raivtnq:
05103101
05103101

Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 30 02 Date all' visit: 13/8/2000 Time: 1515 Printed tin: 8/8/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted N Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: EQ51Cr.F81t7R1,S..1ac,.-..................................................................... 1� .............. County: DAyle.................................................. $RO........
OwnerName: Jgxry........................................ E..Qat iti.......................................................... Phone No: 33.6.99.8.-.8.427 ...........................................................
Facility Contact: dury..k:R lex................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No: 33.09.8,N427 .......................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:. Jrrjry..F.9.at.ff ............
Certified Operator: JerrY..K....................... ... lFQsltrlt.......
Location of Farm:
1l adsxiille-NC..................................................... 2.7UN.............
.. Integrator: J dg9gudcAt................
... Operator Certification Number: 179.3A,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
10 West to 801 exit, left on 801 to stoplight, right on Hwy 158 to Howardtown Rd. Turn left on proceed to stop sign. Turn A
eft on Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 56 11 Longitude 80 • 29 t 29 tt
Design Cu rent Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acit P.o ulation Poultry Ca acit P,o utation Cattle Ca acit ,1?0 ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ID Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean ~` "
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
AI
® Farrow to Finish 225 1 225 Total Design Capacity 225
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLWF 318,825 It
ENumber of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
=ffH5Idi-n-21RFn—ds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treattsent
4. Is stora e`c acit freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ®S Spillway
g P Y( P g) q P Y
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ..Waste, 31ru slut:e...........................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 84
siaa � a
3r
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back
&WL—_

Facility Number: 30-02 Date of Inspection 8/8/2000 1'rinled on: 8/8/2000 "
5. Are there any immediate threats to th grity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tre , severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste, A 1p Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
I
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
'NO vio2:ati6ris:or deficiencies•were noted :during this: 'isit. ;You;will ireceive no i'urth;er ;
corresivondence: about this :visit:::: :::.::...
a. Marker needs to have maximum level identified.
19. Waste analysis for recent applications sent off first week of August.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
WIA
Reviewer/Inspector Name ?Me1i5§a Rosgprock.
/1%//I/Il,/.��f!1..��/:r•.l�l1t>'��s��" i ; ',Ii:'W 02 i,

• utility Number: 30-02 [),*Inspection 8/8/2000 printed on: 8/8/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5100

vision of WaterQuality0
+ ',' iVj
i� 4 t is
"vision of Soil and Water, onservation
�.
Q Other'Agency N
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit y
Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 1151,91061 Time: Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
[3 Permitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .....................
Farm Name:..... .e-r.....Farm,5l..... County: v.l..E......................................................
............................................................. . ...... (� 4 G(� ^]
Owner Name:...... Fgxr �..,......FQ�b$c.................................................... Phone No. ..133.b...........L�..o..�....o..�l..�.l...............
Facility Contact: ...., i .%............... Q .T•Q...'I-itIe:............ .......... ........................................ Phone No: ..................................
Mailing Address:.. I.� � V 1 �...h......�.... !.'.I��rti]. V ...� �e J.....N-............�� 70. d..r .......................
..... ......
Onsite Representative: , r, Fv5.-,6e- Integrator: ...............................................
Certified Operator ........._.....la rr" K! Fob+.fir .. Operator Certification Number:,,,,,,,,,,,,,, f ,3„�,,,,,,
.......... .....
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®• ®° Longitude �• ��
Design Current
swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagwm Area JO.SprayField Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste ;Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Vo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is ohscrved, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h, If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is ohscrved. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & •rreatntent
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
El Yes o
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? >rSpillway ❑ Yes XNo
StI.Ll�ire i _ � Structure . Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier : .............. �, e,^ �,r.0
Frechoard (inches): � I
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: p - Qa, Date of Inspection Printed tfn: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trecfevere erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑Yes )(No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )9�0
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ElYes KNo
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Cl Yes -�Oo
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes )& No
12. Crop type 'rescue, am,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with thoRc designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
I& Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 0 /N
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of'design'?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspcetor fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
.. Rio yi. . idiis oir &ficiendbe *4v rb itatied du -ring this visit' - Y;oo will-eeiceiye ino fuethcr - ;
.. cor'respondence. about; tkris ;visit.. ' . ' ....'
❑ Yes ) No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes I
❑ Yes JrNo
❑ Yes Ao
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �!No
❑ Yes �j(No
❑ Yes X-15,C)
❑ Yes *0
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes *o
❑ Yes )�ro
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
e m a,,� Y needs hGkA)e_ MOLY." Y1 u rn � � 1 '�d�.�► - ed
1 %a54e- a n a[ Jsis -for' m ceo
Pk ors+ wee &PA use-.
a-1°p Opp
A,
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�. ffh//%I,f/.ri7,fL=i7.>.2�

-Facility Number: —Md I)ef Inspection s Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pod orl goon fail to di*charge Wor hPlow �F} es-- &
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? rr�10
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes lXNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes VNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes >No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 6 ��! M / T o7wo �e�--�}�io
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? r+ War, [gwai-
.&I
J
5100

' ton of Water Quality {� v
sion of Soil and Water Conservation' f
ri
Other Agency
L
Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit (jD Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 30 2 Date lit, Visit: 512912D00 '1 hliv: 9:3t) Printed (in: 8/8/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: FwArC.foJC1In,5a.1m........................................................................................ County: I)AYIC .................................................. MR.0........
OwnerName:Jgr.t~y........................................ X'.ttatu.......................................................... Phone No: 33.6.99.8.-.8.427 ...........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: 951.Mill'ltxRd............................................................... .... .... UttdisAle..SIC............................. . 2.7.0 .............
Onsite Representative: ,Derr.FjQj.gr................. ... Integrator: ...............................................................................
Certified Operator:J.elfliy.K................................. 11.0,-Agir............................................... Operator Certification Number: J,79.J.0 .............................
Location of Farm:
40 West to 801 exit, left on 801 to stoplight, right on Hwy 158 to Howardtown Rd. Turn left on proceed to stop sign. Turn +
lefE on Dulin Rd. Farm on left below Dulins Methodist Church.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • Sb 10 14 Longitude 80 • 29 28
DischaMta & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Ireatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier: ........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 66
5100
Continued on back

Facility Number: 30-2 Dare of Inspection 6/29/2000 � Printed on: 8/8/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to th �grity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of•the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is -there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency -situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
' �io•yiolatioris:o� deficiencies•w�re;noted :during•this: visit.• :You
;will ireeeiveno•f�rtlte�; • ;
correspondence: about this :visit. - ' • ' - .
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
15, Hay fields need weed control application. Suggested using 2-4-D to control broad leaf weeds.
19. Waste sample was not within 60 days of Oct. and Nov. '99 applications. Had waste samples, soil samples, and application
cords. Records looked good for the most part. Needed to record, on forms, most recent application and have waste analysis for
me. Operator pumps and hauls.
PS of lagoon is larger than actual lagoon due to trees and heavy vegetation on cut side of lagoon that l had to get around.
Reviewer/Inspector Name !Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

Facility Number: Da Inspection F6/29/20001 Printed on: 8/8/2000
Odor s s .
0 0
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [:]Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
J
5100

6
J* Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 2f30 2EL—j
Date of Inspection 3131199
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Foslar. a anus.r......................................................................................... County: Wyk .................................................. W..SRO........
OwnerName: dgt:cy........................................ JEARtAr .......................................................... Phone No: 336-29.-S917............................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 95il.DmlittljW......................................................................................... MQCkax1&..XC .................................................... 270211.............
Onsite Representative: Jury-FaUcir................. ... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Jerry..& ................................. Foider ............................................... Operator Certification Number:1.7.93.8 .............................
Location of Farm:
4�..W..esk.ka.SQL..ex.ik,.l�'k.QA.Sil.l.ka.�gtnfikigltk,.ri�I�x.ant.Htxy..1,5>3..t,a.Ht?tr:ax�Ikaar�.�s1,..:I:urn.lett.mn�.pxae�d. tm.stap.�igtt,..Ttx�a..l�..... '
tnAulin Rd.....F.arm.nn.leJt.hclQw.]]ettluas.Mctb[►uliak.CFtttnch..................--....................................................................................................................... .
Latitude 35 • 56 10 Longitude 80 • 29 28 11
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ (.)flier
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge front any part of die operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse inipacts to the Waters of the State other than front a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Stnicture 1 Stnicture 2 Stnicture 3 Structure 4 Stnicture 5
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ..............60................................................................................................................................. I...........................
5. Are there any inunediate threats to the integrity of any of the stnictures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
Seepage, etc.)
3/23/'99
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
0 No
Structure 6
..............................
❑ Yes
H No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 30-02 . Def Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require inaititenatiec/improvement'?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required nnaximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need nnaintettance/improvement'?
1 l . is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in die Certified Animal Waste Management Plat (CAWM-)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does rite facility need a wettable acre determination'?
c) This facility is pended for further i►dormation for wettable acre deternination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available`?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, snaps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at tine time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DwQ of emergency situations as required by General Penuit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhiispectio n with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
3131199
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
0 Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
M No
© Yes
❑ No
© Yes
® No
❑ Yes
it@ No
© Yes
No
Yes
No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
.. L....latia'tii. fir:d�firci....s... .:rioted:tiuri . ik.. v... ....ive no f.....:
•' •+4ori•e' ortd�,licc abdull'11a1i§•i�•isii: • . • .. ... .. . .
Gomeitt�' rcicF:t:: uestltth:..:<x tam:aitS>: swersr4n'or ttmeaia# ws:►tk:e�n` nfe`x:ondte0t�:.>.::}.>..;::.;;<«;st: x
... #}.
;;�i...:...:....: ...r ...;,:.: ...:.r ?'.,.}::..:<.u:a.....;yr::r:•s:ns;:.;.yy,p;.:, k:}<ati:: ..� r:.-r-:.
Difilrtwin:fiCllil:litc laliir:s�tatiansi' hae':atidi >:.rr;rr:.r>:.•<
................. :........_ ..........tA.....
............ ........::.„:.r:,.r;>r»r..........r::.:.r:;.:r::.r::.r;,:<;;<;„;;:.rr:.r::.rr:r:.>..r:.:.r:;.>:.r;:>:r> .
- No problems noted with facility.
- Mr. Foster is keeping excellent records.
-lttfluent pipe of lagoon will need to be retro-fitted such that it discharges at or beneath the water surface of the lagoon to comply with
odor BMI's which become effective 6/l /99.
Reviewer/Inspector Namcbtt+�trtdt
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number 30 02 Date of Inspection 11/19/98
Time of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
©Registered M Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 13 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 1Foalrx.hi rmijoic......................................................................................... County: DAYIC .................................................. W..SR.Q........
OwnerName: derby ....................................... J'ms�trx................... . Phone No: 3,3fi.�9.8.-5427...................... .................................................................................
FacilityContact: S.atatc................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No: Sam .......................................
Mailing Address: 951..111t1lhRd...................................................... ................................... Mackayllk..XC .................................................... 27.028..............
Onsite Representative: Smut ................... ............ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Jelrry..K.................................. )Fomle r................................................ Operator Certification Number: Facitlity.0Q8Q0.8......
Location of Farm:
an.D.0 in.R,a....................................................................................................................
Latitude 35 • Sb 10 Longitude 80 • 29 F 28
General
1. Are there any buffers that need naintenance/innprovenneut? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was die conveyance man-made`?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement'?
G. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
[:]Yes [@ No
❑ Yes (] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
CM No
❑ Yes
X No
❑ Yes
® No
D Yes 0 No
7. Did die facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No

Facility Number: 30-02 11 Date o pection 11/19/98
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site ich need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lap-oons.HoldinQ Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard phis storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes X No
Structure I Stnichure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ...........................
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures'? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the stnuctures lack adequate minimtun or maximum liquid level markers'?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of die State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..........................................................................................................................................................................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of tic Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
J :NO. V.iolatians' ar'd'efieieneieS.w6te:':o.te:d.'duir.ibg 4is•visit.' •.�.ot.l will-r.b.ce.lw..n.i).far.t.he.r.,
::::::::::::sicarri4P66d6cAoWthis:vit.
Lagoon recently pumped.
—220 sows
Gilts now housed.
No problems noted.
Reviewer/Inspector Namehltei` 7fttii
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes C4 No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
i

'Division of So d Water Conservation Qther cy
ivision of Water Quality
LO Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
D Registered lill'Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted Not O eratianal Date Last Operated :.............
FarmName:..... .......�.���'j`S � C•............................. County:.. ....... ........... ................... ............. I.........
OwnerName: ......... Z,.............. ..{ Phone No: ..... �.. ...................... /.........
FacilityContact: .......,..rl P............................................ Title:........................................ Phone No: r� /I ................... ........................ ...............
Mailing Address: ........... ��...�/.............Y..1/........�F`r........................... .. �.'!...�Cr`�/. ...f..."..........,......�
Onsite Representative:..... 51-4..1.1.lee..... .... Int rator:..................
r r _ 1
Certified Operator;........: iP/.... ............ (T� ..................... Q� r Certification Number.A
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude ®• ®� ®�� ��'�,t
a
Orw 15,; £ ayapacuy rupuiauun
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
} ❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Subsurface Drains Present iio Lagoon Area ILI Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management S
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes fli'No
❑ Yes ISM
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ArNo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes VINO
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ;R"No

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds or site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Nolding Ponds. -Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
❑ Yes IWNo
❑ Yes KNO
Structure 6
Freeboard(ft):.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ORNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes //1110110
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... I....`..Z�.�. tZ
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Ont
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0• No:vitilitions°or'deiiciencit ss:were-noted•during'this;visit. You:rvill i•eceive.izo�ftirth:er,
egrrespkidehce: about this'vhdt'.
❑ Yes J9 No
❑ Yes XNo
...................................
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes IK No
❑ Yes Ap No
❑ Yes ,1j No
❑ Yes/A` No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes PeNO
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes Pa
❑ Yes VNo
7/25/97 _
f Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

T•�
16 rcounne p e ompiaint p roEtow-up of uwd inspection p rouow-up of a,5wu review p Vtner
7 Facility Number
v Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: F.:aster..Farms,..[atr:........................................................................................ County: Davie WSRO
OwnerName: Jerry ........................................ Foster .......................................................... Phone No: 9.9R-.8.427 ...................................................................
Facility Contact: same ....................................................................Title:........................
Mailing Address: 9.5.1-MlinAd............................................................
Onsite Representative: ,lwry..Foster..................
.. Phone No:.......
Modoxil le...NC..................................................... 2708 ..............
... .......... I... Integrator:...................
Certified Operator: Jerry-K................................. Feaster................................................ Operator Certification Number: )!.7.415.......
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®� ®66 Longitude ®• ®' ®64
esigq urren .estgm urren esign. ,77 urren
'Swine yF C:ipacttyf Population t : I?oultry' d ,.Capacity Po�ulatton=[ ., Cattle , p y p p
�i.,,.� Ca act =�Po ulatinn
p Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
2,000
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy E
..3:.
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other .
: JETotal.DesignCapacity- ,
'I p3 d , f Total SSLW 866,0
> �ENum er ofiLagootis /Holding Ponds'0. ❑ u sur ace rams resen ❑ agoon rea p pray ie c rea
�jOY.0......n......' Liquid Waste
as a Management ......YS..C, .....
1 t
k�us
F �
Q m lip.
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Irdischarge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (Il'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the faciliry'fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
7/25/97

ace i y Number: 34_2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on sitihich need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Hold ing .Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
11
p Yes a No
p Yes N No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .......... ...:61L............. ................................... ............... I .......................................,.......... .............. ..................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......................Ecscuc..............................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
jr • o•via ions -or icfencses•were•no a siring isvisl ouwi .receive'no, ur er. -
.oi'zespo���iie� ab�ti� t�iis•vis;t.. .. .. ' •' . .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes rl No
p Yes ® No
...........I ................
Yes ❑ No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes Cl No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Coititttenits (refer'toe'questiun #)izplain iiny'YES answ-e"rsTaiidYor any recoinmeniiations or any other eoinmenfs.
Use dr v►ings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary);
Improvements to the lagoon dam have just been completed. The lagoon was basically empty. Although no vegetative cover was
present, it should be established in the near future.
Questioe replacement guilts are currently kept onside on a denuded area. Plans are unde way iobu 1 abaFmtoprhouseithese
animals inside as part of the certification
Question (i13) No mum and maximum level markers have been installed.��R"
Question (t16, 22, 23, 24, 25�) The CAWMP is not yet finalized. 7125/97
Y
C
Reviewer/Inspector Name ilce` 1VIic""key Jill
ReviewerA nspector Signature: Date:
'I