290003_INSPECTIONS_20171231

'-------'---------'--- - -'-'--'- -------------------- -
`��r----'---------'----'---------- --- -------------'-----------'----------------- -' ---
�
�
�
�
------------------'------� ----------' --- - --------- -t

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 290003
�^ Facility Status; Permit:
AWC29002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
_ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
_ County: Davidson
Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 01/31/2007
Entry Time:12755 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM
Incident #:
Farm Name: Beallgrav Farm
Inc.
Owner Email:
Owner: James B Graham
•
Phone: [phone] _
Mailing Address: 1218 BglrnQnL Rd
Linwood
NC 27299
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35"44'42"
Longitude: 80"20'21"
1-85 south and take the Belmont Rd.
exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the
next stop sign. Travel 314 mile east on NC
47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: James B Graham
Operator Certification Number: 20952
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
phone
On -site representative
Jim Graham
Phone:
24 hour contact name Jim Graham Phone:
Primary Inspector: M I' a Ro ebrock Phone: �� J
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
6. Operator plans to close 4th waste pond as soon as federal/state money is awarded (April?). Cattle are to be moved out next week.
Operator says that he wants to close the 3-stage waste ponds also as part of his proposed sale of land. Davidson SWCDINRCS is
writing closure plan for these three.
Page: 1

U
9
Permit: AWC290003
Inspection Date: 01/31/2007
Owner - Facility: James B Graham
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 290003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 210 92
Total Design Capacity: 210
Total SSLW: 294,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
FOURTH WSP
18.00
28.00
aste Pond
UPPER THREE
18.00
44.00
Page: 2

i
Permit: AWC290003 Owner- Facility: James B Graham Facility Number: 290003
Inspection Elate: 01/31/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Stora eg 8 Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0M.00
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? Cl
Page: 3

•
Permit: AWC290003 Owner- Facility: James B Graham
Facility Number: 290003
Inspection Date: 01/31/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yea No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Alfalfa
' Crop Type 2
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 3
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Sail Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yea No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James B Graham Facility Number: 290003
Inspection Date: 01/31/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

i
Permit: AWC290003 Owner- Facility: James B Graham Facility Number: 290003
Inspection bate: 01/31/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: i Q Arrival Time: U Departure Time: County: W"J J 50f1 Region: WR
Farm Name: 1Q � r-m L LC- owner Email:
Owner Name: Ina l� ►r i Cal yl Phone: 3$ A — 3
Mailing Address: L i n w oCJ i
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 1"^0-1r ,12 V✓1 Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: n
la —
Certified Operator: V 1�Q� (',o ���CJ ti Operator Certification Number:y��
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ®o ®' [ u Longitude: ®o ©' ®
Designurrent Design Current Design C**urrent
Fcit%P0Pflfti►►opaon
Swine Wet Poultry C►►specify Population Cattle C**opacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish I JEI Layer I I Dairy Cow 10
❑ Wean to Feeder
I IE]Non-Layer
I I
L1 Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dai Heifer
Dry Poultry E]DryCow
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers ❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -La ers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
El Turkeys ❑ Beef Brood Cow
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other I Number of Structures:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No [I NA El NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes No El NA El NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 12128 4 Continued

Facility Number: . Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: $k I at a o�3 3 O 3
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
through a waste management or closure plan?
r _
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
eat, notify DWQ
environmentZNo
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
El Ye;
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
*No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
0
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes dLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b3cNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
No El NA ❑NE
9,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.,,` . .
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages. as. necessary):
IV.
Reviewer/inspector Name Ir Phone: — j 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 ' L . ' 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: A Date of Inspection j D
�T
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No ElNA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ;S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Do s record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste ApWStockiniz
tion d ekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Jalysis Waste Transfers
Rainfall Cron Yield 120 Minute Insnections �onthly and I" Rain Insnections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Of)? ❑ Yes
*o
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
gNA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
!�(NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
tNo
❑ NA
El
29,
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
*o
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
j A 31 0(0 W �. S 5 - 3 . a I Its •/U� tj
+
-IL-3
T
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 290003 Facility Status: fictive Permit: AWC290003 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Davidson Region: tt oston-Salem
Date of Visit: 10/12/2006 Entry Time:09400 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Beallgrav Farm Inc. Owner Email:
Owner: jMajes B Graham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1218 Delmont Rd Linwood NC 27299
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude:35°44'42" Longitude:80°20'21"
t-85 south and take the Belmont Rd, exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 314 mile east on NC
47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James B Graham Operator Certification Number: 20952
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Jim Graham
24 hour contact name Jim Graham
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date: i b r2- d
Inspection Summary:
5. Continue efforts to out woody vegetation on dam between #4 waste structure and freshwater pond.
6. Owner plans to close all four WSPs, beginning with #4.
21. Applications this Spring were outside the 60-day sample window.
24. Still need to calibrate honey wagon. Other calibrations not due again until Oct. 2008.
8/23/06 Waste analyses:
#1=3.2 lbs. N
#2=6.3 lbs. N
#3=0.20 lbs. N
#4=0.25 lbs. N
Composted=9A lbs. N
Page: t

Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James B Graham
Inspection Date: 10/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 290003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations' Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle -Milk Cow 210 98
Total Design Capacity: 210
Total SSLW: 294,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
FOURTH WSP
18.00
32.00
aste Pond
UPPER THREE
18.00
32.00
Page: 2

•
Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James B Graham Facility Number: 290003
Inspection Date: 10/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page; 3

•
•
Permit: AWC290003 Owner - FaclIIty: James B Graham
Facility Number: 290003
Inspection Date: 1011212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
Cl
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3 Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6 .
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
1 & Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

Permit: AWC290003 Owner- Facility: James B Graham
Inspection Date: 10/1212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 290003
Reason for Vlsit: Routine
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fait to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
.0000
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James B Graham
Inspection Date: 10/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 290003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑
■
❑
Cl
Quality representative immediately,
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
Cl
■
Cl
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl
■
❑
❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
===ilber a`� - Q Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation n
0 Other Agency '1
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit C( Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Referral Q Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: - d Arrival Time: Departure Time: © County: DI V id 5Oil Region: L5 R-0
Farm Name: �e�1� a raA4 FoL-r m j L L C- Owner Email: q l
Owner Name: �0.YY1�J rth O- Phone: 'J $ °l ! 7'Z 1
Mailing Address: f Q 0-X S4 q , (y) u-300J 1 t-) C a -7 a q 9 .
Physical Address: 1 A l I Biel _� hyx � [U • t L i nsL�� tee' 9 � 2-1
"�
Facility Contact: 1 M lS r-QV1(3-M Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: -TthA W 1I�C�{lCi`ifY1 Integrator:
Certified Operator 31 `y\ Q roehc�� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Mr M 1 19211 Longitude: E° ia' ER
Y �S _Sooft i mon+ (5-A'i+ L eft a4 io o � r" -A- � @
5i.�n • Etas-� oh NC L41 o nto Be t mon+ • -
00Design_�@urrent
Design Current Design Current
Swine
Capacity Population
Wet Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle C►opacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
Layer
DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
LIE[Q] Non -Layer
0 Daia Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dal
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ $eef Brood Cowl
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other ❑ Other
I Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: A — n 0 Date of Inspection D a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 1�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [I Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3r Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: O � 3 "a of 3J3 Ot
Spillway?: `1
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes $,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan? / _
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t rent, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesTo [INA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) V-
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ElNA [INE
maintenance or improvement? Xy
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 1440 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ElNA ElNE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA [INE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
*o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
46LY
Reviewer/[nspec or Name
t� �� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature.
Date:
Page 2 of 3 .. k. 1 1212NI04 Continued

Facility Number: Al — etc of Inspection a- 0
Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Ly'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design
g El Maps ❑Other
21. Doe ecord keeping need improvement?lea9120Miinute
eke►— Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Doe
Applica ion LuJ Week y FreeboarAnalys' L� Soil Analysis LKWaste ransfers
u6infall L1Q Stocking Crop Yield Inspections [Monthly and l" Rain Inspections M<Cather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
*A
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? WVJ.
El Yes
jNo
fffflf❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
VNA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
90 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
YNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
ElNE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El
No
El NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
ElYes
No
X
ElNA
ElNE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addition -al -Comments Drawings:
i4wr
Oat
Page 3 of Aj i V '12128104

X
i
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 290003 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC290003 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CoMpflance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoUtine County: Davidson Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 11/29/2005 Entry Time:08:50 AM Exit Time: 11:1 DAM Incident #:
Farm Name: Beallgray Farm Inc. Owner Email:
Owner: James B Graham
Mailing Address: 121 § Belmont Rd Linwood NC 27299
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°44'42" Longitude: 80°20'21"
1-85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 314 mile east on NC
47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James B Graham Operator Certification Number: 20952
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Jim Graham Phone:
24 hour contact name Jim Graham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone: [phone]
Ext.383
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(sj:
Date:
Inspection Summary:
7. Must cut vegetation on embankment of #4.
21. 2005 soil test results ok.
21. Operator is awaiting waste sample results to complete PAN balance on SLUR-2 and Solid-2 forms. Check next visit.
Page: 1

•
Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James B Graham Facility Number: 290003
Inspection Date: 11/29/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle -Milk Cow 210 135
Total Design Capacity: 210
Total SSLW: 294,000
Type' Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
FOURTH WSP
18.00
22.00
aste Pond
UPPER THREE
18.00
54.00
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James B Graham Facility Number: 290003
Inspection Date: 11/29/2005 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Via It: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
110
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
110
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste C61lection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
OMOO
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
11000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

,Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James B Graham
Inspection Date: 11/2912005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 290003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste A hcp ation
Yea No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
Cl
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
ONOO
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

0
. Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James B Graham
Facility Number: 290003
Inspection Date: 1112912005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (N.PDES only)?
Cl
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl
■ Cl
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fall to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWC290003 Owner - Facility: James 6 Graham
Facility Number: 290003
Inspectlon Date: 11/29/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fait to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
Cl
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 6

Type of Visit
mpliance Inspection
O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation
Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
9,Routine O Complaint
Q Follow up O Referral O Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: QBWArrival Time: 10t.50 I Departure Time: kL t[) County:. C V-Id 50n Region: ��
Farm Name: V-armC_ Owner Email: _a% I --A 4 -7 7 ,_
Owner Name: 1r' Q �l��Y� Phone: CT
Mailing
Physical
Facility i
Onsite Representative:
T� - A �D r-&- L! Ci2 OA
Certified Operator:y 1rye Ca re-6—,Lm_
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [ 0 [� Longitude:
SS 5o Mi [M o nF U)c � Le_-FI--cu+ -imp rq kp+ 0 - nect-
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
-Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
i FEILaoyer
n-La et
Other
❑ Other �
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
Mlurkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
Dairy Cow
I owl
El Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes -0No El NA El NE
❑ Yes XNo- ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — * Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�J Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structu e 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
'! a Identifier: .3 :0
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): cZ
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 90 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes )(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or enviro ental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes INO
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Vo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soi
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) v
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA El NE
1
A «
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
1No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
[I NA
[I NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%Q
Yeso
to
❑ NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/inspector Name Z b.r`O, "" Phone: 17 • q(Q (--
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date: dl D
12/28/0.4.,-..._ - Continued

Facility Number: --3 1 D#Inspection it f os—
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does r ord keeping need imp vement? If yes, the the appropriate box b ow. ❑ Yes L� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Ap2stocking
tion Weekl Freeboard7120'Minute
aste Analysis Soil An lysis ra/waste Transfers !1
VRainfall Crop Yield Inspections Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
r_
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit`? J(­❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pert -nit? ❑ Yes ❑ No XNA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 9No ElNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ElYes ❑ No YNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
X
ElNA
ElNE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
)No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
,Y
;qNo
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
iNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
a l am5
PA
=:_.4 W"t
12128104

.i, ! 11F
..'! 1,.. 11 f
"�
of,Wat'er Quality
..;,,.I
r
I" y' Won of Soil and Water Conservation
1'I a: ,,.r¢ a, -III: `:tl II. 1€+ f 11` i l I d 1 !11 ! Ir
I€ g y.°,!`ii I laif=Ei 3 r Ii`�rf .11E `If,ia
I 0 Other A enc i
•E�'iflN: Ila #; t I@ r f. - }Ei�jf,xrxf
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 29 3 Date of Visit: 3/24/2004 Time: 0930
Not Operational C Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Hgallgxay.I+axmlml.......................................................... County: I?AYlld.StkR................................ W MQ......
Owner Name: ,laitfES--- ---- -- --- GrAItSm.-------•--------------- -- Phone No: -----------•--
MailingAddress:.1.2.1.$..QR1majat.Raa.d............................................................................ Unw.Q.aid.-AC................ ........................................ ZU99 ..............
Facility Contact: ditn.Groham......................................Title:............................................... Phone No: 336.9SG.�0.$S.(Fla...........
Onsite Representative: 1141 GtAklal0.----•---.._._.___._.---.-------------- Integrator: ------------------------------------•------.
Certified Operator:,lAmc&,B, ............................... GrAtLaw ............................................ Operator Certification Number: 29.912.............................
Location of Farm:
-85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 3/4 mile A
€ast on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 - 44 L 42 Longitude SO a 20 4 21 66
Design
Current Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
® Dairy
210 66
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
IF1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
... I . .
... . , .
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
210
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
294,000
Number of Lagoons
4
r 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
1
Identifier: .-Lastnfippe -l....--•--•--..#4...................................... ------------------------------------------------------...........................
Freeboard (inches):20 31
12112103 _gq 1 rj Conanaed

Facility Number: 29-3 Date of Inspection 3/24/2004 .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Com (Silage & Grain) Wheat Rye
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes to No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ® Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comment Ire y T �.y: ,..comments.w>, v
❑ Field Copy ® Final
YES answers ari
;g efe'r to ystion # Exp iatn' an ations. (use additional pages asmmenda��ns for an- otlter Notes
of factlt to; better ex 1 atn sttu neeessa �-, Use,drawt[� s _
8. Milk parlor waste is not confined to lot or a pipe. Waste flows over land and concrete by gravity into #1. is not a WQ concern. +
15. Rye crop has lots of broadleaves. Operator says he sprayed last week.
16. Need pressure gauge on the irrigation gun. Gauge on reel is not working properly.
23. 2004 soil test results are back. Five fields need almost 2 tons of lime per acre.
1/13/04 waste analyses: ALD=4.0 lbs N/1000 gal and FCD=7.7 lbs. N/ton
plans to sell propertyfor industrial development and close WSPs. Davidson SWCD is developing closure plan.
er pond (#S) is a man made impoundment.
Reviewer/Inspector Name m
�Rosebrock
12112103
L
Signature?
Date:
Continued

Facility Number: D* inspection 3/2472004
Reauired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
IN No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
®No
3 L
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
3 €z` it P -�! �� k k€! € i ! lkl. 3.I I!i 9 i;il lit �'I,"E 9 i. I i I j5 € a 1'li E€ € VE 3 dE ! i "Ji t! -i. i t i < E�l�',
Addrttonal Continents; andlor Drawing's I , 3 € € u [ ,}}
�.['. � ilk:+.i�33�ji�I�l1.l�H, ;aV ��.� €=VI drli_;,, 3ii�V
12112103
12112103

P,, .. rl J.� x-� (°)ther.A enc �..J.�af
t F tti ` F y 1 f Je a I _.
L7 11 i rx r d f t r. I,akr 'r Af
, ! 1"'•[i, Y r.
Type of Visit Co pliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility NumberEAD__=
Date of Visit:
Perndtted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
A a F�
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Time:
Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..........................
County:.... ..... �...4.......................................
Phone No:.. ........L. ! 77 ,4L Vt` [G2
i.......1....................................... I............�....�......�° 1 J
FacilityContact: ....'�` }.rQI.� ........ Title: .................... . .......................................... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative:..-�.1...�. Y...'....1...... �.rQ..Jf •! a Integrator:..........
Certified Operator:..,�, �� ]..........B. ................ �,Q,��OL.M Operator Certification Number:....... A0q�� Z-
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑Poultry Vcattle ❑Horse Latitude �•' L" Longitude • ®� ���
Swine
Deiign 11"�:Current "
,C�AflACItV. '. �Pnmiladnn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Current
.Capacity rpopulation:.';
a II]r
ILL r+on-Layer 1
�`i ❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other Z
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?.
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Cl Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes *0
Waste Collection & Treatment
�4. Is stora capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ YesXNO
S Ct 1 Stru to S cture -3 tructure 4 Structure 5 Structure
VFre
Identifier:lr 1,��.�'�il..f.................................................................................
..rd (inches): 1 IVrn
12112103 `Co��1 Continued

Facility Number: — Doff Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
XNO
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
b�o
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23.
Does record keeping need Lim, rovement? If yes, check the approp 'ate box below.
[Itaste Application ❑ eeboard ❑ Vaste Analysis ❑ it Sampling
dJ
❑ Yes
No
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
o
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
26.
FaiI to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
27,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
28.
' T
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections . ❑ Annual Certification Form
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

C<9
C�_
]Facility Number: Q q — Date of Inspection
0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, E3 Yes AKO
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes Xwo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes a
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes o
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc 4
' � 6
12. Crop type 14
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those d ignated in the Certified Animal Was#Managemdt Plan (CAWMPV❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
- tt [! ...��qc �ui-"'s'r�fl*-:'ss;a?t .r :�,.y, t`:car- s tua�,' a>r»vr�r •rt"'.w'd! a :n' ..� i e t" ee...e, .t �. tt : ` ^-. - nc�• •-trr i< ....-i, u,''
Cvm►�entsl{refer question #) E plain nny YFS'answers andMany,recommendatians r aey'0_er�com rents
i1LNUGf" ,t
ilJs��erkdrarpvyiafadLtyto better explain situations.(nse3sq�dditioNrtn�}a�lPages`asjne�cessa�iy7'}•th; Field Final Note fig :``i
CCOPY❑1
f
��"{1F�f, Ffs�b j:w"7.t>?.�3!,i�.�.i.+,�na.'�`FiG�.-?tuizt ^�--1f:..• ':S" aw�.Y'�f�lf:i'�Ill�iu�E.E�.?litf4'1t� -.'f!'f�.[5'�+!tf Si'i•',•.�5r�i... ,�j 1. �c ir:�..4�ti�.r +s�
YY1 11� Pli�lr�u r c�.5�� �S no4 Co jt re-4 of o r- 'r pe NoLos
a l o-rnd ��-�o ! �' 3 s-+��e. Na +- a c.o � �o nC
6f0P has 10kS leaves
sln Man n M G-je ovrj
rk9a,0 p re5:5u re- av er o n un on r42.e- re e.. 5
woo r 1L i wn p f0,P q9�(,
-7.1 N /40')
1 3 o�F J N- 4-0 FGD t Ins •
11
T
a� ' �t3'1 ' !!r i!l�4�! +1 f �a�Y��+ �: kl�,i {'���•+ 'jt�j(`i�7 "j�gji?+ + §)� ICI j ?°�° !i 1 S'3 ` �'i{,(.�`
Reviewer/Inspector Name �' : � ;, �1� .�,�.> S ; . ° l rfla t .' �
ReviewerAnspector Signature Date:
129
12112103
I Continued

Assistance Site Visit
DiMn of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number Date: 8114103 Time: 1 13:40 Time On Farm: 45 WSRO
Farm Name Beallgray Farm Inc. County Davidson
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 1218 Belmont Road Linwood, NC 27299
Onsite
Representative Chuck Graham
Type Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Integrator
Purpose Of Visit
Q Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
0 Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
® Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Integrator
Purpose Of Visit
Q Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
0 Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
® Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
® Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
2toI
Sao
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? [--]yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4• Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment [--]yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structural Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier Upper Three Middl E Freshwater
Level (Inches) 12 IF 26
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

•
n
Facility Number 29 - 3 Date:
8/14/03
PARAMETER
p No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
El
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components [list to comments]
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
30.21-11.0200
❑
❑
[115. Over application < 10% or < 10 ibs.
re -certification
[116. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
[124. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
®
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWO Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation design/installation
El
El
El Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendatlons
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsolling, aeration, etc.3.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
$
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 29 - 0 Date: 1 8/14/03
MMENTS:
Mr. Graham called at the last minute and said he could not meet our scheduled time. Mr. Graham stated
fiat the Governor was coming by today with French businessmen that are interested in building a
ianufacturing plant on the property. He gave permission to come by the farm and check the lagoon
;eels.
The marker for the upper three lagoons appears to be high. The freeboard was estimated to be at 12
fiches and was not up to the start pump mark.
I will schedule another visit to check application records.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST lRocky Durham JPat Hooper
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: $122103 Entered By: lRocky Durham
3 03/10/03

,f +
i stun of Water Quality }
i l',I JI 'Et iE a irk I', E I��I 7 ii ii �,�lil v�w1 liaSii.. �l`,,#'ail
lvlsloll Of SO And Water Conservati6n1!
I e, �O Otha er-'Ai" , �.. e4v S �Pry i##°.P. i"lily 4i•�1 vi�'i-ri, ,�,6 #�.#.,,11 z =r1
ency
i, .. .'"R :"�1.. ,' s
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
on for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 03/27/2003 'rime: 1000
Facility Number 29 �-"�
O Nut O erational O Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified © Conditionally Certified M Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name:13ga0gxax..Faxm.l;c.r .............................................. ...................................... County: J2AYUNR..................... ................•.... W.SRQ.......,
Owner Name: dAnues ...................................... Gr,AlxaM..................................................... Phone No: 33.6-956.77.7.6t2..................
Mailing Address:))el�tAtlt.�i9.0d........................................................... ....... ............
Facility Contact: Jim.Gil:abm...................................................'Title:.....,.,.
Onsite Representative: ,J.jt[t G ahaJ[Tl.............................................
Ljm.w..Qod,..NC....................................................... 2.7.29.9 ..............
............................................ Phone No:t~A.�.6,.>z�Q2...............
Integrator:............................................................
Certified Operator: ,]a1t17.es.A............................. ....GX.R111M ........................................... Operator Certification Number: ZQQ52�.............................
Location of Farm:
I-85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 3/4 mile A
east on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road. T
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 44 42 Longitude 1 80 • 20 21 4.
Design Current
Swine Caoacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca acit Po )ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer IN Dairy 640 210
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 640
Total SSLW 896,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Ftetd Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 3 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes []No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ® Yes [--]No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...Last.of uppea.3... .......... Middle .......... .•..... ):xcshsvater ........ ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 24 0 6
05103101 �/� ? � Continued

Facility Number: 29-3 Date of Inspection 03/27/2003 40
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste ADDIleation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Rye (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need, improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &_Docume_nts
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
al
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain, Any YES answers and/or any rccommend4tiuns,or;any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ,[]'Field Copy ®Final Notes
25. CAWMP needs to state what is the max. liquid level" for structures #3, #4, #5 (#s 1,2, &3 on this form).
+
4. and 25. Waste level in final stage of three (#1 on this form) is ok. Waste level in middle structure (#2 on this form) is 6" into the red
on the marker and is overflowing spillway into fifth structure (#3 on this form). Fifth structure is 6" from overflowing and is 1-2" into the
ed. Talked with technical specialist and operator regarding status of the last pond. Last pond (structure #5), or # 3 on this form, is to be
used for freshwater irrigation only. It is not to receive animal waste. CA WMA has been revised to clarify this. Waste level on fourth
structure is never to go above the max. liquid mark except in 25 yr 24 hr. storm. Last structure is a freshwater farm pond.
7. Vegetation on dams looks better. Top is still denuded but slopes look better.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: A17 Date:
05103101 1 PT l r Continued

Facility Number: 29-3 ll.f Inspection 03/27/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Addition all, Comments and/or Drawings:''
l9. Records look pretty good.
13. Alfalfa has been added to WUP.
25. Tract 4652 Field 8B and Tract 4652 F-1 OB needs to be added to WUP if possible.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
1/02 ALD 1.2 lbs. N/1000 gal. and SSD = 5.1 lbs. Mon Operator is waiting on results to complete Spring 2003 records.
117. and 25. Operator has WUP for 210 cattle but DWQ database lists 726. DWQ to check on this.
. WSRO DWQ did not receive call from operator when waste level got into the red on structure number 4. Need to complete 30
vPOA
J
05103101

'4
I°A411
;.D1VisIQn of9Water t�uallty S acs x �� §',. El.; y §:° �,F4S : }3� !. lr i; .��1y a lSit3riiii g yi* 3 t$j�11 e §a f6 Sf
9 3:.5.3 it yid a t�i;i Hs3� o-ii:
D�Vl�Eirl at�all.atH1 Water SCOt19eCVIIt�©R n a
k 1 x F� -a-§ 6tt s aa, �: �k -t ;E
her l-_y a31§ ':'-:if:$u� E -4,., afx kt4i:i"� s9 4,rv" 4I t,�f rx t�' . ,4` Eft t��] a�' s ji .it i � ` q§" ry-tom, i9-er
§ 7 ! �, sxs Pax : a, i:. .ul e i 3 it i1± ". •.� ,a . (( 33''.. ' �y.
Type of Visit Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine o Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
Not O erational Below Threshold
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [,] Registered Date Last Operated or Ab$v Threshold:
Farm Name: •7� C County
Owner Name: J aro ti �rax Phone No:w 3 3�s .E4 o -776 7— L
Mailing Address: l � 1 � Y��r■ an Wei bng� , MC a -7 2q_9 Ham' �diass
Facility Contact: � J1LEQ192 hd _ T_ Title: e)P11 3 3 (01 20 377Z,
Onsite Representative: sMf1A_ M Integrator:
!�
h
Certified Operator: xQalVtiil� n_ _ (�1�- r 34.i91. _ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
all I
�
Aw
• 1 �► V xw • r:� • •' !I• C��
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ACattle ❑ Horse Latitude l !i5 I' E 4 4 i l - I" Longitude 1 Q I Z—Uj- j 7—i IM
Deli n Current Des n Current Dest n Cnrrent1
1'4 y �� � 4y f
Svyine� �Ca acitv`'i?o� ulahon Poultry` �' Ca achy "1'o§ulatidn_`Cattle " !�€ � ` Caacity Po
g „ �
Oulatiatt
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer € `,, Da' 0
❑ Feeder to Finish xF]L:1 Non -La er g'10,-:, on-Daia I
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑` ❑ Other 1
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish T©tal Design C�paetty=3
l
. ❑ Gilts } { - a t `> s E s =i. y €1- ' j ° t, i F .:
e❑Boars 60
,
4,1
IAtTI V
Number, ofLsgoons,a , -•" it a;; [] Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ID S rav Field Area
Haldan 'Ponds / Solid:Tra s 3 ° ; ; . nay `"}1 s;
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & tream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection R Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? pillway Yes ❑ No
Structure I S r tructure 3 ' x Structure 4 Structure 5 St>ZUre 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): oZ
05103101 , t t Co ued ,
LOOP /ice-��- * -, � W �8 W �

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.) /
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do anv stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ YeSANo
11. Is there evidence of over application? 4 Excessive Ponding PAN El Hydraulic Overload El Yes
////// El
r.
12. Crop type
ll
13. Do the receiving crops differ wit those designated in the C ified nimal Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? IDYesfN
o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? El Yeso
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yeso
i
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yeso
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes /pl No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (({
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes XNO
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes `�lo`
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to quest►on 3f} Explain any "YES S answers'°andlor, any recommendations 3or any other conements ! k E ct; ; f sE 3 E€ A1 f .E
'.• E - �{ 1 .. 9 s a1 1 E El I'll i,..v.•elll.�•.e•.'.=': d•.e..Ew Ea d Ifif.ii.,.�...: e.fifh.i 3 T
ilse'dirawings of facility, tv`b�etter explain situations:u(use� dilitional�pagrss'as eeeessary)
} w —Field Cory ❑ Final Notes
) i4 Ok 4b
11 )1 j 05P
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101
IN
,ad I I
rb E `

r
Facility Number: — 03 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
1"Addition2l_Comments and/or'Drawings:
a- ay - 3;z .
1
s
/r►
I/tom%/i/w I
,
Ig
n
A
s rM;
�� +/ ♦/
/ w

D ibh'of Water Quality ,
�.. sionofSo►lan'dWater.Conservation,,;�,. ` v
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection OO Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up 4 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 29 3 Date of Visit: 9/3/2002 Time: to:0o
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold; .........................
Farm Name: Urallguy..Faxmt.lar......................................... .......................... .................. County: J).Ayjd;jQA .......................................... W5R.0........
OwnerName:Jlt[>ut<s...................................... Grlrahtam.................................................... ...-Phone N ��.........................................................
Mailing Address: 121.1 Aelfin.M.Ru d........................................... ........:. Lijawmd,.M ................................ ...... Z7299 ..............
FacilityContact .............. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ,]a1mes..Gr .ailM .................. .. Integrator:
Certified Operator:,JaKtje.s.A................................ Grabam........................................... Operator Certification Number:ZQ9.52...................,
Location of Farm:
[-85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 314 mile
:ast on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 35 ` 44 42 Longitude 80 • 20 6 21
Design Current
Swine Canacsty Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
[-]Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ® Dairy 726 450
❑ Non -Layer JEJ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 726
Total SSLW 1,016,400
Number of Lagoons I I I[] Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 1 3 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier: ....Uppex.I.W..SP.... ....Middk.Stage.... ..... l awrx.JStagrr...............................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 12 60 65
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 29-3 Date of Inspection 913/2l}ll2
5. Are there any immediate threats to theOrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tre , severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? N Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9, Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12, Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Sudex (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain) Alfalfa
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? N Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
c
❑ Yes
N No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
N Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations oranyother comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Field Copy N Final Notes
# 7. Continue efforts to establish grass on the middle waste pond embankments.
# 13. Alfalfa will need to be added to the waste plan. Applied for Alfalfa crop in ,4ugust.
_#
# 19. Still need to complete the application records from the Spring and Summer applications.
Waste ponds had been recently mowed around and no sign of any partially buried cattle.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 29-3 Dab Inspection 9/3/2002
Odor Issues
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional ommen s and/or Drawings:
Waste analysis: 6-21-02 ALD 1.2 lbs.N/i000 gals. I, SSD 5.1 lbs.N/ton B
4- l 6-02 ALD 2.1 " ", SSD 5.9 " ", FCD 9.2 Ibs.N/ton B
oil analysis dated 4-3-02: Several fields calling for one or more tons of lime per acre. Lime has been applied to these fields per Mr.
0
05103101
J

0
Type of Vialt O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Vlait O Routine O Complaint O Follow up ® Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Mile of Visit: 8/8l2002 Time: 1645
Facility Number 29 3
o Not Operational C Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...........
Farm Name: Real gIAY.IAICAq.laQ................................................................................... County: QAXjd5'QIj .......................................... W'SRA........
OwnerName: dAll f*...................................... GrAhnin............ ............... I......................... Phone No: 336-956-2762 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 1 1#. jdpgQtA. QAd ......
........... .......:........... :.:.................. ................... UAW. tam.AC....................................................... 2,7299 .............
FacilityContact: .......................... Title :................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: Chu.dKGxA11 ................: Integrator:....
........................................................................................................................................
Certified Operator:. mne i.8................................. Gxaba lt.:........:................................ Operator Certification Number: 209.52..............................
Location of Farm:
1-85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 3/4 mile
mst on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 80 • 20 16 21 f{
Discharges 8X Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................... .......................... .......... ................................... ..........................................•....•••....................
Freeboard (inches):
05/03/01 7 -,;1Continued

Facility Number: 29-3 Date of inspection 8/8/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.).
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? [:]Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were rioted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
day's visit was as a result of a complaint by John Hendron and Don Stephens (Davidson Co. Health Dept.) that the Beallgray Farm
cows that had died suddenly. A neighbor, Donny Meyers (956.1719) also called DWQ alleging that the surface water creek that fl
in his pasture, into the Graham's pasture, had poisoned the Graham's cattle. Mr Meys said that his cows were ok, though.
Rankin and I went to the pasture and walked the entire pasture fenceline and found no surface water entering or leaving the site.
Representatives from the Vet School, State Vet's office, Soil and Water, and Public Water Supply were also on site. Turned out that the
cattle had nitrate poisoning that had occured as a result of using a tank for watering the cattle that had previously been used to apply+
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
05103101 Continued

Faciiky Number: 29-3 1 1*I' Inspection 8/8/2002 0
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
mix liquid nitrogen fertilizer.
o samples were taken by DWQ since no surface water was on site.
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
. Lots of tall vegetation on some slopes of the third stage waste storage pond that needs to be mowed. Other slopes have no
egetation and need to establish some for dam stability.
. While checking the waste pond freeboard levels, three partially buried cows were noted in woods along drive leading to the last
ponds.
left blank were not applicable to this facility at this time and/or to this visit.
05103101

-
_
IL
a
�'•=n;-''•.A`'^+�.
N
17
AN
a
i
�- �,'� - �-s,= � 'psi.. ,��,- ��� s., tg ,���.�:._ 4��"a'.� .✓" � - "''„�'-a..'- ,. Xi "` - ;:��
t
.err ', .�!.�. � ,Pf' � `� • `r `g1j. - r - -
�A
-
e
i
-
s L.f
Y ..
i
vpil
• � � � H ��• .. W.
ON
W Vft
r .
� 5 �'{� � .>�.Y . �•� �`�'••.i$ - ij •�' It.«i� < w .�_. 'r • i- ter{
— S
e

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 29 03 Date or visit: 3B/2t102 Time: t1920
O Not O erational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted E Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Brallg rAy.f.arrollc,................................................................................... County: DA'Xj&.QIa .......................................... W.SRO........
Owner Name: dart;s...................................... G r m...................................................... Phone No: !'. be SlC1-.7.7.G2.kt.3 fir9S.b�bIRSS..................
MailingAddress: 121014moot.Raud........................................................................... Uvw.Q.A.M ....................................................... 2.7r299.............
Facility Contact:]ames..G,raiwm.............................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: cs~11. (l, S?..3�72...............
Onsite Representative: ,tjpn rrxAla;illt.................... .... Integrator:...................
.......................................................................................................................
Certified Operator: Jpma.0................................. Giraham........................................... Operator Certification Number:,ZO9,52 .............................
Location of Farm:
1.85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 314 mile +
east on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 44 42 " Longitude 80 • 20 21 '�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acit Population Poultry ,, Ca acit Po ulation; ;Cattle Capacity. Population
Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Dairy 726 593
Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean .off"•
Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity: 726
Gilts
Boars I I Total SSLW 1,016,400
Number of:Lagooiis S 0 10 Subsurface Drains Present 1p Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Hoidin Ponds? Solid Tra s 3 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
g M ,PS 1 3 4 l;e Y
Disch@EM & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....... UpperJrd....... ... Mi ddie.Stagrd... .... LaHter.Staged.............................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 32 12 60
05/03/01 � / ,' / dF"' Continued

Facility Number: 29-03 Date of Inspection 318C1002 e
5. Are there any immediate threats to the tntegrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes IM No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Rcquired
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
IN Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
4. Structure #2 (WSP #4) is staged to overflow into structure #3 (lower staged WSP #5).
7. Embankment of first three WSPs must be vegetated by next inspection or will have to issue NOV.
19. Need to fill in IRR-2 forms completely.
having technical specialist initial and date most recent PAN, crop, and application months pages.
(Facility is no longer exchanging solids for shavings. Old silage, composted manure (with bedding), and dairy scraped solids are land
annlied now. rj
Reviewer/Inspector Name IMelissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature.
Date: , 3/ :3/0.;1__
05103101 I' . Continued

Facility dumber: 29-03 1 Dief Inspection F-3/8—/200-2--1 0
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
05103101

0
Type of Visit Xcompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for VisitRoutine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification
Date of Visit:
Facility Number
Permitted Certified O Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: Q
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ,_
Q Other
❑ Denied Access
Time: 1=1�
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County: _ J�V id'56 [)
Phone No: g 95& ' (O 69S
A)(f-- e? 2-9
Phone No: q,5_ • 7 2 6 0—
k1I .3349.38.2.397.�L
Operator Certification Number: ao 5 Z
Design
Current Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population oultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacltv. Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 1
11:1 Layer I
I Dairy
-7
❑ Feeder to Finish I
JL] Non -Layer I
-on-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design -Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
ao
"
Number of=:Lagoons
�, ❑ Subsurface Drains
Present ❑ La oon Area
❑ S ra Field Area
A_odPonds/ SoidTra s
Waste Management S stem
`
M❑N
Discharges & Stream I.mgacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ko
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) 1 s th n adequate? [Spillway ❑ Yes No
Struct I tructur Structure W%re re 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �li� �7
Freeboard (inches): �� O
05103101 Continued

Facility Number. — Date of Inspection
Odor Is
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
64* AX*06-
05103101
BTa—E'No
Cl Yes No
❑ Yes No
t
't10
❑ Yes o
ElYes No

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ yes #No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes )] No
{If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? XYes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ((No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level _K
elevation markings? El Yes No
Aaste Appligation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
1 t. Is there evidence over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ElPAN ElHydraulic Overload ElYes o
e
IN
12. Crop type
13. Da the receiving crops differ ith those designated in the Ce ified Animal Waste Management Pian (CAWMP)? El No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Cl Yes o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does tlifacili ail to 46 all V./mponents of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checlttists, design, maps, etc,) V ✓ KIsample
❑ Yes �No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard,waste analysis & sreports) DO Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes /g]No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes KNo
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 'KNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes XNo
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cominetlts'(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any, recorrimendations oran a her comments. ".
Use drawin s of facili to better situations. (use additional " a ems s necess iy) �,„ tf - .
g facilityexplainw . 4p g -. Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
_ u{
1
Ak
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: d pL
05103101
I
Continued

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 29 p3 Date of Visit: 10/11/2001 Time: 1010 Printed on: 10/11/2001
r Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: H9A1lgrAY.FArJ1ftr.....................................................................
Owner Name: .il MC:j...................................... Graham ......................................
Mailing Address:]121A.DAI7RA.{1.t.Rod............................................................
Facility Contact: dial m.Graharn......ARIAr ... ....Title:
Onsite Representative: 11m S..71',dht;ll17.................
Certified Operator.Jams..................................... Qimbam ............................
Location of Farm:
County: J, wid5!aot...
WSR.0........
Phone No: 33.(.956.-7.762..W..................
{ 7 a 30AA
Uu.w.9.Od,..NC....................................................... V299 .............
Phone No: t~�k4.34t.2t,3'12...............
Integrator: ..................................................... .... .... ............ .............
Operator Certification Number:20952 .............................
I-85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 3/4 mile A
past on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road. w
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 * ®6 42 it Longitude 80 * 20 { 21 ff
K r v eg '
va.alxg[A
,Current
- _";'s r>, ncarme,Ir
'. �� Designs Current;
Poultry
Cattle
,n.
Ca scat
Po ulation
Ca actt l'o ulation
iss"
Ca acrt 1, ulat�on '
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
® Dairy
726
593
❑ Feeder to Finish
n-Layer
❑Non -Dairy
,-
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
- a
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
"1ii'
ti Total Design Capacity
x `
726
z
❑ Boars
Total SSI�W:
1,016,400
Number of Lagoons L. 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Magoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stretim Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential'adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .... Uppex.3..W..S.F.... .... Middle.stage..... .....Lowea:.stage................................................. I.......................... ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 25 22 66
05/03/01 / Continued
-71

Facility Number: 29-03 Date of Inspection 10/11/2001 Printed on: 10/11/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to theVegrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tr'eW, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ADDheation
❑ Yes
IS No r
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16,
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Rcjjuired
Records &Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
0
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
7. Need to cut woody vegetatiIn and weeds (> 18") around dams of all waste ponds.
19. Still need to obtain soil samples for application fields for 2001.
27. Any burial of animals is >300 from any flowing water.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
:lissa Rosebrock
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector
Date:
05103101 I I Continued

Facility Number: 29-03
D d' Inspection 10/11/2001 Printed on: 10/11/2001
I
0
dor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
.&1
J
05103101

U 6 qd `� T/ t��td� ` of
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint, O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other
Facility Number Date of Visit:
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
Farm Name: .......A: All ..rf.�.,.I.......Farm.f T .......................
OwnerName:....... i............!�ar?.,,.i'�....... al ..... I ...............................
Facility Contact: ...-.J.a.r XsS........ drjaA&MTitle: ..........................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representa
Certified Operator
Location of Farm:
❑ Denied Access
T@ Time:
Not Ouerational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
udCounty:... a.` q.....................................
Phone No:.,. .i� .,....f �....226 n
......................................
UM04..t" .01..1.........�.7. A22' '..........................
Integrator: ..................................................................... .
Operator Certification Number•
•..........................................
❑ Swine u❑ Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse ZFq Longitude ®• ®` pZ �
Design,, Current Design , Current Design Correct '
Ca aci . Po _.ulation, ., . PoWt d n
!'Y �.Gapacity`, Papulatiion, Ca#tie �'1"Capacii►:Pop"ulation,.,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number -of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area . ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding.Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) lesfi than adequate? pillway ❑ Yes o
� ]Structure I Q S to a Structure 3 Stru Lure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
-1,24 . ... .................................... ....................................
Identifier: .l , ....3.�.1.......�1 � �..... .. .. .�.....♦
Freeboard (inches): ��
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: !entegrity
Date of Inspection 0,5. Are there any immediate threats to the of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes gNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or gNo
closure plan? Yes
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? � Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level rr
elevation markings? ❑ Yes YNO
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes X.No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pondin g ❑ PAN []Hydraulic Overload -` ❑Yes X.
12. Crop type &
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�vQ YiQ1ati0iis.at. dtfjejeA�i wore jaked• �(Wh)g 01S,visit; - Y00 Ai11•0e0fe Ao flitthk
coriesporidence* abi; ii this visit: ................................... .
❑ Yes No
ElYes 2 o
❑ Yes ,_No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes qN0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 1XNo
❑ Yes $J No
❑ Yes "��` o
❑ Yes �Emo
❑ Yes �No
Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o

Facility Number: of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 9 No
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes %No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or �No
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? i34"—ZL�Lu-
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional Comments an or ra ngs
J
5100

ision of Water Quality
ision of Soil and Water Conservation 101
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date ul' Visil; 5/t0/2t101 Tim9;Oo
e; Printed on; 10/2/2001
L_ rO 29 3
Not Operational G Below Threshold
■ Permitted ■ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Heillgray.faX1I11..1nr.................................................................................... County: DAYI 1, M.......................................... W.5XQ........
Owner Name: d;ttlaCS ...................................... GrAham ...................................................... Phone No: 336-9515-.7.7.42.....................
l Mailing Address: 1218.0e1Alinnt.Road............................
.......................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title: .
Onsite Representative: .1im-Gilraha.......................................................
Certified Operator: James ...................................... Grab= ...................
Location of Farm:
1,iln.w.Q. A,...NC.......
Phone No:.............
Integrator:
2.7.29.9..............
......... Operator Certification Number: 10952...............
.-85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 3/4 mile A
:ast on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
[]Swine []Poultry ®Cattle []Horse Latitude 35 • 44 42 Longitude 80 •F 20 ' 21 66
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry -Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ® :Dairy 726 1 612
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 726
Total SSLW 1,016,400
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps L3 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
I)ischarLes . Stream Imltacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes El No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass it lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....Uppex.I W..SR... .... Middle..Stage.... ..... Uwr_r.Stagt~........................................ ................................... .....
Freeboard (inches): 18 2 60
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 29-3 Date of inspection 1 5/10/2001 1 Printed on: 10/2/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to theregrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Sudex (Silage) Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Flay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
IN No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
soil test reflect that several fields needed 1-2 tons of lime.
Graham is recording freeboard levels from the max, liquid level down, not spillway or top of dam,
rail facility is in good shape.
Graham traded 330 tons of waste solids to Mr. Wallace of Charlotte in exchange for wood shavings.
Waste analysis: 4/9/01 ALD 2.3 lbs.N/1000 gals. I, ASD 7.8 Ibs.N11000 gals. B, SSD 2.5 Ibs.N/ton B
1/3/01 ALD 0.70 Ibs.N/1000 gals. 1, LSD 3.4" ,, FCD 8.8 "
9/19/00 ALD 0,55 " ", FCD 6.5 lbs.N/ton B, SSD 2.9 " 1"W1
Reviewerllnspector Name Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 29-3 1) 1' Inspection 5/10/2001 . Prinlerl on: 10/2/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes []No
J
05103101

Facility Number 29 03 Date of Visit: S/28/2000 Time: 1060 Printed on: 8/28/2000
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
E Permitted ■ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.. ...............
FarmName: &Allg ruf.ar m,.tc,................................................................................... County: Dayi dsata..........................................1 'S RQ........
OwnerName: 1ttAl 5...................................... GrAUm ...................................................... Phone No: 336r.9,56-7762..........................................................
Facility Contact: .l W.Glrakt>3ttut................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 1Z1#Aelmoj t.R9,%d........................................................................... Ljn.w.o.osla..N.C....................................................... 2.729.9 .............
Onsite Representative: Jim-Grahain............................................................................... integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator.jpmwU................................. Gr;i#lam........................................... Operator Certification Number: 2,QQ52.............................
Location of Farm:
1.85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel 3/4 mile
:ast on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 44 42 Longitude F 80 • 20 21
.::"
ffl�Design
Sw�ite Ca aci
.�
Current' De ign ; Cu rent. '"rDe jgn'Cutrrentx`"
Po ulation Poultry Ca acjt . Po ulation. @attleCa acit'1:1?oalatjon '
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer ®Dairy 726 525`
�w'
§?
z
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
❑Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
toae
Pais 726
b
[3 Gilts
Y
F ,� Ttotal SSLW 1,016,400
Boars
Number of Lagoons 0 �1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present]©Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Ho-11
ldjng Ponds 1 Solid Traps � ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System1�=�l
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection. Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............. SAlids............ U uid........... q :.I..t4ttxd... :....... Sur a=.Drainage. St.trface.Drainage.....
Freeboard (inches): 24 30 30 20 66
5/00�
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 29-03 Date of Inspection 8/28/2000 printed on: 8/28/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the grity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tre ,severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Sudex (Silage)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
ReqUired
17.
Records & Documents
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
violatit... defcieneie were il... during thiYtiu... j .... >.. ftir.. .
.:.
coriesnondence: about this :visit.' - '. ::..:: • :....: . . . : . : . ........::.....::..... .
7. Need to mow/cut vegetation around and.between #1 and #2 and also #2 and #3.
9. Recommend markers at # 1 and #2.
19. Need to keep records on IRR 1 and 2. Also SLD I and 2. Send SLD 1 and 2 and IRR I and 2. Keep an eye on recordkeeping.
February applications may have been March applications.
25. Call Susan Cauley to have permit amended to 726.
Reviewer/Inspector Name JMeliV4o' sebrock n _ 1 , _ I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. / ,� p-A _ Date: g/pp

Facility Number: 29-03 D0f Inspection $/28/2000 Printed on: 8/28/2000
Odor Issues
0
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below• ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28,
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32,
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[_' ' t Uifa i `onimcn Itini .O!'I 18W Jf&*
A,
5/00

Q.J0 Ani
*ivision; of Water Quality
ivision of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit joutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 'Time: ® Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
kt�
XPermitted )4 Certified © Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Ab we Threshold:
Farm Name ....... 0.g.a..4 ..r. ........Far .�....1�. n..c..:............ County:.. * 1.......................................
Owner Name: ...........-Tamea... 5,....rl�.haky..1................................... Phone No: �? 1. .............�.2� .........................
......... . ...... ....
Facility Contact: .................... •I'itle:....... ................................................... ..... Phone o:....�p.,....a:...L./aC.
Mailing Address:.... o".}....A.....jbP.1.M—Qn r`""' .............................. LiA .� f �►C/.....t�...l.. R-5. ......
Onsite Representative:.... I. ,••„•• he integrator: ...........
Certified Operator: ......!,•,.,........' I- Operator Certification Number:......p.0..............
Location of Farm:
f
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �* �° ��� Longitude•
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer Dairy 1600+it al:&T
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagann Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
e. 1f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
y 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? 7 Spillw y ❑ Yes No
S te.�'rOt.1 e..
Structur4 I Structu o 2 Structur3tru dire 4 5tr lure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:...5.�.�d............. ......t} ...:.C1....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 r Continued on back
Ik,n

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection I- /�`Q /( tl) i Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the irity of any of the structures observed?? (ic/ trei severe erosion, [] Yes o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? YesVo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )R:<o
9. 'Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes o
12. Crop type r SC. uC
13. Do the receiving crops differ w h those designa ed in the Certified Anim aste Management PI n (CAW P)? ❑ Yes o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes tN
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes A4,o
Reguired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, snaps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
❑ Yes
.�N0
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
o
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of ernergency situations as'required by General Permit'?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
rjo
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
�'�io yiolafigris or deficiencies were ngted. ding �this'visit.'- Y:ou ;Wit! •r, eecive b6 fut-tjwr; • . - .
,correspondence. abaitt. this .visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
kw -A *� A.
I�
S. dal I Susan ddoloOd hiwt m �d .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

Facility Number: — of Inspection !Tinted on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues .
0
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge tit/or helow
liquid level,of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? Q ryl M, 07O)o
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes to
o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, El Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?� 7-1 o7CCO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged CII pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? �9
5100

Facility Number
Date of Visit: 518J2��U Time: � Printed on: 8/25/2000
29 3
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.. .......................
Farm Name: HE,ALLOiRt1,1' IARkY INC.................................................................... County: Dayids.an .......................................... W;SRO........
OwnerName: Ian a ...................................... Gria mm...................................................... Phone No: 33.fi-9.56.-77.6t2............................................. I ............ ..
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:
Mailing Address: J2tx#.1E+KQ..Nx..R0AJD..........................
Phone No:
L1XW..Q%...NOR1O.GA►ROLIi`[A.......... 2.7.29.9..............
Onsite Representative: lRmc*.Grah=.......................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Ja]A o..8................................. G.ram ........................................... Operator Certification Number:,7iQQ5;,.............................
Location of Farm:
-85 south and take the Belmont Rd. exit. Take a left at top of ramp and then a right at the next stop sign. Travel3/4 mile A
:ast on NC 47 and the farm is on the right side of the road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 44 42 Longitude F 80 • 20 21 s
Vi5chprges K Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?, ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..................................... ................. :................... .................................... ....................... ............. .............................
Freeboard (inches): 21 21 21 18 54
5100
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 29-3 Date of Inspection 5/8/2000 j Printed on: 8/25/2000 y '
5. Are there any immediate threats to the9grity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tr*evere erosion, ❑ Yes IN No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes IN No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste AURlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Barley) silage Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay) Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pendcd for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0; Rio viota. tigns;or defdenei;es•were i�oiei} during this: y1sit::Ytiu:wilE receive no furI . .: ;
corresb6fideh& about this' visit. .
[]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
7. Need to mow around waste ponds for easy visual inspection.
19.Operator is keeping IRRII and S1dII information on blank paper, but he is figuring the Nitrogen balance. l suggested that he use
e appropriate forms since he was required to have all the information anyway and it would be less confusing for the inspector even
ere maybe more paperwork to fill out.
ad 2000 operators card, soil samples and waste samples.
sed GPS unit to collect lagoon areas.
W
Reviewer/Inspector Name Roeky!,Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date: 5100

Facility Number: 29-3 Dff Inspection 5/8/2000 • Printed on: 8/25/2000
Odor Tssues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
FXdd tt tine l!ommen & Iari orb _raw rigs:
AL
5100

State of North Carol;
Department of Enviro ment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 27, 199°
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
James Graham
BEALLGRAY FARM INC.
1218 BELMONT ROAD
LINWOOD, NORTH CAROLINA 27299
r���
•I��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RREOMEh
N:C. Dept., of EHNR
S EP - 9 1999
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
BEALLGRAY FARM INC.
Facility Number 29-3
Davidson County
Dear James Graham:
A letter dated January 15, 1999-was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Rocky Durham on 3/11 /99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your
facility that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of
the following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
❑ The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Rocky Durham the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Rocky Durham, at 585 Waughtown Street,
Winston-Salem, NC 27107, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions please contact Rocky Durham at [phone]. If within 90 days you are
unable to provide Rocky Durham with the information you are automatically required
to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within
180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax 9I9-715-6048
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable. Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Davidson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

me p Lonrpranit p t•ono►v-up or 1)►v1.,) Inspection p
Facility Number I
p Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered
F:m n Name: eallgray..Farm.lnc.................................................................
ow -up of O'NNNI � rerie►r p Other
24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Counly: Davidson WSRO
Owner Name: damia..................................... Gxabam ..................................................... Phone No: 33ft-9.5.6-.7.7.62 ..........................................................
Facility Contact:
......................... I................. Ville: .....................
... Phone No:
llailinc, Address: ..................................................... Uawaud...NC ......................................................... 27299 ..............
5:09:00 PM
OnsileItepresentative:.......................................................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.lames.& ............................... GlraKam ............................................ Operator Certification Nuniher:20.Q52.....
Location of Farni:
Latitude ©�®® L.oliritrrdc ®�®
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
p Weanto Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
E3 Farrow to Wean
❑ arrow to Feeder
p arrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
DischniR" & Stream linpacts
�Ign, Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle: Capacity Population
ayer ® Uairy
❑ Non -Layer p Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 726
Total SSLW. 1,016,400
nSubsurface rams Presentn aaoon Ica n Dray re r rea
p No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge ori-tinaled at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. li discharge Is observed. Was the convey, nee n1an-made? p Yes p No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water ofthe State? (If ves. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
C. ICdischarue is Observed, what is the estimated ilo►v in ualhnin?
d. Does.discharge bypass a lagoon systcrn? ([fycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Wasle Collection & Treatnient
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure I Strticlure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Sli'nClUrc 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ toft..l............. ............ xala.2............. .......tc p..3............. ....tmiddle........... ..bottom.......... ...... ...... ............................................
Freeboard(inches): ................ 1.8................ ................ l.$........ ,....... ............... t.8............... ............... 24............... ............... 24............... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
1/6/99 Continued on back
# 4S / AftA

acilit Number: 29_p3
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a w� management or
p p Y g g S
closure plan? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes ® No
1V;Islc 'Noplic.alion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding 0 PAN
p Yes M No
Yes M No
12. Crop type Small.Graita.(Wheat,.Barjey .
Rys«................................GQr�I,.. ox �ans,..W.h.eat...... ................ F..e.9.Il:r..CHs1Y)................
Milo, Oats)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re(luired Records & I)ucnlnenrc
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes ® No
K : No.viulations:or' Jehcien•cres•were'•u•otcd' -d irlt e. this .visit. • I'ou. wiI! ic'eeive no further '
:: i irrespbndence aboirf this;visit...... :.....::....:::.......: :

j�z," .1 1
Division of Sound Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
aDivision of Water Quality
Routine 'O Complaint O Follow -lip of IDNVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DMVC review O Other �
Date of Inspection 1319p
Fracility Number ^
ime of Inspection I re i 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not O eratinnal Date Last Operated .
Farm Name: Qa1.lgTay...... l...orm - ac................... .... ... ..... County:.......... � 11t.{ 1`..0/7 ...........I................
Owner Name:.......... lFib.1!? ............. I. ........ . ...�.�. �L%n............................. Phone No:..L. r .......l, �r,.'r.... .o�.
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ... Phone No:
�
Mailing Address: ....1C�..l�t....�Lr1x.....�.•.f•.••f•...............................................1:..... ......�.1..17..1.tfC1�Ld /.!/.4....co.............. .R./...o�..:l...:!
OnsiteRepresentative: ..... d.D.t.rn-tj.......... 6.......... r.+Ft.h. .I ........ integrator: ..................
.....................................................................
Certified Operator,........... O..al']lefz..... , .......... .. .,/.,',�'j................ Operator Certification Number,...... , ...
.,oration of Farm:
E .lXte7 �" t!,lx....to......exS..,..,...?,.......t....s?,t~1.........G.
.. .
Latitude ©'l__q# i l 4�a" Longitude ®` ©, ERTI"
,`
Design . 'Current; Designer Current N� Design Current .'
°Capad y; Population Poultry „,Capucity�PopulattonF Cattle Populatiox on ;.
❑ Wean to Feeder
I0 Layer
T
Dairy
,Capacity
A-
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
I'
,
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
loss,Total Design Capaeitye
❑ Gilts
h n
e
^ #~ T-
otal LW SS
Boars
a n
r� .:,
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding P nds :14 a M IJ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area lip
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System w
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any..discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface, Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
-d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
` 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7I25197
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes No
Continue on back n

Facility Number: — 0
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ,` No
Structures (La2oons.Holdine Ponds. Flush Pits, etc
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes KNO
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
a, Freeboard (ft):........ .....!}.Q................ ................ `..0............. .................i.......a., .,O.., ......... .,....Q�r...�................ ....... .,.....,.....................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes JN
o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeso
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ElYeso
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? , ❑ Yes KNO
WasteApplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes XNO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 7 urn
j
15. Crop ty�..�.... �.... 1..-t... ...... rit.. cif .. . 1!.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Pian (AWMP)? ❑ Yes No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ANO
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes KNO
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ANo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes YNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ElYes V No
0° No.violations-or deficiencies. we're-ii6ted-durin$ this:visit.- You will receive-no,fi rider : -
correspondence aa0id this. visit....:.:.:...