175003_INSPECTIONS_20171231

State of North Caro .
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Charles Crumpton
5451 NC Highway 62 North
Blanch NC 27212
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Charles Crumpton Swine
Facility Number .17-5003
Caswell County
Dear Charles Crumpton;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface AreaAAcres) Rankin
1 0.15 Medium
2 0.23 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 Waughlown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk • •
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have Certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you -the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Caswell County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File
1\

i� HM � t. - - ,- [J r ,• 5�.„t X,e `i �. k,;.n °"' +.'S� 4 L:, v+t wr; '�� ! ,,y � �Y�^�-�
3, vision of Water Quality" R w r r z- }
P� �—+' x {�1s n rs u_, c g�ns�on of Soil.and Water Conservatiamaa _E1 _ x°sr x,w�e t7pt��
si 4'�
O Other,AgP.IIC'y3
t�isr�_ c _>-
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 27 5003
❑ Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date of Visit 1/24/2000
10 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 1/1I,ZQ.$5........
Farm Name: ChaxAe.s.Cr_ut p.W.K.S.Wits-C........................ County: Caswell .............................................. .Y.4'.ERQ........
OwnerName: CharkS.................................. crumplon ................................................. Phone No: .......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title: , Phone No:.:
Mailing Address: 5.451.N.C.kijgb.way..62,,NQrtbl.......................................................... HlAncht..XC............................................................. Z.72U ..............
Onsite Representative: ................................................................... .............. Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Emd..d.CrumiaimRand...........................................................................................................................•............................_...............................................................
.................... ........................ I ............................. ............................_.............................._................................................................................................................._.----..............
'®"Swine ;❑Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑>Horse
Design Current Design 'Current :Design Current
awilic CapacityUapacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 0
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry °Capadity Population 'Cattle ;Capacity;Capkity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons z Hblding ,Ponds / Solid :Traps
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. ]f discharge: is observed. was the convevance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'' (If yes_ nolify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. ll• discharr e is observed. what is the estimated flow in �,allmin?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3, is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection h Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/inspector Name Daphne Cartner
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facility Number 17 — 5003 0agoon Number 1............. Lagoon ntifier St.age qnip
0 Active # Inactive Latitude 36 28 03
Waste Last Added 1/1./Q..................................... Longitude 79 i fi 24
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated By GPS or Map? 19 GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS012418a
Surface Area (acres): Q,1..5........................
Embankment Height (feet): .............
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet # 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? [:]Field Measurement ®Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0 ¢ 5 O 5 - 10 * > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes (*No O Unknown
Spillway *Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 1/24/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 24
embankment condition # Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly'Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
pp No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
OO No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability.
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ication equipment tail to make contact
and/or sprayfield 0 Yes O No 0 Unknown with representative O Yes No
unavailable
comments -Date of last operation per Caswell SWCD staff
ICI

Facility Number 17 — 5003 agoon Number ........... Lagoon ratifier1.ag..tw4.............................................
O ActiveO Inactive Latitude 36 .2$ �0� 2
Waste Last Added 1/1/2.05.................................... Longitude F797 16 '25
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS i:j Map
GPS fife number: IS012418a
Surface Area (acres): .23...........................
Embankment Height (feet): 4.......................
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet Q 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? []Field Measurement ®Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes* No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 OO > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? (:)Yes # No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes *No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 1 /24/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
OQ Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 8
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield O Yes Op No O Unknown with representative O Yes 0 No
unavailable
comments --Date of last operation per Caswell SWCD staff