010036_PERMITTING_20171231

Joseph Johnson Narrative Addition
Joseph Johnson's Nutrient Management Plan currently shows
the application window on fescue to be Feb. through Oct. This is
what was entered into the plan considering very cold weather in
the winter months. Joseph has expressed a desire to be able to
apply waste Jan. —Dec. on his fescue to be able to keep his
lagoon below begin pump level. This is Permissible according to
the Manure Application. Windows for common Crops chart that
I was provided in a recent Nutrient Management class. I have
included a chart with this narrative to show that this is
permissible. He should check the footnotes at the bottom of the
page on the chart I provided to be sure he will be in compliance.
I am providing Joseph and Melissa a copy of this narrative and
chart to be included in his Nutrient management Plan.
7/30/2015!
Wally Walker
Alamance SWCD

,y
Manure Application Windows' for Common Crops
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov bec
' Dates shown represent statewide limits; Plan ring and harvesting dates vary across the state and from year to year. Actual vaiuessholl reflect sirespeciflc conditions and in no case allow
applicatlon more thon rirheF30 days prior. to plonting1bredking dormancy or less than '30days belbrehorvest. See General Permltforfoodcrops
_ Mountains' -limit N application duringJune.andJuly/no nitrogen in December andlanuary.
Piedmont & Coastal Plain -limit IV application during June and Julylno nitrogen in Dec and Jon during severe w7�iers

There was a question as to why in the nutrient management plan it was showing
200 Ibs of N for soybeans. 1 did not enter that amount, that is what isinthe
program to show the N requirements of a soybean crop yielding over 50 bushels.
The first column shows the N requirements to make the RYE of that particular
crop. If you will look to the right of the application method column you will see
the recommended amount I have entered. 1 have included an article explaining
the N requirements of soybeans and it explains where they are able to acquire
these nutrients. I hope this clears up any questions you may have had.
Wally Walker
Alamance SWCD

P N I ■�
Plant Nutrition ■ ODAY
Better Crops, Better Environment... through Science
Spring 2012, No. 4
From Scientific Staff of the
International Plant Nutrition Institute (iPNI)
3500 Parkway Lane, Suite 550
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2844 USA
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
E-mail: info a ipni.met Webs ite:avww.ipni-net
DO HIGH YIELDING SOYBEANS NEED TO BE FERTILIZED WITH NITROGEN?
Are higher yielding soybeans running short on N? Do they need additional N fertilizer to ensure they are
properly fed? Recently, a group.of scientists at University of Nebraska examined 108 published scientific studles on.
this topic to see if any trends could be discovered. Soybean yields in the studies ranged from 9 to 88 bu/A, and aver-
aged 40 bu/A. Here are a few of their findings.
Soybean N requirements. The above -ground portion of a soybean plant takes up, on average,,about 4.72 lb
N/bu. This means.that a 40 bu/A crop takes up about 189 lb.N1A, while an 88.bu/A crop takes up about 415 lb NIA.
The average concentration of N in the seed was found to be 6.34%. This works out to be 3.3 lb Nlbu: So that same
40 bu/A.crop will remove 132 lb N/A from the field at harvest, while the 88 bu/A crop will remove 296 lb NIA.
Sources of N for soybean uptake. Soybeans get their N from three sources: 1) N2 fixation by Bradyrhizobium,
2) nitrate and ammonium in the soil, and 3) fertilizer N. The studies showed that on average, 50 to 60% of the N in
soybeans comes from N2 fixation. Normally, the remainder comes from the N in the soil. The maximum amount of
N2 that can be fixed was considered by the authors of the review to be 300 lb NIA. When fertilizer N is applied, it can
reduce the amount of N2 fixation. This reduction is exponential. The first 45 lb NIA can reduce maximum N fixation to
about 190 lb NIA. Applying 90 lb NIA can reduce it to 125 lb NIA.
Soybean response to fertilizer N. Information about soybean response to N fertilization was reported in 67 of
the 108 studies. Positive responses to N fertilization occurred in about half of them. The average yield response was
8 bufA. A slightly higher:average response of 10 bu/A occurred when low rates of N (less than 45 lb NIA) were ap-
plied.after growth stage.R3 (beginning pod). Typically, seasonal N demand peaks after this stage. When a subset of
12 studies with soybean yields greater than 67 bu/A was'examined, 9 of the studies (75%) responded positively to N
fertilization. The authors concluded that in high yielding environments, fixed N and soil N supplies may not be great
enough to meet the N demands of the plant, increasing the probability that soybean may respond to N fertilization.
Conditions favoring soybean response to N. High yielding environments may have a greater chance of
responding to fertilizer N, but at lower yields, there are still several situations the authors listed where responses to N
were more likely. These included poor establishment of the nodule system, extremely low soil N supplies at planting,
plant water stress, soil pH problems, low soil temperature, or an absence of native B_radyrhizobium resulting from a
cropping history with infrequent or no legumes.;
So do high yielding soybeans need to be fertilized with N? The answer appears to be that they might, but
the yield response may only be. marginally profitable. When soybean prices outpace the price of N, profitability is.
More likely, but such a window is usually pot long-lasting. Therefore, N fertilization of soybeans still carries a financial
risk even under high yielding_ environments. Local trials can help determine whether or not the practice makes sense
in individual situations.
For more information on the details of this review, see Salvaglotti, F. et al. 2008. Field Crops Res. 108:1-13.
_TSM —
For more information, contact Dr. T. Scott Murrell, Northcentral Director, IPNI, 1851 Secretariat Dr., West Lafayette,
IN 47906. Phone: (765.) 413-3343. E-mail. [e-mail].
Abbreviations: N = nitrogen.
Now-Plaitl Nurrldon TODAY articles are available online at the 11'Nl website: ww%v.ipni.nct/pnt

Joseph Johnson DaiEX Animal Waste Utilization Plan rev.7/2012
Narrative
Joseph Johnson presently has three manure types on the farm, dairy slurry, dairy solid and
poultry solid. For planning purposes, all fields are shown as being able to receive all three
sources: using'/4 poultry,'/4 dairy slurry, and ''/z dairy solids. The plan also shows that there is
sufficient acreage to receive all .of the manure generated, BUT that Joseph reserves the right to
use these sources in whatever combination he needs to meet the Nitrogen needs of the crop based
on RYE's. The poultry litter cleanout or Dry stack may or may not time with a particular crop
need, therefore Joseph will be able to use the manure that is available when a particular crop
needs it. This should work well, because we want the nutrients to be used for agronomic needs
(Not disposal). Also taking into consideration that wet wastes are more expensive to haul,
Joseph may choose not to apply this type of waste on fields that are farther away. There is a
greater potential for Phosphorus accumulation when the N needs of a crop met with poultry
versus dairy manure. Both sources may lead to P accumulation, and the extra P that comes with
the poultry litter could certainly have consequences for his permitted dairy operation. Therefore,
it would be a good idea to monitor the soil tests, and make adjustments to his operation schedule,
to avoid any possible nutrient accumulations in the fields that he presently has in his plan.
New Soil Type Info 7/2012
Alamance County is in the process of having an updated Soil Survey. The original Soil Survey
was completed in 1960 and the soil types in this plan are based on that soil mapping. This has
caused some concern for this operation limiting the N applications rates based on RYE'S
predominately on the Durham and Callison soil types that are shown in the 1960 survey.
We are currently getting updated soils information, because of this we looked at the preliminary
new soils data and these soil types appear not to be present in the new mapping.
Areas that were mapped Durham/Callison now are showing Appling and Vance soil types. This
allows for a greater N application rate to meet crop yield needs. Caution should be taken not to
over apply P if using Poultry Litter. The N rates are listed below for these soil types:
Vance Soil
Corn Silage 192 lbs/ac
Small Grain Silage 87 Ibs/ac
Fescue pasture 135 Ibs/ac
AAppling Soil
Corn Silage 267 lbs/ac
Small Grain Silage 125 lbs/ac
Fescue pasture 135 lbs/ac
It is recommended that you use the Rates for the Vance soil type for Durham and Callison
soil types shown in this plan until the soil survey data is finalized for this area. Your Waste
plan will then be revised to the accurate soil types.

Rosebrock, Melissa
From: Phil Ross [Phil. [e-mail]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:38 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: Joseph Johnson Dairy Animal Waste Utilization Plan72012
Attachments: Joseph Johnson Dairy Animal Waste Utilization Plan72012.pdf
Hi Melissa,
Please review what is attached for Josephs new narrative. This is what we discussed.
I have also talked to Joseph about it, but wanted to review before I sent it out
Thanks
Phil Ross
Alamance SWCD

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form
(THIS FORA-1. 1A Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE ASAN ORIGINAL)
State General Permit — New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
1, GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: , t J , f ►� ti L ��=� ��i�t f �ct , c� '
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: 7v5af U e,<.,1J3 a.v
1.3 Mailing address: Gj 6"3 -�, P/-eta 5 *N �— I--,- le Ala
City, State: /-/ lJ /ir) , /\l , C _ Zip: "2-7 2-1 a
Telephone number (include area code):( 33 374 - 3 9 7c)
1.4 Physical address: q / 4 /S r L ✓H-N ;qW
City. State: G, pj.s,r {� �� . C'- • Zip: 2-7 2-1 9
Telephone number (include area code): { 33-6. ) 376 - 3 !7 0
1.5 County where facility is located: A-& r -�d'./Ve+r
1.6 Facility location (directions from nearest major highway, using SR numbers for state roads): +�W% yq Si Z opt/
S �2 �375,r12 Oat _.1-3 7/01 L o0J 5,Q ;2-37v, 9- sP� 2-3?Z R. Iry 5Q 2-1.7 Farm ✓tanager's name (if different from Land Owner): SAIA 3
1.3 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; circle which type is listed):
1.9 Facility's original start-up date: 076 Date(s) of facility expansion(s) (if applicable):At
�t,} In/ Pja��SS
2U07
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility number:
2.2 Operation Description:
Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for Nvhich the waste
management structures were designed.
Tv e� e of Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farow to Wean (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Feeder (M sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow)
❑ Wean to Finish (# sow)
❑ Gilts
❑ BOas!Stttd
No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Layer ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
❑ iron -Layer
❑ Turkey
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beer Stocker Calf
tP airy Calf U
airy Heifer
EA-bry Cow
]ilk Cwx
No. of Animals:
U
d
FOR1'VI: A'4VO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 1 Of 5

3.
2. 3 Acrea-ehel"Ved and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
systern)' Required Acreage Acreage (as listed in the CAW.MP):
2.4 Number�oflat-wils: J Total Capacity (cubic foet): / Required Capacity (cubic feet):
3
Number of Storage Ponds: A— Total Capacity (ct(lbic teet): Gj Required Capacity (cubic feet): C� r'S 46
2.5 .Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields:' YES or NO (circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management systern? YES or NO (circle ow:e
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? YES or NO (circle onel
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST:
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space providers next to each
item.
Applicants initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied and a county road map with the location of the /yy
lacility indicated.
3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWV1P). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for �!'�
animal waste operations. U"t
The CAWNIP must include the following components. Some of these components maly not have been required ell the time
thefiicility was certified but should be added to the CAPVMPfor permitting purposes:
3.3.1 \RCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required
3.3.3 Documentation that proposed swine facilities meet the Swine Farm Siting Act, including a site map prepared by
a Registered Land Sun,eyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed 1 inch = 400 feet. At a minimum. the site
map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to occupied residences within 1 500 feet,
schools, hospitals, churches, outdoor recreational facilities, national parks, state parks, historic properties. or
child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500 feet, water supply wells within 500 feet.
The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries and perennial streams or rivers located 'xithin
75 feet of waste application areas.
3,3A Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners, all property owners who own property located
across a public road, street, or highwav from the facility, the local health department, and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination
3.3.6 The lagoorilstorage facility design 5;9
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design '3 J, P"'"`�"�
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field
3.3,12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
3.3.15 The required MRCS Standard specifications
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Pate 2 of 5

6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWQ regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by I I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name: Joseph Johnson Dairy (formerly Fogleman Dairy)
6.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm:N/A
Telephone number: (
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Unnamed Tributary to Cane Creek
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are locatedAlamance
6.5 Map name and date: Crutchfield Crossroads, N.C. 1974
6.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters: Unnamed Tributar rLto Cane Creek
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): C-NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters}
Proposed classification, if applicable: NIA
Signature of regional office personae A
4M tAJ T Date: June 25, 2007
(All attachments must be signed)
1RIM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06
Page 4 of S

A
a79° 28 0.00" w i 07 27 0.00" Wj I I I P79° 260M" W, I I
i
ff/r /r' / -t�✓/ 1 •=�
�—/r•� T}lti��� � �% �•-,• l J
S--�1—
Ca
��` J' ' -✓ ek. r;� �C,' no— -- _mo7' '
—
` .1 `V^\'� i �-[ n'. CnnO CKeek '} �..C.. :•'Q.-%tom yr/']
tl
jCl)— i7y� ��� ..A j ! I{ i% 7]6Q ./ •, -
t I
cn
a
G
t i i ✓' h 4 \
•S �' a l l�. J 0� J .'"y � 1� ��� l"��' �J- i ice' #!/-'. �•' l 1'i �:. i`� v�
'�
6 Z1
L`'�-_.1�� 1� 1 �ni1` -�7,�- .� � `�`,`Yy.+.-. �' \'li %i� (1.�1 �� �1- lU" ."�'�� ..�"_•�� !',�i� S
_
10
n rJ 1 1
Z�
tit L_ 1 1 V\ J\
Z
0
CD
Ln
cn
Cl
00
JJ��// +,r /`— V ` J
."l
l I
°A � •
���
� t �
l ��y,' t `� J �•� `
(j 44e41 n
� a�1 �`^\JI
7177
t63
=� 1J #01-36
epi
79° 28'.0-00"
I I I 079° 2T 0.0a. I �779° 26' a.0a"
Copyright (C) 1998, Mapiech, Inc.
�� � 7

Name of Stream
Description
Curr. Class
Date Prop. Class
Basin
Stream Index #
Meadow Creek
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-23
Whiteheat Creek
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-24
Motes Creek
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-25
(Newland Creek)
Marys Creek
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-26
Long Branch
From source to Marys
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-26-1
Creek
Caterpillar Creek
From source to Orange
WS-II;HQW,N 08/03/92
Cape
Fear
16-27-6-(1)
County SR 1007
SW
Cane Creek
From dam at Cane Creek
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-27-(7)
Reservoir to Haw River
Cane Creek (South
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-28
side of Haw River)
Wells Creek
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-28-1
Creek
Hunting Branch
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-28-2
Creek
Reedy Branch
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-2B-3
Creek
Foust Creek
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-28-4
Creek
South Fork Cane
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-28-5
Creek
Creek
Pine Hill Branch
From source to South
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-28-5-1
Fork Cane Creek
Pine Branch
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-28-6
Creek
HAW RIVER
From a point 0.4 mile
WS-IV;NSW
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
16-(28.5)
downstream of Cane
Creek (South side of
Haw River) to a point
0.4 mile downstream of
Brooks Branch
Big Branch
From source to a point
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-29-(1)
0.3 mile upstream of
Alamance County SR 2182
Big Branch
From a point 0.3 mile
WS-IV;NSW
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
16-29-(2)
upstream of Alamance
County SR 2182 to Haw
River
Lick Creek
From source to a point
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
16-31-3-(1)
0.8 mile upstream of
N.C. Hwy. 87
Lick Creek
From a point 0.8 mile
WS-IV;NSW
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
16-31-3-(2)
upstream of N.C. Hwy.
87 to Terrells Creek
North Prong Rocky
From source to Rocky
WS-III
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-43-4
River
River
tk)s -0 Page 5 of 6

3.3. l6 Energency Action Plan
, 3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.1E Odor Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the kloritoria on Construction or
Expansion of Swine Farms, if the application is for a swine facility
3.3.21 A neap showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features
that affect facility desicn, the dimensions and elevations of anv existing facilities.
the fields used for waste application, and areas where surface runoff is to be
controlled
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your
submittal. (Composting. waste transfers, etc.)
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, ­SoSeA Y7, �e�islSo�l
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2). attest that
this application for 1� ale,MgYL� -11 (facility name listed in question 1.1 )
has been reviewed by me d�issaaccurate and complete tif the hest of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete. r� AI
Signature ��� Date f+
S. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (connplcte only if different from the Land Owner)
1. %1 J 0 (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for %`J� (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed borne and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application packave
will be returned as incomplete.
Sianature 4d,-'t'," Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENTTO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS UNIT
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH C AROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORD[: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 3 of 5

6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWQ regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by I 1 " copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Toprgraphic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name: Fo g Ieman Dai
6.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm:N/A
Telephone number: (
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Unnamed Tributary to Cane Creek
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are locate d:A lamance
6.5 Map name and date: Crutchfield Crossroads, N.C. 1974
6.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters: Unnamed Tributary to Cane Creek
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): C-NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters)
Proposed classification, if applicable: N/A
Signature of regional office personnel: Jh M " Date: June 25, 2007
(All attachments must be signed)
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

Name of Stream
Description
Curr. Class
Date Prop. Class
Basin
Meadow Creek
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Whiteheat Creek
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Motes Creek
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
(Newland Creek)
Marys Creek
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Long Branch
From source to Marys
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Creek
Caterpillar Creek
From source to Orange
WS-II;HQW,N
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
County SR 1007
SW
Cane Creek
From dam at Cane Creek
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Reservoir to Haw River
Cane Creek (South
From source to Haw River
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
side of Haw River)
Wells Creek
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Creek
Hunting Branch
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Creek
Reedy Branch
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Creek
Foust Creek
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Creek
South Fork Cane
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Creek
Creek
Pine Hill Branch
From source to South
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Fork Cane Creek
Pine Branch
From source to Cane
C;NSW
12/01/83
Cape
Fear
Creek
HAW RIVER
From a point 0.4 mile
WS-IV;NSW
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
downstream of Cane
Creek (South side of
Haw River) to a point
0.4 mile downstream of
Brooks Branch
Big Branch From source to a point C;NSW 12/01/83
0.3 mile upstream of
Alamance County SR 2182
Big Branch From a point 0.3 mile WS-IV;NSW 08/03/92
upstream of Alamance
County SR 2182 to Haw
River
Lick Creek From source to a point C;NSW 12/01/83
0.8 mile upstream of
N.C. Hwy, 87
Lick Creek From a point 0.8 mile WS-IV;NSW 08/03/92
upstream of N.C. Hwy.
87 to Terrells Creek
North Prong Rocky From source to Rocky WS--I-II 08/03/92
River River
Stream Index #
16-23
16-24
16-25
16-26
16-26-1
16-27-6-(1)
16-27-(7)
16-28
16-28-1
16-28-2
16-28-3
16-28-4
16-28-5
16-28-5-1
16-2B-6
16-(28.5)
Cape Fear 16-29-(1)
Cape Fear 16-29-(2)
Cape Fear 16-31-3-(l)
Cape Fear 16-31-3-(2)
Cape Fear 17-43-4
� 1 ,RTl 0-7 ' V �`L� � �j (� � Z�S IP Q Page 5 of 6

0110.001,
wl I j,[�/ P79° 2- 0.00" , 079° 26' 0.D0" W I I
-77 -! r • U-+- '`_
`� ' ,`_ �1 '+�'•�ek' ^? tfl%[ 'r' a_ - s .�,- r �L� \ =. SnoR,Camp
r^,4J / 7 a (1.' '+�-` r "' ` t J �•.J-' i ! i-
'i• � � her `-• ���f-' �• '�`w,��".�. .L � •! C1 ;3,,,�� s �-
At j
650
f�
10
4i
Lo
U"i
�Ylvan i�,�� � �••\ �--r-r'
" �'J_ , ,,` ,•,�1 , -J7 , ti ,I�', �,�� `� _gip �E"�Y� � l I� E , �-- �, rl
�• - %` �' � tip � � � � 11' � fN S � � � 5 `
a i x 626 `�! r • 1 .. ' �` 2369 - -` `' rJ i / --r
V
y �
•1 / j
� �
' �- -rl •p l�
1 � U if \ {� �J i • f \ ' �
to
CO
IM
V� s j1.1;--
659% �t ✓1��
N
LID
Oro
?1.'• - J
U) -L-�Ll �k
aa• �A/I �� � -`� f '- �-�'Y�:Ii���' .Sctlllc {~( I f o .S
2372
—
�, co, i 7
IF
O
Ln
r-
i (ice ..�/• . =� {j j x 5�7 �' / ` 3 •` f �i^�� @ 637
JU ! (elf \( i j� i \J '~\
, �� �_ c� t
Q
CD
#01 36%
aI,[CE co,
t 1 ;
9' 2
' 0.00" 79° 27' 0.00" I b79° 26'
0.00" W I I
�j Copyright (C)'99", M pt,cm, fnc.
l

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (9/05)
Asheville Regional APS Supervisor
2090 U.S. Highway 70
S%vannanoa. NC 2877S
(S''8) 296-4500
Fax [phone]
W ashim,ton Regional APS Supervisor
943 Washington Square iMall
Washimton. NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Beaufort
Jones
Buncombe
Madison
Bettie
Lenoir
Burke
McDowell
Camden
Martin
Caldwell
Mitchell
Chowan
Pamlico
Cherokee
Polk
Craven
Pasquotank
Clay
Rutherford
Currituck
Perquimans
Graham
Swain
Dare
Pitt
Haywood
Transylvania
Gates
Tyrell
Henderson
Yancey
Greene
Washington
Jackson
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Fayetteville Regional APS Supervisor
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Bladen
Richmond
Cumberland
Robeson
Harnett
Sampson
Hoke
Scotland
Montgomery
Winston-Salem Regional APS Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockinghatn
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
Mooresville Regional APS Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander
Lincoln
Cabanas
Mecklenburg
Catawba
Rowan
Cleveland
Stanly
Gaston
Union
lredell
Raleigh Regional APS Supervisor
1628 Mall Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-162S
(9 t 9)V791-4200
Fax[phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Region APS Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Bnlnswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pender
Duplin
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-NIE 1/10/06 Page 5 of 5

S �j��• - Emergency Sgillw0.
Level Control Section EL 653.7
fA!► LJJ f 25' long x 10', Side Slopes 3-1 +
oFj 1
5�"'�P'Pj5�o�t� + tis �rvrFRG 1{re4: O.S7
KwwvAha&be1OK .- F, +
CaliheTonyendlg, V l� p /' T / / �9 Lry�ar7` GL+Fy %Sodif 43.
Must fence entire 3 sr f z/ } , %—� /F 1,12"
pond fo exclude F« (,oar, 12" m
animals and people /
Jru�4 Nsor.1 6A%/ 2 6R �� 4 S 1 "Tf M ta: V— •1 �.
� be 1
,Gjr-A.wAwc' �i$`'' + pJFiys sf7�A� 141
7. 537 ro
+ 79 3 ` w m
r/
o l b•4 ti'Diversion t
' Trapezoidal shape to gc%fa 0 Q U
Top 15' botton 2' 411 sides min v4i
Grade Onto r : A%Arc
Outlet Into ro[< autrcop p f
1-00
QLJ-
rz
�U�= nit -i= • "t� 4 V '�J
+ _ 4
Design Details:
sewed rop R 655 ✓ � '^' Pt `! ffi «� C Q
CrestE5W653.7b53.8 L-
Finished Bottom EL 645 b C (Q
Cut Bottom EL 843.5 1p 1}3. T p O V)
Clay Liner 1 ft thick ((� Dl,q ho (° q 3LI I 66 >
Liner Cover 05ft thick
Pump Marker EL 5531
Top Width 10R. East Side 15'for umping Exists ate f / '°QD � 0
,� � Owne�s Proposed hu�ld/ng pad V� �
Side slopes 11 inside and outside ,rf Storage PondP
.}s Scale: j"= 54Z

Dairy Waste Storage Pond 7116118
Engineering Design Worksheet for: Joseph Johnson
In Alamance County, NC
Inside Top Dimensions: 115 x 70
:SW Dimensions: 1 s ft sawn, o ft top, 0 ft deep wror 3:1 sides Pond 1 already existing
Top EL 662.00
ESW Crest EL 660.80
1 Sort
sLPMWF.L 659.10
Pool
bankment
w�sU w�lrt, k�cMre
Liner Bottom EL 652.00
STRUCTURE
POND #2 STORAGE VOLUME SIZING
PRISMOMAL POND SIZING (based on prismoidat formula from EFH 11-44)
vokme • fens of tops+(4 . eras of mieregipn).(sres of bonom}
IM NSIONS
Top of Elam Elevation
655.00
ft
Inside top length:
186
ft.
Inside lop width:
155
ft.
inside Side Slope averse
3.29
-to-one
Pond Depth to top of dam
10.00
ft
Pump th to start pump elev
8.0
ft
Required Freeboard above stage in ESW
1.00
ft
RESULTS:
Total Storage to Crest ESW Min required =149326 cu.tLj
164,928
cu.ft.
Start Pump Storage Min mquired -134910 cu.ft.
136 276
cu.ft.
Storm Story a-Pond2 on Min required -14416 cu.fL
10.652
cu.fL
EmergencyEme!gency Sp4lway Top Width
16
ft.
Flow depth (stage) in emergency s il
0.30
Total Emergency SpilWy Depth
1.30
ft.
Start Pump Elevation
653
Depth to Crest Emer SpIlKwy
8.70
Depth of Storm Staege (stop pump to nest E
0.74
CALCULATIONS:
Bottom Length
120.20
ft.
Bottom Width
89,20
ft-
Bottom Area C
10,721.84
ft.
Top of Dam Area
28 630.00
a .ft,
Top of Dam Acreage
0.66
acres
Sots a Elevation
653.70
Bottom Elevation
845.00
Appondmated equivalent square dimension
Averaged based on actual des. areas.
Egwva'ent slope to account for long narro,:: pond on a 3 1
(also used In liner des.)
8.1
140.272 as built
18.475 both ponds
Odd shape design Areas from CAD design: (largest to 1
7.576 sf at bottom of pond - 87
14.992 sf mid pond depth) 122
24,114 sf at top of dam - 155
pond 155' square x 10'deep 3:1 - 159.250 cu ft to top dar
prismoid formula vol from above= 152763
pond 155' sq x 10'deep 3.29:1 = 152692 cu ft to top dam

Dairy Waste Storage Pond 7116113
Engineering Design Worksheet for: Joseph Johnson
in Alamance County, NC
POND #1 STORAGE VOLUME SIZING
(Cased on pramWsl 1a utn from EFH 11-44j
Dimensions from existing rectanpular lagoon:
Top of Dam Elevation
662.00
ft.
Inside top ien the
116.00
R.
Inside top width:
70.00
R.
Inside Side Sl0 aver
2.00
-tonne
Total Depth
10.00
ft
ESW pest elev
660.80
ft.
Skimmer Pie Invert Elov Start Pump El if no skimmer )
659.10
ft.
Head on skimmer pipe invert from Crest ESW elev.
1.70
ft.
Freeboard from top dam to invert skimmer pipe,2.90
ft,
ESW depth 10!2E of dam
0.00
ft.
Erne illwaX Top Width
0
ft,
marts:
9,851
Available tamp 25 yr Storm Storagemin - 4548 cuff.
Storage Volume = A+4B+C x Dl8 solids-30794.4 c.f.
28,784
tuft.
(ignore skmmer "outllowt
mkutaaora:
Storage De h D
7.10
ft.
Top of Dam Acreage
0.19
acres
Scitrage Elevation
659.10
ft.
Bottom Elevation
652.00
ft.
Bottom Length
76.00
ft.
Bottom Width
30.00
ft.
Bottom Area C
2.280.00
s .ft.
Mid Store a Len th
90.20
ft.
Mid Storage Width
44,20
ft
Midstoma Area B
1985,84
%ft.
Lop Storage Length
104.40
fL
Top Storage Width
58,40
R.
Top Storage Area A
6,096,96
S ft.
Top of Dam Area
8,120,00
Rit.
Temporary S
to crest
Bottom Length
104
M
Bottom Width
58
R
Bottom Area C
51197
sq.1t.
Storage Depth p
2
ft.
Mid Storage Length
108
FL
Mid Story a Width
62
ft.
Mid Storage Area B
6662
s .fl.
Top Storage Length
116
ft.
Top Storage Width
70
ft.
Top Storage Area A
8120
s .R.
Temp. Storm Storage Volume a (A+41B+C) x ale
9,851
cu..R.
Has skimmer pipe YIN? N
Some solids must go to Pond2

RAINFALL WATER for STORAGE -PERIOD:
(see "Runoff and Evap Example *is" and-Raintatl-Monmly
Storms Evaporation doc" I
Normal Lot Runoff -Concrete-small unroofed corner feed barn 7.35
In.
Normal Lot Runoff - -Silos half runoff Caplured small' sump
3.68
in.
Normal Runoff from Undiverted Roofs
0
in.
Excess Rainfall on Pond (Rainfall Less Evaporation)
7.42
in.
STORM WATER ,2k:YEAR 24-HOUR:
(see"Rainfall-Nlpnlhiv Storms Evaporationdoc'i
Concrete Lot Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm
6.0
in.
Unpaved Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm
0.0
in.
Roof Runoff from 25-year 24-houf Stone
0.0
in,
Rainfall on Pond from 25-year 24-hour Storm
6.0
in.
Ignore summer SPRINKLER water in barn_ because Wm
than summer -rainfall sprinkler-runolf
4.7 months
4.7 months Small' auto-purnp leachale sump captures half rain, no st
4.7 months
4.7 months
SAND SEPARATOR 9FFICIENCY: 0.0 % removed
!enter 0 if no sand senarator Usedl
Dairy Waste Storage Pond 7116118
Engineering Design Worksheat for: Joseph Johnaon
In Aiamance County, NC
STORAGE WORKSHEET
Deslpn hasiv M co": a r4dM: 4.7 Monllu Storapa;
Rmon AmasZomwla 975af, Unpamid MAW, Rooled Oaf
STORAGE CALCULATIONS
1. Waste Generated:
750 Cows x 1.82cuMcowlday x 141 days x 32%1100 = 61,589 cu.ft
0 Heifers x Ocu.itlhefrlday x 141 days x 32%1100 = 0 CuA
2. Sand Bedding Entering Pond (after sand separator):
100% x 750 Cows x 0 cflcowlday x141 days = 0 cu.ft
3. Wash Water.
(5gals.fdaylcow) I (7.48 gals.lcu.ft.)x 750cows x 141 Days =
70,689 cu.ft
4. Sileage Leachate sump pumped into WSP1:
16cu.ft-per day, x 141days =
2.256 cu.ft
5. Lot Run-off Concrete & Unpaved (Oct.- May.):
7.35f12 x 975sf Conc t 3.68112 x 18640sf unpaved =
6,313 cu.ft
6. Undiverted Roof Run-off for storage period (worse case):
0 in. Undiverted Runoff / 12in. x Osq. ft. Roof Area -
0 cu.ft
7. Excess Rainfall on Both WS Ponds during storage period:
7.42 in. Excess RaWl2in.x 36950 sq.ft. Pond Surface A -
22.847 cu."
8.25-year 24-hour Storm on Paved&Unpaved Areas:
6 in,Stofm112in. x 975 sf + 0 in.Stormll2in. x 18640 =
488 cu.ft
9. 25-year 24-hour Storm on Undtverted Roofed Area:
0 In.Stom-Min, x 0 sq.RUrtdiverted Area=
0 CUM
10.25-year 24-tour Storm on Both Waste Storage Ponds:
bin. Storm 112in. x 36950sq. ft.Pond Top Area =
18,475 cu.fl
Break au14,pump leachale sump captures half rain no st.
IKol, typIca: for gpod auger separator

Dairy Waste Storage Pond 7/16118
Engineering Design Worksheet for: Joseph Johnson
In Alamance County, NC
msrfte rop mmensrons: iee x ies
ESW Dbnansioru: 10 ft batmen, 17.8 ft top. 1.3 ft dare with 3:1 aldn
Top EL
655.00
ESW'mst EL
663.70
tsr
sLPump EL
653.00
.—,— an P"
P;no
bankment "° "'" °"'""'e•""°
w.n raen, Wow,
60eom EL
$45.00
Lr
User cut EL
043.50
Engineering Design Worksheet for. Joseph Johnaat
CLAY LINER YARDAGE ESTIMATE -TO CREST OF ESW:
(Subtracting storage vol from total cut vol at crest ES
This wk.tlatbn •pas vent ea graphrcaly antl by Ivm es! maca.q nwhods
Length at ESW
177A
fL
Width at ESW
146.4
ft
horizontal liner thickness = thickness/ cos Arc -fan side
3.44
ft.
Cut top Length at ESW - Length + 2 x horiz INkkness
184.32
ft.
Cut top Width at ESW - Width + 2 x horiz thikcness
153.32
ft.
Cut Depth at ESW D
9.70
ft.
Top Storage Area A
28,261.04
ft.
Bottom Length
120.50
ft.
Bottom Width
89.50
s .ft.
Bottom Area C
10,784.17
ft.
Mid Storage Length
152.41
1L
Mid Storage Width
121.41
ft.
Mid Store a Area B
18,504.16
rq.R.
Cut Volume to crest ESW (A+4B+C) x la
182,783
cu.ft.
Volume of Liner Fill = Cut Vol - Storage Vol at ESW
27,855
cu.ft.
Volume of Liner Fill in cubic yards
1.032
cu.yd.
Increase to allow for for material kiss and compaction
15
%
Estimated Yard a for Full Clay Liner up to crest ESW
1,186
cu. d.
(typical 1Gto 15%}
Ballpark check -lop dam area as if pond was flat+10% for slopes 1,175 (should be close to the above)
Estimated Soda Ash, ii required for the day liner by tab tests
Density of Soda Ash 64 UVcu.ft. Mfgr. website 57 to 70lb1cuft. http:liwww.ansac.comlproductsldense-so.
Required Additive Rate from soils lab report 0.10 Wsq.fL over surface of clay.
Number of lifts in day liner (6'-9' loose material) 2
Liner surface area (volume clay / 1'mer thickness) 27.856 sq.it
weight of Soda Ash 5.571 b 111 bags ® 50Ib.
volume of Soda Ash 87 cu.ft, $2,674

NC®ENK
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October i, 2009
Joseph Johnson
Fogleman Dairy
9558 Pleasant Hill CH Rd
Liberty, NC 27298
Natural Resources
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept of ENR 1Dee Freeman
Secretary
Winston-Salem j
ReglortalOffice -
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC010036
Fogleman Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Alamance County
Dear Joseph Johnson:
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Joseph Johnson, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Fogleman Dairy, located in Alamance County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf: Dry Cow: Beef Brood Cow:
Dairy Heifer: Beef Stocker Calf: Other:
Milk Cow. 330 Beef Feeder:
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC010036 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General-Termit. Please nav careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Maii Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd.. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 it
Phone: [phone] t FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-523-6748 I`c nh Carey f i n a
Internet: www.ncx+aterquality.org
An Eaual Opportunityti A„irma5ve Action Emdoyer ; flutfrally

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Pen -nit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.gov/er/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Pennit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Alamance County Health Department
Alamance County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC010036)
AFO Notebooks

Top of Dam Elevation: 101.0
I .j �ee7� -
4 1 Emergency Spillway Elevation: 99.3
{ 4eA
4 1 Start Pump
PVC
Marker
inside slope of dam
1
u
Elevation: 98.4
Capacity: 40,320 cubic feet
Bottom of WSP Elevation: 90.7
Waste Storage Pond Marker (made with PVC pipe)
For: Joseph Johnson Alamance County Facility No. 01 — 36 Date: July 3, 2007
Fogleman Dairy

T. -
wsm
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
04-12-2007
This plan has been prepared for:
Joseph Johnson DairylPoultry Farrar
Joseph Johnson
9538 Pleasant Hill Church
Road 2
Liberty, NC 2 72 98 01
J
(336)376-641
This plan has been developed b%-
Rick Bailei,
NR CS
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of ENR
APR 0 2 mna
209 X Graham -Hopedale Rd. Winston-Salem
RegfonalOffice
Burlington, NC 27217
(336) 228-175 3 Ert. 3 r
Developer Signature.
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
1 (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
jSi ature (manager' r producer) Dat4 f
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department ol'.abriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: A�4 / /z 3 07
Technical Specialist Signature D to
RECENED I DEN R I D\ section
Aqfifer
OR 3 0 Z009
Previev, Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Covcr Pa,c I

44
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S1
Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid waste generated 3,927.00 tons/year by a 231 animal Dairy
(Mille Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
16886
Incorporated
22384
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
16,886
17520
-634
4,074.35
-147.35
Year 2
1 16,886
18169
-1,283
4,225.23
-298.23
S2
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 767,151 gals/year by a 99
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 100 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
7594
Incorporated
10356
Injected
11736
Irrigated
6904
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
7,594
12910
-5,316
1,304,099
-536,948
Year 2
7,594
14895
-7,301
1,504,712
-737,561
------ -- -- ----- - --- - -- -- - ---- --
Note: In source ID. S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application tnethod(s) identified in the plan for this source.
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 Source Page Page I of 2

S22
Broiler House Stockpiled Litter waste generated 301.60 tons/year by a 52,000 animal
Broiler House Stockpiled Litter operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
4886
incorporated
6297
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
NIA
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
4,886
9188
-4,302
567.18
-265.58
Year 2
4,886
9337
-4,451
576.37
-274.77
-
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 Source Page Page 2 of 2

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
P2O5
Total
Useable
Plat
Removal
(lbs/acte)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
"[Tact
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
I I
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
2381
2
9.70
9.00
Medium
15.0
Georgeville
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
56
NIA
Soybeans, Full Season
48 bu.
38
NIA
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
74
N/A
2381
3
2.00
2.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
34
NIA
2381
6
6.80
6.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
34
N/A
2381
7
9,60
9.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
34
NIA
2381
8
13.80
13.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
NIA
Soybeans, Full Season
43 bu.
34
NIA
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
N/A
2383
3
3.50
3.00
Low
15.0
Durham
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
22
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
22
NIA
Corn, Grain
86 bu.
38
N/A
2383
5
4.80
4.00
Low
15.0
Durham
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
4
N/A
2392
1
19.20
14.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
9,5 Tons
51
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
34
NIA
2392
2
3.10
3.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu,
34
NIA
2392
3
6.30
6.00
Medium
15.0
Herndon
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
74
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
56
NIA
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/9/2009
PCS Page Page 1 of 4
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
P205
Total
Useable
Plat
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(lbslacre)
Tract
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
48 bu.
38
NIA
2392
4 1
1.60
1.601
Medium
15.0
j Tatum
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
34
NIA
2392
5
2.30
2.00
Medium
15.0
Georgeville
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
74
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
56
N7A
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
48 bu.
38
NIA
2392
6
6.40
6.00
Medium
15.0
Georgeville
Corn, Silage
22.5 Tons
77
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
58
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Tull Season
49 bu.
39
NIA
2392
7
8.10
8.001
Medium
15.0
Callison
Corn, Silage
11.4 Tons
39
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
7.1 Tons
38
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
28 bu.
22
NIA
2415
1
19.30
19,00
Medium
15.0
Callison
Corn, Silage
11.4 Tons
39
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
T 1 Tons
38
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
28 bu.
22
NIA
2415
3 1
14.20
14.00
Medium
15.0
Herndon
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
55
NIA
Soybeans, Full Season
46 bu.
37
NIA
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
72
NIA
2415
5
6.30
6.00
Very High
9.0
Orange
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
1.7 Tons
2
0
2415
6
6.00
6.001
Medium
15.0
Callison
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
4
NIA
2415
7
27.70
27,00
Medium
15.0
Callison
Corn, Silage
1 l.8 Tons
40
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
73 Tons
39
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
29 bu.
23
NIA
540
1
8.20
8.20
Medium
15.0
Georgeville
Corn, Grain
119 bu.
52
NIA
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
29
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
32
NIA
540
2
14.90
1490
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.3 Tons
5
NIA
540
3
17.20
IT20
Medium
8.0
Orange
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
1.7 Tons
2
NIA
540
4
2.701
2.70
Medium
15.0
Georgeville
Corn, Grain
119 bu.
52
NIA
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
29
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
32
NIA
540
5
9.70
9.70
Medium
15.0
Georgeville
Corn, Grain
119 bu.
52
NIA
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
79
NIP`
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
32
NIA
540
7
L60
1.60
Low
15.0
Durham
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
4
NIA
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/9/2009
PCS Page Page 2 of 4
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data,

Planned Crops Summary
P205
Total
Useable
Plat
Removal
(Ibs.acre)
Applied
(lbslacre)
"Pratt
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
540
8
6.20
6.20
Medium
15.0
Durham
Corn, Grain
88 bu.
39
NIA
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
22
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
22
NIA
540
9
6.10
6.10
Medium
15.0
Durham
Corn, Grain
88 bu.
39
NIA
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
22
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
22
NIA
542
5
1&00
15.00
Medium
15.0
Durham
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
22
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
22
NIA
Corn, Grain
86 bu.
38
NIA
542
6
5.90
5.00
Low
15.0
1 Durham
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
22
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
22
NIA
Corn, Grain
86 bu.
38
NIA
542
7
4.30
4.00
Low
15.0
Durham
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
21
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
22
NIA
Corn, Grain
83 bu.
37
NIA
542
8
6.50
6.001
Medium
15.0
Durham
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
21
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
22
NIA
Corn, Grain
83 bu.
37
NIA
542
9
5.00
4.50
Medium
15.0 1
Durham
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
23
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
23
NIA
Corn, Grain
90 bu.
40
NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 275.00 264.70
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/9/2009
PCS Page Page 3 of
NOTE: Symbol s means user entered data.

Ll
--Potential Leaching
Technicat Guidane"el.
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
<
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
>- 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned-
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> l0
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term Na-Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391),
PUT lnd.e�
Rat ing
P r4lariagement Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed-. N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3t9/2009
PCS Page Page 4 of 4
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included i'n the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs1A)
Comm.
Furl.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbslA)
liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
'Cons
1000 gals
tans
2381
2
Sl
Georgvville
9.70
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4'['on
911-3/31
112
0
0
Broad,
28
0.00
6.51
0.00
58.60
2381
2
Sl
Georgeville
9.70
9.00
Soybeans, Full Season
48 bu.
4/1-9115
0
0
0
Broad,
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2381
3
Sl
Tatum
2.00
2.00
Com, Silage
20.9 Tun
2115-6130
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0.00
47.44
0.00
94.88
2381
3
Sl
'Tatum
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
103
0
0
Broad,
771
0.00
17.96
0.00
35,93
2391
6
Sl
Tatum
6.80
6.00
Cam, Silage
20.9 Ton
2/15-6130
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0,00
47.44
0.00
284.65
2381
6
Sl
Taturn
6.80
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3131
103
0
0
Broad,
77
0.00
17.96
0.00
107.79
2381
7
Sl
Tatum
9.60
9.00
Corn, Silage
20.9'Von
2115-6/30
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0.00
4T44
0,00
426.97
2381
7
Sl
Taluin
9.60
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
77
0.00
17.96
0.001
161.69
2381
8
S1
Tatum
13.80
13.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
103
0
0
Broad.
20
0.00
5.99
0.00
77.85
2381
8
Sl
Taturn
13.80
13.00
Soybeans, Full Season
43 bu.
411-9115
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2383
3
S22
Durham
1 50
3.00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
911-4130
R6
0
0
Broad_
22
0.00
1.33
0.00
3.98
2383
3
S22
Durham
3.50
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
411-9/15
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
6.73
0.00
20.19
2383
5
S2
Durham
4,80
4.00
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
8/1-7131
100
0
0
Broad.
100
10,10
0.00
40.41
0.00
2392
1
Sl
Tatum
19.20
19.00
Corn, Silage
20.9 Ton
2/15-6130
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0.00
4T44
0.00
901.38
2392
1
Sl
Tatum
19.20
19,00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
103
0
0
Broad.
77
0.00
17.96
0.00
341.33
2392
2
S1
'Tatum
3.10
3.00
Corn, Silage
209 Ton
2115-6130
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0.00
47.44
0.00
142.32
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 WUT rage Page l of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Comm,
Feri.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
NuuientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
ti
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
t000gals
tons
2392
2
S1
Tatum
3.10
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
77
0.00
1796
0.00
53.90
2392
3
St
Herndon
6.30
6.00
Com, Silage
21.9 Ton
2/15-6130
234
0
20
Broad.
214
0.00
49.77
0.00
298.60
2392
3
S l
Herndon
6.30
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Broad.
84
0.00
19.54
0.00
117.21
2392
4
Sl
Tatum
1.60
1,60
Corn, Silagc
20.9 Ton
2115-6130
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0.00
47.44
0.00
75.91
2392
4
S1
Tatum
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9A-3131
103
0
0
Broad
77
0.00
17,9G
0,00
29.74
2392
5
S1
Georgeville
2.30
2.00
Corn, Silage
21.9 "1'on
2/15-6130
234
0
20
Broad.
214
0.00
49,77
0,00
99.53
2392
5
Sl
Georgeville
2.30
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10A Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
84
0.00
1954
0.00
39.07
2392
6
S1
Georgeville
6A0
6.00
Corn, Silage
22.5 Ton
2/15.6/30
241
0
20
Broad.
221
0.00
51,39
0.00
309.37
2392
6
Sl
Georgeville
0 4D
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.9 Ton
9I1-3131
117
0
0
Broad.
88
0.00
2041,
0,00
122,44
2392
7
Sl
Callison
8.10
8.00
Corn, Silage
11.4"[on
2115-6/30
122
0
20
Broad.
102
0.00
23,72
0.00
189,76
2392
7
Sl
Callison
8.10
8.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.1 Tons
9/1-3131
77
0
0
Broad,
58
0,00
1343
0.00
107.44
2415
1
S2
Callison
19.30
19.00
Com, Silage
I I A Ton
2115-6/30
1 122
0
20
Broad
102
10.30
0,00
195.77
0.00
2415
1
S2
Callison
19.30
19.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.1 Pons
9/1.3/31
77
0
0
Broad.
58
5,83
0,00
110,84
0.00
2415
3
S2
Herndon
14.20
14.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
27
2.75
0.00
38.54
0.00
2415
3
S2
Herndon
14,20
14.00
Soybeans, Full Season
46 bu.
411-9/15
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2415
5
NIA
Orange
6.30
6.00
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
l.7'rons
811-7/31
52
52
0
NIA
0
0.00
0.00
(WO
0.00
2415
6
S2
Callison
6.00
6.00
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
811-7131
98
0
0
Broad.
98
9,90
0.00
59,40
0.00
2415
7
S2
Callison
27.70
27.00
Corn, Silage
11.8 Ton
2/15-6/30
126
0
20
Broad.
106
10.71
0.00
289.12
0.00
2415
7
S2
Callison
27.70
27.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
79
0
0
Broad.
59
5.99
0.00
161.69
0.00
540
1
S2
Georgeville
8.20
8.20
Corti, Grain
119 bu.
2/15-6/30
129
0
20
Broad.
109
11.01
0.00
90.29
0.00
540
1
S2
Georgeville
8.20
8.20
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
9/1-4/30
110
0
0
Broad.
83
8,33
0,00
69.34
0.00
540
2
S2
Georgeville
14.90
14.90
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.3 Tons
9/1-7/31
107
0
0
Broad. 1
107
10.81
0,00
161.05
0.00
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 WUl' Page Page 2 of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
11)
Soi) Series
'I'otal
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs1A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
"Tons
1000 gals
tuns
540
3
S22
Orange
17.20
17.20
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
l.7 Tons
8/1-7131
52
0
0
Broad.
52
O.DO
3.21
0.00
55.21
540
4
S22
Georgeville
2.70
2.70
Com, Grain
119 bu.
2/15-6/30
129
0
20
Broad.
109
0.00
6.73
0.00
18.17
540
4
S22
Georgeville
2.70
2.70
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
9/1-4/30
110
0
0
Broad,
83
0.00
5,09
0.00
13,75
540
5
S22
6corgeville
9.70
9.70
Corn, Grain
119 bu.
2115-6130
129
0
20
Broad.
109
0.00
6.73
0.00
65.27
540
5
S22
Georgeville
9.70
9.70
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
9/1-4130
110
0
0
Broad,
83
0.00
5.09
0.00
49,40
540
7
S22
Durham
1.60
1.60
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
811-7131
I00
0
0
Broad.
100
0,00
6.17
0.00
9.88
540
8
S22
Durham
6.20
6.20
Com, Grain
88 bu.
2115-6/30
98
0
20
Broad.
78
0.00
4.91
0.00
29,85
540
8
S22
Durham
6.20
6.20
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
9/1-4/30
88
0
0
Broad.
66
0.00
4.07
0.00
25.26
54D
9
S2
Durham
6.10
6.10
Com, Grain
88 bu.
2/15-6130
98
0
20
Broad.
78
7.89
0.00
49.07
0.00
540
9
S2
Durham
6.10
6.10
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
911-4130
88
0
0
Broad.
66
6.07
0.00
40.67
0.00
542
5
S22
Durham
16.00
15.00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
9/1-4/30
86
0
0
Broad.
22
0.00
1.33
0.00
19,91
542
5
S22
Durham
16.00
15.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
4/1-9/15
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
6.73
0.00
100.93
542
6
S22
Durham
5.90
5,00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
9/14/30
86
0
0
Broad.
22
0.00
1.33
0.00
6.64
542
6
S22
Durham
5.90
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
4/1-9115
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
6.73
0.00
33.64
542
7
822
Ihtrhatn
4.30
4.00
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
911-4130
82
0
0
Broad.
21
0.00
1.27
0.00
5.06
542
7
S22
Durham
4.30
4.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
411-9/15
105
0
0
Broad.
105
0.00
6.49
0.00
25.93
542
8
S22
Durham
6.50
6.00
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
9/1-4130
82
0
0
Broad.
21
OM
1.27
0.00
7.59
542
8
S22
Durham
6.30
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
4/1-9/15
105
0
0
Broad.
105
0,00
6.48
0.00
38.89
542
9
S22
Durham
5.00
4.50
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
9/1-4/30
90
0
0
Broad.
23
0.00
1.39
0,00
6,25
542
9
S22
Durham
5.00
4.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1.9115
113
0
0
Broad.
113
0.00
6,98
0.00
31.39
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 WUT ['age Page 3 of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,304.10
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
767.15
Balance, 1000 gallons
-536.95
'?F .4:
Total Applied, tons
: f
4,641.53
Total Produced, tons
•" ��3 ='''C
4,228.60
Balance, tons
ty
-412.93
Notes: I. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 WUT Page Page 4 of 7

Waste Utilization 'Fable
Year 2
Traci
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutnent
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm,
Feri.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applie.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
ObslA)
Liquid I
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid I
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
ions
2381
2
S1
Georgeville
9.70
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
M-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
84
0.00
19.54
0.00
175.81
2381
2
Sl
Georgeville
9.70
9.00
Corn, Silage
21.9 Ton
2115-6/30
234
0
20
Broad.
214
0.00
49.77
0.00
447.90
2381
3
S1
'['alum
2,00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
26
0.00
5.99
0.00
11.98
2381
3
S I
'Tatum
2.00
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, lull Season
43 bu.
411-9115
166
0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
38.60
0.00
77.21
2381
6
S1
Tatum
6.80
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
26
0.00
5.99
0.00
35.93
2391
6
St
'Tatum
6.80
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
411-9115
166
0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
38.60
0.00
231.62
2391
7
S1
"Tatum
9.60
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3131
103
0
0
Broad,
26
0.00
5.99
0.00
53.90
2381
7
SI
"Tatum
9.60
9.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 hu.
411-9/15
166
0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
38.60
0.00
347.44
2381
8
S1
Tatum
13.80
13.00
Small Grain, Silage
9,5 Tons
9/1-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
77
0.00
17.96
0.00
233.54
2381
8
91
'Tatum
13.80
13.00
Corn, Silage
20.9 Ton
2/15-6l30
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0.00
47.44
0.00
616.73
2383
3
S22
Durham
3.50
3.00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
9/1-4130
86
0
0
Broad.
65
0.00
3.98
0.00
11.95
2383
3
S22
Durham
3.50
3.00
Corn, Grain
86 bu.
2115-6t30
95
0
20
Broad.
75
0.00
4.63
0.00
13.89
2383
5
S2
Durham
4.80
4.00
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
VI -7/31
100
0
0
Broad.
100
10.10
0.00
40.41
0.00
2392
l
S i
'Tatum
19.20
19.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
103
0
0
Broad.
26
OM
599
0.00
113.79
2392
1
Si
Tatum
1910
19.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
411.9/15
166
0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
38.60
0.00
733.48
2392
2
SI
Tatum
3.10
3,00
Small Grain, Silagc
9.5 Pons
9/1-3/31
103
0
0
Broad.
26
0.00
5.99
0.00
17.97
2392
2
S1
'Tatum
3.10
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
4/1-9115
166
0
0
Broad,
166
0,00
38.60
0.00
1 15,81
2392
3
S 1
Hem don
6.30
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
6.5 [
0.00
39.07
2392
3
S1
Ilemdon
6.30
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
48 bu.
411-9/15
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
43,26
0.00
259.53
2392
4
S1
"Tatum
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silagc
9.5 Tons
9/1-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
26
0.00
5.99
0,00
9,59
2392
4
S1
'['alum
1,60
1.60
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
4/1-9115
166
0
0
Broad.
1 166
0,00
38.60
0.00
01.77
2392
5
S1
Georgeville
2.30
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3131
112
D
0
Broad.
28
0.00
6.51
0,00
13.02
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 WUT Page Page 5 of 7

Waste Utilization -fable
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
R YE
Applie.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Munure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
etas
2392
5
St
Georgeville
2.30
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
48 bu.
4/1-9115
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
43,26
0.00
86.51
2392
6
Sl
Georgeville
6.40
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Ton
9/1-3/31
11.7
0
0
Broad,
29
0.00
6.80
0.00
40.81
2392
6
S I
Georgeville
6.40
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
49 bu.
411-9/15
190
0
0
Broad,
190
0.00
44.19
0,001
265.11
2392
7
Sl
Callison
8.10
8,00
Small Grain, Silage
7, l 'Cons
911-3131
77
0
0
Broad.
19
0.00
4.48
0.00
35.91
2392
7
SI
Callison
8.10
8.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
28 bu.
4/1-9/15
108
0
0
Broad.
108
0.00
25,12
0.00
200.93
2415
1
S2
Callison
19-30
19.00
Smali Grain, Silage
7.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
77
0
0
Broad.
19
1.94
0,00
36,95
0.00
2415
1
S2
Callison
19,30
19.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
28 bu,
4/1-9l15
108
0
0
Broad.
108
10.91
0.00
207.29
0.00
2415
3
S2
Ilerndon
14.20
14.00
Smail Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
911-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
82
8.26
0.00
115.62
0.00
2415
3
S2
I lerndon
14.20
14.00
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-6/30
227
0
20
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
292,75
0,00
2415
5
NIA
Orange
6.30
6.00
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
1.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
52
52
0
NIA
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
2415
6
S2
Callison
6,00
6.00
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
98
0
0
Broad.
98
9.90
0.00
59.40
0.00
2415
7
S2
Callison
27.70
27.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
79
0
0
Broad,
20
2.00
0.00
53.87
0.00
2415
7
S2
Callison
2T70
27.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
112
0
0
Broad.
112
11.31
0.00
305.48
0,00
540
l
S2
Georgeville
8.20
8.20
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
9/1-4130
110
0
0
Broad.
28
2.78
0.00
22.78
0.00
540
l
S2
Georgeville
8.20
8,20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1.9/15
155
0
0
Broad.
155
15,66
0.00
128.40
0.00
540
2
S2
Georgeville
14.90
14.90
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.3 Tons
8I1-7131
107
0
0
Broad.
107
10.81
0.00
161.05
0.00
540
3
S22
Orange
17.20
17.20
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
1.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
52
0
0
Broad.
52
0.00
3.21
0.00
55.21
540
4
S22
Georgeville
2.70
2.70
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
9/14/30
110
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
1.70
0.00
4.58
540
4
S22
Georgeville
2.70
2.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
411-9/15
155
0
0
Broad.
155
0.00
9.57
0.00
25.93
540
5
S22
Georgeville
9.70
9.70
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
9/14/30
110
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
1.70
0.00
16.47
540
5
S22
Georgeville
9.70
9.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9/15
155
0
0
Broad.
155
0,00
9.57
0.00
92.81
540
7
S22
Durham
1.60
1.60
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3A'1'ons
8/1-7131
l00
0
0
Broad.
100
0,00
6.17
0.00
9.8g
55257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 WUT Page Page 6 of 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
$puree
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
clop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
NuoientA
ppligd
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplicd
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
Nti
N
N
It100
gal/A
Pons
t0008,115
Ions
540
8
S22
Durham
6.20
6.20
Wbca% Grain
44 bu.
911-4/30
88
0
0
Broad.
22
0.00
1.36
OAM
8.42
540
8
S22
Durham
0.20
6,20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
4/1-9115
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
6.73
O,OO
41.72
540
9
S2
Durham
6,10
6AO
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
911-4130
88
0
0
Broad.
22
2.22
0.00
13.56
0.00
540
9
S2
Durham
6.10
6.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
411-9115
109
0
0
Broad.
109
11.01
0.00
67.17
0.00
542
5
S22
Durham
16.00
15.00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
9/1-4/30
86
0
0
Broad.
65
0.00
3.98
0.00
59,72
542
5
S22
Durham
10.00
15.00
Corn, Grain
86 bu.
2/15-6130
95
0
20
Broad.
75
0.00
4,63
0.00
69.45
542
6
S22
Durhanl
5.90
5.00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
9l1-4130
86
0
0
Broad.
65
0.00
3.98
0.00
19.91
542
6
S22
Durham
5.90
5.00
Corn, Grain
86 bu.
2/15-6/30
95
0
20
Broad.
75
0.01)
4,63
0.00
23.15
542
7
S22
Durham
4.30
4.00
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
911-4/30
82
0
0
Broad.
62
0.00
3.80
0.00
15.19
542
7
S22
Durham
4.30
4.00
Com, Grain
83 bu.
2115-6130
92
0
20
Broad.
72
0.00
4.44
0,00
17.78
542
8
S22
Durham
6.50
6.00
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
911-4130
82
0
0
Broad.
62
0.00
3.80
0.00
22.78
542
8
S22
Durham
6.50
6.00
Corn, Grain
83 bu.
2/15-6130
92
0
20
Broad.
72
0.00
4.44
0.00
26.67
542
9
S22
Durham
5.00
4.50
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
911-4/30
90
0
0
Broad.
68
0.00
4A7
0.00
18.75
542
9
S22
Durham
5.00
4.50
Corn, Grain
90 bu.
2/15-6/30
100
0
20
Broad.
80
O.OD
4.94
0.00
22.22
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,504.71E
W" sr
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
767.15
PA
Balance, 1000 gallons
-737.56;,
Total Applied, tons
' ` '
4,801.60
Total Produced, tons!'
:`.a f'
4,228.60
Balance, tonsyd
,^',; k'l i
-573.D0
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means ]eased, otherwise. owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009
W UT Page Page 7 of 7

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the reglired amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Q
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2381
2
Req'd Nutrients
112
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App, Period
9.00
91E-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
01
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
10.4 Tons
04-16-04
,Manure
112
113
159
57
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
56 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
83
159
57
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2381
8
Req'd Nutrients
103
10
0
0
0
0
0i
0
Acres App. Period
13.00
911-3/31
Supplied By:
�
j l`��
�
•rOM
m
�r
_.1' yam`
� �
!,3ti� I�
�: � ail
°4mP �_r
.-
i a�N :; Y
�w�
--
CROP
Small Grain. Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
104
146
53
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
94
146
53
2
2
01
0
Tract Field
2383
3
Req'd Nutrients
86
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.00
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
d7.ir
g
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43bu.
09-19-06
Manure
86
297
126
42
3
3
1
0
P Removal Rating
22 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
297
126
42
3
3
l
0
Tract
Field
2415
3
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App- Period
14.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
1 r
laa�.,+'<
r
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0,
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Herndan
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.1 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
109
108
163
52
2
2
1
0
P RemovaS
Rating
55 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
108
123
52
2
2
1
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Dale Printed: 3/9/2009 NM Page Page I or 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Q
N
(lbslA)
P205
(lbs1A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Nig
(lbslA)
Nin
(lbsIA)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tonslA)
Tract
Field
542
5
Req'd Nutrients
86
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App, Period
15.00'
4/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat. Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sainple
Date
43 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
86
2971
126
42
3
3
l
0
P Removal Rating
22 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
297
76
42
3
3
l
0
Tract
Field
542
6
Req'd Nutrients
86
0
110
0
0
0
0
l
Acres
App. Period
5.00
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
r¢ i`..Ih'E-`"E
;;ry "Ll
aY
'tom
-�i S:�
�5:"
'� 3;:;)
i
r X ? x
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
86
297
126
42
3
3
1
0
P Removal
ji7ing
22 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
297
16
42
3
3
l
0
F�A�pp.
Field
542
7
Req'd Nutrients
82
0
110
0
0
0
0
l
Period
4.00
911-4/30
Supplied By:
i �`-"' '�
t�'3.i�x1k
er, 15A
Tst.�tlf�lx.o:t
`` I,
KS A:Sis-4;e:3.
- 't "
u;.z?h,�r.s
� s
c�''r �.H�.
i
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Dale
41 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
82
283
120
40
3
3
l
0
P Removal
Rating
21 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
283
10
40i,
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
542
8
Req'd Nutrients
82
80
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.00
9/1-4/30
Supplied lay:
�- d Y� b^1
sY:= it
y p0
r rGi^/:t3L'4
Fug .: r�..
, 11� 'rt!
s, '
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
41 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
82
283
120
40
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
21 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
283
40
40
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
542
9
Req'd Nutrients
90
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
I
A Period
App.
4.50
9/] 4/30
Supplied By:
_,
� '.i$�. .!.
h �Sk$°L� s
SQ� .I�Y
'
- �_��1.
-.7 =`�
f6,�_ .
s ti �R
� t3O
� 4...5..�..1-
k g c7
�'. J� t�t'ii
€�S'sTse"axl
�
v �� �t.
;
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
90
311
132
44
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
23 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
1 0
3 t 1
102
44
3
3
1
1 0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
155257 Databasc Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Pagc Page 2 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbs/A)
13205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Nig
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(Ibs/A)
Lime
(tuns/A)
Tract
Field
2381
2
Req'd Nutrients
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
9.00
4/1-9/15
Supplied By;
-3 x.. -.
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
48 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal Rating
38 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
0
0
I)l
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
2381
3
Req'd Nutrients
103
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
A Period
pP
2.00
411-3/3l
Supplied By:
pP
i �:�
?, }
s
1 +'�
_r`a-
#s ,r..•r...f`��.
:i._ 'ja._7
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
t03
104
146
53
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
64
146
53
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2381
3
Req'd Nutrients
224
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
2.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
c �l%
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
71 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
146
289
104
4
31
1
0
Tract
Field
2381
6
Req'd Nutrients
103
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
6.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied B}':'a`
: 'ZI
"r..'W-i�
Lf
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
104
146
53
2
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
14
146
53
2
2
0
0
Tract Field
2381
6
Req'd Nutrients
224
100
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
A Period
PP
6.00
2/15 6130
Supplied By:
s + a x. F
#� -
Y r
�.�°` rT'3
'%`n
u W
+' xs
;,MT
s� r
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
1 04-16-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
31
1
0
P Removal
Rating
71 lbs/ae.
Medium
BALANCE
0
106
271
104
4
3
1
0
155257 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 3/912009 NMR Page Page 3 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbslA)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
lVig
(lbs/A)
Nin
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbslA)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2381
7
Req'd Nutrients
103
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
9,00
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
' "" `a;;"
s;`' r
k" '
"t
j)r
:.
CKOP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
pate
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
104
146
53
21
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 Ibs/ac,
Medium
BALANCE
0
44
146
53
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2381
7
Req'd Nutrients
224
70
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
9.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
t*"•,u y
'„� ;.�
Y r
¢¢
F 4i.
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
1 04-16-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
71 lbs/ac.
Medium
13ALANCE
0
136
269
104
4
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2391
8
Req'd Nutrients
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.00
4/1-9/15
Supplied B
°f 3*'s
r `ate
y � ,� Y
z t'xT 4,
��;2, :�:,
11`eI K",u
. ��h if",. i
..a�'3'?�"�..r
es1
� �i�; 1
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
01
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
34 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
2383
3
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.00
411-9/15
Supplied By:
t
si r3'°r
CROP
Soybeans. Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE: I Sample
Date
28 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
109
377
160
54
4
4
2
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
01
377
160
54
4
4
2
0
Tract
Field
23a3
5
Req'd Nutrients
100
70
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
4.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By
3,
f :q
:'23' i`.
s
'5��
k t � "#
:t r w`µr�E
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.0 Tons
09-19-06
Manure
100
99
149
48
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
4 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
29
149
48
2
2
0
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NM Page Page 4 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2392
l
Req'd Nutrients
103
40
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
19.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
104
146
53
2
21
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
01
64
136
531
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2392
l
Req'd Nutrients
224
60
60
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
A Period
19.00
2/15-6/30
5u lied B"
`_+'
t`
4 1 '•
"
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
011
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
71 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
146
229
104
4
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
2
Req'd Nutrients
224
100
110
0
0
0
0
2
Acres I
App. Period
3.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:Arl,
.Fa
r'?sy'��r{w`41
�"�.
"Y�i
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
201
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
04-03-07
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
71 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
106
179
104
4
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
2
Req'd Nutrients
103
90
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.00
9/1-3131
Supplied By;
T ' p
r''{-�,,�rr3-,f
Ch.+'7N��xk
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-03-07
Manure
103
104
146
53
21
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
14
96
53
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2392
3
Rcq'd Nutrients
234
80
130
0
0
0
0
I
Acres
A Period
pP
6.00
2115-6/30
Supplied B
Pp Y:�
f x�xl
a �
,�I,w..w.n¢
3•.��.
i?
-__..f _
f s"1
..�R��K�_ :,
3 a�.�
, i "•,.
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Herndon
Residual
20
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
21.9 Tons
04-16-04
M anurel
214
216
303
1 10
4
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
74 lbs/ae.
Medium
BALANCE
0
136
! 73
1 10
4
41. -
1
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page 5 of l a

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
!
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs1A)
Zn
(ibs1A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tonslA)
Tract
Field
2392
3
Req'd Nutrients
112
70
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Perin .
6.00
9l1-3/31
Supplied B}':
+ - 4
� � �{
•!:r' ..d-
�';
;, t r rt
i�
,�" '.-..'(." �.",t
{ �''r�' k
„� , ,.s_:
�;�r"..�
� �;'�+;:
•�' :!1�'�`''�'
CROP
Small Grain. Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Herndon
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
10.4 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
112
113
159
57
2
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
56 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
01
43
89
57
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2392
4
Req'd Nutrients
103
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1.60
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
mot
` :''
! �
� ; '" !�
a, tt''s
Yr d'Se
I ,
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
104
146
53
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
51 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
64
146
53
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2392
4
Req'd Nutrients
224
60
30
0
0
0
0
l
Acres
App. Period
l .60
2115-6130
Supplied By:
•`F
..f� '.4�
Ky _ r�{
tt
LL.ra�,-.�i r: �_
si. ,}
c
cI4 _�'� r: x(
t T? _. z
_4 !"�
Aa a, r #,
f:. �_'''--� �
�_. !h a
rT � t ,x
:-fir: v. i+f;•i..
I;
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
04-16.04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
71 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
146
259
104
4
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
5
Req'd Nutrients
112
80
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
2.00
911-3/31
Supplied By:
''r 3F
R4d,��vz
?^ vfr,
."� i
. t
fy "'
CROP
Small Grain. Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.4 Tons
04.16-04
Manure
112
113
159
57
2
2
01
0
P Removal
Rating
56 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
33
129
57
2
2
0
0
TracyT
Field
2392
5
Req'd Nutrients
234
90
80
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
. Period
2.00
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
1Y`�'':r 1y
�''��
Ewp .� S'L
��`'� t�,
tJr.S„�y_�
:��.�.'?xr'l
r{� •'�+
?,�.?.}l,�
;v fI -
�i:'�,`,'t:�+�]
' 1lStt} _
..:; :�; �+''�
i'o- ice`
g ,,. �„�:,.
n S --116
�_ , r y',f
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
21.9 Tons
04.16-04
Manure
214
216
303
110
4
4
1
0
P Removal
I Rasing
74 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
126
2-23
1101
4
4
1
0
155257 [database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page 6 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ihs/A)
Mn
(lbsIA)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Traci
I Field
2392
6
Req'd Nutrients
241
40
40
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period,
6.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By
'Y izL
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Georg-ille
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
- 0
RYE I Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
221
223
313
113
4
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
77 [bs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
183
273
113
4
4
1
0
Tract
I Field
2392
6
Req'd Nutrients
117
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
6.00
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
10.8 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
117
118
166
60
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
98
166
60.
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2392
7
Req'd Nutrients
122
70
140
01
0
0
01
1
ACTCS
1
App. Period.
8.00
2115-6130
Supplied By:
.1 1
. I NI- il' J
�X- z
-- "M
L�-
r-&
M
'7
'!41�:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Ferl.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
20
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYAJ Sample
Date
11A Tons
04-16-04
Manure
102
103
144
52
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating39
lbs/.c.
Medium
BALANCE
0
33
4
52
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2392
7
Req'd Nutrients
77
50
80
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
I
App. Period
8.00
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
iHm"
?FW-411
"X
k�i DO; T-111 14
1.
der"XIMI,
'NN
1112-Qv-
N�TIIMV
CROP
Small Grain. Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
7.1 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
771
78
109
39
2
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
38 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
28
29
39
2
1
0
0
'tract
Field
2415
1
Req'd Nutrients
77
0
50
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
19.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
;?N 314,
1� ift
P-;M!. .' - -
I -
-,-,6
RK f0P''
11 `ii�
R
Pt.-'ft
VIA.
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
RYE Date
TI Tons
1 04-16-04
Manure
77
76
115
37
1
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
38 lbstac.
IMedium
BALANCE
0
76
65
371
1
2
0
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page 7 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2415
1
Req'd Nutrients:
122
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
19.00
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
: 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil SeHes
Callison
Residual
20.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
11.4 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
102
101
152
49
21
2
0
01
P Removal
Rating
39 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
101
52
49:
2
2
0
0
Traci
Field
2415
3
Req'd Nutrients
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
14.00
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
J«'
4"
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Herndon
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
46 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
37 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Tract
Field
2415
5
Req'd Nutrients
521
0
70
0
0
O
0
1
Acres
I
App. Period
6.00 i
811-7/31
Supplied BY:
V
MAAM
_'T
'
4
440
y
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
52
0:
70
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Orange
Residual
0
01
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
L7'rons
04-16-04
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
2 lbstac.
Very High
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
2415
6
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
20
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
6,00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
t t !
fQ
7
TZ��Xa'!
!f
W.
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter
ol
0
0
01
0
0
)I
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
3.0'Fons
1 04-16-07
Manure
98
97
146
47
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
4 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
97
126
47
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2415
7
Req'd Nutrients
126
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
App. Period
27.00
2/15-6130
Supplied fay:
0171
29
�62
111
'-FAcres
f"Y
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
201
01
01
01
01
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
11.8 Tons
1 04-16-04
Manure
t06
1 1051
158 .1
511
21
21
0
P Removal
I Rating
40 lbsiac.
IMedium
BALANCE
01
1051
158
511
21
21
01
0
15.5257 Database Version 3.1 Date Prime& 3/9/2009 MNIR Page Page 8 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ibs1A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Field
2415
7
Req'd Nutrients
79
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
[MEApp.
Period
27,00
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
3 �r'�r.-. -ti.
.ti... :�i.�i
.,. •r�!
4�; Y
'F, {';'! yx .5
�'*iy"a�
�i�+� 1.
'1 'tla r.'�. at
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
7.3 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
79
78
118
38
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
39 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
78
118
381
l
2
0
0
Tract
Field
540
l
Req'd Nutrients
110
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
8.20
9/1-4130
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
57 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
110
109
164
53
2
2
1
0
P Removal
Rating
29 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
109
124
53
2
2
1
0
Tract
Field
540
l
Req'd Nutrients
129
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
8?0
2/15 6130
Supplied By:
'482, sn
TS1
W.Az
k5, ,3 �s
; ��u2RA"'1
WO
,3
Nk%m
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
119 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
109
108
163
52
2
2
1
0
P Rcmovai
Rating
52 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
108
123
52
2
2
1
0
Tract
Field
540
2
Req'd Nutrients
107
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
14.90
811-7131
Supplied By:
�
sA 7nilan"i
�. � w�
MT.t_a
"����,t�
RM
s� r ` �
7VIN ki
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
3.3 Tons
01-06-05
Manure
107
106
160
51
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
5 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE"
0
106
120
51
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
540
3
Req'd Nutrients
52
50
70
0
0
0
0
l
Acres
App, Period
17.20
811-7/31
Supplied B
� Pts,'s^'rt`s
" 5
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Orange
Residual
I01
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.7 Tons
01-06-05
Manure
52
180
76
26
2
2
1
0
P Re -oval
Rating
2 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
1 0
130
6
26
2
2
1
0
155257 Database Version 3.l Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page 9 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
M11
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
540
4
Req'd Nutrients
129
0
0
0
0
0
G
0
Acres I
App. Period
2.70
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
A"
*w
*0-
417-10-
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual,
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
119 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
1091
377
160
54
4
41
2
0
P Removal
I Rating
52 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
377
160
54
4
4
2
0
Tract
I Field
540
4
Req'd Nutrients
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App Period
2.70
911-4/30
Supplied By
i11�"""
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
57 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
1101
380
162
54
4
4
2
0
P Removal
I Rating
29 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
380
162
54
4
4
2
0
Tract Field
540
5
Req'd Nutrients
110
0
10
0
13
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
9.70
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
�In"VE'Zx
;11
il�
I I
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
ol
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
57 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
110
380
.162
54
4
4
2
0
P Removal
I Rating
29 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
380
152
54
4
4
2_
0
Tract I Field
540
5
Req'd Nutrients
129
0
10
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
9.70
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
Commercial Fert.
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
119 bu
01-06-05
Manure
109
377
160
54
4
4
2
0
P Removal
Rating
52 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
377
150
54
4
4
2
0
Tract Field
540
7
Req'd Nutrients
100
110
60
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I
App. Period
1,60
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
1110 al-WR
t
MARIAN".
�Z§0
"I
z 1011�1% iUl'
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Dale
3.0 Tons
1 01-06-05
Manure
100
346
147
49
4
3
2
0
P Removal
Rating
4 lbs/ac.
1Low
BALANCE
0
236
871
49
4
3
21
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 31912009 NIM R Page Page 10 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbsIA)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
540
1
Req'd Nutrients
11
0
10
0
11
1
Acres
App Period
6.20
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Daie
88 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
78
269
114
38
31
3
1
0
PRemoval
Rating
39 lbstac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
269
34
38
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
540
8
Req'd Nutrients
88
0
90
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.20
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
'N4
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
ol
0
0
ol
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
44 bu,
01-06-05
Manure
88
304
129
43
3
3:
1
0
P P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
304
49
43
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
540
9
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
6.10
2/15-6130
Supplied BY:
7
le�-�
VM
R'5
M
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
Soil Series
Durham
Residual:,
201
0
0:
0
0
()1
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
88 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
78
77
116
37
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
39 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
77
66
37
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
540
9
Req'd Nutrients
88
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App Period
6.10
911-4/30
Supplied By:
W �.h
0,
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Staner
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
44 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
88
87
131
42.
2
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
01
87
81
42
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
542
5
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
50
0
1
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
1500
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
9), V.,
MnM
7-Nz
59-0110-01131it
Nil. "WHI
441-A-111.Z11
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0!
Commercial Fert..
a
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYEI Sample
Date
28 bu.
�9- 19-�O6
Manure
109
377
160,
541
4
4
2
0
P Removal
I Rating
22 lbs/ac.
IMedium
BALANCE
01
377
110
541
4
4
2
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Dale Printed: 3/9/2009 INMR Page Page I I of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbslA)
14g
(Ibs1A)
INH
(lbslA)
Zn
(lbslA)
Cu
(lbslA)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
542
6
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App, Period
5.00
411-9/15
Supplied By:.;t
CROP
Soybeans. Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Dale
28 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
109
377
160
54
4
4
2
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
01
377
50
54
4
4
21
0
Tract
Field
542
7
Req'd Nutrients
105
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
All Period
4.00
411-9/15
Supplied By.
CROP
Soybeans, Manured.
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
27 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
105
363
154
52
4
4
2
0
P Removal
I Rating
22 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
363
44
52
4
4
2
0
Tract Field
542
8
Req'd Nutrients
105
0
80
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A Period
PP
6.00
411-9115
Supplied $
Pp y
' f"Y 4
Mkt-
" 'X
i r �° '.rA:�s
fir' " }
t:t
�x �
`4s�i' �t4'
'�r�a
' : w
''§t
r.�_A �=„
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
27 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
105
363
154
52
4
4
2
0
P Removal
Rating
22 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
363
74
52
4
4
2
0
Tract
Field
542
9
Req'd Nutrients
113
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.50
4/1 9/15
Supplied By:
>
f
�,[ '�i r2
Y
. �`a,nts._.;
w
��� :,..�
E?i'�Y.. i-
4
±` ,;�? A
yi'� t l
4. M -'I .
t�1' 7 _Zt^
CROP
Soybeans, Nlanured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
29 bu.
09-19-06
Manurel
1131
391
166
56
4
41
0
P Removal
Rating
23 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
391
136
5b
4
4
2
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page 12 of'[ 8

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(Ibs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
([bs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Traci
Field
2381
2
Req'd Nutrients
234
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
9.00
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
21.9 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
214
216
303
110
4
4
1
0
P Removal Rating
74 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
176
303
110
4
4
1
0
Tract Field
2381
3
Req'd Nutrients
166
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
2,00
411-9/15
Supplied By:
Z
,�-tt a�iQyY
mot-
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
34 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
128
235
85
3
3
l
0
Tract
Field
2381
6
Req'd Nutrients
166
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
PP�
6,00
4/1-9/15
Supplied B ':
PP }
r.,, '
'�� n
''� lt"y�
� �vF3-
i
a r
�,' �
s
n
a F+i'Sp
CROP
Soybeans, Manured. Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
01
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
3
I
0
I' Removal
Rating
34 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
78
235
85
3
3
l
0
Tract
Field
2381
7
Req'd Nutrients
166
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
9.00
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
4�Q
9
MX
Wm
Uw
2�
RPM
TRRM:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured. Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0:
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
34 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
108
235
85
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2381
8
Req'd Nutrients
224
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.00
2/l5 6130
Supplied 8y:st'
_^a'i'k
?'1'.i'-
SAY,
s, -
4 A ASS. P2
Fray
-1
�tar�
1� .�3Fi5t0
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
201
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
31
!
1 0
PRemoval I Rating
71 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
176
289
104
4
3
1
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page 13 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbslA)
P205
(lbslA)
K20
(lbs1A)
141g
(lbslA)
Mn
(lbslA)
"Ln
(IbslA}
Cu
(lbs1A)
Lime
(tonslA)
Field
2383
3
Req'd Nutrients
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
[MApp.Penod
3.00
2l15-6/30
Su lied By:
tt3` i 1
i_1
' l ar s�
_s s, 7t
t A0.• "
4 + ` c
rek{• 2
? f
-{a. i
`fx
FkdHFS
c ' �pp
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
86 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
75
259
110
37
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
38 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
259
110
37
3
31
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
1
Req'd Nutrients
166
40
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
19.00
411-9115
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Nfanured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
166
t68
235
85
3
3
1
0
P Removal Rating
34 Ibslac,
Medium
BALANCE
0
128
225
85
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
2
Req'd Nutrients
166
90
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.00
41l-9/15
Supplied B},:
lr�
,r
hiss
7%;t. �.
:x�
'iwy
-N; ' :...�'k';L
:"';` -f
r ...i.'pxa .i'
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-03-07
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
34 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
78
185
85
3
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
3
Rcq'd Nutrients
186
70
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.00
411-9115
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Herndon
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4a bu:
04-16-04
Manure
186
188
263
95
4
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
38 tbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
118
193
95
4
1
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
4
Req'd Nutrients
166
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
APP Period
1.60
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
`
`' 1
'=W,
%k rr�
'' w
r F#
4 ;
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
3
1
0
P Rcmova]
Rating
34 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
128
235
85
3
3
3
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page 14 of 19

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
2392
5
Req'd Nutrients
186
so
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App Period
2.00
411-9/15
Supplied By
7..
CROP
Soybeans, Nlanured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
48 bu.
04-16-04
Manurell
186
188
263
95
4
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
38 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
108
233
95
4
31
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
6
Req'd Nutrie.t.,
190
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App Period
6.00
4/1-W 15
Supplied Bytr�
-
11
` -' 1
& a�
-- -'. , ;,
;- �-
JU
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
49 bu.
1 ()4-16-04
Manure
190
192
269
97
4
3
1
0
0 Removal
Rating
39 lbsfac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
172
269
97
4
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2392
7
Req'd Nutrients
1081
50
80
01
0
0
0
D
Acres IW
App.Period
8.00
411-9115
Supplied By:
" - UA
iiO-24. 2;
�X-'
",-;V
h
41
CROP
Soybeans, Martured. Full
Season
Starter
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Dale
28 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
108
109
15.3
55
2
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
59
73
55
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2415
1
Req'd Nutrients
log
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App.Period
19,00
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
M
NX -V A
.17
Rt
CROP
Soybeans, Manured. Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0!
01
0
0
0
0
RYFj Sample
Date
28 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
108
107
161
52
2
2
1
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
a
107
111
52
2
2
1
0
Tract
Field
2415
3
Req'd Nutrients
2271
0
90
0
0
0
0
1 0
Acres App. Period
14.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
MW
U?,
kif
t3vp. —
PC �' 54 I
I N
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Herndon
Residual
20
- 01
--- 0
1 0
0
0
0
0
Sample
PR'
Date
21.2 Tons
1 04-16-04
Manurc
2071
2041
3091
1001
4.1
4
1
0
[RYE
P Re-moval
,
I Rating
72 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
01
2041
2191
i0o
4
4
1
1 01
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page 15 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
NIg
(lbs/A)
NIn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
2415
7
Req'd Nutrients
112
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
[TractField
Acres
Period
27.00
411-9/15 .
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
29 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
112
110
167
54
2
2
1
0
P Removal
Rating
1
23 lbs/ac,
Medium
BALANCE
0
110
167
54
2
2
1
0
Traci
Field
540
1
Req'd Nutrients
155
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
8.20
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
d
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
01
0.
0
01
0
0
Soil Series
Gcorgeville
Residual
0
0
0!
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
40 bu.
0 1 -0fj-05
Manure
155
153
231
75
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
32 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
153
191
75
3
3
1
0
Traci
Field
540
4
Req'd Nutrients
135
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
170
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:FN?5*w
Z2%13
'AA;A -5
i
CROP
Soybeans, Manured.
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville.
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
40 bu,
0 1 -06-05
Manure
155
536
228
76
6
5
3
0
Removal
Rating
32 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
536
228
76
6
5
3
0
IP Tract
I Ficid
540
5
Req'd Nutrients
155
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
9.70
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
A,
Z. -S.
2�n �
'M
A
'tar
—
CROP
Soybeans, Manured.
Double Crop
—
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
40 bu,
01-06-05
Manure
155
536
228
76
6
5
3
0
P Removal
Rating
32 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
536
218
76
6
5
3
0
Tract
Field
540
8
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
80
ol
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
620
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
U04 A
�"�. W"
25,'. t
CROP
Soybeans. Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
28 bu.
1 01-06-05
Manure
109
377
160
54
4
41
2
0
P Removal
I Rating
22 lbsiac.
IMedium
BALANCE
0
377
80
54
4
41
2
0
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NM R Page ]'age 16 of 18

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(IWA)
NIg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
540
9
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.10
4/1-9/15
Supplied B,,
P
CROP
Soybeans. Manured.
Double Crop
Starter
0
a
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
28 bu.
1 01-06-05
Manure
109
108
163
52
2
2
1
0
P Removal
Rating
22 ibstac.
Medium
BALANCE
01
108
113
321
2
2
1
0
Traci
Field
542
3
Req'd Nutrients
951
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
Period
App.-6/30
15.00
2115
Supplied By:
---
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
ol
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
0; I
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
86 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
75
259
110
37
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
38 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
259
60
37
3
3
1
0
fP Tract
Field
542
6
Req'd Nutrients
95
0
110
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
5.00
2115.6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I Sample
Date
86 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
75
259
110
37
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
38 lbslac.
ILOW
BALANCE
0
259
0
37
1 3
31
1
0
IRYE
Tract
Field
542
7
Req'd Nutrients
92
0
.110
0
0
0
0'
Acres I
App. Period
4.00
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
MM�;
M�
?M"
"�- cr
T�
"��
IM, �r
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
4
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durliam.
Residual
201
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
RYE[ Sample
Date
83 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
72
249
106
35
3
2
1
01
Removal
Rating
37 lbs/ac'
Low
BALANCE
0
249
0
35
3
2
1
0
IP Tract
Field
542
8
Req'd Nutrients
92
0
87
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
6.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
K
:xQ-
Ai��
--*'A
--
i -`!� '�]
1-71NIWINWIWAI
T
� MR-4711;
CROP
Corn. Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
01
0
01
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
83 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
72
249
106
351
3
2
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
37 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
1 01
249
261
351
31
21
11
0
155257 Dalabase Vcrsion 3.1 Date Printed: 3/912009 N MR Page Page 17 of IS

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbslA)
Ivin
(lbslA)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
542
9
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
t�
.` -
`r>•
; ; t
`f"
u ' °1
CROP
Com• Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYF Sample
Date
1 90 bu.
1 09-19-06
Manure
80
277
I l8
39
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
JO lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
277
88
39
3
3
1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 NMR Page Page l8 oft8

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. hligh levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth,
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbslacre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85, By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pl-I in the optimum range for crop production .
12rnuired Nnil Trcl Valrtr.c
Tract
Field
Crop
pl1
Lintc Recom.
(tonslacre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Za-1
"Zinc Recommendation
2381
2
Small Grain, Silage
6.8
0.0
132
Nome
202
None
2381
2
Soybeans, Full Season
6.8
0.0
132
None
202
None
2391
2
Corn, Silage
6.8
0.0
132
None
202
None
2381
3
Corn, Silage
7.1
O.t)
178
None
215
None
2381
3
Small Grain, Silage
7.1
0.0
178
Norte
215
None.
2391
3
Soybeans, Manurcd, Full Season
7,1
0,0
178
None
215
None
2381
6
Corn, Silage
6.8
0.0
80
None
139
None
2381
6
Srntrll Grain, Silage
fi.8
0.0
80
None
139
None
2 391
6
Soybeans, Manured, full Season
6.8
0.0
80
None
139
None
2381
7
Corn, Silage
7.1
0.0
127
None
173
None
2381
7
Snfall Grain, Silage
7.1
0.0
127
None
173
None
2381
7
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
7.1
0.0
127
None
173
None
2391
8
Sntall Grain, Sila_c
6.8
0.0
79
None
99
None
2381
8
Soybeans, Full Season
6.8
0.0
79
None
99
None
2381
8
Cont, Silage
.6.8
0.0
79
None
99
None
2383
3
Wheat, Grain
7.2
0.0
222
None
279
None
2383
3
Soyheatts, Manured, Double Cop
7.2
0.0
222
None
279
None
2383
3
Corn, Grain
7.2
0.0
222
None
279
None
2383
5
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
5.1
1.1
51
None
156
None
2392
l
Corti, Silage
5.l
1.1
l07
None
83
None
2392
l
Small Grain, Silage
5.1
0.0
107
None
83
None
2392
1
SON -beans, Manured, Full Season
5.1
0.0
t07
None
83
None
2392
?
Corn, Silage
4.9
t.5
68
None
55
None
---- --. ------------- --------------------------- ---------------------- --------------- -- - ----- ------------ - ---------------................... ...... ...-...-...--.-.---
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 STV Page Page 1 of 4

ReClUired Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crap
p31
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recoa mandalion
Ln-1
Zinc Recommendation
2392
2
Smali Grain, Silage
4.9
0.0
68
None
55
Norte
2392
2
Soybeans, Manured, Pull Season
4.9
0.0
68
None
55
None
2392
3
Corn, Silage
5.1
1.1
59
None
72
None
2392
3
Small Grain, Silage
5.1
0.0
59
None
72
None
2392
3
SOyhcans, Manured, Fu11 Seatsun
5.1
0.0
59
None
72
None
2392
4
Corn, Silage
5.1
1.0
132
None
78
None
2392
4
Small Grain, Silage
5.1
0.0
132
None
78
Name
2392
4
Sovbeans, Manured, Full Season
5.1
0.0
132
None
78
None
2392
5
Com, Silage
5.2
0.9
117
None
96
None
2392
5
Small Grain, Silage
5.2
0.0
117
None
96
None
2392
5
Soybeans, Mantired, full Season
5.2
0.0
117
None
96
None
2392
6
Corn, Silaga
5.5
0.6
116
None
143
None
2392
6
Small Grain, Silage
5.5
0.0
116
None
143
None
2392
6
Soybeans, Manured, Pull Season
5.5
0,0
116
None
143
None
2392
7
Corn, Silage
5.3
0.9
121
None
83
None
2392
7
Small (imin, Silage
5.3
0.0
121
None
83
None
2392
7
Soybeans, Manured, Full Scason
5.3
0.0
121
None
83
None
2415
1
Corn, Silagc
5.9
0.0
258
Nome
170
None
2415
l
Small (;rain, Silagc
5.9
0,0
258
None
170
None
2415
1
Soybeans, Ma)ured, F1.111 Season
5.9
0.0
258
None
170
None
2415
3
Small Grain, Silage
6.3
0.0
269
None
157
None
2415
3
S ffbCans, Full Sealson
63
0.0
269
None
157
None
2415
3
Corn, Silagc
6.3
0.0
269
None
157
None
2415
5
Mixed Cool Season brass -Pasture
5.4
0.9
572
None
379
None
2415
6
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Pasturc
5.1
1.0
239
;None
169
None
2415
7
Corn, Silage
6.1
0.0
329
None
355
None
2415
7
Small Grain, Silage
6.1
0.0
329
None
355
None
2415
7
Soyhcans, Manured, Pull Season
6.1
0.0
329
None
355
None
540
1
Corn, Grain
6.3
0.0
2l2
None
l65
None
540
1
Wheat, Grain
6.3
0.0
212
1 None
1.65 INone
.... ....... .......... .... ............................................. ..................... ....................................................... . .............. -------------- I ......... .....
155257 Database Version 3.1 Dace Printed: 03-09-2009 STV Pagc Page 2 of 4

Required Soil Tcst Values
t reel
Field
Crop
pFF
Lime Reeom.
(tonslaerc)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
711-1.
Zinc Recurnmendation
540
1
soybeans, hl:nuarcd, Double Crop
6.3
0.0
21.2
None
165
None
540
2
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Pasturc
5,9
0.0
241
None
181
None
540
3
Mixed Cool Season GriLSS-Pasture
5.6
0.6
266
None
191
None
540
4
Corn, Grain
5.9
0.0
207
None
168
Norte
540
4
Wheat, Cirain
5.9
0.0
207
None
169
Norio
540
4
SoyhCans, Manurcd, Double Crop
5,9
0.0
207
Nuns
169
None
540
5
Corn, Grain
5.8
0.4
167
Non c
122
Nuns
540
5
Wheat, Cirain
5,H
0.0
167
None
122
None
540
5
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
5.8
0.0
167
None
122
None
540
7
Miscd Cool Season Grass -Pasture
5.5
0.9
88
None
10g
Nonc
540
8
Corn,(irain
5.3
t.0
509
None
5t5
Norte
540
8
Wheat, Grain
5.3
0.0
509
Nuns
513
Nortc
540
8
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.3
0.0
509
None
515
None
540
9
Corn, Cirain
5.7
0.4
217
None
335
None
540
9
Wheat, Grain
5,7
0.0
217
None
335
None
540
9
Soybeans, Manurcd, DPtablc Crop
5.7
0.0
2l7
Nonc
335
None
542
5
Wheat, Grain
6.5
0.0
176
None
281
None
542
5
Soyheans, Manured, Double Crop
6.5
0.)
176
None
281
None
542
5
Curti, Grain
6.5
0.0
176
None
281
Norio
542
6
Wheat, Grain
5.0
1.1
38
Nonc
158
Norte
542
6
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.0
0.0
38
None
t58
Nnne
542
6
Corn, Grain
5.0
0.0
38
None
158
None
542
7
Wheat. Grain
5.0
1.1
38
None
158
None
542
7
Sovbcans, Manurcd, Double Crop
5.0
0.0
38
None
138
None
542
7
Corn, Grain
5.0
0.0
38
None
159
None
542
8
Wheat, Grain
6.0
().0
143
None
209
None
542
8
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
143
None
2O9
Nonc
542
9
Corn. ("rain
6.0
0.0
143
1 None
209
None
542
9
Wheat,Orain
6.7
0.0
326
Nonc
276
None
542
9
Soybeans, Manurcd, Uouhle Crop
6.7
0.0
226
Norio
276
None
---------- --------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---- .... -- -- ............ ............... ..... .... ........... ..... ----- -- --- - ... ..........--
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Primed: 03-09-2009 S3'V Page Page 3 of-4

Required Sol] Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pii
Lime Recom,
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Z,n-1
Zinc Recommendation
542
9
Corn, Grain
6.7
0.0
1 226
None
276
N,77
--- ---- - ---------- ---- - ...... .................. --------------- ------ I -- - ------------------- ................. ................ -- - - -- - -- - - -- ---------
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 STV Page Page 4 oN

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacitv
Source Name
Dai (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
12/ 1
100
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
69
l
2
59
1
3
100
1
4
70
l
5
65
1
6
40
1
7
16
1
8
33
1
9
69
1
10
100
I
11
75
t
12
63
2
1
32
2
2
64
2
3
100
2
4
70
2
5
100
2
6
75
2
7
51
2
8
68
2
9
100
2
10
69
2
11
44
2
12
32
. Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
- ------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I - --------------------------------------------- -
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 Capacity Page Page 1 of t

TopoGone - USGS Crutchfield Crossroads (NC) Topo Map Paae 1 of 1
Flights from U.S. to Asia
to ozoneOur Lowest Fares at Singapore Air. Flights to Asia Starting At $696!
singaporeak.com/usa
Ads by Google Advertise on this site
� • " f r ! N ; a
New Product USGS Crutchfield Crossroads (NC} Topo Map
Download every View TopoZone Pro topographic maps, aerial photos', street maps, coordinatf
Topo and Aerial at 1350 50 83'N; 790 27 591N NAD27)
this location $9.95 ,.
Get Your MapPack . 7: topol'one
�K•�}i�C3�a3aMix,Sti ,{r' '_w .` ~� .' f �'� f � =i
Now! y f ,r� �` , _, _- ~° i I L__•' n
Map and Photo Info �- rw
Download Topo images := ; O`' • Ir `i,'," `-,1= _ { f`r�'• ` i ! !� ''//I,/r
Download Photo images
USGS Topo Maps
L.- 1:24K/25K Topo Maps _ �_i ..' r�:{. 4 f� 423i2� i _ I ,�°•, .--
4J 1:100K Topo Maps 3 1 -; - it f +
^i1:250KTopo Ma 5
Automatic selection ?} r = aft
'
Map Size��
Small
Medium
Co' Large
View Scale
1 . 50,000 �., r J r ` %i j,;, f�•'I;�
Coordinate Format
DD MM.MM f11 ti. ,f J.w' it �r is
Map Datum
,� 1 . •� -� . ` I — `�.
NAD27
Z.
Show target g € ; , i , �'` ritLA141 ANC:.!`
Email this topo map 4� I
NCH;AT11 Ali .-C�Lyr;
Bookmark this topo map , 1 tom-. ',j
Print this topo maps',+ ° : ,f D• a, Ff.5 l tij
112
���: � .ti'(• .
AM
.iir f —: s�'t �,�`j , i •ii _ 1. - ��' °�S }h62 6.r' Ls .
!��' j',�Y .",� �' � _ � � e� �,� t �� ° � s z�!`f I ++�II s �' _ - t�` :\�JEiJ • , ..o, t-_ �!� � � ?` -
L -" r - _ _ �' F� i i�`I � � r�\. _ '" L ``, - 3 i``�/� � r `i • : ,Y �' l f t'=`. �ses` r . , �. � �'_�
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.8
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
TopoZone.com © 1999-2006 Maps a la carte, Inc. - All rights reserved.
Use of this site is governed by our Conditions and Terms of Use. We care about your privacy - please read our Privacy statement.
http: //vvAw.topozone.corn/map.asp?lat=35.84719&ton=-79.45981 &size=l&symshou--n&u=4&datum=na... 4/12/2007

28'
0.00" /�j 079-. '710.00" W, 07F 26'0 00*1 w
W,
N L
)�ptL
eek
J X "(2 2
W
Ch
65
J
N
-4 123N)
z
C)
Ci
q
cc
AI
Ln
cn
r4
3n
2358
tsr r.
�
IT
I
Vn
.Yl ",
•
�Z �cS
j
Z
?
z
ram_
V, 2jv
o
L Y
4
CzCCL�
,n3))
'ILS
659
%
A
ch
37 fY
zCZcCo43>
Y(
IT
_Jr
J-,
#01-36
2*3C
3_1 l
N
.TH A
9* 21E
679-27- O.00­ I I I 679- 26- 0,00" W
(C) lqqd,MaptIah,

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- -------- --- ------------------- ---
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 Specification Pap-e l

8. Animal -waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on.
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
---------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
155252 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 Specification Pape 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/9/2009 Specification Pale 3

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for: �_r7_ <e T N
k
Farm: Tract: I7ate:/J_
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount,
source, placement, form and timing of the
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or
ground waters. The practice, Waste
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly
accomplished through the development of a
Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization_ Plan,
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple
natural resource concerns on the land.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES
Your nutrient management/waste utilization
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives:
• To budget nutrients for plant production.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural
nutrients to surface and ground water
resources.
• To maintain or improve the physical,
chemical, and biological condition of the
soil.
• To utilize agricultural wastes for
livestock feed or as an energy source.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT / WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The information provided in this Job
Sheet and the attachments meet the
minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
purposes. This Nutrient Management
Plan includes:
1 A plan map and soils map for the area
planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan).
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
or resources (streams, wells,
sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
3. Your planned crop rotation.
4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
Index (LI) as required.
6. Realistic yield expectations for the
crops in the rotation, and their source
if other than default values approved
for N.C.
7. Recommended nutrient application
rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August. 2003) Page I

and method of application and
incorporation, if applicable.
8. This Job Sheet (or comparable
information), that provides the following
• General requirements of this practice,
as well as additional requirements to
meet the natural resource protection
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to
this plan.
• Operation and maintenance
information associated with this
practice.
Because this Nutrient Management Plan
includes agricultural organic sources,
additional items are required in the plan to
ensure proper waste utilization:
• Waste Utilization Agreement (if
applicable)
• Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement (if applicable)
• Additional engineering design and
operating information for waste storage
structures, transport, and application
system, as applicable. These designs,
and the instructions for operating these
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management/
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent
overtopping or other discharges from
storage structures or facilities, as
applicable.
This plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal,
state, or local regulations or policies.
Changes in laws or regulations may
necessitate a revision of the plan.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE
UTILIZATION
General
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management
plan (see the following section, "BASIC
REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT")
You are required to acquire and comply
with all federal, state, or local permit
requirements related to the handling and
application of manure or organic
materials.
The nutrient management/waste
utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement must exist to address all
organic waste not handled by the nutrient
management/waste utilization plan.
Manure or organic wastes will not be
applied to the following areas:
• surface waters,
• wetlands, unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment
system,
• soils subject to frequent flooding
during the period when flooding is
expected,
• frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
soils,
• within 200 feet of a dwelling other
than those owned by the producer,
• within 100 feet of a well,
• within 25 feet of surface waters, or
• within any other setbacks as identified
by federal, state, or local laws or
regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
being applied within 75 feet of a
residential property boundary or
perennial stream or river if the facility
was sited on or after October 1995.)
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
in a manner not to reach surface waters,
wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
structures must be analyzed prior to land
INC Practice lob Sheet: NC-590 (August. 2003) Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available
land and/or third party manure agreements)
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in
adherence to all nutrient application
requirements. All federal and state guidance
regarding the proper testing, handling,
planning, and application of sludge must be
followed for regulated operations.
Since compliance with all applicable North
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste
Management for questions.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other
organic residues used for feedstock must be
handled in a manner to minimize
contamination and preserve its feed value.
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall
develop rations that utilize animal wastes.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY
If your facility is to be used for energy
production, all energy producing components
of the system are included in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization Plan and
provisions for the utilization of residues of
energy production identified. Your Nutrient
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT
General
Application of nutrients must comply with all
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
The realistic yield expectations (RYES) in
this plan are based on one or more of the
following:
• Default values approved by the N.C.
Interagency Nutrient Management
Committee that incorporate soil
productivity information, yield data,
and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Additional information on the default
values may be found at:
www. soil. ncsu. edu/nmp/ncnmwg/index. hfm
• Documented actual yield data from
the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
consecutive specific crop harvests.
(For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
the last five years.)
�• A fertilization rate recommended by
North Carolina State University may
be used in cases where no yield data
or approved RYE values exist for a
crop.
• An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
chemical features may be used for
new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
ONLY be specified by a certified
Nutrient Management planner.
Erosion, runoff, and water management
controls have been planned, as needed,
on fields that receive nutrients.
Soil Testing
This nutrient management plan has been
developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
Soil samples must be collected and
prepared in accordance with North
Carolina State University or the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August. 2003) Page 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any
laboratory or program that is certified by the
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing.
Growers who utilize other laboratories must
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology
to ensure the test results are compatible with
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide
consistency, all laboratories used must
provide fertilization recommendations using
guidelines and methodologies as referenced
at the NCDA&CS website:
www.ncegr.comlagronomilobook.htm
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory
that is supported by field research within the
state.
Soil testing shall include analysis for all
nutrients for which specific information is
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Plant Tissue Testing
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall
be done in accordance with North Carolina
State University or NCDA&CS standards or
recommendations.
Manure Testing
Nutrient values of manure and organic by-
products shall be established for planning
purposes based on laboratory analysis,
acceptable default values, or historic records
for the operation.
When determining actual application rates, a
laboratory analysis is required. State
regulations. require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year.
Acceptable laboratories include the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
certified by the NCDENR.
Field Risk Assessment
A field -specific assessment of the
potential for phosphorus transport from
each field (or groups of similar fields)
have been conducted, using the North
Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT)
PLAT assesses the potential for
phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
site to surface water through each of the
four primary loss pathways:
• sediment -bound P transported
through erosion,
• soluble P transported through
surface runoff,
• soluble P leached through the soil
profile, and
• non -incorporated source P
transported through surface
runoff.
Based on the assessment of each loss
pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
rating will identify whether nitrogen or
phosphorus shall be the rate -determining
element in developing the planned
application rate for manure.
PLAT Rating I Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
MEDIUM
Nitrogen -based manure
a2plication.
HIGH
Manure application limited to
phosphorus removal from site
in harvested plant biomass.
VERY HIGH
No additional manure
application to be specified in
plan for the site.
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with NCSU
guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet; NC-590 (August. 2003) Page 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices
that reduce the potential for phosphorus
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips,
ponds, water table management, and residue
management and conservation tillage.
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or
planned, have been incorporated into your
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the
management of the site actually affects the
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the
PLAT analysis (including any required to
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient
Management Plan to be approved.
Nutrient Application Rates
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider
current soil test results, RYEs, and
management.
Liming material shall be applied as needed to
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients.
The application amount and rate (in/hr) for
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation)
shall not result in runoff from the site. The
application shall not exceed the field capacity
of the soil.
The planned rates of nutrient application are
shown on the attached sheets. These rates
have been computed as follows:
Nitrogen Application - When the plan is
nitrogen -based (a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium), the application rate of manure or
organic by-products shall be based on the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops
without established RYEs). This may
result in an application rate for other
nutrients that exceeds the soil test
recommendation.
When the plan is being implemented
on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
rating of High or Very High), manure
or other organic by-products shall be
applied at rates consistent with the
phosphorus application guidance
below. In such situations, an
additional nitrogen application from
non -organic sources may be required
to supply nitrogen at the rate
recommended by the RYE.
Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
All nitrogen rates for hay production
are for pure grass stands. Due to the
nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
by 25% for the portion of the expected
yield that is removed through grazing.
Phosphorus Application — When
manure or other organic by-products
are used, the planned rates of
phosphorus application shall be based
on the PLAT rating for the site, as
follows:
Low or Medium Rating — The
planned manure or organic by-
product application rate is based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
High Rating — The planned
manure or organic by-product
application rate is limited to the
phosphorus removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass.
Very High Rating — No additional
manure or organic by-product
application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August. 2003) Page 5

On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating,
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium may be
recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or
recommendations.
A single application of phosphorus applied
as manure or organic by-product may be
made at a rate equal to the recommended
phosphorus application or estimated
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple
years in the crop sequence.
• When such single applications are
made, the rate shall:
• not exceed the recommended
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or
• not exceed the estimated nitrogen
removal in harvested plant bio-
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very
High PLAT risk rating_
Potassium Application — Planned
potassium application rates should
match the soil test recommended rates
as closely as possible. (This is
particularly critical in situations where a
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or
other organic sources, the addition of
potassium from non -organic sources
may be required.
• Other Plant Nutrients - The planned
rates of application of other nutrients if
applicable are consistent with North
Carolina State University or the
NCDA&CS guidelines or
recommendations.
Nutrient Application Timing
Timing of nutrient application shall
correspond as closely as possible with
plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
considering cropping system limitations,
weather and climatic conditions, and field
accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
saturated soil.
Manure or organic by-products shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
For nutrients applied through irrigation
systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
distribution of material at planned rates.
Plan Review and Revision Period
A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
to exceed five years.
Heavy Metals Monitoring
For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
and copper concentrations shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites for
application shall be sought when these
metals approach excessive
concentrations. The following criteria and
actions are provided:
ZINC
Mehlich-3lndex
Action
Zn-I
300 (21 Ibslac)
Peanuts are very sensitive to
zinc, and application on peanuts
should be limited. Seek
alternative sites when possible.
The risk of zinc toxicity is
greater with low soil pH and has
been seen at Zn-I as low as
300, *
500 (35 Ibslac)
Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts. *
2,000 (142
Caution: Seek alternative sites
Ibslac)
when possible for all crops. *
3,000 (213
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibslac)
Cease application for all crops.*
NC Practice Job Sheet-. NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 6

COPPER
Mehlich-3Index
Action
Cu-t
2,000 (72 Ibslac)
Caution: Seek alternative sites
when possible for all crops. '
3,000 (108
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibslac)
Cease application on all crops.'
" Maintain pH at 6.0 on these
sites.
When sewage sludge is applied, the
accumulation of potential pollutants (including
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state
and local laws or regulations. Additional
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage
sludge may be found in Land Application of
Sewage Sludge, EPA1831-B-93-002b
publication number at:
http://www. e,oa.gov/nodes/Aubs/sludge. pdf
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
MINIMIZING DELIVERY. OF NUTRIENTS TO
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER
In areas that have been identified as impaired
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus
transport from the site. (The streams/water
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA-
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section
1.)
❑ NO
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in
an area where surface waters are
impaired, with agricultural nutrients
identified as a likely source. The Leaching
Index (LI) is not required.
❑ YES
This nutrient management plan IS in an
area where surface waters are impaired,
with agricultural nutrients identified as a
likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
is included in this plan.
While the results of the LI does not affect
your planned nutrient application rates,
some additional conservation practices
may be specified in the plan to reduce the
risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
applicable.
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
soluble elements and either or both may
be components of organic and inorganic
fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
move with water as leachate down
through the soil, or over the soil surface
as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
phosphorus exist in different forms and
may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
can have detrimental effects on both
surface and shallow ground water quality.
As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
severe algal blooms and fish kills.
Because of the topography, hydrology,
and other factors in the state, the
environmental problems from excess
nutrients reaching surface water may not
be exhibited near the contributing source,
but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico Basin,
the Chowan River, the watershed of the
B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
watershed of the New River in Onslow
County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
waters in North Carolina.
Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
water and eventually to surface waters.
(Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) rage 7

required part of the nutrient management plan
in some areas of the state with surface water
impairments. The LI uses soils information
and local climate data to assess the potential
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results
of the LI analysis and recommended actions
are included in your nutrient management
plan, if applicable.
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be
transported off -site than recognized in the
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3)
in soluble form leaching downward through
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by
site, and depends upon such factors as soil
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The
results of the PLAT analysis and
recommended actions are included in your
nutrient management plan, if applicable.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus
removal rate. In these cases, the planned
nutrient application rate is not sustainable,
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be
reached.
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
You are responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. The following Operation &
Maintenance should be conducted:
1 Review the plan annually to determine if
adjustments or modifications to the plan
are needed. (The S.B. 1217
interagency group guidelines
accepted by the N.C. Division of
Water Quality for .0200 operations
specify a plan revision when there are
changes in crops or cropping patterns
that utilize more than 25 percent of
the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
management plans shall be
thoroughly reviewed every five years
and revised if necessary. The next
review will be performed in
2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
product storage facilities from weather
and accidental leakage or spillage.
3. Ensure proper calibration of
application equipment to ensure
uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
4. Inspect and maintain the equipment
and facilities used to implement the
Nutrient Management/Waste
Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
applicable, annually.
6. Records should be maintained for five
years, or for a period as required by
other Federal, state, or local
ordinances, or program or contract
requirements. To ensure adequate
information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
included:
• Soil test results and
recommendations for nutrient
application,
• Quantities, analyses and sources
of nutrients applied (When the
actual rates used exceed the
recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
\C Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e_g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
• Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
• Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record -keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)
Page 9

0
Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 4, 5
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from }private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbslacre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
------------------------------------------ - ----
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 Crop Note Page Page I of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 7
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- -----------------
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 4. 5
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 Ibs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to feld(s): 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 Ibs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ­---
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3, 8
Soybeans: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSU Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However,
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 7
Soybeans -Full Season: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSU Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However,
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Soybeans -Full Season: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSU Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However,
applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
------------------ -- ---- --------------------------- - - -- ---- --
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 7

The following crop note applies to feld(s): 1, 4, 5
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th,
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Call. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
----------------------------------------------------^----------------------------------------------------------- --� ---
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 CropNote Page Page 5 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 7
Small Grain Silage. Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s)! 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Mixed Cool Season Grasses: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 5
Mixed Cool Season Grasses: No Comment
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- -- ----- ------
155257 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-09-2009 Crop Note Page Page 6 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): ?
Mixed Cool Season Grasses: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, 7
Mixed Cool Season Grasses: No Comment
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -
155257 Database Version 3.1 [)ate Printed: 03-09-2009 Crop Note Page Page 7 of 7

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DwQ (331) 77l- 4-�oc
ENIL-RGENCY NIANAGE�IENT SYSTEM
SWCD C336} 2..8 / 7 -3
MRCS Sa . ,, e a s
k �_- 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. "this plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
December 18, t996

a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irri�oation pump,
c. Make sure t10 siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows i« the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put
in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom
as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters'?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration'?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage''
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters`?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)'?
h. How much reached surface waters'?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office.
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should,
include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident front item 2 above,
the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather
and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - and
local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4. If none of the above works call 9 f l or the Sheriff's Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
2 December 1 �, 1996

damage.
a. Contractors Name: t�40 1i- e- Id'.f G
b. Contractors :address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer. etc.
a. Name: ?3--Il Alooa's
b. Phone: 3 3 &% �L 2,6 - / 753 EX • 3
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems
with release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Suurev
cause.
BINIPs to Minirnizc Odnr- Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
• Dairy Production
❑
Vegetative or wooded buffers;
0
Recommended best management practices;
❑
Good judgement and commonsense
Paved lots or barn alley
• fret rrlanure-covered surfaces
❑
Scrape or Flush daily;
sul'f;sces
❑
Promole drying with proper ventilation;
❑
Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
• Urine;
❑
Prolnolc drying with proper ventilation;
• Partial microbial decomposition
❑
Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
Manure city stacks
• Partial microbial decomposition
❑
Provide liquid Drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bonorn or mid -level loading;
surface • Miring while filling; ❑ Tank covers;
• Agitation while emptying 0 Basill surface mats of solids;
0 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions;
7-1 Agit;rtc only lyrilrr to manure removal;
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling hasin surfaces
•
Partial microbial decomposition;
0
Liquid drainage from settled solids;
•
Mixing while filling;
❑
Remove solids regularly
•
Agitation while em t ing
Manure, slurry, or sludge -
•
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets
•
Volatile gas emissions
0
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
M
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure- slurry
•
Volatile gas emissions while drying
(71
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
or sludge on field surfaces
0
Soil incori)oration within 48 hrs:.
❑
Spread in thin uniform layers liar rapid drying:
❑
Proven bioingical additives or oxidants
Mush tanks
•
Agitation of"recycled lagoon liquid
❑
Hush lank covers:
while tanks are tilling
❑
I:xtcnd fill lines to dear hrluom of tanks with
allil-sipholl Ve111S
011ISIl1C (1VIllll C011CCtllitl Of
•
Aottatltln during wasiewater
[1
lio\ l'lrvva s
jullctinr) hoxcS
conveyance
AN'10(` - Novc111hrr I i. I91)0, Pasw I

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Lift sialions • Agitation during sump tank filling 0 Sump tank covers
and drawdown
End of drainpipes at lagoon • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
Conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon Surlaces
•
voluble gas emission;
❑
Proper lagoon liquid capacily;
•
Biological mixing;
❑
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
❑
Minimum surf rcc area-to-VUltrme ratio;
❑
Minimum agitation when pumping;
❑
Mechanical aeration;
❑
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles
•
High pressure agitation;
❑
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
•
Wind drift
O
Minimum recommended operating pressure;
O
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
Pump from second stage lagoon;
❑
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
Dead animals
0
Carcass decomposition
❑
Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing, waler around
a
Improper drainage;
❑
Grade and landscape such that Water drains away
facilities
•
Microbial decomposition of organic
from facilities
matter
Mud tracked onto public
0
Poorly maintained access roads
❑
Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Infonnation:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dais), Educational Unit Manure Managemem System - Lake Wheeler Road Filed Labatory ; E-BAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Managemcnt for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-93
Management of Dairy Wastewater; L•RAI: 106-83 -
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment_ ERAF Fact 5heel
Nuisancc Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From:
NCSU, County I7xtension Center
N'CSIJ - 13AE
NC."SU - RAF
NCSIJ - RAF
1JCSU - RAF
Florida Cooperative Extension
r1111n�}(.� - IVrrvcnrhrr 11, 19�1(r, Pa�c

Poultry Layer Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BN1I's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Pouitry Production ❑ Vegetative or wooded buffers;
❑ Recommended best management practices;
❑ Good judgenient and common sense
Floor surfaces (w-alk aisles) • Wet dirty surl'ices ❑ Scrape manure, dust, feathers into collection alleys;
❑ Splash boards along upper ends of collection alleys;
❑ Proper ventilation '
Cage manure dropping • Manure -covered surface ❑ Scrape manure into collection alleys
hoards
Manure collection alleys • Partial microbial decomposition
© frequent manurc removal by flush or scrape;
© Frequent checks and maintenance on waterers and
water Pipes
Ventilation exhaust furs • Volatile gases; ❑ Fan maintenance;
• Dust C1 F.flicieni air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust C1 Vaernlln or washdown between flocks;
Manure conveyors
• Partial microbial decomposition
❑
Keep mechanical equipment in good repair;
0
Remove manure accumulations promptly
Storage tank or basin
• Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
Bottom or midlevel loading;
Snrf ace
❑
Tank covers;
O
Basin surface mats of solids;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Mamgrc slurry or sludge
• Agitation when spreading;
❑ .
Soil injection of sluta-y/Sludges;
spreader outlets
• Volatile gas emissions .
❑
Wash residual manurc from spreader after use;
❑
Proven biologicai additives or oxidants
Uncovered manurc slurry
• Volatile gas emissions while drying
❑
Soil injection of slurrylsludgeS;
nr sludge on #Wtd Surlhces
❑
5U11 InCUihUralllln \Ylthnl 48 I7r5-
C)utside dnriu Lullrclion nr • Agitation during; Wastewater ❑ Box covers
Junction hoses conveyance
A.N,IU(' - Mivcmhrr 1 I. 1990. I';ige 6

Source Cause 6MPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Lift stations • Agitation during sunip tank filling ❑ Sump tank covers
and drawdown
End of drainpipes al lagoon • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Fxtend discharge point 01' pipes underneath
conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volitile gas emission; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
O Minimum agitation while pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biolouical additives
In igation sprinkler nozzles
•
High pressure agitation;
❑
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
•
Wind drift
❑
Minimum recommended operating procedure;
❑
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
]'Limp from second -stage lagoon
Dead birds
•
Carcass decomposition
❑
Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead bird disposal pits
s
Carcass decomposition
❑
Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
❑
Proper location/construction of disposal pits.
❑
Disposal.pit covers tight fitting
Standing water around
0
Improper drainage
❑
Grade and landscape such that water drains away
facilities
•
Microbial decomposition oforganic
from facilities
shatter
Mud Iracked onto public 0 Poorly maintained access roads ❑ Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information: Available From
ANIOC - November 1 I, 1996, Pagc 7
•

Source
Cause
HMI's to Minimize Odor
Poultry Manure Management; .0200 Rule/13M1' Packet
Poultry layer E'roduction Facility Manure Management: High Rise, Deep Ili% EBAF 131-88
Poultry Layer PrOdiretI01) Facility Manure ManagcmenC Undercage FEush - Lagoon 'Treatment; EMU" 130-88
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; F1BAF 103-83
Calibration of Manurc and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Shce[
Proper Disposal 0i DC3d Paultr}; PSST Guide No. 19
Nuisance Corner IS in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PROW, 1995 Conference Proceedings
A\1CJ(_' - NOV011hcr 1 I. 1'i9h. 1';
Site Specific Practices
NCSIJ, County Extension Center
NCSU - BAF
NCSU - BA1
NCSU BA1
NCSU BAE
NCSU - Poultry Science
Florida Cooperallvc Extension

a
•
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source
Cause
lih'll's to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush G1111crs
• Acctnnulation of Solids
❑
Flush system is designed and operated sullicienily to
remove accumulated solids From gutters as designed;
0
Remove bridging of accumulated solids at discharge
Lagoons and fits
0 Crusted solids
Cl
Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where pest
breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting of
solids to a depth of no more than 6 - K inches over
more than 30% of surface.
Esccssive Vegetative
0 Decaying vegetation
©
Maintain vegetative control along banks of lagoons
Growth
and nthcr impoundments to prevent accumulation of
decaying vegetative matter along water's edge on
impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svslerns
Feeders
• Feed Spillage
O
Design, operate and maintain feed systems (c.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
O
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during
wlnler).
Feed storage
• Accumulation of feed residues
71
Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage area,, by
_
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for brewer's
grain and similar high moisture grain products).
O
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
Animal I lolding Areas r Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along knees
and feed wasiage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal.
Maintain fence rows and tiller strips arnllncl anima}
holding areas to rninimize accumulations of wasics
(i.e. inspect for and reniove or break up
accuntrslated solids as needed,
AM1C - Novembrr 11, 1996. 1'agc

Source Cause
BMPs to Minimize insects Site Specific Practices
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes O Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during
winter) where manure is loaded Jar land application
or disposal.
• Provide fo adequate drainage around manure
Stockpiles.
C7 Inspect for an remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed.
],or more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Depailment of Entomology, Boa 7613, ,North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
�'— 27695-7613
ANIR' - NovcIIIher i I. 19Q6. Page 2

1•Iortality Management 'Methods
{check which method(s) are being implemented)
Ud" Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knov, ledge of
the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body
of water.
U'— Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-165.7.
GJ-' Complete incineration
LIa Ln the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved
by the Department of Agriculture.
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make
possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or
animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)
December 18, 1996

_.
United States Department of Agriculture
o N R C S
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Burlington Field Office
209 N. Graham -Hopedale Road
Burlington, North Carolina 27217
June 25, 2007
NC Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Re: CAWMP for Joseph Johnson Dairy
To Whom It May Concern:
Rick Bailey, District Conservationist
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
This Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP) was recently prepared for Joseph
Johnson.
As the attached Waste Storage Pond data sheet shows (prepared by Bill Woods, the designer of
the original waste storage pond), the pond, originally designed for 100 days storage for 99
animals, will handle the waste for up to 330 cows for 90 days. The reason for this increase in
animal capacity is the addition of the dry pack shelter system recently installed in the feedlot
area. This shelter obviously eliminates a large portion of the waste/runoff that would otherwise
go into the pond.
The CNMP accounts not only for the wastes going into the pond but also the wastes
accumulating under the dry pack shelter. It also includes the poultry wastes generated by the
poultry houses on site. In order to use the CNMP computer program, we showed that the
equivalent of 99 dairy animals' waste was going into the waste storage pond as slurry since that
was the number of animals the pond was originally designed for (though Mr. Woods data sheet
shows that the pond will now accommodate 330 animals with the dry pack in place). We showed
the waste generated by the additional 231 animals to be in a solid form under the dry pack
shelter. In other words, the CNMP accounts for all the waste generated by 330 dairy cows over a
year's time as well as the waste generated by the poultry houses. The plan shows that he has
more than enough land to handle this amount of waste. Mr. Woods' data sheet shows that the
waste pond will handle the wastes from 330 animals for 90 days.
We hope this CNMP plus the Data Sheet, etc will suffice as Mr. Johnson's CAWMP. If not,
please let us know and we will rework the CNMP accordingly.
Helping People Help the Land
An Equa] oppwuni[y Provider and Employer

1
1f you have any questions concerning the CLAMP, please contact me at [phone], ext. 3.
Sincerely,
Rick Bailey
District Conservationist

Joseph Johnson Dairy
Waste Storage Pond Data (preliminary)
January 23, 2007
Required volume needed for 99 cows on lot 75% for 100 days (excluding 25 yr storm) 33, 719 cu ft
Designed capacity
Constructed capacity (as built)
33,052 cu ft
35,765 cu ft
Revised capacity due to shed built over most of lot (deceases 25 yr storm volume) *40,320 cu ft
40,320 - 33,052 = 7268 cu ft / 33,052 = 22% increase in capacity from original design capacity
40,320 - 35,765 = 4555 cu ft / 35,765 = 13% increase in capacity from as built capacity
WSP Bottom
Elevation
Start Pump
Elevation
Emergency
Spillway Elev.
Top of Dam
Elevation
Capacity to
Start Pump E.
Orig. Capacity
90.7
97.8
99.3
100.7
33,052 cu ft
Revised Cap.
90.7
98.4
99.3
100.7
40,320 cu ft
Change
0
+ 0.6 ft
0
0
+ 7,268 cu ft
No.
Time
Design
Waste
Parlor
Feedlot
Runoff
25 yr
25 yr St
of
on Lot -
Days
Generated
Water
Area
Feedlot
Storm
Structure
Cows
Feeding
of
Cu Ft
Cu Ft
Sq Ft
Cu Ft
Feedlot
Storage
Area
storage
5 gal/cow
(no roof)
(no roo0
Storage
Original
99
75%
100
14,493
6,618
13,750
8,525
09 ft
0.5 ft
Revised
330
25%
90
14,492
19,852
4,300
2,473
0.3 ft
0.5 ft
Change
+231
-500/.
- 20
- 1
+13,234
- 9,450
- 6,052
-0.6 ft
0
am
Original Design
New Design
CHANGE
99 cows-100 days 75%
330 cows-90 day 25%
Waste solid & liquid) o
L 14,493 cu ft
14,492 cu ft
- 1 cu ft
Parlor wash water
16,618 cu ft
19,852 cu ft
+ 13,234 cu ft
Runoff from lot
8,525 cu ft
2,473 cu ft
- 6052 cu ft
Rainfall on WSP less e
4,083 cu ft
3,341 cu ft
- 742 cu ft
TOTAL:
33,719 cu ft
40,158 cu ft
+ 6,439 cu ft
Design to start pump
33,052 cu ft
40,320 cu ft
Cap. to start p. as built
35,765 cu ft
40,320 cu ft
* As built capacity = 35,765 cu ft + 4555 cu ft (amount of storage gained by most of lot being
roofed) = 40,320 cu ft. Start pump can be raised from 97.8 to 98.4. This means the 25 yr storm
storage will go from 1.4 feet to 0.8 feet (0.5 feet on the wsp and 0.3 feet from 4,300 sq ft of lot
runoff). See supporting data.
B W 1/23/2007

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Joseph Johnson Dain-/Poult,v Farm
Joseph Johnson
9558 Pleasant Hill Church
Road
Liberty, NC 27298
[phone]
04-12-2007
This plan has been developed bN :
Rick Bailev
NRCS
209 N. Graham -Hopedale Rd.
Burlington, NC 27217
[phone] E_rt.3
4k Z&4
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
i (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the Farm named above. 1 have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
I /
1 Si ature (manager` r producer) Date
t
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and watcr
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
3 07
Technical Specialist Signature D to
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 cover Pa,C 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
St
Dairy (Mill: Cow) Solid waste generated 3.927.00 tons/year by a 231 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
16886
Incorporated
22384
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Max. Avail,
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficir
(Tons)
Year 1
16,886
17520
-634
4,074.35
-147.35
Year
16,886
18169
-1,283
4,225.23
-298.23
S2
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 767,151 gals/year by a 99
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 100 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
7594
Incorporated
10356
Injected
11736
Irrigated
6904
Max. Avail,
PAN (lbs)
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
7,594
12910
-5,316
1,304,099
-536.948
Year 2
77594
14895
-7,301
1,504,712
-737.561
----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------...---------------------...-------------------- ------
....
Note: In source ID. S means standard source. U means user defined source.
* Lklax. Available PA\' is calculated on the basis ofthe actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Source Page Page l of 2

S22
Broiler House Stockpiled fitter waste generated 301.60 tons/year by a 52,000 animal
Broiler House Stockpiled Litter operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
4SS6
Incorporated
6297
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year l
4,886
9188
-4.302
567.18
-265.3S
Year 2
4,886
9337
-4,451
576.37
-274.77
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------........ .
mote: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* �v1ax. Available PANE is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 01-12-2007 Source Page Page 2 of

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realism Yield rstinrileS arc-
also provided for each crop. as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Ratiu�, is High, any platmed manure application is litrtited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating. starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recormnendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is sho«vn in the t'ollowinc, table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High,
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
"Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
ft. and
Applied
ilbs.acrcl
2381
2
9-70
9.00
Medium
I5.0
Georgea•ille
Small Grain, Silage
I0. i Tints
io
ti'A
Soybeans, Full Season
48 bu.
's
ti"
Corn, Silage
21 9 Tons
74
N:A
2381
3
2.00
2.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corti, Silage
Tun,
71
` 1
Small Grain, Silage
I un;
Soybeans, Manured, Full SC2SM
43 hu.
�''`
2381
6
6.80
6.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corn, Silage
20.1) M•ons
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
,1
N" ,
Soybeans. Nlanured, Full Season
43 bu.
34
N•; A
2331
7
9.60
9.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corn, Silage
2o.9 Tons
71
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
NIA
Soybeans, tklanffed, Full Season
43 bu.
34
N"\
2381
8
1 13.80
13.00
Medium
15.0
-Tatum
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
Soybeans, Full Season
43 bu.
34
tieA
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
\IA
2383
3
3.50
3,00
Low
15.0
Durham
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
22
V"
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
2� bu.
22
No,-\
Corn. Crain
tiff bu.
3t4
2383
5
4.80
4.00
Low
15.0
Durham
'Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
4
NIA
2392
1
19.20
19.00
Medium
15.0
Tatum
Corn, Silage
20.9 runs
71
ti;,\
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
Soybeans, llanured, Full Season
43 bu.
=�
N"\
2392
2
3.10
3.00
IMcdium
15.0
'ratunt
Corn, Silage
20.1) Ton,
71
Small Grain, Silage
1).? Tuns
; I
N1r�
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
43 bu.
34
MIA
2392
3
6.30
6.00
Medium
15.0
Herndon
Corn, Silage
21.1) ,1't>ns
74
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
10. 1 Tuns
50
\!A
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/12/2007
PCS Page E'aee i ur4
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Sumtnaly
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
PIOi
kemntal
(Ib.acref
;lppl+e�
sibs:avre)
Sovbean5. Manured, Full Season
48 bu.
38
VA
2392
4
1.00
1.60
\-tedium
I5.0
1"arum
Cum, Silage
_(}.9'1"un.
Small Grain, Silage
1). 'I'uo;
' 1
`\
Soybeans, Manured, Full Sea50n
231)2
5
2.30
2.00
Medium
15.0
GeurgevWe
Cum, Silage
211)'fnn:
74
N'`\
Small Grain, Silage
I tl 4 'fans
u
-N \
Soybeans, Manured, Ful} Season
48 hrt
N '
2392
6
6.40
6.00
Medium
15.0
Georgeville
Cons, Silage
22.i "fora
77
'N.
Small Grain, Silage
I0.S Tons
38
IN \
Soybeans, Mtanured, Full Season
41) bu-
3`)
-WA
2392
7
8.10
8.00
Medium
15.0
Caliison
Corn, Silage
11.4 "Cons
3`}
N'r\
Small Grain, Silage
7.1 TUnS
3S
u/r\
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
"_8 bu.
22
`r A
2415
1
19,30
19-00
Medium
I5.0
Caliison
Corn, Silage
1 1.4 Tons
31)
Small Grain, Silage
7.1 Tons
38
N/A
Soybeans, Manure(4, Full Season
28 bu.
22
\iA
2415
3
1-1.20
14.00
Medium
15.0
Herndon
Small Grain, Silage
I0.1 Tuns
»
NiA
Soybeans, Full Season
46 bu.
37
N'A
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
�2
NIA
2415
5
6.30
6.00
Very High
8.0
Orange
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
1.7 Tuns
7
0
2415
6
6.00
6 00
Mediurn
15.0
Callisun
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Ton,
VA
2415
7
27.70
27.00
Medium
15.0
Callisun
Corn, Silage
I LS Tons
4(}
N):\
Small Grain, Silage
7.3 Ton.,
``�
N':\
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
71) bw
NI'A
540
t
8.20
8.20
Medium
15,0
Georgcville
Com, Grain
I I) bu.
''
N"A
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
2`)
N, A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
32
LMA
540
2
14,90
14,90
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.3 Tuns
NI'A
540
3
17.20
17.20
Medium
8.0
1 Orange
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
1.7 "Pons
W\
540
4
2.70
2.70
Medium
I5.0
Georgeville
Corn, Grain
119 bu.
S2
N/`\
Wheat, Grain
57 bu.
29
N/A
Soybeans, MEanured, Double Crop
40 bu.
32
N/`\
540
5
9.70
9.7U1
MVdlUm
15.0
Georgeville
Com. Grain
1 19 bu.
52
\rA
Wheat. Grain
57 hu.
'9
NSA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 hu.
3'
\, \
540
7
1.60
1.60
Low
I5.0
Durham
Mixed Coal Season Grass -Pasture
+.0 "fans
4
N"\
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/1.2/2007
1,0) fa_e PL'u,: ' ui
NOTE: Svmbol ' means user entered data.

Planned Crops SUmmary
Total
Useable
Plat
P?O:
R,r„,cal
Apple it
Tract
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
�4U
S
6.20
6.20
Medium
15.0
Durham
Corn, Grain
SS bu.
=`�
N. A
Whea¢. Grain
d» bu_
12
Soybeans. \lanured. Double Crop
4 bu,
"
\,'A
510
9
6.I1
6.10
Medium
15.0
Durham
Corn. Grain
SS bu.
'`)
NIA
Wheat, Grain
-14 btt.
22
\: A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bu.
22
N/A
542
5
16.00
15.00
Medium
15.0
Durham
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
21
N, A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
23 bu.
?2
N/A
Corn, Grain
8(, bu.
38
i1�'�
542
6
5.90
5.001
Low
15.0
Durham
%Vhea[, Grain
41 bu
72
N"A
Soybeans, Manured, DOLlblc Crop
23 bu.
22
NiA
Com, Grain
SF, hu,
38
NOL
542
7
4.30
4.00
Low
15-0
Durham
"'heat, Grain
J1 bu.
21
N;A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
--
N/A
Corn, Grain
S3 bu.
37
` ,
542
8
6.50
6.00
Medium
15.0
Durham
Wheat, Grain
41 hu.
Soybeans, Manured. Double Crop
27 hu.
"
NIA
Corn, Grain
S3 hu.
37
N.:1
542
9
5.00
4.50
Medium
15.0
Durham
Wheat, Grain
45 bu.
-.
N`
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crup
_") bu.
2 i
N;A
Corn. Grain
9l1 bu.
-1i,
PLANTOTALS: 275.00 264.70
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4I1212007
PCS Page Page 3 m'-t
NOTE: Symbol , means user entered data.

LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to Contribute to soluble
None
<2
nutrient leaching belou%[he root zurre-
e
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
NUlrienl Manageutent (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient \Management (390) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zoote.
..
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use ctticiencv shOUid he consideretl. E.samplcs
O
are Cover Crops (340) to .scavenge TlUtrlents, Sod -Based Rotations (328). Long; -Term No-T Ill ( s),
and edge-of=field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest 8ulters 1_`�l i
I
PLAT lrrde-r
Rating
P Managemew Recontntenclatio,t
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed: N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed: N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/12/2007
NOTE: Symbol * means User entered data.
PCS Page I'a e» of 4

'['lie Waste Utilization table shown below Summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the numher of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced- The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
ma%imize nutrient uptake.
"['his table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and all estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure Mother hy-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied oil cacti field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization '['able
Year I
Tract
Field
Source:
it)
Soil SCriCS
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
KYEi
Applic,
t'r,iod
Nitrogen
NA
Nutrient
Req'd
(IbslA)
COtl,m.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(I1)51A)
lies.
(lbs/A)
Applic,
tvMnhod
Manure
PA
NunientA
pplied
(IWA)
Liquid
[NanurcA
},plied
(acre)
Solid
Marnot:
Applied
(are)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
1
N
1000
palIA
rnas
t000 gals
ions
2381
2
Sl
Gcorgcville
9.70
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
10-4 Won
911-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
6.51
0.00
58.60
2381
2
SI
(korgLwille
9-70
9.00
Soybeans, Full SCa5011
48 bu.
411-9115
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0,00
0.00
O.00
0.00
23M
3
S1
Tatum
2.00
2.00
Cun), Silage
20,9 Ton
VI5-6130
224
0
20
E3road.
204
0.00
47.44
U.00
94.88
2381
3
Sl
TaILIn3
2.00
2.00
Small Gram, Sllagc
9.5 Tons
911-3131
W3
0
n
Broad.
771
0.00
17.')(,
0.00
35.93
2381
6
Sl
Talum
6.80
6.00
Corn, Silage
2.0.9 Ton
2/15-0/30
224
0
20
Broad,
2O4
0.00
47.44
0 0(1
284.65
2381
6
SI
Taltml
6.80
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
103
0
0
Broad.
77
0.00
ITI)o
0.00
107.79
2391
7
S I
"Tatum
9.60
9.00
Corn, Silage
20.9 Ton
2115-6130
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0.00
47.44
0.00
426.97
2391
7
Sl
Tatum
9.60
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
77
0.00
17.96
O.00
161 .Gt)
2-181
8
Sl
'Tatum
13.80
13.00
Small Grain, Silagc
9.5 Tons
911-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
26
0.00
5,9()
Oj)O
77.85
2381
8
Sl
Tatum
13.80
13.00
Soybeans, Foll Season
43 bu.
411-9115
0
0
0
Broad.
fl
OMO
0.00
O flu
O.00
2383
3
S22
Thirltam
3.50
3.00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
9,'1-4130
86
0
0
Broad.
22
O.00
1.33
0.00
3.98
238 3
S22
1h,i1u111
3.50
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Oouhl(! Crop
28 hu
411-9, 1 5
109
0
0
Broad.
101)
0_110
o,7 s
0,00
2019
2383
i
S2
thultun,
4.80
4.00
Mixed Cool Season c.irass-I'asiure
O'Tons
811-7131
100
0
0
Broad.
100
1o.1O
0.00140A1
OmO
2392
1
Sl
Tatum
I).20
19.00
(.'urn, Silage
2(0) Ton
2Ii5-6'30
224
0
20
fIioad_
21Y4
u.nu
.47-44
1).(x1
901 38
231)2
)
s i
Galt,„
19.2a
19-00
small Grain. silage
5 I n -,
')!I-3,131
103
n
n
Broad.
77
n 00
1 7.90
a 1
3a 1.33
3392
2
Sl
rani„
3.10
-1A0
ct,�,,, silage
2O 1) T1111i
2n 5-611()
224
tl
20
Broad.
Iua
u,trtl
�? -1-1
n nrl
142.32
PICvir,+• D;Itahase VCtsHill .I hale Printed: 4-'1?r20N17 Il't 1'! I u1 7

'ti'<'aste Utilization 'fable
Year t
Traci
Field
SOURT
Ib
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Usc.
Acres
(.'Top
RYE:
Applic.
Period
Nitrugeli
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbsJA)
Coimw
Fell.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
RO.
Obs.'A)
Applic.
Method
Mallurc
PA
NuirientA
pplied
(%slA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acrel
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Meld)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(field)
N
N
N
N
WOO
--,a I/A
'foils
1(100 gals
roils
2 392
2
Sl
Talum
3.10
3 00
Small Cn"ain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
103
0
0
Broad.
77
0.00
17.96
0.00
53.90
2392
3
S i
i lemdon
6.30
6,00
Com, Silage
21 .9 Ton
2115 -013 0
234
0
20
Broari,
214
0.00
49.77
(1.U0
298.60
2392
3
S1
I lemdon
6.30
6.00
Small Crain, Silage
10.4 "foil
911-3/31
112
0
0
131-nad.
84
0,00
19.54
0.00
1 l7 21
2392
4
Si
Tatum
1.00
1.60Corn,Silage
20.97on
2/t5-6/30
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0,00
47,44
0.00
75,91
2392
4
SI
T"alrinl
L60
l.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3131
103
0
0
Broad.
77
0.00
17,96
000
28.74
2392
5
SI
Georgeville
2.30
2.00Com,Silage
2t.r)Ton
2/15-6130
234
U
20
Eiraall.
214
0.00
49,77
(1,00
99.53
2392
5
S I
Georgeville
2,30
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
1 12
0
0
Broad.
84
0.00
19.54
0.0()
39.07
2392
(i
S I
Gcorguville
6A0
6.00
Cum, Silagc
22.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
241
(1
20
Broad,
221
OAO
51.3`)
0.(Jf)
308.37
2392
0
SI
Gu rgevilie
6.40
6.00
Small (hail, Silage
10.8 Ton
9/1-3131
117
0
0
Broad.
8K
0.06
20.41
0,GO
122 4-;
2392
7
SI
Callison
8.10
8.00
Corn, Silage
11.4'['on
2115-6/30
122
O
20
Broad.
i02
0.00
23.72
O.OU
189.7t.
2 39?
7
S I
Callison
8.10
8.00
Small Grain, Silagc
7.1 'funs
9/1.3131
77
0
0
Broad.
58
0-00
13,43
0.00
1117,44
2415
1
S2
Callison
19.30
19.00
Corn, Silage
11.4 Ton
2115-6130
122
0
20
Broad.
102
10,30
0.00
195.77
2415
1
S2
Callisnti
19 30
1900,
Small Grain, Silage
T I Tons
9/1-3131
77
0
0
131.oad.
58
5.931
0-00
110.94
0.00
2415
3
S2
iieindon
14.20
14,00
Sma11 Grain, Silage
10.1 Tun
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
13rvari,
27
2.75
0.00
38.54
(MM
2415
3
S2
Elemdon
14.20
14.00
SoyheanN, Full 5eai1111
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
0
O
0
Broad.
I?
0.00
O,O(1
0,00
E).00
241 i
5
NIA
Orange
6.30
6.00
Mixed Cool Scasnn (.Bass-Pjs(urc
1.7 Tons
811-7/31
52
52
0
NIA
Oj
O.00
O.06
(i.00
0,1)II
2 l5
0
S2
C.allison
6.0O
0.00
Mixa(i Caul Season (',lass-Paslure
3.0"foils
8/1-713)
98
0
l}
Brood.
98
9 90
0_(})
59.40
0.00
'1415
7
S2
Calh%on
27.70
27.00
Corn, Silage
1 1.8 Tun
211 5-6130
126
O
20
Broad
1M,
10.71
0.0(j
281) 12
241 i
7
S2
Callisun
27.70
27.CO
Small (irain, Silage
7.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
79
0
0
Broad.
51)
5 91)
0.00
16 1. 60
O,m)
>)(I
I
S2
(itorgevillc
8.21�
5 20
Corn, Cii"Jill
119 hu.
2/1 5-6/30
129
O
20
Broad
109
11.O1
0.[lU
90.211
0 00
5.40
1
S2
tkorgevi0u
8.lo
8.21)
When I,GIaIM
57bu.
9,'I-4/30
1W
0
0
Broad.
93
933
000
68.34
(I,tul
:lu
S2
(icorgevillr
14,9r1
IT Il[I
MINC(i Cool Scasnn Grass-3'ailurc
3.3 "tons
911-7131
107
{)
0
1311 lad
107
Ili X[
fI,O0
16i.(.)i
(lilfl
1'rrview Daclhasc llcr;ion .3 1 Dme Prime& 4/121200? 1VUT Pagc I'ut-�c 2 (0' 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year i
hart
Fieid
Source
11)
suil series
Tutal
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crup
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
nutrient
Rey'd
(IhsIA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
{Ibs1A)
Res.
(IbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrien[A
pplied
(Ibs1A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acrel
Solid
nlanu,e
Applied
(acrel
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Ficld)
N
N
'N
n•
10110
dal/A
Tuns
1000 _gals
Inns
540
3
S22
Orange
17 20
17.20
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Paslure
1.7 Tons
811-7131
52
0
0
Broad.
52
0.00
3.21
0,0(1
55.21
540
4
S22
Gtoigeviile
2.70
2.70
Cum, Grain
11') Ixl.
2115-0130
129
0
20
Uruad.
101)
O.I}O
6.73
0.00
18.17
540
4
S22
l) nrgu i I 1
2.70
2.70
Wheal, Grain
57bu.
911-4130
110
0
0
Broad.
83
0.00
5.09
.0,1)I1
13.7i
540
5
S22
(Jteorgeville
9.70
9.70
Corn, Grain
1 lt) bu.
2115-6/30
129
0
20
Broad.
l09
0.0(I
6.73
(1.0O
65.27
540
5
S22
Gwrgeyiiie
9.70
9.70
Wheal, Grain
57 bu.
911-4130
110
0
0
E3ruad.
83
0.00
5.09
0.00
49.40
540
7
S22
I)urliam
1.60
1.60
MIXCd COUI SCaSOn (',I@SS-PaSWIC
10Tons
811-713)
too
0
0
Broad.
100
0.00
6.17
0.00
9,8K
540
8
S22
Durham
6.20
6.20
Cozzi, Grain
SS bu.
2/15-6130
98
0
20
Broad.
78
0 00
4,81
0.00
21),85
540
6
S22
Durhan,
6.20
0.20
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
911-4130
88
0
0
13roacf,
66
0.00
4.117
0.00
25.26
540
9 -
S2
Durham
0 10
6.10
Com, Grain
88 bu.
2/15-6130
98
0
20
Broad.
7Si
T8X
0.00
48.07
0,00
540
9
S2
Durham
G.10
6.10
Wheat, Grain
44 hu.
911-4i30
88
0
0
E3ruad.
6h
6.67
0.00
40.67
0.00
542
5
S22
Durham
i(,.00
15.00
Wheal, Grain
43 bu.
9/1-4130
86
0
0
Broad.
22
000
i.33
0, Oil
19.91
542
5
S 2 2
Durham
16.00
15.00
Soybeans, P7anurcd, Dotlhle C'rnp
28 bu.
411-911 5
109
0
0
T3n)ad.
101)
0.00
6.73
0.00
100.93
542
6
S22
Durham
5.90
5.00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
911-4130
86
0
0
Broad.
221
0.00
1.3.1
0.00
0.64
542
6
S22
Durham
5,90
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
28 bit
4/1-9/15
t09
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
6.73
0.00
33.04
542
7
S22
Durham
4.30
4.00
Wheal, Grain
41 Im
911 -4130
82
0
0
1311 ,ad
21
0.00
1.27
0,00
5,06
542
7
S22
Durhan)
4,30
4.00
Soybeans, Mann red, Double Cn,p
27 bu,
411-9l15
105
0
0
Broad.
105
0.00
(.48
U.00
25.93
542
8
S22
Durham
6.50
6.00
Wheal. Grain
41 bu
911-a130
82
0
0
ill uad
21
0.00
1,27
[1,00
7.51)
542
8
1,21
Durham
6.50
0.00
Soybeans, Marwlcd, Doubly Clop
27 hu
411-9/1 5
105
0
0
llwul 1,
105
o.O0
('A
0.110
38.81)
ia?
9
S22
Durhan)
5.00
4.50
Wheat, Grain
45 hu.
9%1-4130
90
0
0
Illuad.
23
0 00
1.39
0 (}0
6.25
S42
9
S2'
I)ulham
5.00
4-50
Soybeans, Mai,ured, Double 0up
21) htl.
4/1-9115
113
0
0
131oald.
113
a 0O
h"M
0.00
31.31)
PIcvic w Dat.lhils \ rusts, ".I Di ile 1'6MCll: a.'l?:211(}7 Wl-'-I- POVC 1':I C ;i of-7

Waste Utilization 'fable
Year I
Nitrogen
Comm,
kcs.
Alatture
Litµtid
Solid
Hyoid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbsrA)
PA
ManureA
Mantuc
Manutc
Manure
NuFricnt
Nutrient
Ntit ion [A
pplicd
Applied
Applic;d
Applied
Rcy'd
Applied
pplied
{acre}
{acre)
(Field)
{field)
(Ibs/A)
Ohs/A)
(Als/A)
SOttrrC
"Cutal
Use.
Applie.
Applir.
I040
brace
Field
11)
Suil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Pei iod
IN
N
N
1<tcnhod
N
gal/A
Tons
IDOO ea IS
tons
fatal Applied, 1000 gakons
1,304.10
..-„r
'total Produced, 1000 gallons
7G7.1 5
': rr
Balance, 11100 gallons
-530.95
Total Applied, [oils
S'r ..,
4,641.53
lbtaI 1'raduscd, lolls
f.<41 t�"�
4,228.60
Balance, lolls
'• ,
-'; I 2.93
Naves: I . In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
i'rer)ew Database Wi-sl+tn ".I Datc Printed: 4/12/2007 Wt."T I%1L'e I'd e <I Of

Waste 1ltilizatiu[t "fable
Year 2
Itw
field
Sower
[1)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Ube.
Acres
Carp
K)T:
Applic.
Padod
Nillogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcy'd
(lbs/A)
C'umn).
Fell.
Nutrient
Applied
tthslA)
Res.
(lbs+A)
Applic-
Ntetbod
,'Manure
PA
NuuiculA
pplied
(Ibs1A)
Liquid
ManuacA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manuic
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manulc
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
!Field}
N
N
N
1000
pIIA
Tun
1000 rah
Inns
2381
2
SI
Geolgeville
9.70
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
}04Ton
911-3/31
112
0
0
Hruad-
84
0.00
19.54
0,00
175.91
2381
2
S1
Gcurgeville
9.70
9.00
Corn, Silage
21.9 Ton
2/15-6/30
234
0
20
Broad.
214
0,00
49.77
0.00
447.90
' 381
3
S I
Tatum
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
103
0
0
Broad.
26
0,00
5.99
0.00
1 1.98
2381
3
SI
Tatum
2,00
2.00
Soybeans, Mwiioed, Pull Season
43 bit.
4/1J9115
16fi
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
38.0
0,00
77.21
2381
6
S1
Tau.nn
6.80
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
9,5 Tons
911-3/31
103
0
0
Broad,
26
0,00
5.99
0.00
35.9.1
2381
h
SI
Tatum
6,80
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Fllll Season
43 bu-
4/1-9115
106
0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
38.to)
0.00
231,62
2381
7
Sl
'fall-,
U)O
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9l1-3131
103
0
0
Broad-
26
0.00
5.,)9
0 OU
53.90
2381
7
SI
Talltm
9.60
9.00
Soybeans. Mamned, full Season
43 hu,
411-9l15
166
0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
38.60
0.00
347.44
2381
8
SI
Taltu))
13.80
13.00
Small Grafrl, Silage
9.5 Twis
911-3131
103
0
0
f3rtla(l.
771
0.00
17.9(r
0.00
233.54
2391
8
tit
Tatum
13.80
13.00
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tun
2115-6130
224
0
20
Broad.
204
0.00
47.44
0.00
0)0.73
239.1
3
S22
Mirl)am
3.50
3,00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
911-4130
86
0
0
Broad.
65
0.00
3.98
0.00
2383
3
S22
Durham
3.50
3.00
Com, Grain
86 bu.
2/15.0130
95
0
20
Broad.
75
0.00
4.63
0.00
13.89
2383
5
S2
Durham
4.80
4.00
Mixed Coo) Season GIris-1ra511.11C
3.0 Tuns
8l1-7131
100
0
0
13rnad.
100
10.10
0.001
40,4t
0.00
2392
1
S I
Tatum
19.20
19,00
Small Grain, Silage
9,5 Tons
911-3/31
iO3
0
0
131 uad.
26
0.00
5.99
0 00
11 3,78
2392 1
1
SI
'Eaton)
19.20
19.00
Soybeans, Manure, Full Season
43 hu.
411-9r15
106
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
38.60
0.00
733.48
2 392
2
S I
Paton)
3.10
3.00
Small Crain, Silage
9.5 Tons
91`1-3131
103
0
0
Broad_
26
0.00
5.(n)
0.00
17.97
2392
2
SI
"l'uiuln
3.1O
3A0
Soybeans, Manulcd, Dull 5casnn
43 bu.
411-0/1 5
166
0
0
Brnud
166
0.00
3h 60
0.00
115.91
2;92
3
5I
Herndon
6.30
6.00
Small Gram, S11a1 e
10.4 Tun
9/1-3l31
112
0
0
HS 03d.
28
0.00
(, 51
0 Ot1
39.07
239?
SI
Ilei Ildon
6?0
0.00
Soybeans, 1113nurerl. bull Season
48 hu
411-9l15
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
4? 1(,
1100
259.53
tit
)'alum
L60
1.60
Small (;rain. Silage
9.5 "Duns
91"1-3131
103
0
0
11;,rad.
R.
0.00
5.y)
1LU0
9.5$
23 )2
a
SI
i:0um
1 60
1.00
Soybeans, A-lanurrd. 1:1111 SCaN011
43 htl.
4I1-21i5
166
0
0
Bn>:;d
In6
000
3K n0
fl.00
61.77
23')
5
i
C4eol;evIlle
2.10
2.00
Small Grain.Silage
I(),4'I'nn
9/1-3/31
112
0
I)
Blom;
28
l).00
f,it
000
13.(12
I'r(.N.IC.�N I)atahasc V C1sioI) '.I I,)alr Pi inwd: 41, 121'2007 WI j,I' P;I,-C i",Iuc � d',

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
I Tact
Field
Source
11)
Soil Serics
Toral
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RY1i
Applic.
Period
Nit] ugcn
PA
Nutrient
Rey'd
(IWA)
Culllnl.
Ferl.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
ides.
(lbs,'A)
Applic.
111clhud
hlalit]IC
VA
Nurrien(A
pplied
(Ibs/A)
i.i'lui.i
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
{acre}
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
.Solid
%bilLre
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
I -al,,A
'Ions
1000 uais
tans
2392
-S
Sl
Georgeville
2.30
2,00
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
48 hu.
1 411-9115
186
0
0
Broad.
190
0.00
43.20
0.00
86.51
2392
SI
Genrgeville
6.40
6.00
Small (rain, Silage
10.S Twi
9/1-3/31
117
0
0
[dead.
29
0_00
6 80
0.00
40.81
2392
6
SI
Gcorgeville
6.40
6.00
Soybeans, MaiiLwcd, hull Season
49 bu.
4/1-9/15
100
0
0
Broad.
190
0.00
44.19
(1.Oq
205.1 1
2392
7
SI
Callisonl
8.10
8.00
Small Grail, Silage
7.1 Tons
911-3/31
77
0
0
Broad.
19
0.0(I
4.48
(}.U0
31.81
2392
7
S1
Callison
8 10
8.00
Soybeans, Mantled, Trull Season
28 bit.
411-9/15
108
0
0
Broad.
108
0.00
25-12
0.00
200.93
2415
1
S2
Callisnn
19,30
19.00
Small Grain, Silage
7,1 -Eons
911-3/31
77
0
0
13ruad.
19
1.941
0 00
36.95
0_w
2415
1
S2
Callisnn
19.30
1900.
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
2S bit.
4/1-9115
108
0
0
Broad.
108
10.91
0.00
207.21)
0.00
2415
3
S2
Ilerndon
14.20
14.00
Smad (rani, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
82
8.26
0.00
1 15.62
0.00
2415
3
S2
Ilerndon
14.20
1400
Cole, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
227
0
20
Broad.
207
20.91
0.00
292.75
0.00
241 i
5
NIA
Orange
6.30
000
Mixed Cool Season Crass -Pasture
1.7 Tons
811-7/31
52
52
0
NIA
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2415
6
S2
Callisnn
6.00
6.00
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
3.0 Tons
811-7/31
98
0
0
lboad.
98
9.90
0,00
59.40
0.00
2415
7
52
Callison
27,70
2.7.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.3 Tons
911-3131
79
0
0
Broad.
20
2.00
0. Of)
5.1.87
0,00
2415 1
7
S2
Callison
2T701
27.00
Soybeans, Manured, Full SC2SO11
29 bu.
4/1-9115
112
0
0
Broad
112
11.31
O.00
305 48
0.00
540
1
S2
GeorgevillC
8,20
8.20wileat,Grain
57hu.
9i1-4130
1W
0
0
lirnad
28
2.78
0.00
22,78
0.00
540
1
S2
GeoigeviIle
8,20
8.20
Soybeans, Manured, 1 OUNC Crup
40 bu,
4/1-9115
155
0
0
limad_
155
15,66
0.00
1 2h.40
0.00
540
2
S2
George%iIle
14 90
14.90
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Pasturc
3.3 Tuns
811-7131
107
0
0
Broad,
107
10.81
0.00
I61.0s
0.00
540
3
S22
01an�=e
] 7,20
17.20
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
1.7 Dons
811-713l
52
U
0
Bload,
57
0,00
3-21
{).0(I
55.11
54O
4
S22
Gcoigcvillc
2.70
2.70
Wheat, Grain
57 hu
9/1-4/30
110
O
0
HiciA_
28
ROO
1.70
0.00
4.58
s40
4
S22
GenrgeviIle
2,70
?_7(1
Soybeans, MallUIC(l, Double Crop
40 hu
4/1-,)Il 5
155
U
0
Bwad.
155
0,00
9.57
0 oil
2.h3
s4{)
5
ti?
(Ieor2evi11C
9.70
9.70
Wheat. Grain
57 hu
l -a'30
1 ] (I
(1
0
)iruad.
28
ll.{IU
1 70
tj_OV
16.47
54f1
>
S22
(i1L)I eCViIIL'
9.70
9 70
Soyhcans, Manured, IhwblcCiop
40 hu.
4 I-'),15
155
0
0
Broad.
155
0.00
9.57
0,00
9? 81
5411
7
S22
Durham
1_60
1 (10
Miscd C'(io1 Scasun (rass-Pasturc
"..O Tons
5 1-7 31
10)
{I
(}
Broad.
100
0.00
6.17
f).00
9 8
P1QVICW I)alohase Vcisloli i I)alr Printed: 4112;2007 1 1)T i'uac Paar� 6 t11'7

Waste Utilization Table.
Year 2
Ti aCt
Field
Source
11)
Sail Series
Twal
Acres
1)sr.
Acres
Crop
RYE:
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Ney'd
(lb'A)
Comm.
Fcrr
Nntriem
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Mcdxrd
NLIIILLre
PA
NutrienrA
pplied
Obs,A)
Liquid
NlanureA
p{died
Iaue}
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Ficldl
Suiid
Manure
Applied
(Fcld)
N
N
N
N'
1000
311A
'Tuns
1000 guli
Ions
540
8
S22
Durham
6.20
6.20
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
9/1-4130
88
0
0
Broad.
22
0.00
1 ,36
000
8.42
540
8
S22
Durham
6.20
6.ZO
Soybeans, Manurc6, Double Crap
28 bu.
411-9/15
109
0
0
Ilroad,
109
0.00
0.73
U.00
41.72
540
9
S2
Durham
6.10
6.10
Wheat, Grain
44 bu.
911-4/30
88
0
0
Broad,
22
2.22
O.NO
13.iO
0.00
540
9
S2
Durham
6.10
6.10
Soybeans, Manured, DOONCC I'op
28 bu.
411-9/15
109
0
O
Aroatl.
IIN
11.OI
0.00
67.17
0,00
542
5
S22
Durham
16.00
15,00
Wheat, Grain
43 bu.
911.4I30
86
0
0
Broad.
65
0L00
3.98
0.00
59.72
5.12
5
S22
Durham
16.00
15,00
Com, Grain
86 hti.
2/15-6130
95
0
20
Broad.
75
U,00
4.(i3
(}-00
69 4.5
542
6
S72
Durham
5.90
5.00
Wheat, Grails
43 6u.
9/1-4/30
86
0
0
Broad.
6)5
i).Ol}
3.9t;
0.00
19.91
542
6
S2?
DLII'113111
5.90
5.00
Com, Grain
86 bu.
2/15-6/30
95
0
20
Broad.
75
(M)o
4.01
0.00
23.15
542
7
S22
Durham
4.30
4.00
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
9/1-4130
82
0
0
Bsad.
02
0.00
3.80
0.00
15.11)
542
7
S22
I)urhant
4.30
4.00
Corn, Grain
83 btf.
2/15-6130
92
0
20
Broad, 1
72
0,01}
4.44
0.00
17.78
542
8
S22
DurNIM
6,50
-6.00
Wheat, Grain
41 bu.
9/1-4130
82 1
0
0
Broad.
62
(},00
3.80
0.00
22.78
542
8
S22
Durban,
6.50
6.00
Corn, Grain
83 bu.
2/15-6l30
92
0
20
111 uad.
72
0.00
4.44
0-00
26.67
542
9
S22
Durham
5.00
4.50
Wheat, Grain
45bu.
9/1-4/30
90
0
0
III uad-
69
0.00
4.17
0.00
19.75
542
9
S22
Durham
5.00
4.50
Com, Grain
90 bu.
2/15-6/30
100
0
20
Broad.
80
0.00
4.94
0.00
22,22
7'malApplied,IfH}()galluns
1,504.71
. 4,f;.,-.,
.4, dLv
Total Prnduced. 1000 gallons
767.15
Balance, 1000 aalluns
-737.50
I uml Apliked, ron�,
4,801 (1t)
71141 I'roduced. tans
4,228.(10
lial:tncr. run;
-573.00
Molts: I . In the irarl Column, -- symbol means lCaSCd, 0i11enaisc, owned. 3. Symbol * means user entered data.
PI cvicw Dalabasr Version .1 Date Primed: 4/1212007
\VI :T Pa2t• i':i'e 7 OC7

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient managenient plan
developed for this operation.' This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. I'hc
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other- byprotiucus are utl liZed
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. tiutrient management plans may require that the application of animal %taste be litimc l so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in afield. In such situaticrlys.
additional nitrogen applications from nonorvanic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrot!ert.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(IbslA)
K20
(Ibs/A)
ti1g
(Ibs/A)
NI
(lbsiA)
Zn
(Ibs/Af
Cu
(IbsrA)
Lune
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2381
2
Req'd Nutrients
112
30
0
0
0
0
0
l
Acres
App. Period
9-00
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
�"i+ y3k5 '
+ : , ',
�?'a
x �,..��+s?
-•, ze
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter,
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
u
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
I)
0
11
FPQc..v.l
mple bate
10,4'I'ons
04-16-04
Manure
112
113
139
37
2
2
IY
I}
Rating
56 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
83
159
57
2
I}
it
Tract
Field
2381
8
Req'd Nutrients
103
10
0
0
I}
li
0
1
Acres
pp. Period
13-00
911-3131
Supplied By:
s
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
u
11
Con111101cial Fort.
0
0
0
0
0
it
l
1
Soil Series
Datum
Residual
0
0
0
U
0
G
U
u
RYr_ I Sample
Date
1) 5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
t04
146
53
2
2
0
it
PRcmoval
I Rating
51 lbs/ac.
4leditim
BALANCE
0
94
146
73
?
1
11
11
Traci
Field
2383
3
Req'd Nutrients
86
0
0
0
0
0
0W.
l}
Acres
App. Period
3.00
9/l-4/30
Supplied By:
'j
lr_ � _
n-�-.
r.. r.,ryY'•''
, 7: fir
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
(1
u
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1)
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
U
RYE: Sample
Date
43 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
86
297
l26
42
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ae.
Low
BALANCE
0
297
126
42
3
3
1
0
7Z'mct field
1_4I 5
3
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
4(}
U
0
� 0
0
0Acres
A}�p. Period
14.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
tl
a
0
Commercial Fcrt.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Herndon
Residual
0
0
0
l?
0
1)
0
u
KYE sample
Date
10.1 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
ION
108
163
52
_'
'
I
u
P Removal
I Rahn_
55 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
108
123
32
2
2
u
Preview Database Ver:iozi 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2007 NM Page I'ag- i ul I N

Nutrient Nlallailciucnt Recon-miendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P20-5
(lbs/A)
K20
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
M11
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lb5!A)
Lime
(tons!A)
Tract
Field
542 5
Req'd NU11-iCtItS
86
0
50
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
13.00 Wl -400
Supplied By::
- I �' "
'
- - - -
. �4 ;
-T—...
6 7
I
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
ol
0
0
0
0
0
ol
0
Commercial Fert.
()1
0
0
G
0
0
0
�1
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
RYE I Sample
Date
43 bu-
09- 19 -015
Manure
80
297
120
42
3
3
1
0
P Removal
1 2
22 tbs/ac,
Medium
BALANCE
0
297
70
42
3'
3
1
tract
Field
542
6
Req'd Nutrients
86
0
1 [0
0
0
1)
0
1
ACTe,' I
App. Period
5.00
9/1-4/30
Supplied BY:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
4)
f1
0
7Sample
Date
43 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
361
297
126
42
3
3
1
41
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
01
297
16
42
3
3
I
0
Tract
Field
542
7
Req'd Nutrients
821
0.
110
01
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
4.00
9/1-4130
Supplied By:
I@ WE&
!
'AMN AV
M
rR'; 4
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
41 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
82
283
t 20
40
3
3
1
0
V Removal
Rating21
lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
283
10
40
3
3
1
Tract
Field
542
8
Req'd Nutrients
92
0
so
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
p. Period
6.00
911-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
,op
Wheat, Grain
starter
0
0
0
0
0
01
()1
0
Commercial 1--crt.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Dzu-harn
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RVFJ Sample
Date
41 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
82
283
120
40
3
3
1
il Removal
I Rating
21 lbs/ac.
MC(16.1111
BALANCE
0
283
40
401
3
3
Tract
jField -INPENE107-7
542
9
Req'd NUtriews
90
30
01
11
0
0
ti
Acres
App. Period
4J0
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
U
0
0
oj
0
Soil Series
I Durham
I Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0:
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1 45 bu. 1 09-19-06
Manure
90
31 1
1321
441
3
3
1
P Reino"al
I Rating_L
23 lbs/ac. IMedium
I BALANCE
1 01
311
1021
44
1 3
3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Primcd: :4/12/2007 NMR hgt: Pj--,e 2 of IS

I ie€�t Vlanaremem Recommendations Test
YEAH
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(1bs/A1
K20
(Ibs/A)
;%•1g
(Ibs A)
Mn
(Ibs!A)
Zn
(lbs,A)
Cu
tlbslAI
I-mte
[1t,n;:A
tract
Field
1_331
2
Req'd Nutrients
0
3O
.0
0
0
0
r)
V
Acres
App. Period
9.00
4,'1-9/1j
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans. Full Season
Starter
o
0
C'onmiecial Fcrl.
0
3U
0
0
0
Q
1
Soil Series
Georgcville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
KYEJ Sample
€7aie
48 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
0
U
0
f)
b
ll
}
G
P Remnvai Rating
35 ibs/ac.
Mcdium
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
bract
Field
2351
3
Req'd Nutrients
103
40
0
0
0
0
t)
U
Acres
App. Period
2.00
9/1-301
Supplied B -:
pp
� = «.��''
E.
a ;
.� t cx
k.::�"
w`. •;a`u
."-;i . s ;�°-
":-,,
'
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Taturn
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
104
146
53
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rahn,g
51 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
64
146
53
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2381
3
Req'd Nuirients
224
60
0
0
0
0
0
it
Acres App. Period
2.00
2fi5-6/30
Supplied By:
CROW
Corn. Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
u
u
Coinntei'clal Fert.
0
0
O
0
f)
0
U
it
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
l}
0
0
0
)
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
3
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
71 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
146
299
104
4
3
1
t
1'racI
Field
2351
6
Req'd Nutrients
103
90
0
0
O
0
1)
i
Acres
App. Period
b_00
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
r)
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Sail Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
104
146
53
2
2
l)
0
P Removal
Rating
51 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
14
146
53
2
2
0
f)
Tract
Field
2381
6
Req'd Nuu'iettts
224
100
10
0
0
0
0
f1
Acres
App. Period
6.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1)
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
0
01
C}
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
20 <7 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
1 3
1
0
11Removal
Rating
7€ Ibslac.
'Medium
BALANCE
0
IO6
279
104
4
3
I
1 11
Previen Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12l2007 NM Pa_ue Pagr ;>�' IS

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbsiA)
"VEg
(lbs/A)
'ln
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs1A)
Cu
Nbs/A)
Lmme
(tonslA)
'tract
Field
2381 7
Req'd NnnLients
103
60
0
0
0
0
0
I)
Acres
App. Period
9.0D 911-3131
SuPPlied BY --
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
D
0
0
D
0
0
u
Commercial Pert_
0
U
0
0
0
U
0
0
Soil Series
I-aunn
Residual
D
0
0
0
0
0
it
0
RYE Sample
Matz
9.5 Tons
04-16-04
%Ianure
103
104
146
53
2
2
0
0
PRemoval
Elating
5€ Ibslac.
IvlediUm
BALANCE
0
44
146
53
2
2
U
0
Tract
Field
2381
7
Req'd Nutrients
224
70
20
0
0
0
0
It
Acres
App. Period
9.00
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
u
tt
n
Commercial f7ert-
i)
0
0
0
1)
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
t)
n
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 Tuns
04-16-04
Manure
204
206
299
104
4
PRemoval Rating
71 Ibslac.
'`Medium
BALANCE
0
€36
269
104
4
1
Tract
Field
2381
8
Req'd Nutrients
U
10
0
0
0
0
l)
>
Acres I
App. Period
13.00
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
f R,
r-
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
Starter
0
0
0
U
D
u
u
C'otnrnercial Fert.
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatalm
Residual
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
34 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
{)
0
f}
0
Tract
Field
2383
3
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r\cres- I
App. Period
3.00
4/1 -9fl 5
Supplied B
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cunnnercial Pert.
0
0
0
0
f)
0
0
it
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
U
RYE Sample
Date
78 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
109
377
160
54
4
4
_>
0
P Removal I Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
377
160
54
4
4
2
tl
Tract
Field
2383
5
Req'd Nutrients
100
70
0
0
0
0
U
1
Acres
App. Period
4.00
811-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
,'Yltxcd Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
u
Commercial Felt.
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Soil Series
lhrham
Residual
0
a
0
0
01
1)
0
n
RYE Sample
Date
3.0 Tons
09-19-06
Manure
100
99
149
48
2
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
4 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
29
149
48
?
2
0
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: a/12/2007 NNI R Page Page 4 of 18

Nutrient Nlana�aement Reconlniendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(IbS/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs'A)
%lg
IIbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/.A)
Zn
(Ibs1A)
CLt
(Ibs;A)
Lintz
Itu1,.i;:'<)
Tract
Field
2392 1
Req'd Nutrients
101,
40
10
0
0
0
I}
:Acres App.
Perin)
19.[7f1 )/1-313I
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Start+cr
+)
0
0
0
u
11
n
�
Couuncrcial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
11
r
RYE Sample
Dole
9.5'Tons
04-16-04
Manure
103
104
146
53
2
P Removai
Rarim,
51 lbs/ac.
Nlediuni
BALANCE
0
64
136
53
2
I}
J
"tract Field
2392
1
Req'd Nutrients
224
60
60
U
0
0
0
I
Acres
App. Period
19.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
rya"
;
,
- i . .
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
U
0
0
0
U
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
lutum
Residual
20
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Dale
20.9 Tons
04-16-04
Nlanure
204
206
289
104
4
3
1
tl
P Removal
Ratirl�
71 lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
146
229
104
4
3
1
1
Tract
Field
2392
2
Req'd Nutrients
224
100
110
0
0
0
0
_
Acres
App. Period
3.00
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
Cl
0
Soil SCI"1CS
Tawm
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
l
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 Tons
04-03-07
hlalxu•c
204
206
289
1 U4
11
3
1
f
P Removal
Ratio=
71 Ibs/ac.
Nludium
BALANCE
0
106
179
104
4
I
it
Tract
Field
2392
2
Req'd Nutriews
103
90
50
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3,00
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
Y nor
° i rl'
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
(1
0
0
Coninicrciat Fer1.
0
0
0
0
0
0
(1
II
Soil Series
Tatitnl
Residual
0
0
0
0
(1
(3
0
U
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-03-07
Manure
f03
104
146
53
?
2
i)
u
11 Remuval
Rahn_
51 lbslac.
iYledium
BALANCE
U
14
96
53
2
2
0
o
Tract
Field
2392
3
Req'd Nutrients
234
80
130
U
0
0
1)
I
Acres
App. Period
6.00
2/15-0/30
Supplied By:
i
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
(t
1
Soil Series
f-ferndcn
Residual
20
(}
0
0
U
0
0
1 0
RYE I Sample
Date
21.9 Tons
0-1-16.04
\•lanure
214
216
303
1101
4
4
I
1 0
11 Removal
Rallll_
74 lbs/ac.
V td111111
BALANCE
[]
136
[73
110
4
I
I1
Preview Do tabasc Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4112/2007 NMK I'a_c lluuL 5 "' I

Nutrient Management Recommendations West
YEAR
1
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(lbs;A)
K2O
(lbs1A)
blq
(IbSIA)
:tiin
Ilbs"A)
Zn
(Ibs/A}
Cu
fib,;AI
Lime
Ilons, AU
rract
Field
2392
3
Req'd Nutrients
l 1 2
70
70
0
0
0
0
u
,-acres
App. Period
6.D0
911-3/31
Supplied Bv:-
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
{
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
rlemdon
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
ti
RYEJ Sample
Date
10.4 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
I 12
1 13
159
57
2
?
0
0
PRemoval
Rating
56lbslac.
,Lleciium
BALANCE
0
43
89
57
2
2
0
0
tract
Field
13
4
liey'd Nutrients
103
i0
0
0
0
n
n
0
Acres
App Period
1.60
9/l-3l31
Supplied By:
z''t`,�'^
+ 51irCp}
r rz-:
^,- , ,-z
_•'.
CROP
SmaD Grain, Silage
Starie.•r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i1
Commercial Fen.
(]
0
U
0
0
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
u
RYE Sample
Date
9.5 Tons
04-10-04
Manure
I03
104
146
53
2
o
I
P Removal
Rating
51 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
64
146
53
2
Tract
Field
2392
4
Rc:q'd Nun'itnls
224
60
30
0
(}
U
f
Acres I
App. Period
1,60
2115-6130
Supplied By:
{
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
f}
tl
ti
n
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
RYE I Samplc
Date
20.9 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
71 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
146
259
104
4
3
1
0
Tract
Picld
2392
5
Req'd Nutrients
1 4 2
80
30
0
0
0
U
0
Acres App. Period
2.00
9l1-3131
Supplied By:�
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Gcorgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(i
RYG Sample
Date
10.4 Tons
04•I6-04
Manure
112
1 13
154
57
2
2
t)
0
P Removal
TRatinb
56lbslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
33
129
57
2
2
0
p
Tract
Field
2392
5
Req'd Nutrients
234
90
80
0
t)
0
I)
1
Acres I
App. Period
2.00
2115-0130
Supplied By�
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Felt.
ol
0
0
0
0
D
I)
I
Soil Series
Gcargeville
Residual
20
0
0
0
n
n
it
RYE Sample
Date
21.9 Tuns 04-16-04
N-1an11re
214
216
303
1 10
-1
4I
t1
P Removal
Rating
74 Ibslac. Medium
BALANCF
0
126
223
1 10
4
1 4
Y
it
Preview Database Version I I Date Prime& 4/1 2/2007 NNIR Page Pape; 6 of I }

Nutrient Nlanat,cment Recommendations Test
YEAR
l
N
(lbs`A)
P_ON
(lbs,`A)
K'_O
(Ibs1A)
Nlg
(ibs/A)
Mn
(IbslA)
Zn
(IbSIAl
Ctt
(lbs:.A)
Lime
(tnnS�AI
Tract
Field
2392 ==6
Rcq'd Nutrients
'41
40
40
0
{}
1
[)
i
Acres App. Period
6.00
2115-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage:
Slavic:-
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
[i
0
!
Soil Series
(',eor�evillc
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
o
0
RYE Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
221
22 ,
31 3
1 13
4
r
P Removal Ratina
77 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
183
273
113
41
Tract
Field
2392
6
Req'd Nutrients
l 1 7
20
0
0
[)
l
1
u
Acres
App. Period
6.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
t`
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
U
0
Soil Scrics
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(i
RYE Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
04-16-04
Marturc
117
1 I S
166
60
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
98
166
60
2
2
0
[l
Trace
Field
2392
7
Req'd Nutrients
122
70
140
0
0
0
0
l
Acres
App. Period
8.00
2l15-6130
Supplied By:
�4r3^k
CROP
Corn, Silage
starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Conlmr)-cial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
1}
0
tt
RYF Sample
Dale
11,4'Cons
04-10-04
Manure
102
103
144
52
2
0
(1
P Removal
Rating
391bs./ac.
tvlediom
BALANCE
0
33
4
52
2
2
U
o
Tract
I Field
2392
7
1Zcq'd Nutrients
77
50
80
0
0
0
0
0
ACre$
App. Period
8.00
911-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
U
Commercial Fert.
t}
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
RYF Sample
Date
7.1 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
77
78
109
39
2
1
0
[i
P Removal
Rating
38 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
28
29
39
2
1
0
Tract
Field
2415
1
Req'd Nutrients
77
0
50
0
0
0
0
u
Acres
App. Period
1900
9/ 1-3121
Supplied BY:
'` ""
' �''''` y
}
s, �, _ #
-
i;•:
.
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
IS
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
01
0
01
ol
0
01
RYE Sample
Date
7.1 Tons 04-16-04
Manure
77
76
1151
37
2
01
0
P Removal
Rating
38 Ibslac. Medium
BA1_ANCE
D
76
65
37
2
I)
0:
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed - 4/12/2007 NMl< PALL: P,t -�c 7 ,1 I:"

Nutrient NfanaLemeat Recommendations Test
YEAR
IN,
(lbs'A)
(Ibs1A)
K_O
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(Ibs'A}
�In
(Ibs/A)
7_n
llbs/-A1
Cu
(Ibs.'AI
L1111c
(torWA)
tract
Field
241
1
Req'd NuVients
I22
0
100
0
0
U
l}
I
Acres r\pp.
Period
19.00
2/1546130
Supplied 13y:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1 l.4 Tons
04-16-04
\lanure
102
101
152
49
2
2
0
0
P Removal I Rating
39 1bs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
101
52
49
2
2
0
U
Tract
Ficid
2415
3
Req'd Nutrients
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
14.00
4l1-9/15
Supplied 13Y:isr3
r
a
f
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
5lartcr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cummercial Felt.
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Herndon
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
46 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
0
0
0
01
U
U
0
it
P Removal
Ratin__
37 Ibs/ae.
Nledium
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
Trace I Field
2415
5
Req'd Nutrients
52
0
70
0
0
0
0
I
Acres
App. Period
6-00
811-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass Pasture
Starter
U
0
0
0
0
0
n
u
Commercial Fen.
52
0
70
0
0
0
0
i
Soil Series
Orange
Residual
0
0
U
0
0
0
11
RYE Sample
Date
1.7 Tons
04-16-0-1
\lanure
0
0
U
0
l}
I}
0
n
P Removal
Kating
2 Ibs/ac.
Very High
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
Tract
Field
2415
6
Req'd Null'ienis
98
0
20
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App. Period
6.00
SYI-7131
Su 1 lied By:
CROP
Mixed Coal Season
Grass-Pasturc
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comincl-cial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
RYE I Sample
Date
3.0 Tons
0446-07
\lanure
98
97
lab
47
2
2
0
13
P Removal
Rating
4 lbslac.
\Medium
BALANCE
0
97
126
47
2
2
0
0
Tract Field
2415
7
Req'd Nutrients
136
0
0
0
I}
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
27.00
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
)
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
(I
U
o
RYE Sample
Date
11.8 Tons
04-16-04
Manure
I06
05
�051
1.58
51
2
211
Removal
R,
40 Ibsac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
158
51
'
2t
11
(1
Preview Database Version 3, 1 Date Printed- 4/12/2007 NNIR Page Park S 14. 11i

Nutrient Management Recotnmendations Test
YEaR
(lbs!A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
In
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(Ibs.'A)
Cu
(lbsiA)
Lime
(tonaAI
I'ract
Field
2-115
7
Req'd Nutrients
79
0
0
0
0
O
0
s)
A cres
App. Period
27.00
911-3/31
Supplied Bv:
CROP
Small Grain. Siial e
Starter
0
U
Commercial Fert.
0
0
U
0
U
0
I)
(+
SOIL Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
U
0
0
It
R1'F. Sample Date
7.3 Tons
04-16-04
IMULIure
79
78
1 18
i
1
2
II
I
P Removal
Karin.
39 lbstac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
78
l i s
38
1
2
i)
Tract
Field
540
1
Req'd Nutrients
1 l0
0
40
0
0
41
ll
.acres
App. Period
8.20
911-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
l)
t
Commercial Fert.
0
0
O
U
O
0
(1
Soil Series
Ccorgevillc
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
c
RY - Sample
Dale
57 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
1101
109
1(,4
53
2
2
1
0
P Removal
F179
29 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
U
109
124
53
2
2
1
u
Tract Field
540
1
Req'd Nutrients
129
0
40
0
[)
0
0
11
Acres
App. Period
8.20
2/15-6130
Supplied plied By:
t w.��.w-'i.
ti `x,:rrt
tryJrfi k.'
x.c�,
�
,•.r , r
,
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter-
0
0
0
U
0
U
0
li
Commercial Fen.
0
0
O
O
0
0
U
ii
Soil Series
t.leorgevillc
Residual
20
0
0
f)
I}
f)
0
R)'li I Sample
Date
1 19 bu.
01 -06-05
Manure
109
108
163
52
1'Removal
Rating
52lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
I08
123
52
2
2
1
i
Trap
I Field
540
2
Req'd Nutrients
107
0
40
()
0
O
0
Acres I
App. Petod
14.90
8/1-7131
Supplied By:
-
}
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter-
0
U
0
0
U
0
o
u
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
II
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
- 0
0
0
U
0
(1
0
t
RYE Sample
Date
3,3Tons
0I-00-05
Manure
M7
106
160
51
2
2
0
u
(' Removal
Rating
5 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
01
106
120
51
2
2
0
it
Tract Field
5-40
3
Req'd Nutrients
52
50
1 70
0
0
()
ft
I
Acres App. Period
17.20
811-7/31
Supplied BY:
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
U
U
0
0
41
Commercial Ferl.
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
1
Soil Series
Grange
Residual
01
0!
01
01
U
0
0
0
RYE: Sample
Date
1.7 Tons
01 -06-05
Manure
52
180
76
26
2
2
1
0
Y Kenwval
Rating
2 Ibslac.
`fediutn
BALANCE
0
130
G
26
2
2
1
0
Preview Database Version 3, 1 Dale Printed: 4112i2007 NNI R Page Pagc el of I ti

NIL111-lellt Nlana,,einent Recommendations Test
C
YEAR
1\1
(lbsrA)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(.Ibs/A)
I'VIG
(lbs/A)
MII
(lbs/A)
Zn
(ibs/A)
Cu
(Ibs!All
Lime
(tons A)
Tract
Field
:40
8
Req'd Nutrients:
98
0
so
0
Acres
App. Period
6.20
2,115-0130
Supplied By:
Cp
,op
Corn, Grain
01
0
1)
ol
0
17
0
Cointrerew) Feat.
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
10
0
0
0
0
0
1)
RYEJ Sample Date
88 bu.
01-OCI-05
Manure
78
269
114
39
P Rcmoval
Rating
39 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
269
34
39
3
3
1
Tract
I Field
540
8
Req'd Nutrients
88
0
so
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.20
9/[ -4130
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
it
Cortun,ercial Fu-t.
0
0
0
0
0
it
Soil Series
Durham
Rcsidual
0
0
0
0
0
41
RYF I Sample
Date
44 bu.
01-06-05
Nfanure
H
304
129
4 3
3
3
1
11 Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
M ediurn
BALANCE
G
304
49
43
31
3
1
Tract I Field
5-10
9
Req'd Nutrients
98
0.
50
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
6.10
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cornrtwrcia3 Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1)
Soil.Series
Durliarn
Residual
20
0
0
01
0
0
RYE I Samplc
Date
SS bu.
01-06-0�
Nlallwe
78
77
116
37
1
2
0
0
Removal
Rating
39 lbs!ac.
'VICLI11.1111
BALANCE
0
77
66
37
1
2
Traci
field
540
9
Req'd NU11-101IS
S S
0
50
Acres I
App. Period
6.10
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
VI:
�;It
T
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
01
0
0
0
0
it
Conunercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
it
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
It
RYE I Sample
Date
44 bu.
01-06-05
Marture
88
87
131
42
2
P Removal
Rating
22 lbsiac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
87
81
42
2
2
Tract
Field
542
5
Req'd Nunient.q.
109
0
50
0
0
it
Ii
Acres
App. Period
J5.00
4A -9115
supplicil By:
CROP
Soybcuns, iklanffl-ed,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
Coninietcial Feat
0
0
0
0:
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
28 bu.
09-19-06
I'llaTIL]"I
101
377
1
160
54
4
4
2
01
V RemovalI
Rating
22 lbslac.
1IN'lediuni
BALANCE
1 0
377
110
54
4
4
2
(1
Preview Databu;e Version 3.1 Daic fringed: 4112/2007 \"MR P:)L-,e Patze I I of ]ti

Nutrient Nianauenlent Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(IbsW
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
NIL,
0bs!A)
1111
(lbs'A)
Zn
Ilbs!A1
Cu
ilhs Aa
Lime
I[uns•:1
Tract
Field
542
6
Req'd Nutrients
I(Y)
0
l i0
0
0
0
Il
i
:acres I
App, Period
5.00
4/1-9i15
Supplied Bv
CROP
Soybeans. Nlanured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
1
RYFI Sample
Date
281bu.
09-19-06
1,la11111e
109
377
IbO
54
4
4
2
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
377
50
54
4
n
Tract
Field
542
7
Rcq'd Nutrients
105
0
1 10
0
0
0
0
7
Acres
App. Penal
4.00
41I-9!15
Supplied By:
4-;:';� �"
_e__ ..y
k'r ,sG,i
r'r.�'y;'
s
.. -
CROP
Soybeans, lvlanured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
27 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
105
363
154
52
' 4
4
2
0
P Removal
Rating,
22 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
363
44
52
4
4
2r1
Tract
Field
542
9
Req'd Nutrients
105
0
30
0
0
0
U
±1
Acres
App. Period
600
4/1-9/15
Supplied By
�`
• °"
>4
CROP
Soybeans. Nlanured,
Rouble Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
r1
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f}
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
U
0
0
0
U
U
±)
RYE Sample
Date
27 bu.
04-09-07
Manure
105
363
t 5 t
52
4
4
2
P Removal
Rating
22 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
O
363
74
52
4
4
2
0
T.cr
I field
542
9
Req'd Nuvients
1 13
0
30
0
f)
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans. Nlanured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
t)
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
�l
RYE Sample
Date
29 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
113
391
166
56
4
4
2
0
P Removal
Ratin_
23 lbs/ac.
Medium
13ALANCE
(y
391
136
56
4
4
2
0
NNCUE: Symbol' means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.I Date Printed: 4112?2007 NNIR 1'a"c E'a e I' i I

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs,'A)
P20i
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
'M
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(Ibs/A)
Lime
itons,'A)
Tract
Field
2381
2
Req'd Nutrients
234
40
0
0
O
0
0
+1
Acres
App. Period
9.00
2il,5-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Cum, Sila'Ze
Starter:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
Commercial inert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
(:+corgeville
R"i[ival
30
(}
0
0
0
0
U
ItYG Sample
Date
21.9Ton s
04-10-04
Manure
214
216
303
11
4
4
1
I
P Removal
hating
74 ibslac-
Medium
BALANCE
0
176
303
110
4
4
1
11
Tract
Field
2381
3
Req'd NUtTiCilt5
166
40
0
Il
[)
Q
o
[i
Acres App. Period
2.00
4/t-9/15
Supplied By:
=
CROP
Soybeans, Nlanured, Full
Season
Jlar[Lh'
[1
0
0
0
U
0
it
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
li
Sail Series
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
[7
0
[)
u
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
166
168
235
85
I
u
P Removal
Rating
34 Ibs/ae.
Medium
BALANCE
U
128
235
85
3
!
Tract
Field
2391
6
Req'd Nutrients
166
90
0
0
0
0
U
(i
r\cres
App. 11c:riud
6.00
411-9115
SuPfilitd 13y:
CROP
Soybeans, i•lanured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
[l
0
(1
Soil Series
Tatum
Residual
()
1
0
0
0
KYEJ Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
3
I
U
P Removal ka[ing
34 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCF
0
78
235
85
3
3
1
0
'[Tact field
2381
7
Req'd N(Ltriertts
106
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
9.00
4/1-9115
SuppliedBy:
PP
�`y�k
R a aFtr,
y:�aZ
5
alr
CROP
Soybeans, �1-9anurcd, Full
Season
S(arter
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
Commercial Fun.
U
0
0
0
[,
0
U
u
Soil SerieS
Tatum
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
l
RYE Sample
Date:
43 bu.
04-10-04
Manure
166
163
235
85
3
3
1
�(
P RemovaE Rating
34 lbs/ae.
Medium
BALANCE
0
108
235
85
3
I
[l
Tract
Field
2381
8
Req'd Nutrietets
224
30
0
0
0
0
0
11
Acres
App. PeTiOd
13.00
2/15-6130
SUpplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
(l
0
U
0
[)
u
Commercial Fect.
(}
0
[)
0
0
[i
0
u
Soil Series
-Tatum
Residual
1_0
0
U
U
0
(
0
RYE Sample
Date
20.9 -Eons
04-10-04
Manure
204
206
289
104
4
i
1
(I
1' Removal
12a(ing
71 lbslac.
Medium
BALANt;l3
0
176
289
104
4
3
I
Pre�iety Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/l2/2007 N'.N1R Page Page 13 of IS

-utrient �1ana(-),ement Recommendations Test
YEAR
\
(Ibs/.i)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs,A)
CIS
(Ibs/A)
N I n
(Ibs/A)
Zn
Ilbs/.-\)
Cu
Ilbs/AI
Lone
(tons'-1)
Traci
Field
2383
3
Req'd Nutrients
95
0
0
0
0
U
(1
i
Acres
App. Period
3.01
2/15-6/30
Supplied fay:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
i)
0
0
n
U
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durban,
Residual
20
0
0
0
(l
u
11
0
RYF Sample
Date
86 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
75
259
110
37
3
3
1
U
P Removal
Ratin=
38 Ibs/ac.
Lon'
BALANCF_
0
259
110
37
3
3
I
it
Tract
Field
2392
1
Req'd Nutrients
166
40
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
19.00
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, tNlanured, Full
Season
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
()
Soil Series
Tatuin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
i)
0
RYE Sample
Date
43 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
3
1
0
1' Removal
P2ating
34 Ibs/ac.
iMediuni
BALANCE
0
12S
225
85
3
3
1
N
Tract
Field
2392
2
Req'd Nuh'ients
166
90
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
3.00
411-9/I5
Supplied By:
µi
, s +,.
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
11
Commercial Fcrt.
0
0
0
0
0
0
It
n
Soil Series
Taunn
Residual
0
j
0
U
li
u
RYF. I Sample
Dace
43 bu.
04-03-07
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
}
u
I' Removal
Radii;
34 Ibs/ac.
Nlediun,
BALANCE
11
78
185
85
,
o
tract
Field
2392
3
Req'd Nutrieius
186
70
70
0
0
0
n
Acres I App. Period
6.00
411-9/15
Supplied By:
•,
,ale
¢� _ ,,,
CROP
Soybeans, N•lanured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
1)
c
u
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ll
Soil Series
I-lcrndon
Residual
U
U
0
01
0
0
U
U
RYE Sample
Date
48 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
186
188
263
95
4
3
1
I)
P Removal
Ratin
38 Ibslac.
Medium
BALANCE
[)
1 18
193
95
4
3
1
ll
Tract
Field
2392
4
Req'd 'Nutrients
166
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1.60
4/1-9/15
Su ,lied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
U
0
0
0
u
Commercial Pert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
t)
Soil Series
Tatun,
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
ILYL I Sample
Date
43 bu. 04-16-04
Manure
166
168
235
85
3
3
I
U
P Removal
Rahn,-
34 lbslac, Medium
13ALANCE
0
12,4
235
85
3
3
I
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2007 N.%ilk f'a r Pa_c I; nl IN

Nl_t[rien[ klanat<emetlt Recommend atioils -Pest
YEAR
N
(lbsrA)
P'05
(Ibs/?,)
K2O
(lbs/A)
'Mv
(lbs/A)
N I n
(lb;/A)
Zn
ilbs/:\I
Cu
ObsiA)
Linw
{tons:.A)
Tract
Field
2392 5
Rcq'd Nutrients
186
s0
30
0
(}
0
(!
r)
Acres I
App. Period
2.00 4/1-Q115
Supplied 13y:'_.A
.�r
CROP
Soybeans, Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
U
0
0
U
(1
(I
r)
Commercial port.
0
0
0
0
1)
0
U
(t
Soil Series
Georeville
Residual
n
0
0
0
0
0
I)
RYE I Sample
Date
48 bu.
04-lo-o4
Manure
186
Iss
263
95
4 1
3
1
l7
P Rrmocal
12aftna
3S Ibslac.
\ICLEUm
13ALANCE
U
108
233
95
4
;
1
Tract
Field
2392
6
Req'd Nutrients
190
20
0
0
(1
U
l
u
Acres I
App. Period
6.00
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
y
CROP
Soybeans, Mantired, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
U
O
l
u
Commercial Fert.
0
0
U
0
u
U
r)
n
Soil Series
Georgevilic
Residual
0
0
U
0
u
17
U
t
RYE I Sample
Date
49 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
190
192
?b9
97
4
3
1
P Removal
Raring
39 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
172
269
97
4
;
I
)
Tract
Field
2392
7
Req'd Nutrients
108
50
s0
0
0
+'
Acres
App. Period
8.00
4/1 -911 5
Supplied By:
-
CROP
Soybeans, i"vlanured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
U
u
u
Cornniercia! Fcrt.
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
I1
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE: Sample
Date
28 bu.
04-16-04
Manure
108
109
153
55
2
2
U
0
P Removal
Rating
22 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
59
73
55
2
2
0
I)
Tract Field
2415
1
Req'd Nutrients
108
0
50
0
0
0
U
rr
Acres
App. Period
19.00
411 9/15
Supplied By:
"
. :�z
-ri
CROP
Soybeans, 1Manured, Full
Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t)
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
u
Soil Series
Callison
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
28 bu.
04-16-04
\Manure
I Os
107
161
52
2
2
1
r)
P Removal
Ratin-
22 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCF.
0
107
11 1
52
2
2
1
t)
Tract
Field
2415
3
keq'd Nutients
227
0
90
0
E)
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
14.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
u
l7
0
Commercial Felt.
0
0
0
O
0
Soil Series
Herndon
RiCsidual
20
0
I}
0
I}
U
U
u
RYE Sample
Date
21.2 Pons 04-16-04
Nlanare
207
204
309
100
-t
4
!
0
PRemosal
Rating
72lbs/ic, Nlcdium
BALANCE'
0
204
?19
100
(
I
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2007 NNI R Page Ira ,c 15 of I

Nutrient Nianauement Recommendations Test
YEAR
7
N
(lbs/A)
P'O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Lln
(IbS A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(Ibs).a)
Lino
tton 5;A1
Tract
Field
2415
7
Req'd Nutrients
112
0
0
I)
0
0
I}
)
Acres .'pp.
Period
27.00
4/1JVI5
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, 1Manured, Full
Season
S[artcl
0
0
0
0
0
u
u
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
{)
1}
0
7
Soil Series
Callison
ReSldtlal
0
0
0
0
G
it
it
RYE Sample
Date
29 bu.
04-16-04
l lanitre
112.
110
167
54
2
'
I
I' Removal
Rating
23 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
U
i 10
167
54
?
I
u
Trot
1 Field
540
1
Req'd Nutrients
155
0
40
0
0
U
0
u
Acres App. Period
8.20
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Nlanured,
Double Crup
Starter
0
0
U
0
0
0
u
U
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
U
U
0
U.
Soil Series
Geor-geville
Residual
0
0
0
0
U
t}
0
IF
RYE Sample
Date i
40 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
155
153
231
75
3
3
1
0
P Removal
Ratinb
32 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
153
191
75
3
3
I
0
Tract
Field
540
4
Req'd Nutrients
155
0
0
0
0
U
l)
0
Acres
App. Period
2.70
4/1-9/15
Supplied ByET
i S
M.
CROP
Soybeans, '`Ianurcd,
Double Crop
Slartcr
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
t)
Commercial Pcrt.
U
0
0
0
[)
0
0
1)
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
!)
0
0
U
0
RYE Sample
Date
40 bu.
01-06-05
Manure
155
536
228
76
6
1
P Removal
Rating
32 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
536
228
76
6
5
)
1'rau
Picld
540
5
Req'd Nutrients
155
0
10
0
11
lJ
n
1I
acre+
App.1erind
).70
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
r G
t..
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
r)
it
it
Colmnerc:al Pert,
0
0
0
0
0
ol
U
It
Soil Series
Georgevillc
Residual
0
0
0
U
0
U
I)
o
RYE Sample
Date
40 bu.
01-06-05
Manlrre
155
536
228
76
6
5
3
0
l' Removal
Rating
32 lbslac.
`lediuni
BALANCE
0
536
218
76
b
5
3
0
Tract Field
540
8
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
SO
0
0
1)
0
{i
Acres I App. Period
6.20
411-9l15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
t)
a
0l
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
U
0
0
1)
1fl
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYI: SaI»ple
Date
78 hu.
01-06 -05
MalltlYe
101)
377
160
54
4
a
2
I}
1' Remuval Rating
2Z Ibs/ac.
Medium
BA LA NCI:
0
377
80
54
4
4
'
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2007. `.Mf< PaLc I';i_c I I. ,I i ;

N''Lltrient lklanuuement Recommendations Test
YEAR
NI
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(ibsliA.)
vik
(IbS/A)
Mn
(I b s: A)
Zn
(I bs,A i
Cu
(Ibs'.-\)
Lome
mins;'A i
Tract
I Field
540
9
Req'd Nutrients
109
0
50
01
0
Acres
App. Period
6.10
-1/ 1 - 9/15
Supplied By:
21
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
Cominercsai: Ftm,
D
0
0
a,
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
0
0
0
G
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
28 bit.
01.06-05
Manure
1091
108
163
52.
2
2
1
li
P Removat
[7Kiting
22 fts/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
108
H3
52
Trace
1 4c'
Field
5112
Req'd Nutrients
95
0
50
0
0
0
0
App. Period
15.00
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
U
9
0
(I
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
U
0
0
0
n
R VE Sample
Date
86 bU.
09-19-06
MaIIW-C
75
259
1 10
37
3
3
1
P Removal
Rating
39 lbstac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
259
60
37
1
1
Tract
Field
542
6
Req'd Nutrients
95
0
1 10
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
500
2/15-6/30
SUPPlic(l BY'
T!'.-
CROP
Corn, Grain
slarlel.
n
0
it
Conitnurcial Fert.
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
Q
RYE" Sample
Date
86 bit,
09-19-06
Manure
75
259
110
37
3
3
1
0
P Removal
FT
39 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
259
0
37
3
3
1
0
Traci
Field
542
7
Req'd Nutrients
92
0
110
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period4.00
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
*.Ikf
`
N 2
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Conunci-cial Fert.
0
0
4
a
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYEI Sample
Date
83 bit.
04-09-07
Ntamire
72
249
106
35
3
2
1
P Removal
[7 �1119
37 IbS/aL:L
LOW
BALANCI-
0
249
0
35
3
2
1
ll
Traci
Field
542
9
Req'd NULFiCTIUS
92
0
S()
0
U
Acres
App. Period
6.00
2115-6/30
Supplied BY:
7
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
t)
curnrilctcial Felt.
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
U
Soil Seri - es
Durham
Residual
201
01
0
0
0
ol
1)
RYEI S-ropir
Date
93 bat.
04-09-07
Manure
72
2,19
106
35
3
2
1
11
11 Removal
1Rating
37 lbs/ac
[Medium
BALANC'
01
2491
20
5
Preview I)ii(DI)-use Vcrsiun 3.1 Date I'T'Ifited: 4/1212007 NNIR Page lla'-u: 17 of 18

Nutrient Nianaize:nent Recon-unendations Test
YEAR
"
IN
(ibs.'A)
P205
(Ibs/A)
KZO
(lbs'A)
11e
(Ibs/A)
ln
(lbs,;A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs+A)
Lime
(tons,A)
Trace
I Field
542
9
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acre$
App. Period
4.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied Bv-
-
..
.
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
t)
I.;
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Durham
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
RYF Sample
Date
90 bu.
09-19-06
Manure
so
277
13
30
3
h
P Removal
Rttin�
10 lbs/ac-
4led+um
BALANCE
0
277
88
34
3
I
1
MOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
previc%v Database Version 3.1 Date printed: 4/12,'2007 NNW !'a��c I X ��j !

The Required Soil Test Value, shown in the following table provide a suminal-y ol'rccommcnded aclions that should be Laken iisuil tests indicate cxcessivc levels ol'
copper or zinc. Fields that receive 111.1nLI1-C must have an annual sail analysis for these elements. High levels ot'zilic and copper cats adversely affect p1a111 growth.
Alternative crop sites mast be used when the concentration of these: metals approach excessive Icvels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbslacre by 0,036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.55. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or uric, we
can predict I]Ce of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a su111mt1ry OHMIC r'ccom111e11dations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is :accessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range tier crop production .
Required Soil Test Values
Truel
Field
Crop
p11
Lime Recam.
(Ions/acre)
Cu-I
Cnpper ketomnundulilal
L11-1
7.inr krcuuuncnSutinn
2381
2
Small Grain, Silage
6.8
0.0
132
Nune
202
None
2381
2
Soybeans, full Season
6.8
0.0
132
None
202
None
2381
1 2
Coro. Silage
6.8
0.0
132
None
202
None
2381
3
Cnrn, Silage
7.1
0.0
178
None
215
Nolte
2381
3
Small Grain, Silage
7,1
0.0
17S
None
2 15
`one
2381
3
Snyhcans, hlanured, Full Season
7.1
0.0
178
None
215
None
2381
6
Cunt, Silage
6.8
0.0
80
None
131)
None
2181
6
SIM111 Grain. Silage
6.8
0.0
80
None
139
None
�3S1
0
Soybeans, ;.Manure(], Full 5eLlS011
6.8
0.0
so
None
131)
No lie
2381
7
Coro, sllugc
7.1
1 0.0
127
None
173
Nolte
2391
7
Small Grain, Silage
7, 1
0.0
127
None
173
None
2381
7
Soybeans, M,anured, Full Season
7. I
Q0
127
None
173
Nnnc
2381
8
Small Grain, Silage
6.8
0.0
79
None
99
None
2381
8
Soybeans, Full Season
&.S
0.0
79
Nune
99
Nolle
2381
8
Corn, Silage
b.8
0.0
79
None
99
None
2383
3
Wheat, Grain
7.2
0.0
222
None
279
None
2383
3
Soyhcans, RManurcd, DOUble Crop
7.2
().0
222
None
279
None
2383
3
Con/, Galin
7?
0-0
222
Nune
279
None
238'
5
N16,ed Cool Season Grass-l'aslure
5.1
1.1
51
None
15(l
None
1 392
i
torn, Silage
=. i
1.)
107
None',
5 i
Mille
2392
1
S1111111 (.il'alll, Silage
�1.
0.0
107
None
�3
Nore
2 392
1
Soybeans, Manure(l, F110 tieaSOIl
5.1
o.(1
107
None
S3
Nullc
111)2
l
Corn. Shake
4.°)
1.5
68
None
55
NPnc
f`srvit�+` Database Version 3.1 Dull: Printed: 04-12-2007 Sl'V Page Page I ol,4

EZequircd Soil 'Vest Vtducs
'tract
Ficid
Cop
p1I
Lintc Rearm.
(tonefacre)
Cu-1
Copper Reconvnerrdwion
%n-1
Zinc Rucomnwrd:iiion
2392
2
small Grain. Siintic
4.9
0.0
68
Nonc
55
None
2392
2
Soybeans, N'tanllred, Full Season
4.9
0.0
68
None
55
None
2392
3
Corn. Silage
5.1
1.1
59
None
72
None
2392_
3
Small Grain, Silage
5.1
0.0
59
None
72
Norte
2392
3
Snybcans, ManrrrCd, Full SC35017
5.1
0.0
59
None
72
None
2392
4
cork. silage
5.1
1-0
132
None
79
None
2392
1 4
Small. Grain. Silagc
5.1
(M
132
None
78
None
2392
4
Soybeans, Manured. Fill) Season
5.1
0.0
132
Nate
78
None
2392
5
Corn. Srlargc
5.2
0.9
1 17
Nonc
96
None
2392
5
Small Grain. Silage
5.2
0.0
1 17
None
96
Note
2392
5
soybeans, Manurcd, Pull Season
5.2
0.0
1 17
None
9fi
Nunc
2392
G
Corn, Siiage
5.5
0.6
I M
None
143
Norte
2392
6
Small Crain, Silage
5.5
(1.0
1 lG
Nonc
143
None
2392
b
Soybeans, klanurt:d. Fu11 Season
5.5
(0
1 16
None
143
None
239_1
7
Corn, Silage
5.3
0.9
121
None
83
Nunc
2392
7
Small Grairr. Silage
5.3
0 0
121
None
83
Nunc
231)2
7
Soybeans, Mtsnurcd, lull Season
5.3
0.0
12l
None
83
None
2415
1
Corn, SiIagc
5.9
0.0
258
None
17(;
Notrc
2415
1
Small Grain, Silage
5.9
(W
258
None
170
None
241)
1
Soybeans, Mantrrcd, Full Season
5.9
0.0
258
Note
iT)
Note
2415
3
Small Grain. silage
6.3
(W
269
None
157
None
2415
3
Soybeans, Full Season
6.3
0.0
269
None
157
None
2415
3
Com, Silage
63
0.0
269
Norc
157
Norte
2415
5
N-lixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
5.4
0.9
572
None
379
None
2415
6
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Pasture
5.1
1.0
239
Nonc
1(}9
None
2415
7
Cain, Silagr
G.1
0.0
329
Nonc
355
Nunc
2415
7
small Grain. silagr
6.1
U (1
329
Nunc
355
Nine
2415
7
Soybeans. Manned, Fu11 Season
6.1
0.0
329
Nonc
355
Nonc
540
1
(:orn.Grain
6.3
U.O
2)2
None
165
None
54d
I
W11cat. Grain
6.3
0.0
2 12 1
None
165
None
PrevIcw D;ttah:rse Version 3. 1 Chun Prin(, rd: 04- 1 ?-2007 STV PuLr Pagc 2 1)1'4

Recnlirerl Soil Test Values
'tract
Pidd
(`roll
pl I
t,l llle Rel'11111.
{« mslacre}
Cu-I
Coppcc Rccummendatiun
Z11-1
7.inc RCO)IIlnlcudviull
542
y
(:urn. Grain
6,7
1 U.0
1 226 1
None
276
1Now
Preview Database. Version 3.I Da:u Printed: 0 4-1?-2007 STV lade P:ige 4 01't

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each nionth of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at n-hich storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative.
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plate is inconsistent %vith the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Ca acitV
Source Name
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
12/1
100
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
!
!
69
!
2
59
!
3
100
!
4
70
1
5
65
1
6
40
1
7
16
!
8
33
!
9
69
1
10
100
1
11
7�
1
12
63
2
1
32
2
2
64
2
3
100
2
4
70
2
5
100
2
6
75
2
7
51
2
8
68
2
9
100
2
10
69
2
11
44
2
12
32
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Capacity Page Page I ol' I

•
f
+
r
M �
j 1 • .• P.
r
• fi
J
r
,
'�•��
'ter •
.
}

TopoZone - USGS Crutchfield Crossroads (NC) Topo Map
Flights from U.S. to Asia
topozone- Our Lowest Fares at Singapore Air. Flights to Asia Starting At $696!
singaporeair.com/usa
Acts by Google
New Product
Download every
Topo and Aerial at
this location $9.95
Get Your MapPack
Now!
Map and Photo Info
Download Topo Images
Download Photo Images
USGS Topo Maps
r11:24K/25K Topo Maps
( 1:100K Topo Maps
t } 1:250K Topo Maps
(1o; Automatic selection
Map Size
O Small
(DMedium
OW Large
View Scale
1:50,000
Coordinate Format
DD MM.MM
Map Datum
NAD27 Oti
❑v Show target
Email this topo map
Bookmark this topo map
Print this t000 mar)
Page 1 of 1
Advertise on this site
USGS Crutchfield Crossroads (NC) Topo Map
View TopoZone Pro topographic maps, aerial photos, street reaps, coordinatE
i350 50.83'N, 790 27.59'W (NAD27)'
"- COWtapmone' -,' • ' • ,.- �,y _ , : ,.. I� f
0113�2WP a to ffi1 aAp irc
Al
1271n"
i
P k
,�.. �:• , I .f
k;r'7�r.•,x�MMAN
_•t. _• I i '] 'f lw:. _ }
C IT
IT
�j _f ilt� — p}t � �•R C�'Li fiES � As ! {{ .'
# r T. , :. ( I'lirni RidgeIt
Ch
.1682
F
r
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.8
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
TopoZone.com © 1999-2006 Maps a la carte, Inc. - All rights reserved.
Use of this site is governed by our Conditions and Terms of Use. We care about your privacy - please read our Privacy Statement.
http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat-35.84719&Ion=-79.45981&size=l&symshow—n&u=4&datum=na... 4/ 12/2007

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
Z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than IO tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
G. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. , Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/12/2007 suecitIcation fate I

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be -applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed- 4/12/2007 Specification PaL_=e 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for:_ J�Se/a/Y Jai So✓
By:
Farm: Tract:
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount,
source, placement, form and timing of the
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or
ground waters. The practice, Waste
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly
accomplished through the development of a
Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization Plan,
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple
natural resource concerns on the land.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES
Your nutrient management/waste utilization
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives:
• To budget nutrients for plant production.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural
nutrients to surface and ground water
resources.
• To maintain or improve the physical,
chemical, and biological condition of the
soil.
Dater /�_ o-7
• To utilize agricultural wastes for
livestock feed or as an energy source.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT 1 WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The information provided in this .lob
Sheet and the attachments meet the
minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
purposes. This Nutrient Management
Plan includes:
1 A plan map and soils map for the area
planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan),
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
or resources (streams, wells,
sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
3. Your planned crop rotation.
4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
Index (LI) as required.
6. Realistic yield expectations for the
crops in the rotation, and their source
if other than default values approved
for N.C.
7. Recommended nutrient application
rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice Job Shcet: NC-590 (august, 2003) Page 1

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for:_v �0seP/V .Io�So.✓
By: AID'
Farm:. Tract: Date:-4 J /_ J
To utilize agricultural wastes for
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT? livestock feed or as an energy source.
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount,
source, placement, form and timing of the
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or
ground waters. The practice, Waste
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly
accomplished through the development of a
Nutrient ManagementlWaste Utilization Plan,
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple
natural resource concerns on the land.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES
Your nutrient management/waste utilization
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives:
• To budget nutrients for plant production.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural
nutrients to surface and ground water
resources.
• To maintain or improve the physical,
chemical, and biological condition of the
soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT / WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The information provided in this Job
Sheet and the attachments meet the
minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
purposes. This Nutrient Management
Plan includes:
1 A plan map and soils map for the area
planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan),
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
or resources (streams, wells,
sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
3. Your planned crop rotation.
4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
Index (LI) as required.
6. Realistic yield expectations for the
crops in the rotation, and their source
if other than default values approved
for N.C.
7. Recommended nutrient application
rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NIC Practice .tab Sheet: bfC-590 (august, 2003) Pine l

and method of application and
incorporation, if applicable.
& This Job Sheet.(or comparable
information), that provides the following
General requirements of this practice,
as well as additional requirements to
meet the natural resource protection
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to
this plan.
• Operation and maintenance
information associated with this
practice.
Because this Nutrient Management Plan
includes agricultural organic sources,
additional items are required in the plan to
ensure proper waste utilization:
• Waste Utilization Agreement (if
applicable)
• Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement (if applicable)
• Additional engineering design and
operating information for waste storage
structures, transport, and application
system, as applicable. These designs,
and the instructions for operating these
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management/
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent
overtopping or other discharges from
storage structures or facilities, as
applicable.
This plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal,
state, or local regulations or policies.
Changes in laws or regulations may
necessitate a revision of the plan.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE
UTILIZATION
General
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management
plan (see the following section, "BASIC
REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT")
You are required to acquire and comply
with all federal, state, or local permit
requirements related to the handling and
application of manure or organic
materials.
The nutrient management/waste
utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement must exist to address all
organic waste not handled by the nutrient
management/waste utilization plan.
Manure or organic wastes will not be
applied to the following areas:
• surface waters,
• wetlands, unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment
system,
• soils subject to frequent flooding
during the period when flooding is
expected,
• frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
soils,
• within 200 feet of a dwelling other
than those owned by the producer,
• within 100 feet of a well,
• within 25 feet of surface waters, or
• within any other setbacks as identified
by federal, state, or local laws or
regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
being applied within 75 feet of a
residential property boundary or
perennial stream or river if the facility
was sited on or after October 1995.)
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
in a manner not to reach surface waters,
wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
structures must be analyzed prior to land
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available
land and/or third party manure agreements)
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in
adherence to all nutrient application
requirements. All federal and state guidance
regarding the proper testing, handling,
planning, and application of sludge must be
followed for regulated operations.
Since compliance with all applicable North
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste
Management for questions.
ADDITIONAL, REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other
organic residues used for feedstock must be
handled in a manner to minimize
contamination and preserve its feed value.
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall
develop rations that utilize animal wastes.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY
If your facility is to be used for energy
production, all energy producing components
of the system are included in the Nutrient
ManagemenUWaste Utilization Plan and
provisions for the utilization of residues of
energy production identified. Your Nutrient
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT
General
Application of nutrients must comply with all
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
The realistic yield expectations (RYEs) in
this plan are based on one or more of the
following'
• Default values approved by the N.C.
Interagency Nutrient Management
Committee that incorporate soil
productivity information, yield data,
and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Additional information on the default
values may be found at.
www.soil.ncsu.edu/nmi)/ncnr73wq/J*ndex,htm
• Documented actual yield data from
the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
consecutive specific crop harvests.
(For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
the last five years.)
A fertilization rate recommended by
North Carolina State University may
be used in cases where no yield data
or approved RYE values exist for a
crop.
• An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
chemical features may be used for
new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
ONLY be specified by a certified
Nutrient Management planner.
Erosion, runoff, and water management
controls have been planned, as needed,
on fields that receive nutrients.
Soil Testing
This nutrient management plan has been
developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
Soil samples must be collected and
prepared in accordance with North
Carolina State University or the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Shem NC-590 (August, 2003} Ya c 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any
laboratory or program that is certified by the
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing.
Growers who utilize other laboratories must
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology
to ensure the test results are compatible with
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide
consistency, all laboratories used must
provide fertilization recommendations using
guidelines and methodologies as referenced
at the NCDA&CS website:
www.ncaqr.com/aqronomi/0book.htm
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory
that is supported by field research within the
state.
Soil testing shall include analysis for all
nutrients for which specific information is
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Plant Tissue Testing
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall
be done in accordance with North Carolina
State University or NCDA&CS standards or
recommendations.
Manure Testing
Nutrient values of manure and organic by-
products shall be established for planning
purposes based on laboratory analysis,
acceptable default values, or historic records
for the operation.
When determining actual application rates, a
laboratory analysis is required. State
regulations require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year.
Acceptable laboratories include the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
certified by the NCDENR.
Field Risk Assessment
A field -specific assessment of the
potential for phosphorus transport from
each field (or groups of similar fields)
have been conducted, using the North
Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT)
PLAT assesses the potential for
phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
site to surface water through each of the
four primary loss pathways:
• sediment -bound P transported
through erosion,
• soluble P transported through
surface runoff,
• soluble P leached through the soil
profile, and
• non -incorporated source P
transported through surface
runoff.
Based on the assessment of each loss
pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
rating will identify whether nitrogen or
phosphorus shall be the rate -determining
element in developing the planned'
application rate for manure.
PLAT Rating
I Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW
Nitrogen -based manure
application,
MEDIUM
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
HIGH
Manure application limited to
phosphorus removal from site
in harvested plant biomass.
VERY HIGH
No additional manure
application to be specified in
plan for the site.
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with NCSU
guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August. 2003) PuLe 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices
that reduce the potential for phosphorus
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips,
ponds, water table management, and residue
management and conservation tillage.
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or
planned, have been incorporated into your
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the
management of the site actually affects the
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the
PLAT analysis (including any required to
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient
Management Plan to be approved.
Nutrient Application Rates
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider
current soil test results, RYEs, and
management.
Liming material shall be applied as needed to
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients.
The application amount and rate (in/hr) for
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation)
shall not result in runoff from the site. The
application shall not exceed the field capacity
of the soil.
The planned rates of nutrient application are
shown on the attached sheets. These rates
have been computed as follows:
Nitrogen Application - When the plan is
nitrogen -based (a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium), the application rate of manure or
organic by-products shall be based on the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops
without established RYEs). This may
result in an application rate for other
nutrients that exceeds the soil test
recommendation.
When the plan is being implemented
on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
rating of High or Very High), manure
or other organic by-products shall be
applied at rates consistent with the
phosphorus application guidance
below. In such situations, an
additional nitrogen application from
non -organic sources may be required
to supply nitrogen at the rate
recommended by the RYE.
Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
All nitrogen rates for hay production
are for pure grass stands. Due to the
nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
by 25% for the portion of the expected
yield that is removed through grazing.
Phosphorus Application — When
manure or other organic by-products
are used, the planned rates of
phosphorus application shall be based
on the PLAT rating for the site, as
follows..
Low or Medium Rating — The
planned manure or organic by-
product application rate is based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
High Rating --- The planned
manure or organic by-product
application rate is limited to the
phosphorus removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass.
Very High Rating — No additional
manure or organic by-product
application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet. NC-590 (August, 2003) PaEe

On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating,
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium may be
recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or
recommendations.
A single application of phosphorus applied
as manure or organic by-product may be
made at a rate equal to the recommended
phosphorus application or estimated
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple
years in the crop sequence.
• When such single applications are
made, the rate shall:
• not exceed the recommended
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or
• not exceed the estimated nitrogen
removal in harvested plant bio-
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended
nitrogen application, or
• not be made on sites with a Very
High PLAT risk rating.
• Potassium Application — Planned
potassium application rates should
match the soil test recommended rates
as closely as possible. (This is
particularly critical in situations where a
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or
.other organic sources, the addition of
potassium from non -organic sources
may be required.
• Other Plant Nutrients - The planned
rates of application of other nutrients if
applicable are consistent with North
Carolina State University or the
NCDA&CS guidelines or
recommendations.
Nutrient Application Timing
Timing of nutrient application shall
correspond as closely as possible with
plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
considering cropping system limitations,
weather and climatic conditions, and field
accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
saturated soil.
Manure or organic by-products shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
For nutrients applied through irrigation
systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
distribution of material at planned rates.
Plan Review and Revision Period
A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
to exceed five years.
Heavy Metals Monitoring
For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
and copper concentrations shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites for
application shall be sought when these
metals approach excessive
concentrations. The following criteria and
actions are provided:
ZINC
Mehlich-3Index
Action
Ln-11
300 (21 Ibslac)
Peanuts are very sensitive to
zinc, and application on peanuts
should be limited. Seek
alternative sites when possible.
The risk of zinc toxicity is
greater with low soil pH and has
been seen at Zn-I as low as
300. `
500 (35 Ibslac)
Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts. '
2,000 (142
Caution: Seek alternative sites
Ibslac)
when possible for all crops. '
3,000 (213
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibslac ____
Cease application for all crops. '
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Pale 6

COPPER
-
Mehlich-3 index
Action
2.000 (72 lbslac)
Caution: Seek alternative sites
when possible for all crops.
3,000 (108
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibslac)
Cease application on all crops.'
Maintain pH at 6.0 on these
sites.
When sewage sludge is applied, the
accumulation of potential pollutants (including
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state
and local laws or regulations. Additional
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage
sludge may be found in Land Application of
Sewage Sludge, EPA1831-B-93-002b
publication number at:
http://www. epa.gov/n,odes/pubs✓sludge.pdf
ADDITIONAL, REQUIREMENTS FOR
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER
In areas that have been identified as impaired
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus
transport from the site. (The streams/water
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA-
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section
I.)
❑ NO
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in
an area where surface waters are
impaired, with agricultural nutrients
identified as a likely source. The Leaching
Index (LI) is not required.
❑ YES
This nutrient management plan IS in an
area where surface waters are impaired,
with agricultural nutrients identified as a
likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
is included in this plan.
While the results of the LI does not affect
your planned nutrient application rates,
some additional conservation practices
may be specified in the plan to reduce the
risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
applicable.
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
soluble elements and either or both may
be components of organic and inorganic
fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
move with water as leachate down
through the soil, or over the soil surface
as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
phosphorus exist in different forms and
may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
can have detrimental effects on both
surface and shallow ground water quality.
As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
severe algal blooms and fish kills.
Because of the topography, hydrology,
and other factors in the state, the
environmental problems from excess
nutrients reaching surface water may not
be exhibited near the contributing source,
but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico Basin,
the Chowan River, the watershed of the
B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
watershed of the New River in Onslow
County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
waters in North Carolina.
Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
water and eventua€Iy to surface waters.
(Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
`°C Practice Job Sheen NC-590 (,August. 2003) Page 7

required part of the nutrient management plan
in some areas of the state with surface water
impairments. The LI uses soils information
and local climate data to assess the potential
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results
of the LI analysis and recommended actions
are included in your nutrient management
plan, if applicable..
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be
transported off -site than recognized in the
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3)
in soluble form leaching downward through
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by
site, and depends upon such factors as soil
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The
results of the PLAT analysis and
recommended actions are included in your
nutrient management plan, if applicable.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus
removal rate. In these cases, the planned
nutrient application rate is not sustainable,
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be
reached.
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
You are responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. The following Operation &
Maintenance should be conducted:
1 Review the plan annually to determine if
adjustments or modifications to the plan
are needed. (The S.B. 1217
interagency group guidelines
accepted by the N.C. Division of
Water Quality for .0200 operations
specify a plan revision when there are
changes in crops or cropping patterns
that utilize more than 25 percent of
the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
management plans shall be
thoroughly reviewed every five years
and revised if necessary. The next
review will be performed in
a0/2— .
2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
product storage facilities from weather
and accidental leakage or spillage.
3. Ensure proper calibration of
application equipment to ensure
uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
4. Inspect and maintain the equipment
and facilities used to implement the
Nutrient Management/Waste
Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
5. Review the Emergency Action flan, if
applicable, annually.
6. Records should be maintained for five
years, or for a period as required by
other Federal, state, or local
ordinances, or program or contract
requirements. To ensure adequate
Information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
included:
• Soil test results and
recommendations for nutrient
application, .
• Quantities, analyses and sources
of nutrients applied (When the
actual rates used exceed the
recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Shcet. NC-590 {Auuust, 2003)

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record -keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) 11 wt: 9

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to ficld(s): 1. 4. 5
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
Yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10"r„ whcn
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, %vet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the younV
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normaily broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and infon-nation from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10%) when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcasi or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the votkn4
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 ibs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program. the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
-- -------------------------------- ------------------- ------
111eview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Crop Note Page Pa,e t of 7

The following crop note applies it) field(s): 1, 7
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont. corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 213 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stake. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2. 3. 4, 5, 6. 7. 8
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
-------------- --------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------..
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 7

The following crop note applies to lield(s): I. 4. 5
Wheat: Piedmont
En the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "mall
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10`%4, when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety ",reell
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characterlstics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre Ni at planting- Increase the N' at
planting to 40 ibs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The retraining N should be applied during the months of February-Nlarch.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3; 5, G, 7, 8, 9
Wheat: Piedmont
in the Piedmont; wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5`%o for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 lbs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February-lvlarch.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the grro.ving season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
----------------- -------------------------------- -- -------------------------------------- I..........
Prev�ca% Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Crop Note Pauc Pule 3 L)1' 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2. 3. S
Soybeans: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Reviewv the NCSU Official
Variety 'green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10`% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However,
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and villor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the. overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1- 7
Soybeans -Full Season: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSLJ Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills_ 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-t0 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1- t 1/2" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However.
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Soybeans -Full Season: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSU Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills, 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However.
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ------------------------- ..------------------------------- ----- --
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Crop Note Pa,,,,e Page 4 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 17 4. 5
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
DnUble-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting corpleted by .)ulv 401.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and Conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/ro-w foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth shutIld be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown W111iout
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 5, 6., 7. 8, 9
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high vieldina variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-t
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
----------------------------- --- - ---- ------------
preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Crop Note Page Pave 5 of",

The following crop note applies to held(si: l . 7
Small Grain Silage. Piedmont and tMOUntains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high -yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1. 2. 3, 4. 5, 6. 7. 5
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
Optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -oil. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to lield(s): 0
Mixed Cool Season Grasses: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field{sl: 3. 5
ylixed Cool Season Grasses: No Comment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------..-----I ------------------
Frevie% Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-12-2007 Crop Notc Page Page 6 of

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2
Mired Cool Season brasses: No Comment
The following crop note applies to fseld(s}: ?. 7
Mixed Cool Season Grasses: No Comment
----------------- ------ - -
Previuw Database Version 3.1 Date Printed- 04-12-2007 Crop \ate Yaffe Pa,e 7 of 7

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DINQ (33l� 7 71 - -boa
EMERGENCY NIANAGENIl NT SYSTEM
SWCD r5fC�) Z �8 _ 17S3
MRCS Sct.*.. e a.y 416ave-
4� i'_ 31
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leakille,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
l . Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to benn to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
U. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leafs prior to restarting; pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems; houses, solid separators -action include:
Decen-iber 18, 1996

a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage fi-oni base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put
in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
c. -Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom
as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters'?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration'?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage'?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f Could a future rain event Cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)''
h. How much reached surface waters.)
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should
include: your name. facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above,
the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather
and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - local SWCD office phone number - - and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
]. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize o#'l-site
2 December 18, 1996

dama,ze
a. Contractors Name: 6 e-
b. Contractors .address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consultim-, Engineer. etc.
a. Name: 13,-11 AlngW-s _
b. Phone: L3 3 6 ) � Ze - / 75- 3 E-C f • 3
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems
with release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
131N7Ps to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
]=rarnlstcad
•
Dairy Production
❑
Vegetative or wooded buffers;
❑
Recommended best management practices;
❑
Good judgcmcnt and common sense
Paved lots or barn alley,
•
Wct manure -covered surfaces
❑
Scrape or flush daily;
surf secs
❑
Promote drying with proper ventilation;
❑
ROLatine checks and tlliailttCIlanCe un waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
•
Urine;
❑
Promote drying with proper ventilation;
•
Partial ricrobial decomposition
❑
Replace wct or manure -covered bedding
Manure dry stacks
•
Partial microbial decomposition
❑
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or mid -level loading;
surface • Miring while filling; ❑ 'tank covers;
• Agitation while emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions;
Agitate only prior to manure rcrnoval;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Scltling basin surfaces
•
Partial microbial decomposition;
O
Liquid drainage from settled solids;
•
Mixing while filling;
❑
Remove solids regularly
•
Agitation while emptying
Manure, slurry, or sludge
•
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injeclion of slurry/sludges;
spreader oau lets
•
Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residuai manure from spreader after use;
Cl
Proyell Nological additives or oxidants
1_Incovered manure, slurry
•
Volatle gas emissions while drying
❑
Soil injecllon of siun-y/sludges;
or sludge on field surfaces
❑
Soil incoti)or.ation within 48 hrs;
❑
spresad in thin uniform lavers 161 rapid drying:
Cl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush mrks
•
Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid
❑
Flush tank covers',
„ laile tanks are tilling
❑ Extend fill So near hollonl of ranks with
aoli-stphon arias
Outside drain cndreliorl or • ,Agitation during wastewater to, cr:
yunction hn.\c"s conveyance
A\21()('- t`'o%cmlwi 1 i. I1)1H1. I';iec

Source Cause BMIN, to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Litt stations • Agitation during sump tank Wing ❑ Sump tank covers
and drawdown
End o€'drainpipes at lagoon •
Agitation daring wastewater.
Conveyance
©
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon liquid level
l-agoon surface, •
Volitile gas emission;
C1
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
•
Biological mixing;
❑
COLTCCt lagoon startup Procedures;
•
Agitation
❑
Mininnnn surface area-[o-volume ratio;
❑
Minimum agitation when pumping;
M
Mechanical aeration;
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles •
High pressure agitation;
❑
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
•
Wind drift
M
Minimum recommended Operating pressure;
0
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
Pump from second stage lagoon;
❑
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of-
SInFTV/sludu,c pnmpinvs
Dcad animals • Carcass decomposition Cl Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing Na,ater around • ImpropCr drainage; ❑ Grade and landsCa17C suClt that water drains away
lacilitiCs • Microbial decomposition oforganic from facilities
matter
Mud tracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads ❑ Mann access road maintenance
roads from Cann access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packci
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Managemenl System - Luke Wheeler Road Filed Labatory ; E'BAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; FBAI, 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; FHAE 100-83
Calihiation of'Manure and Wastewater Applicalion Equipment; FBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Cnncenss in Animal Manure ManagcmCnn: Odors and Flies; PR0107, 1t)95 Conference Proceedings
AWR - Nnrcmhc3 11, 1996. Pa,,c '
Available FrOM:
NCSU, County I'.\ICrlSiorl CCntLT
NCS1J - HAF,
N(_Stl - BA1'
NICSU - RAF.
M'NU - RAF
Flnrida Conperativr tly1enSi0n

Poultry Layer Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
MN'll's to Mininlize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
0 Poultry Production
❑
Vegetative or wooded buffers;
❑
Rccom vended best management practices;
❑
Good judgement and common sense
Floor surtilccs (walk aisles)
• Wet dirty surfaces
❑
Scrape manure, dust, feathers into collection alleys;
❑
Splash boards elong tipper ends of collection alleys;
Cl
Proper ventilation
Cage manure dropping
• Manure -covered surface
❑
Scrape rrlanure into collection alleys
hoards
Manure collection alleys ! Partial microbial decomposition ❑ Frequent manure removal by flush or scrape;
❑ Frequent checks and nlaiLllenance on waterers and
%vfter pipes
VC111ila6oll exhaust fans • Volatile gases, ❑ Pan maintenance;
• DLISI ❑ l;fficient all, movement
Indoorsurl:iccs .0 DLISl ❑ Vacuum or Washdown between Ilocks;
Manure C0nYCy0rS
O
Partial microbial decomposition
❑
Keep oledlaniCal CgllipnlClll in good repair;
❑
Remove manure accumulations promptly
Storage tank or basiIl
O
Parllal microbial decomposition;
❑
Bottoill or widlevel loading;
SUI-laCC
❑
hank covers;
❑
Basill surface nlalS of'solids;
❑
Provell blologleal addilives ol. oxidants
Manure slurry or Sludge
•
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection ill slurryisludges;
ip1'CFLdCr OlidciS
O
Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑
PI ovell biological 3ddlltves or Oxidants
1111covzrcd 111 lInurc skurry
O
Volatile gas Cnlissions while dryillg
❑
Soil iltjcctiorl al"slurrN'/sludgcs.
or sludge call field ;urlac`5
Cl
Soil incorlloralion within 48 hrs.
OUISllle drain colirclion or
•
Agitation during wastewater
❑
Box cmcrs
Junction bow."
collvCyallce
A'v10(. - Novcmim 1 I. 1990. Pouc f�

Source Cause BNIPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific 1'r-aclices
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank filling ❑ Sump lank covers
and drawdown
l:nd of drainpipes at lagoon
•
Agitation during vrastewater
❑
Extend discharge point of -pipes underneath
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
•
Volltrle gas emission;
0
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
•
liiologicai mixing;
❑
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
❑
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑
Minimum agitation while pumping;
❑
Mechanical aeration;
❑
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles
•
High pressure agitation;
❑
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
•
Wind drift
Cl
Minimum recommended operating procedure;
❑
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon
Dead birds
•
Carcass decomposition
❑
Proper disposition of'carcasses
Dead bird disposal pits
•
Carcass decompoSltlOn
0
Complete covering of earcasses In burial pits;
❑
Proper location/construction of disposal pits;
❑
Disposal pit covers light Filling
Standing water around
•
Improper drainage
❑
Grade and landscape such that water drains away
facilities
•
Microbial decomposition of organic
from facilities
matter
Mud tracked onto public
•
Poorly maintained access roads
❑
Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information: Availahle I"Vmm;
AMOC - November 1 I, 1996, Pagc 7

Sou rce
C:luse
BN11's to Minimize Odor
Poultry ,Manure Managemcnt; .0200 Rule/13M1' Packet
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Manauemcnt: High Rise, Deep Pit; FHAE 131-88
Poultry Layer I'roduc'ticnz facility Manure Managcmenz: Undurcage Flush - Lagoon Treatmem; EBAF 130-88
L;Igoun Design and Evlallagcmeut fix Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAF 103-83
Calibration o[' M.nitrrc and Wastett'aic r Application Equipment; EBAF Fact Sheei
Proper Disposal of DL:ad Poultry; PS&T Ciuidc No. 19
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Managenienti Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Site Specific Practices
NCSU, Counly Lxtensu,n Celle)
NCSU - BAF
NCSU - BA1
NCSU - IAAF
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - Poultry SClenCe
Florida Cooperative IAtension

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause HMIs to Mininlize lusects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters O Accumulation of Solids la blush system is designed and operated sufficiently to
remove accumulated solids front gutters as designed;
Ci Remove bridging or accunrlllated solids at discharge
Lagoons and Pits 0 Crusted Solids ❑ Maintain lagoons, settling basins and hits where pest
breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting of
solids to a depili of no Vlore than G - S inches over
more than 30'%, ol'surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation ❑ Maintain vegetative control along banks of lagoons
Growth and other impoundments to prevent accumulation of
decaying vegetative matter along waters edge on
impoundment's perimeter.
Feeders • Peed Spillage ❑ [design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to mlinintize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
❑ Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - t 0 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day inten al during
winter).
Deed Storage O Accumulation ol"fced residues ❑ Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
initnediate perimeter of reed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for brewer's
grain and Similar high moisture grain products).
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accttnlulated
solids in filter strips around teed storage as needed.
Aninial I'lolding Areas O AcculnUlaltolls of anllllal waStCS
and feed tvastaue
AM[(" - November I L 19V6. P;igc
❑ Eliminate low areas that trap nlnisturc along tenceS
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is mininsal.
❑ Maintain fence rows and filter snips around anillmI
holding areas to Minimize accunlLIL100115 ul +vases
(i.e. inspect leer and remove (it, break up
accumulated solids as needed.

Source Cause 131VII's to Minimize insects Site Specific Practices
Dry Manure I landling Accumulations of animal wastes O Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-10 day
systems interval during Sununer; 15-30 day intCI-val during
winter) where manure is loaded fiir land application
or disposal.
11 Provide fo adequate drainage ❑round manure
stockpiles.
0 Inspect for an remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed.
For more infimnation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, Forth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27G95-7G13
AMK' - Novrniher I I. 19%. 1'agt' 2

Mortality tManabement Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after hnowleci�e ot'
the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body
of water.
Q'- Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-165.7.
GJ-' Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved
by the Department of Agriculture.
© Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make
possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or
animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)
i 60Mft) e .� ��?�C kens 0 AJ I -
December 18, 1996

Form 1)RY-i
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone t#
Facility Number
Dry Litter Cleanout Records for Alternative Uses of Litter
Third Party Applicator
Third Party Applicator's
Address
Third Party Applicator's Phone #
(t)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Use of Litter
Dale
mm/dd/yr
4 of 1-oads
Removed
Spreader or Truck
Volume I
(cubic foot)
Spreader or'l'ruck
Capacity 2
(tons)
Total Removal
(tons)
(4) x (2)
Temporary
Storage
(tons)
Spread
on Farm
(tons)
Removed
from Farm
(tons)
Other
(Indicate Use) 3
(Ions)
Owner's Siunaturr
1 Can he found in operator's manual fix thU ;pICZJdCr_ CJmaCt a local dealer- if you do not have your owner's manual
2 Scc attached sheet fot f0r111Lrla
3 Catlle Peed; Composted Soil AmnlenCIrnenr. t urumrrtr:rll. i)istribuled Organic Fertilizer, etc.

Form DRY-2
Farm Owncr
Spreader Operator
Dry Litter Application Field Record
For Recording Dry Litter Application Dents on Different fields
Facility Number
Traci N
Field #
Date
Type
Field Size
Application
# of [.Dads
Volume of Loads 2
Spreader Capacity 3
(mmlddlyr)
(acres)
Method I
Per Field
(cubic feet)
(tons)
151 = soil incorpomied (disked); BR = broadcasz (surface applied).
(`:rn he k1und in operalor's manuatl for the spreader. Contact a IOCa1 (icalC1 if' )'uu du nut hank your uWner's manual.
Jcr auachetl c dIbr:rtinn sheet fur tlu formula.

Form DRY-3
TI nct 4
Field size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone St
Field #
Dry Litter Application Field Record
One Fosrn for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number --
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone N
From Animal baste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommendcd PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (13)
(2)
(3 )
(4)
(5)
(G)
171
fM
Date
nunlddlyr
li of Loads Per Field
Spreader Capacity
(tons)
Total Application
(tons)
(2) x (3)
Litter- Per Acre
(tons/acre)
(4)
(A)
Waste Analysis PAN I
(lbsiton)
PAN Applied
(lhiacrc)
(.G).r (5)
Nitrogen Balance 2
(Iblacre)
(13) - (7)
Crop 1e TOtuls
Owner's SignawN
Spreader Operator 's Ygna[ufl'
I NCDA Wasw An:rl%sis or I:yuivalent w NRCS I's[imu[r. Technic::rl Guidc tiection (>>_ =.
F IIICI tIlC +:flue' recetN•rd br subtractins! column (7) front I Ill. t.ununue s[eh[ractntI coltinut (7) f10111 colremn (£) fallow[ne each ❑ppGcul1on e\ertt

Form SLUM
1
��r •till, w �' t} .' _'
ami' O��ner Z:..
Slurry and Sludge Application l{ield Record
For Recording Slurry and Lagoon Sludge Application Events on Different Fields
Facility NW117er
°+yya" t `Date`" i;� :r f`
i #f a' " s icld M it mn %cici�vr� t "Crop V1c' '
Fietd Size
{ arks
Alit7lication
tl
t� Of 1.{�al4s
Pet- k'ieicl
Vnlun:c of'Li�ailsl�l
{,liluns)
1 I151 = sail ill, M1101 2tCd Uliskrdl: 13K = broadcast I;ggih'-dI
{?I l'nn he f rund in ITC1mmr m:rnu;rl (,11 prend",. :r I11r;11 r11'alrr iI'LWw do iull hate ynur un'ner's manual.

Norm SLUR-2
"I'racl #1
Field size (acres)— (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address,
Owner's Phone 8
Field O!
Slurry and Sludge Application field Record
One Form for }arch Field Per Crop Cycle
Faultily Number
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phrme ft
From Waste l}tilizaliou Plan
Crop 'Typo Recommended PAN
Loading (1b/acre) _ (Q)
fit n , ril rar rs� r�i r7t re,
Date
(mm/dd/yr)
of Loads Per Field
VUlllnle oCS_oadSlll
Total Volume
(gallons)
{(,'
(2) x (3)
Volume her Acre
(gals/acre)
(q) - A
-'
Waste Analysis � )PAN
(Ibs/1000 gals)
PAN Applies!
(Ihslaere)
F z j 1.00 i
Niurlgen Balancc(3)
(Ibslacre)
(B) - (7)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified ()perator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator Ccrtificalion N
I( sn Itc IhuIx{ III nhC[,II,It'n m;tnu,rl titr the sptt:ader. Contact a local dealer il'you do IRA h:ne },wt t%%DlI manual.
I Svc %.IlIt :III int:tI a-.t>tr tTill n:memcm p}an tilt sans;ding Al a minimum_ ic:utr nnalcsis I, It'll uiIClI +�.IIIi n Lp daN-, alAand application cents.
31 I.utci Ill,' ,:tlur t,"L,'I rd h% ,nhnacling ❑durtm (7) Crum (tit, Continue suhnaciiII21:041 nut i7} I'm I]I col Ill fs'Ill, llu%cins: each appIca tion "VVI A.

Form SIM-1
Manure Solids Application Field Record
For Recording Manure solids Application I.vents on Different Fields
Farm Over Facility Number
SFn�ader Operatcir
`I'rnl it
Field fl
Date
in111MLI I-
Crop Type
Field Size
(acres)
Application
Method(!I
fi ul toads
1'cr FiCILi
VUIl1RIC 0f I..oalhl'-I
�s allunsl
S I l SI _ Anil incmporaleri Wiskr,lt. lilt _ hru:ulcasl l aurfacc app1w,l)
i? I { ':In he round in operniori manual Grr sIII cNIIVI. ('nmacr ;r local Jrrler Y N,ni do nol ha%c yow oWrIel's manual.

Form SLD-2
'Tract r�
Fielrl size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone it
Manure Solids Application field Record
One Form for Bach Field Per Crop Cycle
Pielcl 1; Facility Number
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
C rop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (iUlacre) = (i3)
(Il 2 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Date
(ntntldeUyr)
# of Loads Per field
Weight nT[_�ads (I)
(tons)
Total ",eight
(toils)
tons
(2) x (3)
Weight per Acre
(tunslac:re)
(4) _ (A)
('-)
Waste Analysis PAN
(Ihshon)
PAN Applied
(Ibs/acrr)
(h) x (5)
Nitrogen 13alanc.eljl
(Ihsracrr}
(13) - (7)
Crop Cycle Totals 1
O%N,Itel"'S Signature
Ccrilfied Operxtor (Print)
Operator's signaturc
Operator Corti Ileallon ti
! 1 t J11 be 41111111 ur ,gxratrn', rn;n:aal C the npwadcr. ( `onelci a local dealer if pm do i poi hake ww m ner's manual,
�. 'r err ��un :minr:rl x:nlr nor n:n�c nl�:nr Man liar pan>pling [rcL{ucrlc e. AS a minimum. ,rasle :ut•il}nia i, reyui reJ xithin b(1 days ul'I:utd apl>licali,m events.
a,•i rlri ,:rlur lk-lk I,f'li 11� nuhnac[in, cuhmut (71 rmm MI. C'nntinuc 101)lractine ii+lunm i ; I lank column (>,) tailor, ing each applicalinn ccenl.

a
YEAR: Nitrogen Based Fields Plan ID: r
This Application Plan is for: Nutrient Management Plan Developed By:
Farm: Developer Name:
Producer: Agency/Business:
Address: Address:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
"tract
Field
Crop
Plat
Rating
(L M)
Waste
Report
No
Useable
Acres
(A9)
Req'd
Nitrogen
(Ibslac)
(A2)
Fert
Nitrogen
(Ibslac)
Residual
Nitrogen
g 2
(lbslac)
Litter
Nitrogen
a
(Ibs/ac)
(2-(3+4))
Applic.
Method
BR S(
()
Litter N
Content
3
(lbs/ton)
Litter
Rate
(lonslacre)
(5/7)
Litter
Applied
pp
panslfield)
(1 x 8)
Six digil number printed at bottom of Nutrient Management Plan
15-30 Ibslac for crop following soybeans. 20-40lbstac for crop following peanuts
\N,islo Analysis Results
Sheet of
TOTAL: 1
7112/0 5

YEAR:
This Application.Plan is for:
Farm:
Producer:
Address:
HIGH PLAT Fields
Nutrient Management Plan Developed By:
Developer Name:
Agency/Business:
Address:
Plan ID: i
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
Tract
Field
Crop
Waste
Report
No
Useabte
Acres
(BI)
P205
Applic.
Rate
(Ibslac)
(B2)
Litter
P205 2
ContentCOeff.
(lbsllon)
(BR,SI)
Avail.
s
Litter
Total
P205
lb
(slton)
(314)
Litter
Rate
Applied
(tanslac}
(215)
Litter
Applied
(tonslfiefdy
(1 x 6)
Litter N
Content
2
(lbslton)
Req d
Nitrogen
pbslac)
(B3)
Residual
Nitro en
(Ibslac) 4
Litter
Nitrogen5
(Ibslac)
(6 x 8)
Add')
Fert N
(lbslac)
(9-(10i 11))
Six digit number printed at bottom of Nutrient Management Plan
waste Analysis Results
Availability Coefficient Broadcast (BR) = 0.7, Soil incorporated (SI) = 0.75
a
15-30 Ibslac for crop following soybeans, 20-40 Ibslac for crop following peanuts
s
Litter N Applied Cannot exceed Req'd Nitrogen (col 0) . Residual Nitrogen (cal 10)
Sheet of
TOTAL: I
7/ 12105

TopoZone - USGS Crutchfield Cro$sroads, (NC) Topo Map Page 1 of 1
:1
r.�Opozone!
:cyrightt3E3•�tigG�psaisn�te,ac �_ ` '� i� *eft-:: .• ��'„- fJ
LJ
Ir
- �• .��' :� / � ti• ��.� • ' Ii � � :/ f-'. if � I� .�• --'1
k J .'-� i ii `�.�.,.-_v -e t rr •e -•-.
, ��• r-�� �tt `r' SS may} - �' �j` �••� ! �'F ,r •' •� •\
A•.1:r�.hIA�� L o6
NE'!: t,`i'),3, a _— t✓�,�„�
A IN
p� ' :•i. •'.�._�'f�ltns Ridg. :,'}e „'! �.c;•�~-.._ _} •�.. ��\ �, I � i ,-. � -
el 4
a -�ti
\.\`
, �-r.. ;� t s _ I ,}�� f l ..�•. _ .,-••' ter+' �F� :i •�' r.,� • ,
.... 'i -- \L..` � + j S _ ��� js��� - - .ty_ �� f gyp -.�� t :_'r� \ — .,� - `{ , •, �r r�
M*
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km G
0 0.2 0'4 0.6 0.8 1 jai
350 50' 50'N, 790 27' 35"W (NAD27)
USGS Crutchfield Crossroads (NC) Quadrangle M=-g, 282
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum G=0.902

United States Department
of Agriculture
Natural Resources `RCS-CPA-026F
Conservation Service 912000
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND CONSERVATION DETERMINATION
dame �js t¢rgs.�•�r Niel CN��1.
Request Q S�
f¢1p
County: �} itrrxFNGE '
Address: L� 3t�e NG 78
Date:
Agency of Person
ZT , .Feep ✓
Tract
FSA Faurn
Requesting Determination:
o: .2 41 5—
No.: yD
Section I - Highly Erodible Land
Is a soil survey now available far making a hiphl erodible land determination:' -
Are there hiRhly erodible soil map units on this farm? -
Fields in this section have undergone a deterrrrination of whether they are highly'erodible land (HEL) or not; fields
for which an HEL Determination has not been completed are not listed. In order to be eligible for USDA benefits,
a person must be using an approved conservation system on all HEL.
Fields HEL(Y/r"I Sodbust(Y�') Acres Determination Date
The Highly Erodible Land determination was completed in,the-
Section IX - Wetlands
Are there h dric soils on this farm? I - e5
Fields in this section have had wetland determinations completed. See the Definition of Wetland Label Codes for
additional information regarding allowable activities under the wetland conservation provisions of the Food
Security Act and'or when wetland determinations are necessary to determine USDA program eligibility.
Fields
Wetland
Label*
Occurrence
acres
Determination
Certification
Year (CM**
Date
Date
/
Xp rfii
-
wesfo Fc�d G
-
east c F a�
-
q to,,( _ v 2
--
The wetland determination was completed in the jr1eYlt was Am4.4 the person on 411710e,
Remarks: eCs +rs }�SCe/Yuo� aart, o, �a ltrato C/' you„,
as �•r .
I certify that the above determinations are correct and were conducted in accordance with policies and procedures
contained in the National Food Security Act Manual,
Signature Designated Conservationist
Date
The G.S. Department of Ao culture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in ali its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national
origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (blot ali prohibited hases apply to all
programs.) Persons with disabilities who require altcmativc means for communication of program information {Braille• large pint• audi)tape,
ctc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).

N,
Jo
rop 2L4) r
.'lamance
County
GIS PortalZY
y-
'"-.
Page 1 of 1
-71
,o IO kL1.
All
y. 5. i � .-}y'+ 'RrT{# Y�,�rr•rr / :� '� ,�� t�� ,��� �' lK� ��-c,E,.E"� � - �
le
�� f7.A'�t� - �fr -r`i r �� r R � _� "{,:e,���e•? �� `i 2 i -c.,
+"—
. _ �,+ i ii� ,i�/lit �-rs �``�r .. • • T �- • ors �f
�"+ T � � ''-���3iw'i;•4' A � •i�4�� r' 1` �`' «��y}1 tCi "�.., h S4�`.• -, -
„�t'.. J -f _ f�ii �•4ii -ta 4T d,, �yl� i•�iUy r a
a�
N.
` !; i_"�irr'S i# 3 y,, r c F � ;_ t. k i r't'1�.— �t � .i t 3•`'f,,�l � 'r " '�'� .r+' �t
" `f �rJ F. -' - 11, .,S'l y* :,• - - �'3_p j 9 i`. .STi¢G'7fL+R
Y -
41r 'Per
FA ki
CID
st
A.
{) i--�d.:,Fa.°-*'3i ei.F;'. �;j $aM ..mot =sw }! c. ,�. ?•
dw-�•.
T yr -m ,5� :P 42 '4�a Y'S c'Ki'c' 'yj, r Y� ylr�t,•..r'aR !_ -�`�i �Y-k rti
;6i �+35:."tiiie {" �,5rii4+,�g ,1 ?$�,�»s•:
)y _ �4 -� t. f jam'} � ' �•.s �,- 1�
1�s 1 t C yS".K• � 4 +",R�X, 'i�Y -rt�,y
zr4 _'�� '2 �t t° -...d` qs•'r t '"__,'� S -ram �. 1
.�, rL
F L3 • a "rt � � >
'fir'• }�'_ n. S_.—
a � t
�
THIS IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
DISCLAIMER: ALAMANCE COUNTY shall assume no liability for any errors, omissions,
or inaccuracies in the information provided regardless of how caused; or any decision Map Scale
made or action taken or not taken by user in reliance upon any information or data 1 inch = 200 feel
furnished hereunder. The user knowingly waives any and all claims for damages against
any and all of the entities comprising the Alamance County GIS System that may arise
from the mapping data.
Ww s s -- /10 We- re -A Al A-, ° + SD f sT
M I Iyo7 /1VVE1v7-0R16-1)

r,
Data Sheet- Procedure for Determining Obvious Non -Wetlands
r �
Prepared forFarm: Tract:
Approximate Boundary of Determination Indicated on Attached:
CLU Photo map ✓Other photo map Soil Survey Map Topo. Map
Boundary of Determination Area Flagged in the Field? ✓YES NO
Boundary of Determination Recorded with GPS? YES ✓ENO
This determination area measures approximately acres.
The entire determination area is part of a convex landform, or an obvious broad upland ridge top.
✓YES NO
None of the following occur inside the area of evaluation: (make a check mark beside each feature NOT present)
soil mapping unit with a description mentioning occurrence of spring or seeps, flood plains,
depressions, swales, drainages or other water receiving landscape positions.
(seeps, springs, or depressions
✓severely disturbed soil, fill, or excavated material
✓wet spot symbol on soils map
i
Sail map unit(s) in the determination area are:
The predominant slope of the area of determination is -7 percent.
The soil pit(s) documented on the following page are located on the following landscape positions:
t---Ridge Top Shoulder Side Slope Bench Terrace
Remarks about determination area: �7/� J/ S4) �'/ ,:a)cp - jrpr �'i'd� .Sleles Cc doyc
%/TlJus4- 4a,'% r+9LtJp ,rrG�r'G41crS �a•.rc 6Dr,rt�ts rh
174ve, flee i ir' eolt-AX CCe-)
CusC• L.<Gn�ok�ritr �/R.-3s J'� l.:►,.'� /��.t� c-J�ur,� �j gre.es at,� ��s'� .sue �
T"/'�'m 5 J i-�c�-rn Gt�xGt' �r�r •:� �t � � tc/tc.' S t'2 �C C of � • n .b r m a ei.r r- �la rac(�a A. �1t ec r � 4-
W1Tqrre e neCw--sr 3 7'01tApr earyJy
Gr/V-A �+r✓ f�sf S�rzs,cr s f-rr,r-s/- procCY' �,u,'sl 6:4a57 Yee, zoXLic, �'*a l•
Si�T[R'� •"�,��+ S:G[I� IY1G1AQ'ICcm r-7-r 0-! /17VJr CGc� �S / j/�,� S✓• • • r»vv" �,• •�, GC
G; r� It s J
NRCS-North Carolina
January 2006

Soil Pit 1
- Locate in the lowest elevation of the land evaluated.
Soil Pit 2
- Needed when evaluation area is ?1 acre,
- Locate Pit 2 in another low elevation of land evaluated.
t-' Pit location is indicated on attached map
✓ Pit location is indicated on attached map
_
Present land -use is:
Cropland/ Hayland ✓ Forest/Cut-over
Pasture Newly cleared land
Present land -use is:
Cropland/ Hayland ✓ForesVCut-over
Pasture Newly cleared land
Dominant vegetation with,iin/30 ft. of pit is:
�/ >✓ !/G�✓�G✓UIrG� Yam'/��f
Dominant vegetation/within 30 ft./of pit is:
�/Xt"6i" fl7�lfirdrLrjflaG✓ LJJ/c�.�i�-
.-
--
Depth Matrix Mottle/Redox Feature
(to 20 inches) Collor // Coior(s)
0- 12, yi. f o YR �Y� Al h r-
General Texture
Sand, Loam, Clay
Depth Matrix Mottle/Redox Feature
(to 2/0 inches) Color Color(s)
0"
/o ?.a f� 61,
General Texture
Sand, Loam, Clay
�
�—
C/
%f1 '?1J„r lCOG�— 'A AV A r~ A"
Depth to: Saturated soil in pit '`ffi' in.. Free water in pit
A0A in.
Depth to: Saturated soil in pit A11,W in. Free water in pit
in,
Hydric Soil Indicators Observed?
YES
Hydric Soil Indicators Observed? ENO
YES
Prepared by: Date: 4l_ r _ToG
Reviewed by:
Date:
NRCS-North Carolina
January 2006

Soil Pat 3
- Locate in the lowest elevation of the land evaluated.
Soil Pitjr 4- - i
- Needed when evaluation area is >1 acre.
Locate Pit 2 in another low elevation of land evaluated.
Pit location is indicated on attached map
Pit location is indicated on attached map
Present land -use is:
Cropland/ Hayland V/ Forest/Cut-over
Pasture Newly cleared land
Present land -use is:
Cropland/ Hayland L-F6�rest/Cut-aver
Pasture Newly cleared land
Dominant vegetation within 30 fft, of pit is:
C17ovr•' A/zl wool/ i:vleSf
Dominant vegetation within 30 ft, of pit is:
r,lamI�O��� Aa
Depth Matrix Mattle/Redox Feature General Texture
(to 20 inches) Color Coiorts) Sand, Loam, Clay
0- %off f� ant' G'�
Depth Matrix Mottle/Redox Feature
(to 20 inches) Color Color(s)
0-_(L117. IO ye
General Texture
Sand, Loam, Clay
Depth to: Saturated soil in pit 61A in. Free water in pit in.
Depth to: Saturated sail in pit /Uf} in. Free water in pit
-fl,4 in.
Hydric Soi) Indicators Observed? YES
O
Hydric Soil Indicators Observed? VQ
YES
Prepared by: G &_ Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
NRCS-North Carolina
January 2006

w
oil
- o"%Ce-
/ (kGl y NLrJ
!1 03
vosTaGr—
P
srFL mod. _ t< -- Q.
CR
a
C5711-2-1
Z
P� r1u
i
CG
4
Ncr e
N TIE
t` C P,0P05--cQ,)
Gb;c-kC.) A0usC-
`-00 IJ 1 a?4r C
1 U6r� 7 p3�aN vrt'
c C-Y - i.= -Tv; F L`
0q;SS
/
IPJ
Gv !+1rJrjrr'
F
1
pjo'f�vat�i
9a ,7
ve SW
��r'114•� i�lvc� �3,
LPG[>, newD
.I � TRH � � ,�Ur? ; � g .�.a:,P<� Coc•� s
rt—
tiNT);��P
rip C f 1,v PC-
� y-cis vlk, GT-) AND
DlUr,r.ly:`�D Dur 4 1J51�

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS OR HOLDING PONDS
Clearing: All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started'. Stumps will -be removed within
the area of' the foundation of the embankmett and all excavated areas. All
stumps and roots exceeding one (1) inch in diameter shall be removed to a
minimum depth of one (1) foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made -of
all debris. The foundation area shall. ta'! loosened thoroughly -and roughly
leveled, with suitable equipment, before.placemact of•.eny embankment
material.
Cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated as shown on the plans.
The cutoff trench shall be baekfilled in thin''layers, not to exceed eight
(8) inches in depth. All standing water shall be: removed from the trench
before backfilling is started.
Construction: Construction will be composed of excayation-and fill placement
to obtain the planned in volume. Cons truction..shall be accomplished
to the grades and slopes as planned....
The fill material placed in .th4- embankment shall be free of sod, roots,
stones over six (6) inches in diameter, and other objectionable materials.
The fill material shall be placed abd spread over the entire fill in layers
not to exceed eight (8) inches in.thickness. Construction of the fill shall
be undertaken only at such times that the moisture content of the fill
material will permit a'reasonable degree of compaction.
The primary borrow area will be within the basin itself. Any other areas
will be designated on the plans.
vegetation: All exposed embankment, spillway, and borrow areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after construction.
SPECIAL SPECIFICATIONS
�a _ r0 (l+�r ;s rPGk:r.ve9 �'r C�.�s ¢r.�v % AS
/�? /Ni M �til C �/P'y � �i✓P,,C- (.�/i �� 7,8� ?4/} a �n Oni �� i NS. � I
At o r
b S h e. Atiw 14r,ciL s SiCs�c` .�C cr•t,e.rpr C�/¢f� ✓rn-/ Gttto d�G fir.vc�i
,c}�d �,8�l�,raoaJ%' �� o�,G✓ /-esx p/isrSG �,.-•,�.�4�� .u��ae ccs•� .i�
f�
's
Co a,T�-�-TEoti► a F
s
Cut Core Where Fill Exceeds 3' 41wf
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
o�ap� Jc�`c.uso�% LJS P
s i�a y a !!off duo V,
QUO .' ,a AG!` ,Sla 6� I s: A�,
54a o w r v jiA-wr s i►.a�
e -1-t C14 "W cal"{�+ �o yob
%1'i�(i" �oVl/5 f11U'c�ajv O �
f p (etj efv s , a'i1)

U. S- DEPARIKENT OF AGRICULTURE MC-ENG-40
Soil Conservation Service Rev, 7/91
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT
NAME:
county:
Date: v
Address: l �59/ems �� c� ,��� �� r- Nc 2-72-98
1•t%s P C� C jtr w
Alolk-
LEKGI4[ D 5 v' 1' So x e{
Si DE SLOPE _ZTO 1
0�0'
lV0i 7 AVE. TOP ELEV. /or,
I�/fa
oti
D
40
c—
�
A0 o AVE. BOTTOM ELEV. �
1 qo, 7 1
LEMSTH _--_
(See beck for volupe calculations)
Use of facility: !�� ! 1�'% [A)iA"S�
Capacity:_ 2- q 7. Z 7-- 9 Gallons -3 3 0-5 2- Ft3
Soil Type:
Bench Mark Description e,, 41 k--
rt-d v,e A47ar>>k / D' r--t►-l= AJ1� -6D,C AMI 0 -(- /o f.
Bottom
Normal Liquid Level
Storage for normal Precip.
Maximum Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm Storage
Crest ESW
Max.Flow Depth
Freeboard
Top of Dam
BIIMMARY
Elev. — qo ,7
Elev.
(+) Ft.
Elev. 177
(+) /, j rFt.
Elevti.2-
(+) 15 Ft.
(+) /, o Ft.
Elev.

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
File Code: 210
Landowner 7(j - _mod GieU Sy�L/ County AG�A/V
Community or Group No. ��' Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam /D Ft. Length of Flood Pool D Ft.
A5"s 6 9- C►',a�.lv�re
Date of Field Hazard Investigation_ _TAB / 7 Z-003
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Ilev.:Est.
Elevation
Kind of
:Improvements:
of Breach
Reach: Length:
Width: Slope:
Land Use ;
Improvements
Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft.
Ft. %
/7 Ft.
Ft.
�
V � fir• r'-PrLI •
_.
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach /12,60i,6, W0-11-eA.-
)tD l �1 0 , 3 Are rG W (; -r,
p� �'a'y)f)y. 600,00
o Nac L'.) , �C-
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V)
By
name
e
Concurred By _
name title
W�
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
zz_
Date V7/0 3
Date
�_3.2- ?IA?

USDA United States Natural NC-CPA-17
Department of Resources Rev. Dec. 2000
Agriculture Conservation Page 1 of 2
Service
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Name ^ TTL _ rt
Address 4; LL.2x Al-C. 2 7 x 68
04) 33 G 37 F - G yrz
Telephone (, 3 3 L' 37 (1- 3 J 70
Location 5-W. D -t- 'SAJdtJ 4+,n,p %v�.�.
ON S,R- z3 S Ale*i-
A- Co
AA
Size of Operation (animal units) c]q co t-j
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER G/4UPJ+ A-a"Je)
9'"L GA.c.relt)
L�3 00 FT
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACILITY (school, church, etc...) GYlrxskr+f
1 I�FT
IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN?
YES_ NO ✓
If yes, MRCS cannot provide assistance.
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A 'BLUE LINE" PERENNIAL STREAM?
YES ✓ NO
If no, site must he relocated.
DOES SITE MEET MINIMUM STATE SETBACK REQUIREh1ENTS FROM A
YES ✓ NO�
WELL SUPPLYING WATER FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION? �
'91S-1/iNGG 'D LJIrze,
If no, NRCS cannot provide assistance.
IS SITE WIT14FN 1-MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY?
YES_ NO !�
If yes, landowner should consult with a local zoning board about required
permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval.
./
ARE UTILITY LINES LOCATED IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA?
YES_ NO V
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual for policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference material may be attached to site evaluation.)
WETLANDS
WILL PROJECT INVOLVE CLEARING VEGETATION, IMPROVING DRAINAGE, OR FILLING LOW GROUND?
If yes, producer should have a "Certified Wetland Determination" on file for the work site. YES NO k,
Producers shall complete forms CPA-038 and AD-1026 to obtain Certified Weiland Determinations.
WILL THE PROJECT INVOLVE DIRECT OR INDIRECT MANIPULATION OF WETLAND SOILS,
PLANTS, OR HYDROLOGY? YES NO
1F WETLANDS WILL BE MANIPULATED, HAS THE PRODUCER BEEN ADVISED THAT THEY MUST NOT WORK IN
WETLANDS UNTIL THEY HAVE RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONCERNING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS? titlk YES NO_
NRCS WILL PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PROJECTS IMPACTING WETLANDS ONLY UNDER THE
FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES:
a.) NRCS has determined that a suitable non -wetland site is not available Ij1A, YES NO
h.) The most practical site for the project involves wetlands. NRCS has determined this site to be most practical considering the
change of wetland functions, the suitability of the resource for this project, the costs, and best available technology. The producer,
according to a mitigation plan provided or approved by NRCS, shall mitigate unavoidable impacts to wetlands.
.�j/y YES— NO
ODOR CONTROL
14AS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER:
• PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION?
YES —Z NO
PRE -CHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH WATER TO AT LEAST,'. OF THE CAPACITY? N/A -YES NO
USTtiG GOOD SOUND JUDGEMENT IN I -AND APPLICA T ION OF WASTE? YESNO

NC-CPA-17
Rev. Dec. 2000
Page 2 of 2
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
If the answer to any of the following is YES, MRCS may provide technical assistance according to its
General INIanual policies. Contact the resource specialist for assistance, if needed.
USING THE FOTG LIST OF ENDANGERED & THREATENED SPECIES AS A GUIDE, IS IT OBVIOUS THAT THE SITE
PROVIDES HABITAT FOR A LISTED SPECIES? YES NO V"
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED N THE PLANNFNG AREA, OR YES NO V
WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IhIPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA?
HAS A CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW BEEN PERFORMED FOR THE AREA, PRIOR TO STARTING ANY GROUND
DISTURBING ACTIVITIES? YES_LX NO
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT YE5 NO ✓
FARMLANDS N THE OPERATING UNIT?
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES NO
WASTE IsIANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY APPLY ALL WASTE INCLUDING YES t/ NO
SLUDGE, EVEN THOUGH SLUDGE MAY BE ONLY APPLIED INFREQUENTLY?
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? i� YES `"O
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER GET AN AGREEMENT FOR YES NO
LAND ON WHICH WASTE- WILL BE APPLIED? �JI
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.)
SOIL INVESTIGATION (VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET .ATTACHED)
IS SOIL_ SUITABLE FOR L N? Gc�4 s� Sd�I A�e panlG� 7 J/
YES NO
IS A LINER REQUIRED? YE5 I/ NO
TYPE OF LINER TO 8E USED: CLAY BENTONiTE SYNTHETIC
IF CLAY LFNER IS TO BE USED, IS SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON SITE? YES V-_"NO
IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE ACCESS TO CLAY? �J[A- YES NO
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED? (Attach soil investigation sheet to site evaluation.) YES / NO /
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TILE PRESENT? (If ves, file must be removed or plugged.) YES N,0 Y
Si'1'G APPI20Y'ED
ES�/ NO CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS
This site investigation is valid for twelve months from the date shown below. If Construction has not been started
% ithin twelve months, a new src investigation will be rec rired. /l
Signature) t tlz�✓ Dale I L�-'?o /a z
`k Changes In the local or 5taie lave or chalm_,es in the standard coulci require a nev,' Site Inv esligalial.