710073_Inspection_20181010

✓ 1-9 ivy �
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
rot 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review ®Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:I 10p1 Arrival Time: QO — Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �' j a TA'-w Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: r
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: — Phone: OU h 3 303 6
Onsite Representative: `
P �e S��� �� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish 14�
a er Da' Cow
Wean to Feeder by Non-LayerI Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish I Oak) Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean LOD ,Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ILayers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys °
Other Turkey Poults
Other MOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the'conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [—] No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes fA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? 1P
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of inspection: t 0 1 Jo
Waste Collectibn&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Co No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:] No V NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): L G ,
Observed Freeboard(in): 11
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) T
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ONE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes '� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application -
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes '❑ No, ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s);
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA T NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1� NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weath r Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA Q NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - 1 Date of Inspection: jlp 10
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
o
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check [—] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA V
NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [�)No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW? ❑ Yes CA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
IFS: 91% Z y� Y' �g: -�
;,n ,�-Q 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: V e Vv�Qs� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 10 [113 (D
Page 3 of 3 21 015