20051833 Ver 1_Complete File_20050921

OF WATER Michael F. Easley, Governor
`Q? QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
October 27, 2005
LJ Readal, CDR/CEC/USN
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28547
Subject: 401 Water Quality GC #3495
Shoreline Stabilizatioli •l >? ? ?;;JJ Q
Brewster Scout Area
DWQ Project # 05 183 ?Vj I
Onslow County
kt g i;tv
Dear Commander Readal•;
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions (WQC # 3495) to conduct the
following activity located on Brewster Scout Camp area in the Camp Lejeune located in Jacksonville,
Onslow County. This approval allows you to:
1. Fill 0.23 acre of 404 coastal wetlands for 902 linear feet of shoreline stabilization. This impact
includes fill material and the rip rap necessary to protect the shoreline.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in you Pre-Construction
Notification (PCN) application received as complete by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) in the
Wilmington Regional Office on October 4, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have determined
that General Water Quality Certification Number 3495 (enclosed) covers this activity. This Certification
can also be found on line at: http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/certs:htm]. This Certification (#3495)
allows you to use your 404 Permit when the Corps of Engineers issues it. Please keep.in mind that there
may be additional Federal, State or Local regulations applicable to your project, such as (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations, NPDES
Stormwater and Coastal Stormwater. In addition, this approval will expire when the accompanying
404 Permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
Please be aware that if you change or modify your project, you must notify the Division
(DWQ) in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the
future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification
and the additional conditions listed on the following page:
N. C. Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] Fax [phone] One
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper NorthCarolina
Naturally
Page Two
LJ Readal, CDR/CEC/USN
Brewster Scout Area
DWQ Project # 051883
October 27, 2005
1. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-construction Notice
Application. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall
be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur;
2. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to this office and a copy to the
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Please notify this Office at the number listed below if any problem arises during the
construction of the project that may affect water quality.
Please read General Certification # 3495. If you do not accept any of the conditions of
this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the
date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition conforming to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings,
6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are
final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the DWQ Pen-nit #051883 under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Joanne Steenhuis or Ed Beck at
910-796-7215.
Sincer5y,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosures: GC # 3495
Certificate of Completion
cc: Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
Brad Shaver, - USACE Wilmington
Marty Karonic - Camp Lejeune Environmental
Kevin Avolis, P.E. - Avolis Engineering, P.A.
WiRO
401 PERMIT ISSUED
Subject: 401 PERMIT ISSUED
From: Patricia Collins <Patri [e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:09:41 -0400
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, IAN McMillan <[e-mail]>
The following project has been issued a 401 permit:
Brewster Scout Area, Camp Lejeune **303d** DWQ#: 2005 1833, Onslow County
Patricia Collins
Administrative Assistant
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection Section
Wilmington, North Carolina
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 of 1
10/28/2005 10:43 AM
fl
Triage Check List
Date: 10/03/05
Project Name: - Brewster Scout Camp - Camp Lejeune
DWQ#: 05-1833
County: Onslow

To: Noelle Lutheran, Wilmington Regional Office
60-Day processing time: 9/21/05 to 11/19/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
i 3 3

p@RodF= P
SEP 2 1 2005
DENR • WATER QUALITY
!'Zr?LROSAND STOMMATM LUNCH
OF W A TF
^* tt tw : ?^ ? G E
f i
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Pen-nits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
httli://w\v\v.sa\v.us,ice.,iriny.mil/wetlands/Perm anp.htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at littp://wvv\v.saw.usace.armv.mil/wetlands/index.fitm, or contact one of the field
offices listed on page 3 of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by tile USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncxvetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for General Certifications is not required, provided
that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet should
contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on page 4 of this application) prior to submittal of the application.
Page 1 of 1
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's
twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4) the applicant should contact the North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management (DCM). DCM will determine whether or not the project is within a designated
Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency. In such
cases, DCM will require a CAMA Permit and will coordinate the 404/401 Permits.
The applicant may also choose to coordinate with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to ensure
that the proposed project will have no impact upon any endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat as regulated by the Endangered Species Act, and the State Historic Preservation Office, North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources to ensure that the proposed project will have no impact upon
any properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Compliance with
these regulations is required to be eligible for any Department of the Army permit. The addresses for
both agencies are listed on page 3 of this application.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office. Upon receipt of an application, the
USACE will determine if the application is complete as soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This
PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant to address information needs for all USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as information required for State authorizations,
certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the information requested on this form will result in a
complete application for any of the USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the
minimum amount of information that must be provided for a complete PCN for each USACE
Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed. Reg. 12893 (March 9, 2000), available at
http://NvwNv.saNv.usace.army.mil/wetlands/nvpfina]FcdRe'2.pci Processing times vary by permit and
begin once the application has been determined to be complete. Please contact the appropriate
regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://li2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/fees.litm1. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested infornation, or denial.
Page 2 of 2
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
US Army Corps of Engineers Alleghany Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
151 Patton Avenue Ashe Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
Room 208 Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Telephone: [phone] Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Fax: [phone] Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Franklin Nash Surry
US Army Corps Of Engineers Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Suite 120 Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Raleigh, NC 27615 Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Telephone: [phone] Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
Fax: [phone] Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin Washington
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico Wayne
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans *Croatan National Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Hamctt Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
US Fis
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
h and Wildlife Service / National 1\1
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
arine Fisheries Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone]
Pa,-,e 3 of 3
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan I lertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
APPLICATION FORM BEGINS ON PAGE 5. PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT PAGES 1 - 4.
Page 4 of 4
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002 6 3 3
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
ITC., .i.._
I" -••, r•-• ••?u•u= -- 13 11UL app '-a U w w,s project, piease enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
I. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
0 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested
13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on pa??e
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Ivianazement Area of --a
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), the p it V
11. Applicant Information
S E p 2 1. 2005
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: LJ READAL, CDR/CEC/USN DE1411-WAI6H tillAuTY
VZWJ03 MO 9ftMMWAT0 D{tl Q1
Mailing Address: l nnc; MTC WAF.T. ROAD
CAMP LEJEUNE, NC 2854
l elephone Number: 91 0-451 -5950 Ext. 2pt, x Number: 91 0-451 -5463
E-mail Address: ----
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Avolis, P.E.
Company Affiliation: AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 15564
NEW BERN, NC 28563
Telephone Number: ( 252 ) 633-0068 Fax Nutnber:_( 252) 633-6507
E-mail Address: avoliseng@lpmonline. net
hue 5 ol'j
111. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SHORELINE STABILIZATION PART 1- BREWSTER SCOUT AREA
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO. N62470-02-B-3455
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): ----
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): ----
4. Location
County: Onslow Nearest Town: Jacksonville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): See attached site map
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N340-43-51 W770-25. 0
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): ? 1 .0 ACRE
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):
8. River Basin: WHITE OAK
NORTHEAST CREEK
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/adinin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: EXISTING SITE IS WOODED SCOUT ACTIVITY
AREA. SITE IS USED FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES.
Page 6 of 6
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
SEE ATTACHED PROJECT NARRATIVE
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
SEE ATTACHED PROJECT NARRATIVE
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional detenninations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NONE
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
NONE ANTICIPATED
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 7
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts
OF RIP RAP SHORELINE STABILIZATION,
• INSTALLATION OF 902 LF
ALL ABOVE THE NORMAL WATER
LEVEL, AT THE BREWSTER SCOUT AREA.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
-- fillin 0.23 yes 0 saltwater mars

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://?? ?? w. fema.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 11 .0 AC
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 1 0, 01 4 SF, 0.23 AC
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif
NONE

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
ww,v.usUs.cov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., %vww.topozonc.com,
ww%v.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 0
Page 8 of 8
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
NONE

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
(?., darn/embankment, excavation, installation of
Describe the method of constructio N/A
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
see attached project narrative
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 9
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmeide.litm1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NO MITIGATION PROPOSED
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.tis/wrp/index.iitm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following infonmation:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 10
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes © No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes © No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ?X If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
/-one f extends out sU feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 1 1 of I 1
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
A TOTAL OF 10,014 SF OF RIP RAP WILL BE INSTALLED; HOWEVER, DUE
TO THE LOOSE NATURE OF THE STONE, IT IS CONSIDERED
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NO SEWER TO BE GENERATED BY PROJECT
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibiji?y prgblems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
LJ RBADAL; CDR, CEC,
(?) R All'o 1?6
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from tile appli
Date
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
ATTACHMENT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
SHORELINE STABILIZATION BASEWIDE - PART I
BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT N62470-02-B-3455
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THIS PROJECT ENTAILS THE CONSTRUCTION OF 902 LINEAR FEET OF RIP RAP
SHORELINE STABILIZATION IN THE BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP AREA OF MARINE
CORP BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE, ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. THE
SHORELINE TO BE PROTECTED IS LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AN
EXISTING SCOUT CAMP AREA. THE SHORELINE IN THIS AREA HAS EXPERIENCED
EXCESSIVE EROSION IN THE PAST. A PORTION OF THE SHORELINE IN THE AREA
OF A SCOUT HUT/BUILDING HAS BEEN STABILIZED WITH RIP-RAP.
IT IS THE DESIRE OF MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE TO INSTALL RIP-RAP
AS A METHOD OF SHORELINE STABILIZATION IN THIS GENERAL AREA.
SPECIFICALLY, IT IS PROPOSED THAT GRANITE RIP-RAP BE INSTALLED
LANDWARD OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE. THE GRANITE WILL BE
INSTALLED TO AN ELEVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5 FEET ABOVE THE NORMAL
WATER LEVEL.
ADDITIONALLY, SMALL PODS OF SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA HAVE ESTABLISHED
THEMSELVES NATURALLY ALONG THIS SECTION OF SHORELINE. THESE AREAS
ARE DELINEATED ON THE PROJECT PLANS. IT IS PROPOSED THAT ALL EXISTING
VEGETATION ALONG THE SHORELINE BE LEFT IN TACT.
IT IS PROPOSED THAT 902 LINEAR FEET OF RIP RAP SHORELINE BE INSTALLED.
THE TOTAL AREA OF IMPACT IS 10,014 SF, 0.23 ACRES. ALL RIP RAP WILL BE
PLACED ABOVE THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL.
II. CONSTRUCTION METHODS
ALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS ISSUED BY MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP
LEJEUNE ARE ISSUED ON A COMPETITIVE BASIS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALLOWED
TO UTILIZE HIS DISCRETION IN DEVELOPING A WORK PLAN FOR EACH PROJECT
AND TO DEVELOP A PROPOSED COURSE OF ACTION TO EXECUTE THE PROJECT.
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIP RAP SHORELINE STABILIZATION WILL LIKELY
BE COMPLETED FROM THE WATER. THE UPLAND AREAS LOCATED ADJACENT TO
THE PROJECT SHORELINE AREA ARE COVERED WITH MATURE TIMBER
VEGETATION THAT IS TO REMAIN. DUE TO THE SHALLOW NATURE OF THE
WATER IN THE PROJECT AREA, IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT RIP RAP MATERIAL WILL
BE TRANSPORTED TO THE PROJECT SITE ON SMALL BARGES. HAND LABOR WILL
BE UTILIZED TO PLACE THE GEO-GRID FABRIC. A TRACK HOE OR EXCAVATOR
WILL BE UTILIZED TO PLACE THE RIP RAP MATERIAL.
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DEVICES ARE PROPOSED TO BE
UTILIZED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION AND
OFF-SITE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT. AS INDICATED ON THE PROJECT PLANS A
TURBIDITY CURTAIN WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE PROJECT BOUNDARY
WATERWARD OF THE PROPOSED RIP RAP. THE TURBIDITY CURTAIN WILL BE
MAINTAINED FOR THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONALLY, ALL
UPLAND AREAS DISTURBED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
WILL BE RE-ESTABLISHED WITH VEGETATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
VEGETATIVE SEEDING SCHEDULE PRESENTED ON THE PROJECT PLANS. THE
PROPOSED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRACTICES WILL PREVENT
THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT OFF-SITE.
THE TOTAL PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA THIS PROJECT IS 10,014 SF, 0.23 ACRES;
THEREFORE, NO EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PERMIT IS REQUIRED
TO EXECUTE THE PROJECT.
III. ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
THE MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE MAINTAINS AN INVENTORY OF ALL
ARCHEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES ON MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP
LEJEUNE. THE PROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARIES ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN
ANY KNOWN AREA OF ARCHEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE.
IV. WETLAND IMPACTS
THIS PROJECT INCLUDES THE PLACEMENT OF RIP RAP ON AREAS ABOVE THE
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ONLY.
A TOTAL OF 10,014 SF, 0.23 ACRES OF LAND IMMEDIATELY ABOVE THE NORMAL
WATER LEVEL WILL BE IMPACTED TO INSTALL THE SHORELINE STABILIZATION.
V. SUBAQUATIC VEGETATION
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT IMPACT ANY SUBAQUATIC VEGETATION
THAT EXISTS WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT AREA OF THE SHORELINE STABILIZATION.
VI. WATER QUALITY
THE LONG TERM WATER QUALITY WITHIN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE
PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT BE IMPACTED ADVERSELY BY THE PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION. THE SHORT TERM WATER QUALITY MAY BE IMPACTED TO A
LIMITED EXTENT BY THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE UTILIZED TO PREVENT
SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION FROM OCCURRING TO THE SURFACE WATERS.
THE RIP RAP SHORELINE STABILIZATION WILL PREVENT SHORELINE EROSION
FROM CONTINUING TO OCCUR IN THIS AREA. THE LONG-TERM IMPACT ON THE
SURFACE WATERS IN THE PROJECT AREA ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE IMPROVED AS
A RESULT OF THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT DUE TO THE PREVENTION OF
SHORELINE EROSION AND RELATED SEDIMENTATION.
VII. NAVIGABILITY - PUBLIC TRUST WATERS
THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN THE DISTURBANCE OF
NAVIGATIBLE PUBLIC TRUST WATERS.
VIII. CONSISTENCY WITH PERMIT 42-00
NATIONWIDE PERMIT 13 WAS ISSUED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
ON MARCH 18, 2002. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
CONDITIONS OF THE NATIONWIDE PERMIT EXCEPT THAT THE TOTAL LENGTH OF
THE SHORELINE STABILIZATION IS 902 LINEAR FEET, EXCEEDING THE 500
LINEAR FOOT PERMIT CONDITION. THE INSTALLATION OF THE SHORELINE
STABILIZATION ALONG THE SPECIFIED AREA WILL FULLY PROTECT THE ENTIRE
SCOUT CAMP AREA. PROVIDING SHORELINE STABILIZATION ABOVE 500 LINEAR
FEET IN THIS AREA WILL NOT HAVE ANY ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
OR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS.
ER-01-117
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
FOR THE NEW RIVER INLAND SHORELINE STABILIZATION
AND REHABILITATION STUDY
FOR
MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE
NORTH CAROLINA
Responsible Officer: Commanding General
Marine Corps Base
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
Point of Contact: Mr. Tom Barbee
AC/S, Installations and Environment Dept
Environmental Management Division
Environmental Conservation Branch
Marine Corps Base
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
FEBRUARY 2002
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
for the
NEW RIVER INLAND SHORELINE STABILIZATION
AND REHABILITATION STUDY
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Onslow County, North Carolina
Pursuant to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40 Code of
Federal Regulations 1500-1508) implementing procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune,
gives notice that an Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding Of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) have been prepared for the proposed action to stabilize
and protect eroding portions of the New River shoreline aboard the Camp Lejeune
complex. Wind-generated wave action and past hurricane flooding have caused 80
percent of the shoreline to erode an average of one foot per year. This results in
about two acres of land being lost annually. Camp Lejeune is concerned that
erosion will cause the loss of base infrastructure, negatively impact military
training operations, and increase maintenance activities and costs.
The EA addresses two alternatives. One is the no action alternative. If
chosen, it would do nothing to stabilize any areas of the shoreline. The
environmental impacts of the no action alternative include continued erosion of the
shoreline, negatively impacting soils, vegetation, wetlands, near-shore fish habitat,
and archaeological sites.
The second, the proposed action, is the preferred alternative. It includes
stabilization by these techniques: construction of offshore detached sills with
marsh vegetation plantings; construction of riprap revetments; and placing concrete
mats. These three techniques were chosen because they are suitable for stabilizing
a range of high and low wave energy environments in wetlands and uplands. Other
techniques were considered but are not suitable for the New River shoreline or are
too expensive to use. Environmental impacts of the proposed action include
temporary soil disturbance and turbidity, change in habitat from soil to rock,
creation of wetlands and habitat, and long-term stabilization of soils. None of the
impacts are significant. Implementation of the proposed action will not adversely
impact threatened and endangered species.
Based on information gathered during preparation of the EA, the Marine
Corps finds that implementing the proposed action using the techniques described
in the EA will not significantly impact the human environment. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Separate projects will be
designed and submitted to the North Carolina State Clearinghouse for review and
comment. Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune will obtain all required permits and
approvals from State and Federal agencies prior to taking. any action. The EA
addressing this action is on file and may be reviewed by interested parties at
Cor uiianding General, Consolidated Public Affairs office, Marine Corps Base,
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004, telephone [phone]. A limited
number of copies of the document are available to fill single copy requests.
1 8 MAR 2002
Date
,L) /t-c tits
D. M. Mize
Major General, U.S. Marine Corps
Commanding General
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
2
ER-01-117
i
I,
Environmental Assessment
for the New River Inland Shoreline Stabilization
and Rehabilitation Study
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune,
North Carolina

Responsible Officer: Commanding General
Marine Corps Base
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
Point of Contact: Mr. Tom Barbee
AC/S, Installations and Environment Dept.
Environmental Management Division
Environmental Conservation Branch
Marine Corps Base
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
[phone]
February 2002
A?CB Camp Lejeune Inland Shoreline Stabilization and Rehabilitation Study
Executive Summary
Marine Corps Base $ICB) Camp Lejeune proposes to stabilize/protect eroding portions
of the New River shoreline on the base, through implementation of the best management
plan for given site conditions and regulatory restrictions. Approximately 47 miles (75.6
km) of the 60 miles (96.5 km) of riverine shoreline in the study area have been identified
as areas for which stabilizati on measures have been recommended. A range of
engineering alternatives for shoreline protection was evaluated. Shoreline stabilization
methods that result in the creation of marsh-vegetated shorelines will be used whenever
possible. This programmatic Environmental Assessment (EA) identifies and evaluates the
potential environmental impacts of these actions.
Purpose and Need
The shoreline of theliew River is eroding from wind-generated wave action and from the
effects of recent hurricane flooding. Approximately 80 percent of the New River
shoreline is erodingat an average of one foot per year (0.3 meters per year; USACE
1988). This erosionresults in nearly two acres (8094 square meters) of valuable upland
being lost annually. Camp Lejeune is concerned that the erosion will cause the loss of
base infrastructure, negatively impact military training operations, and increase
maintenance activives and costs.
Approximately 8% of the shoreline within the project area has been stabilized over the
years- The majority of the protection is revetments. Historically, most of the revetments
have been constructed with rubble that appears to have been placed by end dumping the
material from the topof the bank. The revetments in several areas have failed, allowing
continued erosion of the bank. More recently constructed revetments have been
constructed ofriprapbased on an engineering design. These structures are in good
condition and appearto be functioning well. Concrete bulkheads also have been used
successfully at a fewsites within the project area.
The objective of theproposed actions is to stabilize eroding portions of the New River
shoreline with engineering designs appropriate for the physical conditions and type and
degree of erosion. This would help control on-going wind-generated erosion and help
diminish the effects of future storms, thereby preserving access to essential training areas
that support military training requirements, and recreation areas that provide
opportunities for base personnel to rest and relax. Stabilization of the shoreline would
further afford protection for natural and cultural resources in the area. Shoreline erosion
control would ultimately improve water quality and protect habitat for fish and wildlife,
while preventing undocumented and documented archaeological sites from being eroded
into the river and lost
Proposed Actions and Alternatives
Areas of shoreline were characterized based on their general topography, soil, and
erosional characteristics. These generalized shoreline areas were further divided into 103
November 2001 Page S-1
Al CB Camp Lejcune Inland Shorclinc Stabilization and Rehabilitation Study
segments to allow more specific evaluation of stabilization needs. The need for
protection was prioritized by ranking, based on a number of factors, including the
presence of threatened buildings or areas important to base activities, the presence of
threatened archaeological sites, the existence of wetland areas, and the rate of shoreline
recession. The type of shoreline present (high bank, medium or low bank, or wetland)
was then used to determine the method and degree of erosion control required.
Alternatives considered for the stabilization/protection of eroding bank environments
include the no action alternative, and multiple action alternatives for a range of high and
low wave energy environments and wetlands.
The proposed action for stabilizing most eroding bank communities is the construction of
offshore detached sills with planting of marsh vegetation. These sills could be
constructed of either granite or limestone riprap or marine grade treated timber. Briefly,
implementation would involve accessing the eroding shoreline and establishing a staging
area from which offshore construction could be coordinated. Construction would then
involve the placement of material approximately 20 to 50 ft (6.1 to 15.2 m) offshore. The
height of the sill would be approximately 6 in. (15 cm.) above the mean low water line
for sills constructed of riprap, and a minimum of 6 in. (15 c{h.) above the mean high
water line for sills constructed of timber. Design would include gaps in the structure to
allow for tidal exchange behind the sill. Native marsh vegetation would then be planted
and encouraged to establish between the sill and shoreline. These plants would
themselves act as biological stabilizers of the eroding shoreline, in concert with the sill
structure. After construction is completed, any areas on the shore disturbed or cleared
would be repaired and revegetated with native plant species, as appropriate.
In areas where it may be determined necessary to provide a greater degree of protection
or stabilization, as in areas that experience high wave energy and/or behind which are
located essential base resources, the proposed action is the construction of riprap
revetments. Briefly, implementation of this alternative would involve accessing the
eroding shoreline through the creation of roads in the uplands, where necessary, and
along the top of the bank. The riverbanks would then be graded, and a key trench would
be installed at the top of the embankments. After grading the existing embankment, a
woven geotextile material would be placed over the bank extending across and into the
trench, and at least 10 ft Q m) beyond the toe of the bank. Stone riprap material would
be placed first in a stone apron at the toe of the bank, and then from the toe to the top of
the bank, working in sections along the river. After construction is completed, any
cleared or disturbed areas would be repaired and revegetated with native grasses and tree
saplings, as appropriate.
Another alternative considered for the stabilization/protection of eroding bank
environments is the use of concrete block mats. Briefly, the implementation of this
alternative would involve the installation of pre-fabricated compressed concrete blocks
interconnected with galvanized steel cables. These block mats would be installed on
eroding riverbanks, which would first be graded and covered with woven geotextile. The
geotextile would be anchored into a key trench on the top of the bank, and the ends of the
November 2001
Page S-2
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O, Box 15564 • New Bern, North Carolina 28561 • [phone]
2 0 0 5 1 8 3 3
September 13, 2005
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Shoreline Stabilization Basewide Part 1, Brewster Scout Camp
MCB Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
AE Project No. 03051
Gentlemen:
Attached please find a 401 Water Quality Certification application for he referenced project
consisting of the following:
• Permit Application (Seven Copies)
• Project Plans (Seven Copies)
• USGS Map (Seven Copies)
• Permit Fee $200
It is requested that you review the attached permit application and if deemed appropriate issue a
401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed impact.
If you should have any questions or need any additional infonnation to process this request,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
ft?@,Wfl 11 Ili 2 1 205
it D&Nk - WgTE
R4.9t?/

j _ A ?

0-T F
OS-1833
9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cyndi Karoly
NC DENR/DWQ
FROM: Steven H. Everhart, PhD tt '`
Southeast Coastal Region Coordinator Nov 0
DATE: October 28, 2005
SUBJECT: Brewster Scout Area Shoreline Stabilization DWQ 420051833
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (Commission) reviewed the request
to stabilize the shoreline of Northeast Creek on a shore near Paradise Point with regard to impacts on fish
and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Coastal Area
Management Act (G.S. 113A-100 through 113A-128), as. amended, and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
The applicant proposes to reshape and armor, with riprap, approximately 1000 feet of shoreline above the
normal water level. No work is to be performed below normal water level.
The Commission does not object to the project as proposed in regard to its impacts to fish and wildlife
resources. We would recommend that plantings of native shrubs such as wax myrtle (Alyrica cerifera) be
used to further stabilize the area upslope. Furthermore, we would recommend planned removal of
upslope riprap as the bank becomes stabilized, replacing it with plantings.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this permit application. If you need further
assistance or additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
I
T - JI 1~ -
~~'n' LiAr= ~,APP~~w'ET'
r-- + - -
.
i
i -1-
i
'DOTES
1 CONTKA^?OR SMALL ACTOR SHALE If~JSTALL Ti ~~RBIDITY CURTAIN PRIOR T1J
COMPLET~iJi~ ANY PF ETIiJi; ANY PROJECT WORK,
2. TURBIDITY CURTAIN CITY CURTAIN SHALL BE REMOVED UPON PROJECT
COMPLETION. ETION.
3~ALL UPLAND AREAS 'LAND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
VEGETATED IN ACCC TED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VEGETATION PLAN
SHOWN 1Pd DETAIL C, 1Pd DETAIL C, SHEET C3
4. THE CONTRACTOR SI ENTRACTOR SHALL NOT REMOVE ANY VEGETATION
ABOVE OR BELOW TI OR BEEOW THE PJORMAL WATER EEUEL EXCEPT
FALLEN TREES OR S TREES OR SHRUBS ON THE BANK AREA THAT INTERFERE
WITH THE INSTALLAT HE INSTALLATION OF THE RIP RAP SHORELINE STABILIZATION.
I
-o~
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5 i ~
• 902 LF o -oa 0
0 1 ` _ ~ - 0.7
4 ~ A B RIP RAP H SC RIP RAP SH R IN 0'3 TUR IDITY CURTAIN 0 EL E /
STABILIZATION SEE NOTES - ~
C2 C3 C2 C3 STABILIZATIOP ~01`~ 1.5 _~-.1.2 ~ ~ ~ , _ J,... 0 4 ~ ~
-o.o ~}-g- ~
~ 1.9 ~ _ ~ ~ / _ ~ ,Ills ~Illc ~--Q1 _ _ ~0 -1.5
=e-~-o- -
~ 15 ~ i ~ -0.4 1(~-_
EXISTIPI rypRESS ~ _ J ~ 1.6 _ / i ~ L. ~ - 1.5
EE TO REMAIN / _ ~,.i - - _ NORMAL WATER LEVEL _ - -
2 / i 1_ ~ X1.4 _ _ _ - - rs
5 ~ y - - ~iQ~
~1a- - NORMAL WATER LEUEL - ~ EXISTING COASTAL VEGETATION ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ° / 15
TBM-SPIKE IN 24" PINE _ i ~.o / -0 3 -NO DISTURBANCE- ° ° 1 1.4
N 357947.85 / TURBIDITY CURTAIN i / °
E 2488515.60 -0,3 / W~ SEE NO ~ ES ,o WOODS TO REMAIN EXISTING RIP-RAP ° °
~ -v 3 ELEV. = 4.5 TO REMAIN ,1,51.1
~ A -o o - - - - o~ ~ 1 0 2 / EXISTING TOE OF SLOPE 0 0 ,
~ - - - \ ~ - ~o /
~ ~ / i i Sys, ~
- / i ~ ~~Q'' ~ _ I - o 'v ~
.8j, o.z ~ , EXISTING TOP OF BANK N42°41'24"E . - TBM-SPIKE - N 1 . 1 -1a
NORMAL~WATER LEVEL ~ - _ _ - - - _ 78~ 3585 6 6
773 ,V4 ~ - ~ 5 ~ 18.6 ~ ~ E 2489040,25 6 I _ , 1 ~ 1.7 0
ELEV. = 18.6' ,5~ 2 O
i \ , ~ ,a ~ ~ ~
~ I i
1~ Q~
~ TT / ~ I~ 8
6 ~ ~b~: 1 I
~ EXISTING COASTAL VEGETATION ~ SUMMARY OF IMPACTS 6 I , n i lJ ,
-NO DISTURBANCE- ~ 2.3 -1.7
~ A ~ E' RIP R4~~~~ ~h~,~,PT ir,~F , ~ ~ _ . ~ _ TOTAL ~Ef~C~TH OF SHORELINE STABILIZATION 9U~ LF EhI~TING PINE n
~ C2 C3 i_2' C3 STABI'~_~EATION ~ ~ TREE TO REMAIN _ TOTAL AREA OF IMPACT 10 014 SF 0.23 ACRES A~~ AE , i AEA ABOVE THE NORMA W T ~ A ER ~EUE~
WOODS TO REMAIN r~
1.
I
2.7 -1.2
11.6 -0.0 I
I v N~
a 4~"5 4
I
\ I 0.0
1.8 0
1 ~
-0.9 > ~
o ~
1 ~0
L5 ~0~ -1.1
15
5 1.6
i
~~quira?q~ Z b
CAR
REAL =
• 15738 c yam:
,,ti P iii kFVIN
1 C:~r L AYO!_~T i
c1 C,
C2
AVO LI S ENGINEERING, P. A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND
P.O. BOX 15564, NEW BERN NC 28561 S) BASE
252633-0063, FAX [phone] ( ) ( ) CAMP LEJEUNE NORTH CAROLINA
DES. J.K AVELIS P,E, SHORELINE STABILIZATION BASEWIDE
DR. R,R DOWNS PART I BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP
CHK. J,C, AvaLIS, P,Ei
SUBMITTED BY:
DESIGN DIR. SITE LAYOUT AND GRADING PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60 APPROVED: PWO OR OICC DATE SIZE ODE (DENT. NO NAVFAC DRAWING NO. 30
4542340
SATISFACTORY TO: DATE 80091 CONTR. CONTR. NO. N62470-02-8-3455
SCALE: 1 INCH = 30 FEET
SCALE: NOTED SPEC. 02-B-3455 SHEET 3 OF 4

~ - - - - 'Ar'PRC'vEL i GYM DATE
1 CAMA CCU",~~',^~~ ~~TS !±/18/04 JKA
-
I I VEGETATIVE SEEDING
i - ~ AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES AfJD THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SWALES, ALL EXPOSED AREAS SHALL
BE SEEDED i0 FHE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS:
i RIP RAP RIP RAP ~ SEED BED
~ r f` ~ LIME 1-1~2 T~~N PAR A~R~
FERTILIZER 1~2-TON PER ACRE
SEED
RYE GRAIN 50 LBS PER ACRE
TALI FESCUE 100 LBS PER ACRE i
MAY THROUGH AUGUST;
CENTIPEDE 5 LBS PER ACRE
- _ - PROCEDURE
STRAW MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE WHICH WILL
.NORMAL---- EXIT NORMAL EXISTING TOP - - - INSURE APPROXIMATELY 75~ COVERAGE OF THE SEEDED
EXISTING TOP - WATER_LINE OF WATER LINE
OF BANK OF BANK - - - AREA. THE STRAW AND SOWN SEED WILL BE LIGHTLY
- - - - - DISCED INTO THE BED TO GIVE IT FURTHER RESISTENCE
TO BLOWING AND WASHING.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE A FULL STAND OF
GRASS OVER THE ENTIRE DISTURBED AREA. IF NECESSARY 1
THE CONTRACTOR WILL WET DOWN THE AREAS TO ASSIST
IN SEED GERMINATION OR AID IN GROWTH IN TIMES OF
EXCESSIVELY DRY WEATHER. A STAND OF GRASS WILL BE
N 1 R D ACCEPTABLE WHEN THE ENTIRE STAND OF COSDEE
GRASS 1S AT LEAST FOUR INCHES HIGH AND HAS
ACHIEVED AT LEAST 95~ COVERAGE OF DISTURBED
AREAS. RESEEDING WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY BY
THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE SPECIFIED STAND OF GRASS.
C VEGETATION PLAN
. _ C2 C3
~ ~
TI,IRBIDITY CURTAIN TURBIDITY CURFAIN
SEE NOTES, SHEET C1 SEE NOTES, SHEET Cl
RIP .RAP
RIP RAP
i i
I
PEA PLAN UIEW PEAK 1~IEW
T T A NOT NO 0 SC LE NOT TO SCALE
~L! EXISTING VEGETQ ;TING VEG~T?r~n~~
ON BLUFF AREA TO F -F AREA TO REMAIN
EXISTING TOP
AFL EXISTING VEGETATION NO MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED OF BANK NO MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED
ON BLUFF AREA TO REMAIN BELOW THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL BELOW THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK i
I
RIP RAP TOP OF PIP RAP = 5.0' RIP RAP TI1P f1F RIP PAP = 0' _ 5
2
2 1
~i
I
10' TURBIDITY CURTAIN Iv i ~ TURBIDITY CIRT I AIN
SEE NOTES, SHEET Cl SEE NOTES, SHEET Cl
Illlllllq~?~~
EXISTING TOE C ~ N,• AAO
OF BAP,IK EXISTING TOP NORMAL WATER ELEVATION = 1 0'± off 1J1jRhr1AL 'vVATER ELEVATION = 1.0'± us, oo
OF BANK
Ex;ST:NG TOt ITT l' EAL B;~ UM ELEVATION = VARIES'SEE PLuI _
BOTTOM ELEVATION = V,"RIES (SEE PLAPJ} 15738 g
STRUCTI,!PAL GEOGBID STRU~TI~RAI- CEUGRID q~ .GINE.••~~~
ON E; ISTNG ORAGE C;I'J Exn,IN~, ADF
i
d C 3
NOT TO SCALE wl.'T T ' CCALE
A VO LIS E N G I N E E R I N G , DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND
P.O. BOX 15564, NEW BERN, NC 2856
[phone] FAX [phone] CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
DES. J,K. AVOL_IS P.E.
SHORELINE STABILIZATION BASEWIDE
WNS PART I BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP
("A~RIP RAP SHORELINE STABIU7ATION CONDITION 1 Y B RIP RAP SHORELINE STABILIZATION -CONDITION 2 DR. RR. DO cHK, _I C AY, OLI_, P E
1 C2 C3 NOT TO SCALE SUBMITTED BY:
C21 q )NOT TO SCALE DETAILS
DESIGN DIR.
APPROVED: PWO OR OICC DATE SIZE ODE (DENT. NO NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
4542341
80091 T
SATISFACTORY T0: :DA TE ~ONS:P. COMP N0. NF-4?0-02-B-5455
SCALE: NOTED SPEC. 02-B-3455 SHEET 4 OF 4

_ _ V ~ 1
--r-
~ ~ V~,~ ~ jJ I ~ (~PPR~~~LD
i
NOTES;
~H i I 1, CONTRACTOR A.L~ ?ACTOR SHA.~L INSTALL Tl!RBIDITY CURTAIN PRIOR TO
COMPLETING AN>' P _ETING AN>' PROJECT WORK.
2. TURBIDITY Ci,i~~T:"~P~ DITY Oi,iRT:~'P~,' S~'~Ai'~ BE REMOVED UPON PRC!JECT
COMPLETION. _ETION.
3,AEL UPLAND AREA` '~PLAND ARE?S DISTURBED BY COGdSTRUCTION SHAD BE
VEGETATED Iw A~~~;~~~ ~ATcD IPJ A;: ~~'~~RDAP~I~~'E '~~"JITH THE ~~%E'~ETATION P'~Af~l
j SHOWN IN DETAIL ~ IN DETAIL C, SHEET C3
4. THE CONTRACTOR ;ONTRACTOR SHALL NOT REMOVE ANY VEGETATION
ABOVE OR BELO'~"~ OR BELO'~~N THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL EXCEPT
FALLEN TREES OR N TREES OR SHRUBS ON THE BANK AREA THAT INTERFERE
WITH THE INSTALLA THE INSTALLATION OE THE RIP RAP SHORELINE STABILIZATIOGJ
i -0 7
-0 3
-0.4
-0 5
-0.5 i
-0.2
-1.0 -0.8 -0.8 ~ \ p.i ~ - -0.7
/ ~ _ ~
1 (TYI (TYP. OF 3) 0 3
~
-1.4 X0.1 15 04 ~ ~
1 ~ ~
-0 0 ~ 0.0 - ~ ` ~ _ . 1.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ -t 5
i 2 ~ o-- oo ~ ~
~ -5 ~ t5 ~ -04
EXISTING CYPRESS -1(~ ~ - - i j --fg~ - , ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ 23'2_ ~ - - ~ NORMAL WATER LEVEL i - -
1.1 ~ TREE TO REMAIN _ _ ~
~ / -o.o / - e o o a o
/ - -1.2 _ ~-0.1 / ~5- ~ _ ~ ~ _ ~1Q i. i o a ~
p /~~Q-- ~i / / ~ i EXISTING COASTAL VEGETATION / 15
/ / -NO DISTURBANCE- r
T M-SPIKE IN 24" PINE -1.0 ~ B -0.3 / ~ / / o a
N 357947.85 i / EXISTING RIP-RAP ~ o 0 WOODS TO REMAIN
E 2488515.60 -0.3 0~ / / \ ~ ~ / TO REMAIN ~ t t -o t -1.4
\ 0.2 / EXIS ING TOE OF SLO E
~ -o o - - o~ ~ / goo ~ ~ / / /
~ ~ / / /
~ NORMAL WATER LEVEL--;? / /
~ ~ 1.1 i ~ „ - - - TBM-SPIKE - - ~ -t a
0 2 ~ ~ ~ " , EXISTING TOP OF BANK 42°41'24 E . - N358516,61
0.1 NORMAL WATER LEVEL 3 / / _ - - - 773.78' ~ / . - 18 6 E 2489040.25 ~6 J ' -o ~ z
ELEV. = 18.6' S~ 2 O
0.0 ~ ~5 ~ _ ~ , ~a ~ ~
t - - - - - - . 12 ~ y
3 ~,0/
4 ~ - ~9 11 / 8
~5~ \ ~ 6 ~ t ~ I ,n
- ' EXISTING COASTAL VEGETATION -1.7 l/ ,
-NO DISTURBAPJCE- 2.3 -Q1
I I`-{J~
EXISTING PINE N
TREE TO REMAIN
I
WOODS TO REMAIN I
1
~ I
I
2 7 -t2 I -0 0
I

I
1 P ~ ~
14 4.5 -
\ I 00
1
0
t l
~ ~ -09
i t
O ` l
~Q.u
~ _ 1
~ ~
15 181 ~ ~
l
i I
\~~~uu?rr??r~~ \.k CAFjo
8S1~ ~i
• -ft
15738 ;
c ~ i~0 vim.
~~i~ kE`VIN P\~~`` ~r??n~nn~A~
A 151TE LAYOUT AND GRADING PLAN i
C1 C1 SCALE:
c 1
AVO LI S ENGINEERING, P.A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND
P.O. BOX 15564, NEW BERN, NC 28561 MARINE Cu"RPS BASE
252633-0068, FAX [phone] ( ) ( ) CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
DES. J K AVOLIS P.E. SHORELINE STABILIZATION BASEWIDE
DR. R R DOWNS PART I, BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP
CHK. JC. AVOLIS, P,E,
SUBMITTED BY:
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS GRAPHIC SCALE DESIGN DIR.
0 15 30 60 APPROVED: PWO OR OICC DATE SIZE ODE (DENT. NO NAVFAC DRAWING NO. 30 4542339
,T
SATISFACTORY T0: DATE 180091 CONS~R CONTR. N0. N6247J-~2-B-3455
SCALE: 1 INCH = 30 FEET SCALE: NOTED SPEC. 02-B-3455 SHEET 2 OF 4

i
I~
I, J V i.___-_~--..._._--.-___
1 ~V^~ ~ ~J~T~ ~APPR~wETI
I ~ j
i
NOTES
i CONTRACTOR SHAT fR,gi^i(~IR SHA i IP~JTTA II R T ~ r L_ ~ ~L J„BIDI Y CURTAIN PRIOR TJ
COMPLETING ANY 'LETING ANY PROJECT WORK,
2. TURBIDITY CURTAIP ~IDITY CURTAIN SHAD BE REMOVED UPON PROJECT
COMPLETION. 'LETION.
~ , 3.ALL UPLAND AREA UPLAND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
VEGETATED IN ACS TATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VEGETATION PLAN
' SHOWN IN DETAIL VN IN DETAIL C, SHEET C3
4, THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT REMOVE ANY VEGETATION
A BOUE OR BELOW ~E OR BELOW THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL EXCEPT
FALLEN TREES OR .N TREES OR SHRUBS ON THE BANK AREA THAT INTERFERE
WITH THE 1NSTALLF THE INSTALLATION OF THE RIP RAP SHORELINE STABILIZATION.
~ -0.7 -0.3
-0.4
-0.5 -0.5 . ~
i
902 LF o -o.a -0.8 / \ -0.2
1 0.1 ~ ~ - 0.7
A B
-14 R1P RAP SF RIP RAP SHORELINE 0~3 TUR I ITY / D CURTAIN
C2 C3 C2 C3 STAB(LIZATI~ STABILIZATION SEE NOTES -
-o o ~ ~1~ - 2 i ~ ~ ~ ~
~-s- ~ ~ 1.9
- ~ ~ ~-~0_ 0.0 ~0~ -1.5
.e-a-o-- - - - ~ _ ~ -0.4
EXISTING CYPRESS ~ =1 - _ - _
I ~ ~ i~ EE TO REMAIN _ / , i 5~ ~ ~ ~ -1.5 / ~ _ _ _ 2. 1.5 _ _ _ ~ - -
NORMAL WATER LEVEL - ---t~ ~ 1.4
. 2 / - , _ _
NORMAL WATER LEUEL ~ --1°- - ~ ~ ~ EXISTI ~ ,o NG COASTAL VEGETATION o~
TBM-SPIKE 1N 24" PINE _ o i 0.3 f ~ ~5 -NO DISTURBANCE- o
N ~ 35 947.85 TURBIITY T D CUR AIN ~ r f 1.4
SEE NOTES E 2488515.60 -0.3 / ~ I 0 WOODS TO REMAIN EXISTING RIP-RAP
~ -0 3 ELEU~ = 4. ' 5 ~ 4
~ \ -oo -----off 1~6± / o o - ~ ~ 0.2 / EXISTING TOE OF SLOPE TO REMAIN ~ 1,51.1 ~o ~ -0.1 _14
\ ~ ~ - - - ~ i ~
~ s~ o ~ ~ i
~ S ~ ~ 2~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~
S~ \ Gv \ t ~ / t .8j~ ~ ~ 0.2 ~ , EXISTING TOP OF BANK °41'24"E _
5 N42 - NORMA~WATER LEUEL ~ - - TBM-SPIKE
. , - - 773.78 N 358516,61 -18
- 186 E 2489040 25 ~6 J 1.7 -01 z
a, i \ ~ _ ~ P ~ i ~ ~ I ELEV. = 18.6' ~5~ 2 O
~ ~
,z
~;~'~--n--~ 1 T .1-
~n / y ~
~ ~ i ~ E~iSTN~ COASTAL VEGETATION p SU~ti~ARY 0~ 1~M~ A ~ CS I ~ 6 I
j _ -NO DISTURBANCE- A A E ,RIP RA° ~h,~,P~; ~n,~ i
, . ~ ~ X ~ TOTAL BEN TH ~ ~ I - E I~TING PIP~I G ~F ~H R E 0 ERNE ETA ~ I AT ~ B~~ ION 9..2 ~F ~ 2.3 -1.7 ~~2 ~E _ 1~ 01
~ C2 C3 C2~ C3 STABI'~_~~AT10~°J TREE TO REMAIN i
TOTAL AREA - OF IMPACT 1 14 ~ 0 0 SF 0~ A 23 CRES A A ~ i n S AEE A BOUE TH ~ E FORMA WA TER ~EUE~
WOODS TO REMAIN i r~
3
2.7 -1.2
1.6 E o
i
N,
4`~5 - . a
i ~ 00
18 0
~ ~
11
~ -o
s ti
11
1.5
1,1 15
16
%J111????n1, 2 b
SEAL 15738
v* 4o KEVIN
I J ~
i
l
C2
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A.
P.O. BOX 15564, NEW BERN, NC 28561
[phone], FAX [phone]
CAMP LEJEUNE NORTH CAROLINA
DES. JK. AVEILIS P,E, SHORELINE STABILIZATION BASEWIDE
DR. R.R.DOWNS PART I, BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP
CHK. J.C AVOLIS, P ,E,
SUBMITTED BY:
DESIGN DIR. SITE LAYOUT AND GRADING PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60 APPROVED: PWO OR OICC DATE
30 SIZE ODE (DENT. NO NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
4542340
80091 SATISFACTORY T0: DATE CONSTR. CONTR. NO. N62470-02-B-34,;5 SCALE: 1 INCH = 30 FEET
SCALE: NOTED SPEC. 02-B-3455 TSHEET 3 OF 4

r-
jYM DATE APPROVED
i
1 i _AM.. ~ ~ tiT5 ~~,~/,g/04~ _1KA F - -
i
I
1

i

~ > TAT r VE~E IVt SEES d,
~ AETER COVPL Tip N 'F ~'R ~ r~~ ' - E J O ~ ACING ACTIVIT,tS A~~D THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SWALES, ALL EXPOSED AREAS SHALL
RIP RAP ~ R!P RAP BE SEEDED TO THE TOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS:
I SEED BED
I LIME 1-1~2 TON PER ACRE
_ _ ~ EERTILI~ER 1/2-TGN PER ACRE `
SEED
- RYA GRAIN SO LBS PER ACRE
- _
k TALL FESCUE 100 LBS PER ACRE
- MAY THROUGH AUGUST;
CENTIPEDE 5 LBS PER ACRE
PROCEDURE
- NORMAL-- EXISTING TOP - XI - - - - STRAW MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE WHICH WILL NORMAL---
AT E S OF BANK W ER LINE EXISTING TOP - WATER LINE INSURE APPROXIMATELY 75~ COVERAGE OF THE SEEDED
OF E OF BANK _ - AREA. THE STRAW AND SOGJN SEED W1LL BE LIGHTLY
_ DISCED INTO THE BED TO GIVE IT FURTHER RESISTENCE
_ TO BLOWING AND WASHING.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE A FULL STAND OF
GRASS OVER THE ENTIRE DISTURB AR A IF ED E NECESSARY ~
- THE CONTRACTOR WILL WET DOWN THE AREAS TO ASSIST
IN SEED GERMINATION OR AID IN GROWTH IN TIMES OF
r EXCESSIVELY DRY WEATHER. A STAND OF GRASS WILL BE
CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE WHEN THE ENTIRE STAND OF
- GRASS IS AT LEAST FOUR INCHES NIGH AND HAS
- ACHIEVED AT LEAST 95~ COVERAGE OF DISTURBED
- - - AREAS. RESEEDING WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY BY
- THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE SPECIFIED STAND OF GRASS.
- _ -
C V TATI
EGE ON PLAN
M
TI~iRBIDITY CURTAIN TURBIDITY CURTAIN
SEE NOTES, SHEET C1
RIP RAP SEE NOTES, SHEET C1
RIP RAP
P~APJ UI~W p,
NOT TO SCALE NUT TC NOT TO SCALE
ALL EXISTING UEGETATI( ING VEGETATION
ON BLUFF AREA TO REI AREA TO REMAIN
ALA EXISTING VEGETATION EXISTING TOP
ON BUFF AREA TO REMAIN NO MATERIAL SHALL BE PEACED OF BANK NO MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED
EXISTING TOP BELOW THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL
OF BANK BELOW THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL
I
RIP RAP DRIP RAP ~ Tnn nr non non _ c n'
~ TOP OF FIP RAP = 5 ~;i'
„r r n r !~~r - ~.u
2
2
1
10' TURBIDITY CURTAIN 10 TURBIDITY CURTAIN
SEE NOTES, SHEET Cl
EXi TD - ; TOE SEE NOTES, SHEET Cl
OF BANK EXISTIPJG TOP I 1{IIIIIIIII~j
NORMAL WATER ELEUAT!Uf`J = 1.0'± %k COGA9
OF BANK NORMAL WA,-R ELEVATION = 1.0'± •,Ol J E8S i2'.
EXISTING TOE .
BOTTCM ELEvATi,N = VARIES SEE PLAN) C BOTTOM ELE~,'Tj~N VARIES S (SEE PLAN) EAL OF BANK -
15736 8
STRUCTI,!PAL CEOCRID STRUCTHnA!_ GE0CRID E?•
ON E,xI T'NC CRADE .DINE ,T
T L T !-T
SECT2N 1 i.. J C3
NOT TO SCALE 1 r, E
AVO LI S ENGINEERING, P. A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND
P.O. BOX 15564, NEW BERN, NC 28561 M AR L)
[phone] FAX [phone] CAMP LEJEUNE NORTH CAROLINA
DES. JK, AVOLIS, F.E.
SHORELINE STABILIZATION BASEWIDE
A RIP RAP SHORELINE STABILIL'ATION - CONDITION 1 CONDITION 2 DR. R R. L i ~ \A/NS B PART i BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP ~ RIR RAR SHORELINE STABILIZATION ~ ~
r " OT TO SCALE C H K. J f- A? u~TIL iISp ,
C2 C3 NUT TO SCALE SUBMITTED BY:
DESIGN DIR. DETAILS
APPROVED: PWO OR OICC DATE SIZE CODE (DENT, NO NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
4542341
I 80091
SATISFACTORY TO: DATE ~0NS7F. CON-F NO. N624-/0-02-B-3455
SCALE: NOTED SPEC. 02-B-3455 SHEET 4 OF 4
I

i

i GYM DATE APPROVED
t, _
/ ~ ~ CEM JACK ~NVILLE
~ ~
GEIGER r(ytls~ / Y~~ ~ - ~ AREA-B ~ dBaY~ j~ ~ 9 ii ~ .~d' , _ i r ~ r
~ 9Z ~ I _ ~ p o ~ ~NGk TARAWA TERRACE \ ,
~ (1 I I \MI'ti~r a I ~ I-~ n ~ p , ii' ~ ~ II ~1 ~ ~ l
FARr I ~ I ~ ~ r thea pre , e , 1 ~ j ~ ~r ~ ~ 1 ~ 1~
~ GEIGER Eue Is e ' MGNTFGR US AREA-B QAp T ~ ve e NA'dA ~ ~ \ ~ Pf]IN-~ ~--~r~ HGSPITA ie1 ( ~ : \ ~ ~
~ L paeP C~
MARINE CORPS ~ ew°~ N,c.
AIR STATION Muptord esEV,7es ar, F d P 24 fIRC 70VER
~ y?~ ~ ST7 Ravl¢RO ~_(//I
/ i T 6~0 of/
~ , ~F I~m s~ PA E at' 0 ~ i o \
Rogga~~ POf T `fir, ~ R~ q ~ Bell Pt AREA ~ ~°-4 a & a n
WATKINS _ ! ~ r~ E ~ / ~ sze ~ ~ "
\ I I ~q
o 0
J RACE ~ ~ oc °r ~ COURSE y~ ~ ° S~ORAGE
~ AREA /L ~`o AREA aD ~ Run ~ 1)
i EM. ~ ~ Homes +
Pt ~ p~ i ~ ~ gip,
J ~ V ~ s C ~ SB72 I C_ 9 :
~ a 1NDUST Madras ~
~Fa P< p~h i 0 aYq Cl..--' u LIRE rOVER \ S \\~\M
P AREA .J~~ p
~~~PNiS J ~~/1 D ~ Sf J N
~II HP CJ NAT RpAU ~ AREA`., c~
J~~ ( \
7/ TRIANGLE R aOA ~ ~ ~ OUTPOST Oy U ~ Be F r:_, a fi r3~t ~ Ask .~.Jm 4~ ~ b ~ ,•'-r: { ' -n w,. i r-.. w:~' ~r w a• y y, ~`ri. ~n`Nr . ~ aFtK.w 1^' +M7 r-:• ~ W. ~ 3,v. ~ za : t7 r a ~ d .a r i
0 Q~ c ~ ~ ,e w1 ~ _ ~ ~s, x~ r ,a rya ~ > ~ a, ~.t•5 c'~~A-~"'a}'~"~+~'Fd'~ ,,rrl,-i,~ ('f~°~ -'d! ~`~"~'.=~'..~;t'~t t~°'° vl~,: . - _ y" v ~ ' a
1oa~ Creek r^ a t."- rr ~ ~ s ~.P. y v i ,:+,.'~.o. fat: ,rsi:~;::u rL 'M^e ~ a „:4 s,~'.
FRENCH a r ~ ~ CREEk a - t a+ ~ "r
AREA HAP ~ ~ , Wh't%~~ Rhodes ~ MAGAZINE 3
! ~ Pt, (rl F'rpn[h~ pre AREA ' r~~
RHpDES POINT pD ap t PAINT ev^ O
of ~ " AREA 0 ~4"t .ky;,F~r t +t i r'~.~ a bra .7 ~:r+~ ,Ik "°3'. 'i' ~ ~ P., r ~'S ~.~1 r h 1 ,.s G, ~i::9i .!:k' ~'.a. a 3
~ f < ~J' uunders r--' r.~ ~',~k- *+'y •i +:m~ r~ ~ rj- +,-.s r,Tr.~w u.+a"~ ..1, ~ TM ~ 'v~ - f7 'r_,r'°' " r
~o o Island o-° ~ °f ~:,x ~ ~ 1' -.k:~ f r ':ew RtH°- d tx' t y ~J."'MY 1
~ q~~~ Y ~ , p
a a~° .O y~ 44 .i
~'>is ,'-C,. \ ~ RAG K2 ~,a0 f 'z'e ~ rY fff
nRE ravER C~pWNT ENGINEER S1P ANT(-TANK / STOCKADE RANGE / ~r r{ N. 0. q~w ~ t1~t L r ~ ~r : ,Tq. B: -..Y .A44~ a # ''Y k Yaa , 4 1• •~,Sr v. q• Z k
~ \ ~aE Rings Pt. / ~ x ~ ti•t d.
Store Bay / • t . ~'a a y ~ Vi'i' d'' } ~ ti ;e ,
Cu ""*jKS ~ Q
1 N ~ ~0
/ n .ys ~e1, ,_p w .8 ""yam'. ~R
Stc O~N~ Y "tx _ ~ 4i t, i~ ..fr ~ ~iT1, 7 ~y 'i~ .l • a r (.'i
AMPHIBIAN ,rti~AOS %ff BASE y`, ~ X14 f~.~ , ~ ~ J
RIFLE TIRE '"0 1 ~ o RANGE ravER eai 42 t.L. ~ . it ~~{{$yyyy''e ~ ~
~ r/'~ ENAREAER Ftaar \ 9c '1 ~ "a~ ~
n I r S y p1~ IL J / Ollo[k5 Pt. ~ / ZI LANBING_
QP U s rPiry ~ JaPrt ells ROAD ~ ~O ~D~ 1 K .
I J A ~~P ` / /
Gy / N\ ~ ~ ~ , t
N pr AR A Q' E
~C Traps U / G Ba Y Pv ,p e~ PS, 0
Jd~ tE~pp ~ ~N P ~ s .''la. ~r.' ~ r,~ ~ a _ , ~ ~ ~ ' {St• l . ~ C' r • >a t. :~D~ t ~.Sa,i [ yg, ~ ~ ^A i , 5 ' dt
~ 0Py
BA301 BA30A~ ~y'i~., 4 ia' ~ .."S rA+ ~ h ~ y'/ q.~i '~f Y i'F ~ s<r ~ ~ t` n ,1~'~ v~R 's. '~~~4 K .
aT SBAI77 NC. Ii~NannocM Ba / # , !KI it . ~ ~ 5 A ~ • , M "'a ar ~.;t tip'. mo`o' ~ ' s •
~Q ~r c "1, 'fir, ~•~~'A'~+' M-. ~ y(r,F * V ~ ~
~OJ ~C
~S v ~ ~ ~ rs.' ~ ~ .,fib + < .'!4, ~ r
Ghadwick~ . . ~ y . . 1 ~ fir-.
Bay / ~ C, v ~ .,p .a r`a .4 ka . . ~ .y d•-a _ 4 ~ _.1. y
P 6000 0 'x' ri ~ ;t t rt
6000 12000
' r t ? • ~J1 " `?J r r ~ ` ~ Ufa y ~ a,, r e
• - ~ ~ ~ R : a w T
a
SCALE 0~ BEET .F y, eat
. r
err ~ ~ k , t, s
- ,1.J~ r ~ ~ M, ya 1~ ~ 'r t
kA 7"i s """111 a. y,
~
AERIAE .,IT MAP E
NOTTOSA C ~E
LEGEND:
EXISTING
NEW
INDEX OE R o D AWIN GS
Goldsboro s ,o Kinsto Dover ~
ew Bern ~ Tuscarora J~ TURBIDITY CURTAIN SEP 2 11
' CNE~Sf ~ i~ ~ H T 005 EE NUMB R E TI T ~E
Tr?nton OAK ~B!_II~_ ~(ylll - - ('(IAIT(111D ~ENR • wArec,,....
/ IiVIV VVIA Seven ¦ CHERRY PINT "tnAWSANpsTpAyL n
Pollocksvilla Cs LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP
Olive Springs Havelock Fink Comfort Maysville O t w a ~ MEAN HIGH WATER (MHW) l~! Hill EXISTING VEGETAITON
C1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
eaufor ~ Richlands
s a w 3 \ oreheod ci Be Ulca Vllle l~ C2 SITE LAY OUT AND GRADING PLAN
EXISTING RIP RAP Jacksonvil e MO n C3 DETAILS
gnolo' , F \~A~
~ N e'o ~F P R°seh'ii V
STREET LIGHT Dixon C MP LEJELINE G 0. FESS~~•./ , 0 ti2~
Wallace
Foikstor ® REFLECTIVE MARKER POST r = 157381
~s
ZL HoI1y~Ridge TEMPORARY BENCHMARK B!wgaw /i F //,'1 P?J
WjroL Corn, 1_l
+03.23) SPOT ELEVATION 3.23 r~anpstend +
I' i
Scott Hill "i
T c s
Del Acne ~.y on Wilrinyton A\
Balto,, Q ABBREVIATIONS a 6 76 Leland Ik
\ N NORTHING AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND P.A.
E EASTING P.O. BOX 15564, NEW BERN, NC 28561
' T J N N, C, ELEV ELEVATION 1,_ L r MARINE CORPS BASE [phone], FAX [phone] CAMP LEJEUNE NORTH CAROLINA
TBM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK DES. J. K. AVOLIS P-E, SHORELINE STABILIZATION BASEWIDE
MHW MEAN HIGH WATER
EXIST EXISTING DR. R.R. DAWNS PART I, BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP
M1N. N/!, !41, JjM CHK. J.(-. 4\/L IS P.E.
MAX. MAXIMUM SUBMITTED BY:
TYP TYPICAL DESIGN LOC DIR. ATION AND VICINITY MAP
APPROVED: PWO OR OICC DATE SIZE ODE (DENT. NO NAVFAC DRAWING NO.
2338 8009 454
f
SATISFACTORY T0: DATE CONSTR. CONTR. NO. N62470-02-B-3455
SCALE: NOTED SPEC. 02-8-3455 7SHEET 1 OF 4
7711
r

j i ~ !_'i'
~~hi i DATE ~iPRI~`?ED
- -
I
~ -L- -
j NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SNAE'~ ,CTOR SNALL INSTALL TURBIDITY CURTAIN PRIOR TO
COMPLETING ANY PRA :TING ANY PROJECT WORK.
2. TURBIDITY CURTAIN TY CURTAIN SHH L EE REMOVED ~'~PC~~ PRO,'ECT
COMPLETION. TION.
3.ALL UPLAND AREA'S LAND ARE?,' DI'~~TURBED EY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
VEGETATED ifv ,4;'~~;'~~~ TED Ifv ,4;'C~;'~~RCAPICE WI TN THE VEGETATION PLAid
SHOWN IN DETAIL C, IN DETAIL C, SHEET C3
4, THE CONTRACTOR SH NTRACTOR SHALL NOT REMOVE ANY VEGETATION
ABOUE OR BE~O'~N TH OR BELO'~N THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL EXCEPT
FALLEN TREES OP Sfi TREES OR S~TRUBS ON THE BANK AREA THAT INTERFERE
WITH THE IN~~TAL~A III 1E INSTALLA TIOiJ OF THE R!P RAP S~RORELINE STABILIZATIOPJ.
I
-o~
i -0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5 _ i
-1.0 -0.8 j -0.2
-0.8 01 ~ ~ _ ~ -0.7
TYP. (TYP. OF 3) 0.3
i -1.4 ,o' a ~ ~ - ~
~ 15~__--~ ~ 0.4 \ ~
-0.0 ~ ~
~ 0 0 _ ' ~ ~ ~ _ - , / 1.9 /
TYP. OF 6 _ - - =e-~-o - 0- 0.0 ~ \ ~
EXISTING CYPRESS ~
~ / ~ TREE TO REMAIN i ~ ~ ~ i ~ _ ~ ~.5
i . _ _ ~ NORMAL WATER LEVEL ~ ~ j ~ ~ - ~-tom
-o.o / / - ~ - c o ° ~ p _ ~ / , .
CP " ~ , -0.1 ~ ~5- i~ i74
/ / ~ ~ i i EXISTING COASTAL VEGETATION ~ % / 15
TBM-SPIKE IN 24" PINE -~.o i / -0.3 / ~ / -NO DISTURBANCE- ° ~ ° ° r
N 357947.85 / ~ / / /
` ~ E 2488515.60 -0.3 / / WC o ~o ~ / . EXISTING RIP-RAP WOODS TO REMAIN ° °
-0 3 ELEV. = 4.5' ~ / / TO REMAIN ~ ° ° ~ -0.1 -1.4
_ - - ' 0 2 , / / EXISTING TOE OF SCOPE i
c o 0 0 - - - o~ ~ ~ / ` - - - / ~ / ~
~ ~ / / i NORMAL WATER LEVEL--;? - ~ ~ 0 0 _
~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / - ~ N ~
~ t~ i ~ 0.2 ~ / , , EXISTING TOP OF BANK 41'24"E - _ - - - - - TBM-SPIKE _ _ - 8 -1.8
0~1 NORMAL WATER LEVEL 0~5 ~ ~ ~ - - - - _ - - N 358516.61 ~
` i' 3 i ~ _ - - - 773.78' i - - 186 E 2489040.25 ~6 ~ ~ _o i ~
0.0 , i ~5T T ELEV. = 18.6' S~ 2 ~ a 0
~ ~ i
---~r--- - - 3 - - - f
4 ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~~0
- ~ - ~S~ i i j ~9 0
~ 6 \ ~ 1 ~ 6 I ^
~ EXISTING COASTAL VEGETATION / ~ -1.7 ~J l
-NO DISTURBANCE- 2.3 -0.1
EXISTING PINE I ^
TREE TO REMAIN I
I''
WOODS TO REMAIN I
I
1
I
2 7 -1.2
I I -C 0 ~ I,
1 P N ~ I
\4'5 ~ -i 4
I
\ I 0.0
c
1 -'9 1
O ~ 1
D.0 . \
0 -1.1
1~ 1 ~ ~
Q': ' g iii
~E s~o .ti
EAL
15738
: y~ 0
/i~KEVINP\~`
A SITE LAYOIJT AND GPADING PLAN i
CALF 1 ~ '
AVOLIS ENGINEERING, P.A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND
P.O. BOX 15564, NEW BERN, NC 28561 MARINE CORPS BASE
252633-0068, FAX [phone] ( ) CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
DES. J,K, AVOLIS P .E, SHORELINE STABILIZATION BASEWIDE
DR. R R.DOWNS PART I, BREWSTER SCOUT CAMP
CHK. J,C AVOLIS, P.E,
SUBMITTED BY:
_ EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS _ --,:ALE DESIGN DIR.
so APPROVED: PWO OR OICC DATE SIZE ODE (DENT. NO NAVFAC DRAWING NO. 0 5 30 30 4542339
SATISFACTORY TO: DATE 80091 CONSTR. CONTR. NO. NE2470-02-B-3455
SCALE: 1 INCH = 30 FEET SCALE: NOTED SPEC. 02-8-3455 SHEET 2 OF 4