710097_INSPECTIONS_20171231

30 Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 71 g7 Date Of Visit: [11161200(} Time: t1:14 Printedow 11/16/2000
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ __
Farm Name: R9b.o;...NMlr5vf,Y...................................... ..................................................... Y. County: PMdu............._...................... IRO ......
...
(honer Name: J.YliKltgVj._ raiiti............... I)ghpK.......................................... Phone No: 2102,81-.5.479....................................--•--....
Facility Contact: - - - Title: - Phone No: - - - --
Mailing Address: 5.21.6.-NA.Mv................................. .................................. ......... :......... .W.11da int-m... NC .......... .................... .................. . 2.8.4.0.3 .............
Onsite Representative: ---------------------------------------------------------- •---------------- Integrator: --------------- ---------------- •---------------------------------
Certified Operator:.-.- Operator Certification Number:_
Location of Farm:
ron intersection of US 421 and SR 1128 (Costin) go south 0.5 miles to farm entrance on left.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude F 06
16,
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Population
® Wean to Feeder
2600
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gifts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 1C] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,600
Total SSLW 78,000
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischart=es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, Nvas the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed; did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [I Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection && -Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes []No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.........................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):

5/00 Caltinuerl on back
Facility Number: 71-97 Date of Inspection 11/16/2000 Printed on: 11/16/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need/ improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (rcfcr:to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional-pages:as necessary):
reviewed comments under General Information for this facility in the database which say that the farm is not going to be built.
IV
Reviewer/inspector Name Stonewall Mathis

,r
IReviewerAnspector Signature: Date: 5100 I
Facility Number: 71-97 Date of Inspection l l/{b/2000 Printed on: 11/16/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atfor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3 i. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Commentsand/or_Drawings: