710051_HISTORICAL_20171231

NUH I H CAHULINA
Department of Environmental Quaff

ROY COOPER
Governor
S. REGAN
REGEIVED1RCDEN6WAF-L
Secretary
.,
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Environmental
Director
FEB �� 4 2017
Quality
February 10, 2017
W ater Quality Regional
Murphy -Brown LLC
Operations Section
Farm 3135
Wilmington Regional Office
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398-0856
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS710051
Farm 3135
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Pender County
Dear Murphy -Brown LLC:
In accordance with your February 6, 2017 request to change operation type without exceeding the permitted
steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Murphy -Brown LLC, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system in
accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for Farm 3135, located in Pender County, with a swine animal capacity of no greater than the
following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 4,640 Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts -
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows- Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS710051 dated October 1, 2014. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified
in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals
authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and
must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
recordkeepingand monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keepin forms.
arms.
-=-'>'Nothing Compares`: ---
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality i Division of Water Resaurees
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, Nortb Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

If your Was1etiUtilizati6n Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards;, acid oidinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this- permit convey. any, property rights in either real or personal property.
Per MRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable,. you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is trade within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition U.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours -of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Wilmington, NC National Weather
Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: http://www.weather.gov/ilnit
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 910-796-7215. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
� v
Lor S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Pender County Health Department
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS710051)
Southfield Hog Production

N
50
Murphy Brown u.c 785 Hwy NC
2
Warsaw, 8398
Murphy Brown East
August 27, 2010
Mr. Charles Stehman
NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Re: Farm 31351
Facility # 71-051
Accidental Discharge 6129/10
Dear Mr. Stehman,
This letter is in response to a NOV Notification dated August 3, 2010 from your office at the
Division of Water Quality.
The following summary is an explanation of the violation.
It was determined that the operator was applying on saturated soils and that the reel
speed was too slow for the conditions, contrary to the company's instructions and training
protocols. During the night we received an unexpected rainfall event of 1.2" that washed
out our containments and carried the effluent off of our property.
The following is a description of actions taken and plans in place to prevent a
reoccurrence.
a. Murphy Brown employees worked 4 days and invested over 540 internal
man hours and equipment in efforts to recover all of the effluent that left
the field at an estimated cost of $19,500.00. We also brought in a
contractor to help with remediation at a cost of $10,970.00.
b_ The employee at fault was disciplined. A work order was opened to
reemphasize to the group the need to identify saturated soils and not
pump on them as well as setting the proper travel speed on equipment.
c. Murphy Brown hired Geo Solutions Ltd. to complete a geophysical
survey and geochemical evaluation of the site to determine if there were
any negative effects to the area influenced by the spill. Their sample
results show the effectiveness of the clean up. This survey was
completed at a cost of $9,353.00.
Murphy Brown has designed a plan that will protect the surrounding
properties from being affected from any possible future spills. The plan
includes upgrading existing slam gates and installing 4 additional slam
gates. Grading waterways, installing and maintaining 12' buffers along
ditch banks. The approximate cost to implement these BMP's is
$9,000.00. The time frame to have these BMP's in place is Nov. 30t,
due to getting the crops out to allow access to all areas identified.
.L? IVED
SEP022010
rM

co
Ir
C3
Postage
5
--
M
�
Certif ad Fft
rri
Refum Receipt Fee
ru
(Endorsement Required)
e
0
Q
Restricted Delivery Fee
�.
` .a
(Endorsement Required)Im
8
C3
Total Postage &Fees
@
i • I
...A
C3
ease P ' Clearly) (to
� completed bygmeh
f r �f `
'_____________�/_____
/ /�✓/1— Alt
C)
0
_ _
[reef t. No.; PO Box No.
fQj�
_ _-------------------------------------------
Q
__..
M1
.__.._p.!!�i-------EF-----------------------------------------------
State, Z1P4-4

• Page 2
September 1, 2010
Included with this letter are the following: map of the BMP plan, water sample results, copy of the
geophysical survey, geochemical evaluation of the site, original letter of notification.
Murphy -Brown LLC is committed to environmental stewardship, we feel that we have
addressed this occurrence properly and have plans in place to prevent any further incidences. We ask
that the division take into consideration the proactive nature of both our initial spill response and follow-
up, along with the significant resources devoted to each when considering enforcement. Should you
have any other concerns about this issue please do not hesitate to contact me at 910-293-9364 ext.
241.
Sincerely,
#�/� /j
Michael Norris
Environmental Resource Specialist
Murphy -Brown LLC

Geo lugs Ltd.
P.O. Sox 37698
Raleigh, North Carolina 27627
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Fax)
Preliminary and Attorney -Client Privileged
July 16, 2010
Mr. David Nordin
Murphy -Brown LLC
2822 W NC Highway 24
Warsaw, NC 28398-7952
Re: Preliminary Geophysical Survey, and Geochemical Evaluation of Murphy -Brown farm
31351, Pender County, NC following an accidental run-off report on ,lunge 29, 2010 for
Facility #71-051.
Dear Mr. Nordin,
Geo Solutions Limited, Inc. (Geo Solutions) is pleased to submit the results of a geophysical
and geochemical evaluation conducted at Murphy -Brown Farm 31351 (formerly Farm 35)
located in Pender County, North Carolina at 877 Tuckahoe Road. (see below):
Figure 1. Location of Farm 31351, ditch drainage pattern and ditch containment structure.

BACKGROUND
Farm 31351 is located north of Atkinson, NC, less than one mile north of the intersection of Beatty
Bridge and Tuckahoe Roads on Tuckahoe Road. The Farm experienced a waste application run-off
event on June 29, 2010 due to the application of waste on saturated soil at pull -irrigation sites 6-B and
9-B. The run-off event was further exacerbated by an unexpected heavy rainfall event on the same
evening of the observed surface nun -off (June 29, 2010). The details of the run-off event and a
description of the immediate remedial actions taken by Murphy -Brown are detailed in an Accidental
Spill Report to Mr. John Farnell NCDENR , Division of Water Quality, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 (see attachment)
According to Murphy -Brown Farms, LLC, (Murphy -Brawn), once the surface run-off was
recognized, Murphy Brown personnel immediately implemented their waste containment program
which required the use pumps, hoses, tanker trucks, and dike plugging equipment. The Murphy
Brown spill control crew was able to contain the surface release to a relatively small area, and no
affected water entered any of the neighboring controlled surface waters. The affected waters were
contained and pumped back into a large waste storage pond located on Farm 31351 (Figure 2).
W w'cr 0'&S 4 so Ca AZ-eal
ink
Figure 2 - Location of Farm 31351, spray units 6-B and 9-B, and surface drainage pattern to two collection areas
along Tuckahoe Road.
2

However, the release did, to some degree, pass through a roadway drainage ditch that intersected the
property belonging to Ruth Blanchard Dawson (PO Box 277 Atkinson, North Carolina).
As such, Murphy Brown was concerned that the affected surface waters may potentially
adversely impact the sole operating water supply well on the Dawson property. The Dawson
well is reportedly a two-inch jet well completed to a depth of 186 feet where it is screened in the
PeeDee Aquifer (Geise, et. al. 1991). The actual well construction markings were not present on
the well.
Figure 3. Photographs of the Blanchard water supply well with the insulation pulled back to expose
2-inch well and jet pump ports.
North Carolina well completion regulations require that the well be sealed from the surface to
near the top of the first intake screen using neat cement. We inspected the well and found the
site surrounded by debris and some garbage. Evidence of a well -pad seal was not visible;
however it is possible that the pad had been covered with soil and other surface debris. The well
discharge pipe was loosely covered with thermal insulation. As such, the protection of the well
from runoff originating from the area surrounding the well could not be evaluated.
Geo Solution reviewed the rainfall information from the WILD Econet station at the
Williamsdale, North Carolina. The Climatic Field Lab is operated by the State Climate office of
North Carolina and maintains the NC CRONOS climate data. The site is located in southwestern
Duplin County approximately 16 miles to the northeast of the Pender county farm site. The NC
CRONOS rainfall records reported 0.69 inches of rainfall on June 29, 2010 (Figure 2), local
rainfall may have been more. This was a departure of —0.5 inches from average daily rainfall in
3

the area. In addition, June 2010 was reported as the wettest month on record since September
2008 at the WILD Field Station.
W OOrnsdale Field Lab ECONET Station, Duplin County
2.6
a
0.6
0.0 "
6nn0
t 1m Dairy R�cipitaam{mi
9010 ai11r10 W16110 6f21n0 6f46110 711110
Date
WILD - ?recip Difference from Normal
2.5
e
g 2.0
a
1.5
a
1.0
0.5
2L 0.0
m
a
-0.5
06101f10 O6f0610 0611510 06=10 OBf29f1O
Date
Figure 2. Precipitation record from the WILD Econet site 16 miles to the NE of Farm 31351 near Wallace,
NC. 23 inches fell on 6/13, and —0.7 inches fell on 6/25 and 6129. Precipitation on 6l2912010.
Farm 31351 in northwestern Pender County is located in mostly hydric (wetlands) soils with
deep drainage ditches around the perimeter of the fields to improve land drainage so that farm
equipment can work in the fields (Figure 3). The purpose of this study was to gather some
preliminary data to investigate impacts of the reported waste runoff event of June 29ffi in the
drainage ditchs around 420 Tuckahoe Road. Geo Solutions collected samples in the drainage
ditch along Tuckahoe road, drainage ditches around the Dawson property, and one water sample
was collected from the Dawson well that is reported to be 186 feet deep. An additional sample
was collected from the waste lagoon on Farm 31351 for isotopic fingerprinting.
4

Figure 4a. Surface water sample locations for samples taken by Geo Solutions and Murphy -Brown

Figure 4b. surface water sample locations around 420 Tuckahoe Road for samples taken by
Geo solutions and Murphy -Brown.
Murphy Brown personnel collected 11 surface water samples from 7-1-2010 to 7-6-2010 that
were analyzed by Vann Labs, Warsaw, NC for nitrogen content (Figures 4a, b).
7

GEOPHYSICAL EVALUATION
Introduction
An Electromagnetic (EM) investigation was conducted around the perimeter of the Dawson
property to investigate conductivity changes in shallow groundwater that would indicate impacts
of waste water from the ditches that surround the property. A detailed multifrequency
electromagnetic survey adjacent to the ditches was completed on July 2, 2010, three days after
the surface runoff event. The survey was completed using a GEM-2 Multifrequency
Electromagnetic Profiler (GEM-2 EM) manufactured by Geophex, Inc., and carried by hand
using a shoulder strap.
The GEM-2 was used to collect the in -phase and quadrature mode data at 7-frequencies (1470
Hz, 5010 Hz, 9990 Hz, 19950 Hz, 39510 Hz, 60030 Hz and 90030 Hz). Each quadrature data set
was converted to apparent electrical conductivity values using the WinGem2 Software. Base on
the results of these data, Geo Solutions selected the 60030 Hz data to best represent the
distribution of the combined soil and groundwater conductivity data. The result of the apparent
electrical conductivity values the 60030 Hz frequency EM data was tabulated and then
contoured. The results of this contouring process are presented in Figure 5.
The green hues of Figure 5 indicate normal and low conductivities in unaffected
soil/groundwater. Along Tuckahoe Road there are yellow areas adjacent to the ditch which is
normal for standing water in a ditch. The only areas that have high conductivities are along the
driveway where utilities enter the property, and some areas along the northern boundary where
metal debris is found on the surface. No boundary area contains a consistent high conductivity
plume that extends from a drainage ditch onto the property, indicating that the affected ditch
water has had little or no impact on the Dawson property.
8

3826850
3826800
3826730
3826700
3826650
3826600
758600 758650 758700 758750 758800 758850
LJSGS UTM COORDINATES (METRIC)
80
60
40
20
0
60030 Hz
APPARENT
CONDUCTIVITY
(MSIM)
Figure 5. EM survey completed at the Pender County spill site at 420 Tuckahoe Road. Green hues indicate
normal soil conductivity values. Yellow and orange hues indicate values from surface debris, junk, and
driveway bridge. Elevated conductivity values are present from the northeast property line to the driveway
bridge crossing.
E

GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND
Farms 31351 are situated in the south central coastal plain of North Carolina in the Cape Fear
River Basin. The farm is underlain by the PeeDee Formation (Kp, Figure 6) which is comprised
of sand, clayey sand, and clay, greenish gray to olive black, massive, glauconitic, locally
fossiliferous and calcareous marls. The PeeDee formation is a large aquifer system in the
southeastern NC Coastal Plain that is separated by from the water table aquifer by a 50 to 100 ft
thick aquitard composed of silts and clay. This sandy well drained Cretaceous pelagic deposit is
overlain by reworked Quaternary surficiai deposits of sand, clay, gravel, and peat deposited in
fluvial (river) environments. These geomorphic features contain well developed dendritic
drainage systems that have the traditional coastal plain features of slow flowing creeks
surrounded by hydric soils occupying wide floodplains.
10

Figure 6. Geological map of northern Pender County. Farm 31351 is underlain by the PeeDee Formation
(Kp) which is a sandy Cretaceous pelagic deposit
it

SPATIAL ANALYSIS
Spatial data was downloaded from the USGS Seamless Data Server (http://seamless.usgs.gov/),
and soil data was downloaded from the USDA NRCS Soil Data Mart
(http://soildatamart.nres.usda.gov/) and the Soil Data Viewer V5.2 Arcmap extension was used
to process the soil data sets. ESRI ArcMap V9.3 was used to view and process the spatial data.
The farm complex is 0.7 miles by 0.5 miles in size and is approximately 1.15 miles from the
Clovin Creek which crosses Slocum Trail Road on the other side of Beattys Bridge Road. The
soils are well drained fine sands, loamy sands, sandy loams, and a mucky fine sandy loam (Pn)
that is not well drained (Figure 7). These soils are typical of the PeeDee Formation. The soil
types are listed in Appendix 1. Non-hydric soils are present around the hog houses and lagoon
on Farm 35, and in the field north of the entrance to the farm (Figure 8). Partially hydric soils
are present around the Dawson house and in the adjacent field to the north or the property
between Farm 31351 and the Dawson house. Hydric soils are also present along Tuckahoe Road
(Figure 8). Hydric soils naturally attenuate nitrate in groundwater, but have reduced percolation
capacity.
12

Figure 7. Soil map of Farm 31351 and surrounding area. Well drained soils are found around the hog barns
and waste lagoon (NoA), while poorly drained soils are found in the southern application field (Pn).
13

Figure 8. Distribution of hydric soils near Farm 31351. Hydric soils are common in this area, partially hydric
soils are found the cultivated field and around the private residence to the south of Farm 31351.
14

GEOCHENUCAL EVALUATION:
Background
Groundwater Contamination Sources and Isotopic Discrimination
The geophysical interpretations can be qualified by geochemical and isotopic analysis of surface
waters at the site. 51sN and 8180 of NO3 in surface and ground waters has been used to
differentiate between potential nitrogen contaminate sources in agricultural areas, and can
indicate areas of extensive nitrate attenuation by denitrification (Aravena and Robertson 1998,
Kendall 1998, Kendall and Aravena 2000, Showers et al., 2005, 2008). In many circumstances
isotopes offer a direct means of source identification because different sources of nitrogen have
distinct isotopic compositions. Biological cycling of nitrogen by the microbial community often
changes the isotope ratios in predictable directions ()Figure 6) that can be used to quantify the
amount of natural nitrate attenuation. Stable isotopes have become a common tool for tracing
the sources of water and solutes in small watersheds, but are underutilized in Iarger basins and in
agricultural areas.
2s
synr'°�c
Dent a, 2D%
2C
M 4-NO3
idHl¢er
(% msWwl N(hj
aox
015.
N uiesbon
�
2 10
aox
and
Mirwafted
NHrNOs
�
5
*Mtzer Sol
atomic
Mall
ayMem �fuerx
0
-10 5 0 5 10 13 2A 25 30
8"N %- AIR
Figure 9. Nitrogen and Oxygen isotopic composition of nitrate.
Synthetic nitrate produced by the
oxidation of ammonia via the
Haber -Bosch process have low
815N values that reflect an origin
of atmospheric N2 generally in the
range of -4 to +4%0, and 00
values from 15 to 25%'o reflecting
the atmospheric 02 composition of
+23°!eo (Figure 8). Plants and soil
nitrogen have similar 815N values
(+2 to +8%o), and cultivated soils
have slightly lower SisN values than non -cultivated soils. Plants Bing N2 from the atmosphere
have 815N values of —0 to +2%o, close to the 81sN value of atmospheric N2 (= 0%0). Most
terrestrial plants have 81sN in the range of -5 to +2%o.
15

Consumers (microbes to vertebrates) are 2-3%o enriched in 15N relative to their diet. This is
mainly due to the excretion of low 61 N organics in urine, so there is a b'$N enrichment of
--3.4%o in tissue compared to diet in most animals. Manure is enriched in the heavier isotope by
ammonia volatilization, and the amount of volatilization is dependent on how the manure is
stored and/or processed. Animal waste with a typical 81 lV value of about +59'.o is converted to
nitrate, the 5"N values are generally in the range of +15 to +30%o. So fertilizer nitrate in
groundwater can be distinguished from animal waste in groundwater by the 8"N-No3 and 8"ONO3
unless the isotopic values are significantly altered by denitrification.
Denitrification results in the production of isotopically depleted N2 or N2O, which concentrate
the heavier isotope in the residual groundwater nitrate (Kendall 1998, Kendall and Aravena
2000). The residual nitrate nitrogen becomes twice as enriched as nitrate oxygen in the heavier
isotope (6'SNNo3 versus S "ONo3) in this microbial driven process. Groundwater nitrate isotopic
compositions are shifted along a line with a slope of 0.5 in areas of extensive denitrification
(Figure 6). Showers et al., (2005) used this relationship to determine the source of groundwater
nitrate and to define areas of denitrification in biosolid application fields. Showers et al., (2008)
used the denitrification model of Seiler (2005) to determine if denitrification or dilution by
groundwater recharge was the process driving low nitrate concentrations in a piedmont housing
development. If the original isotopic composition of the nitrate contaminate source is known, S
1$NN03 and "0 NO3 can be used to quantify the amount of denitrification in groundwater using an
exponential denitrification model (Figure 9, Seiler, 2005, Showers et al.,2008). Isotopes of
nitrogen and oxygen in nitrate can separated animal / human waste from fertilizer sources, but
can be complicated by extensive denitrification of groundwater nitrate. Using a multiple isotope
approach, the amount of denitrification can be estimated by Raleigh fractionation models.
Animal waste cannot be confused with fertilizer sources because the groundwater nitrate
reservoir can only become more positive with microbial recycling.
Unique nitrogen isotopic values are found in hog waste lagoons -because of the extensive
amounts of volatilization of ammonium. Animal waste in lagoons is enriched in the heavier
16

Volatilization of NH3
Hog Waste in Mature
Hog Lagoon Lagoon
Lagoon Residual waste
maturation
515Nhog ;s 815Nwaete d 4515NNH3 O% 815NNH4 x
+3%o +2%o -9 5 to -25%o +30%o
Figure 10. Nitrogen isotopic of a swine farm with a waste lagoon. The residual waste has elevated 15N because
ammonia volatilized off the lagoon preferentially removes the lighter 14N isotope from the pond. t�This is a
unique isotopic signal that can be used to trace impacts of swine waste from lagoon spray field systems.
15N isotope, because ammonia volatilization removes the lighter 14N isotope from the water
(Figure 10). Ammonia volatilization can removed a significant amount of nitrogen from waste
lagoon water before it is sprayed in application fields. This produces a unique nitrogen isotopic
signal that is not related to nitrogen concentrations, but can be used to trace the impacts of swine
waste sprayed on application fields and to determine the fate of that nitrogen if that waste is
transported off the farm system.
Chloride Bromide Ratios in Groundwater
Chloride and bromide ratios in ground water behave conservatively and have also been used to
separate uncontaminated, septic and animal waste sources (Davis et at., 1998, Panno et al. 2006).
Cl/Br ratios can be determined by various analytical techniques, and the results vary depending
upon the analytical method and the region (Davis et al., 1998, Panno et al. 2006, Hudak and
Blanchard 1997, Hudak 2003). In the southwest USA and Alberta, Cl/Br ratios are generally
<50-I50 for rainfall, <100 for unaffected soil water, 100-200 for most groundwater, 300-600 for
domestic sewage, and 1000-10,000 for runoff affected by brines (Davis et al., 1998). Cl/Br
ratios in ground waters from the mid -west are higher, possibly due to the prevalence of road salt.
Groundwater affected by animal waste in the mid -west had Cl/Br ratios in the between 1250-
1650 (Panno et al. 2006). Studies in Texas indicate that oil field brines, which have very high
Cl/Br ratios, and were pervasive contaminates in shallow groundwater (Hudak and Blanchard
17

1997, Hudak 2003). Showers et al., (2008) found that Cl/Br ratios in North Carolina
groundwaters were distinct between areas affected by animal wastes and septic systems.
Surface Water Analysis
Methods
Water samples were collected from surface drainages at Farm 31351 on June 18, 2010, placed
in a cooler and brought to the NCSU Stable Isotope Lab in Raleigh, NC (Table 1, 2). Samples
were filtered through a 0.45 µm filter and kept at 40C until analysis. Nutrient and ion
concentrations (NO3, NH4, PO4, Cl, Br) were determined by flow injection chromatography
(Showers et al., 2005, 'USEPA 1993, LaChat 2001, 2002, Showers et al., 2008). NO3 and NH4
concentrations are reported as NO3-N and N114-N. An automated flow injection method for
bromide and chloride was modified to increased detection limits by doubling the size of the
injection loop from standard techniques (Showers et al., 2008). In addition, baseline detection
levels were reduced by using >17 megaOhm polished RO water for the carrier liquid and to mix
all standards and chemicals. With these modifications, minimum detection levels were reduced
from 0.5 to 0.25 mg/l for chloride and 5 mg/l to 40 µgll for bromide. With the single injection
loop, chloride standards had a reproducibility of + 3% from 5 to 100 mg/l. With a double
injection loop chloride standards were reproducible + 3% at 5 mg/l and + 1.5 % at 0.5 mg/l.
Bromide standards were reproducible + 1% at 5 mg/l, 5% at 2.5 mg/l, and + 9% from 1.5 mg/l
to 40 µg/l. These techniques allow Cl/Br ratios to be determined in the groundwater samples.
The 8'5N — NO3, 8"0 — NO3 and 615N -- NH4 was determined by Elemental Analysis (EA),
pyrolysis (TCEA) and Continuous Flow Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (Showers et al., 2005,
2008). Nitrate and ammonium were concentrated from dissolved samples on ion exchange resins
(Biorad AG 50-WX8 cation and; AG 2-X8 anion resins). Eluted samples were neutralized and
then cleaned of organic contaminants by passing the eluted sample through a column of cation
resin, PVP, silica gel, and SPE C-18, or if organic rich, with a double column of SPE C-18_ The
nitrate was converted to AgNO3 with AgO, lyophilized, and analyzed by combustion (815N) or
pyrolysis (518O) with a Carlo Erba NC2500 EA, a Thermo TCEA, and a Finnigan Mat Delta+
XL CF-IRMS (Showers et al., 2005, 2008). Ammonium samples were analyzed by EA
combustion of the cation resin with a carbon trap inserted before the GC column (Showers et al.,
18

2005). Isotopic results were calibrated and corrected to NBS, NIST and internal lab isotope
standards (Showers et al., 2005, 2008), and are reported as per mil deviations from the
international standard according to the following equation:
815-N, 8180 = f (R)s. / (R)5td�'1) * 103
R=1-5N/14N, or "0/160. Std = Air or VSMOW
Statistical analyses of nutrient and isotopic results were completed using Microsoft Excel
spreadsheets.
SURFACE GEOCHENHSTRY RESULTS
The waste lagoon, drinking well water, and surface water samples collected between 7/1 /2010
and 7/6/2010 by Murphy Brown Farm personnel and Geo Solutions near Farm 31351 and
analyzed by the NCSU Stable Isotope Lab in Raleigh, ENCO lab in Cary, and VANN lab in
Warsaw, NC. The analytical results of all three lab are in good agreement. These results suggest
that the impact of the waste water runoff event on June 29, 2010 was confined to the ditches
(Tables 1-4). Fecal colliforms were found in all ditch samples tested by ENCO, but not in the
private drinking water well (Table 3). Ammonium concentrations were approximately 140 - 220
mg/l N in the waste lagoon at Farm 35. Concentrations changed in the lagoon over the sampling
period because ditch water with low nitrogen concentrations were pumped into the lagoon after it
removal from the ditches. On July 1 at the downstream darn the ditch water was —.9 mg/l TKN,
and on July 2 at the same location the ditch water contained —0.2 mg/l TKN. Ammonium
concentrations were highest adjacent to the application fields on July 1, and decreased to south
along Tuckahoe Road (Figure 11). On July 2, 2010 nitrate concentrations were below 2.5 mg/1
in all the ditches, and the drinking well water had nitrate and ammonium below detection limits
of the analytical techniques (Figure 12). Fecal colliforms were not present in the well water, but
were present in all the ditch water samples (Table 3).
T

TABLE I Major Ion Results from the NCSU Lab
NCSU
Sample #
Date
Comment
NO3
NH4
PO4
Si02
DP WELL
7I212010
0.03
0.04
0.05
23.20
DP 02
7/2/2010
1.81
0.37
0.08
3.34
DP 03
712I2010
2.36
0.26
0.06
4.15
DP 04
7/2/2010
2.24
0.31
0.09
3.83
DP 05
7/2/2010
0.03
0.01
0.01
5.24
DP 06
7/2/2010
1.99
0.38
0.09
3.58
DP 07
7/2/2010
2.12
0.40
0.10
3.09
FARM 35
LAGOON
7/2/2010
LAGOON
142.00
FARM 35
LAGOON
7/2/2010
LAGOON
140.00
FARM 35
LAGOON
7/212010
LAGOON
137.00
Table 2 Cl, Br and Isotopic Results from the NCSU Lab
NCSU
Sam pie #
CI
Er
CUSr
mri, ;
N
018-
W3
DP WELL
15.9
0.053
303
5.594
8.996
DP 02
7.53
0.027
275
19.555
13.217
DP 03
7.49
0.027
281
13.402
11.324
DP 04
7.5
0.039
191
15.755
9.875
DP 05
2.86
0.029
100
14.823
9.456
DP 06
7.61
0.032
241
19.802
13.428
DP 07
7.53
0.034
221
19.359
13.560
FARM 35
LAGOON
227
0.251
903
32.162
FARM 35
LAGOON
226
0.240
943
32.192
FARM 35
LAGOON
229
0.254
902
32.046
20

TABLE 3 Major Ion and Bacterial Results from the ENCO Lab
ENCO
Sample
DaW
NOS
TKN
PO4
Colliform
Fecal
Collifa m
Well
7/2/2010
0.071
0.061
Absent
Absent
D-2 SW
7/2/2010
2.1
0.94
0.17
Present
Present
D-3 SW
7/2/2010
2.9
0.7
0.1
Present
Present
D-4 SW
7/2/2010
2.6
0.78
0.15
Present
Present
D-5 SW
7/2/2010
0
0
0
Present
Present
D-6 SW
7/2/2010
2.2
1 1.2
0.18
Present
Present
D-7 SW
7/2/2010
2.4
1 1 1
0.16
Present
Present
TABLE 4 Major Ion Results from the Vann Lab
Vann
Labs
sample a
Dow
Comment
NH4
TKN
MBF-1
7/1/2010
0.56
4.5
MBF-2
7/1/2010
0.28
1.68
MBF-3
7/1/2010
5.6
19.6
MBF-4
7/1/2010
0.84
0.98
MBF-5
7/1/2010
0.7
0.98
MBF-6
7/2/2010
0.2
2.1
MBF-7
7/2/2010
0.28
1.4
MBF-8
7/2/2010
LAGOON
212
224
MBF-9
7/6/2010
0.42
MBF-10
7/6/2010
0.42
MBF-11
7/6/2010
t
0.2
Light stable nitrogen isotopes of the nitrate in the ditch and well water indicate that the well
water has not affected by swine or human septic wastes. This is supported by the low
concentration of nitrogen in the well groundwater. The ammonium nitrogen isotopic
composition of the waste lagoon is over 30 per mil (Figure 13), typical for waste lagoons in
North Carolina during the summer months (Karr et al., 2001). The isotopic composition of ditch
water varies from 13 to 20 per mil and has a nitrogen concentration of -2 mg/l. This suggests a
dilution of lagoon waste water of -150 to 200%. Some of this dilution would be from rainwater
during the run-off event; the rest of the dilution would be from groundwater entering the ditch
during pumping operations. This mixing of groundwater and waste water is further supported by
the Cl/Br ratios (Figure 15). Waste lagoon CUBr ratios are over 900; well water Cl/Br ratios are
-300, and the ditch water
21

Figure 11. AmmoniunvTKN concentrations of surface water from July 1 to July 6, 2010 near Farm 31351,
Pender County, NC.
22

t•
y
i
5
YYM= 5
YM 1 }
�r.
•'�
1
c
iy�i
1
r
fy..yy
n 1
I,b
mr,

60
0 40
Z
0
00
c0 20
0
49
Drainage Ditch
Nitrate in
it
Drinking Well
Precipitation
®
Waste Lagoon Ammonium
Fertilizer Nitrate
0
Denitrification
0
L
Z
Soil
Manure
NHa in
fertilizer
& rain
-10 0 10 20 30 40
815N NO3
Figure 13. Nitrogen isotopic composition of nitrate in surface and drinking well water on July 2, 2010 near
Farm 31351, Pender County, NC. The waste lagoon nitrogen isotopic composition is plotted on the X axis for
reference.
24

iN

Figure 15. Lagoon, ditch and well water Cl/Sr ratios on duly 2, 2010 at Farm 31351, Pender County, NC.
26

ratios are below 300. Cl/Br ratios can only be altered by mixing from different sources since
these ions are conservatively mixed in groundwater and not naturally attenuated. The Cl/Br data
also suggest that runoff waste water is diluted by a significant amount in the ditches, and that the
well water comes from a different source than the surface water in the area and is unaffected by
the waste water runoff event.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This investigation has used geophysics and geochemistry with spatial analysis to evaluate the
influence of animal waste on ground and surface waters near Farm 31351 in Pender County, NC.
The geochemical and bacterial results indicate that animal waste was present in the ditches on
July 2, 2010. The following is a summary of our results:
1. Based on a comparison of chemical concentrations and isotopic data of water collected
from the well and neighboring ditches, the drinking well water has not been affected by
the June 29, 2010 release.
2. Based on the geophysical data, it is unlikely that any affected ditch water entered the
property at 420 Tuchahoe Road.
3. Nitrate concentrations of ditch water are higher than ammonium concentrations. This
suggests a rapid conversion of the reduced form of nitrogen in animal waste to the
oxidized from on nitrogen in the ditches. The nitrogen and oxygen composition of nitrate
in the ditch water suggests a mixing of sources with the predominate source of nitrate in
the ditch not coming from animal waste, but from other sources.
4. The dilution of animal waste in the ditch water is supported by Cl/Br ratios. Simple mass
balance equations suggest dilutions of 100 to 200 fold. These data confirm that Murphy -
Brown returned at least 100 to 200 gallons of clean ditch and ground -water to the waste
pond for every gallon of surface run-off.
5. The presence of fecal colliforms in all the ditch water samples indicates that animal waste
present in all ditch locations.
27

6. Because of the high recovery of affected water from the drainage ditches by Murphy -
Brown the water level in the ditches actually reversed groundwater infiltration and setup
groundwater discharge conditions, thus preventing and reversing the flow of affected
ditch waters into the soils of the Dawson property.
7. Because the Dawson drinking water well is completed into the PeeDee Aquifer (a
protected aquifer with at least 50 feet of clay aquitard between the well screen and the
water table aquifer) it is unlikely that the surface release will adversely impact the
drinking water source.
Based on these data and the response report by Murphy -Brown we recommend no additional
remedial actions be taken beyond what has already been proposed to the State.
28

Literature Cited
Aravena R, Robertson WD, Use of multiple isotope tracers to evaluate denitrification in ground
water: Study of nitrate from a large -flux septic system plume. Ground Water, 1998, 36: 975-
982.
Davis, S.N., Whittemore, D.O., Fabryka-Martin, J.F. Uses of Chloride/Bromide Ratios in
Studies of Potable Water. Ground Water, 1998, 36(2): 338-350.
Giese, G.L., Eimers, J.L., and Coble, R.W., Simulation of Ground -water flow in the Coastal
Plain Aquifer System of North Carolina; U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 90-372.
Hudak, P.F. Chloride/Bromide ratios in leachate derived from farm -animal waste. Environ.
Poll., 2003, 121: 23-25.
LaChat QuickChem Method 10-117-07-1-B Determination of Chloride by Flow Injection
Analysis Colorimetry (Mercuric Thiocyanate) Pruefer, A. 2001.
LaChat Quickchem Method 10-135-21-2-B Bromide in Waters Bogen, K. and Smith P. 2000.
Karr, J.D., Showers, W.J. and Jennings G.D., Low-level nitrate export from confined dairy
farming detected in North Carolina streams using 515N, Agriculture, Ecosystems and
Environment, 2003, 95:103-110
Karr, J.D., Showers, WJ, Gilliam, JW, Anders, AS. Tracing nitrate transport and
environmental impact from intensive swine farming using 515N. J. Environ. Qual., 2001, 30:
1163-1175.
Kendall C. Tracing sources and cycling of nitrate in catchments, In Isotope Tracers in
Catchment Hydrology, 1998, C. Kendall and J. J. McDonnell (eds.), pp. 519-576. Elsevier,
Amsterdam.
Kendall, C, Aravena R, Nitrate isotopes in ground water systems. In: Environmental Tracers in
Subsurface Hydrology. 2000, P.G. Cook and A.L. Herczeg (eds.), Kluwer Academic, Boston.
pp. 261-297.
Panno S.V., Hackley K.C., Hwang H.H., Greenberg S.E., Krapac I.G., Landsberger S.,
O'Kelly D.J. Characterization and identification of Na-Cl sources in ground water. Ground
Water, 2006, 44(2): 176-187.
Seiler RL, Combined use of 15N and 1a0 of nitrate and 1113 to evaluate nitrate contamination in
ground water. Applied Geochem. 2005, 20: 1626-1636.
Showers, W.J., Genna, B., McDade, T., Bolich, R., and Fountain, J.C. Nitrate
Contamination in Ground Water on an Urbanized Dairy farm. 2008 Envir. Sci. &Tech. V.
42(13) 4683,
Showers, WJ, Usry, B, Fountain, M, Fountain, JC, McDade„ T, DeMaster, D., Nitrate FIux
from Ground to Surface Waters Adjacent to the Neuse River Waste Water Treatment Plant.
Univ. of North Carolina WM, 2005 Report No 365a, 38 pp.
FIE

APPENDIX 1 Soil Report on Pender County, NC
Acreage and Proportionate Extent of the Soils
Pender County, No, in Carolina
Map
symbol
Map unit name
Acres
Percent
An6
A1pin flee sand, 1 to 6 percent slopes
19,011
3.4
ALA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 tc 3 percent slopes
888
0.2
AuB
Autryville fine sand. 1 to 4 percent slopes
16.174
2.9
AyA
Aycock loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
1.361
0.2
AyB2
Aycock loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
2,603
0.5
ea8
Baymeade fine sand. 1 to 4 percent slopes
10,657
1.9
Bo
Bohicket silty clay loam, frequently flooded
1,049
0.2
Ca
Carteret fine sand. frequently flooded
6.452
1.1
Ch
Chewacla and Chastain soils. frequerdiy flooded
10,423
1.9
Ct
Croatan muck
57,837
10.3
Do
Dcrovan muck, frequent y flooded
11,379
2.0
EmA
Exum foam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
11.627
2.1
EuA
Exum-Urban land complex. 0 to 2 percent slopes
765
0.1
Fo
Forestan loamy fine sand
22,557
4.0
GOA
GoldsDoro fine sandy loam- 0 to 2 percent slopes
29.974
5.3
Gr
Grantham loam
11.120
2.0
Gt
Gnfton loamy fine sand
8,184
1.5
InA
Mvershtl-Gender complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes
1,089
0.2
Jo
aonns fte sandy foam
3.850
0,7
KaA
Kalmia loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent scopes
772
0.1
KeB
Kenansvilie fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
2,500
0.4
KuB
KureO fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
3.584
0.6
LrnA
Leon fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
30,451
5.4
Ls
Liddell silt loam
25,255
4.5
Lu
Lumtlee fine sandy loam, occasionally flooded
4.275
0.8
Ma
Mandarin fine sand
4.588
0 8
MCC
Marvyn and Craven soils, 6 to 12 percent slopes
6.170
1.1
Me
Meggett loam
1.781
0.3
Mk
Muckalee loam, frequently flooded
34.658
G.2
Mu
Murville muck
61.413
10.9
NhC
Newhan fine sand, dredged, 2 to 10 percent slopes
612
0.1
NkE
Newhan-Corolla complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes
571
0.1
NmE
Newhan-Corolla-Urban land complex. n to ail pefcenl slopeS
1.186
0.2
NoA
Norfolk loamy fine sand. 0 to 2 percent slopes
8.119
1 A
NoB
Norfolk loamy fine sand. 2 to 6 percent slopes
13,199
2.3
On
Onslow loamy fine sand
3,169
06
PaA
Pactolus fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
1 BA07
3.3
Pn
Pantego mucky fine sandy loam
6.537
1,2
Pt
Pits
1,324
0.2
Ra
Rains fine sandy loam
46,873
8.3
To
Torhunta mucky fine sandy loam
23,141
4.1
W
Wafer
7.496
1.3
Wo
Woodington fine sandy loam
29,1BO
5.2
USfDA Natural Resources
Tabular Data version: 10
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date 06t0512009 Page 1 of 2
30

Acreage and Proportionate Extent of the Soils
Pender Countv. North Carolina
Map Map unit name Acres Percent
symbol
Total
' Less than 0.1 percent.
5e2,381 100.0
USDA Natural Resources
Tabular Data Version' 10
Cowsier-sation Service Tabular Data Version bate: O&JD5r2609 Page 2 of 2
31

ENCO LAB RESULTS
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
102-A Wo Wd ds rndustnal Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: 919AS73DW FAX: [phone]
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Geo Solutions, LTD (GE030)
Attn: Ronald A. Crowson
1900 Eagle Creek
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: laboratory Results for
Project Number: (none], Project Name/pest: MSF - Pender 935
ENCO Workorder: C008032
Dear Ronald A. Crowson,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our iaboratory on
Friday, July 2, 2010.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without
the written approval of the Laboratory.
This repot contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me
Sincerely,
r
Link Thrower
Project Manager
Enclosure(s)
] h�• [n[al numher uCpa�r. ao rh:. i rlHn i, �idu:l:u� dr , puic ��'?.
3)2
Nk' 00)
www.encolabs.com

I I : hL
www.encelabs.com
SAMPLE SuMMARY[LABORATORY CmRONICLE
cumt m WON
Lob ID: CODBD32-DI
Smmpkmk 07102JID l(k30 Aamibe& 07102i1D 14:35
Parameter ...............
FMd Daftj'rww(s)
- ------------
-prop Dawfrifft(b
Anp"sGaWTmw(*
------- - --------------- .................
coblixt 18-92BB
07103110 16:3D
07)03110 1439 071211O
16:35
713/2D10 12:45
E. mi, Cdlk A 16
07J03110 153D
071MIM 14:m 071021ID
16AS
7/3126ID 12:45
9223E
EPA 3512
D7130110
071D7/ID
11:07
715fMLD 09:12
EPA 353.2
07/30/10
07112/10
06.56
7112/2010 12:01
EPA 36SA
D7/30110
07107/ID
11:07
7/612DIO liao
92238
EPA 35LZ
EPA 3532
EPA 355A
------------- ------------------------------------------------- I -------------------------
0 7ID31 LO 17M 07103/10 1439 07M2110 16:35 773J010 IL45
07/03110 17:DD 07103/10 14:39 07M2110 161,35 7130.10 12:45
D713QIFIO
Dipollo
D7130110
D7107110 11-07 718TMLO 09:14
01112110 06S6 71129011) 12:OS
07107110 U:07 7/0/2010 11:11
ahmam "ANAL
Lob M C003032-03
sampled: 07107410 11;10 FAcgivad; 01/02/10 14:35
Paramda
Hold Dateirune(s)
Pray Datefrn-(s)
AmlymsDatefTinw(
- --------------- �­ ......... .........
0710/10 17jD
WM3110 1439 07A02/10
1635
713j26111 12:45
E. cDl. CdWrt 18
07103110 MiD
07/03110 1439 07102110
16:35
7/3M16 1145
92238
EPA I51.2
07130110
0710711D
IL-07
718ml0 D9.17
EPA 365A
07130/10
0710110
jl.W
71M/MiD 11:13
OientM 0.3 SM 32-93nf1 'wed., 07/02110 14-35
Parameter HoId.Datt/Time(s) PrT Date/Tmw(s) Analy5isgirtOTie(s)
------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------- ..--.--
EPA 3532 4),NAO D7/12/10 06:56 71I7,f2O1D 12:47
omtm o-4 Lw.
Lab 1w. 0001032-04
SmmOedt 07/02110 iLIO Mec6ve& 07/02/20 243S
Parameter .................
HoidDateltaix(s) ........................
F�rteffiatKs).--------
CDklertIB4223B
D7103/10 17:20
07A31M 1439 07JU1I0
16:35
7131MI0 12:45
E. CON, Cbfiiert 18
07t13110 17:20
07l03110 14:39 07M2110
1&-35
713I2010 12:4S
9223E
EPA 351.2
D7/30/10
07107110
11:07
718f2010 09:23
EPA
0713D/10
07ID7110
11:07
7Js121130 11:15
Ment Uh D-4 S.W
Parameter id FT Ra�e�Trw(,� Analysis Date/iinx(s)
L----------------- ----------- ....... ja...... ...............
EPA 3512 07,30110 0656 iq
Page'_ of!',%
33

hL
www.encolabs.com
dimmial 1}SLW.
tabii1:C00i032-05
Smoplmk 01021101L•30 a , - - 07/D3/1DSO:I3
Parameter
11dd Data/Tnne(s)
Prtp Da"MME(s)
"bysis lratejTiffmW
Lohlefl L13E 2MB
D71331 LD 17:39
07r113/LD 14:39 07/02fID
16:35
1/31201JD12:45
E. col, Cdlprt 18
D7/0311D 17:30
07,D3/10 1439 07,M110
16:35
7/3/2030 12AS
92238
EPA 35L2
07130/LD
07]07/10
11:07
7IBfMlD 09:25
EPA 3532
0713D/1D
07IL2110
Db:5b
7/12/2010 12:07
EPA 365A
07130/1D
D7107/10
11A7
7/6/Ztlll) 31:16
OYIl3ol df1 -
- ukM
aG 07/02/1011*0 ROCWsud: 07/02110 1435
Paramaty
1�a1d 0alejlYna(s3
Rap Daaeme(sj
Ara�rsis DaOejYme(s)
Coklen 18-9223B
07/03110 17YD D7/6311D 14:19
07,'02!10
16:15
77/2D10 12:45
E. col, CoUled 18
07/03/10 17:10 07M31W 11:39
07IM110
16:3s
713/201D 12:45
92238
EPA 3511
0713qU0
07167f1D
11:07
7NWID (wv
EPA 3512
07/30110
07/L2110
06:56
7117f2616 1248
EPA 365.9
0713D/19
0710111D
11:07
71BII9ID 11:18
dieotlDe D-7i.lY.
IJ 7
"Mpk& D710211D il:SO ii®Md: 07/02110 1&21,
Parameter------------------
iW{d_Oa6elYa�------------------------
0-Y 9"Ir lw).--..--------A
..---....
Collect 16-92230
071D3110 17:S0 07/MIIC
1439 0210211D
1635
7131MID IZA5
E. mi, Lauren 16
07/03119 17:5D 67J63110
14:39 01/0211D
16,35
113010 12•.15
92238
EPA 351.2
0113DIto
07101/ID
11:07
7/a12Dlo 09:3D
EPA 353.2
0113CVLO
07/12/10
0636
7112/20LD 12:09
EPA365.4
071301LO
0710711D
11:07
718/ID1D 11:2D
34

www.ettcolabs.Dam
SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY
vw ID: Well
Lab W- CaM6032-01
Analtrte
Results
Rag
MDL
PQL
UDks
Method
Notes
_._-'-------------------- - ---------
iill x Ntrite as N
-------- ----------._....------
� .1i1
1
---------- "-----------
0.025
.....
0.10
------------
mgx
I- ---------------------
EPA353.2
Phmphurm
0. 1
1
7.LZS
D.10
mg1L
EPA365A
rsrt ID: D-2 SW.
Lab M: CDDSD32-02
Analyte
Results
Rag
MDL
PQL
Units
Method
Notes
________________________________________________________________-.......______-........__.............________.----------
furc-n, f�L+E
Prtscnt
L0
1.3
ro�ki
Colikrt 18-g2238
I. i
L:i
[bkA-
_, cub, CAhk:rt 188273E
Nuatea'Nur,_ts 7�
Z,1
...=
0.10
mg1.
EPA353.2
Pf:caphorrs
?-1:
..-oi
0.10
mglL
EPA366.4
I;f�! K;el�3t11j,U1r as:
D. 4
'i.1S
0.49
M91L
EPA 35L2
it% m: D-3 S.W.
Lab 1D: CDDSD32-03
Anaiyte
Results
Rag
MDL
PQL
UatS
Method
Naha
CoIlPorm Totei
PrarC
1:0
1.D
[blankj
Cdnkst 10192239
&.d*rktia cull
Pr. m
1.0
1.0
[blatlrj
=. cut, "left 111922.3E
mosphwus
0,10
0,025
0.10
mgiL
EPA346.4
Total K1ddaH Nitrogen
0.13
DAB
D. 48
mg1L
EPA35L2
�� '�
Lab ID:
I
-_.
�.:. -... .: -
. - -„ -•.:
Anaitta
Kesu its
Flag
MDL
PQL
tlnks
Method
NaEea
Ntrate/Nltrde as N
Z.5
U
__._.....______________________________._.__________-_--_---__
0.12
0.50
MWL
IPA35L2
Lab ID: CW=32-04
Analyte
Reslutts
flap
MDL
ML
Units
Method
Note
- - -------------------------------------'----------------------•----...--------......-^---....._..---------------...--------------------
Lj.r'rr T.LJ
Pfesert
LO
1.0
[Etsnkj
CallksL 18.92.M
Esd rmfta Ali
Presort
1.0
LD
@bnkj
=. col, Colliart 18 2ZM
Phusplbrus
0.15
0.025
0.16
mg/L
EPAIE&4
TcWK)IdaHNitrW,r.
0.78
.�. 18
D.48
mgjl
EPA351.2
ID: Di S.W.
Lab W-. CW8032-04M
Anatrie
Results
Rag
MDL
PQL
unit
Method
Naha
---------------------
Nerat�lNdrite es N
........
L5
---------
U
-
0. 12
._-
0.90
-mgR, ---
353. 2 ,
ERp 3.
---------
1a: D-S S.W.
Lab W-. CW8032-05
Analyte
R svlt�
Rag
MDL
PQL
Units
Method
Nato
...............-----------------------------
Cdd_rrr, lo�
..
Pre "
---------------
..........-_--______________________------.___________________
LO
LO
[Wankj
takilutIS-02238
f_sJ�rrNe rah
Print
L0
1.0
[alwkj
=. wl, Colilert 16 9223E
ID: D-6 5.W.
Lab ID: CW8032-06
Analyte
RESuks
flag
MDL
PQL
units
Method
Notes
____________.._..._________________._____________......___________-__...._-________________________.....______________._-___
Cdlkrt,ti Tdai
Print
L0
LD
[blank]
Colikrt L64MB
Efifttkhka mil
Pr!ent
lA
1.0
[blank;
L cal, Cdilart 18 4223E
NemmWNtriw as N
22
0.025
D.10
mgtL
EPA 353.2
Phosphorus
0.18
0.W5
DUD
mgil.
EPA36S.4
Total KjddaH Nitrogen
1.2
0.18
O.46
mg'L
EPA 35L2
m: D-7 S`W.
Lab ID: C008032-07
Amaitte
----------------------------------
Results
__---------- __..._.............
Flag
.----------------------------------
MDL
PQL
Un its
.---------
Method
..,....-------------------
Notes
Pugs 4 of 2i
35

www.encotabs.coFn
�-- ZD- D-7 F.W
Lab W: COM32-07
Analyte
RESLIlts
Flag KOL
PQL
WAS
Method Notes
Cal &�z -T-0-Total ----------- * -----------------------------
P*m" Wt ,- , -----------------
- -----------
J-. 0
-D --- * ------
IL
-A3 --A1 --------
O
Cd'lW * " * ffi-9-2-2-3-6 ---------------
Eschewha colt
New.
1.0
LD
fb6nkl
;, ool, Colilert IS 9223E
NitrakoWme as N
2.4
0.025
MID
mGVL
EPA353-Z
phasphmm
0.16
=5
LID
Mot
EPA36S.4
TvW KjMcahl NOWen
IA
OL IS
CL48
mg;L
EPA 351.2
Page 5 "Q:,
Ta

Descripporr: Well
Matrix: Ground Wahl
Project MBF - Pmider R35
ANALYT19AL RESULTS
Lab Sample ID; C008032-01
Sampled: 07/02110 10:30
Sampled By: %VJ Shcwcrs
CIEFENS raw �
www.encolabs.com
Receiver!: 07/02/ L0 14:35
Work Order: 008032
Classical Chemistry Parameters
-------------------------------------......---------...----------------------------------------
------------------------------•--------...,
^ - Ewocary artfred warfywrl vC s9ll
Anahre FrAS Number]
Resuks F"
rru
MOL
M& Satinh Method
MWA*d
ME jig
Nftgrel76hLM a4 M Eta- io1^
M071
mVL
- 3:325
0.10 3V,20A EPA 3532
071QJAL201
PEV
Pta qi) wi L7723-14-01 ^
Q. 061 _
maL
.3.025
0.10 96364_9 EPA 30.4
WMAD 11-10
PEV
-am�K nNoa9tn IECL-03621^
sill
mal
_ 1
0.49 0GOW17 EPA 3512
07/01100112
PEV
Pam c h rrf'
37

Description: well
Matrix: Ground Water
Lab Sample IO: LVM032-01
Sampled: 01102 J I0 10: 30
www.enmlabs-com
Roasted: 07/ 02 j 10143 5
(Mork Order: C008032
Projeerw MSF - Pender P35 Sampled By: bye Showers
Microbiological Parameters
------------------------•----- - ----------- ------------------..-.......----------------------------------------------------.....---------
- - ENCOCer), C&ffMd "YMfNC 5911
AnaMre FGAS Numkwl Rew esl FLN Units 2L
Luh& wo mk 1615SL22.21 " Ammar. IJ-k]
TTs rgxn MWc Calk' w the s PAt s monad Ot tre woomam, ud my Moyne rWodaced n U.
Pagel oF2-3
38
M& babch Method Anakrzed ft man
:.9 00029D CDI ert II M36 971,01:0 :245 0M
..0 ZON22 k,03o*K5922: VA3101245 Cfb m

Description: Ov2 S.W.
Matrix: surface wafer
Project MBF - fender #35
Lab SampleW.- C008032-02
Sampled: 07/02/10 11:00
Sampled sp: wJ Staxers
Cass" Chemistry Parameters
-----.... --•--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
"-EMCa CdrY Q"Md MaIrieitrC 5911
Auaivie lrsc number}
SIRS BM YAM
x ILL
MIL batch MORA
NdmwlNAMW ac N[am-8016(^
7.1 n%WL
L U25
0.10 OGL2MG EPA JM.7
rbmftde (r7x7•u-0J ^
017 mWl
L Gila
0.10 Dams SPA315.1
TOW Kw"M POMSM (ECL-0163] ^
0A4 mpg
1 0.18
0.49 0G36M7 EPA3S1.2
Pa, r n uF'_?
39
CIE, NS
wwwbs.cmn
Received: 07 J02/10 14:35
Mfacic Order: C008032
AhakyW Al Rom
071010 17:05 PEV
07r'09110 uli PEY
071wia ftli KV

DEFaipthm: D-2 S.W.
Mabix: Salface Wat"
Project MBf - Pendrx A35
Lab Sample ID: COM32-02
Sampled: 07j02/ 1011:00
Sampled 8y: W] Showers
Microbiological Parameters
-------- ----------------------------------------------------------.....
^ . ENCU Lary MrtfxY1 ZLtwe rNC 591J
Anahft ICAS Numbs:rl ft s fts l� units R
Col rrw ,ToW [ECi-0039]^ Fre t ltlaMc] _
EsOhen W cdi CWW3-22-2] ^ Aaseni jbi-k] _
7n7 a-:TLK WY:o~ti,s RLes--d 5Y the3b3t,ry.-d rtat sy ➢e--Mf:Jnf,,L
40
deal ele,
wWwxricolabsAwn
Received: 07/02(1014:35
Work Order. COMM
.MRL 9at 1 Mrthod Anahrzed - NO"
:SI OM2027 CdAm i992231 WPW710 1k45 L'CB
4 O'W2027 wk C4J t242i 071WI0 IZ45 Cm

Dc5u iption: 0-3 SW.
Lab SaMle ID: C008O32-03
EIVCIO
www.encolabs.com
Received: 01 J02/i0 1435
Matrix: Surface water sampled: 07102/1011:10 Work Order: CW8032
ProecC MBF - Pender *35 Sampled by: WI Stowers
C]assical Chemistry Parameters
-------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- - ----------
- EAICV L--y .'Vied orWyYe; AC- 5011
Analvre MAS Numbed Re 11. Flea Units RE Mu ML Batch MCedli
N'ftl c/Nax"as N JECL-00101 ^ M D m,WL 5 0.12 090 0GLMM EPA 3532
PhnsphWr (77i3.14-0] ^ 0.10 myL 0.025 0.10 06060 B EPA 365.4
Total Kjelda0l Klmgg LECL-0162] ^ 0.70 m,WL 1 0.11 0.40 OwWI7 EPA351.2
Fagc 10 oT7.3
41
Anakned ft notts
m112/n Ltv PEW
07/ffl/A 11-.13 PEW
07fMV0ft17 PEW

Description: ❑-3 S.W-
Matriz: Surface Water
Lab Sample ID: C008032-03
Sampled: 07/02/10 11: L0
www.erwlabs.com
Received: 07102110 0:35
Work Order: C003032
Project MOF - Perdu gr35 Sampled tty: WJ Shot."s
Microbiological Parameters
--- ----------------------------------------------.-....---------------------------- ----------
CNCVaryoa� XvIkmINC ssu
Mahe MASN�mber1 Results fL-jq U-t$ pF
ea:t—,rowlm-0as91^ P—t Idaot]
Irma-w CO CGB553-7-2]^ Bresent ]aaR[)
,ha repwt mWes my W She sample as mmwed Ey the Obomba, and may mq be repmhwcrd n ful.
Pine I I uf23
42
tj11_L BA" Method AnaW�d BY hates
:.a QW027 cdw.:9-s2 m wtus,a:acs c®
:-o 0=027 cn1 CcifiM 3 932: VIXW11 !ZE5 cm

Description: 17-4 S.W.
Matrix: Surface Water
Project: MBF - Pender #35
Classical Chemistry Parameters
----------- ---------
"-EHLDCdPY �rl�l arbY rr jAY 5911
---------------------
Anowte rms lruntheri
Res"Its Py4 Mail
Ndn1e/NArd*- N rECL-0OIOf ^
3.6 a mp'L
PA hqr r7727-m-01 ^
0.15 mVL
Taut Kial"H%9.9 a (EU-0112) ^
0.74 r4L
Lab Sample M C008032�04
Sampled: 07/ 02/ 10 11:20
Sampled Or. WJ Showers
M MA B& Bxtch Method
5 0.12 O-W 0G12006 EPA 353.2
1025 0.10 OG060:9 EAA 355.-
0-:s 0A8 omb,3,7 EPA 3511
43
Suco
www.encoiabsAvrn
P:eceived: 071021 L O 14:35
Work Order: CW8032
AaiiKld ft Not"
071WID :L4Y PEV
ti1ce,-LD _.5 PEV
W/OWM".21 Pry

Description: D-4 S.W. Lab Sample ID: C008032-0a Received: 07/02110 4435
Matrix: Surface Water Sampled: 07J02110 u:20 Work Order: CM032
Project MBF - Pcndcr ir35 Sampled By: WJ Showers
Microbiological Parameters
-- ---------------------------------------------....-..------------------------------------.
^ - ENCOCery4VITred anrlyre fNC 591]
Analvte rCAS Numberl Results Rag Unit. OF MKI. NatcIt MA[rod Analyzed ft Nors
eerdwm.rnwien-0a3aj^ P—L laeosl 1.0 002027 ta:MIS-97236 WIQ17l0_L<,
Eac-- is cdr iri552.22.21 ^ P—t - 1.0 OW1027 COL WftA 799R: 07=W 12-4, ...
7hs fmat MWCM mk SO th* iPia arn:maei or ae s d maymk in fevodua1 n Wr
Pagc 13
44

Description: 0-5 S.W.
Matrix: Surface WaIrr
Lab Sample ID: C0 SC32-05
Sampled: 07102;10 11:30
www.encolabs.com
Received: 07/02/10 14:35
Work Order: C006032
Project MBr - Pender z35 Sampled By: YVJ 5hower5
dassicai Chemistry Parameters
..................................................------.------------------------------------- ------- ............
••. FACO Corya r6ad&i yfkpfNC 591]
AnaMrte rMkum6erl Re fts Fing upits x "-a M as uh, MMri
NL7ielNVJt M'4 IECL-00!Q- NO mVL - 0025 0.10 OG12006 EPA 302
Ftww ms i7723-I+-01" No -VL 2425 0.10 OG0wis EPA 3E6.4
Toys 1C)" i %&own iKL-OW] " ND mWL 0.18 0.48 OGOW17 EPA 35L2
Page 14 QP_3
45
EY Motes.
071121:0 12:47 PEV
O7[wio I2-15 PEV
0710t1100426 PEV

Description: I}5 S.W.
Matrix: Surface WaMr
Lab Sample I0: C008032-05
Sampled: 07/02/ 10 11:30
www-erxolabs.com
Received: 0 7 /02 (10 14 :35
Work Order; CM032
Project MBF - Perder * 35 Sampled By. WJ Showers
Microbiological Parameters
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ — ----------------------...... ...........
^ - tmo fay a Y--V eralyu INC 59J]
AoaMe rCAS Numberl R[Sa1Fl1r g UNts pE MUL Andi Method Analyzed NJ Notes
C.Id—.TOW reC!-00391 Present [U-1 1. 1.0 (IMM7 Cdkrt 19.9228 oy'w"10 _Z45 cm
Ead+cncl�a cdi (64543-22-21 ^ worst 75—! I 1.0 002027 COL QiM t 1B 9= N103;10 _Z45 CCa
T76 motr iMKf6*n Ere swrtMasr-xNld Or tee labmWV. mW.xr" 7r It**&md n fur
Page 15 ar23
46

Description: "S.W.
Matrix: Surface Wamr
Project MBF - Pender 935
Classical Chemistry Parameters
-------------------------------------
^ - E1WC0 CWY 4WCeAcl ~Yte (NC 5917
Ana"e rCAS Nutn l
M atclNRr as It JELL-0010]
Ph —ph.. J7723.14,01
TOW KWaaw Nitr g� IECL-03621
1'a - lh 4 _'.
Lab Sample ID: C00€3032-06
Sampled: 0710211011:40
Sampled By: Wl S1wmm
it uits FL3Q Sri tff Mok YML loftch
2.2 mWL 0.0E 0.30 0--2006 EPA 3532
0.18 -OIL 0.025 0.10 OW6M EPA 365A
1.2 mWL - 0.:a 0,48 OC2160E7 EPA 3512
47
ES NS co
www.enoolabs com
Receircd: 0 7102/ 1014 35
Work Order:COW032
+ AX "Obn
W12/30:206 PEY
W/0e/1011:6 M
U71*100¢27 PEV

Pesaiption: D-6 S.w.
Matrix: Surface water
Project" MBF - Perrder k35
Microbiological Parameters
------------------------------------------------------
AaalvtcI.u+NUWAW7 ftsufts
Cdd", Tbtal (ECL-0030) - Pr t
EKh.khia Coli["M3-22-21^ Present
Lab Sample ID: COOSG32-06
Sampled: 0 7102/ 10 I L 40
Sampled By: w) Showers
W W W AMCWabs.com
Received: 07j02/10 14:35
Work Order: C068032
!!nits 4E HRL t7trt Mdhod Analvzed ,f Natm
It mkl 1. 1.0 902027 C0iftd I#-W235 WfM!10 1415 CM
l7lankl 1.0 002G27 cot CMHi E S 922_ 011`.1.rl10:2A5 C.0
lltli fEpbli IlKa: � m Ik�UM` d5 r�(!MM ilY r1Y ah�+d7M'. 3iG m11'rtll� bG <Z'v9AlCd el R 7,
Page 17 of 23
48

www-encolabs.com
Description: D-7 S.W. Lab Sample ID: CO08032-07 Received: 07102/10 14:35
Matrix: Surface Water Sampled: 07102) 0 3L:S0 Work Order: CW8032
Project: MBF - ponder 035 Sampled air. W) Showers
Classical Chemistry Parameters
.............. ----------------
----....--..----•----.-------.----------•------------......----•-
^ - ENC'U Cery a toe Andipte;NC 3911
A.mah" [C.L4 Numberl
EM43 Flag go&
ME "a
NIL. match Method
BY
aarne/Xihiteasll [ELL-W101 ^
IA MWL
1 0.025
0.10 0C12006 EPAM-a
07112l1012:09
PEV
Ph -ph— [7723-L4-01^
a.16 my'L
0.025
0.:0 0M6018 EPA 3M.4
07]06(2011!20
PEV
1'aW Krdd*d W ng- [EM-0162] ^
110 mp'1
i O.19
0.40 OGHIE7 EPA3512
07lm100 a
PEV
49

Dctripbon: D-7SW.
Mabix: Surface Water
Lab Sample M: 0008032-07
Sampled: 07/02/10 11:50
i
www.encalabs.com
Received: 07/02J 10 14:35
Work Order: C008032
Project MBF - Pender V35 Sampled By,. W3 Showers
Microbiological Parameters
- ------
-......
--------- --- ----- - .. -----------------------..--...----------------------------- — ------------------------- --------
^ - ENCV rare M-WMdM JNC 5971
An-shftJrASMumberl 15ftut4 flaa Uftts QE Mill. AWL INdtwad Anakzed ft Mates
CUA". Total 1EC1-0079J - ►resent 902W7 cadvt -92239 V!01:9.2a5 Ca
Ee[1rrn[lxa cou j6855}2]-2J^ Prty, i !.0 OM2927 cnk CaRe29972: 021931M Ft45 CCB
The wm +cues m4 to the waple as mmNei M the mmatwy. aW m y m4' ee rmredread n cur.
Paec ice of 2?
50

www.encolabs.com
QUAL11Y CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Paramctcrs - Quality Control
6331ch 660&11 - Sarnc
Slank (DGD6017-SLXl)
Prepared: VjD712019 11:07 Analyzed: 07/387211D 06:31
Spike Source WSW
RIND
ArLaI
Result
MRL
units
Level Result %REC Ljrnits RIND
Limit
Notes
019
U
0.49
mg(L
LCS (OGD6017-551)
PrEpamd: 07/0712DID 11:D7 Anadged: D7/01/2011) D6:33
Spike Source %RFC
RPD
iina[yte
RasvR
Flag
MRL
Units
Level Reach %REC Lints RPD
Limit
Notts
7x1
1
0A
nIQ11.
12.0 99 50-L29
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ma1ru Spi ke (OGD6017-M 51)
Prepared: VA 7/2010 11:07 Analyzed: 071Ogj2D1D 12:21
------
------- -
source: CD%23&O1RFL
Spike Source %REC
RPD
Result
Rag
MRL
units
Lend Rea;dt 54REC Lifnits am
ikon
bees
'04Kjelaazllk&Dgen
33
0
J.,t
nrr!L
:.20 35 UK go -Liu
W, :-
MR" Spike DW (06)M617-MSD1)
Rcpared: 07/07/2DIO 11:07 MYpted: 07/00010I2:6
Soumv CDO6239-OIRE1
Spike Soumv 1hREC
RPD
lteslit
J4RL
Units
Leval Result %AIC Liwts RPD
Limit
Notrs
TOW Klel' I Nema�
__...----------- -------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32
0
0.96
-,VL
1.20 35 NR 90- 20 2
2S
.......______-___
q4_-:
8;Mh UGA501e - Same
Blank (DG06DSa•sLK1)
"axed: 07107/201011:07 Analyzed- 07/08,20101o:48
Spike Source %RFC
RPD
AAiaA1�
lAnsuR
flag
MRL
Units
Level Result %REC UWAS RPD
LnJi
Nates
Plq�rnrls
O.Ozs
D
0.:1
FKj:L
LCS (01206018-551)
Reaared: 07/071201011A7 Ma112ed: 071011fMLD 10:4D
go- $11ON %NK
R1D
IN dOn
Reaul
"All.
unit
Lmd. . [cart %am ■Po
Unit
Motes
PlnrVu,ui
:.7
O.:D
my'L
L60 105 W120
Matra Spike (Om661&MS1)
Repared: D7/07/201011:07 Nall2e0: D7108/201D 10:51
Sourre: C006238.01
Spike Source 1isEC
RPD
s Algee
AMR
Rag
MAILUni"
Leval Result `kREC Limns RIND
Limit
Notes
pl.xplwrt
65
0
3.2
nWL
0.320 73 w v1}12a
:4
-------------------------------------------------------------
Matrix Spike Dip (OG0601 8-MSD2)
....___-------------------------------------------------------
P1Bparvd: 07)07/201011:D7 MaIIRed: 071WMiD 10:53
...___._-----
Source: C006238-01
Spike Sowrce %"C
RPO
Rr1a11Re
Raul
Rag
MRL
Units
Level Resdt %kit Ljn*s RPD
Cant
Hates
Pry�;­
66
D
12
nglL
O.-12a 71 UN %,r Ij J.9
.t- -:�
aft LG12" -NO PREP
ShInk(OG12006-BLKl)
Page 24 of 23
51
Prepared: 171122.011) 06:56 Analyzed: 011121'2U10 11:20

CeN s
www.csunlatu.g0m
O(IALrT-Y CONTROL
Classical Chemis" Parameters- Quality Control
&xth Z12006 - NO PREP
Blank (OGi2006-BLKI)Continued
Pveparzd: 07,1T1201D 06:56 Analyzec: MOM 11.20
Spike Source % =
RPD
aMRIOR
taWt
MRL
units
Lend Result %REC Limits RPD
Lar[it
Nofs
I.A.a,Ablt s N
Ia2s D
0A
:rq;L
-------------------------------------
LCS (OG12005-BSI)
.------------------------
...................."""'"'...._..___-_____-____._.__.__.......____...___
Prepuree: 02112/201D D6:56 Analyzel: 07; 12i10 LD L1:22
Spilm Soa[v %RW
RPD
Ihs7tt Flag
NRL
thils
Lend Result %REC Limits RPD
limit
tots
N[retRNrre—N
:.3
1:1
GQ,L
i.25 107 20�i20
Make[ Spike (0"20061451)
Pry: 071171L010 06:56 AnN1zm 071IZf2D10 11:25
Source: LD03653.05
Spike Source %REC
RPD
Ratt[R Oft
MRL
Units
Ie ei Result %RFC Lrmtls RA
Notes
N[U*NbgeaZn
D.6S
J..:J
-�Q:L
J.Li J-2 tla tls1�
Matrix Spike Dup (0612006-MSDI)
Prepated: 07112nD30 D6.%Maiyzed: W' 12f2010 11:28
Source: C003653-05
.
Suitt Soon: WAM
RW
Anei
- RapsR-
NIL
t1att
Laval Rc[Wt %6w Lka6 1111110
tint
halo
4Lr�D'N1f[e asy
0.41
9.17
rWL
0.250 9 .,2 76 80120 5
25
ipt-W
5?

wwr.pmlabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DERNMONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
J The reported vaiue Is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The anaiyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisW re content, where applicable.
E The concentration indicated for this analyze is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument. This value is mns�dered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRLs roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
HD The analyte was analyzed for but not deflected to the level Shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
QM-07 The spike recovery was outside acreptance limits for the MS and/or MSD. The hatch was
accepted based on acceptable LCS recovery.
QM•16 Matrix spike recovery could not be calculated due to high concentrations of analyte in source
sample.
J�

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LABORATORIES CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
GD)(E�ff Iotlh[wyery lae{r.. LIII r.n".m..wrlSael.suM 71I IW,AWoftM..t-WWCI
IFlenln, rL lr 4 IervwrA , ri]1716-aw C.Y. IClMrI
I.nf1--- Arp IIOr 016A +1 IM M MF rvlgpIMUtO pa"
�.ria rca �d
.M.nMs
7
246
��!
71�lro fH3y'
QQ
rur U
WM—
,
aptlrm
9j r . yy__
IdIhpFlMd Cr
ar.+R
wrml.na r,
�rinp
I r
�.•�).,L.,, � ',� Ci�td R
,Irinm
we+ru�
,
,�r%
xxnptnll,n umcrnpaao
YMr4. GIY Y4NnMn� W :..r vL :sn4 t. o RILiWpLIe � Y1p.MgftmIp A u uft l 1IMI MMIM `' .n.. n r nrl n n �niaw rN n�.n. v 5nry
pelaNYerylA r6i:IW bL'HCa lsLaanraiW�arl�Iw•unnL pdmr.p.rr. hwlmOre leans rltlw lnm, vJw.fx.Mbn 7yn'Y=mxl

VANN Laboratories Results
55

For: Murphy -Brown
Vann Laboratories Phone: [phone]
P. O. Box 668
Wallace, NC 28466 Wastewater ID
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT
Date Samples Collected:
July 1,2010
PARAMETER
UNITS
ANAL�D
Upstream
Downstream
Containment
PH-
BOD5
mglL
COD
mg/L
Fecal Coliform
col.1100 ml
Total KJeldahl Nitrogen
mg1L
Total Residue
mg/L
Total Suspended Residue
mg1L
7-2-10
42.5
26.5
265
Detergents MBAS
mg/L
Oil & Grease
mglL
Total Phosphorous
mglL
Sulfides
mg1L
Phenols
ug/L
Total Chromium
ug1L
Total Copper
u91L
Total Magnesium
mg1L
Total Zinc
uglL
Ammonia Nitrogen
mg1L
7-2_ 10
0.56
0.28
5.6
"Analysis performed by Oxford Laboratory
Signed:
Date: m y 6 , 2010

NOV-30-1999 23:42 VANN LABORATORIES
vane tlanoratones
P. O. Box 668
Wallace, NC 26466
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT
P.02r05
Phone: [phone].
Wastewater ID #: 22
For: Date Samples Collected:
Murphy-BrownDate
1,2010
PARAMETER
UtVm
AI�YzED
Containment
upstream
parnstrea■
PH-
BODS
rng/L
7-2--10
29
3.4
2.6
COD
mg1L
Fecal Coliform
co1.1100 ml
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
mg/L
7-7-10
19.6
4.5
1.68
Total Residue
m91L
Total Suspended Residue
mg1L
Detergents MBA
mglL
Oil & Grease
mg/L
Total Fhosphorvus
mgQ,
Sulfides
m91L
Phenals
u;IL
Total Chromium
U91L
Total Copper
u91L
Total Magnesium
M91L
Total Zinc
u91L
Ammonia Nitrogen
mgJL
"Analysis performed by oxford Laboratory +nn&4
Signed
Date, 10, 2010

NOU-30--1999 23:42
For Murphy -Brown
VANN LABORATORIES P 03/05
van n Lanoratones Phone: [phone]
P. O. Box 668
Wallace, NC 28466 Wastewater 0 #� 22
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT
Date Samples Collected:
Jul 1 2010
PARA-YETER
UAM
DATE
ANALYZED
Ditel
Downstream
Neighbor's
pitch
PH -
RODS
mglL
COD
mg/L
Fecal COUfOTM
col.1100 ml
Toud Kjeldah I Nitrogen
mall
7-7-10
0.98
0.98
Total Residue
m91L
Total Suspended Residue
M91L
Dae penasMBAS
mg1L
Oil & Grease
mglL
Total Phosphorous
mglL
Sulfides
-91L
Phenols
ug/L
Total Chromium
u91L
Total Copper
ug/L
Total Magnesium
mg/L
Total Zinc
u91L
Ammonia Nitrogen
mg/L
*ArQIysis performed by Oxford Laboratory
Signed,
J'UIA 10,2010

For: Murphy —Brawn
Vann Laboratories Phone: [phone]
P. O. Box 668
Wallace, NC 28466 Wastewater ID #: a2
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT
Date Samples Collected:
July 1, 2010
Lcsha.,se-
PARAMETER
UMTS
DATE
ANALYZED
Ditel
Downstream
Neighbor's
Ditch
PH-
BODS
mg1L
COD
mg1L
Fecal Coliform
co1.1I00 ml
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
mg1L
Total Residue
mg/L
Total Suspended Residue
M91L
Detergents WAS
mglL
Oil & Grease
mg1L
Total Phosphorous
M91L
Sulfades
mg/L
Phenols
U91L
Total Chromium
ug/L
Total Copper
ug/L
Total Magnesium
mg/L
Total Zinc
ug/L
Ammonia Nitrogen
m91L
7-2-10
0.84
0.70
*Ana{ysis performed by Oxford Laboratory
Signed:
L6��
Date: July 6, 2010

For:
Vann Laboratories phone: [phone]
P. 0. Box 668
Wallace, NC 28466 Wastewater ID #: 22
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT
Murphy —Brown Date Samples Collected:
July 2,2010
PARAMETER
UNITS
DATE
ANALYZED
Upstream
Downstream
Lagoon
PH -
RODS
mgJL
COD
mg/L
Fecal Coliform
col.1100 mI
Total K1eidahl Nitrogen
mg/L
Total Residue
M91L
Total Suspended Residue
m91L
Detergents MBAS
mg1L
Oil & Grease
mg1L
Total Phosphorous
m91L
Sulfides
mg1L
Phenols
ug/L
Total Chromium
u91L
Total Copper
ug/L
Total Magnesium
mg1L
Total Zinc
ug/L
Ammonia Nitrogen
mg/L
7-2-10
<0.20
0.28
212
"Analysis performed by Oxford Laboratory
Stgner
Date: JUly 6,2010

NOV-30-1999 23;43 URNN LABORATORIES
Vann Laboratories
P. O. Box 668
Wallace, NC 28466
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT
For: Murphy -Brown
P.04i05
Phone: [phone]
Wastewater ID #' 22
Date Samples Collected:
/1' 3u1 2 209
PARAMETF-R
UNITS
DATE
ANALi'7.ED
Upstream
Da■nstreaa
Lagoon
PH -
BODS
mg1L
COD
mg/L
Fecal Coliform
coLl100 Tnl
Total KjOdahl Nitrogen
mg)L
777-10 1
2.10
1.4
224
Total Residue
mg/L
Total Suspended Residue
M91L
Derergertts MBAS
mg1L
Oil & Grease
mg/L
Total Phosphorous
mg1L
Sulfides
mg1L
Phenols
ug/L
Torsi Chromium
U91L
Total Copper
uglL
Torsi Magnesium
mg1L
Total Zinc
u91L
Ammonia Nitrogen
mglL
'Analyse performed by Oxford Laboratory
Signed:
Date. _ _July 10.ZOID _ . _

NOV-30-1999 23:43 VANN LABORATORIES P 05/05
Vann Laboratories Phone: [phone]
P. O. Box 668
Wallace, NO 28466 Wastewater 1p #: 22
WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT
FOt: Murphy-5roxn
Date Samples Collected:
® ��1 6 20
fl
PAR4METER
UNIT
DATE
ANALYZED
[ipstreso
Upstream fro
Highway
Uovnstream Y
Nei hbor
om
PH-
BOD5
M91L
COD
mg/L
Fecal Coliform
col.1100 ml
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
mg/L
Total Residue
m91L
Total Suspended Residue
m91L
Derergents MBAS
M91L
Oil cot Creme
mglL
Total Phosphorous
mg/L
Sulfides
mg/L
Phenols
U91L
Total Chromium
ug/L
Total Copper
ug/L
Total Magnesium
m91L
Total Zlnc
ug1L
Ammonia Nirrogen
mglL
7-6-10
0 _ 42
0.42
<0.20
'Anatysis performed by Oxford Laboratory
Signed;
TOTAL P.05

Murphy -Brown
[ ]�y y rph Byoa■!_._,� � W Box 858
lYlu j' oJOjii Warsaw, NC 28338
Murphy Brown East
July 5, 2010
Mr. John Farrell
NCDENR — Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
RE: Farm 31351
Facility # 71-051
Accidental Discharge 6/29/10
Dear Mr, Famell,
This letter is the follow-up to an accidental discharge on farm 31351 reported to the Division on
June, 29 2010. The sequence of events on 6/29/2010 is:
1) Farm 31351 is comprised of 1 site with 1 lagoon and 7 spray fields with a total of 19 pulls.
The total wettable acres on this site are 119.66. Land and Nutrient Management
technician was irrigating pulls 65 and 913 when his supervisor visiting the site noticed
runoff entering the field ditch. The system was immediately shut down and the ditch was
dammed to contain the spill. The supervisor contacted me at 3:30pm to report the spill.
When I arrived at 4:45 pm we set up pumps to remediate the spill, I then contacted DWQ
at around 5:10 pm and reported the spill.
2) We pumped all the waste from our containment back on the spray field (pull 10a 10b). We
built up our containment berm to capture any subsequent runoff which may occur
overnight and for removal the following morning.
3) During the night (6/29/2010) we received 1.2" of rainfall that washed more waste out of the
fields and overran our containments.
4) The following morning we again started remediation efforts and reconstructed our dams.
then made contact with DWQ and reported that the spill had entered the side ditch and
flowed down beside state road 1206. 1 also contacted a contractor to help with the
recovery efforts.
5) It was determined to Uock off the road ditch and remediate the waters along the highway.
After building dams along the road we began hauling water back to the lagoon using two 6
thousand gallon tankers a 3200 gallon field tanker. We also brought in two high capacity
pumping units with lay flat hose to pump water back to the farms lagoon.
6) Murphy brown invested over 540 man hours in efforts to recover all of the effluent that left
the field. In our efforts we hauled 600,000 gallons of water and pumped over 1,200,000
gallons of water back to the lagoon.
7) Remediation from the road ditch continued until 3pm on Friday 7/2/2010 at which time all
visibfe effluent from the ditch had been removed. At this time the containments in the road
ditch were removed as mutually agreed to by Murphy Brown and DWQ.
8) Temporary containments which had been built on Murphy -Brown property were left in
place and remediation continued until Tuesday 71612010.
9) Root Cause: Irrigating on saturated soils, contrary to the company's instructions and
training protocols.

• Page 2
Estimate of the discharge:
July 7, 2010
A) The irrigation events in question started at 10:50 am and were ended at 3:03 pm.
B) Our best estimation is that approximately 15,000 gallons left the spray field.
Through our recovery methods we feel that 100% of the effluent was recovered.
The plan to correct the problem identified from this accidental discharge is to:
1)As part of our EMS training we will reemphasize to our group the need to identify
saturated soils and not pump on them.
2)Evaluate the site for proper drainage and install flow control structures where
necessary.
Included with this letter is a copy of the most current waste analysis a copy of the notice of
discharge as required by the permit.
I have outlined in this report all available information related to this accidental discharge
incident. Murphy -Brown has dealt with this incident in a timely, appropriate and responsible manner, in
accordance with the emergency response protocol outlined in our Environmental Management System
(EMS) and with the farm's state operating permit.
If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Michael Norris
Environmental Resource Specialist
Murphy -Brown LLC
[phone] ext. 241
Enclosed: Waste analysis report, Notice of discharge.

FA,j-AA, 31�,S
3 ti �,:J+ 11 2-q-
�� A-k
�L��
CfaSSe 5
s
kr4
A 1 �e - C t�-� -P-1U n4i `I
I
CA . cl k
dr-�kN -pA-ck tx�
'51&&h T-le

f
rt
f
AAA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Govemor
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
August 03, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7002 1000 0005 2389 8461
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Murphy Brown LLC
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398-0856
Dear Sir or Madam:
Subject: Notice of Violation &
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Recommendation For
Enforcement
Case # NOV-20 I O-DV-0299
Farm 3135
Facility Number: 71-051
Pender County
This is to notify you of a violation of Swine Waste Management System State General Permit
AWG100000 issued on October 1, 2009 under Certificate of Coverage AWS710051.
On June 30, 2010, Mr, Kevin Rowland and NVir. John Farrell from the Wilmington Regional Office of
the Division of Water Quality responded to a call from Mr. Michael Norris of Murphy Brown LLC
concerning your animal operation and the animal waste management system serving your operation.
The following violations to State General Permit AWG100000 were documented:
1. Discharge
At the time of inspection waste had flowed from farm field ditches and then into ditch adjacent
to Tucahoe Rd for approximately 0.6 miles. Samples and photographs were taken.
This is in violation of Condition No. I. 1 of the General Permit that states, in part, "The waste
collection, treatment, storage and application system operated under this General Permit shall be
effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of
pollutants to surface water or wetlands."
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 one
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterauality.org Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
50% Recycled/107o Post Consumer Paper

rr I y
Murphy Brown LLC
Notice of Violation RFE
71-051
August 03, 2010
Page 2 of 3
2. Ponding and Runoff
During•the inspection, excessive ponding and over saturation of the corn fields were noted.
Additionally, several locations were photographed and documented where waste had run off
spray fields.
This is in violation of Condition No. II.5 of the General Permit that states, "In no case shall land
application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff during any given application event."
The following information must be received by the Wilmington Regional Office, Division of Water
Quality within 30 working days of the receipt of this notice.
Response requirements are listed as follows:
a. A written explanation of the violation.
b. A written description of the actions to be taken to prevent a recurrence.
You may wish to contact your County Soil & Water Conservation District Office, County Extension
office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance they may be able
to provide.
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the
Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These violations may
result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.6 A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for reasonable costs of the investigation in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). Your response will be
forwarded to the Director along with the enforcement package for his consideration. Be advised
that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in this matter including injunctive
relief and permit revocation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Mr. Kevin Rowland from
the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7436.
Yours very truly,
1 'A ,
Charles F. Stehman, Ph.D., P.G.
Environmental Program Supervisor III

Murphy Brown LLC
Notice of Violation RFE
71-051
August 03, 2010
Page 3 of 3
Attachments
cc: Jason Turner, Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown LLC
Will Burke, DSWC-WiRQ
APS Central Files
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 71-051
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\PENDER\2010\71-051NOVRFE

i
rl
G'
m
ru
ern
0
0
0
0
0
0
ru
a
0
r-
0' • N

7/;V
Murphy -Brown, LLC 4/9/2009 2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Sox 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
BOC # 35
county: Penner
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 1200
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
oWG
'soE� 1 at%
IDS
Storage Structure: Anaerobic Lagoon qp
Storage Period: >180 days Z fl 2009
Application Method: Irrigation BI':
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
1200
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
4,818,000 gal/yr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
gal/yr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
gallyr
Total 4,818,000 gal/yr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibs/yr
Ibslyr
1200
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
7,800 Ibslyr
Farrow to Finish
26 lbslyr
Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibs/yr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Total 7,800 Ibslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 119.66
Total N Required 1st Year: 27912.56
Total N Required 2nd Year: 27288.86
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 27,600.71
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 7,800.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (19,800.71)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

BOC# 3135
Reception Area Specifications Year 1 of a 2 year crop rotation
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Hydrant Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs N1Unit Residual !Ac Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual IAc Utilized
Total
Lbs N1Ac
Total Ibs N
Utilized
372
1
2.68
Pn
D
Feb15-June
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
412.05
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
385.92
297.75
797.97
372
2
4.15
Pn
D
Feb15-June
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
638.06
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
597.60
297.75
1235.66
372
3
3.34
Pn
D
Feb15-June
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
513.53
N
Sept -Apr
60
2A
144
480.96
297.75
994.49
372
4A
5.19
Pn
D
Feb15-June
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
797.95
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
747.36
297.76
1545.32
372
4B
5.98
Re
D
Feb15-June
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
844.68
N
Se - r
55
2.4
132
789.36
273.25
1634.04
372
5A
5.37
NoA
D
Feb15•June
115.0
1.25
15
128.75
691.39
N
Sept -Apr
60
2A
144
1 773.28
272.75
1464.67
372
5B
5.78
Ra
D
Feb15-June
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
816.43
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
762.96
273.25
1579.39
372
6A
4.89
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4
200.00
978.00
0
D
1 0.00
200.00
978.00
372
6B
5.86
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4 i
200.00
1172.00
0
0
0.00
200.00
1172.00
372
7A
3.77
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4
200.00
754.00
0
0
0.00
200.00
754.00
372
78
3.79
Pn
O
June -Sept
50.0
4
200.00
758.00
0
0
0.00
200.00
758.00
372
8A
3.77
NoA
O
June -Sept
42.0
4
168.00
633.36
0
0
0.00
168.00
633.36
372
8B
4.97
NoA
O
June -Sept
42.0
4
168.00
834.96
0
0
0.00
168.00
834.96
372
9A
2.31
NoA
O
1 June -Set
42.0
4
1 168.00
388.08
0
1
0
0.00
168.00
388.08
372
9B
5.03
NOA
O
June -Set
42.0
1 4
168.00
845.04
0
0
0.00
168.00
845.04
372
l0A
0.56
NoA
O
June -Sept
42.0
1 4
168.00
97.44
0
0
0.00
168.00
97.44
372
1013
5.31
NOA
O
June -Set
42.0
4
168.00
892.08
0
0
0.00
168.00
892.05
372
11
3.76
Ra
D
Feb15-June
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
531.10
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
496.32
273.25
1027,42
372
12
2.61
Ra
D
Feb15-June
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
354.54
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
331.32
273.25
685.86
372
sub 1 2 3
1.78
Pn
D
F015-June
135.0
1.25 1
15
153.75
27168
N
Se t-
60
2.4
144
256.32
297.75
530.00
372
sub 4a 4b
7.39
Pn/Re
D
Feb15-June
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
1043.84
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
975.48
273.25
1 2019.32
372
sub 5a 5b
8.63
NoAlRB
D
Feb15-June
115.0
1.25
15
1 128.75
1111.11
N
Sept:6Rr
55
2.4
132
1139.16
260.75
1 2250.27
372
sub 6a 6b
8.14
Pn
O
June -Sept
50.0
4
1 200.00
1628.00
O
0
0.00
200.00
1628.00
372
sub 7a- 1 Ot
8.02
NOA
O
June -Set
42.0
4
168.00
1347.36
O
0
0.00
168.00
1347.36
372
sub 11
3.49
Re
D
Feb15-June
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
492.96
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
1
132
460.68
273.25
953.64
372
sub 12
1 3.17
Ra
D
Feb15-June
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
447.76
N
Se •A r
55
2.4
132
418.44
273.25
866.20
Totals: 119.66 19297.4 8616.16 27912.56
3(a) Of 8

BOCP 3135
Reception Area Specifications Year 2 of a 2 year crop rotation
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs N1Ac Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acrea e Type Code Apply Yield lbs N1Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs N1Ac Lbs N Total lbs N
Code Apply Yield lbs NfUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs NIAc
Total lbs N
Utilized
372
1
2.68
Pn
O
Jun"a t
50.0
4
200
536.00
0
0
0
200
536.00
372
2
4.15
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4
200
830.00
0
0
0
200
830.00
372
3
3.34
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4
200
668.00
0
0
0
200
668.00
372
4A
5.19
Pn
O
June -Sat
50.0
4
200
1038.00
0
0
0
200
1038.00
372
48
5.98
Re
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
1052.48
0
0
0
176
1052.48
372
5A
5,37
NoA
O
June -Set
42.0
4
168
902.16
0
0
0
168
902.16
372
58
5.78
1 Re
O
1 June -Set
44.0
4
1 176
1017.28
0
0
0
176
1017.28
372
6A
4,89
Pn
D
Febl5-June
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
751.84
N
Sept-6pr
60
2.4
144
704,16
297,75
1456.00
372
613
5.86
Pn
D
Feb15-June135.0
1,25
15
153.75
900.98
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
843.84
297,75
1744.82
372
7A
3.77
Pn
D
Feb15-June
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
579.64
N
wt-Avr
60
2.4
144
542.88
297.75
1122.52
372
7B
3.79
Pn
D
Feb15-June
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
582.71
N
Se t- r
60
2.4
144
545.76
297.75
1128.47
372
BA
3.77
NOA
D
Feb15-,tune
115.0
1.25
15
128.75
485.39
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
542.88
272.75
1028.27
372
813
4.97
NoA
❑
F015-June
115.0
1.25
15
128.75
639.89
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
715.68
272.75
1355.57
372
1 9A
2.31
NoA
D
Feb15-June
115.0
1.25
15
128.75
1 297.41
N
Sa t-A r
60
2.4
144
332.64
272.75
630.05
372
913
5.03
NoA
❑
Feb15-June
115.0
1 1.25
15
128.75
647.61
N
I Sept -Apr
60
1 2.4
1 144
724.32
272.75
1371.93
372
10A
0.58
NoA
D
1`015-June
115.0
1.25
15
128,75
74.68
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
83.52
272.75
1 158.20
372
10B
5.31
NoA
❑
Feb15-June
115.0
1.25
15
128.75
683.66
N
Sept -Apr
60
2A
144
764.64
272,75
1448.30
372
11
3.76
Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
661.76
0
0
0
176
661,76
372
12
2.51
Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
441.76
0
0
0
176
441.76
372
sub 1.2L
1.78
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4
1
200
356.00
O
0
0
200
356.00
372
sub 4e 4b
7.39
Pn/Ra
1 0
June -Set
44.0
4
176
1300.64
O
0
0
176
1300.64
372
sub 505b
8.63
NoA/Ra
O
June -Set
42.0
4
168
1449.84
O
1
0
0
1 168
1449.84
372
sub 6a 6b
8.14
Pn
D
Febl5-June
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
1251.53
N
SWAM
60
2.4
144
1172.16
1 297,75
2423.69
372
sub 7a-10t
8.02
NoA
D
Febl5-June
115.0
1.25
15
128.75
1032.58
N
Sept -Apr
50
2A
120
962A
248.75
1994.98
372
sub 11
3.49
Ra
0
June t
44.0
4
176
614.24
0
0
0
176
614.24
372
sub 12
3.17
Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
557.92
O
0
0
176
557,92
�27288.06
Totals: 119.66 19353.98 7934.88
3(b) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results_
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N /. bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N I lbs lint
G
Fescue- Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N 1 bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N / acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PAN/ danimal Farm Total r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
1200 Farrow to Feeder 1 1200
Farrow to Finish 4A
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1200 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6000 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 20 acreas of land. if you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 4B acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5 of 8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant
Type
Crop
in/hr
* inches
372
1
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
2
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
3
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
4A
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
4 B
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
5A
NoA
D
0.5
1
372
5B
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
6A
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
6B
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
7A
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
7B
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
8A
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
8B
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
9A
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
9B
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
10A
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
10B
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
11
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
12
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
sub 1,2,3
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
sub 4a,4b
Pn/Ra
D
0.45
1
372
sub 5a,5b
NoA/Ra
D
0.5
1
372
sub 6a,6b
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
sub 7a-10b
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
sub 11
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
sub 12
Ra
D
OA
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
This plan revised to show wetted acres by hydrant rather than by field.
This plan is based on previous plan by Kevin Weston, and modified by adding
aerway acres.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: BOC # 35
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager: Michael Norris
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. llwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner): Michael Norris
Signature:
Date
Date
Name of Technical Specialist: Toni W. King
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC _
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Signature:
Date
8 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within- a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization flan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field {See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips}.
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Wastelnutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3 of 3

Murphy -Brown, LLC
10/18/2004
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm Name:
130C # 35
County:
Pender
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
1200
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Storage Period:
>180 days
Application Method:
Irrigation
2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be -used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less -than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWO regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of a

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, W, tons, etc.):
Capacity Type Waste Produced perAnimal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gal/yr
gal/yr
1200
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gal/yr
4,818,000 gal/yr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gal/yr
gal/yr
Wean to Feeder
223 gal/yr
gal/yr
Feeder to Finish
986 gal/yr
gal/yr
Total 4,818,000 gal/yr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitro en Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibstyr
Ibs/yr
1200
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
7,800 Ibslyr
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibs/yr
Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibs/yr
Ibs/yr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
Total 7,800 I bs/yr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 119.66
Total N Required 1st Year. 27912.56
Total N Required 2nd Year: 27288.86
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 27,600.71
Total Nitrogen Produced by Faun: 7,800.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (19,800.71)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specked crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8

BOC# 3135
Reception Area Specifications Year 1 of a 2 year crop rotation
Tract Field Irrigated Sol] fst Crop Time to ist Crop 1st Crop Lbs WAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Hydrant Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbw N Total the N
Code Apptv Yield Ibs N/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs NJAc.
Total The N
Utilized
372
1
2.68
Pn
D
Mar -July
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
412.05
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
385.92
297.76
797.97
372
2
4.15
Pn
D
Mar -July
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
638.06
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
597.60
297.75
1235.66
372
3
3.34
Pn
D
Mar -July
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
513,53
N
Se -Apr
60
2.4
144
480.96
297.75
994.49
372
4A
5.19
Pn
D
Mar -joy
135.0 m
1.25
15
153.75
797.96
N
Sept -Apr
60
2A
144
747.36
297.75
1545.32
372
48
5.98
Re
D
Mar-Juty
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
844,68
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
789.36
273.25
1634.04
372
SA
5.37
NoA
D
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
16
128.75
691.39
N
Sept -Apr
60
2A
144
773.28
272.75
1464.67
372
58 1
5.78
Re
0
Mar -July
125.0
1.26
15
141.25
816,43
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4 1
132
762.96
273.25
1579.39
372
6A
4,89
Pn
0
June -Sept
50.0 1
4
200.00
978.00
0
0
0.00
200.00
978,00
372
68
5.86
Pn
O
June -Sept
50.0
4
200,00
1172.00
0
0
0.00
200.00
1172.00
372
7A
3.77
Pn
0
June -Se
50.0
4
200.00
754,00
0
0
0.00
200.00
754.00
372
7B
3.79
Pn
O
Jun"epl
50.0
4
200.00
758.00
0
0
0.00
200.00
758.00
372
8A
3.77
NoA
0
June -Sept
42.0
4
168,00
633.36
0
0
0,00
168.00
633.36
372
8B
4,97
NoA
0
Jun"
4200
4
168.00
834.96
0
0
0.00
168.00
834,96
372
9A
2.31
NoA
0
June -Sept
42.0
4
168.00
$86,08
0
0
0.00
168.00
388.08
372
9B
5.03
NaA
O
June -Set
42.0
4
16&00
84504
0
0
0.00
160.00
845.04
372
10A
0,58
NoA
O
June -Se
42,0
4
168,00
97.44
0
0
0,00
168.00
97.44
372
108
5.31
NoA
O
June -Sept
42.0
4
168.00
892,08
0
0
0.00
168.00
892.08
372
11
3.76
Re
D
Mar -July
125.0
1.25
15
141,25
531.10
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
496.32
273.25
1027.42
372
12
2.51
Re
D
Mar -Jul
125A
1.25
15
141.25
354,54
N
Se -A r
65
2.4
132
331.32
27325
685,86
372
sub 1 2 3
1.78
Pn
D
Mar-Juty
13&0
1,25
15
153.75
273.68
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
256.32
297.75
530,00
372
sub4a4b
7.39
Pn/Ra
D
Mar -July
1250
1.25
15
141.25
1043.84
N
Sept:6er
55
2.4
132
97548
273.25
2019.32
372
sub 5a 5b
863
NoA/Ra
D
Mar lin
115,0
1.25
15
128.75
1111.11
N
Sept -Apr
55
2,4
132
1139.16
260.75
2250.27
372
sub 6a 6b
8.14
Pn
0
June -Sept
50.0
4
200.00
1628.00
O
0
0.00
200.00
1628.00
372
Bub 7a-1 Ot
8.02
NoA
O
June -Sept
42.0
1 4
168.00
1347.36
O
0
0.00
168.00
1347.36
372
sub 11
3,49
Ra
D
Mar -July
125,0
1.25
15
141.25
492.96
1 N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
460.68
273.25
953.64
372
sub 12
3.17
Ra
D
Mar-Ju
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
447.76
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
418.44
273.25
866.20
Totals; 11966 19297.4 8615.16 279f256
3(a) of 8

BOC# 3135
Reception Area Specifications Year 2 of a 2 year crop rotation
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crap Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NRlnit Residual /Ac Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs WAc Lbs N Total Ids N
Code Apply Yield Ibs H/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs NlAc
Total Itsi N
Utilized
372
1
2.68
Pn
0
June -Set
50,0
4
200
536.00
0
0
0
200
536.00
372
2
4.15
Pn
O
June -Se
50.0
4
200
830.00
0
0
0
200
830.00
372
3
3.34
Pn
O
JuneSe
50.0
4
200
608,00
0
0
0
200
668.00
372
4A
5.19
Pn
O
June -Se
50.0
4
200
1038.00
0
0
0
200
1038.00
372
4B
5.98
Ra
O
June -Sept,
44.0
4
176
1052.48
0
0
0
176
1052.48
372
5A
5.37
NoA
O
June -Set
42,0
4
168
902.16
0
0
0
168
902.16
372
58
5.78
Ra
O
June -Sept
44.0 1
4
176
1017.28
0
0
0
176
1017.28
372
fiA
4.89
Pn
0
Mar -July
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
751.84
N
Sep( -Apr
60
2.4
144
704.16
297.75
1456DO
372
68
5.86
Pn
D
Mar -Jul
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
900.98
N
Sept -Apr
60
2A
144
843.84
297.75
1744.82
372
7A
3.77
Pn
1 D
Mar-lu
135,0
1.25
15
153.75
579.64
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
1
144
542.88
297.75
1122.52
372
7B
379
Pn
D
Mar-Ju
135.0
1,25
15
153.75
582.71
N
Sept -Apr
60
2,4
144
545.76
297.75
1128.47
372
8A
3,77
NoA
D
Mar -July
115,0
1.25
15
128.75
485.39
N
Sept -Apr
60
2,4
144
542.88
272.75
1028,27
372
88
4.97
NoA
D
Mar-Ju
115,0
1.25
15
128.75
639.89
1 N
Se - r
60
2,4
144
715.68
272.75
1355.57
372
9A
2,31
NoA
D
Mar -July
115.0
1.25
15
128.75
297.41
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
332.64
272.75
630.05
372
98
5.03
NoA
D
Mar-juty
115.0
1 1.25
15
128.75
647.61
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
724.32
272.75
1371.93
372
10A
0,58
NoA
D
Mar -July
115,0
1 1.25
15
128.75
74.68
N
_Sept -Apr
60
2,4
144
83.52
272.75
158.20
372
10B
511
NoA
D
Mar -July
11&0
1 1.25
15
128.75
683.66
N
Sept -Apr
fi0
24
144
764.64
272.75
1448.30
372
11
3.76
Re
O
Jvne-Sept
44.0
1 4
176
661.76
0
0
0
176
661.76
372
12
2.51
Ra
0
June -Set
44.0
4
176
441,76
0
0
0
176
441.76
372
sub 1 2 3
1,78
Pn
0
June -Se
50.0
4
200
356.00
1 O
0
0
200
356.00
372
sub 4a 4b
7,39
Pn/Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
1300.64
O
1
0
0
176
1300,64
372
sub 5a 5b
8.63
NQAlRa
0
June -Sept
4200
4
168
1449.84
0
0
0
168
1449.84
372
sub 6a 6b
8,14
Pn
D
Mar-JuI
135.0
1,25
15
153.75
1251.53
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
1172.16
297.75
2423,69
372
sub 7a-1 Ot
8.02
NoA
D
Mar -July
115.0
1.25
15
128,75
1032.58
N
Sept -Apr
50
2A
120
962.4
248.75
1994,98
372
sub 11
3.49
Ra
0
June -Sept
44,0
4
176
614.24
0
0
0
176
614.24
372
sub 12
3.17
Ra
O
June -Set
44.0
4
176
557.92
0
0
0
176
557.92
Totals: 119,66 19353.98 7934.88 27288.86
3(b) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N / bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N / ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
D
Com - Grain
1.25 lbs N / bushel
E
Com - Silage
12 Ibs N / ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 lbs: N / ton
H
Fescue - Hay
501bs N / ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N / bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs; N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N / cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N / acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT/animal Farm Total/yr
Farrow to Wean 0.84
1200 Farrow to Feeder 1 1200
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1200 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6000 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 20 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 48 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
'This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant
Tye
Crop
inthr
* inches
372
1
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
2
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
3
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
4A
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
4B
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
5A
NoA
D
0.5
1
372
5B
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
6A
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
6B
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
7A
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
7B
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
8A
NoA
O
0.5
1 `
372
8B
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
9A
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
9B
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
10A
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
10B
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
11
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
12
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
sub 1,2,3
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
sub 4a,4b
Pn/Ra
D
0.45
1
372
sub 5a,5b
NoA/Ra
D
0.5
1
372
sub 6a,6b
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
sub 7a-10b
NoA
O
0.5
1
372
sub 11
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
sub 12
Ra
D
0.4
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
This plan revised to show wetted acres by hydrant rather than by Meld.
This plan is based on previous plan by Kevin Weston, and modified by adding
aerway acres.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: BOC # 35
Owner. Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager: Michael Norris
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be Sled on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Signature:
/) �� Date
Name of Manager (if different from /owner): Michael Norris
Signature: Lx� L /,0 "oa0�/ s d�%
Name of Technical Specialist: Toni W. King
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398T _
Telephone: [phone]
Signature:
o-1%-N
Date
8of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 80 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

BOC
Spray
#313 5
Fields
Scale: 1 "=300'
Pull#
Acres
1
—.68
2
4.15
3
3.34
4A
5.19
4B
5.98
5A
5.37
5B
5.78
6 A
4.89
6B
5.86
7A
3.77
7B
3.79
8A
3.77
8B
4.97
9A
2.31
9B
5.03
10A
0.58
108
5.31
11
3.76
12
2.51
Total
79.04
MB00107030179

#3135
Spray Fie -Ids
Sccle:
1"=300'
Pull#
Acres
1
2.68
2
4.15
3
3.34
4A
5.19
4B
5.98
5A
5.37
5B
5.78
6A
4.89
6B
5.86
7A
3.77
7B
3.79
8A
3.77
8B
4.97
9A
2.31
9B
5.03
10A
0.58
10B
5.31
11
3.76
1')
0 r,1
Well —
w/100'
m,
KI

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to -the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding -
This -facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached ai [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
i
dz /_
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section -
Pender County Health Department
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS710051
NDPU Files

O� W A r�R Michael F. Easley, Governor
C� Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j [ Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
0 Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Brown's of Carolina # 35
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS710051
Brown's of Carolina # 35
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Pender County
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Brown's of Carolina, Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS710051 which expired on April
30, 2003.
This approval_shalI.consist of -the operation -of -this system. including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Brown's of Carolina # 35, located in Pender County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 1200 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federaI), nor does issuance of a COC to { to
phis permit convey any Aroperty rights in either real or personal nron_erty.
€NR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
October 15, 2004
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm 3135 OCT Z 5 2004
PO Box 856
Warsaw NC 28398 BY:
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS7I0051
Farm 3135
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Pender County
Dear Murphy -Brown, LLC:
.In accordance with your permit modification received on October 5, 2004, we are hereby forwarding to
you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Murphy -Brown, LLC, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the 3135, located in Pender County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an
annual average of 1200 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder
operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may be
replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts
for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS710051 dated October 1, 2004, and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to
operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit,
the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required
monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this
COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be
completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: http:Mo.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
I� Carolina
XqAfrally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an -application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact: J R Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Pender County Health Department
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS710051
APS Central Files

O� W A Michael F. Easley, Govemor
O� QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water duality
d6!►Y 0 2004
°3sr:
.� June 5.2004
Murphy -Brown, LLC
3135 Farm
PO Box 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS710051
3135 Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Pender County _
Dear Murphy -Brown, LLC:
In accordance with your request for a change in operation type received on June 9, 2004 and in
accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Murphy -Brown, LLC, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the 3135 Farm, located in Pender County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 1446 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boarffor each-15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS710051 dated May 1, 2003, and shall be subject to the conditions
and limitations as specified therein. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the
system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's
CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production
greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
NODENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
500/6 recycled/100/* post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A namelownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding --
This facility is Iocated in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc_ (Certificate_of_Coverage-only_for_all_cc's)z�
�WilmingtonRegional Office, Water Quality Section
Pendei County Health Department
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS710051
NDPU Files

f
Murphy -Brown LLc
Mr. Shiver,
! F IF,.' 1,
ij
PO Drawer 856 ;'fi'i
2822 Hwy. 24
Warsaw, NC 28398--------'
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
The following farms within the Murphy -Brown, LLC system had plan
amendments made to extend pumping windows and add additional PAN where needed.
The plan amendments are attached for each farm.
Farm Name
Farm 2601
Maple Hill
Bulltail
Farm 3135
Waters; M&M Rivenbark
Bland
Facilitv Number
71-41
71-1
71-18
AWS710051
31-35
31-358
If there are any questions please let me know.
Regards,
Todd Rowe, CCA
Agronomist
Murphy -Brown, LLC

41
CAWMP AMENDMENT
Farm 3135
6/20/03
This amendment is intended to provide additional Nitrogen to the corn crop.
Tissue analysis was conducted on the corn crop on June 10, 2003. The results of this
analysis indicated the plants to be low in Nitrogen. Upon evaluation of the tissue sample
results and the crop that is planted, it is found that additional Nitrogen is required for the
corn crop. The additional Nitrogen is mainly due to the wet weather conditions that have
been seen so far this growing season. Several processes have caused Nitrogen to be lost
from the soil and restricted uptake by the plant. This additional Nitrogen is for
supplementation of the required PAN in the waste management plan.
Hydrant
1
2
3
4A
4B
11
B wn's of o m , Owner
Manager
Technical Specialist
SuDDlemental Nitrogen her acre (hounds
20.25
20.25
20.25
33.75
43.75
37.5
7 t 03
Date
Date

Murphy -Brown, LLC 10/24/2002 . 2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN P11-5
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
Brown's of Carolina
BOC # 35
County: Pender
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 1200
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste froWour animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8
41
B00119220924

I „ 4
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for speck crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, W, tons, etc.):
Capac ity Tvpe Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
1200
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
4,818,000 gallyr
arrow -to -Finish
0585-gallyr
- gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gaVyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
gallyr
Total 4,818,000 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs):
-Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 lbslyr
lbslyr
1200
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 lbslyr
7,800 lbslyr
Farrow to Finish
26 lbslyr
lbslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 lbslyr
lbslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 lbslyr
lbslyr
Total 7,800 I bslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 79.04
Total N Required 1st Year: 18317.77
Total N Required 2nd Year: 21266.35
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 19,792.06
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 7,800.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (11,992.06)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on.this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8
B00119220925

BOt.,, -i35
Reception Area Specifications Year 1 of a 2 year crop rotation
Tract Field Irrigatod Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Hydrant Acreage Tvpa Code Apply Yield Ibs N/Unit Residual lAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to
Code
Rnd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Yield Ibs NfUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs NIAc
Total Ibs N
Utilized
-Apply
372
1
2.68
Pn
D
Mar -Jul
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
412,05
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
144
385.92
297.75
797.97
372
2
4.15
Pn
D
Mar-Ju
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
638.06
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
597.60
297.75
1235.66
372
3
3.34
Pn
0
Mar -July
135.0
1.25
15
153,75
513.53
N
Se 1-A r
60
2.4
144
480.96
297.75
994,49
372
4A
5A9
Pn
0
Mar-Juty
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
797.96
N
f Se t-A r
60
2.4
144
747,36
297.75
1545.32
372
45
5,98
Ra
D
Mar-Juty
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
844.68
N
Sept -Apr
1 55
2.4
132
789.36
273.25
1634.04
372
5A
5.37
NoA
D
Mar -July
115.0
1,25
15
128.75
691.39
N
Sept -Apr
1 60
2.4
144
773.28
272.75
1464.67
372
513
1 5.78
Ra
D
Mar-J2
125,0
1.25
15
141.25
816.43
N
Se f-A r
1 55
2.4
132
762.96
273.25
1579.39
372
6A
4,89
Pn
0
June -Set
50.0
4
200.00
976,00
0
0
0.00
200.00
978.00
372
68
5,86
Pn
0
June -Set
50.0
4
.200,00
1172.00
0
0
0.00
200.00
1172.00
372
7A
3.77
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4
200.00
754.00
0
I
0
0.00
200.00
754.00
372
7B
3.79
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4
200.00
758.00
0
0
0.00
200.00
758.00
372
BA
3.77
NoA
0
June -Set
42.0
4
168.00
633.36
0
0
0.00
168.00
633.36
372
8B
4.97
NoA
O
June -Set
42.0
1 4
168.00
1 834.96
0
!
0
0.00
168.00
1 834.96
372
9A
2,31
NoA
O
June -Set
42.0
4
168.00
388.08
0
0
0.00
168.00
388.08
372
9B
5.03
NoA
O
June-8et
42.0
4
168.00
845.04
0
0
0.00
168.00
845,04
372
10A
0.58
NoA
0
June -Set
42.0
4
168.00
97.44
0
0
0.00
168.00
97.44
372
10B
5,31
NoA
O
June -Set
42.0
4
168.00
892.08
0
0
0.00
168.00
892.08
372
11
3.76
Ra
0
Mar -July
125.0
1.25
15
141.25
531.10
N
Sept -Apr
55
2.4
132
496.32
273.25
1027.42
372
12
2.51
Ra
D
Mar-Ju
125.0
1,25
1 15
141.25
3M.54
N
Sept -Apr
1 55
2.4
132
331.32
273.25
685.86
1
Totals, 79.04 12952.69 I
5365.08 18317.77
3(a) of 8 1 B00119220926

BOC.,, -135
Reception Area Specifications Year 2 of a 2 year crop rotation
Ind
Tract Field Irrigated Soli 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total The N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NfUnit Residual IAc Utilized
2nd Crap Time to
Cade Apply
Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual !Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs NlAc
Total Ibs N
Utilized
3
1
3.71
Pn
O
June -Se 1
50.0
4
200
742.00
0
I
0
0
200
742.00
372
2
4.46
Pn
O
June -Sept
50.0
4
200
892.00
0
0
0
200
892.00
r72
372
3
2.41
Pn
O
June -Set
50.0
4
200
482.00
0
0
0
200
482.00
372
4A
5.46
Pn
O
June -Sept
50.0
4
200
1092.00
0
0
0
200
1092.00
372
48
7.8
Ra
O
June -Se 1
44.0
4
176
1372.80
0
0
0
176
1372,80
372
5A
6,32
NoA
O
June -Set
42.0
4
168
1061.76
0
0
0
168
1061.76
372
5B
7.8
Ra
O
1 June -Set
44,0
1 4
176
1372.80
0
0
0
176
1372.80
372
6A
6.32
Pn 1
D j
Mar-Jufy
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
971.70
N
Sept-Ppr
60
2.4
144
910.08
297.75
1881.78
372
6B
7.8
Pn
D
Mar -July
135.0
1,25
15
153.75
1199.25
N
Sept -Apr
60
2 4
144
1123.2
297.75
2322.45
372
7A
4.87
Pn
D
Mar -July
135.0
1,25
15
153.75
748.76
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
144
701.28
297.75
1450.04
372
78
5.5
Pn
D
Mar-J2
135.0
1.25
15
153.75
845.63
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
792
297.75
1637,63
372
BA
3.58
NoA
D
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
15
128.75
460.93
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
144
515,52
272.75
976.45
372
a6
6.32
NoA
O
Mar -July
115.0
1.25
15
1 128.75
813.70
N
Sgt-Apr
60
2.4
1
144
910.08
272.75
1723.78
372
9A
3.03
NoA
D
Mar-Julv
1 115.0
1.25
15
128.75
390.11 1
N
Sc I -A r 11
60
2.4
144
436,32
272.75
826.43
372
9B
4.4
NoA
D
Mar -July
115.0
1.25
15
125.75
566.50
N
Seel -Apr
60
2.4
144
633.6
272.75
1200.10
372
10A
1.14
NoA
D
Mar -Jul
115.0
1,25
15
128.75
146.78
N
Sept -Apr
1 60
2.4
144
164,16
272.75
310.94
372
105
1.65
NoA
D
Mar-Ju
115.0
1.25
15
128,75
212.44 1
N
Sept -Apr
1 60
2,4
144
237.6
272.75
450.04
372
11
4.27
Ra
O
June -Se 1
44,0
4
176
751.52
0
1
0
0
176
751.52
372
12
4.09
Ra
O
June Se i
44.0
4
176
719.84
0
0
0
176
719,84
I
1
I
Totals: 90.93 14842,51 1
6423.84 21266.35
3(b) of 8
B00119220927

t , , 1
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N / bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N / ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N / ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
E
Com - Silage
12 lbs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 lbs N / ton
H
Fescue- Hay
50 lbs N / ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N / bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N / cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N / acre I yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8
B00119220928

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PAN/ /animal Farm Total/
Farrow to Wean 0.84
1200 Farrow to Feeder 1 1200
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1200 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6000 pounds of plant
avaiiabte-nitrogen,to utilize: -Assuming -you -apply this -PAN -to hybrid-bermuda-grass haytand'at-the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 20 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 48 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
'This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8
B00119220929

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant
Type
_Crop
inlhr
* inches
372
1
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
2
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
3
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
4A
Pn
D
0.45
1
372
4B
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
5A
NoA
D
0.5
1
372
5B
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
6A
Pn
0
0.45
1
372
6B
Pn
0
0.45
1
372
7A
Pn
O
0.45
1
372
7B
Pn
0
0.45
1
372
8A
NoA
0
0.5
1
372
8B
NoA
0
0.5
1
72 9A
NaA
0-0.5
372
9B
NoA
0
0.5
1
372
10A
NoA
0
0.5
1
372
10B
NoA
0
0.5
1
372
11
Ra
D
0.4
1
372
12
Ra
D
0.4
1
6 of 8 B00119220930

Additional Comments:
This plan revised to show wetted acres by hydrant rather than by field.
7 of 8
B00119220931

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: BOC # 35
Owner: Brown's of Carolina
Manager: David Nordin
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to-land-apply'the animal -waste desctibed-in this nutrient"management plan. -This equipment -
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Brown's of Carolina
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
i
Signature:
David Nordin
Je -- ;2-
Date
Name of Technical Specialist: M. Kevin Weston
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC_ _
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Box 856
Warsaw. NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Signature: /Jrj, iCuti L.% � /o/z V/a _
Date
8of8
B00119220932

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.,
Jimmy Vinson
Brown's of Carolina (BOC-35)
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Jimmy Vinson:
JUN 1 z 1998
BY:
June 8, 1998
A&V440 0
D E H N R
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS710051
Brown's of Carolina (BOC-35)
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Pender County
in accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received on May 6, 1998, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Brown's of Carolina, authorizing the operation of an
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's
General Permit (attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Mack Horrell Farm, located in Pender County, with
an animal capacity of no greater than 1200 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as specified in
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001, shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS710051 dated November 17, 1997 and shall be. subject to the conditions
and limitations as specified therein. The COC shall be effective from tyre date of issuance until December
31, 2001. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity
with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this
COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining
the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase
in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals
above the number authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and
shall be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycl" 10°/6 post -consumer paper

Brown's of Carolina (BOC-35)
Farm # 71-51
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely
i
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Pender County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

iNomicati<on of %,nange of u snip
Animal Waste Management Facility
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
In accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC ?H .0217(a)(1)(H)(xii) this form is official
< notification to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) of the transfer of ownership of an Animal Waste
Management Facility. This form must be submitted to DEM no later than 60 days following the transfer
of ownership.
Name of Farm:_KQC �-6 i-re L.Uoja a irm �o[d na! ,e_ _Facility No: `71 --5-1_
Previous Owner(s) Name: _ Mr10 �48rr-6 I _ Phone No:9,U-ags- tQ
New Owner(s) Name: tug o b nQ_ 1Bo - 3S Phone No:'?) O- P96- )SOD
Mailing Address: y �� [L) 0 jC SQ j j C aF 6 _
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:
Latitude and Longintde: 30' 390 0 1 '��� ! 7 ' 3 o " County: �r
Please attach a copy of a county road map -with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
* Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
* Farrow to Wean
harrow to Feeder 1 -'� O O
0 Farrow to Finish
Type of Poultry
❑ Layer
0 Pullets
No. of Animals
Type of Cattle No. ofArtirnals
Dairy
Beef
Other Type of Livestock. Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: 103 Required Acreage: 9S
Number q
agoo / Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: 95�F zly? Cubic Fe�t (ft3)
***R*�#yrac. qefirifae#xk:fiae�#aek:#�MF��ck�!e#fiset�c*#+!#�#F*Ktjc���es,*�exeeaariweiE*i*Rye*�*ye*nt�ke�es**
Owner / sNlanaaer Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for'the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) kaiow that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submictcd to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) before the new animals are stocked_ I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from
the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a than -made conveyance or from a storm
event less severe than the 25-year, ? -hour storm and there trust not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we)
understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards
developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the
local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical specialist and
submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written
notification to DWQ or a new certification (if the approvcq plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name o NeNi
Signature -
Name of
Signature.__._
Please sign a
return this form to:
Date: t, L
Date:_. - E14�w/ - �F- ,
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
Raleigh, NC Z76?6-0535
NCO — tilay 3,1996

State of North Carolina ffllv�TA
Department of Environment IT
and Natural Resources RECEIVED 4 • •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor DEC 01 1997
Wayne McDevitt, SecretaryF =1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director'BY. `" `
N.0 Dept. of .. ­,r
November 17, 1997 N OV 7 1 1997
Mack Horrell Winston-Salem
Mack Harrell Farm �� #���� ���'��
329 W. Stevens St. _9_
Wallace NC 28466
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS710051
Mack Horrell Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Pender County
Dear Mack Horrell:
In accordance with your application received on September 16, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 71-51, authorizing the operation of an animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit
(attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the
management of animal waste from the Mack Horrell Farm, located in Pender County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 1200 Farrow to Feeder and the application to a minimum of 95 acres of land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

l
If any parts, requirements, or limitations 'contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a requ2st�rs °made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may bereached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
-(A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Pender County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey REC � 5 0�
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGIMJ��IEPtQUA`4-
15 ��91
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Ope>la$ions
ptsnr�t`p
The following questions have been completed utilizing info rmation� on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
Application Date: �t Ic? �� 7 REC � IVE'D I)EC 5
1997
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that ynu havc included the following required items by signing your -initials -in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations. 'A'
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name: Mack Horrell Farm
2. Print Land Owner's name: Mack Hgrrell
3. Land Owners Mailing address. 3 22 W. Stevens St
City: Wallace NC Zip: 28466
Telephone Number: 285-5618 A M A .2 E --� 2 o Z I - � Z F- 3- %I Z
4. County where farm is located: Pender
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SE numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): On northwest side of SR 1206_aMrox. 1 mile east of SR
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
7. Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
71 - 51
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: 71-5_
2. Operation Description: _Swine operation
Farrow to Feeder
1200 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; Q no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tvne of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle NQof Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 103.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):
4. Number of Lagoons: 1 ; Total Capacity: _ CiSLc' f - Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? ES or NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES or (!�O (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, Ad 110 4 Cre 1 I- (Land Owners name listed in question 1I.2), attest that
this application for _ 10 L k; _L6 ✓ r f- � 1 �a' r M (Farm name listed in question II.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to mess incornAte.
Signature
Date
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question II.6), attest that this
application for (Farm name listed in question H.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Iunderstand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

'
M.irrr
x:
1
L a+ n
Iw liL,
a
!
Liu �
N 1�
qu
_ JIL
_
im
12" � t
UK
UK
l� w •�
lz
LVI
1
LIL
Lmm NIZ
.f •
7
{i11 ti•7 WMI
• e
7it
LUJ T ah, au
• "
PAS
�
n w.rr
Il
14,
l!! �,o
Un
,
l� � �wo
im
i
DIRECTIONS: FROM WARSAW TAKE NC # 117 TOWARDS WALLACE
TO NC # 11, TAKE NC # 11 GOING TOWARDS PENDERLEA AND NC # 421.
TURN LEFT OF NC # 421 TOWARDS WILMINTON, THEN TAKE THE 2ND PAVED
ROAD TO THE RIGHT (SR # 1209) , THEN TAKE THE 1ST PAVED ROAD BACK TO
THE LEFT (SR # 1206). FARM WILL BE APPROX: 4 MILES ON THE RIGHT ON
SR. # 1206.
MAILING ADDRESS: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
MR. MAC HORRELL MAC HORRELL
325 W. STEVENS STREET STATE ROAD # 1206
WALLACE, NC 28466 ATKINSON, NC 28421
HOME TELEPHONE: [phone]
BRoWN'S Of- CAROLINA, INC.
303 EAST COLLEGE STREUI= • P.O. BOX 487 • WARSAW. N.('. 2S398-(9S7 OFFICE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

It
ro In
p w r..
rr
° N
m
to W
o
ut Ut ID
r!
o,
n
K N.
a
rt '
O D In
tt'
tj�N@o
rt rt
1.,.
in rt
ON
rt 0
i�� 4 � rat
1m1 rr m
w
Kj
it
;1
rt
n�
hN
1 �
A
11
a ti to Eyj M R, rt P)H u In
w 'd I✓ a; •s P' It 1'•
J 11 01 4 n rn m 'd `f II
N ti O ► h m I- I- to 11 t; m 11 }
I-'� (D U (D 1! q N
th n m 0 1•'•'
rt q1 (D (I '
N 'd. 7 N V° F iD
fD 10 rat rt N n 11,0 In
n n k' 'I A n ..
U to
to rt P`' !D W ll
p'1-0"v� mI°h'nwn.QQm11
U tr �r r t In
'D In 'F� 't H m
mm+DroAil'�° ro u
Ii1hlDtn0f>II
it rt b'0� 'na p
I--' ID b' ro ro � U rr a
Pt mro HiICrt 0
uN1 ;°. d ►" 0fD rt 0 p
rt ',0uproill p
mta Mon'�' 11 wI-1 r
toth.1rt fL W
n 1'• rt
rt
E�mv.:j aw W 1
e, ►1NSmrt�Kr1;� a
:1 .f G in per I' C1ID 0, rt rt p
rt rt a M . rt 0 ,,. t,, � Y
;t
a w rt' n 11
o (Dq'in
' ro n
�, n.
Io�' �!i in m m ,u n
0M I P'p�1t�, w ' 0
(-h ' gg W fi to n N
I h m a E(D rl
ID P, rl
to
ro n ft rt It 0 0 jti
0 O ro o ID
rtr ;s th nn IL �;. N 111 m
rt , M m O; W� In It
rt rf
O ro fo
P . �(
0
IF)N to C] ff 1 N II
r'taS In '1'.(D u
O rt to to }S
IA. ' ,F rt v P. 0 il�• 1J W Il
1-4 O 111 UNt
ris N a P
N 9 Q m B J
I1, (D ;7' 0 0 M E ,n rr (D a
to 0 N o rt t' n !TI ° n 0per
}! r1 to fu Yl a n m
(�i ► h 1
(D 1'
rr rrr'tl r1 s d1 .1
0
1'- ti 'd , , 1 1'• '1 O N _
1,.ID 1 I--',! In I m N �1
i� ° 1
N P. 0
to N 111
1' j I' a ;1 II I- U rr ii, I I'-
o
I-, ju ' (r I • n I'• �� 'f f 1,.'1 m
0 IL
�3 0 m
rt . t1 y G I 0 0 rt n W
�' O y rt Sl. rn to p Qj pr ,...
'� '�1 o
to n n
r
's ,s CD 0N s 0 to
rr ,n ,�' P. r h R,'i (' 0
6q
0 0 1-' 1-' i�. w n ID
P.
0 1-
1�71
It 'ti M O 1J (D 0 ij
0 ,(j r- N r' ,D I- Ia, 'P
N
N ri tA
a m
S
n O. C o (ti ri r1 ti u' It
D n '0 1.1 . 1--' m O N ID 1U o n'
J�' is. n
rt a���
1vIn
fDnil�a
1
0in mtn fDD
roiD'ift,d� rt rt ��N
, p
1 En tD J ° ti r ,7 In
sr�
`_�
Oj.. V Nit NF,rwtronryftt�•Fq{�
1't, 0'u Ur rt 0 ,�. rr P
o '° V•�
'''°
.•rwn
N
F1
}rt ;: 0
(D� r) I ul (D
�L
� ,n 0
I{ut
1•mm°ow a}3Q,
a "' 1' 1- 7
N ;1
1-''U m IJ z C1
f y D ,1. 0 :.�' 14 '' 1 f�• N �]
0 •1
rt
N 11 ,. U I n a N n
Ft
0m(Drt(n N�o'•Uj.jrtl..�
�..
•
Lm I" to��InII,O.shjro
ti {
to ,.,.fA
:1 ,: In ;n 'c1 I , iD f
�� Nm'sDCtirhnNo0
w1
0 f Ut Al ,1 (M , .. to I-' 0 11
11rl '1 am C1 W aD(n ft
r-t I• Al I1, ,.rtJ• ; D rt r t IL • .f
rmi(D.• N rtj.rtroQ 0 N MHO
0 .�
;s n to ° ° fml Fi (n 0 0 N
0 f1 0 IN rt (D to ri n N
0'th to !i n 011 ro 0
z
rt
m i ;m
o
f
0 it, w ' h ,o ,u
-
m� rP, U. D 0
(�
(1
m a a + 1 14 1n
rr
0, rr H1-'0 �rtj.rt � �Vj
I-"Ial,1,.N• N..rN r ro p,
ki
a ? m ,.. n'
nmi�in -z0n m11
n '2
N to �..
m m.
'1 01 P, Pu1 'Ur9 N E!
to
III 111 0 (D
m m 1I, U
pi m N O rN1 �
n I'.'t1 U rt
'( t, N ro N ,
mron•H.nso
m t'In atft j
oar.
ID o 0 'y
0 a
rt
tiI {] to It' 1r `
.
m N
11, 0 ro r �' `.
I.,. I j. :j 0 �.
°
U '.I 0 N M � Il
,t rh a
J
y
n,OI 11 n�
P,rt to
,(j ,f Ij rt
I- toI'• D g
Do 01
Nd
r.
Ft F_'
,. N N ,d
0 tt f
o ° ] N�'MC
o �� ,.nr l � n
10
to (A n 1''0
m�(NA ch`b
n 0�.
ID
0
It hl
J
r4 p to
N th It.
I rt
p
rt.

REGISTRATION FOR!] FOR A141MAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS
Department of Environments Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
WaLet Quality Section
it the animal waste )transgernent system for your feedlot operation is
designed to serve mbi'e than or equal to 100 head of cattle, 75
horses, 250 swine, 1,000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in order to be
deemed permitted by UEII. Please print clearly:
17 ,
Farm game:(%J'� �_ /J��',r'k-�,/
flailiny Address:_ _�._;�`'� 4�� i' Ott. E r-j 5
l CV, k- IA c 0 - fir- - -- -- ZIP Z S
County � _�,�iVi7r-12 -- phone No.
Owner (s) Name! 42-2 ,e rr- .e C
Manager (s) Name:
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road namest direction,
milepost, etc.) :- ]s_LA , 2 O-L _„PC N ice 2-
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal Waste management system (NU er and type
of confined animal (s) ) : 1L')e) .SD"C) -- cj
Average animal population on the farm (t umb r and type of animal (s)
raised):- �U�IO �eeJv f'
Year Production Began'. l�R ASCS Tract No.,.i Sri
Type of Waste Management System Used: � C ;O
Acres Available for Land Application of Waste:__ Iq `A ACVe5
Owner (s) Signature (s) ) a' �f Jr "L1� - DATE:
DATE:

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
County:
Farm Type:
Farm Capacity:
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Mack Horrell
Pender
Far -Feed
1200
Anaerobic Lagoon
180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tors, etc.):
1200 animals X 4,015 gal/animallyear =
4,818,000 gallons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs):
1200 animals X 6.50 lbs/animal/year =
7,800.00 Ibs
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Page: 2

The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type, and surface application.
Tract
Field
Soil
Type
Crop
Code
Yield
IAc
Ibs N
/unit
Acres Lbs N
Resic
372
1
Ra
G
3.4
50.00
30.0
372
2
Ra
G
3.4
50.00
25.0
372
3
Ra
* K
50.00
22.0
372
4
N oA
B
4.6
50.00
10.0
372
5
NoA
B
4.6
50.00
8.0
Total 95.0
Available N
"Difference
/Ac ; Lbs N 1 Ibs N Time to
ual IAc i Required Appiv
170.0
1 5100.00
F-June, S-N
170.0
4250.00
F-June, S-N
50.0
1100.00
Apr-S
230.0
2300.00
Mar -Oct
230.0
1840.00
Mar -Oct
14590.00
7800.00
-6790.00
--Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer
annuals.
*A negative number reflects the total Ibs of additional nitrogen needed to achieve yields on
acreage listed in chart. A positive number means additional acreage is required to utilize the
nitrogen produced by the farm.
NOTE:
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definitely interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
Page: 3

being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
The following legend explains the crop codes listed in the table above:
Crop ode
CLO-122
Lbs N utilized 1 unit field
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N I bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N / ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N / ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N / ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N./ lbs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 ibs N I ton
H
Fescue - Hay .
50 lbs N / ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N / bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
100 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
133 lbs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N I cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1 pounds of plant available nitrogen per animal per year in the
Page: 4

sludge based on the application method listed earlier.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6000.00
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 20.00 acres of land. If you apply
the sludge to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will nee 48.00 acres of land.
Please be aware that,these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements
could vary by 25% depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
applications.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil
Type
Crop
Application Rate
inlhr
372
1
Ra
G
0.40
372
2
Ra
G
0.40
372
3
Ra .
*K
0.40
372
4
NoA
B
0.50
372
5
NoA
B
0.50
Application Amount
inches
0.95
0.95
0.95
1.50
1.50
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the -volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
Page: 5

freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsiability of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
Additional Comments:
*K is summer annual such as sorghum-sudan hybrids millet, etc. for summer grazing.
Fields 3, 4, 5 can be overseeded in the winter for grazing at a rate of 50 lbs N/ac if grower
wishes. It is not required to meet the N production from the animals.
�i�.Gr1 .t-1�✓ ✓✓t�lr2.� �1''h..J� r �' c-r-� �-.:/�j,G .•eel % f
U
Page: 6

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system,, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. i also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be fled on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
Signature: k-i.-`-��
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist:
Affiliation:
Address:
Signature:
Telephone:
Please Print
Jimmy R. Vinson
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
P.O. Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
[phone]
AMMA L) 6, lw,-�
V, 0 1
Date
Date
Date
Page: 7

NoA L'
- LnA
Re
Gc
Pn
c y GuA Np�
LnA At{�
:�., f�4 � •!• GoA
Mu Pli
Pn4.
GoA ;
GoA ' ci
COL VINS Fo k NoAPn
NoA GoA
Mk GOA
h 1 s,' `
Mu aq GoA M/ k
' NCR . . lek' : • . - - � _� i Ton] ..:. _ � �
13 AY GoA
7�34=
F° Pei
GoA �''. '..1:.•' .a
GoAPn
u!.' ' •' ,, i
Re
To Fa
Ra NoAif
Rw`
Pn + F° �� ,3, k� NoA ; 4
.'.. Ica •„ - � ..
S'. NoA r
�1 To
Re
ti,`` •1, ;
GOA oA
v ai t Re
GoA GoA Re
GoA Re
-_ r * + .et. 4 - '•j, GaA
Ra NoA NoA GoA r
Cpq
MI rf 1hn N°A ''' Ra . GOA y
M,A rj'
RA
GmA
GOA
GOA
w �S
I + •� j^i iF f1�ir �, R i
7• 'No
��y�l.. � •+ } l '�'#tf� }' Prti„� i- •i' •Ji• ��r}I �Y � �5i +k�}'+ r' !'��'.
I'�';, r I = `, T'r ti7C iss �� _1• tii,.. •n�'•.. f, y� lr• T
;t�r�}J. J�' I •t„ r i7 f� '"yrf'y, S4
5 r Fqj
,t
.. ( :y,V •'lf GoA
GoA NaA Go �'''. ,, .�• 'f+`, I,• . i`• !'Ij�l��{"`!',?;'.._'
NoA�Y'.'
t '�L•�f it = , Y r .. i•r'';1 �,
Ra
_
woll

:►. :i. 1��- f..'1 r.. �t��. �rJ1 t''�., ,fC' i' r'�, i. : �'''..p.,r� :r� ... ::1
I.. 4• .F. y'• jS� "r' .r" ',/. }.d1 '•iY.'� r'• ��. �1,' ^.�r:. ..,; rT��s,l ir,. '.Mi', '�. �r:r.1';i .,I
1 . f +, � t' r'�'i +'s • .,' "t[Y�
1+• i,� 1R'!,, �'� �. 1 • .(J ..!(��; !¢ J,; y .i 9r 1'. �41}y ..d. '�'U i%t' r '!y ,iSl . i.•,,: rl �. 'j 1'�,J` ^� + .1' r ;' +
� '{ r '�'+ '•3 ••"•,4a• 'I •'�%i,'r, V'}1•. �'f ..,''.. L w,. /(;. '�," rl'r, _ J.f ,r S,
'• : j: F J ,,i.:'q•a + .r .:,. 'S r �' JJJ, t �r t'•'�t1'� ��+ r ••rJ''.'•;i •' �t.�' .i �,�'.:, ,r,•, ,I,
,'�. ,' `i'i' �.3 �•. ,`ppr rri r�• Z 7 •rf.' ! �le,:'r!'7,r'J,a ,-S' r•' (�Jr�i t '
1' " ;:i.,i.,.,•','y. �`J'.s'' ' -;'}, ,"1'rf.'.:r:..L ' Lt{�•..r� +,'•'�' +'r►1„a','`f tJ t..1`i�'afjla (i'. �j7! tl 1'f- S�nt. 4 lY �pLyjaa,f�' y'r',•tr I!r fltd1!+f,
4: j 4�a'y, i,y} �',iJ','� 7 F� S1j.';,..i,ti!/, , 1 r., .}tr' , 'ti .�.r• •'•/•^1: :t'.•;if''''.`'a.`•r,t•!Il, fS.,•i,•,
_�•. u
r,.
'�ryYQ ♦ S{�.1JK+•r', r�f?':i `. N, ,� :It ,r r.r'*,,1td1 .',! ''�
•• ,17'''j' Pr-' :� +' .,5 �': J.S '. �+!„N •A .,, ' ����'�,r.(• i�,ti•II •'rY�Ni,' 11•.i 1f19' 41•1 rI. T' •++.,. 'L' � „}/} 51 i_.f 1'f' +r .V : .'1 rfi l't•. 't, r�';!I•1' ••J i4-
1 r e1+. ,a, a� �`:1X.. S •? t•r. r+.'.• -. I �,,+ Zfi!!!!>� tl4y F'fJrrrL•: r�r JL�1 'Lw' tiF :I-;'Jr.'� i c �r „�'t •. r ;r..,, r,', of � , .
'! �`., ri.;"•1. �,•t,t r. T'!}=''. r.h J •.�/'},I' 7, � 4.yi"�, 1 �'•.fr��rl•t yrr�i (r t»:." } � � �r'�'. 5 i 1 ( '•'-i;•' +'•. '•j:.� • :'j ,''•
'�' I �'} t f 1/ 'i', }} • � rl" ``! 1., i1F �r, _yam I .1 ' i t1l s 'r; #�i+, !•� I '- ; !.r, "s,r, �J'-y: J:' t r,.
•'S' .• �. •°/: •;,l.l, i ,�•.��!?. .� �' i[`r,-l� \ J ��,t., �+ •�'-S�, r. ry.. � , 4 ! } , �� � s I!�� yJ e�
}s, • t, ;':' !'! + .y J. �!' y ..1 t /,}"• q ti- p�t�' r ,. r,1r J5 r� F, S r,, ' ° '� � , S 'L•• r t � '"1 ! ,'[: `: J 1'J- yt :�: • I .+ '�' 7' .l�9� �{�}„• i(CS. f! r !y � '�l '"�,.� ', ''...f� r•' :�L:r,;? i',/Y�, ,f �+ S 1 •+: ' ''
,F .lt• ..tr•�•e:.:'..�':•J��i::rl s, f}rti'. ,•.!�•r'i 't ,�i�r'y;� '� r+l-air�r�Er•f._ ±±�}'+ f'i�M1 ,, •>: };. rris. .�+'.: ��s ','+•'�•. flfr^„ 't'
'+' • '-!r'!, '' r •if •'.! J'; !' t'�•lt.: .•4� rF.: .,, �'� +�, .•'.y�l.f t,r,�SA ��::/•�st �i(�'yj,�u` +�,,},1 i }•'n/, .iti'y'y�}M iti 11 .ry '�::
•, .,t�f ��• Y' '.'i j. i•�'r �.: 1,s .}.,• •,� ,err t,:J {+IJfi q;fl�: �y�J.�'.,i�lr `• .'.. �� G'+1" 1;'"�t�t, I'-' ,:�'y, •�i:' it 1'l f •ri,
,`' ', ;.�- ,!4'r�t t'• a .'�. ."i'• ..t' :1�f... 11.1 W• � 1.1`S• w >{ •�. 11 r. ,rr.• lG.• �y: ,i, Sa�• ,I;:�„1.. ' J" f.l.� '
1 . ,F . >•,.,f'.t;�f'�•r r1, ■ 1 •� � �, JS r} s t•'.. l ^� 'J:�, ',-/J 1' ••r
%3tt• t'rl,i'•��!`�i•.{�.,'Yri•'Y,� :i�l.:t'� �:% r�i�J1 '.�k!r +J',iyyJ'" ! S"!I F �i''} LrJ r
:�• r'' �L. ,1 �f}, r � id ,tii'.. i4-' :4ylr' yy,�' ',' 'P3 ',}''' 'h "�1 ..f'�' r ' ,.+, ',•i ,',:.1
• ' '7'• '� r t.^ Y!I - I',t ti J:'. r} 1+ IF l S ':I, I la J� "� � �t':+ �!."
'i r.w•1 ;,' ,,•}r• .. i..`•'I f if'{ �,F/I. ,,,, r, S'':>} �rJl, j(J�t i ,J :);�1. �r,,i• yA r1 '' t ••�
is +� r .L �' : , f,i.} 'll•Y>f '.i 1` '. � ;71 .:1�. �'� q .d trP .•i;Fr . aT,r+ fH I. , a t `:•r '�,+' ;}-.
` r\. ,•+ 7 y!r', {ff•. '.� •� 1.�'ri njj r''rfr� � - 1 ... �j, ,,rye, 1 J;'r +T ' �:r�. a. t, ,t•�r
''i- ;k'r:l•',1''i� •�t•. �. ,��'yl���f'�( ,.i�!t.l+• \ ,�J•kt�7};�'', ��(yj. ;;� a!s.1F,. a.iVtl?D�'��;;'it�l ,/i;''� i4 .��i�?r7�sr.. :w,�!"j :.: ,re.yyrt:
. �rj ,��•'♦A���•,•."•f •i %r*�t�k1 i4;' � / � t`S�q�l !{J/.71�i• �+�yy� 1;'y�' aM1�� �i 1+',Jr/',t.i 'C4�C�"r 1 I' '•�,L JI r, Iri •a:7 ;4 ♦,%!•'3 �1't
!' •'}' •• r, 1 , `.e ,1""` �i::r:'I 44 i Y +, i;�j, � t .!i <'1r } �r 'fi J.r r�i 1•'; M1.i. •�
.; .i: •5w:+! .i•i J ir,i �I '5�..�f!}I ! d��'�'^' +�'�}j1ff ;}•}h,1 ,,� F.r '",j'7;; �r, 1, '! ' {�� lJt`r ,••,pd, rr t,. :11'
t' . • i I .. � =.... , '+ I x� � r a, /.1 r'41r I,- tt�r �;r i �+Stis 1 iJ �J'r�'• N, It :•r:
t'•7 ,,4, ,'' } . ?r r1• ; 5+/. ".i•�� 7�5 +}'1,ti��' Lft ,}1f. r J ��.1: '�'`,.�I ,,1!,�r7 Ji' .�s ,f -•, r r y /t f'�.,t t (•.f
.•�i' •[• �4: 1.•.,Jr-. vi,;l{�:"!�Ati F L' r pf.Y'•},': •. r'y,� ,{• .I .t .,.
'1JI' .r,.,: �.:�''.r1.'. .IF}.f !, !�� r� ' • ;�. J q' •1},S i. �,- ., '•7''1' 1"•'� :I'. ' J �•, �''' ' }�, Ly �f :7r r5 F.
.:� �:,,,�. .',, ,:,`+' [; : .t �. F.,;;':► yr �:. gs'•jfi, .�..oti.11'"}�;It�' ,��•'' ''r'h: J r. , r ,.. e'':�rr,t•t1,� �' y' ;J,` , .f1,'+
•'� -".: }�i 4t{t,.)•;'t,:+••,',t S l �' `L w..yJ"'.lf :`' (I'� .a !♦i �. ;, .v • •,�. } .•!i , • .,.i.: ;,L. J� • +. I { l:''MI
. �"' ,1 %,i _.. � i �,�, rlt�•.' (, ��` . r' �,S{`. :,�, ii. '4'y Y} } •Ili i.' � 5.' w , 'F. � tl � ' 4
. '�, ,r' :�',•,+:�r r r t� I, t'' :'i.r,,,�'r, , t ,, � ';t,c(+1" :;� ,.'''•% r !'r; • ,.r,� r• ;_;r .'i ,
•r• ,,. 1� :}: 'rS ..[i., P � r.r �Ry1 d ;�� ,r�i' � J 6i•, '•li. ' +' i�,` '1 .
•I. •'i• .f,r.,. ti „ ` r,r '.q•.�.:.y�r1/ -f �..a /F 'I• 'r .f:.�i.`'%:' 'J' :,i•:�''•%''i':' ,r�'''• •,!''rj:
'� : ,•' :%r',i f' ,. '� + r,r � R� '}'J"!`s, S!7yy.61_: 11 �.fL•ih .�c+•.-..�;(a'J} .. � 1' i �: �.i} r J711' i . ,.r�''i' ,'+• 'i{,", t, : 9•" t ;� ril�x: ,yt.! t'''i I'''
•• �.f. "; 1'�Y'r , '�' ;I ly �' r �.'.�' i ��;li'r� },7 t• W qr �.1..i �/ ,i I.r �!r, }Y. , ..'rsl l:F'' ins Y^, t w J.'r ! 1 vl �.. •'.i •'A til �,•yF��j}}yy��'�,"'x �.,,Ft ..3: +�+T �l: � hD ". � a�`.., i f• t�!.%1+'; 1r •i F�i.� 1 t f t •ham t 4 't,.�.r � ','_ `
.'r'- !' 'rr//JJ3 hi �.j. 1. f1�o}.r: r' �J;LS+,l ��%ti .rt � 7 � y�i..� I•. .�..♦ ,t ,�``��,�".., '''4.1'�,'4 L y 1, l..r,�i ,� l:-�'
•°•.'lJ• .! - i'•:" 'f t! yyv' r.j. # `3t!+^ a4. �. f, 1 ��• •t �lj, ,l -�r
. 4' .. ;, • ?, ' •.i4.' • ! r, k;, t�,r .::,.�.i -.S •a, ..� � J i,',
�.s�r N .r;} .� ti > A 1 J �,. J14 Y . �. l,111.... ji"Y:
,. C tQ�i ri.. !"J 0".. I r+
:•, : i `;� •. ' J ' i, r1 � 3�,: � ''1, ,.;'ilri �+ 1 "'r a,. f'I•� ' ,,, + t A,:'•.
f• ;.�' :'1 ,1', .,.r�11, r• 1�1 uL�d.',1,2 � t��' n �,; !r ' I'��. Afi�y�• h �►•''Iri7lr l•�'.faar,ri:'i�Frr ''S1': •.� Y*r.
Ol
1, •,.,,[., 11 .,' :., � ;till': f•.',:.,.r. ..�;,,
04 J F..tYfi:,�,��.-;i!.i:'��''•r ;
io
r ,1.
'J .r. 1 • 1'. l,t ;�l, .tip; .': �'. r• I r I., .� v�rKn+; I
• �}', .,' •;,'�' mil' :•'.[ a'i i {rtr7+�,• F
•�L'• r,' ,',;ter' 'r ffl 4 7, Ip '-! F.1,S{.-:rr ti >!Iri
,rl',
r .:i rg r
v ,'f '' '11 t+-��'�r'• iF'I; l`i� ''t t-, ', �'?f, i.�S; i��+lf aik-I!!t, [e �:,'.'� � � �'
_ rr
;,••, •, i, '+:'''r.•'•4 '••t' '1. '�, •:r.. r,i .,r, ,S+.' .. .. 'a r'I- •�-�f,E,. I''I} 'r' tee+
'1'• ' 7, •.: Y!;.' •J 4.::.�,.:. ;'�r, ,r � - •'kr'• '' f �. r 11,i, r l .r s
fir., - ' °�.;�• ;' .; �+ 'a1 ''
't�• * i +
if r
T: ly
;•I L a, .'�,' .r. lL� 1,, I•,5>. 1 rl r + S�/. d" ..5 , 'S'.
r 7' �' •5 :'1
'fryl'11• �rir1' ;'��•;,1;',. ;i!'+ ',� ��J.':'`..• w��f';"�''L,•'fi' '.+� ,, •'�,'�
j.G1 •li'.�,' .t. i'+Li}. t+,i �, ••��rY'.,,. �• .ra, b�ylr'.I =C•7;;y' •'1, �r S
�1. d'
y' i 1 V .1 •�
k
r
"'; `1 1' �S•• �.i •••' r7r ,yy>•y').7�'. "�,t�•i Fly r '''p '.''.r ••�'j• .'I ,'r '..
. t'' .y, ir!i: '1 .J�nF. }, 'if. �}r `'t 1,�•�j�}�i'Ir+ r'..
.,• I M� � �,r•+ ,M ,ti .il
•''� L'J T .i L'
•," rr w y',t

MRCS WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN SPECIFICATIONS
1. A--imazwaste shall not reach surfa= waters of the state by n mof: drift, mail -made conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge duHmg operation or land application. Ariv discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
proEb I :ed
2. Tberc must be doct>me-. ation in the design folder that the producer either oxv-r:� or has a notarized ag; eement for use
of acdes:t:.ate land on which to properly apply the waste. if the producer does not w,%-n adequate land to properly
dispose of waste, bdshe shall provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowTier who is within a reasonable
pro. ;--ity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste applications. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to se -cure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change ill tht operaiton, increase in the
number of animas, method of utilization, or available lard.
3. Animal waste. shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogeu need's for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisrure, historical data, climate conditions, and level of 111an32e:nent, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual yieic?; iilav 1% ill littl Ui realisic yield tables at the
discretion of the pla.^idler.
4. Atai:,nal waste stall be applied on land eroding less than ] tons per acre per year. Waste raay be applied to land tLat
is eroding at more than 5 tors but less than 10 tons per acres per veair providing gra: s dial' ships are installed where
runoff Ieaves the field. (See F OTG Standard 393-Filter 5t ;p )
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking aft--, wash Watt should ::ot be applitc when
there is danze of drift from the irn-gation :field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flood : g, it will be soil incon-porated on conventionally filled
cropland. V,,hen applied to conservation tilled crops or prassiand, the was to may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur e during a seasor prone to fiocdit:?. (Sc,: 'Wiie:itlier :n)d Climate in Nott Carolina" for
guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at r aces not to exceed the soil n rate such ilia[ ru ei1 does not cccure ou site
or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift ti-,,n] [lie siti durii:_ application. No ponding should
occur in order to control odor and hies.
8. AaLmal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rniaiall evems. or when the surface is fr ozer:.
9. AnimaI waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a mnrttier that the crop is not covered with waste
.to depth that would prohibit growth. The potential for salt c!, insLL fn nri aniinal waste shiwid also be considered.
10. Waste nut.-icats shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted Crulis Ml s:)ils %vile] a hi& potential for
Waste nutrcnt IoaLng rates on these soils should be held to a niinitnuni and a suitable vvirlte, cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied iliulrc than 30 days prii,r to planting of a crop or
forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or aaer October 1, 1995 sliair ci=nipiv•vyiih (lie following-. Tot outer perimeter of
the land area onto which waste is applied iE om a lagoon that is a cunil3LM:t uta sviht farm shail be at least 50 feet
from a-.y residential property- bounL—y wid L-or- any per_ri_:ial sn-cani or river oily[: clean an irnaatier ditch or
canal. Animal waste o[iier than su4-ie waste Lean fac;litie, sited oli or a;Lcr October 1. 1995, shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may be rdZILICCL tier water; dlat al•e not pe:truiiai provided
adeat.ate vegetative filter strips are present (See Standard 19? - riltcr Strips).

MRCS 'VVASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN SPECIFICATIONS
(C0NTr?N7'LTD)
12. A—R:al waste suzll not be applied closer than 100 feet from well.,.
13. A zd=a] waste shall not be applied close, than 200 feet of dwellings either thaii flip x omnl:d by landowner.
14. WaSze shall be aapiied in a roamer not to reach other propery and public right-oT-ways.
15. A.tz-,=al waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainagewoys or wetlands by a discharge or by over-
spray-iag. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved as a land
applications site by a "technical specialist'. Animal waste applied on grassed,-raterwatis shall be at agrononvc rates
and in a manner &t causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16, Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, sho« er:, toilets. sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
anal waste manat{ement system.
17. A protective caver of appropriate vegetation will be established un all disturbed aria: (lagoon emnbazikments,
be==, pipe ru-as, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as nec:ssam , to prole-V the %'egetstiun. Vegetation such as trees,
sl"'bs, and othe wood' species, etc. are limited to areas where cot sidered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and a,,;.rssible. Lagoon berms and 5tructure::I:nu1LI he Msj%-zi%:d r:gularly Tor evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is terminated, the owner is respatr ible for ubtai:zing acrid implementi.rra a "closure
plan_' which w711 e1imL:rate the pessibilin, of an illegal d:sclix-Et, paIIltitiiou and etr„um:.
19. Waste handline szuc tires, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on 1 regular b.a. is to prevent breskdowrs,
leaks, and spills. A regularntai_�rtazance chechlis: should bC l:el?t gar ;ite.
20. A:zumal waste can be used in a rotation that includes veaetaIbles and other crop ;or direct humawn coriTu rption.
However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct hu:na;: it :lil3uld 0111V he applied prepla.nt with no
fur Cher applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. F dgnly visible perm-anenet markers shall be installed to marl: the top and bonoln elevations of the temporary storage
(pu ipi.ng volutne) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping Shall be tuannpcd to maintain the liquid level between
the markers. A marker will be required to mark the ma.Xinzuni stem a_ e V nitunr L'or ware s wragc ponds,
22. Sol] tests shall be rnade eve;}• year, and a Iiquid waste analvsis shall he taLen within 60 da s of application
copS'5ten[ with waste utilization plan. Poultry lime-, shot] he ie,tOd lVltIl' t(I appliccifi tn. Sall and %vast analysis
retards shall be kept for five years.
Dead. ari:.,als will be disposed of in a ma per that inLi:l, NL' rtculatiulis.

r
\-lortality Management N-lethods
(check: which method(s) are bein2 implemented)
J Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
know1cdgc of the death. The burial must be at least -
300 feet from an flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incineration
❑ - In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of A!Triculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Vcterinarian must be
attached)
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
SOU l CC Clime 11MI's to 011111-ol I11SLOS Sile SINLCOIIC Vl-;lc6cc5
Liquid 5ysle1115
1:111di Cillllcrs Acculuulalioll of solids ❑ Flusll systull is de5i};uct1 and operalcil
suf lcielllly to reluovc accluuulatcd solids from
l;uticrs as designed.
❑ 1RC1110YC brillgiug of accuuullalcd solids ill
discharge
I.auoulls and t'ils a Crosled Solids Maintain lagoons, setlllllp; basl11s and pits whel'4
pest breeding is allparenl to lltilliulize 111c
crusliug ofsolids to a depth ofuo more t11an G -
8 inches over luorc 111a1130% of surface.
k:accs,i+� Vccclalivc Decaying vegclalioll � Maiulaill vcl;clativa conlrul akonli hanks of
tilow1h lal;oons lout other ill) IM111 dulculs lu pl'evcut
accwr1111atioll o1'dccayiul; vei;ctativc Mailer
along \vatcr's edge oil iulpoinalmeni's perinicicr.

11
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Sntu'Le i"rI SCC 1"iK is In illininli.1, other' tiill tilu e:ifiL i'l-mAires
l ;llnlstt;ld Swilw lnuduclilnl Vcgelalivc or wooded buffers; —�
Recommended lu:sl Ill;urll;cnlcnl llraclices;
Cnod judgnlcnl and common sins!
1 AnimA hotly stufaces 6 Dirly Manure -covered ;nliulals Dry Iloors
7.imn. snlflces 0 Wc1 nl,lonl'c-covered 1luors :dolled lionrs; ,
waterers loc;aed over Slollull liaors;
❑ Feeders al high end ofsolid hums;
fa Scrape immurc buildup from floors;
Umlerfloor vemilalion fur dryiol,
�I unnc collcclioa llils 0 urine; f-1 FUCIIIICul nlallurC re IUMLI-h)' hush, Jlil let liffne, T
• Pat lial Iaicrohial dccomposilioll or scr-ye;
f=1 Untlerlloor veallialion
Vellliklloll C\lmllsl l;nl5 r
VI1l;ltllc gases;
Fall In;lnlietl;nice;
l)1151
l:l l CiClll aft• I110VCHIC111
11111uur su1J;ltLs
J)nsl
Washdown hettvecn 81,01111s of animals;
Cl
Feed addilivus;
Cl
heed delivery elownslwu{ ezlCrldurs In feeder
covers
I 111}ll faults r
Agil;aion of recycled lagoon
❑
Blush lank covers;
litlnid while 1-inks are Jillilll;
Cl
Extend fill lines to near huttolll ol't�'nlhN will)
mill -sipholl VC111s
l:lnsh ;Illa)'s 6
Agil;Il1u11 during wasicivaler
0
Underfloor 11115111 with nnllerllnnr verldlaliull
1
cooveyallce
—
I'Il 1CL11MI-C 11111111i 0Agitallnn
of I'ea:ycictl lilf;llllll
Cl
I:AlCllll rCCll;ll'I;e 1i11es to ne;u iluuuul 111 Mils ------
liquid while pill ;II-C Illlnlf;
with anti-Sllilloll vclllti
,.Ili S1d1141nS •
AI;Elalllnl dIN711g 51n1111 iAnl;
rl
51n1111 lilllk CtrVCrS '-----•--------.�—�.-..�� _ _.
llllingand draw(loLVt1
(1w51t1C Ihanl collcclllnl •
Agilalion boring wasle:waler
F1
llox com-S
ur julIC1in11 lluAt:s
cullvey,lllce
Ahlll(: --hivl:wller 11, 1996, • l'a�e 3

Sunrcc Clllisc 11A11's If) Alinimir.c Will. Sill' tillcrilir• 1'1';lrIiCC5
I lld of dI-milpilles ill •• Agilalioo tiring wasteivaler n lixtcnf) discharge point of liilics underricalli — �-
Fagoon conveyance lagoon lulilid level
L,ILnlrli surfaces • Volalile gas cillissions; Troller lilgooll 11ill1id rilllacily;
• Willogical Inixiog; Correct lagoon stairtup liroreihu-cs;
' Agiialiou
lvliuinuiui surface area -in -volume ratio;
Mininillin agitation wllclipuniliing;
n Mcchanlical acr,llioll; :
Cl Proven Iliolnl;ical addilivcs
III igillioll )Irrinklcr
high III-cssole agiialiol►;
Ilrigale on iiry clays with lillle or no ►vied;
routes
Llrind drill
Miilirnuni reconuncudi:d olicral•utt; liressure;
I'umll hilak-c licar lagoon ligllit] slirfacc;
Cl
Pump from second -stage lagoon
Nwtagc iank of I-asiil
0i ;nlial olicrollial
lolloill or 11611level loading;
�wrGicc
iviixing while filling;
Cl
'I'aill; covers;
• Agilalioo when ctnhiylng
❑
11asirl surface mills ofsoiids;
Cl
Provell Wological'Iddilives of oxldallls
5clihill; lw; iu surl',Icc
!'allial microbial 1lecorlillosilioll;
Cl
ISXICIIiI flr,linliipt; orillels 1111drrnealll lillilid ^
• Mixinl; while filling;
level;
:.
• Agilmion when -emptying - .
C1
. itcmuve sculud solids fegulai ly
Maourc, )hurry nr sludge
• Agilaliou when slrrcading;
6-
Soil injection of slurry/sliillges; -
spic'.1d,11.
0 Volalile gas colissiolis
171
Wusll r sidual manlne from spreader afler itsG;
f'1
I'rnven Ilinlnl;icai addilivcs or nxid;oils
Ilricuvercll linrlunc,
6 Volalile gas cillissions while
n
Soil injeclion of slurry/slnllgcs
Ali-'ry or sludge on Geld
_drying
n
Soil illeorliorilinla within 1111 lu's.;
)ln ral;e5
r_1
:.hfumi in tliin mkirOrm I,iycr!, III,- rlllid Illyilig;
C1
Ill -oven biological addnlvf:s or ox141;iln5
Dcad almirils
0 Carcass (lccollillosilion
Troller disposition of carcasscs
Ml)c;Iul ;nlilool IiS;Jws II
0 C;nC;lss decollilloslimil -
Cl
Collllilele covcrillg of CalcaS[;es in 111Ifl;lI lilts;
l ]n)
n
Proper localioll/consilliclioll of lisimsal lliis
lucnhaaluls Inconll►lele colobuslilill 171 Secondary stack huruers
71MOC. 4lovemlicr 11, 1996. 1%ige I

Cause 11M1's to Minimize 041111. - --- --- — -- Silt: sliccific Practices �—
Standing water around Improper drainage; A Grade and landscape such that ►valor drains
la�ilitics Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic ntaller
Klinmre tracked onto • Poorly mainlained access roads Farm access read maintenance
public roasts lions fare►
access
Additional Information : Available from :
Swiuc Mumire Management ; 0200 llulcll)MP ]'ackcl NCS11, Comity Hx1cusion Comer
Swiuc i'radoclion Farut Pulemial Odor SOLINCS an{i I(cmedias ; F-BAls Pact Sited NCSIJ - IIAF
Swine ProdnClion Facility Manure Mauagcutcnl: Pit Recllarge - Lagoon Treatment - EBAE 128-88 NCSI i - BAH
swine l'roduclioo Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Fhtsh - Lagoon "treatment ; FBAF 129-88 NCSIJ - IIAIi
Lagoon Design and Managcntertt for Livestock ManurcTreatment and Storage ; EBAF 103-83 ` NCSIJ - IlAls
Calilff40rt of Manure and Waste:waler Application Equipment ; FBAG Fact Shcel NCSIJ - I I A li
Controlling Odors from Swine; Buildings ; I'll1-33 NCSIJ - Swine Iixtcnsion
Enviranmenlal Assurance Program ; NI111C Manual NC Pork Producers Assoc
01)tiuns fur Managing Odor ; a repoll from llic Swine% Odor Task Force NCSIJ Agri Conummicatinns
Niiis,otcc C onccnis in Anima[ Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PIIO107. 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative l:atension
AhI(){:-November11.1996, hille:S

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NZ,IvBER5
DWQ ]n _3gS 3�0a
MAN. A GEyENT SYSTEM 911
EM}RG iCY
SWCD qr'9 asy es
N-RCS 9/g s� 5�3as
-- =This pla_i will be imple:nenLed in the eve -it that wastes fion your operation are lealcrig,
over-�ow-ing, or rurzung orr site. You should not wait until wastes reach suface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be ;Zsted in an accessible location for all :mpspyees at the
faiLZ The fo[iov�rig are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the re"case of wastes. Depending on the sir-mation, this may or may not be possible.
Su22es7zed responses to some possible problems are listed below.
1- Lagoon cve.nElow—possible solu'tlons are:
a, Add soil to be.r,i to Lncrese elevation of dam.
b. Pump waste to fields at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all 2cws to the lagoon i 7.rnediately.
d. Call a purrpii:g cone. -actor.
e. Make sure no su,:ace water is ente:-ing lagoon.
B. Ri-mou L1 om was-..- apolicanon Lel6-ac7nons Inclur'.e
a. L-.--nediztely stop waste appLication.
b. Create a ternporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and elir,inate :.he rAeson(s) that caused the runoff:
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occur, ed.
C. Lea'�ge from the waste pipes and s7rir»k-lers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop iri.e Lion pur,.p.
c. Close v ilves to eIL-rdr, to far--h discharge.
d. Repair alI lezlcs prior to res`, :irg pumps.

D. Les_kaae from flush systerns, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Shop irigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair a1 leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage frorn base or sidewall of lagoon. 4i=en this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersiole pump, and pump
back to lagoon.
b. Ii holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
C. Hav- a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and Iagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess t"-'e: e,ctent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did tie waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any d rnage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property -damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill Have the potential to reach su„ ace waters?
f. Could a Riture rails event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or o« of the property)?
h. How• much reached sup face waters?
3. Con= appropriate agencies.
a During normal business hours, tali your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone 0y5 _3900_ After hours, emergency number: _9!9 73� �39'5��- Your phone call
should include: your name, faciliry, , telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction ofmovement of she spy
wean+ter and wind conditions. The corrective rneaRlres that have been under taker and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. L sp'W leaves propery or eaters su: face waters, call local EIS Phone number 911.
c. L-,strLct E iS to contact local Health Department.
d. Corr,;_:.ct CES, phone rnumber q1-9 �5WR3s , local SWCD of ice phone number
*0 a51 f34�5-1 and local -RCS ofuce for advice,4echnical assistance phone number
910 asy 530 s .
4. If none of the above works, call 911 or the Sheriff Department and explain your problem to
them anal ask that person'to contact the proper agencies for you.

5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problern to minimize ou site age.
Cacontractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Cont-actors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certmEed the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc_)
a. Name: J/, rn (I,/,/,,i ')
b. Phone: d a , ko b Io S o 2-7 a 3
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the systerr4 and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from, happening again.

rr
ur;;ed Sates Natural
Ccr:se.,raticrn
CZ--f r --ST .rLn'C:Y
C�FA-'17
�i r �%. 4. Z-a6
%4aA .:CN(
GLT.LYC• :?'_^.b{1ir�: ?� �tiC4NIC i C'='.`r:� 3`: ?Q^.GI.'�_ /�U �_
,
S S.:r 7-r-72=�r !Or-:S-;a --Cm PL Z47
Y=5 NO
IfXCS �n=oer7vi3s sssis-.aa�
Im L�
If sirs be =c==
�-
S 5:- � i= �i Z 3r� �.."74 � fC : �.�TSLSC-GH aF .►]di.�i�.i:= :7
`�� i IC ��
—
If v..,- laCda—=cr 11aald ==-a:t wizh lOG =ni=g > cmri =Bau'..r=Zi:'=ril
pC.:.S� ob-;!,L 2r.cr :z dezip __ pr--vz .
.
f7CZEC..
(Caci= of wsms or athe_ rya; _� sa is =sv be a=cd 4te
s:•.'�i:sdar�l .
INC
G � n�LH ?r:._�:.:... � ��itif� �L'�?�'�t? • � � y ti'i
:)l v Z N Ce' AANAt—�70 0 AR= RZgZ.'3^
5 ti=Lz C,r Y 0L'v=, : .'ac0t:CM S-r_CU= :YC 7 CZa3.A-N-! i.L`M G?CT�i-A W-z-",*4Z G�-Yr�4�iGN
P3C.S -or U, prrvldx tm^ri=i ::sis=ac in Omly =der t!:e fana�� csadiL'ers Far, wed2=d
d=iecs ie:s ::.tea aae ==-a L-1 si:z, `i3C5 wsI prsvida zssisw..a ariv f t"he ft=zCars =d imimu 7msL= i�S:=4
car ==__-i We_:3nds g-t *h--- one s. ARCS ?rM gr�%s zw � �+!L�- z
r•:gar- �s seacc= g �ra=a :a :e'::� ;wid_=� - - - - =aa of it a=, aid canp�r7 ' s
--peg cut •'^^ or-- afar-�_
Q GC A CC; r�L L.
• ?FEZ �ti.CiNC-tiCti.GNi..ter"W;=- TCA7ULA-S-6if-'
C F
• C� 1G CC= ISCLN'c 17.:,Clma-Y-k ,�,{ LAND A-var'C.l7,CN(
Cr

r L-CG.�'J..'"�Gs �w_r--' -� ti A^� I rm A r-rK �0J1 wiY•M T -- �_-I`���:` S'�'
f 1 a- i'vc YqCrUl 5-_ vDA ZA=.."_'3Cr' S X=--':' tS -.
/ _y
Ltur
QA'
M-� �zn cc 'J Zc Z- y— m
c C_ Si M?C :
' i3D_�"�'*�� i?r'IIOS W .L"►.3�Q G':YA`]JO�TY7�_'.]� T.�G'S
ice. It SO
1.73�"Y? sZa" cl _q:==t'ZA--Tw-a =—QZ S--Dc,DK3
L"n=.�?�r_YFc� Cs".a3"3�:iZrion`3'K�X*•T'S �330�?t' �-�' �;��:�.��
='oa
�.-irQL7D, S}iMnDC h3 :---
�f Q1� 5-�i L•].'�.'IcC: QS !ti _ =.^S� 1Q D"�7'�' �� =�
M Z ric _ _ ' 7'
4~ m }"y� yiJ�"t���K�—�.�1��7' L��l"'^3�v J �/T�ST'D+`i,3^� 73ei� ����':.,� ` :� Cam' h : M
.d.:+!•'s"2Y �IiNsf.a ""T h� C3C� .�h: `rho' Q'.i.ws i r L�' „J: "1:D' c Y E;
S37II'Ys • ►.�3ti1.��'�..ril.� L'��
z as=-.j

atl
11
n
r+ u
+
+
\
+ Al
\ I .
+\ O p a
+
II +\ \\+ 14
-.51
r 16 INI
1
f f �.. ❑ dr I
11 µ • ri
p 11 r
j11
S•. U O ! -
1
\ ll
.� 1}4 I 515 -• +� p .
8M � Ik - \
J
a dcatk
it 64
rtl�
t't Cems
-Lake
—a`ti �•9292 54 ,Yy 1100 �\ 701
12001
1 a H Haweshapei
4, - `...-�.- `— � - _ 6c
eu Zinn Ch m N 1218 `+
It
'� 1,

operator:Mac Horrell County: Pender
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
Date: 12/10/93
1500.0 feet
0
sows
( f arrow to finish)
x 1417
lbs.
- 0
lbs
1200
sows
(farrow to feeder)
x 522
lbs.
= 626400
lbs.
0
head
(finishing only)
x 135
lbs.
- 0
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to wean)
x 433
lbs.
- 0
lbs
0
head
(wean to feeder)
x 30
lbs.
= 0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 626400 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 626400 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 626400 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0. 0 cubic feet N+ ScuU at? 5iwaor 0- 4 ,r-
OEE-ove�er
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 390.0 feet Inside top width 330.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 49.0 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 3.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 48.0 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 39.0 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 44.5 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/ENDI SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 384.0 324.0 9.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
384.0 324.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
330.0 270.0
124416 (AREA OF TOP)
89100 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
357.0 297.0 424116 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTH/6
124416.0 424116.0 89100.0 1.5
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 956448 CU. FT.

5: TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
390.0 330.0 128700.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 126700.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 626400 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Wastp/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 153343 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for.in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day *
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 75075.0 cubic feet

5D. Volume -of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 80437.5 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 153343 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 75075 cubic feet
5D. 80438 cubic feet
TOTAL 308855 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 935255 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 956448 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 626400 cubic fe
At elev. 45.3 feet ; Volume is 635773 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 876011 cubic feet
At elev. 47.3 feet ; Volume is 870393 cubic feet (start pumping)
Season 1 high water table elevation 44.5 feet
7.. DESIGNED BY: �'"�'�^� APPROVED BY:-:
DATE. f2-�d 'Gf� DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
chance over time as equipment ge-s older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every
Three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges work best because
they already have a graduated scale from which to read the application amount
without having to perform additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets,
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used provided
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns, sprinklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction
of pull. Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both
sides of the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
*Aerrirued for Ceniiication Training for Operations of Animal waste M.anagemenr Systems Manual

OPERATION & NLAX TENANTCE PLA2N,
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especially
important to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as winter'-irne for berm dagrass) or when there are
ed extendrainy spells such as the thunderstorm, season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winterlearly spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as Ion; as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet periods.
Overflow from the lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penalty action.
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
iMaintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or common bermuda,rass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fendlized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of ferilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or
equivalent.
Brtsh and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing. spraving, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---look for:
1. separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4, overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface ---look for:
1. undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment ---look for:
1. settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability ---slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
A erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action
5.. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon dam_
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave action. If
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon may be
used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon has
any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert familiar with design -and
constraction of waste lagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a threat
of a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps ---check for proper operation of:
1. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will allow some
safetv time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is not the time
to think about switching, repairing , or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full,
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory of spare
Parts or pumps.
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
and parking lot runof) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
corning from your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfall that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following:
1. adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3. ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again = to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a cer-Lain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should 'help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
1. immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least halt full of water before
waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
5. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid volume. This seeding should occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
pH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and recharged each day, also work well.

Practice water conservation ---minimize building water usage and
spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Management:
Maintain lagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage level.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarlv,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon'
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than I foot to the lowest
point of the dam -or embankment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
level unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon darn or embankment.
Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is responsible for
obtaining and implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator.
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate_
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.-
. Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with drazline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge. you must also pay attention to the liner, to prevent damage. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge can be
removed without liner injury. if the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels; as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphores, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus: As with other
wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lag failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure. Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
darn. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in dams.)
Lagoon liquid levels ---high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Liner integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during 'sludge
removal, or rupture from lowering lagoon liquid level below groundwater
table.
NOTE: If lajoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a' large discharge
of wastewater and possible dam failure.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) with
min. odor control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached (permanent } temporary storage) may vary due to soil conditions
flushing operations, and the amount of fresh water added to the system.
The designed 6 months temporary storage is an estimated volume
based on: 1) waste from animals; 2) excess rainfall after evaporation;
and 3) the largest 24 hour (one day) rainfall that occurs on the
average of once every 25 years. The volume of waste generated from
a given number of animals will be fairly constant throughout the year
and from year to year. This estimate is based on 7 inches of excess
rainfall which is equal to or exceeds the highest 6 months excess in
a year. The average annual excess rainfall is approximately 8 inches.
Therefore, an average of 8 inches of excess rainfall will need to be
pumped each year. The 25 year rainfall will not be a factor to consider
in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage volume must always be
available. A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed on the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed on this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain minimum treatment depth (6 feet).
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage,�_o crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 47.3 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 45.3 or before the fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria). The design temporary storage, less 25 year storm
is 228418 cubic feet or 1708565 gallons. As stated before, this
volume will vary considerably from year to year.

4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
S. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 f-eet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material. Lagoon site (and pad site if needed) to be
stripped of topsoil (311) and stockpiled for use on dike and pad
slopes (2-311). The topsoiling quantity is in excess of amounts
specified on page one (1).
Cut-off Trench:
---------------
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
-------------
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall be placed in
max. of 6" lifts and not placed in standing water. Compaction shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable materre encountered, they will need to
be excavated a minimum of 400t below grade and backf illed and
compacted with a SCS approved material (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soil
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to -the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction according to seeding specifications sheet.

SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 6.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
�360 LBS. FESCUE GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
��`` (BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. rPENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
0 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS @ 8 LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
--180 LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
!! 0 LBS. RYE GRASS @ 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1,TO MARCH 30
LBS. ,c.�
/D r y %•= a fC� � r c S f 0 6 � 6 nJ f: rC d f /D✓ /y�.�fP• $E
4,4 G �reir 6c �3r'4bL 1s hL d
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
6000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
12 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
600 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO'•PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

U: S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
File Code: 210
Landowner
727a-al
7.4��
County
Community
or Group
No.
Conservation Plan No.
Estimated
Depth of
Water.to Top of Dam io
Ft. Length of Flood Pool ___Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. st. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. % Ft. Ft.
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach 14,, �_,(_ .:C Z_ „ dam.»„ e &
07=+h
Lbo Zee,L•- W
Ile 4'
Hazard Classification of Dam (0 b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III,(g, V)
r� '•; � i i -i-1
B J n n a
Y
name ' title u
Concurred By
name title
Ll
Date Jam'
Date / /Z -mil
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
/il o�G Lf

&RA
Z5 2
?72
DC, w" 7-0 S e- At Anje vot
7-C-.' Tie' 141YY W691(' 41,4 -Y'CR 1.,4 t IZ 61Vervy7-eeLln
e A— E

F2
Ile —
!-�
SCS-ENG-538 y a _ � .� U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rer, 5-70 1, /' SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
[:UG r 5 GUJ L
S0I1 INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMERS AME ac r DISTRICT '
DATE �� COUNTY
S. C. S. PHOTO S iEET NO. WORK UNIT
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACRES
WOODLAND ACRES TOTAL ACRES POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVA;'lO::IST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approx. scale 1"= feet)
Locart reference point in center line of dam and Identify on sketch.
-
e
fAlf
A
li
o
i
I
1
1
I
1
1
II
1
I
I
JII
1
ail
�
111
I
I�
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
q
o�
4F/"11
a
SHOW
DEPTH
CAL
ORING NU�AND PR LE
Make and list dam -site and spilhuaw borings first •then ponded area and borrpw pit
1 / onrinued on Aff4eh— necessary} o water table eleua -f - dam -site r�gs.
borings • separate with vertical red line.
..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 11
12
13 114
1
15 116
17 118
19
20
12111
22 11
23
0-1
Crr;
I
41,5ns
m
Zm:
--�
. c
1►1
r. e
i�
c m
i-3
SC
5
Sf
`ir
SM
C
1
5Ca`-
Sm
sT:
4--
F
C
I ^
a''
S
Err,
r. f
C
to
-7
Srdl�_�
�.q
we
5
c
I.
7-a
�
SC
irS<s'�
S
S�
''=
S4
z
Sp
<-rr
5t.a
5
�q
S
ca
c
Sp
c.
n • ��
5 r'�
� r
, <
sa
r
5F
I� -Sm ,
BORLNCI MADE BY r' SIGNATURE & TITLE
Ce-cr / G�'. �4_f-
W 150h S1e•rccr

w
TYPES MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION I USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW - Well graded gravels; gravel. sand mix g - gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels. s - sand
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix vfs - very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix sl -sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; send -gravel mix fsl - fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands 1- loam
SM -Silty send gl -gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures si-silt
ML - Silts; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt sil - silt. loam
CL -Clays of low to medium plasticity cl -clay loam
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity sicl - silty clay loam
MH - Elastic silts scl -sandy clay loam
OL - Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity c-clay
1. Suitable matterW for embankment is available ffes !0 No /lnd;caeelwhe.c Iowird on lhb shrch w"
RFMA.RM: fCeCOprGkQar,��d�11dJC.Cf" U�a'Ati IJC t'4�$rr�
rrie•cJ off 5/r•�Q( 5A-' C-7 9 �1110
FL o S ,[{.� 'jI c r �t I. ti f f Fe— o J� r e-
X
f To Fz
I Explain baxards requiring special attention in design lSeepape, snrtnO..rMk etr-j
Ga 4 5 f—�. �Tj � y� AV
ProCIO
GENERAL, REMARKS:
7
If -la-
Al, - Cf' l `lc,a /
47 c
-Te

IZoo Sam- For- MAa-'---
pes.+pW 9 ce
�_.�.._.. q�•g - .. 4ra�r 48 _.._�g.�._.... --9S '-: .- ;.. g8..._.__........ ¢77- _ �3.._ .. -. 44.1
t 7�1 4;�8
r
1Q.I � .- `'���j]=r _..._ _ - "� /.r, .�a:_i. •--�. .- � C4.- i a.� i l�'Q k Eli
Ali
CI''
Q O Q Q Q Q G' Q E� - 1 >^
�Etasrn
oil
ry
f 4..o 42• f you
r?f¢�S
. 01
47
2-foo 31oO 4fo6 1 too Pit) 9510 ra 1oeLfo-
I r tC— '

LAGOON: MARKER
FRrr--EB(--"Ar-"-) + ']-15YR/24HR STORM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM IEVEL
PERMANENT

F WATF
�O RP D Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., secretary
> [ orth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O Ar O i
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
�3&0?
Division of Water Quality
�_.
'Mayj , 2002
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Brown's of Carolina # 35
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Attn: Dawn Williamson
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. �AWS710051 ,
Brown's of Carolina # 35
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Pender County
Dear Dawn Williamson. -
In order to correct the expiration date, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Brown's of Carolina, Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste. collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWGi00000. This approval
shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal
waste from the Brown's of Carolina # 35, located in Pender County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than 1200 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS710051 dated June 8, 1998. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized
and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters.
An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational
information must be established for this farm. "Any increase in waste production greater than the
certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this
COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mal Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet httpJRr2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]$
Telephone [phone] .
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
DEN Customer Service Center
An Equal opportunity Action Employer

This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext.-502.
Sincerely,
ory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Pender County Health Department
WilmingtoT Regional -Office, Water_Quality Section
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Water Quality Central Files
NDPU Files

JUL-16-2001 MON 02:44 PM BROWN'SOFCAROLINA 9102966166 P. 01/01
'7 I - .s 1
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
755 Hwy. 24 Bast
PO Box 407
Warsaw, NC 2839"487
i�� �AR�LtiVA
Femi
To: DWQ — Wilmington
Faic 910-350-2004
From: R. 0. Britt
Pages: 1
Phone: . Data: 07/16/01
Re: Lagoon Levels Update CC:
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Conment 0 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
• Con wnents:
The following is. an update at facility # 710051, farm 35. As of July 16, 2001, the
lagoon level is 22". We will continue to work diligently to increase freeboard level on
this facility. However, we no longer consider this lagoon to be a concern.
If you have any questions regarding this issue, please contact David Nordn at
[phone].

JUL-09-2001 MON 02:42 PH
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy. 24 East
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
BROWN`SOFCAROLINA
r7l-51
9102966166
OF CAROLINA
Fcaix
To: DWO —Wilmington Region From: R. O. Britt
Fax: [phone] Pages: 1
Phone:
Date: 07/09/01
Re: Lagoon Level Update CC:
P. 01/01
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review O Please Comment 0 Please Reply © Please Recycle
s Comments:
The following is an update at facility # 710051, farm 3135. As of July 9, 2001, the
lagoon level is 19.5'.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this issue, please call David Nordin
at 910-296-1800.

JUL-02-2001 MON 04;04 PM BROWN'SO1:CAROLIKA
srowr's of carana, Inc,
755 Hwy. 24 East
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
To: DWQ —Wilmington Region
9102966166
From R. 0. Britt
Fam 910-350-2004 Pages: 1
Phone:
Date: 07/02/01
Re: Lagoon Level Update CCC
P, O1/01
L7R\..JYYIV'S i
OF CAROLIIVA
❑ urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment © Please Reply © Please Recycle
♦ Comments:
The following is are update at facility # 710051, Farm 3135. As of July 2, 2001, the
lagoon level is 19".
If you have any questions or comments regarding this issue, please call David Nordin
at 910-296-1800,

JUN-18-2001 MON 09:57 AM
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
785 Hwy, 24 East
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398-M7
FaX
BROWN'SOFCAROLINA
To: DWQ—Wilmington Region
7+-5I
9102966166
P. 01/01
` ROW&111S'\
From: R.O. Britt
Fax: [phone] Pages: 1
Phone; 910-395-390o Date: 06/18/01
Re: Lagoon Levels
CC:
❑ Urgent © For Review O Please Comment ❑ Please Replay CI Please Recycle
e Comments:
The lagoon level at facility # 710051, farm 3135 as of June 18, 2001 is 19'. This
facility has recived in excess of 4' of rain in the past several days. A plan of action is
being developed and will be submitted as soon as possible. If you have any
questions regarding this issue, please contact David Nordin at 910-296-1800.

-PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMA
Facility Number. 71 - SI County: Te14D�
Facility
Name:
Certified Operator Name: KAYE ���EE Operator
# IWI
LITIES
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure B
Lagoon Name/ldentifier (ID): Boc-103f
Spillway (Yes or No): No
Level (inches): /1?
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
✓ Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: J kAx &,r GLirlf
hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct
Zj�ou►,.• f of �,{�� .rv�y W-C _ Phone: OZO Z& -1Jo6
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date: G119/
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
PoA Cover Page 2121/00

PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 130C #35
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.5 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.5 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 1244161 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 116329 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 153343 ft3
h. current herd # i200 certified herd # 1200
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 5/21/01
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
153343 ft3
0 ft3
75075 ft3
284761 gallons
2.10 Ibs/1000 gal.
842.3 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM
STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: BOC #35
line m = 842.3 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure 1D:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure 1D:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6842.3lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR-
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD Ilbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
372
1
Com
13.30
120.00
1596.0
Mar -Jul
3721
2
Corn
14.10
100.00
1410.0
Mar -Jul
3721
5
Corn
i0.60
140.00
1484.0
Mar -Jul
372
6
Corn
4.10
140.00
574.0
Mar -Jul
372
7
Corn
4.30
140.00
602.0
Mar -Jul
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 5666.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 842.3 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) Y 5666.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -4824 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation equipment is on site and responsible irrigation to lower the lagoon level will begin as soon as weather
and field conditions permit.
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

APR-26--2001 THU 11:23 AM BROWN'SOFCAROL1NA
9102966166 P. 01
f-13R'S`\
CIF CAROLINA J
Femc
785 HWY 24 Fast 1 ` - 51
PO Sax 487 ,
Warsaw, NC 2639"487
910-29&18W
14W"71 -6326
010-296-6166 - Fax
To: DWQ -- Wilmington From Kevin Weston
Fam 910-350-2004 Pages: 1
Phone: Date: 04/261011
Rw Lagoon Levels Update cc,
❑ Urgent CI For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
• Cong"ats:
The following lagoons are no longer within the 19" of freeboard:
Farm # 35
out since 4/7/01
Farm # 03
out SinCe 4/7/01
Farri) # 12
Out sinCe 4/7/01
Fam1 # SH
out SinCe 4/7/01
Farm # 17F
out SinCC, 4/7/01
Farm # 17S
out since 4/7/01

J.S. Postal
Servi(
;ERTIFIED
MP
Domestic Mail
C)nfv-- Mr,
I , -Up
; n C
r Postage $
Certified Fee
:3 Return Receipt Fee
U (Endorsement Requirecq
=ed ry n Fee
Oeteq
red)
:3 Total PosWe A Fria LL—
C1610y) 50M le
---------------------- --
=3
fk f
Postmark
Hem
ted bmailer)
-------------------
-----------
as 4 o 5

a ' MAR--22-2001 THU 09:53 AM
■
BROWN` SO CAROL I NA
rT-51
9102966166
P. 01
Fax
QF GAROLINA
Tor �..���.��.. �_�r \....+��.�.� Frorm
Phoom caw
Ra GC:
785 Hwy 24 East
PO Bar 487
Wemaw, NC 2839$4487
91 0-296.1800
1-SO64171.8M
81 a29"188 - Fa+c
❑ Urgent Ct For Review D Plemm Comment ❑ Please Reply M Please Recycle
• Commanbla.
March 21, 2001
Subject: Lagoon Levels Update
The following lagoons are within the 19" of freeboard as of March 21, 2001.
Farm # 35
17"
Farm # 03
17"
Farm # 12
17"
Farm # SH
16"
Farm # 17F
15"
Farm # 17S
16"
Gus Simmons 910-286-1800 (Office)
Glenn Davis 910-296-1800 (Office) 910-290-0366 (Mobile)
Kevin Weston 910-296-1800 (office)

HAR-22--01 THU 05:58 PM BROWN'S OF CAROL I NA! FAX NO. 2961333
P. 05
PLAN OFACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Nurr bol : _ � f - County: _ ?,cwt,c,
Facility ,
Name:
Certified Operafor Name: x"qY-6 operator
In / y;
Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways, and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/jIeentifier (lD): -01" 3x
Spillway (Yes or No): Al
Level (inch s): J7
2. Check all applicable items
L.iqu;d level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and ;10 day Purls of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acce.ptabls.- ranges.
Liqu;d lewq is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action Is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Was'e is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
purnrtped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
prop'Jsed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality etior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation -gill be partially or fully depopulated.
attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest' possible date to begin land application of waste: IAz
I hereby certify that I h;we reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, arad to 1ha bast of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
/�•� ,� l . � trrf ,,� ,ro /.-�. Phone: gto zR4 - lW&O
r Facility Ou►ner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facila fy Owrter:Manager (signature)
PoA Cover P g P, 2129100

MAR-22-01 THU 05:58 Fn BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO, 2961333
W-1
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOYAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Wr rnc/ldentifier (ID): BOC #35
2. Currant liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker 1 17.0 inches
U. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm 8 structural freeboard i8.5 inches
c. line b - line a Cinches in red none) = 2.5 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 124416 ft2
e, fine 02 x line d x 7.48 gallonslfe 193682 gallons
3. Protected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 153343 ft3
h. current herd # 1200 certified herd #1 1200
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 153?43 R3
-- 3243
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 1117/01
rn. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click an the next :structure tab shown below)
1ft3
75075 fe
284761 gallons
1.80 Ibs11000 gal.
861.6 lbs. PAN
POA (30 Dcy) 2121100

MAR-22-01 THU 05:58 PM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO. 2961333
P. 07
11. TOTAL F OUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID; gOC #35 line m = 861.6 lb PAN
2. sinictul-3 113: line m = lb PAN
3. Structure ID: line m = lb PAN
4. Stnichae ID: line m = lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
G. StnlCtLITC ID:
line m = Ib PAN
line m = lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 861.6lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD, DO NOT LIST
FIELDS TO WHICH PAN
CANNOT BE
APPLIED DURING
THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o.
p. lield #
[)_ crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR-
2 PAN balance
(lbilacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u_ applicalion window'
372
1
Small Grain
13.30
70.00
931.0
Sept -Apr
372.
_372
2
small Grain
141.101
70.00
987.0
Sept -Apr
5
Small Grain
10.60
60.00
636.0
Sept -Apr
_. 372
37Z
_
6
Small Grain
4.10
74.32
304.7
Sept -Apr
7
Small Grain
4.30
74.77
321.5
Sept -Apr
Stale current erne cndino anolicalion date or next croo anDlication
beoinnina
date for available
receiviri0 cro;:s during 30 dny draw down period.
v. Totil PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 3180.2 lb. PAN
IV. FACiI__ITY's Po/1 OVERALL. PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) =
861.6 lb_ PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

MAR-22-01 THU 05:59 PM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO, 2961333 P. 08
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 3180.2 W. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -2319 lb. PAN
Line y must chow as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, c[epopu!ation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and heal reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on nc-%v info, nation. If new folds are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
Fields to [tie PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another penn;tteci facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
reccivinti faoifity.
NARMTiVE;
Irrigation equipinan',
and field conraitions
PoA (30 Dozy) 2/21100

k�,
B 4WN'S
OF CAROUNA
Emergency Pion of Action
TM M* Shiver, I3WQ - Mnington Regional Office
From Gus Simmons
c es J" Vinson
fI 02/D4/00
1 / �
RGC Bmwn's of Carolina Fanns #3. M. 020. 0i7S, a
S�mmagr.
The foll0wino Action Plan will outlines the stem,i�nen directiorl
.. :.res al ma en
: ri s car a sI u a inucrx a sere an a sa�n ■c
and maintaining the structural integrity of the waste treatment and stomps impoundments at the
aforementioned farms. This plan discuses the required actions and avaNA means of.maintaining
the structural integrity of the rnpour bneids, and furrther reacift the additional T inches of operational
tr" freeboard as spedffed in the General Pemut far these fades itaauoh Intensified face ty management.
1, Accurate Liquid gavel Measurernents. A simple, but nary, step Is to ensure that oquld revels
are being ac cxnwety measured to prevent overestimating or umdemstirnaft the current liquid level
for each lagoon. This process Includes verifying the eleyaftis of the staff gauges with the actual
top or a affa n for each mwmnt w a wn Ord fteww ot hsman to
inches.
2. Solt Moisture Condition Analysis. The fastest and most effidert way of lowering the' liquid levels is
to use the spray irrigation systems designed for these fadtifies for wastewater effluent application.
The main constraint on operating these systems to their design capability the past 2-3 weeks has
been a problem of hydrology. The recent snow .and nightly fieezhrg conditions has left most
application fields, as specified In .the waste management plan 'for•each facility, at soil moisture
levels above field mndi lorL To prevent rur-odf and sty perform effluent applications at every
available opportunity, the environmental management staff, including our staff Crop Specialist and
Technical Speciaiist, are assisting our field -personnel with moisture condition. This also Includes
maidng frequent, micro -applications (Q-25' appiications) with our edstirrg Ikon equipment to
reduce surface infiiiration impacts associated with heavier appllcations.
3. Intensified Fresh Water Conservation. The Production Staff at Brown's of Carolina has adopted an
Emergency Fresh Water Conservation Plan which outlines steps to be taken to reduce fresh water
usage on our facilities. This includes reduced senitation.pract€ces. Although this compromises the
biosecuriiiy of the facilities, It is a method of reducing liquid Input into the Impoundments. In
addition, as further means of policing Influent amounts. fiesta water usage Is measured daily on afl
facilities operating with less than 19 inches of freeboard.
0 Page 1

s
4. Evaluation of Alternative Effluent Storage. An krmxiate sirort tarn aid for some farms may be to
obtain aW banal effluent storage W# in the fac ty, Itsal€ An emmpie would be to make sure that
the owdlows for each pul-jft %olty are sat tD the coned ekwation. A few f w*M of storage
may be obtained In some pits In this mariner. Also, the possibility exists in lempomft converting
some flush barns to pit -recharge to pain addtional stomas capacity.
5. Implementation of Aftenw0we Waste Application Sites. As many of the pedcaJauly well drafted. or
'tiddW soii-typa hydrants are approaching the appkatlon goal of pant available nilrvgen (PAN) due
to the postftoyd intgation everds, fl may be necessary. on some sites, to obtain additional
application land via a Nutrient Management. (Nk" addendum. Appfrtafion of effluent to
these receiving sites may require the installation of additional Irrigation egdpnerd, sup*Anes.
and operatioog personnel. It may also mqulre the fmplernentation of *pump and haul. In either
case, effluent will be app wd to these application fields at agronomic rates and as specified in the
addendum_ of the NMP for these sites, created by a certified Technical Spedalist-
As always, Brown's of Carolina Is committed to the corrg iFant operation of aft it's fades. Brown's of
Caroima recognizes the intenSTrad effort rsquhW to manage these higher liquid levels. It is our poficy
not to place animals in any of our farms in which the impending environmental AA may lead to a
dwwrg@ or Nn-off Grim ly eauza by the plaeemal Of Orm in tab ww.
Brown's of Carolina appreciates the cooperative effoft of the Division of Water Quality and it staff In
these efforts and this Emergency Plan of Action.
0 Page 2

SFP--08-00 FRI 11.12 AM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA!
FAX NO. 2961333
P. 01
i■
I■
-,--.-,-""BROWN'
OF CAROLINA
Fax
From:
785 Hwy 24 East
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398'0497
91 a29&I SW
1-800-871-GM
91 a29"168 - Fax
Faa�(il_�� _^aiCiC'� __ pages` n - - -
Phorm Oatee Cv
Ita: CC:
L3 Uggent Ta For Review ❑ Please Coranrent d Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
0 i:onun.ant=

SEP-08-00 FRI 11:12 AM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX N0, 2961333
� WI
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: -,. _Z/ - County: , &.wAV
Facility
Name:
Certified Operator Name: X.r )le 44,24E E _ _ Operator
74/f
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure4 Structure 5 Structure fi
Lagoon NanieUenti"ter (ID):
Spillway (Yes or No), /'/
Level (inches):
2. Check a!1 applicable items
✓ Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
War;te is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact :and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered In the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facifity number, lagoon
freeboard levels and head population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the test of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and cornett.
_p�rerr��..'s � [,-✓.¢ems i�.a
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
..-� I W i �F- i� rZac r r✓�r �37 �Ca.a�— G�4,s-�.
Facility OwnerlManager (signature)
Phone: _ L9G - 41ao
Date: "
PoA Cover Page 2121100

SEP-08-00 FRI 11:12 AM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO. 2961333
P. 03
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifrer (1D): I 130C *35
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 11 A inches
b. designed structural freeboard zone 12.0 inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 124416 ft
e. line d12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/R3 77553 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 153343 ft3
h. current herd # 120U certified herd # 120D
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
1. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h+I+j)x7.48x5days/line f=
4. Tothl vctume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
1. total volume to be land applied line a +line k =
153343 ft3
I --- 7:0flg
75075 fe
47460 gallons
125013 gallons
REPEAT SiECTIO61 9 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (5 Day) 2/21100

SFP-08-00 FRI 11 : 12 Ali BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO. 2961333
P. 04
It. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALI. WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.:tructure 10: 60C #35
line I =
125013 gallons
2.. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
3_ :.truclure ID:
line I =
gallons
4. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
5. structure ID:
line 1=
gallons
6. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
n. lines +2+3+4+5+6=
o. line n 127154
125013 gallons
4.60 acre -inches
Ill. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD1,2
'While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
ajronornic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan.
2F ields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste.
p. tract #
q_ field i>t
r. soil type
s. crop
t. acres
v. Fernammg
IRR-2 PAN
balance
cu�aa.y
v. maAmutn
application rate
(Inrhr)
w, maximum
application
amount (Mch s)
372
L-1 d 3A
NoA
Soybeans
3.58
100
0.5
1
372
Hyd9S
NoA
Soybeans
6.32
106
0.5
1
372
hl d']A
NoA
So beans
3.03
90
0.5
1
372
H d'3B
NoA
Soybeans
4.40
95
0.5
1
372
Hydl0A
NoA
Soybeans
1.14
132
0.5
1
372
HydI0B
NoA
Soybeans
1.65
132
0.5
1
x. total acres available during 5 day draw down (sum of column 1) = 20.12 acres
IV. FACILITY'S Poi► OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
PoA (5 Day) 2i21100

SFP-08-00 FRI 11:13 AM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO. 2961333 P. 05
y, line 4) 0.23 inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
live x
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new h�►draulic load based on new information.
Pump and haul is a probability that may begin as early as Friday, 9/8100, however this option will take some
time to move a large volume of water to another facility due to the distance away from that facility.
Plan to land apply hydraulic load:
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e.g. Is there water standing in field; does irrigation
e uipmi�nt mar down in field; "trafficabilit " across soils; will soils absorb application without runoff etc.
Most of the fields htEvessome standing water in them, however Feld #4 (hydrants 8-10) had only a few small
areas of standing water. Small trenches to aid in the drainage of these areas have been installed temporarily
so that irrigation onto these pulls can be made by 918/00. The soil is currently too wet to irrigate on today, but
with the trenches, wind and sun should be okay tommorow. The trenches will be blocked prior to Irrigating,
2. Date and amount of last rainfall event?
DATE: 1 09/05/00 AMOUNT: 2.00 inches
3_ Dates of last waste application event per feld:
last irrirtation event in this field was made on
5100.
coil and weather conditions, is irrigation equipment capable of applying the volume
line "n" at appropnate seasonal (i.e. wintery application rates 5 days?_
Yes _ s w-
5. irrigatiotischcdule for next 5 days - include daily schedule; proposed application rates and amounts
per Irrigation event; changes made In gun sizes, nozzles, "o" rings, operating time, travel speed, etc. to
meet propose;i charges in application rates and amounts; and any other Information for consideration.
Thursday, 9/7100: Change ring size in nozzle of gun on the irrigation reel. New ring size to be .86". Operate
the reel such that tho pressure at the nozzle is 60 psi, flow rate of 110 gpm, travel speed of 6 fthnin. This will
result in a proposed application rate of .25 in/hr and .25" total application amount per event.
Friday, 9/8)00: Begin irrigation on the highest, driest pull in the field, which is 9A.
Saturday, 9/9)00; Continue irrigating on the next highest, driest pull in the field.
Sunday, 9/10/00: Continue as previously noted.
Monday, 9/11/00: Continue as previously noted.
Tuesday, 9/12100: Continue as previously noted.
PoA (5 W y) 2.121 /00

SFP-08-00 FRI 11:13 AM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO. 2961333
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I_ TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. St«rcture N,aine/ldentifer (ID); BO 0035
2. Current liquid volume In 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 1 12,0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard I 19-01 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.0 Inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 124416 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft3 542868 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 190 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 153343 ft3
h. current herd # 1200 certified herd # 1200
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 153343 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PA14 to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 7/21/00
rn. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION li FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
{Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
1 t3
75075 ft3
284761 gallons
1.70 Ibs/1000 gal.
1407.0 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Clay) 2J2110C.

SFP-08-00 FRI 11:13 AM BROWN'S OF GAROLINA! FAX NO. 2961333
P. 07
It. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM
STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 130C #35
line m = 1407.0 lb PAN
2.
Structure: ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structum ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Stweturo ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structum ID:
line m =
lb PAN
C.
Structure; ID:
fine m =
lb PAN
n.tinesl+2+3+4+S+6= 1407.0lbPAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT'LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
a. tract f
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s_ iemaiNng IRR-
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD lebs.)
coiwnn r: s
u. application window'
372
1
Soybeans
13.30
63.00
837.9
June -Sept.
372
.� ..,�. 2
Soybeans
14.10
82.00
11 S6.2
June -Sept.
372
3
Soybeans
14.10
113.00
1S93.3
June -Sept.
372
4
Soybeans
30.50
103.00
3141.5
June --Se .
372
5
Soybeans
10.60
67.00
710.2
June -
372
6
Soybeans
4.10
127.00
S20.7
June -Sept.
372
7
Soybeans
4.30
132.00
567.6
June -Sept.
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 8527.4 Ib. PAN
IV. FACIL17Y'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total FAN to be land applied (line n from section It) = 1407.0 lb. PAN
PoA (30 D yy) 2%21 /00

SFP-08-00 FR I 11:13 AM BROWN'S OF CAROL I IAA! FAX NO. 2961333 P. 08
x. Crop'�s remaining PAN balance (line v from section pl) = 8527. lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -7120 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. if line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
anolher permitted N, ciiity, provide information regarding the head population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation e(
and field cc
PoA (30 Day) 7121 /00

MIA
---mzs4
.-Ai,w ,
I
4 1!-
"
;
-
At14
fln Y.
v1"
W
Z
Ire, I
,g
I C � -P-, , _
N,
;F.
'A t.7V-4:
�Av !o�
5
Oil
MY
IRV
r
W,�
Y ran:
4
7110�0 �IQN
IDIOM
two N Un
•!
''AI y
-R
,0
N'
p,
*1
tCta1Nog
IF
40
.4.W
•
Z5
off?
I TNT
X.-
7-
song,
0.
*9
" 4-1
-
"'MSA
nTwoai
j
4
WS
SI
MOM
n41n
i. Y-
�m vv
4?l
m
IS, 1�
I;
il e
�rd71(
Or
NZ
V "t,
MAI
A
qC:
-04
b I
quo
-017
Y 1,
� ;�
A
a
a,
INV
4e
..
rr , s .
::�� yoll
t�y�`
1A avi'
S4
,
ASW

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 6, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7000 0600 0023 4229 8797
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Gus Simmons
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
IT • •
��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
Brown's of Carolina # 35
Facility Number: 71-51
Pender County
Dear Mr. Simmons:
This is to notify Brown's of Carolina, Inc., who holds Certificate of Coverage
AWS710051 under Swine Waste General Permit AWG100000 issued pursuant to North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1, of violations of the General Permit.
On August 28, 2000, Mr. Stonewall Mathis of the Wilmington Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality inspected the referenced animal operation and the animal waste
management system serving this operation. During the inspection, Mr. Mathis observed that the
freeboard in the lagoon was seventeen and one half (17.5) inches. This is a violation of Part V.
General Conditions, Section 3 of the General Permit which requires -that the operating level of
Iago ons must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain at a minimum .a 25
year, 24 hour storm event, chronic rainfall, plus an additional 1 foot of freeboard (at least 19
inches for the referenced facility).
In an inspection performed by Mr. Mathis on August 24, 2000 as well as in tile inspection
performed on August 28, 2000, it was indicated that waste application equipment is shared
between this facility and others. As indicated in the inspection reports, this may not be adequate
when considering the noncompliant freeboard that has resulted. It is understood that additional
equipment has been purchased to be used at the referenced facility. Please verify whether this is
the case in your response.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 'telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Gus Simmons
Brown's of Carolina
September 6, 2000
Pa6e Two
In addition, during the August 24, 2000 inspection, Mr. Mathis observed the following:
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) overapplication has occurred on the 1999-2000
wheat crop. The Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) allows
1241bs PAN/acre on wheat on Field 4 Hydrants 913 and 1 OB; PAN was applied at
140 lbs/acre and 143 lbs/acre on these land application sites respectively. These
are violations of Part I. Performance Standards, Section 2 of the General Permit
which incorporates the CAWMP into the General Permit and specifies that any
violation of the CAWMP shall be considered a violation of the General Permit.
Application events exceeding 1 in/acre have occurred. This is a violation of Part
I(2); the CAWMP requires that a maximum of 1 in/acre may be applied during
any given application.
Low wet areas in the land application fields need improvement. This is a
violation of Part 11. Operation and Maintenance Requirements, Section 1 of the
General Permit which requires that the land application sites be properly
maintained and operated at all times.
Please submit a Plan of Action which addresses the noted violations. The Plan of Action
should include a list of any and.all modifications that have been and will be implemented to
correct and prevent the recurrence of the noted violations. The written Plan of Action must be
submitted to this office within ten days of receipt of this notice.
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to
the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These violations
may result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for reasonable costs of the
investigation in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). If.you have an
explanation for these violations that you wish to present, please submit your written response
along with the Plan of Action. Your response will be forwarded to the Director along with the
enforcement package for his consideration.
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in these matters
including assessment of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation.

Mr. Gus Simmons
Brown's of Carolina. Inc.
September 6, 2000
Paae Three
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to_ call Mr.
Stonewall Mathis at 910-395-3900 ext. 203 or Mr. Steve Lewis at 919-733-5083 ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Jason Turner, Pender County Soil and Water Conservation
Harry Lewis, Pender County Health Department
Central Files
Wilmington Files
S:lWQS1ANIMALSIPENDER12000171-51novrfe

State of forth Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 6, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL 4 7000 0600 0023 4229 8797
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Gus Simmons
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
NCDENR
NORTH GAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURGEs
Subject: Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
Brown's of Carolina 4 35
Facility Number: 71-51
Pender County
Dear Mr. Simmons:
This is to notify Brown's of Carolina, Inc., who holds Certificate of Coverage
AWS710051 under Swine Waste General Permit AWG100000 issued pursuant to North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1, of violations of the General Permit.
On August 28, 2000, Mr. Stonewall Mathis of the Wilmington Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality inspected the referenced animal operation and the animal waste
management system serving this operation. During the inspection, Mr. Mathis observed that the
freeboard in the lagoon was seventeen and one half (17.5) inches. This is a violation of Part V.
General Conditions, Section 3 of the General Permit which requires that the operating level of
lagoons must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain at a minimum a 25
year,'24 hour storm -event, chronic rainfall, plus an additional 1 foot of freeboard (at least 19
inches for the referenced facility).
In an inspection performed by Mr. Mathis on August 24,.2000 as well as in the inspection
performed on August 28, 2000, it was indicated that waste application equipment is shared
between this facility and others. As indicated in the.inspection reports, this may not be adequate
when considering the noncompliant freeboard that has resulted. It is understood that additional
equipment has been purchased to be used at the referenced facility. Please verify whether this is
the case in your response.
127 }North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 "telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

U.S. Postal Service
CERTIFIED
MAIL
(DomesticEG
.
,
4�
117
tiPostage
$ 3�3
[lJ
�-
Certified Fee
m
Return Recelpt Fee
��
rU
{Endorsement Required)
r•
C3
E�
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
M
Total Postage & Fees
$ C,
.0
3 lease n!//
t Cle to be completed by mailer)
�vs
M •S t A-pf. N r Pp Box
o - xg7
a
t."t Ursw..0 /J Z 243 CL8
!PS Form 3800,
c�'�N 28Q
O�
Po tmark
j Q .

Mr: Gus Simmons
Brown's of Carolina
September 6, 2000
Pate Two
In addition, during the August 24, 2000 inspection, Mr. Mathis observed the following:
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) overapplication has occurred on the 1999-2000
wheat crop. The Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) allows
124 lbs PAN/acre on wheat on Field 4 Hydrants 9B and 1 OB; PAN was applied at
140 ibs/acre and 143 lbs/acre on these land application sites respectively. These
are violations of Part I. Performance Standards, Section 2 of the General Permit
which incorporates the CAWMP into the General Permit and specifies that any
violation of the CAWMP shall be considered a violation of the General Permit.
Application events exceeding 1 in/acre have occurred. This is a violation of Part
1(2); the CAWMP requires thata maximum of 1 in/acre may be applied during
any given application.
Low wet areas in the land application fields need improvement. This is a
violation of Part II. Operation and Maintenance Requirements, Section 1 of the
General Permit which requires that the land application sites be properly
maintained and operated at all times.
Please submit a PIan of Action which addresses the noted violations. The Plan of Action
should include a list of any and all modifications that have been and will be implemented to
correct and prevent the recurrence of the noted violations. The written Plan of Action must be
submitted to this office within ten days of receipt of this notice.
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to
the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the above noted violations. These violations
may result in civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in accordance with North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2). You may also be assessed for reasonable costs of the
investigation'in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9). If you have an
explanation for these violations that you wish to present, please submit your written response
along with the Plan of Action. Your response will be forwarded to the Director along with the
enforcement package for his consideration. _
Be advised that the Division of Water Quality may take further action in these matters
including assessment of civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit revocation.

Mr. G,us.Sknmons
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
September 6, 2000
Page Three
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to. call Mr.
Stonewall Mathis at 910-395-3900 ext. 203 or Mr. Steve Lewis at 919-733-5083 ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Jason Turner, Pender County Soil and Water Conservation
Harry Lewis, Pender County Health Department
Central Files
Wilmington Files
S:IWQSIANEV ALSIPENDER12000171-51novrfe

' AUG-29-00 TUE 11:13 AM BROWN'S OF CAROL I NA! FAX NO. 2961333 P. 01
■
-�' BROWN'S »H�East
Box 487
OF CAROLINA 91D298=NOD &-,g& 7
-800871-W26
910.2%-Sl W — Fax
Fax �t
Front
Phonw, Data: l Q
CC:
r-7 urgoobt ❑ For Review ❑ Please, Comment ❑ Pleaso Reply D Please Rode
e Eom�nenia,;

`Z 312 648 691
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for Intemalional Mail See reverse
Stye 6 Number
P office, Code ^C
�j
Postage
$ 3
Certified Fee
3
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Ln
R Showing to
red
1 J
R Wlnm,
ate, ,
TAage
tm
0
L
to
USA

AUG-29-00 TUE 11:13 AM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO. 2961333
P. 02
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I, TOT^11, L PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1, Structure Nalric/Identifier (ID): 100C #35
2_ CUrrcnt liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c_ line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 124416 ftz
e. line ell x line d x 7.48 gallons/Ft3 77553 gallons
3. Projected volorne of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 153343 ft3
h. current herd # F-1-2-0-01 certified heal # 1200
actual waste produced = current herd
# x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k_ (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated _ 7/21/00
rn. ((lines e * k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION -I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on tine next Structure tab shown below)
153343 ft3
t) ft3
75075 ft3
284761 gallons
1.70 Ibs/1000 gal.
615,9 Ibs. PAN
PoA (30 ©8y) 2/21/00

AUG-29-00 TUE 11.14 AM BROWN'S OF CAROLINAt FAX NO. 2961333
P. 03
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDtOR 25 YRJ24
FIR. STORM
STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE
STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 130C #35
tine m = 615.9 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
3.
Structura 1D:
line m =
-lb PAN
r.
Giructura ID:
fine rn =
lb PAN
5.
Structura ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
G.
Skructur-2 ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
in. lines +2+3+4+5+6= 615.9lbPAN
III, TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CHOPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIEL13S TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
O_ tract �
p. field #
q. crap
r. acres
s. remaining IRR-
2 PAN balance
(lblacre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (ibs.)
column r x s
U. application window'
372.
1
Soybeans
13.30
63.00
837.9
June-Sept.-
372
_
2
Soybeans
14.10
82.00
1156.2
June -Sept.
t 372
3
Soybeans
14.10
113.00
1593.3
June -Sept.
Soybeans
30.50
103.00
3141.5
June -Se t.
372
- T 5
Soybeans
Soybeans
10.60
4.10
67,00
127.00
710.2
520.7
June -Sept,
June-Seli
372
6
372
7
Soybeans
4.30
132.00
567.6
June -Sept.
'State c.urrint crop ending application elate or next crop application beginning date for available
receivini:t r rop7; dirir J 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PA. -NJ available for all fields (sum of column t) = 8527.4 lb_ PAN
IV. FACiLIIY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (litre n from section I1) = 615.9 lb. PAN
POA (30 Day) 2121100

AUG-29-00 TUE 11:15 Aft BROWN'S OF CAROL INA! FAX NO, 2961333 P. 04
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = $527.4 Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = 7911 lb. PAN
Rile y musl show a s —ad' of icit. If line y does not snow as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
baSc,d on new Information_ If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
relds to the PAN balance table and recalculate'the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
anoiher pennfitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
rceivi?
Irrigaiio;) equ?
and ficid cand
POA (30 D iy) 212110Ci

SEP-11-00 MON 04:56 PM BROWN'S OF CAROLINA! FAX NO. 2961333 P. 01
BROWN`
ofCAROLINA�-
Fc*ix
Ta: 1 it . 'l '1
SEP z zoQo
?,-s1
From
785 K" 24 East
PO Bax 487
Mmaw. NC 2839a4W
9i a298.1800
1-800.871-SM
910-29"166 — Fax
Fwa l " am- Pages: i
Phone: bate: \�~Q
Re: cc:
0 Urgent ❑ For Review 0 Please Conment 0 Pismo Reply 0 Please Rocyele
e coma dont8:
September 6, 2000
Subject: Lagoon Levels Update
The following lagoon is no longer within the 19" of freeboard as of September 11, 2000.
Farm # 35 19"
Gus Simmons 910-296-1800 (Office)
Glenn Davis 910-296-1800 (Office)
910-290-0366 (Mobile)

!`r Sr.r-Ub-M WEV u4: 41 rrl tiKUWI ` 5 Ur l:Al{U! 1NH?
o�
r�
r
BROWN'S
�. QF C! LIIVA
r 8x NU, Z5UI JJJ
7I-si
785 Hwy 24 East
PO Box 487
Warsaw, Ne 283W-0497
910-296-IBM
1-000-871-=0
910-23"1 B8 - Fax
From
rpc ` Pages:
h one; Date:
% CC:
El Urgan 11 For R"ew ❑ Please Carnment © Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
September 6, 2000
SUbject , t_a000n Levels Update
The r'c!!cwing lagoon is within the 19' of freeboard as of September 5, 2000.
Farm # 35 12" Plan of Action 8/29/00
Farm # 90 18"
Cur pi-,n of act:en is to apply land applications as soon as the rains subside and the
f7alds are nc, longer saturated. Please call if you wish to discuss these lagoons or the
octions underway to alleviate this high level.
Gus 5 rnino is 910-296-1800 (Office)
G!ern Davis 910-296-1800 (Office) 910-290-0366 (Mobile)
P. U1

SEP-19-00 TUE 04:23 PM
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA!
FAX NO. 2961333
P. 01
FaX
FAM Cx
iOOWN'S
F CAROLINA
785 Hwy 24 Fast
PO Boot 487
Warsaw. MC 283W0497
91 a29&i OW
1-8048714i26
91 0-2966186 — Frig
Mon= mtm `�N-. \1V Q
Ro:
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review E3 Please Commoat D Please Reply ❑ Please ReCyNe
• Gornmentm

SEP-19-00 TUE 04!23 PM BROWN'S OF CAROLIIAA± FAX NO, 2961333 P. 02
ROW N3
OF CAROLINA
Sc-ple, ❑ber 19, 2000
Mr. Rick Shiver
Wafter Quality Regional Supervisor
N C Dept. of Euviranincnt and Natural Resources
127 Nardi Cardimil Dr,
Wilmington, NC 28405
DC—ir Mr. Shi ver,
This later is in response to the Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement letter
for BOC #35 datul September 6, 2000. 7iie following will serve as both a Plan of Action and an
crplarrition fir the noted violations.
On Jmgust 24, 2000 Mr. Mathis performed an inspection at the above mentioned farm. At that
time, tlhc only ixhtractions to be found were the two PAN over applications that occurred on the 1999-2000
wheat creep hrcd a couple of application events 1kit exree" l "Ac/mrhl. The amounts of PAN over
appliG:laons mere 16 and 19 Ibslac respeciivcly. These overages were due to Brown's of Carolina staff
in-,inag ng the excessive amounts of water received from the hurricanes and the extremely wet winter that
follower is The must environmentally sound inaimer possible. Thai is, irrigation events were made on the
"higlhest" and "driest" application sires to avoid runoff or discharges.
In re:,aards to the applications exceeding 1 Vaclevent, the ring size in the gun on the traveler has
bc.n clanged to tlio smaller Sine and the travel speed iris been increased. This will not only decrease the
flow mzc, but .ilso decraase Ilhc total applicatlon amount per event.
As fcr [lie "low wet am s" in the application Fields, plans for re -grading and rye-skaping these
areas %ere discussed with Mr. Mathis al the time of inspection. Mr. Mathis was informed that as soon as
Ilie coelrlctor completed [Tic grading work at another BOC farm, he would be starting at this ratan. The
wct we,a lker a:id field conditions are currently delaying the start of this project.
Also, during lids inspection, as well as the following inspection perforned on August 29, 2000,
much dismission occurred in ri.ference: to the availability of irrigation equipment and labor at this faun. It
W.Is Stetted than. cquipuzent and labor was shared between this facility and others. However, just because
q uipm ,w anti labor is shared between facilities does not mean tivit (here is inadequate equipmeEt and
labor to melnage tltcsc facilities.
'rhe i aspeaion on August 28, 2000 was an unscheduled inspection by Mr. Mathis to observe alit
effects C+f 0)a riin events that occurred after the inspection on August 24, 2000. At Ibis time the frecboird
i n the Lagoon lead risen to 17.5" and Mr. Mathis called to let me know of his observation and that a Notice
of Violation would be Sent, lmntedkitely niter receiving this inronnation a 30 Day Plan of Action was sent
to [lee Wilmington Regional ice. Upon investilpition into why the lagoon had risen so fast, it was
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA. INC.
78:i f fM 24 EAST - PRO. BOX 487 - WARSAW, N.C. 23308 - PI IONS (910) 29tt-1800

SEP-19-00 TUE 04: 23 PM BROWN'S OF CAROL I NA! FAX NO. 2961333 P. 03
rliticovercd that there was a problem with fresh water usage inside the barns. This problem has been fted
and new water mciers have been installed to better manage the water uk%W at this fang.
The problem wish fresh water and the rains that followed the previous inspection caused the
Iagooa Ievel to rise into the noncompliant frooboard stage, not an inadequge supply of irrigation
equipment and labor, as Mr. Mathis would like for you to believe. It is coincidental that these dings
occurred simuIlancously, thus appearing I give credibility to Mr. Malhis's statement about inadequate
cquipur+cr t. Although this facility is currently being considered for a solid set irrigation system4 additional
travelam have bcA n purchased ttnd are available for use at this facility.
Brown's of Carolina recognizes that the over applications and high frmuboard are noncompliant
with IN, permi.t. However, 130C staft'have continued to manage the cacess water from nature and from
mcchatuical pmblcros without failure of tlic structure, runoff or discharge. Since no meastuable harm to
the environment has occurred, no enforcement action should be talren
If you have any questions or need additional information concerning this matter, please do not
lx.kisate io call me at [phone] cxt. 238.
Sinmely,
Kevin Weston
Environmental Compliance
MarIager
cc: Grq, Brown
Cats Sinlimons

r7 _ 5- �ECEIVEID
JUN 2 6 2000
June 16, 2000
Dear Rick Shiver:
The purpose of this letter is to notify DWQ regarding specific PAN
application rates associated with the unprecedented rainfall events of last
summer and early fall. We now have completed a review of this issue by
_____________ examining the_ CAWMP' s_ and _associate_ d land_ application records . for _ all
company owned farms. Based on that review, no land application records
have been changed, but we have corrected all of our computer printouts to
reflect actual pounds of PAN as applied, without any "rollover" into
subsequent crop periods. Attached is a list of all hydrants on our company
owned farms that operate within the Wilmington Regional Office.
This means that our records accurately show a number of instances
where land application practices were carried out in excess of specified
PAN rates in order to preserve lagoon integrity and properly manage water
levels that occurred as a result of multiple rainfall events in excess of
the regulatory 25-year, 24-hour storm event. In carrying out land
application practices last fall and winter, and on into the spring of this
year, all practicable measures were taken to minimize and prevent over -
application of PAN, and to prevent surface water runoff. Our consistent
policy was to use the "highest and driest" fields to draw down high lagoon
levels that were caused by the unprecedented string of rains we had in
excess of the 25-year, 24-hour storm level.
Company farm lagoon levels before these storms generally were in very
good shape, thus documenting good farm management and winter season
preparedness. In addition to initial land application practices designed
to protect lagoon integrity, much of the excess water volumes that resulted
from these multiple storms in excess of the 25-year, 24-hour storm level
remained in lagoons throughout the winter of 1999 and into the spring of
this year. We ask that DWQ take these factors into account and determine
that, where farms properly had prepared last summer, that no enforcement
action be taken for excess PAN applications made as a result of these
storms.
Should you have any questions or desire to meet to discuss the
information in this letter, please give me a call.
offs Simmons
Director of
Environmental Affairs &
Engineering Services
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST • P.O. BOX 487 • WARSAW, N.C. 28398 • PHONE [phone]
* ry _ YtJiJ :� wf

1999/2000 Winter Hydrants Pumped Out
Farm Hydrants Crop Amount over pumped PAN Goal
1,2
02
RYE
3.19
100
:
13
RYE
113.95
100
14
RYE
73.43
100
15
RYE
47.89
100
3A
01
WHEAT
66.43
112
02
WHEAT
17.66
112
WHEAT__
17.19
124
08A
WHEAT - { ' -
-- --
- 13.19
--- -
124 T - -
08B
WHEAT
31.14
124
12
03B
RYE
0.06
100
05A
RYE
14.02
100
O5B
RYE
55.28
100
06A
RYE
130.26
100
06B
RYE
74.31
100
17
01
SG GRAZED
1.12
50
02
SG GRAZED
0.22
50
04
SG GRAZED
67.07
50
05
SG GRAZED
72.61
50
07
SG GRAZED
2.27
50
09
SG GRAZED
101.34
50
10
SG GRAZED
65.53
50
13
SG GRAZED
28.94
50
16
SG GRAZED
1.22
55
17
SG GRAZED
2.95
55
20
SG GRAZED
58.55
55
21
SG GRAZED
33.06
55
17
23
SG GRAZED
109.68
55
24
SG GRAZED
21.91
55
25
SG GRAZED
39.79
55
26
SG GRAZED
10.33
50
27
SG GRAZED
6.85
50
28B
SG GRAZED
208.81
50
29
SG GRAZED
41.88
50
35
09B
WHEAT
16.39
124
10B
WHEAT
19.85
124
SH
03B
WHEAT
1.82
100
Wilmington Region
S

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
NCDENVI
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
!�
NoR-rH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
April 13, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL # P 328 829 374
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jimmy Vinson
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
BOC Farm # 35
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
BOC Farm # 35
Facility Number: 71-51
Pender County
Dear Mr. Vinson:
This is to notify Brown's of Carolina, Inc., who holds a non -discharge permit for an animal waste
disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0200 and North Carolina G.S. 143.215.1, of a deficiency of
Animal Waste Permit AWS 710051.
On January 31, 2000, it was reported by your facility that the freeboard level in your lagoon was not
in compliance with a level of 17 inches. Therefore, this notice is being sent in accordance with the Division
of Water Quality's (DWQ) high freeboard policy.
You should have submitted a Plan of Action to obtain compliance within a stipulated time frame
depending on your lagoon level. The following procedure is to be implemented whenever the freeboard
level in any lagoon is not in compliance:
1. Notify DWQ Wilmington Regional Office within 24 hours
2. Submit appropriate Plan of Action documents obtained from DWQ, Soil & Water district
office, or Service Company
3. Provide DWQ Regional Office with weekly updates
4. Notify DWQ Regional Office when compliance is attained.
It is highly recommended that this facility: 1) explores and initiates measures to conserve fresh
water usage and 2) make any necessary changes to the waste management system and/or waste
utilization plan to help maintain appropriate lagoon levels.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
71
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recvcled110%. post -consumer paper

`^ 4 P. 328- 829 374
i Receipt for
Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided
Mr. Jimmy Vinson
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Postage
y
yy"
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing
i7
O�
to Whom & Date D
m
Return Race ham,
e
3
Date, and A re . s dres
TOTAL Po age . s
C
& Fees
Q
Postmark r D to f�
M
E
0`
N rJ �

Mr. Jimmy Vinson
April 13, 2000
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality will take no further action for this reported incident at this time.
DWQ may pursue additional actions including civil penalties, injunctive relief, or revocation of your
Animal Waste Permit AWS 710051 for future occurrences..
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either Mr.
Stonewall Mathis or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dean Nunkele
Environmental Specialist
cc: Jason Turner, Pender County Soil and Water Conservation
DWQ Non -Discharge Operations Branch File
DWQ Wilmington Animal Files 71-51
S:1WQSIANIMALSIPENDER12000171-51 BOC 35 NOD.wpd

FEB' 8-00 TUE 11:47 AM BROWN 5 FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 2
kI-­11
BROW N's
OF CAROLINA
To : DEHNR —Wilmington Region
From: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Subject: Lagoon Levels Update
February 7, 2000
The following lagoons were less 6n 19' at bf FAUN 1, 2000.
Farm
#
1 J
1Y
Farm
Farm
#
#
2
3S ✓
15"
14" --=3�, rj 1-51
Farm
#
3 ✓
1g', 3I_3gS
Farm
#
4 /
17"
Farm
Farm
#
207 13° -=A
17 V16"
#
finisher
✓
Farm
#
17 sow
14"
Pleasa call If you wish to discuss these lagoons or the actions underway to alleviate
these high levels.
Jimmy Vinson 910-296-1800 (Office) 910-290-4469 (Mobile)
Glenn Davis 910-296-1800 (Office) 910-290-0366 (Mobile)
BROWN'S OF CAROUNA_ INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST . P.O. BOX 487 - WARSAW, N.C. 28398 - PHONE [phone]

FFR-1F5-00 TUE 11:46 AM BROWN S FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 1

FEB-22-00 TUE 6:11 PM BROWN S FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 1
w...a.•-r•rw.a•:..r...._.n.�.,,.r,...�.,.u,�i:-�r.r.�.:��vaer>a-�_a�-:ac^..ac-^rtc.[:x�sa.o.�C�r�Ti�7�'FS3YYl�^'l_: �L -•.r.�__=1:.' .•�L�L_�:IJ.:t':r ,- •;�L..rr_a.
e
■ ,
r
- . Feburary 21, 2000 - - - - - - - - - -
To : Greer McVicker
From: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Subject: Lagoon Levels Update
The following lagoon were less than 19' as of Feburary 19, 2000.
I,- S LA Farm # 1 15•
�1-3 `+ T Farm # 3 is-
4 Farm # 17F
80
/
Fans # 17S
l—g6Q Farm # 20
14"
IT
Farm # 34
17`
Y
Farm # 35
16-
Farm # 90
1 W
Please call N you wish to discuss these lagoons or the actions underway to alleviate
these h1h levels.
Jimmy Vinson 910-2W1800 (Office) 910-290-4469 (Mobile)
Glenn Davis 910.298-1800 (Office) 910-290-0366 (Mobile)
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA. INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST • P.O. BOX 457 • WARSAW. N.C. 25398 • PH0N£ (910) 29&1800

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 15, 2000
• T_v17E QED MAIL # Z_ 153.115 9_=
lRE�T � . RECEIP�TIiRE � .UES�T+ED
Mr. Gus Simmons
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Brown's of Carolina # 35
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
M4
•
A&.V
f
2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsoURCE5
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Brown's of Carolina # 35
Facility Number: 71-51
Pender County
Dear Mr. Simmons:
This is to notify Brown's of Carolina, Inc., who holds Certificate of Coverage AWS710051
under Swine Waste General Permit AWG100000 issued pursuant to North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1, of a deficiency of the General Permit.
On May 2, 2000, it was reported by your facility that the freeboard level in your lagoon was
not in compliance with a level of 17 inches. Therefore, this notice is being sent in accordance with
the Division of Water Quality's (DWQ) high freeboard policy.
You should have submitted a Plan of Action to obtain compliance within a stipulated
time frame depending on your lagoon level. The following procedure is to be implemented
whenever the freeboard level in any lagoon is not in compliance:
1. Notify DWQ Wilmington Regional Office within 24 hours
2. Submit appropriate Plan of Action documents obtained from DWQ
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

/ 9
Z 153 115 f�l.932
4�,US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mai!
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail See reve►se
Sent t /r M
St d Number
+,
t
Post office, StateZlP Cqd�
Stk3
.53
Certified Fee
!�d
Specie! Delivery Fee
Restricted Dar 4
Retum Recei p to
�Ay 4
Whom & Da red
.0
RBhim to
Data, d B5$
0
TOTAL I,I es
$
.ig
Postmark or D Q
O MC,
0
u.
a

Mr. Gus Simmons
June 15, 2000
Page Two
3. Provide DWQ Regional Office with weekly updates
4. Notify DWQ Regional Office when compliance is attained.
It is highly recommended that this facility: 1) explores and initiates measures to conserve
fresh water usage and 2) make any necessary changes to the animal waste management system
and/or animal waste management plan to maintain appropriate lagoon levels.
DWQ. may pursue actions including civil penalties, injunctive relief, and permit
revocation for future occurrences.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Engineer
cc: Jason Turner, Pender County Soil and Water Conservation
Central Files
��=Vir•
�
S:\WQS\ANIMALS\PENDER\2000\71-51BOC35NOD2.wpd

MAY— B-GO MON 10: 37 AM BROWN S — --.----FAX 1d0. . 91.02961675 P. 1
to no A €ig
PO Box 487
Warsaw; NC 28396-04e7
Voke:(910)298`1B00
Fax: (910) 29"168
Fewix
BROWN 8
OF GAROLINA
Phan Data
Rm CCs
0 Urgent M For Review 0 Please Comment 17 Please Reply
i t"
Cl Please Recycle
1
a Page 1

MAY-.8-00 MOH 10:37 AM BROWN S
FAX NO, 9102961675 P. 2
.::r
May 8, 20M
To: DEHNR —Wilmington Region
From: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Subject : Lagoon Levels Update
The following lagoon is no longer within the 19* freeboard as of May 6, 2000.
Farm # 35
Gus -Simmons 910-29&1800 (Office)
Glenn Davis 910-296.1600 (Office) 910-290-0366 (Mobile)
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA. INC.
785HWY 24 FAST • P.O. BOX 487 - WARSAW. N.G. 28398 • PHONE [phone]

MAY- 2-00 TUE 4:59 PM BROWN S
FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 1
71 -51
66 Hwy 24 EW
Po Boar 487
Warsaw, NC 263864W
Volta: [phone]
F= (910) 29"160
FaX
Pa w
BROWN'S
OF GAROLINA
Phone Cates
Ra: M.
© Ur+awd ❑ For NoWsw ❑ Please Comment 0 Please Reply
❑ Please Recycle
r
f
0 Page 1

MAY- 2-00
TUE
4:59 PM
BROWN S
FAX
NO,
9102961675
P.
2
aas..�.4':[Zi�4:�..tiw.Xfi4.�::-
F+.Mi:a�-..:Q:a.*..�:.c':4L.Z•'.}G:�=:.1.'3^?:!'SS.�__.--Y-'�?'�.
^'Y�� .�y"..'.L�:'_���i'4
��." - •S�[._ _
_ :GJ'w..i:
�'�'.-•Ms+�e=nnYs.�
To: DEHNR — Wilmington Region
F m *F Pr9wn't qf WON, Inc,
Subject: Lagoon Levels Update
May 2. 2000
The following lagoon was less than 190 as of April 29, 2000.
Farm # 35 17"
Please call if you wish to discuss these lagoons or the actions underway to alleviate
these high levels.
Gus Simmons 910-296-1800 (Office)
Glenn Davis 910-29&1600 (Office)
91 Q290-0365 (Mobile)
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST - P.O. BOX 487 . WARSAW. N.G. 28398 - PHONE [phone]

APR,-10-00 MON 9:38 AM BROWN S FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 4
W:..::c.iy;:._1:_sa+t++.:t.�._.�.rre'.✓.�.v-.�':r�aa:..}s�3'.:---:_rs c7�z'N:��--� ��^raauz•�croes-.nr:-: _�%^.�..... :.-;�75: ¢t._.c......:s-:r. Y.:�':: �:r_"_'•--..,_-..cs.+: «:.wx:sa:�--a:-r _.:c
BROWN'S
OF CAROLINA
Running Lagoon
Perm Name_ 35
Date Lagoon LeVel
Level & Rainfall Report
Ralnfall(incheS
10/9199 16
0.9
10123/99 14
0.3
l
` 5 `
1 U/30V99 14
O
1 1/6/99 13
1.3
1 )/ 13/99 17
0
1 1 /20/999 13
O
1 1 /27/99 8
t .22
12/4/99 19
0
12/ 1 1 /99 19
0.3
12/18I99 16
1
12/25/99 17
0.5
Monday. APM t o. 2000 page 3

APR-10-00-MOH 9.:.36_AM _ BROWK_S FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 5
BROWN'R Running Lagoon Level & Rainfall Report
OF CAROLINA1 Mrm Name: 35
Date Lagoon Level Rainfall(inches
1/1/00
20
0.3
11900
29
0.4
1 / 1 &00
24
0.5
1 /22100
23
0.5
1 /29100
17
1.4
2/5100
14
1.3
2/ 12100
13
O
2/ 19100
16
0.8
2126/00
20
0
3/ 1 1 /00
27
0
3/ 1 B/)0
22
4
3/25100
19
0.7
4/ 1 /00
is
0.4
Monday, April 10, 2000 Inge a

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed
Farm Emergency Call Form
Farm Number
Farm Name 113rown's of Carolina # 35
Owner Frist Name F
Owner Last Name 113rown's of Carolina, Inc.
I* eporting 0 Uomplaint
Source Eimmy Vinson
Breached
Depopulated
Overflowed
LQ Issue
Perm issionToPu m p
Inudated
Flooded
Pumping Equipment
Comments
Date ji 131/2000
Time I
Call Number V45
jo Yes o p Freeboard Level 1 117
10 Yes 0 O Freeboard Level 2
10 Yes 0 O Freeboard Level 3
10 Yes 0 OFreeboard Level 4
10 Yes 0 O
Freeboard Level 5
L(:�Yes 0!=
Freeboard Level 6
10 Yes 0
10 Yes 0
%51onewalL.Maff Fs-U.o-k..Uie..call-.o.-n7M/ZUUL)..ancl..entered..into..clatab.ase..on.2t2j2i).U.Q� ....
.............. I ................................................................................................................................................................................... -, ............................. I
.I......".1 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................... I ..................................................................................................... I ............................................................. I
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
" ... I ........................... I ........................................................................................... I ............................................... I ............................................
.................................................................................................................... --.. .......................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................ I ..........................................................................
........... I ........................................................................................ I ..............................................................................................................................
................................................................................................. I .......................... ................................................................................................
............................................................ I ...................................... I ...............................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................
....................................... I .................................................................................................................................. I .................................................
........................... ................................... I ............................................................................................................................................................ I
...... I ................................................................................................................................................................... I .........................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
I .................................................................................................................................................................... I ........................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
- ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................. I
............................................ I ................................................. I ............................ -, .....................................................................................................
................................. I ......................... I .......................... I ............................................................................................................................................

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment �T�
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality JAN 0 3 2000
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor By:
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
BrownOs of Carolina # 35
PO Box 487
Wallace NC 28398
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
K 4
00 2
@Lff
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 71-51
Pender County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY], DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance,inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do.not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

OW
004: RI'lip. LSEP2 p Cuuu
September 19, 2000
Mr. Rick Shiver
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
N C Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
127 North Cardinal Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Shiver,
This letter is in response to the Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement letter
for BOC #35 dated September 6, 2000. The following will serve as both a Plan of Action and an
explanation for the noted violations.
On August 24, 2000 Mr. Mathis performed an inspection at the above mentioned farm. At that
time, the only infractions to be found were the two PAN over applications that occurred on the 1999-2000
wheat crop and a couple of application events that exceeded 1 "/ac/event. The amounts of PAN over
applications were 16 and 191bs/ac respectively. These overages were due to Brown's of Carolina staff
managing the excessive amounts of water received from the hurricanes and the extremely wet winter that
followed in the most environmentally sound manner possible. That is, irrigation events were made on the
"highest" and "driest" application sites to avoid runoff or discharges.
In regards to the applications exceeding 1 "/actevent, the ring size in the gun on the traveler has
been changed to the smaller size and the travel speed has been increased. This will not only decrease the
flow rate, but also decrease the total application amount per event.
As for the "low wet areas" in the application fields, plans for re -grading and re -shaping these
areas were discussed with Mr. Mathis at the time of inspection. Mr. Mathis was informed that as soon as
the contractor completed the grading work at another BOC farm, he would be starting at this farm. The
wet weather and field conditions are currently delaying the start of this project.
Also, during this inspection, as well as the following inspection performed on August 28, 2000,
much discussion occurred in reference to the availability of irrigation equipment and labor at this farm. It
was stated that equipment and labor was shared between this facility and others. However, just because
equipment and labor is shared between facilities does not mean that there is inadequate equipment and
labor to manage these facilities.
The inspection on August 28, 2000 was an unscheduled inspection by Mr. Mathis to observe the
effects of the rain events that occurred after the inspection on August 24, 2000. At this time the freeboard
in the lagoon had risen to 17.5" and Mr. Mathis called to let me know of his observation and that a Notice
of Violation would be sent. Immediately after receiving this information a 30 Day Plan of Action was sent
to the Wilmington Regional Office. Upon investigation into why the lagoon had risen so fast, it was
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
785 HWY 24 EAST - P.O. SOX 487 - WARSAW, N.C. 28398 - PHONE [phone]

discovered that there was a problem with fresh water usage inside the barns. This problem has been fixed
and new water meters have been installed to better manage the water usage at this farm.
The problem with fresh water and the rains that followed the previous inspection caused the
lagoon level to rise into the noncompliant freeboard stage, not an inadequate supply of irrigation
equipment and labor, as Mr. Mathis would like for you to believe. It is coincidental that these things
occurred simultaneously, thus appearing to give credibility to Mr. Mathis's statement about inadequate
equipment. Although this facility is currently being considered for a solid set irrigation system, additional
travelers have been purchased and are available for use at this facility.
Brown's of Carolina recognizes that the over applications and high freeboard are noncompliant
with the permit. However, BOC staff have continued to manage the excess water from nature and from
mechanical problems without failure of the structure, runoff or discharge. Since no measurable harm to
the environment has occurred, no enforcement action should be taken.
If you have any questions or. need additional information concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to call me at (910) 2%-1800 ext. 238.
Sincerely,
Kevin Weston
Environmental Compliance
Manager
cc: Greg Brown
Gus Simmons

h.7 C,- cu" -fIF1 P�1?!1 � 1 � FM BROWN S
TAX NO, 919295E166
P. 1
I - OF CAROLINA
786 Hwy 24 EaO
PO Box 487
Waftew, HC =984MQ7
810-296-1800
1-800-8714�=
010.29"1 ss - Fan
VrOMQ=S� axiscilcgSt"
Phan" oaten
R.e CC:
❑ Drum R ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment C] P1?W jtpl7 ®iiom fteeyli`IR
a Canunanto
August 28, 2000
Subject: Lagoon Levels Update
The following lagoon is within the 19" of freeboard as of August 26, 2000.
Farm # 35 18,
Our plan of action is to apply land applications as soon as the rains subside and the
fields are no longer saturated. Please call if you wish to discuss these lagoons or the
actions underway to alleviate this high level.
Gus Simmons 910-296-1800 (Office)
Glenn Davis 910-296-1800 (Office) 910-290-0366 (Mobile)

State of North Carolina
t Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
BrownOs of Carolina # 35
PO Box 487
Wallace NC 28398
Dear Brown's of Carolina, Inc.:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 71-51
Pender County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
'must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere]
Kerr T. 'Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality,. .
cc: Wilmington Regional Office c,
Pender County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
Aunt 6, 1999
Certified Mail # Z 153 1,16 085
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Jimmy Vinson
Brown's of Carolina
P O Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
NCDENR
NcRTH C ARauxA �tp a:w-rff GF
FNVIRCNMENT AND NA uRAL RESCURCE5
Si • Compliance Inspe: tion Forms
Facilin, Lumbers: 31-48_ 31-398,
31-9)0. 31-401, 31 '.i6, i 1-51
Dear Mr. Vinson:
Please find enclosed the cemplianw h�`a-z. F,-r-ac from the referenced faC: s_ I was
unable to leave a coPy on site at && time of dr I am sworn' for anv inconu-enin--e this
may have caused. If you have any gn`s6cam 15imst zcr mot me ?—T [phone]. e=. 202.
��
Em-tmmwnrc-J Specialist
cc: Wilmington Files
S: tWgSIBRIANWWISClboccomiW.I� i
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington. Nior--a Ct:niima :,%.OE.': 7t!enrhvze FAX 4111-1-!, -2fM
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Acrion Eanpiiver 5 ra: d 74IM16 pest-coosumtr ya;or,

Revised April 20, 1999 -
.JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number —I I - - s1 - Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: t -�' acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative:_ -1 m��:��r Part 11 eligibility item(s) Ft F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: ex�r.
Date of site visit: S
Date of most recent WUP: J I
Annual farm PAN deficit: i4j Ro12. pounds
✓ Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this firno based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; _2: center.pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Par I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D)D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
_V"'�E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - Fi F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART I1.75% Rule.Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination requiredbecause. operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
- F1 Lack ofacreage_whicnTesuitedinmvermpplicationmfwastewater_(PAN) on:spray.
field(s) :@ccordingtolarm'sdasttwoyears nfimgaton7ecords.-.
F2 Unclear, -illegible; or lack of information/map.
F3 Obviousfield -limitations-(numerous:ditches;�ailure-:io:deductTequired .-...
buffer/setback�acreaae;-or25% offotal-acreageddentified:.in-.CAWMP..includes
small; in-egulady-shaped.fields-fields-less than-5mcres#or.travelers-or .less -than
2 acres for stationary -sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage -in excess
of 71;0/ of tho rnencr+hfln +.+n1 -- -- -- • , • • — --

' Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number.' -Ii _ 51
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER''
TYPE OF TOTAL
IRRIGATION ACRES
SYSTEM
CAWMP FIELD
ACRES %
COMMENTS3
s
lay
q,l
I
I L4-3 I
I
I 2-
_
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or.point numbers may be used in place of field numbers dependino on CAWMP
and type of irrigation'system., If pulls, etc. cross more -than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERZ - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage-exceeding`75% of its total.acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous -two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation Tecords,--cannot serve as the
sole basis -for requiring a WA Determ_inaiion__Back-up fields -must -be noted in the -comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part 1V. Pending WA Determinations -
P1 Plan -.lacks.followinginformation:
P2 Plan revision may-satisfy-75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit -and by
adjusting all field -acreage-.to below 75% use rate
P3 Offer (ie/in process of installing new irrigation system):

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 12, 1998
Mack Horrell
Horrell Farms
329 W. Stevens St.
Wallace NC 28466
MAY 1 5 1998
SUBJECT: Designation of a Certified Operator In
Horrell Farms
Facility # 71-51
Pender County_
Dear Mr. Horrell:
North Carolina General Statute 90 A-47.2 requires the owner of each animal waste
management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid
animal waste management system, to designate a properly certified operator as the
Operator in Charge (OIC). Our records indicate that the OIC you previously
designated is no longer a certified animal waste management system operator.
As the owner of a registered animal operation with an animal waste management
system, you must designate a certified animal waste management system operator as
the Operator in Charge. Enclosed is an Operator in Charge Designation Form
specifically for your facility. Please return this completed form to this office by
June 12, 1998. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as
absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for
your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge.
If you have any questions regarding the certification of an operator, or need assistance
in Iocating a certified operator in your area, please contact
Cindy Dudley with the Technical Assistance and Certification Unit at
[phone] ext. 309.
Sincerely,
opt
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
cd/Desig. of certified OIC
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
P.O.BOX 29S35, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

APP-02-98 THU 02:07 PM HORRELL F RMS 9102837440 P.01
ol
gljg e;to o7io)(o
qla -ata-- Iwo

APR—Z2-98 THU 02'09 PM HORRELL FARMS 9102837440 P.01
W f l-Al,' &I I

APR=02-98 THU 02:07 PM HORRELL FARMS 9102837440 P.02
lcl1��,P� �-Xf
JZ-
r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
March 20, 1998
Certified Mail # Z 312 648 691
Return Receipt Rgquested
Mack Horrell
Horrell Farms
321 West Stevens Street
Wallace, NC 28466
low
'. A
Ad
NCDENR
NORTH CAROtINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Horrell Farms
Facility Number: 71-51
Pender County
Dear Mr. Horrell:
On March 18, 1998, staff from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected your animal operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was observed
that the lagoon had insufficient freeboard. In addition, nitrogen was applied in excess of the
recommended rates for small grain crops in spray field #3.
The level of the waste lagoon must to be lowered and maintained in accordance with the
NRCS guidelines and the state 2H .0200 rules governing animal waste management systems.
Nitrogen should be applied at rates consistent with those listed for each in the waste utilization
plan. The narrative section of the waste utilization plan should be amended to specify which crops
are to be grown on the excess acreage of spray field #4 and the • rates at which waste is to be
applied on those'crops. Waste application on the excess acreage of field #4 should be discontinued
until the corrections are made. In addition, animal carcasses should be disposed of properly as
required by the State Office of the Veterinarian. Bare areas on the lagoon dike wall should be re-
seeded. The coastal bermuda crop in spray field #5 should be improved in the spring of 1998.
We suggest that you contact your service company, local NRCS or Soil and Water District office
for any assistance they may be able to provide to correct the situation.
To remain a deemed permitted facility, you must notify this office in writing within
fourteen (14) days of the receipt of this notice, what actions will be taken to comply with your waste
management plan. Failure to do so may result in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status,
requiring it to obtain an individual non discharge permit.
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mack Horrell
March 20, 1998
Page 2.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater
to the surface waters of the State without a permit. The Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per day per
violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, you must notify this office in writing
at the address below. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call David
Holsinger, Andy Helminger or Brian Wrenn at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Brian L. Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
cc: Marilyn Stowell, Pender County Soil and Water Conservation
Sandra Weitzel, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Jimmy Vinson, Brown's of Carolina
Operations Branch
Wilmington Files
S. lWQSlBRUNWIDEMPENDERl71-51.DEF

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mack Horrell
Mack Horrell Farm -
325 W. Stevens St.
Wallace NC 28466
Farm Number: 71-51
Dear Mack Horrell:
�r"CKI —7
SEP 0 21997
•
Y:
August 28, 1997
IDEHNF 11
You are hereby notified that Mack Horrell Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has thirty_ (30) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section
19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified
by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified
date. Your application'must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit
the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions
for each day the facility is operated following the due state of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call Mike L.ewandowski at [phone]
extension 362 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
JA. Preston Ho d, Jr., P.E. ,
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Mack Horrell
Mac_ k Horrell Farm
325 W. Stevens St.
Wallace NC 28466
Ak
�EHNR
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
. �.: Mack Horrell Farm
Facility Number 71--51
Pender County
Dear Mr. Horrell:
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997: Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form•for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed. Form to this office as soon as possible but in no cash later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet i
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29635. Is, A FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 'Wf C An Equal Opporiunity/Affirmafive Action Employer
Telephone [phone]°k recycles/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Mack Horrell
Mack Harrell Farm
325 W. Stevens St.
Wallace NC 28466
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Mack Horrell Farm
Facility ID#: 71-51
Pender County
Dear Mr. Horrell:
EDEHNR
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincere ,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, *
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611- 7687 f An Equal Opportunity/Atflrmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 1 - 50% recycled/ 1(3. post -consumer paper

41
AM3VL • WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR NEW OR EXPANDED FL7E17LOTS
Please retu-n the completed forma to the Divisiom of Eavirormeata].X=agement at
the address on the reverse aide of this fC=.
Name of farm (Please print):
Address: -- 2-5 AJ,
Ld,a&dQF, Iy•C• iLAWe-6, Phone Nj�.' Y/4 - S .� G,
90unty : !� Z, _
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:-Loyff 0`/a`.LZ a9l(required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): /%v�
Design capacity (number of animals): 1200 S o w
Average size of operation- (12 month population avg-) :12-00 SbwS_ FRSt. FG� t7e
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
=aaaaa=�saaaaaaaa3aanxaa=aa=aa=aayasaaasaa�aaaaasaaaaaa�aaa=ar=�aasaaaa�aaaaaa
Technical Specialist certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-haua-beer)-_verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers).; liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Techai. x Specialist (Please Print) : Yy1ni !rluu�t
Affiliation: Is -/ a . e -vio
Address (Ag cy) . J Phone No. >f�A7-.a'-13
Signature- Date: l
3=3aa�aaaaaa �� azsaaa aa:saasaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaasaaaaaa==aaaaaaaaaoaaa
OW=Gr/HaaaQer sameat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I. (we) know- that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked._ I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Lead owner (Ple se Print) /V� G/1 zz� /eCL
Signature: Sd:�G.e. Date: �` Z4
Name of Hanager, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature- Date:
Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or -a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer. `�
DEM USE 4NLX:ACNEW# !V 42nQIA
-�1-51

SL eta of Nor h Ccrofina
DeperTment or Environment,
iiecith cnd Ncturcl Resources
Division of Environmental Management 1 Zy..: n
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor MW
Jonathan S. Howes, Secretar/---
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 17, 1994
Mac Horrell
329 West Stevens
Wallace NC 28466
Dear Mr. Horrell:
This is to inform you that your completed registration form required by the recently
modified nondischarge rule has been received by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), Water Quality Section.
On December 10, 1992 the Environmental Management Commission adopted a water
quality rule which governs animal waste management systems. The goal of the rule is for
animal operations to be managed such that animal waste is not discharged to surface waters
of the state. The rule allows animal waste systems to be "deemed permitted" if certain
minimum criteria are met (15A NCAC 2H .0217). By submitting this registration you have
met one of the criteria for being deemed permitted.
We would like to remind you that existing feedlots which meet the size thresholds
listed in the rule, and any new or expanded feedlots constructed between February 1, 1993
and December 31, I993 must submit a signed certification form (copy enclosed) to DEM by
December 31, 1997. New or expanded feedlots constructed after December 31, 1993 must
obtain signed certification before animals are stocked on the farm. Certification of an
approved animal waste management plan can be obtained after the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission adopts rules later this year.
We appreciate you providing us with this information. If you have any question about
the new nondischarge rule, please contact David Harding at [phone].
enc:
Sincerely,
-a4f�
/ -n Steve Tedder, Chief
/` Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535, Rdelgh, North Ccrorina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% racyc{ed/ 10% post-cons.rmer paper

HORRELLMAC 00 FARROW• FEEDER 4-,tU
STATE ROAD # 1206 - PENDER COUNTY
RK207wo
•„
um�
n
+u>
Stu
e.l
r
J=
Wf
ma
kaf
1� �
11
■
Cyr
Lis
Lus Lax
r
1
ub
/L► w- w
,.b
41
ti
J
�.
Iw
13V
un 5
r
♦
- 'v
ym LIU iw,
Cti..rd.
ssu
n w�
c•""
v
u
v
.Ul!
s
�t
rift
DIRECTIONS: FROM WARSAW TAKE NC # 117 TOWARDS WALLACE
TO NC # 11, TAKE'NC # 11 GOING TOWARDS PENDERLEA AND NC # 421.
TURN LEFT OF NC # 421 TOWARDS WILMINTON, THEN TAKE THE 2ND PAVED
ROAD TO THE RIGHT (SR # 1209) , THEN TAKE THE 1ST PAVED ROAD SACK TO
THE LEFT (SR # 1206). FARM WILL HE APPROX: 4 MILES ON THE RIGHT ON
SR. # 1206.
MAILING ADDRESS:
MR. MAC HORRELL
325 W. STEVENS STREET
WALLACE, NC 28466
HOME TELEPHONE: [phone]
SHIPPING ADDRESS:
MAC HORRELL
STATE ROAD # - 12 0 6
ATKINSON, NC 28421
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
303 CAST COLL1;GF STREET P.A. BOX 487 - WAR&M. NI.C. 23393-04S7 - OFFIC[: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

REGISTRATION FORM FOR ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS*,:"p
Department of Environmentp Health and Natural Reso,f` �'
Division of Environmental Management Q.�
Water Quality Section
r,
If the animal waste management system for your feedlot opera `1' 10-
designed to serve mfi'e than or equal to 100 head of cattl ;�-`"
horses! 250 swine, 1t 000 sheep, or 30,000 birds that are served by
a liquid waste system, then this form must be filled out and mailed
by December 31, 1993 pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c) in order to be
deemed permitted by DEM. Please print clearly:
Farm Name:
Mailing Address 3.2C� i _:ram_Z r-- 5_,,,..,,_
t.J os• Lic ZIP , w 66
County: - 2 Phone No:
Owner (s) Name,
Managers) Name:
Lessee Name:
Farm Location (Be as specific as possible: road names* direction,
milepost j etc.)! S'� 4:V 1706
Latitude/Longitude if known:
Design capacity of animal waste management system (Nu er and type
of confined animal (s))
Average animal population 9,n the farm
raised) : L&D 1-eed&q-r f't �5 aC6
and type of animals)
Year
production Began! %�%� ASCS Tract
No.,.
Type
of Waste Management System Used:
+ re
Roth C T o
Acres Available for Land Application of Waste; 41� Ae
Owner (s) Signature (s) : DATE:/2
DATE