710051_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA �
Department of Environmental Qual

Type of Visit aCompliance Inspection 0 O ration Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 4 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7 { b Arrival Time: i {� Departure Time: County: _t Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email: `
Owner Name: —
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
,, ( Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Ul4Ury ►y o� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: o =] ' [_—] Longitude: [� ° [=' =
SwineW
Design
apacity
Current
Population
Design Current DeI gn Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ an to Finish
❑ Layer
❑Dai Cow
❑ an to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ID Non -Layer
❑Dai Calf
Dry Poultry
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ Beef Stocker
ElBeef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ TurkeyPoults
❑ Other
❑ Beef Brood Co
I
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes 2(N El NA ONE
El Yes L�JNo El NA El NE
12128104 Continued

rf
Facility Number: — S Date of Inspection 2-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: LA%k/
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ti 36
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
eat, notify DWQ
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta7vo
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
❑ NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes
;7No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
[2/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
M. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ yes
4
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
WNo
l l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
El NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
El Yes
,ffNo
[/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Commints (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any. recommendations or;any:other cnninients .
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations:.(use additional pages as. necessary) . ne
C")QA/ up F1,VXS 9XW &- AT 3 66 _T(J A1406 RD DZ 144. Dk7Z A/i/t
6f F.4gte� -fj6t_0 0,TTa. FCHI yr 7 % I1a
�S7 (t Age L , Spn yu�S fiats GEa .r���r�oN s
'rA/r4,'tAT n- SArn Pt,� �4=-rP 1�A A,7 ZJAS W40 _ �a:r 0� 9fwPt43-
Reviewer/InspectorName ��' E., colt","Phone: D
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3
I
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —5 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ /NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA LJ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑�E
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA L;'NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA VNE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2 N
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA LfNE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 121/NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ,��
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? El Yes El No El NA MNE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or. Drawings.
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit (�rcompliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint A31o'llow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
ol
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: eparture Time: County:
Farm Name: `/n c�lri Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: ! LZls
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone
No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region: 4._L�
Location of Farm: Latitude: = c = S 0 fi Longitude: 0 ° = d = {1
Destgn Current ' „ „ Desrgn� =Current . Ell A n Current
Swtne
_ =Ca aci Po ulahon'ri Wet Poiilt Ca act Po ulatroo" � Cattle " Na P
..-:.:$�..�.Np ..Z, p,. ❑ i Cow apactty apulation
❑Wean to Fi sh ' ❑ Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
I JEJ Non -Layer I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
- ❑ Dai Heifer
^« .,. -
❑ Farrow to Wean
DrPoult . 8 ❑ Da Cow
y"
❑ Farrow to Feeder
".: , `�.. ;
" ❑Non-Dai
.,. Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
• El Beef Brood Co
❑ Turkeys
Other ," �...` ❑ TurkeyPoults
_— . ;:«�-,��
❑ Other
❑Other Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes P'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
,ETNo.
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
01%
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: iC5 Date of Inspection QJ
Waste Collection & Treatment
4: is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2'&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Fie'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes _2"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments refer., to question # Explain an YES'a an recommendations or ( g ) p y yany other comments�
Use;drawings of facility to better.explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) s
Reviewer/Inspector Name � " Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date: �� ///_
I
Page 2 of 3
Continued

Facility Nujnber: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PWE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ; NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �TNE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ONE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
PNE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
P�NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Fe NE
27.
Did the facility fail'to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Ja NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
J�iNE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
.2Mo
❑NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
,O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems„over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
;�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
E21�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Goal ef�iA Aw� deeu Ka U-e, a >c
G Qd� dvk' A f z�aue
art",-e A& L�Ilk,
Page 3 of 3 12128104
r.

Type of Visit Qf Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 9)Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2/ g Arrival Time: i �� Departure Time: �'Pp� County:
Farm Name: bqkm '!5/3 5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: i/lPPr��I� &eda'1✓ 1,66 Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:yL°fi/JEC01�5
Certified Operator: rA
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
fA Region: Gc1-40
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =o [= t Longitude: 0 0= 6 "
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder IZVO J,7OD
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other - --- - - - - --- .
❑ La er
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Dischar¢es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowi
Number of Structures: ©,
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes so No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: / — 5/
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: W-Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes /1" No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA [I NE
Structure 6
s
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any oft he structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes X
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) Coo. !� r �,� �� `i /�/✓5
13. Soil type(s) rN A Ay�
i
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
El Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[]
yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
/I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comtnen (efe gto questeop�#) ' Ea:plainfaoy=YES'answers and/ auyrecommendahons or any other Co men
1(7setdravi mgs of>faciltty to better explatnksttt%aizons {use addthonalspag as riec sary,):
I5� �SO�� Gfi✓,�v�'� G.e�[.�rr-� �oyr�fA �,./ Lost,✓ ��'�.os �Nv c�'�E.�o ��i�s
Reviewer/Ins ector Name s
p � /2 �; Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2izaS
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: --2ej' Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
I,,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
9NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
VN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 t. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
VN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addc&onal Comments and/or: Drawengs
"/- /V P"/.
12128104

(Type of Visit compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 8Y I Time:
Facility Number 1 S
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
Permitted Certifiedr� [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..._ .... ....»..
Farce Name: »...__.» _......?�_��» ....» .._ .: _ »._. »»...._.»_...._.... ».» .»......._ County: ._.». 5 �' N �z�......... _ .. ......_ ....»,
OwnerName: ............................................. . .... .... . ..... Phone No: ».».........»...»... --
Mailing Address: » »_..� . _ .- ...._. .. ... ..» _».._ ._».....»..... .
Facility Contact: ....._ ........ »... ...... _... .............. _.. _----------- Title:.. .. » . Phone No:
r
Onsite Representative: ...... »» _.. _». ».....
�C f �+`i'�11 "L Integrator: _... ,._........»........ - -
Certified Operator:. ....».» .. Operator Certification Number: .. . . ................. ............ ..
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ` " Longitude • ° 96
-t Des7gn `, Current Design' Current Design -Current
Swuae � ..._CJ � a Po �Iation� ;; Ponliry! _ ci S Po' i lation ,Cattle Ca aci Pv tilatfon
=
Wean to Feeder
❑Layer r ❑ Dairy _
Feeder to Finish
W ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
= -• _
Farrow to Feeder t ?,ot5Ad
Other
Farrow to Finish-
e Total Design Capacity:
GiltsvW
-- r�
El
Boars
_
ff ota! SSLW
-'' a azT
-
;Number of Lagoons
DischaMes & Stream Imparts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............ I ........ ........... ............. .............. •..... ............................. .......
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection b
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 7No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or El Yes
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? /Yes❑
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes!No
KNII
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancehimprovement? ❑ Yes 11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes:�No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type CS {r.� ro'~�-V
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 7eNo,/
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes PN(oZ15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? �
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes .2rNo,
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Reviewer laspector Name
Reviewer/Inspectvr Signature:
Date: 5;-/ 17 10
12112103 1
Continued

Facility.Number: — Date of inspection
RejtLuired Records & Documents /
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes io
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? _ f
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes o
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑�N_
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes l o
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q4 or
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes 01:ro
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
35. Doe�rd keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es ❑ NoSg Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Type of Visit 10compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit RRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: t/ 2 02 Time: �300
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
© Permitted E] Certified p Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....- .. -- -- -•
Farm Name: �'"c tvr! S ('�Gi rc/ ut 3S ................ County: __�-e nGt� �...-- -- -- -- -- -- ----......._._..._....
Owner Name: Phone No: ------------------------------------ ------
MailingAddress: ....................................................... .......... . ................................... ..................
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: - _-+1- ?---------------------------_ Integrator: __ frp�vrlr 4�-C� ra 1 ��•'� .-
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude C�• �� �" Longitude �• �OK
Design Current _ Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca`aci Po ulat�on _ Poultry Capacity .Population - :Cattle Capacity: Population -
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ONO
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is.the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Dfqo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes�NO
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: -------------------------- ------------- .--_--------------------------------- •--•-----•-----------•------------•--•--•--------•----
Freeboard (inches):
A r An%A%I

Facility Ngmber: fl I - 5 r
Date of Inspection
4onunueu
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type C o ti W he of Sa b e c,✓tS Sit 1 l G rar
❑ Yes f�No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes J—Z(o
❑ Yes- o
❑ Yes'No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those de ignated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes PfNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes Sa No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes R<O
/
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
design,
❑ Yes
(ie/ WUP, checklists, maps, etc.)
)2r140
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes_12'90
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes�o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
/
❑ Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
—j2'fVo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes 0<0
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 'L31Ko
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes.0'No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Commens.(refer to=questcons#f} ' Expl , in any ESanslwers andlor anyrecommeridationsory other comments -°
�z4
=a�`L r. rez:--�
Use rawm of,iac>Si to better explai�s uay tio� (use add na�I pages as n s aQY7 FielCopy El Final Notes
J r7, wed 4e, 4,ive cl, 51,q4e5
is e-(7X'etl v-e vY,40 2_.9o3 a✓a I1cb1e A'e' )>'75j GL-1vrren�l77 h� j
� D�1 e �� a -� ���e s�-�r-��d >'-� watts e�eG� i ✓G 1l ✓!�' � l 2Lb � � vim, � % �1 �
. e; 1,1r slro�l�it G�q�e -a ,,,�e�igbfe �ter�s a(�r�,�R�ro� fie,-�d�ed .
end reGo'-df Awe 6"ell Ae��.
lI
T
47
Reviewer/Inspector Name git
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �, 2b 02

Facility Number: Date of Inspection Z 0 Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Rl�o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes E] No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes j2rNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes Ad"No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes J&No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5100

j
Iiype of Visit )QfCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
13 Permitted 1] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: ...................................... ��r0 t.✓ h-:F..�ro 11."`Di....3F�................................
Owner Name: i`d
Facility Contact:
Title:
Time: S
10 Not Onerational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .
County:.....JOe-Lde�
...............................................
PhoneNo: ...................................
Phone No:
MailingAddress: ........................................................................................................
Onsite Representative. ..... Integrator: „!Wn S O4C�a..L.1....
.......... �......................._............................................ .........--•--..-........ -.
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 1 « Longitude 4 «
Design . Current
Swine 71
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
Gilts
❑ Boars
Design , Current- Design Currestt
Poultry Ca' aci Po uladon Cattle Ca aci " : Po 'tidaHeiu
❑ Layer FoNon-Dairy
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
TOW Design Capacity
Total. SSL W
Numbe%of, Lagiwns ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
"Holding Pods-/ SoGd`Traps: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .............. ................. ............................
Freeboard (inches): 7
5/00
❑ Yes oNo
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ff No
❑ Yes iLj
o
[IYes o
❑ Yes )� No
Structure 6
Continued on hack

Facility Number: — S) Date of Inspection ^ 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes ZfNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes �jNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yesj2fNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ,'No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ONo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type C o✓-M W 1je44 r,.s S��q 11 Gv ll �
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those design ted in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes ONO .
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes j2 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes j2rNo
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes UNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes .No
t9. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes A No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ONO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1PNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 10 No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes , YNO
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes PNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes _,0 No
•yi0r;a( ijs.os dgfdj6h.. war. itQtc d�x`ir�g��tjs.visit; Yoh will Xec lye ti u>rth�r. . .
correspondence a�au this visit. .. .
li. ge oa►re�'Ul no-k -to CIONA eo +oaf- aprl. pha.'e - kq&i ! r,�^�
n i A�P li &,14; oi. e—w fj esrc c;G f ! wzl4c', ol✓o 4ro, �Gt,fs eta
04' 1414 41019.
-7- , e /A c, i 114 7
v.1d
rec6r4i - o%re�+ rpea42
keP•1. 74 P so bc4h Crop
appggfS 40 �E
1/e"y
g°-&d. T�e t'"AG; r 4
clepecj^S IMVA IV-% "Vact,
Woe Llas b��-
k
d opt �
� v�+loroVC ,SJY'r��
77
Reviewer/Inspector Name
7-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date: VZ f% B/ 5/00

Facility Number: 7 ) —5 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes PNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the Iiquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ONo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes P'No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additionalomments and/orDrawings:.
5/00

Facility Number 71 51 Date Of Visit 5-10.2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
- O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted ECertified ® Conditionally Certified E3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName- Brawn's..of.Caro11na.A.3.5.......................................................................... County: fender ............................................... ..iRQ.........
Owner Name: ................................................... RLVW..W.5..af.CArijmA,.jijr .................... Phone No: ..........................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: P.Q.11o.&M.7............................................................................................. W..aBace..NC.......................................................... 1839.8 .............
Onsite Representative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator: Braa a.'s.01.Catwlina. .................................
Certified Operator:.V.argill.................................. Murphy ........................................... Operator Certification Number: .1b.395.............................
Location of Farm:
®Swine ❑ Poultry []Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude =• =` =.. Longitude =• =' ="
Design
Cumnt
Design Current
Desijr Carreat
Swiao
_.
Capacity,
Po sOlatiop:'
It Ca' ad Ya ulation Cattle
__._
Ca taci Population
ElWean
to Feeder
❑Layer ❑ Dairy
❑
Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑
Farrow to Wean
®
Farrow to Feeder
1200
1150
❑Other
❑
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
'_ 1,200
❑
❑
Gilts
Boars
Total SSLW
626,400
�.NumberofLagoons,
, ' ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area jig Spray Field Area
Holding -Ponds 1Soitd
Traps U
,.: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
a If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............................................................................................................................................. .
Freeboard(inches): ................19........................................................................................................................................................
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes [R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
[j Yes X No
❑ Yes H No
Structure 6
............................

Facility Number: 71-51 Date of Inspection 5-10-2000 Printed on
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement7
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
I L is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Soybeans, Wheat
5/16/2000
❑ Yes
H No
❑ Yes
X No
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 0 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes X No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes IR No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes Z No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/liispector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
4 -> o-VWlaiioans' ar'dift6iericies-vvere:rioieid:du'nng ttiis visit:. �riti w" l'receiv'e :no fftirA& : • : -
..[`A'17YPCl1f1R(I PUPA 9I)I111t�rll�•V•IG•_' • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19 - OIC needs to monitor hydrolic loading rates so no more than 1 inch per application is done per field.
ield # 4 has slight amount of hydrolie overloading.
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes 0 No
9 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
] Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N No
I&
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name

J '
Facility Number: 71-51 Date of Inspection 5-10-2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 0 Yes H No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 0 Yes [R No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes M No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes S No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes R No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes X No

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 28, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7000 0600 0023 4230 1398
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Gus Simmons
Brown's of Carolina
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear Mr. Simmons:
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLFNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE.5ouRcE5
Subject: Inspection Report
Brown's of Carolina # 35
Facility Number: 71-51
Pender County
Please find enclosed a copy of the inspection report for the August 28, 2000 inspection
of the Brown's of Carolina # 35. 1 spoke with Mr. Kevin Weston by telephone on August 28,
2000 regarding the inspection. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 910-395-3900.
Sincerely,
Stonewall Mathis
Environmental Engineer
enclosure
cm
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

0 Division of Ilk-ater Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit .6 Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification .(§ Other ❑ Denied Access
;'.2 r -' t :: Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number t flare ��i )sit: �r,-, fi�rre:
l Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
d-Permitted 0 Certified ❑ Conditionaffy Certified © Registered Date Gast Operated or/Above Threshold: .........................
zz
FarmName:.....................................................:.............:,.:.......:....................................... Cou ntv-
r, r f
Owner Name: ..�,�r_c-n _ Phone No:
Facility Contact: .... Title Phone No:
)failing Address:..................................................................................................................................................................................................... .........................•
01
OnsiteRepresentative- ...:.............`..........................:._........--•--......................._...................... lntegrator:....................... .......... ............................ ............. .........
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
i T
t Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ElHorse Latitude �• �� �• Longitude �• ��«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population POultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver �E] Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Laver I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ soars Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present IFO Lag-lon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar: es S Strum Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Ili;charge originated at: 14J` Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyancz mars-€nadc'-' ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. ]f (ilschai'«e IC (lhscrve(1. Uli' It I'ea h �i ater ni- the State° lI1 yes, n(1[it� l�tiV�)) [] Yes ❑ No
c•. if discharge is ohserved_ what is the estimated floe' in cal/min`1
d. Do--s discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ❑ No
3_ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate" ❑ Spillway Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Struc:tun; 2 Structure Structure 4 Structure j Structure 6
A
1d.r111I1C'r:............................................... I ...................... . .......... -....................................
Frechoard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Printed ctn: Im] lfa ility Number':' , — — Datc of in.; ecti> 7/21/2000
i, F � 13
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion. ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do am' of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does amr part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes 1J` No
11. Is there evidence of over application.) ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ❑ No
12, Crop type
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those desi?nated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)•? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Rectuire(l Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available,) ❑Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19, Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation. freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative" ❑ Yes 0 No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
-violai}oris:or. di f ue'ncies •were h6fted- cfi�•r'ltag this: visit: - Y:oi>t :will -r. ece�ye i fuither•.
corresponc�eRce: a�atiti thi :visit_ ::: :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
,- !^rlrig_., 'i feAri:ifr rl. �!,i'z/ a
e
1 ',rfi. �. r;; .-"C ,-�•`!'1r 5�'I; �rCe�.Lie i"it a -M F'�:. ►'! iJ :�rT�1ro/!�. ai E' Yi-1p r"Cl 71rr"
C_lrfi�� 1
Y�S= 4•r
Inc G. 1,'e 1%`1C:� .l r,r-,^j �(1ri- ,-.--%tIr*^�i� /-''.{ .`/lr:✓:'fi T ii..•CC�
3� ,�r �a .� i� :. � /'i n;'r J ' r • ` ��iiJ •f: [',�s ;�,..-. ?r,E tf ;`_"Y•'iCCt� C: i"�n'� 1��. (�r Lei"r �.
L -`.!'� `'' ? r'; r i `-non.;
'
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �=- " - -�. -t ; 4.. �•;.; . Date: 5100

18iDivision of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
of Visit VrCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint QF Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other
Facility Number
S I Date of Visit
r71
Permitted [3 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Name: ! w s D !! .... no ] ivk4t ## 35
............. ......................:E...........1..................................................,
Owner Name: ff"Ot-.1 n S uY cq i '-i1 7Y1 G
.............................................................................................
❑ Denied Access
q dA Time: �Q Printed on: 7/21/2000
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Countv:....Pg..................................................e e^
_......................
Phone No:...
Facility Contact: ...Title: ............................... Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress:.....................................y�.................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative- ....v1..a.- e LJA -bee Integrator: ►�1'� �/!7
p f� ...................... +....i-,..............°{.................�........�r
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................. Operator Certification Number:....................... .
Location of Farm:
[]Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude 0 �� �^ Longitude 0
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I 1 El
Dairy
El Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ soars Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons JEJ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
JWYes
❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................
......................... ........
Freeboard (inches): [ 4
5100
Continued -on back

Facility Number: 71 - sr Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
$. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAVVMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [] No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
E: 10 violafi6tis:ok deficiencies were noted during #hiis,visit.' - :Y:ou will->receiye Rio: fut M
. , correspondence. albouf this visit. . . .... . .. . . . .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes "❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
.Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
2n3�vat�io� Gat4ve4eof Ces 4-Fo1Jowvr4v reoeh+ Ihspet_4 �o,if1O�'IG�^^�1►�,n}
6e; T)UvillpeA o,nd 6AVIed 40 BDG f"t�'"`�
f vrnio A. -VA 1-1avl -.0106tld e,or►4;,x.ue -40 sewer` l02'0"'o;1 level i-1-�,o
comrl ;av1C_e . T77.0A card+-#1 '"_5 Mire no+ r' 44 ble ar I i 641o►>, 4ode,.
La,o( °'1Pi1' ��t-j-�b►, q� 6e able. 4o oGf-vv- Oki Fiefs( 4 re oseq1��gqkw�
on 4tva pelts close-44&-rraf►'hpa+i., 4,0%--.ev► y1ow rovtd+^Ce''t�i"�v�oldr
&Pl te{i �rov►S 4oda1�; DG s t�l ;mat-�Gl i�cs�a�s:b�e f'o,� de ,,,,,;v►ir1� Svi-�ol%l�
y c,►t : t
Reviewer/Inspector Name IS4a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: "4.4ko Date:171y Sloo

Facility Number: i]'' - ) Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge At/or helow ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings: 1.: _
-ror 1A--let aff l,"c�,�on n-ld Lvill be, aze,"►'t-Agble
�or1B(�•1, �r✓no���p�tSGka��� s1?cw1J� ��- o�Gvr- ��' .SaG decs ta•1.0(,
'4 is �'[Gn� wtcnde0l -�� -!�� �tJh de �,,rnliq�-� ir►
a-1 A 4044 face ar.d et 1, y)14 atr�o 1, cat 3-i.'ti be ode dam, -��e sfeGil;ed
pulls. T c �eri•,�ihdetr -Fields s -,11 -4y*V4^' h"'Ve s-L,VxdiW-9
a"J'O( s,,,; 11 na-1 6e st,;4able 4, 1 ihtA mpf 1; col io—) Ao, - ot rpnr.)de,-a ble
ri>"1.au✓14 ii e
5100

$ Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O'Other Agency
Type of Visit J9 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification J81 Other
Facility Number S Date of Visit:
© Permitted © Certified Q Conditionally Certifiedi1 [3 Registered
Farm Name B roiLo►v1s .Orl O del -#F 3 ......................
................ ................ ..... ............................................
Owner Name:.......Y'Dt.�YsS.� tG. ..............................................
Denied Access
? 40 Time: =35 Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Not operational Q Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County: ..Pe. x-.r....................................................
Phone No:
FacilitvContact: ................................................................. ............. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .......... ............................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:..... v lvj W P-Sq,*kj C�t�S �iw{FKon �t�G$ntegrator: „lJ,�oi,tlhS Of �A "° j � �L? �tG
.....................r..................... �....... _....
Certified Operator:.....
Location of Farm:
.................. ............... ........................ I .... ... Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude �' �� ��� Longitude
Design Current
Swine Capacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag--n Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance maii-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. I1-discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway EfYes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I
Feeehoard (inches): ! 1
5100
Continued on back

Facility ]dumber: Date of inspection OD Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reouired Records & Document_s
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ElYes ❑ No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes X No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0: K,6.V]4� tioAs:or• &flcienues were noted• Oirririg this:visit: - Yoir will receive bo fufther
coriresponr#ene . agouti this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
qo(v;sed W G�t►^el;�� rep�ese•-���-F; vex �1��t� la�p�>n level
�P and
b e[ a r,,.,e,-cad o D� !7 a� G o �^'t®1 / �t •� G e 6�ryva u C tj a ri,1A
Ge A4aled 4e $O(4 1q). --AVa Respar�s%bl{e
6e wtade 40 ru,,4ker lager 1a9oah level 4,6 /add mare s4ov-r,
--r�,e t.�el ,? yvlgYlher
IF
I Reviewer/Inspector Name ��Q dewy 11 MR� h !s I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:_V_V lq G� Date: % / 7 /,00 5100

AEDivis onxof Water Quality,
O-Division of Soil and Water:Conservation:�
Other Agency.
[Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit oRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ZY d0 Time: �R� Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number f.131
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
19 Permitted U Certified © Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name: +rCG ^n y'�°t County:....................................................... ......................
...................................../..r......................................................................
Owner Name: ..Bw..... r+ r i i r1Ll� �!r1 c.... Phone No ........ . ......................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................
Onsite Representative: .e r �JtAv�! Todd f�oLvc
...............................................................
Certified Operator:....
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
/ .
- /� .........
Integrator: '� . 6r4-O r r �� �`tC
........ Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �`�� Longitude �• ��«
Design Current
Swine CaDacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
12DD
11,96
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry_ Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Layer T Dai
❑ Y ❑ ry
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lag-nn Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-rnade'? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, slid it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes No
c. If disc:har«e is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min? h
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............ I:..............................._.............
Freeboard (inches): �Z
5100
❑ Yes ;9 No
❑ Yes DdNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility -Number: rl I — Date of Inspection 2 DO Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste A lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding OPAN 0 Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type I ke- 44 ,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement`?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reouired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
K16 yi6latitins W deficiencies were n6ted• during 4his;visit'. - Y;ott will •receive Rio: #'ullther ....
corresporideRce: about this visit. :: ' . : : .. .. : ,
❑ Yes )gNo
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes [1 No
❑ Yes ffi No
KYes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
JO Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes % No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �E No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes JS No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
11- 14 4rLti/l+G 1OverrOa�, t"�q e3"4 7 4A eyel c,,4,0 l i 4.<
15. ►^ (V"aVe / 0 W . W e 4 1req S iYl -,;,P K", ��e �S � Sper,4; C-0(
E's#U b!; s�, Fevv��,r,err� 9,�c,-sJ Cov lo_ oyt wct�,e�wo s �i� Fri l�(s j 2 o��d
)4. Sip ^&� Arr cq4 t'dn e-/ wPy4c r,o u Id be do►�e +ada -�a law�r I�ao�,
level , bu-i 14 ;11 t)a4 be due —�o elvl
t:ryme f
l�eLtGtt ► QtVa ✓l i-; es.
. � G b � � q-{• -� tr e �� .-,,,.1 � �� v .,Pm e n to A4 a4 It c r -44c
'�. L4.ya,,n 11e✓ef _<-ecgl,( 1 Dt�red �a s cto ► it p /eve) '," reStpahs.'btc`�;-•,e) y �tan+7�.
Reviewer/Inspector Name A mews ll I ,44,'.S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 8 ?— A9 5/00

Facility Number: 71 -ram
1)atc of Inspection 240D
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
�No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
MNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
Pq No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31 _
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
ONo
dditional . omments an g
Ad/or: rawtn s.
a
3123/99

Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency ,
(Type of Visit )0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
iReason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification VOther ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date. of Visit: 8 2� pQ Tirrae: l3'I � Printed on: 7/21/2000
% i��'
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified �© Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .•...•••........
Farm Name: BI-0 t.J -1 -S 1 C.,? r'0 % t nq _-f 3s Count`.: Pe ✓1(.......................
....................... .........a ..........................................................................................................................................�G r
OwnerName :............ r.'�w.....��...�:�...+�'�pl.. f�n.�.................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:.............................
Phone No:
MailingAddress:...............LL._.....----........................................._...................................................._..-•--•---................................................................._... ..........................
e:OnsiteRe resentativpl/5........ Integrator:....6...... r TrI
.......... ..............r...l.!......................................
Certified Operator:_,•,_•_...
Location of Farm:
...................................................... ...... Operator Certification Number...........................
i
___- - _. ____ 7
Ig5wine []Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude �� �' ' Longitude �� �' F__J"
Design Current
Swine Caoacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer T ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: [-]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field (:]Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. slid it reach Water of the State'' (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑.Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4
` Identifier: ...............I ................... .............................. ..... ................................... .... .... .---............--
Freeboard (inches): 1 7. S-
5100
Structure 5
Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: '71 Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
'3. Are[here any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Write Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes.
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19, Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
`2fNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0: o yiolafiotis:or deficiencies were . . . . during �ttis:v... Y:ou ... re. . . . t.. i..titer: :
correspondence. albotit: this visi t� ::::::::... ............ • ........... .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�i. J40rV%q-e cApG;7 irI lajaarl ;s nab tdegva-ie- L,alve-, 1Aje4n•1 ievej )'Ala
evta�.,ner.
IL. Cans;fie 4A.,J 5Z•te ;J res�lo- 44e yrr,y,',tj
�t G # �.•;-f-; es �tf si X �aL r.-a s..she �tlSo ind � ��cd -�-ha � 3 ree) x Gt re s�AfFci
4-tie -r; ve �a �^1 S� W h: hSZI e j r•ct r 44C w--W f4e ,d I : c L, use
She !sa►nd + c�-�cd -�Gt a-� -cad ��m�s are .�s1-w � e�i 6�-fw ee•, -{�o s e s � k �a,�.., s.
Yes �h;s is c iack o{' -dequq wis e a��l>'Ca¢"o►-, e`%L1p,,-n a�-.vl 1abo� end
;s ev)denr-eo( 6\, 4k,e (esv4 •rah 41-r'eebo,q-A.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
5-4,o n ew a 1 I MOi, r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S/2&00 5/00

hf1V-1?-99 WED 9 40 AM BROWN S FAX NO. 9102961675 P. 1
". fir`= 14,`-1 7�- '_- �-7v--��_--r.,- „�. - -- -�
13 DiVU on -of Soil x 5�' y� ,4s � .'. $ } F� • ��
✓';- ` :'_i .QDiEyWonof$off , y J 4- 4 "r:LFi� _" ?' '•fit
oDivwon of Waii=r: .r W r • ,y!L�. F,'- ;Y�s , ''-"'• •�
t3Other Agency Op ,•i �;. a:"s. i!; ti.. , ti�-kl,
Routine OCurnplaint Follaw.0 of Dtir ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review "Q Other
Facility Number I _ Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection I r : oo 124 hr. (hbmun)
0 Permitted [] Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered in Not O erstional Date Last Operated
' County
Farm Name; ..............................._.......,.............- ,.�..._ .............. • ......i _... »............
.
owner Names R t Phone No: �' rIIG I
..................R1d1!.....LtultrrlftlrtuistAllununlln11u1111Tunlmrrn,:,......�9.t...,r.�R................._..............._....... ,
FacilityContact: ...................................... Title: .............. .................................................. Phone No: ............... _..................................
NiailingAddress: ....................... .........._._.__........................................._ ................................ ............... ......................................................... ......».............
Onsite Representative: ...........W�.axx>,Ylrl_-A ...... . .........Integramr:_96.ux;S................................................... w.....
Certified Operator:....................................................................................................... Operator Certif cation Number: ........................... , .....
Location of rFarm. S ��
........—•.......Lr�...r1<�!.,....►{rti..._..L1...s1. .....6LliL.��l j...�......,...i.ta�Uis1111>N11ft11�1111IIt1{II IfNllktlll�t Sllliltll4114�llt:aS ........................................
r
Latitude o• 0` �•ti Longitude r­10
_,.: _ Design Current. .:.. • : ;-Deslg ', Curren...;: , . ut;Gen Design C f .
Swine Capacity Population Poulkry Cs achy ' Po 'iiYstion ` Cattle"
Capacity Po • u "
j] Wean to Feeder ., ❑ Layer - ❑ Dairy
Feeds to Finish [] Non -Layer Non -Dairy_ 1
t : �?arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ❑ ` _ -
Other
Farrow to Fin paci
= r -Q. Des�gri :C$tY f ,
❑ Gilts10 j {� '
Bows:.i.: - y"„ �'ipi'r:e. iia :%.�- .�,.. T6{a1SSL •• r - ,
_; r3:1">dgiber j;rOeing... gad Subsurface Drains Present [3Lagoon Area Spray Field Area i 1
Traps "ILI No Liquid Waste Management System t �-
•rw..
Dischat is $: SIXER Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance tnan-[Wade? ❑ Yes [ No _
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes ONO
c- if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes aNa
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?. ❑ Yes PNa
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
Waste Collectioja & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 13 Spillway
Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .............3Z....._................................................................................................................................................. ...........
5. Are there any immediare threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, a Yes F] No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

NOV-1,7-99 WED 9:41 AM BROWN 5 FAX NO, 9102961675TT I
Facility Number: Data of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ).
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvemem?
B. Boes any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require main tenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maxitnurn and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need rnaintenance/improvement?
11 • Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type L
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those
sL7r�C�
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping, need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ d emergency situations as required 6y General PermlO
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspecdon with on -site representative?
24. Dori facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were. any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0'f •yj r r 414ZIS Q if�e�ies 11 : V�SC; You V�IiC�i0.1�1 s
corresaorideace a�ovti this visit: . . .. ...............:::.............
0 Yes E9 No
❑ Yes $0 No
❑ Yes CM No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[] Yes ® No
❑ Yes R} No
In Vas Ro
❑ Yes [9 No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes (RNo
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes
® No, : ;•
[9Yes
❑ No i
❑ Yes
ba No
❑ Yes
93 No
C3 Yes J4 No
0 Yes ® No
[} Yes JR No
❑ Yes 0 No
Cotnmcnts (refee to tpstfip ! �: ga�plaiii: ~ -•F�T ei s o 'aziftecorni id. d o`r'aigr _ofii " gJFYi>;iients:
Ilse drawiings '. ages ne
oifarycilti. to .,P1a�ad�ral pas ce§saiY^:•''s ,� ', ,:'
_
Car,rcc� -0Ar.,i (i.,.V% ,IiccAr 4,c tt,i AJ c, A, IRO,-7- tar 1wil-, 1 --s. �
SvViU be c dJeJ �a fi- eras 4t,- S 4,11 4 cc wid' N [o 5r, ;C,;Zf SeeC� f+7n�l J,:
�GYI►� Ve(P,%)S I r'U.[aA b1" 1rt Jah,- AAarc.,, .
Reviewer/Inspector Narne 'A '�+ . • a �:,_ , �. ; .i t. , ': _ -;t, : _ t
Reviewer/inspector Signature_ % Date:
3123/99

NOV-1.7-9a9 WED 9: 42 AM BROWN 5 FAX NO. 9'102961_675 _ P. 3
��' . ws? ..�y. :; • . _ •' —f,��R -�c --ems.'— ' Y�'g �,.... _ _ .....��.^�..�.F.+�s T7
Facility Number — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
7, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes allo
28- Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major mamfenance pro6le&i With till U156151i6n WO BOI97 (U. byokan fin belle, mhging Of
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged rill pipe or a pemaanenthemporary cover?
❑ Yes JW No
❑ Yes ? No
❑ Yes No
[] Yes No
❑ Yes No
A'idditionAl Loft ntxAnd/41r* - - _ '•?;<�' r,Y `t
ww®
3123/99

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
13 Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
I ■� YI�11. - 1
Facility Number
Date of inspection
�
Time of Inspection �24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ® Certified 13 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted Not Opera Eional Date Last Operated:
FarmName: R� . 1�County:......14m........................................ .......................
Owner Name:...... WALK.......16.KrXil...... ............... Phone No:
Contact: .............................................................. ...... Title. Phone No:
Mailing Address:..... ,4........ .:.... VtinS...... .............. ,�' .......
Onsite Representative:...1....6M.11................ Integrator:.,-- wn�
...................................................
Certified Operator; ...............................
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number;----------- .........................................
....n,pr4i-.w.e .....�i.:....Q......S.R...I.Q�v�...�:.....t4s�.....r�r#k..........S�i�.x.ti.:...............................................
................................ ...... .......................................... ...............................................................
Latitude • « Longitude 0• 1 66
Design ;Current
I S av�ne `Capacity Pouulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
uj
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
Design Current Desiga C.i
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacrty Pop
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
:Total SSLW (I
a Number of Lagoons I Holdt Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes MNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes t%No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [8 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes RNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require J, Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes EA No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes IA. No
7/25/97
- Continued on buck

Facility Number: — 5
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Va No
Structures (Lagoon.s.11olding fonds Flush Pits etc
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Im Yes ❑ No
Structure l Structure 1 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 0
Identi her:
Freeboard(ft):.............1.......................................... .............................................................................................................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures'?
❑ Yes
�B No
11.
Is erasion, or any either threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
i
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers"
❑ Yes
10 No
Waste .iPplication
14,
Is there physical evidence of over application?
r ❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type......�SS.Its................. .... J c1mJp........................... : 1!matl.....��'t' -i A,-..............................................................................`..............................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMf')? 1$4 Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[3No
19.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
C9 No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
DO Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
® Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit''
® Yes
❑ No
No.violations or deficiencies. were-note'd during this visit.- .You.will receive no further
correspondence i fiout this',yisit ;
Coriunents (refei to:quesiion ##): `Explain any VES answers andlor anv recommendations or any'other comments, .
`'. '
Use drawings of facility to better eipla' m situations {use additional pages as necessary}, " '
F.
eote'i1 t�sixsn Se `v U4 ' u<,'tyy a U0%;,lum ii1e At, ifrbah y►. 1,,03 s vuO 6e ICgf ci,
n.;„��yy j.-A�aon i Ws Vr sutH C�( Ov+� , t. hoar, le&f SkvW be, f OWet-ef1 iA a rpS�01161k O' �rq++Mti�
17- lwm &wixs5i�oaa�e1 �c• �i�3.�
AR . r-w � 6e S;J .be lz-- � r�Sk
s\ 4tM1 rti�V � � {� �
,n1a-s`0. of,
{{
�.i3Qtrn�t��a l+� Fj-C� S�+Od
2. Ljol 3-s S1Vda �e<000, 5 bo-Uwec it. 5{vw) Yccvok, lrnit`6l
eN�P �k��ld � :►. ioa+•
�S 4v G125197&Css t: ev *e� 6 fftO 41'U416�
Reviewer/Inspector lame
r l� (Alt
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
I

Facility Number:.. ZL... —.. Date of Inspection:
Additional`Comments and/or Drawings
l r1 4
In "a C cLgft-J o n t.YVT1
4/30/97

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review f
�DwAn>fmal�Us
Feedlot O�eratlonS><te Ins' ecton
P v P
® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fellow -up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
FDate of Inspection 2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Facility Number Time of Inspection I I _ : 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
® Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .... . . ...... . ..... . ........ .... . ..... .......... ...................... ..............
_ .
Farm County:
d
Land Owner Name: ...... .... ....... --..... .......... Phone No: . � .� i.�i ...�$..� .` �lr? C.Q .; --� s••- 2gdZ
Facility Conctact:............T................................_.... ..... _... Title: ---•I---, Phone No:
Mailing Address:.. &.�...k)_=....' .LGat.l� i�. -S t - ........
Onsite Representative•. egra
a 4...9_fc .�C.. �.......W.................. ........_.... 4—...—c
,�
Certified Operator: .... . .... . . .... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm: 0� Sf, I Ub ,rPf -V, 1 n4.1i7(- P.a-_W SR )15
Longitude ®• ©4 C4
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require .
4/3 0/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes E� No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes E� No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
JR No
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Yes
IN No
Continued on back

Facility Number: ...0....... _—...5......
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes KNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes [KNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes RNo
Structures U u oous and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 9 No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes RNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats -to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
H No
Waste,ARplication
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
91 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type . ...... ........... ..... ...... .............. ........... � e: ,c�.at s��......_........._ ........... ......
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
C9 No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0 Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
j@ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
For
Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
RNo
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
tR Yes
❑ No
#) Explain°any YE:
. .. .. ... .......... ..... ... _,. .. ..._... 1.. .--... (... ........ 1 _ ... .. .. .. ..r. .. .. .
_ 1 cLi-e C_$_re- 6 W e b rV v wt 1 tom. -Ys l,til. i� S C b Grw. V t[ tC Ti e-Ltt
2-4• TaK G0Yre-,,L So aria vj&stc C,uly4
inl d tL b ciY1'Q S p�i a cL � tNv P_ + VL �'� N � t L° S S CL
fee l; a u cL-P—a-A 10 oyc .
nx
Reviewer/Inspector Name ., ....`�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
ee. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment lywt 4/30/97

•
0
Site Requires Immediate Attention: AID
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIO S SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: /g , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: / /rr
Mailing Address: ?CQ. -'�qV ✓
County: D
Integrator: Phone:
On- Site Representative; dL Ot Phone: -71
Physical Address/Location: ! L T� CAI
17-a& DAI _ <ibf_-
Type of Operation: Swine V Poultry . Cattle
Design Capacity: I zm� Number of Animals on Site: a� f0 j�d2� ¢105
DEM Certification Number: ACE
Latitude: Longitude:
DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
" Elevation: Feet
�A S Dlez Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25�ear 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inchespeagoon(s)?
No Actual Freeboard:` l ZFt. Inches
Was any seepage observed from Yeso(9 Was any erosion observed? Yes r No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the co v crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: .37 00 4eR9,S � 'O
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from DwellingWNo
rNo
100 Feet from Wells
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters 9fthe state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes r No if Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate Wasff management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage w# cover grope Yesjr No
Comments:
AM
is .0 .S
Inspector Name
U eAT
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

OPERATION'S BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Jul 21 '95 13:10 P.05/14
C,
•
•
Site Requires Immediate Attention
Facility Number:?
STD VISITATION RECORD
DATE: u1. 18 I995
owne'n t. Fa=.tame: Ifoxrel-t Farms
County: gender
Agent VLsitinng Site: Jeff Haifsnidar Phone: [phone]
Operator:
_ Phone:
On Site Representmfve: N/A Phone:
Physical Address:._ On 'west side' of H-6y 1206. Entrance is approximately 1.0 miles
BML of a=Cti cm 4tb FTw 1203 - — -
Mijiug Address: Mailbox 937 on Rw 1206
Type of Operation: -Swine :K Poultry Cattle
Design Capaciry: '• Number of Ads on Site: ?
Latitude: ° Longitude:
Type of Inspectiou: Ground X Acrial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient fi=board of I Foot + 25 year 24, hour storm event
(approxin=ly 1 Foot +7 inches) 0 or No Actual Freeboard: 1 Feet l() ..Inches
Fcr facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard undcr the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the Noon(s)? Yes or@t Was there erosion of the darn?: G or No
Is adequate land aviCable for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
unlmown unknown
Additional Comrnoats: Banks inside lagoon need bare spots reseeded. No people
s Contract with Browne of Carolina. Fields near 15oon
are covered with mowed teas. Hay removed.
Fax to [phone] ` WgnaWre of Agent